Compliance Just Got Easier: Stay ahead of regulatory changes with instant notifications on updates that matter.
['Training', 'Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA)']
['Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA)', 'Training', 'Supervisor training']
2023-08-01T05:00:00Z
JOIN TODAY TO CONTINUE READING THIS ARTICLE & OTHER INDUSTRY NEWS!
You'll also get exclusive access to:
A database of easy-to-understand regulationsAsk unlimited questions to our expertsPre-led discussions forumsAnd more
TRY IT FREE TODAY
Already have an account? Log in now.
NewsTrainingSupervisor trainingTrainingTraining & DevelopmentFamily and Medical Leave Act (FMLA)In-Depth ArticleFamily and Medical Leave Act (FMLA)HR ManagementEnglishHuman ResourcesIndustry NewsHR GeneralistAssociate RelationsFocus AreaUSA
How to minimize FMLA leave abuse — 7 more tips for supervisors
2023-08-01T05:00:00Z
In a previous article, we provided six tips for supervisors to help minimize abuse of leave under the federal Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA). Here are seven more to share with supervisors.
Not all tips will apply to all supervisors. Which ones apply will depend upon how much involvement they have in FMLA leave administration.
7 more tips for supervisors:
- Do not jump to termination. If an employee is close to exhausting their 12-weeks of leave for their own serious health condition and it appears the employee will not be able to return because of the condition, hold off on termination. The company’s FMLA obligations might cease at the exhaustion of the 12 weeks, but it might have obligations under the Americans with Disabilities Act.
- Be aware that not every reason for FMLA leave requires an absence of more than three days. The regulations indicate that, only for “incapacity and treatment” an employee needs to have a period of incapacity (not necessarily absence) of more than three days. Any period of incapacity for pregnancy, chronic conditions, permanent or long-term conditions, and conditions requiring multiple treatments is FMLA leave.
- Don’t expect an employee to expressly assert their FMLA rights initially. Employees don’t have to mention the FMLA when seeking leave for the first time for an FMLA-qualifying reason. Supervisors may, however, require an employee to specifically reference the qualifying reason or the need for FMLA leave when taking leave due to an FMLA-qualifying reason for which they have already provided FMLA-protected leave.
- Be prepared to answer questions about scheduling appointments. Supervisors might be asked about whether leave for planned medical treatment would disrupt the department’s operations. When planning medical treatment, employees must consult with the employer and make a reasonable effort to schedule the treatment so as not to unduly disrupt operations, subject to the approval of the health care provider.
- Listen to employee coworkers. Every now and then, an employee will request FMLA leave, only to be seen engaging in activities that make coworkers question whether the leave is valid. If, for example, an employee is on FMLA leave because of a back issue, rendering the employee unable to walk for any distance, and coworkers see that employee at a local festival walking around, you may have reason to doubt the continuing validity of the employee’s stated reason for FMLA leave. Inform the company leave administrator.
- Look at vacation schedules. Employees might request vacation and have it denied. Subsequently, they might request FMLA leave for the same time period. This might create suspicion that the stated reason for leave might not be valid.
- Watch for other leave patterns. Employees who abuse FMLA leave sometimes form scheduling patterns, such as taking FMLA leave the same time each year or taking FMLA leave on Mondays, Fridays, or the days surrounding a holiday. Being aware of patterns of behavior can help minimize FMLA abuse.
FMLA leave administration is no easy task. Throughout the last 30 years, some employees have gotten wise in the ways of gaming the system. Training supervisors on some simple tips can help not only the overall administration, but also to help with curbing leave abuse.
Key to remember: Use these tips to enroll the help of supervisors to make leave administration easier.

NewsTrainingSupervisor trainingTrainingTraining & DevelopmentFamily and Medical Leave Act (FMLA)In-Depth ArticleFamily and Medical Leave Act (FMLA)HR ManagementEnglishHuman ResourcesIndustry NewsHR GeneralistAssociate RelationsFocus AreaUSA
How to minimize FMLA leave abuse — 7 more tips for supervisors
2023-08-01T05:00:00Z
Written by
Darlene Clabault
Darlene Clabault
SHRM-CP, PHR, CLMS
University of Wisconsin Oshkosh
Editor and subject matter expert since 1996, specializing in some of the most complex employment laws. She is a passionate expert on the FMLA, ADA, FLSA and state leave provisions.
In a previous article, we provided six tips for supervisors to help minimize abuse of leave under the federal Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA). Here are seven more to share with supervisors.
Not all tips will apply to all supervisors. Which ones apply will depend upon how much involvement they have in FMLA leave administration.
7 more tips for supervisors:
- Do not jump to termination. If an employee is close to exhausting their 12-weeks of leave for their own serious health condition and it appears the employee will not be able to return because of the condition, hold off on termination. The company’s FMLA obligations might cease at the exhaustion of the 12 weeks, but it might have obligations under the Americans with Disabilities Act.
- Be aware that not every reason for FMLA leave requires an absence of more than three days. The regulations indicate that, only for “incapacity and treatment” an employee needs to have a period of incapacity (not necessarily absence) of more than three days. Any period of incapacity for pregnancy, chronic conditions, permanent or long-term conditions, and conditions requiring multiple treatments is FMLA leave.
- Don’t expect an employee to expressly assert their FMLA rights initially. Employees don’t have to mention the FMLA when seeking leave for the first time for an FMLA-qualifying reason. Supervisors may, however, require an employee to specifically reference the qualifying reason or the need for FMLA leave when taking leave due to an FMLA-qualifying reason for which they have already provided FMLA-protected leave.
- Be prepared to answer questions about scheduling appointments. Supervisors might be asked about whether leave for planned medical treatment would disrupt the department’s operations. When planning medical treatment, employees must consult with the employer and make a reasonable effort to schedule the treatment so as not to unduly disrupt operations, subject to the approval of the health care provider.
- Listen to employee coworkers. Every now and then, an employee will request FMLA leave, only to be seen engaging in activities that make coworkers question whether the leave is valid. If, for example, an employee is on FMLA leave because of a back issue, rendering the employee unable to walk for any distance, and coworkers see that employee at a local festival walking around, you may have reason to doubt the continuing validity of the employee’s stated reason for FMLA leave. Inform the company leave administrator.
- Look at vacation schedules. Employees might request vacation and have it denied. Subsequently, they might request FMLA leave for the same time period. This might create suspicion that the stated reason for leave might not be valid.
- Watch for other leave patterns. Employees who abuse FMLA leave sometimes form scheduling patterns, such as taking FMLA leave the same time each year or taking FMLA leave on Mondays, Fridays, or the days surrounding a holiday. Being aware of patterns of behavior can help minimize FMLA abuse.
FMLA leave administration is no easy task. Throughout the last 30 years, some employees have gotten wise in the ways of gaming the system. Training supervisors on some simple tips can help not only the overall administration, but also to help with curbing leave abuse.
Key to remember: Use these tips to enroll the help of supervisors to make leave administration easier.
See More
RELATED NEWS
NewsTrainingSupervisor trainingTrainingTraining & DevelopmentFamily and Medical Leave Act (FMLA)On-the-job TrainingIn-Depth ArticleFamily and Medical Leave Act (FMLA)HR ManagementEnglishUSAIndustry NewsAdult LearningHR GeneralistAssociate RelationsFocus AreaHuman Resources
05/15/2025
HR Toolbox: FMLA basics refresher training for supervisors

Specialized Industries
Go beyond the regulations! Visit the Institute for in-depth guidance on a wide range of compliance subjects in safety and health, transportation, environment, and human resources.
J. J. Keller® COMPLIANCE NETWORK is a premier online safety and compliance community, offering members exclusive access to timely regulatory content in workplace safety (OSHA), transportation (DOT), environment (EPA), and human resources (DOL).

Interact With Our Compliance Experts
Puzzled by a regulatory question or issue? Let our renowned experts provide the answers and get your business on track to full compliance!

Upcoming Events
Reference the Compliance Network Safety Calendar to keep track of upcoming safety and compliance events. Browse by industry or search by keyword to see relevant dates and observances, including national safety months, compliance deadlines, and more.
SAFETY & COMPLIANCE NEWS
Keep up with the latest regulatory developments from OSHA, DOT, EPA, DOL, and more.
REGSENSE® REGULATORY REFERENCE
Explore a comprehensive database of word-for-word regulations on a wide range of compliance topics, with simplified explanations and best practices advice from our experts.
THE J. J. KELLER INSTITUTE
The Institute is your destination for in-depth content on 120+ compliance subjects. Discover articles, videos, and interactive exercises that will strengthen your understanding of regulatory concepts relevant to your business.
ADD HAZMAT, ENVIRONMENTAL, & HR RESOURCES
Unlock exclusive content offering expert insights into hazmat, environmental, and human resources compliance with a COMPLIANCE NETWORK EDGE membership.
DIRECT ACCESS TO COMPLIANCE EXPERTS
Struggling with a compliance challenge? Get the solution from our in-house team of experts! You can submit a question to our experts by email, set up a phone or video call, or request a detailed research report.
EVENTS
Register to attend live online events hosted by our experts. These webcasts and virtual conferences feature engaging discussions on important compliance topics in a casual, knowledge-sharing environment.
Most Recent Highlights In Environmental
NewsIndustry NewsWater PermittingPoint SourcesWater ProgramsEnvironmental Protection Agency (EPA)Industrial WastewaterEnvironmentalIn-Depth ArticleWater ProgramsUSAEnglishFocus AreaCWA Compliance
2026-04-16T05:00:00Z
Effluent limitations: FAQs for direct dischargers of industrial wastewater
Facilities across the country conduct industrial activities that generate wastewater containing pollutants and then release it directly into nearby surface waters, such as streams, rivers, or lakes. However, before any industrial wastewater can be discharged from a site, the facility must obtain a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit.
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) uses effluent limitations as the primary method to regulate direct discharges of industrial wastewater into waters of the United States. These restrictions are incorporated into NPDES permits.
Meeting effluent limitations is the key to compliance with NPDES permits. But like other environmental regulations, these standards can get complex quickly without a solid foundation of understanding. We’ve compiled common FAQs to help you become fluent in effluent limitations.
What’s effluent?
There’s no specific statutory or regulatory definition of “effluent.” Thankfully, a 1997 document from EPA entitled Terms of Environment: Glossary, Abbreviations, and Acronyms, Revised December 1997 (EPA 175-B-97-001) provides clarity, defining effluent as “wastewater — treated or untreated — that flows out of a treatment plant, sewer, or industrial outfall.”
What’s the difference between effluent guidelines and limitations?
There are subtle but important distinctions between these two terms.
Effluent guidelines (also known as effluent limitations guidelines and standards or ELGs) are the national industrial wastewater discharge standards established by EPA for all facilities in an industrial category.
The federal agency develops effluent guidelines based on the performance of the best available technology that’s economically achievable for an industry. Notably, effluent guidelines are technology-based; they’re not based on risk or impacts to receiving waters (i.e., water quality-based).
Federal effluent guidelines (40 CFR Subchapter N) for direct dischargers of industrial wastewater are implemented through the NPDES permitting program.
Effluent limitations are any restrictions imposed “on quantities, discharge rates, and concentrations of pollutants” from industrial wastewater discharges (122.2). Simply put, effluent limitations are the specific numeric and non-numeric requirements developed for facilities to comply with the effluent guidelines. Unlike effluent guidelines, effluent limitations may be both technology- and water quality-based.
Most states issue NPDES permits, except for the District of Columbia, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, and New Mexico, where EPA serves as the permitting authority. The permit writer develops effluent limitations for NPDES permits and issues them to facilities. The permit may be general (covering multiple facilities with similar operations and discharges) or individual (customized with site-specific conditions).
What’s the bottom line? Effluent guidelines aren’t directly enforceable permit conditions, whereas effluent limitations are.
What are the types of effluent limitations?
Two categories of effluent limitations may appear in NPDES permits:
- Technology-based effluent limitations (TBELs), and
- Water quality-based effluent limitations (WQBELs).
TBELs are based on available treatment technologies and require facilities to meet a minimum level of treatment of pollutants in wastewater discharges.
WQBELs apply only when TBELs aren’t enough to achieve water quality standards. States develop total maximum daily loads (TMDLs). A TMDL is the maximum amount of a pollutant that can be discharged into a waterbody while still meeting the water quality standards. Specific portions of the TMDL are then allotted to permitted facilities (called wasteload allocation). Facilities can’t release more than their allocated amounts.
Any applicable wasteload allocations are incorporated into a facility’s NPDES permit.
Do facilities have to use specific control technologies?
Although EPA’s effluent guidelines are based on the use of a specific control technology, facilities aren’t required to install the same technology system. As long as they comply with the standards, facilities may implement other treatment technologies.
Key to remember: Understanding effluent limitations is key to complying with industrial wastewater discharge permits.
NewsClosuresIndustry NewsIndustry NewsWaste/HazWasteWasteEnvironmental Protection Agency (EPA)Waste ManagementEnvironmentalSolid WasteEnglishFocus AreaUSA
2026-04-16T05:00:00Z
EPA proposes major changes to coal combustion residuals rules
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) published a proposed rule on April 13, 2026, to revise the existing regulations governing the disposal of coal combustion residuals (CCR) in landfills and surface impoundments as well as the beneficial use of CCR.
Who’s impacted?
The proposed rule affects coal-fired electric utilities and independent power producers subject to the CCR disposal and beneficial use regulations at 40 CFR Part 257.
What are the changes?
Significant changes the EPA proposes include:
- Adding an option for facilities to certify the closure of legacy CCR surface impoundments by CCR removal that were closed before November 8, 2024, under regulatory oversight;
- Expanding the eligibility criteria for facilities to defer CCR closure requirements until site-specific determinations are made for legacy surface impoundments that were closed before November 8, 2024, under regulatory oversight;
- Exempting CCR dewatering structures (used to dewater CCR waste for the disposal of CCR elsewhere) from federal CCR regulations (Part 257);
- Rescinding all CCR management unit (CCRMU) requirements or revising the existing CCRMU regulations;
- Allowing permit authorities to make site-specific determinations regarding certain requirements during permitting for CCR units complying with federal CCR groundwater monitoring, corrective action, and closure requirements under a federal or an approved-state CCR permit; and
- Revising the beneficial use requirements by:
- Removing the environmental demonstration requirement for non-roadway use of more than 12,400 tons of unencapsulated CCR; and
- Excluding these beneficial uses from federal CCR regulations (Part 257):
- CCR used in cement manufacturing at cement kilns,
- Flue gas desulfurization (FGD) gypsum used in agriculture, and
- FGD gypsum used in wallboard.
Key to remember: EPA plans to make significant amendments to the coal combustion residuals requirements.
NewsHazardous WasteIndustry NewsEnglishWaste ManifestsSafety & HealthGeneral Industry SafetyWasteEnvironmentalIn-Depth ArticleEnvironmental Management SystemsFocus AreaUSA
2026-04-14T05:00:00Z
What to know about the EPA’s proposed manifest sunset rule
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is taking another major step toward modernizing hazardous waste tracking. The Agency’s proposed “manifest sunset rule” would officially phase out paper hazardous waste manifests and require the exclusive use of the e-Manifest system. For employers, especially those generating or managing hazardous waste, it’s a fundamental shift in how waste shipments are documented, tracked, and audited.
Since 2018, EPA’s e-Manifest system has been available as a digital alternative to paper manifests. Over the years, the agency has added requirements pushing the industry toward adoption, including mandatory registration and electronic data submission. But despite those efforts, many companies have continued to rely on paper manifests, either out of habit, convenience, or because parts of their waste chain weren’t ready to go digital. EPA even states in the proposed rule that less than one percent of all e-manifest users have completely switched to digital manifest. The proposed sunset rule is designed to close that gap. Once finalized, it would set a firm deadline (24 months) after which paper manifests would no longer be allowed.
Why EPA wants to eliminate paper manifests
EPA’s reasoning is pretty straightforward. Paper manifests are slower, easier to lose, and more prone to errors. They rely on manual handling and delayed processing, which can create gaps in tracking and compliance. A fully electronic system, on the other hand, allows for real-time visibility, standardized data entry, and faster correction of mistakes. It also gives regulators a clearer, more immediate picture of what’s happening across the entire waste life cycle.
Addressing one of the biggest digital barriers: signatures
One overlooked part of the proposed rule is how EPA is trying to solve one of the biggest barriers to going fully digital, which is signatures in the field. Anyone who has dealt with manifests knows that the weak point is often the hand-off between the generator and the transporter, especially when drivers don’t have system access or reliable connectivity. To address that, EPA is proposing new functionality that would allow users to sign manifests using quick response (QR) codes or even short message service (SMS). In practice, this could mean a driver scans a QR code or receives a text prompt, then completes the signature process directly from their phone. So, no login or full system access needed. EPA is also exploring the ability to use SMS and QR-based tools to make updates to manifest data without needing full system permissions. That’s a big deal operationally, because it removes one of the most common bottlenecks in needing a registered user at a specific site to make even minor corrections.
Operational challenges companies should expect
With that said, moving to a fully digital system still comes with potential issues. It requires coordination across your entire operation. Generators, transporters, and disposal facilities all have to be aligned and capable of using the system effectively. If one party in that chain struggles, it can create delays or compliance issues for everyone involved. There’s also an upfront investment to consider. Companies may need to upgrade internal systems, ensure reliable connectivity, and train employees in new work processes. For organizations with multiple sites or field operations, which can take some planning. But over time, many of those burdens are expected to decrease. Electronic signatures, reusable templates, and centralized record-keeping can significantly reduce administrative work.
One of the biggest shifts employers will notice is the level of visibility. With paper manifests, there’s often a lag between shipment and final documentation. In a digital system, that lag disappears. Information becomes available almost immediately, and regulators have access to the same data. That means errors or discrepancies are easier to find and harder to ignore.
The good news is that companies don’t have to wait for the final rule to start preparing. Taking a close look at your current manifest process is a good first step. If paper is still a major part of your workflow, that’s a clear signal that changes are coming. Making sure your e-Manifest account is fully set up and that employees understand how to use it, will go a long way in avoiding future disruptions.
Keys to remember: The EPA’s proposed Paper Manifest Sunset Rule would set a firm date to phase out paper hazardous waste manifests and require that all covered shipments be tracked through the agency’s electronic e‑Manifest system, in which the Agency says will improve hazardous‑waste tracking and transparency while reducing administrative burden and saving regulated entities roughly $28.5 million per year.
NewsIndustry NewsCAA ComplianceEnvironmentalIn-Depth ArticleFocus AreaEnglishAir PermittingAir ProgramsUSA
2026-04-13T05:00:00Z
How incinerators are permitted: A look at the regulatory framework and EPA’s new streamlining proposal
Incinerators in the United States operate under a complex permitting framework designed to protect air quality, public health, and the environment. Under the Clean Air Act (CAA), facilities that burn waste must meet strict emission standards, maintain operating controls, and follow extensive monitoring and reporting rules. These requirements ensure that incineration, while a valuable tool for waste management, wildfire mitigation, and disaster recovery, remains safe and consistent with federal air quality objectives. Against this backdrop, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) recently proposed a rule to streamline permitting for specific types of incinerators used in wildfire prevention and disaster cleanup, a move that could reduce delays for state and local governments.
The regulatory basis for incinerator permitting
Most incinerators fall under Section 129 of the Clean Air Act, which mandates EPA to establish performance standards and emission guidelines for categories of solid waste combustion units. These standards govern pollutants such as particulate matter, carbon monoxide, sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxides, lead, cadmium, mercury, hydrogen chloride, and dioxins/furans. Operators must also conduct emissions testing, maintain continuous monitoring equipment, track operational parameters, and submit regular compliance reports.
Permitting generally occurs through Title V operating permits, which consolidate all applicable air quality requirements into a single enforceable document. A Title V permit typically requires annual certifications, detailed recordkeeping, periodic emissions tests, and reporting of deviations. While the Title V program does not impose new standards, it ensures that incinerators comply with all existing federal and state air quality rules.
Different categories of incinerators such as Large Municipal Waste Combustors (LMWC), Small Municipal Waste Combustors (SMWC), Commercial and Industrial Solid Waste Incinerators (CISWI), and Other Solid Waste Incinerators (OSWI) have distinct requirements. These subcategories reflect variations in unit size, waste composition, and operational design, and each has its own subpart under EPA’s air quality regulations.
Air curtain incinerators: A special case
Air Curtain Incinerators (ACIs), which burn wood waste, yard debris, and clean lumber, occupy a niche segment of the permitting landscape. They use a mechanized “curtain” of air to increase combustion efficiency and reduce particulate emissions compared to open burning. However, their regulatory treatment has historically been inconsistent.
Because ACIs fit partly within several existing subparts, operators often face confusion about which monitoring, opacity limits, and reporting duties apply. Overlap across four regulatory categories can create delays, particularly during emergencies when ACIs are deployed to remove vegetative fuels that increase wildfire risk or to process debris after storms.
EPA’s emergent focus on streamlining
In March 2026, EPA announced a proposal to consolidate the regulatory requirements for ACIs used solely to burn wood derived materials into a single subpart under Section 129. The proposal would also allow these ACIs to operate without a Title V permit unless located at a facility that otherwise requires one.
EPA stated that the change would “cut red tape” and provide clarity for state, local, and Tribal governments, allowing them to respond more effectively to natural disasters and conduct wildfire mitigation activities without unnecessary administrative delays. The agency emphasized that unprocessed debris contributes to poor air and water quality and poses safety risks, particularly in post disaster environments.
Context: Broader federal actions on disaster related incineration
The proposal follows earlier federal steps to ease temporary use of incinerators during emergencies. In 2025, EPA issued an interim final rule permitting CISWI units to burn nonhazardous disaster debris for up to eight weeks without prior EPA approval, a provision intended to accelerate cleanup after hurricanes, wildfires, and floods. These units must still operate their pollution control equipment, and extensions beyond eight weeks require EPA authorization.
Such measures reflect the increasing volume of debris associated with severe weather events and the need for rapid, environmentally sound disposal mechanisms. The current proposal for ACIs builds on these efforts by targeting the specific regulatory bottlenecks associated with vegetative and wood waste disposal.
Looking ahead
EPA’s streamlined permitting proposal does not alter emissions standards but rather clarifies and simplifies administrative pathways. If finalized, it may make ACIs more accessible during periods of heightened wildfire risk and in the critical early stages of disaster recovery.
Key to remember: At its core, the permitting system for incinerators aims to balance environmental protection with operational flexibility. The new proposal underscores EPA’s recognition that, in emergency contexts, speed matters but so does environmental stewardship.
NewsIndustry NewsIndustry NewsToxic Substances Control Act - EPAToxic Subtances Control Act - EPATSCA ComplianceToxic Substances - EPAEnvironmental Protection Agency (EPA)EnvironmentalEnglishFocus AreaUSA
2026-04-13T05:00:00Z
EPA delays TSCA Section 8(a)(7) PFAS reporting timeline again
On April 13, 2026, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) published a final rule that further delays the submission period for the one-time report required of manufacturers on per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) by the PFAS Reporting and Recordkeeping Rule (PFAS Reporting Rule).
This final rule pushes the starting submission period to either 60 days after the effective date of a future final rule updating the PFAS Reporting Rule or January 31, 2027, whichever is earlier.
Who’s impacted?
Established under Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) Section 8(a)(7), the PFAS Reporting Rule (40 CFR Part 705) requires any business that manufactured (including imported) any PFAS or PFAS-containing article between 2011 and 2022 to report. Covered manufacturers and importers must submit information on:
- Chemical identity, uses, and volumes made and processed;
- Byproducts;
- Environmental and health effects;
- Worker exposure; and
- Disposal.
What’s the new timeline?
The opening submission period was moved from April 13, 2026, to either 60 days after the effective date of a future final PFAS Reporting Rule or January 31, 2027, whichever is earlier.
Most manufacturers have 6 months to submit the report. Small manufacturers reporting only as importers of PFAS-containing articles have 1 year.
| TSCA Section 8(a)(7) PFAS Reporting Rule submission period | ||
|---|---|---|
| Start date | End date | |
| Most manufacturers | 60 days from effective date of final PFAS Reporting Rule or January 31, 2027 (whichever is earlier) | 6 months from start date or July 31, 2027 (whichever is earlier) |
| Small manufacturers reporting solely as PFAS article importers | 60 days from effective date of final PFAS Reporting Rule or January 31, 2027 (whichever is earlier) | 1 year from start date or January 31, 2028 (whichever is earlier) |
Why the delay?
In November 2025, the agency proposed updates to the PFAS Reporting Rule. EPA has delayed the reporting period to give the agency time to issue a final rule (expected later this year).
Key to remember: EPA has delayed the starting submission deadline for the TSCA Section 8(a)(7) PFAS Reporting Rule from April 2026 to no later than January 2027.
Most Recent Highlights In Transportation
NewsGreenhouse GasesIndustry NewsIndustry NewsAir ProgramsEnvironmental Protection Agency (EPA)CAA ComplianceEnvironmentalFocus AreaEnglishVolatile Organic CompoundsAir ProgramsStationary Emission SourcesUSA
2026-04-10T05:00:00Z
EPA amends specific oil and gas emission standards
On April 9, 2026, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) published a final rule that makes technical changes to the emission standards established in March 2024 (2024 Final Rule) for crude oil and natural gas facilities. This rule (2026 Final Rule) amends the requirements for:
- Temporary flaring of associated gas, and
- Vent gas net heating value (NHV) monitoring provisions for flares and enclosed combustion devices (ECDs).
