Compliance Just Got Easier: Stay ahead of regulatory changes with instant notifications on updates that matter.
['Hazmat', 'Hazardous Materials Table', 'Hazmat markings, Placards, and Labels', 'Hazmat: Highway']
['Hazardous materials table', 'Hazmat Placarding', 'Special provisions - Hazmat', 'Packing group assignment - Hazmat', 'Hazmat Labels', 'Classification - Hazmat']
2024-04-10T05:00:00Z
JOIN TODAY TO CONTINUE READING THIS ARTICLE & OTHER INDUSTRY NEWS!
You'll also get exclusive access to:
A database of easy-to-understand regulationsAsk unlimited questions to our expertsPre-led discussions forumsAnd more
TRY IT FREE TODAY
Already have an account? Log in now.
NewsPipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA), DOTHazmat SafetyHazmat: HighwayHazardous Materials TableHazmatHazardous materials tableSpecial provisions - HazmatHazmat markings, Placards, and LabelsHazmat LabelsEnglishPacking group assignment - HazmatClassification - HazmatChange NoticesChange NoticeHazmat PlacardingFocus AreaTransportationUSA
PHMSA Final Rule: Hazmat Harmonization With International Standards
2024-04-10T05:00:00Z
PHMSA is amending the Hazardous Materials Regulations (HMR) to maintain alignment with international regulations and standards by adopting various amendments, including changes to proper shipping names, hazard classes, packing groups, special provisions, packaging authorizations, air transport quantity limitations, and vessel stowage requirements. PHMSA is also withdrawing the unpublished November 28, 2022, Notice of Enforcement Policy Regarding International Standards on the use of select updated international standards in complying with the HMR during the pendency of this rulemaking.
DATES:
Effective date: This rule is effective May 10, 2024.
Voluntary compliance date: January 1, 2023.
Delayed compliance date: April 10, 2025.
This final rule is published in the Federal Register April 10, 2024.
View final rule.
| §171.7 Reference material. | ||
| (t)(1), (v)(2), and (w)(32) through (81) | Revised | View text |
| (w)(82) through (92) | Added | View text |
| (aa)(3) and (dd)(1) through (4) | Revised | View text |
| §171.12 North American shipments. | ||
| (a)(4)(iii) | Revised | View text |
| §171.23 Requirements for specific materials and packagings transported under the ICAO technical instructions, IMDG code, Transport Canada TDG regulations, or the IAEA regulations. | ||
| (a)(3) | Revised | View text |
| §171.25 Additional requirements for the use of the IMDG code. | ||
| (c)(3) and (4) | Revised | View text |
| (c)(5) | Added | View text |
| §172.101 Purpose and use of the hazardous materials table. | ||
| Section heading | Revised | View text |
| (c)(12)(ii) | Revised | View text |
| Hazardous materials table, multiple entries | Revised, added, removed | View text |
| §172.102 Special provisions. | ||
| (c)(1) special provisions 78, 156, and 387 | Revised | View text |
| (c)(1) special provisions 396 and 398 | Added | View text |
| (c)(1) special provision 421 | Removed and reserved | View text |
| (c)(2) special provision A54 | Revised | View text |
| (c)(2) special provisions A224 and A225 | Added | View text |
| (c)(4) Table 2—IP Codes, special provision IP15 | Revised | View text |
| (c)(4) Table 2—IP Codes, special provision IP22 | Added | View text |
| §173.4b De minimis exceptions. | ||
| (b)(1) | Revised | View text |
| §173.21 Forbidden materials and packages. | ||
| (f) introductory text, (f)(1), and (f)(2) | Revised | View text |
| §173.27 General requirements for transportation by aircraft. | ||
| (f)(2)(i)(D) | Revised | View text |
| §173.124 Class 4, Divisions 4.1, 4.2 and 4.3— Definitions. | ||
| (a)(4)(iv) | Removed | View text |
| §173.137 Class 8—Assignment of packing group. | ||
| Introductory text | Revised | View text |
| §173.151 Exceptions for Class 4. | ||
| (d) introductory text | Revised | View text |
| §173.167 ID8000 consumer commodities. | ||
| Entire section | Revised | View text |
| §173.185 Lithium cells and batteries. | ||
| (a)(3) introductory text and (a)(3)(x) | Revised | View text |
| (a)(5) | Added | View text |
| (b)(3)(iii)(A) and (B) | Revised | View text |
| (b)(3)(iii)(C) | Added | View text |
| (b)(4)(ii) and (iii) | Revised | View text |
| (b)(4)(iv) | Added | View text |
| (b)(5), (c)(3) through (5), and (e)(5) through (7) | Revised | View text |
| §173.224 Packaging and control and emergency temperatures for self-reactive materials. | ||
| (b)(4) | Revised | View text |
| Table following (b)(7) | Revised | View text |
| §173.225 Packaging requirements and other provisions for organic peroxides. | ||
| Table 1 to paragraph (c) | Revised | View text |
| Table following paragraph (d) | Retitled | View text |
| Table following paragraph (g) | Revised | View text |
| §173.232 Articles containing hazardous materials, n.o.s. | ||
| (h) | Added | View text |
| §173.301b Additional general requirements for shipment of UN pressure receptacles. | ||
| (c)(1), (c)(2)(ii) through (iv), (d)(1), and (f) | Revised | View text |
| §173.302b Additional requirements for shipment of non-liquefied (permanent) compressed gases in UN pressure receptacles. | ||
| (g) | Added | View text |
| §173.302c Additional requirements for the shipment of adsorbed gases in UN pressure receptacles. | ||
| (k) | Revised | View text |
| §173.311 Metal Hydride Storage Systems. | ||
| Entire section | Revised | View text |
| §175.1 Purpose, scope, and applicability. | ||
| (e) | Added | View text |
| §175.10 Exceptions for passengers, crewmembers, and air operators. | ||
| (a) introductory text, (a)(14) introductory text, (a)(15)(v)(A), (a)(15)(vi)(A), (a)(17)(ii)(C), (a)(18) introductory text, and (a)(26) introductory text | Revised | View text |
| §175.33 Shipping paper and information to the pilot-in-command. | ||
| (a)(13)(iii) | Revised | View text |
| §178.37 Specification 3AA and 3AAX seamless steel cylinders. | ||
| (j) | Revised | View text |
| §178.71 Specifications for UN pressure receptacles. | ||
| (f)(4), (g), (i), (k)(1)(i) and (ii), (m), and (n) | Revised | View text |
| §178.75 Specifications for MEGCs. | ||
| (d)(3) introductory text and paragraphs (d)(3)(i) through (iii) | Revised | View text |
| §178.609 Test requirements for packagings for infectious substances. | ||
| (d)(2) | Revised | View text |
| §178.706 Standards for rigid plastic IBCs. | ||
| (c)(3) | Revised | View text |
| §178.707 Standards for composite IBCs. | ||
| (c)(3)(iii) | Revised | View text |
| §180.207 Requirements for requalification of UN pressure receptacles. | ||
| (d)(3) and (5) | Revised | View text |
| (d)(8) | Added | View text |
Previous Text
§171.7 Reference material.
* * * * *
(t) * * *
(1) ICAO Doc 9284. Technical Instructions for the Safe Transport of Dangerous Goods by Air (ICAO Technical Instructions), 2021-2022 Edition, copyright 2020; into §§171.8; 171.22 through 171.24; 172.101; 172.202; 172.401; 172.407; 172.512; 172.519; 172.602; 173.56; 173.320; 175.10, 175.33; 178.3.
* * * * *
(v) * * *
(2) International Maritime Dangerous Goods Code (IMDG Code), Incorporating Amendment 40-20 (English Edition), (Volumes 1 and 2), 2020 Edition, copyright 2020; into §§171.22; 171.23; 171.25; 172.101; 172.202; 172.203; 172.401; 172.407; 172.502; 172.519; 172.602; 173.21; 173.56; 176.2; 176.5; 176.11; 176.27; 176.30; 176.83; 176.84; 176.140; 176.720; 176.906; 178.3; 178.274.
(w) * * *
(32) ISO 9809-2:2000(E): Gas cylinders—Refillable seamless steel gas cylinders—Design, construction and testing—Part 2: Quenched and tempered steel cylinders with tensile strength greater than or equal to 1 100 MPa., First edition, June 2000, into §§178.71; 178.75.
(33) ISO 9809-2:2010(E): Gas cylinders—Refillable seamless steel gas cylinders—Design, construction and testing—Part 2: Quenched and tempered steel cylinders with tensile strength greater than or equal to 1100 MPa., Second edition, 2010-04-15, into §§178.71; 178.75.
(34) ISO 9809-3:2000(E): Gas cylinders—Refillable seamless steel gas cylinders—Design, construction and testing—Part 3: Normalized steel cylinders, First edition, December 2000, into §§178.71; 178.75.
(35) ISO 9809-3:2010(E): Gas cylinders—Refillable seamless steel gas cylinders—Design, construction and testing—Part 3: Normalized steel cylinders, Second edition, 2010-04-15, into §§178.71; 178.75.
(36) ISO 9809-4:2014(E), Gas cylinders—Refillable seamless steel gas cylinders—Design, construction and testing—Part 4: Stainless steel cylinders with an Rm value of less than 1 100 MPa, First edition, 2014-07-15, into §§178.71; 178.75.
(37) ISO 9978:1992(E)—Radiation protection—Sealed radioactive sources—Leakage test methods. First Edition, (February 15, 1992), into §173.469.
(38) ISO 10156:2017(E), Gas cylinders—Gases and gas mixtures—Determination of fire potential and oxidizing ability for the selection of cylinder valve outlets, Fourth edition, 2017-07; into §173.115.
(39) ISO 10297:1999(E), Gas cylinders—Refillable gas cylinder valves—Specification and type testing, First Edition, 1995-05-01; into §§173.301b; 178.71.
(40) ISO 10297:2006(E), Transportable gas cylinders—Cylinder valves—Specification and type testing, Second Edition, 2006-01-15; into §§173.301b; 178.71.
(41) ISO 10297:2014(E), Gas cylinders—Cylinder valves—Specification and type testing, Third Edition, 2014-07-15; into §§173.301b; 178.71.
(42) ISO 10297:2014/Amd 1:2017(E), Gas cylinders—Cylinder valves—Specification and type testing—Amendment 1: Pressure drums and tubes, Third Edition, 2017-03; into §§173.301b; 178.71.
(43) ISO 10461:2005(E), Gas cylinders—Seamless aluminum-alloy gas cylinders—Periodic inspection and testing, Second Edition, 2005-02-15 and Amendment 1, 2006-07-15; into §180.207.
(44) ISO 10462:2013(E), Gas cylinders—Acetylene cylinders—Periodic inspection and maintenance, Third edition, 2013-12-15; into §180.207.
(45) ISO 10692-2:2001(E), Gas cylinders—Gas cylinder valve connections for use in the micro-electronics industry—Part 2: Specification and type testing for valve to cylinder connections, First Edition, 2001-08-01; into §§173.40; 173.302c.
(46) ISO 11114-1:2012(E), Gas cylinders—Compatibility of cylinder and valve materials with gas contents—Part 1: Metallic materials, Second edition, 2012-03-15; into §§172.102; 173.301b; 178.71.
(47) ISO 11114-1:2012/Amd 1:2017(E), Gas cylinders—Compatibility of cylinder and valve materials with gas contents—Part 1: Metallic materials—Amendment 1, Second Edition, 2017-01; into §§172.102; 173.301b; 178.71.
(48) ISO 11114-2:2013(E), Gas cylinders—Compatibility of cylinder and valve materials with gas contents—Part 2: Non-metallic materials, Second edition, 2013-04; into §§173.301b; 178.71.
(49) ISO 11117:1998(E): Gas cylinders—Valve protection caps and valve guards for industrial and medical gas cylinders—Design, construction and tests, First edition, 1998-08-01; into §173.301b.
(50) ISO 11117:2008(E): Gas cylinders—Valve protection caps and valve guards—Design, construction and tests, Second edition, 2008-09-01; into §173.301b.
(51) ISO 11117:2008/Cor.1:2009(E): Gas cylinders—Valve protection caps and valve guards—Design, construction and tests, Technical Corrigendum 1, 2009-05-01; into §173.301b.
(52) ISO 11118(E), Gas cylinders—Non-refillable metallic gas cylinders—Specification and test methods, First edition, October 1999; into §178.71.
(53) ISO 11118:2015(E), Gas cylinders—Non-refillable metallic gas cylinders—Specification and test methods, Second edition, 2015-09-15; into §§173.301b; 178.71.
(54) ISO 11119-1(E), Gas cylinders—Gas cylinders of composite construction—Specification and test methods—Part 1: Hoop-wrapped composite gas cylinders, First edition, May 2002; into §178.71.
(55) ISO 11119-1:2012(E), Gas cylinders—Refillable composite gas cylinders and tubes—Design, construction and testing—Part 1: Hoop wrapped fibre reinforced composite gas cylinders and tubes up to 450 l, Second edition, 2012-08-01; into §§178.71; 178.75.
(56) ISO 11119-2(E), Gas cylinders—Gas cylinders of composite construction—Specification and test methods—Part 2: Fully wrapped fibre reinforced composite gas cylinders with load-sharing metal liners, First edition, May 2002; into §178.71.
(57) ISO 11119-2:2012(E), Gas cylinders—Refillable composite gas cylinders and tubes—Design, construction and testing—Part 2: Fully wrapped fibre reinforced composite gas cylinders and tubes up to 450 l with load-sharing metal liners, Second edition, 2012-07-15; into §§178.71; 178.75.
(58) ISO 11119-2:2012/Amd.1:2014(E), Gas cylinders—Refillable composite gas cylinders and tubes—Design, construction and testing—Part 2: Fully wrapped fibre reinforced composite gas cylinders and tubes up to 450 l with load-sharing metal liners, Amendment 1, 2014-08-15; into §§178.71; 178.75.
(59) ISO 11119-3(E), Gas cylinders of composite construction—Specification and test methods—Part 3: Fully wrapped fibre reinforced composite gas cylinders with non-load-sharing metallic or non-metallic liners, First edition, September 2002; into §178.71.
(60) ISO 11119-3:2013(E), Gas cylinders—Refillable composite gas cylinders and tubes—Design, construction and testing—Part 3: Fully wrapped fibre reinforced composite gas cylinders and tubes up to 450 l with non-load-sharing metallic or non-metallic liners, Second edition, 2013-04-15; into §§178.71; 178.75.
(61) ISO 11119-4:2016(E), Gas cylinders—Refillable composite gas cylinders—Design, construction and testing—Part 4: Fully wrapped fibre reinforced composite gas cylinders up to 150 L with load-sharing welded metallic liners, First Edition, 2016-02-15; into §§178.71; 178.75.
(62) ISO 11120(E), Gas cylinders—Refillable seamless steel tubes of water capacity between 150 l and 3000 l—Design, construction and testing, First edition, 1999-03; into §§178.71; 178.75.
(63) ISO 11120:2015(E), Gas cylinders—Refillable seamless steel tubes of water capacity between 150 l and 3000 l—Design, construction and testing, Second Edition, 2015-02-01; into §§178.71; 178.75.
(64) ISO 11513:2011(E), Gas cylinders—Refillable welded steel cylinders containing materials for sub-atmospheric gas packaging (excluding acetylene)—Design, construction, testing, use and periodic inspection, First edition, 2011-09-12; into §§173.302c; 178.71; 180.207.
(65) ISO 11621(E), Gas cylinders—Procedures for change of gas service, First edition, April 1997; into §§173.302, 173.336, 173.337.
(66) ISO 11623(E), Transportable gas cylinders—Periodic inspection and testing of composite gas cylinders, First edition, March 2002; into §180.207.
(67) ISO 11623(E):2015, Gas cylinders—Composite construction—Periodic inspection and testing, Second edition, 2015-12-01; into §180.207.
(68) ISO 13340:2001(E), Transportable gas cylinders—Cylinder valves for non-refillable cylinders—Specification and prototype testing, First edition, 2004-04-01; into §§173.301b; 178.71.
(69) ISO 13736:2008(E), Determination of flash point—Abel closed-cup method, Second Edition, 2008-09-15; into §173.120.
(70) ISO 14246:2014(E), Gas cylinders—Cylinder valves—Manufacturing tests and examination, Second Edition, 2014-06-15; into §178.71.
(71) ISO 14246:2014/Amd 1:2017(E), Gas cylinders—Cylinder valves—Manufacturing tests and examinations—Amendment 1, Second Edition, 2017-06; into §178.71.
(72) ISO 16111:2008(E), Transportable gas storage devices—Hydrogen absorbed in reversible metal hydride, First Edition, 2008-11-15; into §§173.301b; 173.311; 178.71.
(73) ISO 16148:2016(E), Gas cylinders—Refillable seamless steel gas cylinders and tubes—Acoustic emission examination (AT) and follow-up ultrasonic examination (UT) for periodic inspection and testing, Second Edition, 2016-04-15; into §180.207.
(74) ISO 17871:2015(E), Gas cylinders—Quick-release cylinder valves—Specification and type testing, First Edition, 2015-08-15; into §173.301b.
(75) ISO 17879: 2017(E), Gas cylinders—Self-closing cylinder valves—Specification and type testing, First Edition, 2017-07; into §§173.301b; 178.71.
(76) ISO 18172-1:2007(E), Gas cylinders—Refillable welded stainless steel cylinders—Part 1: Test pressure 6 MPa and below, First Edition, 2007-03-01; into §178.71.
(77) ISO 20475:2018(E), Gas cylinders—Cylinder bundles—Periodic inspection and testing, First Edition, 2018-02; into §180.207.
(78) ISO 20703:2006(E), Gas cylinders—Refillable welded aluminum-alloy cylinders—Design, construction and testing, First Edition, 2006-05-01; into §178.71.
(79) ISO 21172-1:2015(E), Gas cylinders—Welded steel pressure drums up to 3000 litres capacity for the transport of gases—Design and construction—Part 1: Capacities up to 1000 litres, First edition, 2015-04-01; into §178.71.
(80) ISO 22434:2006(E), Transportable gas cylinders—Inspection and maintenance of cylinder valves, First Edition, 2006-09-01; into §180.207.
(81) ISO/TR 11364:2012(E), Gas cylinders—Compilation of national and international valve stem/gas cylinder neck threads and their identification and marking system, First Edition, 2012-12-01; into §178.71.
* * * * *
(aa) * * *
(3) OECD Guideline for the Testing of Chemicals 431 (Test No. 431): In vitro skin corrosion: reconstructed human epidermis (RHE) test method, adopted 29 July 2016; into §173.137.
* * * * *
(dd) * * *
(1) Recommendations on the Transport of Dangerous Goods, Model Regulations (UN Recommendations), 21st revised edition, copyright 2019; into §§171.8; 171.12; 172.202; 172.401; 172.407; 172.502; 172.519; 173.22; 173.24; 173.24b; 173.40; 173.56; 173.192; 173.302b; 173.304b; 178.75; 178.274; as follows:
(i) Volume I, ST/SG/AC.10.1/21/Rev.21 (Vol. I).
(ii) Volume II, ST/SG/AC.10.1/21/Rev.21 (Vol. II).
(2) Manual of Tests and Criteria (UN Manual of Tests and Criteria), 7th revised edition, ST/SG/AC.10/11/Rev.7, copyright 2019; into §§171.24, 172.102; 173.21; 173.56 through 173.58; 173.60; 173.115; 173.124; 173.125; 173.127; 173.128; 173.137; 173.185; 173.220; 173.221; 173.224; 173.225; 173.232; part 173, appendix H; 175.10; 176.905; 178.274.
(3) Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals (GHS), 8th revised edition, ST/SG/AC.10/30/Rev.8, copyright 2019; into §172.401.
(4) Agreement concerning the International Carriage of Dangerous Goods by Road (ADR), copyright 2020; into §171.8; §171.23 as follows: [Change Notice][Previous Text]
(i) Volume I, ECE/TRANS/300 (Vol. I).
(ii) Volume II, ECE/TRANS/300 (Vol. II).
(iii) Corrigendum, ECE/TRANS/300 (Corr. 1).
* * * * *
§171.12 North American shipments.
* * * * *
(a) * * *
(4) * * *
(iii) Authorized CRC, BTC, CTC or TC specification cylinders that correspond with a DOT specification cylinder are as follows:
| TC | DOT (some or all of these specifications may instead be marked with the prefix ICC) | CTC (some or all of these specifications may instead be marked with the prefix BTC or CRC) |
|---|---|---|
| TC-3AM | DOT-3A [ICC-3] | CTC-3A |
| TC-3AAM | DOT-3AA | CTC-3AA |
| TC-3ANM | DOT-3BN | CTC-3BN |
| TC-3EM | DOT-3E | CTC-3E |
| TC-3HTM | DOT-3HT | CTC-3HT |
| TC-3ALM | DOT-3AL DOT-3B | CTC-3AL CTC-3B |
| TC-3AXM | DOT-3AX | CTC-3AX |
| TC-3AAXM | DOT-3AAX DOT-3A480X | CTC-3AAX CTC-3A480X |
| TC-3TM | DOT-3T | |
| TC-4AAM33 | DOT-4AA480 | CTC-4AA480 |
| TC-4BM | DOT-4B | CTC-4B |
| TC-4BM17ET | DOT-4B240ET | CTC-4B240ET |
| TC-4BAM | DOT-4BA | CTC-4BA |
| TC-4BWM | DOT-4BW | CTC-4BW |
| TC-4DM | DOT-4D | CTC-4D |
| TC-4DAM | DOT-4DA | CTC-4DA |
| TC-4DSM | DOT-4DS | CTC-4DS |
| TC-4EM | DOT-4E | CTC-4E |
| TC-39M | DOT-39 | CTC-39 |
| TC-4LM | DOT-4L DOT-8 DOT-8AL | CTC-4L CTC-8 CTC-8AL |
* * * * *
§171.23 Requirements for specific materials and packagings transported under the ICAO technical instructions, IMDG code, Transport Canada TDG regulations, or the IAEA regulations.
(a) * * *
(3) Pi-marked pressure receptacles. Pressure receptacles that are marked with a pi mark in accordance with the European Directive 2010/35/EU (IBR, see §171.7) on transportable pressure equipment (TPED) and that comply with the requirements of Packing Instruction P200 or P208 and 6.2 of the ADR (IBR, see §171.7) concerning pressure relief device use, test period, filling ratios, test pressure, maximum working pressure, and material compatibility for the lading contained or gas being filled, are authorized as follows:
(i) Filled pressure receptacles imported for intermediate storage, transport to point of use, discharge, and export without further filling; and
(ii) Pressure receptacles imported or domestically sourced for the purpose of filling, intermediate storage, and export.
(iii) The bill of lading or other shipping paper must identify the cylinder and include the following certification: “This cylinder (These cylinders) conform(s) to the requirements for pi-marked cylinders found in 171.23(a)(3).”
* * * * *
§171.25 Additional requirements for the use of the IMDG code.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(3) Except as specified in this subpart, for a material poisonous (toxic) by inhalation, the T Codes specified in Column 13 of the Dangerous Goods List in the IMDG Code may be applied to the transportation of those materials in IM, IMO and DOT Specification 51 portable tanks, when these portable tanks are authorized in accordance with the requirements of this subchapter; and
(4) No person may offer an IM or UN portable tank containing liquid hazardous materials of Class 3, PG I or II, or PG III with a flash point less than 100°F (38°C); Division 5.1, PG I or II; or Division 6.1, PG I or II, for unloading while it remains on a transport vehicle with the motive power unit attached, unless it conforms to the requirements in §177.834(o) of this subchapter.
* * * * *
§172.101 Purpose and use of hazardous materials table.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(12) * * *
(ii) Generic or n.o.s. descriptions. If an appropriate technical name is not shown in the Table, selection of a proper shipping name shall be made from the generic or n.o.s. descriptions corresponding to the specific hazard class, packing group, hazard zone, or subsidiary hazard, if any, for the material. The name that most appropriately describes the material shall be used; e.g, an alcohol not listed by its technical name in the Table shall be described as “Alcohol, n.o.s.” rather than “Flammable liquid, n.o.s.”. Some mixtures may be more appropriately described according to their application, such as “Coating solution” or “Extracts, flavoring, liquid”, rather than by an n.o.s. entry, such as “Flammable liquid, n.o.s.” It should be noted, however, that an n.o.s. description as a proper shipping name may not provide sufficient information for shipping papers and package markings. Under the provisions of subparts C and D of this part, the technical name of one or more constituents which makes the product a hazardous material may be required in association with the proper shipping name.
* * * * *
§172.102 Special provisions.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(1) * * *
(78) This entry may not be used to describe compressed air which contains more than 23.5 percent oxygen. Compressed air containing greater than 23.5 percent oxygen must be shipped using the description ‘‘Compressed gas, oxidizing, n.o.s., UN3156.’’
* * * * *
(156) Asbestos that is immersed or fixed in a natural or artificial binder material, such as cement, plastic, asphalt, resins or mineral ore, or contained in manufactured products is not subject to the requirements of this subchapter.
* * * * *
(387) When materials are stabilized by temperature control, the provisions of §173.21(f) of this subchapter apply. When chemical stabilization is employed, the person offering the material for transport shall ensure that the level of stabilization is sufficient to prevent the material as packaged from dangerous polymerization at 50°C (122°F). If chemical stabilization becomes ineffective at lower temperatures within the anticipated duration of transport, temperature control is required and is forbidden by aircraft. In making this determination factors to be taken into consideration include, but are not limited to, the capacity and geometry of the packaging and the effect of any insulation present, the temperature of the material when offered for transport, the duration of the journey, and the ambient temperature conditions typically encountered in the journey (considering also the season of year), the effectiveness and other properties of the stabilizer employed, applicable operational controls imposed by regulation (e.g., requirements to protect from sources of heat, including other cargo carried at a temperature above ambient) and any other relevant factors. The provisions of this special provision will be effective until January 2, 2023, unless we terminate them earlier or extend them beyond that date by notice of a final rule in the Federal Register.
* * * * *
(421) This entry will no longer be effective on January 2, 2023, unless we terminate it earlier or extend it beyond that date by notice of a final rule in the Federal Register.
* * * * *
(2) * * *
A54 Irrespective of the quantity limits in Column 9B of the §172.101 table, a lithium battery, including a lithium battery packed with, or contained in, equipment that otherwise meets the applicable requirements of §173.185, may have a mass exceeding 35 kg if approved by the Associate Administrator prior to shipment.
* * * * *
(4) * * *
IP15 For UN2031 with more than 55% nitric acid, the permitted use of rigid plastic IBCs, and the inner receptacle of composite IBCs with rigid plastics, shall be two years from their date of manufacture.
* * * * *
§173.4b De minimis exceptions.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(1) The specimens are:
(i) Wrapped in a paper towel or cheesecloth moistened with alcohol or an alcohol solution and placed in a plastic bag that is heat-sealed. Any free liquid in the bag must not exceed 30 mL; or
(ii) Placed in vials or other rigid containers with no more than 30 mL of alcohol or alcohol solution. The containers are placed in a plastic bag that is heat-sealed;
* * * * *
§173.21 Forbidden materials and packages.
* * * * *
(f) A package containing a material which is likely to decompose with a self-accelerated decomposition temperature (SADT) of 50°C (122 °F) or less, or polymerize at a temperature of 54°C (130 °F) or less with an evolution of a dangerous quantity of heat or gas when decomposing or polymerizing, unless the material is stabilized or inhibited in a manner to preclude such evolution. The SADT may be determined by any of the test methods described in Part II of the UN Manual of Tests and Criteria (IBR, see §171.7 of this subchapter).
(1) A package meeting the criteria of paragraph (f) of this section may be required to be shipped under controlled temperature conditions. The control temperature and emergency temperature for a package shall be as specified in the table in this paragraph based upon the SADT of the material. The control temperature is the temperature above which a package of the material may not be offered for transportation or transported. The emergency temperature is the temperature at which, due to imminent danger, emergency measures must be initiated.
| SADT 1 | Control temperatures | Emergency temperature |
|---|---|---|
| SADT ≤20°C (68°F) | 20°C (36°F) below SADT | 10°C (18°F) below SADT. |
| 20°C (68°F) <SADT ≤35°C (95°F) | 15°C (27°F) below SADT | 10°C (18°F) below SADT. |
| 35°C (95°F) <SADT ≤50°C (122°F) | 10°C (18°F) below SADT | 5°C (9°F) below SADT. |
| 50°C (122°F) <SADT | (2) | (2) |
| 1 Self-accelerating decomposition temperature. | ||
| 2 Temperature control not required. | ||
(2) For self-reactive materials listed in §173.224(b) Table control and emergency temperatures, where required are shown in Columns 5 and 6, respectively. For organic peroxides listed in The Organic Peroxides Table in §173.225 control and emergency temperatures, where required, are shown in Columns 7a and 7b, respectively.
* * * * *
§173.27 General requirements for transportation by aircraft.
* * * * *
(f) * * *
(2) * * *
(i) * * *
(D) Divisions 4.1 (self-reactive), 4.2 (spontaneously combustible) (primary or subsidiary risk), and 4.3 (dangerous when wet) (liquids);
* * * * *
§173.124 Class 4, Divisions 4.1, 4.2 and 4.3— Definitions.
(a) * * *
(4) * * *
(iv) The provisions concerning polymerizing substances in paragraph (a)(4) will be effective until January 2, 2023.
* * * * *
§173.137 Class 8—Assignment of packing group.
The packing group of a Class 8 material is indicated in Column 5 of the §172.101 Table. When the §172.101 Table provides more than one packing group for a Class 8 material, the packing group must be determined using data obtained from tests conducted in accordance with the OECD Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals, Test No. 435, “ In Vitro Membrane Barrier Test Method for Skin Corrosion” (IBR, see §171.7 of this subchapter) or Test No. 404, “Acute Dermal Irritation/Corrosion” (IBR, see §171.7 of this subchapter). A material that is determined not to be corrosive in accordance with OECD Guideline for the Testing of Chemicals, Test No. 430, “ In Vitro Skin Corrosion: Transcutaneous Electrical Resistance Test (TER)” (IBR, see §171.7 of this subchapter) or Test No. 431, “ In Vitro Skin Corrosion: Reconstructed Human Epidermis (RHE) Test Method” (IBR, see §171.7 of this subchapter) may be considered not to be corrosive to human skin for the purposes of this subchapter without further testing. However, a material determined to be corrosive in accordance with Test No. 430 must be further tested using Test No. 435 or Test No. 404. If the in vitro test results indicate that the substance or mixture is corrosive, but the test method does not clearly distinguish between assignment of packing groups II and III, the material may be considered to be in packing group II without further testing. The packing group assignment using data obtained from tests conducted in accordance with OECD Guideline Test No. 404 or Test No. 435 must be as follows:
* * * * *
§173.151 Exceptions for Class 4.
* * * * *
(d) Limited quantities of Division 4.3. Limited quantities of dangerous when wet solids (Division 4.3) in Packing Groups II and III are excepted from labeling requirements, unless the material is offered for transportation or transported by aircraft, and are excepted from the specification packaging requirements of this subchapter when packaged in combination packagings according to this paragraph. For transportation by aircraft, the package must also conform to applicable requirements of §173.27 of this part (e.g., authorized materials, inner packaging quantity limits and closure securement) and only hazardous material authorized aboard passenger-carrying aircraft may be transported as a limited quantity. A limited quantity package that conforms to the provisions of this section is not subject to the shipping paper requirements of subpart C of part 172 of this subchapter, unless the material meets the definition of a hazardous substance, hazardous waste, marine pollutant, or is offered for transportation and transported by aircraft or vessel. In addition, shipments of limited quantities are not subject to subpart F (Placarding) of part 172 of this subchapter. Each package must conform to the packaging requirements of subpart B of this part and may not exceed 30 kg (66 pounds) gross weight. Except for transportation by aircraft, the following combination packagings are authorized:
* * * * *
§173.167 Consumer commodities.
(a) Effective January 1, 2013, a “consumer commodity” (see §171.8 of this subchapter) when offered for transportation by aircraft may only include articles or substances of Class 2 (non-toxic aerosols only), Class 3 (Packing Group II and III only), Division 6.1 (Packing Group III only), UN3077, UN3082, UN3175, UN3334, and UN3335, provided such materials do not have a subsidiary risk and are authorized aboard a passenger-carrying aircraft. Consumer commodities are excepted from the specification outer packaging requirements of this subchapter. Packages prepared under the requirements of this section are excepted from labeling and shipping papers when transported by highway or rail. Except as indicated in §173.24(i), each completed package must conform to §§173.24 and 173.24a of this subchapter. Additionally, except for the pressure differential requirements in §173.27(c), the requirements of §173.27 do not apply to packages prepared in accordance with this section. Packages prepared under the requirements of this section may be offered for transportation and transported by all modes. As applicable, the following apply:
(1) Inner and outer packaging quantity limits. (i) Non-toxic aerosols, as defined in §171.8 of this subchapter and constructed in accordance with §173.306 of this part, in non-refillable, non-metal containers not exceeding 120 mL (4 fluid ounces) each, or in non-refillable metal containers not exceeding 820 mL (28 ounces) each, except that flammable aerosols may not exceed 500 mL (16.9 ounces) each;
(ii) Liquids, in inner packagings not exceeding 500 mL (16.9 ounces) each. Liquids must not completely fill an inner packaging at 55°C;
(iii) Solids, in inner packagings not exceeding 500 g (1.0 pounds) each; or
(iv) Any combination thereof not to exceed 30 kg (66 pounds) gross weight as prepared for shipment.
(2) Closures. Friction-type closures must be secured by positive means. The body and closure of any packaging must be constructed so as to be able to adequately resist the effects of temperature and vibration occurring in conditions normally incident to air transportation. The closure device must be so designed that it is unlikely that it can be incorrectly or incompletely closed.
(3) Absorbent material. Inner packagings must be tightly packaged in strong outer packagings. Absorbent and cushioning material must not react dangerously with the contents of inner packagings. Glass or earthenware inner packagings containing liquids of Class 3 or Division 6.1, sufficient absorbent material must be provided to absorb the entire contents of the largest inner packaging contained in the outer packaging. Absorbent material is not required if the glass or earthenware inner packagings are sufficiently protected as packaged for transport that it is unlikely a failure would occur and, if a failure did occur, that it would be unlikely that the contents would leak from the outer packaging.
(4) Drop test capability. Breakable inner packagings (e.g., glass, earthenware, or brittle plastic) must be packaged to prevent failure under conditions normally incident to transport. Packages of consumer commodities as prepared for transport must be capable of withstanding a 1.2 m drop on solid concrete in the position most likely to cause damage. In order to pass the test, the outer packaging must not exhibit any damage liable to affect safety during transport and there must be no leakage from the inner packaging(s).
(5) Stack test capability. Packages of consumer commodities must be capable of withstanding, without failure or leakage of any inner packaging and without any significant reduction in effectiveness, a force applied to the top surface for a duration of 24 hours equivalent to the total weight of identical packages if stacked to a height of 3.0 m (including the test sample).
(b) When offered for transportation by aircraft:
(1) Packages prepared under the requirements of this section are to be marked as a limited quantity in accordance with §172.315(b)(1) and labeled as a Class 9 article or substance, as appropriate, in accordance with subpart E of part 172 of this subchapter; and
(2) Pressure differential capability: Except for UN3082, inner packagings intended to contain liquids must be capable of meeting the pressure differential requirements (75 kPa) prescribed in §173.27(c) of this part. The capability of a packaging to withstand an internal pressure without leakage that produces the specified pressure differential should be determined by successfully testing design samples or prototypes.
§173.185 Lithium cells and batteries.
* * * * *
(a) * * *
(3) Beginning January 1, 2022 each manufacturer and subsequent distributor of lithium cells or batteries manufactured on or after January 1, 2008, must make available a test summary. The test summary must include the following elements:
* * * * *
* * * * *
(ix) Reference to the revised edition of the UN Manual of Tests and Criteria used and to amendments thereto, if any; and
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(3) * * *
(iii) * * *
(A) Be placed in inner packagings that completely enclose the cell or battery, then placed in an outer packaging. The completed package for the cells or batteries must meet the Packing Group II performance requirements as specified in paragraph (b)(3)(ii) of this section; or
(B) Be placed in inner packagings that completely enclose the cell or battery, then placed with equipment in a package that meets the Packing Group II performance requirements as specified in paragraph (b)(3)(ii) of this section.
* * * * *
(4) * * *
(ii) Equipment must be secured to prevent damage caused by shifting within the outer packaging and be packed so as to prevent accidental operation during transport; and
(iii) Any spare lithium cells or batteries packed with the equipment must be packaged in accordance with paragraph (b)(3) of this section.
* * * * *
(5) Lithium batteries that weigh 12 kg (26.5 pounds) or more and have a strong, impact-resistant outer casing may be packed in strong outer packagings; in protective enclosures (for example, in fully enclosed or wooden slatted crates); or on pallets or other handling devices, instead of packages meeting the UN performance packaging requirements in paragraphs (b)(3)(ii) and (iii) of this section. Batteries must be secured to prevent inadvertent shifting, and the terminals may not support the weight of other superimposed elements. Batteries packaged in accordance with this paragraph may be transported by cargo aircraft if approved by the Associate Administrator.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(3) Lithium battery mark. Each package must display the lithium battery mark except when a package contains only button cell batteries contained in equipment (including circuit boards), or when a consignment contains two packages or fewer where each package contains not more than four lithium cells or two lithium batteries contained in equipment. [Change Notice][Previous Text]
(i) The mark must indicate the UN number: “UN3090” for lithium metal cells or batteries; or “UN3480” for lithium ion cells or batteries. Where the lithium cells or batteries are contained in, or packed with, equipment, the UN number “UN3091” or “UN3481,” as appropriate, must be indicated. Where a package contains lithium cells or batteries assigned to different UN numbers, all applicable UN numbers must be indicated on one or more marks. The package must be of such size that there is adequate space to affix the mark on one side without the mark being folded.

(A) The mark must be in the form of a rectangle or a square with hatched edging. The mark must be not less than 100 mm (3.9 inches) wide by 100 mm (3.9 inches) high and the minimum width of the hatching must be 5 mm (0.2 inches), except marks of 100 mm (3.9 inches) wide by 70 mm (2.8 inches) high may be used on a package containing lithium batteries when the package is too small for the larger mark;
(B) The symbols and letters must be black on white or suitable contrasting background and the hatching must be red;
(C) The “*” must be replaced by the appropriate UN number(s) and the “**” must be replaced by a telephone number for additional information; and
(D) Where dimensions are not specified, all features shall be in approximate proportion to those shown.
(ii) [Reserved]
(iii) When packages are placed in an overpack, the lithium battery mark shall either be clearly visible through the overpack or be reproduced on the outside of the overpack and the overpack shall be marked with the word “OVERPACK”. The lettering of the “OVERPACK” mark shall be at least 12 mm (0.47 inches) high.
(4) Air transportation. (i) For transportation by aircraft, lithium cells and batteries may not exceed the limits in the following Table 1 to paragraph (c)(4)(i). The limits on the maximum number of batteries and maximum net quantity of batteries in the following table may not be combined in the same package. The limits in the following table do not apply to lithium cells and batteries packed with, or contained in, equipment.
| Contents | Lithium metal cells and/or batteries with a lithium content not more than 0.3 g | Lithium metal cells with a lithium content more than 0.3 g but not more than 1 g | Lithium metal batteries with a lithium content more than 0.3 g but not more than 2 g | Lithium ion cells and/or batteries with a watt-hour rating not more than 2.7 Wh | Lithium ion cells with a watt-hour rating more than 2.7 Wh but not more than 20 Wh | Lithium ion batteries with a watt-hour rating more than 2.7 Wh but not more than 100 Wh |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maximum number of cells/batteries per package | No Limit | 8 cells | 2 batteries | No Limit | 8 cells | 2 batteries. |
| Maximum net quantity (mass) per package | 2.5 kg | n/a | n/a | 2.5 kg | n/a | n/a. |
(ii) Not more than one package prepared in accordance with paragraph (c)(4)(i) of this section may be placed into an overpack.
(iii) A shipper is not permitted to offer for transport more than one package prepared in accordance with the provisions of paragraph (c)(4)(i) of this section in any single consignment.
(iv) Each shipment with packages required to display the paragraph (c)(3)(i) lithium battery mark must include an indication on the air waybill of compliance with this paragraph (c)(4) (or the applicable ICAO Technical Instructions Packing Instruction), when an air waybill is used.
(v) Packages and overpacks of lithium batteries prepared in accordance with paragraph (c)(4)(i) of this section must be offered to the operator separately from cargo which is not subject to the requirements of this subchapter and must not be loaded into a unit load device before being offered to the operator.
(vi) For lithium batteries packed with, or contained in, equipment, the number of batteries in each package is limited to the minimum number required to power the piece of equipment, plus two spare sets, and the total net quantity (mass) of the lithium cells or batteries in the completed package must not exceed 5 kg. A “set” of cells or batteries is the number of individual cells or batteries that are required to power each piece of equipment.
(vii) Each person who prepares a package for transport containing lithium cells or batteries, including cells or batteries packed with, or contained in, equipment in accordance with the conditions and limitations of this paragraph (c)(4), must receive instruction on these conditions and limitations, corresponding to their functions.
(viii) Lithium cells and batteries must not be packed in the same outer packaging with other hazardous materials. Packages prepared in accordance with paragraph (c)(4)(i) of this section must not be placed into an overpack with packages containing hazardous materials and articles of Class 1 (explosives) other than Division 1.4S, Division 2.1 (flammable gases), Class 3 (flammable liquids), Division 4.1 (flammable solids), or Division 5.1 (oxidizers).
