Compliance Just Got Easier: Stay ahead of regulatory changes with instant notifications on updates that matter.

FREE TRIAL UPGRADE!
Thank you for investing in EnvironmentalHazmatHuman ResourcesHuman Resources, Hazmat & Environmental related content. Click 'UPGRADE' to continue.
CANCEL
YOU'RE ALL SET!
Enjoy your limited-time access to the Compliance Network!
A confirmation welcome email has been sent to your email address from ComplianceNetwork@t.jjkellercompliancenetwork.com. Please check your spam/junk folder if you can't find it in your inbox.
YOU'RE ALL SET!
Thank you for your interest in EnvironmentalHazmatHuman ResourcesHuman Resources, Hazmat & Environmental related content.
WHOOPS!
You've reached your limit of free access, if you'd like more info, please contact us at 800-327-6868.
You'll also get exclusive access to:
Already have an account? .

NHTSA Final Rule: Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards; Child Restraint Systems, Child Restraint Anchorage Systems, Incorporation by Reference

2025-01-07T06:00:00Z

This final rule amends Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) No. 225; Child restraint systems, and FMVSS No. 213b; Child restraint systems, to improve ease-of-use of the lower and tether anchorages, improve correct use of child restraint systems in vehicles, and maintain or improve the correct use and effectiveness of child restraint systems (CRSs) in motor vehicles. This final rule fulfills a mandate of the Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP-21) requiring that NHTSA improve the ease-of-use for lower anchorages and tethers in all rear seat positions.

DATES:

Effective date: March 20, 2025.

IBR date: The incorporation by reference of certain publications listed in the rule is approved by the Director of the Federal Register beginning March 10, 2025.

Compliance date: This final rule adopts a 3-year phase-in period to comply with the updated requirements in FMVSS No. 225. The phase-in begins on September 1, 2028, and requires that 20 percent of a manufacturer's applicable vehicles produced from September 1, 2028, to August 31, 2029, comply with the updated FMVSS No. 225, followed by 50 percent from September 1, 2029, to August 31, 2030, and 100 percent on and after September 1, 2030. Early compliance is permitted.

Reconsideration date: If you wish to petition for reconsideration of this rule, your petition must be received by February 21, 2025.

Published in the Federal Register January 7, 2025, page 1288.

View final rule.

§571.5 Matter incorporated by reference.
(k)(10)-(11)AddedView text
§571.213b Child restraint systems; Mandatory applicability beginning December 5, 2026.
S5.5.2(j)RevisedView text
S5.6.1.13 and S5.6.1.14AddedView text
S5.9(a) through (c)RevisedView text
Figures 15 and 16AddedView text
§571.225 Child restraint anchorage systems.
S4.2RevisedView text
S4.3-S4.6Redesignated, revisedView text
S5 and S6RevisedView text
S8 introductory text and S8.1 introductory textRevisedView text
S8.2Removed and reservedView text
S9 introductory text, S9.1.1(d) and S9.2RevisedView text
S9.2.4 and S9.2.5AddedView text
S9.5RevisedView text
S11, S12, and S13RevisedView text
S14, S15, and S16RemovedView text
Figures 8, 9, 10, and 19RevisedView text
Figure 11Removed and reservedView text
Figures 23 through 28AddedView text

New Text

§571.213b Child restraint systems; Mandatory applicability beginning December 5, 2026.

* * * *

S5.5.2(j) In the case of each child restraint system equipped with a tether strap the statement: Secure the tether strap provided with this child restraint.

* * * *

S5.9 Attachment to child restraint anchorage system. (a) Each add-on child restraint system other than a car bed, harness, or belt-positioning seat shall have components permanently attached to the system that enable the restraint to be securely fastened to the lower anchorages of the child restraint anchorage system specified in Standard No. 225 (§571.225) and depicted in NHTSA Standard Seat Assembly; FMVSS No. 213, No. NHTSA-213-2021, (March 2023) (incorporated by reference, see §571.5). The components must be attached to the add-on child restraint by use of a tool, such as a screwdriver. In the case of rear-facing child restraints with detachable bases, only the base is required to have the components. All components provided to attach the add-on child restraint or the detachable base (in the case of a rear-facing child restraint with a detachable base) to the lower anchorages of the child restraint anchorage system shall be permanently marked with the pictogram in figure 15 to this section.

(b) In the case of each child restraint system that has components for attaching the system to a tether anchorage, those components shall include a tether hook that conforms to the configuration and geometry specified in figure 11 to this section. The tether hook or the tether strap shall be permanently marked with either pictogram shown in figure 16 to this section. If the mark is on the tether strap or on a tag attached to the tether strap, the mark must be located within 25 mm of the tether hardware assembly (which consists of a tether hook and a webbing tightening mechanism designed to tighten or loosen the tether strap).

(c) In the case of each child restraint system that has components, including belt webbing, for attaching the system to an anchorage of a child restraint anchorage system (lower anchorage or tether anchorage), the belt webbing shall be adjustable so that the child restraint can be tightly attached to the vehicle. The length of the tether hardware assembly, which consists of a tether hook and a mechanism designed to tighten and loosen the tether strap, shall not exceed 165 mm.

§571.225 Child restraint anchorage systems.

* * * *

S4.2 Vehicles shall be equipped as specified in paragraphs S4.2(a) through (c), except as provided in S5 of this standard.

(a) Each vehicle with three or more forward-facing rear designated seating positions shall be equipped as specified in S4.2(a)(1) and (2).

(1) Each vehicle shall be equipped with a child restraint anchorage system conforming to the requirements of S6 and S9 of this standard at not fewer than two forward-facing rear designated seating positions. At least one of the child restraint anchorage systems shall be installed at a forward-facing seating position in the second row in each vehicle that has three or more rows, if such a forward-facing seating position is available in that row.

(2) Each vehicle shall be equipped with a tether anchorage conforming to the requirements of S6 of this standard at a third forward-facing rear designated seating position. The tether anchorage of a child restraint anchorage system may count towards the third required tether anchorage. In each vehicle with a forward-facing rear designated seating position other than an outboard designated seating position, at least one tether anchorage (with or without the lower anchorages of a child restraint anchorage system) shall be at such a designated seating position.

(b) Each vehicle with not more than two forward-facing rear designated seating positions shall be equipped with a child restraint anchorage system conforming to the requirements of S6 and S9 of this standard at each forward-facing rear designated seating position.

(c) Each vehicle without any forward-facing rear designated seating position shall be equipped with a tether anchorage conforming to the requirements of S6 of this standard at each forward-facing front passenger designated seating position.

* * * *

S4.3 Movable seats. (a) A vehicle that is equipped with a forward-facing rear designated seating position that can be moved such that it is capable of being used at either an outboard or non-outboard forward-facing designated seating position shall be considered as having a forward-facing non-outboard designated seating position. Such a movable seat must be equipped with a tether anchorage that meets the requirements of S6 of this standard or a child restraint anchorage system that meets the requirements of S6 and S9 of this standard, if the vehicle does not have another forward-facing non-outboard designated seating position that is so equipped.

(b) Tether and lower anchorages shall be available for use at all times, except when the seating position for which it is installed is not available for use because the vehicle seat has been removed or converted to an alternate use such as allowing for the carrying of cargo.

* * * *

S5 General exceptions. Vehicles manufactured before September 1, 2031, must meet the requirements of S5.1. Vehicles manufactured on or after September 1, 2031, must meet the requirements of S5.2.

S5.1 Vehicles manufactured before September 1, 2031. (a) Convertibles and school buses are excluded from the requirements to be equipped with tether anchorages.

(b) A vehicle may be equipped with a built-in child restraint system conforming to the requirements of Standard No. 213 (§571.213) or Standard No. 213b (§571.213b) as applicable, instead of one of the required tether anchorages or child restraint anchorage systems.

(c) Vehicles with no air bag in front passenger designated position:

(1) Each vehicle that does not have a rear designated seating position and does not have an air bag installed at front passenger designated seating positions pursuant to a temporary exemption granted by NHTSA under 49 CFR part 555, must have a child restraint anchorage system installed at a front passenger designated seating position. In the case of convertibles, the front designated passenger seating position need have only the two lower anchorages meeting the requirements of S9 of this standard.

(2) Each vehicle that has a rear designated seating position and meets the conditions in S4.5.4.1(b) of Standard No. 208 (§571.208), and does not have an air bag installed at front passenger designated seating positions pursuant to a temporary exemption granted by NHTSA under 49 CFR part 555, must have a child restraint anchorage system installed at a front passenger designated seating position in place of one of the child restraint anchorage systems that is required for the rear seat. In the case of convertibles, the front designated passenger seating position need have only the two lower anchorages meeting the requirements of S9 of this standard.

(d) A vehicle that does not have an air bag on-off switch meeting the requirements of S4.5.4 of Standard No. 208 (§571.208) shall not have any child restraint anchorage system installed at a front designated seating position.

