FREE TRIAL UPGRADE!
Thank you for investing in EnvironmentalHazmatHuman ResourcesHuman Resources, Hazmat & Environmental related content. Click 'UPGRADE' to continue.
CANCEL
YOU'RE ALL SET!
Enjoy your limited-time access to the Compliance Network!
A confirmation welcome email has been sent to your email address from ComplianceNetwork@t.jjkellercompliancenetwork.com. Please check your spam/junk folder if you can't find it in your inbox.
YOU'RE ALL SET!
Thank you for your interest in EnvironmentalHazmatHuman ResourcesHuman Resources, Hazmat & Environmental related content.
WHOOPS!
You've reached your limit of free access, if you'd like more info, please contact us at 800-327-6868.
You'll also get exclusive access to:
Already have an account? .

Because of the deadly danger of fire, it’s to workers’ benefit to know what to do if a fire starts. They should be aware of certain procedures to protect themselves and others from injury during fires and other emergencies. They should be familiar with:

  • How to report fires, hazardous chemical spills, and other emergencies.
  • The route they are assigned to take during a building evacuation.
  • Who to ask for more information.

In 2022, OSHA issued 11 citations to an employer with proposed penalties of $139,427 for a flash fire that resulted in an explosion and injured six workers. Violations included fire protection and prevention hazards not addressed by the employer during welding, cutting, and brazing operations. Ensure your workplace fire protection and prevention plan includes alarm systems, emergency shutdown, evacuation, and what to do if a fire starts.

Alarm systems

Most companies use alarm systems to alert employees to evacuate an area or to take a specific action. They must be able to recognize these alarms. In areas where production noise could prevent an alarm from being heard, flashing lights are often installed as a second visual alarm. These alarm systems must be reliable and may operate from auxiliary power sources even when the power goes out.

Emergency shutdown of equipment

If time permits before evacuation, workers should turn off any equipment they are operating, such as forklifts or conveyors. Employers should designate certain workers to shut down critical facility systems, such as gas and electrical power, before evacuating the work area if it’s safe to do.

Evacuation

Employers must develop emergency escape routes for the various locations in the workplace. Floor plans or work-area maps clearly define emergency escape routes and are commonly used to convey this information.

Designate certain employees to take a headcount of all workers after evacuation and to inform emergency responders of any missing personnel.

When a fire starts

When a fire starts, think only of safety and the safety of others.

Workers should sound the fire alarm when a fire is out of control, when not sure what is burning, or training for operating a fire extinguisher hasn’t been completed. Then, they should be instructed to call for emergency help from a safe place.

Workers must be aware of smoke and toxic fumes. These fumes enter the lungs and leave people unconscious and at the mercy of the smoke and flames.

Fire in the workplace is serious business. Any fire in the workplace has the potential to cause serious personal or property damage. When chemicals are involved, the possibilities for destruction are greatly multiplied. Employers and workers must each do their parts to make the workplace fireproof.

Key to remember

Workers must be aware of certain procedures to protect themselves and others from injury during fires and other emergencies.

Specialized Industries

Go beyond the regulations! Visit the Institute for in-depth guidance on a wide range of compliance subjects in safety and health, transportation, environment, and human resources.

J. J. Keller® COMPLIANCE NETWORK is a premier online safety and compliance community, offering members exclusive access to timely regulatory content in workplace safety (OSHA), transportation (DOT), environment (EPA), and human resources (DOL).

Interact With Our Compliance Experts

Puzzled by a regulatory question or issue? Let our renowned experts provide the answers and get your business on track to full compliance!

Upcoming Events

Reference the Compliance Network Safety Calendar to keep track of upcoming safety and compliance events. Browse by industry or search by keyword to see relevant dates and observances, including national safety months, compliance deadlines, and more.

SAFETY & COMPLIANCE NEWS

Keep up with the latest regulatory developments from OSHA, DOT, EPA, DOL, and more.

REGSENSE® REGULATORY REFERENCE

Explore a comprehensive database of word-for-word regulations on a wide range of compliance topics, with simplified explanations and best practices advice from our experts.

