FREE TRIAL UPGRADE!
Thank you for investing in EnvironmentalHazmatHuman ResourcesHuman Resources, Hazmat & Environmental related content. Click 'UPGRADE' to continue.
CANCEL
YOU'RE ALL SET!
Enjoy your limited-time access to the Compliance Network!
A confirmation welcome email has been sent to your email address from ComplianceNetwork@t.jjkellercompliancenetwork.com. Please check your spam/junk folder if you can't find it in your inbox.
YOU'RE ALL SET!
Thank you for your interest in EnvironmentalHazmatHuman ResourcesHuman Resources, Hazmat & Environmental related content.
WHOOPS!
You've reached your limit of free access, if you'd like more info, please contact us at 800-327-6868.
You'll also get exclusive access to:
Already have an account? .

NHTSA Final Rule: Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards; Child Restraint Systems, Child Restraint Anchorage Systems, Incorporation by Reference

2025-01-07T06:00:00Z

This final rule amends Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) No. 225; Child restraint systems, and FMVSS No. 213b; Child restraint systems, to improve ease-of-use of the lower and tether anchorages, improve correct use of child restraint systems in vehicles, and maintain or improve the correct use and effectiveness of child restraint systems (CRSs) in motor vehicles. This final rule fulfills a mandate of the Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP-21) requiring that NHTSA improve the ease-of-use for lower anchorages and tethers in all rear seat positions.

DATES:

Effective date: March 20, 2025.

IBR date: The incorporation by reference of certain publications listed in the rule is approved by the Director of the Federal Register beginning March 10, 2025.

Compliance date: This final rule adopts a 3-year phase-in period to comply with the updated requirements in FMVSS No. 225. The phase-in begins on September 1, 2028, and requires that 20 percent of a manufacturer's applicable vehicles produced from September 1, 2028, to August 31, 2029, comply with the updated FMVSS No. 225, followed by 50 percent from September 1, 2029, to August 31, 2030, and 100 percent on and after September 1, 2030. Early compliance is permitted.

Reconsideration date: If you wish to petition for reconsideration of this rule, your petition must be received by February 21, 2025.

Published in the Federal Register January 7, 2025, page 1288.

View final rule.

§571.5 Matter incorporated by reference.
(k)(10)-(11)AddedView text
§571.213b Child restraint systems; Mandatory applicability beginning December 5, 2026.
S5.5.2(j)RevisedView text
S5.6.1.13 and S5.6.1.14AddedView text
S5.9(a) through (c)RevisedView text
Figures 15 and 16AddedView text
§571.225 Child restraint anchorage systems.
S4.2RevisedView text
S4.3-S4.6Redesignated, revisedView text
S5 and S6RevisedView text
S8 introductory text and S8.1 introductory textRevisedView text
S8.2Removed and reservedView text
S9 introductory text, S9.1.1(d) and S9.2RevisedView text
S9.2.4 and S9.2.5AddedView text
S9.5RevisedView text
S11, S12, and S13RevisedView text
S14, S15, and S16RemovedView text
Figures 8, 9, 10, and 19RevisedView text
Figure 11Removed and reservedView text
Figures 23 through 28AddedView text

New Text

§571.213b Child restraint systems; Mandatory applicability beginning December 5, 2026.

* * * *

S5.5.2(j) In the case of each child restraint system equipped with a tether strap the statement: Secure the tether strap provided with this child restraint.

* * * *

S5.9 Attachment to child restraint anchorage system. (a) Each add-on child restraint system other than a car bed, harness, or belt-positioning seat shall have components permanently attached to the system that enable the restraint to be securely fastened to the lower anchorages of the child restraint anchorage system specified in Standard No. 225 (§571.225) and depicted in NHTSA Standard Seat Assembly; FMVSS No. 213, No. NHTSA-213-2021, (March 2023) (incorporated by reference, see §571.5). The components must be attached to the add-on child restraint by use of a tool, such as a screwdriver. In the case of rear-facing child restraints with detachable bases, only the base is required to have the components. All components provided to attach the add-on child restraint or the detachable base (in the case of a rear-facing child restraint with a detachable base) to the lower anchorages of the child restraint anchorage system shall be permanently marked with the pictogram in figure 15 to this section.

(b) In the case of each child restraint system that has components for attaching the system to a tether anchorage, those components shall include a tether hook that conforms to the configuration and geometry specified in figure 11 to this section. The tether hook or the tether strap shall be permanently marked with either pictogram shown in figure 16 to this section. If the mark is on the tether strap or on a tag attached to the tether strap, the mark must be located within 25 mm of the tether hardware assembly (which consists of a tether hook and a webbing tightening mechanism designed to tighten or loosen the tether strap).

(c) In the case of each child restraint system that has components, including belt webbing, for attaching the system to an anchorage of a child restraint anchorage system (lower anchorage or tether anchorage), the belt webbing shall be adjustable so that the child restraint can be tightly attached to the vehicle. The length of the tether hardware assembly, which consists of a tether hook and a mechanism designed to tighten and loosen the tether strap, shall not exceed 165 mm.

§571.225 Child restraint anchorage systems.

* * * *

S4.2 Vehicles shall be equipped as specified in paragraphs S4.2(a) through (c), except as provided in S5 of this standard.

(a) Each vehicle with three or more forward-facing rear designated seating positions shall be equipped as specified in S4.2(a)(1) and (2).

(1) Each vehicle shall be equipped with a child restraint anchorage system conforming to the requirements of S6 and S9 of this standard at not fewer than two forward-facing rear designated seating positions. At least one of the child restraint anchorage systems shall be installed at a forward-facing seating position in the second row in each vehicle that has three or more rows, if such a forward-facing seating position is available in that row.

(2) Each vehicle shall be equipped with a tether anchorage conforming to the requirements of S6 of this standard at a third forward-facing rear designated seating position. The tether anchorage of a child restraint anchorage system may count towards the third required tether anchorage. In each vehicle with a forward-facing rear designated seating position other than an outboard designated seating position, at least one tether anchorage (with or without the lower anchorages of a child restraint anchorage system) shall be at such a designated seating position.

(b) Each vehicle with not more than two forward-facing rear designated seating positions shall be equipped with a child restraint anchorage system conforming to the requirements of S6 and S9 of this standard at each forward-facing rear designated seating position.

(c) Each vehicle without any forward-facing rear designated seating position shall be equipped with a tether anchorage conforming to the requirements of S6 of this standard at each forward-facing front passenger designated seating position.

* * * *

S4.3 Movable seats. (a) A vehicle that is equipped with a forward-facing rear designated seating position that can be moved such that it is capable of being used at either an outboard or non-outboard forward-facing designated seating position shall be considered as having a forward-facing non-outboard designated seating position. Such a movable seat must be equipped with a tether anchorage that meets the requirements of S6 of this standard or a child restraint anchorage system that meets the requirements of S6 and S9 of this standard, if the vehicle does not have another forward-facing non-outboard designated seating position that is so equipped.

(b) Tether and lower anchorages shall be available for use at all times, except when the seating position for which it is installed is not available for use because the vehicle seat has been removed or converted to an alternate use such as allowing for the carrying of cargo.

* * * *

S5 General exceptions. Vehicles manufactured before September 1, 2031, must meet the requirements of S5.1. Vehicles manufactured on or after September 1, 2031, must meet the requirements of S5.2.

S5.1 Vehicles manufactured before September 1, 2031. (a) Convertibles and school buses are excluded from the requirements to be equipped with tether anchorages.

(b) A vehicle may be equipped with a built-in child restraint system conforming to the requirements of Standard No. 213 (§571.213) or Standard No. 213b (§571.213b) as applicable, instead of one of the required tether anchorages or child restraint anchorage systems.

(c) Vehicles with no air bag in front passenger designated position:

(1) Each vehicle that does not have a rear designated seating position and does not have an air bag installed at front passenger designated seating positions pursuant to a temporary exemption granted by NHTSA under 49 CFR part 555, must have a child restraint anchorage system installed at a front passenger designated seating position. In the case of convertibles, the front designated passenger seating position need have only the two lower anchorages meeting the requirements of S9 of this standard.

(2) Each vehicle that has a rear designated seating position and meets the conditions in S4.5.4.1(b) of Standard No. 208 (§571.208), and does not have an air bag installed at front passenger designated seating positions pursuant to a temporary exemption granted by NHTSA under 49 CFR part 555, must have a child restraint anchorage system installed at a front passenger designated seating position in place of one of the child restraint anchorage systems that is required for the rear seat. In the case of convertibles, the front designated passenger seating position need have only the two lower anchorages meeting the requirements of S9 of this standard.

(d) A vehicle that does not have an air bag on-off switch meeting the requirements of S4.5.4 of Standard No. 208 (§571.208) shall not have any child restraint anchorage system installed at a front designated seating position.

(e) A vehicle with a rear designated seating position for which interference with transmission and/or suspension components prevents the location of the lower bars of a child restraint anchorage system anywhere within the zone described by S9.2 of this standard is excluded from the requirement to provide a child restraint anchorage system at that position. However, except as provided elsewhere in this S5, such a vehicle must have a tether anchorage at a front passenger designated seating position.

S5.2 Vehicles manufactured on or after September 1, 2031. (a) School buses are excluded from the requirements to be equipped with tether anchorages.

(b) A vehicle may be equipped with a built-in child restraint system conforming to the requirements of Standard No. 213b (§571.213b) instead of one of the required tether anchorages or child restraint anchorage systems.

(c) Vehicles with no air bag in front passenger designated position:

(1) Each vehicle that does not have a rear designated seating position and does not have an air bag installed at front passenger designated seating positions pursuant to a temporary exemption granted by NHTSA under 49 CFR part 555 must have a child restraint anchorage system installed at a front passenger designated seating position.

(2) Each vehicle that has a rear designated seating position and meets the conditions in S4.5.4.1(b) of Standard No. 208 (§571.208), and does not have an air bag installed at front passenger designated seating positions pursuant to a temporary exemption granted by NHTSA under 49 CFR part 555, must have a child restraint anchorage system installed at a front passenger designated seating position in place of one of the child restraint anchorage systems that is required for the rear seat.

(d) A vehicle that does not have an air bag on-off switch meeting the requirements of S4.5.4 of Standard No. 208 (§571.208), shall not have any child restraint anchorage system installed at a front designated seating position.

S6. Requirements for tether anchorages. Vehicles subject to Standard No. 225 (this section) shall meet the tether anchorage requirements specified in S6.1, S6.2, and S6.4 according to the phase-in schedule specified in S13 of this standard.

S6.1 Configuration of the tether anchorage.

S6.1.1 Each tether anchorage shall:

(a) Permit the attachment of a tether hook of a child restraint system meeting the configuration and geometry specified in figure 11 of Standard No. 213 (figure 11 to §571.213);

(b) Be accessible without the need for any tools other than a screwdriver or coin;

(c) Once accessed, be ready for use without the need for any tools; and

(d) Be sealed to prevent the entry of exhaust fumes into the passenger compartment.