Who’s impacted?
The 2026 Final Rule affects new and existing oil and gas facilities. Specifically, it applies to the regulations for the Crude Oil and Natural Gas source category, including the:
- New Source Performance Standards at 40 CFR 60 Subpart OOOOb, and
- Emission guidelines at 60 Subpart OOOOc.
These emission standards are commonly referred to as OOOOb/c.
What are the changes?
The 2026 Final Rule implements technical changes to the temporary flaring and vent gas NHV monitoring requirements set by the 2024 Final Rule.
Temporary flaring
The rule extends the baseline time limit for temporary flaring of associated gas at well sites in certain situations (like conducting repairs or maintenance) from 24 to 72 hours. Owners and operators must stop temporary flaring as soon as the situation is resolved or the temporary flaring limit is reached (whichever happens first).
It also grants allowances beyond the 72-hour limit if exigent circumstances occur (such as severe weather that prevents safe access to a well site to address an emergency or maintenance issue) and there’s a need to extend duration for repairs, maintenance, or safety issues. Owners and operators must keep records of exigent circumstances and include the information in their annual reports.
NHV monitoring
For new and existing sources, the 2026 Final Rule exempts all flare types (unassisted and assisted) and ECDs from monitoring due to high NHV content, except when inert gases are added to the process streams or for other scenarios that decrease the NHV content of the inlet stream gas. In these cases, EPA requires NHV monitoring via continuous monitoring or the alternative performance test (sampling demonstration) option for all flares and ECDs.
Other significant changes include:
- Replacing the general exemption from NHV monitoring for associated gas for any control device used at well site affected facilities with NHV monitoring requirements,
- Granting operational pauses during weekends and holidays for the consecutive 14-day sampling demonstration requirements (limiting it to no more than 3 operating days from the previous sampling day), and
- Permitting less than 1-hour sampling times for twice daily samples where low or intermittent flow makes it infeasible (as long as owners and operators report the sampling time used and the reason for the reduced time).
The 2026 Final Rule takes effect on June 8, 2026.
Key to remember: EPA’s technical changes to the emission standards for oil and gas facilities apply to temporary flaring provisions and vent gas NHV monitoring requirements.
NewsWaste ManifestsEnforcement and Audits - OSHAWaste/HazWasteWater ProgramsMonthly Roundup VideoCAA ComplianceUSACWA ComplianceStormwaterEnglishAir ProgramsIndustry NewsEnforcement and Audits - OSHAMunicipal WastewaterSafety & HealthGeneral Industry SafetyWasteEnvironmentalFocus AreaAir ProgramsVideo
EHS Monthly Round Up - March 2026
In this March 2026 roundup video, we'll review the most impactful environmental health and safety news.
Hi everyone! Welcome to the monthly news roundup video, where we’ll review the most impactful environmental health and safety news. Let’s take a look at what happened over the past month.
OSHA released an updated Job Safety and Health poster. Employers can use either the revised version or the older one, but the poster must be displayed in a conspicuous place where workers can easily see it.
OSHA recently removed a link from its Data topic webpage that displayed a list of “high-penalty cases” at or over $40,000 since 2015. The agency says it discontinued and removed it in December. The data is frozen and archived elsewhere.
OSHA published two new resources as part of its newly launched Safety Champions Program. The fact sheet provides an overview of how the program works, eligibility criteria, and key benefits. The step-by-step guide helps businesses navigate the core elements of OSHA’s Recommended Practices for Safety and Health Programs.
Several forces are nudging OSHA to address a number of workplace hazards and high-hazard industries. This comes from other agencies, safety organizations, watchdogs, legislative proposals, and persistent injury/fatality data. Among the hazards are combustible dust; first aid; personal protective equipment; and workplace violence. How all this translates into new regulations, guidance, programmed inspections, or other initiatives remains to be seen.
Turning to environmental news, EPA issued a proposed rule to require waste handlers to use electronic manifests to track all RCRA hazardous waste shipments. Stakeholders have until May 4 to comment on the proposal.
On March 10, EPA finalized stronger emission limits for new and existing large municipal waste combustors and made other changes to related standards.
And finally, EPA temporarily extended coverage under the 2021 Multi-Sector General Permit for industrial stormwater discharges until the agency issues a new general permit. The permit expired February 28 and remains in effect for facilities previously covered. EPA won’t take enforcement action against new facilities for unpermitted stormwater discharges if the facilities meet specific conditions.
Thanks for tuning in to the monthly news roundup. We’ll see you next month!
NewsIndustry NewsIndustry NewsMunicipal WastewaterPublicly Owned Treatment WorksSafe Drinking WaterWater ProgramsEnvironmental Protection Agency (EPA)EnvironmentalUSAWater ProgramsEnglishFocus AreaCWA Compliance
2026-04-07T05:00:00Z
EPA releases draft list of drinking water contaminants for possible regulation
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) published the draft Sixth Contaminant Candidate List (CCL 6) for the next group of contaminants to be considered for regulation under the Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA). The agency’s proposed list designates microplastics and pharmaceuticals as priority contaminant groups for the first time.
What’s on the list?
The proposed CCL 6 contains:
- 4 chemical groups, including:
- Microplastics,
- Pharmaceuticals,
- Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), and
- Disinfection byproducts.
- 75 chemicals; and
- 9 microbes.
EPA may regulate the listed contaminants in the future.
What does the CCL do?
The drinking water CCL is the first part of the process to regulate contaminants in public water systems. The list identifies unregulated contaminants known or anticipated to be present in drinking water that pose the greatest health risk. It helps EPA prioritize which contaminants to evaluate for potential regulation.
The SDWA requires EPA to make regulatory determinations (i.e., whether to develop rules for a contaminant) for at least five contaminants listed on the CCL every 5 years. When the agency determines a contaminant needs to be regulated, it begins the rulemaking process to develop a National Primary Drinking Water Regulation (NPDWR) for the contaminant. The NPDWRs apply to public water systems.
How can I participate?
EPA will receive public comments on the CCL 6 through June 5, 2026. You can send comments to EPA via regulations.gov or by mail. Make sure your submission includes the Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OW-2022-0946.
Key to remember: The draft list of the next round of drinking water contaminants to be considered for regulation adds priority groups for microplastics and pharmaceuticals.
NewsIndustry NewsIndustry NewsEnvironmental Protection Agency (EPA)Renewable and Alternative EnergyBiofuelCAA ComplianceEnvironmentalRenewable and Alternative EnergyFocus AreaEnglishAir ProgramsAir ProgramsUSA
2026-04-03T05:00:00Z
EPA delivers 2026–2027 renewable fuel volumes
On April 1, 2026, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) published the “Set 2” Rule, establishing the Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS) program’s 2026 and 2027 renewable fuel volumes and associated percentage standards for:
- Cellulosic biofuel,
- Biomass-based diesel (BBD),
- Advanced biofuel, and
- Total renewable fuel.
The final rule also implements other significant changes.
Who’s impacted?
The “Set 2” Rule affects:
- Transportation fuel (i.e., gasoline and diesel) refiners, blenders, marketers, distributors, importers, and exporters; and
- Renewable fuel producers and importers.
The volume and percentage requirements apply to obligated parties, which include transportation fuel refiners and importers.
What are the changes?
The final rule sets the renewable fuel volume requirements and associated percentage standards for 2026 and 2027. Volume requirements are measured in billion Renewable Identification Numbers (RINs). One RIN represents 1 gallon of ethanol-equivalent renewable fuel.
| Renewable fuel category | Volume requirements (in billion RINs) | Percentage standards | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 2027 | 2026 | 2027 | |
| Cellulosic biofuel | 1.36 | 1.43 | 0.79% | 0.84% |
| BBD | 9.07 | 9.20 | 5.24% | 5.37% |
| Advanced biofuel | 11.10 | 11.32 | 6.42% | 6.61% |
| Total renewable fuel | 26.81 | 27.02 | 15.50% | 15.78% |
The “Set 2” Rule also:
- Reallocates 70 percent of the exempted Renewable Volume Obligations (RVOs) for 2023–2025 to 2026 and 2027 (which are reflected in the above table’s volume requirements),
- Partially waives the 2025 cellulosic biofuel volume requirement from 1.38 billion RINs to 1.21 billion RINs and adjusts the related percentage standard from 0.81 percent to 0.71 percent, and
- Removes renewable electricity as a qualifying renewable fuel under the RFS program.
RFS program refresher
The RFS program requires transportation fuel sold in the United States to contain a minimum volume of renewable fuels. EPA sets the renewable fuel volume targets for each of the four renewable fuel categories.
To comply, obligated parties must:
- Calculate their RVOs for each renewable fuel category, and
- Obtain and retire enough RINs to meet their RVOs.
Regulations also apply to fuel blenders, marketers, and exporters.
Small refiners may petition EPA for a small refinery exemption (SRE), which allows refineries to produce gasoline and diesel without having to meet the RVOs required by the RFS program. EPA grants SREs annually, and they cover one specific compliance year.
Key to remember: EPA’s final “Set 2” rule establishes the renewable fuel volumes and percentage standards for 2026 and 2027 and drives other changes to the RFS program.
NewsAir QualityIndustry NewsIndustry NewsAir ProgramsEnvironmental Protection Agency (EPA)Hazardous Air PollutantsCAA ComplianceEnvironmentalFocus AreaEnglishAir ProgramsStationary Emission SourcesUSA
2026-04-02T05:00:00Z
EPA releases final NESHAP for chemical manufacturing area sources
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) published a final rule on April 1, 2026, amending the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for Chemical Manufacturing Area Sources (CMAS). The NESHAP controls hazardous air pollutant (HAP) emissions from facilities that manufacture a range of chemicals and products, such as inorganic chemicals, plastics, and synthetic rubber.
Who’s impacted?
The final rule applies to nine area source categories in the chemical manufacturing sector that are regulated by the CMAS NESHAP (40 CFR 63 Subpart VVVVVV).
What are the changes?
EPA’s final rule:
- Establishes leak detection and repair requirements for equipment leaks and heat exchange systems in organic HAP service,
- Adds detectable emissions monitoring standards for pressure vessels in organic HAP service and emission management practice standards for pressure relief devices (PRDs) in organic HAP service,
- Prohibits closed vent systems in organic HAP service from bypassing an air pollution control device (APCD), and
- Requires recurring performance testing of non-flare APCDs to demonstrate compliance with process vent and storage tank provisions.
The final rule also mandates electronic reporting for notifications of compliance status (NOCs), performance test reports, and periodic reports. Facilities must submit these reports through the Compliance and Emissions Data Reporting Interface (CEDRI) on EPA’s Central Data Exchange.
What didn’t change?
Significantly, the final rule doesn’t add previously proposed regulations for area sources that use ethylene oxide (EtO) to produce materials described by code 325 of the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS).
EPA states that it intends to address the regulation of EtO from area sources and major sources in one final action.
What are the compliance timelines?
Existing facilities must comply with the amendments by April 1, 2029.
New facilities (those that begin construction or reconstruction after January 22, 2025) have to comply with the changes by April 1, 2026, or upon startup, whichever is later.
Additionally, facilities must start electronically submitting:
- Performance tests by June 1, 2026;
- NOCs by August 31, 2026; and
- Periodic reports by April 1, 2029.
Key to remember: EPA’s final HAP emissions rule for chemical manufacturing area sources adds new requirements for certain processing equipment and systems.
Most Recent Highlights In Safety & Health
NewsTier II Inventory ReportingIndustry NewsCERCLA, SARA, EPCRACommunity Right to KnowEmergency Release PlanningEnvironmental Protection Agency (EPA)EnvironmentalIn-Depth ArticleEnglishSARA ComplianceFocus AreaUSA
2026-03-31T05:00:00Z
EPCRA inventory reports: A case study in federal, state, and local collaboration
Environmental regulations require many facilities to report annual inventories of the hazardous chemicals they use or store. Have you ever considered the impact that this information has beyond regulatory compliance? Reporting facilities, whether they realize it or not, serve an essential role in local emergency response planning.
The Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA’s) Hazardous Chemical Inventory Reporting program under the Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act (EPCRA) offers a prime example of how collaboration among the federal, state, local, and facility levels supports safer communities.
What’s EPCRA's inventory reporting program?
The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) requires facilities to keep Safety Data Sheets (SDSs) for any hazardous chemical used or stored in the workplace. Facilities that use or store the chemicals on-site at or above certain thresholds at any one time are subject to EPCRA’s Hazardous Chemical Inventory Reporting program. Regulated facilities must report information about the hazardous chemicals to the:
- State Emergency Response Commission (SERC),
- Local Emergency Planning Committee (LEPC), and
- Local fire department.
What’s reported?
EPA’s EPCRA inventory program consists of two reporting requirements under Sections 311 and 312 of EPCRA.
SDSs/lists
Section 311 of EPCRA requires facilities to submit the SDSs for or a list of the hazardous chemicals used or stored on-site at or above the reporting thresholds to the SERC, LEPC, and local fire department.
SDSs usually include comprehensive information, such as:
- The composition of ingredients,
- Physical and health hazard information, and
- First aid and firefighting measures.
If a facility opts to list the chemicals, it must group them by hazard categories and include each chemical’s name and any hazardous components as identified by the SDS. This is generally a one-time submission for each hazardous chemical. However, if a facility submits an SDS for a hazardous chemical and later discovers significant new information about it, the facility has to send an updated SDS to the SERC, LEPC, and local fire department.
Annual inventories
Under Section 312 of EPCRA, facilities must also submit an annual inventory (known as the Tier II inventory report) of the hazardous chemicals used or stored on-site at or above the reporting thresholds to the SERC, LEPC, and local fire department by March 1.
Facilities should check state regulations to confirm Tier II reporting thresholds, as they may be more stringent.
The Tier II inventory report requires information on the covered hazardous chemicals used or stored at the facility during the previous calendar year, including:
- The locations of the chemicals,
- The amounts of the chemicals, and
- The potential hazards of the chemicals.
How do inventories support emergency planning?
Inventory reports provide information that’s vital to effective emergency response planning. Specifically, the inventories tell state and local officials about where hazardous chemical releases may occur and the risks that such releases may pose. Equipped with an accurate view of these hazards, officials can build and maintain effective emergency response plans for their communities.
Each participant in the emergency planning effort plays a distinct role:
- Reporting facilities provide the SERCs, LEPCs, and local fire departments with the information they need to build effective response plans, such as the types of chemicals on-site and their quantities, locations, and possible hazards.
- SERCs designate local emergency planning districts and appoint and supervise LEPCs. They also establish the inventory reporting procedures, review local emergency response plans, and process information requests from the public.
- LEPCs use inventory reports to develop and update emergency response plans that address each community’s unique risks.
- Local fire departments use the inventory reports to understand the potential chemical-related risks they may encounter at specific facilities. By knowing where the chemicals are and the potential hazards they pose, fire departments can improve personnel training and identify the most appropriate ways to respond to chemical emergencies.
Ultimately, reporting facilities aren’t just meeting a compliance requirement; they’re also supporting safer communities.
Key point: EPCRA’s hazardous chemical inventory requirements provide an example of effective collaboration between EPA, state and local officials, and facilities to prepare communities for chemical emergencies.
NewsIndustry NewsCERCLA, SARA, EPCRAToxics Release Inventory ReportingEnvironmentalIn-Depth ArticleEnglishSARA ComplianceFocus AreaUSA
2026-03-27T05:00:00Z
Expert Insights: Four commonly overlooked categories in TRI reporting
Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) reporting can be tricky, even for seasoned EHS teams. Many facilities meet all the requirements but still miss chemicals that should be reported. Most oversights fall into four key categories. Here’s what they are and why they get missed, along with a few simple examples that show up in routine operations.
Newly added or updated TRI chemicals
The TRI list changes more often than many people realize. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regularly updates it and recently added new per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) and even a full diisononyl phthalate (DINP) chemical category. When facilities don’t review these updates each year, they may keep using materials that now contain reportable chemicals without realizing it. For example, PFAS were expanded for Reporting Years 2024 and 2025, and the DINP category was added in 2023. These changes mean that everyday items like coatings, lubricants, and flexible plastics can suddenly trigger TRI thresholds.
“Otherwise used” chemicals
Not every reportable chemical is manufactured or processed. Many are simply “otherwise used,” including solvents, degreasers, cleaners, and maintenance chemicals. Facilities often overlook these because they aren’t part of the product mix, but they can add up fast. Even common shop chemicals, when used across a year, can exceed the 10,000-pound threshold and require reporting.
Coincidentally manufactured byproducts
Some chemicals are created unintentionally during normal operations. Ammonia may form during baking or heating steps, nitrates often appear in wastewater treatment, and metal compounds can be generated during welding, machining, or corrosion. These substances count as “manufactured” under TRI even if they weren’t intentionally manufactured. Examples like ammonia, nitrates, metal compounds, and diesel byproducts such as naphthalene and polycyclic aromatic compounds are regularly overlooked in TRI reporting because they’re easy to underestimate.
Impurities or additives in mixtures
Many reportable chemicals hide inside mixtures, oils, coatings, lubricants, and chemical blends. If a facility focuses only on the main ingredients, it may miss the smaller additive or impurity that’s actually subject to TRI reporting. These overlooked components can push a facility over a reporting threshold, even when the product is used in small amounts.
TRI oversights usually occur not because facilities ignore the rules but because chemicals show up in unexpected forms. Keeping an eye on updates, tracking cleaners and maintenance chemicals, monitoring byproducts, and checking mixtures closely can prevent the most common reporting mistakes.
NewsIndustry NewsWaste/HazWasteSustainabilityCAA ComplianceSustainabilityIn-Depth ArticleCWA ComplianceEnvironmentalEnglishSustainabilityESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance)Focus AreaUSA
2026-03-25T05:00:00Z
The essential role of local governments in environmental regulation
Counties and municipalities play a major role in protecting air, water, and land resources across the United States. Although federal and state agencies establish the overarching environmental framework, thousands of local agencies conduct the day to day permitting, inspections, and enforcement needed to make those rules work.
Local governments obtain regulatory authority largely through delegation. Federal environmental laws such as the Clean Air Act, Clean Water Act, and Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) allow the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to authorize state agencies, which may then rely on local entities to administer components of these programs. In many states, local districts, counties, or municipalities operate significant environmental programs directly under state authority.
Common local level programs
A strong example of local involvement can be seen in air quality management. The National Association of Clean Air Agencies (NACAA) reports that 117 local air agencies participate in implementing federal and state clean air programs, highlighting how implementation frequently happens at the local level.
EPA’s AirNow directory lists numerous local air quality agencies across the country; Examples include air pollution control districts in California (such as the Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management District, the San Francisco Bay Area Air Quality Management District, and the South Coast Air Quality Management District) as well as local air programs in Maricopa County, Arizona; Jacksonville, Florida; and Omaha, Nebraska. These districts conduct inspections, issue permits, investigate complaints, and maintain air monitoring networks, all of which support state and federal clean air requirements.
Local authority is also central to solid waste management, where many states rely heavily on counties and municipalities to manage planning, facilities, and enforcement. For instance, Washington State requires local governments to develop comprehensive solid and hazardous waste management plans that guide all waste handling and recycling programs within each county or city. These plans determine facility needs, outline reduction and recycling strategies, and shape local ordinances designed to meet state goals.
Additional examples appear across the country. Maryland’s Montgomery County, California’s Alameda County, and the District of Columbia all implement ambitious local waste diversion plans that supplement or exceed state requirements, demonstrating how counties and cities directly shape waste reduction and recycling policy. Likewise, South Carolina places most solid waste management responsibility on county governments, which must develop local plans, designate recycling coordinators, and report progress toward statewide goals.
Why is local involvement critical?
Local environmental regulatory authority matters because conditions vary widely across the nation. Counties and municipalities better understand their own industries, land uses, and growth patterns, allowing them to respond quickly to complaints, target outreach effectively, and adopt ordinances that go beyond state or federal minimums when necessary. Their proximity to communities makes local agencies essential partners in achieving environmental compliance and advancing public health protections.
As federal and state programs evolve, the role of local agencies continues to expand. Air quality districts, solid waste authorities, and local environmental health departments all demonstrate how counties and municipalities contribute directly to national environmental objectives.
Key to remember: With thousands of local agencies responsible for on the ground regulatory tasks, the strength and responsiveness of the United States’ environmental protection system depend heavily on the active engagement of local governments.
NewsIndustry NewsCERCLA, SARA, EPCRACommunity Right to KnowToxics Release Inventory ReportingEnvironmental Protection Agency (EPA)EnvironmentalIn-Depth ArticleEnglishSARA ComplianceFocus AreaUSA
2026-03-24T05:00:00Z
Toxics Release Inventory: Are you ready to report?
Every year at the beginning of July, industrial facilities across the nation can breathe a collective sigh of relief — their annual inventories of toxic chemicals are complete! To ensure that your facility can be part of that celebration (and avoid a chaotic rush to meet the deadline), now’s the perfect time to start preparing for the Toxics Release Inventory (TRI).
The Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA’s) TRI program requires industrial facilities to report waste management data on certain toxic chemicals they manufacture, process, and use by July 1 each year. Is your facility ready to report? Here’s an overview of the TRI program to help you answer this question.
Who’s covered by TRI reporting?
Generally, TRI reporting applies if the facility:
- Is in a covered industry sector (40 CFR 372.23);
- Employs 10 or more full-time-equivalent employees; and
- Manufactures, processes, or otherwise uses a covered chemical or chemical category (372.65) in quantities above the threshold levels (372.25, .27, and .28) in a given year.
TRI tip: The TRI reporting year (RY) reflects the calendar year covered by the report, not the year in which you submit the report. For example, TRI reports for RY 2025 are due by July 1, 2026.
What’s covered by TRI reporting?
Facilities must submit the TRI Form R (or the streamlined Form A Certification Statement if eligible) for each TRI-listed chemical manufactured, processed, or used during the previous calendar year. The data covers chemical waste management activities (including releases to the environment) and any actions taken to reduce or prevent chemical waste.
Facilities usually report for each chemical:
- The quantities of releases (routine and accidental),
- Any releases caused by catastrophic or other one-time events,
- The maximum amount on-site during the year, and
- The amount contained in wastes managed on-site or transferred off-site.
What’s new for RY 2025?
The TRI reports for RY 2025 contain three differences from previous years:
- The de minimis level for anthracene was lowered from 1.0 percent to 0.1 percent. Anthracene’s Chemical Abstracts Service Registry Number (CASRN) is 120-12-7.
- More activity sub-use codes were added to the sub-use codes for “processing” and “otherwise use” activities.
- Nine per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) were added to the TRI chemical list:
| EPA registry name | CASRN |
|---|---|
| 6:2 fluorotelomer sulfonate acid | 27619-97-2 |
| 6:2 fluorotelomer sulfonate ammonium salt | 59587-39-2 |
| 6:2 fluorotelomer sulfonate anion | 425670-75-3 |
| 6:2 fluorotelomer sulfonate potassium salt | 59587-38-1 |
| 6:2 fluorotelomer sulfonate sodium salt | 27619-94-9 |
| Acetic acid, [(.gamma.-.omega.-perfluoro-C8-10-alkyl)thio] derivs., Bu esters | 3030471-22-5 |
| Ammonium perfluorodecanoate | 3108-42-7 |
| Perfluoro-3-methoxypropanoic acid | 377-73-1 |
| Sodium perfluorodecanoate | 3830-45-3 |
How are TRI reports submitted?
Facilities must submit TRI reports electronically to the TRI-MEweb application on EPA’s Central Data Exchange (CDX). Even if a facility uses its own software to prepare TRI forms, it must upload and submit the forms to TRI-MEweb.
TRI tip: To complete the submission process on TRI-MEweb, you need to assign one user the Preparer role and another user the Certifying Official role. Ensure both users have added TRI-MEweb to their CDX user accounts.
TRI reports must be submitted to both EPA and the state. If your facility’s state participates in the TRI Data Exchange (TDX), TRI-MEweb will automatically send your report to the state. If your facility’s state doesn’t participate, you must send a hard copy of the report to the TRI state contact.
TRI tip: Use EPA’s “TRI Data Exchange” webpage to determine whether your facility’s state participates in TDX. As of March 2026, all 50 states participate in TDX. The District of Columbia doesn’t participate.
More TRI tips
Keep these things in mind when preparing your TRI reports:
- You must submit a Form R (or Form A if eligible) for each TRI-listed chemical your facility manufactured, processed, or otherwise used above the threshold quantity.
- TRI data is publicized. If a chemical’s identity needs to be protected, you have to submit substantiation forms to claim the chemical identity as a trade secret. EPA must approve the claims. Further, for each chemical with a trade secret claim, you have to mail hard copies of the substantiation forms and the corresponding Form Rs (or Form As if eligible) to EPA and the state.
- EPA’s online GuideME platform offers comprehensive guidance for TRI reporting, including reporting forms and instructions, the TRI chemical list, and Q&As.
- Contact the state environmental agency directly to confirm the submission method. EPA’s “TRI State Contacts” webpage contains state contact information.
- Register your facility on CDX or ensure your facility’s CDX account is updated as soon as possible to avoid delays caused by technical issues.
Start preparing for TRI reporting now to give your facility plenty of time to gather data, complete the forms, and respond to unexpected issues that could arise. That way, your facility can breathe easily throughout the whole reporting season.
Key to remember: The submission deadline for TRI reporting is July 1, 2026. Make sure your facility is ready to report.
