Construction staffing company’s blueprint for not hiring protected-class workers results in hefty fine
“Don’t hire women, Black workers, or older employees for construction jobs because our clients don’t like it.” This was the message a Minnesota staffing company recruiter got before essentially being forced to resign because she refused to engage in unlawful conduct.
The conduct alleged in these hiring practices violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which makes it unlawful to discriminate against employees because of their sex or race. It also violates the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, which prohibits discrimination against employees 40 years of age or older.
In January 2025, the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) announced that the staffing company will pay $300,000 and provide other equitable relief to settle the discrimination lawsuit.
Company must improve hiring process, provide training
The staffing company in this case provides temporary employees for commercial, residential, restoration, heavy industrial, and energy construction companies.
The EEOC’s suit alleged that employees told the recruiter that the company didn’t hire women for construction jobs, Black workers in certain areas, or individuals who were over 40 years old, because some clients supposedly did not want them. The recruiter later spoke with the staffing company president who confirmed that practice.
The EEOC further alleged that the staffing company assigned employees by sex and race, which resulted in women getting fewer hours and receiving less pay than men, and Black employees getting fewer hours and receiving less pay than white employees.
In addition to the fine, the staffing company is required to implement a hiring process that provides equal employment opportunities, and must:
- Use objective, job-related criteria in hiring decisions going forward, and
- Provide training on anti-discrimination laws to employees involved in the hiring and recruitment process.
Additionally, the staffing company is required to identify and report to the EEOC information regarding all clients who made or make discriminatory requests for employees based on a protected status such as sex, race, or age, and must provide reports to the EEOC regarding complaints of discrimination based on sex, race, or age.
Hiring lessons for all employers
The start of a new year means new budgets and companies excited to spend money –perhaps on recruiting.
Some recruiters said last year was an odd combination of too many candidates for open positions, but not enough qualified ones. This was according to the annual Recruiter Nation Report by talent acquisition software and services company Employ Inc.
The year 2025, however, is poised to give recruiters a more hopeful vibe that hiring won’t be as hard, according to the report. In fact, 92 percent of recruiters surveyed said they feel “optimistic” about hiring this year.
That optimism might be based on improved hiring tactics such as:
- Using artificial intelligence,
- Incorporating new technology,
- Automating steps,
- Offering candidates higher salaries and better benefits, or
- Being flexible during the overall recruitment process.
Regardless of new technologies and better techniques, when it comes to a compliant hiring process, it’s all about the fundamentals. Companies need to focus on the basics, like not discriminating against job candidates as the construction staffing company did.
No one wants a giant EEOC wrecking ball swinging in and demolishing all the positive recruitment energy a few weeks into the new year.
Key to remember: Despite the excitement of adding new technology to the hiring process, companies should focus on the fundamentals, like not discriminating against job candidates.