(5) For transportation by aircraft, a package that exceeds the number or quantity (mass) limits in the table shown in paragraph (c)(4)(i) of this section, the overpack limit described in paragraph (c)(4)(ii) of this section, or the consignment limit described in paragraph (c)(4)(iii) of this section is subject to all applicable requirements of this subchapter, except that a package containing no more than 2.5 kg lithium metal cells or batteries or 10 kg lithium ion cells or batteries is not subject to the UN performance packaging requirements in paragraph (b)(3)(ii) of this section when the package displays both the lithium battery mark in paragraph (c)(3)(i) and the Class 9 Lithium Battery label specified in §172.447 of this subchapter. This paragraph does not apply to batteries or cells packed with or contained in equipment.
* * * * *
(e) * * *
(5) Lithium batteries, including lithium batteries contained in equipment, that weigh 12 kg (26.5 pounds) or more and have a strong, impact-resistant outer casing may be packed in strong outer packagings, in protective enclosures (for example, in fully enclosed or wooden slatted crates), or on pallets or other handling devices, instead of packages meeting the UN performance packaging requirements in paragraphs (b)(3)(ii) and (iii) of this section. The battery must be secured to prevent inadvertent shifting, and the terminals may not support the weight of other superimposed elements;
(6) Irrespective of the limit specified in column (9B) of the §172.101 Hazardous Materials Table, the battery or battery assembly prepared for transport in accordance with this paragraph may have a mass exceeding 35 kg gross weight when transported by cargo aircraft;
(7) Batteries or battery assemblies packaged in accordance with this paragraph are not permitted for transportation by passenger-carrying aircraft, and may be transported by cargo aircraft only if approved by the Associate Administrator prior to transportation; and
* * * * *
§173.224 Packaging and control and emergency temperatures for self-reactive materials.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(4) Packing method. Column 4 specifies the highest packing method which is authorized for the self-reactive material. A packing method corresponding to a smaller package size may be used, but a packing method corresponding to a larger package size may not be used. The Table of Packing Methods in §173.225(d) defines the packing methods. Bulk packagings for Type F self-reactive substances are authorized by §173.225(f) for IBCs and §173.225(h) for bulk packagings other than IBCs. The formulations listed in §173.225(f) for IBCs and in §173.225(g) for portable tanks may also be transported packed in accordance with packing method OP8, with the same control and emergency temperatures, if applicable. Additional bulk packagings are authorized if approved by the Associate Administrator.
* * * * *
| Self-reactive substance (1) | Identification No. (2) | Concentra- tion—(%) (3) | Packing method (4) | Control tempera- ture— (°C) (5) | Emer- gency tempera- ture— (6) | Notes (7) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Notes: | ||||||
| 1. The emergency and control temperatures must be determined in accordance with §173.21(f). | ||||||
| 2. With a compatible diluent having a boiling point of not less than 150 °C. | ||||||
| 3. Samples may only be offered for transportation under the provisions of paragraph (c)(3) of this section. | ||||||
| 4. This entry applies to mixtures of esters of 2-diazo-1-naphthol-4-sulphonic acid and 2-diazo-1-naphthol-5-sulphonic acid. | ||||||
| 5. This entry applies to the technical mixture in n-butanol within the specified concentration limits of the (Z) isomer. | ||||||
| Acetone-pyrogallol copolymer 2-diazo-1-naphthol-5-sulphonate | 3228 | 100 | OP8 | |||
| Azodicarbonamide formulation type B, temperature controlled | 3232 | <100 | OP5 | 1 | ||
| Azodicarbonamide formulation type C | 3224 | <100 | OP6 | |||
| Azodicarbonamide formulation type C, temperature controlled | 3234 | <100 | OP6 | 1 | ||
| Azodicarbonamide formulation type D | 3226 | <100 | OP7 | |||
| Azodicarbonamide formulation type D, temperature controlled | 3236 | <100 | OP7 | 1 | ||
| 2,2′-Azodi(2,4-dimethyl-4-methoxyvaleronitrile) | 3236 | 100 | OP7 | −5 | +5 | |
| 2,2′-Azodi(2,4-dimethylvaleronitrile) | 3236 | 100 | OP7 | +10 | +15 | |
| 2,2′-Azodi(ethyl 2-methylpropionate) | 3235 | 100 | OP7 | +20 | +25 | |
| 1,1-Azodi(hexahydrobenzonitrile) | 3226 | 100 | OP7 | |||
| 2,2-Azodi(isobutyronitrile) | 3234 | 100 | OP6 | +40 | +45 | |
| 2,2′-Azodi(isobutyronitrile) as a water based paste | 3224 | ≤50 | OP6 | |||
| 2,2-Azodi(2-methylbutyronitrile) | 3236 | 100 | OP7 | +35 | +40 | |
| Benzene-1,3-disulphonylhydrazide, as a paste | 3226 | 52 | OP7 | |||
| Benzene sulphohydrazide | 3226 | 100 | OP7 | |||
| 4-(Benzyl(ethyl)amino)-3-ethoxybenzenediazonium zinc chloride | 3226 | 100 | OP7 | |||
| 4-(Benzyl(methyl)amino)-3-ethoxybenzenediazonium zinc chloride | 3236 | 100 | OP7 | +40 | +45 | |
| 3-Chloro-4-diethylaminobenzenediazonium zinc chloride | 3226 | 100 | OP7 | |||
| 2-Diazo-1-Naphthol sulphonic acid ester mixture | 3226 | <100 | OP7 | 4 | ||
| 2-Diazo-1-Naphthol-4-sulphonyl chloride | 3222 | 100 | OP5 | |||
| 2-Diazo-1-Naphthol-5-sulphonyl chloride | 3222 | 100 | OP5 | |||
| 2,5-Dibutoxy-4-(4-morpholinyl)-Benzenediazonium, tetrachlorozincate (2:1) | 3228 | 100 | OP8 | |||
| 2,5-Diethoxy-4-morpholinobenzenediazonium zinc chloride | 3236 | 67−100 | OP7 | +35 | +40 | |
| 2,5-Diethoxy-4-morpholinobenzenediazonium zinc chloride | 3236 | 66 | OP7 | +40 | +45 | |
| 2,5-Diethoxy-4-morpholinobenzenediazonium tetrafluoroborate | 3236 | 100 | OP7 | +30 | +35 | |
| 2,5-Diethoxy-4-(phenylsulphonyl)benzenediazonium zinc chloride | 3236 | 67 | OP7 | +40 | +45 | |
| 2,5-Diethoxy-4-(4-morpholinyl)-benzenediazonium sulphate | 3226 | 100 | OP7 | |||
| Diethylene glycol bis(allyl carbonate) + Diisopropylperoxydicarbonate | 3237 | ≥88 + ≤12 | OP8 | −10 | 0 | |
| 2,5-Dimethoxy-4-(4-methylphenylsulphony)benzenediazonium zinc chloride | 3236 | 79 | OP7 | +40 | +45 | |
| 4-Dimethylamino-6-(2-dimethylaminoethoxy)toluene-2-diazonium zinc chloride | 3236 | 100 | OP7 | +40 | +45 | |
| 4-(Dimethylamino)-benzenediazonium trichlorozincate (-1) | 3228 | 100 | OP8 | |||
| N,N′-Dinitroso-N, N′-dimethyl-terephthalamide, as a paste | 3224 | 72 | OP6 | |||
| N,N′-Dinitrosopentamethylenetetramine | 3224 | 82 | OP6 | 2 | ||
| Diphenyloxide-4,4′-disulphohydrazide | 3226 | 100 | OP7 | |||
| Diphenyloxide-4,4′-disulphonylhydrazide | 3226 | 100 | OP7 | |||
| 4-Dipropylaminobenzenediazonium zinc chloride | 3226 | 100 | OP7 | |||
| 2-(N,N-Ethoxycarbonylphenylamino)-3-methoxy-4-(N-methyl-N- cyclohexylamino)benzenediazonium zinc chloride | 3236 | 63−92 | OP7 | +40 | +45 | |
| 2-(N,N-Ethoxycarbonylphenylamino)-3-methoxy-4-(N-methyl-N- cyclohexylamino)benzenediazonium zinc chloride | 3236 | 62 | OP7 | +35 | +40 | |
| N-Formyl-2-(nitromethylene)-1,3-perhydrothiazine | 3236 | 100 | OP7 | +45 | +50 | |
| 2-(2-Hydroxyethoxy)-1-(pyrrolidin-1-yl)benzene-4-diazonium zinc chloride | 3236 | 100 | OP7 | +45 | +50 | |
| 3-(2-Hydroxyethoxy)-4-(pyrrolidin-1-yl)benzenediazonium zinc chloride | 3236 | 100 | OP7 | +40 | +45 | |
| 2-(N,N-Methylaminoethylcarbonyl)-4-(3,4-dimethyl-phenylsulphonyl)benzene diazonium zinc chloride | 3236 | 96 | OP7 | +45 | +50 | |
| 4-Methylbenzenesulphonylhydrazide | 3226 | 100 | OP7 | |||
| 3-Methyl-4-(pyrrolidin-1-yl)benzenediazonium tetrafluoroborate | 3234 | 95 | OP6 | +45 | +50 | |
| 4-Nitrosophenol | 3236 | 100 | OP7 | +35 | +40 | |
| Phosphorothioic acid, O-[(cyanophenyl methylene) azanyl] O,O-diethyl ester | 3227 | 82−91 (Z isomer) | OP8 | 5 | ||
| Self-reactive liquid, sample | 3223 | OP2 | 3 | |||
| Self-reactive liquid, sample, temperature control | 3233 | OP2 | 3 | |||
| Self-reactive solid, sample | 3224 | OP2 | 3 | |||
| Self-reactive solid, sample, temperature control | 3234 | OP2 | 3 | |||
| Sodium 2-diazo-1-naphthol-4-sulphonate | 3226 | 100 | OP7 | |||
| Sodium 2-diazo-1-naphthol-5-sulphonate | 3226 | 100 | OP7 | |||
| Tetramine palladium (II) nitrate | 3234 | 100 | OP6 | +30 | +35 | |
§173.225 Packaging requirements and other provisions for organic peroxides.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
| Technical name | ID No. | Concentration (mass %) | Diluent (mass %) | Water (mass %) | Packing method | Temperature (°C) | Notes | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | B | I | Control | Emergency | ||||||
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4a) | (4b) | (4c) | (5) | (6) | (7a) | (7b) | (8) |
| Acetyl acetone peroxide | UN3105 | ≤42 | ≥48 | ≥8 | OP7 | 2 | ||||
| Acetyl acetone peroxide [as a paste] | UN3106 | ≤32 | OP7 | 21 | ||||||
| Acetyl cyclohexanesulfonyl peroxide | UN3112 | ≤82 | ≥12 | OP4 | −10 | 0 | ||||
| Acetyl cyclohexanesulfonyl peroxide | UN3115 | ≤32 | ≥68 | OP7 | −10 | 0 | ||||
| tert-Amyl hydroperoxide | UN3107 | ≤88 | ≥6 | ≥6 | OP8 | |||||
| tert-Amyl peroxyacetate | UN3105 | ≤62 | ≥38 | OP7 | ||||||
| tert-Amyl peroxybenzoate | UN3103 | ≤100 | OP5 | |||||||
| tert-Amyl peroxy-2-ethylhexanoate | UN3115 | ≤100 | OP7 | +20 | +25 | |||||
| tert-Amyl peroxy-2-ethylhexyl carbonate | UN3105 | ≤100 | OP7 | |||||||
| tert-Amyl peroxy isopropyl carbonate | UN3103 | ≤77 | ≥23 | OP5 | ||||||
| tert-Amyl peroxyneodecanoate | UN3115 | ≤77 | ≥23 | OP7 | 0 | +10 | ||||
| tert-Amyl peroxyneodecanoate | UN3119 | ≤47 | ≥53 | OP8 | 0 | +10 | ||||
| tert-Amyl peroxypivalate | UN3113 | ≤77 | ≥23 | OP5 | +10 | +15 | ||||
| tert-Amyl peroxypivalate | UN3119 | ≤32 | ≥68 | OP8 | +10 | +15 | ||||
| tert-Amyl peroxy-3,5,5-trimethylhexanoate | UN3105 | ≤100 | OP7 | |||||||
| tert-Butyl cumyl peroxide | UN3109 | >42−100 | OP8 | 9 | ||||||
| tert-Butyl cumyl peroxide | UN3108 | ≤52 | ≥48 | OP8 | 9 | |||||
| n-Butyl-4,4-di-(tert-butylperoxy)valerate | UN3103 | >52−100 | OP5 | |||||||
| n-Butyl-4,4-di-(tert-butylperoxy)valerate | UN3108 | ≤52 | ≥48 | OP8 | ||||||
| tert-Butyl hydroperoxide | UN3103 | >79−90 | ≥10 | OP5 | 13 | |||||
| tert-Butyl hydroperoxide | UN3105 | ≤80 | ≥20 | OP7 | 4, 13 | |||||
| tert-Butyl hydroperoxide | UN3107 | ≤79 | >14 | OP8 | 13, 16 | |||||
| tert-Butyl hydroperoxide | UN3109 | ≤72 | ≥28 | OP8 | 13 | |||||
| tert-Butyl hydroperoxide [and] Di-tert-butylperoxide | UN3103 | <82 + >9 | ≥7 | OP5 | 13 | |||||
| tert-Butyl monoperoxymaleate | UN3102 | >52−100 | OP5 | |||||||
| tert-Butyl monoperoxymaleate | UN3103 | ≤52 | ≥48 | OP6 | ||||||
| tert-Butyl monoperoxymaleate | UN3108 | ≤52 | ≥48 | OP8 | ||||||
| tert-Butyl monoperoxymaleate [as a paste] | UN3108 | ≤52 | OP8 | |||||||
| tert-Butyl peroxyacetate | UN3101 | >52−77 | ≥23 | OP5 | ||||||
| tert-Butyl peroxyacetate | UN3103 | >32−52 | ≥48 | OP6 | ||||||
| tert-Butyl peroxyacetate | UN3109 | ≤32 | ≥68 | OP8 | ||||||
| tert-Butyl peroxybenzoate | UN3103 | >77−100 | OP5 | |||||||
| tert-Butyl peroxybenzoate | UN3105 | >52−77 | ≥23 | OP7 | 1 | |||||
| tert-Butyl peroxybenzoate | UN3106 | ≤52 | ≥48 | OP7 | ||||||
| tert-Butyl peroxybenzoate | UN3109 | ≤32 | ≥68 | OP8 | ||||||
| tert-Butyl peroxybutyl fumarate | UN3105 | ≤52 | ≥48 | OP7 | ||||||
| tert-Butyl peroxycrotonate | UN3105 | ≤77 | ≥23 | OP7 | ||||||
| tert-Butyl peroxydiethylacetate | UN3113 | ≤100 | OP5 | +20 | +25 | |||||
| tert-Butyl peroxy-2-ethylhexanoate | UN3113 | >52−100 | OP6 | +20 | +25 | |||||
| tert-Butyl peroxy-2-ethylhexanoate | UN3117 | >32−52 | ≥48 | OP8 | +30 | +35 | ||||
| tert-Butyl peroxy-2-ethylhexanoate | UN3118 | ≤52 | ≥48 | OP8 | +20 | +25 | ||||
| tert-Butyl peroxy-2-ethylhexanoate | UN3119 | ≤32 | ≥68 | OP8 | +40 | +45 | ||||
| tert-Butyl peroxy-2-ethylhexanoate [and] 2,2-di-(tert-Butylperoxy)butane | UN3106 | ≤12 + ≤14 | ≥14 | ≥60 | OP7 | |||||
| tert-Butyl peroxy-2-ethylhexanoate [and] 2,2-di-(tert-Butylperoxy)butane | UN3115 | ≤31 + ≤36 | ≥33 | OP7 | +35 | +40 | ||||
| tert-Butyl peroxy-2-ethylhexylcarbonate | UN3105 | ≤100 | OP7 | |||||||
| tert-Butyl peroxyisobutyrate | UN3111 | >52−77 | ≥23 | OP5 | +15 | +20 | ||||
| tert-Butyl peroxyisobutyrate | UN3115 | ≤52 | ≥48 | OP7 | +15 | +20 | ||||
| tert-Butylperoxy isopropylcarbonate | UN3103 | ≤77 | ≥23 | OP5 | ||||||
| 1-(2-tert-Butylperoxy isopropyl)-3-isopropenylbenzene | UN3105 | ≤77 | ≥23 | OP7 | ||||||
| 1-(2-tert-Butylperoxy isopropyl)-3-isopropenylbenzene | UN3108 | ≤42 | ≥58 | OP8 | ||||||
| tert-Butyl peroxy-2-methylbenzoate | UN3103 | ≤100 | OP5 | |||||||
| tert-Butyl peroxyneodecanoate | UN3115 | >77−100 | OP7 | −5 | +5 | |||||
| tert-Butyl peroxyneodecanoate | UN3115 | ≤77 | ≥23 | OP7 | 0 | +10 | ||||
| tert-Butyl peroxyneodecanoate [as a stable dispersion in water] | UN3119 | ≤52 | OP8 | 0 | +10 | |||||
| tert-Butyl peroxyneodecanoate [as a stable dispersion in water (frozen)] | UN3118 | ≤42 | OP8 | 0 | +10 | |||||
| tert-Butyl peroxyneodecanoate | UN3119 | ≤32 | ≥68 | OP8 | 0 | +10 | ||||
| tert-Butyl peroxyneoheptanoate | UN3115 | ≤77 | ≥23 | OP7 | 0 | +10 | ||||
| tert-Butyl peroxyneoheptanoate [as a stable dispersion in water] | UN3117 | ≤42 | OP8 | 0 | +10 | |||||
| tert-Butyl peroxypivalate | UN3113 | >67−77 | ≥23 | OP5 | 0 | +10 | ||||
| tert-Butyl peroxypivalate | UN3115 | >27−67 | ≥33 | OP7 | 0 | +10 | ||||
| tert-Butyl peroxypivalate | UN3119 | ≤27 | ≥73 | OP8 | +30 | +35 | ||||
| tert-Butylperoxy stearylcarbonate | UN3106 | ≤100 | OP7 | |||||||
| tert-Butyl peroxy-3,5,5-trimethylhexanoate | UN3105 | >37−100 | OP7 | |||||||
| tert-Butyl peroxy-3,5,5-trimethlyhexanoate | UN3106 | ≤42 | ≥58 | OP7 | ||||||
| tert-Butyl peroxy-3,5,5-trimethylhexanoate | UN3109 | ≤37 | ≥63 | OP8 | ||||||
| 3-Chloroperoxybenzoic acid | UN3102 | >57−86 | ≥14 | OP1 | ||||||
| 3-Chloroperoxybenzoic acid | UN3106 | ≤57 | ≥3 | ≥40 | OP7 | |||||
| 3-Chloroperoxybenzoic acid | UN3106 | ≤77 | ≥6 | ≥17 | OP7 | |||||
| Cumyl hydroperoxide | UN3107 | >90−98 | ≤10 | OP8 | 13 | |||||
| Cumyl hydroperoxide | UN3109 | ≤90 | ≥10 | OP8 | 13, 15 | |||||
| Cumyl peroxyneodecanoate | UN3115 | ≤87 | ≥13 | OP7 | −10 | 0 | ||||
| Cumyl peroxyneodecanoate | UN3115 | ≤77 | ≥23 | OP7 | −10 | 0 | ||||
| Cumyl peroxyneodecanoate [as a stable dispersion in water] | UN3119 | ≤52 | OP8 | −10 | 0 | |||||
| Cumyl peroxyneoheptanoate | UN3115 | ≤77 | ≥23 | OP7 | −10 | 0 | ||||
| Cumyl peroxypivalate | UN3115 | ≤77 | ≥23 | OP7 | −5 | +5 | ||||
| Cyclohexanone peroxide(s) | UN3104 | ≤91 | ≥9 | OP6 | 13 | |||||
| Cyclohexanone peroxide(s) | UN3105 | ≤72 | ≥28 | OP7 | 5 | |||||
| Cyclohexanone peroxide(s) [as a paste] | UN3106 | ≤72 | OP7 | 5, 21 | ||||||
| Cyclohexanone peroxide(s) | Exempt | ≤32 | >68 | Exempt | 29 | |||||
| Diacetone alcohol peroxides | UN3115 | ≤57 | ≥26 | ≥8 | OP7 | +40 | +45 | 5 | ||
| Diacetyl peroxide | UN3115 | ≤27 | ≥73 | OP7 | +20 | +25 | 8,13 | |||
| Di-tert-amyl peroxide | UN3107 | ≤100 | OP8 | |||||||
| ([3R- (3R, 5aS, 6S, 8aS, 9R, 10R, 12S, 12aR**)]-Decahydro-10-methoxy-3, 6, 9-trimethyl-3, 12-epoxy-12H-pyrano [4, 3- j]-1, 2-benzodioxepin) | UN3106 | ≤100 | OP7 | |||||||
| 2,2-Di-(tert-amylperoxy)-butane | UN3105 | ≤57 | ≥43 | OP7 | ||||||
| 1,1-Di-(tert-amylperoxy)cyclohexane | UN3103 | ≤82 | ≥18 | OP6 | ||||||
| Dibenzoyl peroxide | UN3102 | >52−100 | ≤48 | OP2 | 3 | |||||
| Dibenzoyl peroxide | UN3102 | >77−94 | ≥6 | OP4 | 3 | |||||
| Dibenzoyl peroxide | UN3104 | ≤77 | ≥23 | OP6 | ||||||
| Dibenzoyl peroxide | UN3106 | ≤62 | ≥28 | ≥10 | OP7 | |||||
| Dibenzoyl peroxide [as a paste] | UN3106 | >52−62 | OP7 | 21 | ||||||
| Dibenzoyl peroxide | UN3106 | >35−52 | ≥48 | OP7 | ||||||
| Dibenzoyl peroxide | UN3107 | >36−42 | ≥18 | ≤40 | OP8 | |||||
| Dibenzoyl peroxide [as a paste] | UN3108 | ≤56.5 | ≥15 | OP8 | ||||||
| Dibenzoyl peroxide [as a paste] | UN3108 | ≤52 | OP8 | 21 | ||||||
| Dibenzoyl peroxide [as a stable dispersion in water] | UN3109 | ≤42 | OP8 | |||||||
| Dibenzoyl peroxide | Exempt | ≤35 | ≥65 | Exempt | 29 | |||||
| Di-(4-tert-butylcyclohexyl)peroxydicarbonate | UN3114 | ≤100 | OP6 | +30 | +35 | |||||
| Di-(4-tert-butylcyclohexyl)peroxydicarbonate [as a stable dispersion in water] | UN3119 | ≤42 | OP8 | +30 | +35 | |||||
| Di-(4-tert-butylcyclohexyl)peroxydicarbonate [as a paste] | UN3116 | ≤42 | OP7 | +35 | +40 | |||||
| Di-tert-butyl peroxide | UN3107 | >52−100 | OP8 | |||||||
| Di-tert-butyl peroxide | UN3109 | ≤52 | ≥48 | OP8 | 24 | |||||
| Di-tert-butyl peroxyazelate | UN3105 | ≤52 | ≥48 | OP7 | ||||||
| 2,2-Di-(tert-butylperoxy)butane | UN3103 | ≤52 | ≥48 | OP6 | ||||||
| 1,6-Di-(tert-butylperoxycarbonyloxy)hexane | UN3103 | ≤72 | ≥28 | OP5 | ||||||
| 1,1-Di-(tert-butylperoxy)cyclohexane | UN3101 | >80−100 | OP5 | |||||||
| 1,1-Di-(tert-butylperoxy)cyclohexane | UN3103 | >52−80 | ≥20 | OP5 | ||||||
| 1,1-Di-(tert-butylperoxy)-cyclohexane | UN3103 | ≤72 | ≥28 | OP5 | 30 | |||||
| 1,1-Di-(tert-butylperoxy)cyclohexane | UN3105 | >42−52 | ≥48 | OP7 | ||||||
| 1,1-Di-(tert-butylperoxy)cyclohexane | UN3106 | ≤42 | ≥13 | ≥45 | OP7 | |||||
| 1,1-Di-(tert-butylperoxy)cyclohexane | UN3107 | ≤27 | ≥25 | OP8 | 22 | |||||
| 1,1-Di-(tert-butylperoxy)cyclohexane | UN3109 | ≤42 | ≥58 | OP8 | ||||||
| 1,1-Di-(tert-Butylperoxy) cyclohexane | UN3109 | ≤37 | ≥63 | OP8 | ||||||
| 1,1-Di-(tert-butylperoxy)cyclohexane | UN3109 | ≤25 | ≥25 | ≥50 | OP8 | |||||
| 1,1-Di-(tert-butylperoxy)cyclohexane | UN3109 | ≤13 | ≥13 | ≥74 | OP8 | |||||
| 1,1-Di-(tert-butylperoxy)cyclohexane + tert-Butyl peroxy-2-ethylhexanoate | UN3105 | ≤43 + ≤16 | ≥41 | OP7 | ||||||
| Di-n-butyl peroxydicarbonate | UN3115 | >27−52 | ≥48 | OP7 | −15 | −5 | ||||
| Di-n-butyl peroxydicarbonate | UN3117 | ≤27 | ≥73 | OP8 | −10 | 0 | ||||
| Di-n-butyl peroxydicarbonate [as a stable dispersion in water (frozen)] | UN3118 | ≤42 | OP8 | −15 | −5 | |||||
| Di-sec-butyl peroxydicarbonate | UN3113 | >52−100 | OP4 | −20 | −10 | 6 | ||||
| Di-sec-butyl peroxydicarbonate | UN3115 | ≤52 | ≥48 | OP7 | −15 | −5 | ||||
| Di-(tert-butylperoxyisopropyl) benzene(s) | UN3106 | >42−100 | ≤57 | OP7 | 1, 9 | |||||
| Di-(tert-butylperoxyisopropyl) benzene(s) | Exempt | ≤42 | ≥58 | Exempt | ||||||
| Di-(tert-butylperoxy)phthalate | UN3105 | >42−52 | ≥48 | OP7 | ||||||
| Di-(tert-butylperoxy)phthalate [as a paste] | UN3106 | ≤52 | OP7 | 21 | ||||||
| Di-(tert-butylperoxy)phthalate | UN3107 | ≤42 | ≥58 | OP8 | ||||||
| 2,2-Di-(tert-butylperoxy)propane | UN3105 | ≤52 | ≥48 | OP7 | ||||||
| 2,2-Di-(tert-butylperoxy)propane | UN3106 | ≤42 | ≥13 | ≥45 | OP7 | |||||
| 1,1-Di-(tert-butylperoxy)-3,3,5-trimethylcyclohexane | UN3101 | >90−100 | OP5 | |||||||
| 1,1-Di-(tert-butylperoxy)-3,3,5-trimethylcyclohexane | UN3103 | >57−90 | ≥10 | OP5 | ||||||
| 1,1-Di-(tert-butylperoxy)-3,3,5-trimethylcyclohexane | UN3103 | ≤77 | ≥23 | OP5 | ||||||
| 1,1-Di-(tert-butylperoxy)-3,3,5-trimethylcyclohexane | UN3103 | ≤90 | ≥10 | OP5 | 30 | |||||
| 1,1-Di-(tert-butylperoxy)-3,3,5-trimethylcyclohexane | UN3110 | ≤57 | ≥43 | OP8 | ||||||
| 1,1-Di-(tert-butylperoxy)-3,3,5-trimethylcyclohexane | UN3107 | ≤57 | ≥43 | OP8 | ||||||
| 1,1-Di-(tert-butylperoxy)-3,3,5-trimethylcyclohexane | UN3107 | ≤32 | ≥26 | ≥42 | OP8 | |||||
| Dicetyl peroxydicarbonate | UN3120 | ≤100 | OP8 | +30 | +35 | |||||
| Dicetyl peroxydicarbonate [as a stable dispersion in water] | UN3119 | ≤42 | OP8 | +30 | +35 | |||||
| Di-4-chlorobenzoyl peroxide | UN3102 | ≤77 | ≥23 | OP5 | ||||||
| Di-4-chlorobenzoyl peroxide | Exempt | ≤32 | ≥68 | Exempt | 29 | |||||
| Di-2,4-dichlorobenzoyl peroxide [as a paste] | UN3118 | ≤52 | OP8 | +20 | +25 | |||||
| Di-4-chlorobenzoyl peroxide [as a paste] | UN3106 | ≤52 | OP7 | 21 | ||||||
| Dicumyl peroxide | UN3110 | >52−100 | ≤48 | OP8 | 9 | |||||
| Dicumyl peroxide | Exempt | ≤52 | ≥48 | Exempt | 29 | |||||
| Dicyclohexyl peroxydicarbonate | UN3112 | >91−100 | OP3 | +10 | +15 | |||||
| Dicyclohexyl peroxydicarbonate | UN3114 | ≤91 | ≥9 | OP5 | +10 | +15 | ||||
| Dicyclohexyl peroxydicarbonate [as a stable dispersion in water] | UN3119 | ≤42 | OP8 | +15 | +20 | |||||
| Didecanoyl peroxide | UN3114 | ≤100 | OP6 | +30 | +35 | |||||
| 2,2-Di-(4,4-di(tert-butylperoxy)cyclohexyl)propane | UN3106 | ≤42 | ≥58 | OP7 | ||||||
| 2,2-Di-(4,4-di(tert-butylperoxy)cyclohexyl)propane | UN3107 | ≤22 | ≥78 | OP8 | ||||||
| Di-2,4-dichlorobenzoyl peroxide | UN3102 | ≤77 | ≥23 | OP5 | ||||||
| Di-2,4-dichlorobenzoyl peroxide [as a paste with silicone oil] | UN3106 | ≤52 | OP7 | |||||||
| Di-(2-ethoxyethyl) peroxydicarbonate | UN3115 | ≤52 | ≥48 | OP7 | −10 | 0 | ||||
| Di-(2-ethylhexyl) peroxydicarbonate | UN3113 | >77−100 | OP5 | −20 | −10 | |||||
| Di-(2-ethylhexyl) peroxydicarbonate | UN3115 | ≤77 | ≥23 | OP7 | −15 | −5 | ||||
| Di-(2-ethylhexyl) peroxydicarbonate [as a stable dispersion in water] | UN3119 | ≤62 | OP8 | −15 | −5 | |||||
| Di-(2-ethylhexyl) peroxydicarbonate [as a stable dispersion in water] | UN3119 | ≤52 | OP8 | −15 | −5 | |||||
| Di-(2-ethylhexyl) peroxydicarbonate [as a stable dispersion in water (frozen)] | UN3120 | ≤52 | OP8 | −15 | −5 | |||||
| 2,2-Dihydroperoxypropane | UN3102 | ≤27 | ≥73 | OP5 | ||||||
| Di-(1-hydroxycyclohexyl)peroxide | UN3106 | ≤100 | OP7 | |||||||
| Diisobutyryl peroxide | UN3111 | >32−52 | ≥48 | OP5 | −20 | −10 | ||||
| Diisobutyryl peroxide [as a stable dispersion in water] | UN3119 | ≤42 | OP8 | −20 | −10 | |||||
| Diisobutyryl peroxide | UN3115 | ≤32 | ≥68 | OP7 | −20 | −10 | ||||
| Diisopropylbenzene dihydroperoxie | UN3106 | ≤82 | ≥5 | ≥5 | OP7 | 17 | ||||
| Diisopropyl peroxydicarbonate | UN3112 | >52−100 | OP2 | −15 | −5 | |||||
| Diisopropyl peroxydicarbonate | UN3115 | ≤52 | ≥48 | OP7 | −20 | −10 | ||||
| Diisopropyl peroxydicarbonate | UN3115 | ≤32 | ≥68 | OP7 | −15 | −5 | ||||
| Dilauroyl peroxide | UN3106 | ≤100 | OP7 | |||||||
| Dilauroyl peroxide [as a stable dispersion in water] | UN3109 | ≤42 | OP8 | |||||||
| Di-(3-methoxybutyl) peroxydicarbonate | UN3115 | ≤52 | ≥48 | OP7 | −5 | +5 | ||||
| Di-(2-methylbenzoyl)peroxide | UN3112 | ≤87 | ≥13 | OP5 | +30 | +35 | ||||
| Di-(4-methylbenzoyl)peroxide [as a paste with silicone oil] | UN3106 | ≤52 | OP7 | |||||||
| Di-(3-methylbenzoyl) peroxide + Benzoyl (3-methylbenzoyl) peroxide + Dibenzoyl peroxide | UN3115 | ≤20 + ≤18 + ≤4 | ≥58 | OP7 | +35 | +40 | ||||
| 2,5-Dimethyl-2,5-di-(benzoylperoxy)hexane | UN3102 | >82−100 | OP5 | |||||||
| 2,5-Dimethyl-2,5-di-(benzoylperoxy)hexane | UN3106 | ≤82 | ≥18 | OP7 | ||||||
| 2,5-Dimethyl-2,5-di-(benzoylperoxy)hexane | UN3104 | ≤82 | ≥18 | OP5 | ||||||
| 2,5-Dimethyl-2,5-di-(tert-butylperoxy)hexane | UN3103 | >90−100 | OP5 | |||||||
| 2,5-Dimethyl-2,5-di-(tert-butylperoxy)hexane | UN3105 | >52—90 | ≥10 | OP7 | ||||||
| 2,5-Dimethyl-2,5-di-(tert-butylperoxy)hexane | UN3108 | ≤77 | ≥23 | OP8 | ||||||
| 2,5-Dimethyl-2,5-di-(tert-butylperoxy)hexane | UN3109 | ≤52 | ≥48 | OP8 | ||||||
| 2,5-Dimethyl-2,5-di-(tert-butylperoxy)hexane [as a paste] | UN3108 | ≤47 | OP8 | |||||||
| 2,5-Dimethyl-2,5-di-(tert-butylperoxy)hexyne-3 | UN3101 | >86−100 | OP5 | |||||||
| 2,5-Dimethyl-2,5-di-(tert-butylperoxy)hexyne-3 | UN3103 | >52−86 | ≥14 | OP5 | ||||||
| 2,5-Dimethyl-2,5-di-(tert-butylperoxy)hexyne-3 | UN3106 | ≤52 | ≥48 | OP7 | ||||||
| 2,5-Dimethyl-2,5-di-(2-ethylhexanoylperoxy)hexane | UN3113 | ≤100 | OP5 | +20 | +25 | |||||
| 2,5-Dimethyl-2,5-dihydroperoxyhexane | UN3104 | ≤82 | ≥18 | OP6 | ||||||
| 2,5-Dimethyl-2,5-di-(3,5,5-trimethylhexanoylperoxy)hexane | UN3105 | ≤77 | ≥23 | OP7 | ||||||
| 1,1-Dimethyl-3-hydroxybutylperoxyneoheptanoate | UN3117 | ≤52 | ≥48 | OP8 | 0 | +10 | ||||
| Dimyristyl peroxydicarbonate | UN3116 | ≤100 | OP7 | +20 | +25 | |||||
| Dimyristyl peroxydicarbonate [as a stable dispersion in water] | UN3119 | ≤42 | OP8 | +20 | +25 | |||||
| Di-(2-neodecanoylperoxyisopropyl)benzene | UN3115 | ≤52 | ≥48 | OP7 | −10 | 0 | ||||
| Di-(2-neodecanoyl-peroxyisopropyl) benzene, as stable dispersion in water | UN3119 | ≤42 | OP8 | −15 | −5 | |||||
| Di-n-nonanoyl peroxide | UN3116 | ≤100 | OP7 | 0 | +10 | |||||
| Di-n-octanoyl peroxide | UN3114 | ≤100 | OP5 | +10 | +15 | |||||
| Di-(2-phenoxyethyl)peroxydicarbonate | UN3102 | >85−100 | OP5 | |||||||
| Di-(2-phenoxyethyl)peroxydicarbonate | UN3106 | ≤85 | ≥15 | OP7 | ||||||
| Dipropionyl peroxide | UN3117 | ≤27 | ≥73 | OP8 | +15 | +20 | ||||
| Di-n-propyl peroxydicarbonate | UN3113 | ≤100 | OP3 | −25 | −15 | |||||
| Di-n-propyl peroxydicarbonate | UN3113 | ≤77 | ≥23 | OP5 | −20 | −10 | ||||
| Disuccinic acid peroxide | UN3102 | >72−100 | OP4 | 18 | ||||||
| Disuccinic acid peroxide | UN3116 | ≤72 | ≥28 | OP7 | +10 | +15 | ||||
| Di-(3,5,5-trimethylhexanoyl) peroxide | UN3115 | >52−82 | ≥18 | OP7 | 0 | +10 | ||||
| Di-(3,5,5-trimethylhexanoyl)peroxide [as a stable dispersion in water] | UN3119 | ≤52 | OP8 | +10 | +15 | |||||
| Di-(3,5,5-trimethylhexanoyl) peroxide | UN3119 | >38−52 | ≥48 | OP8 | +10 | +15 | ||||
| Di-(3,5,5-trimethylhexanoyl)peroxide | UN3119 | ≤38 | ≥62 | OP8 | +20 | +25 | ||||
| Ethyl 3,3-di-(tert-amylperoxy)butyrate | UN3105 | ≤67 | ≥33 | OP7 | ||||||
| Ethyl 3,3-di-(tert-butylperoxy)butyrate | UN3103 | >77−100 | OP5 | |||||||
| Ethyl 3,3-di-(tert-butylperoxy)butyrate | UN3105 | ≤77 | ≥23 | OP7 | ||||||
| Ethyl 3,3-di-(tert-butylperoxy)butyrate | UN3106 | ≤52 | ≥48 | OP7 | ||||||
| 1-(2-ethylhexanoylperoxy)-1,3-Dimethylbutyl peroxypivalate | UN3115 | ≤52 | ≥45 | ≥10 | OP7 | −20 | −10 | |||
| tert-Hexyl peroxyneodecanoate | UN3115 | ≤71 | ≥29 | OP7 | 0 | +10 | ||||
| tert-Hexyl peroxypivalate | UN3115 | ≤72 | ≥28 | OP7 | +10 | +15 | ||||
| 3-Hydroxy-1,1-dimethylbutyl peroxyneodecanoate | UN3115 | ≤77 | ≥23 | OP7 | −5 | +5 | ||||
| 3-Hydroxy-1,1-dimethylbutyl peroxyneodecanoate [as a stable dispersion in water] | UN3119 | ≤52 | OP8 | −5 | +5 | |||||
| 3-Hydroxy-1,1-dimethylbutyl peroxyneodecanoate | UN3117 | ≤52 | ≥48 | OP8 | −5 | +5 | ||||
| Isopropyl sec-butyl peroxydicarbonat + Di-sec-butyl peroxydicarbonate + Di-isopropyl peroxydicarbonate | UN3111 | ≤52 + ≤28 + ≤22 | OP5 | −20 | −10 | |||||
| Isopropyl sec-butyl peroxydicarbonate + Di-sec-butyl peroxydicarbonate + Di-isopropyl peroxydicarbonate | UN3115 | ≤32 + ≤15 −18 + ≤12 −15 | ≥38 | OP7 | −20 | −10 | ||||
| Isopropylcumyl hydroperoxide | UN3109 | ≤72 | ≥28 | OP8 | 13 | |||||
| p-Menthyl hydroperoxide | UN3105 | >72−100 | OP7 | 13 | ||||||
| p-Menthyl hydroperoxide | UN3109 | ≤72 | ≥28 | OP8 | ||||||
| Methylcyclohexanone peroxide(s) | UN3115 | ≤67 | ≥33 | OP7 | +35 | +40 | ||||
| Methyl ethyl ketone peroxide(s) | UN3101 | ≤52 | ≥48 | OP5 | 5, 13 | |||||
| Methyl ethyl ketone peroxide(s) | UN3105 | ≤45 | ≥55 | OP7 | 5 | |||||
| Methyl ethyl ketone peroxide(s) | UN3107 | ≤40 | ≥60 | OP8 | 7 | |||||
| Methyl isobutyl ketone peroxide(s) | UN3105 | ≤62 | ≥19 | OP7 | 5, 23 | |||||
| Methyl isopropyl ketone peroxide(s) | UN3109 | (See remark 31) | ≥70 | OP8 | 31 | |||||
| Organic peroxide, liquid, sample | UN3103 | OP2 | 12 | |||||||
| Organic peroxide, liquid, sample, temperature controlled | UN3113 | OP2 | 12 | |||||||
| Organic peroxide, solid, sample | UN3104 | OP2 | 12 | |||||||
| Organic peroxide, solid, sample, temperature controlled | UN3114 | OP2 | 12 | |||||||
| 3,3,5,7,7-Pentamethyl-1,2,4-Trioxepane | UN3107 | ≤100 | OP8 | |||||||
| Peroxyacetic acid, type D, stabilized | UN3105 | ≤43 | OP7 | 13, 20 | ||||||
| Peroxyacetic acid, type E, stabilized | UN3107 | ≤43 | OP8 | 13, 20 | ||||||
| Peroxyacetic acid, type F, stabilized | UN3109 | ≤43 | OP8 | 13, 20, 28 | ||||||
| Peroxyacetic acid or peracetic acid [with not more than 7% hydrogen peroxide] | UN3107 | ≤36 | ≥15 | OP8 | 13, 20, 28 | |||||
| Peroxyacetic acid or peracetic acid [with not more than 20% hydrogen peroxide] | Exempt | ≤6 | ≥60 | Exempt | 28 | |||||
| Peroxyacetic acid or peracetic acid [with not more than 26% hydrogen peroxide] | UN3109 | ≤17 | OP8 | 13, 20, 28 | ||||||
| Peroxylauric acid | UN3118 | ≤100 | OP8 | +35 | +40 | |||||
| 1-Phenylethyl hydroperoxide | UN3109 | ≤38 | ≥62 | OP8 | ||||||
| Pinanyl hydroperoxide | UN3105 | >56−100 | OP7 | 13 | ||||||
| Pinanyl hydroperoxide | UN3109 | ≤56 | ≥44 | OP8 | ||||||
| Polyether poly-tert-butylperoxycarbonate | UN3107 | ≤52 | ≥48 | OP8 | ||||||
| Tetrahydronaphthyl hydroperoxide | UN3106 | ≤100 | OP7 | |||||||
| 1,1,3,3-Tetramethylbutyl hydroperoxide | UN3105 | ≤100 | OP7 | |||||||
| 1,1,3,3-Tetramethylbutyl peroxy-2-ethylhexanoate | UN3115 | ≤100 | OP7 | +15 | +20 | |||||
| 1,1,3,3-Tetramethylbutyl peroxyneodecanoate | UN3115 | ≤72 | ≥28 | OP7 | −5 | +5 | ||||
| 1,1,3,3-Tetramethylbutyl peroxyneodecanoate [as a stable dispersion in water] | UN3119 | ≤52 | OP8 | −5 | +5 | |||||
| 1,1,3,3-tetramethylbutyl peroxypivalate | UN3115 | ≤77 | ≥23 | OP7 | 0 | +10 | ||||
| 3,6,9-Triethyl-3,6,9-trimethyl-1,4,7-triperoxonane | UN3110 | ≤17 | ≥18 | ≥65 | OP8 | |||||
| 3,6,9-Triethyl-3,6,9-trimethyl-1,4,7-triperoxonane | UN3105 | ≤42 | ≥58 | OP7 | 26 | |||||
| Notes: | ||||||||||
| 1. For domestic shipments, OP8 is authorized. | ||||||||||
| 2. Available oxygen must be <4.7%. | ||||||||||
| 3. For concentrations <80% OP5 is allowed. For concentrations of at least 80% but <85%, OP4 is allowed. For concentrations of at least 85%, maximum package size is OP2. | ||||||||||
| 4. The diluent may be replaced by di-tert-butyl peroxide. | ||||||||||
| 5. Available oxygen must be ≤9% with or without water. | ||||||||||
| 6. For domestic shipments, OP5 is authorized. | ||||||||||
| 7. Available oxygen must be ≤8.2% with or without water. | ||||||||||
| 8. Only non-metallic packagings are authorized. | ||||||||||
| 9. For domestic shipments this material may be transported under the provisions of paragraph (h)(3)(xii) of this section. | ||||||||||
| 10. [Reserved] | ||||||||||
| 11. [Reserved] | ||||||||||
| 12. Samples may only be offered for transportation under the provisions of paragraph (b)(2) of this section. | ||||||||||
| 13. “Corrosive” subsidiary risk label is required. | ||||||||||
| 14. [Reserved] | ||||||||||
| 15. No “Corrosive” subsidiary risk label is required for concentrations below 80%. | ||||||||||
| 16. With <6% di-tert-butyl peroxide. | ||||||||||
| 17. With ≤8% 1-isopropylhydroperoxy-4-isopropylhydroxybenzene. | ||||||||||
| 18. Addition of water to this organic peroxide will decrease its thermal stability. | ||||||||||
| 19. [Reserved] | ||||||||||
| 20. Mixtures with hydrogen peroxide, water and acid(s). | ||||||||||
| 21. With diluent type A, with or without water. | ||||||||||
| 22. With ≥36% diluent type A by mass, and in addition ethylbenzene. | ||||||||||
| 23. With ≥19% diluent type A by mass, and in addition methyl isobutyl ketone. | ||||||||||
| 24. Diluent type B with boiling point >100 C. | ||||||||||
| 25. No “Corrosive” subsidiary risk label is required for concentrations below 56%. | ||||||||||
| 26. Available oxygen must be ≤7.6%. | ||||||||||
| 27. Formulations derived from distillation of peroxyacetic acid originating from peroxyacetic acid in a concentration of not more than 41% with water, total active oxygen less than or equal to 9.5% (peroxyacetic acid plus hydrogen peroxide). | ||||||||||
| 28. For the purposes of this section, the names “Peroxyacetic acid” and “Peracetic acid” are synonymous. | ||||||||||
| 29. Not subject to the requirements of this subchapter for Division 5.2. | ||||||||||
| 30. Diluent type B with boiling point >130°C (266°F). | ||||||||||
| 31. Available oxygen ≤6.7%. | ||||||||||
(d) *****
Table to Paragraph (d): Maximum Quantity per Packaging/Package
* * * * *
(g) * * *
| UN No. | Hazardous material | Minimum test pressure (bar) | Minimum shell thickness (mm-reference steel) See . . . | Bottom opening requirements See . . . | Pressure-relief requirements See . . . | Filling limits | Control temperature | Emergency temperature |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3109 | ORGANIC PEROXIDE, TYPE F, LIQUID | |||||||
| tert-Butyl hydroperoxide, not more than 72% with water. *Provided that steps have been taken to achieve the safety equivalence of 65% tert-Butyl hydroperoxide and 35% water. | 4 | §178.274(d)(2) | §178.275(d)(3) | §178.275(g)(1) | Not more than 90% at 59°F (15°C) | |||
| * * * * | * * * * | * * * * | * * * * | * * * * | * * * * | * * * * | * * * * | * * * * |
| Note: 1. “Corrosive” subsidiary risk placard is required. | ||||||||
* * * * *
§173.301b Additional general requirements for shipment of UN pressure receptacles.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(1) When the use of a valve is prescribed, the valve must conform to the requirements in ISO 10297:2014(E) and ISO 10297:2014/Amd 1:2017 (IBR, see §171.7 of this subchapter). Quick release cylinder valves for specification and type testing must conform to the requirements in ISO 17871:2015(E) (IBR, see §171.7 of this subchapter). Until December 31, 2022, the manufacture of a valve conforming to the requirements in ISO 10297:2014(E) is authorized. Until December 31, 2020, the manufacture of a valve conforming to the requirements in ISO 10297:2006(E) (IBR, see §171.7 of this subchapter) was authorized. Until December 31, 2008, the manufacture of a valve conforming to the requirements in ISO 10297:1999(E) (IBR, see §171.7 of this subchapter) was authorized.