NewsIndustry NewsIndustry NewsStationary Emission SourcesEnvironmental Protection Agency (EPA)Hazardous Air PollutantsCAA ComplianceEnvironmentalFocus AreaEnglishAir ProgramsAir ProgramsUSA
2026-03-19T05:00:00Z
Final rule adds EtO emission limits to polyether polyol production
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) finalized major changes to the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for Polyether Polyols (PEPO) Production (PEPO NESHAP).
Who’s impacted?
The final rule applies to facilities that produce polyether polyols and are subject to the regulations at 40 CFR 63 Subpart PPP.
What are the changes?
EPA’s final rule establishes ethylene oxide (EtO) standards, updates maximum achievable control technology (MACT) requirements, and revises other provisions for the PEPO NESHAP.
EtO standards
The final rule adds EtO emission standards for:
- Equipment leaks,
- Heat exchange systems,
- Process vents,
- Storage vessels, and
- Wastewater.
The standards set emission limits and add requirements for monitoring and leak repairs.
MACT standards
Further, the final rule:
- Requires heat exchange systems to use the more sensitive Modified El Paso Method (also known as the Air Stripping Method) for quarterly monitoring and a leak definition of 6.2 parts per million by volume of total strippable hydrocarbon concentration (as methane) in the stripping gas,
- Lowers the MACT control thresholds for batch process vents and storage vessels,
- Updates the requirements for internal floating roof storage vessels,
- Lowers the threshold for equipment leaks for valves in gas/vapor service or light liquid service, and
- Requires transfer operations with loading operations that exceed a certain threshold to use a vapor balance system or reduce emissions.
Other standards
EPA’s final rule also:
- Requires 5-year performance testing for process vent control devices;
- Revises flare monitoring and operational requirements to ensure they meet the MACT standards at all times when controlling hazardous air pollutant (HAP) emissions;
- Adds new monitoring requirements for pressure vessels to verify that no detectable emissions exist;
- Clarifies that any bypass of a pollution control device for closed vent systems is a violation;
- Aligns the requirements for surge control vessels and bottoms receivers with the process vent standards;
- Adds butylene oxide to the definition of “epoxide” and the HAPs list;
- Expands “affected source” to cover specific post-reaction processes; and
- Finalizes work practice standards for maintenance vents and equipment openings, storage vessel degassing, and routine storage vessel maintenance.
However, EPA didn’t finalize the 2024 proposed rule’s addition of a fenceline monitoring program for EtO or its changes to the continuous process vent standard.
What’s the compliance timeline?
Facilities subject to the PEPO NESHAP must comply with the changes by March 18, 2029, or upon startup, whichever is later.
Key to remember: EPA’s final rule for polyether polyol emissions makes significant changes, such as establishing EtO limits and revising MACT standards.
Most Recent Highlights In Human Resources
NewsIndustry NewsWater PermittingWater ProgramsEnvironmentalIn-Depth ArticleCWA ComplianceStormwaterEnglishFocus AreaUSA
2026-03-16T05:00:00Z
Key questions in industrial stormwater compliance
Industrial stormwater compliance can feel complex for facilities balancing operations, employees, and shifting permit requirements. Many questions center on the federal general permit, pollution prevention plan expectations, monitoring, and what to do in everyday situations where stormwater risks arise. The following sections summarize core topics and practical concerns.
What is the current status of the federal 2021 Multi-Sector General Permit (MSGP)?
EPA issued the current MSGP in 2021, and it remains in effect beyond its February 28, 2026 expiration until EPA finalizes the proposed 2026 MSGP. Because the proposed 2026 permit is still under review, the 2021 MSGP continues to govern covered facilities.
Why has the proposed 2026 MSGP not taken effect?
EPA released the proposed 2026 MSGP in December 2024. Public comments, including an extended comment period ending May 19, 2025, must be reviewed before finalizing the permit. Since the existing MSGP remains valid until replaced, the 2021 permit stays in force while EPA completes its process.
What is a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP)?
A SWPPP outlines how a facility prevents pollutants from reaching stormwater. It identifies pollutant sources, control measures, inspection routines, monitoring steps, and staff training. A SWPPP must be written before submitting a Notice of Intent (NOI) for permit coverage and updated when operations or stormwater risks change.
What are the requirements for authorized state stormwater permits?
Most states issue their own industrial stormwater permits modeled on the federal MSGP. These permits typically require:
- Preparation and maintenance of a SWPPP;
- Inspections and monitoring (such as benchmark, effluent, or visual monitoring);
- Corrective actions when control measures fail; and
- Reporting through state online systems.
States may add requirements based on local conditions. When EPA updates the MSGP, states often revise their permits to align with new federal standards.
Who needs coverage under the MSGP?
Industrial facilities that discharge stormwater to waters of the United States generally need permit coverage unless they qualify for a no‑exposure exclusion. The federal MSGP applies in areas where EPA, not the state, holds National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) authority.
How does a facility obtain coverage?
To obtain coverage, a facility must:
- Prepare and implement a SWPPP;
- Put pollution controls in place, such as good housekeeping and spill prevention;
- Identify sector specific requirements based on the permit; and
- Submit a Notice of Intent through EPA’s online system.
The proposed 2026 MSGP includes updated forms and appendices, but current requirements remain based on the 2021 version until a new permit is published.
What monitoring is required?
Under the 2021 MSGP, required monitoring may include:
- Quarterly visual assessments,
- Benchmark monitoring in designated years, and
- Effluent limitations monitoring for specific regulated discharges.
The proposed 2026 MSGP would expand per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) sampling, increase benchmark monitoring frequency, and add requirements for impaired waters. These changes remain pending.
What happens if benchmark thresholds are exceeded?
A benchmark exceedance requires the facility to investigate causes, improve control measures, and document actions in the SWPPP. The proposed 2026 MSGP would formalize additional implementation measures and reporting steps, but these wouldn’t apply until the new permit takes effect.
What about common real world compliance scenarios?
Industrial stormwater issues often arise from everyday activities. Consider these examples:
Employees’ vehicles leaking oil in parking lots
Leaks from employee vehicles can contaminate stormwater. While the MSGP does not regulate personal vehicles directly, the facility is responsible for any pollutants that enter stormwater from its property. Good housekeeping practices include absorbent stations, spill kits, drip pans, and designated parking areas with routine inspection.
Nonroutine outdoor maintenance
Temporary outdoor activities such as conducting maintenance, unloading equipment, or staging materials, can introduce pollutants. The SWPPP should address nonroutine tasks by requiring temporary controls like tarps, containment pads, or scheduling activities during dry weather. Documentation of these activities is also part of good recordkeeping.
Outdoor waste storage or scrap piles
These materials should be covered or sheltered, kept away from storm drains, and inspected frequently. If runoff contacts industrial materials, the discharge becomes regulated and must be managed under the permit.
These scenarios reinforce the need for strong housekeeping practices, staff training, and prompt corrective actions.
What documentation must facilities keep?
Facilities must maintain monitoring records, inspection logs, SWPPP updates, and corrective action reports. EPA may request these documents at any time. Appendices in the proposed 2026 MSGP preview updated forms, but the 2021 requirements remain in place for now.
What should facilities do while waiting for the 2026 MSGP?
Facilities should continue full compliance with the 2021 MSGP, track regulatory updates, and prepare for more frequent monitoring and PFAS sampling likely included in the 2026 permit. Reviewing proposed changes now helps facilities plan needed SWPPP updates in advance.
Key to remember: Industrial facilities covered under the 2021 MSGP or a state equivalent must continue following that permit until EPA issues a new federal MSGP. Staying informed, maintaining strong housekeeping, and keeping SWPPP documentation current remain the most effective strategies for compliance.
NewsIndustry NewsCERCLA, SARA, EPCRACommunity Right to KnowToxics Release Inventory ReportingEnvironmental Protection Agency (EPA)EnvironmentalIn-Depth ArticleEnglishSARA ComplianceFocus AreaUSA
2026-03-13T05:00:00Z
Toxics Release Inventory: Are you ready to report?
Every year at the beginning of July, industrial facilities across the nation can breathe a collective sigh of relief — their annual inventories of toxic chemicals are complete! To ensure that your facility can be part of that celebration (and avoid a chaotic rush to meet the deadline), now’s the perfect time to start preparing for the Toxics Release Inventory (TRI).
The Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA’s) TRI program requires industrial facilities to report waste management data on certain toxic chemicals they manufacture, process, and use by July 1 each year. Is your facility ready to report? Here’s an overview of the TRI program to help you answer this question.
Who’s covered by TRI reporting?
Generally, TRI reporting applies if the facility:
- Is in a covered industry sector (40 CFR 372.23);
- Employs 10 or more full-time-equivalent employees; and
- Manufactures, processes, or otherwise uses a covered chemical or chemical category (372.65) in quantities above the threshold levels (372.25, .27, and .28) in a given year.
TRI tip: The TRI reporting year (RY) reflects the calendar year covered by the report, not the year in which you submit the report. For example, TRI reports for RY 2025 are due by July 1, 2026.
What’s covered by TRI reporting?
Facilities must submit the TRI Form R (or the streamlined Form A Certification Statement if eligible) for each TRI-listed chemical manufactured, processed, or used during the previous calendar year. The data covers chemical waste management activities (including releases to the environment) and any actions taken to reduce or prevent chemical waste.
Facilities usually report for each chemical:
- The quantities of releases (routine and accidental),
- Any releases caused by catastrophic or other one-time events,
- The maximum amount on-site during the year, and
- The amount contained in wastes managed on-site or transferred off-site.
What’s new for RY 2025?
The TRI reports for RY 2025 contain three differences from previous years:
- The de minimis level for anthracene was lowered from 1.0 percent to 0.1 percent. Anthracene’s Chemical Abstracts Service Registry Number (CASRN) is 120-12-7.
- More activity sub-use codes were added to the sub-use codes for “processing” and “otherwise use” activities.
- Nine per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) were added to the TRI chemical list:
| EPA registry name | CASRN |
|---|---|
| 6:2 fluorotelomer sulfonate acid | 27619-97-2 |
| 6:2 fluorotelomer sulfonate ammonium salt | 59587-39-2 |
| 6:2 fluorotelomer sulfonate anion | 425670-75-3 |
| 6:2 fluorotelomer sulfonate potassium salt | 59587-38-1 |
| 6:2 fluorotelomer sulfonate sodium salt | 27619-94-9 |
| Acetic acid, [(.gamma.-.omega.-perfluoro-C8-10-alkyl)thio] derivs., Bu esters | 3030471-22-5 |
| Ammonium perfluorodecanoate | 3108-42-7 |
| Perfluoro-3-methoxypropanoic acid | 377-73-1 |
| Sodium perfluorodecanoate | 3830-45-3 |
How are TRI reports submitted?
Facilities must submit TRI reports electronically to the TRI-MEweb application on EPA’s Central Data Exchange (CDX). Even if a facility uses its own software to prepare TRI forms, it must upload and submit the forms to TRI-MEweb.
TRI tip: To complete the submission process on TRI-MEweb, you need to assign one user the Preparer role and another user the Certifying Official role. Ensure both users have added TRI-MEweb to their CDX user accounts.
TRI reports must be submitted to both EPA and the state. If your facility’s state participates in the TRI Data Exchange (TDX), TRI-MEweb will automatically send your report to the state. If your facility’s state doesn’t participate, you must send a hard copy of the report to the TRI state contact.
TRI tip: Use EPA’s “TRI Data Exchange” webpage to determine whether your facility’s state participates in TDX. As of March 2026, all 50 states participate in TDX. The District of Columbia doesn’t participate.
More TRI tips
Keep these things in mind when preparing your TRI reports:
- You must submit a Form R (or Form A if eligible) for each TRI-listed chemical your facility manufactured, processed, or otherwise used above the threshold quantity.
- TRI data is publicized. If a chemical’s identity needs to be protected, you have to submit substantiation forms to claim the chemical identity as a trade secret. EPA must approve the claims. Further, for each chemical with a trade secret claim, you have to mail hard copies of the substantiation forms and the corresponding Form R (or Form A if eligible) to EPA and the state.
- EPA’s online GuideME platform offers comprehensive guidance for TRI reporting, including reporting forms and instructions, the TRI chemical list, and Q&As.
- Contact the state environmental agency directly to confirm the submission method. EPA’s “TRI State Contacts” webpage contains state contact information.
- Register your facility on CDX or ensure your facility’s CDX account is updated as soon as possible to avoid delays caused by technical issues.
Start preparing for TRI reporting now to give your facility plenty of time to gather data, complete the forms, and respond to unexpected issues that could arise. That way, your facility can breathe easily throughout the whole reporting season.
Key to remember: The submission deadline for TRI reporting is July 1, 2026. Make sure your facility is ready to report.
NewsAir QualityIndustry NewsIndustry NewsAir ProgramsAir EmissionsEnvironmental Protection Agency (EPA)CAA ComplianceEnvironmentalFocus AreaEnglishAir ProgramsStationary Emission SourcesUSA
2026-03-12T05:00:00Z
EPA finalizes emission standards for large municipal waste combustors
On March 10, 2026, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) finalized emission regulations for large municipal waste combustors (LMWCs). The final rule revises nearly all emission limits for new and existing LMWCs.
Who’s impacted?
The final rule applies to LMWCs that combust more than 250 tons per day of municipal solid waste and are covered by the:
- New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) for new LMWCs, or
- Emission Guidelines (EGs) for existing LMWCs.
EPA established new subparts for the amendments at 40 CFR Part 60, including:
- Subpart VVVV for the NSPS, and
- Subpart WWWW for the EGs.
What are the changes?
Generally, stricter emission limits apply. For all LMWCs (new and existing), the rule revises the emission limits for:
- Cadmium,
- Hydrogen chloride,
- Lead,
- Mercury,
- Particulate matter,
- Polychlorinated dibenzodioxins and dibenzofurans, and
- Sulfur dioxide.
For all new LMWCs, the final rule revises the emission limits for carbon monoxide (CO) and nitrogen oxides (NOx). The final rule also amends the CO and NOx limits for all existing LMWCs, except for the CO limits for two subcategories of combustors and the NOx limits for two subcategories of combustors for new municipal solid waste incinerators.
Other major changes include:
- Removing certain exclusions and exemptions for startups, shutdowns, and malfunctions (requiring LMWCs to meet emission standards at all times);
- Removing the NOx emissions averaging compliance alternative for existing LMWCs;
- Amending recordkeeping and reporting requirements; and
- Eliminating Title V operating air permit requirements for qualifying air curtain incinerators that burn only wood waste, yard waste, and clean lumber.
What’s the compliance timeline?
When EPA updates EGs, states must revise their State Implementation Plans (SIPs) to incorporate the changes. States have to submit revised SIPs by March 10, 2027. Once EPA approves the SIP, facilities with existing LMWCs must meet the new standards either within 3 years of the SIP’s approval date or by March 10, 2031, whichever is earlier.
New LMWCs must comply with the amended NSPS by September 10, 2026, or upon startup, whichever is later.
Key to remember: EPA finalized stronger emission limits for new and existing large municipal waste combustors and made other changes to the standards.
NewsGreenhouse GasesEnforcement and Audits - OSHAMonthly Roundup VideoWalking Working SurfacesCAA ComplianceUSAInjury and Illness RecordkeepingLaddersEnglishIndustry NewsEnforcement and Audits - OSHAOSHA InspectionsSafety & HealthInjury and Illness Recording CriteriaGeneral Industry SafetyEnvironmentalFocus AreaAir ProgramsVideo
EHS Monthly Round Up - February 2026
In this Februrary 2026 roundup video, we'll discuss the most impactful environmental health and safety news.
Hi everyone! Welcome to the monthly news roundup video, where we’ll review the most impactful environmental health and safety news. Let’s take a look at what happened over the past month.
Fatal work injuries fell 4 percent in 2024, largely due to a decline in workplace drug- and alcohol-related overdoses. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, overdose fatalities fell from 512 in 2023 to 410 in 2024. Across all types of workplace incidents, there were 5,070 fatal work injuries in 2024, compared to 5,283 in 2023. Transportation incidents continue to be the most frequent type of fatal event, accounting for over 38 percent of all occupational fatalities in 2024.
OSHA is fast-tracking a proposal to remove the 2036 obligation to upgrade fall protection systems on fixed ladders that extend over 24 feet. This follows an industry petition from major chemical and petroleum industry groups, which argue the provision is unjustified, costly, and not supported by the rulemaking record. OSHA frames the upcoming proposed action as deregulatory, allowing employers to update fixed ladders at the end of their service lives. We’ll provide updates as more information becomes available.
As OSHA leans into “deregulatory” actions, lawmakers are moving to pressure the agency to issue “regulatory” rulemaking to protect American workers. The latest legislative wave of bills aims to fill regulatory gaps, tackle emerging hazards, expand OSHA authority, and raise penalties. Topics addressed by these bills include musculoskeletal disorders, heat stress, infectious diseases, wildfire smoke, and workplace violence.
In a recently issued letter of interpretation, OSHA states that a burn injury caused by a personal lithium-ion battery fire is work related if it occurs in the workplace during assigned working hours. The letter details an incident where an employee was burned when their rechargeable lithium-ion batteries for e-cigarettes sparked a fire after coming into contact with a key used for work.
A new report from the Department of Labor Office of Inspector General concludes that OSHA struggles to meet its mission, particularly in high-risk industries like healthcare, construction, and manufacturing. Several pages point to OSHA’s difficulties in effectively enforcing annual injury and illness reporting requirements, reaching the nation’s high-risk worksites for inspection, and addressing workplace violence by regulatory or other action.
Turning to environmental news, EPA extended the deadlines for Facility Evaluation Reports and related requirements for coal combustion residuals facilities. In most instances, the deadlines have been moved one or two years out.
And finally, EPA announced a final rule eliminating the 2009 Endangerment Finding and related greenhouse gas emission requirements for on-highway vehicles and vehicle engines. When the final rule takes effect, manufacturers and importers of new motor vehicles and motor vehicle engines will no longer have to measure, report, certify, or comply with federal greenhouse gas emission standards.
Thanks for tuning in to the monthly news roundup. We’ll see you next month!
NewsAir EmissionsChange NoticesChange NoticeColoradoCAA ComplianceEnvironmentalFocus AreaEnglishAir ProgramsAir Programs
2026-03-06T06:00:00Z
Colorado adds landfill methane emission regulation
Effective date: February 14, 2026
This applies to: Open and closed municipal solid waste landfills
Description of change: The Colorado Air Quality Control Commission added Regulation 31, which establishes new emission control and monitoring requirements for municipal solid waste landfills. Applicability is based on the landfill’s amount of waste it holds and methane emissions.
Significant changes implemented by Regulation 31 include:
- Establishing a stricter emission control threshold than federal standards so that more landfills must install gas collection and control systems,
- Mandating closed landfills with emission combustion devices to install biofilters when the devices are removed,
- Expanding the methane monitoring requirements (allowing additional monitoring tools for identifying large emission sources) and allowing alternative monitoring technologies for periodic monitoring, and
- Phasing in a ban on open flares to replace them with enclosed flares.
Related state info: Clean air operating permits state comparison
New Network Poll
Hazard communication
Apr 16, 2026
The Occupational Safety and Health Administration’s (OSHA’s) hazard communication, or HazCom, standard (HCS) applies to general industry, construction, shipyard, marine terminals, and longshoring employment. Any employer with one employee and one hazardous chemical is covered. As defined at 1910.1200(c), “hazardous chemical” means any chemical which is classified as a physical hazard or a health hazard, a simple asphyxiant, combustible dust, or hazard not otherwise classified.
The HCS covers “any chemical which is known to be present in the workplace in such a manner that employees may be exposed under normal conditions of use or in a foreseeable emergency.” Most chemicals used in the workplace have some hazard potential, and thus will be covered by the rule.
The hazardous nature of the chemical and the potential for exposure are the factors that determine whether a chemical is covered. If the chemical is not hazardous per OSHA’s definition at 1910.1200(c), it is not covered by the standard. If there is no potential exposure, the chemical is not covered by the standard. Under the HCS, “exposure or exposed” means that an employee is subjected in the course of employment to a hazardous chemical, and includes potential (e.g., accidental or possible) exposure. “Subjected” in terms of health hazards includes any route of entry (e.g., inhalation, ingestion, skin contact, or absorption).
Exemptions from coverage
- Certain hazardous substances are exempt from coverage by the Hazard Communication standard.
Certain hazardous substances are regulated by other agencies; therefore, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) has exempted them from coverage by the Hazard Communication standard. The standard does not apply to the following substances:
- Any hazardous waste, as defined and regulated under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA).
- Any hazardous substance, as defined and regulated under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA).
- Tobacco or tobacco products.
- Wood or wood products, including lumber which will not be processed, where the chemical manufacturer or importer can establish that the only hazard the products pose to employees is the potential for combustion.
- Food or alcoholic beverages which are sold, used, or prepared in a retail establishment (such as a grocery store or restaurant) and foods intended for personal consumption by employees while in the workplace.
- Any drug as defined by the federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act) when it is in solid, final form for direct administration to the patient (e.g., pills), drugs packaged by the chemical manufacturer for sale to consumers (e.g., over-the-counter drugs), and drugs intended for personal consumption by employees while in the workplace (e.g., first aid supplies).
- Cosmetics packaged for sale to consumers and those intended for personal use by employees in the workplace.
- Any consumer product or hazardous substance as defined in the Consumer Product Safety Act and Federal Hazardous Substances Act respectively, used in the workplace in the same manner as normal consumer use, and which use results in exposure which is not greater than exposures experienced by consumers.
- Nuisance particles when they do not pose any physical or health hazard covered by the HazCom standard.
- Ionizing and nonionizing radiation.
- Biological hazards.
- Articles.
Articles
- Articles are exempt from the HazCom standard requirements.
- If a hazardous chemical can be expected to be released only when the item is repaired, that is not considered part of its normal condition of use.
“Articles” are exempt from the requirements of the HazCom standard (HCS). An article is defined as a manufactured item other than a fluid or particle which:
- Is formed to a specific shape or design during manufacture,
- Has end use function(s) dependent in whole or in part upon its shape or design during end use, and
- Must not release more than very small quantities (e.g., minute or trace amounts) of a hazardous chemical, or pose a physical hazard or health risk to employees under normal conditions of use.
It may be difficult to define what is considered “normal conditions of use.” An employer may have a manufactured item that meets the definition of an article, but if it is burned, it produces a hazardous byproduct. The question then becomes, is burning “normal use” for the product? If burning occurs during its normal use, then it cannot be exempted as an article.
Normal use does not include incidental exposure.
If a hazardous chemical can be expected to be released only when the item is repaired, that is not considered part of its normal condition of use. The item would be considered an article under the HCS, and thus exempted. Stainless steel tables, vinyl upholstery, and tires are such articles.
Basically, if the product will be processed in some way after leaving the manufacturing site — heated, welded, glued, sawed, etc. — and a hazardous chemical could be emitted, it probably will not qualify for the article exemption.
Items that are covered by HCS include (this is not an exhaustive list):
- Bricks,
- Metal ingots,
- Wood products where the hazard is not just combustion (e.g., wood that is cut is covered since the sawdust created during the cut creates a respiratory hazard),
- Hazardous drugs not in final form or a solid (e.g., drugs that are crushed or dissolved prior to administration),
- Combustible dusts,
- Simple asphyxiants,
- Welding rods/wire,
- Acid batteries,
- Switches with mercury in them when a certain percentage break under normal conditions of use,
- Fabric treated with formaldehyde where downstream garment manufacturing employees will be exposed when making clothing,
- Consumer products not used in the quantities and the manner that a consumer would use them, and
- Oil and gas products.
What are the requirements?
- Responsibilities for communicating hazards differ based on how a company uses the chemicals.
Depending on whether a business manufactures, distributes, sells, or simply uses chemicals, the requirements under the HazCom standard vary. Chemical manufacturers have the most stringent requirements in that they are responsible for classifying chemicals as to their hazards. However, employers who use hazardous chemicals have responsibilities to communicate information to employees about the hazards of the chemicals they work with.
Responsibilities for communicating hazards
| Chemical manufacturers and importers |
|
| Distributors |
|
| Employers |
|
| Employers in work operations where employees only handle chemicals in sealed containers |
|
| Retail distributors |
|
Laboratories and handling chemicals in sealed containers
- Laboratories do not need to have a written HazCom program and list of chemicals.
- Certain actions must be done in work operations where employees only handle chemicals in sealed containers.
Laboratories
In laboratories, employers do not have to have a written HazCom program and list of chemicals. They do have to:
- Make sure that labels on incoming containers of hazardous chemicals are not removed or defaced,
- Maintain any safety data sheets (SDSs) that are received with incoming shipments of hazardous chemicals,
- Make SDSs readily accessible during each work shift to laboratory employees when they are in their work areas, and
- Provide laboratory employees with information and training on the chemical hazards in the work area, methods to detect exposures, ways to protect themselves, and so on.
Handling chemicals in sealed containers
In work operations like warehouses, where employees only handle chemicals in sealed containers which are not opened under normal conditions of use, employers must:
- Make sure container labels on incoming containers of hazardous chemicals are not removed or defaced,
- Maintain copies of any safety data sheets that are received with incoming shipments of the sealed containers of hazardous chemicals,
- Obtain an SDS as soon as possible for sealed containers of hazardous chemicals received without a safety data sheet if an employee requests it,
- Make SDSs available during each work shift to employees when they are in their work area(s), and
- Provide employees with information and training in accordance with 1910.1200(h) as needed to protect them in the event of a spill or leak of a hazardous chemical from a sealed container.
