Compliance Just Got Easier: Stay ahead of regulatory changes with instant notifications on updates that matter.

FREE TRIAL UPGRADE!
Thank you for investing in EnvironmentalHazmatHuman ResourcesHuman Resources, Hazmat & Environmental related content. Click 'UPGRADE' to continue.
CANCEL
YOU'RE ALL SET!
Enjoy your limited-time access to the Compliance Network!
A confirmation welcome email has been sent to your email address from ComplianceNetwork@t.jjkellercompliancenetwork.com. Please check your spam/junk folder if you can't find it in your inbox.
YOU'RE ALL SET!
Thank you for your interest in EnvironmentalHazmatHuman ResourcesHuman Resources, Hazmat & Environmental related content.
WHOOPS!
You've reached your limit of free access, if you'd like more info, please contact us at 800-327-6868.
You'll also get exclusive access to:
Already have an account? .

Protect workers who work alone

Each year, thousands of workers are injured and even killed while performing seemingly routine tasks where the injury or death could have been prevented had another worker been nearby to help them. Although OSHA’s regulations do not specifically require employers to develop a safety plan for their workers who must work alone, the General Duty Clause does require that every employer provide a safe workplace for workers. Therefore, having procedures in place to stay connected with or monitor workers who work alone is prudent.

Assess the job

Nearly any job may require working alone, without the presence of a supervisor or coworker, even if only for short periods.

Every work-alone situation needs to be assessed to determine any hazardous conditions or circumstances that would compromise the worker’s safety. If any dangerous situations are identified, develop methods and procedures to ensure that the worker is monitored and can get assistance if an accident occurs. You may want to consult with your safety committee, supervisors, and workers for suggestions.

Provide the necessary tools and equipment, information about the hazards that may be encountered, and safety training to reasonably ensure that workers, supervisors, and foremen are familiar with the risks and the use of all devices or equipment provided for their protection. Both project management and workers have the responsibility and duty to minimize the possibility of an incident.

Categorize the job

When assessing the conditions or circumstances under which a worker must work alone, specific job functions have inherent hazards. These functions can be categorized as high risk, low risk, or a combination of both. No matter the degree of risk, however, employers should develop control methods to minimize them.

High-risk job hazards include:

  • High energy materials (radioactive, elevated temperature);
  • Toxic gases, liquids, or solids;
  • High pressure and high voltage electrical systems;
  • Moving equipment or machinery;
  • Handling or transferring flammable liquids;
  • Confined spaces; and
  • Extreme weather conditions.

Low-risk job hazards include:

  • Maintenance functions other than on active processing equipment;
  • Janitorial or custodial functions (except in hazardous locations);
  • Routine job functions that are part of a long-standing operating procedure where experience has shown them to be safe; and
  • Desk work.

Top Tips for protecting workers who work alone

Prominently post telephone numbers for emergencies and routine calling for workers who work alone. Be sure they understand the procedures to follow if a security issue or dangerous situation should arise. Here are other tips that will help your jobsite ensure workers who must work alone can do so safely.

  • Have a call-in procedure. If the worker makes rounds of the jobsite, have the worker call into another location or individual when they leave, give an estimated time of return, and call again upon return. Communicating via the telephone at regularly scheduled intervals may be adequate in low-risk, work-alone situations. Telephone numbers for routine calling and emergencies should be prominently posted. Even office workers should be instructed about emergency procedures for working alone during non-regular office hours.
  • Increase barriers. If the worker works with the public, increase the physical barriers between the worker and the public.
  • Provide other methods of security. Use a visible security camera and a posted sign stating the jobsite is being monitored at all times. Workplace security systems can often be modified to watch a particular worker working alone and the workplace’s status itself. You may want to use personal pagers, two-way radios, emergency sounding devices, visual monitoring systems, and similar equipment. It is essential to tailor the suitability of safety measures and strategies to the workers’ needs. For instance, if a worker is deaf, visible alarms should be provided in the workplace.
  • Central monitoring could also be implemented. The activities of those required to work alone are monitored by a person designed for that purpose. If you decide to use a central monitoring system to relay an alarm, check federal, state, and local regulations regarding this system.
  • Work in pairs. If the worker will be working in hazardous areas, pair the worker with another individual for those tasks if possible, and make sure they are well trained to deal with emergencies that may arise. Buddy systems are primarily used for working in confined spaces where entrance into or exits from a confined space is restricted. Examples include utility holes, pits, or tanks that may be oxygen-deficient or where there may be an accumulation of hazardous gases, vapors, or mists. The buddy must be knowledgeable about the worker’s activities being observed, be adequately equipped with emergency equipment, and be capable of putting pre-planned rescue or emergency operations into effect.
  • Have workers check on each other. If another worker can check on the person working alone, have them check on the individual by telephone at regular intervals. You could also issue two-way radios for workers to check up on each other. Check on the worker by periodic visits at regular intervals; this should be done by the employer, another worker, or some other knowledgeable person designated by the employer. The hazards of the job should determine the length of time between checks.

