Roofing contractor willfully exposes workers to deadly fall hazards
The U.S. Department of Labor has once again found a roofing contractor in violation of fall protection safety standards, marking the company’s second failed inspection in five years. OSHA revealed that the roofing contractor allowed employees to work on a residential roof without adequate fall protection, exposing them to significant risks.
"Falls from elevation kill more construction workers than any other industry hazards and yet, far too often, we find employers exposing their employees to debilitating injuries or worse," explained OSHA Area Director in Fort Lauderdale, Florida.
During the most recent inspection, OSHA discovered that employees were working at a height of 32 feet without the required fall protection equipment while securing trusses and roof fascia. As a result, OSHA has issued $161,323 in proposed penalties for a single citation.
"Workers have a right to a safe workplace, and employers must take all necessary steps to protect them, including identifying and eliminating hazards commonly associated with their industry,” added the Area Director. “If they fail to do so, they can expect hefty fines like the one assessed in this investigation."
OSHA requirements for residential construction
The roofing contractor was found to be in violation of the following construction safety standard:
1926.501(b)(13) Residential construction. Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure.
Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of § 1926.502.
Note: There is a presumption that it is feasible and will not create a greater hazard to implement at least one of the above-listed fall protection systems. Accordingly, the employer has the burden of establishing that it is appropriate to implement a fall protection plan which complies with § 1926.502(k) for a particular workplace situation, in lieu of implementing any of those systems.
Under this fall protection standard, employers must either protect workers from fall hazards by means of guardrail systems, safety net system, personal fall arrest systems, or approved fall protection plans.
A fall protection plan must document the reasons why the use of conventional fall protection systems (guardrail systems, personal fall arrest systems, or safety nets systems) are infeasible or why their use would create a greater hazard.
It must also include a written discussion of other measures that will be taken to reduce or eliminate the fall, such as the extent to which scaffolds, ladders, or vehicle-mounted work platforms can be used to provide a safer working surface and thereby reduce the hazard of falling.
Safety monitoring systemscompliant with OSHA standard 1926.502(h) may also be necessary as part of an approved fall protection plan.
Willful, serious, and repeat OSHA citations
The type of violation this contractor received from the most recent inspection was classified as “willful and serious.”
- A willful violation occurs when an employer knowingly fails to comply with a legal requirement (purposeful disregard) or acts with plain indifference to employee safety. These are the most severe types of violations and suggest that the employer was aware that a hazardous condition existed but made no effort to eliminate it. Additionally, if a willful violation results in a fatality, criminal charges can be brought against the employer.
- A serious violation occurs when there is a substantial probability that death or serious physical harm could result from a hazard about which the employer knew or should have known.
- A repeat violation occurs when an employer has previously been cited for the same or a substantially similar condition or hazard. The original citation must have been issued within the past three to five years, depending on the circumstances, although this period can be extended in some situations. Repeat violations can result in increased penalties, enhanced scrutiny, and reputational damage to employers.
One final note to consider is that residential construction work often involves multiple employers. And in situations where there are general contractors and subcontractors working together, OSHA may cite more than one employer for health and safety violations. Review OSHA's Multi-Employer Citation Policy for more information.
Key to remember: Employers, especially those in residential construction, should take note that failing to adhere to OSHA's fall protection standards can result in significant fines and legal consequences.