Hazard classification procedures
- There are four steps in the process of hazard classification.
The basis for hazard communication is the chemical hazard evaluation and classification.
Those who know the most about the chemicals — the chemical manufacturers and importers — must classify the hazards of the chemicals they produce or import and convey hazard information to downstream employers where the chemicals are used.
An employer that manufactures, processes, formulates, blends, mixes, repackages, or otherwise changes the composition of a hazardous chemical is also considered a “chemical manufacturer.” An “importer” is the first business with employees within the Customs Territory of the United States which receives hazardous chemicals produced in other countries for the purpose of supplying them to distributors or employers within the United States.
Hazard information is standardized, both in the evaluation and classification method, as well as in label elements, safety data sheet (SDS) elements, and hazard statements. In other words, if a chemical is determined to be a “Category 1 flammable gas” there is a predetermined pictogram, signal word and other label elements, hazard and precautionary statements, based upon that classification that must be used.
Chemical manufacturers and importers classifying chemicals must identify and consider the full range of available scientific literature and other evidence concerning the potential hazards. The process of hazard classification consists of four basic steps:
- Selection of chemicals to evaluate,
- Collection of data,
- Analysis of the collected data, and
- Records of the rationale behind the results obtained.
OSHA requires chemical manufacturers to consult Appendix A to 1910.1200 for classification of health hazards, and Appendix B to 1910.1200 for the classification of physical hazards.
Mixtures and by-products
- It is recommended to use the test data for the complete mixture, if available.
- During hazard determination or hazard classification, account for any hazardous by-products.
Chemical manufacturers and importers evaluating chemical mixtures must follow the procedures described in Appendices A and B to 1910.1200. Under the HazCom standard, it is recommended to use the test data for the complete mixture, if available. If not, then there are other options for classifying the mixture using “bridging principles” based on ingredients and data.
Hazard determination or hazard classification must anticipate the full range of downstream uses of products and account for any hazardous by-products which may be formed. Decomposition products produced during normal conditions of use or in foreseeable emergencies for the product are covered. For example, a manufacturer of gasoline must inform downstream users of the hazards of carbon monoxide, since carbon monoxide is a hazardous chemical and is “known to be present” as a by-product resulting from the use of gasoline.
Testing is not required
- Testing, unlike collection and analysis of data, is not required for the HazCom standard.
The standard does not require the testing of chemicals — only the collection and analysis of currently available data. Nevertheless, if no data is available or it is questionable, testing should be considered when hazardous properties are suspected.
Tests conducted according to internationally recognized scientific principles can be used for purposes of hazard classification. In the case of health hazards, for example, this includes the results of valid in vitro tests, relevant animal data, and human experience, such as epidemiological and clinical studies, and well-documented case reports and observations.
If no hazards are found, the manufacturer, importer, or employer is not required to take further action pertaining to the evaluated chemical.
Hazard class and category
- Classify substances by “Hazard Classes” and assign a “Category” for severity.
- Hazard classes are further sub-divided into hazard categories.
- Low hazard categories mean higher severity in a class.
OSHA requires that these parties evaluate and classify each substance using pre-determined “Hazard Classes” (e.g., “flammable gas”). After that has been done, the manufacturer or importer must then assign a “Category” to show severity of the hazard. OSHA uses “hazard class” and “hazard category” to break down the hazardous effects of chemicals or mixtures into levels of severity. OSHA does not classify nor approve of classification of chemicals.
OSHA says the breakdown of hazard classes into categories that reflect different severities or levels of effect provide employers and employees with more precise information to:
- Understand the hazards,
- Determine the risks in the workplace, and
- Respond to exposure incidents.
A “hazard class” is defined as “the nature of the physical or health hazards, e.g., flammable solid, carcinogen, oral acute toxicity.” Most hazard classes are further sub-divided into categories of hazard.
The definitions of the physical or health hazard classes are specific and detailed. Each hazard or endpoint (e.g., explosives, carcinogenicity) is a hazard class.
The definition of “hazard category” is the division of criteria within each hazard class that compare hazard severity within a hazard class and should not be taken as a comparison of hazard categories more generally. The lower the category number, the higher the severity within that class (for example, a Category 1 flammable gas is more flammable than a Category 2). Depending on the class, there can be up to five categories.
The HazCom standard includes the classification criteria for 11 health hazard classes. In many cases, a chemical may pose more than one type of health hazard. OSHA’s guidance on determining health hazards can be viewed in Appendix A to 1910.1200, Health Hazard Criteria.
OSHA’s guidance on determining physical hazards can be viewed in Appendix B to 1910.1200, Physical Hazard Criteria.
OSHA defined hazards and HNOC
- Defined hazards include simple asphyxiants and combustible dust.
- HNOC is also mentioned in the definition of the term hazardous chemical.
OSHA has added two “defined hazards” into the HazCom standard to address known hazards that have no corresponding Globally Harmonized System (GHS) classification. These OSHA defined hazards are:
- Simple asphyxiant — A substance or mixture that displaces oxygen in the ambient atmosphere, and can thus cause oxygen deprivation in those who are exposed, leading to unconsciousness and death.
- Combustible dust — Finely divided solid particulates of a substance or mixture that pose a flash-fire hazard or explosion hazard when dispersed in air or other oxidizing media.
You will also find the term “hazard not otherwise classified” (HNOC) mentioned in the definition of hazardous chemical. HNOC is an adverse physical or health effect identified through evaluation of scientific evidence during the classification process that does not meet the specified criteria for the physical and health hazard classes addressed in 1910.1200. This does not extend coverage to adverse physical and health effects for which there is a hazard class addressed in 1910.1200, but the effect either falls below the cut-off value/concentration limit of the hazard class or is under a GHS hazard category that has not been adopted by OSHA (e.g., acute toxicity Category 5).
Hazardous wastes
- Many wastes not covered by RCRA do not fall under the scope of the HazCom standard.
The HazCom rule does not apply to “hazardous waste as such term is defined by the Solid Waste Disposal Act, as amended by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976, as amended (42 U.S.C. 6901 et seq.), when subject to regulations issued under that Act by the Environmental Protection Agency.”
A vast majority of wastes that are not covered by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) do not exhibit any hazardous properties, and therefore do not fall under the scope of the HazCom standard. However, a small subset of these waste materials exhibit some level of hazard (such as toxicity) if ingested, injected, absorbed, or inhaled in significant quantities. Examples of hazardous wastes that are not covered by RCRA include:
- Non-RCRA regulated commercial solid waste.
- Electronic wastes (recycled computers, cell phones, electronic devices).
- Household hazardous wastes.
- Waste products that are clearly non-RCRA hazardous wastes, but may require a Department of Transportation (DOT) hazard label because of chemical properties.
When waste does not meet the definition of “hazardous waste” under the RCRA regulations, it is covered by the HazCom standard if it meets the standard’s definition of “hazardous chemical” AND it does not fall under any of the exemptions listed under 1910.1200(b)(6).
For a non-RCRA waste product, the HazCom standard does not require that the waste generator to create its own label or safety data sheet (SDS); however, any chemical hazard information, including available labels and SDSs, received by the waste generator from upstream must be passed downstream with the non-RCRA waste product. For mixtures of non-RCRA wastes, it is acceptable to provide multiple SDSs downstream. This would also apply to disposal of mixtures of non-RCRA waste product from laboratories, manufacturers, importers, and distributors.
Labels
- Labels provide immediate warning and must be on the immediate container of each hazardous chemical.
- Shipped containers of hazardous chemicals must have six different required label elements.
Summary of requirements
The HazCom standard requires that a label must be on the immediate container of each hazardous chemical. The label provides an immediate warning of the hazards and protective information related to the chemical and is a summary of the more detailed information available on the safety data sheet (SDS).
Labels are not intended to be either the sole or the most complete source of information regarding the nature or identity of the hazardous chemicals in the container. The chemical identity on the label must match the chemical’s SDS, which contains more extensive information. The chemical manufacturer, importer, or distributor is required to:
- Provide labels on shipped containers with all the required label elements for the hazard class(es).
- Update labels within six months of becoming aware of any new hazard information and ensure that labels on containers shipped after that time contain the new information.
Chemical manufacturers, importers, and distributors have the option to NOT relabel chemicals already released for shipment and awaiting further distribution. With this option, however, they must provide the updated label for each individual container with each shipment.
If the chemical is not currently produced or imported, the chemical manufacturer, importer, distributor, or employer must add the information to the label before the chemical is shipped or introduced into the workplace again.
Employers are required to ensure that:
- Containers of hazardous chemicals in the workplace are labeled.
- Labels remain readable and are not smudged or defaced.
- Labels are at least in English.
- Employees are trained on the labels used in the workplace.
Labels on shipped containers
All shipped containers of hazardous chemicals must be labeled with the required label elements:
- Product identifier;
- Signal word;
- Pictogram(s);
- Hazard statement(s);
- Precautionary statement(s); and
- Name, U.S. address, and U.S. phone number of the chemical manufacturer, importer, or other responsible party.
Labeling exemptions
Many government agencies require labeling on items they regulate. Even though the chemicals themselves are covered under HazCom, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) does not require hazard communication labeling for the following chemicals:
- Any pesticide, labeled under the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act.
- Any chemical substance or mixture labeled under the Toxic Substances Control Act.
- Any food, food additive, color additive, drug, cosmetic, or medical or veterinary device labeled under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act or the Virus-Serum-Toxin Act.
- Any alcoholic beverages, wine or beer intended for nonindustrial use, labeled under the Federal Alcohol Administration Act.
- Agricultural or vegetable seed treated with pesticides and labeled under the Federal Seed Act.
- Any consumer product or hazardous substance, labeled under the Consumer Product Safety Act.
Required pictograms under HazCom
- Pictograms are required on labels of shipped containers and help identify physical and health hazards.
Pictograms are one of the required elements on labels of shipped containers and help identify physical and health hazards.
On shipped containers, pictograms consist of a red square frame set at a point with a black hazard symbol on a white background, sufficiently wide to be clearly visible. On workplace (or in-plant) labels only, pictograms may have a black border, rather than a red border.
The Globally Harmonized System (GHS) uses nine pictograms, but the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) did not adopt the environmental pictogram. It may be seen on labels and safety data sheets (SDSs) to convey environmental hazards, and it may provide useful information to use in managing chemicals, but its use is not required by the HazCom standard.
Label design and in-house labeling
- Labels must be legible and pictograms, signal words, and hazard statements should be together on the label.
- Maintain the labels of any containers received already labeled from the supplier.
The label format or layout is not specified by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), except to require that the pictograms, signal word, and hazard statements should be located together on the label. OSHA states that the three elements should appear in “the same field of view.”
There are also no guidelines or requirements on label size. However, OSHA says that labels must be legible without the use of any aid except corrective lenses if the person reading the label normally must wear glasses. If the label is not legible, it is not in compliance.
In-house labeling
For those containers that are received already labeled from the supplier, simply maintaining the label on the container is the best and easiest option. If materials are transferred in the workplace from labeled containers into other containers, the employer must ensure that these are labeled as well, unless they fall under the portable container exemption.
In-house containers of hazardous chemicals must be labeled, tagged, or marked with either:
- The same label information required on shipped containers (apart from the supplier identification), or
- A product identifier and words, pictures, symbols, or some combination that provides general hazard information regarding the physical and health hazards of the hazardous chemical.
The employer shall ensure that workplace labels or other forms of warning are:
- Legible,
- In English, and
- Prominently displayed on the container, or readily available in the work area throughout each work shift.
For in-house purposes, the employer can re-label using the label elements found on the original, shipped container, or use an alternative labeling system, such as the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) or the Hazardous Materials Identification System (HMIS).
HMIS® and NFPA® labeling systems
- If using an alternative labeling system, it cannot conflict with HazCom.
The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) says that employers who use general, nonspecific in-plant labeling systems such as the Hazardous Materials Identification System (HMIS) or the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) must ensure through their hazard communication program that their employees can correlate the visual warning on the in-plant container with the applicable chemical and its appropriate hazard warnings.
If an employer does choose to use an alternative labeling system, it may not conflict with HazCom. For example, under the HazCom standard, labels of chemicals that present specific target organ toxicity hazards must display the health hazard symbol. The skull and crossbones symbol is used only for certain acute toxicity hazards. If an in-house label used the skull and crossbones symbol for a specific target organ toxin, it would be in conflict with the HazCom standard.
Where all hazards are not addressed by a particular rating system, such as chronic health hazards, the hazards not addressed must be communicated by words, pictures, symbols, or a combination, in addition to the rating system number.
NFPA® or HMIS® rating systems do not directly correlate with the HazCom standard (HCS) classifications (e.g., the NFPA® rating of 1 (“low”) does not correlate with HCS classification of 1 (“high”). Category numbers do not appear on HazCom shipped container labels and are not equivalent to the numbers used in the hazard rating systems. A user of the HMIS® or NFPA® system should use those systems as they are designed, and not try to include HazCom standard classifications as part of the label.
Relabeling containers
- Relabeling containers may be necessary in some situations.
While employers are never required under the HazCom standard to re-label already labeled containers, there are several situations in which relabeling may be needed:
- If the received quantity of a chemical is broken down into smaller containers, employers need to label these containers.
- Labels that fall off or become unreadable must be replaced.
- Relabeling incoming containers for a company-wide uniform labeling system. This also makes training easier because the employer only needs to explain one system of labels.
Although an employer may choose to provide additional information, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration’s (OSHA’s) requirements are limited to that required to convey the hazards to users. Other data regarding protective measures and first aid are included on the safety data sheet (SDS) or covered during training. In evaluating the effectiveness of labels, OSHA has found that the more detail that appears on a label, the less likely it is that users will read and act on the information.
Portable containers and small containers
- The employer is not required to label portable containers where hazardous chemicals are transferred from labeled containers, and which are for immediate use.
- Just because a container is small does not mean it is exempt from a label.
Portable containers
The employer is not required to label portable containers into which hazardous chemicals are transferred from labeled containers, and which are intended only for the immediate use of the employee who performs the transfer. “Immediate use” means that the hazardous chemical will be under the control of and used only by the person who transfers it from a labeled container and only within the work shift in which it is transferred.
Problems arise when the shift ends and there is material left in the portable container, or if another employee needs to use the container/substance. Before the chemical can be passed along to another employee, the container must be properly labeled.
Quality control samples taken in a plant must be labeled, tagged, or marked unless the person taking the sample is also going to be performing the analysis, as the sample would then fall under the portable container exemption.
Small containers
There are no exemptions from labeling due to the size of the container. The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) says labeling can be done with pull-out labels, fold-back labels, tags or other methods.
For shipped containers, chemical manufacturers, importers, or distributors can often demonstrate that it’s not feasible to use pull-out labels, fold-back labels, or tags with the full label information. If that’s the case, they have some labeling alternatives depending on the size of the container:
| Containers less than or equal to: | Must: | And the immediate outer package must include both: |
|---|---|---|
| 100 ml capacity | Include the product identifier, pictogram(s), signal word, chemical manufacturer's contact information, and a statement that the full label information is provided on the immediate outer package. | • The full label information for each hazardous chemical in the immediate outer package, and • A statement that the small container(s) inside must be stored in the immediate outer package bearing the complete label when not in use. |
| 3 ml capacity | Provide at least the product identifier where chemical manufacturers, importers, or distributors demonstrate that any label interferes with the normal use of the container. |
Stationary process containers and bulk shipping containers
- Signs, placards, process sheets, batch tickets, operating procedures, or other written materials may be used in lieu of affixing labels to individual stationary process containers.
- In the case of bulk shipping containers, the appropriate label may be posted on the outside of the vehicle, attached to the shipping papers or the bills of lading, or transmitted by technological or electronic means (if agreed to by the receiving entity).
For purposes of the HazCom standard, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) says a stationary process container means a container that is not mobile, in which a process other than storage takes place, or a stationary container which contains a liquid (other than water) used for dipping and coating.
- Examples of stationary process containers are permanent dip tanks, and permanent mixing vessels.
- Items which are not stationary process containers are storage tanks (even if connected to a distribution system), and portable dip tanks.
Employers may use signs, placards, process sheets, batch tickets, operating procedures, or other such written materials in lieu of affixing labels to individual stationary process containers, as long as the alternative method identifies the containers to which it is applicable and conveys the information required by 1910.1200(f)(6) to be on a label (i.e., the information required to be on shipped containers, as found in 1910.1200(f)(1)(i) through (v)).
Employers shall ensure these written materials are readily accessible to employees in their work area throughout each work shift.
Bulk shipping containers
Bulk shipments are hazardous chemicals transported where the mode of transportation IS the immediate container. This includes shipments via tanker truck, rail car, or intermodal container. Labels for bulk shipments must be:
- On the immediate container,
- Transmitted with the shipping papers or the bills of lading, or
- Transmitted by technological or electronic means (if agreed to by the receiving entity).
OSHA pictograms are not required when a pictogram for the same hazard is already required by the Department of Transportation (DOT) to be on a shipped container.
DOT labels and placards
- DOT label requirements take precedence during transportation.
- Small containers packed in larger shipped containers require an HCS label but not a DOT label.
During transportation, the Department of Transportation (DOT) label requirements take precedence. If hazardous chemical containers are packaged within another container (such as small bottles packed inside a box), the outer container is required to be labeled per DOT regulations, but a HazCom standard (HCS) label is not required to appear on the outer container. The smaller containers packed inside the larger shipped container would require the HCS label, but do not require the DOT label.
If shipped containers are not packaged within another container, such as a bucket, drum, or tote, then these containers must have both the DOT required markings and the HCS label, tag, or marking. In situations where a tank truck, rail car, or similar vehicle comprise the container for the hazardous chemical, the HCS labeling information may either be posted on the outside of the vehicle, attached to the accompanying shipping papers or bills of lading, or transmitted by technological or electronic means (if agreed to by the receiving entity).
Packages, containers, rail cars, or similar vessels holding hazardous materials regulated by the DOT and shipped to a workplace are required to arrive fully marked, placarded, or labeled according to the hazardous materials regulations (HMR). The retention rule requires employers who receive hazardous materials to retain markings and any other information specified by HMR until the materials have been removed so they no longer pose a health or safety risk.
If a tanker truck or railroad tank car is stored (wheels chocked and cab/engine disconnected from the tanker/rail car) prior to offloading, it may be labeled as a stationary process container. If the tanker truck or railroad tank car becomes part of the process (e.g., hooked up to the piping system, used as a process container), it must also be labeled and may be labeled as a stationary process container. However, if the tanker truck or railroad tank car is used as a transport container in-house (e.g., internal railroad car system), the container is no longer stationary, and it may not be labeled as a stationary process container.
Additionally, if a tanker truck or railroad tank car that is labeled in accordance with the Department of Transportation (DOT) labeling requirements arrives at a facility and is offloaded into a storage tank, without storage of the tanker truck or railroad car, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) says the DOT labeling would be sufficient on the tanker truck or railroad car.
Safety data sheets (SDSs)
- Safety data sheets must be readily accessible.
- New information must be added to the safety data sheet within three months.
Summary of requirements
A hazardous chemical’s safety data sheet (SDS) is the source of detailed information on the physical, health, and environmental hazards of the chemical; protective measures; and safety precautions for handling, storing, and transporting the chemical. The SDS includes information for many different audiences — employers, workers, safety and health professionals, emergency responders, government agencies, and consumers.
The HazCom standard requires that:
- Chemical manufacturers or importers obtain or develop an SDS for each hazardous chemical produced or imported.
- Distributors provide SDSs to other distributors and employers with their initial shipment and with the first shipment after a safety data sheet is updated.
- Employers maintain the most recently received SDS for each hazardous chemical in the facility.
- SDSs be readily accessible to employees in their work areas during each work shift.
- SDS files must be updated as new data sheets are received.
- HazCom training must be considered when new data sheets are received to determine if training must be revised.
Updating SDSs
When new information about safety issues or the hazards of a chemical is learned, the chemical manufacturer, importer, or employer preparing the safety data sheet must add the new information within three months. If the chemical is not currently being produced or imported, the chemical manufacturer or importer must add the information to the safety data sheet before the chemical is introduced into the workplace again.
Employer responsibilities
- Safety data sheets are required for each hazardous chemical used in the workplace.
Employers must have a safety data sheet (SDS) for each hazardous chemical which they use. Do not allow employees to use a chemical if the SDS for that chemical has not been received. Employers assume no responsibility for the content and accuracy of the SDS provided to them by the manufacturer, importer, or distributor, unless the employer changes the SDS.
The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) requires that the SDS be written in English. However, this should not prevent an employer with employees who speak English as a second language from providing data sheets in other languages.
For workplaces such as warehouses or retail sales where employees do not normally open sealed containers of hazardous chemicals, that employer need only maintain the SDSs that are sent with incoming shipments. If an employee requests an SDS and it is not available, the employer must contact the manufacturer and request one. The primary difference is that the warehouse or hardware store does not have to maintain a complete file of data sheets. This simplifies the paperwork for operations where hundreds of different chemicals pass through but are never opened or worked with.
If you’re required to have SDSs for hazardous chemicals, you may be subject to EPA SDS reporting and Tier II reporting at 40 CFR 370. This applies to ANY facility owner/operator that is:
- Required to prepare or have available an SDS or material safety data sheet (MSDS) for a hazardous chemical under 29 CFR 1910.1200; AND
- That hazardous chemical is not exempt under 1910.1200(b)(6) or 40 CFR 370.13; AND
- That hazardous chemical is present at any one time at or above its threshold level during the previous year. Under EPA’s regulations at 40 CFR 370 this means:
- A hazardous chemical that is an extremely hazardous substance (EHS) is present at the facility at any one time in an amount equal to or greater than 500 pounds (227 kg — approximately 55 gallons) or the threshold planning quantity (TPQ), whichever is lower.
- A hazardous chemical that is not an EHS is present at the facility at any one time in an amount equal to or greater than the threshold level for that hazardous chemical. Threshold levels for such hazardous chemicals are described below:
- For any hazardous chemical that does not meet the criteria in (2) or (3) below, the threshold level is 10,000 pounds (or 4,540 kg).
- For gasoline at a retail gas station, the threshold level is 75,000 gallons (approximately 283,900 liters) (all grades combined), but only under conditions listed at 40 CFR 370.10(a)(2)(ii).
- For diesel fuel at a retail gas station, the threshold level is 100,000 gallons (approximately 378,500 liters) (all grades combined), but only under conditions listed at 40 CFR 370.10(a)(2)(iii).
Readily accessible
- Safety data sheets must be readily accessible to all workers during each shift.
- Hard copies of safety data sheets must be available in case of medical emergency.
The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) requires that safety data sheets (SDSs) be “readily accessible” to all affected workers during each work shift when they are in their work area. If any barriers to immediate access to SDSs exist, then the employer is not complying with the HazCom standard. Factors to consider include:
- Must employees ask a supervisor or other management representative for the SDS?
- Can the employees access the SDSs during each work shift and in each work area?
- Have employees been trained on how to access SDSs and where they are kept?
- Do employees know who they can go to if they have questions?
If the employer is maintaining the SDSs on a company website or with an off-site/web-based SDS service provider that provides them electronically, they must ensure that:
- All employees have adequate access, with no restrictions;
- There is a backup procedure or system in place in case the system is not functioning;
- Employees are trained on how to access the SDSs both on the computer and the backup system, and;
- Employees can receive a hard copy if desired and in cases of emergency. It is not acceptable to only transmit the information verbally.
In the event of a medical emergency, hard copy SDSs must be immediately available to medical personnel. There must be an adequate back-up system for rapid access to SDSs in the event of power outages, equipment failures, or other system failure.
Multi-employer worksites
- The employer bringing a hazardous chemical onto a multi-employer worksite must inform the other employers of the presence of the hazardous chemical.
- A label or SDS does not need to be created for a non-RCRA waste product.
The employer bringing a hazardous chemical onto a multi-employer worksite must inform the other employers of the presence of the hazardous chemical and the availability of the safety data sheet (SDS). If an intermediary employer, such as a general contractor, holds and provides access to the SDSs, the intermediate employer is responsible for ensuring the availability of the SDS(s).
If SDSs are not available because a subcontractor or immediate employer failed to make them readily accessible, that employer will be cited.
Air emissions
- Employee exposure to any air emissions that are being created in the facility must be accounted for.
Hazardous materials can also be created as a by-product of a process or procedure in a facility, such as from:
- Welding operations,
- Gasoline-powered forklift vehicles,
- Power tools with internal combustion motors, and
- Vehicle bay exhaust.
Employee exposure to any air emissions that are being created in the facility must be accounted for. An employer may need to contact the supplier of the welding rods for help in tracking down the appropriate SDS.
Also, do not overlook gasoline and carbon monoxide. An SDS is required for the fuels used by vehicles such as lift trucks, tractors, or automobiles. Employees should be aware of the potential for exposure to carbon monoxide and associated physical hazards of petroleum fuel products such as fire and explosion.
SDS format and content
- Safety data sheets must follow a standardized, 16-section format.
- Information within each section isn't required to be in any particular order.
The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) requires that safety data sheets (SDSs) use a standardized, 16-section format. The sections have generally been organized so that the information of most use to exposed workers, emergency responders, and others who do not need extensive technical detail is in the beginning of the SDS, while the more technical information most commonly read by health and safety professionals is located in the later sections. While each section of the SDS must contain all the specified information, it’s not required to be in any particular order within each section.
Sections 1 through 8 contain general information about the chemical, identification, hazards, composition, safe handling practices, and emergency control measures (e.g., firefighting). This should be helpful to those that need to get the information quickly.
