FREE TRIAL UPGRADE!
Thank you for investing in EnvironmentalHazmatHuman ResourcesHuman Resources, Hazmat & Environmental related content. Click 'UPGRADE' to continue.
CANCEL
YOU'RE ALL SET!
Enjoy your limited-time access to the Compliance Network!
A confirmation welcome email has been sent to your email address from ComplianceNetwork@t.jjkellercompliancenetwork.com. Please check your spam/junk folder if you can't find it in your inbox.
YOU'RE ALL SET!
Thank you for your interest in EnvironmentalHazmatHuman ResourcesHuman Resources, Hazmat & Environmental related content.
WHOOPS!
You've reached your limit of free access, if you'd like more info, please contact us at 800-327-6868.
You'll also get exclusive access to:
Already have an account? .

PHMSA is amending the Hazardous Materials Regulations (HMR) to maintain alignment with international regulations and standards by adopting various amendments, including changes to proper shipping names, hazard classes, packing groups, special provisions, packaging authorizations, air transport quantity limitations, and vessel stowage requirements. PHMSA is also withdrawing the unpublished November 28, 2022, Notice of Enforcement Policy Regarding International Standards on the use of select updated international standards in complying with the HMR during the pendency of this rulemaking.

DATES:

Effective date: This rule is effective May 10, 2024.

Voluntary compliance date: January 1, 2023.

Delayed compliance date: April 10, 2025.

This final rule is published in the Federal Register April 10, 2024.

View final rule.

§171.7 Reference material.
(t)(1), (v)(2), and (w)(32) through (81) Revised View text
(w)(82) through (92) Added View text
(aa)(3) and (dd)(1) through (4) Revised View text
§171.12 North American shipments.
(a)(4)(iii) Revised View text
§171.23 Requirements for specific materials and packagings transported under the ICAO technical instructions, IMDG code, Transport Canada TDG regulations, or the IAEA regulations.
(a)(3) Revised View text
§171.25 Additional requirements for the use of the IMDG code.
(c)(3) and (4) Revised View text
(c)(5) Added View text
§172.101 Purpose and use of the hazardous materials table.
Section heading Revised View text
(c)(12)(ii) Revised View text
Hazardous materials table, multiple entries Revised, added, removed View text
§172.102 Special provisions.
(c)(1) special provisions 78, 156, and 387 Revised View text
(c)(1) special provisions 396 and 398 Added View text
(c)(1) special provision 421 Removed and reserved View text
(c)(2) special provision A54 Revised View text
(c)(2) special provisions A224 and A225 Added View text
(c)(4) Table 2—IP Codes, special provision IP15 Revised View text
(c)(4) Table 2—IP Codes, special provision IP22 Added View text
§173.4b De minimis exceptions.
(b)(1) Revised View text
§173.21 Forbidden materials and packages.
(f) introductory text, (f)(1), and (f)(2) Revised View text
§173.27 General requirements for transportation by aircraft.
(f)(2)(i)(D) Revised View text
§173.124 Class 4, Divisions 4.1, 4.2 and 4.3— Definitions.
(a)(4)(iv) Removed View text
§173.137 Class 8—Assignment of packing group.
Introductory text Revised View text
§173.151 Exceptions for Class 4.
(d) introductory text Revised View text
§173.167 ID8000 consumer commodities.
Entire section Revised View text
§173.185 Lithium cells and batteries.
(a)(3) introductory text and (a)(3)(x) Revised View text
(a)(5) Added View text
(b)(3)(iii)(A) and (B) Revised View text
(b)(3)(iii)(C) Added View text
(b)(4)(ii) and (iii) Revised View text
(b)(4)(iv) Added View text
(b)(5), (c)(3) through (5), and (e)(5) through (7) Revised View text
§173.224 Packaging and control and emergency temperatures for self-reactive materials.
(b)(4) Revised View text
Table following (b)(7) Revised View text
§173.225 Packaging requirements and other provisions for organic peroxides.
Table 1 to paragraph (c) Revised View text
Table following paragraph (d) Retitled View text
Table following paragraph (g) Revised View text
§173.232 Articles containing hazardous materials, n.o.s.
(h) Added View text
§173.301b Additional general requirements for shipment of UN pressure receptacles.
(c)(1), (c)(2)(ii) through (iv), (d)(1), and (f) Revised View text
§173.302b Additional requirements for shipment of non-liquefied (permanent) compressed gases in UN pressure receptacles.
(g) Added View text
§173.302c Additional requirements for the shipment of adsorbed gases in UN pressure receptacles.
(k) Revised View text
§173.311 Metal Hydride Storage Systems.
Entire section Revised View text
§175.1 Purpose, scope, and applicability.
(e) Added View text
§175.10 Exceptions for passengers, crewmembers, and air operators.
(a) introductory text, (a)(14) introductory text, (a)(15)(v)(A), (a)(15)(vi)(A), (a)(17)(ii)(C), (a)(18) introductory text, and (a)(26) introductory text Revised View text
§175.33 Shipping paper and information to the pilot-in-command.
(a)(13)(iii) Revised View text
§178.37 Specification 3AA and 3AAX seamless steel cylinders.
(j) Revised View text
§178.71 Specifications for UN pressure receptacles.
(f)(4), (g), (i), (k)(1)(i) and (ii), (m), and (n) Revised View text
§178.75 Specifications for MEGCs.
(d)(3) introductory text and paragraphs (d)(3)(i) through (iii) Revised View text
§178.609 Test requirements for packagings for infectious substances.
(d)(2) Revised View text
§178.706 Standards for rigid plastic IBCs.
(c)(3) Revised View text
§178.707 Standards for composite IBCs.
(c)(3)(iii) Revised View text
§180.207 Requirements for requalification of UN pressure receptacles.
(d)(3) and (5) Revised View text
(d)(8) Added View text

Previous Text

§171.7 Reference material.

* * * * *

(t) * * *

(1) ICAO Doc 9284. Technical Instructions for the Safe Transport of Dangerous Goods by Air (ICAO Technical Instructions), 2021-2022 Edition, copyright 2020; into §§171.8; 171.22 through 171.24; 172.101; 172.202; 172.401; 172.407; 172.512; 172.519; 172.602; 173.56; 173.320; 175.10, 175.33; 178.3.

* * * * *

(v) * * *

(2) International Maritime Dangerous Goods Code (IMDG Code), Incorporating Amendment 40-20 (English Edition), (Volumes 1 and 2), 2020 Edition, copyright 2020; into §§171.22; 171.23; 171.25; 172.101; 172.202; 172.203; 172.401; 172.407; 172.502; 172.519; 172.602; 173.21; 173.56; 176.2; 176.5; 176.11; 176.27; 176.30; 176.83; 176.84; 176.140; 176.720; 176.906; 178.3; 178.274.

(w) * * *

(32) ISO 9809-2:2000(E): Gas cylinders—Refillable seamless steel gas cylinders—Design, construction and testing—Part 2: Quenched and tempered steel cylinders with tensile strength greater than or equal to 1 100 MPa., First edition, June 2000, into §§178.71; 178.75.

(33) ISO 9809-2:2010(E): Gas cylinders—Refillable seamless steel gas cylinders—Design, construction and testing—Part 2: Quenched and tempered steel cylinders with tensile strength greater than or equal to 1100 MPa., Second edition, 2010-04-15, into §§178.71; 178.75.

(34) ISO 9809-3:2000(E): Gas cylinders—Refillable seamless steel gas cylinders—Design, construction and testing—Part 3: Normalized steel cylinders, First edition, December 2000, into §§178.71; 178.75.

(35) ISO 9809-3:2010(E): Gas cylinders—Refillable seamless steel gas cylinders—Design, construction and testing—Part 3: Normalized steel cylinders, Second edition, 2010-04-15, into §§178.71; 178.75.

(36) ISO 9809-4:2014(E), Gas cylinders—Refillable seamless steel gas cylinders—Design, construction and testing—Part 4: Stainless steel cylinders with an Rm value of less than 1 100 MPa, First edition, 2014-07-15, into §§178.71; 178.75.

(37) ISO 9978:1992(E)—Radiation protection—Sealed radioactive sources—Leakage test methods. First Edition, (February 15, 1992), into §173.469.

(38) ISO 10156:2017(E), Gas cylinders—Gases and gas mixtures—Determination of fire potential and oxidizing ability for the selection of cylinder valve outlets, Fourth edition, 2017-07; into §173.115.

(39) ISO 10297:1999(E), Gas cylinders—Refillable gas cylinder valves—Specification and type testing, First Edition, 1995-05-01; into §§173.301b; 178.71.

(40) ISO 10297:2006(E), Transportable gas cylinders—Cylinder valves—Specification and type testing, Second Edition, 2006-01-15; into §§173.301b; 178.71.

(41) ISO 10297:2014(E), Gas cylinders—Cylinder valves—Specification and type testing, Third Edition, 2014-07-15; into §§173.301b; 178.71.

(42) ISO 10297:2014/Amd 1:2017(E), Gas cylinders—Cylinder valves—Specification and type testing—Amendment 1: Pressure drums and tubes, Third Edition, 2017-03; into §§173.301b; 178.71.

(43) ISO 10461:2005(E), Gas cylinders—Seamless aluminum-alloy gas cylinders—Periodic inspection and testing, Second Edition, 2005-02-15 and Amendment 1, 2006-07-15; into §180.207.

(44) ISO 10462:2013(E), Gas cylinders—Acetylene cylinders—Periodic inspection and maintenance, Third edition, 2013-12-15; into §180.207.

(45) ISO 10692-2:2001(E), Gas cylinders—Gas cylinder valve connections for use in the micro-electronics industry—Part 2: Specification and type testing for valve to cylinder connections, First Edition, 2001-08-01; into §§173.40; 173.302c.

(46) ISO 11114-1:2012(E), Gas cylinders—Compatibility of cylinder and valve materials with gas contents—Part 1: Metallic materials, Second edition, 2012-03-15; into §§172.102; 173.301b; 178.71.

(47) ISO 11114-1:2012/Amd 1:2017(E), Gas cylinders—Compatibility of cylinder and valve materials with gas contents—Part 1: Metallic materials—Amendment 1, Second Edition, 2017-01; into §§172.102; 173.301b; 178.71.

(48) ISO 11114-2:2013(E), Gas cylinders—Compatibility of cylinder and valve materials with gas contents—Part 2: Non-metallic materials, Second edition, 2013-04; into §§173.301b; 178.71.

(49) ISO 11117:1998(E): Gas cylinders—Valve protection caps and valve guards for industrial and medical gas cylinders—Design, construction and tests, First edition, 1998-08-01; into §173.301b.

(50) ISO 11117:2008(E): Gas cylinders—Valve protection caps and valve guards—Design, construction and tests, Second edition, 2008-09-01; into §173.301b.

(51) ISO 11117:2008/Cor.1:2009(E): Gas cylinders—Valve protection caps and valve guards—Design, construction and tests, Technical Corrigendum 1, 2009-05-01; into §173.301b.

(52) ISO 11118(E), Gas cylinders—Non-refillable metallic gas cylinders—Specification and test methods, First edition, October 1999; into §178.71.

(53) ISO 11118:2015(E), Gas cylinders—Non-refillable metallic gas cylinders—Specification and test methods, Second edition, 2015-09-15; into §§173.301b; 178.71.

(54) ISO 11119-1(E), Gas cylinders—Gas cylinders of composite construction—Specification and test methods—Part 1: Hoop-wrapped composite gas cylinders, First edition, May 2002; into §178.71.

(55) ISO 11119-1:2012(E), Gas cylinders—Refillable composite gas cylinders and tubes—Design, construction and testing—Part 1: Hoop wrapped fibre reinforced composite gas cylinders and tubes up to 450 l, Second edition, 2012-08-01; into §§178.71; 178.75.

(56) ISO 11119-2(E), Gas cylinders—Gas cylinders of composite construction—Specification and test methods—Part 2: Fully wrapped fibre reinforced composite gas cylinders with load-sharing metal liners, First edition, May 2002; into §178.71.

(57) ISO 11119-2:2012(E), Gas cylinders—Refillable composite gas cylinders and tubes—Design, construction and testing—Part 2: Fully wrapped fibre reinforced composite gas cylinders and tubes up to 450 l with load-sharing metal liners, Second edition, 2012-07-15; into §§178.71; 178.75.

(58) ISO 11119-2:2012/Amd.1:2014(E), Gas cylinders—Refillable composite gas cylinders and tubes—Design, construction and testing—Part 2: Fully wrapped fibre reinforced composite gas cylinders and tubes up to 450 l with load-sharing metal liners, Amendment 1, 2014-08-15; into §§178.71; 178.75.

(59) ISO 11119-3(E), Gas cylinders of composite construction—Specification and test methods—Part 3: Fully wrapped fibre reinforced composite gas cylinders with non-load-sharing metallic or non-metallic liners, First edition, September 2002; into §178.71.

(60) ISO 11119-3:2013(E), Gas cylinders—Refillable composite gas cylinders and tubes—Design, construction and testing—Part 3: Fully wrapped fibre reinforced composite gas cylinders and tubes up to 450 l with non-load-sharing metallic or non-metallic liners, Second edition, 2013-04-15; into §§178.71; 178.75.

(61) ISO 11119-4:2016(E), Gas cylinders—Refillable composite gas cylinders—Design, construction and testing—Part 4: Fully wrapped fibre reinforced composite gas cylinders up to 150 L with load-sharing welded metallic liners, First Edition, 2016-02-15; into §§178.71; 178.75.

(62) ISO 11120(E), Gas cylinders—Refillable seamless steel tubes of water capacity between 150 l and 3000 l—Design, construction and testing, First edition, 1999-03; into §§178.71; 178.75.

(63) ISO 11120:2015(E), Gas cylinders—Refillable seamless steel tubes of water capacity between 150 l and 3000 l—Design, construction and testing, Second Edition, 2015-02-01; into §§178.71; 178.75.

(64) ISO 11513:2011(E), Gas cylinders—Refillable welded steel cylinders containing materials for sub-atmospheric gas packaging (excluding acetylene)—Design, construction, testing, use and periodic inspection, First edition, 2011-09-12; into §§173.302c; 178.71; 180.207.

(65) ISO 11621(E), Gas cylinders—Procedures for change of gas service, First edition, April 1997; into §§173.302, 173.336, 173.337.

(66) ISO 11623(E), Transportable gas cylinders—Periodic inspection and testing of composite gas cylinders, First edition, March 2002; into §180.207.

(67) ISO 11623(E):2015, Gas cylinders—Composite construction—Periodic inspection and testing, Second edition, 2015-12-01; into §180.207.

(68) ISO 13340:2001(E), Transportable gas cylinders—Cylinder valves for non-refillable cylinders—Specification and prototype testing, First edition, 2004-04-01; into §§173.301b; 178.71.

(69) ISO 13736:2008(E), Determination of flash point—Abel closed-cup method, Second Edition, 2008-09-15; into §173.120.

(70) ISO 14246:2014(E), Gas cylinders—Cylinder valves—Manufacturing tests and examination, Second Edition, 2014-06-15; into §178.71.

(71) ISO 14246:2014/Amd 1:2017(E), Gas cylinders—Cylinder valves—Manufacturing tests and examinations—Amendment 1, Second Edition, 2017-06; into §178.71.

(72) ISO 16111:2008(E), Transportable gas storage devices—Hydrogen absorbed in reversible metal hydride, First Edition, 2008-11-15; into §§173.301b; 173.311; 178.71.

(73) ISO 16148:2016(E), Gas cylinders—Refillable seamless steel gas cylinders and tubes—Acoustic emission examination (AT) and follow-up ultrasonic examination (UT) for periodic inspection and testing, Second Edition, 2016-04-15; into §180.207.

(74) ISO 17871:2015(E), Gas cylinders—Quick-release cylinder valves—Specification and type testing, First Edition, 2015-08-15; into §173.301b.

(75) ISO 17879: 2017(E), Gas cylinders—Self-closing cylinder valves—Specification and type testing, First Edition, 2017-07; into §§173.301b; 178.71.

(76) ISO 18172-1:2007(E), Gas cylinders—Refillable welded stainless steel cylinders—Part 1: Test pressure 6 MPa and below, First Edition, 2007-03-01; into §178.71.

(77) ISO 20475:2018(E), Gas cylinders—Cylinder bundles—Periodic inspection and testing, First Edition, 2018-02; into §180.207.

(78) ISO 20703:2006(E), Gas cylinders—Refillable welded aluminum-alloy cylinders—Design, construction and testing, First Edition, 2006-05-01; into §178.71.

(79) ISO 21172-1:2015(E), Gas cylinders—Welded steel pressure drums up to 3000 litres capacity for the transport of gases—Design and construction—Part 1: Capacities up to 1000 litres, First edition, 2015-04-01; into §178.71.

(80) ISO 22434:2006(E), Transportable gas cylinders—Inspection and maintenance of cylinder valves, First Edition, 2006-09-01; into §180.207.

(81) ISO/TR 11364:2012(E), Gas cylinders—Compilation of national and international valve stem/gas cylinder neck threads and their identification and marking system, First Edition, 2012-12-01; into §178.71.

* * * * *

(aa) * * *

(3) OECD Guideline for the Testing of Chemicals 431 (Test No. 431): In vitro skin corrosion: reconstructed human epidermis (RHE) test method, adopted 29 July 2016; into §173.137.

* * * * *

(dd) * * *

(1) Recommendations on the Transport of Dangerous Goods, Model Regulations (UN Recommendations), 21st revised edition, copyright 2019; into §§171.8; 171.12; 172.202; 172.401; 172.407; 172.502; 172.519; 173.22; 173.24; 173.24b; 173.40; 173.56; 173.192; 173.302b; 173.304b; 178.75; 178.274; as follows:

(i) Volume I, ST/SG/AC.10.1/21/Rev.21 (Vol. I).

(ii) Volume II, ST/SG/AC.10.1/21/Rev.21 (Vol. II).