(2) * * *
(ii) By equipping the UN pressure receptacle with a valve cap conforming to the requirements in ISO 11117:2008(E) and Technical Corrigendum 1 (IBR, see §171.7 of this subchapter). Until December 31, 2014, the manufacture of a valve cap conforming to the requirements in ISO 11117:1998(E) (IBR, see §171.7 of this subchapter) was authorized. The cap must have vent-holes of sufficient cross-sectional area to evacuate the gas if leakage occurs at the valve;
(iii) By protecting the valves by shrouds or guards conforming to the requirements in ISO 11117:2008(E) and Technical Corrigendum 1 (IBR; see §171.7 of this subchapter). Until December 31, 2014, the manufacture of a shroud or guard conforming to the requirements in ISO 11117:1998(E) (IBR, see §171.7 of this subchapter) was authorized. For metal hydride storage systems, by protecting the valves in accordance with the requirements in ISO 16111:2008(E) (IBR; see §171.7 of this subchapter).
(iv) By using valves designed and constructed with sufficient inherent strength to withstand damage in accordance with Annex B of ISO 10297:2014(E)/Amd. 1: 2017;
* * * * *
(d) Non-refillable UN pressure receptacles. (1) When the use of a valve is prescribed, the valve must conform to the requirements in ISO 11118:2015(E), (IBR, see §171.7 of this subchapter). Manufacture of valves to ISO 13340:2001(E) is authorized until December 31, 2020;
* * * * *
(f) Hydrogen bearing gases. A steel UN pressure receptacle bearing an ‘‘H’’ mark must be used for hydrogen bearing gases or other embrittling gases that have the potential of causing hydrogen embrittlement.
* * * * *
§173.302c Additional requirements for the shipment of adsorbed gases in UN pressure receptacles.
* * * * *
(k) The filling procedure must be in accordance with Annex A of ISO 11513 (IBR, see §171.7 of this subchapter).
* * * * *
§173.311 Metal hydride storage systems.
The following packing instruction is applicable to transportable UN Metal hydride storage systems (UN3468) with pressure receptacles not exceeding 150 liters (40 gallons) in water capacity and having a maximum developed pressure not exceeding 25 MPa. Metal hydride storage systems must be designed, constructed, initially inspected and tested in accordance with ISO 16111 (IBR, see §171.7 of this subchapter) as authorized under §178.71(m) of this subchapter. Steel pressure receptacles or composite pressure receptacles with steel liners must be marked in accordance with §173.301b(f) of this part which specifies that a steel UN pressure receptacle bearing an “H” mark must be used for hydrogen bearing gases or other gases that may cause hydrogen embrittlement. Requalification intervals must be no more than every five years as specified in §180.207 of this subchapter in accordance with the requalification procedures prescribed in ISO 16111.
§175.10 Exceptions for passengers, crewmembers, and air operators.
(a) This subchapter does not apply to the following hazardous materials when carried by aircraft passengers or crewmembers provided the requirements of §§171.15 and 171.16 (see paragraph (c) of this section) and the requirements of this section are met:
* * * * *
(14) Battery powered heat-producing devices (e.g., battery-operated equipment such as diving lamps and soldering equipment) as checked or carry-on baggage and with the approval of the operator of the aircraft. The heating element, the battery, or other component (e.g., fuse) must be isolated to prevent unintentional activation during transport. Any battery that is removed must be carried in accordance with the provisions for spare batteries in paragraph (a)(18) of this section.
* * * * *
(15) * * *
(v) * * *
(A) Securely attached to the wheelchair or mobility aid;
* * * * *
(vi) * * *
(A) Securely attached to the wheelchair or mobility aid; or
* * * * *
(17) * * *
(ii) * * *
(C) The battery must be securely attached to the mobility aid; and
* * * * *
(18) Except as provided in §173.21 of this subchapter, portable electronic devices (e.g., watches, calculating machines, cameras, cellular phones, laptop and notebook computers, camcorders, medical devices, etc.) containing dry cells or dry batteries (including lithium cells or batteries) and spare dry cells or batteries for these devices, when carried by passengers or crew members for personal use. Portable electronic devices powered by lithium batteries may be carried in either checked or carry-on baggage. When carried in checked baggage, portable electronic devices powered by lithium batteries must be completely switched off (not in sleep or hibernation mode) and protected to prevent unintentional activation or damage. Spare lithium batteries must be carried in carry-on baggage only. Each installed or spare lithium battery must be of a type proven to meet the requirements of each test in the UN Manual of Tests and Criteria, Part III, Sub-section 38.3, and each spare lithium battery must be individually protected so as to prevent short circuits (e.g., by placement in original retail packaging, by otherwise insulating terminals by taping over exposed terminals, or placing each battery in a separate plastic bag or protective pouch). In addition, each installed or spare lithium battery:
* * * * *
(26) Baggage equipped with lithium battery(ies) must be carried as carry-on baggage unless the battery(ies) is removed from the baggage. Removed battery(ies) must be carried in accordance with the provision for spare batteries prescribed in paragraph (a)(18) of this section. The provisions of this paragraph do not apply to baggage equipped with lithium batteries not exceeding:
* * * * *
§175.33 Shipping paper and information to the pilot-in-command.
(a) * * *
(13) * * *
(iii) For UN3480, UN3481, UN3090, and UN3091 prepared in accordance with §173.185(c), except those prepared in accordance with §173.185(c)(4)(vi), are not required to appear on the information to the pilot-in-command.
* * * * *
§178.37 Specification 3AA and 3AAX seamless steel cylinders.
* * * * *
(j) Flattening test. A flattening test must be performed on one cylinder taken at random out of each lot of 200 or less, by placing the cylinder between wedge shaped knife edges having a 60° included angle, rounded to ½-inch radius. The longitudinal axis of the cylinder must be at a 90-degree angle to knife edges during the test. For lots of 30 or less, flattening tests are authorized to be made on a ring at least 8 inches long cut from each cylinder and subjected to the same heat treatment as the finished cylinder. Cylinders may be subjected to a bend test in lieu of the flattening test. Two bend test specimens must be taken in accordance with ISO 9809–1 or ASTM E 290 (IBR, see §171.7 of this subchapter), and must be subjected to the bend test specified therein.
* * * * *
§178.71 Specifications for UN pressure receptacles.
* * * * *
(f) * * *
(4) ISO 21172-1:2015(E) Gas cylinders—Welded steel pressure drums up to 3,000 litres capacity for the transport of gases—Design and construction—Part 1: Capacities up to 1,000 litres (IBR, see §171.7 of this subchapter). Irrespective of section 6.3.3.4 of this standard, welded steel gas pressure drums with dished ends convex to pressure may be used for the transport of corrosive substances provided all applicable additional requirements are met.
(g) Design and construction requirements for UN refillable seamless steel cylinders. In addition to the general requirements of this section, UN refillable seamless steel cylinders must conform to the following ISO standards, as applicable:
(1) ISO 9809-1:2010 Gas cylinders—Refillable seamless steel gas cylinders—Design, construction and testing—Part 1: Quenched and tempered steel cylinders with tensile strength less than 1100 MPa. (IBR, see §171.7 of this subchapter). Until December 31, 2018, the manufacture of a cylinder conforming to the requirements in ISO 9809-1:1999 (IBR, see §171.7 of this subchapter) is authorized.
(2) ISO 9809-2: Gas cylinders—Refillable seamless steel gas cylinders—Design, construction and testing—Part 2: Quenched and tempered steel cylinders with tensile strength greater than or equal to 1100 MPa. (IBR, see §171.7 of this subchapter). Until December 31, 2018, the manufacture of a cylinder conforming to the requirements in ISO 9809-2:2000 (IBR, see §171.7 of this subchapter) is authorized.
(3) ISO 9809-3: Gas cylinders—Refillable seamless steel gas cylinders—Design, construction and testing—Part 3: Normalized steel cylinders. (IBR, see §171.7 of this subchapter). Until December 31, 2018, the manufacture of a cylinder conforming to the requirements in ISO 9809-3:2000 (IBR, see §171.7 of this subchapter) is authorized.
(4) ISO 9809-4:2014(E) (IBR, see §171.7 of this subchapter).
* * * * *
(i) Design and construction requirements for UN non-refillable metal cylinders. In addition to the general requirements of this section, UN non-refillable metal cylinders must conform to ISO 11118:2015(E) Gas cylinders—Non-refillable metallic gas cylinders—Specification and test methods (IBR, see §171.7 of this subchapter). Until December 31, 2020, cylinders conforming to ISO 11118:1999(E) Gas cylinders—Non-refillable metallic gas cylinders—Specification and test methods (IBR, see §171.7 of this subchapter) are authorized.
* * * * *
(k) * * *
(1) * * *
(i) ISO 9809-1:2010 Gas cylinders—Refillable seamless steel gas cylinders—Design, construction and testing—Part 1: Quenched and tempered steel cylinders with tensile strength less than 1100 MPa. Until December 31, 2018, the manufacture of a cylinder conforming to the requirements in ISO 9809-1:1999 (IBR, see §171.7 of this subchapter) is authorized.
(ii) ISO 9809-3: Gas cylinders—Refillable seamless steel gas cylinders—Design, construction and testing—Part 3: Normalized steel cylinders. Until December 31, 2018, the manufacture of a cylinder conforming to the requirements in ISO 9809-3:2000 (IBR, see §171.7 of this subchapter) is authorized.
* * * * *
(m) Design and construction requirements for UN metal hydride storage systems. In addition to the general requirements of this section, metal hydride storage systems must conform to the following ISO standards, as applicable: ISO 16111: Transportable gas storage devices—Hydrogen absorbed in reversible metal hydride (IBR, see §171.7 of this subchapter).
(n) Design and construction requirements for UN cylinders for the transportation of adsorbed gases. In addition to the general requirements of this section, UN cylinders for the transportation of adsorbed gases must conform to the following ISO standards, as applicable: ISO 11513:2011, Gas cylinders—Refillable welded steel cylinders containing materials for sub-atmospheric gas packaging (excluding acetylene)—Design, construction, testing, use and periodic inspection, or ISO 9809-1:2010: Gas cylinders—Refillable seamless steel gas cylinders—Design, construction and testing—Part 1: Quenched and tempered steel cylinders with tensile strength less than 1100 MPa. (IBR, see §171.7 of this subchapter.)
* * * * *
§178.75 Specifications for MEGCs.
* * * * *
(d) * * *
(3) Each pressure receptacle of a MEGC must be of the same design type, seamless steel, or composite, and constructed and tested according to one of the following ISO standards, as appropriate:
(i) ISO 9809-1: Gas cylinders—Refillable seamless steel gas cylinders—Design, construction and testing—Part 1: Quenched and tempered steel cylinders with tensile strength less than 1100 MPa. (IBR, see §171.7 of this subchapter). Until December 31, 2018, the manufacture of a cylinder conforming to the requirements in ISO 9809-1:1999 (IBR, see §171.7 of this subchapter) is authorized;
(ii) ISO 9809-2: Gas cylinders—Refillable seamless steel gas cylinders—Design, construction and testing—Part 2: Quenched and tempered steel cylinders with tensile strength greater than or equal to 1100 MPa. (IBR, see §171.7 of this subchapter). Until December 31, 2018, the manufacture of a cylinder conforming to the requirements in ISO 9809-2:2000 (IBR, see §171.7 of this subchapter) is authorized;
(iii) ISO 9809-3: Gas cylinders—Refillable seamless steel gas cylinders—Design, construction and testing—Part 3: Normalized steel cylinders. (IBR, see §171.7 of this subchapter). Until December 31, 2018, the manufacture of a cylinder conforming to the requirements in ISO 9809-3:2000 (IBR, see §171.7 of this subchapter) is authorized; or
* * * * *
§178.609 Test requirements for packagings for infectious substances.
* * * * *
(d) * * *
(2) Where the samples are in the shape of a drum, three samples must be dropped, one in each of the following orientations:
(i) Diagonally on the top chime, with the center of gravity directly above the point of impact;
(ii) Diagonally on the base chime; and
(iii) Flat on the side.
* * * * *
§178.706 Standards for rigid plastic IBCs.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(3) No used material other than production residues or regrind from the same manufacturing process may be used in the manufacture of rigid plastic IBCs.
* * * * *
§178.707 Standards for composite IBCs.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(3) * * *
(iii) No used material other than production residues or regrind from the same manufacturing process may be used in the manufacture of inner receptacles.
* * * * *
§180.207 Requirements for requalification of UN pressure receptacles.
* * * * *
(d) * * *
(3) Dissolved acetylene UN cylinders: Each dissolved acetylene cylinder must be requalified in accordance with ISO 10462:2013(E) (IBR, see §171.7 of this subchapter). A cylinder previously requalified in accordance with the second edition of ISO 10462(E) up until December 31, 2018, may continue to be used until the next required requalification. The porous mass and the shell must be requalified no sooner than 3 years, 6 months, from the date of manufacture. Thereafter, subsequent requalifications of the porous mass and shell must be performed at least once every ten years.
* * * * *
(5) UN cylinders for adsorbed gases: Each UN cylinder for adsorbed gases must be inspected and tested in accordance with §173.302c and ISO 11513:2011 (IBR, see §171.7 of this subchapter).
* * * * *
NewsPipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA), DOTHazmat SafetyHazmat: HighwayHazardous Materials TableHazmatHazardous materials tableSpecial provisions - HazmatHazmat markings, Placards, and LabelsHazmat LabelsEnglishPacking group assignment - HazmatClassification - HazmatChange NoticesChange NoticeHazmat PlacardingFocus AreaTransportationUSA
PHMSA Final Rule: Hazmat Harmonization With International Standards
2024-04-10T05:00:00Z
PHMSA is amending the Hazardous Materials Regulations (HMR) to maintain alignment with international regulations and standards by adopting various amendments, including changes to proper shipping names, hazard classes, packing groups, special provisions, packaging authorizations, air transport quantity limitations, and vessel stowage requirements. PHMSA is also withdrawing the unpublished November 28, 2022, Notice of Enforcement Policy Regarding International Standards on the use of select updated international standards in complying with the HMR during the pendency of this rulemaking.
DATES:
Effective date: This rule is effective May 10, 2024.
Voluntary compliance date: January 1, 2023.
Delayed compliance date: April 10, 2025.
This final rule is published in the Federal Register April 10, 2024.
View final rule.
| §171.7 Reference material. | ||
| (t)(1), (v)(2), and (w)(32) through (81) | Revised | View text |
| (w)(82) through (92) | Added | View text |
| (aa)(3) and (dd)(1) through (4) | Revised | View text |
| §171.12 North American shipments. | ||
| (a)(4)(iii) | Revised | View text |
| §171.23 Requirements for specific materials and packagings transported under the ICAO technical instructions, IMDG code, Transport Canada TDG regulations, or the IAEA regulations. | ||
| (a)(3) | Revised | View text |
| §171.25 Additional requirements for the use of the IMDG code. | ||
| (c)(3) and (4) | Revised | View text |
| (c)(5) | Added | View text |
| §172.101 Purpose and use of the hazardous materials table. | ||
| Section heading | Revised | View text |
| (c)(12)(ii) | Revised | View text |
| Hazardous materials table, multiple entries | Revised, added, removed | View text |
| §172.102 Special provisions. | ||
| (c)(1) special provisions 78, 156, and 387 | Revised | View text |
| (c)(1) special provisions 396 and 398 | Added | View text |
| (c)(1) special provision 421 | Removed and reserved | View text |
| (c)(2) special provision A54 | Revised | View text |
| (c)(2) special provisions A224 and A225 | Added | View text |
| (c)(4) Table 2—IP Codes, special provision IP15 | Revised | View text |
| (c)(4) Table 2—IP Codes, special provision IP22 | Added | View text |
| §173.4b De minimis exceptions. | ||
| (b)(1) | Revised | View text |
| §173.21 Forbidden materials and packages. | ||
| (f) introductory text, (f)(1), and (f)(2) | Revised | View text |
| §173.27 General requirements for transportation by aircraft. | ||
| (f)(2)(i)(D) | Revised | View text |
| §173.124 Class 4, Divisions 4.1, 4.2 and 4.3— Definitions. | ||
| (a)(4)(iv) | Removed | View text |
| §173.137 Class 8—Assignment of packing group. | ||
| Introductory text | Revised | View text |
| §173.151 Exceptions for Class 4. | ||
| (d) introductory text | Revised | View text |
| §173.167 ID8000 consumer commodities. | ||
| Entire section | Revised | View text |
| §173.185 Lithium cells and batteries. | ||
| (a)(3) introductory text and (a)(3)(x) | Revised | View text |
| (a)(5) | Added | View text |
| (b)(3)(iii)(A) and (B) | Revised | View text |
| (b)(3)(iii)(C) | Added | View text |
| (b)(4)(ii) and (iii) | Revised | View text |
| (b)(4)(iv) | Added | View text |
| (b)(5), (c)(3) through (5), and (e)(5) through (7) | Revised | View text |
| §173.224 Packaging and control and emergency temperatures for self-reactive materials. | ||
| (b)(4) | Revised | View text |
| Table following (b)(7) | Revised | View text |
| §173.225 Packaging requirements and other provisions for organic peroxides. | ||
| Table 1 to paragraph (c) | Revised | View text |
| Table following paragraph (d) | Retitled | View text |
| Table following paragraph (g) | Revised | View text |
| §173.232 Articles containing hazardous materials, n.o.s. | ||
| (h) | Added | View text |
| §173.301b Additional general requirements for shipment of UN pressure receptacles. | ||
| (c)(1), (c)(2)(ii) through (iv), (d)(1), and (f) | Revised | View text |
| §173.302b Additional requirements for shipment of non-liquefied (permanent) compressed gases in UN pressure receptacles. | ||
| (g) | Added | View text |
| §173.302c Additional requirements for the shipment of adsorbed gases in UN pressure receptacles. | ||
| (k) | Revised | View text |
| §173.311 Metal Hydride Storage Systems. | ||
| Entire section | Revised | View text |
| §175.1 Purpose, scope, and applicability. | ||
| (e) | Added | View text |
| §175.10 Exceptions for passengers, crewmembers, and air operators. | ||
| (a) introductory text, (a)(14) introductory text, (a)(15)(v)(A), (a)(15)(vi)(A), (a)(17)(ii)(C), (a)(18) introductory text, and (a)(26) introductory text | Revised | View text |
| §175.33 Shipping paper and information to the pilot-in-command. | ||
| (a)(13)(iii) | Revised | View text |
| §178.37 Specification 3AA and 3AAX seamless steel cylinders. | ||
| (j) | Revised | View text |
| §178.71 Specifications for UN pressure receptacles. | ||
| (f)(4), (g), (i), (k)(1)(i) and (ii), (m), and (n) | Revised | View text |
| §178.75 Specifications for MEGCs. | ||
| (d)(3) introductory text and paragraphs (d)(3)(i) through (iii) | Revised | View text |
| §178.609 Test requirements for packagings for infectious substances. | ||
| (d)(2) | Revised | View text |
| §178.706 Standards for rigid plastic IBCs. | ||
| (c)(3) | Revised | View text |
| §178.707 Standards for composite IBCs. | ||
| (c)(3)(iii) | Revised | View text |
| §180.207 Requirements for requalification of UN pressure receptacles. | ||
| (d)(3) and (5) | Revised | View text |
| (d)(8) | Added | View text |
Previous Text
§171.7 Reference material.
* * * * *
(t) * * *
(1) ICAO Doc 9284. Technical Instructions for the Safe Transport of Dangerous Goods by Air (ICAO Technical Instructions), 2021-2022 Edition, copyright 2020; into §§171.8; 171.22 through 171.24; 172.101; 172.202; 172.401; 172.407; 172.512; 172.519; 172.602; 173.56; 173.320; 175.10, 175.33; 178.3.
* * * * *
(v) * * *
(2) International Maritime Dangerous Goods Code (IMDG Code), Incorporating Amendment 40-20 (English Edition), (Volumes 1 and 2), 2020 Edition, copyright 2020; into §§171.22; 171.23; 171.25; 172.101; 172.202; 172.203; 172.401; 172.407; 172.502; 172.519; 172.602; 173.21; 173.56; 176.2; 176.5; 176.11; 176.27; 176.30; 176.83; 176.84; 176.140; 176.720; 176.906; 178.3; 178.274.
(w) * * *
(32) ISO 9809-2:2000(E): Gas cylinders—Refillable seamless steel gas cylinders—Design, construction and testing—Part 2: Quenched and tempered steel cylinders with tensile strength greater than or equal to 1 100 MPa., First edition, June 2000, into §§178.71; 178.75.
(33) ISO 9809-2:2010(E): Gas cylinders—Refillable seamless steel gas cylinders—Design, construction and testing—Part 2: Quenched and tempered steel cylinders with tensile strength greater than or equal to 1100 MPa., Second edition, 2010-04-15, into §§178.71; 178.75.
(34) ISO 9809-3:2000(E): Gas cylinders—Refillable seamless steel gas cylinders—Design, construction and testing—Part 3: Normalized steel cylinders, First edition, December 2000, into §§178.71; 178.75.
(35) ISO 9809-3:2010(E): Gas cylinders—Refillable seamless steel gas cylinders—Design, construction and testing—Part 3: Normalized steel cylinders, Second edition, 2010-04-15, into §§178.71; 178.75.
(36) ISO 9809-4:2014(E), Gas cylinders—Refillable seamless steel gas cylinders—Design, construction and testing—Part 4: Stainless steel cylinders with an Rm value of less than 1 100 MPa, First edition, 2014-07-15, into §§178.71; 178.75.
(37) ISO 9978:1992(E)—Radiation protection—Sealed radioactive sources—Leakage test methods. First Edition, (February 15, 1992), into §173.469.
(38) ISO 10156:2017(E), Gas cylinders—Gases and gas mixtures—Determination of fire potential and oxidizing ability for the selection of cylinder valve outlets, Fourth edition, 2017-07; into §173.115.
(39) ISO 10297:1999(E), Gas cylinders—Refillable gas cylinder valves—Specification and type testing, First Edition, 1995-05-01; into §§173.301b; 178.71.
(40) ISO 10297:2006(E), Transportable gas cylinders—Cylinder valves—Specification and type testing, Second Edition, 2006-01-15; into §§173.301b; 178.71.
(41) ISO 10297:2014(E), Gas cylinders—Cylinder valves—Specification and type testing, Third Edition, 2014-07-15; into §§173.301b; 178.71.
(42) ISO 10297:2014/Amd 1:2017(E), Gas cylinders—Cylinder valves—Specification and type testing—Amendment 1: Pressure drums and tubes, Third Edition, 2017-03; into §§173.301b; 178.71.
(43) ISO 10461:2005(E), Gas cylinders—Seamless aluminum-alloy gas cylinders—Periodic inspection and testing, Second Edition, 2005-02-15 and Amendment 1, 2006-07-15; into §180.207.
(44) ISO 10462:2013(E), Gas cylinders—Acetylene cylinders—Periodic inspection and maintenance, Third edition, 2013-12-15; into §180.207.
(45) ISO 10692-2:2001(E), Gas cylinders—Gas cylinder valve connections for use in the micro-electronics industry—Part 2: Specification and type testing for valve to cylinder connections, First Edition, 2001-08-01; into §§173.40; 173.302c.
(46) ISO 11114-1:2012(E), Gas cylinders—Compatibility of cylinder and valve materials with gas contents—Part 1: Metallic materials, Second edition, 2012-03-15; into §§172.102; 173.301b; 178.71.
(47) ISO 11114-1:2012/Amd 1:2017(E), Gas cylinders—Compatibility of cylinder and valve materials with gas contents—Part 1: Metallic materials—Amendment 1, Second Edition, 2017-01; into §§172.102; 173.301b; 178.71.
(48) ISO 11114-2:2013(E), Gas cylinders—Compatibility of cylinder and valve materials with gas contents—Part 2: Non-metallic materials, Second edition, 2013-04; into §§173.301b; 178.71.
(49) ISO 11117:1998(E): Gas cylinders—Valve protection caps and valve guards for industrial and medical gas cylinders—Design, construction and tests, First edition, 1998-08-01; into §173.301b.
(50) ISO 11117:2008(E): Gas cylinders—Valve protection caps and valve guards—Design, construction and tests, Second edition, 2008-09-01; into §173.301b.
(51) ISO 11117:2008/Cor.1:2009(E): Gas cylinders—Valve protection caps and valve guards—Design, construction and tests, Technical Corrigendum 1, 2009-05-01; into §173.301b.
(52) ISO 11118(E), Gas cylinders—Non-refillable metallic gas cylinders—Specification and test methods, First edition, October 1999; into §178.71.
(53) ISO 11118:2015(E), Gas cylinders—Non-refillable metallic gas cylinders—Specification and test methods, Second edition, 2015-09-15; into §§173.301b; 178.71.
(54) ISO 11119-1(E), Gas cylinders—Gas cylinders of composite construction—Specification and test methods—Part 1: Hoop-wrapped composite gas cylinders, First edition, May 2002; into §178.71.
(55) ISO 11119-1:2012(E), Gas cylinders—Refillable composite gas cylinders and tubes—Design, construction and testing—Part 1: Hoop wrapped fibre reinforced composite gas cylinders and tubes up to 450 l, Second edition, 2012-08-01; into §§178.71; 178.75.
(56) ISO 11119-2(E), Gas cylinders—Gas cylinders of composite construction—Specification and test methods—Part 2: Fully wrapped fibre reinforced composite gas cylinders with load-sharing metal liners, First edition, May 2002; into §178.71.
(57) ISO 11119-2:2012(E), Gas cylinders—Refillable composite gas cylinders and tubes—Design, construction and testing—Part 2: Fully wrapped fibre reinforced composite gas cylinders and tubes up to 450 l with load-sharing metal liners, Second edition, 2012-07-15; into §§178.71; 178.75.
(58) ISO 11119-2:2012/Amd.1:2014(E), Gas cylinders—Refillable composite gas cylinders and tubes—Design, construction and testing—Part 2: Fully wrapped fibre reinforced composite gas cylinders and tubes up to 450 l with load-sharing metal liners, Amendment 1, 2014-08-15; into §§178.71; 178.75.
(59) ISO 11119-3(E), Gas cylinders of composite construction—Specification and test methods—Part 3: Fully wrapped fibre reinforced composite gas cylinders with non-load-sharing metallic or non-metallic liners, First edition, September 2002; into §178.71.
(60) ISO 11119-3:2013(E), Gas cylinders—Refillable composite gas cylinders and tubes—Design, construction and testing—Part 3: Fully wrapped fibre reinforced composite gas cylinders and tubes up to 450 l with non-load-sharing metallic or non-metallic liners, Second edition, 2013-04-15; into §§178.71; 178.75.
(61) ISO 11119-4:2016(E), Gas cylinders—Refillable composite gas cylinders—Design, construction and testing—Part 4: Fully wrapped fibre reinforced composite gas cylinders up to 150 L with load-sharing welded metallic liners, First Edition, 2016-02-15; into §§178.71; 178.75.
(62) ISO 11120(E), Gas cylinders—Refillable seamless steel tubes of water capacity between 150 l and 3000 l—Design, construction and testing, First edition, 1999-03; into §§178.71; 178.75.
(63) ISO 11120:2015(E), Gas cylinders—Refillable seamless steel tubes of water capacity between 150 l and 3000 l—Design, construction and testing, Second Edition, 2015-02-01; into §§178.71; 178.75.
(64) ISO 11513:2011(E), Gas cylinders—Refillable welded steel cylinders containing materials for sub-atmospheric gas packaging (excluding acetylene)—Design, construction, testing, use and periodic inspection, First edition, 2011-09-12; into §§173.302c; 178.71; 180.207.
(65) ISO 11621(E), Gas cylinders—Procedures for change of gas service, First edition, April 1997; into §§173.302, 173.336, 173.337.
(66) ISO 11623(E), Transportable gas cylinders—Periodic inspection and testing of composite gas cylinders, First edition, March 2002; into §180.207.
(67) ISO 11623(E):2015, Gas cylinders—Composite construction—Periodic inspection and testing, Second edition, 2015-12-01; into §180.207.
(68) ISO 13340:2001(E), Transportable gas cylinders—Cylinder valves for non-refillable cylinders—Specification and prototype testing, First edition, 2004-04-01; into §§173.301b; 178.71.
(69) ISO 13736:2008(E), Determination of flash point—Abel closed-cup method, Second Edition, 2008-09-15; into §173.120.
(70) ISO 14246:2014(E), Gas cylinders—Cylinder valves—Manufacturing tests and examination, Second Edition, 2014-06-15; into §178.71.
(71) ISO 14246:2014/Amd 1:2017(E), Gas cylinders—Cylinder valves—Manufacturing tests and examinations—Amendment 1, Second Edition, 2017-06; into §178.71.
(72) ISO 16111:2008(E), Transportable gas storage devices—Hydrogen absorbed in reversible metal hydride, First Edition, 2008-11-15; into §§173.301b; 173.311; 178.71.
(73) ISO 16148:2016(E), Gas cylinders—Refillable seamless steel gas cylinders and tubes—Acoustic emission examination (AT) and follow-up ultrasonic examination (UT) for periodic inspection and testing, Second Edition, 2016-04-15; into §180.207.
(74) ISO 17871:2015(E), Gas cylinders—Quick-release cylinder valves—Specification and type testing, First Edition, 2015-08-15; into §173.301b.
(75) ISO 17879: 2017(E), Gas cylinders—Self-closing cylinder valves—Specification and type testing, First Edition, 2017-07; into §§173.301b; 178.71.
(76) ISO 18172-1:2007(E), Gas cylinders—Refillable welded stainless steel cylinders—Part 1: Test pressure 6 MPa and below, First Edition, 2007-03-01; into §178.71.
(77) ISO 20475:2018(E), Gas cylinders—Cylinder bundles—Periodic inspection and testing, First Edition, 2018-02; into §180.207.
(78) ISO 20703:2006(E), Gas cylinders—Refillable welded aluminum-alloy cylinders—Design, construction and testing, First Edition, 2006-05-01; into §178.71.
(79) ISO 21172-1:2015(E), Gas cylinders—Welded steel pressure drums up to 3000 litres capacity for the transport of gases—Design and construction—Part 1: Capacities up to 1000 litres, First edition, 2015-04-01; into §178.71.
(80) ISO 22434:2006(E), Transportable gas cylinders—Inspection and maintenance of cylinder valves, First Edition, 2006-09-01; into §180.207.
(81) ISO/TR 11364:2012(E), Gas cylinders—Compilation of national and international valve stem/gas cylinder neck threads and their identification and marking system, First Edition, 2012-12-01; into §178.71.
* * * * *
(aa) * * *
(3) OECD Guideline for the Testing of Chemicals 431 (Test No. 431): In vitro skin corrosion: reconstructed human epidermis (RHE) test method, adopted 29 July 2016; into §173.137.
* * * * *
(dd) * * *
(1) Recommendations on the Transport of Dangerous Goods, Model Regulations (UN Recommendations), 21st revised edition, copyright 2019; into §§171.8; 171.12; 172.202; 172.401; 172.407; 172.502; 172.519; 173.22; 173.24; 173.24b; 173.40; 173.56; 173.192; 173.302b; 173.304b; 178.75; 178.274; as follows:
(i) Volume I, ST/SG/AC.10.1/21/Rev.21 (Vol. I).
(ii) Volume II, ST/SG/AC.10.1/21/Rev.21 (Vol. II).
(2) Manual of Tests and Criteria (UN Manual of Tests and Criteria), 7th revised edition, ST/SG/AC.10/11/Rev.7, copyright 2019; into §§171.24, 172.102; 173.21; 173.56 through 173.58; 173.60; 173.115; 173.124; 173.125; 173.127; 173.128; 173.137; 173.185; 173.220; 173.221; 173.224; 173.225; 173.232; part 173, appendix H; 175.10; 176.905; 178.274.
(3) Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals (GHS), 8th revised edition, ST/SG/AC.10/30/Rev.8, copyright 2019; into §172.401.
(4) Agreement concerning the International Carriage of Dangerous Goods by Road (ADR), copyright 2020; into §171.8; §171.23 as follows: [Change Notice][Previous Text]
(i) Volume I, ECE/TRANS/300 (Vol. I).
(ii) Volume II, ECE/TRANS/300 (Vol. II).
(iii) Corrigendum, ECE/TRANS/300 (Corr. 1).
* * * * *
§171.12 North American shipments.
* * * * *
(a) * * *
(4) * * *
(iii) Authorized CRC, BTC, CTC or TC specification cylinders that correspond with a DOT specification cylinder are as follows:
| TC | DOT (some or all of these specifications may instead be marked with the prefix ICC) | CTC (some or all of these specifications may instead be marked with the prefix BTC or CRC) |
|---|---|---|
| TC-3AM | DOT-3A [ICC-3] | CTC-3A |
| TC-3AAM | DOT-3AA | CTC-3AA |
| TC-3ANM | DOT-3BN | CTC-3BN |
| TC-3EM | DOT-3E | CTC-3E |
| TC-3HTM | DOT-3HT | CTC-3HT |
| TC-3ALM | DOT-3AL DOT-3B | CTC-3AL CTC-3B |
| TC-3AXM | DOT-3AX | CTC-3AX |
| TC-3AAXM | DOT-3AAX DOT-3A480X | CTC-3AAX CTC-3A480X |
| TC-3TM | DOT-3T | |
| TC-4AAM33 | DOT-4AA480 | CTC-4AA480 |
| TC-4BM | DOT-4B | CTC-4B |
| TC-4BM17ET | DOT-4B240ET | CTC-4B240ET |
| TC-4BAM | DOT-4BA | CTC-4BA |
| TC-4BWM | DOT-4BW | CTC-4BW |
| TC-4DM | DOT-4D | CTC-4D |
| TC-4DAM | DOT-4DA | CTC-4DA |
| TC-4DSM | DOT-4DS | CTC-4DS |
| TC-4EM | DOT-4E | CTC-4E |
| TC-39M | DOT-39 | CTC-39 |
| TC-4LM | DOT-4L DOT-8 DOT-8AL | CTC-4L CTC-8 CTC-8AL |
* * * * *
§171.23 Requirements for specific materials and packagings transported under the ICAO technical instructions, IMDG code, Transport Canada TDG regulations, or the IAEA regulations.
(a) * * *
(3) Pi-marked pressure receptacles. Pressure receptacles that are marked with a pi mark in accordance with the European Directive 2010/35/EU (IBR, see §171.7) on transportable pressure equipment (TPED) and that comply with the requirements of Packing Instruction P200 or P208 and 6.2 of the ADR (IBR, see §171.7) concerning pressure relief device use, test period, filling ratios, test pressure, maximum working pressure, and material compatibility for the lading contained or gas being filled, are authorized as follows:
(i) Filled pressure receptacles imported for intermediate storage, transport to point of use, discharge, and export without further filling; and
(ii) Pressure receptacles imported or domestically sourced for the purpose of filling, intermediate storage, and export.
(iii) The bill of lading or other shipping paper must identify the cylinder and include the following certification: “This cylinder (These cylinders) conform(s) to the requirements for pi-marked cylinders found in 171.23(a)(3).”
* * * * *
§171.25 Additional requirements for the use of the IMDG code.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(3) Except as specified in this subpart, for a material poisonous (toxic) by inhalation, the T Codes specified in Column 13 of the Dangerous Goods List in the IMDG Code may be applied to the transportation of those materials in IM, IMO and DOT Specification 51 portable tanks, when these portable tanks are authorized in accordance with the requirements of this subchapter; and
(4) No person may offer an IM or UN portable tank containing liquid hazardous materials of Class 3, PG I or II, or PG III with a flash point less than 100°F (38°C); Division 5.1, PG I or II; or Division 6.1, PG I or II, for unloading while it remains on a transport vehicle with the motive power unit attached, unless it conforms to the requirements in §177.834(o) of this subchapter.