(e) A vehicle with a rear designated seating position for which interference with transmission and/or suspension components prevents the location of the lower bars of a child restraint anchorage system anywhere within the zone described by S9.2 of this standard is excluded from the requirement to provide a child restraint anchorage system at that position. However, except as provided elsewhere in this S5, such a vehicle must have a tether anchorage at a front passenger designated seating position.

S5.2 Vehicles manufactured on or after September 1, 2031. (a) School buses are excluded from the requirements to be equipped with tether anchorages.

(b) A vehicle may be equipped with a built-in child restraint system conforming to the requirements of Standard No. 213b (§571.213b) instead of one of the required tether anchorages or child restraint anchorage systems.

(c) Vehicles with no air bag in front passenger designated position:

(1) Each vehicle that does not have a rear designated seating position and does not have an air bag installed at front passenger designated seating positions pursuant to a temporary exemption granted by NHTSA under 49 CFR part 555 must have a child restraint anchorage system installed at a front passenger designated seating position.

(2) Each vehicle that has a rear designated seating position and meets the conditions in S4.5.4.1(b) of Standard No. 208 (§571.208), and does not have an air bag installed at front passenger designated seating positions pursuant to a temporary exemption granted by NHTSA under 49 CFR part 555, must have a child restraint anchorage system installed at a front passenger designated seating position in place of one of the child restraint anchorage systems that is required for the rear seat.

(d) A vehicle that does not have an air bag on-off switch meeting the requirements of S4.5.4 of Standard No. 208 (§571.208), shall not have any child restraint anchorage system installed at a front designated seating position.

S6. Requirements for tether anchorages. Vehicles subject to Standard No. 225 (this section) shall meet the tether anchorage requirements specified in S6.1, S6.2, and S6.4 according to the phase-in schedule specified in S13 of this standard.

S6.1 Configuration of the tether anchorage.

S6.1.1 Each tether anchorage shall:

(a) Permit the attachment of a tether hook of a child restraint system meeting the configuration and geometry specified in figure 11 of Standard No. 213 (figure 11 to §571.213);

(b) Be accessible without the need for any tools other than a screwdriver or coin;

(c) Once accessed, be ready for use without the need for any tools; and

(d) Be sealed to prevent the entry of exhaust fumes into the passenger compartment.

S6.1.2 Each tether anchorage shall:

(a) Consist of a rigid bar of any cross-section shape that permits the attachment of a tether hook (of a child restraint system) meeting the configuration and geometry specified in figure 11 of Standard No. 213 (figure 11 to §571.213), except in buses with a GVWR less than or equal to 10,000 pounds and vehicles that use a routing device per S6.2.1.2;

(b) Be accessible without the need for any tools and without folding the seat back (other than the head restraint) or removing carpet or other vehicle components (other than cargo covers) to access the anchorages. Individual tether anchorages may be covered with a cap, flap, or cover, provided that any cap, flap, or, cover is specifically designed to be opened, moved aside, or to otherwise give unobstructed access to the anchorage and is labeled with the symbol shown in figure 25 to this section;

(c) Once accessed, be ready for use without the need for any tools; and

(d) Be sealed to prevent the entry of exhaust fumes into the passenger compartment.

S6.2 Location of the tether anchorage.

S6.2.1 Subject to S6.2.1.2, the part of each tether anchorage that attaches to a tether hook must be located within the shaded zone shown in figures 3 through 7 to this section of the designated seating position for which it is installed. The zone is defined with reference to the seating reference point (see §571.3). (For purposes of the figures, “H Point” is defined to mean seating reference point.) A tether anchorage may be recessed in the seat back, provided that it is not in the strap wrap-around area at the top of the vehicle seat back. For the area under the vehicle seat, the forwardmost edge of the shaded zone is defined by the torso line reference plane.

S6.2.1.1 [Reserved]

S6.2.1.2 In the case of a vehicle that—

(a) Has a user-ready tether anchorage for which no part of the shaded zone shown in Figures 3 to 7 of this standard of the designated seating position for which the anchorage is installed is accessible without removing a seating component of the vehicle; and

(b) Has a tether strap routing device that is—

(1) Not less than 65 mm behind the torso line for that seating position, in the case of a flexible routing device or a deployable routing device, measured horizontally and in a vertical longitudinal plane; or

(2) Not less than 100 mm behind the torso line for that seating position, in the case of a fixed rigid routing device, measured horizontally and in a vertical longitudinal plane, the part of that anchorage that attaches to a tether hook may, at the manufacturer's option (with said option selected prior to, or at the time of, certification of the vehicle) be located outside that zone.

(c) The measurement of the location of the flexible or deployable routing device described in S6.2.1.2(b)(1) is made with SFAD 2 properly attached to the lower anchorages. A 40 mm wide nylon tether strap is routed through the routing device and attached to the tether anchorage in accordance with the written instructions required by S12 of this standard. The forwardmost contact point between the strap and the routing device must be within the stated limit when the tether strap is flat against the top surface of the SFAD and tensioned to 55 to 65 N. In seating positions without lower anchorages of a child restraint anchorage system, the SFAD 2 is held with its central lateral plane in the central vertical longitudinal plane of the seating position. The adjustable anchor attaching bars of the SFAD 2 are replaced by spacers that end flush with the back surface of the SFAD.

S6.2.2 Subject to S6.2.2.2, the part of each tether anchorage to which a tether hook attaches must be located within the shaded zone shown in figures 3 through 7 to this section of the designated seating position for which it is installed. The zone is defined with reference to the seating reference point (see §571.3). (For purposes of the figures, “H Point” means seating reference point.) A tether anchorage may be recessed in the seat back, provided that it is not in the strap wrap-around area at the top of the vehicle seat back. For the area under the vehicle seat, the forwardmost edge of the shaded zone is defined by a vertical plane 120 mm rearward of the “H Point,” as shown in figure 3 to this section.

S6.2.2.1 Subject to S6.2.2.2, for vehicles with adjustable or removable head restraints or no head restraints, the tether anchorage to which a tether hook attaches must be located outside the zone created by a 325 mm radius sphere with its center on the R-point and truncated horizontally at 230 mm below the sphere's center as shown in figures 8 and 9 to this section.

S6.2.2.2 In the case of a vehicle that—

(a) Has a user-ready tether anchorage for which no part of the shaded zone shown in figures 4 through 7 and 10 to this section of the designated seating position for which the anchorage is installed is accessible without the need for folding the seatback (other than the head restraint) or removing a seating component of the vehicle; and

(b) Has a tether strap routing device that is—

(1) Not less than 65 mm behind the torso line for that seating position, in the case of a flexible routing device or a deployable routing device, measured horizontally and in a vertical longitudinal plane; or

(2) Not less than 100 mm behind the torso line for that seating position, in the case of a fixed rigid routing device, measured horizontally and in a vertical longitudinal plane, the part of that anchorage that attaches to a tether hook may, at the manufacturer's option (with said option selected prior to, or at the time of, certification of the vehicle) be located outside that zone.

(c) The measurement of the location of the flexible or deployable routing device described in S6.2.2.2(b)(1) is made with SFAD 2 properly attached to the lower anchorages. A 40 mm wide nylon tether strap is routed through the routing device and attached to the tether anchorage in accordance with the written instructions required by S12 of this standard. The forwardmost contact point between the strap and the routing device must be within the stated limit when the tether strap is flat against the top surface of the SFAD and tensioned to 55 to 65 N. In seating positions without lower anchorages of a child restraint anchorage system, the SFAD 2 is held with its central lateral plane in the central vertical longitudinal plane of the seating position. The adjustable anchorage attaching bars of the SFAD 2 are replaced by spacers that end flush with the back surface of the SFAD 2.

S6.3 Strength requirements for tether anchorages. (a) When tested in accordance with S8, the tether anchorage must not separate completely from the vehicle seat or seat anchorage or the structure of the vehicle.

(b) Provisions for simultaneous and sequential testing:

(1) In the case of vehicle seat assemblies equipped with more than one tether anchorage, the force referred to in this S6.3 may, at the agency's option, be applied simultaneously to each of those tether anchorages. However, that force may not be applied simultaneously to tether anchorages for any two adjacent seating positions whose midpoints are less than 400 mm apart, as measured in accordance with S6.3(b)(i) and (ii) and figure 20 to this section.

(i) The midpoint of the seating position lies in the vertical longitudinal plane that is equidistant from vertical longitudinal planes through the geometric center of each of the two lower anchorages at the seating position. For those seating positions that do not provide lower anchorages, the midpoint of the seating position lies in the vertical longitudinal plane that passes through the SgRP of the seating position.

(ii) Measure the distance between the vertical longitudinal planes passing through the midpoints of the adjacent seating positions, as measured along a line perpendicular to the planes.

(2) A tether anchorage of a particular child restraint anchorage system will not be tested with the lower anchorages of that anchorage system if one or both of those lower anchorages have been previously tested under this standard.

S6.4 Marking and conspicuity requirements for tether anchorages. Vehicles subject to Standard No. 225 (this section) shall meet S6.4 according to the phase-in schedule specified in S13 of this standard.