Sections 9 through 11 and Section 16 contain other technical and scientific information, such as physical and chemical properties, stability and reactivity information, toxicological information, exposure control information, and other information including the date of preparation or last revision.
The SDS must contain headings for Sections 12 through 15, but OSHA will not enforce the content of these sections because they concern matters handled by other agencies such as the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Department of Transportation (DOT).
Refer to Appendix D of 29 CFR 1910.1200 to see an all-in-one list of the mandatory and nonmandatory sections and subsections of an SDS.
Sections 1 and 2
- Section 1 identifies the chemical on the SDS as well as recommended uses.
- Section 2 identifies the hazards of the chemical on the SDS and the appropriate warning information.
Section 1. Product and company identification
This section identifies the chemical on the safety data sheet (SDS) as well as the recommended uses. It also provides the essential contact information of the supplier. The required information consists of:
- Product identifier used on the label;
- Other means of identification;
- The recommended use of the chemical and restrictions on use;
- The name, U.S. address, and U.S. telephone number of the chemical manufacturer, importer, or other responsible party; and
- An emergency phone number (must be a U.S. phone number).
Section 2. Hazard(s) identification
This section identifies the hazards of the chemical presented on the safety data sheet (SDS) and the appropriate warning information associated with those hazards. The required information consists of:
- Classification of the chemical in accordance with paragraph (d) of 1910.1200.
- Signal word.
- Pictograms (the pictograms or hazard symbols may be presented as graphical reproductions of the symbols in black and white or be a description of the name of the symbol (e.g., skull and crossbones, flame)).
- Hazard statement(s).
- Precautionary statement(s).
- For a mixture that contains an ingredient(s) with unknown toxicity, a statement describing how much (percentage) of the mixture consists of ingredient(s) with unknown acute toxicity. Please note that this is a total percentage of the mixture and not tied to the individual ingredient(s).
Hazard rating systems numbers, such as those for the Hazardous Materials Identification System (HMIS) or the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA), can appear in Section 2 as long as those hazard ratings do not contradict or cast doubt on the HazCom standard classification.
Sections 3 and 4
- Section 3 identifies ingredient(s) contained in the product indicated on the SDS.
- Section 4 describes the initial care that should be given by untrained responders to an exposed individual.
Section 3. Composition/Information on ingredients
This section identifies the ingredient(s) contained in the product indicated on the safety data sheet (SDS), including impurities and stabilizing additives. This section includes information on substances, mixtures, and all chemicals where a trade secret is claimed. The required information consists of:
Substances
- Chemical name.
- Common name and synonyms.
- Chemical Abstracts Service (CAS) number and other unique identifiers.
- Impurities and stabilizing additives, which are themselves classified and which contribute to the classification of the chemical.
Mixtures
- Same information required for substances.
- The chemical name and concentration (i.e., exact percentage) of all ingredients which are classified as health hazards and are:
- Present above their cut-off/concentration limits or
- Present a health risk below the cut-off/concentration limits.
- The concentration (exact percentages) of each ingredient must be specified except concentration ranges may be used in the following situations:
- A trade secret claim is made,
- There is batch-to-batch variation, or
- The SDS is used for a group of substantially similar mixtures.
Chemicals where a trade secret is claimed
Where a trade secret is claimed, the SDS must contain a statement that the specific chemical identity and/or exact percentage (concentration) of composition has been withheld as a trade secret. Where a trade secret claim is made for an exact percentage, the chemical manufacturer or importer must provide a concentration range (as found in 1910.1200(i)(1)(iv) - (vi)) to assist downstream users in providing appropriate protections. However, Section 3 must indicate that a trade secret claim is being made and information has been withheld.
Section 4. First-aid measures
This section describes the initial care that should be given by untrained responders to an individual who has been exposed to the chemical. The required information consists of:
- Necessary first-aid instructions by relevant routes of exposure (inhalation, skin and eye contact, and ingestion).
- Description of the most important symptoms or effects, and any symptoms that are acute or delayed.
- Recommendations for immediate medical care and special treatment needed, when necessary.
Sections 5 and 6
- Section 5 provides recommendations for fighting a fire caused by the chemical.
- Section 6 provides recommendations on the appropriate response to spills, leaks, or releases.
Section 5. Firefighting measures
This section provides recommendations for fighting a fire caused by the chemical. The required information consists of:
- Recommendations of suitable extinguishing equipment, and information about extinguishing equipment that is not appropriate for a particular situation.
- Advice on specific hazards that develop from the chemical during the fire, such as any hazardous combustion products created when the chemical burns.
- Recommendations on special protective equipment or precautions for firefighters.
Section 6. Accidental release measures
This section provides recommendations on the appropriate response to spills, leaks, or releases, including containment and cleanup practices to prevent or minimize exposure to people, properties, or the environment. It may also include recommendations distinguishing between responses for large and small spills where the spill volume has a significant impact on the hazard. The required information may consist of recommendations for:
- Use of personal precautions (such as removal of ignition sources or providing sufficient ventilation) and protective equipment to prevent the contamination of skin, eyes, and clothing.
- Emergency procedures, including instructions for evacuations, consulting experts when needed, and appropriate protective clothing.
- Methods and materials used for containment (e.g., covering the drains and capping procedures).
- Cleanup procedures (e.g., appropriate techniques for neutralization, decontamination, cleaning or vacuuming; adsorbent materials; and/or equipment required for containment/clean up).
Sections 7 and 8
- Section 7 provides guidance on the safe handling practices and conditions for safe storage of chemicals.
- Section 8 indicates the exposure limits, engineering controls, and personal protective measures that can be used to minimize worker exposure.
Section 7. Handling and storage
This section provides guidance on the safe handling practices and conditions for safe storage of chemicals. The required information consists of:
- Precautions for safe handling, including recommendations for handling incompatible chemicals, minimizing the release of the chemical into the environment, and providing advice on general hygiene practices (e.g., eating, drinking, and smoking in work areas is prohibited).
- Recommendations on the conditions for safe storage, including any incompatibilities. Provide advice on specific storage requirements (e.g., ventilation requirements).
Section 8. Exposure controls/Personal protection
This section indicates the exposure limits, engineering controls, and personal protective measures that can be used to minimize worker exposure. The required information consists of:
- For all ingredients or constituents listed in Section 3 of the SDS, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) Permissible Exposure Limits (PELs), American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH) Threshold Limit Values (TLVs), and any other exposure limit used or recommended by the chemical manufacturer, importer, or employer preparing the safety data sheet (SDS), where available.
- Appropriate engineering controls (e.g., use local exhaust ventilation, or use only in an enclosed system).
- Recommendations for personal protective measures to prevent illness or injury from exposure to chemicals, such as personal protective equipment (PPE) (e.g., appropriate types of eye, face, skin or respiratory protection needed based on hazards and potential exposure).
- Any special requirements for PPE, protective clothing or respirators (e.g., type of glove material, such as polyvinyl chloride (PVC) or nitrile rubber gloves; and breakthrough time of the glove material).
Sections 9 and 10
- Section 9 identifies physical and chemical properties associated with the substance or mixture.
- Section 10 describes the reactivity hazards of the chemical and the chemical stability information.
Section 9. Physical and chemical properties
This section identifies physical and chemical properties associated with the substance or mixture. The minimum required information consists of:
- Physical state
- Color
- Odor (includes odor threshold)
- Melting point/freezing point
- Boiling point (or initial boiling point or boiling range)
- Flammability
- Lower and upper explosion limit/flammability limit
- Flash point
- Auto-ignition temperature
- Decomposition temperature
- pH
- Kinematic viscosity
- Solubility
- Partition coefficient n-octanol/water (log value)
- Vapor pressure (includes evaporation rate)
- Density and/or relative density
- Relative vapor density
- Particle characteristics
The SDS may not contain every item on the above list because information may not be relevant or is not available. When this occurs, a notation to that effect must be made for that chemical property. Manufacturers may also add other relevant properties, such as the dust deflagration index (Kst) for combustible dust, used to evaluate a dust’s explosive potential.
Section 10. Stability and reactivity
This section describes the reactivity hazards of the chemical and the chemical stability information. This section is broken into three parts: reactivity, chemical stability, and other. The required information consists of:
Reactivity
- Description of the specific test data for the chemical(s). This data can be for a class or family of the chemical if such data adequately represent the anticipated hazard of the chemical(s), where available.
Chemical stability
- Indication of whether the chemical is stable or unstable under normal ambient temperature and conditions while in storage and being handled.
- Description of any stabilizers that may be needed to maintain chemical stability.
- Indication of any safety issues that may arise should the product change in physical appearance.
Other
- Indication of the possibility of hazardous reactions, including those associated with foreseeable emergencies.
- List of all conditions that should be avoided (e.g., static discharge, shock, vibrations, or environmental conditions that may lead to hazardous conditions).
- List of all classes of incompatible materials (e.g., classes of chemicals or specific substances) with which the chemical could react to produce a hazardous situation.
- List of any known or anticipated hazardous decomposition products that could be produced because of use, storage, or heating. (Hazardous combustion products should also be included in Section 5 (Fire-Fighting Measures) of SDS.)
Sections 11 and 12
- Section 11 identifies toxicological and health effects information or indicates that such data are not available and must contain a description of the various toxicological (health) effects and the available data used to identify those effects.
- Section 12 provides information to evaluate the environmental impact of the chemical(s) if it were released.
Section 11. Toxicology information
This section identifies toxicological and health effects information or indicates that such data are not available and must contain a description of the various toxicological (health) effects and the available data used to identify those effects, including:
- Information on the likely routes of exposure (inhalation, ingestion, skin and eye contact).
- Description of the symptoms. This description includes the symptoms associated with exposure to the chemical including symptoms from the lowest to the most severe exposure.
- Description of the delayed, immediate, or chronic effects from short- and long-term exposure.
- The numerical measures of toxicity (e.g., acute toxicity estimates such as the LD50 (median lethal dose)) — the estimated amount [of a substance] expected to kill 50 percent of test animals in a single dose.
- Interactive effects; information on interactions should be included if relevant and readily available.
- Indication of whether the chemical is listed in the National Toxicology Program (NTP) Report on Carcinogens (latest edition) or has been found to be a potential carcinogen in the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) Monographs (latest edition), or by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA).
- When specific chemical data or information is not available, the preparer must indicate if alternative information is used and the method used to derive the information (e.g., where the preparer is using information from a class of chemicals rather than the exact chemical in question and using (structure activity relationship) SAR to derive the toxicological information).
Section 12. Ecological information
Section 12 provides information to evaluate the environmental impact of the chemical(s) if it were released. This section provides information to evaluate the environmental impact of the chemical(s) if it were released to the environment. The information may include:
- Data from toxicity tests performed on aquatic and/or terrestrial organisms, where available (e.g., acute or chronic aquatic toxicity data for fish, algae, crustaceans, and other plants; toxicity data on birds, bees, plants).
- Whether there is a potential for the chemical to persist and degrade in the environment either through biodegradation or other processes, such as oxidation or hydrolysis.
- Results of tests of bioaccumulation potential, making reference to the octanol-water partition coefficient (Kow) and the bioconcentration factor (BCF), where available.
- The potential for a substance to move from the soil to the groundwater (indicate results from adsorption studies or leaching studies). Other adverse effects (e.g., environmental fate, ozone layer depletion potential, photochemical ozone creation potential, endocrine disrupting potential, and/or global warming potential).
Sections 13 and 14
- Section 13 provides guidance on proper disposal practices, recycling or reclamation of the chemical(s) or its container, and safe handling practices.
- Section 14 provides guidance on classification information for shipping and transporting of hazardous chemical(s) by road, air, rail, or sea.
Section 13. Disposal considerations
This section provides guidance on proper disposal practices, recycling or reclamation of the chemical(s) or its container, and safe handling practices. To minimize exposure, this section should also refer the reader to Section 8 (Exposure Controls/Personal Protection) of the SDS. The information may include:
- Description of appropriate disposal containers to use.
- Recommendations of appropriate disposal methods to employ.
- Description of the physical and chemical properties that may affect disposal activities.
- Language discouraging sewage disposal.
- Any special precautions for landfills or incineration activities.
Section 14. Transport information
This section provides guidance on classification information for shipping and transporting of hazardous chemical(s) by road, air, rail, or sea. The information may include:
- UN number (i.e., four-figure identification number of the substance).
- UN proper shipping name.
- Transport hazard class(es).
- Packing group number, if applicable, based on the degree of hazard.
- Environmental hazards (e.g., identify if it is a marine pollutant according to the International Maritime Dangerous Goods Code (IMDG Code)).
- Guidance on transport in bulk (according to IMO instruments).
- Any special precautions which an employee should be aware of or needs to comply with, in connection with transport or conveyance either within or outside their premises (indicate when information is not available).
Sections 15 and 16
- Section 15 identifies the safety, health, and environmental regulations specific for the product not indicated anywhere else on the SDS.
- Section 16 indicates when the SDS was prepared or when the last revision was made.
Section 15. Regulatory information
This section identifies the safety, health, and environmental regulations specific for the product that is not indicated anywhere else on the SDS. The information may include:
- Any national and/or regional regulatory information of the chemical or mixtures (including any Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), Department of Transportation (DOT), Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), or Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) regulations).
Section 16. Other information
This section indicates when the SDS was prepared or when the last revision was made. The SDS may also state where the changes have been made to the previous version.
The SDS must include information reflecting the scientific information used in making the hazard classification. Other useful information also may be included here.
If new, significant information regarding the hazards of a chemical, or ways that users can protect themselves against those hazards, is discovered, that new information must be added to the SDS within three months.
Trade secrets
- Trade secrets must be indicated in Section 3.
Trade secret means any confidential formula, pattern, process, device, information, or compilation of information used in an employer’s business. The term “trade secret” includes the chemical name, the Chemical Abstracts Services (CAS) Registry Number, or any other specific information that reveals the precise designation. It does not extend to Permissible Exposure Limits (PELs) or Threshold Limit Values (TLVs). If the hazardous chemical or a component of the mixture has a PEL or TLV, this must be reflected on the safety data sheet (SDS).
If the chemical manufacturer, importer, or employer withholds the identity of a chemical or the exact composition of any constituent, the SDS must indicate in Section 3 that the constituent(s) and/or exact percentage(s) are being withheld as trade secrets.
Manufacturers, importers, and employers can withhold a chemical’s concentration range as a trade secret on the SDS. When the actual range is claimed as a trade secret, prescriptive concentration ranges must be used; these are found in 1910.1200(i)(1)(iv) - (vi).
The chemical identity or exact composition must be immediately disclosed to a treating physician or nurse when:
- A medical emergency exists, and
- The specific chemical identity and/or specific percentage of composition of a hazardous chemical is necessary for emergency or first-aid treatment.
- The specific chemical identity and percentage is made available to health professionals, employees, and designated representatives in accordance with the applicable provisions of this paragraph.
Auditing the SDS program
- A thorough SDS audit can help maintain compliance.
In order to stay in compliance, consider the following:
- Keep a master safety data sheet (SDS) file and check in each SDS, particularly noting the revision date. If a new or updated SDS is received, send copies to each department that will use it. Remove the old version.
- Assign someone to monitor all paper SDS files, binders, etc. Sheets get lost or become unreadable and need to be replaced. Have a cover sheet listing what SDSs are in the file, along with the revision number. Replace missing or unreadable data sheets immediately.
- Occasionally review and update as necessary the chemical inventory list.
- Include the name and contact information of the person responsible for the SDSs on the purchase orders and ask that SDSs be sent to that person.
- If any SDSs are missing, contact the supplier and request one. Document these requests, either by keeping a copy of a letter or email, or a note regarding telephone conversations.
- As new SDSs are received, there should be a process in place to review them and determine whether any handling procedures need to change to protect against the hazards of these chemicals.
The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) does not specify a particular retention period for SDSs. However, according to the Employee Access to Medical Records at 1910.1020, an employer must retain medical records, air sampling data, and other exposure information for 30 years.
While SDSs are considered “exposure records,” employers only need to document the chemical identity, where the chemical was used, and how long the chemical was used.
Information and training
- Include all employees who are exposed to hazardous chemicals in the training.
- Thorough training and understanding of the HazCom standard can help maintain compliance.
Employers must train all employees who are exposed to hazardous chemicals in their work area before they are initially assigned to those jobs.
“Exposure” or “exposed” means that “an employee is subjected to a hazardous chemical in the course of employment through any route of entry (inhalation, ingestion, skin contact or absorption, etc.) and includes accidental or possible exposure.”
If there are some employees who are occasionally in an area where chemicals are stored or used, and it is undecided whether they are “exposed,” include them in the training program. Those employees who encounter hazardous chemicals only in non-routine, isolated instances would not have to receive training.
Summary of requirements
Employees must be informed of:
- The requirements of the HazCom standard;
- The operations in their work area where hazardous chemicals are present; and
- The location and availability of the written hazard communication program, including the list of hazardous chemicals, and safety data sheets (SDSs).
Training must address:
- Methods and observations used to detect the presence or release of a hazardous chemical in the work area (such as monitoring conducted by the employer, continuous monitoring devices, visual appearance or odor of hazardous chemicals when being released, etc.);
- The physical and health hazards of the chemicals in the work area;
- Measures workers can take to protect themselves from these hazards, work practices and other measures the employer has implemented to protect workers from exposure to hazardous chemicals, such as emergency procedures, and personal protective equipment to be used; and
- An explanation of and the details of the workplace hazard communication program, the labeling system and the SDS, and how workers can obtain and use the appropriate information.
Conducting training
- Training needs to be provided at no cost to the employees, and employees must be paid for the time they spend in training.
- After the training, workers should understand how to read labels and SDSs, understand what information is in these documents, and understand how to access them.
- Training must be provided prior to the initial job assignment.
Information and training may be done either by individual chemical, or by categories of hazards, such as flammability or carcinogenicity. If there are only a few chemicals in the workplace, then an employer may want to discuss each one individually. Where there are large numbers of chemicals, or the chemicals change frequently, training based on the hazard categories such as flammable liquids, corrosive materials, or carcinogens may make more sense.
Training must be provided at no cost to the employees, and employees must be paid for the time they spend in training.
Focus on the specific chemical hazards in the workplace. Explain:
- How to detect the presence or release of the chemical;
- The visual appearance or odor when the chemical is being released;
- How any monitoring devices work and what they indicate;
- The physical and health effects of the chemicals;
- What first aid measures should be used in the event of exposure or overexposure, and
- Where on the safety data sheet (SDS) this information can be found.
The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) does not expect that workers will be able to recall and recite all data provided about each hazardous chemical in the workplace. What is most important is that workers understand that they are exposed to hazardous chemicals, know how to read labels and SDSs, and have a general understanding of what information is provided in these documents, and how to access these tools.
When to train
Prior to the initial job assignment, each employee who has exposure risks to hazardous chemicals must be provided information and training. Additional training must be done whenever a new physical or health hazard is introduced into their work area.
Training temporary workers/contract employees
The responsibility for training temporary or contract employees is shared between the employment agency and the host employer. The employment agency has the primary responsibility to provide generic HazCom information and training to their employees. This should include information on labels and other forms of warning, the format and content of SDSs, and other employee information and training required by the HazCom Standard.
The contracting employer is responsible for providing site-specific training and has the primary responsibility to control potential exposure conditions. This training should include identifying and communicating information about site-specific chemical hazards, ensuring appropriate labeling of chemical containers, providing access to SDSs, and providing appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE). The HazCom training provided to temporary workers should be identical or equivalent to the training given to the host employers’ own employees.
As a recommended practice, the employment agency and contracting employer should discuss responsibility for each aspect of HazCom training and inform the other employer when the training is completed. The details of the particular training to be performed can be clearly stated in the language of the contract between the employers and in the host employer’s written HazCom program.
Effective training and refresher training
- Training must accommodate employees who typically speak a language other than English and those who have limited vocabularies.
- Refresher training is not required annually.
Effective training
The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) requires that employers provide “effective” training, that is, in a manner and language that their employees can understand. For information and training to be effective, the workers in the training must comprehend the hazards in the workplace and ways to protect themselves.
If employers customarily need to communicate work instructions or other workplace information to employees in a language other than English, they will also need to provide safety and health training to employees in the same manner.
If the employee’s vocabulary is limited, the training must account for that limitation. If employees are not literate, telling them to read training materials will not satisfy the employer’s training obligation. It is not sufficient to either just read material to the workers, or simply hand them material to read.
The employees must carry the knowledge from the training into their daily jobs. For example, if asked, they should know where hazardous chemicals are present in their work area and should also know how to protect themselves. Employees must be aware that they are exposed to hazardous chemicals, know how to read and use labels and safety data sheets (SDSs), and follow the protective measures established by the employer.
Refresher training
Training must be provided to affected employees when new hazards are introduced into the workplace (not necessarily new chemicals). Refresher training is not required on a routine basis, such as annually. However, receiving a new SDS or chemical compels the employer to evaluate the information provided in the SDS and to decide whether the new product represents a new health or physical hazard to employees.
Who can train?
- If an employee has not received training or is not adequately trained, the employer who provides the day-to-day supervision of the employee will be held responsible.
- No formal certification is required to conduct HazCom training.
- Records of employee training are not required by the HazCom standard but are recommended.
The controlling employer is responsible
The employer who provides the day-to-day supervision of the employee is ultimately responsible for ensuring that workers are adequately trained.
The experience provided by a previous employer or other entity may relieve an employer of some of the burdens of training that worker. So long as training is adequate, general training may be provided by:
- The current employer
- A past employer
- An employee union
- Any other entity
If an employee has not received training or is not adequately trained, the current employer will be held responsible regardless of who trained that particular employee.
The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) does not specify who can conduct HazCom training, nor is any formal certification required to do so.
The trainer must be familiar with:
- The requirements of the standard that apply to the workplace;
- The hazardous chemicals in the workplace to which workers are potentially exposed, as well as the types of hazards they pose;
- The hazard communication program implemented in the workplace; and
- The protective measures being employed in the workplace to prevent adverse effects from occurring.
In addition to being thoroughly familiar with the material to be covered in the training, the trainer should be aware of the facilities available for the training, including the physical location, the type of equipment (e.g., a PowerPoint projector, computer), and plan the training session accordingly based on the conditions.
The employer may determine who is qualified to do training. Whoever does the chemical-specific training should be familiar with the safe handling requirements of those chemicals.
Documentation
It is an industry best practice to maintain records of HazCom training, although the standard does not require it. By keeping training records the employer can ensure that all employees have received appropriate and timely training as needed. Companies can also demonstrate to the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) that they are complying with the training requirement.
Written HazCom program
- The written HazCom program should serve as a blueprint for implementation of the program.
The written hazard communication program, simply put, is the written record of what a company has done and will do to comply with the Hazard Communication standard.
The written program does not have to be lengthy or complicated. It is intended to be a blueprint for implementation of the program and an assurance that all aspects of the requirements have been addressed. It serves to communicate to employees and to OSHA exactly what has been done to comply with the HazCom standard.
In general, the written program must describe how the requirements for labels and other forms of warning, safety data sheets (SDSs), employee information, and training are going to be met.
It must be available, upon request, to employees, their designated representatives, and any OSHA officials. If the workers’ job assignment requires travel between various geographical locations, employers may keep the written program at the primary work location.
Summary of program requirements and exempt workplaces
- The written hazard communication program must include information on labels and other forms of warning, SDSs, and training.
- In work operations where employees only handle chemicals in sealed containers which are not opened under normal conditions of use, a written hazard communication program is not required, although these operations have other responsibilities under 1910.1200(b)(4).
Summary of requirements
All employers with employees who are exposed or potentially exposed to hazardous chemicals known to be present in their workplaces, must develop, implement, and maintain at each workplace a written hazard communication program that includes labeling and other forms of warning, safety data sheets (SDSs), and training.
Employers on multi-employer worksites who do not use hazardous chemicals, but whose employees are exposed to the chemicals used by other employers on the worksite, are required to have a program and train their employees on the hazards of the chemicals in the work areas.
The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) will be looking for the following elements in a written program to ensure compliance with the HazCom standard:
- A list of the hazardous chemicals known to be present in the workplace that matches the identifier on the container label and the SDS.
- Designation of person(s) responsible for ensuring labeling of in-plant containers.
- Designation of person(s) responsible for ensuring labeling of shipped containers (if any).
- Description of any in-plant labeling system(s) (if used).
- Description of any labeling alternatives used in the facility (if any).
- Description of HazCom training provided to employees.
- Procedures to review and update label information when necessary.
- Methods used to inform employees of the hazards of non-routine tasks.
- Methods used to inform employees of the hazards of unlabeled pipes in their work areas.
- How the employer will comply on multi-employer worksites.
Exempt workplaces
In work operations where employees only handle chemicals in sealed containers which are not opened under normal conditions of use, such as in warehouses or consumer outlets, a written hazard communication program is not required. However, these operations have other obligations under the standard at 1910.1200(b)(4).
Laboratories, whether completely or partially exempt from the HazCom standard, do not need to complete a written program, even if other portions of the standard apply. See 1910.1200(b)(3).
Chemical inventory and assessing workplace hazards
- The written HazCom program must include a list/inventory of the hazardous chemicals known to be present in the workplace.
- The inventory must use the “product identifier” for each chemical that aligns with the SDS and label.
- Identify any chemicals generated in the work operations.
Chemical inventory/list
The written HazCom program must include a list of the hazardous chemicals known to be present in the workplace. The list must include all hazardous chemicals present, even if the chemicals are stored or are not in use. The list can be maintained by work area or for the workplace as a whole.