S6.1.2 Each tether anchorage shall:

(a) Consist of a rigid bar of any cross-section shape that permits the attachment of a tether hook (of a child restraint system) meeting the configuration and geometry specified in figure 11 of Standard No. 213 (figure 11 to §571.213), except in buses with a GVWR less than or equal to 10,000 pounds and vehicles that use a routing device per S6.2.1.2;

(b) Be accessible without the need for any tools and without folding the seat back (other than the head restraint) or removing carpet or other vehicle components (other than cargo covers) to access the anchorages. Individual tether anchorages may be covered with a cap, flap, or cover, provided that any cap, flap, or, cover is specifically designed to be opened, moved aside, or to otherwise give unobstructed access to the anchorage and is labeled with the symbol shown in figure 25 to this section;

(c) Once accessed, be ready for use without the need for any tools; and

(d) Be sealed to prevent the entry of exhaust fumes into the passenger compartment.

S6.2 Location of the tether anchorage.

S6.2.1 Subject to S6.2.1.2, the part of each tether anchorage that attaches to a tether hook must be located within the shaded zone shown in figures 3 through 7 to this section of the designated seating position for which it is installed. The zone is defined with reference to the seating reference point (see §571.3). (For purposes of the figures, “H Point” is defined to mean seating reference point.) A tether anchorage may be recessed in the seat back, provided that it is not in the strap wrap-around area at the top of the vehicle seat back. For the area under the vehicle seat, the forwardmost edge of the shaded zone is defined by the torso line reference plane.

S6.2.1.1 [Reserved]

S6.2.1.2 In the case of a vehicle that—

(a) Has a user-ready tether anchorage for which no part of the shaded zone shown in Figures 3 to 7 of this standard of the designated seating position for which the anchorage is installed is accessible without removing a seating component of the vehicle; and

(b) Has a tether strap routing device that is—

(1) Not less than 65 mm behind the torso line for that seating position, in the case of a flexible routing device or a deployable routing device, measured horizontally and in a vertical longitudinal plane; or

(2) Not less than 100 mm behind the torso line for that seating position, in the case of a fixed rigid routing device, measured horizontally and in a vertical longitudinal plane, the part of that anchorage that attaches to a tether hook may, at the manufacturer's option (with said option selected prior to, or at the time of, certification of the vehicle) be located outside that zone.

(c) The measurement of the location of the flexible or deployable routing device described in S6.2.1.2(b)(1) is made with SFAD 2 properly attached to the lower anchorages. A 40 mm wide nylon tether strap is routed through the routing device and attached to the tether anchorage in accordance with the written instructions required by S12 of this standard. The forwardmost contact point between the strap and the routing device must be within the stated limit when the tether strap is flat against the top surface of the SFAD and tensioned to 55 to 65 N. In seating positions without lower anchorages of a child restraint anchorage system, the SFAD 2 is held with its central lateral plane in the central vertical longitudinal plane of the seating position. The adjustable anchor attaching bars of the SFAD 2 are replaced by spacers that end flush with the back surface of the SFAD.

S6.2.2 Subject to S6.2.2.2, the part of each tether anchorage to which a tether hook attaches must be located within the shaded zone shown in figures 3 through 7 to this section of the designated seating position for which it is installed. The zone is defined with reference to the seating reference point (see §571.3). (For purposes of the figures, “H Point” means seating reference point.) A tether anchorage may be recessed in the seat back, provided that it is not in the strap wrap-around area at the top of the vehicle seat back. For the area under the vehicle seat, the forwardmost edge of the shaded zone is defined by a vertical plane 120 mm rearward of the “H Point,” as shown in figure 3 to this section.

S6.2.2.1 Subject to S6.2.2.2, for vehicles with adjustable or removable head restraints or no head restraints, the tether anchorage to which a tether hook attaches must be located outside the zone created by a 325 mm radius sphere with its center on the R-point and truncated horizontally at 230 mm below the sphere's center as shown in figures 8 and 9 to this section.

S6.2.2.2 In the case of a vehicle that—

(a) Has a user-ready tether anchorage for which no part of the shaded zone shown in figures 4 through 7 and 10 to this section of the designated seating position for which the anchorage is installed is accessible without the need for folding the seatback (other than the head restraint) or removing a seating component of the vehicle; and

(b) Has a tether strap routing device that is—

(1) Not less than 65 mm behind the torso line for that seating position, in the case of a flexible routing device or a deployable routing device, measured horizontally and in a vertical longitudinal plane; or

(2) Not less than 100 mm behind the torso line for that seating position, in the case of a fixed rigid routing device, measured horizontally and in a vertical longitudinal plane, the part of that anchorage that attaches to a tether hook may, at the manufacturer's option (with said option selected prior to, or at the time of, certification of the vehicle) be located outside that zone.

(c) The measurement of the location of the flexible or deployable routing device described in S6.2.2.2(b)(1) is made with SFAD 2 properly attached to the lower anchorages. A 40 mm wide nylon tether strap is routed through the routing device and attached to the tether anchorage in accordance with the written instructions required by S12 of this standard. The forwardmost contact point between the strap and the routing device must be within the stated limit when the tether strap is flat against the top surface of the SFAD and tensioned to 55 to 65 N. In seating positions without lower anchorages of a child restraint anchorage system, the SFAD 2 is held with its central lateral plane in the central vertical longitudinal plane of the seating position. The adjustable anchorage attaching bars of the SFAD 2 are replaced by spacers that end flush with the back surface of the SFAD 2.

S6.3 Strength requirements for tether anchorages. (a) When tested in accordance with S8, the tether anchorage must not separate completely from the vehicle seat or seat anchorage or the structure of the vehicle.

(b) Provisions for simultaneous and sequential testing:

(1) In the case of vehicle seat assemblies equipped with more than one tether anchorage, the force referred to in this S6.3 may, at the agency's option, be applied simultaneously to each of those tether anchorages. However, that force may not be applied simultaneously to tether anchorages for any two adjacent seating positions whose midpoints are less than 400 mm apart, as measured in accordance with S6.3(b)(i) and (ii) and figure 20 to this section.

(i) The midpoint of the seating position lies in the vertical longitudinal plane that is equidistant from vertical longitudinal planes through the geometric center of each of the two lower anchorages at the seating position. For those seating positions that do not provide lower anchorages, the midpoint of the seating position lies in the vertical longitudinal plane that passes through the SgRP of the seating position.

(ii) Measure the distance between the vertical longitudinal planes passing through the midpoints of the adjacent seating positions, as measured along a line perpendicular to the planes.

(2) A tether anchorage of a particular child restraint anchorage system will not be tested with the lower anchorages of that anchorage system if one or both of those lower anchorages have been previously tested under this standard.

S6.4 Marking and conspicuity requirements for tether anchorages. Vehicles subject to Standard No. 225 (this section) shall meet S6.4 according to the phase-in schedule specified in S13 of this standard.

(a) For each tether anchorage installed pursuant to S4 of this standard, there shall be a permanent marking that:

(1) Consists of one of the pictograms shown in figure 25 to this section that is not less than 20 mm in height;

(2) Except for vehicles that use a routing device per S6.2.2.2, the center of the pictogram in the longitudinal direction must be in the vertical longitudinal plane that passes through the center of the tether anchorage bar (± half of the tether anchorage length), as shown in figure 26 (Left) to this section; or the center of the pictogram in the lateral direction must be in the horizontal lateral plane that passes through the center of the tether anchorage bar (± half of the pictogram height), as shown in figure 26 (right) to this section.

(3) The nearest edge of the marking shall be located not more than 100 mm away from the tether anchorage bar as shown in figure 27 to this section. No other attachment feature to secure occupant items (i.e., cargo hooks or similar) shall be nearer to the marking than the distance from the marking to the tether anchorage. Vehicles with routing devices per S6.2.2.2 may use tags attached to the routing device.

(b) The tether anchorage bar may be covered by a cap or cover that is removable without the use of any tool, provided that the cap or cover is permanently labeled with a marking meeting the requirements of S6.4(a)(1). If the cap or cover is permanently attached to the vehicle, the tether anchorage is not required to be separately marked. If the cap or cover is not permanently attached to the vehicle, the tether anchorage must also be marked with the symbol meeting S6.4(a)(1) through (3).

(c) For vehicles that have a cargo cover that needs to be moved or removed to access the tether anchorages, the cargo cover must be permanently marked with the symbol meeting S6.4.1(a)(1) of this standard for each tether anchorage that is accessible under the cargo cover. Tether anchorages under the cargo cover must also be marked per S6.4(a).

* * * *

S8 Test procedures. Each vehicle shall meet the requirements of S6.3 when tested according to the following procedures. * * *

S8.1 Apply the force specified in S6.3 as follows—

* * * * *

S9. Requirements for the lower anchorages of the child restraint anchorage system. Vehicles subject to Standard No. 225 (this section) shall meet the lower anchorage requirements specified in S9.2 and S9.5 according to the phase-in schedule specified in S13 of this standard.

S9.1 Configuration of the lower anchorages

S9.1.1 * * *

(d) The bars must not be capable of being stowable or foldable.

* * * *

S9.2 Location of the lower anchorages.

* * * *

S9.5 Marking and conspicuity requirements.

S9.5.1 Requirements for lower anchors. Lower anchorages must meet the requirements in S9.5.1(a) or (b).

(a) For each bar installed pursuant to S4, the vehicle shall be permanently marked with a circle:

(1) That is not less than 13 mm in diameter;

(2) That is either solid or open, with or without words, symbols, or pictograms, provided that if words, symbols or pictograms are used, their meaning is explained to the consumer in writing, such as in the vehicle's owner's manual; and

(3) That is located such that its center is on each seat back between 50 and 100 mm above or on the seat cushion 100 ±25 mm forward of the intersection of the vertical transverse and horizontal longitudinal planes intersecting at the horizontal centerline of each lower anchorage, as illustrated in figure 22 to this section. The center of the circle must be in the vertical longitudinal plane that passes through the center of the bar (±25 mm).

(4) The circle may be on a tag.

(b) The vehicle shall be configured such that the following is visible: Each of the bars installed pursuant to S4, or a permanently attached guide device for each bar. The bar or guide device must be visible without the compression of the seat cushion or seat back, when the bar or device is viewed, in a vertical longitudinal plane passing through the center of the bar or guide device, along a line making an upward 30-degree angle with a horizontal plane. Seat backs are in the nominal design riding position. The bars may be covered by a removable cap or cover, provided that the cap or cover is permanently marked with words, symbols or pictograms whose meaning is explained to the consumer in written form as part of the owner's manual.

S9.5.2 Requirements for lower anchors. Lower anchorages must meet the requirements in S9.5.2(a) and (b), as applicable.

(a) For each bar installed pursuant to S4, the vehicle shall be permanently marked with a symbol that:

(1) Is not less than 13 mm in diameter;

(2) Contains the pictogram shown in figure 24 to this section; and

(3) Is located such that its center is on each seat back between 50 and 100 mm above or on the seat cushion between 100 to −50 mm forward of the intersection of the vertical transverse and horizontal longitudinal planes intersecting at the horizontal centerline of each lower anchorage, as illustrated in figure 19 to this section. The center of the symbol must be in the vertical longitudinal plane that passes through the center of the bar (±25 mm).

(4) The symbol may be on a tag.

(b) The bars may be covered by a removable cap or cover, provided that the cap or cover is permanently marked with the pictogram shown in figure 24 to this section. If the cap or cover is permanently attached to the vehicle, the lower anchorage bars are not required to be separately marked with the pictogram. If the cap or cover is not permanently attached to the vehicle, the lower anchorage bars must also be marked with the symbol meeting S9.5.2(a)(1) through (4).

