Recruiting, hiring remains tough — Is fair chance hiring the solution?
Brian, a college-educated person with a successful career track record, spent a short stint behind bars after making some poor choices while going through a divorce. Brian served his time and is acclimating back into day-to-day life, but who will hire him (and should they)?
The answer to that question depends on all the facts and circumstances involved, as well as state laws about hiring previously incarcerated individuals. Given the continual low unemployment rates and struggle to find workers, however, more employers might be open to the idea of expanding their talent pool to include those they may have passed up before.
Hiring and retention are worrisome for employers, based on a recent survey of about 1,100 companies by the law firm Ogletree Deakins. While strategies like flexible scheduling and eliminating drug testing are still viable options for some, other companies are hiring formerly incarcerated workers, and using mentoring and training programs to optimize their success.
Brian’s not alone. Almost one out of every three adult workers in the U.S. has a criminal record, according to California’s The Fair Chance Act website. The site points out that having a record doesn’t stop them from being dedicated employees. California’s not the only state that puts fair chance hiring legislation behind this notion of second chances.
What is fair chance hiring?
When applying for a job, candidates are sometimes asked whether they have been convicted of a crime, or to mark a box that allows the employer to conduct a criminal background check. Fair hiring laws, called “ban-the-box” laws, require employers to wait to delve into someone’s criminal history until further along in the hiring process. This lets job applicants present their qualifications without a criminal record sabotaging their chance of getting hired.
In multiple states (and individual counties and municipalities in states without a statewide law) ban-the-box legislation limits when employers may ask about criminal records. Generally, ban-the-box laws prohibit employers from asking about convictions until the initial interview or after a conditional job offer has been made. This means that the application may not have any variation of the question: “Have you ever been convicted of a crime?”
Since its introduction, 37 states, the District of Columbia, and more than 150 counties and cities have adopted a form of fair chance policy for public sector employment. Fifteen of those states and 22 counties and cities have extended their policy to private employment. In recent years, support for fair chance practices has increased in popularity not only at the state and local levels but also federally.
Nature of the offense
If a background check reveals any convictions or prior imprisonment, many fair hiring laws prohibit employers from turning down a candidate based on that fact alone. They must consider the nature of the offense and decide if it interferes with the job’s requirements. Some legal requirements may overrule this. For instance, if an employer runs a childcare center or school, a candidate who has been convicted of hurting children may not be allowed to work in these settings.
Risks and rewards
Fair chance hiring laws can be beneficial for both workers and employers.
As an employer, keeping an open mind when evaluating a background check from a candidate with a criminal history provides access to a stronger talent pool. Instead of being quick to overlook an ex-offender, fair chance laws push employers to assess otherwise qualified candidates and consider their skills and employment history.
On the other hand, fair chance laws can put additional pressure on employers, especially those that run a business with multiple locations across states, cities, and counties. Compliance requirements will likely vary from some areas with strict regulations to others with none.
Employers’ best course of action is to stay up to date on fair chance laws wherever businesses are located. Make sure hiring practices align with any policies and that all job candidates receive fair treatment when applying and interviewing for open positions.
While Brian, from the example above, may have made some bad decisions in his personal life, that doesn’t mean he’s not a great computer technician, and it shouldn’t stop a company from giving him a “fair chance” when filling an open position.
Key to remember: Hiring qualified employees who were previously incarcerated brings risks and rewards. It may be a solution for some employers that face talent acquisition challenges, especially in locations with fair chance hiring laws.