(2) Manual of Tests and Criteria (UN Manual of Tests and Criteria), 7th revised edition, ST/SG/AC.10/11/Rev.7, copyright 2019; into §§171.24, 172.102; 173.21; 173.56 through 173.58; 173.60; 173.115; 173.124; 173.125; 173.127; 173.128; 173.137; 173.185; 173.220; 173.221; 173.224; 173.225; 173.232; part 173, appendix H; 175.10; 176.905; 178.274.

(3) Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals (GHS), 8th revised edition, ST/SG/AC.10/30/Rev.8, copyright 2019; into §172.401.

(4) Agreement concerning the International Carriage of Dangerous Goods by Road (ADR), copyright 2020; into §171.8; §171.23 as follows: [Change Notice][Previous Text]

(i) Volume I, ECE/TRANS/300 (Vol. I).

(ii) Volume II, ECE/TRANS/300 (Vol. II).

(iii) Corrigendum, ECE/TRANS/300 (Corr. 1).

* * * * *

§171.12 North American shipments.

* * * * *

(a) * * *

(4) * * *

(iii) Authorized CRC, BTC, CTC or TC specification cylinders that correspond with a DOT specification cylinder are as follows:

TC DOT (some or all of these specifications may instead be marked with the prefix ICC) CTC (some or all of these specifications may instead be marked with the prefix BTC or CRC)
TC-3AM DOT-3A [ICC-3] CTC-3A
TC-3AAM DOT-3AA CTC-3AA
TC-3ANM DOT-3BN CTC-3BN
TC-3EM DOT-3E CTC-3E
TC-3HTM DOT-3HT CTC-3HT
TC-3ALM DOT-3AL
DOT-3B
CTC-3AL
CTC-3B
TC-3AXM DOT-3AX CTC-3AX
TC-3AAXM DOT-3AAX
DOT-3A480X
CTC-3AAX
CTC-3A480X
TC-3TM DOT-3T
TC-4AAM33 DOT-4AA480 CTC-4AA480
TC-4BM DOT-4B CTC-4B
TC-4BM17ET DOT-4B240ET CTC-4B240ET
TC-4BAM DOT-4BA CTC-4BA
TC-4BWM DOT-4BW CTC-4BW
TC-4DM DOT-4D CTC-4D
TC-4DAM DOT-4DA CTC-4DA
TC-4DSM DOT-4DS CTC-4DS
TC-4EM DOT-4E CTC-4E
TC-39M DOT-39 CTC-39
TC-4LM DOT-4L
DOT-8
DOT-8AL
CTC-4L
CTC-8
CTC-8AL

* * * * *

§171.23 Requirements for specific materials and packagings transported under the ICAO technical instructions, IMDG code, Transport Canada TDG regulations, or the IAEA regulations.

(a) * * *

(3) Pi-marked pressure receptacles. Pressure receptacles that are marked with a pi mark in accordance with the European Directive 2010/35/EU (IBR, see §171.7) on transportable pressure equipment (TPED) and that comply with the requirements of Packing Instruction P200 or P208 and 6.2 of the ADR (IBR, see §171.7) concerning pressure relief device use, test period, filling ratios, test pressure, maximum working pressure, and material compatibility for the lading contained or gas being filled, are authorized as follows:

(i) Filled pressure receptacles imported for intermediate storage, transport to point of use, discharge, and export without further filling; and

(ii) Pressure receptacles imported or domestically sourced for the purpose of filling, intermediate storage, and export.

(iii) The bill of lading or other shipping paper must identify the cylinder and include the following certification: “This cylinder (These cylinders) conform(s) to the requirements for pi-marked cylinders found in 171.23(a)(3).”

* * * * *

§171.25 Additional requirements for the use of the IMDG code.

* * * * *

(c) * * *

(3) Except as specified in this subpart, for a material poisonous (toxic) by inhalation, the T Codes specified in Column 13 of the Dangerous Goods List in the IMDG Code may be applied to the transportation of those materials in IM, IMO and DOT Specification 51 portable tanks, when these portable tanks are authorized in accordance with the requirements of this subchapter; and

(4) No person may offer an IM or UN portable tank containing liquid hazardous materials of Class 3, PG I or II, or PG III with a flash point less than 100°F (38°C); Division 5.1, PG I or II; or Division 6.1, PG I or II, for unloading while it remains on a transport vehicle with the motive power unit attached, unless it conforms to the requirements in §177.834(o) of this subchapter.

* * * * *

§172.101 Purpose and use of hazardous materials table.

* * * * *

(c) * * *

(12) * * *

(ii) Generic or n.o.s. descriptions. If an appropriate technical name is not shown in the Table, selection of a proper shipping name shall be made from the generic or n.o.s. descriptions corresponding to the specific hazard class, packing group, hazard zone, or subsidiary hazard, if any, for the material. The name that most appropriately describes the material shall be used; e.g, an alcohol not listed by its technical name in the Table shall be described as “Alcohol, n.o.s.” rather than “Flammable liquid, n.o.s.”. Some mixtures may be more appropriately described according to their application, such as “Coating solution” or “Extracts, flavoring, liquid”, rather than by an n.o.s. entry, such as “Flammable liquid, n.o.s.” It should be noted, however, that an n.o.s. description as a proper shipping name may not provide sufficient information for shipping papers and package markings. Under the provisions of subparts C and D of this part, the technical name of one or more constituents which makes the product a hazardous material may be required in association with the proper shipping name.

* * * * *

§172.102 Special provisions.

* * * * *

(c) * * *

(1) * * *

(78) This entry may not be used to describe compressed air which contains more than 23.5 percent oxygen. Compressed air containing greater than 23.5 percent oxygen must be shipped using the description ‘‘Compressed gas, oxidizing, n.o.s., UN3156.’’

* * * * *

(156) Asbestos that is immersed or fixed in a natural or artificial binder material, such as cement, plastic, asphalt, resins or mineral ore, or contained in manufactured products is not subject to the requirements of this subchapter.

* * * * *

(387) When materials are stabilized by temperature control, the provisions of §173.21(f) of this subchapter apply. When chemical stabilization is employed, the person offering the material for transport shall ensure that the level of stabilization is sufficient to prevent the material as packaged from dangerous polymerization at 50°C (122°F). If chemical stabilization becomes ineffective at lower temperatures within the anticipated duration of transport, temperature control is required and is forbidden by aircraft. In making this determination factors to be taken into consideration include, but are not limited to, the capacity and geometry of the packaging and the effect of any insulation present, the temperature of the material when offered for transport, the duration of the journey, and the ambient temperature conditions typically encountered in the journey (considering also the season of year), the effectiveness and other properties of the stabilizer employed, applicable operational controls imposed by regulation (e.g., requirements to protect from sources of heat, including other cargo carried at a temperature above ambient) and any other relevant factors. The provisions of this special provision will be effective until January 2, 2023, unless we terminate them earlier or extend them beyond that date by notice of a final rule in the Federal Register.

* * * * *

(421) This entry will no longer be effective on January 2, 2023, unless we terminate it earlier or extend it beyond that date by notice of a final rule in the Federal Register.

* * * * *

(2) * * *

A54 Irrespective of the quantity limits in Column 9B of the §172.101 table, a lithium battery, including a lithium battery packed with, or contained in, equipment that otherwise meets the applicable requirements of §173.185, may have a mass exceeding 35 kg if approved by the Associate Administrator prior to shipment.

* * * * *

(4) * * *

IP15 For UN2031 with more than 55% nitric acid, the permitted use of rigid plastic IBCs, and the inner receptacle of composite IBCs with rigid plastics, shall be two years from their date of manufacture.

* * * * *

§173.4b De minimis exceptions.

* * * * *

(b) * * *

(1) The specimens are:

(i) Wrapped in a paper towel or cheesecloth moistened with alcohol or an alcohol solution and placed in a plastic bag that is heat-sealed. Any free liquid in the bag must not exceed 30 mL; or

(ii) Placed in vials or other rigid containers with no more than 30 mL of alcohol or alcohol solution. The containers are placed in a plastic bag that is heat-sealed;

* * * * *

§173.21 Forbidden materials and packages.

* * * * *

(f) A package containing a material which is likely to decompose with a self-accelerated decomposition temperature (SADT) of 50°C (122 °F) or less, or polymerize at a temperature of 54°C (130 °F) or less with an evolution of a dangerous quantity of heat or gas when decomposing or polymerizing, unless the material is stabilized or inhibited in a manner to preclude such evolution. The SADT may be determined by any of the test methods described in Part II of the UN Manual of Tests and Criteria (IBR, see §171.7 of this subchapter).

(1) A package meeting the criteria of paragraph (f) of this section may be required to be shipped under controlled temperature conditions. The control temperature and emergency temperature for a package shall be as specified in the table in this paragraph based upon the SADT of the material. The control temperature is the temperature above which a package of the material may not be offered for transportation or transported. The emergency temperature is the temperature at which, due to imminent danger, emergency measures must be initiated.

Table 1 to Paragraph (f)(1)—Method of Determining Control and Emergency Temperature
SADT 1 Control temperatures Emergency temperature
SADT ≤20°C (68°F) 20°C (36°F) below SADT 10°C (18°F) below SADT.
20°C (68°F) <SADT ≤35°C (95°F) 15°C (27°F) below SADT 10°C (18°F) below SADT.
35°C (95°F) <SADT ≤50°C (122°F) 10°C (18°F) below SADT 5°C (9°F) below SADT.
50°C (122°F) <SADT (2) (2)
1 Self-accelerating decomposition temperature.
2 Temperature control not required.

(2) For self-reactive materials listed in §173.224(b) Table control and emergency temperatures, where required are shown in Columns 5 and 6, respectively. For organic peroxides listed in The Organic Peroxides Table in §173.225 control and emergency temperatures, where required, are shown in Columns 7a and 7b, respectively.

* * * * *

§173.27 General requirements for transportation by aircraft.

* * * * *

(f) * * *

(2) * * *

(i) * * *

(D) Divisions 4.1 (self-reactive), 4.2 (spontaneously combustible) (primary or subsidiary risk), and 4.3 (dangerous when wet) (liquids);

* * * * *

§173.124 Class 4, Divisions 4.1, 4.2 and 4.3— Definitions.

(a) * * *

(4) * * *

(iv) The provisions concerning polymerizing substances in paragraph (a)(4) will be effective until January 2, 2023.

* * * * *

§173.137 Class 8—Assignment of packing group.

The packing group of a Class 8 material is indicated in Column 5 of the §172.101 Table. When the §172.101 Table provides more than one packing group for a Class 8 material, the packing group must be determined using data obtained from tests conducted in accordance with the OECD Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals, Test No. 435, “ In Vitro Membrane Barrier Test Method for Skin Corrosion” (IBR, see §171.7 of this subchapter) or Test No. 404, “Acute Dermal Irritation/Corrosion” (IBR, see §171.7 of this subchapter). A material that is determined not to be corrosive in accordance with OECD Guideline for the Testing of Chemicals, Test No. 430, “ In Vitro Skin Corrosion: Transcutaneous Electrical Resistance Test (TER)” (IBR, see §171.7 of this subchapter) or Test No. 431, “ In Vitro Skin Corrosion: Reconstructed Human Epidermis (RHE) Test Method” (IBR, see §171.7 of this subchapter) may be considered not to be corrosive to human skin for the purposes of this subchapter without further testing. However, a material determined to be corrosive in accordance with Test No. 430 must be further tested using Test No. 435 or Test No. 404. If the in vitro test results indicate that the substance or mixture is corrosive, but the test method does not clearly distinguish between assignment of packing groups II and III, the material may be considered to be in packing group II without further testing. The packing group assignment using data obtained from tests conducted in accordance with OECD Guideline Test No. 404 or Test No. 435 must be as follows:

* * * * *

§173.151 Exceptions for Class 4.

* * * * *

(d) Limited quantities of Division 4.3. Limited quantities of dangerous when wet solids (Division 4.3) in Packing Groups II and III are excepted from labeling requirements, unless the material is offered for transportation or transported by aircraft, and are excepted from the specification packaging requirements of this subchapter when packaged in combination packagings according to this paragraph. For transportation by aircraft, the package must also conform to applicable requirements of §173.27 of this part (e.g., authorized materials, inner packaging quantity limits and closure securement) and only hazardous material authorized aboard passenger-carrying aircraft may be transported as a limited quantity. A limited quantity package that conforms to the provisions of this section is not subject to the shipping paper requirements of subpart C of part 172 of this subchapter, unless the material meets the definition of a hazardous substance, hazardous waste, marine pollutant, or is offered for transportation and transported by aircraft or vessel. In addition, shipments of limited quantities are not subject to subpart F (Placarding) of part 172 of this subchapter. Each package must conform to the packaging requirements of subpart B of this part and may not exceed 30 kg (66 pounds) gross weight. Except for transportation by aircraft, the following combination packagings are authorized:

* * * * *

§173.167 Consumer commodities.

(a) Effective January 1, 2013, a “consumer commodity” (see §171.8 of this subchapter) when offered for transportation by aircraft may only include articles or substances of Class 2 (non-toxic aerosols only), Class 3 (Packing Group II and III only), Division 6.1 (Packing Group III only), UN3077, UN3082, UN3175, UN3334, and UN3335, provided such materials do not have a subsidiary risk and are authorized aboard a passenger-carrying aircraft. Consumer commodities are excepted from the specification outer packaging requirements of this subchapter. Packages prepared under the requirements of this section are excepted from labeling and shipping papers when transported by highway or rail. Except as indicated in §173.24(i), each completed package must conform to §§173.24 and 173.24a of this subchapter. Additionally, except for the pressure differential requirements in §173.27(c), the requirements of §173.27 do not apply to packages prepared in accordance with this section. Packages prepared under the requirements of this section may be offered for transportation and transported by all modes. As applicable, the following apply:

(1) Inner and outer packaging quantity limits. (i) Non-toxic aerosols, as defined in §171.8 of this subchapter and constructed in accordance with §173.306 of this part, in non-refillable, non-metal containers not exceeding 120 mL (4 fluid ounces) each, or in non-refillable metal containers not exceeding 820 mL (28 ounces) each, except that flammable aerosols may not exceed 500 mL (16.9 ounces) each;

(ii) Liquids, in inner packagings not exceeding 500 mL (16.9 ounces) each. Liquids must not completely fill an inner packaging at 55°C;

(iii) Solids, in inner packagings not exceeding 500 g (1.0 pounds) each; or

(iv) Any combination thereof not to exceed 30 kg (66 pounds) gross weight as prepared for shipment.

(2) Closures. Friction-type closures must be secured by positive means. The body and closure of any packaging must be constructed so as to be able to adequately resist the effects of temperature and vibration occurring in conditions normally incident to air transportation. The closure device must be so designed that it is unlikely that it can be incorrectly or incompletely closed.

(3) Absorbent material. Inner packagings must be tightly packaged in strong outer packagings. Absorbent and cushioning material must not react dangerously with the contents of inner packagings. Glass or earthenware inner packagings containing liquids of Class 3 or Division 6.1, sufficient absorbent material must be provided to absorb the entire contents of the largest inner packaging contained in the outer packaging. Absorbent material is not required if the glass or earthenware inner packagings are sufficiently protected as packaged for transport that it is unlikely a failure would occur and, if a failure did occur, that it would be unlikely that the contents would leak from the outer packaging.

(4) Drop test capability. Breakable inner packagings (e.g., glass, earthenware, or brittle plastic) must be packaged to prevent failure under conditions normally incident to transport. Packages of consumer commodities as prepared for transport must be capable of withstanding a 1.2 m drop on solid concrete in the position most likely to cause damage. In order to pass the test, the outer packaging must not exhibit any damage liable to affect safety during transport and there must be no leakage from the inner packaging(s).

(5) Stack test capability. Packages of consumer commodities must be capable of withstanding, without failure or leakage of any inner packaging and without any significant reduction in effectiveness, a force applied to the top surface for a duration of 24 hours equivalent to the total weight of identical packages if stacked to a height of 3.0 m (including the test sample).

(b) When offered for transportation by aircraft:

(1) Packages prepared under the requirements of this section are to be marked as a limited quantity in accordance with §172.315(b)(1) and labeled as a Class 9 article or substance, as appropriate, in accordance with subpart E of part 172 of this subchapter; and

(2) Pressure differential capability: Except for UN3082, inner packagings intended to contain liquids must be capable of meeting the pressure differential requirements (75 kPa) prescribed in §173.27(c) of this part. The capability of a packaging to withstand an internal pressure without leakage that produces the specified pressure differential should be determined by successfully testing design samples or prototypes.

§173.185 Lithium cells and batteries.

* * * * *

(a) * * *

(3) Beginning January 1, 2022 each manufacturer and subsequent distributor of lithium cells or batteries manufactured on or after January 1, 2008, must make available a test summary. The test summary must include the following elements:

* * * * *

* * * * *

(ix) Reference to the revised edition of the UN Manual of Tests and Criteria used and to amendments thereto, if any; and

* * * * *

(b) * * *

(3) * * *

(iii) * * *

(A) Be placed in inner packagings that completely enclose the cell or battery, then placed in an outer packaging. The completed package for the cells or batteries must meet the Packing Group II performance requirements as specified in paragraph (b)(3)(ii) of this section; or

(B) Be placed in inner packagings that completely enclose the cell or battery, then placed with equipment in a package that meets the Packing Group II performance requirements as specified in paragraph (b)(3)(ii) of this section.

* * * * *

(4) * * *

(ii) Equipment must be secured to prevent damage caused by shifting within the outer packaging and be packed so as to prevent accidental operation during transport; and

(iii) Any spare lithium cells or batteries packed with the equipment must be packaged in accordance with paragraph (b)(3) of this section.