Compiling the list for the entire workplace may be most suitable for very small facilities, while for larger workplaces, it may be more convenient to compile lists of hazardous chemicals by work area and then assemble them together as the list for the workplace. As new chemicals are purchased, the list should be updated.
The inventory must use the “product identifier” for each chemical that aligns with the safety data sheet (SDS) and label. It may be kept by product name, common name, or chemical name, as long as the identity used on the list matches that used on both the SDS and the label so that these documents can be cross-referenced.
The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) does not specifically require that the list contain any other information.
Assess for workplace hazards
To prepare a comprehensive chemical list perform a department-by-department search for every chemical present. Include:
- Cleaning supplies, such as bathroom and window cleaners;
- Grounds maintenance chemicals, such as weed killers and fertilizer;
- Vendor samples being used on a trial basis;
- Fuels;
- Paints; and
- All chemicals used in daily operations.
Identify any chemicals generated in the work operations. For example, welding fumes, dusts, and exhaust fumes are all sources of chemical exposures. Some other suggestions include:
- Read labels provided by suppliers for hazard information,
- Make a list of all chemicals that are potentially hazardous,
- Note the storage and use location(s) of the products, and
- Note the hazards as found on the label.
Purchasing records may also help, and employers should establish procedures to ensure that purchasing procedures result in receiving safety data sheets (SDSs) before a material is used in the workplace. Prior to purchasing chemicals, review the hazards of the chemicals and evaluate if less hazardous chemicals can be used instead.
What to look for
While compiling this inventory, consider listing the substances separately by department. Employers will find that it makes it easier to conduct employee training to know which chemicals are used in which departments.
Program elements for SDSs and labeling
- The written program should include six elements for SDSs and should address six points for labeling
Safety data sheets
The written program should include the following elements for safety data sheets (SDSs):
- The person responsible for obtaining/maintaining the SDSs;
- Where the SDSs are kept in the facility, and how employees can obtain access to them;
- The procedure for reporting a missing SDS;
- The procedure to be followed when the SDS is not received at time of first shipment;
- A list of those chemicals without SDSs and copies of request letters sent to manufacturer or supplier;
- If SDSs are generated, the procedure for updating the SDS when new and significant health information is found.
Any written requests from employees for copies of SDSs and dated responses may be kept in this file.
Labels and labeling
The written program should address the following points for labels:
- Designation of the person responsible for ensuring labeling of in-plant containers;
- Designation of the person responsible for ensuring labeling of shipped containers;
- A complete description of any workplace labeling system used which is different from the HazCom labeling at 1910.1200(f)(1) (include samples of labels used);
- Description of written alternatives to labeling of in–plant containers, if used (for example, putting the label information on batch tickets for stationary process tanks, using posters for air emissions);
- Procedures to review and update label information when necessary, to ensure that labels that fall off or become unreadable are immediately replaced;
- A copy of posters used (if any) to inform employees about the law, or where HazCom standard information is located.
Program element for employee information and training
- The written program should provide details on six different main points regarding employee information and training.
- Describe how employees will be informed of the hazards of non-routine tasks and of chemicals contained in unlabeled pipes in their work areas.
The written program should provide details on six different main points regarding employee information and training:
- The person responsible for conducting training.
- Which employees will receive training (if training all employees, state this).
- The format of the training program that is used (audiovisual, classroom instruction, etc.). If any handouts are given to employees, include copies of them.
- Procedure to train new employees at the time of their initial assignment.
- Procedure to retrain all employees when a new hazard is introduced. For example, will safety department personnel track the training and retraining, or will area supervisors?
- How training is documented (such as a copy of a training attendance sheet signed by employees upon completion of their training, if applicable).
Hazards of non-routine tasks and unlabeled pipes
To cover all situations of employee exposure, the written program must include:
- The methods used to inform employees of the hazards of non-routine tasks (for example, the cleaning of reactor vessels). What procedures are in place to ensure that those jobs that are not part of the weekly or monthly facility functioning fall under the employee training system?
- How employees will be informed of the hazards of chemicals contained in unlabeled pipes in their work areas.
Multi-employer worksites and need for periodic program review
- Include how on-site access to safety data sheets will be provided if there is more than one employer operating on a site.
- Include how employers will be informed of precautionary measures and on-site labeling system differences.
Multi-employer worksites
Where there is more than one employer operating on a site, and employees may be exposed to the chemicals used by each employer, the employer’s written hazard communication program must address:
- How on-site access to safety data sheets (SDSs) will be provided to the other employer(s).
- How such employers will be informed of needed precautionary measures.
- How such employers will be informed of the on-site labeling system if it is different from the labels specified for shipped containers under the standard.
Employers in multi-employer worksites who do not use hazardous chemicals, but whose employees are exposed to the chemicals used by other employers, are required to have a program and train their employees on the hazards of the chemicals in the work areas.
Need for periodic review
Because the hazard communication program must remain up to date, it will be necessary to periodically evaluate and reassess it. The information in the written program must be accurate.
Review and revise the program as appropriate to address changing conditions in the workplace, such as the addition of new chemicals, updated hazards from chemicals currently used, changes in processes that affect exposures, required changes to personal protective equipment (PPE) or training, and so on.
Assigned responsibilities
- Assign someone to coordinate the implementation of hazard communication.
- Include HazCom in your emergency action plan because these plans will result in fewer and less severe employee injuries and less structural damage during emergencies.
To ensure an effective hazard communication program, and address all the necessary components, responsibility for implementation of hazard communication should be assigned to someone to coordinate. The person designated for overall program coordination should then identify staff to be responsible for particular activities, such as training.
Those people designated as responsible for the different parts of the program should also be current, and those people should be carrying out their responsibilities under the program.
Many companies have found it convenient to include on their purchase orders the name and address of the person designated in their company to receive safety data sheets (SDSs) to help maintain a complete set.
Program coordinators should routinely walk around the workplace to check that containers are labeled as required and that workers are following established work practices to protect themselves from chemical exposure. Proactive monitoring of the workplace is critical to ensuring compliance with the HazCom standard.
Include HazCom in EAP
An emergency action plan (EAP) is a written document required by certain Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) standards which directs employer and employee actions during workplace emergencies. Well-developed emergency plans and proper employee training (such that employees understand their roles and responsibilities within the plan) will result in fewer and less severe employee injuries and less structural damage to the facility during emergencies.
Portions of the HazCom plan may be included in the EAP, or portions of the EAP may be included in the HazCom training as it relates to workplace emergencies and spills.
What OSHA will look for
- OSHA will confirm that an employer has a written HazCom program, and that it addresses all the required topics.
- Designate someone to ensure all containers have labels that are readable.
- Compliance officers will look for appropriate labels, descriptions of written alternatives to labeling stationary process containers, descriptions of labels on shipped and workplace containers included in training, and procedures to review and update label information.
- OSHA will look for the following with safety data sheets: person(s) responsible for sheets, how the sheets are maintained, how workers gain access, sheet procedures to follow, a sheet for each hazardous chemical, and training of workers.
- Review and revise training as needed with workers. Set up a system for periodic retraining.
During an inspection, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) will confirm that an employer has a written HazCom program, and that it addresses all the required topics for that workplace.
The employer is expected to provide access to the written program upon request to all employees and employee representatives — failure to do so is a violation.
Assigning responsibility to one person for keeping the written program up to date can ensure that it remains compliant.
Chemical inventory
The list of hazardous chemicals in the workplace must be kept current. Revise the list as necessary when eliminating chemicals in the workplace, or when bringing in a new chemical.
Labels/Other forms of warning
Labeling is a continuing duty — all in-plant containers of hazardous chemicals, except for portable containers for immediate use, must always be labeled.
Written programs should include the person responsible for labeling, both shipped containers and workplace containers, a description of the labeling system used, and a description of any alternative labeling for workplace containers, if applicable.
Review and update labeling and the written program’s label information when necessary.
A compliance officer will check to see that container labels are legible and prominently displayed, and that the container can be cross-referenced to a safety data sheet (SDS). The compliance officer will also evaluate any in-house or workplace labeling, or any alternative labeling provisions used.
The compliance officer may also interview employees to determine if they are familiar with the labeling used in the workplace, and the hazards which the labels denote.
Since labels can come off, information can become smudged or otherwise made unreadable, designate someone to be responsible for ensuring that all containers are labeled, that labels are readable, and that newly purchased materials are checked for labels prior to use.
With these requirements in mind, a compliance officer will be looking for the following types of information to ensure that labeling is properly implemented:
- Designation of person(s) responsible for ensuring compliant labeling of shipped and in-plant containers;
- Description of written alternatives to labeling of stationary process containers (if used);
- Appropriate labels on all workplace containers, including those received from a supplier, secondary containers, and stationary process containers;
- A description and explanation of labels on both shipped and workplace containers included in the employee training program; and,
- Procedures to review and update workplace label information when necessary.
Safety data sheets (SDSs)
In order to ensure a current safety data sheet (SDS) for each chemical in the plant as required, and that worker access is provided, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) will look for:
- Designation of person(s) responsible for obtaining and maintaining the SDSs;
- How SDSs are maintained in the workplace (e.g., in notebooks in the work area(s) or electronically);
- How workers obtain access to them when they are in their work area during the work shift;
- Procedures to follow when the SDS is not received at the time of the first shipment;
- An SDS for each hazardous chemical in the workplace, and;
- Training of workers that includes review of SDS format and use.
Employers must maintain the most current version of the SDS provided by the supplier. When a new SDS is sent, check it against the chemical inventory and against the version of the SDS previously filed. If it is a newer version, replace the older version.
Check the new SDS for any updated hazard or protective information that might affect HazCom training, personal protective equipment (PPE), waste disposal, etc.
Make copies and provide to all necessary departments or make the new SDS available on a computer system.
If an SDS is missing, or the SDS received is deficient, document any efforts to contact the supplier and request a compliant data sheet. If a compliant data sheet from a supplier cannot be obtained, request assistance from the local OSHA office.
During an inspection, OSHA will interview employees to determine if they know the location of SDSs, and of what to do if an SDS is missing or if they do not understand the information. If SDSs are provided on a company website, OSHA will determine if all employees have access, and that all employees know how to use the system.
Information and training
Through proper training, employers can ensure that workers understand the hazards of the chemicals they work with, as well as what steps to take to ensure that they are protected from them.
If workers are not interested in the training as it is conducted, do not appear motivated, and/or do not exhibit an increased knowledge of hazards and the use of protective practices, it may be necessary to review and revise the training to achieve a better outcome.
Review the training whenever a new hazard is introduced, or when processes change that can affect potential exposures.
While refresher training is not required, it is an opportunity to review the hazard communication program and training.
Providing training once, then assuming that several years later employees are still knowledgeable is a risky assumption. It is wise to set up a system for periodic retraining. It does not have to be an annual, full-blown training session. Occasionally remind workers of where the safety data sheets (SDSs) are located or of what the pictograms represent during any applicable monthly or quarterly safety meetings.
Compliance dates of the revised standard
- OSHA provides compliance dates associated with its 2024 and 2026 final rules.
On May 20, 2024, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) finalized an update to the Hazard Communication standard at 29 CFR 1910.1200. The rule was later corrected on October 9, 2024, January 8, 2026, January 15, 2026, and February 13, 2026.
With the new rules, paragraph (j) of the Hazard Communication standard specifies the dates by which compliance with the updated provisions of the standard is required. OSHA adopted a tiered approach to compliance. On January 15, 2026, OSHA extended the original compliance dates found in 1910.1200(j) in order to have time to issue key guidance on the updated standard. As stated in paragraph (j):
- Manufacturers, importers, and distributors, evaluating substances shall be in compliance with all modified provisions 1910.1200 no later than May 19, 2026.
- For substances, all employers shall, as necessary, update any alternative workplace labeling used under 1910.1200(f)(6), update the hazard communication program required by 1910.1200(h)(1), and provide any additional employee training in accordance with 1910.1200(h)(3) for newly identified physical hazards, or health hazards or other hazards covered under 1910.1200 no later than November 20, 2026.
- Chemical manufacturers, importers, and distributors evaluating mixtures shall be in compliance with all modified provisions of 1910.1200 no later than November 19, 2027.
- For mixtures, all employers shall, as necessary, update any alternative workplace labeling used under 1910.1200(f)(6), update the hazard communication program required by 1910.1200(h)(1), and provide any additional employee training in accordance with 1910.1200(h)(3) for newly identified physical hazards, health hazards, or other hazards covered under 1910.1200 no later than May 19, 2028.
- Between May 20, 2024, and the dates specified above, as applicable, chemical manufacturers, importers, distributors, and employers may comply with either the latest effective 1910.1200, or 1910.1200 revised as of July 1, 2023, or both, during the transition period.
Watch the Federal Register for new developments, if any, affecting the standard text and/or the compliance dates.
Most Popular Highlights In Environmental
NewsIndustry NewsIndustry NewsToxic Substances Control Act - EPAToxic Subtances Control Act - EPATSCA ComplianceToxic Substances - EPAEnvironmental Protection Agency (EPA)EnvironmentalEnglishFocus AreaUSA
2026-04-13T05:00:00Z
EPA delays TSCA Section 8(a)(7) PFAS reporting timeline again
On April 13, 2026, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) published a final rule that further delays the submission period for the one-time report required of manufacturers on per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) by the PFAS Reporting and Recordkeeping Rule (PFAS Reporting Rule).
This final rule pushes the starting submission period to either 60 days after the effective date of a future final rule updating the PFAS Reporting Rule or January 31, 2027, whichever is earlier.
Who’s impacted?
Established under Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) Section 8(a)(7), the PFAS Reporting Rule (40 CFR Part 705) requires any business that manufactured (including imported) any PFAS or PFAS-containing article between 2011 and 2022 to report. Covered manufacturers and importers must submit information on:
- Chemical identity, uses, and volumes made and processed;
- Byproducts;
- Environmental and health effects;
- Worker exposure; and
- Disposal.
What’s the new timeline?
The opening submission period was moved from April 13, 2026, to either 60 days after the effective date of a future final PFAS Reporting Rule or January 31, 2027, whichever is earlier.
Most manufacturers have 6 months to submit the report. Small manufacturers reporting only as importers of PFAS-containing articles have 1 year.
| TSCA Section 8(a)(7) PFAS Reporting Rule submission period | ||
|---|---|---|
| Start date | End date | |
| Most manufacturers | 60 days from effective date of final PFAS Reporting Rule or January 31, 2027 (whichever is earlier) | 6 months from start date or July 31, 2027 (whichever is earlier) |
| Small manufacturers reporting solely as PFAS article importers | 60 days from effective date of final PFAS Reporting Rule or January 31, 2027 (whichever is earlier) | 1 year from start date or January 31, 2028 (whichever is earlier) |
Why the delay?
In November 2025, the agency proposed updates to the PFAS Reporting Rule. EPA has delayed the reporting period to give the agency time to issue a final rule (expected later this year).
Key to remember: EPA has delayed the starting submission deadline for the TSCA Section 8(a)(7) PFAS Reporting Rule from April 2026 to no later than January 2027.
NewsAir QualityIndustry NewsIndustry NewsAir ProgramsEnvironmental Protection Agency (EPA)Hazardous Air PollutantsCAA ComplianceEnvironmentalFocus AreaEnglishAir ProgramsStationary Emission SourcesUSA
2026-04-02T05:00:00Z
EPA releases final NESHAP for chemical manufacturing area sources
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) published a final rule on April 1, 2026, amending the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for Chemical Manufacturing Area Sources (CMAS). The NESHAP controls hazardous air pollutant (HAP) emissions from facilities that manufacture a range of chemicals and products, such as inorganic chemicals, plastics, and synthetic rubber.
Who’s impacted?
The final rule applies to nine area source categories in the chemical manufacturing sector that are regulated by the CMAS NESHAP (40 CFR 63 Subpart VVVVVV).
What are the changes?
EPA’s final rule:
- Establishes leak detection and repair requirements for equipment leaks and heat exchange systems in organic HAP service,
- Adds detectable emissions monitoring standards for pressure vessels in organic HAP service and emission management practice standards for pressure relief devices (PRDs) in organic HAP service,
- Prohibits closed vent systems in organic HAP service from bypassing an air pollution control device (APCD), and
- Requires recurring performance testing of non-flare APCDs to demonstrate compliance with process vent and storage tank provisions.
The final rule also mandates electronic reporting for notifications of compliance status (NOCs), performance test reports, and periodic reports. Facilities must submit these reports through the Compliance and Emissions Data Reporting Interface (CEDRI) on EPA’s Central Data Exchange.
What didn’t change?
Significantly, the final rule doesn’t add previously proposed regulations for area sources that use ethylene oxide (EtO) to produce materials described by code 325 of the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS).
EPA states that it intends to address the regulation of EtO from area sources and major sources in one final action.
What are the compliance timelines?
Existing facilities must comply with the amendments by April 1, 2029.
New facilities (those that begin construction or reconstruction after January 22, 2025) have to comply with the changes by April 1, 2026, or upon startup, whichever is later.
Additionally, facilities must start electronically submitting:
- Performance tests by June 1, 2026;
- NOCs by August 31, 2026; and
- Periodic reports by April 1, 2029.
Key to remember: EPA’s final HAP emissions rule for chemical manufacturing area sources adds new requirements for certain processing equipment and systems.
NewsGreenhouse GasesIndustry NewsIndustry NewsAir ProgramsEnvironmental Protection Agency (EPA)CAA ComplianceEnvironmentalFocus AreaEnglishVolatile Organic CompoundsAir ProgramsStationary Emission SourcesUSA
2026-04-10T05:00:00Z
EPA amends specific oil and gas emission standards
On April 9, 2026, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) published a final rule that makes technical changes to the emission standards established in March 2024 (2024 Final Rule) for crude oil and natural gas facilities. This rule (2026 Final Rule) amends the requirements for:
- Temporary flaring of associated gas, and
- Vent gas net heating value (NHV) monitoring provisions for flares and enclosed combustion devices (ECDs).
Who’s impacted?
The 2026 Final Rule affects new and existing oil and gas facilities. Specifically, it applies to the regulations for the Crude Oil and Natural Gas source category, including the:
- New Source Performance Standards at 40 CFR 60 Subpart OOOOb, and
- Emission guidelines at 60 Subpart OOOOc.
These emission standards are commonly referred to as OOOOb/c.
What are the changes?
The 2026 Final Rule implements technical changes to the temporary flaring and vent gas NHV monitoring requirements set by the 2024 Final Rule.
Temporary flaring
The rule extends the baseline time limit for temporary flaring of associated gas at well sites in certain situations (like conducting repairs or maintenance) from 24 to 72 hours. Owners and operators must stop temporary flaring as soon as the situation is resolved or the temporary flaring limit is reached (whichever happens first).
It also grants allowances beyond the 72-hour limit if exigent circumstances occur (such as severe weather that prevents safe access to a well site to address an emergency or maintenance issue) and there’s a need to extend duration for repairs, maintenance, or safety issues. Owners and operators must keep records of exigent circumstances and include the information in their annual reports.
NHV monitoring
For new and existing sources, the 2026 Final Rule exempts all flare types (unassisted and assisted) and ECDs from monitoring due to high NHV content, except when inert gases are added to the process streams or for other scenarios that decrease the NHV content of the inlet stream gas. In these cases, EPA requires NHV monitoring via continuous monitoring or the alternative performance test (sampling demonstration) option for all flares and ECDs.
Other significant changes include:
- Replacing the general exemption from NHV monitoring for associated gas for any control device used at well site affected facilities with NHV monitoring requirements,
- Granting operational pauses during weekends and holidays for the consecutive 14-day sampling demonstration requirements (limiting it to no more than 3 operating days from the previous sampling day), and
- Permitting less than 1-hour sampling times for twice daily samples where low or intermittent flow makes it infeasible (as long as owners and operators report the sampling time used and the reason for the reduced time).
The 2026 Final Rule takes effect on June 8, 2026.
Key to remember: EPA’s technical changes to the emission standards for oil and gas facilities apply to temporary flaring provisions and vent gas NHV monitoring requirements.
NewsHazardous WasteIndustry NewsEnglishWaste ManifestsSafety & HealthGeneral Industry SafetyWasteEnvironmentalIn-Depth ArticleEnvironmental Management SystemsFocus AreaUSA
2026-04-14T05:00:00Z
What to know about the EPA’s proposed manifest sunset rule
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is taking another major step toward modernizing hazardous waste tracking. The Agency’s proposed “manifest sunset rule” would officially phase out paper hazardous waste manifests and require the exclusive use of the e-Manifest system. For employers, especially those generating or managing hazardous waste, it’s a fundamental shift in how waste shipments are documented, tracked, and audited.
Since 2018, EPA’s e-Manifest system has been available as a digital alternative to paper manifests. Over the years, the agency has added requirements pushing the industry toward adoption, including mandatory registration and electronic data submission. But despite those efforts, many companies have continued to rely on paper manifests, either out of habit, convenience, or because parts of their waste chain weren’t ready to go digital. EPA even states in the proposed rule that less than one percent of all e-manifest users have completely switched to digital manifest. The proposed sunset rule is designed to close that gap. Once finalized, it would set a firm deadline (24 months) after which paper manifests would no longer be allowed.
Why EPA wants to eliminate paper manifests
EPA’s reasoning is pretty straightforward. Paper manifests are slower, easier to lose, and more prone to errors. They rely on manual handling and delayed processing, which can create gaps in tracking and compliance. A fully electronic system, on the other hand, allows for real-time visibility, standardized data entry, and faster correction of mistakes. It also gives regulators a clearer, more immediate picture of what’s happening across the entire waste life cycle.
Addressing one of the biggest digital barriers: signatures
One overlooked part of the proposed rule is how EPA is trying to solve one of the biggest barriers to going fully digital, which is signatures in the field. Anyone who has dealt with manifests knows that the weak point is often the hand-off between the generator and the transporter, especially when drivers don’t have system access or reliable connectivity. To address that, EPA is proposing new functionality that would allow users to sign manifests using quick response (QR) codes or even short message service (SMS). In practice, this could mean a driver scans a QR code or receives a text prompt, then completes the signature process directly from their phone. So, no login or full system access needed. EPA is also exploring the ability to use SMS and QR-based tools to make updates to manifest data without needing full system permissions. That’s a big deal operationally, because it removes one of the most common bottlenecks in needing a registered user at a specific site to make even minor corrections.
Operational challenges companies should expect
With that said, moving to a fully digital system still comes with potential issues. It requires coordination across your entire operation. Generators, transporters, and disposal facilities all have to be aligned and capable of using the system effectively. If one party in that chain struggles, it can create delays or compliance issues for everyone involved. There’s also an upfront investment to consider. Companies may need to upgrade internal systems, ensure reliable connectivity, and train employees in new work processes. For organizations with multiple sites or field operations, which can take some planning. But over time, many of those burdens are expected to decrease. Electronic signatures, reusable templates, and centralized record-keeping can significantly reduce administrative work.
One of the biggest shifts employers will notice is the level of visibility. With paper manifests, there’s often a lag between shipment and final documentation. In a digital system, that lag disappears. Information becomes available almost immediately, and regulators have access to the same data. That means errors or discrepancies are easier to find and harder to ignore.
The good news is that companies don’t have to wait for the final rule to start preparing. Taking a close look at your current manifest process is a good first step. If paper is still a major part of your workflow, that’s a clear signal that changes are coming. Making sure your e-Manifest account is fully set up and that employees understand how to use it, will go a long way in avoiding future disruptions.
Keys to remember: The EPA’s proposed Paper Manifest Sunset Rule would set a firm date to phase out paper hazardous waste manifests and require that all covered shipments be tracked through the agency’s electronic e‑Manifest system, in which the Agency says will improve hazardous‑waste tracking and transparency while reducing administrative burden and saving regulated entities roughly $28.5 million per year.
NewsIndustry NewsTSCA ComplianceCAA ComplianceSustainabilityIn-Depth ArticleCWA ComplianceEnvironmentalEnglishSustainabilityESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance)Focus AreaUSA
2025-12-05T06:00:00Z
EPA’s 2026 regulatory shift: How environmental managers can stay ahead
The clock is ticking for environmental teams. By 2026, several new EPA regulations will reshape compliance obligations for U.S. companies. Organizations that act now will avoid costly penalties and operational disruptions.
What’s changing and why it matters
Although EPA has been deregulating or loosening some requirements, there are still some standards being tightened across multiple fronts in the coming year:
- Renewable fuel standards (RFS): The EPA proposed higher volume requirements for 2026, including 24.02 billion renewable identification numbers (RINs), up nearly 8% from 2025. This increase pushes stricter expectations on fuel producers and organizations purchasing renewable fuels.
- Stormwater multi-sector general permit (MSGP): A new MSGP set to take effect by February 2026 will require quarterly PFAS indicator monitoring, expanded benchmark sampling, and resiliency measures in stormwater control designs.
- PFAS Reporting under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA): TSCA Section 8(a)(7) mandates PFAS manufacturing and import data collection beginning in April 2026, through October 2026, with extended deadlines for certain small manufacturers.
Failure to prepare could lead to fines, reputational damage, supply chain disruptions, and permit delays. Companies that weave compliance planning into their 2026 strategy will be positioned not just to meet legal deadlines but to sustain operations smoothly.