(a) For each tether anchorage installed pursuant to S4 of this standard, there shall be a permanent marking that:

(1) Consists of one of the pictograms shown in figure 25 to this section that is not less than 20 mm in height;

(2) Except for vehicles that use a routing device per S6.2.2.2, the center of the pictogram in the longitudinal direction must be in the vertical longitudinal plane that passes through the center of the tether anchorage bar (± half of the tether anchorage length), as shown in figure 26 (Left) to this section; or the center of the pictogram in the lateral direction must be in the horizontal lateral plane that passes through the center of the tether anchorage bar (± half of the pictogram height), as shown in figure 26 (right) to this section.

(3) The nearest edge of the marking shall be located not more than 100 mm away from the tether anchorage bar as shown in figure 27 to this section. No other attachment feature to secure occupant items (i.e., cargo hooks or similar) shall be nearer to the marking than the distance from the marking to the tether anchorage. Vehicles with routing devices per S6.2.2.2 may use tags attached to the routing device.

(b) The tether anchorage bar may be covered by a cap or cover that is removable without the use of any tool, provided that the cap or cover is permanently labeled with a marking meeting the requirements of S6.4(a)(1). If the cap or cover is permanently attached to the vehicle, the tether anchorage is not required to be separately marked. If the cap or cover is not permanently attached to the vehicle, the tether anchorage must also be marked with the symbol meeting S6.4(a)(1) through (3).

(c) For vehicles that have a cargo cover that needs to be moved or removed to access the tether anchorages, the cargo cover must be permanently marked with the symbol meeting S6.4.1(a)(1) of this standard for each tether anchorage that is accessible under the cargo cover. Tether anchorages under the cargo cover must also be marked per S6.4(a).

* * * *

S8 Test procedures. Each vehicle shall meet the requirements of S6.3 when tested according to the following procedures. * * *

S8.1 Apply the force specified in S6.3 as follows—

* * * * *

S9. Requirements for the lower anchorages of the child restraint anchorage system. Vehicles subject to Standard No. 225 (this section) shall meet the lower anchorage requirements specified in S9.2 and S9.5 according to the phase-in schedule specified in S13 of this standard.

S9.1 Configuration of the lower anchorages

S9.1.1 * * *

(d) The bars must not be capable of being stowable or foldable.

* * * *

S9.2 Location of the lower anchorages.

* * * *

S9.5 Marking and conspicuity requirements.

S9.5.1 Requirements for lower anchors. Lower anchorages must meet the requirements in S9.5.1(a) or (b).

(a) For each bar installed pursuant to S4, the vehicle shall be permanently marked with a circle:

(1) That is not less than 13 mm in diameter;

(2) That is either solid or open, with or without words, symbols, or pictograms, provided that if words, symbols or pictograms are used, their meaning is explained to the consumer in writing, such as in the vehicle's owner's manual; and

(3) That is located such that its center is on each seat back between 50 and 100 mm above or on the seat cushion 100 ±25 mm forward of the intersection of the vertical transverse and horizontal longitudinal planes intersecting at the horizontal centerline of each lower anchorage, as illustrated in figure 22 to this section. The center of the circle must be in the vertical longitudinal plane that passes through the center of the bar (±25 mm).

(4) The circle may be on a tag.

(b) The vehicle shall be configured such that the following is visible: Each of the bars installed pursuant to S4, or a permanently attached guide device for each bar. The bar or guide device must be visible without the compression of the seat cushion or seat back, when the bar or device is viewed, in a vertical longitudinal plane passing through the center of the bar or guide device, along a line making an upward 30-degree angle with a horizontal plane. Seat backs are in the nominal design riding position. The bars may be covered by a removable cap or cover, provided that the cap or cover is permanently marked with words, symbols or pictograms whose meaning is explained to the consumer in written form as part of the owner's manual.

S9.5.2 Requirements for lower anchors. Lower anchorages must meet the requirements in S9.5.2(a) and (b), as applicable.

(a) For each bar installed pursuant to S4, the vehicle shall be permanently marked with a symbol that:

(1) Is not less than 13 mm in diameter;

(2) Contains the pictogram shown in figure 24 to this section; and

(3) Is located such that its center is on each seat back between 50 and 100 mm above or on the seat cushion between 100 to −50 mm forward of the intersection of the vertical transverse and horizontal longitudinal planes intersecting at the horizontal centerline of each lower anchorage, as illustrated in figure 19 to this section. The center of the symbol must be in the vertical longitudinal plane that passes through the center of the bar (±25 mm).

(4) The symbol may be on a tag.

(b) The bars may be covered by a removable cap or cover, provided that the cap or cover is permanently marked with the pictogram shown in figure 24 to this section. If the cap or cover is permanently attached to the vehicle, the lower anchorage bars are not required to be separately marked with the pictogram. If the cap or cover is not permanently attached to the vehicle, the lower anchorage bars must also be marked with the symbol meeting S9.5.2(a)(1) through (4).

* * * *

S11. Test procedures. Each vehicle shall meet the requirements of this standard when tested according to the following procedures. Where a range of values is specified, the vehicle shall be able to meet the requirements at all points within the range.

(a) Strength requirements —(1) Forward force direction. Place SFAD 2 in the vehicle seating position and attach it to the two lower anchorages of the child restraint anchorage system. Do not attach the tether anchorage. A rearward horizontal force of 135 ±15 N is applied to the center of the lower front crossbar of SFAD 2 to press the device against the seat back as the fore-aft position of the rearward extensions of the SFAD is adjusted to remove any slack or tension. Apply a preload force of 500 N horizontally and in the vertical centerline of the SFAD 2 at point X. Increase the pull force as linearly as practicable to a full force application of 11,000 N in not less than 24 seconds and not more than 30 seconds and maintain at an 11,000 N level for 1 second.

(2) Lateral force direction. Place SFAD 2 in the vehicle seating position and attach it to the two lower anchorages of the child restraint anchorage system. Do not attach the tether anchorage. A rearward force of 135 ±15 N is applied to the center of the lower front crossbar of SFAD 2 to press the device against the seat back as the fore-aft position of the rearward extensions of the SFAD is adjusted to remove any slack or tension. Apply a preload force of 500 N horizontal and perpendicular to the longitudinal centerline of the SFAD 2 at point X of the test device. Increase the pull force as linearly as practicable to a full force application of 5,000 N in not less than 24 seconds and not more than 30 seconds and maintain at a 5,000 N level for 1 second.

(b) Clearance angle. The seat back angle, if adjustable, is set at the manufacturer's nominal design seat back angle. If the position is not specified, set the seat back at the first detent rearward of 25° from the vertical. Remove or open any lower anchorage cover, if present, to expose the lower anchorage. To measure clearance angle, attach the clearance angle tool to the lower anchorage and apply a vertical force of 67 N (15 lbf) to the tool. Measure the angle (with respect to the horizontal) of the tool while the force is being applied.

(c) Anchorage depth. The seat back angle, if adjustable, is set at the manufacturer's nominal design seat back angle. If the position is not specified, set the seat back at the first detent rearward of 25° from the vertical. To measure the anchorage depth, subtract 30 degrees from the measured seat pan angle to calculate the view angle. With the anchorage depth tool ( see figure 28 to this section) on a flat surface, adjust the view bar to read the view angle. Slide the zeroing strip along the view bar so that it is barely touching the top of the depth tool hook. Move the view bar forward, so the end of the zeroing strip is aligned with the zero-scribe line. For hidden anchorages, slide the anchorage depth tool so that it reads 0 mm at the rear edge of the slider. For visible anchorages, align the depth gauge to 25 mm so that negative values can be read. Attach the depth tool centered to the lower anchorage. Adjust the depth tool base to be within ±2 degrees of the view angle (30 degrees minus seat pan angle) to set the tool-parallel to the seat pan angle. Move the entire slider bar forward until the zeroing strip contacts the vehicle seat back or any other vehicle part.

S12. Written instructions. Vehicles subject to Standard No. 225 (this section) shall meet the written instruction requirements specified in either S12.1 or S12.2 according to the phase-in schedule specified in S13.

S12.1 Written instructions shall:

(a) Indicate which seating positions in the vehicle are equipped with tether anchorages and child restraint anchorage systems;

(b) In the case of vehicles required to be marked as specified in paragraphs S4.1 and S9.5 of this standard, explain the meaning of markings provided to locate the lower anchorages of child restraint anchorage systems; and

(c) Include instructions that provide a step-by-step procedure, including diagrams, for properly attaching a child restraint system's tether strap to the tether anchorages.