* * * * *

(5) Lithium batteries that weigh 12 kg (26.5 pounds) or more and have a strong, impact-resistant outer casing may be packed in strong outer packagings; in protective enclosures (for example, in fully enclosed or wooden slatted crates); or on pallets or other handling devices, instead of packages meeting the UN performance packaging requirements in paragraphs (b)(3)(ii) and (iii) of this section. Batteries must be secured to prevent inadvertent shifting, and the terminals may not support the weight of other superimposed elements. Batteries packaged in accordance with this paragraph may be transported by cargo aircraft if approved by the Associate Administrator.

* * * * *

(c) * * *

(3) Lithium battery mark. Each package must display the lithium battery mark except when a package contains only button cell batteries contained in equipment (including circuit boards), or when a consignment contains two packages or fewer where each package contains not more than four lithium cells or two lithium batteries contained in equipment. [Change Notice][Previous Text]

(i) The mark must indicate the UN number: “UN3090” for lithium metal cells or batteries; or “UN3480” for lithium ion cells or batteries. Where the lithium cells or batteries are contained in, or packed with, equipment, the UN number “UN3091” or “UN3481,” as appropriate, must be indicated. Where a package contains lithium cells or batteries assigned to different UN numbers, all applicable UN numbers must be indicated on one or more marks. The package must be of such size that there is adequate space to affix the mark on one side without the mark being folded.



(A) The mark must be in the form of a rectangle or a square with hatched edging. The mark must be not less than 100 mm (3.9 inches) wide by 100 mm (3.9 inches) high and the minimum width of the hatching must be 5 mm (0.2 inches), except marks of 100 mm (3.9 inches) wide by 70 mm (2.8 inches) high may be used on a package containing lithium batteries when the package is too small for the larger mark;

(B) The symbols and letters must be black on white or suitable contrasting background and the hatching must be red;

(C) The “*” must be replaced by the appropriate UN number(s) and the “**” must be replaced by a telephone number for additional information; and

(D) Where dimensions are not specified, all features shall be in approximate proportion to those shown.

(ii) [Reserved]

(iii) When packages are placed in an overpack, the lithium battery mark shall either be clearly visible through the overpack or be reproduced on the outside of the overpack and the overpack shall be marked with the word “OVERPACK”. The lettering of the “OVERPACK” mark shall be at least 12 mm (0.47 inches) high.

(4) Air transportation. (i) For transportation by aircraft, lithium cells and batteries may not exceed the limits in the following Table 1 to paragraph (c)(4)(i). The limits on the maximum number of batteries and maximum net quantity of batteries in the following table may not be combined in the same package. The limits in the following table do not apply to lithium cells and batteries packed with, or contained in, equipment.

Table 1 to Paragraph (c)(4)(i)
Contents Lithium metal cells and/or batteries with a lithium content not more than 0.3 g Lithium metal cells with a lithium content more than 0.3 g but not more than 1 g Lithium metal batteries with a lithium content more than 0.3 g but not more than 2 g Lithium ion cells and/or batteries with a watt-hour rating not more than 2.7 Wh Lithium ion cells with a watt-hour rating more than 2.7 Wh but not more than 20 Wh Lithium ion batteries with a watt-hour rating more than 2.7 Wh but not more than 100 Wh
Maximum number of cells/batteries per package No Limit 8 cells 2 batteries No Limit 8 cells 2 batteries.
Maximum net quantity (mass) per package 2.5 kg n/a n/a 2.5 kg n/a n/a.

(ii) Not more than one package prepared in accordance with paragraph (c)(4)(i) of this section may be placed into an overpack.

(iii) A shipper is not permitted to offer for transport more than one package prepared in accordance with the provisions of paragraph (c)(4)(i) of this section in any single consignment.

(iv) Each shipment with packages required to display the paragraph (c)(3)(i) lithium battery mark must include an indication on the air waybill of compliance with this paragraph (c)(4) (or the applicable ICAO Technical Instructions Packing Instruction), when an air waybill is used.

(v) Packages and overpacks of lithium batteries prepared in accordance with paragraph (c)(4)(i) of this section must be offered to the operator separately from cargo which is not subject to the requirements of this subchapter and must not be loaded into a unit load device before being offered to the operator.

(vi) For lithium batteries packed with, or contained in, equipment, the number of batteries in each package is limited to the minimum number required to power the piece of equipment, plus two spare sets, and the total net quantity (mass) of the lithium cells or batteries in the completed package must not exceed 5 kg. A “set” of cells or batteries is the number of individual cells or batteries that are required to power each piece of equipment.

(vii) Each person who prepares a package for transport containing lithium cells or batteries, including cells or batteries packed with, or contained in, equipment in accordance with the conditions and limitations of this paragraph (c)(4), must receive instruction on these conditions and limitations, corresponding to their functions.

(viii) Lithium cells and batteries must not be packed in the same outer packaging with other hazardous materials. Packages prepared in accordance with paragraph (c)(4)(i) of this section must not be placed into an overpack with packages containing hazardous materials and articles of Class 1 (explosives) other than Division 1.4S, Division 2.1 (flammable gases), Class 3 (flammable liquids), Division 4.1 (flammable solids), or Division 5.1 (oxidizers).

(5) For transportation by aircraft, a package that exceeds the number or quantity (mass) limits in the table shown in paragraph (c)(4)(i) of this section, the overpack limit described in paragraph (c)(4)(ii) of this section, or the consignment limit described in paragraph (c)(4)(iii) of this section is subject to all applicable requirements of this subchapter, except that a package containing no more than 2.5 kg lithium metal cells or batteries or 10 kg lithium ion cells or batteries is not subject to the UN performance packaging requirements in paragraph (b)(3)(ii) of this section when the package displays both the lithium battery mark in paragraph (c)(3)(i) and the Class 9 Lithium Battery label specified in §172.447 of this subchapter. This paragraph does not apply to batteries or cells packed with or contained in equipment.

* * * * *

(e) * * *

(5) Lithium batteries, including lithium batteries contained in equipment, that weigh 12 kg (26.5 pounds) or more and have a strong, impact-resistant outer casing may be packed in strong outer packagings, in protective enclosures (for example, in fully enclosed or wooden slatted crates), or on pallets or other handling devices, instead of packages meeting the UN performance packaging requirements in paragraphs (b)(3)(ii) and (iii) of this section. The battery must be secured to prevent inadvertent shifting, and the terminals may not support the weight of other superimposed elements;

(6) Irrespective of the limit specified in column (9B) of the §172.101 Hazardous Materials Table, the battery or battery assembly prepared for transport in accordance with this paragraph may have a mass exceeding 35 kg gross weight when transported by cargo aircraft;

(7) Batteries or battery assemblies packaged in accordance with this paragraph are not permitted for transportation by passenger-carrying aircraft, and may be transported by cargo aircraft only if approved by the Associate Administrator prior to transportation; and

* * * * *

§173.224 Packaging and control and emergency temperatures for self-reactive materials.

* * * * *

(b) * * *

(4) Packing method. Column 4 specifies the highest packing method which is authorized for the self-reactive material. A packing method corresponding to a smaller package size may be used, but a packing method corresponding to a larger package size may not be used. The Table of Packing Methods in §173.225(d) defines the packing methods. Bulk packagings for Type F self-reactive substances are authorized by §173.225(f) for IBCs and §173.225(h) for bulk packagings other than IBCs. The formulations listed in §173.225(f) for IBCs and in §173.225(g) for portable tanks may also be transported packed in accordance with packing method OP8, with the same control and emergency temperatures, if applicable. Additional bulk packagings are authorized if approved by the Associate Administrator.

* * * * *

Self-Reactive Materials Table
Self-reactive substance


(1)
Identification No.


(2)
Concentra-
tion—(%)


(3)
Packing method


(4)
Control
tempera-
ture— (°C)


(5)
Emer-
gency
tempera-
ture—


(6)
Notes


(7)
Notes:
1. The emergency and control temperatures must be determined in accordance with §173.21(f).
2. With a compatible diluent having a boiling point of not less than 150 °C.
3. Samples may only be offered for transportation under the provisions of paragraph (c)(3) of this section.
4. This entry applies to mixtures of esters of 2-diazo-1-naphthol-4-sulphonic acid and 2-diazo-1-naphthol-5-sulphonic acid.
5. This entry applies to the technical mixture in n-butanol within the specified concentration limits of the (Z) isomer.
Acetone-pyrogallol copolymer 2-diazo-1-naphthol-5-sulphonate 3228 100 OP8
Azodicarbonamide formulation type B, temperature controlled 3232 <100 OP5 1
Azodicarbonamide formulation type C 3224 <100 OP6
Azodicarbonamide formulation type C, temperature controlled 3234 <100 OP6 1
Azodicarbonamide formulation type D 3226 <100 OP7
Azodicarbonamide formulation type D, temperature controlled 3236 <100 OP7 1
2,2′-Azodi(2,4-dimethyl-4-methoxyvaleronitrile) 3236 100 OP7 −5 +5
2,2′-Azodi(2,4-dimethylvaleronitrile) 3236 100 OP7 +10 +15
2,2′-Azodi(ethyl 2-methylpropionate) 3235 100 OP7 +20 +25
1,1-Azodi(hexahydrobenzonitrile) 3226 100 OP7
2,2-Azodi(isobutyronitrile) 3234 100 OP6 +40 +45
2,2′-Azodi(isobutyronitrile) as a water based paste 3224 ≤50 OP6
2,2-Azodi(2-methylbutyronitrile) 3236 100 OP7 +35 +40
Benzene-1,3-disulphonylhydrazide, as a paste 3226 52 OP7
Benzene sulphohydrazide 3226 100 OP7
4-(Benzyl(ethyl)amino)-3-ethoxybenzenediazonium zinc chloride 3226 100 OP7
4-(Benzyl(methyl)amino)-3-ethoxybenzenediazonium zinc chloride 3236 100 OP7 +40 +45
3-Chloro-4-diethylaminobenzenediazonium zinc chloride 3226 100 OP7
2-Diazo-1-Naphthol sulphonic acid ester mixture 3226 <100 OP7 4
2-Diazo-1-Naphthol-4-sulphonyl chloride 3222 100 OP5
2-Diazo-1-Naphthol-5-sulphonyl chloride 3222 100 OP5
2,5-Dibutoxy-4-(4-morpholinyl)-Benzenediazonium, tetrachlorozincate (2:1) 3228 100 OP8
2,5-Diethoxy-4-morpholinobenzenediazonium zinc chloride 3236 67−100 OP7 +35 +40
2,5-Diethoxy-4-morpholinobenzenediazonium zinc chloride 3236 66 OP7 +40 +45
2,5-Diethoxy-4-morpholinobenzenediazonium tetrafluoroborate 3236 100 OP7 +30 +35
2,5-Diethoxy-4-(phenylsulphonyl)benzenediazonium zinc chloride 3236 67 OP7 +40 +45
2,5-Diethoxy-4-(4-morpholinyl)-benzenediazonium sulphate 3226 100 OP7
Diethylene glycol bis(allyl carbonate) + Diisopropylperoxydicarbonate 3237 ≥88 + ≤12 OP8 −10 0
2,5-Dimethoxy-4-(4-methylphenylsulphony)benzenediazonium zinc chloride 3236 79 OP7 +40 +45
4-Dimethylamino-6-(2-dimethylaminoethoxy)toluene-2-diazonium zinc chloride 3236 100 OP7 +40 +45
4-(Dimethylamino)-benzenediazonium trichlorozincate (-1) 3228 100 OP8
N,N′-Dinitroso-N, N′-dimethyl-terephthalamide, as a paste 3224 72 OP6
N,N′-Dinitrosopentamethylenetetramine 3224 82 OP6 2
Diphenyloxide-4,4′-disulphohydrazide 3226 100 OP7
Diphenyloxide-4,4′-disulphonylhydrazide 3226 100 OP7
4-Dipropylaminobenzenediazonium zinc chloride 3226 100 OP7
2-(N,N-Ethoxycarbonylphenylamino)-3-methoxy-4-(N-methyl-N- cyclohexylamino)benzenediazonium zinc chloride 3236 63−92 OP7 +40 +45
2-(N,N-Ethoxycarbonylphenylamino)-3-methoxy-4-(N-methyl-N- cyclohexylamino)benzenediazonium zinc chloride 3236 62 OP7 +35 +40
N-Formyl-2-(nitromethylene)-1,3-perhydrothiazine 3236 100 OP7 +45 +50
2-(2-Hydroxyethoxy)-1-(pyrrolidin-1-yl)benzene-4-diazonium zinc chloride 3236 100 OP7 +45 +50
3-(2-Hydroxyethoxy)-4-(pyrrolidin-1-yl)benzenediazonium zinc chloride 3236 100 OP7 +40 +45
2-(N,N-Methylaminoethylcarbonyl)-4-(3,4-dimethyl-phenylsulphonyl)benzene diazonium zinc chloride 3236 96 OP7 +45 +50
4-Methylbenzenesulphonylhydrazide 3226 100 OP7
3-Methyl-4-(pyrrolidin-1-yl)benzenediazonium tetrafluoroborate 3234 95 OP6 +45 +50
4-Nitrosophenol 3236 100 OP7 +35 +40
Phosphorothioic acid, O-[(cyanophenyl methylene) azanyl] O,O-diethyl ester 3227 82−91 (Z isomer) OP8 5
Self-reactive liquid, sample 3223 OP2 3
Self-reactive liquid, sample, temperature control 3233 OP2 3
Self-reactive solid, sample 3224 OP2 3
Self-reactive solid, sample, temperature control 3234 OP2 3
Sodium 2-diazo-1-naphthol-4-sulphonate 3226 100 OP7
Sodium 2-diazo-1-naphthol-5-sulphonate 3226 100 OP7
Tetramine palladium (II) nitrate 3234 100 OP6 +30 +35

§173.225 Packaging requirements and other provisions for organic peroxides.