* * * *

S11. Test procedures. Each vehicle shall meet the requirements of this standard when tested according to the following procedures. Where a range of values is specified, the vehicle shall be able to meet the requirements at all points within the range.

(a) Strength requirements —(1) Forward force direction. Place SFAD 2 in the vehicle seating position and attach it to the two lower anchorages of the child restraint anchorage system. Do not attach the tether anchorage. A rearward horizontal force of 135 ±15 N is applied to the center of the lower front crossbar of SFAD 2 to press the device against the seat back as the fore-aft position of the rearward extensions of the SFAD is adjusted to remove any slack or tension. Apply a preload force of 500 N horizontally and in the vertical centerline of the SFAD 2 at point X. Increase the pull force as linearly as practicable to a full force application of 11,000 N in not less than 24 seconds and not more than 30 seconds and maintain at an 11,000 N level for 1 second.

(2) Lateral force direction. Place SFAD 2 in the vehicle seating position and attach it to the two lower anchorages of the child restraint anchorage system. Do not attach the tether anchorage. A rearward force of 135 ±15 N is applied to the center of the lower front crossbar of SFAD 2 to press the device against the seat back as the fore-aft position of the rearward extensions of the SFAD is adjusted to remove any slack or tension. Apply a preload force of 500 N horizontal and perpendicular to the longitudinal centerline of the SFAD 2 at point X of the test device. Increase the pull force as linearly as practicable to a full force application of 5,000 N in not less than 24 seconds and not more than 30 seconds and maintain at a 5,000 N level for 1 second.

(b) Clearance angle. The seat back angle, if adjustable, is set at the manufacturer's nominal design seat back angle. If the position is not specified, set the seat back at the first detent rearward of 25° from the vertical. Remove or open any lower anchorage cover, if present, to expose the lower anchorage. To measure clearance angle, attach the clearance angle tool to the lower anchorage and apply a vertical force of 67 N (15 lbf) to the tool. Measure the angle (with respect to the horizontal) of the tool while the force is being applied.

(c) Anchorage depth. The seat back angle, if adjustable, is set at the manufacturer's nominal design seat back angle. If the position is not specified, set the seat back at the first detent rearward of 25° from the vertical. To measure the anchorage depth, subtract 30 degrees from the measured seat pan angle to calculate the view angle. With the anchorage depth tool ( see figure 28 to this section) on a flat surface, adjust the view bar to read the view angle. Slide the zeroing strip along the view bar so that it is barely touching the top of the depth tool hook. Move the view bar forward, so the end of the zeroing strip is aligned with the zero-scribe line. For hidden anchorages, slide the anchorage depth tool so that it reads 0 mm at the rear edge of the slider. For visible anchorages, align the depth gauge to 25 mm so that negative values can be read. Attach the depth tool centered to the lower anchorage. Adjust the depth tool base to be within ±2 degrees of the view angle (30 degrees minus seat pan angle) to set the tool-parallel to the seat pan angle. Move the entire slider bar forward until the zeroing strip contacts the vehicle seat back or any other vehicle part.

S12. Written instructions. Vehicles subject to Standard No. 225 (this section) shall meet the written instruction requirements specified in either S12.1 or S12.2 according to the phase-in schedule specified in S13.

S12.1 Written instructions shall:

(a) Indicate which seating positions in the vehicle are equipped with tether anchorages and child restraint anchorage systems;

(b) In the case of vehicles required to be marked as specified in paragraphs S4.1 and S9.5 of this standard, explain the meaning of markings provided to locate the lower anchorages of child restraint anchorage systems; and

(c) Include instructions that provide a step-by-step procedure, including diagrams, for properly attaching a child restraint system's tether strap to the tether anchorages.

S12.2 Written instructions shall:

(a) Indicate which seating positions in the vehicle are equipped with tether anchorages and child restraint anchorage systems;

(b) In the case of vehicles required to be marked as specified in paragraphs S4.1 and S9.5 of this standard, explain the meaning of markings provided to locate the lower anchorages of child restraint anchorage systems and the top tether anchorages;

(c) Include instructions that provide a step-by-step procedure, including diagrams, for properly attaching a child restraint system's tether strap to the tether anchorages;

(d) Include instructions on how to locate and access the tether anchorage and the lower anchorages; and

(e) Use the following terms when referring to the different components of the child restraint anchorage system that are used to connect the child restraint system to the vehicle: “lower anchor” means the lower anchorage of the child restraint anchorage system in the vehicle, “tether anchor” means the top tether anchorage of the child restraint anchorage system in the vehicle, “lower anchor attachment” means the child restraint system or the detachable base's (in the case of a rear-facing child restraint with a detachable base) lower anchorage connector and the lower anchorage strap (for flexible lower anchorage attachments), “rigid lower anchor attachment” means the child restraint system or the detachable base's (in the case of a rear-facing child restraint with a detachable base) lower anchorage connector that is rigidly attached to the CRS or detachable base, respectively, and does not have a lower anchorage strap, and “tether” means the child restraints system's tether hook and tether strap.

S13 Phase-in schedule. The S13 phase in schedule details when listed requirements become inactive and are replaced by newer requirements. Requirements in Standard No. 225 (this section) not listed in S13 shall be in effect before, during, and after the S13 phase-in.

S13.1 Vehicle certification information. At any time during the production years ending August 31, 2029, and August 31, 2030, each manufacturer shall, upon request from the Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance, provide information identifying the vehicles (by make, model and vehicle identification number) that have been certified as complying with the child restraint anchorage usability requirements of this standard. Manufacturers shall specify the number of vehicles meeting each phase-in percentage. The manufacturer's designation of a vehicle as a certified vehicle is irrevocable.

S13.1.1 Pre phase-in. Vehicles manufactured before September 1, 2028, are subject to S6.1.1, S6.2.1, S9.2.1, S9.2.2, S9.2.3, S9.5.1, and S12.1 of this standard.

S13.1.2 Phase-in year 1. Vehicles manufactured on or after September 1, 2028, and before September 1, 2029. The total number of individual vehicles complying with S6.1.2, S6.2.2, S6.4, S9.2 (except for S9.2.2(a)), S9.5.2, and S12.2 of this standard shall be not less than 20 percent of a vehicle manufacturer's total production for this time period. The remaining 80 percent of a vehicle manufacturer's total production are subject to S6.1.1, S6.2.1, S9.2.1, S9.2.2, S9.2.3, S9.5.1, and S12.1 of this standard.

S13.1.3 Phase-in year 2. Vehicles manufactured on or after September 1, 2029, and before September 1, 2030. The total number of individual vehicles complying with S6.1.2, S6.2.2, S6.4, S9.2 (except for S9.2.2(a)), S9.5.2, and S12.2 of this standard shall be not less than 50 percent of a vehicle manufacturer's total production for this time period. The remaining 50 percent of a vehicle manufacturer's total production are subject to S6.1.1, S6.2.1, S9.2.1, S9.2.2, S9.2.3, S9.5.1, and S12.1 of this standard.

S13.1.4 Phase-in year 3 and beyond. Vehicles manufactured on or after September 1, 2030. The total number of vehicles complying with S6.1.2, S6.2.2, S6.4, S9.2 (except for S9.2.2(a)), S9.5.2, and S12.2 shall be not less than 100 percent of a vehicle manufacturer's total production.

S13.2 Vehicles produced by more than one manufacturer.

S13.2.1 For the purpose of calculating average annual production of vehicles for each manufacturer and the number of vehicles manufactured by each manufacturer under S13.1.1 through S13.1.4, a vehicle produced by more than one manufacturer shall be attributed to a single manufacturer as follows:

(a) A vehicle which is imported shall be attributed to the importer.

(b) A vehicle manufactured in the United States by more than one manufacturer, one of which also markets the vehicle, shall be attributed to the manufacturer which markets the vehicle.

S13.2.2 A vehicle produced by more than one manufacturer shall be attributed to any one of the vehicle's manufacturers specified by an express written contract, reported to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration under 49 CFR part 585, between the manufacturers so specified and the manufacturer to which the vehicle would otherwise be attributed under S13.2.1.

Figures to §571.225

* * * * *

Figure 8 to §571.225. Side View of 325 mm Radius Sphere Zone From R-Point, Truncated at 230 mm Below the Center



Figure 9 to §571.225. Three-Dimensional 325 mm Radius Sphere Zone From R-Point, Truncated Along the Lower Edge at 230 mm Below Its Center



Figure 10 to §571.225—Side View. User Ready Tether Anchorage Location



* * * *

Figure 19 to §571.225. Placement of Symbol on the Seat Back and Seat Cushion of Vehicle



Specialized Industries

Go beyond the regulations! Visit the Institute for in-depth guidance on a wide range of compliance subjects in safety and health, transportation, environment, and human resources.

J. J. Keller® COMPLIANCE NETWORK is a premier online safety and compliance community, offering members exclusive access to timely regulatory content in workplace safety (OSHA), transportation (DOT), environment (EPA), and human resources (DOL).

Interact With Our Compliance Experts

Puzzled by a regulatory question or issue? Let our renowned experts provide the answers and get your business on track to full compliance!

Upcoming Events

Reference the Compliance Network Safety Calendar to keep track of upcoming safety and compliance events. Browse by industry or search by keyword to see relevant dates and observances, including national safety months, compliance deadlines, and more.

SAFETY & COMPLIANCE NEWS

Keep up with the latest regulatory developments from OSHA, DOT, EPA, DOL, and more.

REGSENSE® REGULATORY REFERENCE

Explore a comprehensive database of word-for-word regulations on a wide range of compliance topics, with simplified explanations and best practices advice from our experts.

THE J. J. KELLER INSTITUTE

The Institute is your destination for in-depth content on 120+ compliance subjects. Discover articles, videos, and interactive exercises that will strengthen your understanding of regulatory concepts relevant to your business.

ADD HAZMAT, ENVIRONMENTAL, & HR RESOURCES

Unlock exclusive content offering expert insights into hazmat, environmental, and human resources compliance with a COMPLIANCE NETWORK EDGE membership.

DIRECT ACCESS TO COMPLIANCE EXPERTS

Struggling with a compliance challenge? Get the solution from our in-house team of experts! You can submit a question to our experts by email, set up a phone or video call, or request a detailed research report.

EVENTS

Register to attend live online events hosted by our experts. These webcasts and virtual conferences feature engaging discussions on important compliance topics in a casual, knowledge-sharing environment.

Most Recent Highlights In Environmental

Air permitting challenges for portable machinery
2025-10-28T05:00:00Z

Air permitting challenges for portable machinery

Portable generator engines, rock crushers, and aggregate processing units are designed to move from site to site. However, under certain conditions, these mobile units may be reclassified as stationary sources of air pollution. This shift in classification can trigger regulatory requirements that operators may not anticipate, including permitting, emissions monitoring, and reporting obligations.

Defining stationary sources under the Clean Air Act

The Clean Air Act defines a stationary source as any building, structure, facility, or installation that emits (or has the potential to emit) air pollutants. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) further clarifies that portable equipment becomes stationary if it remains at a single location for more than 12 consecutive months. This rule applies regardless of whether the equipment was originally designed to be mobile.

For example, a portable diesel engine used to power a rock crusher may be considered stationary if it operates at the same site for over a year. Once reclassified, the equipment may be subject to federal standards such as New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) or National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP).