S12.2 Written instructions shall:

(a) Indicate which seating positions in the vehicle are equipped with tether anchorages and child restraint anchorage systems;

(b) In the case of vehicles required to be marked as specified in paragraphs S4.1 and S9.5 of this standard, explain the meaning of markings provided to locate the lower anchorages of child restraint anchorage systems and the top tether anchorages;

(c) Include instructions that provide a step-by-step procedure, including diagrams, for properly attaching a child restraint system's tether strap to the tether anchorages;

(d) Include instructions on how to locate and access the tether anchorage and the lower anchorages; and

(e) Use the following terms when referring to the different components of the child restraint anchorage system that are used to connect the child restraint system to the vehicle: “lower anchor” means the lower anchorage of the child restraint anchorage system in the vehicle, “tether anchor” means the top tether anchorage of the child restraint anchorage system in the vehicle, “lower anchor attachment” means the child restraint system or the detachable base's (in the case of a rear-facing child restraint with a detachable base) lower anchorage connector and the lower anchorage strap (for flexible lower anchorage attachments), “rigid lower anchor attachment” means the child restraint system or the detachable base's (in the case of a rear-facing child restraint with a detachable base) lower anchorage connector that is rigidly attached to the CRS or detachable base, respectively, and does not have a lower anchorage strap, and “tether” means the child restraints system's tether hook and tether strap.

S13 Phase-in schedule. The S13 phase in schedule details when listed requirements become inactive and are replaced by newer requirements. Requirements in Standard No. 225 (this section) not listed in S13 shall be in effect before, during, and after the S13 phase-in.

S13.1 Vehicle certification information. At any time during the production years ending August 31, 2029, and August 31, 2030, each manufacturer shall, upon request from the Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance, provide information identifying the vehicles (by make, model and vehicle identification number) that have been certified as complying with the child restraint anchorage usability requirements of this standard. Manufacturers shall specify the number of vehicles meeting each phase-in percentage. The manufacturer's designation of a vehicle as a certified vehicle is irrevocable.

S13.1.1 Pre phase-in. Vehicles manufactured before September 1, 2028, are subject to S6.1.1, S6.2.1, S9.2.1, S9.2.2, S9.2.3, S9.5.1, and S12.1 of this standard.

S13.1.2 Phase-in year 1. Vehicles manufactured on or after September 1, 2028, and before September 1, 2029. The total number of individual vehicles complying with S6.1.2, S6.2.2, S6.4, S9.2 (except for S9.2.2(a)), S9.5.2, and S12.2 of this standard shall be not less than 20 percent of a vehicle manufacturer's total production for this time period. The remaining 80 percent of a vehicle manufacturer's total production are subject to S6.1.1, S6.2.1, S9.2.1, S9.2.2, S9.2.3, S9.5.1, and S12.1 of this standard.

S13.1.3 Phase-in year 2. Vehicles manufactured on or after September 1, 2029, and before September 1, 2030. The total number of individual vehicles complying with S6.1.2, S6.2.2, S6.4, S9.2 (except for S9.2.2(a)), S9.5.2, and S12.2 of this standard shall be not less than 50 percent of a vehicle manufacturer's total production for this time period. The remaining 50 percent of a vehicle manufacturer's total production are subject to S6.1.1, S6.2.1, S9.2.1, S9.2.2, S9.2.3, S9.5.1, and S12.1 of this standard.

S13.1.4 Phase-in year 3 and beyond. Vehicles manufactured on or after September 1, 2030. The total number of vehicles complying with S6.1.2, S6.2.2, S6.4, S9.2 (except for S9.2.2(a)), S9.5.2, and S12.2 shall be not less than 100 percent of a vehicle manufacturer's total production.

S13.2 Vehicles produced by more than one manufacturer.

S13.2.1 For the purpose of calculating average annual production of vehicles for each manufacturer and the number of vehicles manufactured by each manufacturer under S13.1.1 through S13.1.4, a vehicle produced by more than one manufacturer shall be attributed to a single manufacturer as follows:

(a) A vehicle which is imported shall be attributed to the importer.

(b) A vehicle manufactured in the United States by more than one manufacturer, one of which also markets the vehicle, shall be attributed to the manufacturer which markets the vehicle.

S13.2.2 A vehicle produced by more than one manufacturer shall be attributed to any one of the vehicle's manufacturers specified by an express written contract, reported to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration under 49 CFR part 585, between the manufacturers so specified and the manufacturer to which the vehicle would otherwise be attributed under S13.2.1.

Figures to §571.225

* * * * *

Figure 8 to §571.225. Side View of 325 mm Radius Sphere Zone From R-Point, Truncated at 230 mm Below the Center



Figure 9 to §571.225. Three-Dimensional 325 mm Radius Sphere Zone From R-Point, Truncated Along the Lower Edge at 230 mm Below Its Center



Figure 10 to §571.225—Side View. User Ready Tether Anchorage Location



* * * *

Figure 19 to §571.225. Placement of Symbol on the Seat Back and Seat Cushion of Vehicle



Specialized Industries

Go beyond the regulations! Visit the Institute for in-depth guidance on a wide range of compliance subjects in safety and health, transportation, environment, and human resources.

J. J. Keller® COMPLIANCE NETWORK is a premier online safety and compliance community, offering members exclusive access to timely regulatory content in workplace safety (OSHA), transportation (DOT), environment (EPA), and human resources (DOL).

Interact With Our Compliance Experts

Puzzled by a regulatory question or issue? Let our renowned experts provide the answers and get your business on track to full compliance!

Upcoming Events

Reference the Compliance Network Safety Calendar to keep track of upcoming safety and compliance events. Browse by industry or search by keyword to see relevant dates and observances, including national safety months, compliance deadlines, and more.

SAFETY & COMPLIANCE NEWS

Keep up with the latest regulatory developments from OSHA, DOT, EPA, DOL, and more.

REGSENSE® REGULATORY REFERENCE

Explore a comprehensive database of word-for-word regulations on a wide range of compliance topics, with simplified explanations and best practices advice from our experts.

THE J. J. KELLER INSTITUTE

The Institute is your destination for in-depth content on 120+ compliance subjects. Discover articles, videos, and interactive exercises that will strengthen your understanding of regulatory concepts relevant to your business.

ADD HAZMAT, ENVIRONMENTAL, & HR RESOURCES

Unlock exclusive content offering expert insights into hazmat, environmental, and human resources compliance with a COMPLIANCE NETWORK EDGE membership.

DIRECT ACCESS TO COMPLIANCE EXPERTS

Struggling with a compliance challenge? Get the solution from our in-house team of experts! You can submit a question to our experts by email, set up a phone or video call, or request a detailed research report.

EVENTS

Register to attend live online events hosted by our experts. These webcasts and virtual conferences feature engaging discussions on important compliance topics in a casual, knowledge-sharing environment.

Most Recent Highlights In Environmental

EHS Monthly Round Up - October 2026

EHS Monthly Round Up - October 2026

In this October 2026 roundup video, we'll review the most impactful environmental, health, and safety news.

Hi everyone! Welcome to the monthly news roundup video, where we’ll review the most impactful environmental, health, and safety news. Let’s take a look at what happened over the past month.

A Department of Labor Office of Inspector General investigation found that OSHA may have conducted certain small employer inspections in low-hazard industries that did not comply with its appropriations acts. The investigation stemmed from a September 2025 hotline complaint. OSHA disputes the findings, and its review of the cases and the Inspector General’s recommendations is ongoing.

OSHA issued guidance to help employers respond to opioid emergencies. The factsheet provides employers with practical information on recognizing the signs of an overdose and responding immediately.

The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health published toolbox talks addressing workplace fire hazards and lockout/tagout. The talks highlight the importance of fire prevention programs and following lockout/tagout procedures.

Turning to environmental news, EPA proposes to reallocate the excess 2025 small refinery exemption volumes to the 2026 and 2027 compliance years. The proposed rule would adjust the renewable volume and percentage standards for biomass-based diesel, advanced biofuel, and total renewable fuel. The deadline for public comments is December 4.

EPA further extended the submission deadline for the reporting year 2025 annual greenhouse gas report from October 30, 2026, to March 10, 2027. This applies to facilities subject to the greenhouse gas reporting program.

EPA proposes to extend additional compliance dates for the trichloroethylene risk management rule finalized in 2024. If finalized, the rule would delay compliance deadlines for certain chemical processors and refrigerant manufacturers.

And finally, EPA extended the compliance date to submit Facility Response Plans for worst-case discharges of Clean Water Act hazardous substances by 3 years, to June 1, 2030. Effective December 14, the final rule also removes provisions related to climate change and environmental justice.

Thanks for tuning in to the monthly news roundup. We’ll see you next month!

EHS Monthly Round Up - January 2023

EHS Monthly Round Up - January 2023

In this monthly roundup video, we’ll review the most impactful environmental, safety, and health news.

Hi everyone! Welcome to the monthly roundup video, where we’ll review the most impactful environmental, safety, and health news. First, let’s take a look at what’s happening in safety and health.

If you haven’t already done so, now is the time to post your OSHA 300A Summary. Employers are required to post the Summary in a conspicuous place from February 1st through April 30th.

As required by law, OSHA increased its penalties for inflation in mid-January. Penalties went up 7.7 percent, effective January 17th.