* * * * *

(c) * * *

Table 1 to Paragraph (c)—Organic Peroxide Table
Technical name ID No. Concentration (mass %) Diluent (mass %) Water (mass %) Packing method Temperature (°C) Notes
A B I Control Emergency
(1) (2) (3) (4a) (4b) (4c) (5) (6) (7a) (7b) (8)
Acetyl acetone peroxide UN3105 ≤42 ≥48 ≥8 OP7 2
Acetyl acetone peroxide [as a paste] UN3106 ≤32 OP7 21
Acetyl cyclohexanesulfonyl peroxide UN3112 ≤82 ≥12 OP4 −10 0
Acetyl cyclohexanesulfonyl peroxide UN3115 ≤32 ≥68 OP7 −10 0
tert-Amyl hydroperoxide UN3107 ≤88 ≥6 ≥6 OP8
tert-Amyl peroxyacetate UN3105 ≤62 ≥38 OP7
tert-Amyl peroxybenzoate UN3103 ≤100 OP5
tert-Amyl peroxy-2-ethylhexanoate UN3115 ≤100 OP7 +20 +25
tert-Amyl peroxy-2-ethylhexyl carbonate UN3105 ≤100 OP7
tert-Amyl peroxy isopropyl carbonate UN3103 ≤77 ≥23 OP5
tert-Amyl peroxyneodecanoate UN3115 ≤77 ≥23 OP7 0 +10
tert-Amyl peroxyneodecanoate UN3119 ≤47 ≥53 OP8 0 +10
tert-Amyl peroxypivalate UN3113 ≤77 ≥23 OP5 +10 +15
tert-Amyl peroxypivalate UN3119 ≤32 ≥68 OP8 +10 +15
tert-Amyl peroxy-3,5,5-trimethylhexanoate UN3105 ≤100 OP7
tert-Butyl cumyl peroxide UN3109 >42−100 OP8 9
tert-Butyl cumyl peroxide UN3108 ≤52 ≥48 OP8 9
n-Butyl-4,4-di-(tert-butylperoxy)valerate UN3103 >52−100 OP5
n-Butyl-4,4-di-(tert-butylperoxy)valerate UN3108 ≤52 ≥48 OP8
tert-Butyl hydroperoxide UN3103 >79−90 ≥10 OP5 13
tert-Butyl hydroperoxide UN3105 ≤80 ≥20 OP7 4, 13
tert-Butyl hydroperoxide UN3107 ≤79 >14 OP8 13, 16
tert-Butyl hydroperoxide UN3109 ≤72 ≥28 OP8 13
tert-Butyl hydroperoxide [and] Di-tert-butylperoxide UN3103 <82 + >9 ≥7 OP5 13
tert-Butyl monoperoxymaleate UN3102 >52−100 OP5
tert-Butyl monoperoxymaleate UN3103 ≤52 ≥48 OP6
tert-Butyl monoperoxymaleate UN3108 ≤52 ≥48 OP8
tert-Butyl monoperoxymaleate [as a paste] UN3108 ≤52 OP8
tert-Butyl peroxyacetate UN3101 >52−77 ≥23 OP5
tert-Butyl peroxyacetate UN3103 >32−52 ≥48 OP6
tert-Butyl peroxyacetate UN3109 ≤32 ≥68 OP8
tert-Butyl peroxybenzoate UN3103 >77−100 OP5
tert-Butyl peroxybenzoate UN3105 >52−77 ≥23 OP7 1
tert-Butyl peroxybenzoate UN3106 ≤52 ≥48 OP7
tert-Butyl peroxybenzoate UN3109 ≤32 ≥68 OP8
tert-Butyl peroxybutyl fumarate UN3105 ≤52 ≥48 OP7
tert-Butyl peroxycrotonate UN3105 ≤77 ≥23 OP7
tert-Butyl peroxydiethylacetate UN3113 ≤100 OP5 +20 +25
tert-Butyl peroxy-2-ethylhexanoate UN3113 >52−100 OP6 +20 +25
tert-Butyl peroxy-2-ethylhexanoate UN3117 >32−52 ≥48 OP8 +30 +35
tert-Butyl peroxy-2-ethylhexanoate UN3118 ≤52 ≥48 OP8 +20 +25
tert-Butyl peroxy-2-ethylhexanoate UN3119 ≤32 ≥68 OP8 +40 +45
tert-Butyl peroxy-2-ethylhexanoate [and] 2,2-di-(tert-Butylperoxy)butane UN3106 ≤12 + ≤14 ≥14 ≥60 OP7
tert-Butyl peroxy-2-ethylhexanoate [and] 2,2-di-(tert-Butylperoxy)butane UN3115 ≤31 + ≤36 ≥33 OP7 +35 +40
tert-Butyl peroxy-2-ethylhexylcarbonate UN3105 ≤100 OP7
tert-Butyl peroxyisobutyrate UN3111 >52−77 ≥23 OP5 +15 +20
tert-Butyl peroxyisobutyrate UN3115 ≤52 ≥48 OP7 +15 +20
tert-Butylperoxy isopropylcarbonate UN3103 ≤77 ≥23 OP5
1-(2-tert-Butylperoxy isopropyl)-3-isopropenylbenzene UN3105 ≤77 ≥23 OP7
1-(2-tert-Butylperoxy isopropyl)-3-isopropenylbenzene UN3108 ≤42 ≥58 OP8
tert-Butyl peroxy-2-methylbenzoate UN3103 ≤100 OP5
tert-Butyl peroxyneodecanoate UN3115 >77−100 OP7 −5 +5
tert-Butyl peroxyneodecanoate UN3115 ≤77 ≥23 OP7 0 +10
tert-Butyl peroxyneodecanoate [as a stable dispersion in water] UN3119 ≤52 OP8 0 +10
tert-Butyl peroxyneodecanoate [as a stable dispersion in water (frozen)] UN3118 ≤42 OP8 0 +10
tert-Butyl peroxyneodecanoate UN3119 ≤32 ≥68 OP8 0 +10
tert-Butyl peroxyneoheptanoate UN3115 ≤77 ≥23 OP7 0 +10
tert-Butyl peroxyneoheptanoate [as a stable dispersion in water] UN3117 ≤42 OP8 0 +10
tert-Butyl peroxypivalate UN3113 >67−77 ≥23 OP5 0 +10
tert-Butyl peroxypivalate UN3115 >27−67 ≥33 OP7 0 +10
tert-Butyl peroxypivalate UN3119 ≤27 ≥73 OP8 +30 +35
tert-Butylperoxy stearylcarbonate UN3106 ≤100 OP7
tert-Butyl peroxy-3,5,5-trimethylhexanoate UN3105 >37−100 OP7
tert-Butyl peroxy-3,5,5-trimethlyhexanoate UN3106 ≤42 ≥58 OP7
tert-Butyl peroxy-3,5,5-trimethylhexanoate UN3109 ≤37 ≥63 OP8
3-Chloroperoxybenzoic acid UN3102 >57−86 ≥14 OP1
3-Chloroperoxybenzoic acid UN3106 ≤57 ≥3 ≥40 OP7
3-Chloroperoxybenzoic acid UN3106 ≤77 ≥6 ≥17 OP7
Cumyl hydroperoxide UN3107 >90−98 ≤10 OP8 13
Cumyl hydroperoxide UN3109 ≤90 ≥10 OP8 13, 15
Cumyl peroxyneodecanoate UN3115 ≤87 ≥13 OP7 −10 0
Cumyl peroxyneodecanoate UN3115 ≤77 ≥23 OP7 −10 0
Cumyl peroxyneodecanoate [as a stable dispersion in water] UN3119 ≤52 OP8 −10 0
Cumyl peroxyneoheptanoate UN3115 ≤77 ≥23 OP7 −10 0
Cumyl peroxypivalate UN3115 ≤77 ≥23 OP7 −5 +5
Cyclohexanone peroxide(s) UN3104 ≤91 ≥9 OP6 13
Cyclohexanone peroxide(s) UN3105 ≤72 ≥28 OP7 5
Cyclohexanone peroxide(s) [as a paste] UN3106 ≤72 OP7 5, 21
Cyclohexanone peroxide(s) Exempt ≤32 >68 Exempt 29
Diacetone alcohol peroxides UN3115 ≤57 ≥26 ≥8 OP7 +40 +45 5
Diacetyl peroxide UN3115 ≤27 ≥73 OP7 +20 +25 8,13
Di-tert-amyl peroxide UN3107 ≤100 OP8
([3R- (3R, 5aS, 6S, 8aS, 9R, 10R, 12S, 12aR**)]-Decahydro-10-methoxy-3, 6, 9-trimethyl-3, 12-epoxy-12H-pyrano [4, 3- j]-1, 2-benzodioxepin) UN3106 ≤100 OP7
2,2-Di-(tert-amylperoxy)-butane UN3105 ≤57 ≥43 OP7
1,1-Di-(tert-amylperoxy)cyclohexane UN3103 ≤82 ≥18 OP6
Dibenzoyl peroxide UN3102 >52−100 ≤48 OP2 3
Dibenzoyl peroxide UN3102 >77−94 ≥6 OP4 3
Dibenzoyl peroxide UN3104 ≤77 ≥23 OP6
Dibenzoyl peroxide UN3106 ≤62 ≥28 ≥10 OP7
Dibenzoyl peroxide [as a paste] UN3106 >52−62 OP7 21
Dibenzoyl peroxide UN3106 >35−52 ≥48 OP7
Dibenzoyl peroxide UN3107 >36−42 ≥18 ≤40 OP8
Dibenzoyl peroxide [as a paste] UN3108 ≤56.5 ≥15 OP8
Dibenzoyl peroxide [as a paste] UN3108 ≤52 OP8 21
Dibenzoyl peroxide [as a stable dispersion in water] UN3109 ≤42 OP8
Dibenzoyl peroxide Exempt ≤35 ≥65 Exempt 29
Di-(4-tert-butylcyclohexyl)peroxydicarbonate UN3114 ≤100 OP6 +30 +35
Di-(4-tert-butylcyclohexyl)peroxydicarbonate [as a stable dispersion in water] UN3119 ≤42 OP8 +30 +35
Di-(4-tert-butylcyclohexyl)peroxydicarbonate [as a paste] UN3116 ≤42 OP7 +35 +40
Di-tert-butyl peroxide UN3107 >52−100 OP8
Di-tert-butyl peroxide UN3109 ≤52 ≥48 OP8 24
Di-tert-butyl peroxyazelate UN3105 ≤52 ≥48 OP7
2,2-Di-(tert-butylperoxy)butane UN3103 ≤52 ≥48 OP6
1,6-Di-(tert-butylperoxycarbonyloxy)hexane UN3103 ≤72 ≥28 OP5
1,1-Di-(tert-butylperoxy)cyclohexane UN3101 >80−100 OP5
1,1-Di-(tert-butylperoxy)cyclohexane UN3103 >52−80 ≥20 OP5
1,1-Di-(tert-butylperoxy)-cyclohexane UN3103 ≤72 ≥28 OP5 30
1,1-Di-(tert-butylperoxy)cyclohexane UN3105 >42−52 ≥48 OP7
1,1-Di-(tert-butylperoxy)cyclohexane UN3106 ≤42 ≥13 ≥45 OP7
1,1-Di-(tert-butylperoxy)cyclohexane UN3107 ≤27 ≥25 OP8 22
1,1-Di-(tert-butylperoxy)cyclohexane UN3109 ≤42 ≥58 OP8
1,1-Di-(tert-Butylperoxy) cyclohexane UN3109 ≤37 ≥63 OP8
1,1-Di-(tert-butylperoxy)cyclohexane UN3109 ≤25 ≥25 ≥50 OP8
1,1-Di-(tert-butylperoxy)cyclohexane UN3109 ≤13 ≥13 ≥74 OP8
1,1-Di-(tert-butylperoxy)cyclohexane + tert-Butyl peroxy-2-ethylhexanoate UN3105 ≤43 + ≤16 ≥41 OP7
Di-n-butyl peroxydicarbonate UN3115 >27−52 ≥48 OP7 −15 −5
Di-n-butyl peroxydicarbonate UN3117 ≤27 ≥73 OP8 −10 0
Di-n-butyl peroxydicarbonate [as a stable dispersion in water (frozen)] UN3118 ≤42 OP8 −15 −5
Di-sec-butyl peroxydicarbonate UN3113 >52−100 OP4 −20 −10 6
Di-sec-butyl peroxydicarbonate UN3115 ≤52 ≥48 OP7 −15 −5
Di-(tert-butylperoxyisopropyl) benzene(s) UN3106 >42−100 ≤57 OP7 1, 9
Di-(tert-butylperoxyisopropyl) benzene(s) Exempt ≤42 ≥58 Exempt
Di-(tert-butylperoxy)phthalate UN3105 >42−52 ≥48 OP7
Di-(tert-butylperoxy)phthalate [as a paste] UN3106 ≤52 OP7 21
Di-(tert-butylperoxy)phthalate UN3107 ≤42 ≥58 OP8
2,2-Di-(tert-butylperoxy)propane UN3105 ≤52 ≥48 OP7
2,2-Di-(tert-butylperoxy)propane UN3106 ≤42 ≥13 ≥45 OP7
1,1-Di-(tert-butylperoxy)-3,3,5-trimethylcyclohexane UN3101 >90−100 OP5
1,1-Di-(tert-butylperoxy)-3,3,5-trimethylcyclohexane UN3103 >57−90 ≥10 OP5
1,1-Di-(tert-butylperoxy)-3,3,5-trimethylcyclohexane UN3103 ≤77 ≥23 OP5
1,1-Di-(tert-butylperoxy)-3,3,5-trimethylcyclohexane UN3103 ≤90 ≥10 OP5 30
1,1-Di-(tert-butylperoxy)-3,3,5-trimethylcyclohexane UN3110 ≤57 ≥43 OP8
1,1-Di-(tert-butylperoxy)-3,3,5-trimethylcyclohexane UN3107 ≤57 ≥43 OP8
1,1-Di-(tert-butylperoxy)-3,3,5-trimethylcyclohexane UN3107 ≤32 ≥26 ≥42 OP8
Dicetyl peroxydicarbonate UN3120 ≤100 OP8 +30 +35
Dicetyl peroxydicarbonate [as a stable dispersion in water] UN3119 ≤42 OP8 +30 +35
Di-4-chlorobenzoyl peroxide UN3102 ≤77 ≥23 OP5
Di-4-chlorobenzoyl peroxide Exempt ≤32 ≥68 Exempt 29
Di-2,4-dichlorobenzoyl peroxide [as a paste] UN3118 ≤52 OP8 +20 +25
Di-4-chlorobenzoyl peroxide [as a paste] UN3106 ≤52 OP7 21
Dicumyl peroxide UN3110 >52−100 ≤48 OP8 9
Dicumyl peroxide Exempt ≤52 ≥48 Exempt 29
Dicyclohexyl peroxydicarbonate UN3112 >91−100 OP3 +10 +15
Dicyclohexyl peroxydicarbonate UN3114 ≤91 ≥9 OP5 +10 +15
Dicyclohexyl peroxydicarbonate [as a stable dispersion in water] UN3119 ≤42 OP8 +15 +20
Didecanoyl peroxide UN3114 ≤100 OP6 +30 +35
2,2-Di-(4,4-di(tert-butylperoxy)cyclohexyl)propane UN3106 ≤42 ≥58 OP7
2,2-Di-(4,4-di(tert-butylperoxy)cyclohexyl)propane UN3107 ≤22 ≥78 OP8
Di-2,4-dichlorobenzoyl peroxide UN3102 ≤77 ≥23 OP5
Di-2,4-dichlorobenzoyl peroxide [as a paste with silicone oil] UN3106 ≤52 OP7
Di-(2-ethoxyethyl) peroxydicarbonate UN3115 ≤52 ≥48 OP7 −10 0
Di-(2-ethylhexyl) peroxydicarbonate UN3113 >77−100 OP5 −20 −10
Di-(2-ethylhexyl) peroxydicarbonate UN3115 ≤77 ≥23 OP7 −15 −5
Di-(2-ethylhexyl) peroxydicarbonate [as a stable dispersion in water] UN3119 ≤62 OP8 −15 −5
Di-(2-ethylhexyl) peroxydicarbonate [as a stable dispersion in water] UN3119 ≤52 OP8 −15 −5
Di-(2-ethylhexyl) peroxydicarbonate [as a stable dispersion in water (frozen)] UN3120 ≤52 OP8 −15 −5
2,2-Dihydroperoxypropane UN3102 ≤27 ≥73 OP5
Di-(1-hydroxycyclohexyl)peroxide UN3106 ≤100 OP7
Diisobutyryl peroxide UN3111 >32−52 ≥48 OP5 −20 −10
Diisobutyryl peroxide [as a stable dispersion in water] UN3119 ≤42 OP8 −20 −10
Diisobutyryl peroxide UN3115 ≤32 ≥68 OP7 −20 −10
Diisopropylbenzene dihydroperoxie UN3106 ≤82 ≥5 ≥5 OP7 17
Diisopropyl peroxydicarbonate UN3112 >52−100 OP2 −15 −5
Diisopropyl peroxydicarbonate UN3115 ≤52 ≥48 OP7 −20 −10
Diisopropyl peroxydicarbonate UN3115 ≤32 ≥68 OP7 −15 −5
Dilauroyl peroxide UN3106 ≤100 OP7
Dilauroyl peroxide [as a stable dispersion in water] UN3109 ≤42 OP8
Di-(3-methoxybutyl) peroxydicarbonate UN3115 ≤52 ≥48 OP7 −5 +5
Di-(2-methylbenzoyl)peroxide UN3112 ≤87 ≥13 OP5 +30 +35
Di-(4-methylbenzoyl)peroxide [as a paste with silicone oil] UN3106 ≤52 OP7
Di-(3-methylbenzoyl) peroxide + Benzoyl (3-methylbenzoyl) peroxide + Dibenzoyl peroxide UN3115 ≤20 + ≤18 + ≤4 ≥58 OP7 +35 +40
2,5-Dimethyl-2,5-di-(benzoylperoxy)hexane UN3102 >82−100 OP5
2,5-Dimethyl-2,5-di-(benzoylperoxy)hexane UN3106 ≤82 ≥18 OP7
2,5-Dimethyl-2,5-di-(benzoylperoxy)hexane UN3104 ≤82 ≥18 OP5
2,5-Dimethyl-2,5-di-(tert-butylperoxy)hexane UN3103 >90−100 OP5
2,5-Dimethyl-2,5-di-(tert-butylperoxy)hexane UN3105 >52—90 ≥10 OP7
2,5-Dimethyl-2,5-di-(tert-butylperoxy)hexane UN3108 ≤77 ≥23 OP8
2,5-Dimethyl-2,5-di-(tert-butylperoxy)hexane UN3109 ≤52 ≥48 OP8
2,5-Dimethyl-2,5-di-(tert-butylperoxy)hexane [as a paste] UN3108 ≤47 OP8
2,5-Dimethyl-2,5-di-(tert-butylperoxy)hexyne-3 UN3101 >86−100 OP5
2,5-Dimethyl-2,5-di-(tert-butylperoxy)hexyne-3 UN3103 >52−86 ≥14 OP5
2,5-Dimethyl-2,5-di-(tert-butylperoxy)hexyne-3 UN3106 ≤52 ≥48 OP7
2,5-Dimethyl-2,5-di-(2-ethylhexanoylperoxy)hexane UN3113 ≤100 OP5 +20 +25
2,5-Dimethyl-2,5-dihydroperoxyhexane UN3104 ≤82 ≥18 OP6
2,5-Dimethyl-2,5-di-(3,5,5-trimethylhexanoylperoxy)hexane UN3105 ≤77 ≥23 OP7
1,1-Dimethyl-3-hydroxybutylperoxyneoheptanoate UN3117 ≤52 ≥48 OP8 0 +10
Dimyristyl peroxydicarbonate UN3116 ≤100 OP7 +20 +25
Dimyristyl peroxydicarbonate [as a stable dispersion in water] UN3119 ≤42 OP8 +20 +25
Di-(2-neodecanoylperoxyisopropyl)benzene UN3115 ≤52 ≥48 OP7 −10 0
Di-(2-neodecanoyl-peroxyisopropyl) benzene, as stable dispersion in water UN3119 ≤42 OP8 −15 −5
Di-n-nonanoyl peroxide UN3116 ≤100 OP7 0 +10
Di-n-octanoyl peroxide UN3114 ≤100 OP5 +10 +15
Di-(2-phenoxyethyl)peroxydicarbonate UN3102 >85−100 OP5
Di-(2-phenoxyethyl)peroxydicarbonate UN3106 ≤85 ≥15 OP7
Dipropionyl peroxide UN3117 ≤27 ≥73 OP8 +15 +20
Di-n-propyl peroxydicarbonate UN3113 ≤100 OP3 −25 −15
Di-n-propyl peroxydicarbonate UN3113 ≤77 ≥23 OP5 −20 −10
Disuccinic acid peroxide UN3102 >72−100 OP4 18
Disuccinic acid peroxide UN3116 ≤72 ≥28 OP7 +10 +15
Di-(3,5,5-trimethylhexanoyl) peroxide UN3115 >52−82 ≥18 OP7 0 +10
Di-(3,5,5-trimethylhexanoyl)peroxide [as a stable dispersion in water] UN3119 ≤52 OP8 +10 +15
Di-(3,5,5-trimethylhexanoyl) peroxide UN3119 >38−52 ≥48 OP8 +10 +15
Di-(3,5,5-trimethylhexanoyl)peroxide UN3119 ≤38 ≥62 OP8 +20 +25
Ethyl 3,3-di-(tert-amylperoxy)butyrate UN3105 ≤67 ≥33 OP7
Ethyl 3,3-di-(tert-butylperoxy)butyrate UN3103 >77−100 OP5
Ethyl 3,3-di-(tert-butylperoxy)butyrate UN3105 ≤77 ≥23 OP7
Ethyl 3,3-di-(tert-butylperoxy)butyrate UN3106 ≤52 ≥48 OP7
1-(2-ethylhexanoylperoxy)-1,3-Dimethylbutyl peroxypivalate UN3115 ≤52 ≥45 ≥10 OP7 −20 −10
tert-Hexyl peroxyneodecanoate UN3115 ≤71 ≥29 OP7 0 +10
tert-Hexyl peroxypivalate UN3115 ≤72 ≥28 OP7 +10 +15
3-Hydroxy-1,1-dimethylbutyl peroxyneodecanoate UN3115 ≤77 ≥23 OP7 −5 +5
3-Hydroxy-1,1-dimethylbutyl peroxyneodecanoate [as a stable dispersion in water] UN3119 ≤52 OP8 −5 +5
3-Hydroxy-1,1-dimethylbutyl peroxyneodecanoate UN3117 ≤52 ≥48 OP8 −5 +5
Isopropyl sec-butyl peroxydicarbonat + Di-sec-butyl peroxydicarbonate + Di-isopropyl peroxydicarbonate UN3111 ≤52 + ≤28 + ≤22 OP5 −20 −10
Isopropyl sec-butyl peroxydicarbonate + Di-sec-butyl peroxydicarbonate + Di-isopropyl peroxydicarbonate UN3115 ≤32 + ≤15 −18 + ≤12 −15 ≥38 OP7 −20 −10
Isopropylcumyl hydroperoxide UN3109 ≤72 ≥28 OP8 13
p-Menthyl hydroperoxide UN3105 >72−100 OP7 13
p-Menthyl hydroperoxide UN3109 ≤72 ≥28 OP8
Methylcyclohexanone peroxide(s) UN3115 ≤67 ≥33 OP7 +35 +40
Methyl ethyl ketone peroxide(s) UN3101 ≤52 ≥48 OP5 5, 13
Methyl ethyl ketone peroxide(s) UN3105 ≤45 ≥55 OP7 5
Methyl ethyl ketone peroxide(s) UN3107 ≤40 ≥60 OP8 7
Methyl isobutyl ketone peroxide(s) UN3105 ≤62 ≥19 OP7 5, 23
Methyl isopropyl ketone peroxide(s) UN3109 (See remark 31) ≥70 OP8 31
Organic peroxide, liquid, sample UN3103 OP2 12
Organic peroxide, liquid, sample, temperature controlled UN3113 OP2 12
Organic peroxide, solid, sample UN3104 OP2 12
Organic peroxide, solid, sample, temperature controlled UN3114 OP2 12
3,3,5,7,7-Pentamethyl-1,2,4-Trioxepane UN3107 ≤100 OP8
Peroxyacetic acid, type D, stabilized UN3105 ≤43 OP7 13, 20
Peroxyacetic acid, type E, stabilized UN3107 ≤43 OP8 13, 20
Peroxyacetic acid, type F, stabilized UN3109 ≤43 OP8 13, 20, 28
Peroxyacetic acid or peracetic acid [with not more than 7% hydrogen peroxide] UN3107 ≤36 ≥15 OP8 13, 20, 28
Peroxyacetic acid or peracetic acid [with not more than 20% hydrogen peroxide] Exempt ≤6 ≥60 Exempt 28
Peroxyacetic acid or peracetic acid [with not more than 26% hydrogen peroxide] UN3109 ≤17 OP8 13, 20, 28
Peroxylauric acid UN3118 ≤100 OP8 +35 +40
1-Phenylethyl hydroperoxide UN3109 ≤38 ≥62 OP8
Pinanyl hydroperoxide UN3105 >56−100 OP7 13
Pinanyl hydroperoxide UN3109 ≤56 ≥44 OP8
Polyether poly-tert-butylperoxycarbonate UN3107 ≤52 ≥48 OP8
Tetrahydronaphthyl hydroperoxide UN3106 ≤100 OP7
1,1,3,3-Tetramethylbutyl hydroperoxide UN3105 ≤100 OP7
1,1,3,3-Tetramethylbutyl peroxy-2-ethylhexanoate UN3115 ≤100 OP7 +15 +20
1,1,3,3-Tetramethylbutyl peroxyneodecanoate UN3115 ≤72 ≥28 OP7 −5 +5
1,1,3,3-Tetramethylbutyl peroxyneodecanoate [as a stable dispersion in water] UN3119 ≤52 OP8 −5 +5
1,1,3,3-tetramethylbutyl peroxypivalate UN3115 ≤77 ≥23 OP7 0 +10
3,6,9-Triethyl-3,6,9-trimethyl-1,4,7-triperoxonane UN3110 ≤17 ≥18 ≥65 OP8
3,6,9-Triethyl-3,6,9-trimethyl-1,4,7-triperoxonane UN3105 ≤42 ≥58 OP7 26
Notes:
1. For domestic shipments, OP8 is authorized.
2. Available oxygen must be <4.7%.
3. For concentrations <80% OP5 is allowed. For concentrations of at least 80% but <85%, OP4 is allowed. For concentrations of at least 85%, maximum package size is OP2.
4. The diluent may be replaced by di-tert-butyl peroxide.
5. Available oxygen must be ≤9% with or without water.
6. For domestic shipments, OP5 is authorized.
7. Available oxygen must be ≤8.2% with or without water.
8. Only non-metallic packagings are authorized.
9. For domestic shipments this material may be transported under the provisions of paragraph (h)(3)(xii) of this section.
10. [Reserved]
11. [Reserved]
12. Samples may only be offered for transportation under the provisions of paragraph (b)(2) of this section.
13. “Corrosive” subsidiary risk label is required.
14. [Reserved]
15. No “Corrosive” subsidiary risk label is required for concentrations below 80%.
16. With <6% di-tert-butyl peroxide.
17. With ≤8% 1-isopropylhydroperoxy-4-isopropylhydroxybenzene.
18. Addition of water to this organic peroxide will decrease its thermal stability.
19. [Reserved]
20. Mixtures with hydrogen peroxide, water and acid(s).
21. With diluent type A, with or without water.
22. With ≥36% diluent type A by mass, and in addition ethylbenzene.
23. With ≥19% diluent type A by mass, and in addition methyl isobutyl ketone.
24. Diluent type B with boiling point >100 C.
25. No “Corrosive” subsidiary risk label is required for concentrations below 56%.
26. Available oxygen must be ≤7.6%.
27. Formulations derived from distillation of peroxyacetic acid originating from peroxyacetic acid in a concentration of not more than 41% with water, total active oxygen less than or equal to 9.5% (peroxyacetic acid plus hydrogen peroxide).
28. For the purposes of this section, the names “Peroxyacetic acid” and “Peracetic acid” are synonymous.
29. Not subject to the requirements of this subchapter for Division 5.2.
30. Diluent type B with boiling point >130°C (266°F).
31. Available oxygen ≤6.7%.