State-level interpretations and variations

While EPA provides overarching guidance, individual states often implement their own rules and permitting frameworks. These can vary significantly depending on local air quality concerns, industrial activity, and enforcement priorities.

California’s Portable Equipment Registration Program allows certain engines and equipment to operate statewide without obtaining site-specific permits, provided they meet emission standards and are properly registered. In contrast, Texas requires a permit for rock crushers that operate at a site for more than 12 months, aligning closely with EPA’s definition of stationary sources. Maine uses a Crusher Identification Number system to track emissions from portable units and ensure compliance with state regulations.

Some states also impose thresholds based on horsepower, fuel type, or emission potential. Equipment that exceeds these thresholds may require a stationary source permit even if it is moved periodically.

Compliance challenges and enforcement risks

Misunderstanding the distinction between portable and stationary sources can lead to significant compliance issues. Operators may assume that mobility exempts equipment from permitting, only to discover that prolonged use at a single site has triggered regulatory oversight. Failure to obtain the proper permits or meet emission standards can result in fines, enforcement actions, and operational delays.

Recordkeeping is another common challenge. Regulators often require documentation showing how long equipment has been at a site, its emission characteristics, and any relocations. Without accurate records, operators may struggle to prove that their equipment qualifies as portable.

Best practices for operators

To be compliant, operators should:

  • Monitor and record how long each unit remains at a location,
  • Understand the emissions profile and horsepower of their equipment,
  • Review both federal and state regulations before deploying portable units,
  • Maintain detailed records of equipment movement and usage, and
  • Consult with environmental agencies when planning long-term projects.

Proactive communication with regulators can help clarify requirements and avoid costly surprises. In some cases, applying for a general or portable permit may be the simplest way to ensure compliance.

Key to Remember: Portable equipment doesn’t stay exempt forever. If it remains at one site too long, it may be regulated as a stationary source, bringing new rules, responsibilities, and risks.

HazCom, Hazmat, and HazWaste: Unpacking applicability and training requirements
2025-10-17T05:00:00Z

HazCom, Hazmat, and HazWaste: Unpacking applicability and training requirements

No matter what you call them, hazardous chemicals are regulated by OSHA, DOT, and EPA depending upon what you’re doing with those chemicals. Three of the most confusing sets of regulations related to chemicals include:

  • Hazard Communication (HazCom), 29 CFR 1910.1200 — OSHA requires that chemical hazards be communicated downstream from the manufacturer, importer, or distributor to employers and employees. This communication takes the form of safety data sheets (SDSs), labels, and information/training.
  • Hazardous Materials (Hazmat), 49 CFR 171 to 180 — DOT regulates hazmat. Hazmat regulations are aimed to ensure that hazmat is packaged and handled safely during transport.
  • Hazardous Waste (HazWaste), 40 CFR 260 to 299 — EPA explains that HazWaste is solid waste that is listed as hazardous OR that exhibits a characteristic of HazWaste (ignitability, corrosivity, reactivity, or toxicity). HazWaste is waste with properties that make it dangerous or capable of having a harmful effect on human health and the environment.

OSHA HazCom

HazCom applies to “any chemical which is known to be present in the workplace in such a manner that employees may be exposed under normal conditions of use or in a foreseeable emergency.” The OSHA regulation has requirements for hazardous chemical manufacturers, importers, distributors, and employers.

HazCom-covered employers must ensure containers of non-exempt hazardous chemicals are labeled, SDSs are readily accessible to employees in their work areas, and effective information/training is provided for exposed employees. They must also prepare and implement a written HazCom program (which includes a chemical inventory), unless they only have exempted operations under 1910.1200(b)(3) and/or (b)(4).

Covered employees have a right to understand the chemical hazards in their workplace. Training is key to ensuring employees have that understanding. Employees must be trained prior to initial assignment with hazardous chemicals and whenever a new chemical hazard is introduced. Employers must cover the elements in 1910.1200(h).

DOT Hazmat

The hazmat regulations apply to those involved in three primary types of activities: pre-transportation functions, transportation functions, and hazmat packaging. Pre-transportation functions include activities performed by the hazmat shipper and deal largely with paperwork. Transportation functions, on the other hand, include activities performed by those directly involved in transporting hazmat, including drivers.

“Hazmat employees” must be trained per 49 CFR 172.704 within 90 days of employment or job function assignment, and refresher training is mandated at least once every three years. Employees are considered hazmat employees if they directly affect hazmat transportation safety. See 49 CFR 171.8 for a detailed definition of hazmat employee.

The DOT says, “Training conducted by OSHA, EPA, and other Federal or international agencies may be used to satisfy the training requirements in 172.704(a) to the extent that such training addresses the components specified in paragraph (a) of this section (general awareness/familiarization; function-specific; safety; security awareness; in-depth security training, if a security plan is required; and driver training for each hazmat employee who will operate a motor vehicle).”

EPA HazWaste

Every business deals with waste and must know how to properly dispose of it. Most states are authorized to run their own HazWaste programs, so a facility needs to be aware of state (and often local) HazWaste regulations. When waste is generated, the facility must identify the waste and determine if it is HazWaste by definition.

EPA’s HazWaste generator regulations at 40 CFR 262 apply differently depending upon the “generator category” (large quantity (LQG), small quantity (SQG), and very small quantity (VSQG)), which is determined by how much HazWaste a facility generates each month. Therefore, under Part 262, employee training requirements too are based on the generator category.

SQGs must train employees according to 40 CFR 262.16. SQGs have basic training requirements. They must ensure employees are thoroughly familiar with proper waste handling and emergency procedures relevant to their responsibilities during normal facility operations and emergencies. LQG personnel training requirements are found at 40 CFR 262.17. Being large, these generators are required to meet much more extensive training requirements. It’s a best practice for VSQGs to train employees to safely handle HazWaste, but it’s not specifically called out in EPA’s HazWaste generator regulations. However, other training regulations, such as those for OSHA and DOT may come into play.

Key to remember: No matter what you call them, hazardous chemicals are regulated by OSHA, DOT, and EPA depending what you’re doing with those chemicals. Employers must understand what regulations apply to their situation and train employees accordingly.

No inspectors, no excuses: Why compliance still matters in a government shutdown
2025-10-14T05:00:00Z

No inspectors, no excuses: Why compliance still matters in a government shutdown

There have been 21 federal shutdowns since 1976, with an average duration of 8 days. The longest shutdown (in 2018–2019) lasted 35 days. Shutdowns aren't uncommon. When federal agencies shut down, inspections stall, enforcement actions pause, and regulatory oversight slows. For many companies, this might seem like a temporary reprieve from environmental scrutiny. But for professionals committed to environmental excellence, it’s an opportunity, not a loophole. The absence of enforcement doesn’t mean the absence of responsibility.

Why compliance still matters, even without enforcement

Environmental compliance isn’t just about avoiding fines. It’s about protecting worker health, community trust, and long-term operational stability. During a government shutdown, the temptation to defer environmental investments or relax internal standards can grow. But doing so risks more than future penalties; it undermines the credibility of your environmental program and can lead to reputational damage.

It’s also important to note that state programs are still typically operational and active during federal shutdowns, so inspections and compliance activities for state-authorized programs continue.

Making the business case for continued investment

To convince management and stakeholders, frame environmental excellence as a strategic asset:

  • Risk management: Environmental lapses can still be discovered post-shutdown, and penalties may be retroactive.
  • Operational efficiency: Many environmental controls improve process reliability, reduce waste, and lower energy costs.
  • Brand and stakeholder trust: Investors, customers, and communities increasingly expect companies to go beyond compliance.
  • Permit renewals and expansions: Agencies may scrutinize historical performance when reviewing future applications.

Use real-world examples or internal metrics to show how environmental investments have paid off — even when enforcement wasn’t the driver.

Strategies for promoting excellence during a shutdown

Environmental professionals can lead by example and keep the momentum going:

  • Maintain internal audits and inspections: Show that oversight continues, even if external reviews pause.
  • Communicate proactively: Share updates with leadership about ongoing compliance efforts and environmental performance.
  • Highlight cost savings: Quantify how environmental initiatives reduce resource use, waste disposal costs, or downtime.
  • Engage employees: Reinforce the company’s environmental values through training, recognition, and involvement.

Turning downtime into opportunity

A shutdown can be a chance to strengthen internal systems:

  • Review and update environmental management plans.
  • Conduct training or tabletop exercises.
  • Evaluate historical data to identify trends and areas of improvement.
  • Prepare for future inspections with mock audits or gap analyses.

These efforts demonstrate commitment and prepare your team for when oversight resumes.

Key to remember: Environmental excellence isn’t just about avoiding fines. It’s about building a resilient, responsible, and respected operation. Even when enforcement pauses, your commitment shouldn’t.

EHS Monthly Round Up - September 2025

EHS Monthly Round Up - September 2025

In this September 2025 roundup video, we'll review the most impactful environmental health and safety news.

Hi everyone! Welcome to the monthly news roundup video, where we’ll review the most impactful environmental health and safety news. Let’s take a look at what’s happened over the past month.

OSHA released its Spring 2025 regulatory agenda on September 4. Many rulemakings have been pushed into the fourth quarter of 2025 and the first half of 2026, while a few have been removed from the agenda altogether. These include Infectious Diseases, Blood Lead Level for Medical Removal, and the Musculoskeletal Disorders Column on the OSHA 300 log.

Three rules moved into the long-term actions category – Workplace Violence in Health Care and Social Assistance, Cranes and Derricks in Construction, and Process Safety Management and Prevention of Major Chemical Accidents. The proposed rule stage saw an influx of new entries, most of which were published in the July 1 Federal Register.

The Standards Improvement Project, slated for proposal in May 2026, intends to “remove, modernize, or narrow duplicative, unnecessary, or overly burdensome regulatory provisions.”

OSHA renewed its alliance with the National Waste and Recycling Association and the Solid Waste Association of North America. The partnership will focus on safety issues such as transportation hazards; slips, trips, and falls; needlestick and musculoskeletal injuries; and health issues associated with lithium battery hazards in waste/recycling collection and processing.

For the 15th year in a row, fall protection for construction topped OSHA’s list of top 10 violations. In fiscal year 2024, there were 5,914 recorded fall protection violations, down from 7,271 in fiscal year 2023. The standards that round out the top 10 remain unchanged, with a shift in some of the rankings.

Turning to environmental news, EPA proposes to eliminate the Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program requirements for all source categories except the petroleum and natural gas systems category. The agency also proposes to suspend compliance obligations for covered facilities until 2034. A public hearing was held October 1 and stakeholders have until November 3 to comment on the proposal.

Hazardous waste handlers may continue to use 5-paper copy manifest forms. EPA announced it will accept these forms from entities regulated by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, or RCRA, until further notice. The agency will give a 90-day notice before it plans to stop accepting the 5-copy forms.

And finally, EPA published its Spring 2025 regulatory agenda on September 4. The agenda outlines the agency’s upcoming regulatory actions and their status in the rulemaking process. Major updates on the docket include those for greenhouse gases, risk management rules, and the Renewable Fuel Standards for 2026 and 2027.

Thanks for tuning in to the monthly news roundup. We’ll see you next month!

What are the 3 types of National Pretreatment Program standards?
2025-10-06T05:00:00Z

What are the 3 types of National Pretreatment Program standards?