Also in January, OSHA released its long-awaited Fall 2022 regulatory agenda. Along with numerous proposed rules in the works, three major final rules are slated for 2023 – COVID-19 in healthcare, Injury and Illness tracking, and an update to the hazard communication standard.

OSHA recently released two new letters of interpretation, which address exit signs and lockout/tagout. Specifically, OSHA states that the International Standards Organization emergency exit symbol can be located beside the mandatory EXIT text on an existing sign.

The second letter addresses the applicability of lockout/tagout and the maintenance and operations of cathodic protection rectifiers when working on pipelines.

New York’s Warehouse Worker Protection Act was signed into law in December and takes effect in late February. It protects warehouse distribution workers from undisclosed or unlawful work speed quotas and includes protections for workers who fail to meet these quotas.

In 2021, a worker died every 101 minutes from a work-related injury, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics. A total of 5,190 fatal work injuries was recorded in the U.S. in 2021, an 8.9 percent increase over 2020.

Turning to environmental news, EPA automatically added nine per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, or PFAS, to the Toxics Release Inventory, or TRI, list. Four PFAS were added since they are no longer claimed as confidential business information.

EPA released its Fall 2022 regulatory agenda in early January. Included are major regulations impacting the National Ambient Air Quality Standards, waters of the United States, and modifications to the Risk Management Program under the Clean Air Act.

There are also a number of rules related to the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants in various rule stages.

And finally, beginning with model year 2027, heavy-duty trucks will be required to meet clean air standards that are 80 percent more stringent than current requirements.

EPA says this final rule is aimed at reducing smog- and soot-forming emissions, increasing the life of governed vehicles by up to 250 percent, and increasing emissions warranty periods up to 450 percent.

Thanks for tuning in to the monthly news roundup!

2026-11-02T06:00:00Z

Tennessee establishes waste tire hauler registration program

Effective date: January 18, 2027

This applies to: Waste tire generators, commercial waste tire haulers, and permitted waste tire management facilities

Description of change: The Tennessee Underground Storage Tanks and Solid Waste Disposal Control Board approved regulations establishing a waste tire hauler registration program that tracks and regulates the transportation of waste tires from the point of generation to the delivery for permitted storage, processing, or disposal.

The regulations include:

  • Administrative requirements for registration;
  • Decal requirements for vehicles that commercially haul waste tires;
  • An annual registration fee for registered waste tire hauler vehicles;
  • Terms and conditions for registered waste tire haulers;
  • Manifest requirements for all waste tire generators, transporters, and permitted waste tire management facilities; and
  • Financial assurance requirements for registered waste tire haulers.
2026-11-02T06:00:00Z

California adopts regulations for initial corporate GHG report

Effective date: October 12, 2026

This applies to: U.S.-based companies that do business in California with total annual revenues above $1 billion (reporting entities) and with total annual revenues above $500 million (covered entities)

Description of change: The California Office of Administrative Law (OAL) approved the California Corporate Greenhouse Gas Reporting and Climate-Related Financial Risk Disclosure Initial Regulation, which was approved by the California Air Resources Board (CARB) in February 2026.

The adopted regulations help implement the Climate Corporate Data Accountability Act and the Climate-Related Financial Risk Reporting Act, which require U.S.-based companies operating in California to report greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and climate-related financial risks.

The regulation:

  • Establishes annual fee calculations and procedures,
  • Specifies definitions to help entities determine applicability (whether the rule applies and if they must comply with both emissions reporting and fee requirements), and
  • Sets the first-year reporting deadline of November 10, 2026, for reporting Scope 1 and Scope 2 GHG emissions.

Annual report

CARB has sent a reminder letter to organizations potentially required to sumbit the inital report by November 10, 2026.

Entities that weren’t collecting data or weren’t planning to collect data when CARB issued its December 2024 Enforcement Notice aren’t expected to submit Scope 1 and 2 reporting data for this first reporting cycle in 2026 only.

Starting in 2027, reporting entities must annually disclose Scope 1, Scope 2, and Scope 3 GHG emissions for the previous fiscal year. CARB is developing reporting regulations for 2027 and later.

Annual fee

Reporting entities and covered entities must pay the applicable annual implementation fee within 60 calendar days of receiving a fee determination notice from CARB.

Federal environmental reporting: 5 annual reports due in 2027
2026-11-02T06:00:00Z

Federal environmental reporting: 5 annual reports due in 2027

With the new year quickly approaching, many businesses take time to reflect on the previous year to evaluate their performance. For numerous facilities subject to federal environmental regulations, this isn’t just a good practice; it’s mandated through annual reporting requirements.

Mark your compliance calendars for these common federal environmental annual reports due in 2027.

Multi-Sector General Permit (MSGP) annual report

Due: January 30, 2027

EPA issues industrial stormwater MSGPs in areas where it serves as the permitting authority. Examples include Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New Mexico, and the District of Columbia.

Facilities with MSGPs must submit the Annual Report for Stormwater Discharges Associated with Industrial Activity Under the NPDES MSGP (NPDES Form 6100-28) electronically via the NPDES Electronic Reporting Tool (NeT). The report covers information from calendar year 2026.

Take note! EPA has administratively continued the 2021 MSGP for facilities covered under the permit before it expired in February 2026.

New facilities must comply with the requirements in EPA’s No Action Assurance for New Industrial Facilities Needing Stormwater Permit Coverage under EPA’s Multi-Sector General Permit memorandum (issued February 27, 2026) until the agency issues a new MSGP. The memorandum mandates that facilities provide the electronically reported information required by the 2021 MSGP (including the annual report) if EPA requests it.

Emergency and Hazardous Chemical Inventory (Tier II Inventory Report)

Due: March 1, 2027

Section 312 of the Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act (EPCRA) requires covered facilities to submit the Tier II Inventory Report (or a state-equivalent form) to the State Emergency Response Commission, Local Emergency Planning Committee, and local fire department. Reporting applies to facilities:

  • That are required by OSHA’s Hazard Communication standard (29 CFR 1910.1200) to prepare or have available Safety Data Sheets (SDSs), and
  • That have on-site at any one time emergency hazardous substances (EHSs) or non-EHS hazardous chemicals at or above certain thresholds (40 CFR Part 370 Subpart B).

The report provides information on the covered hazardous chemicals used or stored at the facility in 2026, including locations, amounts, and potential hazards.

Take note! Facilities should check state regulations to:

  • Confirm Tier II reporting thresholds, as they may be more stringent;
  • Determine whether any additional chemicals are covered; and
  • Verify how the report must be submitted, including whether Tier2 Submit files are accepted.

Hazardous Waste Export Annual Report

Due: March 1, 2027

The Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) requires exporters of regulated hazardous waste to submit an annual report electronically through the RCRA Information (RCRAInfo) Waste Import and Export Tracking System (WIETS). The report lists the types, quantities, shipment frequency, and ultimate destination of all hazardous waste exported in 2026.

Take note! If an exporter doesn’t ship any hazardous waste after obtaining consent to export certain hazardous wastes, the exporter must still submit an annual report that lists the quantity shipped under the issued consent as 0.

2025 Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Annual Report

Due: March 10, 2027

The GHG Reporting Program (GHGRP) requires large industrial sources of GHG emissions, fuel and industrial gas suppliers, and carbon dioxide injection facilities to report GHG emissions from 2025 for all applicable source categories. Facilities submit reports through EPA’s Greenhouse Gas Reporting Tool (e-GGRT).

Take note! Annual GHG reports for the previous calendar year are usually due by March 31 of the next calendar year. However, EPA issued an interim final rule (effective October 14, 2026) extending the submission deadline for Reporting Year 2025 GHG reports to March 10, 2027.

Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) Report

Due: July 1, 2027

Section 313 of EPCRA requires facilities in specific industry sectors to submit a TRI Form R for each TRI-listed chemical (372.65) manufactured, processed, or otherwise used above threshold levels (listed at 372.25, 372.27, and 372.28) in the previous calendar year. The report, submitted through TRI-MEweb, covers waste management activities and any actions taken to reduce or prevent chemical waste during 2026.

Take note! TRI reports must be submitted to both EPA and the state. If your facility’s state participates in the TRI Data Exchange (TDX), TRI-MEweb will automatically send your report to the state. If your facility’s state doesn’t participate in TRI TDX, check the state’s TRI submission requirements to determine how to submit the required state copy.

Key to remember: The new year is quickly approaching, and the annual reporting compliance deadlines for many federal environmental programs are following closely behind.

See More

Most Recent Highlights In Transportation

EPA proposes major changes to oil, gas emission rules
2026-10-29T05:00:00Z

EPA proposes major changes to oil, gas emission rules

On October 29, 2026, EPA published a proposed rule to amend certain emission standards that were established by a rule finalized in 2024 (2024 Final Rule) for new and existing crude oil and natural gas facilities

Who’s impacted?

The proposed rule primarily applies to:

  • New, modified, and reconstructed crude oil and natural gas facilities subject to the New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) at 40 CFR Part 60 Subpart OOOOb; and
  • Existing crude oil and natural gas facilities subject to the emissions guidelines (EGs) at Part 60 Subpart OOOOc.