* * * * *
§172.101 Purpose and use of hazardous materials table.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(12) * * *
(ii) Generic or n.o.s. descriptions. If an appropriate technical name is not shown in the Table, selection of a proper shipping name shall be made from the generic or n.o.s. descriptions corresponding to the specific hazard class, packing group, hazard zone, or subsidiary hazard, if any, for the material. The name that most appropriately describes the material shall be used; e.g, an alcohol not listed by its technical name in the Table shall be described as “Alcohol, n.o.s.” rather than “Flammable liquid, n.o.s.”. Some mixtures may be more appropriately described according to their application, such as “Coating solution” or “Extracts, flavoring, liquid”, rather than by an n.o.s. entry, such as “Flammable liquid, n.o.s.” It should be noted, however, that an n.o.s. description as a proper shipping name may not provide sufficient information for shipping papers and package markings. Under the provisions of subparts C and D of this part, the technical name of one or more constituents which makes the product a hazardous material may be required in association with the proper shipping name.
* * * * *
§172.102 Special provisions.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(1) * * *
(78) This entry may not be used to describe compressed air which contains more than 23.5 percent oxygen. Compressed air containing greater than 23.5 percent oxygen must be shipped using the description ‘‘Compressed gas, oxidizing, n.o.s., UN3156.’’
* * * * *
(156) Asbestos that is immersed or fixed in a natural or artificial binder material, such as cement, plastic, asphalt, resins or mineral ore, or contained in manufactured products is not subject to the requirements of this subchapter.
* * * * *
(387) When materials are stabilized by temperature control, the provisions of §173.21(f) of this subchapter apply. When chemical stabilization is employed, the person offering the material for transport shall ensure that the level of stabilization is sufficient to prevent the material as packaged from dangerous polymerization at 50°C (122°F). If chemical stabilization becomes ineffective at lower temperatures within the anticipated duration of transport, temperature control is required and is forbidden by aircraft. In making this determination factors to be taken into consideration include, but are not limited to, the capacity and geometry of the packaging and the effect of any insulation present, the temperature of the material when offered for transport, the duration of the journey, and the ambient temperature conditions typically encountered in the journey (considering also the season of year), the effectiveness and other properties of the stabilizer employed, applicable operational controls imposed by regulation (e.g., requirements to protect from sources of heat, including other cargo carried at a temperature above ambient) and any other relevant factors. The provisions of this special provision will be effective until January 2, 2023, unless we terminate them earlier or extend them beyond that date by notice of a final rule in the Federal Register.
* * * * *
(421) This entry will no longer be effective on January 2, 2023, unless we terminate it earlier or extend it beyond that date by notice of a final rule in the Federal Register.
* * * * *
(2) * * *
A54 Irrespective of the quantity limits in Column 9B of the §172.101 table, a lithium battery, including a lithium battery packed with, or contained in, equipment that otherwise meets the applicable requirements of §173.185, may have a mass exceeding 35 kg if approved by the Associate Administrator prior to shipment.
* * * * *
(4) * * *
IP15 For UN2031 with more than 55% nitric acid, the permitted use of rigid plastic IBCs, and the inner receptacle of composite IBCs with rigid plastics, shall be two years from their date of manufacture.
* * * * *
§173.4b De minimis exceptions.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(1) The specimens are:
(i) Wrapped in a paper towel or cheesecloth moistened with alcohol or an alcohol solution and placed in a plastic bag that is heat-sealed. Any free liquid in the bag must not exceed 30 mL; or
(ii) Placed in vials or other rigid containers with no more than 30 mL of alcohol or alcohol solution. The containers are placed in a plastic bag that is heat-sealed;
* * * * *
§173.21 Forbidden materials and packages.
* * * * *
(f) A package containing a material which is likely to decompose with a self-accelerated decomposition temperature (SADT) of 50°C (122 °F) or less, or polymerize at a temperature of 54°C (130 °F) or less with an evolution of a dangerous quantity of heat or gas when decomposing or polymerizing, unless the material is stabilized or inhibited in a manner to preclude such evolution. The SADT may be determined by any of the test methods described in Part II of the UN Manual of Tests and Criteria (IBR, see §171.7 of this subchapter).
(1) A package meeting the criteria of paragraph (f) of this section may be required to be shipped under controlled temperature conditions. The control temperature and emergency temperature for a package shall be as specified in the table in this paragraph based upon the SADT of the material. The control temperature is the temperature above which a package of the material may not be offered for transportation or transported. The emergency temperature is the temperature at which, due to imminent danger, emergency measures must be initiated.
| SADT 1 | Control temperatures | Emergency temperature |
|---|---|---|
| SADT ≤20°C (68°F) | 20°C (36°F) below SADT | 10°C (18°F) below SADT. |
| 20°C (68°F) <SADT ≤35°C (95°F) | 15°C (27°F) below SADT | 10°C (18°F) below SADT. |
| 35°C (95°F) <SADT ≤50°C (122°F) | 10°C (18°F) below SADT | 5°C (9°F) below SADT. |
| 50°C (122°F) <SADT | (2) | (2) |
| 1 Self-accelerating decomposition temperature. | ||
| 2 Temperature control not required. | ||
(2) For self-reactive materials listed in §173.224(b) Table control and emergency temperatures, where required are shown in Columns 5 and 6, respectively. For organic peroxides listed in The Organic Peroxides Table in §173.225 control and emergency temperatures, where required, are shown in Columns 7a and 7b, respectively.
* * * * *
§173.27 General requirements for transportation by aircraft.
* * * * *
(f) * * *
(2) * * *
(i) * * *
(D) Divisions 4.1 (self-reactive), 4.2 (spontaneously combustible) (primary or subsidiary risk), and 4.3 (dangerous when wet) (liquids);
* * * * *
§173.124 Class 4, Divisions 4.1, 4.2 and 4.3— Definitions.
(a) * * *
(4) * * *
(iv) The provisions concerning polymerizing substances in paragraph (a)(4) will be effective until January 2, 2023.
* * * * *
§173.137 Class 8—Assignment of packing group.
The packing group of a Class 8 material is indicated in Column 5 of the §172.101 Table. When the §172.101 Table provides more than one packing group for a Class 8 material, the packing group must be determined using data obtained from tests conducted in accordance with the OECD Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals, Test No. 435, “ In Vitro Membrane Barrier Test Method for Skin Corrosion” (IBR, see §171.7 of this subchapter) or Test No. 404, “Acute Dermal Irritation/Corrosion” (IBR, see §171.7 of this subchapter). A material that is determined not to be corrosive in accordance with OECD Guideline for the Testing of Chemicals, Test No. 430, “ In Vitro Skin Corrosion: Transcutaneous Electrical Resistance Test (TER)” (IBR, see §171.7 of this subchapter) or Test No. 431, “ In Vitro Skin Corrosion: Reconstructed Human Epidermis (RHE) Test Method” (IBR, see §171.7 of this subchapter) may be considered not to be corrosive to human skin for the purposes of this subchapter without further testing. However, a material determined to be corrosive in accordance with Test No. 430 must be further tested using Test No. 435 or Test No. 404. If the in vitro test results indicate that the substance or mixture is corrosive, but the test method does not clearly distinguish between assignment of packing groups II and III, the material may be considered to be in packing group II without further testing. The packing group assignment using data obtained from tests conducted in accordance with OECD Guideline Test No. 404 or Test No. 435 must be as follows:
* * * * *
§173.151 Exceptions for Class 4.
* * * * *
(d) Limited quantities of Division 4.3. Limited quantities of dangerous when wet solids (Division 4.3) in Packing Groups II and III are excepted from labeling requirements, unless the material is offered for transportation or transported by aircraft, and are excepted from the specification packaging requirements of this subchapter when packaged in combination packagings according to this paragraph. For transportation by aircraft, the package must also conform to applicable requirements of §173.27 of this part (e.g., authorized materials, inner packaging quantity limits and closure securement) and only hazardous material authorized aboard passenger-carrying aircraft may be transported as a limited quantity. A limited quantity package that conforms to the provisions of this section is not subject to the shipping paper requirements of subpart C of part 172 of this subchapter, unless the material meets the definition of a hazardous substance, hazardous waste, marine pollutant, or is offered for transportation and transported by aircraft or vessel. In addition, shipments of limited quantities are not subject to subpart F (Placarding) of part 172 of this subchapter. Each package must conform to the packaging requirements of subpart B of this part and may not exceed 30 kg (66 pounds) gross weight. Except for transportation by aircraft, the following combination packagings are authorized:
* * * * *
§173.167 Consumer commodities.
(a) Effective January 1, 2013, a “consumer commodity” (see §171.8 of this subchapter) when offered for transportation by aircraft may only include articles or substances of Class 2 (non-toxic aerosols only), Class 3 (Packing Group II and III only), Division 6.1 (Packing Group III only), UN3077, UN3082, UN3175, UN3334, and UN3335, provided such materials do not have a subsidiary risk and are authorized aboard a passenger-carrying aircraft. Consumer commodities are excepted from the specification outer packaging requirements of this subchapter. Packages prepared under the requirements of this section are excepted from labeling and shipping papers when transported by highway or rail. Except as indicated in §173.24(i), each completed package must conform to §§173.24 and 173.24a of this subchapter. Additionally, except for the pressure differential requirements in §173.27(c), the requirements of §173.27 do not apply to packages prepared in accordance with this section. Packages prepared under the requirements of this section may be offered for transportation and transported by all modes. As applicable, the following apply:
(1) Inner and outer packaging quantity limits. (i) Non-toxic aerosols, as defined in §171.8 of this subchapter and constructed in accordance with §173.306 of this part, in non-refillable, non-metal containers not exceeding 120 mL (4 fluid ounces) each, or in non-refillable metal containers not exceeding 820 mL (28 ounces) each, except that flammable aerosols may not exceed 500 mL (16.9 ounces) each;
(ii) Liquids, in inner packagings not exceeding 500 mL (16.9 ounces) each. Liquids must not completely fill an inner packaging at 55°C;
(iii) Solids, in inner packagings not exceeding 500 g (1.0 pounds) each; or
(iv) Any combination thereof not to exceed 30 kg (66 pounds) gross weight as prepared for shipment.
(2) Closures. Friction-type closures must be secured by positive means. The body and closure of any packaging must be constructed so as to be able to adequately resist the effects of temperature and vibration occurring in conditions normally incident to air transportation. The closure device must be so designed that it is unlikely that it can be incorrectly or incompletely closed.
(3) Absorbent material. Inner packagings must be tightly packaged in strong outer packagings. Absorbent and cushioning material must not react dangerously with the contents of inner packagings. Glass or earthenware inner packagings containing liquids of Class 3 or Division 6.1, sufficient absorbent material must be provided to absorb the entire contents of the largest inner packaging contained in the outer packaging. Absorbent material is not required if the glass or earthenware inner packagings are sufficiently protected as packaged for transport that it is unlikely a failure would occur and, if a failure did occur, that it would be unlikely that the contents would leak from the outer packaging.
(4) Drop test capability. Breakable inner packagings (e.g., glass, earthenware, or brittle plastic) must be packaged to prevent failure under conditions normally incident to transport. Packages of consumer commodities as prepared for transport must be capable of withstanding a 1.2 m drop on solid concrete in the position most likely to cause damage. In order to pass the test, the outer packaging must not exhibit any damage liable to affect safety during transport and there must be no leakage from the inner packaging(s).
(5) Stack test capability. Packages of consumer commodities must be capable of withstanding, without failure or leakage of any inner packaging and without any significant reduction in effectiveness, a force applied to the top surface for a duration of 24 hours equivalent to the total weight of identical packages if stacked to a height of 3.0 m (including the test sample).
(b) When offered for transportation by aircraft:
(1) Packages prepared under the requirements of this section are to be marked as a limited quantity in accordance with §172.315(b)(1) and labeled as a Class 9 article or substance, as appropriate, in accordance with subpart E of part 172 of this subchapter; and
(2) Pressure differential capability: Except for UN3082, inner packagings intended to contain liquids must be capable of meeting the pressure differential requirements (75 kPa) prescribed in §173.27(c) of this part. The capability of a packaging to withstand an internal pressure without leakage that produces the specified pressure differential should be determined by successfully testing design samples or prototypes.
§173.185 Lithium cells and batteries.
* * * * *
(a) * * *
(3) Beginning January 1, 2022 each manufacturer and subsequent distributor of lithium cells or batteries manufactured on or after January 1, 2008, must make available a test summary. The test summary must include the following elements:
* * * * *
* * * * *
(ix) Reference to the revised edition of the UN Manual of Tests and Criteria used and to amendments thereto, if any; and
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(3) * * *
(iii) * * *
(A) Be placed in inner packagings that completely enclose the cell or battery, then placed in an outer packaging. The completed package for the cells or batteries must meet the Packing Group II performance requirements as specified in paragraph (b)(3)(ii) of this section; or
(B) Be placed in inner packagings that completely enclose the cell or battery, then placed with equipment in a package that meets the Packing Group II performance requirements as specified in paragraph (b)(3)(ii) of this section.
* * * * *
(4) * * *
(ii) Equipment must be secured to prevent damage caused by shifting within the outer packaging and be packed so as to prevent accidental operation during transport; and
(iii) Any spare lithium cells or batteries packed with the equipment must be packaged in accordance with paragraph (b)(3) of this section.
* * * * *
(5) Lithium batteries that weigh 12 kg (26.5 pounds) or more and have a strong, impact-resistant outer casing may be packed in strong outer packagings; in protective enclosures (for example, in fully enclosed or wooden slatted crates); or on pallets or other handling devices, instead of packages meeting the UN performance packaging requirements in paragraphs (b)(3)(ii) and (iii) of this section. Batteries must be secured to prevent inadvertent shifting, and the terminals may not support the weight of other superimposed elements. Batteries packaged in accordance with this paragraph may be transported by cargo aircraft if approved by the Associate Administrator.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(3) Lithium battery mark. Each package must display the lithium battery mark except when a package contains only button cell batteries contained in equipment (including circuit boards), or when a consignment contains two packages or fewer where each package contains not more than four lithium cells or two lithium batteries contained in equipment. [Change Notice][Previous Text]
(i) The mark must indicate the UN number: “UN3090” for lithium metal cells or batteries; or “UN3480” for lithium ion cells or batteries. Where the lithium cells or batteries are contained in, or packed with, equipment, the UN number “UN3091” or “UN3481,” as appropriate, must be indicated. Where a package contains lithium cells or batteries assigned to different UN numbers, all applicable UN numbers must be indicated on one or more marks. The package must be of such size that there is adequate space to affix the mark on one side without the mark being folded.

(A) The mark must be in the form of a rectangle or a square with hatched edging. The mark must be not less than 100 mm (3.9 inches) wide by 100 mm (3.9 inches) high and the minimum width of the hatching must be 5 mm (0.2 inches), except marks of 100 mm (3.9 inches) wide by 70 mm (2.8 inches) high may be used on a package containing lithium batteries when the package is too small for the larger mark;
(B) The symbols and letters must be black on white or suitable contrasting background and the hatching must be red;
(C) The “*” must be replaced by the appropriate UN number(s) and the “**” must be replaced by a telephone number for additional information; and
(D) Where dimensions are not specified, all features shall be in approximate proportion to those shown.
(ii) [Reserved]
(iii) When packages are placed in an overpack, the lithium battery mark shall either be clearly visible through the overpack or be reproduced on the outside of the overpack and the overpack shall be marked with the word “OVERPACK”. The lettering of the “OVERPACK” mark shall be at least 12 mm (0.47 inches) high.
(4) Air transportation. (i) For transportation by aircraft, lithium cells and batteries may not exceed the limits in the following Table 1 to paragraph (c)(4)(i). The limits on the maximum number of batteries and maximum net quantity of batteries in the following table may not be combined in the same package. The limits in the following table do not apply to lithium cells and batteries packed with, or contained in, equipment.
| Contents | Lithium metal cells and/or batteries with a lithium content not more than 0.3 g | Lithium metal cells with a lithium content more than 0.3 g but not more than 1 g | Lithium metal batteries with a lithium content more than 0.3 g but not more than 2 g | Lithium ion cells and/or batteries with a watt-hour rating not more than 2.7 Wh | Lithium ion cells with a watt-hour rating more than 2.7 Wh but not more than 20 Wh | Lithium ion batteries with a watt-hour rating more than 2.7 Wh but not more than 100 Wh |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maximum number of cells/batteries per package | No Limit | 8 cells | 2 batteries | No Limit | 8 cells | 2 batteries. |
| Maximum net quantity (mass) per package | 2.5 kg | n/a | n/a | 2.5 kg | n/a | n/a. |
(ii) Not more than one package prepared in accordance with paragraph (c)(4)(i) of this section may be placed into an overpack.
(iii) A shipper is not permitted to offer for transport more than one package prepared in accordance with the provisions of paragraph (c)(4)(i) of this section in any single consignment.
(iv) Each shipment with packages required to display the paragraph (c)(3)(i) lithium battery mark must include an indication on the air waybill of compliance with this paragraph (c)(4) (or the applicable ICAO Technical Instructions Packing Instruction), when an air waybill is used.
(v) Packages and overpacks of lithium batteries prepared in accordance with paragraph (c)(4)(i) of this section must be offered to the operator separately from cargo which is not subject to the requirements of this subchapter and must not be loaded into a unit load device before being offered to the operator.
(vi) For lithium batteries packed with, or contained in, equipment, the number of batteries in each package is limited to the minimum number required to power the piece of equipment, plus two spare sets, and the total net quantity (mass) of the lithium cells or batteries in the completed package must not exceed 5 kg. A “set” of cells or batteries is the number of individual cells or batteries that are required to power each piece of equipment.
(vii) Each person who prepares a package for transport containing lithium cells or batteries, including cells or batteries packed with, or contained in, equipment in accordance with the conditions and limitations of this paragraph (c)(4), must receive instruction on these conditions and limitations, corresponding to their functions.
(viii) Lithium cells and batteries must not be packed in the same outer packaging with other hazardous materials. Packages prepared in accordance with paragraph (c)(4)(i) of this section must not be placed into an overpack with packages containing hazardous materials and articles of Class 1 (explosives) other than Division 1.4S, Division 2.1 (flammable gases), Class 3 (flammable liquids), Division 4.1 (flammable solids), or Division 5.1 (oxidizers).
(5) For transportation by aircraft, a package that exceeds the number or quantity (mass) limits in the table shown in paragraph (c)(4)(i) of this section, the overpack limit described in paragraph (c)(4)(ii) of this section, or the consignment limit described in paragraph (c)(4)(iii) of this section is subject to all applicable requirements of this subchapter, except that a package containing no more than 2.5 kg lithium metal cells or batteries or 10 kg lithium ion cells or batteries is not subject to the UN performance packaging requirements in paragraph (b)(3)(ii) of this section when the package displays both the lithium battery mark in paragraph (c)(3)(i) and the Class 9 Lithium Battery label specified in §172.447 of this subchapter. This paragraph does not apply to batteries or cells packed with or contained in equipment.
* * * * *
(e) * * *
(5) Lithium batteries, including lithium batteries contained in equipment, that weigh 12 kg (26.5 pounds) or more and have a strong, impact-resistant outer casing may be packed in strong outer packagings, in protective enclosures (for example, in fully enclosed or wooden slatted crates), or on pallets or other handling devices, instead of packages meeting the UN performance packaging requirements in paragraphs (b)(3)(ii) and (iii) of this section. The battery must be secured to prevent inadvertent shifting, and the terminals may not support the weight of other superimposed elements;
(6) Irrespective of the limit specified in column (9B) of the §172.101 Hazardous Materials Table, the battery or battery assembly prepared for transport in accordance with this paragraph may have a mass exceeding 35 kg gross weight when transported by cargo aircraft;
(7) Batteries or battery assemblies packaged in accordance with this paragraph are not permitted for transportation by passenger-carrying aircraft, and may be transported by cargo aircraft only if approved by the Associate Administrator prior to transportation; and
* * * * *
§173.224 Packaging and control and emergency temperatures for self-reactive materials.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(4) Packing method. Column 4 specifies the highest packing method which is authorized for the self-reactive material. A packing method corresponding to a smaller package size may be used, but a packing method corresponding to a larger package size may not be used. The Table of Packing Methods in §173.225(d) defines the packing methods. Bulk packagings for Type F self-reactive substances are authorized by §173.225(f) for IBCs and §173.225(h) for bulk packagings other than IBCs. The formulations listed in §173.225(f) for IBCs and in §173.225(g) for portable tanks may also be transported packed in accordance with packing method OP8, with the same control and emergency temperatures, if applicable. Additional bulk packagings are authorized if approved by the Associate Administrator.
* * * * *
| Self-reactive substance (1) | Identification No. (2) | Concentra- tion—(%) (3) | Packing method (4) | Control tempera- ture— (°C) (5) | Emer- gency tempera- ture— (6) | Notes (7) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Notes: | ||||||
| 1. The emergency and control temperatures must be determined in accordance with §173.21(f). | ||||||
| 2. With a compatible diluent having a boiling point of not less than 150 °C. | ||||||
| 3. Samples may only be offered for transportation under the provisions of paragraph (c)(3) of this section. | ||||||
| 4. This entry applies to mixtures of esters of 2-diazo-1-naphthol-4-sulphonic acid and 2-diazo-1-naphthol-5-sulphonic acid. | ||||||
| 5. This entry applies to the technical mixture in n-butanol within the specified concentration limits of the (Z) isomer. | ||||||
| Acetone-pyrogallol copolymer 2-diazo-1-naphthol-5-sulphonate | 3228 | 100 | OP8 | |||
| Azodicarbonamide formulation type B, temperature controlled | 3232 | <100 | OP5 | 1 | ||
| Azodicarbonamide formulation type C | 3224 | <100 | OP6 | |||
| Azodicarbonamide formulation type C, temperature controlled | 3234 | <100 | OP6 | 1 | ||
| Azodicarbonamide formulation type D | 3226 | <100 | OP7 | |||
| Azodicarbonamide formulation type D, temperature controlled | 3236 | <100 | OP7 | 1 | ||
| 2,2′-Azodi(2,4-dimethyl-4-methoxyvaleronitrile) | 3236 | 100 | OP7 | −5 | +5 | |
| 2,2′-Azodi(2,4-dimethylvaleronitrile) | 3236 | 100 | OP7 | +10 | +15 | |
| 2,2′-Azodi(ethyl 2-methylpropionate) | 3235 | 100 | OP7 | +20 | +25 | |
| 1,1-Azodi(hexahydrobenzonitrile) | 3226 | 100 | OP7 | |||
| 2,2-Azodi(isobutyronitrile) | 3234 | 100 | OP6 | +40 | +45 | |
| 2,2′-Azodi(isobutyronitrile) as a water based paste | 3224 | ≤50 | OP6 | |||
| 2,2-Azodi(2-methylbutyronitrile) | 3236 | 100 | OP7 | +35 | +40 | |
| Benzene-1,3-disulphonylhydrazide, as a paste | 3226 | 52 | OP7 | |||
| Benzene sulphohydrazide | 3226 | 100 | OP7 | |||
| 4-(Benzyl(ethyl)amino)-3-ethoxybenzenediazonium zinc chloride | 3226 | 100 | OP7 | |||
| 4-(Benzyl(methyl)amino)-3-ethoxybenzenediazonium zinc chloride | 3236 | 100 | OP7 | +40 | +45 | |
| 3-Chloro-4-diethylaminobenzenediazonium zinc chloride | 3226 | 100 | OP7 | |||
| 2-Diazo-1-Naphthol sulphonic acid ester mixture | 3226 | <100 | OP7 | 4 | ||
| 2-Diazo-1-Naphthol-4-sulphonyl chloride | 3222 | 100 | OP5 | |||
| 2-Diazo-1-Naphthol-5-sulphonyl chloride | 3222 | 100 | OP5 | |||
| 2,5-Dibutoxy-4-(4-morpholinyl)-Benzenediazonium, tetrachlorozincate (2:1) | 3228 | 100 | OP8 | |||
| 2,5-Diethoxy-4-morpholinobenzenediazonium zinc chloride | 3236 | 67−100 | OP7 | +35 | +40 | |
| 2,5-Diethoxy-4-morpholinobenzenediazonium zinc chloride | 3236 | 66 | OP7 | +40 | +45 | |
| 2,5-Diethoxy-4-morpholinobenzenediazonium tetrafluoroborate | 3236 | 100 | OP7 | +30 | +35 | |
| 2,5-Diethoxy-4-(phenylsulphonyl)benzenediazonium zinc chloride | 3236 | 67 | OP7 | +40 | +45 | |
| 2,5-Diethoxy-4-(4-morpholinyl)-benzenediazonium sulphate | 3226 | 100 | OP7 | |||
| Diethylene glycol bis(allyl carbonate) + Diisopropylperoxydicarbonate | 3237 | ≥88 + ≤12 | OP8 | −10 | 0 | |
| 2,5-Dimethoxy-4-(4-methylphenylsulphony)benzenediazonium zinc chloride | 3236 | 79 | OP7 | +40 | +45 | |
| 4-Dimethylamino-6-(2-dimethylaminoethoxy)toluene-2-diazonium zinc chloride | 3236 | 100 | OP7 | +40 | +45 | |
| 4-(Dimethylamino)-benzenediazonium trichlorozincate (-1) | 3228 | 100 | OP8 | |||
| N,N′-Dinitroso-N, N′-dimethyl-terephthalamide, as a paste | 3224 | 72 | OP6 | |||
| N,N′-Dinitrosopentamethylenetetramine | 3224 | 82 | OP6 | 2 | ||
| Diphenyloxide-4,4′-disulphohydrazide | 3226 | 100 | OP7 | |||
| Diphenyloxide-4,4′-disulphonylhydrazide | 3226 | 100 | OP7 | |||
| 4-Dipropylaminobenzenediazonium zinc chloride | 3226 | 100 | OP7 | |||
| 2-(N,N-Ethoxycarbonylphenylamino)-3-methoxy-4-(N-methyl-N- cyclohexylamino)benzenediazonium zinc chloride | 3236 | 63−92 | OP7 | +40 | +45 | |
| 2-(N,N-Ethoxycarbonylphenylamino)-3-methoxy-4-(N-methyl-N- cyclohexylamino)benzenediazonium zinc chloride | 3236 | 62 | OP7 | +35 | +40 | |
| N-Formyl-2-(nitromethylene)-1,3-perhydrothiazine | 3236 | 100 | OP7 | +45 | +50 | |
| 2-(2-Hydroxyethoxy)-1-(pyrrolidin-1-yl)benzene-4-diazonium zinc chloride | 3236 | 100 | OP7 | +45 | +50 | |
| 3-(2-Hydroxyethoxy)-4-(pyrrolidin-1-yl)benzenediazonium zinc chloride | 3236 | 100 | OP7 | +40 | +45 | |
| 2-(N,N-Methylaminoethylcarbonyl)-4-(3,4-dimethyl-phenylsulphonyl)benzene diazonium zinc chloride | 3236 | 96 | OP7 | +45 | +50 | |
| 4-Methylbenzenesulphonylhydrazide | 3226 | 100 | OP7 | |||
| 3-Methyl-4-(pyrrolidin-1-yl)benzenediazonium tetrafluoroborate | 3234 | 95 | OP6 | +45 | +50 | |
| 4-Nitrosophenol | 3236 | 100 | OP7 | +35 | +40 | |
| Phosphorothioic acid, O-[(cyanophenyl methylene) azanyl] O,O-diethyl ester | 3227 | 82−91 (Z isomer) | OP8 | 5 | ||
| Self-reactive liquid, sample | 3223 | OP2 | 3 | |||
| Self-reactive liquid, sample, temperature control | 3233 | OP2 | 3 | |||
| Self-reactive solid, sample | 3224 | OP2 | 3 | |||
| Self-reactive solid, sample, temperature control | 3234 | OP2 | 3 | |||
| Sodium 2-diazo-1-naphthol-4-sulphonate | 3226 | 100 | OP7 | |||
| Sodium 2-diazo-1-naphthol-5-sulphonate | 3226 | 100 | OP7 | |||
| Tetramine palladium (II) nitrate | 3234 | 100 | OP6 | +30 | +35 | |
§173.225 Packaging requirements and other provisions for organic peroxides.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
| Technical name | ID No. | Concentration (mass %) | Diluent (mass %) | Water (mass %) | Packing method | Temperature (°C) | Notes | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | B | I | Control | Emergency | ||||||
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4a) | (4b) | (4c) | (5) | (6) | (7a) | (7b) | (8) |
| Acetyl acetone peroxide | UN3105 | ≤42 | ≥48 | ≥8 | OP7 | 2 | ||||
| Acetyl acetone peroxide [as a paste] | UN3106 | ≤32 | OP7 | 21 | ||||||
| Acetyl cyclohexanesulfonyl peroxide | UN3112 | ≤82 | ≥12 | OP4 | −10 | 0 | ||||
| Acetyl cyclohexanesulfonyl peroxide | UN3115 | ≤32 | ≥68 | OP7 | −10 | 0 | ||||
| tert-Amyl hydroperoxide | UN3107 | ≤88 | ≥6 | ≥6 | OP8 | |||||
| tert-Amyl peroxyacetate | UN3105 | ≤62 | ≥38 | OP7 | ||||||
| tert-Amyl peroxybenzoate | UN3103 | ≤100 | OP5 | |||||||
| tert-Amyl peroxy-2-ethylhexanoate | UN3115 | ≤100 | OP7 | +20 | +25 | |||||
| tert-Amyl peroxy-2-ethylhexyl carbonate | UN3105 | ≤100 | OP7 | |||||||
| tert-Amyl peroxy isopropyl carbonate | UN3103 | ≤77 | ≥23 | OP5 | ||||||
| tert-Amyl peroxyneodecanoate | UN3115 | ≤77 | ≥23 | OP7 | 0 | +10 | ||||
| tert-Amyl peroxyneodecanoate | UN3119 | ≤47 | ≥53 | OP8 | 0 | +10 | ||||
| tert-Amyl peroxypivalate | UN3113 | ≤77 | ≥23 | OP5 | +10 | +15 | ||||
| tert-Amyl peroxypivalate | UN3119 | ≤32 | ≥68 | OP8 | +10 | +15 | ||||
| tert-Amyl peroxy-3,5,5-trimethylhexanoate | UN3105 | ≤100 | OP7 | |||||||
| tert-Butyl cumyl peroxide | UN3109 | >42−100 | OP8 | 9 | ||||||
| tert-Butyl cumyl peroxide | UN3108 | ≤52 | ≥48 | OP8 | 9 | |||||
| n-Butyl-4,4-di-(tert-butylperoxy)valerate | UN3103 | >52−100 | OP5 | |||||||
| n-Butyl-4,4-di-(tert-butylperoxy)valerate | UN3108 | ≤52 | ≥48 | OP8 | ||||||
| tert-Butyl hydroperoxide | UN3103 | >79−90 | ≥10 | OP5 | 13 | |||||
| tert-Butyl hydroperoxide | UN3105 | ≤80 | ≥20 | OP7 | 4, 13 | |||||
| tert-Butyl hydroperoxide | UN3107 | ≤79 | >14 | OP8 | 13, 16 | |||||
| tert-Butyl hydroperoxide | UN3109 | ≤72 | ≥28 | OP8 | 13 | |||||
| tert-Butyl hydroperoxide [and] Di-tert-butylperoxide | UN3103 | <82 + >9 | ≥7 | OP5 | 13 | |||||
| tert-Butyl monoperoxymaleate | UN3102 | >52−100 | OP5 | |||||||
| tert-Butyl monoperoxymaleate | UN3103 | ≤52 | ≥48 | OP6 | ||||||
| tert-Butyl monoperoxymaleate | UN3108 | ≤52 | ≥48 | OP8 | ||||||
| tert-Butyl monoperoxymaleate [as a paste] | UN3108 | ≤52 | OP8 | |||||||
| tert-Butyl peroxyacetate | UN3101 | >52−77 | ≥23 | OP5 | ||||||
| tert-Butyl peroxyacetate | UN3103 | >32−52 | ≥48 | OP6 | ||||||
| tert-Butyl peroxyacetate | UN3109 | ≤32 | ≥68 | OP8 | ||||||
| tert-Butyl peroxybenzoate | UN3103 | >77−100 | OP5 | |||||||
| tert-Butyl peroxybenzoate | UN3105 | >52−77 | ≥23 | OP7 | 1 | |||||
| tert-Butyl peroxybenzoate | UN3106 | ≤52 | ≥48 | OP7 | ||||||
| tert-Butyl peroxybenzoate | UN3109 | ≤32 | ≥68 | OP8 | ||||||
| tert-Butyl peroxybutyl fumarate | UN3105 | ≤52 | ≥48 | OP7 | ||||||
| tert-Butyl peroxycrotonate | UN3105 | ≤77 | ≥23 | OP7 | ||||||
| tert-Butyl peroxydiethylacetate | UN3113 | ≤100 | OP5 | +20 | +25 | |||||
| tert-Butyl peroxy-2-ethylhexanoate | UN3113 | >52−100 | OP6 | +20 | +25 | |||||
| tert-Butyl peroxy-2-ethylhexanoate | UN3117 | >32−52 | ≥48 | OP8 | +30 | +35 | ||||
| tert-Butyl peroxy-2-ethylhexanoate | UN3118 | ≤52 | ≥48 | OP8 | +20 | +25 | ||||
| tert-Butyl peroxy-2-ethylhexanoate | UN3119 | ≤32 | ≥68 | OP8 | +40 | +45 | ||||
| tert-Butyl peroxy-2-ethylhexanoate [and] 2,2-di-(tert-Butylperoxy)butane | UN3106 | ≤12 + ≤14 | ≥14 | ≥60 | OP7 | |||||
| tert-Butyl peroxy-2-ethylhexanoate [and] 2,2-di-(tert-Butylperoxy)butane | UN3115 | ≤31 + ≤36 | ≥33 | OP7 | +35 | +40 | ||||
| tert-Butyl peroxy-2-ethylhexylcarbonate | UN3105 | ≤100 | OP7 | |||||||
| tert-Butyl peroxyisobutyrate | UN3111 | >52−77 | ≥23 | OP5 | +15 | +20 | ||||
| tert-Butyl peroxyisobutyrate | UN3115 | ≤52 | ≥48 | OP7 | +15 | +20 | ||||
| tert-Butylperoxy isopropylcarbonate | UN3103 | ≤77 | ≥23 | OP5 | ||||||
| 1-(2-tert-Butylperoxy isopropyl)-3-isopropenylbenzene | UN3105 | ≤77 | ≥23 | OP7 | ||||||
| 1-(2-tert-Butylperoxy isopropyl)-3-isopropenylbenzene | UN3108 | ≤42 | ≥58 | OP8 | ||||||
| tert-Butyl peroxy-2-methylbenzoate | UN3103 | ≤100 | OP5 | |||||||
| tert-Butyl peroxyneodecanoate | UN3115 | >77−100 | OP7 | −5 | +5 | |||||
| tert-Butyl peroxyneodecanoate | UN3115 | ≤77 | ≥23 | OP7 | 0 | +10 | ||||
| tert-Butyl peroxyneodecanoate [as a stable dispersion in water] | UN3119 | ≤52 | OP8 | 0 | +10 | |||||
| tert-Butyl peroxyneodecanoate [as a stable dispersion in water (frozen)] | UN3118 | ≤42 | OP8 | 0 | +10 | |||||
| tert-Butyl peroxyneodecanoate | UN3119 | ≤32 | ≥68 | OP8 | 0 | +10 | ||||
| tert-Butyl peroxyneoheptanoate | UN3115 | ≤77 | ≥23 | OP7 | 0 | +10 | ||||
| tert-Butyl peroxyneoheptanoate [as a stable dispersion in water] | UN3117 | ≤42 | OP8 | 0 | +10 | |||||
| tert-Butyl peroxypivalate | UN3113 | >67−77 | ≥23 | OP5 | 0 | +10 | ||||
| tert-Butyl peroxypivalate | UN3115 | >27−67 | ≥33 | OP7 | 0 | +10 | ||||
| tert-Butyl peroxypivalate | UN3119 | ≤27 | ≥73 | OP8 | +30 | +35 | ||||
| tert-Butylperoxy stearylcarbonate | UN3106 | ≤100 | OP7 | |||||||
| tert-Butyl peroxy-3,5,5-trimethylhexanoate | UN3105 | >37−100 | OP7 | |||||||
| tert-Butyl peroxy-3,5,5-trimethlyhexanoate | UN3106 | ≤42 | ≥58 | OP7 | ||||||
| tert-Butyl peroxy-3,5,5-trimethylhexanoate | UN3109 | ≤37 | ≥63 | OP8 | ||||||
| 3-Chloroperoxybenzoic acid | UN3102 | >57−86 | ≥14 | OP1 | ||||||
| 3-Chloroperoxybenzoic acid | UN3106 | ≤57 | ≥3 | ≥40 | OP7 | |||||
| 3-Chloroperoxybenzoic acid | UN3106 | ≤77 | ≥6 | ≥17 | OP7 | |||||
| Cumyl hydroperoxide | UN3107 | >90−98 | ≤10 | OP8 | 13 | |||||
| Cumyl hydroperoxide | UN3109 | ≤90 | ≥10 | OP8 | 13, 15 | |||||
| Cumyl peroxyneodecanoate | UN3115 | ≤87 | ≥13 | OP7 | −10 | 0 | ||||
| Cumyl peroxyneodecanoate | UN3115 | ≤77 | ≥23 | OP7 | −10 | 0 | ||||
| Cumyl peroxyneodecanoate [as a stable dispersion in water] | UN3119 | ≤52 | OP8 | −10 | 0 | |||||
| Cumyl peroxyneoheptanoate | UN3115 | ≤77 | ≥23 | OP7 | −10 | 0 | ||||
| Cumyl peroxypivalate | UN3115 | ≤77 | ≥23 | OP7 | −5 | +5 | ||||
| Cyclohexanone peroxide(s) | UN3104 | ≤91 | ≥9 | OP6 | 13 | |||||
| Cyclohexanone peroxide(s) | UN3105 | ≤72 | ≥28 | OP7 | 5 | |||||
| Cyclohexanone peroxide(s) [as a paste] | UN3106 | ≤72 | OP7 | 5, 21 | ||||||
| Cyclohexanone peroxide(s) | Exempt | ≤32 | >68 | Exempt | 29 | |||||
| Diacetone alcohol peroxides | UN3115 | ≤57 | ≥26 | ≥8 | OP7 | +40 | +45 | 5 | ||
| Diacetyl peroxide | UN3115 | ≤27 | ≥73 | OP7 | +20 | +25 | 8,13 | |||
| Di-tert-amyl peroxide | UN3107 | ≤100 | OP8 | |||||||