Key areas of impact
- Renewable fuel standards (RFS) and air emissions The proposed increase in 2026 Renewable Identification Numbers (RIN) volumes, from 24.02 billion to 24.46 billion for 2027, signals tightening air and fuels policy that affects fuel use and emissions accounting.
- Stormwater management The upcoming 2026 MSGP requires expanded quarterly PFAS monitoring, new benchmark triggers, corrective action plans, and integration of climate resilience in design standards.
- PFAS disclosure (TSCA Section 8(a)(7)) Manufacturers and importers of PFAS must submit electronic reporting of usage, volumes, disposal, and exposure data between April and October 2026, with extensions available for smaller operations.
Steps to take now
- Audit compliance programs: Cross-check operations against RIN inventory, stormwater permits, and TSCA reporting duties.
- Upgrade monitoring and recordkeeping: Implement robust electronic systems to track PFAS, stormwater quality, fuel volumes, and emissions.
- Staff training: Educate teams on PFAS obligations, new stormwater protocols, and RFS structures.
- Engage regulators early: Comment on proposed rules, consult during permit drafting, and flag issues during the notice-and-comment period.
Looking ahead
The EPA’s 2026 updates reflect a trend toward increased transparency and environmental accountability. Companies that treat compliance as strategic will not only avoid enforcement but also gain resilience and stakeholder trust.
Key to remember: Start planning now. Early action on EPA rule changes will save time, money, and headaches when enforcement begins.
NewsWaste ManifestsEnforcement and Audits - OSHAWaste/HazWasteWater ProgramsMonthly Roundup VideoCAA ComplianceUSACWA ComplianceStormwaterEnglishAir ProgramsIndustry NewsEnforcement and Audits - OSHAMunicipal WastewaterSafety & HealthGeneral Industry SafetyWasteEnvironmentalFocus AreaAir ProgramsVideo
EHS Monthly Round Up - March 2026
In this March 2026 roundup video, we'll review the most impactful environmental health and safety news.
Hi everyone! Welcome to the monthly news roundup video, where we’ll review the most impactful environmental health and safety news. Let’s take a look at what happened over the past month.
OSHA released an updated Job Safety and Health poster. Employers can use either the revised version or the older one, but the poster must be displayed in a conspicuous place where workers can easily see it.
OSHA recently removed a link from its Data topic webpage that displayed a list of “high-penalty cases” at or over $40,000 since 2015. The agency says it discontinued and removed it in December. The data is frozen and archived elsewhere.
OSHA published two new resources as part of its newly launched Safety Champions Program. The fact sheet provides an overview of how the program works, eligibility criteria, and key benefits. The step-by-step guide helps businesses navigate the core elements of OSHA’s Recommended Practices for Safety and Health Programs.
Several forces are nudging OSHA to address a number of workplace hazards and high-hazard industries. This comes from other agencies, safety organizations, watchdogs, legislative proposals, and persistent injury/fatality data. Among the hazards are combustible dust; first aid; personal protective equipment; and workplace violence. How all this translates into new regulations, guidance, programmed inspections, or other initiatives remains to be seen.
Turning to environmental news, EPA issued a proposed rule to require waste handlers to use electronic manifests to track all RCRA hazardous waste shipments. Stakeholders have until May 4 to comment on the proposal.
On March 10, EPA finalized stronger emission limits for new and existing large municipal waste combustors and made other changes to related standards.
And finally, EPA temporarily extended coverage under the 2021 Multi-Sector General Permit for industrial stormwater discharges until the agency issues a new general permit. The permit expired February 28 and remains in effect for facilities previously covered. EPA won’t take enforcement action against new facilities for unpermitted stormwater discharges if the facilities meet specific conditions.
Thanks for tuning in to the monthly news roundup. We’ll see you next month!
Most Popular Highlights In Transportation
NewsIndustry NewsCompliance reviews - Motor CarrierFleet SafetyEnglishFines and penalties - Motor CarrierFocus AreaIn-Depth ArticleEnforcement - DOTTransportationUSA
2026-03-31T05:00:00Z
Coming soon: New FMCSA enforcement playbook
The DOT is soon expected to issue a new rule that will affect how the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) writes new guidance and runs enforcement cases. Though it may sound like inside-baseball, for motor carriers it could change the outcome of audits, investigations, and even settlement talks.
According to the DOT, the new “rule on rules” is aimed at making the enforcement process more fair, well-documented, and based on clear legal authority, not a game of “gotcha.” The rule was proposed a year ago and recently got the White House’s stamp of approval, clearing the way for final publication.
No fishing
As proposed, the rule directs the FMCSA and other DOT agencies to avoid “fishing expeditions” without enough evidence in hand to support an enforcement claim. It also spells out what an enforcement notice should include — what rule you allegedly violated, the key facts, and what rights you have to challenge it and “avoid unfair surprise.”
Transparency is another key component. The rule will require agencies to share potentially exculpatory evidence — basically, information in the government’s hands that could help you defend yourself or reduce the penalty. The proposed version of the rule states that “making affirmative disclosures of exculpatory evidence in all enforcement actions will contribute to the [DOT’s] goal of open and fair investigations and administrative enforcement proceedings.”
The rule is also expected to reinforce the fact that guidance documents — including interpretations issued by the FMCSA and often published along with FMCSA regulations — are not legally binding. In addition, agencies will need to take additional steps in the guidance development process, such as doing cost-benefit analyses and legal review, and getting public input.
Many of the changes in the proposed rule were in place prior to 2021 but were rescinded by the previous administration.
A new era for enforcement
One of the most intriguing changes in the rule will allow motor carriers to petition the DOT to argue that their staff violated procedural requirements. If the carrier wins, the proposed remedies go beyond a scolding for the investigators. They could include:
- Removing the enforcement team,
- Excluding certain issues or evidence,
- Ordering certain factual findings, or
- Restarting the enforcement action from the beginning or from an earlier point in the proceedings.
FMCSA enforcement cases dropped dramatically last year even without the new rule; the future may hold even fewer once the proposed changes go into effect.
Key to remember: A new “rule on rules” from the DOT is expected soon, and it could change the FMCSA’s enforcement playbook.
NewsIndustry NewsFleet SafetySafety and Health Programs and TrainingSafety & HealthConstruction SafetyGeneral Industry SafetyTransportationSafety and Health Programs and TrainingIn-Depth ArticleEnglishFocus AreaUSA
2026-03-27T05:00:00Z
April is distracted driver awareness month: A reminder of the preventable risks
Distracted driving awareness month is an important opportunity for organizations to address one of the most overlooked workplace hazards. For employees who drive as part of their job, whether it is operating fleet vehicles, traveling between job sites, or running errands, distractions behind the wheel can lead to serious injuries, costly liability, and even fatalities. Unlike many other workplace hazards, distracted driving often occurs offsite, making it harder to monitor but no less critical to control.
Distracted driving is any activity that takes a driver’s attention away from the road. It typically falls into three categories: visual (eyes off the road), manual (hands off the wheel), and cognitive (mind off driving). In a workplace context, distractions often go beyond personal habits like texting or eating. Employees may feel pressure to respond to work calls, check GPS updates, review schedules, or communicate with supervisors while driving. This expectation, whether real or perceived, can significantly increase the risk of an accident. The actual consequences of distracted driving on the job can be severe. Motor vehicle incidents remain one of the leading causes of workplace fatalities. A momentary lapse of attention at highway speeds means traveling the length of a football field without looking at the road. When employees are involved in crashes, the impact extends beyond personal injury. Employers may face workers’ compensation claims, vehicle damage costs, regulatory scrutiny, and potential legal liability. Additionally, incidents can damage a company’s reputation and disrupt operations.
One of the biggest challenges any organization faces is changing the culture around communication and productivity. Employees may believe they are expected to stay constantly connected, even while driving. Without clear policies, they may take risks trying to meet deadlines or respond quickly to messages. This is where leadership plays a critical role. Establishing and enforcing a clear distracted driving policy is essential. Policies should explicitly prohibit texting, handheld phone use, and other high-risk behaviors while driving on company business. However, policies alone are not enough. Training and communication are key to making expectations clear and practical. Driver safety programs should include real-world examples, statistics, and interactive discussions that emphasize the risks. Employees should understand that no message, call, or task is urgent enough to justify unsafe driving. Encouraging simple habits such as pulling over safely before using a phone, setting up their GPS before starting a trip, and minimizing in-vehicle distractions can make a meaningful difference.
Technology can also support safer driving behaviors. Many organizations are implementing hands-free systems, telematics, and mobile device management tools that limit phone functionality while vehicles are in motion. While these tools are not a substitute for good judgment, they can reinforce safe habits and provide valuable data to identify risk trends. Reviewing telematics data can also help organizations spot patterns such as harsh braking, erratic driving, or frequent phone use, allowing for targeted coaching and intervention.
Supervisors and managers must lead by example. If leadership sends emails or expects immediate responses from employees who are driving, it undermines safety efforts. Setting realistic expectations such as delayed response times for employees on the road helps remove the pressure to multitask while driving. A strong safety culture makes it clear that safe driving is a priority, not a barrier to productivity.
April distracted driving awareness month gives companies the perfect opportunity to take proactive steps to reinforce their commitment to safe driving. This can include safety stand-downs, toolbox talks, policy refreshers, and awareness campaigns focused on distracted driving. Sharing real incident stories, near-misses, and lessons learned can make the risk more tangible for employees. Ultimately, preventing distracted driving in the workplace comes down to awareness, accountability, and culture. Every trip, no matter how routine, carries risk. By prioritizing attention behind the wheel and supporting employees with clear expectations and resources, organizations can protect their workforce, reduce incidents, and ensure that everyone makes it home safely at the end of the day.
Keys to remember: Staying focused behind the wheel protects not only you, but your coworkers and everyone else on the road.
NewsIndustry NewsPhysical exam - Motor CarrierFleet SafetyFocus AreaIn-Depth ArticleUSAEnglishTransportationPhysical exam - Motor Carrier
2026-04-10T05:00:00Z
CDL medical certification 6-month exemption - The essential information
Effective April 11, 2026, through October 11, 2026, the FMCSA exemption allows a paper copy of the medical examiner’s certificate (MEC) to be carried by commercial driver's license/commercial learner's permit (CDL/CLP) drivers and carriers to use the medical card in the driver qualification (DQ) file for up to 60 days after issue, but must be replaced by an updated motor vehicle record (MVR) in that timeframe. The previous waiver, effective from January 11, 2026, through April 10, 2026, allowed the paper copy to be carried by drivers for 60 days as well.
Details of the paper med card exemption
This exemption applies to both CDL and CLP holders. Non-CDL drivers aren't affected by this since they're already required to be issued and to carry a paper medical card, which must be in the non-CDL driver's DQ file after each exam.
As a reminder, the two key impacts of this exemption include:
- CDL drivers can use paper medical cards as proof of medical certification for up to 60 days after the certificate has been issued (following the DOT exam) while operating a commercial motor vehicle (CMV).
- Carriers can use the medical card in the DQ file to be replaced by the CDL motor vehicle record (MVR) with the latest medical certification within 60 days.
The exemption's terms and conditions The exemption does not apply to:
- A driver who doesn’t have a copy of their current, valid MEC that was issued by a certified examiner 60 days prior; or
- A motor carrier that doesn’t have a copy of its driver’s current, valid MEC that was issued 60 days prior.
Additionally, the FMCSA reserves the right to revoke the exemption if safety conditions are negatively impacted in terms of the goals and objectives of the original order.
Other important information
The FMCSA continues to give carriers and drivers support while medical examiners and states transition to the secure electronic transmission to medical certification data update. The FMCSA decided drivers should not be punished for delays that may occur while medical examiners and State Driver’s Licensing Agencies (SDLAs) transition to the new system.
The agency strongly recommends, but does not require, that certified medical examiners (CMEs) continue to issue paper MECs (Form MCSA-5876) along with the required submission of examination results electronically, until further notice.
The FMCSA does not expect to grant additional, nationwide waivers or exemptions after the six-month duration of this exemption.
CDL drivers licensed in the following states must still submit their medical cards to their state of licensing until the state transitions to direct updates from the National Registry:
- Alaska
- California
- Kentucky
- Louisiana
- New Hampshire
This exemption does not affect non-CDL drivers who continue to receive medical cards that must be carried in their commercial motor vehicle and must be in the DQ file.
Key to remember: The use of the exemption does not relieve carriers of the requirement to replace the medical card in a CDL/CLP driver’s DQ file with an updated MVR within 60 days of the day of the medical exam.
NewsIndustry NewsHazmat SafetyHazmat TrainingHazmat trainingIn-Depth ArticleFocus AreaEnglishTransportationUSA
2026-04-13T05:00:00Z
Training is happening, so why are mistakes still occurring?
Late last year, we conducted a hazmat survey to better understand the state of safety when transporting hazmat. What we found was encouraging on the surface, but more revealing once we looked closer at how training actually shows up in daily operations. While most organizations are clearly investing time and resources into training, mistakes are still happening.
Most companies are training regularly, and nearly everyone surveyed uses a mix of classroom, online, and hands-on formats. Despite that, compliance issues still show up in everyday work, including paperwork errors, labeling mistakes, rejected shipments, and near misses that shouldn’t happen. These issues don’t suggest training is missing, but they do suggest something is being lost between the training room and the work environment.
Only about one-third of respondents say hazmat safety is truly “second nature” for employees. Most say training is applied well overall, but with occasional lapses that still create risk. Those lapses are exactly where mistakes tend to occur, even in organizations that take safety seriously.
Where training and reality don't line up
Training usually happens in a controlled setting, with time to explain rules and walk through scenarios. The actual job environment looks very different. Employees are often working under time pressure, switching between transport modes, dealing with changing regulations, and relying on systems that don’t always align as well as they should.
That gap shows up clearly in the survey results. Respondents consistently pointed to documentation errors, marking and labeling issues, and packaging problems as the most common compliance failures. These aren’t careless mistakes; they’re usually judgment calls made in complex situations where employees believe they’re following the rules.
Human error is still the biggest risk
The survey comments made one thing clear: human error remains one of the biggest risks in hazmat operations. Respondents frequently mentioned distraction, fatigue, high turnover, and employees who don’t handle hazmat often enough to build confidence. Others pointed to drivers or third-party carriers arriving without proper paperwork, or undeclared hazmat showing up in inbound shipments.
Even organizations that consider themselves well prepared acknowledged that complacency can creep in over time. When someone has completed the same task dozens or hundreds of times, it’s easy to assume nothing will go wrong on the next one. That assumption is often where small but serious mistakes begin.
This doesn’t mean employees don’t care about safety. It means expecting perfect recall for detailed, high-risk tasks isn’t realistic without consistent reinforcement and support.
Making training stick without adding burden
The good news is that improving execution doesn’t automatically require more training hours or larger budgets. Many of the strongest survey responses pointed to simple, practical reinforcement methods that keep training top of mind, such as daily checklists, short safety conversations, and reminders about common errors.
Technology is helping bridge this gap as well. Shipping software, digital documentation, and compliance tools are increasingly used to catch errors before shipments move. When systems support decisions at the moment they’re made, they reduce reliance on memory and lower the likelihood of mistakes.
Training is the start, not the finish
The survey makes one thing clear: companies care deeply about hazmat safety. Safety emerged as the top concern across nearly every question, outweighing cost pressures, paperwork, and efficiency challenges.
But safety isn’t built on training alone. It’s built on reinforcement and practical support that aligns with the real conditions employees face every day. When that support is in place, hazmat safety becomes less about remembering what was taught and more about consistently doing the right thing.
Key to remember: Training is clearly happening, but the survey shows that mistakes persist when training isn’t reinforced in day-to-day work. Real improvement comes from bridging the gap between knowing the rules and consistently applying them under real-world conditions.
NewsIndustry NewsEnglishFleet SafetyOut-of-service criteria - Motor CarrierFines and penalties - Motor CarrierFocus AreaIn-Depth ArticleEnforcement - DOTRoadside InspectionsTransportationUSA
2026-04-03T05:00:00Z
From warning to OOS: Your ticket to Roadcheck results
With the Roadcheck inspection event approaching, now’s the time to check your knowledge about the various types of “tickets” commercial truck and bus drivers may receive out on the road.
Some carry more consequences than others, including how they impact your company’s Compliance, Safety, Accountability (CSA) scores and drivers’ records.
The following should help clarify the difference between warnings, convictions, citations, and other enforcement actions and their effects under CSA.
Violation: A violation is an infringement of a law or rule. If an officer catches it, then it could lead to one of the following items.
Warning: A warning is notice that you are in violation of a law or regulation. A warning can be verbal or written. If the violation is documented on a roadside inspection report (i.e., a Driver/Vehicle Examination Report), it will affect your company’s CSA results and may appear on the driver’s record, even if it was “just a warning.” A verbal warning will generally not be recorded.
Citation: A citation (often called a “ticket” or “summons”) is a formal notice of an alleged violation, typically carrying a fine and/or a requirement to respond to (or appear in) court. A driver who receives a citation generally has the option to settle the matter out of court by paying a fine (which may result in a conviction). A citation may be issued with or without a roadside inspection report. Either way, it will appear on the driver’s record, but only those violations appearing on roadside inspection reports will affect your CSA scores. If a local officer who is not qualified to inspect commercial vehicles issues a citation, it should not appear on a roadside inspection report and will therefore not affect your CSA scores.
Conviction: A conviction is a court outcome (or equivalent) finding someone responsible for a violation. Paying a fine, pleading “no contest,” or forfeiting bail are often treated as convictions under state law. Convictions can appear on driving records and can trigger state “license points” and other consequences, including disqualification and loss of driving privileges. Convictions themselves do not affect CSA scores, but the citations that lead to them do.
If a citation associated with roadside inspection violations is dismissed (with no fine) or reduced to a lesser charge, or the driver is found not guilty, the driver or company can use the online DataQs system to request that their safety record — in both CSA and the Pre-employment Screening Program — reflect the results.
Violations noted: These are violations documented on a roadside inspection report that do affect CSA scores but do not rise to the level of a written warning or citation and do not appear on the driver’s record (unless a citation was also issued). The violations must be corrected and the form returned to the state or it could lead to a violation of 49 CFR 396.9, Inspection of motor vehicles and intermodal equipment in operation.
“Fix-it ticket”: This is a common term for a state-issued document requiring a driver/carrier to repair a defect and provide proof of correction by a certain deadline. How it is issued varies by jurisdiction, but it does not affect CSA scores unless documented on a roadside inspection report. If the defect is not corrected, it could lead to a citation and appear on the driver’s record.
OOS order: An out-of-service order places the driver or vehicle out of service until a violation is corrected. This may or may not be accompanied by a citation. The criteria used by enforcement officials to determine if a driver or vehicle should be placed out of service are published by the Commercial Vehicle Safety Alliance. Out-of-service violations carry more “weight” than other roadside violations in the CSA scoring system.
Points: The “points” system is a state-administered program that is not tied to CSA. A state licensing agency may assign “points” to your driver’s license if you are convicted for moving violations, and if you collect enough points within a prescribed amount of time your driving privileges may be suspended or revoked. However, getting points on your license has no effect on your CSA scores. The “severities” assigned to violations in the CSA scoring system are sometimes referred to as “points,” but they are not the same as license points.
What to do after an inspection or ticket
After an inspection, keep a copy of the roadside inspection report and any citation. Make sure repairs are completed promptly and that any required certification/proof of correction is submitted within 15 days per the instructions on the report.
If you believe inspection data is incorrect (wrong vehicle/carrier, violation doesn’t apply, etc.), be sure to submit a “Request for Data Review” using the DataQs system.
Key to remember: Roadcheck and other enforcement activities can result in a variety of tickets, citations, and other consequences, with varying impact on CSA scores. Be sure you know the differences between them.
NewsIndustry NewsFleet Safety150 air-mile radius exceptionHours of ServiceFocus AreaIn-Depth ArticleEnglishTransportationUSA
2022-08-29T05:00:00Z
The 150 air-mile short-haul exemptions: Widely used and widely misused
The 150 air-mile exemptions, which are in the regulations at 395.1(e)(1) and (2), allow a driver to use a time record in place of a log, provided that certain conditions are met. While this is possibly the most widely used hours-of-service exemption, it may be the most commonly misused exemption, as well.
The basics of logging exemptions
To be able to use this logging exemption in 395.1(e)(1), the driver must:
- Stay within 150 air-miles of the work reporting location for the day (draw a 150 air-mile radius circle around the work reporting location for the day — the driver must stay within this circle),
- Be back to — and released from — the work reporting location for his/her 8- or 10-hour break within 14 hours, and
- Include the starting and ending times for the day and the total hours on duty on the time record for the day.
The company must retain the time record and have it available for inspection for six months.
| Need more info? View our ezExplanation on the 150 air-mile exception. |
What if the driver goes too far or works too many hours?
If the driver cannot meet the terms of the exemption (he or she goes too far or works too many hours), the driver must complete a regular driver’s log for the day as soon as the exemption no longer applies.
If the driver has had to complete a log 8 or fewer days out of the last 30 days, the driver can use a paper log for the day. If the driver had to complete a log more than 8 days out of the last 30 days, the driver needs to use an electronic log for the day (unless one of the ELD exemptions applies, such as operating a vehicle older than model year 2000).
30-minute break exemption
When a property-carrying driver is operating under the 150 air-mile exemption, the driver is also exempt from having to take the required 30-minute break (see 395.3(a)(3)(ii)).
If the driver began the day as a 150 air-mile driver and has driven more than 8 consecutive hours without a break, and something unexpected happens and the driver can no longer use the 150 air-mile exemption, the driver must stop and immediately take the 30-minute break as well as start logging. If the driver went outside of the 150 air-mile area before the driver had 8 hours of driving without a break from driving, the driver would be expected to take the break at the appropriate time.
Common myths
Here are some of the common myths and misunderstandings about the 150 air-mile exemption:
- The driver must have the time records in the vehicle. Myth. The driver simply needs to explain to an officer during a roadside inspection that he/she does not have logs due to operating under the 150 air-mile exemption and that the required time records are back at the carrier’s office (just telling the officer, “I don’t have any logs” will lead to a violation, so the driver needs to know to provide the full explanation).
- The driver must log the previous seven days if he/she had been using this exemption and suddenly can’t. Myth. If the driver cannot use the exemption on one particular day, that is the only day the driver must use a regular log (either paper or electronic).
- Passenger-carrying drivers and drivers hauling hazardous materials cannot use this exemption. Myth. There are no restrictions on the use of this exemption, so any commercial driver can use it.
- A driver that crosses state lines cannot use this exemption. Myth. As this exemption appears in the Federal Motor Carrier Administration (FMCSA) regulations, it can be used by interstate drivers.
- Only drivers that operate out of a “company terminal” can use the 150 air-mile exemption. Myth. As long as the driver makes it back to the work reporting location for the day within the appropriate number of hours, the driver can use the exemption.
- Drivers that move from one jobsite to another every few weeks cannot use this exemption. Myth. If a driver that normally uses this exemption switches work reporting locations, the day the driver switches work reporting locations is the only day the driver cannot use the exemption.
- Drivers covered by this exemption are also exempt from the driver qualification (licensing and medical cards), driving, and vehicle inspection requirements. Myth. The only rules the driver is exempt from are the logging requirement in 395.8 and the 30-minute break requirement in 395.3.
- The driver cannot drive more than 150 miles for the day. Myth. The driver can drive as many miles as he/she wants to or needs to, as long as the driver stays within the 150 air-mile radius circle and gets back to the work reporting location within the appropriate number of hours.
- If a 150 air-mile driver gets into a vehicle with an ELD, the driver must use it. Myth. The carrier can have the driver log in and have the driver entered into the system as an “exempt driver,” or the carrier can request that the driver not log into the device and then attach a comment to the unassigned driving time generated by the driver’s movements. The comment would need to explain that the driver using the vehicle was a 150 air-mile driver who submitted a time record. It is up to the carrier to decide which option to use. If stopped for a roadside inspection, the driver will need to be able to explain to the inspector that he/she is an exempt driver using the 150 air-mile exemption, so using the electronic log is not required.
What’s different with the ‘150 air-mile non-CDL property-carrying drivers’
The 150 air-mile exemption at 395.1(e)(2) only applies to drivers that: Operate property-carrying vehicles that do not require a CDL to operate, and Stay within the 150 air-miles of their work reporting location.
If the driver stays within the 150 air-mile radius of the work reporting location, and returns to the work reporting location within 14 hours on 5 of the last 7 days, and 16 hours on 2 of the last seven days, the driver is allowed to use a time record in place of a log.
If the driver does not meet the terms of the exception, the driver will need to complete a log for the day. If the driver had to log more than 8 days out of the last 30 days, the driver will need to use an electronic log for the day. All of the other issues discussed above would apply to these drivers as well.
Managing the use
If you have drivers that use these exemptions, you will need to check time records to make sure they are complying with the appropriate time limits. You will also need to check movement records to verify that the drivers using these exemptions are staying within the mandated area (within 150 air-miles of the work reporting location for the day).
If a driver is over the hours limit, or has gone too far, you need to verify that the submitted a log for the day, either paper or electronic, depending on how many days the driver had to log out of the previous 30 days.
Verifying compliance is important
During an audit, if it is discovered that your drivers are using these exemptions incorrectly, you will be cited for not having drivers’ logs when required. Each day this occurred will be another violation, so the fine could be rather large if you are not managing the use of these exemptions!