Collectively, these standards are known as the OOOOb/c rule.

What are the proposed changes?

EPA’s rule proposes revisions to a range of regulations established by the 2024 Final Rule.

Well site categories

The agency co-proposes two options for creating distinct categories of well sites, either:

  • By production level as marginal or non-marginal (with reduced requirements for marginal wells), or
  • By resource type as conventional or unconventional (with reduced requirements for conventional wells).

EPA also proposes an alternative approach to the marginal or non-marginal option, adding further sub-categories of marginal wells based on production levels.

Covers and closed vent systems (CVSs)

EPA proposes to divide the No Identifiable Emissions (NIE) standard into:

  • Design requirements, and
  • Operational requirements.

Additionally, the operational requirements would allow for repairs so that emissions that are fixed within a limited timeframe wouldn’t be a deviation.

Associated gas

EPA proposes to modify the best system of emission reduction (BSER) for associated gas from oil wells, including an approach that would allow routing associated gas to a control device or flare meeting specific emission-reduction requirements.

Control devices

The agency proposes to change control device requirements related to:

  • Continuous burning pilot flames,
  • Flame monitoring data deviations,
  • Control device alerts,
  • Visible emissions test conditions for fugitive emissions,
  • Temporary or backup control devices,
  • Temporary process controllers, and
  • Control device categories.

Other requirements

EPA addresses other aspects of the 2024 Final Rule, proposing to revise requirements for:

  • Liquids unloading,
  • Process controllers,
  • Pumps,
  • Fugitive emissions,
  • Storage vessels,
  • Covers and CVSs, and
  • Equipment leaks at gas plants.

Further, the proposed rule would allow gas processing facilities subject to the NSPS at Part 60 Subparts OOOO, OOOOa, and KKK to conduct optical gas imaging surveys according to Appendix K.

Super Emitter Program

EPA plans to rescind the Super Emitter Program that requires regulated sources to be monitored for methane leaks and releases above a specific threshold by certified third parties using remote-sensing technology. If the threshold is exceeded, it’s known as a “super-emitter event.” The third party notifies EPA, which then notifies a source that a super-emitter event has occurred at its facility. The source must find the leak or release, report its investigation results to EPA, and take corrective action if needed.

Note that the Super Emitter Program isn’t in effect. EPA’s July 2025 interim final rule delayed the program start date to January 22, 2027.

Key to remember: EPA proposes significant changes to emission standards for new and existing oil and natural gas facilities.

2026-10-29T05:00:00Z

Virginia establishes emission limits for data center generators

Effective date: November 4, 2026

This applies to: Data centers that apply for an air permit on or after July 1, 2026

Description of change: The Virginia State Air Pollution Control Board established new emission regulations for engine-generator sets (gen-sets) at data centers. A gen-set refers to an electrical generator and engine mounted together that form one piece of equipment.

The new regulation requires each gen-set covered in the air permit to emit no more than the emissions achieved by a Tier 4 equivalent gen-set. It also grants the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality the authority to require stricter emission limits.

Related state info: Clean air operating permits state comparison

2026-10-29T05:00:00Z

Kansas adds TSDF permit application review fees

Effective date: October 16, 2026

This applies to: Hazardous waste treatment, storage, and disposal facilities (TSDFs)

Description of change: The Kansas Department of Health and Environment (KDHE) approved a new regulation establishing review fees for new and renewal permit applications from TSDFs. Facility permits must be renewed every 10 years.

The review fee is $20,000 for a permit renewal or an application from a TSDF that has a permit, order, agreement, post-closure plan, or other regulatory mechanism issued or approved by EPA or the KDHE.

The review fee is $50,000 for an application from a TSDF that doesn’t have a permit, order, agreement, post-closure plan, or other regulatory mechanism issued or approved by EPA or the KDHE.

2026-10-29T05:00:00Z

Kansas extends duration of state non-discharging water pollution permit

Effective date: October 30, 2026

This applies to: State-issued non-discharging water pollution control permit holders

Description of change: The Kansas Department of Health and Environment adopted amendments to extend the maximum duration of state-issued non-discharging water pollution control permits from 5 to 10 years.

Related state info: Industrial water permitting state comparison

2026-10-29T05:00:00Z

Wyoming updates noncoal surface mining regulations

Effective date: August 21, 2026

This applies to: Noncoal surface mining operations

Description of change: The Wyoming Land Quality Division (LQD) adopted a new chapter and amended three related chapters governing noncoal surface mining operation regulations.

The LQD added Noncoal Chapter 14 to set blasting requirements for noncoal surface mining operations, including requirements for blasting plans for operations that anticipate using explosives.

It also revised Noncoal Chapters 2, 9, and 10 to establish that other types of operations are subject to some or all of the blasting regulations established by Noncoal Chapter 14. For example, the following types of operations must develop blasting plans if the operations are expected to use blasting as part of the mining:

  • Regular noncoal mine permit applicants,
  • Small mining operations, and
  • Limited mining operations on 15 acres or less of affected land.
See More

Most Recent Highlights In Safety & Health

EPA updates formaldehyde testing standards for composite wood products
2026-10-29T05:00:00Z

EPA updates formaldehyde testing standards for composite wood products

EPA published a final rule on October 28, 2026, updating the formaldehyde emission standards for composite wood products under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA). The rule provides a new quality control test method option and updates specific voluntary consensus standards incorporated by reference.

Who’s impacted?

The formaldehyde emission standards apply to entities that manufacture (including import), sell, supply, offer for sale, or certify certain composite wood products that use formaldehyde, including:

  • Hardwood plywood,
  • Medium-density fiberboard,
  • Particleboard, and
  • Products containing these composite wood materials.

It may also apply to entities that test these materials or work with certification firms that certify them.

Regulated entities use approved voluntary consensus standards to comply with the formaldehyde emission standards (40 CFR Part 770).

What are the changes?

EPA’s final rule updates six voluntary consensus standards incorporated by reference to the most current standards issued by the American National Standards Institute (ANSI), the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM), the International Organization for Standardization (ISO), and the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). Regulated entities must comply with the updated versions of these standards.

The final rule also adds an allowable quality control testing method. ISO 12460-2:2024(en), “Wood-based panels — Determination of Formaldehyde Release — Part 2: Small-scale Chamber Method,” is a small-scale chamber test method for measuring formaldehyde emissions from wood products. The new standard contains a wider range of analytical methods that entities can use (e.g., laser absorption spectroscopy).

Finally, the rule removes the British Standards Institute BS EN ISO 12460-3:2020 standard from the allowable quality control methods since ISO 12460-3:2023(E), one of the existing standards that’s being updated by the final rule, is identical.

The final rule takes effect November 27, 2026.

Key to remember: EPA updated the formaldehyde testing standards for composite wood products, adding a quality control test method and updating multiple voluntary consensus standards.

Looking beyond PFAS: Emerging contaminants draw EPA's attention
2026-10-23T05:00:00Z

Looking beyond PFAS: Emerging contaminants draw EPA's attention

For years, conversations about emerging contaminants have focused on per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS). While PFAS remain a major regulatory and public concern, they represent only one part of a much larger picture. Regulators and researchers are increasingly evaluating a broader range of chemicals that may be present in drinking water and the environment.

A recent EPA research initiative highlights this shift. In September 2026, EPA announced a scientific study that will use non-targeted analysis (NTA) to improve the agency's understanding of emerging contaminants in drinking water. Unlike traditional analytical methods that look for a limited list of chemicals, NTA allows researchers to screen for thousands of potential contaminants and identify previously unknown substances.

Emerging contaminants continue to evolve

There's no single regulatory definition of "emerging contaminant." Generally, the term refers to chemicals that have been detected in the environment and may present risks to human health or ecosystems but aren't yet fully understood, routinely monitored, or regulated.

Many emerging contaminants are not new chemicals. In many cases, they've been used for decades. What's changed is the ability to detect them at very low concentrations and to better understand where they occur, how they move through the environment, and what impacts they may have.

PFAS are a prime example. Once largely unknown outside technical circles, they're now the subject of drinking water standards, reporting requirements, cleanup efforts, and litigation. Other contaminant groups may follow a similar path as research continues.

EPA is expanding its view beyond PFAS

As part of its study, EPA developed a screening library containing more than 1,400 emerging contaminants. According to EPA, the library includes more than 1,000 pesticides and pesticide metabolites, more than 250 pharmaceuticals and personal care products, more than 70 PFAS, and other emerging contaminants.

While PFAS remain the most recognized emerging contaminant family, EPA's screening efforts extend far beyond fluorinated chemicals. The pharmaceutical and personal care product category includes compounds such as antibiotics, hormones, and other medicinal ingredients that can enter the environment through wastewater systems and other pathways. The pesticide category encompasses herbicide, insecticide, fungicide, and pesticide degradation products that may persist in soil, groundwater, or surface water.