Industrial and commercial facilities produce significant amounts of pollutant-containing wastewater. Sending these waste streams to public wastewater and sewage treatment facilities as-is can cause major problems since these facilities usually aren’t designed to handle toxic or unexpected industrial pollutants. That’s why facilities have to pretreat wastewater before sending it to the treatment facility.

Industrial and commercial sources that discharge pollutant-containing wastewater to a publicly owned treatment works (POTW) facility are called industrial users (IUs). You may also see them referred to as “nonpoint sources” and “indirect dischargers.” These facilities are subject to the National Pretreatment Program, which is part of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit Program.

The Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA’s) National Pretreatment Program mandates IUs to comply with all applicable federal, state, and local standards to discharge wastewater to a POTW. The federal program has three types of pretreatment requirements:

  • National prohibited discharge standards,
  • National categorical pretreatment standards, and
  • Local discharge limits.

Understanding the differences between the types of pretreatment program standards is essential, especially since your facility may have to comply with all three.

What are the types of pretreatment standards?

IUs must obtain permits or comply with other control mechanisms to discharge wastewater to a POTW. Let’s look at the three kinds of pretreatment standards that may apply.

Prohibited discharge standards are national standards consisting of general and specific prohibitions that forbid facilities from discharging certain pollutants.

  • The general prohibitions ban IUs from discharging any pollutants to a POTW that can cause pass through or interference (defined at 40 CFR 403.3).
  • The specific prohibitions ban IUs from discharging eight kinds of pollutants (defined at 403.5(b)), such as those that pose a fire or explosion hazard to the POTW.

Categorical pretreatment standards are national limits that apply to wastewater discharged by facilities in specific industrial categories.

EPA sets effluent limitations guidelines and standards (ELGs) for the covered industrial categories to prevent discharges from IUs that can pass through or interfere with the works or otherwise disrupt POTW operations. ELGs give numerical, technology-based limits for the quantity, concentration, or properties of a pollutant that IUs can discharge to a POTW.

Local limits are established by POTWs and are specific to each site, so requirements vary across different POTW pretreatment programs. Local limits prevent pollutant discharges from IUs that can pass through or interfere with the works, contaminate sludge, and/or endanger worker health and safety.

POTWs set effluent discharge limits, which can be numerical or narrative (for example, no discharging toxics in toxic amounts). Standards may also include best management practices, such as taking actions to control plant site runoff.

Who enforces the pretreatment standards?

Generally, POTWs implement the NPDES National Pretreatment Program at the local level. EPA requires large POTWs and smaller POTWs with significant industrial discharges to develop local pretreatment programs. Through EPA-approved local programs, POTWs enforce the national standards and requirements in addition to any stricter local regulations that apply.

Where EPA hasn’t approved a POTW’s local pretreatment program, it's administered by the state (if approved to do so) or EPA regional office.

Where does my facility start?

If your facility is subject to the NPDES National Pretreatment Program, first identify the kind of IU your facility is: an IU, a significant IU, or a categorical IU. The category determines the requirements that may apply.

Keep in mind that all IUs must comply with the applicable federal pretreatment program requirements:

  • Regardless of whether the POTW has an approved pretreatment program, and
  • Regardless of whether the IUs have been issued a permit or control mechanism.

Significant IUs (defined at 403.3(v)) and categorical IUs (i.e., facilities subject to one of the categorical standards in Parts 405–471) have additional federal requirements. Generally, these facilities must also meet local limits.

Key to remember: Industrial and commercial facilities must comply with the National Pretreatment Program before discharging pollutant-containing wastewater to a publicly owned treatment works facility.

See More

Most Recent Highlights In Transportation

How the government shutdown affects employers
2025-10-01T05:00:00Z

How the government shutdown affects employers

On October 1, the federal government shut down. As a result, private employers and employees, as well as federal contractors and government employees, will likely face delays in services and programs until a resolution is reached.

Below is a recap of how the shutdown impacts several key federal agencies and what to expect.

Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA)

It’s generally business as usual for the FMCSA. Roadside inspections are considered an essential safety function. Both federal and state enforcement partners perform these inspections, and most weigh stations are run by state Department of Transportation (DOT) agencies, which aren’t directly affected by a federal shutdown.

Drivers should assume inspections will continue as normal. Violations will still result in citations, out-of-service orders, and compliance reviews.

While the day-to-day enforcement likely won’t change, some aspects of the FMCSA and DOT operations may slow down, such as:

  • Rulemaking and new initiatives: Any changes to federal regulations will pause.
  • Audits and investigations: Compliance reviews and safety audits may take longer, although the enforcement of violations will continue.
  • Administrative support: Processing non-urgent matters, permits, or correspondence may be slower.

New registrations and filings, such as new USDOT numbers, new authority, and Unified Carrier Registration filings, will likely experience delays until the shutdown is resolved.

Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA)

The picture is more complex at PHMSA. The DOT plan says about one-third of the agency's 580 employees are expected to be furloughed. Inspections of hazardous materials shippers, carriers, and other entities will continue, as will enforcement of the hazardous materials safety regulations. However, a variety of administrative functions are expected to be impacted, including non-emergency approvals and permits, rulemaking activities, research, grants, outreach, and the hazmat registration and fee-collection program.

Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA)

OSHA will continue only its essential functions, including:

  • Inspections for imminent danger situations, workplace fatalities, and catastrophes;
  • Review and referral of whistleblower complaints tied to imminent threats;
  • Follow-up inspections of serious violations without abatement; and
  • Enforcement actions needed to meet statutory deadlines on high-risk cases.

All other agency activities such as rulemaking, programmed inspections, compliance assistance, website updates, and outreach programs are suspended. Only employees designated as essential may continue working, and the Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission halts all operations for the duration of the shutdown.

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)

EPA has implemented its contingency plan, resulting in a significant reduction in operations. Approximately 90 percent of EPA staff have been furloughed, leaving around 1,700 personnel to continue essential functions, including emergency response operations, law enforcement, criminal investigations, maintenance of critical laboratory assets, and Superfund site work only if halting it poses an imminent threat to human life.

Most routine EPA functions have been suspended (like issuing permits and regulations). The agency has also paused work on climate-related regulations and restructuring efforts unless deemed essential or funded through exempted sources (e.g., Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act or specific fee-based programs).

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC)

The EEOC, which investigates discrimination claims, is closed during the shutdown. The agency won’t be responding to inquiries during this time, but a limited number of services will still be available. If employees want to file a discrimination charge, they should be aware that time limits for filing a charge won’t be extended due to the shutdown.

Additional information on filing new charges, the status of pending charges, or other existing business with the EEOC, etc., will likely be delayed. During the shutdown, information on the EEOC website won’t be updated. In addition, transactions submitted via the website won’t be processed, and EEOC staff won’t be able to respond to requests or questions submitted to the EEOC, including those submitted by email or through its website, until the shutdown is over. 

Members of the public who call the EEOC during the government shutdown will be able to access the pre-recorded information available on the EEOC's Interactive Voice Response System, but EEOC staff will not be available to assist them. Email inquiries sent to the agency will be monitored for urgent matters but generally not addressed during the shutdown.

National Labor Relations Board (NLRB)

NLRB offices are closed during the shutdown, and hearings are postponed. Because documents may not be filed on the NLRB website during the shutdown, due dates for filing documents will be extended.

As the 6-month statute of limitations for filing unfair labor practice charges remains in effect, the agency recommends mailing or faxing a copy of the charge to the regional office during the shutdown.

Department of Labor (DOL)

The DOL is also shut down, except for activities such as those needed to protect life and property. All regulatory work has ceased, including the final rules on independent contractors and joint employers.

The Wage and Hour Division (WHD), which enforces laws such as the Fair Labor Standards Act and the Family and Medical Leave Act, dropped from 1,270 employees to 7. Employees won’t be able to file claims under such laws.

The agency will monitor and respond to child labor investigations and will pursue and address legal cases or investigations in jeopardy of being lost due to a statute of limitations or as otherwise ordered by the court. It will also continue to process certain benefits payments and support federal and state unemployment programs.

The Employee Benefits Security Administration (EBSA) generally stopped its research activities, audits, compliance assistance, and IT support.

The Veterans’ Employment and Training Service (VETS) stopped conducting investigations of the Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act.

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS)

Employers must continue to use the Form I-9 during the shutdown to verify that an employee is eligible to work in the United States. The form must be completed within 3 business days after the employee’s first day of employment.

The form may be downloaded from the USCIS website. The agency expects to retain the majority of its employees during the shutdown.

Employers who use the online E-Verify system to confirm an employee’s eligibility to work in the United States may experience a system shutdown, however. In the event of an E-Verify shutdown, employers won’t be able to create E-Verify cases, run reports, or resolve tentative non-confirmations.

E-Verify employers should continue to complete a Form I-9 for each new employee. After the shutdown ends and the E-Verify system is operational, employers should create E-Verify cases for employees who were hired when the website was not available.

In the event of an E-Verify system shutdown, it’s likely that the USCIS will extend deadlines for creating E-Verify cases and resolving tentative non-confirmations. The agency is expected to provide further guidance.

Federal contractors and government employees

Federal contractors and government employees from shut-down agencies are either furloughed — prohibited from work and unpaid — or required to work without pay if their roles are deemed essential to public safety.

Payments to companies with a federal contract may be delayed, and they may receive a stop-work order. Contracts will not be issued or extended during the shutdown.

The Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs website is not being updated during the shutdown.

Pre-preconstruction permits: Can building begin without one?
2025-09-25T05:00:00Z

Pre-preconstruction permits: Can building begin without one?

Just like blueprints, hard hats, and scaffolding, permits are synonymous with construction. Most businesses have to get permits before breaking ground on a project. However, recent federal guidance on preconstruction permits for air emissions indicates that some construction activities may be able to start without a permit.

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) requires businesses to obtain a preconstruction permit for a new facility or major modifications to an existing facility before starting construction. It ensures that new or modified facilities will be able to comply with air emissions requirements. In September 2025, the agency published guidance (in the form of a response letter), determining that a company may start construction activities on parts of a new facility unrelated to air emissions before obtaining a permit.

Let’s take a look at the preconstruction permit regulations, the facts of the case in the guidance, and EPA’s plans to clarify which construction activities can begin before obtaining a preconstruction permit.

What are the preconstruction permit requirements?

Under the New Source Review (NSR) regulations (40 CFR Part 51 Subpart I and Part 52 Subpart A), businesses that build a new facility or make major modifications to an existing one have to obtain a preconstruction permit to “begin actual construction.” EPA defines “begin actual construction” as “physical on-site construction activities on an emissions unit which are of a permanent nature.” It covers activities including (but not limited to) installing building supports and foundations, laying underground pipework, and constructing permanent storage structures.

There are three types of preconstruction permits: Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) permits, nonattainment NSR permits, and minor source permits. The permits define:

  • What construction is allowed,
  • Emissions limits, and
  • How the source must be operated (if applicable).

It’s important to note that most preconstruction permits are issued at the state or local levels. The requirements must be at least as stringent as EPA’s.

What’s the case?

A county air quality district in Arizona asked EPA to assess whether it may allow a company to start the first phase of construction on a semiconductor manufacturing facility before obtaining an NSR permit if no emissions units are involved.

EPA answered the request with TSMC Arizona Begin Actual Construction — EPA Response Letter (September 2, 2025) and published the letter as new guidance.

Facts of the case

The company builds its facilities in three phases and doesn’t install the semiconductor manufacturing equipment until all phases are complete.