THE J. J. KELLER INSTITUTE

The Institute is your destination for in-depth content on 120+ compliance subjects. Discover articles, videos, and interactive exercises that will strengthen your understanding of regulatory concepts relevant to your business.

ADD HAZMAT, ENVIRONMENTAL, & HR RESOURCES

Unlock exclusive content offering expert insights into hazmat, environmental, and human resources compliance with a COMPLIANCE NETWORK EDGE membership.

DIRECT ACCESS TO COMPLIANCE EXPERTS

Struggling with a compliance challenge? Get the solution from our in-house team of experts! You can submit a question to our experts by email, set up a phone or video call, or request a detailed research report.

EVENTS

Register to attend live online events hosted by our experts. These webcasts and virtual conferences feature engaging discussions on important compliance topics in a casual, knowledge-sharing environment.

Most Recent Highlights In Environmental

The compliance trap of “empty” containers
2025-06-25T05:00:00Z

The compliance trap of “empty” containers

At first glance, an empty container seems like a non-issue – no product, no problem. But in the eyes of regulators, “empty” is a carefully defined status that can determine whether a container is harmless or still subject to hazardous waste rules, labeling, and fire or environmental risk controls. The EPA and OSHA have detailed definitions of what “empty” truly means. Misunderstanding these rules can lead to serious incidents, hefty fines, and unintentional non-compliance.

The EPA definition: “RCRA empty” explained

Under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), a container that once held hazardous waste is only legally “empty” if it meets particular criteria outlined in 40 CFR 261.7. The first standard that must be satisfied is that all material has been removed from the container using normal means such as pouring, pumping, or aspirating. Secondly, no more than 2.5 centimeters or 1 inch of residue remains on the container's bottom or inner lining. Additionally, if the container holds less than 110 gallons, it is “empty” if no more than 3% of the total weight or volume exists. Of course, sometimes special circumstances require further evaluation. For example, a gas cylinder is not “empty” until the pressure has reduced to atmospheric levels, and acute hazardous waste containers must be triple rinsed with an appropriate solvent or cleaned by another approved method. If these conditions are not met, the container is still legally considered to contain hazardous waste, even if it feels empty.

The OSHA definition: “Empty” under the Hazard Communication Standard

While the EPA focuses on environmental disposal and waste management, OSHA’s concern with empty containers centers on worker safety—particularly the potential for exposure to hazardous residues or vapors. Under OSHA’s Hazard Communication Standard (29 CFR 1910.1200), a container that previously contained hazardous chemicals must retain its original hazard label until it is adequately cleaned or until the employer removes the label following proper decontamination procedures. For example, a drum labeled “Flammable” must keep this label even if it appears empty, as residual material or vapors may still pose a significant ignition or fire risk. Removing such labels prematurely could lead to workplace hazards and violations of OSHA regulations.

How to stay compliant

Employers must first clearly determine which rules apply to them: whether the container held hazardous materials governed by EPA regulations, hazardous chemicals subject to OSHA requirements, or both. Emptying procedures should be followed, including properly draining the container, performing triple-rinsing when required, and thoroughly documenting all decontamination activities.  Original hazard labels must be maintained on containers until they are thoroughly cleaned or reconditioned, as removing labels prematurely violates OSHA’s Hazard Communication Standard. Additionally, employers should provide employees with training on the proper handling, labeling, and disposal of containers and ensure they fully understand what constitutes an ‘empty’ container under federal standards. Finally, a detailed record of all rinsing, draining, and cleaning processes should be maintained to demonstrate compliance during EPA or state inspections.

Keys to remember: Employers should educate their teams, enforce proper cleaning procedures, and maintain compliance records to ensure they are staying compliant with “empty” container standards.

The spill on tiers for SPCC Plans
2025-06-20T05:00:00Z

The spill on tiers for SPCC Plans

When it comes to oil spill prevention, it’s a good thing to be in “tiers.” Why? It’s because Tier I or Tier II qualified facilities have simplified requirements for the Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasure (SPCC) Plan.

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) requires facilities subject to the SPCC rule (40 CFR Part 112) to develop and implement a plan that describes how they will use operating procedures, control measures, and countermeasures to prevent oil spills from reaching navigable waters or adjoining shorelines. Typically, SPCC Plans must be certified by a professional engineer (PE), but qualified facilities can self-certify the plans.