| ([3R- (3R, 5aS, 6S, 8aS, 9R, 10R, 12S, 12aR**)]-Decahydro-10-methoxy-3, 6, 9-trimethyl-3, 12-epoxy-12H-pyrano [4, 3- j]-1, 2-benzodioxepin) | UN3106 | ≤100 | OP7 | |||||||
| 2,2-Di-(tert-amylperoxy)-butane | UN3105 | ≤57 | ≥43 | OP7 | ||||||
| 1,1-Di-(tert-amylperoxy)cyclohexane | UN3103 | ≤82 | ≥18 | OP6 | ||||||
| Dibenzoyl peroxide | UN3102 | >52−100 | ≤48 | OP2 | 3 | |||||
| Dibenzoyl peroxide | UN3102 | >77−94 | ≥6 | OP4 | 3 | |||||
| Dibenzoyl peroxide | UN3104 | ≤77 | ≥23 | OP6 | ||||||
| Dibenzoyl peroxide | UN3106 | ≤62 | ≥28 | ≥10 | OP7 | |||||
| Dibenzoyl peroxide [as a paste] | UN3106 | >52−62 | OP7 | 21 | ||||||
| Dibenzoyl peroxide | UN3106 | >35−52 | ≥48 | OP7 | ||||||
| Dibenzoyl peroxide | UN3107 | >36−42 | ≥18 | ≤40 | OP8 | |||||
| Dibenzoyl peroxide [as a paste] | UN3108 | ≤56.5 | ≥15 | OP8 | ||||||
| Dibenzoyl peroxide [as a paste] | UN3108 | ≤52 | OP8 | 21 | ||||||
| Dibenzoyl peroxide [as a stable dispersion in water] | UN3109 | ≤42 | OP8 | |||||||
| Dibenzoyl peroxide | Exempt | ≤35 | ≥65 | Exempt | 29 | |||||
| Di-(4-tert-butylcyclohexyl)peroxydicarbonate | UN3114 | ≤100 | OP6 | +30 | +35 | |||||
| Di-(4-tert-butylcyclohexyl)peroxydicarbonate [as a stable dispersion in water] | UN3119 | ≤42 | OP8 | +30 | +35 | |||||
| Di-(4-tert-butylcyclohexyl)peroxydicarbonate [as a paste] | UN3116 | ≤42 | OP7 | +35 | +40 | |||||
| Di-tert-butyl peroxide | UN3107 | >52−100 | OP8 | |||||||
| Di-tert-butyl peroxide | UN3109 | ≤52 | ≥48 | OP8 | 24 | |||||
| Di-tert-butyl peroxyazelate | UN3105 | ≤52 | ≥48 | OP7 | ||||||
| 2,2-Di-(tert-butylperoxy)butane | UN3103 | ≤52 | ≥48 | OP6 | ||||||
| 1,6-Di-(tert-butylperoxycarbonyloxy)hexane | UN3103 | ≤72 | ≥28 | OP5 | ||||||
| 1,1-Di-(tert-butylperoxy)cyclohexane | UN3101 | >80−100 | OP5 | |||||||
| 1,1-Di-(tert-butylperoxy)cyclohexane | UN3103 | >52−80 | ≥20 | OP5 | ||||||
| 1,1-Di-(tert-butylperoxy)-cyclohexane | UN3103 | ≤72 | ≥28 | OP5 | 30 | |||||
| 1,1-Di-(tert-butylperoxy)cyclohexane | UN3105 | >42−52 | ≥48 | OP7 | ||||||
| 1,1-Di-(tert-butylperoxy)cyclohexane | UN3106 | ≤42 | ≥13 | ≥45 | OP7 | |||||
| 1,1-Di-(tert-butylperoxy)cyclohexane | UN3107 | ≤27 | ≥25 | OP8 | 22 | |||||
| 1,1-Di-(tert-butylperoxy)cyclohexane | UN3109 | ≤42 | ≥58 | OP8 | ||||||
| 1,1-Di-(tert-Butylperoxy) cyclohexane | UN3109 | ≤37 | ≥63 | OP8 | ||||||
| 1,1-Di-(tert-butylperoxy)cyclohexane | UN3109 | ≤25 | ≥25 | ≥50 | OP8 | |||||
| 1,1-Di-(tert-butylperoxy)cyclohexane | UN3109 | ≤13 | ≥13 | ≥74 | OP8 | |||||
| 1,1-Di-(tert-butylperoxy)cyclohexane + tert-Butyl peroxy-2-ethylhexanoate | UN3105 | ≤43 + ≤16 | ≥41 | OP7 | ||||||
| Di-n-butyl peroxydicarbonate | UN3115 | >27−52 | ≥48 | OP7 | −15 | −5 | ||||
| Di-n-butyl peroxydicarbonate | UN3117 | ≤27 | ≥73 | OP8 | −10 | 0 | ||||
| Di-n-butyl peroxydicarbonate [as a stable dispersion in water (frozen)] | UN3118 | ≤42 | OP8 | −15 | −5 | |||||
| Di-sec-butyl peroxydicarbonate | UN3113 | >52−100 | OP4 | −20 | −10 | 6 | ||||
| Di-sec-butyl peroxydicarbonate | UN3115 | ≤52 | ≥48 | OP7 | −15 | −5 | ||||
| Di-(tert-butylperoxyisopropyl) benzene(s) | UN3106 | >42−100 | ≤57 | OP7 | 1, 9 | |||||
| Di-(tert-butylperoxyisopropyl) benzene(s) | Exempt | ≤42 | ≥58 | Exempt | ||||||
| Di-(tert-butylperoxy)phthalate | UN3105 | >42−52 | ≥48 | OP7 | ||||||
| Di-(tert-butylperoxy)phthalate [as a paste] | UN3106 | ≤52 | OP7 | 21 | ||||||
| Di-(tert-butylperoxy)phthalate | UN3107 | ≤42 | ≥58 | OP8 | ||||||
| 2,2-Di-(tert-butylperoxy)propane | UN3105 | ≤52 | ≥48 | OP7 | ||||||
| 2,2-Di-(tert-butylperoxy)propane | UN3106 | ≤42 | ≥13 | ≥45 | OP7 | |||||
| 1,1-Di-(tert-butylperoxy)-3,3,5-trimethylcyclohexane | UN3101 | >90−100 | OP5 | |||||||
| 1,1-Di-(tert-butylperoxy)-3,3,5-trimethylcyclohexane | UN3103 | >57−90 | ≥10 | OP5 | ||||||
| 1,1-Di-(tert-butylperoxy)-3,3,5-trimethylcyclohexane | UN3103 | ≤77 | ≥23 | OP5 | ||||||
| 1,1-Di-(tert-butylperoxy)-3,3,5-trimethylcyclohexane | UN3103 | ≤90 | ≥10 | OP5 | 30 | |||||
| 1,1-Di-(tert-butylperoxy)-3,3,5-trimethylcyclohexane | UN3110 | ≤57 | ≥43 | OP8 | ||||||
| 1,1-Di-(tert-butylperoxy)-3,3,5-trimethylcyclohexane | UN3107 | ≤57 | ≥43 | OP8 | ||||||
| 1,1-Di-(tert-butylperoxy)-3,3,5-trimethylcyclohexane | UN3107 | ≤32 | ≥26 | ≥42 | OP8 | |||||
| Dicetyl peroxydicarbonate | UN3120 | ≤100 | OP8 | +30 | +35 | |||||
| Dicetyl peroxydicarbonate [as a stable dispersion in water] | UN3119 | ≤42 | OP8 | +30 | +35 | |||||
| Di-4-chlorobenzoyl peroxide | UN3102 | ≤77 | ≥23 | OP5 | ||||||
| Di-4-chlorobenzoyl peroxide | Exempt | ≤32 | ≥68 | Exempt | 29 | |||||
| Di-2,4-dichlorobenzoyl peroxide [as a paste] | UN3118 | ≤52 | OP8 | +20 | +25 | |||||
| Di-4-chlorobenzoyl peroxide [as a paste] | UN3106 | ≤52 | OP7 | 21 | ||||||
| Dicumyl peroxide | UN3110 | >52−100 | ≤48 | OP8 | 9 | |||||
| Dicumyl peroxide | Exempt | ≤52 | ≥48 | Exempt | 29 | |||||
| Dicyclohexyl peroxydicarbonate | UN3112 | >91−100 | OP3 | +10 | +15 | |||||
| Dicyclohexyl peroxydicarbonate | UN3114 | ≤91 | ≥9 | OP5 | +10 | +15 | ||||
| Dicyclohexyl peroxydicarbonate [as a stable dispersion in water] | UN3119 | ≤42 | OP8 | +15 | +20 | |||||
| Didecanoyl peroxide | UN3114 | ≤100 | OP6 | +30 | +35 | |||||
| 2,2-Di-(4,4-di(tert-butylperoxy)cyclohexyl)propane | UN3106 | ≤42 | ≥58 | OP7 | ||||||
| 2,2-Di-(4,4-di(tert-butylperoxy)cyclohexyl)propane | UN3107 | ≤22 | ≥78 | OP8 | ||||||
| Di-2,4-dichlorobenzoyl peroxide | UN3102 | ≤77 | ≥23 | OP5 | ||||||
| Di-2,4-dichlorobenzoyl peroxide [as a paste with silicone oil] | UN3106 | ≤52 | OP7 | |||||||
| Di-(2-ethoxyethyl) peroxydicarbonate | UN3115 | ≤52 | ≥48 | OP7 | −10 | 0 | ||||
| Di-(2-ethylhexyl) peroxydicarbonate | UN3113 | >77−100 | OP5 | −20 | −10 | |||||
| Di-(2-ethylhexyl) peroxydicarbonate | UN3115 | ≤77 | ≥23 | OP7 | −15 | −5 | ||||
| Di-(2-ethylhexyl) peroxydicarbonate [as a stable dispersion in water] | UN3119 | ≤62 | OP8 | −15 | −5 | |||||
| Di-(2-ethylhexyl) peroxydicarbonate [as a stable dispersion in water] | UN3119 | ≤52 | OP8 | −15 | −5 | |||||
| Di-(2-ethylhexyl) peroxydicarbonate [as a stable dispersion in water (frozen)] | UN3120 | ≤52 | OP8 | −15 | −5 | |||||
| 2,2-Dihydroperoxypropane | UN3102 | ≤27 | ≥73 | OP5 | ||||||
| Di-(1-hydroxycyclohexyl)peroxide | UN3106 | ≤100 | OP7 | |||||||
| Diisobutyryl peroxide | UN3111 | >32−52 | ≥48 | OP5 | −20 | −10 | ||||
| Diisobutyryl peroxide [as a stable dispersion in water] | UN3119 | ≤42 | OP8 | −20 | −10 | |||||
| Diisobutyryl peroxide | UN3115 | ≤32 | ≥68 | OP7 | −20 | −10 | ||||
| Diisopropylbenzene dihydroperoxie | UN3106 | ≤82 | ≥5 | ≥5 | OP7 | 17 | ||||
| Diisopropyl peroxydicarbonate | UN3112 | >52−100 | OP2 | −15 | −5 | |||||
| Diisopropyl peroxydicarbonate | UN3115 | ≤52 | ≥48 | OP7 | −20 | −10 | ||||
| Diisopropyl peroxydicarbonate | UN3115 | ≤32 | ≥68 | OP7 | −15 | −5 | ||||
| Dilauroyl peroxide | UN3106 | ≤100 | OP7 | |||||||
| Dilauroyl peroxide [as a stable dispersion in water] | UN3109 | ≤42 | OP8 | |||||||
| Di-(3-methoxybutyl) peroxydicarbonate | UN3115 | ≤52 | ≥48 | OP7 | −5 | +5 | ||||
| Di-(2-methylbenzoyl)peroxide | UN3112 | ≤87 | ≥13 | OP5 | +30 | +35 | ||||
| Di-(4-methylbenzoyl)peroxide [as a paste with silicone oil] | UN3106 | ≤52 | OP7 | |||||||
| Di-(3-methylbenzoyl) peroxide + Benzoyl (3-methylbenzoyl) peroxide + Dibenzoyl peroxide | UN3115 | ≤20 + ≤18 + ≤4 | ≥58 | OP7 | +35 | +40 | ||||
| 2,5-Dimethyl-2,5-di-(benzoylperoxy)hexane | UN3102 | >82−100 | OP5 | |||||||
| 2,5-Dimethyl-2,5-di-(benzoylperoxy)hexane | UN3106 | ≤82 | ≥18 | OP7 | ||||||
| 2,5-Dimethyl-2,5-di-(benzoylperoxy)hexane | UN3104 | ≤82 | ≥18 | OP5 | ||||||
| 2,5-Dimethyl-2,5-di-(tert-butylperoxy)hexane | UN3103 | >90−100 | OP5 | |||||||
| 2,5-Dimethyl-2,5-di-(tert-butylperoxy)hexane | UN3105 | >52—90 | ≥10 | OP7 | ||||||
| 2,5-Dimethyl-2,5-di-(tert-butylperoxy)hexane | UN3108 | ≤77 | ≥23 | OP8 | ||||||
| 2,5-Dimethyl-2,5-di-(tert-butylperoxy)hexane | UN3109 | ≤52 | ≥48 | OP8 | ||||||
| 2,5-Dimethyl-2,5-di-(tert-butylperoxy)hexane [as a paste] | UN3108 | ≤47 | OP8 | |||||||
| 2,5-Dimethyl-2,5-di-(tert-butylperoxy)hexyne-3 | UN3101 | >86−100 | OP5 | |||||||
| 2,5-Dimethyl-2,5-di-(tert-butylperoxy)hexyne-3 | UN3103 | >52−86 | ≥14 | OP5 | ||||||
| 2,5-Dimethyl-2,5-di-(tert-butylperoxy)hexyne-3 | UN3106 | ≤52 | ≥48 | OP7 | ||||||
| 2,5-Dimethyl-2,5-di-(2-ethylhexanoylperoxy)hexane | UN3113 | ≤100 | OP5 | +20 | +25 | |||||
| 2,5-Dimethyl-2,5-dihydroperoxyhexane | UN3104 | ≤82 | ≥18 | OP6 | ||||||
| 2,5-Dimethyl-2,5-di-(3,5,5-trimethylhexanoylperoxy)hexane | UN3105 | ≤77 | ≥23 | OP7 | ||||||
| 1,1-Dimethyl-3-hydroxybutylperoxyneoheptanoate | UN3117 | ≤52 | ≥48 | OP8 | 0 | +10 | ||||
| Dimyristyl peroxydicarbonate | UN3116 | ≤100 | OP7 | +20 | +25 | |||||
| Dimyristyl peroxydicarbonate [as a stable dispersion in water] | UN3119 | ≤42 | OP8 | +20 | +25 | |||||
| Di-(2-neodecanoylperoxyisopropyl)benzene | UN3115 | ≤52 | ≥48 | OP7 | −10 | 0 | ||||
| Di-(2-neodecanoyl-peroxyisopropyl) benzene, as stable dispersion in water | UN3119 | ≤42 | OP8 | −15 | −5 | |||||
| Di-n-nonanoyl peroxide | UN3116 | ≤100 | OP7 | 0 | +10 | |||||
| Di-n-octanoyl peroxide | UN3114 | ≤100 | OP5 | +10 | +15 | |||||
| Di-(2-phenoxyethyl)peroxydicarbonate | UN3102 | >85−100 | OP5 | |||||||
| Di-(2-phenoxyethyl)peroxydicarbonate | UN3106 | ≤85 | ≥15 | OP7 | ||||||
| Dipropionyl peroxide | UN3117 | ≤27 | ≥73 | OP8 | +15 | +20 | ||||
| Di-n-propyl peroxydicarbonate | UN3113 | ≤100 | OP3 | −25 | −15 | |||||
| Di-n-propyl peroxydicarbonate | UN3113 | ≤77 | ≥23 | OP5 | −20 | −10 | ||||
| Disuccinic acid peroxide | UN3102 | >72−100 | OP4 | 18 | ||||||
| Disuccinic acid peroxide | UN3116 | ≤72 | ≥28 | OP7 | +10 | +15 | ||||
| Di-(3,5,5-trimethylhexanoyl) peroxide | UN3115 | >52−82 | ≥18 | OP7 | 0 | +10 | ||||
| Di-(3,5,5-trimethylhexanoyl)peroxide [as a stable dispersion in water] | UN3119 | ≤52 | OP8 | +10 | +15 | |||||
| Di-(3,5,5-trimethylhexanoyl) peroxide | UN3119 | >38−52 | ≥48 | OP8 | +10 | +15 | ||||
| Di-(3,5,5-trimethylhexanoyl)peroxide | UN3119 | ≤38 | ≥62 | OP8 | +20 | +25 | ||||
| Ethyl 3,3-di-(tert-amylperoxy)butyrate | UN3105 | ≤67 | ≥33 | OP7 | ||||||
| Ethyl 3,3-di-(tert-butylperoxy)butyrate | UN3103 | >77−100 | OP5 | |||||||
| Ethyl 3,3-di-(tert-butylperoxy)butyrate | UN3105 | ≤77 | ≥23 | OP7 | ||||||
| Ethyl 3,3-di-(tert-butylperoxy)butyrate | UN3106 | ≤52 | ≥48 | OP7 | ||||||
| 1-(2-ethylhexanoylperoxy)-1,3-Dimethylbutyl peroxypivalate | UN3115 | ≤52 | ≥45 | ≥10 | OP7 | −20 | −10 | |||
| tert-Hexyl peroxyneodecanoate | UN3115 | ≤71 | ≥29 | OP7 | 0 | +10 | ||||
| tert-Hexyl peroxypivalate | UN3115 | ≤72 | ≥28 | OP7 | +10 | +15 | ||||
| 3-Hydroxy-1,1-dimethylbutyl peroxyneodecanoate | UN3115 | ≤77 | ≥23 | OP7 | −5 | +5 | ||||
| 3-Hydroxy-1,1-dimethylbutyl peroxyneodecanoate [as a stable dispersion in water] | UN3119 | ≤52 | OP8 | −5 | +5 | |||||
| 3-Hydroxy-1,1-dimethylbutyl peroxyneodecanoate | UN3117 | ≤52 | ≥48 | OP8 | −5 | +5 | ||||
| Isopropyl sec-butyl peroxydicarbonat + Di-sec-butyl peroxydicarbonate + Di-isopropyl peroxydicarbonate | UN3111 | ≤52 + ≤28 + ≤22 | OP5 | −20 | −10 | |||||
| Isopropyl sec-butyl peroxydicarbonate + Di-sec-butyl peroxydicarbonate + Di-isopropyl peroxydicarbonate | UN3115 | ≤32 + ≤15 −18 + ≤12 −15 | ≥38 | OP7 | −20 | −10 | ||||
| Isopropylcumyl hydroperoxide | UN3109 | ≤72 | ≥28 | OP8 | 13 | |||||
| p-Menthyl hydroperoxide | UN3105 | >72−100 | OP7 | 13 | ||||||
| p-Menthyl hydroperoxide | UN3109 | ≤72 | ≥28 | OP8 | ||||||
| Methylcyclohexanone peroxide(s) | UN3115 | ≤67 | ≥33 | OP7 | +35 | +40 | ||||
| Methyl ethyl ketone peroxide(s) | UN3101 | ≤52 | ≥48 | OP5 | 5, 13 | |||||
| Methyl ethyl ketone peroxide(s) | UN3105 | ≤45 | ≥55 | OP7 | 5 | |||||
| Methyl ethyl ketone peroxide(s) | UN3107 | ≤40 | ≥60 | OP8 | 7 | |||||
| Methyl isobutyl ketone peroxide(s) | UN3105 | ≤62 | ≥19 | OP7 | 5, 23 | |||||
| Methyl isopropyl ketone peroxide(s) | UN3109 | (See remark 31) | ≥70 | OP8 | 31 | |||||
| Organic peroxide, liquid, sample | UN3103 | OP2 | 12 | |||||||
| Organic peroxide, liquid, sample, temperature controlled | UN3113 | OP2 | 12 | |||||||
| Organic peroxide, solid, sample | UN3104 | OP2 | 12 | |||||||
| Organic peroxide, solid, sample, temperature controlled | UN3114 | OP2 | 12 | |||||||
| 3,3,5,7,7-Pentamethyl-1,2,4-Trioxepane | UN3107 | ≤100 | OP8 | |||||||
| Peroxyacetic acid, type D, stabilized | UN3105 | ≤43 | OP7 | 13, 20 | ||||||
| Peroxyacetic acid, type E, stabilized | UN3107 | ≤43 | OP8 | 13, 20 | ||||||
| Peroxyacetic acid, type F, stabilized | UN3109 | ≤43 | OP8 | 13, 20, 28 | ||||||
| Peroxyacetic acid or peracetic acid [with not more than 7% hydrogen peroxide] | UN3107 | ≤36 | ≥15 | OP8 | 13, 20, 28 | |||||
| Peroxyacetic acid or peracetic acid [with not more than 20% hydrogen peroxide] | Exempt | ≤6 | ≥60 | Exempt | 28 | |||||
| Peroxyacetic acid or peracetic acid [with not more than 26% hydrogen peroxide] | UN3109 | ≤17 | OP8 | 13, 20, 28 | ||||||
| Peroxylauric acid | UN3118 | ≤100 | OP8 | +35 | +40 | |||||
| 1-Phenylethyl hydroperoxide | UN3109 | ≤38 | ≥62 | OP8 | ||||||
| Pinanyl hydroperoxide | UN3105 | >56−100 | OP7 | 13 | ||||||
| Pinanyl hydroperoxide | UN3109 | ≤56 | ≥44 | OP8 | ||||||
| Polyether poly-tert-butylperoxycarbonate | UN3107 | ≤52 | ≥48 | OP8 | ||||||
| Tetrahydronaphthyl hydroperoxide | UN3106 | ≤100 | OP7 | |||||||
| 1,1,3,3-Tetramethylbutyl hydroperoxide | UN3105 | ≤100 | OP7 | |||||||
| 1,1,3,3-Tetramethylbutyl peroxy-2-ethylhexanoate | UN3115 | ≤100 | OP7 | +15 | +20 | |||||
| 1,1,3,3-Tetramethylbutyl peroxyneodecanoate | UN3115 | ≤72 | ≥28 | OP7 | −5 | +5 | ||||
| 1,1,3,3-Tetramethylbutyl peroxyneodecanoate [as a stable dispersion in water] | UN3119 | ≤52 | OP8 | −5 | +5 | |||||
| 1,1,3,3-tetramethylbutyl peroxypivalate | UN3115 | ≤77 | ≥23 | OP7 | 0 | +10 | ||||
| 3,6,9-Triethyl-3,6,9-trimethyl-1,4,7-triperoxonane | UN3110 | ≤17 | ≥18 | ≥65 | OP8 | |||||
| 3,6,9-Triethyl-3,6,9-trimethyl-1,4,7-triperoxonane | UN3105 | ≤42 | ≥58 | OP7 | 26 | |||||
| Notes: | ||||||||||
| 1. For domestic shipments, OP8 is authorized. | ||||||||||
| 2. Available oxygen must be <4.7%. | ||||||||||
| 3. For concentrations <80% OP5 is allowed. For concentrations of at least 80% but <85%, OP4 is allowed. For concentrations of at least 85%, maximum package size is OP2. | ||||||||||
| 4. The diluent may be replaced by di-tert-butyl peroxide. | ||||||||||
| 5. Available oxygen must be ≤9% with or without water. | ||||||||||
| 6. For domestic shipments, OP5 is authorized. | ||||||||||
| 7. Available oxygen must be ≤8.2% with or without water. | ||||||||||
| 8. Only non-metallic packagings are authorized. | ||||||||||
| 9. For domestic shipments this material may be transported under the provisions of paragraph (h)(3)(xii) of this section. | ||||||||||
| 10. [Reserved] | ||||||||||
| 11. [Reserved] | ||||||||||
| 12. Samples may only be offered for transportation under the provisions of paragraph (b)(2) of this section. | ||||||||||
| 13. “Corrosive” subsidiary risk label is required. | ||||||||||
| 14. [Reserved] | ||||||||||
| 15. No “Corrosive” subsidiary risk label is required for concentrations below 80%. | ||||||||||
| 16. With <6% di-tert-butyl peroxide. | ||||||||||
| 17. With ≤8% 1-isopropylhydroperoxy-4-isopropylhydroxybenzene. | ||||||||||
| 18. Addition of water to this organic peroxide will decrease its thermal stability. | ||||||||||
| 19. [Reserved] | ||||||||||
| 20. Mixtures with hydrogen peroxide, water and acid(s). | ||||||||||
| 21. With diluent type A, with or without water. | ||||||||||
| 22. With ≥36% diluent type A by mass, and in addition ethylbenzene. | ||||||||||
| 23. With ≥19% diluent type A by mass, and in addition methyl isobutyl ketone. | ||||||||||
| 24. Diluent type B with boiling point >100 C. | ||||||||||
| 25. No “Corrosive” subsidiary risk label is required for concentrations below 56%. | ||||||||||
| 26. Available oxygen must be ≤7.6%. | ||||||||||
| 27. Formulations derived from distillation of peroxyacetic acid originating from peroxyacetic acid in a concentration of not more than 41% with water, total active oxygen less than or equal to 9.5% (peroxyacetic acid plus hydrogen peroxide). | ||||||||||
| 28. For the purposes of this section, the names “Peroxyacetic acid” and “Peracetic acid” are synonymous. | ||||||||||
| 29. Not subject to the requirements of this subchapter for Division 5.2. | ||||||||||
| 30. Diluent type B with boiling point >130°C (266°F). | ||||||||||
| 31. Available oxygen ≤6.7%. | ||||||||||
(d) *****
Table to Paragraph (d): Maximum Quantity per Packaging/Package
* * * * *
(g) * * *
| UN No. | Hazardous material | Minimum test pressure (bar) | Minimum shell thickness (mm-reference steel) See . . . | Bottom opening requirements See . . . | Pressure-relief requirements See . . . | Filling limits | Control temperature | Emergency temperature |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3109 | ORGANIC PEROXIDE, TYPE F, LIQUID | |||||||
| tert-Butyl hydroperoxide, not more than 72% with water. *Provided that steps have been taken to achieve the safety equivalence of 65% tert-Butyl hydroperoxide and 35% water. | 4 | §178.274(d)(2) | §178.275(d)(3) | §178.275(g)(1) | Not more than 90% at 59°F (15°C) | |||
| * * * * | * * * * | * * * * | * * * * | * * * * | * * * * | * * * * | * * * * | * * * * |
| Note: 1. “Corrosive” subsidiary risk placard is required. | ||||||||
* * * * *
§173.301b Additional general requirements for shipment of UN pressure receptacles.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(1) When the use of a valve is prescribed, the valve must conform to the requirements in ISO 10297:2014(E) and ISO 10297:2014/Amd 1:2017 (IBR, see §171.7 of this subchapter). Quick release cylinder valves for specification and type testing must conform to the requirements in ISO 17871:2015(E) (IBR, see §171.7 of this subchapter). Until December 31, 2022, the manufacture of a valve conforming to the requirements in ISO 10297:2014(E) is authorized. Until December 31, 2020, the manufacture of a valve conforming to the requirements in ISO 10297:2006(E) (IBR, see §171.7 of this subchapter) was authorized. Until December 31, 2008, the manufacture of a valve conforming to the requirements in ISO 10297:1999(E) (IBR, see §171.7 of this subchapter) was authorized.
(2) * * *
(ii) By equipping the UN pressure receptacle with a valve cap conforming to the requirements in ISO 11117:2008(E) and Technical Corrigendum 1 (IBR, see §171.7 of this subchapter). Until December 31, 2014, the manufacture of a valve cap conforming to the requirements in ISO 11117:1998(E) (IBR, see §171.7 of this subchapter) was authorized. The cap must have vent-holes of sufficient cross-sectional area to evacuate the gas if leakage occurs at the valve;
(iii) By protecting the valves by shrouds or guards conforming to the requirements in ISO 11117:2008(E) and Technical Corrigendum 1 (IBR; see §171.7 of this subchapter). Until December 31, 2014, the manufacture of a shroud or guard conforming to the requirements in ISO 11117:1998(E) (IBR, see §171.7 of this subchapter) was authorized. For metal hydride storage systems, by protecting the valves in accordance with the requirements in ISO 16111:2008(E) (IBR; see §171.7 of this subchapter).
(iv) By using valves designed and constructed with sufficient inherent strength to withstand damage in accordance with Annex B of ISO 10297:2014(E)/Amd. 1: 2017;
* * * * *
(d) Non-refillable UN pressure receptacles. (1) When the use of a valve is prescribed, the valve must conform to the requirements in ISO 11118:2015(E), (IBR, see §171.7 of this subchapter). Manufacture of valves to ISO 13340:2001(E) is authorized until December 31, 2020;
* * * * *
(f) Hydrogen bearing gases. A steel UN pressure receptacle bearing an ‘‘H’’ mark must be used for hydrogen bearing gases or other embrittling gases that have the potential of causing hydrogen embrittlement.
* * * * *
§173.302c Additional requirements for the shipment of adsorbed gases in UN pressure receptacles.
* * * * *
(k) The filling procedure must be in accordance with Annex A of ISO 11513 (IBR, see §171.7 of this subchapter).
* * * * *
§173.311 Metal hydride storage systems.
The following packing instruction is applicable to transportable UN Metal hydride storage systems (UN3468) with pressure receptacles not exceeding 150 liters (40 gallons) in water capacity and having a maximum developed pressure not exceeding 25 MPa. Metal hydride storage systems must be designed, constructed, initially inspected and tested in accordance with ISO 16111 (IBR, see §171.7 of this subchapter) as authorized under §178.71(m) of this subchapter. Steel pressure receptacles or composite pressure receptacles with steel liners must be marked in accordance with §173.301b(f) of this part which specifies that a steel UN pressure receptacle bearing an “H” mark must be used for hydrogen bearing gases or other gases that may cause hydrogen embrittlement. Requalification intervals must be no more than every five years as specified in §180.207 of this subchapter in accordance with the requalification procedures prescribed in ISO 16111.
§175.10 Exceptions for passengers, crewmembers, and air operators.
(a) This subchapter does not apply to the following hazardous materials when carried by aircraft passengers or crewmembers provided the requirements of §§171.15 and 171.16 (see paragraph (c) of this section) and the requirements of this section are met:
* * * * *
(14) Battery powered heat-producing devices (e.g., battery-operated equipment such as diving lamps and soldering equipment) as checked or carry-on baggage and with the approval of the operator of the aircraft. The heating element, the battery, or other component (e.g., fuse) must be isolated to prevent unintentional activation during transport. Any battery that is removed must be carried in accordance with the provisions for spare batteries in paragraph (a)(18) of this section.
* * * * *
(15) * * *
(v) * * *
(A) Securely attached to the wheelchair or mobility aid;
* * * * *
(vi) * * *
(A) Securely attached to the wheelchair or mobility aid; or
* * * * *
(17) * * *
(ii) * * *
(C) The battery must be securely attached to the mobility aid; and
* * * * *
(18) Except as provided in §173.21 of this subchapter, portable electronic devices (e.g., watches, calculating machines, cameras, cellular phones, laptop and notebook computers, camcorders, medical devices, etc.) containing dry cells or dry batteries (including lithium cells or batteries) and spare dry cells or batteries for these devices, when carried by passengers or crew members for personal use. Portable electronic devices powered by lithium batteries may be carried in either checked or carry-on baggage. When carried in checked baggage, portable electronic devices powered by lithium batteries must be completely switched off (not in sleep or hibernation mode) and protected to prevent unintentional activation or damage. Spare lithium batteries must be carried in carry-on baggage only. Each installed or spare lithium battery must be of a type proven to meet the requirements of each test in the UN Manual of Tests and Criteria, Part III, Sub-section 38.3, and each spare lithium battery must be individually protected so as to prevent short circuits (e.g., by placement in original retail packaging, by otherwise insulating terminals by taping over exposed terminals, or placing each battery in a separate plastic bag or protective pouch). In addition, each installed or spare lithium battery:
* * * * *
(26) Baggage equipped with lithium battery(ies) must be carried as carry-on baggage unless the battery(ies) is removed from the baggage. Removed battery(ies) must be carried in accordance with the provision for spare batteries prescribed in paragraph (a)(18) of this section. The provisions of this paragraph do not apply to baggage equipped with lithium batteries not exceeding:
* * * * *
§175.33 Shipping paper and information to the pilot-in-command.
(a) * * *
(13) * * *
(iii) For UN3480, UN3481, UN3090, and UN3091 prepared in accordance with §173.185(c), except those prepared in accordance with §173.185(c)(4)(vi), are not required to appear on the information to the pilot-in-command.
* * * * *
§178.37 Specification 3AA and 3AAX seamless steel cylinders.
* * * * *
(j) Flattening test. A flattening test must be performed on one cylinder taken at random out of each lot of 200 or less, by placing the cylinder between wedge shaped knife edges having a 60° included angle, rounded to ½-inch radius. The longitudinal axis of the cylinder must be at a 90-degree angle to knife edges during the test. For lots of 30 or less, flattening tests are authorized to be made on a ring at least 8 inches long cut from each cylinder and subjected to the same heat treatment as the finished cylinder. Cylinders may be subjected to a bend test in lieu of the flattening test. Two bend test specimens must be taken in accordance with ISO 9809–1 or ASTM E 290 (IBR, see §171.7 of this subchapter), and must be subjected to the bend test specified therein.
* * * * *
§178.71 Specifications for UN pressure receptacles.
* * * * *
(f) * * *
(4) ISO 21172-1:2015(E) Gas cylinders—Welded steel pressure drums up to 3,000 litres capacity for the transport of gases—Design and construction—Part 1: Capacities up to 1,000 litres (IBR, see §171.7 of this subchapter). Irrespective of section 6.3.3.4 of this standard, welded steel gas pressure drums with dished ends convex to pressure may be used for the transport of corrosive substances provided all applicable additional requirements are met.
(g) Design and construction requirements for UN refillable seamless steel cylinders. In addition to the general requirements of this section, UN refillable seamless steel cylinders must conform to the following ISO standards, as applicable:
(1) ISO 9809-1:2010 Gas cylinders—Refillable seamless steel gas cylinders—Design, construction and testing—Part 1: Quenched and tempered steel cylinders with tensile strength less than 1100 MPa. (IBR, see §171.7 of this subchapter). Until December 31, 2018, the manufacture of a cylinder conforming to the requirements in ISO 9809-1:1999 (IBR, see §171.7 of this subchapter) is authorized.
(2) ISO 9809-2: Gas cylinders—Refillable seamless steel gas cylinders—Design, construction and testing—Part 2: Quenched and tempered steel cylinders with tensile strength greater than or equal to 1100 MPa. (IBR, see §171.7 of this subchapter). Until December 31, 2018, the manufacture of a cylinder conforming to the requirements in ISO 9809-2:2000 (IBR, see §171.7 of this subchapter) is authorized.
(3) ISO 9809-3: Gas cylinders—Refillable seamless steel gas cylinders—Design, construction and testing—Part 3: Normalized steel cylinders. (IBR, see §171.7 of this subchapter). Until December 31, 2018, the manufacture of a cylinder conforming to the requirements in ISO 9809-3:2000 (IBR, see §171.7 of this subchapter) is authorized.
(4) ISO 9809-4:2014(E) (IBR, see §171.7 of this subchapter).
* * * * *
(i) Design and construction requirements for UN non-refillable metal cylinders. In addition to the general requirements of this section, UN non-refillable metal cylinders must conform to ISO 11118:2015(E) Gas cylinders—Non-refillable metallic gas cylinders—Specification and test methods (IBR, see §171.7 of this subchapter). Until December 31, 2020, cylinders conforming to ISO 11118:1999(E) Gas cylinders—Non-refillable metallic gas cylinders—Specification and test methods (IBR, see §171.7 of this subchapter) are authorized.
* * * * *
(k) * * *
(1) * * *
(i) ISO 9809-1:2010 Gas cylinders—Refillable seamless steel gas cylinders—Design, construction and testing—Part 1: Quenched and tempered steel cylinders with tensile strength less than 1100 MPa. Until December 31, 2018, the manufacture of a cylinder conforming to the requirements in ISO 9809-1:1999 (IBR, see §171.7 of this subchapter) is authorized.
(ii) ISO 9809-3: Gas cylinders—Refillable seamless steel gas cylinders—Design, construction and testing—Part 3: Normalized steel cylinders. Until December 31, 2018, the manufacture of a cylinder conforming to the requirements in ISO 9809-3:2000 (IBR, see §171.7 of this subchapter) is authorized.
* * * * *
(m) Design and construction requirements for UN metal hydride storage systems. In addition to the general requirements of this section, metal hydride storage systems must conform to the following ISO standards, as applicable: ISO 16111: Transportable gas storage devices—Hydrogen absorbed in reversible metal hydride (IBR, see §171.7 of this subchapter).
(n) Design and construction requirements for UN cylinders for the transportation of adsorbed gases. In addition to the general requirements of this section, UN cylinders for the transportation of adsorbed gases must conform to the following ISO standards, as applicable: ISO 11513:2011, Gas cylinders—Refillable welded steel cylinders containing materials for sub-atmospheric gas packaging (excluding acetylene)—Design, construction, testing, use and periodic inspection, or ISO 9809-1:2010: Gas cylinders—Refillable seamless steel gas cylinders—Design, construction and testing—Part 1: Quenched and tempered steel cylinders with tensile strength less than 1100 MPa. (IBR, see §171.7 of this subchapter.)
* * * * *
§178.75 Specifications for MEGCs.
* * * * *
(d) * * *
(3) Each pressure receptacle of a MEGC must be of the same design type, seamless steel, or composite, and constructed and tested according to one of the following ISO standards, as appropriate:
(i) ISO 9809-1: Gas cylinders—Refillable seamless steel gas cylinders—Design, construction and testing—Part 1: Quenched and tempered steel cylinders with tensile strength less than 1100 MPa. (IBR, see §171.7 of this subchapter). Until December 31, 2018, the manufacture of a cylinder conforming to the requirements in ISO 9809-1:1999 (IBR, see §171.7 of this subchapter) is authorized;
(ii) ISO 9809-2: Gas cylinders—Refillable seamless steel gas cylinders—Design, construction and testing—Part 2: Quenched and tempered steel cylinders with tensile strength greater than or equal to 1100 MPa. (IBR, see §171.7 of this subchapter). Until December 31, 2018, the manufacture of a cylinder conforming to the requirements in ISO 9809-2:2000 (IBR, see §171.7 of this subchapter) is authorized;
(iii) ISO 9809-3: Gas cylinders—Refillable seamless steel gas cylinders—Design, construction and testing—Part 3: Normalized steel cylinders. (IBR, see §171.7 of this subchapter). Until December 31, 2018, the manufacture of a cylinder conforming to the requirements in ISO 9809-3:2000 (IBR, see §171.7 of this subchapter) is authorized; or
* * * * *
§178.609 Test requirements for packagings for infectious substances.
* * * * *
(d) * * *
(2) Where the samples are in the shape of a drum, three samples must be dropped, one in each of the following orientations:
(i) Diagonally on the top chime, with the center of gravity directly above the point of impact;
(ii) Diagonally on the base chime; and
(iii) Flat on the side.
* * * * *
§178.706 Standards for rigid plastic IBCs.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(3) No used material other than production residues or regrind from the same manufacturing process may be used in the manufacture of rigid plastic IBCs.
* * * * *
§178.707 Standards for composite IBCs.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(3) * * *
(iii) No used material other than production residues or regrind from the same manufacturing process may be used in the manufacture of inner receptacles.
* * * * *
§180.207 Requirements for requalification of UN pressure receptacles.
* * * * *
(d) * * *
(3) Dissolved acetylene UN cylinders: Each dissolved acetylene cylinder must be requalified in accordance with ISO 10462:2013(E) (IBR, see §171.7 of this subchapter). A cylinder previously requalified in accordance with the second edition of ISO 10462(E) up until December 31, 2018, may continue to be used until the next required requalification. The porous mass and the shell must be requalified no sooner than 3 years, 6 months, from the date of manufacture. Thereafter, subsequent requalifications of the porous mass and shell must be performed at least once every ten years.
* * * * *
(5) UN cylinders for adsorbed gases: Each UN cylinder for adsorbed gases must be inspected and tested in accordance with §173.302c and ISO 11513:2011 (IBR, see §171.7 of this subchapter).
* * * * *
See More
RELATED NEWS

Specialized Industries
Go beyond the regulations! Visit the Institute for in-depth guidance on a wide range of compliance subjects in safety and health, transportation, environment, and human resources.
J. J. Keller® COMPLIANCE NETWORK is a premier online safety and compliance community, offering members exclusive access to timely regulatory content in workplace safety (OSHA), transportation (DOT), environment (EPA), and human resources (DOL).

Interact With Our Compliance Experts
Puzzled by a regulatory question or issue? Let our renowned experts provide the answers and get your business on track to full compliance!

Upcoming Events
Reference the Compliance Network Safety Calendar to keep track of upcoming safety and compliance events. Browse by industry or search by keyword to see relevant dates and observances, including national safety months, compliance deadlines, and more.
SAFETY & COMPLIANCE NEWS
Keep up with the latest regulatory developments from OSHA, DOT, EPA, DOL, and more.
REGSENSE® REGULATORY REFERENCE
Explore a comprehensive database of word-for-word regulations on a wide range of compliance topics, with simplified explanations and best practices advice from our experts.
THE J. J. KELLER INSTITUTE
The Institute is your destination for in-depth content on 120+ compliance subjects. Discover articles, videos, and interactive exercises that will strengthen your understanding of regulatory concepts relevant to your business.
ADD HAZMAT, ENVIRONMENTAL, & HR RESOURCES
Unlock exclusive content offering expert insights into hazmat, environmental, and human resources compliance with a COMPLIANCE NETWORK EDGE membership.
DIRECT ACCESS TO COMPLIANCE EXPERTS
Struggling with a compliance challenge? Get the solution from our in-house team of experts! You can submit a question to our experts by email, set up a phone or video call, or request a detailed research report.
EVENTS
Register to attend live online events hosted by our experts. These webcasts and virtual conferences feature engaging discussions on important compliance topics in a casual, knowledge-sharing environment.
Most Recent Highlights In Environmental
NewsGreenhouse GasesIndustry NewsAir EmissionsEnvironmental Protection Agency (EPA)CAA ComplianceEnvironmentalIn-Depth ArticleFocus AreaEnglishAir ProgramsStationary Emission SourcesUSA
2026-10-02T05:00:00Z
Repealing GHG emission standards for power plants: Reasons why and how to respond
Federal regulations restrict air emissions of specific substances from fossil fuel-fired power plants. However, with most of the requirements under one rule recently repealed, these power plants can breathe a little easier when it comes to compliance.
In its continued deregulatory efforts, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) repealed a majority of the greenhouse gas (GHG) emission requirements established by the 2024 Carbon Pollution Standards (CPS). Issued on September 17, 2026, the final rule provides a range of reasons for repealing the affected standards.
Use this guide to help you understand EPA’s recent partial repeal of the 2024 CPS (including the reasons behind it) and how facilities should respond.
Is my facility impacted?
The final rule’s rollback of GHG emission standards applies to fossil fuel-fired power plants, specifically:
- Fossil fuel-fired electric utility steam generating units, and
- Stationary combustion turbine electric generating units (EGUs).
Which requirements were removed?
The agency’s final rule repeals:
- All 2024 CPS emission guidelines for existing coal-, oil-, and natural gas-fired steam generating units (40 CFR Part 60 Subpart UUUUb in its entirety);
- The 2024 CPS carbon capture and sequestration/storage (CCS)-based requirements for coal-fired steam generating units undertaking a large modification (Part 60 Subpart TTTTa); and
- The 2024 CPS CCS-based standards for new base load stationary combustion turbines (Part 60 Subpart TTTTa).
Affected facilities no longer have to comply with the repealed GHG mitigation measures set by the 2024 CPS.
Why did EPA repeal these GHG emission standards?
The final rule states that the agency based its decision on a reevaluation of the best systems of emission reduction (BSERs) established by the 2024 CPS. The Clean Air Act requires EPA to base performance standards on BSERs that are adequately demonstrated. Once BSERs are established, EPA then sets emission requirements based on the application of the BSERs.
