Straw poll: GHS favored for inhouse HazCom labeling; NFPA comes in second
How popular are non-GHS-style inhouse labeling systems for chemical hazard communication (HazCom)? GHS, of course, stands for the Globally Harmonized System, and this style is one compliance option at OSHA 29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(6). However, employers have other alternatives per the regulation, but do they opt for those?
J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc., recently posed the question to attendees of our webcast, “HazCom Requirements: Understanding 5 Key Areas of Compliance.” Attendees were asked a straw-poll question, “Do you use any inhouse HazCom labeling systems other than the GHS style?
- Yes, we use NFPA® 704
- Yes, we use HMIS III®
- Yes, we use some other non-GHS-style, inhouse labeling system
- No, we only use GHS-style labels inhouse
Attendees could click more than one answer.
Most attendees use GHS-style only
Most poll participants (about 69 percent) clicked the no answer, indicating they only use the GHS style. This makes sense because containers of hazardous chemicals must be shipped with the OSHA GHS-style label in the U.S. In this way, employers can simply rely on that label inhouse.
If a worker pours a hazardous chemical into another container, and that secondary container is not for “immediate use,” the employer must label the inhouse container, and the easiest way to do that may be to create a label that mimics the original GHS-style label.
In addition, employers would only have to train on one labeling system — the GHS-style.
NFPA 704 is favored choice for many
Coming in second in our poll is the yes answer indicating the employers use NFPA 704, Standard System for the Identification of the Hazards of Materials for Emergency Response. Twenty percent of attendees selected that answer.
That standard has been around for decades, and many state/local fire codes may require containers or buildings and chemical storage areas to depict an NFPA 704 label or sign. Many safety data sheets offer the NFPA 704 ratings to make it easy for chemical purchasers to create NFPA-style labels.
NFPA’s standard is intended to provide information for emergency personnel responding to a fire/spill and those planning for emergency response. It uses a four-color, square-on-point configuration along with number and letter ratings to classify health, flammability, instability, and special chemical hazards.
For OSHA compliance, an inhouse HazCom label in the NFPA style must also include a “product identifier” and any other OSHA 1910.1200 hazards not addressed by the NFPA ratings. NFPA suggests the added elements appear outside the square-on-point. If NFPA labels are used, employers must train employees in the system.
Note that the NFPA square-on-point design CANNOT be used for shipping or transporting chemicals, as it violates Department of Transportation (DOT) regulations.
HMIS III® labeling system came in third
HMIS stands for Hazardous Materials Identification System, an inhouse labeling system created by the American Coatings Association. HMIS, too, uses a numerical hazard rating system, but the ratings are not identical to NFPA.
HMIS also uses a rectangular configuration with colored bars to indicate health, flammability, and physical chemical hazards. A white area allows the employer to indicate suggested personal protective equipment and supplemental information. Many safety data sheets offer the HMIS ratings.
Results show that 9 percent of our poll participants use the HMIS III system for inhouse labeling purposes. The numeral III indicates the third version of the HMIS system. HMIS was originally developed for use by the paint manufacturing industry but has since spread to numerous other service and manufacturing industries.
For OSHA compliance, an inhouse HazCom label in the HMIS style must also include a “product identifier” and any other 1910.1200 hazards not addressed by HMIS ratings. If HMIS labels are used, employers must train employees in the system.
While the OSHA GHS-style must be used for chemical shipping labels, the HMIS label may also appear on the label and does not violate DOT regulations.
Few use other labeling systems
When rounding our results, the lowest-tallied answer (yes, we use some other non-GHS style, inhouse labeling system) garnered 3 percent of participants.
Casting a wide net, it’s possible that employers might use HMIS I or II labels, DOT labels/placards, EPA hazardous waste/pesticide labels, ANSI-style product labels, international symbols, other systems, site-created labeling, and/or a combination thereof.
If the chemicals and containers fall under OSHA’s HazCom Standard, then employers must ensure that the inhouse container labels meet 1910.1200(f)(6). Subparagraph (f)(6) mandates the OSHA GHS-style OR an alternative that provides the product identifier and the general hazards of the chemical. However, stationary process tanks may go with a label alternative at 1910.1200(f)(7).
Key to remember
Our straw poll finds that most of our participants (69 percent) use the GHS-style label for inhouse purposes, and not other labeling systems. NFPA 704 came in second (20 percent), followed by HMIS III (9 percent).