Let’s compare Tier I and Tier II qualified facilities.

Qualified facilities

A qualified facility:

  • Has a total aboveground oil storage capacity of 10,000 gallons or less, and
  • Hasn’t had over the past three years either:
    • One oil discharge greater than 1,000 gallons, or
    • Two oil discharges greater than 42 gallons each within any 12-month period.

The SPCC rule identifies two types of qualified facilities:

  • A Tier I qualified facility has no aboveground oil containers greater than 5,000 gallons.
  • A Tier II qualified facility has an individual aboveground oil container greater than 5,000 gallons.

SPCC Tier Tip: EPA provides a fact sheet (Spill Prevention Control and Countermeasure (SPCC) Plan Qualified Facilities Applicability) to help facilities determine eligibility as a qualified facility and (if applicable) which tier applies.

What are the similarities?

Tier I and Tier II qualified facilities are subject to many of the same requirements for SPCC Plans, including basic requirements, certification, and updates to qualification changes.

Basic requirements

All qualified facilities have to develop and implement a written SPCC Plan. Each plan is unique to the facility, but all plans must include:

  • Operating procedures to prevent oil spills;
  • Control measures to prevent oil spills from reaching navigable waters or adjoining shorelines; and
  • Countermeasures to contain, clean up, and mitigate oil spills that reach navigable waters or adjoining shorelines.

Certification

The primary similarity is that Tier I and Tier II qualified facilities may self-certify their SPCC Plans and amendments to the plan.

SPCC Tier Tip: Some states may not allow self-certification. EPA recommends checking with the state engineer licensing board to determine whether SPCC Plans can be self-certified.

Qualification changes

When the status of a facility changes, the owner or operator must prepare and implement an SPCC Plan according to the requirements that apply to its new designation within six months.

Tier I facilities may still be able to self-certify if they meet the Tier II criteria; if so, these facilities can comply with the Tier II rules. However, facilities that are no longer eligible as qualified facilities have to comply with the full SPCC Plan requirements, including obtaining PE certification of the plan.

What are the differences?

The primary difference between Tier I and Tier II facilities is the extent of the SPCC Plan. Additionally, Tier II facilities may employ certain alternative spill control methods.

Type of SPCC Plan

Tier I qualified facilities may use the template in Appendix G of Part 112 as their SPCC Plan. It’s a simplified plan that only contains the requirements applicable to Tier I facilities.

These facilities must also:

  • Add failure analysis to the plan (including predicted directions and total quantity of oil that could be discharged for each major equipment failure) if there’s a reasonable potential for equipment failure;
  • Install bulk storage secondary containment or an alternative system with a drainage trench enclosure (including for mobile or portable containers); and
  • Establish a system or procedure to prevent container overfills, describe the system or procedure in the SPCC Plan, and regularly test the system or procedure to ensure it works.

Tier II qualified facilities have to develop a full SPCC Plan that complies with 112.7 and the applicable requirements of Subparts B and C of Part 112. This includes developing facility diagrams.

Alternative compliance methods

Tier II qualified facilities (with certification) may implement certain alternative measures and methods that Tier I facilities can’t. Tier II facilities must obtain written certification from a PE to include:

  • Alternative spill prevention, control, or countermeasure methods that provide the same environmental protection as the required methods;
  • Alternative measures where secondary containment is impracticable; and
  • Alternative procedures for skimming produced water containers instead of using sized secondary containment.

Qualified facilities, whether Tier I or Tier II, benefit from the ability to self-certify their SPCC Plans. That’s something that can make owners and operators “tier” up with happiness.

Key to remember: Tier I and Tier II qualified facilities share many similarities under the SPCC rule, but knowing where the requirements differ is vital to maintaining compliance.

EHS Monthly Round Up - May 2025

EHS Monthly Round Up - May 2025

In this May 2025 roundup video, we'll review the most impactful environmental health and safety news.

Hi everyone! Welcome to the monthly news roundup video, where we’ll review the most impactful environmental health and safety news. Let's take a look at what happened over the last month!