Discuss situations with your worker they may have faced in the past about working alone. They may have a problem about an issue you haven’t thought of before or be able to suggest solutions that have worked well for them or at other jobs they worked on in the past.

Specialized Industries

Go beyond the regulations! Visit the Institute for in-depth guidance on a wide range of compliance subjects in safety and health, transportation, environment, and human resources.

J. J. Keller® COMPLIANCE NETWORK is a premier online safety and compliance community, offering members exclusive access to timely regulatory content in workplace safety (OSHA), transportation (DOT), environment (EPA), and human resources (DOL).

Interact With Our Compliance Experts

Puzzled by a regulatory question or issue? Let our renowned experts provide the answers and get your business on track to full compliance!

Upcoming Events

Reference the Compliance Network Safety Calendar to keep track of upcoming safety and compliance events. Browse by industry or search by keyword to see relevant dates and observances, including national safety months, compliance deadlines, and more.

SAFETY & COMPLIANCE NEWS

Keep up with the latest regulatory developments from OSHA, DOT, EPA, DOL, and more.

REGSENSE® REGULATORY REFERENCE

Explore a comprehensive database of word-for-word regulations on a wide range of compliance topics, with simplified explanations and best practices advice from our experts.

THE J. J. KELLER INSTITUTE

The Institute is your destination for in-depth content on 120+ compliance subjects. Discover articles, videos, and interactive exercises that will strengthen your understanding of regulatory concepts relevant to your business.

ADD HAZMAT, ENVIRONMENTAL, & HR RESOURCES

Unlock exclusive content offering expert insights into hazmat, environmental, and human resources compliance with a COMPLIANCE NETWORK EDGE membership.

DIRECT ACCESS TO COMPLIANCE EXPERTS

Struggling with a compliance challenge? Get the solution from our in-house team of experts! You can submit a question to our experts by email, set up a phone or video call, or request a detailed research report.

EVENTS

Register to attend live online events hosted by our experts. These webcasts and virtual conferences feature engaging discussions on important compliance topics in a casual, knowledge-sharing environment.

Most Recent Highlights In Environmental

2026-06-26T05:00:00Z

Multi-media inspections are back: How to prepare for comprehensive EPA and state audits

Regulators have returned to routine, in-person inspections, and many are no longer limited to a single program. EPA and state agencies are again conducting multi-media inspections that review air, water, and hazardous waste compliance in one visit. For facilities, this shift raises the stakes. An issue in one program can quickly lead inspectors into others, especially when records or operations do not align.

Most inspectors now arrive with background data already reviewed. Electronic submissions, air reports, discharge monitoring reports, and hazardous waste filings are compared against what they see on site. When numbers, dates, or practices do not match, the scope of the inspection often expands.

What inspectors are really evaluating

While documents are important, inspectors focus on whether procedures match actual operations. They will often start with a walk-through of the facility, tracing how materials move through production and become emissions, discharges, or wastes.

For example:

  • Air compliance may be checked by reviewing fuel use, hours of operation, or control device logs.
  • Stormwater compliance often involves visual checks for exposed materials and condition of controls.
  • Hazardous waste inspections typically focus on labeling, container condition, and accumulation practices.

The common thread is consistency. If a plan says one thing but operators do another, it is likely to result in a finding.

Common gaps seen during multi-media inspections

Across industries, several issues appear repeatedly:

  • Records that do not match across programs (e.g., waste logs vs. manifests)
  • Missing or incomplete inspection logs for air or stormwater systems
  • Assumptions about exemptions without supporting documentation
  • Satellite accumulation areas managed informally outside environmental oversight
  • Housekeeping issues that create unintended stormwater exposure

Many of these are not complex violations. They are breakdowns in communication, training, or follow-through.

A practical way to prepare

Facilities can improve readiness by conducting an internal, cross-media review that mirrors an actual inspection. This is more effective than reviewing each program in isolation.

