Employee pregnancies —Three ways the PWFA and the ADA differ (and are similar)
The Pregnant Workers Fairness Act (PWFA) goes into effect June 27, 2023. This new employment law requires employers to provide reasonable accommodations to a worker’s known limitations related to pregnancy, childbirth, or related medical conditions, unless the accommodation will cause the employer an undue hardship.
The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) requires employers to provide reasonable accommodations to the known disability of an employee or applicant unless the accommodation will cause the employer an undue hardship.
The two laws have some differences and similarities.
3 differences
The differences between the PWFA and the ADA include the following:
- Pregnancy. The PWFA applies only to employees who have pregnancy-related conditions and limitations. Under the ADA, pregnancy, by itself, is not a disability. Pregnancy-related disabilities (e.g., gestational diabetes, preeclampsia) can, however, be disabilities under the ADA.
- Essential job functions. Under the PWFA, the term “qualified employee” means an employee or applicant who, with or without reasonable accommodation, can perform the essential functions of the employment position. Employees and applicants are considered qualified if:
- Any inability to perform an essential function is for a temporary period;
- The essential function could be performed in the near future; and
- The inability to perform the essential function can be reasonably accommodated.
Therefore, the temporary inability to perform essential functions due to pregnancy, childbirth, or related medical conditions does not render an employee unqualified.
Under the ADA, a qualified individual is someone with a disability who satisfies the requisite skill, experience, education, and other job-related requirements of the employment position such individual holds or desires and who, with or without reasonable accommodation, can perform the essential functions of such position.
- 3. Accommodations. Workplace accommodations under the PWFA can look very different from those under the ADA. PWFA reasonable accommodations include, but are not limited to:
- Allowing employees to sit or drink water;
- Allowing employees to park closer to the facility,
- Providing flexible work hours;
- Allowing additional break time for bathroom use, eating, or resting;
- Being excused from strenuous activities and/or activities that involve exposure to compounds not safe for pregnancy, and
- Using leave to recover from childbirth.
3 similarities
While differences exist between the two laws, similarities include the following:
- Interactive process. When employees request an accommodation, employers must discuss the request with the employees. This is often referred to as the interactive process.
- Definition. The term ‘‘reasonable accommodation’ has the same meaning under both laws. Leave, for example, may be a form of accommodation. It’s possible that another accommodation would also be effective. Employers may not require an employee to take leave if another reasonable accommodation can be provided that would let the employee keep working.
- Undue hardship. Employers are required to provide reasonable accommodations unless they would cause an “undue hardship” on business operations. An “undue hardship” is significant difficulty or expense for the organization.
The Equal Employment Opportunities Commission will issue PWFA regulations, which might have more details.
Key to remember: Come June 27, employers must consider each employee pregnancy on a case-by-case basis, looking at all the facts involved, for both PWFA and the ADA. Depending on the facts, employers must consider their obligations. It’s possible that an employee could have protections under both laws.