OSHA will host an informal public hearing on its proposed Heat Injury and Illness Prevention rule on June 16. Information about the proposed rule and instructions on how to watch the hearing can be found on OSHA’s website.

OSHA’s National Safety Stand-Down to Prevent Falls in Construction event, held the week of May 5, raised awareness of fall hazards in an effort to help prevent injuries and fatalities. Slips, trips, and falls were the leading cause of death in the construction industry in 2023, accounting for 421 fatalities.

After concluding its investigation of a California chemical facility fire, the Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation Board is calling for improved heater safeguards to prevent similar incidents. The fire was caused by an overheated refinery furnace. The Board also made several safety recommendations for chemical facilities.

Following a number of recent fall incidents, the Mine Safety and Health Administration issued a safety alert advising miners to use fall protection. The most recent incident occurred when a miner fell from the deck of a bulldozer.

Turning to environmental news, EPA further delayed the PFAS manufacturing report submission period. The date was moved from July 11, 2025, to April 13, 2026. This is a one-time reporting requirement for manufacturers of per- and polyfluoroalkyl, or PFAS, substances.

Thanks for tuning in to the monthly news roundup. We’ll see you next month!

Agency again delays submission deadline for TSCA Section 8(d) health and safety data
2025-06-05T05:00:00Z

Agency again delays submission deadline for TSCA Section 8(d) health and safety data

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has again delayed the deadline for submitting data on 16 chemical substances required by the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) Health and Safety Data Reporting rule. Manufacturers (including importers) now have until May 22, 2026, to report on all of the covered chemical substances.

What’s required?

The TSCA Section 8(d) Health and Safety Data Reporting rule (40 CFR Part 716) requires manufacturers (including importers) of 16 chemical substances to report data from:

  • Unpublished health and safety studies; and
  • Unpublished studies on environmental effects and occupational, general population, and consumer exposure.

The covered chemical substances include:

  • 4,4-Methylene bis(2-chloraniline),
  • 4-tert-octylphenol(4-(1,1,3,3-Tetramethylbutyl)-phenol),
  • Acetaldehyde,
  • Acrylonitrile,
  • Benzenamine,
  • Benzene,
  • Bisphenol A,
  • Ethylbenzene,
  • Hydrogen fluoride,
  • N-(1,3-Dimethylbutyl)-N’-phenyl-p-phenylenediamine (6PPD),
  • 2-anilino-5-[(4-methylpentan-2-yl) amino]cyclohexa-2,5-diene-1,4-dione (6PPD-quinone),
  • Naphthalene,
  • Styrene,
  • Tribomomethane (Bromoform),
  • Triglycidyl isocyanurate, and
  • Vinyl chloride.

Note that EPA’s first extension in March 2025 moved the submission deadline for vinyl chloride to June 11, 2025, and for the remaining 15 chemical substances to September 9, 2025. This rule pushes the submission deadline for all chemical substances (including vinyl chloride) to May 22, 2026.

Who’s covered?

The rule applies to manufacturers in the North American Industrial Classification System (NAICS) codes for chemical manufacturing (NAICS code 325) and petroleum refineries (NAICS code 324110) that:

  • Currently manufacture (including import) a covered chemical substance, or
  • Manufactured (including imported) or proposed to manufacture (including import) a covered chemical substance within the past 10 years.

The reporting requirement also applies to manufacturers of substances for commercial purposes that coincidentally produced a covered chemical substance during the manufacture, processing, use, or disposal of another substance or mixture (including byproducts and impurities).

How do you report?

Reporters submit the TSCA Section 8(d) data via the Chemical Information Submission System (or CISS) tool on the Chemical Safety and Pesticide Program (CSPP) system. The CSPP is accessed through EPA’s Central Data Exchange.

Key to remember: Manufacturers now have even more time to submit TSCA Section 8(d) health and safety data reports for 16 chemical substances.

Conduct AAI before you buy: Shield against Superfund liability
2025-06-03T05:00:00Z

Conduct AAI before you buy: Shield against Superfund liability

There’s one question that all potential purchasers should ask before buying an industrial or commercial property: Could the business be held liable for hazardous substance contamination? The Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA), also called “Superfund,” allows the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to make both current and past facility owners and operators responsible for cleaning up sites contaminated by hazardous substances.