Start with a process-based walk-through:

  1. Identify where raw materials enter the facility
  2. Follow how they are used, stored, and handled
  3. Note where wastes, emissions, or discharges are generated
  4. Confirm how each is managed and documented

At each step, ask two questions:

  • Is this activity reflected accurately in our records and plans?
  • Would an operator explain it the same way it is written?

This approach often reveals gaps that are not obvious during a desk review.

A recent case: How one issue expands the scope

At a mid-sized manufacturing facility, inspectors began with a routine hazardous waste review. They noticed that waste logs showed periodic disposal of solvent residues, but there were no related air records for emissions tied to cleaning operations.

This led inspectors to review the facility’s air permit assumptions. They found that solvent use had increased over time, but the facility had not updated its potential-to-emit calculations. What started as a simple waste review expanded into an air applicability concern.

The facility ultimately faced findings in both programs, not because of a single major violation, but because information did not align across systems.

Strengthening compliance across programs

Preparation does not require building new systems. It requires making sure existing ones are aligned and consistently followed.

Focus on:

  • Clear ownership of compliance tasks across departments
  • Regular cross-checks between records (air, water, waste)
  • Training staff on how their daily tasks affect compliance
  • Maintaining documentation that supports assumptions, exemptions, and limits

Facilities that treat compliance as a connected system, not separate programs, are better positioned during inspections.

Key to remember: A multi-media inspection looks for consistency across air, water, and waste programs, not just isolated compliance. If your records and operations tell the same story, you are far less likely to face expanded scrutiny.

2026-06-26T05:00:00Z

Multi-media inspections are back: How to prepare for comprehensive EPA and state audits

Regulators have returned to routine, in-person inspections, and many are no longer limited to a single program. EPA and state agencies are again conducting multi-media inspections that review air, water, and hazardous waste compliance in one visit. For facilities, this shift raises the stakes. An issue in one program can quickly lead inspectors into others, especially when records or operations do not align.

Most inspectors now arrive with background data already reviewed. Electronic submissions, air reports, discharge monitoring reports, and hazardous waste filings are compared against what they see on site. When numbers, dates, or practices do not match, the scope of the inspection often expands.

What inspectors are really evaluating

While documents are important, inspectors focus on whether procedures match actual operations. They will often start with a walk-through of the facility, tracing how materials move through production and become emissions, discharges, or wastes.

For example:

  • Air compliance may be checked by reviewing fuel use, hours of operation, or control device logs.
  • Stormwater compliance often involves visual checks for exposed materials and condition of controls.
  • Hazardous waste inspections typically focus on labeling, container condition, and accumulation practices.

The common thread is consistency. If a plan says one thing but operators do another, it is likely to result in a finding.

Common gaps seen during multi-media inspections

Across industries, several issues appear repeatedly:

  • Records that do not match across programs (e.g., waste logs vs. manifests)
  • Missing or incomplete inspection logs for air or stormwater systems
  • Assumptions about exemptions without supporting documentation
  • Satellite accumulation areas managed informally outside environmental oversight
  • Housekeeping issues that create unintended stormwater exposure

Many of these are not complex violations. They are breakdowns in communication, training, or follow-through.

A practical way to prepare

Facilities can improve readiness by conducting an internal, cross-media review that mirrors an actual inspection. This is more effective than reviewing each program in isolation.

Start with a process-based walk-through:

  1. Identify where raw materials enter the facility
  2. Follow how they are used, stored, and handled
  3. Note where wastes, emissions, or discharges are generated
  4. Confirm how each is managed and documented

At each step, ask two questions:

  • Is this activity reflected accurately in our records and plans?
  • Would an operator explain it the same way it is written?

This approach often reveals gaps that are not obvious during a desk review.

A recent case: How one issue expands the scope

At a mid-sized manufacturing facility, inspectors began with a routine hazardous waste review. They noticed that waste logs showed periodic disposal of solvent residues, but there were no related air records for emissions tied to cleaning operations.

This led inspectors to review the facility’s air permit assumptions. They found that solvent use had increased over time, but the facility had not updated its potential-to-emit calculations. What started as a simple waste review expanded into an air applicability concern.

The facility ultimately faced findings in both programs, not because of a single major violation, but because information did not align across systems.

Strengthening compliance across programs

Preparation does not require building new systems. It requires making sure existing ones are aligned and consistently followed.

Focus on:

  • Clear ownership of compliance tasks across departments
  • Regular cross-checks between records (air, water, waste)
  • Training staff on how their daily tasks affect compliance
  • Maintaining documentation that supports assumptions, exemptions, and limits

Facilities that treat compliance as a connected system, not separate programs, are better positioned during inspections.