Most Popular Highlights In Human Resources
NewsIndustry NewsIndustry NewsHR GeneralistFamily and Medical Leave Act (FMLA)Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA)USAHR ManagementEnglishFocus AreaHuman Resources
2023-09-06T05:00:00Z
Appellate court sided with employee's (almost) 3-year-delayed FMLA claim
Back in October 2018, Laffon had a medical emergency and needed some time off under the federal Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA).
Her leave lasted until November 15. Ten days after she returned to work, on November 26, her employer terminated her.
She sued, arguing that the employer retaliated against her because of her FMLA leave.
The catch? She didn't bring the suit until almost three years later.
No link between leave and termination
In court, the employer argued that there was no causal link between Laffon taking FMLA leave and her termination. Although the court documents aren't robust, they do reveal that the employer indicated that Laffon's allegations didn't show that her taking FMLA leave was a factor in the decision to terminate her. The documents showed only that the termination chronologically followed her leave.
The court agreed with the employer. It also agreed that Laffon failed to allege a willful violation of the FMLA, which would allow her to benefit from the FMLA's three-year statute of limitations.
Laffon appealed the case to the Ninth Circuit.
Statute of limitations
Under the FMLA, employees have two years from the date of the last event constituting the alleged violation for which they can bring a claim.
Those two years are extended to three years if the employer's actions were "willful." This means that an employee must show that the employer either knew or showed reckless disregard for whether its conduct violated the FMLA.
Ruling overturned
Fast forward to August 2023, when the Ninth Circuit reversed the lower court's decision. It indicated that, based on Laffon's amended complaint and liberally construing the law, her allegations establish that her leave was causally connected to her termination and that the employer's action (her termination) was willful.
Glymph v. CT Corporation Systems, No. 22-35735, Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, August 22, 2023.
Key to remember: Terminating an employee soon after returning from FMLA leave is risky, unless there is a clear, well-documented, non-leave-related reason. Case documents did not show such a clear reason, which can also increase the risk of a willful finding. Employees have time to file claims, even years.
NewsChange NoticesWage and HourChange NoticeAssociate Benefits & CompensationAssociate RelationsVirginiaHR GeneralistNon-Exempt employees Minimum WageHR ManagementEnglishFocus AreaHuman Resources
2026-04-15T05:00:00Z
Virginia minimum wage increases
Effective date: July 1, 2027
This applies to: Employers with nonexempt employees in Virginia
Description of change: On April 9, 2026, Virginia Gov. Abigail Spanberger signed into law legislation (HB1/SB1) to incrementally increase the state minimum wage to $15 per hour.
The measure codified the adjusted state hourly minimum wage of $12.77 per hour that went into effect on January 1, 2026.
The legislation will then increase the hourly minimum wage as follows:
- $13.75 — January 1, 2027
- $15 — January 1, 2028
View related state info: Minimum wage - Virginia
NewsIndustry NewsPerformance ManagementAssociate Benefits & CompensationHR GeneralistFamily and Medical Leave Act (FMLA)Focus AreaIn-Depth ArticleFamily and Medical Leave Act (FMLA)Performance AppraisalsEnglishHR ManagementAssociate RelationsHuman ResourcesUSA
2023-01-12T06:00:00Z
Performance review timing and FMLA leave
A new year often begins a new round of employee performance reviews. Since the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) allows eligible employees to take up to 12 (or 26) weeks of leave, many events can occur during an employee’s leave, including the employee’s pre-scheduled performance review. Such reviews might take place on an annual or other scheduled basis. How you treat the timing of those reviews should include some thought.
If, for example, Jo Employee takes 12 weeks of FMLA leave, during which her annual performance review is scheduled, here are some questions to ponder:
- Do you look at all 12 months of Jo’s performance?
- What if she hasn’t worked a full 12 months because of leave?
- When can you actual do the review?
- Can you delay it so you can look at a full 12-months of work?
Delaying a review
An annual performance review generally takes into consideration a full years’ worth of work. Some employers think it’s best to delay the performance review by the same amount of time an employee took FMLA leave to capture an entire years’ work. This practice, however, might risk running afoul of one of the cornerstones of the FMLA: Returning the employee to his or her position, including the equivalent pay, benefits, and working conditions.
The issues can be particularly concerning if the performance review affects wage increases or other compensation.
What the regulations say
The FMLA regulations indicate that an equivalent position includes equivalent pay, which includes any unconditional pay increases that may have occurred during the FMLA leave period. Equivalent pay also includes bonuses or payments, whether discretionary or non-discretionary. FMLA leave cannot undermine the employee’s right to such pay.
Furthermore, “… employers cannot use the taking of FMLA leave as a negative factor in employment actions, such as hiring, promotions, or disciplinary actions; nor can FMLA leave be counted under no fault attendance policies.” [29 CFR 825.220(c)]
Avoiding a negative factor
Therefore, you would need to look at whether delaying an employee’s performance review could be seen as having a negative factor for the employee.
If, for example, Jo Employee took 12 weeks of leave from April through June, during which she would otherwise have obtained a pay increase in May, but you delayed this increase until September (so you could use a full 12 months of work), you may have violated the equivalent pay provision. If delaying a review creates a new review schedule going forward, the negative impacts could continue.
If, however, a pay increase is conditioned upon seniority, length of service, or work performed, you would grant it in accordance with your policy or practice as applied to other employees on an equivalent leave status for a reason that does not qualify as FMLA leave.
In other words, don’t treat an employee on FMLA leave differently than you would an employee on other forms of leave.
Key to remember: It might be less risky to keep the performance review on schedule and prorate wage increases to account for FMLA leave.
NewsIndustry NewsHR GeneralistFamily and Medical Leave Act (FMLA)In-Depth ArticleFamily and Medical Leave Act (FMLA)HR ManagementEnglishUSAFocus AreaHuman Resources
2026-04-09T05:00:00Z
No magic words needed (for an employee to trigger FMLA)
- An employee gives the supervisor a doctor’s note excusing an absence for migraines.
- A worried employee tells the manager that a parent was in a car accident and taken to the hospital.
- An employee calls in with morning sickness.
- An employee is injured in a forklift accident at work and needs time off to recover.
- An employee’s spouse calls in to tell the manager that the employee is sick and needs a week off.
- An employee tells the manager about plans to donate a kidney to a sibling.
All these scenarios have one thing in common: They’re all situations in which employees put their employers on notice of the need for leave under the federal Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA).
The employees didn’t first fill out any leave request forms. They didn’t have to at this stage. The information they provided was enough to trigger employers’ FMLA obligations.
The FMLA or its regulations say nothing about employees having to apply for or specifically request initial FMLA leave. Employers may require employees to complete an application or request form, but that requirement must be flexible depending on each situation, and should not be the initial step.
Employers must, however, get any additional required information through informal means. This means that employees must respond to related questions designed to determine whether an absence is potentially FMLA-qualifying.
Employers, therefore, shouldn’t wait until employees mention the FMLA or apply for it before starting the FMLA process. If employers, including supervisors or managers, have an inkling that employees might need FMLA leave, they should start down the FMLA path.
When more information is required
Once their FMLA leave is approved, however, that’s a different story.
When employees ask for FMLA leave that employers have already approved, employees must specifically reference either the qualifying reason for leave or the need for FMLA leave. Calling in “sick” without providing more information isn’t enough to trigger employers’ FMLA obligations at this point. Employees have to be more specific. They must either mention the qualifying reason or “FMLA” leave.
When leave is foreseeable, employees must give at least 30 days’ notice or as much notice as is practicable.
What the courts say
Courts have ruled against employers for overlooking situations where employees gave notice. In one case, an employee’s sleeping on the job was seen as notice (Byrne v. Avon Products, Inc., 7th Circuit Court of Appeals, No. 02-2629, 4/14/2003). In another case, an employee’s crying on the job was enough notice (Valdivia v. Township High School District 214, Northern District of Illinois, No. 16-cv-10333, 5/15/17).
Employers (and anyone acting on their behalf) are responsible for recognizing when employees give notice and responding appropriately.
Key to remember: Employers must be able to recognize when employees put them on notice of the need for leave and not expect employees to say any particular words or phrases, at least initially.
NewsIndustry NewsHR GeneralistFamily and Medical Leave Act (FMLA)In-Depth ArticleFamily and Medical Leave Act (FMLA)Associate RelationsEnglishHR ManagementFocus AreaHuman ResourcesUSA
2026-03-23T05:00:00Z
Revoked security clearance doesn't override FMLA leave law, court rules
A security job isn’t the same as job security.
Nathan and Matthew worked as security police officers for a company where they were contracted out to positions at the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE). The contracting company and the DOE were joint employers.
In August 2024, both took leave under the federal Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA); Nathan for elbow surgery and Matthew for the birth of his child.
When the two officers tried to return to work in December, however, they were told that the DOE had revoked their security clearances, rendering them ineligible to continue working there.
The contracting company then fired them.
The employees filed a lawsuit against the contracting company and the DOE, claiming that they interfered with their right to take FMLA leave.
In court
The joint employers argued that security-clearance decisions can’t be subject to judicial review. But the employees didn’t ask for such a review. Instead, their complaint asserted that the DOE failed to follow its own regulations and procedures in ways that violated the FMLA.
The employees alleged, for example, that DOE regulations required it to:
- Obtain their signatures before firing them,
- Initiate an administrative review process that would have allowed them to contest their clearance withdrawals, and
- Channel revocations through specified processes.
The DOE bypassed these steps to unlawfully fire them in violation of the FMLA.
The employees also claimed that the contracting company violated the FMLA when it didn’t return them to work, including in an equivalent position. Instead, it fired them.
The court pointed out that the FMLA requires employers to reinstate employees following their return from leave. Alternatively — say, for example, an employee’s original position is no longer available — the employer is obligated to place them into an equivalent position.
The court disagreed with the employers and allowed the employees’ FMLA claim to proceed.
Adam Putnam, et al., v. Centerra Group, LLC, et al., District Court of Columbia, No. 25-1272, February 25, 2026.
Key to remember: Just because an employee loses a work clearance doesn’t mean employers can use that to overlook their FMLA obligations.
NewsIndustry NewsAssociate RelationsHR GeneralistIn-Depth ArticleLabor Law PostersHR ManagementEnglishLabor Law PostersUSAFocus AreaHuman Resources
2026-04-10T05:00:00Z
Breaking the law? Improper posting will give you away!
Labor law posters must be displayed to make employees aware of their rights, and failing to comply can be an obvious sign that you’re breaking a law.
Earlier this year, the Appellate Division of the New Jersey Superior Court considered a case involving a company accused of violating the state’s Earned Sick Leave Law and found its cavalier approach to posting compliance to be clear evidence of a violation.
The company’s contention
The concrete company contended that its vacation policy could be used to meet state sick leave requirements and that it qualified for an exemption from the law because it was in the construction industry.
In addition, it displayed the state’s required Earned Sick Leave Law posting at only one of its locations and placed it in an obscure spot.
Substantial evidence of noncompliance
The court didn’t agree with the company’s reasoning. It found that the company didn’t qualify for an exemption from the law and that its vacation policy couldn’t be substituted for compliance with the state’s sick leave law.
The law called for employers to conspicuously post the notification in a place or places accessible to all employees in each of the employer’s workplaces and provide individualized notices.
Because the company didn’t provide notices and failed to conspicuously post the employee rights poster as required, the court found that there was “substantial, credible evidence” to show that the company didn’t adequately notify its employees of their rights under the law.
How to post the right way
Each labor law posting is required under a different law, but in general they must be:
- Posted in all locations. They can’t be only posted in corporate headquarters or at one or two locations. On a large corporate campus, they might need to be posted in more than one building to give all employees ready access to them.
- Readily available. Commonly used entrances, cafeterias, and break rooms are good places for posters.
- Easily readable. Posters shouldn’t be placed too high, and the type size shouldn’t be too small.
In addition, notices must be provided directly to employees when required. They could be emailed, mailed, or handed to the employee.
Key to remember: Failing to properly display labor law posters can be a clear sign that a law is being ignored.
William Cano, et al., vs. County Concrete Corporation, Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division, January 28, 2026
Most Popular Highlights In Safety & Health
NewsSafety & HealthChange NoticesChange NoticeFall ProtectionGeneral Industry SafetyWalking Working SurfacesFall ProtectionOccupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), DOLWalking Working SurfacesEnglishFocus AreaUSA
2026-04-06T05:00:00Z
OSHA Proposed Rule: Walking-Working Surfaces
This proposed rule removes a deadline in OSHA’s Walking-Working Surfaces standard by which all fixed ladders that extend more than 24 feet above a lower level must be equipped with personal fall arrest systems or ladder safety systems. Additionally, OSHA is seeking comment on repealing or revising the requirement that employers use personal fall arrest systems on all fixed ladders over 24 feet tall and instead permitting employers to continue to use ladder cages or wells.
DATES: Comments and other information, including requests for a hearing, must be received on or before June 5, 2026. Published in the Federal Register April 6, 2026, page 17165.
View proposed rule.
NewsIndustry NewsIndustry NewsHeat and Cold ExposureEnforcement and Audits - OSHAEnforcement and Audits - OSHASafety & HealthConstruction SafetyGeneral Industry SafetyAgriculture SafetyMaritime SafetyEnglishHeat StressFocus AreaUSA
2026-04-14T05:00:00Z
OSHA revises heat emphasis program
OSHA revised its National Emphasis Program (NEP) on outdoor and indoor heat-related hazards on April 10. Using OSHA and Bureau of Labor Statistics data from 2022-2025, the agency will prioritize inspections in 55 “high-risk industries” in indoor and outdoor work settings.
The revised NEP introduces two reorganized appendices: one that includes information on how OSHA investigators will evaluate heat illnesses and prevention programs and another that provides citation guidance. The updated NEP also includes better guidance designed to strengthen tracking procedures and more effectively implement the program’s enforcement and outreach efforts.
Compliance officers will provide outreach and compliance assistance and broaden inspections if heat hazards are found on heat priority days. Additionally, random inspections will occur on days when the National Weather Service issues a heat advisory or warning.
The revised NEP remains in place for 5 years after the effective date.
NewsIndustry NewsSafety & HealthConstruction SafetyErgonomicsGeneral Industry SafetyFocus AreaIn-Depth ArticleEnglishErgonomicsUSA
2026-04-10T05:00:00Z
Beyond the cubicle, remote work, real ergonomic risk
While remote work offers flexibility and convenience, they also introduce ergonomic challenges. Without proper setups and regular movement, daily work habits can lead to discomfort, fatigue, and long term injuries.
The home office did not arrive with a grand opening, it just happened. Kitchen tables turned into desks, couches replaced office chairs, and workdays quietly stretched longer than expected. Paying attention to ergonomics outside the traditional office is essential for keeping today’s workforce healthy, comfortable, and productive.
Remote work isn’t risk free — and neither is employer responsibility
Working remotely doesn’t eliminate the risks of musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs). Without proper workstation setups, regular movement, and timely adjustments, daily remote work habits can quietly lead to pain, fatigue, and injury over time.
Although OSHA has no specific ergonomics standard, employers remain responsible under the General Duty Clause, for addressing recognized ergonomic hazards wherever work is performed. In remote and hybrid settings, OSHA may look at whether reasonable steps were taken to identify and manage ergonomic risks.
To meet these responsibilities, employers should prioritize prevention, awareness, and early intervention. Practical steps include:
- providing ergonomic guidance and expectations for home and hybrid workstations,
- training employees to recognize early signs of ergonomic strain and report concerns,
- encouraging regular movement and posture changes throughout the workday,
- conducting workstation evaluations, including virtual reviews or self assessments, and
- documenting ergonomic efforts, including training, assessments, and corrective actions.
Hidden ergonomic exposure in remote work
Remote work can make it easy to fall into ergonomic habits that seem harmless at first but gradually take a toll on the body. Since these issues build over time, they’re easy to miss. Common risk factors include:
- extended laptop use,
- screens that sit too low or too high,
- chairs without adequate support,
- repeated mouse or keyboard movements, and
- staying in the same position for long stretches.
Addressing these risks means applying the same ergonomic principles used in the office to home workspaces by checking posture, monitor height, seating support, task duration, and opportunities for movement. Workstation reviews, employee self check tools, and supervisor guidance can help identify concerns early. Consider using an ergonomic checklist as a simple way to review workstation setups and fix common issues.
Get up and move
Even with a well arranged workstation, sitting still for long periods can cause stiffness, fatigue, and discomfort. Encourage employees to stand, stretch, or change positions every 30 to 60 minutes during the workday.
Simple actions, such as stretching between meetings or switching between sitting and standing, can reduce muscle strain and improve comfort. Regular movement and quick workstation check ins, such as adjusting screen height or chair support, can help prevent small issues from turning into injuries.
Ergonomics pays off
Supporting remote ergonomics benefits both employees and organizations. Proactive ergonomics programs can help reduce injury rates, lower workers’ compensation costs, decrease lost workdays. Employees who feel physically supported are more likely to stay engaged and focused.
Promoting ergonomics shows that an organization values employee health and well being, no matter where work takes place.
Key to remember: Remote work doesn’t eliminate ergonomic risk, it shifts it. A little awareness, early action, and regular movement can go a long way in preventing injuries and supporting healthier, more sustainable work habits.
NewsPersonal Protective EquipmentIn-Depth ArticleWellnessEnglishWellnessIndustry NewsHead ProtectionSafety & HealthConstruction SafetyGeneral Industry SafetyAgriculture SafetyEmployee Mental HealthFocus AreaUSA
2026-04-02T05:00:00Z
From hard hats to headspace: Why mental health is critical for every worker
Protecting workers’ heads takes more than a hard hat. A 2017 National Institute of Health (NIH) study looked at employees across four Kansas worksites and found a clear link between stress and productivity. The study revealed that higher stress scores were significantly associated with lower productivity and greater job dissatisfaction. The result of this study suggests that employers who actively work to reduce stress are not just improving mental health and morale, but they’re boosting productivity as well.
Hidden in plain sight
When Sebastian walked into the office each morning, no one could see the weight he carried. Deadlines were met, meetings attended, yet his smile never faltered. Inside, stress and anxiety were taking a toll, and his story isn’t unique.
One study showed a very interesting contrast: most employees (about 77%) stated they were comfortable supporting a coworker’s mental health. However, when it comes to their own stress or burnout, 42% worry that opening up about it or seeking help could hurt their career or make them a target. Even more striking, one in four have thought about quitting because of mental health challenges. And it’s not just long-term stress. A recent Gallup poll found that 41% of workers felt highly stressed just “yesterday.”
These statistics underscore a troubling theme that employees value and wish to nurture mental wellness; however, stigma, insufficient support, and overwhelming stress persist. Employers need to begin recognizing and proactively addressing workplace mental health in order to cultivate resilient, productive teams.
What one state is doing
The state of Michigan is piloting a new initiative aimed at improving workplace mental health which is increasingly being recognized as an occupational safety and health issue. This expands the state’s historically stringent approach to reducing on-the-job risks.
Michigan’s LEADS program—short for Learn, Educate, Act, Deploy, Study—is a four-month initiative designed to give employers practical tools to tackle stress, burnout, and communication breakdowns that often lead to safety incidents. The idea is simple: when communication falters and stress goes unchecked, mistakes happen. Those mistakes can mean more human errors, higher injury rates, quiet quitting, and turnover.
One of the program’s key features is an evidence-based organizational assessment. Think of it like a safety audit that’s focused on mental health risks rather than physical hazards. Employers get a clear picture of issues such as heavy workloads, unclear roles, workplace conflict or bullying, and weak support systems that can quickly erode a strong safety culture.
The end goal of the LEADS program is not to replace existing safety programs but rather strengthen them. Consider joining Michigan in their effort to enhance communication, better define workers’ roles, support unfettered reporting, and more effectively engage employees.
Key to remember: Stress doesn’t just weigh people down; it can have significant safety and productivity consequences. Programs like Michigan’s LEADS pilot initiative are giving employers the ability to tackle stress and burnout before they lead to mistakes, injuries, or turnover.
NewsIndustry NewsIndustry NewsSafety & HealthGeneral Industry SafetyWalking Working SurfacesOccupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), DOLLaddersEnglishFocus AreaUSA
2026-04-06T05:00:00Z
OSHA proposes removing fixed ladder deadline from WWS rule
An OSHA proposed rule would remove a November 18, 2036, deadline in the Walking-Working Surfaces standard that requires all fixed ladders that extend more than 24 feet above a lower level to be equipped with personal fall arrest systems or ladder safety systems. OSHA also seeks feedback on repealing or revising the requirement and instead permitting employers to continue to use ladder cages or wells. The proposed changes affect 29 CFR 1910.28.
The agency requests comments, data, and information on nine specific questions related to the proposed rule. Stakeholders have until June 5, 2026, to comment. Search for Docket No. OSHA-2025-0072 at regulations.gov.
NewsIndustry NewsEnforcement and Audits - OSHAHead ProtectionPersonal Protective EquipmentSafety & HealthConstruction SafetyGeneral Industry SafetyIn-Depth ArticleEnglishFocus AreaPersonal Protective EquipmentUSA
2024-04-03T05:00:00Z
Does OSHA suddenly require “helmets” now instead of hard hats?
Ever since OSHA published its Trade Release on December 11, 2023, people have been scratching their heads about the “new” PPE requirement.
But here’s the thing. There isn’t a new requirement for “helmets” instead of hard hats.
So where’s the confusion? And what is actually required?
OSHA’s announcement on helmets vs. hard hats
OSHA released a Safety and Health Bulletin (SHIB 11-22-2023) on November 22, 2023, detailing the key differences and benefits of using modern safety helmets over traditional hard hats.
And just a few weeks later, in the December 11, 2023 Trade Release, the Agency announced it would now require its inspectors to wear Type II head protection, which is also commonly referred to as safety helmets.
The two main benefits of Type II safety helmets
The November 22, 2023 SHIB discussed two main benefits of choosing modern safety helmets over traditional hard hats -- the construction of materials and the use of chinstraps.
| Construction of Materials: | The SHIB first explained that one of the benefits of safety helmets lies in their construction materials. While hard hats are made from hard plastics, safety helmets incorporate a combination of materials, including lightweight composites, fiberglass, and advanced thermoplastics. Such materials can help enhance the impact resistance of the helmets but also include the added benefit of reducing the overall weight of the helmet. This reduces neck strain and improves comfort during extended use. |
| Use of Chinstraps: | The SHIB also discussed the potential benefits of chinstraps used in conjunction with Type II safety helmets. The general idea here is that chinstraps can be helpful in maintaining the position of the safety helmet and protecting the worker’s head in the event of a slip, trip, or fall. According to data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, head injuries accounted for nearly 6% of non-fatal occupational injuries involving days away from work. About 20% of those were caused by slips, trips, and falls. |
And while OSHA has recognized the benefits of Type II safety helmets, and is actively taking steps to protect its own employees, it’s important to understand that there is not a new requirement for employers to make the switch to safety helmets.
That being said, a growing number of employers have recognized the benefits of added head protection and are choosing to use Type II helmets for their workers. In addition, some clients are starting to contractually require their construction contractors to make the switch as well.
Understanding the different types of head protection
Hard hats will have a Type I or Type II rating on the manufacturer’s sticker. These markings are based on ANSI Z89.1’s impact ratings.
Type I hard hats protect from objects or impacts from the top center area of the hard hat and are often used in work areas with no lateral head impact hazards.
Type II hard hats, on the other hand, offers protection from both top and lateral impacts and objects and is often found on construction job sites or complex general industry settings where workers face multiple head contact exposures.
Hard hats are classified based on their level of voltage protection. See the chart below.
| Class G – (General) low voltage protection. Class E – (Electrical) high voltage protection. Class C – (Conductive) no voltage protection. |
Choosing the right head protection for your employees
Employers should conduct a job hazard analysis and/or a PPE assessment to determine which style hard hat is best for their workers. In general, OSHA recommends the use of Type II safety helmets at the following locations:
1. Construction Sites: For construction sites, especially those with high risks of falling objects and debris, impacts from equipment, or slips, trips, and falls, safety helmets have enhanced impact resistance and additional features that offer superior protection compared to the components and construction of traditional hard hats.
2. Oil and Gas Industry: In these sectors where workers face multiple hazards, including potential exposure to chemicals and severe impacts, safety helmets with additional features can provide comprehensive protection.
3. Working from Heights: For tasks or jobs that involve working from heights, safety helmets offer protection of the entire head and include features that prevent the safety helmet from falling off.
4. Electrical Work: For tasks involving electrical work or proximity to electrical hazards, safety helmets with non-conductive materials (Class G and Class E) provide protection to prevent electrical shocks. However, some traditional hard hats also offer electrical protection.
5. High-Temperature Environments: In high temperatures or where there is exposure to molten materials, safety helmets with advanced heat-resistant properties can provide additional protection to workers.
Key to remember: While there isn’t a new requirement for safety helmets, employers should review their workplace hazards to determine which style of hard hat will best protect their employees.
Saved to my EVENT CALENDAR!
View your saved links by clicking the arrow next to your profile picture located in the header. Then, click “My Activity” to view the Event Calendar on your Activity page.
OK
J. J. Keller is the trusted source for DOT / Transportation, OSHA / Workplace Safety, Human Resources, Construction Safety and Hazmat / Hazardous Materials regulation compliance products and services. J. J. Keller helps you increase safety awareness, reduce risk, follow best practices, improve safety training, and stay current with changing regulations.
Copyright 2026 J. J. Keller & Associate, Inc. For re-use options please contact copyright@jjkeller.com or call 800-558-5011.





















