The first phase of construction consists of building the core and shell of the facility, which includes the foundation, a steel superstructure, and external walls. The building will eventually house emissions units (semiconductor manufacturing equipment). However, the company stated that the first phase of construction doesn’t involve any air pollution control devices, emissions units, or foundations for emissions units.

The county air quality district agreed that if a structure contains no emissions unit, it’s not subject to NSR permitting because it doesn’t emit or have the potential to emit pollutants.

EPA response to the case

In the September 2025 response letter, EPA recognized that the definition of “begin actual construction” prohibits on-site construction of an emissions unit without a permit, but it doesn’t prohibit on-site construction of the parts of a facility that don’t qualify as an emissions unit.

The agency determined that the county air quality district may allow the company to start the first phase of construction (even if it’s of a permanent nature) before it obtains an NSR permit as long as it doesn’t involve construction on an emissions unit.

What are EPA’s regulatory plans?

The agency will conduct rulemaking to clarify what construction activities need an NSR permit and what construction activities can proceed without one. It plans to amend the NSR regulations in 2026 by:

  • Revising the definition of “begin actual construction," and
  • Establishing how permitting authorities may distinguish parts of a facility that are and aren’t emissions units or parts of emissions units.

Until then, EPA will address preconstruction permitting issues on a case-by-case basis.

How should facilities respond?

If you’re planning to build a new facility or make a major modification to one, consider these tips to help you comply with the NSR regulations:

  • Check whether the state and local requirements are the same as or stricter than federal rules. The state environmental department’s website is a good place to start.
  • Contact the permit-issuing agency (likely the state or local air pollution control agency) for direct help with your specific project.
  • Watch EPA news announcements for updates on rulemaking. You can also track the Federal Register, where the agency publishes proposed and final rules.

Key to remember: EPA plans to conduct rulemaking to help distinguish which construction activities need a preconstruction permit for air emissions and which activities don’t.

CSB says inferno reveals gaping holes in OSHA/EPA regulations
2025-09-23T05:00:00Z

CSB says inferno reveals gaping holes in OSHA/EPA regulations

A stunning 17-minute video from the Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation Board (CSB) animates the turn of events at a Texas terminal facility over six years ago. A broken pump led to a massive fire and significant environmental damage. Despite the process weaknesses at the facility, the video underscores a breach in OSHA and EPA regulations that CSB warns may lead to other incidents in the U.S.

The catastrophic incident

Picture an 80,000-barrel aboveground storage tank. On March 17, 2019, the circulation pump on the tank failed, allowing the release of a flammable butane-enriched naphtha blend. The release was undetected, as vapor accumulated in the area for 30 minutes. The vapor then ignited, resulting in a large-scale fire that spread to 14 other tanks. Fire crews were unable to extinguish it for three days. Black smoke cascaded into the community that was sheltering in place.

Then the petrochemicals, firefighting foams, and contaminated water broke past the secondary containment wall. An estimated 500,000 barrels of the materials then entered an adjacent bayou and reached a shipping channel contaminating a seven-mile stretch.

What did investigators find?

The CSB investigation found technical failures. The video identifies three important but missing things:

  • Procedures to maintain the mechanical integrity of the pump,
  • Flammable gas detection systems, and
  • Remotely operated tank valves.

Outdated tank farm design was also a factor. Tanks were spaced close together and did not have subdivided containment systems.

Despite the process issues, regulatory shortfalls played a prominent role in the board’s findings. CSB Chairperson Steve Owens remarks, “A serious gap in federal regulations also contributed to the severity of this event.”

OSHA regulatory gap

The CSB video, "Terminal Faiure," points out that 29 CFR 1910.119, the OSHA Process Safety Management (PSM) standard, does not cover all flammable liquids. Those stored in atmospheric tanks and kept below their normal boiling point without chilling or refrigeration are not subject to the standard. This is referred to in industry as the “flammable liquid atmospheric storage tank exemption.” See 1910.119(a)(1)(ii)(B).

The terminal facility company took the position that the storage of the butane-enriched naphtha product in the tank was excluded from PSM coverage. It based this stance on the exemption. According to CSB, had the OSHA PSM standard applied to the tank and its equipment, the terminal facility would have been required to implement a formal PSM system.

That system would have given the company a better chance to identify and control hazards for the tank and its equipment. Had the terminal facility put a comprehensive PSM system in place that effectively identified and controlled the tank/equipment hazards, the company could have prevented this incident, argues CSB.

EPA regulatory gap

Unlike the PSM standard, the Risk Management Program (RMP) standard at 40 CFR 68 does not include an exemption for atmospheric storage of flammable liquids. However, CSB highlights that 68.115(b)(2)(i) has a significant loophole. It reads, “[I]f the concentration of the substance is one percent or greater by weight of the mixture, then, for purposes of determining whether a threshold quantity is present at the stationary source, the entire weight of the mixture shall be treated as the regulated substance unless the owner or operator can demonstrate that the mixture itself does not have a National Fire Protection Association [NFPA] flammability hazard rating of 4.”

The terminal facility determined that the butane-enriched naphtha product contained in the tank was not subject to RMP because it was an NFPA-3a rated material. While the CSB is not validating the terminal’s NFPA “3” finding, the board speculates that had the EPA RMP standard applied to the tank and its pump, this incident likely would not have occurred.

CSB recommends closing the regulatory loopholes

In the recently released video, CSB recommends that:

  • OSHA eliminate the atmospheric storage tank exemption from the PSM standard — The board insists that the atmospheric storage tank exemption in the OSHA standard continues to allow for catastrophic incidents to occur. Without PSM coverage, necessary safeguards are not being implemented for equipment that should otherwise be covered, CSB says.
  • EPA modify 68.115(b)(2)(i) to expand coverage of its RMP standard to include all flammable liquids, including mixtures, with a flammability rating of NFPA-3 or higher — NFPA-3 flammability rated materials have resulted in significant explosions and fires similar to those contemplated to occur from NFPA-4 rated materials, observes CSB.

Owens emphasizes, “We believe that our recommendations, particularly to OSHA and EPA, to expand regulatory oversight of these kinds of chemicals and facilities will help ensure that a similar incident does not occur in the future.”

Key to remember

A new CSB video recounts the events involved in a massive storage tank fire. At the same time, the video warns of blind spots in OSHA PSM and EPA RMP regulations that may lead to other incidents in the U.S.

The new rules of waste: How 2025 legislation is reshaping corporate environmental compliance
2025-09-22T05:00:00Z

The new rules of waste: How 2025 legislation is reshaping corporate environmental compliance

In 2025, sweeping changes to waste laws across the U.S. are forcing companies to rethink packaging, disposal, and reporting practices. From statewide bans on single-use plastics to expanded Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) programs and chemical recycling reclassification, these updates carry significant compliance implications for corporate environmental health and safety (EHS) teams.

Single-use plastics: New bans and restrictions

Several states have enacted new bans on polystyrene foam containers, plastic straws, and produce bags:

  • California SB 54, as of January 1, 2025, bans expanded polystyrene (EPS) food containers unless they meet a 25 percent recycling rate. Precheckout bags must be compostable or made of recycled paper (SB 1046).
  • Delaware SB 51 bans foam containers and plastic stirrers unless requested by the customer.
  • Oregon SB 543 bans EPS containers and food packaging with intentionally added PFAS.
  • Virginia bans food vendors from using EPS as of July 1, 2025.

Compliance tip: Audit your packaging inventory and supplier certifications. Ensure alternatives meet compostability or recyclability standards.

Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR): Expanding nationwide

EPR laws now apply in several states. These laws require companies to help pay for recycling and report packaging data:

  • Maryland SB 901 allows multiple Producer Responsibility Organizations (PROs) and mandates cost-sharing for recycling.
  • Washington SB 5284 targets consumer packaging with compliance deadlines starting in 2028.
  • Colorado bans unregistered producers from selling covered products as of July 1, 2025.
  • California's SB 54 revised draft rules released in May 2025 include new compliance dates and exemptions.

Compliance tip: Register with your state’s PRO, submit packaging data, and prepare for fee schedules. Track deadlines and exemptions closely.

Chemical recycling: Regulatory reclassification and impacts

States like Texas and Pennsylvania now classify chemical recycling as manufacturing, not waste management. This shift encourages investment but also changes permitting and emissions reporting obligations.

Compliance tip: If your facility uses or contracts chemical recycling, review air and water permits. Ensure alignment with manufacturing regulations.

Per and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS): Phaseouts and hazardous waste updates

More states are banning PFAS in packaging, cookware, and more:

  • Minnesota, Oregon, Rhode Island, and New Mexico have banned or phased out PFAS in consumer products.
  • Illinois SB 727 aligns PFAS limits in drinking water with the Environmental Protection Agency standards.

Compliance tip: Update product Safety Data Sheets and conduct PFAS audits. Prepare for new reporting under TSCA Section 8(a)(7), including data on manufacture, use, and disposal.

Circular economy and composting: Recent mandates

States are setting zero-waste goals and requiring composting:

  • Hawaii HB 750 launches a statewide recycling needs assessment.
  • Maine LD 1065 requires large food waste generators to compost by 2030.

Compliance tip: Evaluate organics diversion programs and infrastructure. Consider partnerships with composting facilities.

EHS teams: What to do now

  • Map your regulatory exposure: Identify which state laws apply to your operations.
  • Engage with PROs: Register, report, and participate in rulemaking.
  • Train staff: Ensure procurement, operations, and legal teams understand new requirements.
  • Audit packaging and waste streams: Replace banned materials and optimize recycling.
  • Monitor emerging legislation: Stay ahead of new bills and compliance deadlines.

Key to remember: Staying compliant in 2025 means more than avoiding fines. EHS teams must lead efforts to meet new waste laws and support sustainability goals.

EPA proposes to remove GHG reporting requirements for most facilities
2025-09-19T05:00:00Z

EPA proposes to remove GHG reporting requirements for most facilities

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) published a significant proposed rule on September 16, 2025. The agency proposes to eliminate the Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP) requirements for nearly all regulated entities except for petroleum and natural gas systems. EPA also plans to suspend compliance requirements for covered facilities until reporting year (RY) 2034.

Further, the proposed rule notes that Congress amended the Clean Air Act in July 2025 to start the Waste Emissions Charge (WEC) program in 2034. The changes essentially reinstate the WEC program that was previously disapproved.

The GHGRP requires covered entities to submit annual reports of GHG emissions. The regulation applies to 47 source categories, including:

  • Large direct emitters of GHG emissions (25,000 or more metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent per year),
  • Fuel and industrial gas suppliers, and
  • Carbon dioxide injection sites.

What are the possible changes?

EPA proposes to:

  • Remove the requirements of 40 CFR Part 98 for all source categories under Part 98 except for the Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems source category (Part 98 Subpart W),
  • Remove the Natural Gas Distribution industry segment (98.230) from the Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems source category, and
  • Suspend the reporting requirements for the Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems source category until January 1, 2034.

How could this impact facilities?

If finalized, EPA’s proposed rule would have major effects:

  • Nearly all of the covered source categories (apart from petroleum and natural gas systems) would no longer be subject to the GHGRP regulations after RY 2024.
  • Natural gas distributors would be removed from Part 98 Subpart W and, therefore, no longer subject to the GHGRP regulations after RY 2024.
  • Facilities in the Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems source category (except for natural gas distributors) would be subject to the GHGRP regulations. However, requirements wouldn’t apply until RY 2034. The next report would be due by March 31, 2035, and annually thereafter.