Key to remember: A multi-media inspection looks for consistency across air, water, and waste programs, not just isolated compliance. If your records and operations tell the same story, you are far less likely to face expanded scrutiny.

2026-06-26T05:00:00Z

Multi-media inspections are back: How to prepare for comprehensive EPA and state audits

Regulators have returned to routine, in-person inspections, and many are no longer limited to a single program. EPA and state agencies are again conducting multi-media inspections that review air, water, and hazardous waste compliance in one visit. For facilities, this shift raises the stakes. An issue in one program can quickly lead inspectors into others, especially when records or operations do not align.

Most inspectors now arrive with background data already reviewed. Electronic submissions, air reports, discharge monitoring reports, and hazardous waste filings are compared against what they see on site. When numbers, dates, or practices do not match, the scope of the inspection often expands.

What inspectors are really evaluating

While documents are important, inspectors focus on whether procedures match actual operations. They will often start with a walk-through of the facility, tracing how materials move through production and become emissions, discharges, or wastes.

For example:

  • Air compliance may be checked by reviewing fuel use, hours of operation, or control device logs.
  • Stormwater compliance often involves visual checks for exposed materials and condition of controls.
  • Hazardous waste inspections typically focus on labeling, container condition, and accumulation practices.

The common thread is consistency. If a plan says one thing but operators do another, it is likely to result in a finding.

Common gaps seen during multi-media inspections

Across industries, several issues appear repeatedly:

  • Records that do not match across programs (e.g., waste logs vs. manifests)
  • Missing or incomplete inspection logs for air or stormwater systems
  • Assumptions about exemptions without supporting documentation
  • Satellite accumulation areas managed informally outside environmental oversight
  • Housekeeping issues that create unintended stormwater exposure

Many of these are not complex violations. They are breakdowns in communication, training, or follow-through.

A practical way to prepare

Facilities can improve readiness by conducting an internal, cross-media review that mirrors an actual inspection. This is more effective than reviewing each program in isolation.

Start with a process-based walk-through:

  1. Identify where raw materials enter the facility
  2. Follow how they are used, stored, and handled
  3. Note where wastes, emissions, or discharges are generated
  4. Confirm how each is managed and documented

At each step, ask two questions:

  • Is this activity reflected accurately in our records and plans?
  • Would an operator explain it the same way it is written?

This approach often reveals gaps that are not obvious during a desk review.

A recent case: How one issue expands the scope

At a mid-sized manufacturing facility, inspectors began with a routine hazardous waste review. They noticed that waste logs showed periodic disposal of solvent residues, but there were no related air records for emissions tied to cleaning operations.

This led inspectors to review the facility’s air permit assumptions. They found that solvent use had increased over time, but the facility had not updated its potential-to-emit calculations. What started as a simple waste review expanded into an air applicability concern.

The facility ultimately faced findings in both programs, not because of a single major violation, but because information did not align across systems.

Strengthening compliance across programs

Preparation does not require building new systems. It requires making sure existing ones are aligned and consistently followed.

Focus on:

  • Clear ownership of compliance tasks across departments
  • Regular cross-checks between records (air, water, waste)
  • Training staff on how their daily tasks affect compliance
  • Maintaining documentation that supports assumptions, exemptions, and limits

Facilities that treat compliance as a connected system, not separate programs, are better positioned during inspections.

Key to remember: A multi-media inspection looks for consistency across air, water, and waste programs, not just isolated compliance. If your records and operations tell the same story, you are far less likely to face expanded scrutiny.

2026-06-25T05:00:00Z

Hazardous waste episodic events: What to do when a bad month happens

Every generator has that month. A tank clean-out gets scheduled; a forklift punctures a tote, and suddenly you've generated way more hazardous waste than you normally would. If you're a Very Small Quantity Generator (VSQG) or Small Quantity Generator (SQG), that one bad month could technically bump you into Large Quantity Generator (LQG) status, potentially subjecting the facility to LQG requirements such as contingency planning, personnel training, and biennial reporting.

The good news is that EPA built in an escape hatch. The 2016 Generator Improvements Rule added 40 CFR Part 262, Subpart L (the "episodic event" provision), which lets you keep your normal generator category for that month, if you follow the rules in 40 CFR 262.232 exactly.

Scenario 1: The planned tank clean-out

Picture a metal finishing shop that's normally an SQG, generating about 400 kg/month of spent plating solution. They finally get around to cleaning out an old process tank that's been sitting idle for three years. That clean-out produces about 1,800 kg of sludge in one shot and enough to push them into LQG numbers for the month.

