Compliance Just Got Easier: Stay ahead of regulatory changes with instant notifications on updates that matter.
['Enforcement and Audits - OSHA']
['Enforcement and Audits - OSHA']
04/17/2026
ez Explanations
The OSH Act encourages states to develop and operate, under OSHA guidance, state job safety and health plans. Once a state plan is approved, federal OSHA funds up to 50 percent of the program’s operating costs. State plans are required to provide standards and enforcement programs which are at least as effective as the federal program.
To gain OSHA approval as a developmental plan, a state must demonstrate that within three years it will provide:
- Adequate legislation,
- Standards-setting,
- Enforcement and appeals procedures,
- Public employee protection,
- A sufficient number of competent enforcement personnel, and
- Training education and technical assistance programs.
If, at any time during this period or later, it appears that the state is capable of enforcing standards in accordance with the above requirements, OSHA may enter into an “operational status agreement” with the state. OSHA generally limits its enforcement activity to areas not covered by the state in the agreement and ceases all concurrent federal enforcement. Scheduled, accident and complaint inspections are generally the primary responsibility of the state. OSHA closely monitors state programs.
When all development steps concerning legislation, resources and other requirements have been completed and approved, OSHA then certifies that a state has the legal, administrative and enforcement means necessary to operate effectively. This action renders no judgment on how well or poorly a state is actually operating its program but merely attests to the structural completeness of its program. After this certification there is a period of at least one year to determine if a state is effectively providing safety and health protection. If it is found that the state is operating at an effective level and other requirements including compliance staffing levels are met, final approval of the plan may be granted and federal authority will cease in those areas over which the state has jurisdiction.
OSHA continues its monitoring and evaluation of the state program to assure the state maintains its level of effectiveness. If this level should decline, OSHA can begin proceedings to withdraw approval of the program and to reinstate federal enforcement authority.
Employers and employees should find out if their state operates an OSHA-approved state program and, if so, become familiar with it. Visit www.osha.gov/stateplans. State safety and health standards under approved plans must keep pace with federal standards, and state plans must guarantee employer and employee rights as does OSHA.
State plans developed for the private sector also must, to the extent permitted by state law, provide coverage for state and local government employees. OSHA permits states to develop plans limited in coverage to public sector (state and local government) employees only; in such cases, private sector employment remains under federal jurisdiction.
Anyone finding inadequacies or other problems in the administration of a state’s program may file a complaint about state program administration with the appropriate regional administrator for OSHA. The complainant’s name is kept confidential. OSHA investigates all such complaints and, where complaints are found to be valid, requires appropriate corrective action on the part of the state.
Regulatory citations
Approved state plans for both private- and public-sector (state and local government) employees:
| 29 CFR 1952.1 — South Carolina 29 CFR 1952.2 — Oregon 29 CFR 1952.3 — Utah 29 CFR 1952.4 — Washington 29 CFR 1952.5 — North Carolina 29 CFR 1952.6 — Iowa 29 CFR 1952.7 — California 29 CFR 1952.8 — Minnesota 29 CFR 1952.9 — Maryland 29 CFR 1952.10 — Tennessee 29 CFR 1952.11 — Kentucky | 29 CFR 1952.12 — Alaska 29 CFR 1952.13 — Michigan 29 CFR 1952.14 — Vermont 29 CFR 1952.15 — Nevada 29 CFR 1952.16 — Hawaii 29 CFR 1952.17 — Indiana 29 CFR 1952.18 — Wyoming 29 CFR 1952.19 — Arizona 29 CFR 1952.20 — New Mexico 29 CFR 1952.21 — Virginia 29 CFR 1952.22 — Puerto Rico |
Approved state plans for only state and local government employees:
| 29 CFR 1952.23 — Connecticut 29 CFR 1952.24 — New York 29 CFR 1952.25 — New Jersey 29 CFR 1952.26 — The Virgin Islands | 29 CFR 1952.27 — Illinois 29 CFR 1952.28 — Maine 29 CFR 1952.29 — Massachusetts |
States with approved programs
States with OSHA-approved occupational safety and health programs must adopt an access standard that is at least as effective as OSHA’s standard, subject to OSHA approval and monitoring. Since the requirement is that state standards be “at least as effective” as the comparable federal rule, the state standards may differ in some respects.
['Enforcement and Audits - OSHA']
['Enforcement and Audits - OSHA']
UPGRADE TO CONTINUE READING
J. J. Keller is the trusted source for DOT / Transportation, OSHA / Workplace Safety, Human Resources, Construction Safety and Hazmat / Hazardous Materials regulation compliance products and services. J. J. Keller helps you increase safety awareness, reduce risk, follow best practices, improve safety training, and stay current with changing regulations.
Copyright 2026 J. J. Keller & Associate, Inc. For re-use options please contact copyright@jjkeller.com or call 800-558-5011.