About the WEC program

Amendments to Section 136 of the Clean Air Act in 2022 required EPA to start collecting a WEC from facilities in the Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems source category (except those in the natural gas distribution industry segment) that exceed waste emissions thresholds.

In March 2025, a joint congressional resolution disapproved the regulation implementing the WEC program, making the rule ineffective. Further, EPA issued a final rule in May 2025 that removed the WEC regulations from the Code of Federal Regulations.

However, the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (signed into law in July 2025) amended Section 136(g) of the Clean Air Act to begin imposing and collecting a WEC from the Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems source category (except for natural gas distributors) for emissions reported for calendar year 2034 and later.

How can I participate in the rulemaking?

You can register for and attend EPA’s virtual public hearing for the proposed rule on October 1, 2025. Additionally, you may submit public comments on the proposed rule (Docket Id. No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2025-0186) through November 3, 2025.

Key to remember: EPA proposes to eliminate the Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program requirements for all source categories except the petroleum and natural gas systems category and to suspend compliance obligations until 2034.

See More

Most Recent Highlights In Safety & Health

Expert Insights: Lessons that lead
2025-09-19T05:00:00Z

Expert Insights: Lessons that lead

As we continue to navigate the evolving landscape of regulatory changes, one truth remains constant: environmental compliance isn’t just a regulatory requirement; it must be a priority for leadership. Every facility, regardless of size or sector, can lead by example, not only through innovation but also through the lessons learned from challenges.

One such lesson came from a chemical manufacturing facility we worked with in the Midwest. They experienced a near-miss incident involving a wastewater neutralization tank. During a routine transfer, an operator noticed a sudden pH spike in the effluent stream. Quick thinking and immediate shutdown procedures prevented a potential discharge violation. Upon investigation, they discovered that a mislabeled tote of caustic solution was mistakenly added to the neutralization system.

The root causes? There was a breakdown in labeling protocols and a lack of crosschecking during chemical transfers. The facility responded swiftly by:

  • Implementing a barcode-based chemical tracking system,
  • Retraining staff on hazard communication, and
  • Revising their standard operating procedures.

Since then, the facility has reported zero chemical handling errors and has shared the lessons across the corporate network.

This incident serves as a powerful reminder that environmental compliance isn’t just about systems and sensors. It’s about people, processes, and a culture of vigilance. Mistakes can happen, but how we respond defines our commitment to continuous improvement.

We encourage you to reflect on your own facility’s “teachable moments.” Share them. Learn from them. Every lesson learned is a step toward a safer and more compliant operation.

e-Manifest Third Rule compliance checklist: Countdown to December 1
2025-09-12T05:00:00Z

e-Manifest Third Rule compliance checklist: Countdown to December 1

The date of December 1 often evokes thoughts of colder weather, the start of the Christmas season, and … waste manifests?! That’s certainly the case this year for hazardous waste handlers. On December 1, 2025, the rest of the Third Rule’s compliance requirements for electronic manifests take effect.

The Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA’s) final Third Rule, established under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), amends the Hazardous Waste Electronic Manifest System (e-Manifest system) standards. Many of the requirements began in January 2025. The Third Rule’s remaining regulatory changes start on December 1, 2025. Are you prepared to comply?

e-Manifest compliance check

Use this checklist to help you ensure that your business is set to comply with the rest of the Third Rule’s requirements that take effect in December.

Transition to the 4-copy forms

Under the Third Rule, EPA replaced the 5-copy paper manifests and continuation sheets with 4-copy paper manifests (EPA Form 8700-22) and continuation sheets (EPA Form 8700-22A). However, the agency allows hazardous waste handlers to continue using the 5-copy paper forms until further notice. EPA will provide a 90-day notice before it intends to stop accepting the 5-copy forms.

Note: At the time of the publication of this article, EPA has not yet given any authorized printer approval to print the new 4-copy manifest forms. As an authorized printer of the hazardous waste manifest forms, J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc. is working closely with EPA for approval to print the new 4-copy forms.

Users need Certifier permission on the e-Manifest module or Site Manager permission on the RCRA Information (RCRAInfo) Industry Application to submit manifests.

Compliance check:

☑ Begin to use the 4-copy manifests and continuation sheets as soon as they’re made available.

☑ Ensure that at least one user has Certifier or Site Manager permission.

Submit export manifests and related fees to e-Manifest

As of December 1, 2025, domestic hazardous waste exporters must submit all export manifests and continuation sheets (paper and electronic) to the e-Manifest system and pay the associated user fees.

An exporter is considered any entity that originates a manifest to export a hazardous waste shipment. This includes generators; transporters; treatment, storage, and disposal facilities; and recognized traders.

EPA will invoice exporters monthly for the manifest activities conducted during the previous month. The agency applies a fee per manifest, and the amount varies based on the type of submission (scanned image upload, data and image upload, or fully/hybrid electronic manifest).

Only individuals with Site Manager permission on RCRAInfo can pay manifest fees.

Compliance check:

☑ Prepare to use the e-Manifest system for export manifests and pay user fees.

☑ Verify that at least one person has Site Manager permission.

Submit manifest-related reports to e-Manifest

The Third Rule requires hazardous waste handlers to submit all Discrepancy, Exception, and Unmanifested Waste Reports to the e-Manifest system starting on December 1, 2025.

Generators submit Exception Reports, and receiving facilities submit Discrepancy and Unmanifested Waste Reports. No fees apply.

To submit the manifest-related reports to the e-Manifest system, users require Certifier permission for the module.

Compliance check:

☑ Be ready to submit manifest-related reports to the e-Manifest system.

☑ Confirm that at least one user has Certifier permission.

Send manifest copies to exporters

Beginning on December 1, 2025, entities that transport hazardous waste export shipments out of the U.S. (i.e., last transporters) have to send a signed copy of the manifest and continuation sheet to the exporter instead of the generator.

Further, the Third Rule clarifies that starting on December 1, 2025, transporters can use the e-Manifest system to export hazardous waste and send exporters copies of the signed manifest and continuation sheet. Transporters planning to do so need to set up a RCRAInfo account to use the e-Manifest system and assign Certifier permission to the user(s) who will submit the manifests.

Compliance check:

☑ Plan to send signed copies of the manifest and continuation sheet to the exporter.

☑ If applicable, register an account on RCRAInfo, and ensure at least one user has Certifier permission.

Use e-Manifest resources for additional help

EPA has multiple resources to help regulated hazardous waste handlers comply with e-Manifest regulations, including the upcoming Third Rule’s requirements that take effect on December 1, 2025. Consider using the resources the agency provides on “The Hazardous Waste Electronic Manifest (e-Manifest) System” website, such as:

  • Webinars,
  • Demonstration videos,
  • General and user-specific FAQs about the e-Manifest program, and
  • The e-Manifest Helpdesk for industry users.

The compliance checklist and e-Manifest resources can help you ensure that your facility will be ready to comply with the rest of the Third Rule’s requirements by December.

Key to remember: The remaining e-Manifest Third Rule requirements take effect on December 1, 2025. Facilities should confirm that they’re prepared to comply.

Hazardous waste handlers may continue use of 5-copy manifest forms
2025-09-12T05:00:00Z

Hazardous waste handlers may continue use of 5-copy manifest forms

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) announced that it will accept 5-copy paper manifest forms from entities regulated by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) hazardous waste manifest program until further notice.

What changed?

The final Third Rule (effective on January 22, 2025) made multiple changes to the hazardous waste manifest regulations, one of which requires regulated entities to use 4-copy manifests (EPA Form 8700-22) and continuation sheets (EPA Form 8700-22A) instead of the previous 5-copy forms.

Initially, EPA stated that it would no longer accept 5-copy forms starting on December 1, 2025. However, the agency has removed the limit and will accept the 5-copy forms until further notice. Additionally, EPA will give a 90-day notice before the agency plans to stop accepting the 5-copy forms.

As an authorized printer of the hazardous waste manifest forms, J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc. is working closely with EPA for approval to print the new 4-copy forms. At the time of publication of this news article, the federal agency hasn’t yet approved any authorized printer to print the new forms.

Exporter and importer requirements

Hazardous waste exporters and importers that use the 5-copy manifest forms are required to put the consent numbers for their wastes in the Special Handling Instructions and Additional Information Field (Item 14) of the 5-copy manifest. If applicable, exporters must also enter their EPA Identification (ID) numbers in Item 14. The agency recommends using this format: “Exporter EPA ID #AAANNNNNNNNN."

Please note that we will monitor any additional changes that result from EPA's decision to continue accepting 5-copy paper manifest forms and provide updates accordingly.

Key to remember: EPA will accept 5-copy manifests and continuation sheets beyond the initial deadline of December 1, 2025, until further notice.

Countdown to compliance: EPA’s AIM Act and its impact on refrigerant users
2025-09-11T05:00:00Z

Countdown to compliance: EPA’s AIM Act and its impact on refrigerant users

Starting January 1, 2026, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) will enforce sweeping changes under the American Innovation and Manufacturing (AIM) Act, targeting the use and management of hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs)—potent greenhouse gases used in refrigeration, air conditioning, and fire suppression.

These rules apply to all businesses with equipment containing 15 pounds or more of refrigerant with a Global Warming Potential (GWP) over 53, including but not limited to grocery stores, refrigerated transport fleets, repair shops, and small businesses.

Key requirements for end users

1. Leak detection and repair

  • Automatic leak detection systems (ALDs) are mandatory for systems with 1,500 pounds or more of refrigerant.
  • Leaks must be repaired within 30 days or a retirement/retrofit plan must be submitted
  • Leak rate thresholds:
    • Industrial process refrigeration: 30%
    • Commercial refrigeration: 20%
    • Transport & comfort cooling: 10%

2. Refrigerant reclamation

  • Repairs must use reclaimed refrigerants in supermarket systems, refrigerated transport, and commercial ice makers
  • Reclaimed HFCs must contain no more than 15% virgin HFCs and be properly labeled

3. Recordkeeping and reporting

  • Businesses must maintain detailed logs of:
    • Refrigerant purchases and usage
    • Leak events and repairs
    • Equipment servicing and disposal
  • Records must be available for EPA audits at any time.

4. Disposal and recycling

  • HFCs must be recovered from disposable cylinders before disposal
  • Fire suppression systems must be recycled prior to disposal, and technician training is required

Sector-specific impacts

Grocery retailers

  • Must retrofit or replace systems using restricted HFCs like R-404A or R-22
  • Natural refrigerants (CO₂, ammonia) are encouraged but require new equipment and trained technicians
  • Legacy systems may become costly to maintain due to refrigerant scarcity

Refrigerated transport

  • Subject to leak repair thresholds and reclamation rules
  • Must track refrigerant use across fleets and ensure timely repairs

Repair shops

  • Must use reclaimed refrigerants for servicing regulated systems
  • Required to follow EPA labeling and documentation standards

All end users: what you must do now

  • Inventory your equipment: Identify all systems with refrigerants over 15 lbs and GWP greater than 53
  • Install ALDs: For large systems, ensure real-time leak monitoring is in place
  • Train staff: Ensure technicians understand new servicing, reporting, and disposal rules
  • Upgrade Recordkeeping: Use digital tools to automate tracking and reporting

Looking ahead: state-level rules may be stricter

States like California, Washington, and New York are implementing stricter refrigerant rules that may exceed federal AIM Act standards. Businesses operating across state lines must monitor local regulations and prepare for additional reporting and inspections.