Since this is something the facility planned and scheduled for, it's a planned episodic event. Here's what the employer would need to do:

  • Notify EPA (or the delegated state agency) at least 30 calendar days before the clean-out starts, using EPA Form 8700-12. Include the start/end dates, why the event is happening, estimated waste types and quantities, and a 24-hour emergency contact.
  • Double-check the facility's EPA ID number to make sure it is current.
  • Stage the waste properly with compliant containers or tanks and labeled with the episodic event start date.
  • Get it manifested and shipped off-site within 60 calendar days of the start date.
  • Hang onto every record including the notification, manifests for 3 years after the event ends.

Scenario 2: The unplanned spill

Next, picture a packaging plant. They are a VSQG generating around 80 kg/month. They have a forklift punch a hole in a 275-gallon tote of listed solvent and by the time cleanup is done, they're looking at about 900 kg of contaminated absorbent and solvent residue. Nobody planned this. It's not part of normal operations. That makes it an unplanned episodic event. Here is what they should do:

  • They have 72 hours to notify EPA or the state by phone, email, or fax. There will be no time to fill out paperwork first.
  • Follow that up by submitting EPA Form 8700-12 after the fact, documenting what happened since you couldn't give advance notice.
  • Keep the spill cleanup waste separate from your routine waste streams and label it with the episodic start date.
  • The same 60-day shipping window and 3-year recordkeeping requirement apply here too.

The things you can't skip

Whether the event is planned or unplanned, there are a handful of conditions that apply across the board and missing any one of them could cost you the episodic event relief entirely.

  • One event per year, period. Both VSQGs and SQGs get exactly one episodic event a year unless they petition the Regional Administrator under 40 CFR 262.233 for a second. That second one must be the opposite type, so if your first was planned, the next must be unplanned.
  • The clock doesn't wait. Exactly 30 days out for planned and 72 hours for unplanned are required. Miss either window or you lose the relief entirely, meaning full LQG status kicks in for that period.
  • The 60-day shipping clock starts on day one of the event, not when you send the notification, so make sure to track it immediately.
  • Manifest the waste properly. Episodic waste can ship under the standard Subpart B manifest rules, even in the same load as your regular waste.
  • Write everything down. Three years of solid records such as dates, causes of event, quantities, and where it went is what separates a clean inspection from an enforcement headache.

Keys to remember: The episodic event provision rewards generators who plan, classify the event correctly, notify on time, ship within 60 days, and document everything for three years.

2026-06-25T05:00:00Z

Hazardous waste episodic events: What to do when a bad month happens

Every generator has that month. A tank clean-out gets scheduled; a forklift punctures a tote, and suddenly you've generated way more hazardous waste than you normally would. If you're a Very Small Quantity Generator (VSQG) or Small Quantity Generator (SQG), that one bad month could technically bump you into Large Quantity Generator (LQG) status, potentially subjecting the facility to LQG requirements such as contingency planning, personnel training, and biennial reporting.

The good news is that EPA built in an escape hatch. The 2016 Generator Improvements Rule added 40 CFR Part 262, Subpart L (the "episodic event" provision), which lets you keep your normal generator category for that month, if you follow the rules in 40 CFR 262.232 exactly.

Scenario 1: The planned tank clean-out

Picture a metal finishing shop that's normally an SQG, generating about 400 kg/month of spent plating solution. They finally get around to cleaning out an old process tank that's been sitting idle for three years. That clean-out produces about 1,800 kg of sludge in one shot and enough to push them into LQG numbers for the month.

Since this is something the facility planned and scheduled for, it's a planned episodic event. Here's what the employer would need to do:

  • Notify EPA (or the delegated state agency) at least 30 calendar days before the clean-out starts, using EPA Form 8700-12. Include the start/end dates, why the event is happening, estimated waste types and quantities, and a 24-hour emergency contact.
  • Double-check the facility's EPA ID number to make sure it is current.
  • Stage the waste properly with compliant containers or tanks and labeled with the episodic event start date.
  • Get it manifested and shipped off-site within 60 calendar days of the start date.
  • Hang onto every record including the notification, manifests for 3 years after the event ends.