(d) *****

Table to Paragraph (d): Maximum Quantity per Packaging/Package

* * * * *

(g) * * *

Table to Paragraph (g) —Organic Peroxide Portable Tank Table
UN No. Hazardous material Minimum test pressure (bar) Minimum shell thickness (mm-reference steel) See . . . Bottom opening requirements See . . . Pressure-relief requirements See . . . Filling limits Control temperature Emergency temperature
3109 ORGANIC PEROXIDE, TYPE F, LIQUID
tert-Butyl hydroperoxide, not more than 72% with water.
*Provided that steps have been taken to achieve the safety equivalence of 65% tert-Butyl hydroperoxide and 35% water.
4 §178.274(d)(2) §178.275(d)(3) §178.275(g)(1) Not more than 90% at 59°F (15°C)
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Note: 1. “Corrosive” subsidiary risk placard is required.

* * * * *

§173.301b Additional general requirements for shipment of UN pressure receptacles.

* * * * *

(c) * * *

(1) When the use of a valve is prescribed, the valve must conform to the requirements in ISO 10297:2014(E) and ISO 10297:2014/Amd 1:2017 (IBR, see §171.7 of this subchapter). Quick release cylinder valves for specification and type testing must conform to the requirements in ISO 17871:2015(E) (IBR, see §171.7 of this subchapter). Until December 31, 2022, the manufacture of a valve conforming to the requirements in ISO 10297:2014(E) is authorized. Until December 31, 2020, the manufacture of a valve conforming to the requirements in ISO 10297:2006(E) (IBR, see §171.7 of this subchapter) was authorized. Until December 31, 2008, the manufacture of a valve conforming to the requirements in ISO 10297:1999(E) (IBR, see §171.7 of this subchapter) was authorized.

(2) * * *

(ii) By equipping the UN pressure receptacle with a valve cap conforming to the requirements in ISO 11117:2008(E) and Technical Corrigendum 1 (IBR, see §171.7 of this subchapter). Until December 31, 2014, the manufacture of a valve cap conforming to the requirements in ISO 11117:1998(E) (IBR, see §171.7 of this subchapter) was authorized. The cap must have vent-holes of sufficient cross-sectional area to evacuate the gas if leakage occurs at the valve;

(iii) By protecting the valves by shrouds or guards conforming to the requirements in ISO 11117:2008(E) and Technical Corrigendum 1 (IBR; see §171.7 of this subchapter). Until December 31, 2014, the manufacture of a shroud or guard conforming to the requirements in ISO 11117:1998(E) (IBR, see §171.7 of this subchapter) was authorized. For metal hydride storage systems, by protecting the valves in accordance with the requirements in ISO 16111:2008(E) (IBR; see §171.7 of this subchapter).

(iv) By using valves designed and constructed with sufficient inherent strength to withstand damage in accordance with Annex B of ISO 10297:2014(E)/Amd. 1: 2017;

* * * * *

(d) Non-refillable UN pressure receptacles. (1) When the use of a valve is prescribed, the valve must conform to the requirements in ISO 11118:2015(E), (IBR, see §171.7 of this subchapter). Manufacture of valves to ISO 13340:2001(E) is authorized until December 31, 2020;

* * * * *

(f) Hydrogen bearing gases. A steel UN pressure receptacle bearing an ‘‘H’’ mark must be used for hydrogen bearing gases or other embrittling gases that have the potential of causing hydrogen embrittlement.

* * * * *

§173.302c Additional requirements for the shipment of adsorbed gases in UN pressure receptacles.

* * * * *

(k) The filling procedure must be in accordance with Annex A of ISO 11513 (IBR, see §171.7 of this subchapter).

* * * * *

§173.311 Metal hydride storage systems.

The following packing instruction is applicable to transportable UN Metal hydride storage systems (UN3468) with pressure receptacles not exceeding 150 liters (40 gallons) in water capacity and having a maximum developed pressure not exceeding 25 MPa. Metal hydride storage systems must be designed, constructed, initially inspected and tested in accordance with ISO 16111 (IBR, see §171.7 of this subchapter) as authorized under §178.71(m) of this subchapter. Steel pressure receptacles or composite pressure receptacles with steel liners must be marked in accordance with §173.301b(f) of this part which specifies that a steel UN pressure receptacle bearing an “H” mark must be used for hydrogen bearing gases or other gases that may cause hydrogen embrittlement. Requalification intervals must be no more than every five years as specified in §180.207 of this subchapter in accordance with the requalification procedures prescribed in ISO 16111.

§175.10 Exceptions for passengers, crewmembers, and air operators.

(a) This subchapter does not apply to the following hazardous materials when carried by aircraft passengers or crewmembers provided the requirements of §§171.15 and 171.16 (see paragraph (c) of this section) and the requirements of this section are met:

* * * * *

(14) Battery powered heat-producing devices (e.g., battery-operated equipment such as diving lamps and soldering equipment) as checked or carry-on baggage and with the approval of the operator of the aircraft. The heating element, the battery, or other component (e.g., fuse) must be isolated to prevent unintentional activation during transport. Any battery that is removed must be carried in accordance with the provisions for spare batteries in paragraph (a)(18) of this section.

* * * * *

(15) * * *

(v) * * *

(A) Securely attached to the wheelchair or mobility aid;

* * * * *

(vi) * * *

(A) Securely attached to the wheelchair or mobility aid; or

* * * * *

(17) * * *

(ii) * * *

(C) The battery must be securely attached to the mobility aid; and

* * * * *

(18) Except as provided in §173.21 of this subchapter, portable electronic devices (e.g., watches, calculating machines, cameras, cellular phones, laptop and notebook computers, camcorders, medical devices, etc.) containing dry cells or dry batteries (including lithium cells or batteries) and spare dry cells or batteries for these devices, when carried by passengers or crew members for personal use. Portable electronic devices powered by lithium batteries may be carried in either checked or carry-on baggage. When carried in checked baggage, portable electronic devices powered by lithium batteries must be completely switched off (not in sleep or hibernation mode) and protected to prevent unintentional activation or damage. Spare lithium batteries must be carried in carry-on baggage only. Each installed or spare lithium battery must be of a type proven to meet the requirements of each test in the UN Manual of Tests and Criteria, Part III, Sub-section 38.3, and each spare lithium battery must be individually protected so as to prevent short circuits (e.g., by placement in original retail packaging, by otherwise insulating terminals by taping over exposed terminals, or placing each battery in a separate plastic bag or protective pouch). In addition, each installed or spare lithium battery:

* * * * *

(26) Baggage equipped with lithium battery(ies) must be carried as carry-on baggage unless the battery(ies) is removed from the baggage. Removed battery(ies) must be carried in accordance with the provision for spare batteries prescribed in paragraph (a)(18) of this section. The provisions of this paragraph do not apply to baggage equipped with lithium batteries not exceeding:

* * * * *

§175.33 Shipping paper and information to the pilot-in-command.

(a) * * *

(13) * * *

(iii) For UN3480, UN3481, UN3090, and UN3091 prepared in accordance with §173.185(c), except those prepared in accordance with §173.185(c)(4)(vi), are not required to appear on the information to the pilot-in-command.

* * * * *

§178.37 Specification 3AA and 3AAX seamless steel cylinders.

* * * * *

(j) Flattening test. A flattening test must be performed on one cylinder taken at random out of each lot of 200 or less, by placing the cylinder between wedge shaped knife edges having a 60° included angle, rounded to ½-inch radius. The longitudinal axis of the cylinder must be at a 90-degree angle to knife edges during the test. For lots of 30 or less, flattening tests are authorized to be made on a ring at least 8 inches long cut from each cylinder and subjected to the same heat treatment as the finished cylinder. Cylinders may be subjected to a bend test in lieu of the flattening test. Two bend test specimens must be taken in accordance with ISO 9809–1 or ASTM E 290 (IBR, see §171.7 of this subchapter), and must be subjected to the bend test specified therein.

* * * * *

§178.71 Specifications for UN pressure receptacles.

* * * * *

(f) * * *

(4) ISO 21172-1:2015(E) Gas cylinders—Welded steel pressure drums up to 3,000 litres capacity for the transport of gases—Design and construction—Part 1: Capacities up to 1,000 litres (IBR, see §171.7 of this subchapter). Irrespective of section 6.3.3.4 of this standard, welded steel gas pressure drums with dished ends convex to pressure may be used for the transport of corrosive substances provided all applicable additional requirements are met.

(g) Design and construction requirements for UN refillable seamless steel cylinders. In addition to the general requirements of this section, UN refillable seamless steel cylinders must conform to the following ISO standards, as applicable:

(1) ISO 9809-1:2010 Gas cylinders—Refillable seamless steel gas cylinders—Design, construction and testing—Part 1: Quenched and tempered steel cylinders with tensile strength less than 1100 MPa. (IBR, see §171.7 of this subchapter). Until December 31, 2018, the manufacture of a cylinder conforming to the requirements in ISO 9809-1:1999 (IBR, see §171.7 of this subchapter) is authorized.

(2) ISO 9809-2: Gas cylinders—Refillable seamless steel gas cylinders—Design, construction and testing—Part 2: Quenched and tempered steel cylinders with tensile strength greater than or equal to 1100 MPa. (IBR, see §171.7 of this subchapter). Until December 31, 2018, the manufacture of a cylinder conforming to the requirements in ISO 9809-2:2000 (IBR, see §171.7 of this subchapter) is authorized.

(3) ISO 9809-3: Gas cylinders—Refillable seamless steel gas cylinders—Design, construction and testing—Part 3: Normalized steel cylinders. (IBR, see §171.7 of this subchapter). Until December 31, 2018, the manufacture of a cylinder conforming to the requirements in ISO 9809-3:2000 (IBR, see §171.7 of this subchapter) is authorized.

(4) ISO 9809-4:2014(E) (IBR, see §171.7 of this subchapter).

* * * * *

(i) Design and construction requirements for UN non-refillable metal cylinders. In addition to the general requirements of this section, UN non-refillable metal cylinders must conform to ISO 11118:2015(E) Gas cylinders—Non-refillable metallic gas cylinders—Specification and test methods (IBR, see §171.7 of this subchapter). Until December 31, 2020, cylinders conforming to ISO 11118:1999(E) Gas cylinders—Non-refillable metallic gas cylinders—Specification and test methods (IBR, see §171.7 of this subchapter) are authorized.

* * * * *

(k) * * *

(1) * * *

(i) ISO 9809-1:2010 Gas cylinders—Refillable seamless steel gas cylinders—Design, construction and testing—Part 1: Quenched and tempered steel cylinders with tensile strength less than 1100 MPa. Until December 31, 2018, the manufacture of a cylinder conforming to the requirements in ISO 9809-1:1999 (IBR, see §171.7 of this subchapter) is authorized.

(ii) ISO 9809-3: Gas cylinders—Refillable seamless steel gas cylinders—Design, construction and testing—Part 3: Normalized steel cylinders. Until December 31, 2018, the manufacture of a cylinder conforming to the requirements in ISO 9809-3:2000 (IBR, see §171.7 of this subchapter) is authorized.

* * * * *

(m) Design and construction requirements for UN metal hydride storage systems. In addition to the general requirements of this section, metal hydride storage systems must conform to the following ISO standards, as applicable: ISO 16111: Transportable gas storage devices—Hydrogen absorbed in reversible metal hydride (IBR, see §171.7 of this subchapter).