The 2024 CPS required:
- Existing long-term fossil fuel-fired EGUs to comply with an emission limit based on implementing a BSER of 90 percent CCS of carbon dioxide by January 1, 2032;
- Existing medium-term EGUs (i.e., units committed to stop operations by 2039) to comply with an emission limit based on implementing a BSER of 40 percent natural gas co-firing by January 1, 2030;
- Natural gas- and oil-fired EGUs to implement certain BSERs (including routine methods of operation and maintenance for intermediate load units and uniform fuels for low load units); and
- New base load stationary combustion turbines to comply with phase 2 standards based on a BSER of 90 percent CCS of carbon dioxide by January 1, 2032.
90 percent CCS
EPA determined that 90 percent CCS isn’t the BSER for long-term coal-fired steam generating units because:
- The BSER hasn’t been adequately demonstrated;
- The BSER imposes unreasonable costs; and
- The infrastructure needed to comply with the BSER likely can’t be deployed by the January 1, 2032, compliance date (which means the degree of emission limitation wouldn’t be achievable).
Additionally, EPA determined that 90 percent CCS isn’t the BSER for coal-fired steam generating units undertaking a large modification because the BSER hasn’t been adequately demonstrated and imposes unreasonable costs.
40 percent natural gas co-firing
The agency determined that 40 percent co-firing with natural gas isn’t the BSER for existing medium-term coal-fired steam generating units because it constitutes generation shifting (which the Supreme Court ruled impermissible in West Virginia v. EPA (2022)). Generation shifting refers to a forced shift of nationwide electricity generation from one source to another. In this case, the natural gas co-firing standard would require coal-fired boilers to use natural gas, a completely different fuel source.
It also found that this BSER would have adverse impacts on the energy system, and the infrastructure needed to comply with the BSER likely can’t be deployed by the January 1, 2030, compliance date (which means the degree of emission limitation wouldn’t be achievable).
Natural gas- and oil-fired steam generating unit requirements
EPA also determined that the BSERs for natural gas- and oil-fired steam generating units are unnecessary.
It concluded that:
- Requiring states to develop, submit, and implement plans only for natural gas- and oil-fired steam generating units would be an inefficient use of state resources because these units account for a small part of the source category, and
- The BSERs would result in little or no emission reductions.
Phase 2 standards
Finally, the agency determined that 90 percent CCS isn’t the BSER for new base load stationary combustion turbines because:
- The BSER hasn’t been adequately demonstrated;
- The BSER imposes unreasonable costs; and
- The infrastructure needed to comply with the BSER likely can’t be deployed by the January 1, 2032, compliance date (which means the degree of emission limitation wouldn’t be achievable).
How should facilities respond?
Consider these tips to help your facility determine how it may be affected by EPA’s repeal of these federal GHG emission standards:
- Determine if your facility is subject to any regulations established by the 2024 CPS.
- If so, verify whether any of the repealed federal GHG emission standards applied to your facility.
- If any of the repealed federal GHG emission standards applied, evaluate the possible impacts on your facility’s operations.
- Adjust operations and processes as needed.
- Don’t forget to check state requirements! Most air emission permits are issued by state or local air agencies. State regulations must be at least as stringent as federal requirements, but they could also be stricter. Confirm GHG emission standards with your permitting authority.
Key to remember: EPA has repealed a majority of the GHG emission requirements established by the 2024 Carbon Pollution Standards rule.
NewsGreenhouse GasesIndustry NewsAir EmissionsEnvironmental Protection Agency (EPA)CAA ComplianceEnvironmentalIn-Depth ArticleFocus AreaEnglishAir ProgramsStationary Emission SourcesUSA
2026-10-02T05:00:00Z
Repealing GHG emission standards for power plants: Reasons why and how to respond
Federal regulations restrict air emissions of specific substances from fossil fuel-fired power plants. However, with most of the requirements under one rule recently repealed, these power plants can breathe a little easier when it comes to compliance.
In its continued deregulatory efforts, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) repealed a majority of the greenhouse gas (GHG) emission requirements established by the 2024 Carbon Pollution Standards (CPS). Issued on September 17, 2026, the final rule provides a range of reasons for repealing the affected standards.
Use this guide to help you understand EPA’s recent partial repeal of the 2024 CPS (including the reasons behind it) and how facilities should respond.
Is my facility impacted?
The final rule’s rollback of GHG emission standards applies to fossil fuel-fired power plants, specifically:
- Fossil fuel-fired electric utility steam generating units, and
- Stationary combustion turbine electric generating units (EGUs).
Which requirements were removed?
The agency’s final rule repeals:
- All 2024 CPS emission guidelines for existing coal-, oil-, and natural gas-fired steam generating units (40 CFR Part 60 Subpart UUUUb in its entirety);
- The 2024 CPS carbon capture and sequestration/storage (CCS)-based requirements for coal-fired steam generating units undertaking a large modification (Part 60 Subpart TTTTa); and
- The 2024 CPS CCS-based standards for new base load stationary combustion turbines (Part 60 Subpart TTTTa).
Affected facilities no longer have to comply with the repealed GHG mitigation measures set by the 2024 CPS.
Why did EPA repeal these GHG emission standards?
The final rule states that the agency based its decision on a reevaluation of the best systems of emission reduction (BSERs) established by the 2024 CPS. The Clean Air Act requires EPA to base performance standards on BSERs that are adequately demonstrated. Once BSERs are established, EPA then sets emission requirements based on the application of the BSERs.
The 2024 CPS required:
- Existing long-term fossil fuel-fired EGUs to comply with an emission limit based on implementing a BSER of 90 percent CCS of carbon dioxide by January 1, 2032;
- Existing medium-term EGUs (i.e., units committed to stop operations by 2039) to comply with an emission limit based on implementing a BSER of 40 percent natural gas co-firing by January 1, 2030;
- Natural gas- and oil-fired EGUs to implement certain BSERs (including routine methods of operation and maintenance for intermediate load units and uniform fuels for low load units); and
- New base load stationary combustion turbines to comply with phase 2 standards based on a BSER of 90 percent CCS of carbon dioxide by January 1, 2032.
90 percent CCS
EPA determined that 90 percent CCS isn’t the BSER for long-term coal-fired steam generating units because:
- The BSER hasn’t been adequately demonstrated;
- The BSER imposes unreasonable costs; and
- The infrastructure needed to comply with the BSER likely can’t be deployed by the January 1, 2032, compliance date (which means the degree of emission limitation wouldn’t be achievable).
Additionally, EPA determined that 90 percent CCS isn’t the BSER for coal-fired steam generating units undertaking a large modification because the BSER hasn’t been adequately demonstrated and imposes unreasonable costs.
40 percent natural gas co-firing
The agency determined that 40 percent co-firing with natural gas isn’t the BSER for existing medium-term coal-fired steam generating units because it constitutes generation shifting (which the Supreme Court ruled impermissible in West Virginia v. EPA (2022)). Generation shifting refers to a forced shift of nationwide electricity generation from one source to another. In this case, the natural gas co-firing standard would require coal-fired boilers to use natural gas, a completely different fuel source.
It also found that this BSER would have adverse impacts on the energy system, and the infrastructure needed to comply with the BSER likely can’t be deployed by the January 1, 2030, compliance date (which means the degree of emission limitation wouldn’t be achievable).
Natural gas- and oil-fired steam generating unit requirements
EPA also determined that the BSERs for natural gas- and oil-fired steam generating units are unnecessary.
It concluded that:
- Requiring states to develop, submit, and implement plans only for natural gas- and oil-fired steam generating units would be an inefficient use of state resources because these units account for a small part of the source category, and
- The BSERs would result in little or no emission reductions.
Phase 2 standards
Finally, the agency determined that 90 percent CCS isn’t the BSER for new base load stationary combustion turbines because:
- The BSER hasn’t been adequately demonstrated;
- The BSER imposes unreasonable costs; and
- The infrastructure needed to comply with the BSER likely can’t be deployed by the January 1, 2032, compliance date (which means the degree of emission limitation wouldn’t be achievable).
How should facilities respond?
Consider these tips to help your facility determine how it may be affected by EPA’s repeal of these federal GHG emission standards:
- Determine if your facility is subject to any regulations established by the 2024 CPS.
- If so, verify whether any of the repealed federal GHG emission standards applied to your facility.
- If any of the repealed federal GHG emission standards applied, evaluate the possible impacts on your facility’s operations.
- Adjust operations and processes as needed.
- Don’t forget to check state requirements! Most air emission permits are issued by state or local air agencies. State regulations must be at least as stringent as federal requirements, but they could also be stricter. Confirm GHG emission standards with your permitting authority.
Key to remember: EPA has repealed a majority of the GHG emission requirements established by the 2024 Carbon Pollution Standards rule.
NewsGreenhouse GasesIndustry NewsAir EmissionsEnvironmental Protection Agency (EPA)CAA ComplianceEnvironmentalIn-Depth ArticleFocus AreaEnglishAir ProgramsStationary Emission SourcesUSA
2026-10-02T05:00:00Z
Repealing GHG emission standards for power plants: Reasons why and how to respond
Federal regulations restrict air emissions of specific substances from fossil fuel-fired power plants. However, with most of the requirements under one rule recently repealed, these power plants can breathe a little easier when it comes to compliance.
In its continued deregulatory efforts, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) repealed a majority of the greenhouse gas (GHG) emission requirements established by the 2024 Carbon Pollution Standards (CPS). Issued on September 17, 2026, the final rule provides a range of reasons for repealing the affected standards.
Use this guide to help you understand EPA’s recent partial repeal of the 2024 CPS (including the reasons behind it) and how facilities should respond.
Is my facility impacted?
The final rule’s rollback of GHG emission standards applies to fossil fuel-fired power plants, specifically:
- Fossil fuel-fired electric utility steam generating units, and
- Stationary combustion turbine electric generating units (EGUs).
Which requirements were removed?
The agency’s final rule repeals:
- All 2024 CPS emission guidelines for existing coal-, oil-, and natural gas-fired steam generating units (40 CFR Part 60 Subpart UUUUb in its entirety);
- The 2024 CPS carbon capture and sequestration/storage (CCS)-based requirements for coal-fired steam generating units undertaking a large modification (Part 60 Subpart TTTTa); and
- The 2024 CPS CCS-based standards for new base load stationary combustion turbines (Part 60 Subpart TTTTa).
Affected facilities no longer have to comply with the repealed GHG mitigation measures set by the 2024 CPS.
Why did EPA repeal these GHG emission standards?
The final rule states that the agency based its decision on a reevaluation of the best systems of emission reduction (BSERs) established by the 2024 CPS. The Clean Air Act requires EPA to base performance standards on BSERs that are adequately demonstrated. Once BSERs are established, EPA then sets emission requirements based on the application of the BSERs.
The 2024 CPS required:
- Existing long-term fossil fuel-fired EGUs to comply with an emission limit based on implementing a BSER of 90 percent CCS of carbon dioxide by January 1, 2032;
- Existing medium-term EGUs (i.e., units committed to stop operations by 2039) to comply with an emission limit based on implementing a BSER of 40 percent natural gas co-firing by January 1, 2030;
- Natural gas- and oil-fired EGUs to implement certain BSERs (including routine methods of operation and maintenance for intermediate load units and uniform fuels for low load units); and
- New base load stationary combustion turbines to comply with phase 2 standards based on a BSER of 90 percent CCS of carbon dioxide by January 1, 2032.
90 percent CCS
EPA determined that 90 percent CCS isn’t the BSER for long-term coal-fired steam generating units because:
- The BSER hasn’t been adequately demonstrated;
- The BSER imposes unreasonable costs; and
- The infrastructure needed to comply with the BSER likely can’t be deployed by the January 1, 2032, compliance date (which means the degree of emission limitation wouldn’t be achievable).
Additionally, EPA determined that 90 percent CCS isn’t the BSER for coal-fired steam generating units undertaking a large modification because the BSER hasn’t been adequately demonstrated and imposes unreasonable costs.
40 percent natural gas co-firing
The agency determined that 40 percent co-firing with natural gas isn’t the BSER for existing medium-term coal-fired steam generating units because it constitutes generation shifting (which the Supreme Court ruled impermissible in West Virginia v. EPA (2022)). Generation shifting refers to a forced shift of nationwide electricity generation from one source to another. In this case, the natural gas co-firing standard would require coal-fired boilers to use natural gas, a completely different fuel source.
It also found that this BSER would have adverse impacts on the energy system, and the infrastructure needed to comply with the BSER likely can’t be deployed by the January 1, 2030, compliance date (which means the degree of emission limitation wouldn’t be achievable).
Natural gas- and oil-fired steam generating unit requirements
EPA also determined that the BSERs for natural gas- and oil-fired steam generating units are unnecessary.
It concluded that:
- Requiring states to develop, submit, and implement plans only for natural gas- and oil-fired steam generating units would be an inefficient use of state resources because these units account for a small part of the source category, and
- The BSERs would result in little or no emission reductions.
Phase 2 standards
Finally, the agency determined that 90 percent CCS isn’t the BSER for new base load stationary combustion turbines because:
- The BSER hasn’t been adequately demonstrated;
- The BSER imposes unreasonable costs; and
- The infrastructure needed to comply with the BSER likely can’t be deployed by the January 1, 2032, compliance date (which means the degree of emission limitation wouldn’t be achievable).
How should facilities respond?
Consider these tips to help your facility determine how it may be affected by EPA’s repeal of these federal GHG emission standards:
- Determine if your facility is subject to any regulations established by the 2024 CPS.
- If so, verify whether any of the repealed federal GHG emission standards applied to your facility.
- If any of the repealed federal GHG emission standards applied, evaluate the possible impacts on your facility’s operations.
- Adjust operations and processes as needed.
- Don’t forget to check state requirements! Most air emission permits are issued by state or local air agencies. State regulations must be at least as stringent as federal requirements, but they could also be stricter. Confirm GHG emission standards with your permitting authority.
Key to remember: EPA has repealed a majority of the GHG emission requirements established by the 2024 Carbon Pollution Standards rule.
NewsSuperfundCERCLA, SARA, EPCRA CERCLA, SARA, EPCRATransportationHazmat SafetyHazmatIn-Depth ArticleEnglishIndustry NewsClassification - HazmatRelease NotificationsEnvironmentalSARA ComplianceFocus AreaUSA
2026-09-23T05:00:00Z
CERCLA-first PFAS rule: Court upholds EPA's designation
A court of appeals recently denied challenges to EPA’s 2024 final rule that had addressed two “forever chemicals” under the federal Superfund law. The three-judge decision keeps in place the rule that designates perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS) as “hazardous substances.”
The designation under 40 CFR 302 provides EPA authority to compel responsible parties to clean up releases of these chemicals or pay cleanup costs.
Background on the rule
EPA explained in the May 8, 2024, final rule that the agency:
- Evaluated the available scientific information about PFOA and PFOS,
- Determined that the substances may present a substantial danger to public health or welfare or the environment when released, and
- Found that the hazardous substance designation is warranted.
Among its provisions, the rule requires entities to immediately report releases of PFOA or PFOS (or their salts and structural isomers) that meet or exceed one pound in any 24-hour period. These notifications must be made to the National Response Center, state or Tribal emergency response commission (SERC), and the local or Tribal emergency planning committee (LEPC). See 40 CFR 302.
Designation as a Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) hazardous substance under 40 CFR 302 enables EPA to take earlier action. Specifically, the agency can identify, characterize, and clean up the most contaminated sites expeditiously. At the same time, CERCLA ensures that those responsible for contamination pay to clean it up. This is known as “polluter pays.”
This law also generally requires federal agencies selling land contaminated with these substances to provide notice of their presence. In addition, CERCLA requires the Department of Transportation (DOT) to list and regulate PFOA and PFOS as “hazardous materials” under the Hazardous Materials Transportation Act.
How did the petitioners challenge the rule?
According to the latest court opinion, the petitioners submitted three challenges to the designation rule. They argued:
- EPA misinterpreted the term “may present substantial danger” in CERCLA’s definition of a hazardous substance;
- EPA’s cost-benefit analysis provided insufficient notice to the parties; and
- EPA’s cost-benefit analysis and decision to regulate in the face of uncertainties (i.e., the locations and quantities of PFOA/PFOS, economic costs of the rule, and unintended consequences to real estate) were arbitrary and capricious.
What did the Court find?
D.C. Circuit Opinion No. 24-1193, dated August 18, 2026, can be found at https://media.cadc.uscourts.gov/opinions/docs/2026/08/24-1193-2188689.pdf. In over 50 pages of opinion text, the court found, “None of those [petitioner] claims succeeds.” The Court reasoned:
- The plain language of CERCLA allows EPA to designate as “hazardous substances” those chemicals like PFOA and PFOS that repeatedly have been linked to adverse health effects in myriad peer-reviewed studies.
- EPA provided adequate notice of its cost-benefit analysis through its earlier Economic Assessment and request for comments on it.
- EPA acted reasonably based on the record in its calculation of costs and benefits and in its decision to take this regulatory step to designate PFOA and PFOS as hazardous substances.
The appeals court explored the layers of protection for responsible parties faced with liability. It contended, “Petitioners have come forward with no evidence that those responsible for the presence of hazardous substances at a site have been unfairly saddled with liability or that the statute’s operation has hamstrung industry.”
In its concluding remarks, the court summarized, “Having adequately considered and reasonably explained its decision to regulate at this initial stage even in the face of acknowledged uncertainties, EPA made a reasoned decision on the record before it in designating the forever chemicals PFOA and PFOS as hazardous substances … For the foregoing reasons, the petitions for review are denied.”
Why the ruling matters
EPA has remarked that PFOA and PFOS can accumulate and persist in the human body for long periods of time. The agency says that evidence from studies demonstrates that exposure to PFOA and/or PFOS is linked to adverse health effects, including:
- Cancer, and
- The effects on the immune system, cardiovascular system, liver, and developing fetus.
Before the 2024 final rule, commentators observed that EPA had never “directly” listed a substance as a CERCLA hazardous substance under 40 CFR 302 using its authority under CERCLA section 102(a). Historically, EPA had defined CERCLA hazardous substances that were first regulated by:
- Clean Water Act section 307(a),
- Clean Water Act section 311(b)(2)(A),
- Resource Conservation and Recovery Act section 3001,
- Clean Air Act section 112, or
- Toxic Substances Control Act section 7.
Yet, in the 2024 rule, EPA used its section 102(a) authority to declare the two chemicals CERCLA hazardous substances, rather than relying on regulation under those other laws. This is characterized as “CERCLA first.” Therefore, challenges to EPA’s rule were anticipated, but the latest decision leaves it in place.
EPA is using enforcement discretion
PFOA and PFOS are members of the broader class of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS). On April 19, 2024, EPA issued a memo, “PFAS Enforcement Discretion and Settlement Policy under CERCLA.” It describes how the agency will focus on holding responsible entities who significantly contributed to the release of PFAS contamination into the environment. This includes parties that have manufactured PFAS (or used PFAS in the manufacturing process), federal facilities, and other industrial parties.
According to the memo, “EPA does not intend to pursue entities where equitable factors do not support seeking response actions or costs under CERCLA,” such as farmers, municipal landfills, water utilities, municipal airports, and local fire departments.
Key to remember
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit denied challenges to EPA’s May 8, 2024, final rule on the designation of PFOA and PFOS as CERCLA hazardous substances. The opinion keeps the rule in effect. In addition to the rule, EPA has a related enforcement discretion memo.
NewsProcess Safety ManagementSafety and Health Programs and TrainingPersonal Protective EquipmentLockout/TagoutFirst Aid and MedicalRisk Management ProgramRisk Management ProgramCAA ComplianceIn-Depth ArticleHazard CommunicationEnglishEmergency Planning - OSHAIndustry NewsSafety & HealthEmergency Planning (OSHA)General Industry SafetyGeneral Duty ClauseEnvironmentalHazard CommunicationHazardous Materials Safety - OSHARespiratory ProtectionGeneral Duty ClauseFocus AreaToxic and Hazardous Substances - OSHAUSA
2026-09-22T05:00:00Z
Fatal Fog video ups ante on OSHA cryogenic asphyxiant rule
In January 2021, six workers died during a liquid nitrogen release at a poultry processing plant in Georgia. During troubleshooting of a freezer, the liquid overflowed the equipment and vaporized, displacing the oxygen in the room. The U.S. Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation Board (CSB) recently posted an animated video that explores the deadly incident and urges OSHA to issue a comprehensive standard on cryogenic asphyxiants.
The board explains that cryogenic immersion-spiral freezers like the one in the incident are used in various food freezing applications. These include the freezing of poultry, beef, diced luncheon meats, pizza toppings, marinated meats and vegetables, shrimp, and seafood fillets.
The recommendation for a cryogenic asphyxiant standard is not new. CSB first pressed for a regulation in a December 2023 investigation report (No. 2021-03-I-GA) of the event. The latest animation, “Fatal Fog: Liquid Nitrogen Release,” renews attention to a yet-to-be-closed recommendation 2021-03-I-GA-R7 for OSHA.
What happened
The release occurred in a room with an immersion-spiral freezer system. A conveyor belt carried cooked poultry pieces through a liquid nitrogen bath in the immersion freezer before sending them into a spiral freezer.
The immersion freezer had a liquid level measurement device known as a “bubbler tube.” The tube was intended to provide input to the level control system and a high-level safety interlock. At some point, the tube became bent above the overflow level. That meant the system incorrectly measured no liquid level. The system continued calling for more liquid nitrogen to be added and failed to activate the high-level interlock. The substance then overflowed the freezer and vaporized in the room.
High concentrations of nitrogen gas in an enclosed area can displace oxygen, creating an oxygen-deficient atmosphere. In this incident, two maintenance workers (who were were troubleshooting a freezer malfunction) died from asphyxiation. After coworkers spotted a worker on the floor in the freezer room, they reported what they saw to management, and a facility evacuation began.
During the evacuation, at least 14 plant workers responded to the freezer area to try to determine what happened or attempt rescue efforts. Of the workers that responded to the area, four were fatally injured, three were seriously injured, and at least seven sustained minor injuries or were uninjured.
Safety issues
The CSB determined the cause of the release was the failure of the immersion freezer’s liquid level control system to accurately measure and control the liquid level inside the freezer. This resulted from deformation of the system’s bubbler tube component.
The CSB’s investigation and subsequent animation identified five key safety issues that contributed to the severity of the event:
- The immersion freezer design relied on only one device (the bubbler tube) to monitor liquid level. Once the tube became bent, there was nothing else to prevent the overflow.
- No atmospheric monitoring equipment or alarms were installed in the freezer room. As such, no equipment would detect the oxygen-deficient atmosphere, automatically shut off the liquid supply, and notify personnel to evacuate.
- Employees were not informed, trained, equipped, drilled, or otherwise prepared for a release of liquid nitrogen. They did not recognize the oxygen-deficient atmosphere and lacked personal protective equipment to allow safe entry.
- The poultry plant had no documented process safety management (PSM) policy and did not evaluate process hazards.
- The freezer owner leasing the equipment to the poultry plant identified issues with the plant’s safety practices and nonconformance to industry guidance. Yet, the owner continued to supply liquid nitrogen to the plant. CSB concluded that had the owner suspended service until corrections were made, the incident may have been prevented.
Recommendations
CSB made recommendations to the plant and the freezer owner. Yet, it is noteworthy that the video also highlights safety recommendations made to OSHA. Specifically, CSB calls for OSHA to develop a standard on cryogenic asphyxiants. The purpose would be to prevent and/or mitigate hazards arising from the storage, use, and/or handling of these substances. It would address:
- Process equipment design,
- Atmospheric monitoring,
- Emergency shutdown systems,
- Employee training,
- Emergency planning, and
- PSM elements.
Currently, neither OSHA nor EPA define liquid nitrogen as a highly hazardous chemical or extremely hazardous substance. Consequently, OSHA’s PSM standard at 29 CFR 1910.119 and EPA’s Risk Management Program (RMP) rule at 40 CFR 68 did not apply to the Georgia poultry plant’s liquid nitrogen process.
CSB also requested OSHA to publish a guidance document. The document would cover PSM practices applicable to processes involving cryogenic asphyxiants and compressed gases. This recommendation is still open and awaiting a response, but OSHA did publish hazard alert HA-4450 in 2024, “Hazards Associated with the Release of Liquid Nitrogen and Carbon Dioxide During Flash Freezing Processes.”
Other findings
OSHA cited the food plant, freezer owner, sanitation service, and equipment servicing company in this case for a total of 59 alleged violations in July 2021. Proposed penalties were almost $1 million. While the food plant is contesting its nearly $600,000 penalty, the other three employers settled at just over $232,000.
The alleged violations related to walking-working surfaces, exit routes, personal protective equipment, confined spaces, lockout/tagout, eyewash stations, and hazard communication. OSHA also cited under the General Duty Clause of the Occupational Safety and Health Act.
The case is a reminder that not only the site employer but also service providers need to consider safety and health hazards at facilities they work at. OSHA has a Multi-employer Citation Policy for issuing citations on multi-employer worksites.
Key to remember
CSB posted a video that explores a deadly liquid nitrogen release incident. The board urges OSHA to issue a new standard on cryogenic asphyxiants.
Most Recent Highlights In Transportation
NewsGreenhouse GasesIndustry NewsIndustry NewsEnvironmental Protection Agency (EPA)Air ProgramsCAA ComplianceEnvironmentalEnglishFocus AreaAir ProgramsUSA
2026-09-17T05:00:00Z
EPA repeals most 2024 Carbon Pollution Standards for fossil fuel-fired power plants
On September 17, 2026, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) finalized a rule repealing a majority of the greenhouse gas (GHG) emission requirements established by the 2024 Carbon Pollution Standards (CPS) for fossil fuel-fired power plants. The agency also issued a supplemental proposed rule to rescind all other GHG emission standards for fossil fuel-fired power plants.
Who’s impacted?
EPA’s final rule applies to the fossil fuel-fired electric generating unit (EGU) source category, including:
- Fossil fuel-fired electric utility steam generating units, and
- Stationary combustion turbine EGUs.
The final rule specifically impacts:
- Existing fossil fuel-fired steam generating EGUs (subject to 40 CFR Part 60 Subpart UUUUb),
- Coal-fired steam generating units conducting a large modification (subject to Part 60 Subpart TTTTa), and
- New base load stationary combustion turbines (subject to Part 60 Subpart TTTTa).
Final rule: Repeal 2024 CPS regulations
The agency finalized the alternative option from its June 2025 proposed rule, repealing parts of the 2024 CPS and revising the associated best system of emission reduction (BSER) determinations.
EPA’s final rule removes most of the 2024 CPS regulations, including:
- The emission guidelines for existing coal-, oil-, and natural gas-fired steam generating units (the entirety of Part 60 Subpart UUUUb);
- The carbon capture and sequestration/storage (CCS)-based standards for coal-fired EGUs conducting a large modification; and
- The CCS-based standards for new base load stationary combustion turbines (the Phase 2 standards).
The final rule doesn’t repeal or revise the 2024 CPS efficiency-based standards for new stationary combustion turbines (the Phase 1 standards). However, EPA addresses them in the supplemental proposed rule.
Proposed rule: Repeal remaining GHG emission requirements
EPA also issued a supplemental proposed rule to rescind all remaining GHG emission requirements for fossil fuel-fired power plants, including the Phase 1 standards for new stationary combustion turbines. It would require the same regulatory changes as the June 2025 proposed rule but for different reasons.
The supplemental proposed rule would repeal all GHG emission standards in 60 Subparts TTTT and TTTTa for the fossil fuel-fired EGU source category, including the 2015 New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) and the 2024 CPS.
Specifically, EPA would repeal the:
- Partial CCS-based standards for new and efficiency-based standards for reconstructed or modified steam generating units and integrated gasification combined cycle facilities, and
- Efficiency-based standards for new or reconstructed stationary combustion turbines.
If the rule is finalized as proposed, fossil fuel-fired EGUs would no longer be required to comply with the GHG emission standards established under the 2015 NSPS or the 2024 CPS regulations.
Key to remember: EPA’s final rule repeals a majority of the greenhouse gas (GHG) emission standards established by the 2024 Carbon Pollution Standards for fossil fuel-fired power plants. The agency also proposes to remove the remaining GHG emission requirements for fossil fuel-fired power plants.
NewsIndustry NewsEnglishEnvironmental Management SystemsEMS PlanningEnvironmentalIn-Depth ArticleEMS Roles and ResponsibilitiesEnvironmental Management SystemsFocus AreaUSA
2026-09-15T05:00:00Z
Expert Insights: The hidden compliance risk of employee turnover
When environmental professionals think about compliance risks, they often focus on permits, inspections, regulatory changes, and reporting deadlines. Those are certainly important concerns. Yet one of the most significant compliance risks faced by many organizations today has little to do with regulations themselves. It's employee turnover.
Environmental compliance programs depend heavily on institutional knowledge. Over time, employees develop an understanding of permit requirements, reporting schedules, waste streams, inspection practices, agency expectations, and operational nuances that may never be fully captured in a written procedure. When those employees retire, resign, or move into different roles, valuable compliance knowledge can leave with them.
This challenge is becoming more common as organizations experience workforce transitions, retirements, organizational restructuring, and ongoing competition for skilled employees. In some cases, a facility may discover that a single individual has been managing key compliance responsibilities for years with little backup or documentation. Everything may appear to function smoothly until that person is no longer available.
The greatest risks are often not the obvious ones. A permit doesn't disappear when an employee leaves. A reporting deadline doesn't change. Hazardous waste, air emissions, and wastewater obligations continue regardless of who occupies a particular position. The risk arises when important information about those obligations exists primarily in someone's memory rather than within the organization's management system.
Consider a few common examples. An environmental manager may know that a particular production process must be included in annual emissions calculations. A maintenance supervisor may understand why certain inspection frequencies were established. An operations employee may know that a wastewater treatment unit requires additional monitoring during specific production conditions. In some cases, long-term employees have developed productive working relationships with regulatory inspectors and agency staff. They understand how the facility has historically addressed compliance challenges, what information regulators typically request, and the context behind prior inspections or permitting decisions. Experienced personnel often carry these insights with them, yet organizations frequently neglect to capture and document the information for their successors.
Organizations sometimes discover these gaps only after an audit, inspection, or missed deadline. By then, correcting the problem can be far more difficult than preventing it. Fortunately, reducing this risk doesn't necessarily require significant investment. It begins with recognizing that compliance knowledge is an organizational asset rather than an individual asset. Facilities can strengthen resiliency by documenting critical compliance activities, maintaining current procedures, developing training materials, and cross-training employees on key responsibilities. Succession planning shouldn't be limited to leadership positions. It should also include the individuals who perform essential environmental compliance functions.
Environmental management systems can play an important role in this effort. Well-documented processes help ensure that compliance activities continue consistently regardless of changes in personnel. Recordkeeping systems, compliance calendars, written procedures, and periodic reviews all contribute to preserving institutional knowledge and reducing dependence on any single employee.
Every organization experiences personnel changes. The question is whether compliance programs are prepared for them. Facilities that proactively capture knowledge and distribute responsibilities are often better positioned to maintain compliance during periods of transition. In contrast, organizations that rely heavily on individual expertise may discover that employee turnover creates risks they never anticipated.
Environmental compliance is often viewed through the lens of regulations. Increasingly, however, it may be equally important to view compliance through the lens of knowledge management. After all, one of the most valuable environmental assets a facility possesses may be what its employees know and how effectively that knowledge is shared.
NewsHazardous WasteIndustry NewsEnglishWaste ManifestsWaste HandlersWasteEnvironmental Protection Agency (EPA)EnvironmentalIn-Depth ArticleWaste/HazWasteFocus AreaUSA
2026-09-14T05:00:00Z
Hazardous waste e-Manifest report card: Tips for improving your facility’s manifests
With the school year fully underway, report cards will soon start to appear. But these performance evaluations aren’t limited to students in the classroom. A recent assessment serves as a “report card” for the federal e-Manifest system, an electronic platform that tracks hazardous waste shipments. And just like a student’s report card, the report reveals areas for improvement.
On August 11, 2026, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Office of Inspector General (OIG) published Evaluation of the EPA’s e-Manifest System. The report identifies the leading errors made by hazardous waste handlers, including:
- Generators;
- Transporters; and
- Treatment, storage, and disposal facilities (TSDFs).
The e-Manifest system’s “report card” offers hazardous waste handlers valuable lessons to help them deliver A+ manifests.
e-Manifest report card results
The OIG analyzed 2022–2024 e-Manifest system data and identified the most frequent errors:
- Incorrect EPA identification (ID) numbers, and
- Overstated shipping volumes of hazardous waste.
The report also found that more than 99 percent of manifest submissions between 2019 and 2024 were “data + image” submissions. With this submission type, all hazardous waste handlers use a paper manifest. The TSDF transcribes the data from the paper manifest into an electronic data file and then uploads a scanned image of the final paper manifest and the electronic data file to the e-Manifest system.
The OIG found that most of the errors occurred when TSDFs manually transcribed data from the final paper manifest into the electronic data file.
Incorrect EPA ID numbers
According to the report, about 40 percent of hazardous waste generator EPA ID number entries and 50 percent of TSDF EPA ID number entries were invalid. Many errors were due to entering EPA ID numbers incorrectly, but a notable number of them were connected to very small quantity generators (VSQGs) using paper manifests. VSQGs need an EPA ID number only to use electronic manifests, not paper ones. On paper manifests, VSQGs frequently leave the EPA ID number blank or enter different information to indicate that they don’t have an EPA ID number.
Overstated shipping volumes
Overall, the OIG concluded the most significant errors involved overstated shipping volumes caused by incorrect manifest entries or inaccurate transcriptions of paper manifest data into the e-Manifest system.
Common errors made when copying data from the paper manifests into electronic data files included:
- Entering incorrect units of measurement (such as using tons for volumes that were calculated in pounds on the paper manifest);
- Omitting or placing decimal points for volumes in the wrong place (e.g., 941,250 tons instead of 94.1250 tons);
- Entering data that’s incorrect on the paper manifest; and
- Duplicating data entries.
Lessons for hazardous waste handlers
Although the OIG’s report was developed for EPA, it offers valuable insights for hazardous waste handlers required to fill out manifests.
Here are some helpful tips gleaned from the report that all hazardous waste handlers can use:
- Verify that your EPA ID number is entered correctly.
- Verify that the stated volumes match the units of measurement.
- Double-check decimal places.
- If you’re filling out a paper manifest, ensure the information is legible. If you encounter illegible information on a paper manifest, confirm the data with the handler who filled it out.
- Look for unreasonable information. For example, if the volume on the manifest indicates that thousands of tons (instead of thousands of pounds) of hazardous waste are being shipped, an error likely occurred.
If you don’t have one already, consider developing a checklist for filling out hazardous waste manifests. You can add the tips above and any other parts of your organization’s manifest process to the checklist.
Benefits of electronic manifests
The OIG’s report also emphasizes that electronic manifests offer specific advantages over paper manifests, especially when all hazardous waste handlers use them.
Potential improvements include the following:
- Increased data accuracy: Because hazardous waste handlers don’t have to copy data from paper manifests into the e-Manifest system, there’s a much lower risk of entering data incorrectly. Plus, electronic manifests solve the issue of illegible entries.
- Streamlined process: Electronic manifests simplify the data-entry process by removing the need to reenter data from paper manifests into the e-Manifest system.
- Easier recordkeeping: The e-Manifest system retains all manifest records, so electronic manifest users don’t have to keep paper copies (except for generators that use hybrid manifests).
- Compliance with possible future regulations: EPA proposed a rule in March 2026 that would require the use of electronic manifests (hybrid or fully electronic) and phase out the use of paper manifests. By shifting to electronic manifests now, hazardous waste handlers would be better prepared to comply with the rule if it’s finalized.
Key to remember: A recent report evaluating EPA’s e-Manifest system offers hazardous waste handlers valuable insights into common manifest errors to avoid.
NewsWater PermittingChange NoticesChange NoticeWater ProgramsWater ReportingWater AnalysisVirginiaEnvironmentalWater MonitoringWater ProgramsEnglishFocus AreaCWA Compliance
2026-09-10T05:00:00Z
Virginia adds PFAS requirements to biosolids permit
Effective date: September 23, 2026
This applies to: Owners of sewage treatment works and other biosolids permit holders that land apply, market, or distribute treated sewage sludge (i.e., biosolids)
Description of change: The Virginia State Water Control Board’s revisions to two rules add requirements for per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) to biosolids permits.
Starting January 1, 2027, treatment works must test biosolids for PFAS and report concentrations of perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA), perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS), and all other target analytes to the Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) and to the entities that apply the biosolids from the treatment works. The requirement also applies to out-of-state sources of biosolids that will be land applied in the state.
Starting July 1, 2027, the DEQ will limit the distribution, marketing, and land application of PFAS-containing biosolids based on concentrations of PFOA and PFOS. Additionally, companies that land apply PFAS-containing biosolids must provide landowners with PFAS monitoring results at least 2 weeks before application.
Starting July 1, 2029, the DEQ will strengthen limits on the distribution, marketing, and land application of PFAS-containing biosolids, basing them on the combined concentrations of PFOA and PFOS.
NewsGreenhouse GasesAir EmissionsChange NoticesChange NoticeWasteCaliforniaCAA ComplianceEnvironmentalLand Disposal RestrictionsFocus AreaEnglishAir ProgramsAir Programs
2026-09-10T05:00:00Z
California updates Landfill Methane Regulation
Effective date: January 1, 2027
This applies to: Owners and operators of municipal solid waste landfills
Description of change: The California Air Resources Board (CARB) updated the Landfill Methane Regulation (LMR). Major amendments include:
- Requiring inspection and repair when operators are notified of a remotely detected methane emission plume;
- Making the landfill surface and component leak monitoring procedures more stringent by removing monitoring exemptions, reducing corrective action timelines, and increasing monitoring frequency at certain landfills;
- Establishing a process to evaluate and approve emerging alternative leak detection technologies and requiring tools (e.g., drone-mounted laser scanners) to identify leaks in inaccessible areas previously excluded from monitoring;
- Requiring the earlier installation and operation of gas collection infrastructure in new waste deposition areas;
- Limiting periods of gas collection and control system downtime and mitigating the emissions from unavoidable downtime;
- Increasing wellhead monitoring parameters and analysis and requiring response actions for out-of-range values and large value changes;
- Mandating more frequent monitoring, analysis, and mitigation measures (including cover improvements) and requiring more frequent subsurface temperature, oxygen, and liquid level monitoring; and
- Managing declining gas generation at closed landfills.
The changes to the LMR set stricter requirements than the federal environmental regulations for:
- Landfill gas collection and control,
- Component leak testing, and
- Surface emissions monitoring.
Most Recent Highlights In Safety & Health
NewsTennesseeChange NoticeChange NoticesCAA ComplianceEnvironmentalAir PermittingFocus AreaEnglishAir ProgramsAir Programs
2026-09-10T05:00:00Z
Tennessee extends air quality construction general permit eligibility
Effective date: November 2, 2026
This applies to: Conditional major sources of emissions
Description of change: The Tennessee Air Pollution Control Board approved amendments granting eligibility for air quality construction general permit coverage to conditional major sources of emissions. The general permit must adequately limit the facility’s potential to emit and include recordkeeping requirements for demonstrating compliance.
Conditional major sources accept federally enforceable permit limitations to avoid obtaining an individual major source operating permit (i.e., complying with the Title V operating permit program).
Related state info: Clean air operating permits state comparison — Tennessee
NewsEnforcement and Audits - OSHANon-Point SourcesToxic Substances Control Act - EPASafety and Health Programs and TrainingToxic Subtances Control Act - EPATSCA ComplianceWater ProgramsWater QualityMonthly Roundup VideoMiningSafety and Health Programs and TrainingUSACWA ComplianceEnglishOSHA Emphasis ProgramsIndustry NewsWater PermittingSafety & HealthNew Source PerformanceGeneral Industry SafetySpecialized IndustriesEnvironmentalFocus AreaVideo
EHS Monthly Round Up - August 2026
In this August 2026 monthly roundup video, we'll review the most impactful environmental health and safety news.
Hi everyone! Welcome to the monthly news roundup video, where we’ll review the most impactful environmental health and safety news. Let’s take a look at what happened over the past month.
Citing elevated injury and illness rates, OSHA relaunched a National Emphasis Program, or NEP, on Warehousing and Distribution Center Operations. Retail operations are no longer targeted by this NEP, as they were previously. Inspectors will focus on common hazards in warehousing and distribution such as powered industrial vehicle operations, materials handling and storage, and fire protection. The NEP also offers OSHA greater discretion in whether to expand an inspection.
OSHA state-plan enforcement continued to gain momentum in fiscal year 2025. In an upward trend, inspection numbers, violation counts, and penalty amounts all increased. The latest data stem from the Occupational Safety and Health Plan Association’s Grassroots Worker Protection report.
OSHA’s Safe+Sound Week was held August 10 through the 16. The event gave employers an opportunity to highlight their safety and health programs and bring attention to common workplace hazards.
The Mine Safety and Health Administration reopened the comment period for proposed changes to the approval criteria for its mine roof control and ventilation plans. The new deadline for comments is September 30.
Turning to environmental news, EPA extended the compliance dates of certain Workplace Chemical Protection Program requirements for perchloroethylene and carbon tetrachloride. The revised deadlines affect facilities subject to the TSCA PCE and CTC risk management rules finalized in 2024.
And finally, EPA published a proposed 2027 general stormwater permit for construction. It applies to construction activities in areas where EPA is the NPDES permitting authority, including Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New Mexico, and the District of Columbia. If finalized, the rule will replace the existing 2022 permit, which expires in early 2027.
Thanks for tuning in to the monthly news roundup. We’ll see you next month!
NewsIndustry NewsIndustry NewsAir EmissionsEnvironmental Protection Agency (EPA)Renewable and Alternative EnergyBiofuelCAA ComplianceEnvironmentalFocus AreaEnglishAir ProgramsAir ProgramsUSA
2026-09-03T05:00:00Z
EPA extends RFS annual compliance report deadline
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) issued a prepublication of a final rule extending the Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS) annual compliance reporting deadline for the 2025 compliance year from September 1 to October 1, 2026.