Scenario 2: The unplanned spill

Next, picture a packaging plant. They are a VSQG generating around 80 kg/month. They have a forklift punch a hole in a 275-gallon tote of listed solvent and by the time cleanup is done, they're looking at about 900 kg of contaminated absorbent and solvent residue. Nobody planned this. It's not part of normal operations. That makes it an unplanned episodic event. Here is what they should do:

  • They have 72 hours to notify EPA or the state by phone, email, or fax. There will be no time to fill out paperwork first.
  • Follow that up by submitting EPA Form 8700-12 after the fact, documenting what happened since you couldn't give advance notice.
  • Keep the spill cleanup waste separate from your routine waste streams and label it with the episodic start date.
  • The same 60-day shipping window and 3-year recordkeeping requirement apply here too.

The things you can't skip

Whether the event is planned or unplanned, there are a handful of conditions that apply across the board and missing any one of them could cost you the episodic event relief entirely.

  • One event per year, period. Both VSQGs and SQGs get exactly one episodic event a year unless they petition the Regional Administrator under 40 CFR 262.233 for a second. That second one must be the opposite type, so if your first was planned, the next must be unplanned.
  • The clock doesn't wait. Exactly 30 days out for planned and 72 hours for unplanned are required. Miss either window or you lose the relief entirely, meaning full LQG status kicks in for that period.
  • The 60-day shipping clock starts on day one of the event, not when you send the notification, so make sure to track it immediately.
  • Manifest the waste properly. Episodic waste can ship under the standard Subpart B manifest rules, even in the same load as your regular waste.
  • Write everything down. Three years of solid records such as dates, causes of event, quantities, and where it went is what separates a clean inspection from an enforcement headache.

Keys to remember: The episodic event provision rewards generators who plan, classify the event correctly, notify on time, ship within 60 days, and document everything for three years.

See More

Most Recent Highlights In Transportation

2026-06-24T05:00:00Z

Indiana adds permanent underground carbon dioxide storage rules

Effective date: June 10, 2026

This applies to: Entities that seek to participate in carbon sequestration projects

Description of change: The Natural Resources Commission adopted rules for permanent underground carbon dioxide storage, establishing:

  • The rules for entities seeking to petition the Indiana Department of Natural Resources to issue involuntary integration orders for pore spaces, and
  • The rules for storage operators seeking to apply for certificates of project completion.

These regulations add options for entities; the requirements apply only if the options are utilized.

The rules impact entities seeking to participate in carbon sequestration projects. The regulations also affect pore space owners and surface owners.

2026-06-24T05:00:00Z

Virginia reinstates power plant CO2 budget program

Effective date: April 24, 2026

This applies to: Power plant owners

Description of change: The Virginia Department of Environmental Quality reinstated the Virginia CO2 Budget Trading Program Regulation, which implements the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI). Participation in the RGGI was stopped in 2023, but the state will resume participation on July 1, 2026, the same date on which the compliance requirements take effect.

The regulation requires fossil fuel-fired units that serve an electricity generator with a capacity of 25 megawatts or more to obtain enough allowances to cover CO2 emissions, which they can purchase in the September and December RGGI auctions.

The department also adopted amendments to the regulations, including establishing a one-time 6-month control period from July 1, 2026, to December 31, 2026.

Related state info: Clean air operating permits state comparison

2026-06-24T05:00:00Z

New Hampshire updates sludge management rules

Effective date: May 15, 2026

This applies to: Owners and operators of drinking water and wastewater treatment plants that generate sludge; land application sites; and facilities that treat, manage, or dispose of sludge

Description of change: The New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services amended sludge management rules. Major changes include:

  • Reinstating 5-year site and facility permit renewals (instead of 10 years),
  • Adding annual reporting requirements for sludge haulers (which already apply to septage haulers), and
  • Requiring all applications to be submitted electronically.

The rule also codifies per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) sampling (implemented in 2019 for the sludge quality certificate program).

2026-06-24T05:00:00Z

New Jersey adopts permanent remediation standards for PFAS

Effective date: June 15, 2026

This applies to: Contaminated sites subject to the remediation regulations for contaminated groundwater, soil, and soil leachate

Description of change: The New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (NJDEP) formally adopted its interim remediation standards for specific per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), including:

  • Groundwater quality standards for hexafluoropropylene oxide dimer acid and its ammonium salt (GenX chemicals); and
  • Soil and soil leachate remediation standards for:
    • Perfluorononanoic acid (PFNA);
    • Perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS);
    • Perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA);
    • GenX chemicals; and
    • Methanol.

The interim standards have been in place since 2022 and 2023, requiring regulated entities to conduct remediation to ensure these PFAS are cleaned up.