(n) Design and construction requirements for UN cylinders for the transportation of adsorbed gases. In addition to the general requirements of this section, UN cylinders for the transportation of adsorbed gases must conform to the following ISO standards, as applicable: ISO 11513:2011, Gas cylinders—Refillable welded steel cylinders containing materials for sub-atmospheric gas packaging (excluding acetylene)—Design, construction, testing, use and periodic inspection, or ISO 9809-1:2010: Gas cylinders—Refillable seamless steel gas cylinders—Design, construction and testing—Part 1: Quenched and tempered steel cylinders with tensile strength less than 1100 MPa. (IBR, see §171.7 of this subchapter.)

* * * * *

§178.75 Specifications for MEGCs.

* * * * *

(d) * * *

(3) Each pressure receptacle of a MEGC must be of the same design type, seamless steel, or composite, and constructed and tested according to one of the following ISO standards, as appropriate:

(i) ISO 9809-1: Gas cylinders—Refillable seamless steel gas cylinders—Design, construction and testing—Part 1: Quenched and tempered steel cylinders with tensile strength less than 1100 MPa. (IBR, see §171.7 of this subchapter). Until December 31, 2018, the manufacture of a cylinder conforming to the requirements in ISO 9809-1:1999 (IBR, see §171.7 of this subchapter) is authorized;

(ii) ISO 9809-2: Gas cylinders—Refillable seamless steel gas cylinders—Design, construction and testing—Part 2: Quenched and tempered steel cylinders with tensile strength greater than or equal to 1100 MPa. (IBR, see §171.7 of this subchapter). Until December 31, 2018, the manufacture of a cylinder conforming to the requirements in ISO 9809-2:2000 (IBR, see §171.7 of this subchapter) is authorized;

(iii) ISO 9809-3: Gas cylinders—Refillable seamless steel gas cylinders—Design, construction and testing—Part 3: Normalized steel cylinders. (IBR, see §171.7 of this subchapter). Until December 31, 2018, the manufacture of a cylinder conforming to the requirements in ISO 9809-3:2000 (IBR, see §171.7 of this subchapter) is authorized; or

* * * * *

§178.609 Test requirements for packagings for infectious substances.

* * * * *

(d) * * *

(2) Where the samples are in the shape of a drum, three samples must be dropped, one in each of the following orientations:

(i) Diagonally on the top chime, with the center of gravity directly above the point of impact;

(ii) Diagonally on the base chime; and

(iii) Flat on the side.

* * * * *

§178.706 Standards for rigid plastic IBCs.

* * * * *

(c) * * *

(3) No used material other than production residues or regrind from the same manufacturing process may be used in the manufacture of rigid plastic IBCs.

* * * * *

§178.707 Standards for composite IBCs.

* * * * *

(c) * * *

(3) * * *

(iii) No used material other than production residues or regrind from the same manufacturing process may be used in the manufacture of inner receptacles.

* * * * *

§180.207 Requirements for requalification of UN pressure receptacles.

* * * * *

(d) * * *

(3) Dissolved acetylene UN cylinders: Each dissolved acetylene cylinder must be requalified in accordance with ISO 10462:2013(E) (IBR, see §171.7 of this subchapter). A cylinder previously requalified in accordance with the second edition of ISO 10462(E) up until December 31, 2018, may continue to be used until the next required requalification. The porous mass and the shell must be requalified no sooner than 3 years, 6 months, from the date of manufacture. Thereafter, subsequent requalifications of the porous mass and shell must be performed at least once every ten years.

* * * * *

(5) UN cylinders for adsorbed gases: Each UN cylinder for adsorbed gases must be inspected and tested in accordance with §173.302c and ISO 11513:2011 (IBR, see §171.7 of this subchapter).

* * * * *

Specialized Industries

Go beyond the regulations! Visit the Institute for in-depth guidance on a wide range of compliance subjects in safety and health, transportation, environment, and human resources.

J. J. Keller® COMPLIANCE NETWORK is a premier online safety and compliance community, offering members exclusive access to timely regulatory content in workplace safety (OSHA), transportation (DOT), environment (EPA), and human resources (DOL).

Interact With Our Compliance Experts

Puzzled by a regulatory question or issue? Let our renowned experts provide the answers and get your business on track to full compliance!

Upcoming Events

Reference the Compliance Network Safety Calendar to keep track of upcoming safety and compliance events. Browse by industry or search by keyword to see relevant dates and observances, including national safety months, compliance deadlines, and more.

SAFETY & COMPLIANCE NEWS

Keep up with the latest regulatory developments from OSHA, DOT, EPA, DOL, and more.

REGSENSE® REGULATORY REFERENCE

Explore a comprehensive database of word-for-word regulations on a wide range of compliance topics, with simplified explanations and best practices advice from our experts.

THE J. J. KELLER INSTITUTE

The Institute is your destination for in-depth content on 120+ compliance subjects. Discover articles, videos, and interactive exercises that will strengthen your understanding of regulatory concepts relevant to your business.

ADD HAZMAT, ENVIRONMENTAL, & HR RESOURCES

Unlock exclusive content offering expert insights into hazmat, environmental, and human resources compliance with a COMPLIANCE NETWORK EDGE membership.

DIRECT ACCESS TO COMPLIANCE EXPERTS

Struggling with a compliance challenge? Get the solution from our in-house team of experts! You can submit a question to our experts by email, set up a phone or video call, or request a detailed research report.

EVENTS

Register to attend live online events hosted by our experts. These webcasts and virtual conferences feature engaging discussions on important compliance topics in a casual, knowledge-sharing environment.

Most Recent Highlights In Environmental

EHS Monthly Round Up - February 2026

EHS Monthly Round Up - February 2026

In this Februrary 2026 roundup video, we'll discuss the most impactful environmental health and safety news.

Hi everyone! Welcome to the monthly news roundup video, where we’ll review the most impactful environmental health and safety news. Let’s take a look at what happened over the past month.

Fatal work injuries fell 4 percent in 2024, largely due to a decline in workplace drug- and alcohol-related overdoses. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, overdose fatalities fell from 512 in 2023 to 410 in 2024. Across all types of workplace incidents, there were 5,070 fatal work injuries in 2024, compared to 5,283 in 2023. Transportation incidents continue to be the most frequent type of fatal event, accounting for over 38 percent of all occupational fatalities in 2024.

OSHA is fast-tracking a proposal to remove the 2036 obligation to upgrade fall protection systems on fixed ladders that extend over 24 feet. This follows an industry petition from major chemical and petroleum industry groups, which argue the provision is unjustified, costly, and not supported by the rulemaking record. OSHA frames the upcoming proposed action as deregulatory, allowing employers to update fixed ladders at the end of their service lives. We’ll provide updates as more information becomes available.

As OSHA leans into “deregulatory” actions, lawmakers are moving to pressure the agency to issue “regulatory” rulemaking to protect American workers. The latest legislative wave of bills aims to fill regulatory gaps, tackle emerging hazards, expand OSHA authority, and raise penalties. Topics addressed by these bills include musculoskeletal disorders, heat stress, infectious diseases, wildfire smoke, and workplace violence.

In a recently issued letter of interpretation, OSHA states that a burn injury caused by a personal lithium-ion battery fire is work related if it occurs in the workplace during assigned working hours. The letter details an incident where an employee was burned when their rechargeable lithium-ion batteries for e-cigarettes sparked a fire after coming into contact with a key used for work.

A new report from the Department of Labor Office of Inspector General concludes that OSHA struggles to meet its mission, particularly in high-risk industries like healthcare, construction, and manufacturing. Several pages point to OSHA’s difficulties in effectively enforcing annual injury and illness reporting requirements, reaching the nation’s high-risk worksites for inspection, and addressing workplace violence by regulatory or other action.

Turning to environmental news, EPA extended the deadlines for Facility Evaluation Reports and related requirements for coal combustion residuals facilities. In most instances, the deadlines have been moved one or two years out.

And finally, EPA announced a final rule eliminating the 2009 Endangerment Finding and related greenhouse gas emission requirements for on-highway vehicles and vehicle engines. When the final rule takes effect, manufacturers and importers of new motor vehicles and motor vehicle engines will no longer have to measure, report, certify, or comply with federal greenhouse gas emission standards.

Thanks for tuning in to the monthly news roundup. We’ll see you next month!

2026-03-06T06:00:00Z

Colorado adds landfill methane emission regulation

Effective date: February 14, 2026

This applies to: Open and closed municipal solid waste landfills

Description of change: The Colorado Air Quality Control Commission added Regulation 31, which establishes new emission control and monitoring requirements for municipal solid waste landfills. Applicability is based on the landfill’s amount of waste it holds and methane emissions.

Significant changes implemented by Regulation 31 include:

  • Establishing a stricter emission control threshold than federal standards so that more landfills must install gas collection and control systems,
  • Mandating closed landfills with emission combustion devices to install biofilters when the devices are removed,
  • Expanding the methane monitoring requirements (allowing additional monitoring tools for identifying large emission sources) and allowing alternative monitoring technologies for periodic monitoring, and
  • Phasing in a ban on open flares to replace them with enclosed flares.

Related state info: Clean air operating permits state comparison

2026-03-06T06:00:00Z

Louisiana amends Voluntary Environmental Self-Audit Program

Effective date: January 20, 2026

This applies to: Participating entities

Description of change: The Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality (LDEQ) revised the Voluntary Environmental Self-Audit Program rules in January 2026. Some of the changes include:

  • Adding definitions,
  • Changing the timeline to notify LDEQ of violations from 45 days within discovery to 30 days after the end of the audit, and
  • Requiring participants to submit monthly progress reports if corrective actions take longer than 90 days.
2026-03-06T06:00:00Z

Delaware revises 2026 NPDES general construction permit

Effective date: March 11, 2026

This applies to: Construction activities that discharge stormwater into Waters of the State

Description of change: The Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control (DNREC) revised the Delaware National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Construction General Permit (CGP), which implements the DNREC Sediment and Stormwater Management Program.

It applies to construction activities that plan to disturb 1 or more acres (or activities that plan to disturb less than 1 acre but are part of a larger common plan of development or sale that will disturb more than 1 acre) that discharge stormwater to Waters of the State.

The DNREC made minimal changes to the NPDES CGP. The 2026 NPDES CGP will provide coverage for 5 years.

Related state info: Construction water permitting — Delaware

2026-03-06T06:00:00Z

California updates water diversion regulations

Effective date: February 1, 2026

This applies to: Water right holders who divert more than 10 acre-feet per year

Description of change: The California State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) updated the Water Measurement and Reporting Regulation (SB 88) with changes primarily affecting reporting requirements, such as:

  • Requiring diverters to submit data to the SWRCB using a template or the online reporting platform CalWATRS,
  • Requiring large diverters to submit data to CalWATRS instead of posting it to any public website,
  • Requiring diverters to identify and report measurement locations, and
  • Requiring diverters to submit their measurement methodologies.

Updated measuring and reporting requirements take effect on October 1, 2026.

See More

Most Recent Highlights In Transportation

EPA proposes electronic-only hazardous waste manifests
2026-03-06T06:00:00Z

EPA proposes electronic-only hazardous waste manifests

On March 5, 2026, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) issued a proposed rule to end the use of paper hazardous waste manifests and require waste handlers to use electronic manifests on the Hazardous Waste Electronic Manifest (e-Manifest) System to track all shipments of hazardous waste regulated under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA).

What are the proposed changes?

EPA proposes to “sunset” (i.e., phase out) the use of paper manifests and shift to using only electronic manifests (either fully electronic or hybrid) to track RCRA hazardous waste shipments.

The sunset compliance date would be 2 years from the publication date of a final rule. On and after the sunset compliance date, EPA would no longer accept paper hazardous waste manifests (image-only and data-plus-image submission types). In other words, regulated waste handlers would have to use fully electronic or hybrid manifests on the e-Manifest System for all hazardous waste shipments initiated on and after the sunset compliance date.

Who would be impacted?

The proposed rule would affect waste handlers involved in manifesting hazardous waste, including:

  • Generators,
  • Transporters, and
  • Receiving facilities.

Many of the proposed changes would align RCRA regulations with the shift to electronic-only manifesting and with the 2024 e-Manifest Third Rule’s changes. The proposed rule also contains technical corrections to import and export regulations.

Additionally, EPA’s proposed rule would add requirements for:

  • Very small quantity generators (VSQGs) managing episodic events,
  • RCRA hazardous waste transporters,
  • Healthcare facilities and reverse distributors subject to RCRA’s hazardous waste pharmaceutical requirements,
  • Certain polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB) waste generators,
  • PCB waste transporters, and
  • Hazardous waste treatment or storage facilities with standardized RCRA permits.

Examples of these requirements include:

  • Mandating specific waste handlers to register with the e-Manifest System;
  • Requiring VSQGs, healthcare facilities, and reverse distributors to submit data corrections to the e-Manifest System within 30 days of a request from EPA or an authorized state; and
  • Requiring hazardous waste generators and PCB waste generators to identify brokers on the manifest.

EPA will accept public comments on the proposed rule (Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OLEM-2025-3456) through May 4, 2026.

Key to remember: EPA proposes to end the use of paper manifests and require waste handlers to use electronic manifests to track all RCRA hazardous waste shipments.

EPA temporarily extends 2021 MSGP coverage
2026-03-04T06:00:00Z

EPA temporarily extends 2021 MSGP coverage

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has issued an administrative continuance of the 2021 Multi-Sector General Permit (MSGP) and a No Action Assurance memorandum for industrial stormwater discharges regulated under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System.

The 2021 MSGP expired on February 28, 2026. However, because EPA hasn’t reissued a new permit to replace the expired permit, the 2021 MSGP remains in effect for facilities previously covered. Additionally, the No Action Assurance allows facilities without previous coverage to discharge industrial stormwater in compliance with the 2021 MSGP.

Who’s affected?

Facilities are required to obtain MSGPs for stormwater discharges from industrial activities in areas where EPA is the permitting authority, including:

  • Existing facilities (those that had active coverage under the 2021 MSGP), and
  • New facilities (those that didn’t obtain coverage under the 2021 MSGP before it expired).

What do existing facilities do?

The administrative continuance automatically applies to existing facilities that were actively covered by the 2021 MSGP before it expired. The facility’s coverage status should show “Admin. Continued” in the NPDES eReporting Tool (NeT-MSGP).

Facilities will remain covered by the 2021 MSGP until EPA issues a new MSGP and the facilities obtain coverage under the new MSGP. Until then, existing facilities should continue to comply with the 2021 MSGP requirements.

EPA will provide further guidance on renewing coverage when it issues the new MSGP.

What do new facilities do?

New facilities can’t obtain coverage under the MSGP until EPA issues a new permit. However, EPA issued a memorandum on February 27, 2026, establishing a No Action Assurance. The agency won’t take enforcement action against new facilities for unpermitted stormwater discharges if the facilities meet specific conditions.

The No Action Assurance extends from March 1, 2026, to the new MSGP’s effective date.

Applicability

EPA’s No Action Assurance applies to facilities that:

  • Discharge stormwater on or after March 1, 2026 (but before the new MSGP’s effective date); and
  • Didn’t submit a Notice of Intent (NOI) for coverage under the 2021 MSGP before its expiration on February 28, 2026.

The assurance doesn’t apply to existing facilities that started stormwater discharges before February 28, 2026, without obtaining 2021 MSGP coverage.

Conditions

To be covered by the No Action Assurance, new facilities have to:

  • Meet the 2021 MSGP eligibility criteria,
  • Submit an NOI form (Appendix G of the MSGP) via msgp@epa.gov to notify EPA of their intention to operate according to all applicable 2021 MSGP requirements before discharging industrial stormwater, and
  • Comply with all applicable 2021 MSGP regulations, such as:
    • Developing and implementing a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan,
    • Installing and maintaining stormwater controls, and
    • Conducting site inspections and monitoring.

What’s next?

Once EPA issues the new MSGP, facilities planning to continue industrial stormwater discharges must submit a new NOI through Net-MSGP within 90 days of the new MSGP’s effective date to obtain coverage under the new MSGP.

EPA provides guidance for existing and new facilities on its “Administrative Continuance of EPA’s 2021 MSGP” webpage.

Key to remember: EPA has temporarily extended coverage under the 2021 MSGP for industrial stormwater discharges until the agency issues a new general permit.

EPA extends 2025 GHG reporting deadline
2026-02-27T06:00:00Z

EPA extends 2025 GHG reporting deadline

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) finalized a rule on February 27, 2026, extending the submission deadline for the 2025 annual greenhouse gas (GHG) report from March to October 2026.

Who’s impacted?

The final rule applies to facilities regulated by the GHG Reporting Program (GHGRP) at 40 CFR Part 98. Generally, the GHGRP’s annual reporting requirement applies to three types of reporters:

  • Large industrial sources of GHG emissions (that directly emit 25,000 or more metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2e) per year);
  • Fuel and industrial gas suppliers (whose products would result in 25,000 or more metric tons of CO2e of GHG emissions per year if released, combusted, or oxidized); and
  • CO2 injection facilities (that receive 25,000 or more metric tons of CO2 for injection).

What’s the change?

The final rule extends the submission deadline for the reporting year (RY) 2025 annual GHG report from March 31, 2026, to October 30, 2026. The delay applies only to RY 2025.

EPA explains in the final rule that delaying the submission deadline for the RY 2025 GHG report gives the agency time to take final action on the proposed revisions to the GHGRP (published in September 2025).

What does the GHG report cover?

The GHGRP requires facilities to report GHG data and other related information covering the previous calendar year.

The subparts under Part 98 contain the reporting requirements, and regulated facilities must report emissions for all applicable source categories. Reporters must use specific methods to calculate GHG emissions, which are detailed in the regulations; they can usually choose from a collection of methods.

Key to remember: EPA’s final rule delays the submission deadline for the 2025 annual GHG report from March to October 2026.

EPA scraps Endangerment Finding, GHG emission standards: What you need to know
2026-02-25T06:00:00Z

EPA scraps Endangerment Finding, GHG emission standards: What you need to know

“Road Closed Ahead.” That’s the sign that now stands at the entrance of the regulatory road leading to the federal greenhouse gas (GHG) emission standards for vehicle and engine manufacturers.