Who’s impacted?
The RFS annual compliance report applies to obligated parties, including:
- Refiners of gasoline or diesel fuel (transportation fuel), and
- Importers of transportation fuel.
Under the RFS program, obligated parties with renewable volume obligations (RVOs) must retire enough Renewable Identification Numbers (RINs) to meet their RVOs for the calendar year.
What’s the change?
EPA extended the 2025 RFS compliance reporting deadline to October 1, 2026, giving obligated parties additional time to comply with their 2025 RVOs and submit their annual compliance reports.
Why the change?
EPA recently released its small refinery exemption (SRE) decisions for the 2025 compliance year, exempting 1.76 billion RINs for 29 small refineries. SREs affect the cost and availability of RINs for all obligated parties. The extension gives obligated parties more time to assess the impact of the SRE decisions and adjust their strategies before completing their 2025 RFS reporting obligations.
Key to remember: EPA has extended the Renewable Fuel Standard annual compliance reporting deadline from September 1 to October 1, 2026.
NewsEnvironmental Management SystemsEMS PlanningCAA ComplianceEnvironmental Management SystemsIn-Depth ArticleCWA ComplianceWaste/HazWasteEnglishIndustry NewsEMS GoalsEMS Audits and EvaluationsEnvironmentalFocus AreaUSA
2026-09-01T05:00:00Z
10 operational changes that should trigger an environmental compliance review
Environmental compliance issues often arise not because regulations change, but because operations change.
A facility may replace equipment, begin using a new chemical, increase production, or modify a process for legitimate business reasons. However, even routine operational changes can affect permits, reporting obligations, waste generation, emissions, wastewater discharges, or stormwater exposure.
Organizations that review environmental impacts before implementing changes are better positioned to identify compliance obligations early and avoid costly surprises.
What's an environmental compliance review?
An environmental compliance review is a structured evaluation of how a proposed change could affect a facility's environmental obligations.
Many organizations incorporate environmental reviews into an environmental management system (EMS) or formal change-management process. These procedures help ensure that environmental obligations are evaluated before operational changes are implemented. The updated ISO 14001 standard places greater emphasis on managing changes that may affect environmental performance, reinforcing the need to assess environmental impacts before decisions are made.
The review doesn't need to be complicated. In many cases, it involves determining whether the change could affect air permits, wastewater discharges, stormwater permits, hazardous waste management, chemical reporting, spill prevention requirements, or other environmental programs.
The goal is to identify environmental impacts before a change is implemented rather than after a regulator, auditor, or inspector discovers a problem.
Production increases
Increasing production is often viewed as a business decision rather than an environmental one. However, greater production may increase air emissions, wastewater generation, chemical usage, and waste generation.
Facilities should evaluate whether higher throughput could affect permit limits, reporting thresholds, or compliance obligations before production levels increase.
New chemicals or raw materials
A new chemical can trigger a wide range of environmental requirements.
Changes in raw materials may affect hazardous waste determinations, emergency planning requirements, air emissions calculations, Toxics Release Inventory reporting, spill prevention planning, or wastewater characteristics.
Before purchasing or introducing a new chemical, facilities should evaluate its environmental implications and ensure required controls are in place.
Equipment replacements and upgrades
Many organizations assume replacing equipment is simply a maintenance activity. In reality, equipment changes can have environmental consequences.
Replacing a boiler, coating operation, storage tank, dust collector, scrubber, or process equipment may affect emissions, waste streams, monitoring requirements, or permit applicability. Even when equipment serves the same function, environmental impacts should be evaluated before installation.
Process modifications
Changing how a product is manufactured can create environmental consequences even when production levels stay the same.
New process steps, altered operating conditions, different fuels, or modified treatment systems can affect emissions, waste generation, water usage, and permit conditions. Process changes should be reviewed to determine whether existing permits and operating procedures remain appropriate.
Facility expansions
Building additions, new production lines, warehouse expansions, and site development projects often involve environmental considerations beyond construction activities.
Organizations should evaluate potential impacts on air permits, stormwater management, wastewater infrastructure, storage capacity, and environmental monitoring programs before expansion projects begin.
Changes in waste management practices
Facilities occasionally change waste vendors, storage practices, recycling programs, treatment methods, or waste handling procedures to improve efficiency or reduce costs.
While these changes may appear administrative, they can affect generator status, accumulation practices, recordkeeping obligations, and waste determinations. Environmental personnel should review proposed changes before implementation.
New products or services
New products often require new materials, equipment, or processes that may affect existing environmental obligations.
Contractor activities
Contractor activities involving chemicals, waste management, tank cleaning, painting, excavation, demolition, or maintenance may create environmental compliance implications that warrant review.
Property and infrastructure changes
Changes to storage areas, containment systems, drainage patterns, tanks, or utilities can affect stormwater exposure and other environmental obligations.
Acquisitions and ownership changes
Acquiring a facility or business can introduce new permits, reporting obligations, and compliance responsibilities that should be evaluated during due diligence.
Train employees to recognize when a review may be needed
Environmental departments cannot review changes they never hear about.
Engineering, maintenance, operations, purchasing, project management, and production personnel are often the first to learn about proposed changes. Providing basic awareness training can help these groups recognize situations that may have environmental implications.
Employees don't need to become environmental experts. Instead, they should know when to notify EHS and ask whether a compliance review is warranted. A simple "check with EHS before proceeding" expectation can prevent significant compliance problems and reduce the likelihood that environmental requirements will be discovered too late.
Key to remember: Many environmental compliance issues begin with an operational change. Establishing a process to identify and review changes before implementation can help organizations avoid permit problems, reporting errors, and unexpected regulatory obligations.
NewsIndustry NewsWater ProgramsWater QualityEnvironmental Protection Agency (EPA)Industrial WastewaterEnvironmentalIn-Depth ArticleCWA ComplianceEnglishFocus AreaUSA
2026-08-26T05:00:00Z
National wastewater pretreatment program: What type of industrial user is your facility?
Before the wastewater can flow from your facility into a municipal treatment plant, there’s something you need to know: What type of industrial user is your facility? The answer to this question determines the federal environmental regulations your facility must meet.
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regulates wastewater discharges from industrial and commercial facilities to publicly owned treatment works (POTWs) through the National Pretreatment Program. These facilities, known as industrial users (IUs), must obtain a permit or other control mechanism to send wastewater to a POTW. However, IUs must comply with all applicable federal, state, and local pretreatment requirements, regardless of whether the facility has been issued a permit or other control mechanism.
The National Pretreatment Program applies to:
- Industrial users (IUs),
- Significant IUs (SIUs), and
- Categorical IUs (CIUs).
EPA’s regulations at 40 CFR Part 403 contain compliance requirements for all IUs as well as additional requirements for SIUs and CIUs. To know which regulations to comply with, you must identify the types of IUs that apply to your facility.
Is my facility an IU?
The first type of user is the easiest determination to make. If your industrial or commercial facility discharges wastewater to a POTW, it’s an IU.
Is my facility an SIU?
If your facility can answer “yes” to any of these four questions, it qualifies as an SIU:
- Is the facility subject to the categorical pretreatment standards under 403.6 and Subchapter N?
- Does the facility discharge an average of at least 25,000 gallons daily of process wastewater to the POTW (not including sanitary, noncontact cooling, and boiler blowdown wastewater)?
- Does the facility contribute a process waste stream that makes up at least 5 percent of the POTW’s average dry weather hydraulic or organic capacity?
- Is your facility designated as an SIU by the control authority (i.e., the POTW, state, or EPA)?
Even if the first three criteria don’t apply, the control authority may designate your facility as an SIU if it determines that there’s a reasonable potential for your facility’s wastewater discharges:
- To adversely affect the POTW’s operation, or
- To violate the pretreatment standards.
Limited exceptions allow the control authority to designate a facility as a non-significant CIU (if the facility meets specific conditions according to 403.3(v)(2)) or to determine that the facility has no reasonable potential to harm POTW operations or violate the standards (403.3(v)(3)).
Is my facility a CIU?
The National Pretreatment Program has rules that apply to specific industrial processes, known as categorical pretreatment standards. If your facility is subject to a categorical requirement in Parts 405–471, it’s considered a CIU. Examples of covered categories include:
- Metal finishing (Part 433);
- Organic chemical, plastic, and synthetic fiber manufacturing (Part 414); and
- Petroleum refining (Part 419).
Submit a category determination request
The control authority director determines whether any of the categorical standards apply to a facility through a process called “categorical determination.” IUs may submit a category determination request when a new categorical standard is established that could apply to their existing facility. Additionally, EPA requires IUs to request a determination when:
- An existing facility adds or changes an operation or process that may make it subject to an existing categorical pretreatment standard, and
- A facility becomes a new source of discharge to a POTW.
The director will issue a final decision as to whether any of the regulations in Parts 405–471 apply to the facility.
Which pretreatment regulations apply?
The control authority will include the applicable regulations in the facility’s permit or implement the requirements through other control mechanisms. These will be at least as stringent as the following federal standards.
Requirements for all IUs
General and specific prohibitions apply to all types of IUs, banning facilities from discharging pollutants and categories of pollutants that can cause pass through or interference at the POTW.
Additionally, all IUs must report specific discharges and changes to existing discharge practices to the control authority.
Requirements for SIUs
SIUs have additional compliance obligations, such as:
- Conducting self-monitoring and submitting periodic compliance reports every 6 months for SIUs not subject to categorical standards, and
- Developing and implementing a slug control plan if required.
Requirements for CIUs
CIUs also have more requirements, including (but not limited to):
- The applicable categorical pretreatment standards (Parts 405–471),
- The categorical standards at 403.6, and
- Additional reporting and notification requirements.
Understanding the types of IUs that characterize your facility can help clarify which federal wastewater rules apply.
Key to remember: The type of industrial user determines the National Pretreatment Program requirements applicable to facilities that discharge wastewater to publicly owned treatment plants.
Most Recent Highlights In Human Resources
NewsEnglishToxic Substances Control Act - EPAChange NoticesChange NoticeTSCA ComplianceWasteToxic Substances - EPAEnvironmentalSolid WasteWaste/HazWasteNew HampshireFocus Area
2026-08-25T05:00:00Z
New Hampshire adopts PFAS product regulations
Effective date: July 17, 2026
This applies to: Any entity that manufactures or supplies specific consumer products with intentionally added per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS)
Description of change: The New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services adopted rules to implement the Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances Products Control Program, which bans certain PFAS-added consumer products from being sold, offered for sale, or distributed for sale or promotional purposes.
The regulations:
- Ban certain products with intentionally added PFAS from being sold or distributed in New Hampshire (unless specifically exempt);
- Establish the certificate of compliance (COC) process, under which manufacturers and suppliers must provide a COC upon request of the department to demonstrate compliance; and
- Establish exemptions.
The ban applies to PFAS-added products manufactured on or after January 1, 2027. Product categories include:
- Carpets and rugs;
- Cosmetics;
- Feminine hygiene products;
- Food packaging and containers;
- Juvenile products;
- Textile furnishings;
- Textile treatments;
- Upholstered furniture; and
- Waxes for use on boats; skis; surfboards; bodyboards; and skimboards.
Examples of exempted products include all products manufactured before January 1, 2027; secondhand products; and products with at least 85 percent recycled content.
NewsWater PermittingChange NoticesChange NoticeWater ProgramsWater QualityEnvironmentalWater ProgramsEnglishNew HampshireFocus AreaCWA Compliance
2026-08-25T05:00:00Z
New Hampshire requires electronic applications for AOT permits
Effective date: August 6, 2026
This applies to: Projects that will disturb more than 100,000 square feet of terrain (or 50,000 square feet if it’s within the protected shoreline) and projects that will disturb any area with a 25 percent or steeper land slope that’s within 50 feet of surface water
Description of change: The New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services amended the regulations for Alteration of Terrain (AOT) permitting, requiring applicants to submit all permit applications and permits by notification online through its new e-permitting system, NHEnviro.
The department also made other changes, such as:
- Expanding the general permit rule to cover specific steep slope projects, and
- Exempting excavation and mining projects from the 5-acre open area disturbance limit.
NewsIndustry NewsEnglishEnvironmental Management SystemsSustainabilityIn-Depth ArticleEnvironmentalEMS Roles and ResponsibilitiesEnvironmental Management SystemsFocus AreaUSA
2026-08-21T05:00:00Z
Maintenance and environmental compliance go hand in hand
Environmental compliance is often viewed as the responsibility of the environmental, health, and safety (EHS) department. In reality, many compliance successes and failures occur on the plant floor, in maintenance shops, and around equipment managed by maintenance personnel.
Maintenance employees regularly handle used oil, inspect tanks, repair air pollution control equipment, respond to spills, and maintain secondary containment systems. Their daily decisions can directly affect compliance with federal, state, and local environmental requirements. As facilities face increased scrutiny of air emissions, waste management, and spill prevention programs, coordination between environmental and maintenance personnel has become increasingly important. That's why one of the most valuable members of an environmental compliance team is often someone from maintenance.
Used oil management starts in the shop
Many maintenance departments generate used oil from equipment servicing, vehicle maintenance, and hydraulic system repairs. While used oil can often be managed under streamlined regulations, improper handling can quickly create compliance problems.
Common issues include storing used oil in unlabeled containers, mixing used oil with hazardous waste, and failing to address leaks from storage containers. Even small mistakes can increase disposal costs or change how the waste must be managed.
Maintenance personnel can help reduce these risks by ensuring used oil containers remain closed when not in use, are properly labeled, and are routinely inspected for signs of leakage or deterioration.
Spill response depends on employees closest to the release
When a spill occurs, maintenance staff members are often among the first employees on scene.
Their actions during the first few minutes can affect both environmental impacts and regulatory obligations. Quickly stopping the source of a release, protecting drains, and containing spilled material can prevent a minor incident from becoming a reportable event.
Facilities should ensure maintenance personnel understand spill response procedures, know where response equipment is located, and recognize when environmental staff or emergency responders must be notified.
Even facilities with formal spill response plans depend on maintenance employees to implement many of the initial response actions.
Air compliance requires reliable equipment
Many facilities rely on air pollution control devices such as baghouses, scrubbers, thermal oxidizers, and dust collection systems to comply with permit requirements.
Environmental managers may be responsible for reporting emissions and maintaining permit records, but maintenance staff members are often responsible for keeping control equipment operating properly.
A failed pressure gauge, malfunctioning fan, broken duct connection, or neglected preventive maintenance task can affect emissions performance and potentially result in permit deviations.
Facilities should ensure maintenance programs include environmental control equipment and that maintenance personnel understand which equipment has environmental significance.
Tanks and containment need routine attention
Storage tanks and secondary containment systems are another area where maintenance and environmental responsibilities overlap.
Maintenance personnel may also maintain stormwater controls, drainage structures, and outdoor storage areas that affect permit compliance.
Routine inspections can identify corrosion, damaged coatings, leaking fittings, deteriorated hoses, and cracks before they become larger problems. These conditions may not seem urgent from an operational perspective, but they can increase the risk of releases and regulatory violations.
Facilities should establish inspection procedures, clearly define responsibilities, and document findings. A simple inspection program can often identify problems early, reducing both environmental risk and repair costs.
Communication helps prevent violations
Many environmental compliance issues occur when operational changes are made without considering environmental impacts.
New equipment, replacement tanks, process modifications, and maintenance projects can affect air emissions, waste generation, chemical storage, and spill prevention requirements. Environmental staff may not become aware of these changes until after installation.
Regular communication between maintenance and environmental personnel can help identify potential compliance concerns before work begins. In many cases, a short conversation during project planning can prevent significant compliance challenges later.
Building a partnership between maintenance and environmental teams
Environmental compliance is most effective when it's integrated into daily operations. Maintenance teams often have the best understanding of equipment conditions, storage systems, and operational changes occurring throughout a facility.
Environmental awareness training, maintenance involvement in inspections, and regular communication can strengthen compliance programs and identify problems sooner.
Environmental managers bring regulatory expertise. Maintenance personnel bring operational knowledge. Together, they create a stronger foundation for compliance than either group can achieve alone.
Key to remember: Environmental compliance isn't solely an EHS responsibility. Maintenance staff members play a critical role in preventing spills, managing used oil, maintaining compliance equipment, and identifying problems before they become violations.
NewsNon-Point SourcesPublicly Owned Treatment WorksMunicipal WastewaterChange NoticesChange NoticeWater ProgramsIndustrial WastewaterVirginiaEnvironmentalWater MonitoringCWA ComplianceEnglishFocus Area
2026-08-14T05:00:00Z
Virginia requires PFAS monitoring for wastewater
Effective date: September 9, 2026
This applies to: Publicly owned treatment works (POTW)
Description of change: The Virginia State Water Control Board adopted amendments to the Virginia Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (VPDES) Permit regulation. The updated regulations:
- Require POTWs to mandate quarterly discharge monitoring for per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) for certain industrial user categories,
- Establish a 30-day reporting deadline for monitoring results, and
- Specify acceptable test methods.
Covered industrial categories include:
- PFAS manufacturing facilities;
- Electroplating and metal finishing facilities using PFAS;
- Semiconductor and circuit board facilities using PFAS;
- Paper and packaging manufacturing facilities using PFAS;
- Textile mills and tanneries using PFAS and leather, fabric, and carpet treaters using PFAS;
- Centralized waste treatment industrial facilities;
- Industrial launderers; and
- Any other facility or site that’s a source of PFAS (such as landfills).
The POTWs must report results quarterly to the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality. Additionally, industrial users must report monitoring results within 30 days of receiving the laboratory results.
Related state info: Industrial water permitting — Virginia
NewsGroundwaterChange NoticesChange NoticeWater ProgramsWater ReportingVirginiaEnvironmentalWater ProgramsEnglishFocus AreaCWA Compliance
2026-08-14T05:00:00Z
Virginia amends water withdrawal reporting requirements
Effective date: September 9, 2026
This applies to: Water users providing water to another person off-site
Description of the change: The Virginia State Water Control Board amended water withdrawal reporting requirements for water users providing water to another person off-site. These users are now required to report monthly (or quarterly if applicable) the total volumes of potable water and reclaimed water that they provided:
- To a data center with an air permit from the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality; and
- For domestic, commercial, industrial, and all other non-categorized purposes.
The reporting requirement takes effect on January 1, 2027.
New Network Poll
Most Popular Highlights In Environmental
NewsProcess Safety ManagementSafety and Health Programs and TrainingPersonal Protective EquipmentLockout/TagoutFirst Aid and MedicalRisk Management ProgramRisk Management ProgramCAA ComplianceIn-Depth ArticleHazard CommunicationEnglishEmergency Planning - OSHAIndustry NewsSafety & HealthEmergency Planning (OSHA)General Industry SafetyGeneral Duty ClauseEnvironmentalHazard CommunicationHazardous Materials Safety - OSHARespiratory ProtectionGeneral Duty ClauseFocus AreaToxic and Hazardous Substances - OSHAUSA
2026-09-22T05:00:00Z
Fatal Fog video ups ante on OSHA cryogenic asphyxiant rule
In January 2021, six workers died during a liquid nitrogen release at a poultry processing plant in Georgia. During troubleshooting of a freezer, the liquid overflowed the equipment and vaporized, displacing the oxygen in the room. The U.S. Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation Board (CSB) recently posted an animated video that explores the deadly incident and urges OSHA to issue a comprehensive standard on cryogenic asphyxiants.
The board explains that cryogenic immersion-spiral freezers like the one in the incident are used in various food freezing applications. These include the freezing of poultry, beef, diced luncheon meats, pizza toppings, marinated meats and vegetables, shrimp, and seafood fillets.
The recommendation for a cryogenic asphyxiant standard is not new. CSB first pressed for a regulation in a December 2023 investigation report (No. 2021-03-I-GA) of the event. The latest animation, “Fatal Fog: Liquid Nitrogen Release,” renews attention to a yet-to-be-closed recommendation 2021-03-I-GA-R7 for OSHA.
What happened
The release occurred in a room with an immersion-spiral freezer system. A conveyor belt carried cooked poultry pieces through a liquid nitrogen bath in the immersion freezer before sending them into a spiral freezer.
The immersion freezer had a liquid level measurement device known as a “bubbler tube.” The tube was intended to provide input to the level control system and a high-level safety interlock. At some point, the tube became bent above the overflow level. That meant the system incorrectly measured no liquid level. The system continued calling for more liquid nitrogen to be added and failed to activate the high-level interlock. The substance then overflowed the freezer and vaporized in the room.
High concentrations of nitrogen gas in an enclosed area can displace oxygen, creating an oxygen-deficient atmosphere. In this incident, two maintenance workers (who were were troubleshooting a freezer malfunction) died from asphyxiation. After coworkers spotted a worker on the floor in the freezer room, they reported what they saw to management, and a facility evacuation began.
During the evacuation, at least 14 plant workers responded to the freezer area to try to determine what happened or attempt rescue efforts. Of the workers that responded to the area, four were fatally injured, three were seriously injured, and at least seven sustained minor injuries or were uninjured.
Safety issues
The CSB determined the cause of the release was the failure of the immersion freezer’s liquid level control system to accurately measure and control the liquid level inside the freezer. This resulted from deformation of the system’s bubbler tube component.
The CSB’s investigation and subsequent animation identified five key safety issues that contributed to the severity of the event:
- The immersion freezer design relied on only one device (the bubbler tube) to monitor liquid level. Once the tube became bent, there was nothing else to prevent the overflow.
- No atmospheric monitoring equipment or alarms were installed in the freezer room. As such, no equipment would detect the oxygen-deficient atmosphere, automatically shut off the liquid supply, and notify personnel to evacuate.
- Employees were not informed, trained, equipped, drilled, or otherwise prepared for a release of liquid nitrogen. They did not recognize the oxygen-deficient atmosphere and lacked personal protective equipment to allow safe entry.
- The poultry plant had no documented process safety management (PSM) policy and did not evaluate process hazards.
- The freezer owner leasing the equipment to the poultry plant identified issues with the plant’s safety practices and nonconformance to industry guidance. Yet, the owner continued to supply liquid nitrogen to the plant. CSB concluded that had the owner suspended service until corrections were made, the incident may have been prevented.
Recommendations
CSB made recommendations to the plant and the freezer owner. Yet, it is noteworthy that the video also highlights safety recommendations made to OSHA. Specifically, CSB calls for OSHA to develop a standard on cryogenic asphyxiants. The purpose would be to prevent and/or mitigate hazards arising from the storage, use, and/or handling of these substances. It would address:
- Process equipment design,
- Atmospheric monitoring,
- Emergency shutdown systems,
- Employee training,
- Emergency planning, and
- PSM elements.
Currently, neither OSHA nor EPA define liquid nitrogen as a highly hazardous chemical or extremely hazardous substance. Consequently, OSHA’s PSM standard at 29 CFR 1910.119 and EPA’s Risk Management Program (RMP) rule at 40 CFR 68 did not apply to the Georgia poultry plant’s liquid nitrogen process.
CSB also requested OSHA to publish a guidance document. The document would cover PSM practices applicable to processes involving cryogenic asphyxiants and compressed gases. This recommendation is still open and awaiting a response, but OSHA did publish hazard alert HA-4450 in 2024, “Hazards Associated with the Release of Liquid Nitrogen and Carbon Dioxide During Flash Freezing Processes.”
Other findings
OSHA cited the food plant, freezer owner, sanitation service, and equipment servicing company in this case for a total of 59 alleged violations in July 2021. Proposed penalties were almost $1 million. While the food plant is contesting its nearly $600,000 penalty, the other three employers settled at just over $232,000.
The alleged violations related to walking-working surfaces, exit routes, personal protective equipment, confined spaces, lockout/tagout, eyewash stations, and hazard communication. OSHA also cited under the General Duty Clause of the Occupational Safety and Health Act.
The case is a reminder that not only the site employer but also service providers need to consider safety and health hazards at facilities they work at. OSHA has a Multi-employer Citation Policy for issuing citations on multi-employer worksites.
Key to remember
CSB posted a video that explores a deadly liquid nitrogen release incident. The board urges OSHA to issue a new standard on cryogenic asphyxiants.
NewsEnforcement and Audits - OSHANon-Point SourcesToxic Substances Control Act - EPASafety and Health Programs and TrainingToxic Subtances Control Act - EPATSCA ComplianceWater ProgramsWater QualityMonthly Roundup VideoMiningSafety and Health Programs and TrainingUSACWA ComplianceEnglishOSHA Emphasis ProgramsIndustry NewsWater PermittingSafety & HealthNew Source PerformanceGeneral Industry SafetySpecialized IndustriesEnvironmentalFocus AreaVideo
EHS Monthly Round Up - August 2026
In this August 2026 monthly roundup video, we'll review the most impactful environmental health and safety news.
Hi everyone! Welcome to the monthly news roundup video, where we’ll review the most impactful environmental health and safety news. Let’s take a look at what happened over the past month.
Citing elevated injury and illness rates, OSHA relaunched a National Emphasis Program, or NEP, on Warehousing and Distribution Center Operations. Retail operations are no longer targeted by this NEP, as they were previously. Inspectors will focus on common hazards in warehousing and distribution such as powered industrial vehicle operations, materials handling and storage, and fire protection. The NEP also offers OSHA greater discretion in whether to expand an inspection.
OSHA state-plan enforcement continued to gain momentum in fiscal year 2025. In an upward trend, inspection numbers, violation counts, and penalty amounts all increased. The latest data stem from the Occupational Safety and Health Plan Association’s Grassroots Worker Protection report.
OSHA’s Safe+Sound Week was held August 10 through the 16. The event gave employers an opportunity to highlight their safety and health programs and bring attention to common workplace hazards.
The Mine Safety and Health Administration reopened the comment period for proposed changes to the approval criteria for its mine roof control and ventilation plans. The new deadline for comments is September 30.
Turning to environmental news, EPA extended the compliance dates of certain Workplace Chemical Protection Program requirements for perchloroethylene and carbon tetrachloride. The revised deadlines affect facilities subject to the TSCA PCE and CTC risk management rules finalized in 2024.
And finally, EPA published a proposed 2027 general stormwater permit for construction. It applies to construction activities in areas where EPA is the NPDES permitting authority, including Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New Mexico, and the District of Columbia. If finalized, the rule will replace the existing 2022 permit, which expires in early 2027.
Thanks for tuning in to the monthly news roundup. We’ll see you next month!
NewsGreenhouse GasesIndustry NewsIndustry NewsEnvironmental Protection Agency (EPA)Air ProgramsCAA ComplianceEnvironmentalEnglishFocus AreaAir ProgramsUSA
2026-09-17T05:00:00Z
EPA repeals most 2024 Carbon Pollution Standards for fossil fuel-fired power plants
On September 17, 2026, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) finalized a rule repealing a majority of the greenhouse gas (GHG) emission requirements established by the 2024 Carbon Pollution Standards (CPS) for fossil fuel-fired power plants. The agency also issued a supplemental proposed rule to rescind all other GHG emission standards for fossil fuel-fired power plants.
Who’s impacted?
EPA’s final rule applies to the fossil fuel-fired electric generating unit (EGU) source category, including:
- Fossil fuel-fired electric utility steam generating units, and
- Stationary combustion turbine EGUs.
The final rule specifically impacts:
- Existing fossil fuel-fired steam generating EGUs (subject to 40 CFR Part 60 Subpart UUUUb),
- Coal-fired steam generating units conducting a large modification (subject to Part 60 Subpart TTTTa), and
- New base load stationary combustion turbines (subject to Part 60 Subpart TTTTa).
Final rule: Repeal 2024 CPS regulations
The agency finalized the alternative option from its June 2025 proposed rule, repealing parts of the 2024 CPS and revising the associated best system of emission reduction (BSER) determinations.
EPA’s final rule removes most of the 2024 CPS regulations, including:
- The emission guidelines for existing coal-, oil-, and natural gas-fired steam generating units (the entirety of Part 60 Subpart UUUUb);
- The carbon capture and sequestration/storage (CCS)-based standards for coal-fired EGUs conducting a large modification; and
- The CCS-based standards for new base load stationary combustion turbines (the Phase 2 standards).
The final rule doesn’t repeal or revise the 2024 CPS efficiency-based standards for new stationary combustion turbines (the Phase 1 standards). However, EPA addresses them in the supplemental proposed rule.
Proposed rule: Repeal remaining GHG emission requirements
EPA also issued a supplemental proposed rule to rescind all remaining GHG emission requirements for fossil fuel-fired power plants, including the Phase 1 standards for new stationary combustion turbines. It would require the same regulatory changes as the June 2025 proposed rule but for different reasons.
The supplemental proposed rule would repeal all GHG emission standards in 60 Subparts TTTT and TTTTa for the fossil fuel-fired EGU source category, including the 2015 New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) and the 2024 CPS.
Specifically, EPA would repeal the:
- Partial CCS-based standards for new and efficiency-based standards for reconstructed or modified steam generating units and integrated gasification combined cycle facilities, and
- Efficiency-based standards for new or reconstructed stationary combustion turbines.
If the rule is finalized as proposed, fossil fuel-fired EGUs would no longer be required to comply with the GHG emission standards established under the 2015 NSPS or the 2024 CPS regulations.
Key to remember: EPA’s final rule repeals a majority of the greenhouse gas (GHG) emission standards established by the 2024 Carbon Pollution Standards for fossil fuel-fired power plants. The agency also proposes to remove the remaining GHG emission requirements for fossil fuel-fired power plants.
NewsWasteTSCA ComplianceWater ProgramsEnvironmental Protection Agency (EPA)CAA ComplianceWater ProgramsCWA ComplianceWaste/HazWasteEnglishAir ProgramsIndustry NewsIndustry NewsWasteEnvironmentalFocus AreaSARA ComplianceAir ProgramsUSA
2026-07-09T05:00:00Z
EPA releases 2026 regulatory agenda
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) published the 2026 Agenda of Regulatory and Deregulatory Actions on July 3, 2026. The agenda outlines the agency’s upcoming regulatory actions and their status in the rulemaking process. Many of the proposed and final rules support EPA’s continued deregulatory efforts.
Significant rulemaking on EPA’s docket includes the following:
- Proposing risk management regulations under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) for various chemical substances, such as formaldehyde, diisodecyl phthalate (DIDP), and diisononyl phthalate (DINP);
- Aligning the definition of “waters of the United States” with the Supreme Court’s Sackett v. Environmental Protection Agency (2023) decision, which narrowed the definition under the Clean Water Act;
- Finalizing the part 2 risk management regulations for asbestos, including use and associated disposal requirements for legacy asbestos, asbestos-containing talc, and asbestos fibers other than chrysotile;
- Repealing the Carbon Pollution Standards (CPS) that limit greenhouse gas emissions from fossil fuel-fired plants (or repealing a narrower set of requirements under the CPS); and
- Establishing a federal permitting program under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) for the disposal of coal combustion residuals (CCR).
Additionally, EPA continues to conduct rulemaking related to per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), such as:
- Revising existing effluent limitations guidelines and standards (ELGs) to address PFAS discharges from PFAS manufacturing facilities and chromium electroplating facilities;
- Extending the compliance deadlines for Maximum Contaminant Levels established by the National Primary Drinking Water Regulations (NPDWRs) for perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (PFOS); and
- Rescinding the NPDWRs for four PFAS.
This article highlights some of the major rules we’re monitoring closely. You can review the entire agenda to learn about all the rulemakings EPA plans to review, propose, and finalize. Please note that the agenda dates are tentative, indicating when the agency seeks to publish the rulemakings in the Federal Register.
| Final Rule Stage | |
| Projected publication date | Title |
| July 2026 | Reconsideration of the Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program |
| August 2026 | 1-Bromopropane (1-BP); Regulation Under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) |
| October 2026 | Revisions to Standards for the Open Burning/Open Detonation of Waste Explosives |
| October 2026 | Secondary Lead Smelting: National Emissions Standard for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) Technology Review and Reconsideration |
| January 2027 | Listing of Specific PFAS as Hazardous Constituents |
| Proposed Rule Stage | |
| Projected publication date of notice of proposed rulemaking | |
| August 2026 | Improving Recycling and Management of Renewable Energy Wastes: Universal Waste Regulations for Solar Panels and Lithium Batteries |
| September 2026 | Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Oil and Gas Extraction Category (40 CFR 435 Subpart E) |
| October 2026 | Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Centralized Waste Treatment Category (40 CFR 437) |
| December 2026 | Clean Water Act Hazardous Substance Facility Response Plans; Amendment Reconsideration |
| December 2026 | National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants: Stationary Combustion Turbines; Amendments |
| Pre-Rule Stage | |
| Projected publication date or other action | Title |
| January 2027 (final rule) | Risk Management Program, CAA Section 112(r)(7) (Section 610 Review) |
| August 2026 (begin review) | Oil and Natural Gas Sector: Emission Standards for New, Reconstructed, and Modified Sources (Section 610 Review) |
NewsSuperfundCERCLA, SARA, EPCRA CERCLA, SARA, EPCRATransportationHazmat SafetyHazmatIn-Depth ArticleEnglishIndustry NewsClassification - HazmatRelease NotificationsEnvironmentalSARA ComplianceFocus AreaUSA
2026-09-23T05:00:00Z
CERCLA-first PFAS rule: Court upholds EPA's designation
A court of appeals recently denied challenges to EPA’s 2024 final rule that had addressed two “forever chemicals” under the federal Superfund law. The three-judge decision keeps in place the rule that designates perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS) as “hazardous substances.”
The designation under 40 CFR 302 provides EPA authority to compel responsible parties to clean up releases of these chemicals or pay cleanup costs.
Background on the rule
EPA explained in the May 8, 2024, final rule that the agency:
- Evaluated the available scientific information about PFOA and PFOS,
- Determined that the substances may present a substantial danger to public health or welfare or the environment when released, and
- Found that the hazardous substance designation is warranted.
Among its provisions, the rule requires entities to immediately report releases of PFOA or PFOS (or their salts and structural isomers) that meet or exceed one pound in any 24-hour period. These notifications must be made to the National Response Center, state or Tribal emergency response commission (SERC), and the local or Tribal emergency planning committee (LEPC). See 40 CFR 302.
Designation as a Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) hazardous substance under 40 CFR 302 enables EPA to take earlier action. Specifically, the agency can identify, characterize, and clean up the most contaminated sites expeditiously. At the same time, CERCLA ensures that those responsible for contamination pay to clean it up. This is known as “polluter pays.”
This law also generally requires federal agencies selling land contaminated with these substances to provide notice of their presence. In addition, CERCLA requires the Department of Transportation (DOT) to list and regulate PFOA and PFOS as “hazardous materials” under the Hazardous Materials Transportation Act.
How did the petitioners challenge the rule?
According to the latest court opinion, the petitioners submitted three challenges to the designation rule. They argued:
- EPA misinterpreted the term “may present substantial danger” in CERCLA’s definition of a hazardous substance;
- EPA’s cost-benefit analysis provided insufficient notice to the parties; and
- EPA’s cost-benefit analysis and decision to regulate in the face of uncertainties (i.e., the locations and quantities of PFOA/PFOS, economic costs of the rule, and unintended consequences to real estate) were arbitrary and capricious.
What did the Court find?
D.C. Circuit Opinion No. 24-1193, dated August 18, 2026, can be found at https://media.cadc.uscourts.gov/opinions/docs/2026/08/24-1193-2188689.pdf. In over 50 pages of opinion text, the court found, “None of those [petitioner] claims succeeds.” The Court reasoned:
- The plain language of CERCLA allows EPA to designate as “hazardous substances” those chemicals like PFOA and PFOS that repeatedly have been linked to adverse health effects in myriad peer-reviewed studies.
- EPA provided adequate notice of its cost-benefit analysis through its earlier Economic Assessment and request for comments on it.
- EPA acted reasonably based on the record in its calculation of costs and benefits and in its decision to take this regulatory step to designate PFOA and PFOS as hazardous substances.
The appeals court explored the layers of protection for responsible parties faced with liability. It contended, “Petitioners have come forward with no evidence that those responsible for the presence of hazardous substances at a site have been unfairly saddled with liability or that the statute’s operation has hamstrung industry.”
In its concluding remarks, the court summarized, “Having adequately considered and reasonably explained its decision to regulate at this initial stage even in the face of acknowledged uncertainties, EPA made a reasoned decision on the record before it in designating the forever chemicals PFOA and PFOS as hazardous substances … For the foregoing reasons, the petitions for review are denied.”
Why the ruling matters
EPA has remarked that PFOA and PFOS can accumulate and persist in the human body for long periods of time. The agency says that evidence from studies demonstrates that exposure to PFOA and/or PFOS is linked to adverse health effects, including:
- Cancer, and
- The effects on the immune system, cardiovascular system, liver, and developing fetus.
Before the 2024 final rule, commentators observed that EPA had never “directly” listed a substance as a CERCLA hazardous substance under 40 CFR 302 using its authority under CERCLA section 102(a). Historically, EPA had defined CERCLA hazardous substances that were first regulated by:
- Clean Water Act section 307(a),
- Clean Water Act section 311(b)(2)(A),
- Resource Conservation and Recovery Act section 3001,
- Clean Air Act section 112, or
- Toxic Substances Control Act section 7.
Yet, in the 2024 rule, EPA used its section 102(a) authority to declare the two chemicals CERCLA hazardous substances, rather than relying on regulation under those other laws. This is characterized as “CERCLA first.” Therefore, challenges to EPA’s rule were anticipated, but the latest decision leaves it in place.
EPA is using enforcement discretion
PFOA and PFOS are members of the broader class of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS). On April 19, 2024, EPA issued a memo, “PFAS Enforcement Discretion and Settlement Policy under CERCLA.” It describes how the agency will focus on holding responsible entities who significantly contributed to the release of PFAS contamination into the environment. This includes parties that have manufactured PFAS (or used PFAS in the manufacturing process), federal facilities, and other industrial parties.
According to the memo, “EPA does not intend to pursue entities where equitable factors do not support seeking response actions or costs under CERCLA,” such as farmers, municipal landfills, water utilities, municipal airports, and local fire departments.
Key to remember
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit denied challenges to EPA’s May 8, 2024, final rule on the designation of PFOA and PFOS as CERCLA hazardous substances. The opinion keeps the rule in effect. In addition to the rule, EPA has a related enforcement discretion memo.
NewsAir QualityStationary Emission SourcesEnforcement and Audits - OSHAToxic Substances Control Act - EPAAir EmissionsSafe Drinking WaterTSCA ComplianceWater ProgramsWater QualityMonthly Roundup VideoCAA ComplianceAir PermittingHazard CommunicationUSAEnglishHeat StressOSHA Violations and PenaltiesIndustry NewsHeat and Cold ExposureSafety & HealthToxic Substances - EPAGeneral Industry SafetyEnvironmentalFocus AreaWater MonitoringHazard CommunicationAir ProgramsExtreme Temperature PreparationVideo
EHS Monthly Round Up - June 2026
In this June 2026 roundup video, we'll review the most impactful environmental health and safety news.
Hi everyone! Welcome to the monthly news roundup video, where we’ll review the most impactful environmental health and safety news. Let’s take a look at what happened over the past month.
OSHA won’t increase its penalty amounts in 2026. The agency is required to annually adjust its penalties for inflation, based specifically on the October Consumer Price Index data released by the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Due to a lapse in funding, BLS did not release the October 2025 data. Because no alternative calculation is allowed, OSHA penalties will remain at the 2025 amounts.
OSHA updated its inspection guidance for the Hazard Communication standard. While the document is geared towards OSHA inspectors, it provides insights for chemical manufacturers, importers, distributors, and employers as to what the agency will look for during an inspection.
OSHA will hold a series of informal, virtual hearings on multiple proposed rules beginning August 19th. The majority relate to respiratory protection requirements for different chemical substances. All of the proposed rules were originally published in the Federal Register on July 1, 2025.
Nevada OSHA published a list of frequently asked questions related to its recently adopted heat illness rule. The state’s rule took effect April 29.
Turning to environmental news, EPA restored emergency-related affirmative defense provisions for Title V operating permits. This allows stationary sources to assert a regulatory affirmative defense for certain air emission violations caused by events beyond their control.
EPA released two proposed rules that would have major impacts on drinking water regulations for PFAS. The agency will accept comments on the proposals until July 20.
And finally, EPA now allows facilities to submit PCB annual reports electronically. Facilities can start with the upcoming report that’s due July 15.
Thanks for tuning in to the monthly news roundup. We’ll see you next month!
Most Popular Highlights In Transportation
NewsRisk Assessment and ManagementIndustry NewsFleet SafetyDrug and Alcohol Testing - DOTRisk Assessment and ManagementFocus AreaIn-Depth ArticleSafety-sensitive function - Motor CarrierEnglishTransportationUSA
2023-04-13T05:00:00Z
Workplace vs. FMCSA: What is a safety-sensitive position?
A workplace safety definition for “safety-sensitive position” may lead some motor carriers to mistakenly put employees who don’t qualify in their DOT drug and alcohol testing program.
FMCSA: Clearly defined
The Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) clearly defines a safety-sensitive position.
It is one where the employee is expected to operate a commercial motor vehicle (CMV) requiring a commercial driver’s license (CDL). Only these drivers can be placed in the motor carrier’s DOT drug and alcohol testing program under 49 CFR Part 382.
As a result, a carrier would not classify a forklift operator, driver helper, and other positions as safety sensitive for purposes of testing under Part
What about non-CDL CMV drivers?
A driver who operates an FMCSA-regulated vehicle that does not require a CDL fits within the scope of workplace safety-sensitive duties, but not FMCSA.
For property-carrying vehicles, a non-CDL CMV is one that is:
- 10,001-26,000 pounds inclusive of a towed trailer, and
- Not transporting placardable quantities of hazmat.