EPA states that the study will help identify contaminants that may warrant additional investigation in the future.

Why this matters now

Most facilities aren't currently required to monitor for hundreds or thousands of emerging contaminants. However, today's research efforts often become tomorrow's regulatory priorities.

Historically, contaminants often attract scientific attention long before regulatory requirements follow. As occurrence data grows and analytical methods improve, regulators gain a better understanding of where contaminants are found and whether additional action is needed.

Facilities that manufacture, process, use, discharge, or dispose of chemicals should understand which substances are present in their operations and waste streams. This includes evaluating raw materials, wastewater discharges, byproducts, and residual wastes. Facilities may also want to monitor supplier communications and regulatory developments related to chemicals used in their operations.

Organizations with strong chemical inventory management and environmental review processes are often better positioned to adapt when new contaminants attract regulatory attention.

Preparing for what comes next

Organizations don't need to become experts on every emerging contaminant. However, focusing solely on PFAS could cause them to overlook broader trends developing across the environmental landscape.

EPA's latest drinking water study demonstrates that regulators are increasingly using advanced analytical tools to evaluate a much wider universe of chemicals. Whether the next major concern involves pharmaceuticals, pesticide metabolites, or another group of contaminants, facilities that stay informed about emerging issues will be better positioned to anticipate and respond to future compliance challenges.

Key to remember: PFAS may be the most visible emerging contaminant today, but they're unlikely to be the last. EPA's recent drinking water study shows that regulators are evaluating a much broader range of contaminants, making it important for facilities to stay informed about emerging chemical concerns before they become regulatory requirements.

2026-10-20T05:00:00Z

Hawaii overhauls solid waste landfill regulations

Effective date: September 25, 2026

This applies to: Facilities that manage solid waste

Description of change: The State of Hawaii Department of Health made the first major update to the solid waste management control regulations in decades. The amended regulations:

  • Increase flexibility for small municipal solid waste landfills (MSWLFs),
  • Revise siting restrictions for MSWLFs,
  • Add requirements for construction and demolition landfills and special waste landfills,
  • Add leachate control and closure requirements for all solid waste management facilities,
  • Require auto processing and salvaging on an impervious surface, and
  • Update the solid waste permitting program.

Examples of significant changes include:

  • Adding requirements for facilities that manage solid waste (except landfills), such as leachate control for all facilities and use of impervious working surfaces for solid waste salvage facilities;
  • Updating MSWLF requirements (such as requiring compliance with the federal maximum contaminant level or state level (whichever is lower) for groundwater contaminants); and
  • Adding new requirements for construction and demolition landfills.

Related state info: Non-hazardous solid waste and recycling state comparison

2026-10-20T05:00:00Z

North Dakota adopts permanent septic system rules

Effective date: October 1, 2026

This applies to: The licensing, permitting, and installation of on-site wastewater treatment systems (septic systems)

Description of change: The North Dakota Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) finalized permanent rules for on-site wastewater treatment systems (septic systems). The final rule establishes statewide licensing requirements, a common technical code, and a process for variances from the code.

Senate Bill 2267 shifted responsibility for regulating septic systems to the DEQ. The department issued an emergency rule in 2025 to continue existing licenses. This rulemaking finalizes:

  • Licensing requirements for septic system installers,
  • Training requirements for licensed septic system installers,
  • Permit requirements (permits will continue to be issued by the local permitting authority), and
  • Technical requirements (which closely align with the existing voluntary common code previously developed).
2026-10-20T05:00:00Z

Ohio establishes CCR regulations

Effective date: October 1, 2026

This applies to: Owners and operators of coal combustion residuals (CCR) landfills and surface impoundments

Description of change: The Ohio Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) adopted regulations for CCR generated by electric utilities and disposed of in dedicated landfills and surface impoundments. The new rules partially implement the federal CCR regulations (40 CFR Part 257 Subpart D). They also contain state-specific provisions (OAC Chapter 3745-525) for requirements related to CCR permits to install and financial assurance for landfills previously regulated by OAC Chapter 3745-30.

The Ohio EPA plans to apply for partial approval to implement the CCR program in place of EPA.

See More

Most Recent Highlights In Human Resources

2026-10-20T05:00:00Z

Texas adopts financial assurance rules for recycling facilities

Effective date: October 1, 2026

This applies to: Recycling facilities that accept, process, and repurpose renewable energy components

Description of change: The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ)’s final rule adds 30 TAC Chapter 376 (and amends Chapter 328 accordingly) to establish new requirements for recycling facilities that accept, process, and repurpose renewable energy components for recovering valuable materials from:

  • Wind turbine generators,
  • Solar energy devices, and
  • Battery energy storage systems.

The new rule adds reporting, financial assurance, and penalty requirements. For example, the regulation requires recycling facilities to submit annual reports by January 15 that include:

  • An inventory of unrecycled renewable energy components,
  • An estimated timeline to recycle them,
  • A cost estimate for recycling or disposing of the materials prepared by a third-party Texas-licensed professional engineer, and
  • Evidence of financial assurance for the cost estimate.

Related state info: Non-hazardous solid waste and recycling state comparison

2026-10-20T05:00:00Z

California amends vehicle regulations

Effective date: September 10, 2026

This applies to: Public agency utilities, high-priority fleets, and drayer trucks subject to the Advanced Clean Fleets (ACF) regulation and hydrogen refueling stations subject to the Low Carbon Fuel Standard (LCFS) regulation

Description of change: The California Air Resources Board (CARB) amended the ACF’s state and local government requirements. CARB’s final rule:

  • Extends the 50 percent zero-emission vehicle (ZEV) purchase requirement to January 1, 2030;
  • Modifies the Daily Usage Exemption and the ZEV Purchase Exemption to allow all vehicles of all model years to be eligible for consideration;
  • Adds an exemption under the ZEV Milestones Option for captive waste and wastewater fleets that produce biomethane on-site;
  • Expands the ZEV Purchase Exemption availability criteria to ensure minimum ZEV warranty requirements and manufacturer experience or reliability and streamlines the exemption process;
  • Modifies the Fleet Resiliency Exemption by lowering the ZEV penetration threshold from 25 to 5 percent of the fleet where it stays and expands eligibility to all vehicle types; and
  • Repeals sections of the ACF regulation for high-priority fleets and drayer trucks (these regulations were never implemented because CARB didn’t have a federal preemption waiver to enforce them).

CARB also amended the LCFS regulation, modifying the derating factors for light- and medium-duty hydrogen refueling infrastructure (LMD-HRI) crediting. CARB reduced the derating factor so that LMD-HRI stations may receive HRI credits for the full nameplate capacity for public stations and 50 percent of the nameplate capacity for private stations.

EPA proposes reallocating excess 2025 SREs to 2026, 2027
2026-10-20T05:00:00Z

EPA proposes reallocating excess 2025 SREs to 2026, 2027

On October 16, 2026, EPA published a rule proposing to revise the Small Refinery Exemption (SRE) reallocation volumes for compliance years 2026 and 2027 under the Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS) program.

Who’s impacted?

The RFS program applies to obligated parties, including:

  • Refiners of gasoline or diesel fuel (i.e., transportation fuel); and
  • Importers of transportation fuel.

EPA sets annual renewable fuel volume and percentage standards for each compliance year. Obligated parties must calculate their individual renewable volume obligations (RVOs), measured in Renewable Identification Numbers (RINs), and obtain and retire enough RINs to meet their RVOs for each compliance year.

What’s the issue?

In April 2026, EPA established the annual volume and percentage standards for the 2026 and 2027 compliance years (Set 2 Rule), including reallocating part of the SREs granted and expected to be granted for the 2023–2025 compliance years.

However, EPA granted a higher volume of SREs for the 2025 compliance year than expected, exempting 770 million more RINs than the Set 2 Rule projected for the 2026 and 2027 compliance years. The agency plans to revise the Set 2 Rule to account for the additional SRE reallocation volume.

What’s the proposed solution?

EPA proposes reallocating 100 percent of the additional 770 million RINs by reallocating the additional 2025 exempted RVO either:

  • Equally between the 2026 and 2027 compliance years, or
  • Fully to the 2027 compliance year.

The proposed rule would adjust the renewable volume and percentage standards for biomass-based diesel, advanced biofuel, and total renewable fuel. The Set 2 Rule didn’t establish SRE reallocation volumes for cellulosic biofuel.

Additionally, the proposed rule may extend the current 2026 compliance reporting deadline of March 31, 2027.

EPA will host a virtual public hearing for the proposed rule on November 4, 2026. Public comments on the rule are due by December 4, 2026 (Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2024-0505).

Key to remember: EPA proposes to reallocate the excess 2025 small refinery exemption volumes to the 2026 and 2027 compliance years.

When one activity triggers multiple environmental obligations
2026-10-16T05:00:00Z

When one activity triggers multiple environmental obligations

Environmental compliance programs are often managed separately. Air permitting, hazardous waste, stormwater, emergency planning, and chemical reporting frequently involve different personnel, regulations, and procedures.