Additionally, the NJDEP amended the technical requirements to mandate analyses of the following chemicals in all media when contaminants are unknown or not well documented at a contaminated site:

  • PFNA,
  • PFOS,
  • PFOA,
  • GenX chemicals, and
  • 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin.
2026-06-24T05:00:00Z

Indiana adds permanent underground carbon dioxide storage rules

Effective date: June 10, 2026

This applies to: Entities that seek to participate in carbon sequestration projects

Description of change: The Natural Resources Commission adopted rules for permanent underground carbon dioxide storage, establishing:

  • The applicability of carbon sequestration projects, and
  • The rules for the Department of Natural Resources issuing involuntary integration orders and certificates of project completion.

The rules impact entities seeking to participate in carbon sequestration projects under IC 14-39. The regulations also affect pore space owners and surface owners.

See More

Most Recent Highlights In Safety & Health

2026-06-24T05:00:00Z

Nevada adds requirements for hazardous waste recyclers

Effective date: June 8, 2026

This applies to: Hazardous waste recyclers

Description of change: The State Environmental Commission adopted regulations to add requirements for entities that recycle certain hazardous waste, including compliance with:

  • Certain federal requirements;
  • Local zoning requirements, if applicable;
  • Specific reporting and notification requirements; and
  • Other particular regulations of the commission.

The rules also:

  • Exempt owners and operators of certain facilities that recycle certain hazardous materials without storing those materials before they’re recycled from the above requirements, and
  • Add fees for written determinations (required to construct or operate a facility or mobile unit for hazardous waste recycling) and for the facilities that recycle certain hazardous materials without storing those materials before they’re recycled.
2026-06-24T05:00:00Z

Virginia reinstates power plant CO2 budget program

Effective date: April 24, 2026

This applies to: Power plant owners

Description of change: The Virginia Department of Environmental Quality reinstated the Virginia CO2 Budget Trading Program Regulation, which implements the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI). Participation in the RGGI was stopped in 2023, but the state will resume participation on July 1, 2026, the same date on which the compliance requirements take effect.

The regulation requires fossil fuel-fired units that serve an electricity generator with a capacity of 25 megawatts or more to obtain enough allowances to cover CO2 emissions, which they can purchase in the September and December RGGI auctions.

The department also adopted amendments to the regulations, including establishing a one-time 6-month control period from July 1, 2026, to December 31, 2026.

Related state info: Clean air operating permits state comparison

2026-06-24T05:00:00Z

New Hampshire updates sludge management rules

Effective date: May 15, 2026

This applies to: Owners and operators of drinking water and wastewater treatment plants that generate sludge; land application sites; and facilities that treat, manage, or dispose of sludge

Description of change: The New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services amended sludge management rules. Major changes include:

  • Reinstating 5-year site and facility permit renewals (instead of 10 years),
  • Adding annual reporting requirements for sludge haulers (which already apply to septage haulers), and
  • Requiring all applications to be submitted electronically.

The rule also codifies per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) sampling (implemented in 2019 for the sludge quality certificate program).

2026-06-24T05:00:00Z

New Jersey adopts permanent remediation standards for PFAS

Effective date: June 15, 2026

This applies to: Contaminated sites subject to the remediation regulations for contaminated groundwater, soil, and soil leachate

Description of change: The New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (NJDEP) formally adopted its interim remediation standards for specific per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), including:

  • Groundwater quality standards for hexafluoropropylene oxide dimer acid and its ammonium salt (GenX chemicals); and
  • Soil and soil leachate remediation standards for:
    • Perfluorononanoic acid (PFNA);
    • Perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS);
    • Perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA);
    • GenX chemicals; and
    • Methanol.

The interim standards have been in place since 2022 and 2023, requiring regulated entities to conduct remediation to ensure these PFAS are cleaned up.

Additionally, the NJDEP amended the technical requirements to mandate analyses of the following chemicals in all media when contaminants are unknown or not well documented at a contaminated site:

  • PFNA,
  • PFOS,
  • PFOA,
  • GenX chemicals, and
  • 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin.
2026-06-24T05:00:00Z

Nevada adds requirements for hazardous waste recyclers

Effective date: June 8, 2026

This applies to: Hazardous waste recyclers

Description of change: The State Environmental Commission adopted regulations to add requirements for entities that recycle certain hazardous waste, including compliance with:

  • Certain federal requirements;
  • Local zoning requirements, if applicable;
  • Specific reporting and notification requirements; and
  • Other particular regulations of the commission.