For passenger carriers, a non-CDL CMV is designed to transport 9-15 passengers, including the driver, for compensation.
Even though the above vehicles and drivers are subject to the bulk of FMCSA’s safety regulations, the vehicles (and subsequently the drivers) do not qualify for CDL licensing or FMCSA testing.
If the driver happens to hold CDL, it still does not qualify as a safety-sensitive position. Applicability is always based on whether the employee is assigned to operate a CDL CMV.
Are non-CDL CMV drivers subject to any drug and alcohol prohibitions?
Non-CDL CMV drivers are prohibited from operating while impaired under 49 CFR 392.4 and 392.5, but there is no testing mechanism under DOT authority. Testing would be best practice (non-DOT) and managed under the workplace drug program.
Vague definition under OSHA
If a motor carrier mistakenly uses the workplace criteria for its DOT testing, the number and types of positions placed in the random pool far exceed commercial drivers.
For the general workforce, the term “safety sensitive” has been tossed around, but never clearly defined by OSHA (Occupational Safety and Health Administration). Many safety professionals tie the term to OSHA’s General Duty Clause (GDC), which requires that employers provide all workers with a safe and healthful workplace.
Specifically, the GDC requires employers to recognize hazards that cause or likely will cause death or serious physical harm. Any job title that is likely to cause death or serious harm to someone — including the employee, coworkers, or the general public — is usually put on a list of safety-sensitive positions.
The employer must look at each job’s hazards and decide if the position is classified by its organization as safety sensitive. Examples may include:
- Forklift drivers,
- Heavy machinery operators, and
- Crane operators.
Even someone who works as a roofer may be considered a safety-sensitive position because the employee could trip and fall from a high elevation, causing serious personal harm.
Key to remember: When assembling the list of names for your DOT testing program, only include those individuals who are expected to operate a CDL CMV.
NewsIndustry NewsFederal Motor Carrier Safety RegulationsFleet SafetyBusiness planning - Motor CarrierFocus AreaIn-Depth ArticleFleet OperationsUSAEnglishTransportationBusiness planning - Motor CarrierRegistration
2026-09-29T05:00:00Z
Not a “trucking company?” You may still need operating authority
Just because you aren’t hauling toilet paper or groceries doesn’t mean you don’t need a USDOT number. Landscapers, farmers, outdoor recreation companies, and even rock stars (tour buses) sometimes need operating authority, depending on their operations.
Examples of other “non-trucking companies” that may still need operating authority include:
- Universities;
- Blood donation vehicles,
- Home health agencies,
- Utility companies,
- Food trucks, and
- Event production companies.
How do you know if you need to apply for authority?
Per the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA), all interstate commercial motor vehicles (private, for-hire[TL1.1], and exempt) that meet the definition of commercial motor vehicle found in 390.5 must submit them online through Motus at https://motus.dot.gov and obtain a USDOT number before beginning operations.
The commercial motor vehicle definition includes a vehicle which operates in interstate commerce, and:
- Has a gross vehicle weight rating (GVWR) or gross combination weight rating (GCWR), or gross vehicle weight (GVW) or gross combination weight (GCW) of 10,001 pounds or more, whichever is greater;
- Is designed to transport more than 8 passengers (including the driver) for compensation;
- Is designed to transport 16 or more passengers including the driver, and isn’t used to transport passengers for compensation; or
- Is transporting hazardous materials in quantities requiring the vehicle to be placarded.
Not operating as an interstate carrier doesn’t mean you’re in the clear, as many states require USDOT numbers for intrastate carriers. If you fall into this category, it’s important to check your states' requirements.
How do you obtain operating authority?
If you don’t already have a USDOT number, you can obtain one by applying for authority through Motus. The registration process requires basic company demographics to be provided. This information isn’t directly used for safety scoring but does provide information that is helpful to the FMCSA for studies and investigations.
After being issued a new entrant registration, the carrier is subject to an 18-month safety-monitoring period. During this safety monitoring period, the carrier’s roadside safety performance will be closely monitored to ensure the carrier’s basic safety management controls are operating effectively. Also, during this safety-monitoring period, the motor carrier (MC) will receive a safety audit.
For those operating intrastate, the process may be different. Check with your state's department of transportation to learn more about what you need to do.
Why is this necessary?
Larger vehicles, as well as those carrying hazardous materials, pose a higher risk to both themselves and the motoring public. By regulating who may operate these vehicles, and for how long, the FMCSA prioritizes keeping the roadways safe for all who use them.
Key to remember: All companies who operate a commercial motor vehicle in interstate commerce are expected to adhere to the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations — even those who don’t operate as a “traditional trucking company.”
NewsIndustry NewsFleet SafetyRisk Management TransportationRisk Management - Motor CarrierVehicle TechnologyIn-Depth ArticleFleet OperationsVehicle TechnologyEnglishFocus AreaTransportationUSA
2026-09-28T05:00:00Z
3 reasons your fleet needs auxiliary cameras
Every trip presents a moment when a commercial driver must make a decision based on limited visibility, such as vehicles, pedestrians, and obstacles just outside of view.
Forward facing dash cameras are useful for documenting what happens on the road, but they capture only one angle. Auxiliary cameras give drivers and fleet managers a clearer picture of the risks surrounding a commercial vehicle. These supplemental cameras help monitor blind spots, side and rear views, and cargo areas.
Consider the following 3 benefits of investing in auxiliary cameras:
1. Better visibility where drivers need it most
Commercial vehicles frequently operate in tight loading docks, crowded truck stops, urban delivery areas, construction zones, and customer facilities. In these environments, mirrors may not provide enough information to safely complete a lane change, turn, or backing maneuver.
Side-mounted cameras can help drivers monitor blind spots and adjacent lanes. They may reveal passenger vehicles, pedestrians, cyclists, or other hazards that would otherwise be difficult to see. Rear and cargo area cameras can provide a direct view of equipment, parked vehicles, people, and obstacles behind the truck. This added visibility can be especially valuable when backing into docks or maneuvering through confined spaces.
2. More context for coaching and incident review
Auxiliary cameras do more than help prevent collisions. They also give fleet managers additional context when reviewing driving events. Footage from multiple angles can show what the driver saw, where a hazard developed, and whether a safer technique could have been used.
That fuller perspective supports more meaningful coaching. Instead of relying on assumptions or incomplete accounts, supervisors can discuss the event with the driver and identify practical ways to improve. When used appropriately, video can reinforce safe habits, support professional development, and build trust between drivers and management.
3. Clearer evidence when questions arise
Multiple camera views can help clarify what happened after an incident. A side camera may show another vehicle entering the truck’s blind spot. A rear camera may confirm that a driver checked the area and followed the company’s backing procedures. This evidence can reduce uncertainty, resolve disputes, and support a more accurate investigation.
Not a replacement for defensive driving
Auxiliary cameras cannot replace attentive driving, proper mirror use, or established safety procedures. They can, however, give drivers another valuable tool for managing difficult situations. By improving visibility, strengthening coaching, and providing clearer evidence, these cameras help fleets address risk from more than one angle.
Key to remember: When drivers have the information needed to make safer decisions, the result can be fewer preventable incidents, greater confidence behind the wheel, and a safety culture built around awareness and support.
NewsMonthly Roundup VideoFamily and Medical Leave Act (FMLA)Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA)USAHuman ResourcesHR ManagementEnglishAssociate Benefits & CompensationDiscriminationIndustry NewsDiscriminationWage and HourWage and HourHR GeneralistFair Labor Standards Act (FLSA)EEO-1 ReportingFocus AreaOvertimeFleet OperationsAssociate RelationsTransportationVideo
HR Monthly Round Up - May 2026
In this May 2026 roundup video, we’ll review the most impactful HR news.
Welcome, everyone! In the next few minutes, we’ll review the latest HR news. Let’s get started.
A nationwide trucking company will pay $5.5 million to settle a sex discrimination claim for refusing to hire qualified female drivers. The news was announced in a May 15th press release from the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.
According to the suit, the discriminatory hiring practices went on for many years. Female applicants said they saw company officials throwing out their applications. And the dispatcher at one terminal told a female applicant that corporate offices had instructed him not to hire any female truck drivers. All this, and more, violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act which the EEOC enforces.
Speaking of the EEOC, on May 14th, the agency submitted a proposal to rescind workforce data filing and reporting requirements, including the EEO-1 report. Employers should be aware that the proposal doesn’t have an immediate impact on existing data collection or reporting processes.
Until decisions are finalized, employers should continue collecting workforce demographic data and plan to report 2025 data by the 2026 reporting deadline when it’s announced.
In other news, on May 15th, members of Congress introduced a bill that would gradually increase the overtime salary threshold for determining whether employees may be classified as exempt under the federal Fair Labor Standards Act.
If passed, the bill would increase the federal minimum salary level over the next several years. But for now, employers may continue to follow the 2019 rule, where the minimum salary threshold is $684 per week for exempt employees who are classified under the executive, administrative, and professional exemption.
And, finally, does your company outsource its FMLA leave management to a third-party administrator (or TPA)? If so, make sure the system and process is easy for employees to use. In a recent federal court case in Wisconsin, a TPA’s process was so difficult for an employee that his leave wasn’t properly handled and he ended up getting fired. He sued and won.
The court said that the TPA’s system created a “burdensome approval process” that interfered with his rights. And company HR officials didn’t address the issues before terminating him. The bottom line is, outsourcing FMLA leave management does NOT outsource employer liability.
That’s all the HR news we have time for today. Thanks for watching. See you next month!
NewsIndustry NewsHazmat SafetyHazmatIn-Depth ArticleFocus AreaUSAEnglishTransportationHazmat Rulemaking procedures
2023-12-22T06:00:00Z
Navigating change: Key updates to 2024 IATA DGR take effect
Every year the International Air Transport Association (IATA) updates its Dangerous Goods Regulations (DGR) to ensure the safe and secure handling of dangerous goods that are shipped or transported by air. While changes to the 2024 IATA DGR (65th edition) are not as plentiful as they were in previous years, they are no less important.
Mandatory compliance with the 2024 IATA DGR begins on January 1, 2024, and will be valid until the 2025 IATA DGR comes into effect. Let’s look at the key updates, listed by Section, for the 65th edition of the IATA DGR:
Need additional information for IATA? Check out this ezExplanation.
Limitations
- Dangerous Goods Carried by Passengers or Crew (2.3)— Provisions for battery-powered mobility aids have been revised to include reference to the guidance on the end-to-end processes associated with the carriage of mobility aids.
Packing
The following packing instructions have been updated:
- 5.2.0.9 - Added a water capacity limit for non-refillable cylinders containing a flammable gas, limited to a water capacity not exceeding 1.25 L.
- PI 952 - Revised to include reference to "equipment."
- PI 954 - Clarified the rules for marking overpacks containing dry ice. The total net quantity of dry ice in the overpack must be marked on the outside of the overpack.
Packaging specifications and performance tests
- 6.0.3 - Clarified the requirements and formatting for UN specification marks on packages.
Documentation
- 8.1.6.9.2, Step 6 – Added a note to "reinforce that there is no requirement for the type, number and net quantity in inner packagings within the outer packaging of a combination packaging to be shown" on the shipping papers (Shippers Declaration for Dangerous Goods).
Radioactive materials
- 10.8.3.9.1—Added an additional example of the description for the first sequence of information on the Shipper's Declaration to address where a radioactive material has a subsidiary hazard, and the proper shipping name must be supplemented by the technical or chemical name.
- 10.8.6—Added two examples to show how radioactive materials with a subsidiary hazard should be described and how packages in an overpack should be shown.
Appendices
IATA has added a new appendix to the list of appendices in the DGR. Appendix H includes a list of changes IATA will make to the 2025 IATA DGR. IATA added Appendix H so that shippers and carriers have time to prepare for the substantial updates that are coming for 2025. Some of the changes include:
- Adding an exception for data loggers and cargo trackers with installed lithium batteries.
- Modifying the exception for COVID-19 vaccines to now apply to all pharmaceutical products.
- Adding a new classification for sodium ion batteries.
- Updating the list of dangerous goods and special provisions.
- Amending and adding several packing instructions.
- Revising the "lithium battery mark", which will be known as the "battery mark" in the future.
Making sure you are keeping up with these regulatory changes and preparing for future updates is extremely important if you want to avoid costly delays, fines, and lost revenue. Keep your hazmat employees up to speed and inform them of any changes they need to be aware of.
Key to Remember: IATA updates their DGR every year and changes to the 2024 IATA DGR become effective on January 1, 2024.
NewsIndustry NewsFederal Motor Carrier Safety RegulationsBusiness planning - Motor CarrierFocus AreaIn-Depth ArticleFleet OperationsEnglishTransportationBusiness planning - Motor CarrierUSA
2026-09-15T05:00:00Z
Properly marking vehicles: The who, what, and how
Marking your vehicles isn’t just a formality, it is a key step in remaining safe and compliant with the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations (FMCSRs). However, determining which vehicles need to display identification and what information must be shown can be confusing.
Several factors influence the answer to these questions. Ask yourself the following questions to determine if you need to mark your vehicles:
- Is the vehicle a self-propelled commercial motor vehicle (CMV) subject to FMCSA regulations?
- Does the vehicle operate in interstate commerce, including crossing state lines or furthering interstate commerce within a state?
- Does the vehicle meet the CMV definition based on weight, passenger capacity, or transportation of a placardable quantity of hazardous materials?
- If the vehicle is rented or leased, are you going to be operating it for more than 30- days?
- If the vehicle operates only intrastate, does that state require you to comply with the federal DOT marking rules?
If your answer to one or more of these questions is “yes,” then you need to mark your vehicles.
What must the markings contain?
Enforcement officers should be able to quickly and easily identify the motor carrier operating the vehicle. The marking must include:
- The legal name or one trade name of the motor carrier operating the vehicle, as listed with FMCSA.
- The carrier’s FMCSA-issued identification number, preceded by “USDOT.”
- If another company name appears on the vehicle, the operating carrier’s name and USDOT number must be shown after the words “operated by.”
If you wish to go above and beyond, you may add your operating location or additional contact information, but this is not required per the FMCSRs.
How should the markings be displayed?
The key to properly displaying your markings is to ensure they are easily legible. To ensure this, the FMCSA has implemented the following guidelines:
- The markings must appear on both sides of the self-propelled CMV;
- The lettering must contrast sharply with the background color;
- The markings must be readable from 50 feet during daylight hours while the vehicle is stationary; and
- The markings must be maintained so they remain legible.
While permanent markings are most common, FMCSA permits removable signs, as long as they meet the visibility, location, and durability requirements listed above.
What about leased vehicles?
Vehicles that are leased for a longer period of time must follow the same marking requirements as listed above. They will need to either change the existing markings to their own information, or add their information after the rental company’s information preceded by the words “operated by.”
In this scenario, the markings should look something like this:
Rental Company
Operated by Trucking Company A
USDOT 123456
However, a vehicle that is rented for a short period of time – (30 days or less) may be marked with the rental company’s name and USDOT number. To qualify for the exceptions:
- The vehicle is rented for 30 days or less;
- The vehicle is properly marked with the rental company’s legal name and USDOT number; and
- A rental agreement — containing all required information and entered into by the lessor and the renting motor carrier — is carried on the rental CMV during the full term of the rental agreement.
Key to remember: Ensure enforcement officials are able to quickly and easily identify your vehicles with clear markings on both sides of your vehicles.
Most Popular Highlights In Human Resources
NewsChange NoticesChange NoticeAssociate Benefits & CompensationCaliforniaAssociate RelationsHR GeneralistFamily and Medical Leave Act (FMLA)Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA)HR ManagementEnglishFocus AreaHuman Resources
2026-09-29T05:00:00Z
California bereavement leave expanded
Effective date: January 1, 2027
This applies to: California employers with five or more employees
Description of change: On September 27, California Gov. Gavin Newsom signed SB 1149, which expands the state law entitling employees to bereavement leave. The law will now allow employees to take bereavement leave for the death of a “designated person,” which means any individual related to the employee by blood or whose association with the employee is the equivalent of a family relationship.
Employees may identify a designated person when they request the leave.
Employers may limit employees to one designated person per 12-month period for bereavement leave.
The law still requires employees to have worked for the employer for at least 30 days before taking bereavement leave, and entitles employees to take up to 5 days of bereavement leave, which may be taken intermittently. If employers don’t have an existing bereavement leave policy, the bereavement leave may be unpaid, but employees may use their paid time off.
View related state info: FMLA - California
NewsIndustry NewsIndustry NewsHR GeneralistFamily and Medical Leave Act (FMLA)Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA)USAHR ManagementEnglishFocus AreaHuman Resources
2023-09-06T05:00:00Z
Appellate court sided with employee's (almost) 3-year-delayed FMLA claim
Back in October 2018, Laffon had a medical emergency and needed some time off under the federal Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA).
Her leave lasted until November 15. Ten days after she returned to work, on November 26, her employer terminated her.
She sued, arguing that the employer retaliated against her because of her FMLA leave.
The catch? She didn't bring the suit until almost three years later.
No link between leave and termination
In court, the employer argued that there was no causal link between Laffon taking FMLA leave and her termination. Although the court documents aren't robust, they do reveal that the employer indicated that Laffon's allegations didn't show that her taking FMLA leave was a factor in the decision to terminate her. The documents showed only that the termination chronologically followed her leave.
The court agreed with the employer. It also agreed that Laffon failed to allege a willful violation of the FMLA, which would allow her to benefit from the FMLA's three-year statute of limitations.
Laffon appealed the case to the Ninth Circuit.
Statute of limitations
Under the FMLA, employees have two years from the date of the last event constituting the alleged violation for which they can bring a claim.
Those two years are extended to three years if the employer's actions were "willful." This means that an employee must show that the employer either knew or showed reckless disregard for whether its conduct violated the FMLA.
Ruling overturned
Fast forward to August 2023, when the Ninth Circuit reversed the lower court's decision. It indicated that, based on Laffon's amended complaint and liberally construing the law, her allegations establish that her leave was causally connected to her termination and that the employer's action (her termination) was willful.
Glymph v. CT Corporation Systems, No. 22-35735, Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, August 22, 2023.
Key to remember: Terminating an employee soon after returning from FMLA leave is risky, unless there is a clear, well-documented, non-leave-related reason. Case documents did not show such a clear reason, which can also increase the risk of a willful finding. Employees have time to file claims, even years.
NewsChange NoticesWage and HourChange NoticeAssociate Benefits & CompensationAssociate RelationsMinimum WageHR GeneralistWashingtonHR ManagementEnglishFocus AreaHuman Resources
2026-09-30T05:00:00Z
Washington to increase minimum wage
Effective date: January 1, 2027
This applies to: Employers with employees in Washington
Description of change: On September 30, the Washington State Department of Labor & Industries announced that Washington’s minimum wage will rise from $17.13 to $17.73 per hour, effective January 1, 2027.
The salary threshold for exempt employees will also increase as of January 1, 2027:
- For employers with 51 or more employees, the threshold will be $1,773 per week ($92,196 per year).
- For employers with 1–50 employees, the threshold will be $1,595 per week ($82,976 per year).
Employers may pay 14- and 15-year-old workers 85 percent of the minimum wage. In 2027, the minimum wage for these younger workers will increase from $14.56 to $15.07 per hour.
View related state info: Minimum wage - Washington
NewsIndustry NewsEnglishEmployee RelationsHR GeneralistIn-Depth ArticleWorkplace StressAssociate RelationsWellnessUSAHR ManagementFocus AreaHuman Resources
2026-09-15T05:00:00Z
Stop punishing your best employees
It’s challenging to keep up with HR lingo. Just a few years ago, the phrase “quiet quitting” was popular. Now another term is trending: “performance punishment.”
This phenomenon supposedly occurs when high performers are continually given more responsibilities and heavier workloads without a promotion, title change, or pay increase.
But is greater job responsibility punishment? Managers naturally give critical tasks to employees they trust to get them done quickly and correctly. Many managers see this as giving high performers opportunities to stretch and grow.
Singling someone out for a special project can indeed help them develop, but if it’s always the same person on a team being singled out and “rewarded” with more work, problems can arise. For example, when high performers are asked to pick up the slack for underperforming team members, and the work gets done while managers avoid confronting lower performers, it can cause high performers to feel resentment.
Constant pressure to shoulder the load that others can’t handle also leads to burnout, especially if high performers are discouraged from taking time off because there’s no one to pick up the slack. The pressure may build up until the frustrated high achiever quits, believing they’d be more valued by another employer.
To reduce the risk of performance punishment, a manager must first recognize that it exists. The next step is to stop piling extra tasks and responsibilities on high performers when others are permitted to do less work.
Here are some ways to redistribute the workload fairly:
- Cross-train team members, so projects are in good hands when high performers take time off needed to prevent burnout.
- Acknowledge and reward exceptional performance.
- Coach lower performers so eventually the workload can be spread across the whole team.
Expecting high achievers to work longer hours than others or subjecting them to additional stress is counterproductive. Eventually, they’ll walk away. A better method is to remove low-value work from their list of duties. This approach lets your star workers focus on the important high-value tasks where they shine.
Performance punishment can lead to quiet quitting, a toxic workplace, or actual quitting. For better results, try adding "positive reinforcement" and “performance recognition" to your HR lingo. What a turnaround it would be to see these phrases trending.
Key to remember: Piling extra work onto high performers is sometimes referred to as “performance punishment.” Avoid the negative effects of this phenomenon by redistributing workload.
NewsIndustry NewsIndustry NewsAssociate Benefits & CompensationHR GeneralistFamily and Medical Leave Act (FMLA)Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA)Associate RelationsEnglishHR ManagementFocus AreaHuman ResourcesUSA
2026-09-16T05:00:00Z
Employer used an algorithm to detect FMLA fraud
In 2018, an employer suspended or fired 81 employees after they used Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) leave over the holidays in December 2017 and January 2018. That amounted to about 10 percent of the employees in one area of the company suspected of abusing FMLA leave.
Some of those 80 employees felt that they took FMLA leave that had previously been approved and that, by disciplining them for taking the leave, the employer interfered with their FMLA rights and retaliated against them for taking pre-approved leave. As a result, they sued.
Ferreting out leave abuse
From the employer’s perspective, using FMLA leave solely to avoid working on or around holidays, weekends, vacations, and rest days constituted dishonesty in violation of company policy.
Jolanda from HR had an automated system that ferreted out FMLA misuse. Each week, the system looked back at every employee’s FMLA usage over the preceding 12 weeks. If an employee had 5 suspicious uses of FMLA leave within 12 weeks, the algorithm flagged that employee. A suspicious use was any FMLA use on a weekend and any FMLA use that was taken immediately before or after a day off.
If Jolanda believed that an employee’s actions amounted to FMLA “pattern use,” she would conduct an individualized review. This involved reviewing each employee’s:
- Medical information,
- Absences that were identified as pattern use, and
- Statuses of those absences.
To further investigate this FMLA usage, Jolanda used a modified version of the algorithm, which flagged any employee who had used FMLA leave on 4 of the 10 most recent holidays and other special occasions (such as Black Friday and Christmas Eve). Jolanda removed from the list anyone whose leave involved cancer, a terminal illness, or was about to give birth.
Court disagrees with employer
Despite dozens of employees being terminated for misusing their leave, only three of the employees continued their lawsuit. In court, the judge pointed out that the algorithm didn’t show their total FMLA leave, just their holiday use. It didn’t include non-holiday use, so it didn’t give the whole picture.
If an employee used FMLA leave for 10 days in 12 months, and 5 of those days were holidays, an employer might have reason to suspect misuse. If an employee used FMLA leave for 60 days in 12 months and 5 of those days were holidays, there would be much less reason for an investigation. The employer focused on employees’ use of FMLA leave on holidays without considering the context of each situation.
The employer argued in court that it acted on its honest belief that the employees were abusing FMLA leave.
The employees argued that the company’s stated reason for the discipline was untrue and that retaliation was the actual reason for the discipline. The employees were given an internal hearing, but the hearings were suspicious, as a company manager acted both as judge by conducting the hearing and ruling on objections, and as prosecutor by questioning witnesses. The company witness told the hearing manager which questions the prosecutor (the same manager) should ask.
Employees, on the other hand, weren’t allowed to have legal counsel present, nor were there formal rules of evidence that governed the hearings. They also didn’t know the questions in advance, as the employer did.
In denying the employer’s request to have the entire case dismissed, the court determined that the employer’s decision process wasn’t credible and its reliance on that process was, therefore, not honestly held. It sent the case to a jury.
Burgess, et al., v. CSX Transportation, Inc., District of Maryland, No. JKB-18-0744, July 6, 2026.
Court decisions are based on the specific facts presented and each court’s interpretation of the law. Because courts may reach different conclusions, similar situations can lead to different outcomes. Employers should avoid relying on a single case as definitive guidance and instead assess each situation carefully, considering applicable laws and seeking advice when needed.
Key to remember: Employers may use procedures and tools to discern FMLA leave abuse, but they have to use those procedures and tools through the lens of the big picture.
NewsHR ManagementEnglishTalent Management & RecruitingAssociate Benefits & CompensationWage and HourChange NoticesChange NoticeWage and HourCaliforniaHR GeneralistMinimum WageNon-Exempt employees Associate RelationsFocus AreaHuman Resources
2026-08-11T05:00:00Z
California will increase minimum wage, salary in 2027
Effective date: January 1, 2027
This applies to: Employers with employees in California
Description of change: Under California Labor Code section 1182.12(c), the state's minimum wage will increase from $16.90 to $17.40 per hour, effective January 1, 2027. The annual salary threshold for exempt employees will increase from $70,304 to $72,384 in 2027.
View related state info: Minimum wage - California
Most Popular Highlights In Safety & Health
NewsIndustry NewsSafety & HealthConstruction SafetyFall ProtectionGeneral Industry SafetyFall ProtectionIn-Depth ArticleEnglishFocus AreaUSA
2026-09-24T05:00:00Z
Fall protection starts before the harness goes on
A worker climbs onto a mezzanine, roof, platform, or elevated work area and clips into a harness. It feels like the fall hazard has been addressed. However, many fall incidents involve problems that began long before the employee reached the edge. Inadequate planning, improper equipment selection, damaged components, unclear rescue procedures, and insufficient training can turn routine work at height into a serious incident.
Fall hazards aren't always obvious
Some workplace hazards are easy to spot. Fall hazards can be different. Employees may perform the same elevated task repeatedly without incident, creating the impression that the work is low risk, but the absence of a previous incident does not mean the hazard has been eliminated. Familiarity can make employees less likely to recognize physical hazards, changing conditions, and gaps in the fall protection program, including:
- Damaged or improperly used fall protection equipment,
- Unprotected edges or openings,
- Improper ladder or platform use,
- Missing or inadequate training,
- Poor equipment inspections, and
- Changes in work surfaces, weather, housekeeping, or other job-site conditions that were not addressed before work began.
Planning is the first layer of fall protection
Many fall incidents can be traced to decisions made before employees start work. Before the task begins, employers should identify where fall hazards exist, determine what protection is required, and establish how employees will perform the work safely. Deliberate planning helps prevent employees from having to make critical decisions while exposed to a fall hazard. Pre-job planning should consider:
- The location and height of the work,
- Access methods such as ladders, lifts, or stairs,
- The type of fall protection needed,
- Potential swing-fall or lower-level hazards,
- Environmental conditions that could affect employee safety, and
- The rescue procedures, equipment, and personnel needed before work begins.
Inspections help catch problems before equipment fails
Fall protection equipment is often stored, transported, exposed to weather, and used in demanding environments. Over time, components can wear, become damaged, or be altered in ways that reduce their effectiveness. Inspection programs work best when employees understand that reporting equipment concerns is expected, not optional, and know how to identify conditions that may require equipment to be removed from service, including:
- Cuts, tears, abrasions, or excessive wear,
- Damaged stitching,
- Deformed hooks, connectors, or hardware,
- Missing labels or identification markings,
- Signs of chemical damage, corrosion, or heat exposure, and
- Equipment that has been subjected to a fall or has any other condition that could affect its safe performance.
Don't overlook rescue planning
One of the most overlooked aspects of fall protection is what happens after a fall occurs. Arresting a fall is only the first step. Employers must also determine how the employee will be rescued and how quickly help can be provided. Rescue planning should be treated as part of the job rather than something addressed only after an incident and should include, as applicable:
- Identifying primary and backup rescue methods,
- Determining what equipment will be used,
- Establishing emergency communication procedures,
- Verifying rescue equipment is available and accessible,
- Training designated personnel on rescue procedures, and
- Reviewing rescue plans whenever work conditions change.
Strong programs rely on multiple layers of protection
No single piece of equipment eliminates fall hazards. A strong fall protection program brings prevention, equipment selection, inspection, training, and rescue planning together, so each layer supports the others before, during, and after work at height. Before work begins, make sure your program includes the following:
Plan the work: Evaluate fall hazards before work begins and select appropriate protection.
Provide the right equipment: Ensure employees have equipment that matches the task and work environment.
Conduct inspections: Verify equipment remains in safe working condition and remove damaged equipment from service.
Train employees: Train employees to recognize fall hazards, equipment limitations, safe work practices, and rescue procedures.
Prepare for emergencies: Develop and communicate rescue procedures before employees are exposed to fall hazards.
Key to remember: Effective fall protection is more than wearing a harness. When hazards are identified early, equipment is matched to the task, employees are trained, and rescue is planned so that employers are better prepared to prevent serious fall-related injuries.
NewsIndustry NewsConfined SpacesSafety & HealthConfined SpacesConstruction SafetyGeneral Industry SafetyPermit-Required Confined SpacesConfined Space HazardsConfined Space Entry PermitIn-Depth ArticleEnglishFocus AreaUSA
2023-05-18T05:00:00Z
Breaking the plane of a confined space doesn’t require a complete entry
Did you know that OSHA’s standard on permit-required confined spaces (PRCS) says entry occurs as soon as any part of the entrant’s body breaks the plane of the opening into the permit space?
Many workers and employers mistakenly think that placing part of the body or hands into a confined space isn’t entry. Knowing the difference between when entry occurs and not will help employers determine if a permit is required.
Letters of Interpretation
As clarified in an OSHA Letter of Interpretation (LOI) dated October 18, 1995, “When any part of the body of an entrant breaks the plane of the opening of a PRCS large enough to allow full entry, entry is considered to have occurred and a permit is required, regardless of whether there is an intent to fully enter the space.”
This definition of “entry” might seem to be too strict. Still, OSHA’s letter clarifies that there are situations where a partial entry would be hazardous: “Examples of situations where entry by only part of the body into a PRCS can expose an entrant to the possibility of injury or illness are as follows:
- An entrant can possibly suffer a burn while reaching into a PRCS, which is so classified because it contains a thermal hazard.
- An entrant can possibly fall into a below-grade PRCS while standing on a vertical ladder in the opening of the space, which is so classified because it contains an oxygen-deficient atmosphere.
- An entrant can possibly become unconscious as result of his head accidentally entering a PRCS while they are reaching into a PRCS, which is so classified because it contains an oxygen deficient atmosphere.”
As another example, if the space contains a flammable or oxygen-enriched atmosphere, and if the activities during a partial entry could produce a spark or other ignition source, then a fire in the space could flash out of the opening and cause serious injuries to the employee.
OSHA’s guidance continues
This doesn’t necessarily mean you’d be fined if a permit wasn’t followed when someone reached a tank. OSHA’s guidance continues: “However, if entry by only part of the body does not expose the entrant to the possibility of injury or illness, then the violation may be considered a ‘de minimis’ violation.”
A de minimis violation is one in which a standard is violated, but the violation has no direct or immediate relationship to employee safety or health. These violations are documented but no citations are issued.
OSHA says examples of situations where entry by only part of the body into a PRCS would not expose an entrant to the possibility of injury or illness are as follows:
- An entrant reaches through the opening of a horizontal PRCS, which is so classified only because it contains exposed live electrical parts ten feet from the opening.
- An entrant puts his head through the opening of an overhead PRCS, which is so classified only because it contains unguarded rotating parts ten feet from the opening.
Also, consider a situation such as a worker reaching through a small grate to take a sample from a permitted space. The LOI further states, “If a part of the body were placed in an opening through which the worker could not pass into the permit-required confined space, no PRCS entry will have occurred.”
Keep in mind, however, that the employee would still need protection from any hazards involved in the task, but a permit would not be needed.
Key to remember
When any part of the body of an entrant breaks the plane of the opening of a PRCS large enough to allow full entry, entry is considered to have occurred, and a permit is required.
NewsIndustry NewsSafety & HealthGeneral Industry SafetyForklifts and Powered TrucksPIT Training RequirementsIn-Depth ArticleEnglishFocus AreaUSA
2026-02-17T06:00:00Z
These forklift operator violations commonly cause accidents
Forklift accidents often cause serious injuries. Unsafe behaviors can include failing to wear the seatbelt and reaching an arm outside the truck’s running lines. While those violations put the operator at risk, many unsafe behaviors also threaten other employees.
The most common forklift accidents involve rollovers, collisions with pedestrians, and loads falling from the tines. These incidents often result from operator error or (even worse) the operator knowingly engaging in unsafe behaviors.
Inspection failure
If the operator skips or rushes through the pre-shift inspection, safety concerns could get overlooked. Problems with systems like hydraulics, brakes, or steering can obviously contribute to accidents. However, even things like a non-functioning horn or lights could increase the likelihood of collisions.
Also, operators must report any problems that arise during the shift. If a pre-shift inspection identifies failures, the problem likely occurred during the previous shift and perhaps could have been reported. Equipment failures more likely occur during operation, not during idle time between shifts. If something goes wrong mid-shift, the operator must remove the truck from service. Make sure operators know how to report problems, send the truck for service, and obtain an alternate vehicle for the remainder of the shift.
Carrying loads too high
Operators should carry loads as low as possible. During inspections, OSHA compliance officers commonly see loads carried too high. This limits both visibility and stability. When the load size restricts visibility and the truck cannot travel in reverse (like going up a ramp), the operator should use a spotter.
Similarly, operators must never raise or lower a load while moving or turning. Doing so increases the risk of accidents from falling loads. Also, driving while watching the load (not the road) can increase the risk of striking pedestrians or objects.
Driving too fast
Employers might communicate speed limits, but most forklifts don’t have speedometers. Therefore, operators should understand what constitutes safe (and unsafe) speeds under various conditions. In locations with pedestrians or limited visibility, this might mean at walking speed, which can seem painfully slow.
OSHA compliance officers can issue citations for excessive speed. Excessive speed increases the risk of spilling a load, striking a pedestrian, and rollover potential.
Not certified for truck type
Forklift operators must receive training that covers the types of vehicles used. An operator trained on a sit-down counterbalanced forklift needs additional training to operate a stand-up model or even a powered pallet jack. A supervisor might be able to explain the controls for a different vehicle type, but that does not constitute “training” and certainly not certification. OSHA commonly issues citations for lacking operator certification.
In addition, employers must evaluate each operator’s performance every three years. Typically, this involves questioning the operator on safety rules and observing the operator performing typical duties. If the evaluation identifies problems, the employer must provide refresher training. Skipping this evaluation could result in a failure to identify violations that contribute to accidents.
An operator who is not certified for the vehicle type may lack understanding of critical handling characteristics or safety precautions, which increases the risk of accidents.
Key to Remember: When forklift operators feel under time pressure, they might focus on speed over safety. Skipping the inspection, driving too fast, raising loads while moving, and other behaviors put the operator and other employees at risk.
NewsIndustry NewsIndustry NewsSafety & HealthWork-Relatedness DeterminationConstruction SafetyGeneral Industry SafetyAgriculture SafetyMaritime SafetyOccupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), DOLUSAEnglishFocus AreaInjury and Illness Recordkeeping
2026-02-12T06:00:00Z
Work-relatedness focus of latest OSHA interpretive letter
A burn injury caused by a personal lithium ion battery fire is work related if it occurs in the workplace during assigned working hours, OSHA stated in a recently issued letter of interpretation (LOI).
The January 20 letter details an incident where an employee was burned when their rechargeable lithium-ion batteries for e-cigarettes sparked a fire after inadvertently coming into contact with a key used for work. OSHA said that even though the batteries are a personal item used for a non work purpose, the injury happened in the work environment, so the geographic presumption of work-relatedness applies. OSHA also clarified that the precipitating event is the fire, not the act of carrying the batteries.
Lee Anne Jennings, Director of OSHA’s Technical Support and Emergency Management Directorate, clarified that Section 1904.5(b)(3) of OSHA’s recordkeeping regulation doesn’t apply if the employee was at work during assigned hours and present as a condition of employment. She also noted that none of the exceptions in Section 1904.5(b)(2) are relevant in this scenario, so the injury’s cause — including whether the battery was mixed with employer-provided items — is irrelevant for determining work-relatedness.
LOIs clarify federal workplace safety standards and ensure consistent application for employers, workers, and safety professionals.
NewsIndustry NewsSafety & HealthConstruction SafetyGeneral Industry SafetyMaritime SafetyOccupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), DOLIn-Depth ArticleHazard CommunicationHazard CommunicationEnglishFocus AreaUSA
2026-09-17T05:00:00Z
Heads up! HazCom employer compliance deadline approaching fast
OSHA’s revised Hazard Communication (HazCom) standard contains multiple compliance dates at 29 CFR 1910.1200 paragraph (j) for chemical manufacturers, importers, distributors, and employers. In fact, the next compliance date is for employers, and it’s just over two months away! The November 20, 2026, employer deadline is driven by changes to chemical hazard classifications for aerosols, desensitized explosives, and flammable gases.
Reclassification impacts downstream chemical users
According to 1910.1200(j), chemical manufacturers, importers, and distributors evaluating substances (see the definition in 1910.1200(c)) based on the new classifications had until May 19, 2026, to:
- Reclassify the substances under revised criteria,
- Update their safety data sheets (SDSs) and shipping labels for these substances, and
- Otherwise be in compliance with all the modified provisions of the standard for those substances.
Hazard classification is the process of identifying a chemical’s hazards and determining how severe those hazards are. Chemical manufacturers and importers use 1910.1200(d), along with Appendix A (for health hazards) and Appendix B (for physical hazards) to make these determinations. When OSHA aligned HazCom with Revision 7 of the Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labeling of Chemicals (GHS) in 2024, the agency revised its classification categories for aerosols, desensitized explosives, and flammable gases.
Once a classification is determined, it dictates the warnings, pictograms, hazard statements, and other safety and health information that must appear on SDSs and shipping labels. OSHA explains that the classification should provide downstream users with sufficient information to perform a hazard assessment specific to their own workplace and to understand how employees must use the chemical product there.
How the November 20 deadline impacts employers
Employers who purchase substances that are aerosols, desensitized explosives, and flammable gases will receive (or may already have received) revised SDSs and see updated container labels with their shipments.
In addition, according to 1910.1200(j), all employers must, as necessary:
- Update any alternative workplace (in-house) labeling per 1910.1200(f)(6);
- Update their HazCom training program required by 1910.1200(h)(1); and
- Provide additional employee training in line with 1910.1200(h)(3) for newly identified physical, health, or other hazards covered by the standard.
Employers will also need to retain any new SDSs they receive. However, if they have not purchased new inventory, they’re not required to contact the manufacturer, importer, or distributor for a new SDS. Still, an employer may proactively request new ones from their suppliers anyway.
Further HazCom compliance dates in paragraph (j)
Chemical manufacturers, importers, and distributors evaluating mixtures (as defined in 1910.1200(c)) based on the new classifications have until November 19, 2027, to reclassify them based on the new criteria, update their SDSs and shipping labels, and otherwise be in compliance with all the modified provisions of the standard for those mixtures.
Also, for mixtures, employers have until May 19, 2028, to update any alternative workplace labeling, update their HazCom training program, and provide additional employee training for newly identified physical, health, or other hazards.
Key to remember: OSHA paragraph (j) to 1910.1200 has several compliance dates for chemical manufacturers, importers, distributors, and employers. One date has already passed, and the next one (November 20, 2026) applies to employers. Two more are slated for November 19, 2027, and May 19, 2028.
NewsIndustry NewsIndustry NewsEnglishSafety and Health Programs and TrainingSafety & HealthConstruction SafetySafety and Health Programs and TrainingEmployee Mental HealthWellnessFocus AreaUSA
2026-09-14T05:00:00Z
Construction Suicide Prevention Week takes place September 14-18
Each September, Construction Suicide Prevention Week raises awareness about the unique challenges that contribute to suicide among construction workers. This year’s event takes place September 14-18. Additionally, the industry will observe a national stand-down at 11:50 a.m. Pacific time on September 14 in remembrance of construction workers lost to suicide.
In 2019, a group of volunteers launched the initiative to address the higher-than-average number of suicides in the construction industry by providing resources to help prevent those deaths. Recent data shows a decline in suicide and drug-related deaths, but this year’s theme, Building on Progress, means “honoring what’s working while continuing to push forward.”
Participants can register for the event on the construction suicide prevention webpage, which also offers resources such as toolbox talks, crisis response guides, and workplace consultation services.
Saved to my EVENT CALENDAR!
View your saved links by clicking the arrow next to your profile picture located in the header. Then, click “My Activity” to view the Event Calendar on your Activity page.
OK
J. J. Keller is the trusted source for DOT / Transportation, OSHA / Workplace Safety, Human Resources, Construction Safety and Hazmat / Hazardous Materials regulation compliance products and services. J. J. Keller helps you increase safety awareness, reduce risk, follow best practices, improve safety training, and stay current with changing regulations.
Copyright 2026 J. J. Keller & Associate, Inc. For re-use options please contact copyright@jjkeller.com or call 800-558-5011.















