However, CERCLA offers liability protections to landowners and potential purchasers who didn’t cause or contribute to property contamination if they meet specific requirements, including conducting All Appropriate Inquiries (AAI).

Here’s how AAI can shield your organization from Superfund liability.

What’s AAI?

EPA defines AAI as “the process of evaluating a property’s environmental conditions and assessing potential liability for any contamination.” It encompasses the activities required by the AAI rule (40 CFR Part 312) to:

  • Establish current and past uses and ownerships of the property; and
  • Identify conditions that indicate releases or threatened releases of hazardous substances on, at, in, or to the property.

Potential property owners must comply with the AAI rule to claim protection from CERCLA liability. They may use one of three landowner defenses:

  • Innocent landowners (who didn’t know and had no reason to know before purchase that the property was contaminated),
  • Contiguous property owners (who didn’t know and had no reason to know before purchase that the property is or may be contaminated by a neighboring property), or
  • Bona fide prospective purchasers (who knew or had reason to know before the purchase that the property was contaminated but were allowed to purchase it by meeting and continuing to meet certain criteria).

Who’s required to comply?

You must meet the AAI requirements if you plan to purchase a property for nonresidential use and may want to use CERCLA liability protections for hazardous substance releases or threatened releases after purchase.

The AAI rule requires an environmental professional to conduct most of the activities (312.21), but it also contains provisions that the potential owner must meet (312.22).

Who qualifies as an environmental professional?

An environmental professional has the needed background to identify conditions of a property that indicate releases or threatened releases of hazardous substances. According to 312.10, an environmental professional needs:

  • A current professional engineer’s or professional geologist’s license or registration and three years of relevant work experience,
  • A government-issued license or certification to perform environmental inquiries and three years of relevant work experience,
  • A bachelor’s degree or higher in engineering or science and five years of relevant work experience, or
  • Ten years of relevant work experience.

What’s required to comply?

The AAI rule lists the actions needed to qualify for CERCLA liability protection using the landowner defenses. All AAI tasks must be completed before acquiring the property. Most tasks need to be completed within one year prior to purchasing a property. However, a handful of actions must happen within 180 days before purchase:

  • Interviews,
  • Environmental cleanup lien searches,
  • Governmental record reviews,
  • Visual inspections, and
  • Declaration by the environmental professional.

The environmental professional:

  • Interviews current and past property owners, operators, and occupants;
  • Reviews historical information sources;
  • Reviews government records;
  • Conducts visual inspections of the facility and adjoining properties;
  • Reviews commonly known or reasonably ascertainable property information; and
  • Assesses the degree of obviousness of the presence or likely presence of property contamination and the ability to detect the contamination.

The potential landowner:

  • Searches for environmental cleanup liens not provided by the environmental professional,
  • Assesses any personal specialized knowledge or experience,
  • Assesses the relationship of the purchase price to the fair market value if the property isn’t contaminated, and
  • Obtains any commonly known or reasonably ascertainable property information not provided by the environmental professional.

Report the results

The AAI results must be documented in a written report that’s signed by the environmental professional. It must include:

  • The environmental professional’s determination of whether the property has conditions that indicate releases or threatened releases of hazardous substances,
  • Any data gaps that impacted the ability to identify such conditions and how the missing information impacted the determination,
  • The environmental professional’s qualifications, and
  • The required certification statements at 312.21(d).

Get guidance from industry standards

The regulations don’t provide specific requirements for the AAI format, and although the rules outline the actions you must take, it can be daunting to implement AAI without further guidance.

Consider using industry standards! EPA even references ASTM International Standards at 312.11 that you can use to comply.

Key to remember: Potential landowners can shield themselves from CERCLA liability for hazardous substance contamination by conducting All Appropriate Inquiries.

See More

Most Recent Highlights In Transportation

2025-05-27T05:00:00Z

Site Announcement: New Homepage Coming Soon!!!

Thank you to all our members that have taken the time to provide the Compliance Network team with feedback on what they like and do not like about the site. We have taken this feedback to heart and have redesigned the homepage to better serve our members. Our goal is to make finding the information you need easier and faster.