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) finalized a rule on February 18, 2026, to rescind the 2009 Endangerment Finding and repeal all GHG emission standards for new motor vehicles and motor vehicle engines. The final rule applies to vehicles and engines of model years 2012 to 2027 and beyond.

This overview will help you navigate EPA’s final rule that puts GHG emission requirements for vehicles in the rearview mirror.

What does this mean?

Manufacturers (including importers) of new motor vehicles and motor vehicle engines will no longer have future obligations to measure, control, report, or comply with federal GHG emission standards.

Specifically, the final rule removes the requirements for controlling GHG emissions, which include:

  • Emission standards;
  • Test procedures;
  • Averaging, banking, and trading requirements;
  • Reporting requirements; and
  • Fleet-average emission requirements.

Additionally, the final rule eliminates off-cycle credits for manufacturers that added certain technologies to their vehicles and engines (like waste heat recovery) and EPA’s incentives for manufacturers to install a start-stop system (which automatically shuts off a vehicle’s engine when idling).

When do the changes apply?

The final rule takes effect on April 20, 2026. However, a legal challenge has already been brought against the rulemaking, and more litigation is likely.

It’s important to keep an eye on the status of the rule. Legal challenges could result in changes to the rule, such as delaying its effective date.

What regulations were removed?

The final rule repeals all GHG emission regulations in 40 CFR:

Why did EPA remove the standards?

The road to reversal begins in 2009. That’s when EPA issued two findings: the Endangerment Finding and the Cause or Contribute Finding. Collectively, these findings are referred to as the 2009 Endangerment Finding. The agency used the 2009 Endangerment Finding as the legal basis under Section 202(a) of the Clean Air Act (CAA) to regulate GHG emissions from new motor vehicles and motor vehicle engines based on global climate change concerns.

However, upon reconsideration, EPA no longer believes that it has the statutory authority under Section 202(a) of the CAA to regulate GHG emissions from new motor vehicles and motor vehicle engines in response to global climate change concerns. The agency bases its determination on three factors:

  • EPA concludes that the best reading of Section 202(a) of the CAA authorizes the agency to regulate air pollution that threatens to endanger health and welfare through local and regional exposure. Therefore, the CAA doesn’t give EPA the authority to regulate GHG emissions based on global climate change concerns. The agency conducted the “best reading” by using standard interpretation principles and being informed by the Supreme Court’s overturning of “Chevron deference” in Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo (2024).
  • EPA lacks the congressional authorization required to regulate GHG emissions based on global climate change concerns. The agency determined that the major questions doctrine (i.e., federal agencies may not decide issues of major national significance without clear authorization granted by Congress) applies to the Endangerment Finding and that Congress doesn’t give EPA the authority under Section 202(a) of the CAA to decide a national policy response to global climate change concerns.
  • The GHG emission regulations don’t and can’t have a meaningful impact on the identified health and welfare dangers that the Endangerment Finding attributed to global climate change. EPA based this conclusion on the results of climate impact modeling that the public submitted in response to the proposed rule and on the agency’s modeling analysis used to evaluate the submissions.

By rescinding the Endangerment Finding, EPA has no legal basis to regulate GHG emissions from new motor vehicles and motor vehicle engines. Accordingly, the final rule also repeals all GHG emission standards for light-, medium-, and heavy-duty vehicles and heavy-duty engines.

Key to remember: EPA’s final rule eliminates the 2009 Endangerment Finding and the related GHG emission requirements for on-highway vehicles and vehicle engines.

EPA repeals stricter Mercury and Air Toxics Standards for coal-, oil-fired power plants
2026-02-24T06:00:00Z

EPA repeals stricter Mercury and Air Toxics Standards for coal-, oil-fired power plants

On February 24, 2026, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) published a final rule repealing the 2024 amendments made to the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for Coal- and Oil-Fired Electric Utility Steam Generating Units (EGUs). It’s also referred to as the Mercury and Air Toxics Standards (MATS) for power plants.

Effective April 27, 2026, this rule (2026 Final Rule) repeals stricter compliance requirements made to the MATS rule in May 2024 (2024 Final Rule) and reverts them to the less stringent standards established by the 2012 MATS Rule.

Who’s affected?

The rule applies to power plants with coal- and oil-fired EGUs subject to the NESHAP (40 CFR 63 Subpart UUUUU).

What are the changes?

The final rule repeals these 2024 amendments:

  • The revised filterable particulate matter (fPM) emission standard and corresponding total and individual non-metal hazardous air pollutant (HAP) metal standards for existing coal-fired EGUs (reverting to the 2012 MATS Rule requirements);
  • The revised compliance demonstration requirements for all EGUs to install continuous emission monitoring systems (CEMS) for fPM emissions and the adjusted quality assurance (QA) criteria (reverting to the previous standard, allowing EGUs to choose from three compliance demonstration methods); and
  • The revised mercury (Hg) emission standard for lignite-fired EGUs (reverting to the 2012 MATS Rule limit).

The 2026 Final Rule also reinstates the low-emitting EGU (LEE) program for fPM and non-Hg HAP metals. The LEE program requires less frequent stack testing for sources with emissions below 50 percent of the corresponding limit for 3 consecutive years.

Further, EPA’s final rule updates the fPM sampling requirements for EGUs that demonstrate compliance with a PM CEMS. These units must collect either a minimum catch of 6.0 milligrams or a minimum sample volume of 4 dry standard cubic meters (dscm) per test run. EGUs demonstrating compliance using other methods must collect a lower minimum sample volume of 1 dscm per PM test run.

Compliance requirement2024 Final Rule2026 Final Rule
fPM emission limit for existing coal-fired EGUs0.010 pounds per million British thermal units of heat input (lb/MMBtu)0.030 lb/MMBTu
fPM emission compliance demonstration for all coal-and oil-fired EGUsEGUs must use PM CEMS.EGUs may use:
  • Quarterly stack testing,
  • PM continuous parametric monitoring systems, or
  • PM CEMS.
Hg emission limit for existing lignite-fired EGUs1.2 pounds per trillion British thermal units of heat input (lb/TBtu)4.0 lb/TBtu
Key to remember: EPA’s final rule repeals the stricter emission limits set by the 2024 amendments to the Mercury and Air Toxics Standard for coal- and oil-fired power plants.
See More

Most Recent Highlights In Safety & Health

PFAS, pretreatment, and biosolids: The growing challenge for water permitting
2026-02-20T06:00:00Z

PFAS, pretreatment, and biosolids: The growing challenge for water permitting

Per and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) pose one of the most urgent and complex challenges for wastewater systems in the United States. As federal agencies reconsider their regulatory strategies and states impose their own standards, publicly owned treatment works (POTWs) and the industries that discharge to them face increasing pressure to control PFAS at the source. These pressures affect pretreatment permits, industrial dischargers, and biosolids management, forming a rapidly evolving compliance landscape. Recent federal assessments and state actions show that PFAS in wastewater and biosolids is no longer a distant regulatory issue. It is a primary driver shaping future POTW permitting.

PFAS in POTW systems: A problem that starts upstream

PFAS enter POTWs through a mix of industrial wastewater, landfill leachate, household products, and consumer goods. Because PFAS are persistent and resistant to conventional treatment, they pass through biological processes largely unchanged. This means industrial contributors sending PFAS to a POTW can cause downstream compliance problems, even at low concentrations. EPA has emphasized that the best way to manage PFAS in wastewater is to prevent the chemicals from entering treatment systems in the first place, placing new attention on upstream industrial sources.

EPA’s 2025 trajectory indicates broader PFAS rulemaking is coming under several environmental statutes, including the Clean Water Act (CWA), Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, and Safe Drinking Water Act, although the federal landscape remains in flux. Still, agencies agree on one point: pretreatment programs will be an essential component of PFAS control.

Pretreatment permits: The first line of defense

Pretreatment permits regulate indirect dischargers, meaning industrial facilities that send wastewater to POTWs instead of directly to surface waters. These permits already manage pollutants that interfere with treatment or pass through into receiving waters. Now, PFAS has become a central focus.

States and POTWs are increasingly requiring:

  • PFAS monitoring in industrial wastewater,
  • Source identification surveys,
  • Product substitution or process changes,
  • Best management practices to reduce PFAS at the facility, and
  • Local limits or prohibitions on PFAS discharges

EPA’s PFAS strategy specifically encourages states and POTWs to deploy all available pretreatment authorities to control PFAS at the source. This approach aligns with statements from EPA representatives asserting that upstream controls are one of the most effective tools for preventing PFAS from entering wastewater systems.

Biosolids under scrutiny: The impact of PFAS

The PFAS problem does not end with liquid effluent. It extends into biosolids, the treated sewage sludge generated by POTWs. In 2025, EPA released a Draft Sewage Sludge Risk Assessment evaluating risks associated with PFOS and PFOA in biosolids applied to land. The assessment found potential human health risks under certain scenarios when biosolid concentrations exceeded 1 part per billion. Although EPA emphasized the assessment is not a regulatory standard, many states immediately treated the value as a de facto limit for biosolid land application.

This rapid adoption has created a challenging environment for POTWs. Unless PFAS inputs from industrial sources are reduced, biosolid PFAS levels remain high, limiting disposal options such as:

  • Agricultural land application,
  • Composting,
  • Surface disposal,
  • Landfilling, and
  • Incineration

Some states have already implemented bans or strict standards on biosolid land application due to PFAS concerns.

Regulatory uncertainty adds pressure

EPA’s PFAS regulatory posture has shifted several times. In 2025, EPA announced its intent to rescind certain PFAS drinking water designations while maintaining standards for PFOS and PFOA, signaling continued reassessment of its overall PFAS approach. These actions underscore the unsettled nature of federal rulemaking.

Meanwhile, the 2021 PFAS Strategic Roadmap and its subsequent progress updates outline multiple forthcoming actions under the CWA, including potential effluent limitation guidelines (ELGs) for PFAS manufacturers and metal finishers. These ELGs, if finalized, would apply to industrial direct and indirect dischargers and shape pretreatment standards nationwide. Yet, as of early 2026, EPA has not finalized technology based effluent limits for PFAS nor established national PFAS biosolids requirements, leaving states to fill the regulatory void.

What POTWs and industrial users should do now

Despite uncertainty, actions today can reduce long term liability:

  • Conduct PFAS source identification at industrial users,
  • Require PFAS monitoring in pretreatment permits,
  • Develop local limits where state guidance is emerging,
  • Engage with industrial facilities early on substitution and pollution prevention,
  • Evaluate biosolids PFAS levels to assess disposal risks, and
  • Participate in state rulemaking to anticipate new limits

POTWs should also coordinate with state environmental agencies, which continue to implement PFAS restrictions independent of federal action.

Pretreatment programs and biosolids management are becoming central to U.S. PFAS compliance. POTWs sit at the intersection of regulatory expectations, industrial discharges, and community concerns. While federal PFAS rules remain in development, state actions and EPA’s strategic direction make one fact clear: controlling PFAS at the source is essential.

Key to remember: For both industrial users and POTWs, proactive PFAS management is no longer optional. It is a core element of future permitting, planning, and risk reduction.

2026-02-13T06:00:00Z

Expert Insights: States take the lead as federal environmental rules pull back

Recent changes in federal environmental policy have created uncertainty for regulated industries. When federal agencies slow rulemaking, reduce enforcement, or narrow requirements, states often step in. As a result, states are taking a stronger role in setting environmental rules, especially on climate change, air quality, and environmental justice.

This shift is changing how industrial facilities understand and manage regulatory risks.

States as environmental policy leaders

Several states have moved to the front of environmental policymaking. California is the most well-known example. Through the California Air Resources Board (CARB), the state enforces air and climate rules that go beyond federal standards. These include strict vehicle emissions limits and greenhouse gas controls for industrial sources. Because California’s economy is so large, its rules often shape compliance decisions across the country.

Other states are following similar paths. For example, New York’s Climate Leadership and Community Protection Act sets clear, enforceable emissions-reduction goals. It also requires agencies to consider climate and environmental justice impacts during permitting. Washington has adopted a cap-and-invest program that limits carbon emissions from major sources and fuel suppliers.

Growing impacts on industrial facilities

For industrial operators, state-led regulation adds complexity and risk. Companies with facilities in multiple states may face very different rules, timelines, and reporting requirements. Meeting federal standards alone may no longer be enough.

Facilities can still fall out of compliance with state rules covering air emissions, water discharges, waste management, or community impacts. These differences can affect permitting schedules, capital planning, and long-term site decisions.

State enforcement and local focus

State enforcement is often more focused and, in many cases, more stringent than federal enforcement. Many states are increasing inspections and placing greater emphasis on environmental justice.

Facilities located near overburdened or historically impacted communities may face closer review, even when federal enforcement activity is limited.

Practical strategies for compliance

To operate successfully in this environment, companies need a proactive approach. Tracking state regulatory changes is essential, since states often move faster than federal agencies. Building compliance programs around the most stringent applicable rules can reduce long-term risk.

Early engagement with state regulators and local communities can also make a difference. Open communication can improve relationships, reduce conflict, and support smoother permitting outcomes.

For industrial facilities, success now depends less on watching Washington and more on understanding the growing influence of state capitals.

EPA reverses Endangerment Finding, scraps GHG emission standards for vehicles
2026-02-13T06:00:00Z

EPA reverses Endangerment Finding, scraps GHG emission standards for vehicles

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) published a final rule on February 18, 2026, to rescind the 2009 Endangerment Finding and repeal all federal greenhouse gas (GHG) emission standards for:

  • On-highway light-, medium-, and heavy-duty vehicles; and
  • On-highway heavy-duty vehicle engines.

The final rule takes effect on April 20, 2026, and applies to vehicles and engines of model years 2012 to 2027 and beyond.

What are the changes?

Manufacturers (including importers) of new motor vehicles and motor vehicle engines no longer have to measure, report, or comply with federal GHG emission standards. The final rule removes all GHG emission regulations in 40 CFR:

  • Parts 85, 86, and 600 (light- and medium-duty vehicles);
  • Part 1036 (heavy-duty vehicle engines); and
  • Part 1037 (heavy-duty vehicles).

The final rule also eliminates:

  • All off-cycle credits for the addition of certain technological features (e.g., high-efficiency exterior lighting, waste heat recovery, and active seat ventilation); and
  • EPA’s incentives for manufacturers to add a start-stop system (which automatically shuts off a vehicle’s engine during idling).

What doesn’t change?

EPA’s following regulations remain in effect for new motor vehicles and vehicle engines:

  • Criteria pollutant and air toxic measurement and standards,
  • Corporate Average Fuel Economy testing, and
  • Associated fuel economy labeling requirements.

About the 2009 Endangerment Finding

In 2009, EPA issued two findings: the Endangerment Finding and the Cause or Contribute Finding. Collectively, these findings are referred to as the 2009 Endangerment Finding. The agency used the 2009 Endangerment Finding as the legal basis to regulate GHG emissions from new motor vehicles and vehicle engines under Section 202(a) of the Clean Air Act.

EPA regulated GHG emissions from new motor vehicles and vehicle engines through:

  • Emission standards and related requirements, and
  • Engine and vehicle certification requirements.

However, upon reconsideration, EPA stated that it no longer believes it has the statutory authority under Section 202(a) of the Clean Air Act to regulate GHG emissions from new motor vehicles and vehicle engines. Therefore, the agency has simultaneously rescinded the 2009 Endangerment Finding and repealed the related federal GHG emission regulations.

Key to remember: EPA's final rule eliminates the 2009 Endangerment Finding and the related GHG emission requirements for on-highway vehicles and vehicle engines.

EPA delays CCR management unit reporting, related requirements
2026-02-13T06:00:00Z

EPA delays CCR management unit reporting, related requirements

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) issued a final rule that extends the deadlines for Facility Evaluation Reports (FERs) required for active and inactive coal combustion residuals (CCR) facilities. The final rule also delays compliance deadlines for related requirements that apply to CCR facilities with CCR management units (CCRMUs).

Who’s impacted?

The final rule applies to:

  • Active CCR facilities, and
  • Inactive CCR facilities with inactive surface impoundments (i.e., legacy CCR surface impoundments).

The 2024 Legacy Final Rule (40 CFR Part 257 Subpart D) requires active CCR facilities and legacy CCR surface impoundments to submit FER Part 1 and FER Part 2, identifying any CCRMUs of 1 ton or more on-site. CCRMUs include previously unregulated CCR surface impoundments and landfills that closed before October 19, 2015, as well as inactive CCR landfills.

Additionally, the 2024 Legacy Final Rule requires facilities with CCRMUs to:

  • Establish a website to publicize the facility’s CCR information;
  • Conduct groundwater monitoring activities (specifically, install a groundwater monitoring system, develop a sampling and analysis plan, collect independent samples, and perform detection and assessment monitoring);
  • Submit the initial annual groundwater monitoring and corrective action (GWMCA) report; and
  • Comply with closure and post-closure care obligations.

What are the changes?

EPA’s final rule extends compliance deadlines for the following standards:

Compliance requirement(s)2024 Legacy Final Rule deadline2026 final rule new deadline
Establish CCR websiteFebruary 9, 2026February 9, 2027
Submit FER Part 1February 9, 2026February 9, 2027
Submit FER Part 2February 8, 2027February 8, 2028
Install groundwater monitoring systemMay 8, 2028February 10, 2031
Develop groundwater sampling and analysis programMay 8, 2028February 10, 2031
  • Start detection and assessment monitoring
  • Start evaluating groundwater monitoring data for statistically significant increases over background levels and statistically significant levels over groundwater protection standards
May 8, 2028February 10, 2031
Submit initial GWMCA reportJanuary 31, 2029January 31, 2032
Submit closure planNovember 8, 2028August 11, 2031
Submit post-closure care planNovember 8, 2028August 11, 2031
Initiate closureMay 8, 2029February 9, 2032
Key to remember: A final rule delays the deadlines for the Facility Evaluation Reports and related requirements for active and inactive coal combustion residuals (CCR) facilities with CCR management units.
Expiring TSCA CBI claims: How to request an extension
2026-02-12T06:00:00Z

Expiring TSCA CBI claims: How to request an extension

How do businesses keep confidential information “off the record”? Companies that are required to report on federally regulated chemical substances may soon face this question, as the first round of confidential business information (CBI) claims starts expiring in June 2026.