The challenge is that facilities don't operate that way. They operate processes, and those processes rarely fit neatly within a single regulatory category.

A company rarely decides to implement an "air program change" or a "hazardous waste change." Instead, it purchases a new solvent, installs a fuel tank, modifies a manufacturing process, or adds new equipment. A single operational decision can affect multiple environmental compliance programs at the same time. When organizations evaluate changes through only one regulatory lens, they risk overlooking obligations that arise elsewhere.

The following examples illustrate how one product, process, or activity can trigger requirements across several environmental programs.

Switching to a new paint or solvent

A facility may decide to replace an existing paint, coating, or solvent to improve product quality, address supply chain challenges, or reduce costs. Before making the switch, environmental professionals should consider how the change could affect multiple compliance obligations.

A new paint or solvent may contain a different concentration of volatile organic compounds (VOCs), affecting air emission calculations, permit applicability, or recordkeeping requirements. Spent materials, contaminated wipes, absorbents, and cleanup residues may require a new hazardous waste determination. Depending on the chemical composition and quantities involved, the material could also affect Tier II inventory reporting or Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) reporting obligations.

What appears to be a straightforward purchasing decision can ultimately affect air compliance, waste management, and chemical reporting programs.

Installing a diesel fuel storage tank

Organizations often add fuel storage to support emergency generators, fleet operations, or business continuity initiatives. While the project may be viewed primarily as an operational improvement, it can create environmental obligations in several areas.

The tank may count toward Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasure (SPCC) applicability thresholds. Fuel storage can also increase stormwater pollution risks, requiring updates to inspection procedures, pollution prevention controls, or employee training. Secondary containment requirements, spill response procedures, and release reporting obligations may also need review.

A project initially viewed as a facilities improvement may affect spill prevention, stormwater management, and emergency preparedness responsibilities.

Managing aerosol cans

Aerosol cans are commonly used throughout facilities for maintenance, cleaning, lubrication, painting, and other routine activities. Their widespread use can cause organizations to overlook their broader compliance implications.

Depending on how they're managed, discarded aerosol cans may qualify for the federal universal waste regulations. If cans are punctured and processed for recycling, facilities must also consider hazardous waste management requirements, employee training, and potential air emission concerns associated with puncturing operations. Likewise, storage practices, container management, and recordkeeping procedures should be evaluated.

Because aerosol cans intersect with waste management, recycling, and air concerns, they demonstrate how a routine maintenance activity can involve multiple regulatory programs.

Adding a refrigeration process

Expanding refrigerated storage capacity or installing a new industrial refrigeration process may seem like a project driven by production needs. However, depending on the refrigerant used and the quantity stored on-site, the environmental and safety implications can extend well beyond equipment installation.

Certain refrigerants may be subject to leak management and repair, servicing, recovery, and recordkeeping requirements. Depending on the substance and quantity stored on-site, facilities may also trigger Tier II or TRI reporting obligations.

For facilities using substances such as anhydrous ammonia, increasing refrigerant inventories may have even broader consequences. Exceeding regulatory thresholds could trigger EPA's Risk Management Program (RMP) requirements and OSHA's Process Safety Management (PSM) obligations, adding responsibilities related to process hazard analyses, operating procedures, employee training, emergency planning, mechanical integrity, and management of change.

The project may also require updates to emergency response procedures, hazard communication programs, and chemical inventory management processes. As a result, a decision driven by production or storage needs may affect environmental reporting, accident prevention, emergency preparedness, and process safety requirements across the facility.

Looking beyond program boundaries

Environmental regulations are often organized by media, program, or statute. Facilities, however, operate through products, equipment, and processes. Because of this difference in perspective, a single operational change can have consequences that reach far beyond its original purpose.

Organizations that routinely evaluate projects through multiple compliance lenses are often better positioned to identify environmental obligations before they become compliance issues. Asking how a new product, process, equipment installation, or operational change might affect air, waste, water, chemical reporting, spill prevention, emergency planning, or process safety requirements can help reduce surprises and support more effective compliance management.

Key to remember: Environmental compliance obligations rarely exist in isolation. Before implementing a new product, process, or operational change, consider how it may affect multiple environmental programs, not just the one most directly associated with the project.

Court vacates EPA’s methylene chloride rule: How should facilities respond?
2026-10-16T05:00:00Z

Court vacates EPA’s methylene chloride rule: How should facilities respond?

When a court overturns an environmental regulation, it can be tempting to adopt an “all bets are off” approach and stop efforts to comply with the rule. However, facilities that continue to operate as if the rule still applies are better prepared to meet any future rulemaking that’s likely to occur. On September 15, 2026, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit vacated EPA’s methylene chloride risk management rule established under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) and remanded it back to the federal agency for further proceedings. EPA must restart the rulemaking process for methylene chloride.

Here’s what you need to know about the ruling and how your facility can respond to “hedge its bets” against future environmental regulations of methylene chloride.

What regulations and facilities are impacted?

The court’s decision in East Fork Enterprises, Inc. v. EPA (Case No. 24-60227) impacts EPA’s methylene chloride risk management rule finalized in May 2024 (2024 final rule). The rule applied to entities that manufacture (including import), process, distribute in commerce, use, or dispose of methylene chloride or methylene chloride-containing products.

Reasons for overturning the methylene chloride rule

The court listed a range of reasons for vacating the 2024 final rule, including the following significant findings.

Whole-chemical approach

EPA used a “whole chemical” approach in its revised 2022 risk determination for methylene chloride (on which the 2024 final rule is based) instead of making individual risk determinations for each condition of use (COU). As a result, EPA recharacterized six COUs (previously found not to present unreasonable risk) as posing unreasonable risk.

Court’s conclusion: TSCA doesn’t permit EPA to issue a whole-chemical risk determination; it requires EPA to evaluate and issue risk determinations for each COU.

Personal protective equipment (PPE) assumption

In its 2022 risk determination, EPA didn’t assume that exposed employees use PPE. However, TSCA requires the agency to account for PPE use if evidence suggests that it’s commonly used.

Court’s conclusion: There was sufficient evidence for EPA to assume PPE use, especially given that OSHA’s methylene chloride standard generally requires the use of PPE when employee exposure warrants it.

Risk analysis methods

EPA’s approach to “unreasonable risk” went beyond the statutory limits, appearing to attempt to eliminate nearly all risks. Further, EPA’s risk analysis didn’t comply with TSCA’s “best available science” standard (producing exposure limits unsupported by substantial evidence), and the agency overlooked relevant evidence.

Court’s conclusion: TSCA requires EPA to identify only unreasonable risk, which allows for some risk; the act isn’t designed to eliminate all risk. Also, TSCA mandates the agency to base its risk evaluations on all acceptable scientific information, including data contrary to its presuppositions.

Regulating to the extent necessary

EPA exceeded its authority by imposing regulations beyond “the extent necessary.” The court ruled that EPA’s basis for requiring a near-complete ban on methylene chloride use was unauthorized because it was based on the agency’s uncertainty as to whether a risk deemed reasonable will stay reasonable.

Court’s conclusion: TSCA permits EPA to eliminate actual, identified unreasonable risk. The agency can’t ban chemicals based on a reasonable risk that may become unreasonable in the future.

What’s next?

The court vacated with remand EPA’s methylene chloride rule and associated risk determination. As a result, EPA’s risk determination for methylene chloride is invalid, and the methylene chloride risk management rule is no longer in effect. Additionally, EPA must develop a new risk management rule that resolves the issues identified in the court’s opinion.

How should regulated entities respond?

EPA’s methylene chloride risk management rule is legally unenforceable, including its bans on uses and the regulatory requirements (such as the Workplace Chemical Protection Program). However, due to the uncertainty of EPA’s response and future rulemaking, companies should respond thoughtfully. Consider these tips:

  • Watch closely for EPA’s response to this litigation.
  • Consider maintaining protective measures and compliance programs that were implemented in response to the 2024 final rule, where possible. Continuing these efforts may ease compliance burdens if EPA issues a revised rule in the future. For example:
    • Continue conducting exposure monitoring and recording the results,
    • Keep searching for possible substitutes, and
    • Maintain workplace protections that are already implemented.
  • Ensure compliance with existing methylene chloride regulations, including:
    • EPA’s March 2019 final rule banning methylene chloride for consumer paint and coating removal, and
    • OSHA’s occupational exposure control requirements for methylene chloride (29 CFR 1910.1052).

Key to remember: A U.S. court vacated EPA’s 2024 methylene chloride risk management rule, but facilities that maintain protections and compliance programs developed under the rule may be better prepared for any future regulations of the chemical.

See More
New Network Poll
What stumps you most about OSHA's Occupational Noise Exposure standard?

What stumps you most about OSHA's Occupational Noise Exposure standard?

No active poll
Please come back soon!
See More
See More
See More
See More
Saved to my EVENT CALENDAR!
View your saved links by clicking the arrow next to your profile picture located in the header. Then, click “My Activity” to view the Event Calendar on your Activity page.