Key to remember: If your business uses refrigerants, the AIM Act likely applies to you. Start preparing now to avoid penalties and ensure compliance by 2026.

EPA's Spring 2025 regulatory agenda focuses on PFAS, fossil fuels, and rule reconsiderations
2025-09-09T05:00:00Z

EPA's Spring 2025 regulatory agenda focuses on PFAS, fossil fuels, and rule reconsiderations

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) published the Spring 2025 Semiannual Agenda of Regulatory and Deregulatory Actions on September 4, 2025. The agenda outlines the agency’s upcoming regulatory actions and their status in the rulemaking process.

EPA has major updates on the docket, such as:

  • Repealing all greenhouse gas (GHG) standards for fossil fuel-fired power plants and the 2024 amendments to the Mercury Air Toxics Standard for power plants (final rules expected December 2025);
  • Establishing risk management rules for multiple chemical substances, such as 1-bromopropane and n-methylpyrrolidone (final rules expected April 2026);
  • Adding hazardous waste solar panels to the federal universal waste program and setting universal waste standards specific to lithium batteries (proposed rule expected February 2026);
  • Setting the Renewable Fuel Standards for 2026 and 2027 and implementing regulatory program changes (final rule expected October 2025); and
  • Reconsidering current rules, like:
    • The GHG Reporting Program (final rule expected November 2025),
    • The National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for iron and steel and the NESHAP for oil and natural gas (proposed rules expected November 2025 and December 2025, respectively), and
    • The 2024 amendments to the procedures for conducting Toxic Substances Control Act chemical risk evaluations (final rule expected April 2026).

Additionally, the agency intends to address per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) across multiple media. For example, EPA plans to:

  • Rescind the National Primary Drinking Water Regulations for PFHxS, PFNA, GenX, and mixtures of these three as well as for PFBS (proposed rule expected September 2025);
  • Add certain PFAS to the Toxics Release Inventory (final rule expected February 2026); and
  • Address PFAS discharges from PFAS manufacturers (proposed rule expected January 2026).

This article highlights some of the major rules we’re monitoring closely. You can review the entire agenda to learn about all the rulemakings on EPA’s docket. Please note that the agenda dates are tentative, indicating when the agency seeks to publish the rulemakings in the Federal Register.

Final Rule Stage
Projected publication dateTitle
December 2025Phasedown of Hydrofluorocarbons: Reconsideration of Certain Regulatory Requirements Under the Technology Transitions Provisions of the American Innovation and Manufacturing Act of 2020
January 2026Accidental Release Prevention Requirements: Risk Management Programs Under the Clean Air Act; Common Sense Approach to Chemical Accident Prevention
February 2026Addition of Certain Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) to the Toxics Release Inventory (TRI)
February 2026Initial Air Quality Designations for the 2024 Revised Primary Annual Fine Particle (PM2.5) National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS)
April 2026Listing of Specific PFAS as Hazardous Constituents
Proposed Rule Stage
Projected publication date of notice of proposed rulemaking
Title
October 2025Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Oil and Gas Extraction Category (40 CFR 435 Subpart E)
October 2025New Source Performance Standards for the Synthetic Organic Chemical Manufacturing Industry and National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for the Synthetic Organic Chemical Manufacturing Industry
November 2025Additional Reconsideration of Standards of Performance for New, Reconstructed, and Modified Sources and Emissions Guidelines for Existing Sources: Oil and Natural Gas Sector Climate Review
November 2025PFAS Requirements in NPDES Permit Applications
November 2025Steam Electric Effluent Limitations Guideline Reconsideration Rule
December 2025Updates to the RCRA Hazardous Waste Regulations and Related Technical Corrections — Permitting Updates Rule 
January 2026Paper Manifest Sunset Rule; Modification of the Hazardous Waste Manifest System 
January 2026Revision to “Begin Actual Construction” in the New Source Review Preconstruction Permitting Program
April 2026Reconsideration of National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants: Gasoline Distribution Technology Reviews and New Source Performance Standards Review for Bulk Gasoline Terminals
May 2026Formaldehyde; Regulation Under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA)
Pre-Rule Stage
Projected publication date or other actionTitle
September 2025 (advanced notice of proposed rulemaking)Visibility Protection: Regional Haze State Plan Requirements Rule Revision
December 2025 (end review)National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Brick and Structural Clay Products Manufacturing; and Clay Ceramics Manufacturing
Key to remember: EPA’s planned rulemakings may impact regulatory compliance with air, land, and water rules.
See More

Most Recent Highlights In Human Resources

EHS Monthly Round Up - August 2025

EHS Monthly Round Up - August 2025

In this August 2025 roundup video, we'll review the most impactful environmental health and safety news.

Hi everyone! Welcome to the monthly news roundup video, where we’ll review the most impactful environmental health and safety news. Let’s take a look at what’s happened over the past month!

OSHA extended the comment period for multiple proposed rules it published on July 1. Stakeholders now have an extra 60 days, until November 1, to comment. Impacted rules include those for respiratory protection, construction illumination, COVID-19, and the General Duty Clause.

OSHA is expanding its Voluntary Protection Programs to help employers develop strong safety programs and lower injury rates. To participate, employers must submit an application to OSHA and undergo an onsite evaluation by a team of safety and health professionals.

Following a series of recent trench collapses, OSHA urges employers to take steps to protect workers. Trench collapses can be prevented by sloping or benching trench walls at an angle, shoring trench walls with supports, and shielding walls with trench boxes. More information can be found on OSHA’s website.

The Mine Safety and Health Administration launched a webpage for its new Compliance Assistance in Safety and Health, or CASH, program. The agency anticipates a surge in domestic mining productivity and seeks to proactively provide miners and mine operators with compliance assistance materials.

Turning to environmental news, EPA proposes challenges to California’s Clean Truck Check program. The program aims to reduce emissions of nitrogen oxides and particulate matter for heavy-duty vehicles. EPA supports the regulation as it applies to California-registered vehicles but disapproves the regulation as it applies to out of state and out of country vehicles. Stakeholders have until September 25 to comment on the proposal.

On August 14, EPA released the July 2025 nonconfidential TSCA Inventory of chemical substances manufactured, processed, or imported in the U.S. The Inventory contains over 86 thousand chemicals, nearly half of which are in active use. The next inventory update is planned for late 2026.

And finally, EPA proposes to rescind the 2009 Endangerment Finding and repeal greenhouse gas emissions for new motor vehicles and vehicle engines. The agency will accept comments on the proposal through September 15.

Thanks for tuning in to the monthly news roundup. We’ll see you next month!

Update: EPA withdraws direct rule, keeps proposed rule for alternative CCR reporting option
2025-09-05T05:00:00Z

Update: EPA withdraws direct rule, keeps proposed rule for alternative CCR reporting option

On September 4, 2025, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) withdrew a direct final rule it issued on July 22, 2025, that offered active and inactive coal combustion residuals (CCR) facilities an alternative reporting option and delayed corresponding compliance obligations for CCR management units (CCRMUs). However, the parallel proposed rule that was published with the direct final rule remains in place, and EPA has extended the comment period through September 15, 2025.

Who does this affect?

The direct and proposed rules impact (a) active CCR facilities and (b) inactive CCR facilities with inactive surface impoundments (called legacy CCR surface impoundments) that are regulated by the 2024 Legacy Rule.

What does this mean?

Because the direct rule was withdrawn, the alternative reporting option for the Facility Evaluation Report (FER) Part 1 doesn’t apply, and the compliance deadlines for the related CCRMU requirements revert to the previous timelines.

The parallel proposed rule remains active and contains the same changes as the withdrawn direct final rule, including:

  • Adding an alternative option for active CCR facilities and legacy CCR surface impoundments to submit FER Parts 1 and 2 together by February 8, 2027; and
  • Extending the related compliance deadlines for facilities with CCRMUs.

Further, the proposed rule seeks public input on potentially delaying both FER reporting deadlines and adjusting the CCRMU compliance timelines accordingly. The proposed additional extension would give CCR facilities the option to:

  • Submit FER Part 1 by February 8, 2027, and FER Part 2 by February 8, 2028; or
  • Submit FER Parts 1 and 2 together by February 8, 2028.

You can submit comments to Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OLEM-2020-0107.

Please see the original Industry News article ("EPA offers CCR facilities delayed reporting option and extends compliance deadlines") for more information about the withdrawn direct rule and the active proposed rule.

Key to remember: EPA has withdrawn a direct final rule that offered active and inactive coal combustion facilities an alternative reporting option, but the agency has kept the corresponding proposed rule in place.

OSHA renews alliance to improve worker safety in waste and recycling industry
2025-09-03T05:00:00Z

OSHA renews alliance to improve worker safety in waste and recycling industry

In a renewed alliance, OSHA, the National Waste & Recycling Association (NWRA), and the Solid Waste Association of North America (SWANA) will continue to work together to improve the safety and health of workers in the solid waste and recycling industry.

The partnership will focus on safety issues such as:

  • Transportation hazards;
  • Slips, trips, and falls;
  • Needlestick and musculoskeletal injuries; and
  • Health issues associated with lithium battery hazards in waste/recycling collection and processing.

OSHA, NWRA, and SWANA will develop resources to help employers prevent and mitigate hazards, including:

  • Educational articles,
  • Fact sheets, and
  • Toolkits.

The group will share these resources and additional information at conferences, forums, and meetings, with much of their outreach aimed at reaching small- and medium-sized employers who may have limited access to safety information.

2025-08-29T05:00:00Z

New Mexico bans PFAS from oil and gas well completions and recompletions

Effective date: July 29, 2025

This applies to: Oil and gas operations

Description of change: The New Mexico Oil Conservation Commission adopted amendments to ban per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) from being used in completions (bringing into production) or recompletions (restarting production) of oil wells. The amendments to 19.15 N.M.A.C.:

  • Require operators to provide certification that no PFAS chemicals were used;
  • Require applicants for a permit to drill, deepen, or plug back a well to certify that they won’t introduce PFAS-containing additives;
  • Adds completion operations to the factors that trigger notification and diligence action requirements when potential loss of containment or damage occurs; and
  • Adds FracFocus disclosure requirements.
2025-08-29T05:00:00Z

Colorado provides alternative window, door, skylight efficiency standards

Effective date: January 1, 2026

This applies to: Residential windows, doors, and skylights sold or leased for residential use in the state

Description of change: As of January 1, 2026, all residential windows, doors, and skylights sold or leased for residential use in Colorado must meet specific energy efficiency standards established by House Bill 23-1161. The Colorado Energy Office established an alternative energy standard for compliance. Manufacturers may choose between the standard at C.R.S. 6-7.5-105(5)(j)(l) and the alternative standard at 5 CCR 1004-2(1.1).

See More
New Network Poll
Do you provide over-the-counter medications in your first aid kits?

Do you provide over-the-counter medications in your first aid kits?

No active poll
Please come back soon!
See More
See More
See More
See More
Saved to my EVENT CALENDAR!
View your saved links by clicking the arrow next to your profile picture located in the header. Then, click “My Activity” to view the Event Calendar on your Activity page.