Two words HR fears hearing together: “Wrongful” and “termination”
In September, a Los Angeles jury has ordered an apartment building owner and property management company to pay $7.6 million to two former live-in apartment managers who claimed they were wrongfully terminated.
Cases like this strike fear into the hearts of employers and HR professionals. They worry that if they fire someone, that person will turn around and file a similarly costly wrongful termination claim.
While these types of claims can and do occur, keep in mind that in order to prevail, an employee must show some reason the termination was wrongful, such as a violation of law or public policy.
In the Los Angeles case, the court agreed the termination of the couple was indeed “wrongful” because they had been terminated shortly after one of them was diagnosed with thyroid cancer and requested accommodations and time off from work. There was no documented evidence of any performance issues or other valid reasons for the terminations.
Two examples of wrongful termination
- An employee terminated shortly after taking leave under the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) might claim that the termination was in retaliation for taking the leave, or that the employee was denied job reinstatement required by the law. If so, the termination would have been “wrong” because it violated the law. The FMLA recognizes both “interference” claims and “retaliation” claims.
- Most state workers’ compensation laws prohibit employers from discriminating or retaliating against employees who file injury claims. Thus, if an employee is fired shortly after filing such a claim, the termination might appear to have been connected to the claim, and therefore “wrongful.”
The best defense is a valid reason for termination
Although in at-will states (and all but Montana are at-will) employers do not need a reason to terminate. Having a valid reason, however, can help refute claims of wrongful termination.
An employer may still terminate employees who have engaged in protected activity, such as:
- Filing an injury claim,
- Taking FMLA,
- Making a discrimination complaint,
- Making a complaint to OSHA, or
- Filing a claim for unpaid overtime.
However, the employer needs to show that the termination was justified by other valid reasons.
The fact is that if an adverse employment action is taken about the same time that an employee engages in protected activity, the proximity will create the impression that the protected activity was a motivating factor in the termination.
Documentation is HR’s best friend
A lack of documentation is often the biggest problem when the employer tries to show that the termination was justified by legitimate business concerns. For example, if an employee’s performance has been lacking but the individual’s supervisor decided to document an “average” performance rating and simply tell the employee verbally about the performance problems, a future termination for poor performance will not be supported by the company’s documentation. If that termination also occurred around the same time that the employee engaged in protected activity, the company could face a wrongful termination claim.
The point is that an employee can’t simply file a generic “wrongful termination” claim and expect to win. Terminations may seem unfair to an employee without being unlawful.
The employee must show that the company violated some law, public policy, or other right of the employee. Even in such cases, the company can prevail if the documentation or other evidence shows that the employee would have been fired for other legitimate reasons, whether or not the employee engaged in protected activity.