Thankfully, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has answered how to keep CBI off the record. On January 6, 2026, the agency published in the Federal Register the process to request extensions of expiring CBI claims for information submitted under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA).

Here’s what you need to know.

CBI extension request process

Businesses that seek to extend a CBI claim beyond its expiration date must submit an extension request. The Federal Register notice describes the following general process:

1. EPA notifies the entity of an expiring CBI claim.

The agency will publish a list of TSCA submissions with expiring CBI claims on the Confidential Business Information Under TSCA (TSCA CBI) website at least 60 days before the claims expire.

EPA will also notify submitters directly through its online Central Data Exchange (CDX). Verify that your company’s contact information on CDX is updated!

Submitters with CBI claims for specific chemical identities should reference the TSCA Chemical Substance Inventory (column EXP) to confirm expiration dates.

2. The entity submits an extension request.

The extension request for an expiring CBI claim includes:

  • A certified supporting statement confirming the four assertions at 40 CFR 703.5(a), and
  • Answers to EPA’s substantiation questions.

EPA lists the general questions that apply to all CBI claims at 703.5(b)(3). Additional questions at 703.5(b)(4) apply to entities claiming CBI for specific chemical identities.

Businesses must submit the extension through EPA’s CDX at least 30 days before the CBI claim expires. The agency is currently developing a new application on CDX for submitting extension requests, which it plans to launch before CBI claims begin expiring in June 2026.

If there’s a delay, EPA will notify submitters on the TSCA CBI website. Additionally, the agency won’t publicize any information from expiring CBI claims until businesses have the opportunity to submit extension requests and the agency reviews them.

3. EPA reviews the extension request.

If the agency approves the extension request, the information in the CBI claim will remain protected for up to another 10 years.

If the agency denies the extension request, the information in the CBI claim can be publicized once the claim expires. EPA will notify submitters of denied claims through CDX at least 30 days before it plans to disclose the information.

Expiring CBI claims: What are the options?

Regulated entities have three ways to address expiring CBI claims:

  • If you choose to maintain the CBI claim, submit the extension request to EPA.
  • If you decide not to renew the CBI claim, you can either:
    • Withdraw the CBI claim through CDX, or
    • Allow the CBI claim to expire (i.e., take no action).

Keep in mind that if you withdraw a CBI claim or allow it to expire, EPA can publicize this information without notifying you beforehand.

Who’s impacted?

The CBI extension request process applies to companies that have made CBI claims under TSCA on or after June 22, 2016.

The Frank R. Lautenberg Chemical Safety for the 21st Century Act (signed into law on June 22, 2016) made amendments to TSCA, including adding a 10-year expiration date to CBI claims.

Key to remember: EPA established the process for entities to request extensions of expiring CBI claims for information submitted under TSCA.

See More

Most Recent Highlights In Human Resources

Common errors companies make when submitting air emissions inventories
2026-02-10T06:00:00Z

Common errors companies make when submitting air emissions inventories

Submitting accurate air emissions inventories (AEIs) is essential for regulatory compliance, public transparency, and long-term environmental planning. Yet companies routinely make mistakes that delay approvals, trigger enforcement, or compromise data quality. Many of these errors stem from misunderstanding the reporting rules, such as the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA’s) Air Emissions Reporting Requirements (AERR) and Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP). Awareness of these pitfalls helps facilities avoid compliance failures and improve emission tracking systems.

Misunderstanding what must be reported

One of the most common errors is failing to understand which pollutants must be included. Under the AERR, states and delegated agencies must report annual emissions of criteria air pollutants, including sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxides, volatile organic compounds, carbon monoxide, lead, particulate matter (PM2.5 and PM10), and ammonia. These pollutants drive national air quality planning and modeling.

However, many companies overlook hazardous air pollutants (HAPs). While past AERR rules made HAP reporting voluntary, EPA’s proposed revisions would require annual HAP reporting for many sources starting in 2027, significantly expanding reporting duties. Failing to include HAP data or assuming it's still voluntary is a growing compliance risk.

Greenhouse gases (GHGs) are another reporting blind spot. The GHGRP requires large emitters and certain suppliers to report carbon dioxide (CO2), methane, nitrous oxide, and other GHGs each year. Companies often assume GHG reporting applies only to the largest industries, yet thousands of facilities fall within the rule’s thresholds.

Using incorrect or incomplete emission calculations

Facilities often make calculation errors when converting raw activity data into emissions. Many rely on outdated emission factors or incomplete process data. EPA urges states and regulated entities to use standardized estimation guidance from the Air Emissions Inventory Improvement Program whenever possible. But companies may choose default factors without confirming they apply to the specific process, control efficiency, fuel type, or measurement method.

Under EPA’s proposed AERR revisions, if approved, the agency will require more detailed stack information, such as release point coordinates, exhaust parameters, control device data, and stack test results. Failure to collect these details early can lead to rushed estimates or missing data.

Misreporting source categories

Another major issue is misidentifying emission sources. The AERR distinguishes between point, nonpoint, mobile, and portable sources. Mislabeling a source may cause a facility to submit incomplete inventories or fail to meet the required reporting frequency. For example, point sources often require annual reporting, while nonpoint sources may follow triennial schedules.

Similarly, GHGRP reporting is broken into numerous subparts that define equipment types, fuel suppliers, industrial processes, and CO2 injection activities. Companies sometimes choose the wrong subpart or assume their process is exempt, leading to incomplete data submissions.

Incorrect use of thresholds and applicability

Both the AERR and GHGRP have emission-based thresholds. Companies frequently make errors when determining:

  • Whether they meet the AERR Type A point source criteria;
  • Whether they exceed GHGRP reporting thresholds (generally 25,000 metric tons CO2 equivalent annually); and
  • Whether HAP emissions exceed thresholds when HAP reporting is required by a state.

These mistakes usually occur when internal data systems lack consistent tracking or when actual emissions deviate from "potential to emit" estimates used in permitting.

Missing documentation and recordkeeping

EPA requires extensive documentation for emission calculations, monitoring methods, stack tests, control equipment operation, and assumptions. GHGRP rules include detailed monitoring, Quality Assurance/Quality Control (QA/QC), missing data, and record retention requirements. Under proposed AERR rules, companies would also need to submit performance test and evaluation data. Missing or incomplete records often lead to rejected inventories.

Failing to track regulatory updates

Both the AERR and GHGRP are undergoing major revisions. EPA’s proposed AERR updates aim to convert some triennial reporting to annual schedules, add HAP reporting, expand mobile source requirements, and require more detailed facility-level data. Meanwhile, the GHGRP is facing proposed cuts that would eliminate reporting requirements for many source categories while delaying petroleum and natural gas reporting until 2034.

Companies that rely on outdated guidance or assume reporting rules remain static are at risk of major compliance failures.

Improving AEI quality and compliance

Avoiding common errors begins with three fundamentals:

  • Use current regulatory guidance, emission factors, and calculation tools;
  • Maintain complete process data, stack test records, and QA/QC documentation; and
  • Assign knowledgeable staff to track AERR, GHGRP, and state-level changes.

Key to Remember: Accurate air emissions inventories play a crucial role in protecting public health, supporting air quality regulation, and demonstrating corporate responsibility. By understanding the most common pitfalls, companies can improve compliance and reduce costly reporting errors.

EHS Monthly Round Up - January 2026

EHS Monthly Round Up - January 2026

In this January 2026 roundup video, we'll review the most impactful environmental health and safety news.

Hi everyone! Welcome to the monthly news roundup video, where we’ll review the most impactful environmental health and safety news. Let’s take a look at what happened over the past month.

Chemical manufacturers, importers, distributors, and employers will have an extra four months to comply with the provisions of OSHA’s revised Hazard Communication standard. When the rule was revised in 2024, it contained staggered compliance dates for those who classify or use chemical substances and mixtures. The first compliance date is now May 19 rather than January 19 of 2026.

On January 8, OSHA issued further technical corrections to its Hazard Communication final rule. An initial set of corrections was published in October 2024, and OSHA continued to review the standard for errors. The agency said these corrections should reduce confusion during the chemical classification process and prevent errors on labels and safety data sheets.

In 2024, private industry employers reported 2.5 million nonfatal workplace injuries and illnesses, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics. This is down 3.1 percent from 2023 and largely due to a decrease in respiratory illnesses. The greatest number of cases involving days away from work, job restriction, or transfer were caused by overexertion, repetitive motion, and bodily conditions, followed by contact incidents.

Registration is open for OSHA’s Safety Champions Program, which is designed to help employers develop and implement effective safety and health programs. Participants can work at their own pace through Introductory, Intermediate, and Advanced levels.

Turning to environmental news, on January 9, EPA withdrew its direct final rule on SDS/Tier II reporting tied to OSHA HazCom, before it had a chance to take effect. The direct final rule was published back on November 17, 2025, and was intended to relax the Tier II and safety data sheet reporting requirements and align with OSHA’s HazCom standard. EPA said it plans to write a new rule addressing all public comments.

And finally, EPA published a final rule that changes certain requirements for wastewater discharges from coal-fired steam electric power plants. It applies to the deadlines established by the preceding rule finalized in 2024.

Thanks for tuning in to the monthly news roundup. We’ll see you next month!

Erosion vs. sediment controls: Prevent stormwater pollution at the construction site
2026-01-30T06:00:00Z

Erosion vs. sediment controls: Prevent stormwater pollution at the construction site

It’s wintertime, and many construction sites across the U.S. face unique challenges that the season brings, especially keeping workers warm! However, one challenge that construction sites face year-round is how to keep stormwater runoff (whether it’s generated by snowmelt or rain) from transporting pollutants off-site into nearby waterways.

Under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) stormwater program (40 CFR Part 450), the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) requires construction site operators to obtain a permit to discharge stormwater runoff into waters of the United States from any construction activity that disturbs:

  • 1 acre or more of land, or
  • Less than 1 acre of land if it’s part of a plan of development or sale that will ultimately disturb 1 or more acres of land.

Construction sites must implement best management practices (BMPs), which are controls and activities used to prevent stormwater pollution. Erosion controls and sediment controls are the two leading types of BMPs that construction sites have to apply.

Understanding the differences between erosion controls and sediment controls (and how they function together) will help you choose the most effective BMPs to reduce stormwater pollution at your construction site.

Erosion controls vs. sediment controls

Both types of controls are important, but their functions are distinct. Construction sites should use erosion controls as the primary method and sediment controls as the backup method to reduce stormwater pollution.

Erosion controls prevent the land from wearing away. These measures stop soil particles from being dislodged and transported by stormwater or wind. Erosion controls are the first line of defense against stormwater pollution.

Erosion control examples include:

  • Shoring excavated areas with retaining walls,
  • Conducting construction work in concentrated areas at different times to minimize soil exposure, and
  • Installing erosion control blankets on steep slopes.

Sediment controls capture soil particles that have been dislodged (i.e., eroded) before stormwater or wind moves them off the construction site. Sediment controls are the second line of defense, serving as backup BMPs.

Examples of sediment controls are:

  • Protecting storm drain inlets with filtering materials (such as rock-filled bags),
  • Installing fiber rolls around the perimeter to retain soil dislodged by runoff from small areas, and
  • Adding a sedimentation basin to receive dewatering discharges.

Common BMP examples

EPA’s “National Menu of Best Management Practices (BMPs) for Stormwater-Construction” webpage details erosion controls and sediment controls frequently used at construction sites, including (but not limited to) the following:

Erosion control BMPsSediment control BMPs
  • Composting blankets
  • Dust control measures (e.g., irrigation)
  • Mulching
  • Riprap (i.e., a layer of large stones)
  • Wind and sand fences
  • Compost filter socks
  • Rock dams
  • Sediment filters and pretreatment sediment chambers
  • Silt fences
  • Track-out controls (for construction entrances/exits)
Another popular option is vegetative cover, which can provide both erosion and sediment control. For example, a construction site can seed disturbed land to cover exposed soil (setting up temporary controls until vegetation grows). Once vegetation is established, it can stop stormwater from eroding the soil and act as a natural filter to remove sediment from the runoff.

Use both types of BMPs

The most effective way to control stormwater pollution at construction sites is by applying a selection of erosion controls and sediment controls that are coordinated to work together. Consider these examples:

  • After an area has been graded, the exposed soil must be stabilized. A site can lay sod over the exposed soil (erosion control) and install a silt fence to catch any contaminated soil moved out of the area by stormwater (sediment control) while the sod takes root.
  • Stormwater from upstream locations can flow through a construction site. To protect the disturbed land, a site can build a berm that diverts runoff away from the construction area (erosion control) to a basin where the sediment settles before the runoff is discharged (sediment control).
  • When grading an area with a slope, stormwater can transport contaminated soil down the disturbed slope. A site can install a temporary slope drain that directs the runoff at the top of the slope to a pipe that carries it down the side of the slope (erosion control). The site may also add a sediment trap at the slope drain outlet to remove sediment from the runoff before it’s released (sediment control).

Check state and local requirements

Most states issue NPDES construction stormwater permits. Check the permit to confirm erosion control and sediment control requirements, as they may be more stringent at the state level.

Additionally, some local governments may impose requirements on construction sites. However, unless the local program is designated as a qualifying local program, compliance with local regulations may not mean that your construction site is compliant with EPA’s rules (and vice versa). Confirm with the local government whether additional requirements apply.

Key to remember: Construction sites must implement erosion controls and sediment controls to prevent stormwater pollution.

Dust collector to disposal: Understanding dust as a waste stream
2026-01-28T06:00:00Z

Dust collector to disposal: Understanding dust as a waste stream

When the topic of dust is brought up, the conversation usually starts and ends with worker exposure. How much is in the air? Is ventilation adequate? Are employees protected? Once that dust has been captured and removed from the process, the critical question shifts: how should this material be classified and disposed of? That’s where many facilities run into trouble. Collected dust may no longer be floating in the air, but it hasn’t stopped being regulated. In fact, once it’s captured, dust often enters a much more complicated regulatory world.

When captured dust becomes a regulated waste

Under EPA regulations, most collected dust qualifies as a solid waste once it’s removed from a dust collector, hopper, or filter. And despite the name, “solid waste” doesn’t mean solid, benign, or harmless. It simply means a discarded material. At that point, facilities are expected to determine whether the dust is hazardous or non-hazardous under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). This determination is based on what the dust contains, not how dusty it looks or how long it has been managed that way. Dust generated from metalworking, surface coatings, chemical processing, plastics, or specialty manufacturing can contain regulated constituents such as heavy metals or chemical residues. In these cases, facilities are required to make a waste determination using process knowledge, testing, or a combination of both. This step is often overlooked. Many companies assume that if dust has not caused problems in the past, it must be non-hazardous. Unfortunately, regulators do not accept assumptions as documentation. If there’s no clear waste determination on file, that alone can be cited during an inspection. Misclassifying dust can also have ripple effects. If collected dust is later found to be hazardous, the facility may face issues related to improper disposal, incorrect generator status, or even cleanup liability at the disposal site. What began as a routine housekeeping task can suddenly become a significant compliance issue.

Storage, Disposal, and the Risks of Getting It Wrong

Even when dust is correctly identified as non-hazardous, it still needs to be managed properly. Open containers, poor labeling, and inconsistent handling practices are common findings during inspections. These issues are often viewed as minor, but they can quickly escalate if dust is released, mixed with other waste streams, or stored improperly. Recycling adds another layer of complexity. Many facilities recycle metal dusts or other recoverable materials, which can be a smart environmental and economic decision. However, recyclable does not mean unregulated. Dust being recycled still needs to be stored safely, managed to prevent releases, and documented as legitimate recycling. Without proper controls, regulators may view the material as improperly managed waste. Outdoor storage creates additional risk. Dust stored outside, transferred outdoors, or tracked out of the building can easily become a stormwater concern. Even non-hazardous dust can be considered a pollutant if it migrates off-site during rain events. This is a frequent source of violations under stormwater permits and Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans (SWPPP), especially when dust management isn’t addressed in the plan. Another common issue is mixing dust with general trash or other waste streams. Once mixed, otherwise manageable dust can become more difficult or impossible to classify correctly. This can complicate disposal, increase costs, and raise questions during audits or inspections. What makes dust especially challenging is that responsibility for it often falls into a gray area. Safety teams may assume environmental is managing disposal. Environmental teams may assume safety has already classified the material. When no one clearly owns the waste determination and disposal process, gaps are almost guaranteed. The most effective facilities treat dust as a waste stream that deserves the same attention as any other regulated material. They document waste determinations, define storage and labeling requirements, train employees on proper handling, and periodically revisit those determinations as processes change.

Keys to remember: Captured dust doesn’t stop being regulated once it leaves the air. Understanding whether collected dust is hazardous or non-hazardous, how it must be stored, and where it can legally go is essential to staying compliant.

2026-01-28T06:00:00Z

Wisconsin raises, adds fees to NSR construction permit program

This applies to: Construction air permit applicants

Effective date: April 1, 2026

Description of change: The New Source Review (NSR) construction permit program requires applicants to obtain an NSR permit before constructing, reconstructing, replacing, relocating, or modifying stationary sources that emit air contaminants. The amendments:

  • Increase most construction permit fees by 20 percent,
  • Adjust certain fees to better align with actual workload, and
  • Add new fees for:
    • Permit revisions,
    • Public hearing requests from someone other than the applicant, and
    • Incorporating consent decree requirements into permits.

Related state info: Clean air operating permits state comparison

See More
New Network Poll
No active poll
Please come back soon!
See More
See More
See More
See More
Saved to my EVENT CALENDAR!
View your saved links by clicking the arrow next to your profile picture located in the header. Then, click “My Activity” to view the Event Calendar on your Activity page.