The rules also:

  • Exempt owners and operators of certain facilities that recycle certain hazardous materials without storing those materials before they’re recycled from the above requirements, and
  • Add fees for written determinations (required to construct or operate a facility or mobile unit for hazardous waste recycling) and for the facilities that recycle certain hazardous materials without storing those materials before they’re recycled.
See More

Most Recent Highlights In Human Resources

2026-06-24T05:00:00Z

Virginia reinstates power plant CO2 budget program

Effective date: April 24, 2026

This applies to: Power plant owners

Description of change: The Virginia Department of Environmental Quality reinstated the Virginia CO2 Budget Trading Program Regulation, which implements the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI). Participation in the RGGI was stopped in 2023, but the state will resume participation on July 1, 2026, the same date on which the compliance requirements take effect.

The regulation requires fossil fuel-fired units that serve an electricity generator with a capacity of 25 megawatts or more to obtain enough allowances to cover CO2 emissions, which they can purchase in the September and December RGGI auctions.

The department also adopted amendments to the regulations, including establishing a one-time 6-month control period from July 1, 2026, to December 31, 2026.

Related state info: Clean air operating permits state comparison

2026-06-24T05:00:00Z

New Hampshire updates sludge management rules

Effective date: May 15, 2026

This applies to: Owners and operators of drinking water and wastewater treatment plants that generate sludge; land application sites; and facilities that treat, manage, or dispose of sludge

Description of change: The New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services amended sludge management rules. Major changes include:

  • Reinstating 5-year site and facility permit renewals (instead of 10 years),
  • Adding annual reporting requirements for sludge haulers (which already apply to septage haulers), and
  • Requiring all applications to be submitted electronically.

The rule also codifies per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) sampling (implemented in 2019 for the sludge quality certificate program).

2026-06-24T05:00:00Z

New Jersey adopts permanent remediation standards for PFAS

Effective date: June 15, 2026

This applies to: Contaminated sites subject to the remediation regulations for contaminated groundwater, soil, and soil leachate

Description of change: The New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (NJDEP) formally adopted its interim remediation standards for specific per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), including:

  • Groundwater quality standards for hexafluoropropylene oxide dimer acid and its ammonium salt (GenX chemicals); and
  • Soil and soil leachate remediation standards for:
    • Perfluorononanoic acid (PFNA);
    • Perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS);
    • Perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA);
    • GenX chemicals; and
    • Methanol.

The interim standards have been in place since 2022 and 2023, requiring regulated entities to conduct remediation to ensure these PFAS are cleaned up.

Additionally, the NJDEP amended the technical requirements to mandate analyses of the following chemicals in all media when contaminants are unknown or not well documented at a contaminated site:

  • PFNA,
  • PFOS,
  • PFOA,
  • GenX chemicals, and
  • 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin.
2026-06-24T05:00:00Z

Nevada adds requirements for hazardous waste recyclers

Effective date: June 8, 2026

This applies to: Hazardous waste recyclers

Description of change: The State Environmental Commission adopted regulations to add requirements for entities that recycle certain hazardous waste, including compliance with:

  • Certain federal requirements;
  • Local zoning requirements, if applicable;
  • Specific reporting and notification requirements; and
  • Other particular regulations of the commission.

The rules also:

  • Exempt owners and operators of certain facilities that recycle certain hazardous materials without storing those materials before they’re recycled from the above requirements, and
  • Add fees for written determinations (required to construct or operate a facility or mobile unit for hazardous waste recycling) and for the facilities that recycle certain hazardous materials without storing those materials before they’re recycled.
2026-06-24T05:00:00Z

Virginia reinstates power plant CO2 budget program

Effective date: April 24, 2026

This applies to: Power plant owners

Description of change: The Virginia Department of Environmental Quality reinstated the Virginia CO2 Budget Trading Program Regulation, which implements the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI). Participation in the RGGI was stopped in 2023, but the state will resume participation on July 1, 2026, the same date on which the compliance requirements take effect.

The regulation requires fossil fuel-fired units that serve an electricity generator with a capacity of 25 megawatts or more to obtain enough allowances to cover CO2 emissions, which they can purchase in the September and December RGGI auctions.

The department also adopted amendments to the regulations, including establishing a one-time 6-month control period from July 1, 2026, to December 31, 2026.

Related state info: Clean air operating permits state comparison

See More
New Network Poll
What's your opinion on using Performance Improvement Plans (PIPs) as an employee performance management tool?

What's your opinion on using Performance Improvement Plans (PIPs) as an employee performance management tool?

No active poll
Please come back soon!
See More
See More
See More
See More
Saved to my EVENT CALENDAR!
View your saved links by clicking the arrow next to your profile picture located in the header. Then, click “My Activity” to view the Event Calendar on your Activity page.