Let’s take a tour!

Sitewide Search

We heard you. Search has been brought front and center to help you find the information you need quickly.

Activity Overview

The Activity Overview will provide quick access to items that matter to you.

  • Profile Builder - Get the most from your membership. Complete your profile so the information important to you rises to the top.
  • My Saves - Organize and save your content of interest for quick access later.
  • Notifications - We will keep current with site updates, new content, network events, and most importantly, regulatory updates.
  • Top Stories now - Recent news in your areas of interest.

Latest in your favorite Topics

This section will highlight any new content added to your selected topics of interest.

Network Polls and Discussion Activity

See what other professionals in your field are saying.

Premium Content

Exclusive content only available to Compliance Network members.

Trending

Catch up with what other professional like yourself are reading.

The new homepage will go live in June. Don’t hesitate to let us know what you think: compliancenetwork@jjkeller.com

Title V operating permits: Comply, certify, repeat
2025-05-23T05:00:00Z

Title V operating permits: Comply, certify, repeat

A Title V operating permit is a legally enforceable document with the federal and state air emissions regulations that a facility must meet to operate. One requirement that applies to all Title V permit holders is the annual compliance certification. It answers whether a facility fulfills the permit’s terms and conditions (such as emissions limits, monitoring, recordkeeping, and reporting).

Whether the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) or a state or local regulatory agency issues the Title V permit, your facility must complete the annual compliance certification.

Discover what your facility needs to comply, certify, and repeat.

What’s required?

Facilities submit annual compliance certifications to the Title V permitting authority, which is usually a state or local regulatory agency (40 CFR 70.6). An EPA Regional Office serves as the permitting authority (71.6) for federally issued permits.

Title V tip:Check the state or local regulations for Title V compliance certification rules. They may require more frequent submissions and additional information.

At a minimum, the annual compliance certification covers two major areas for every permit term or condition:

  • The compliance methods, and
  • The compliance status.

Let’s take a closer look at each element.

Compliance methods

Your facility’s compliance methods are the ways it tracks whether it’s meeting the Title V permit requirements or not. When a term or condition isn’t met (like exceeding an emission limit), it’s known as a deviation.

Compliance methods consist of monitoring, recordkeeping, and reporting:

  • Monitoring includes the procedures, test methods, and equipment used to track compliance data.
  • Recordkeeping covers:
    • The date, place, and time of monitoring;
    • The date when monitoring results were analyzed, the entity that conducted the analysis, the analytical methods used, and the results; and
    • The operating conditions during monitoring.
  • Reporting consists of semiannual monitoring reports and deviation reports (which list the deviation, the applicable permit requirement, the probable cause, and any corrective or preventive actions).

Compliance status

Three questions determine the compliance status of each permit requirement during the covered period:

  • Did the facility comply with the requirement?
  • Was compliance continuous or intermittent?
  • Were any deviations a “possible exception to compliance"?

Intermittent vs. continuous compliance

For each permit term or condition, your facility has intermittent compliance if it doesn’t meet the requirements at any time during the covered period. Your facility achieves continuous compliance only if it:

  • Performs the necessary compliance methods,
  • Has no unexcused deviations, and
  • Records no contrary evidence.

Possible exception to compliance

EPA defines a possible exception to compliance as “any periods during which compliance is required and in which an excursion or exceedance … occurred” (70.6(c)(5)(iii)(C)).

Simply put, a possible exception to compliance is a deviation that occurs when compliance is mandated. If compliance isn’t required or another permit requirement excuses it, the deviation isn’t a possible exception.

How do I submit a compliance certification?

Your facility’s Title V permit provides instructions for how to submit the annual compliance certification, including the required forms and methods (via mail or electronic submission). You can also confirm requirements with your permitting authority. Generally, federally permitted facilities use the Annual Compliance Certification (EPA Form 5900-04).

Title V tip: Electronic submissions may be an option through the Compliance and Emissions Data Reporting Interface (CEDRI) on EPA’s Central Data Exchange. Check with your permitting authority to determine whether you may submit the annual compliance certification electronically via CEDRI.

Annual compliance certification is vital to maintaining your Title V permit. Keep in mind: comply, certify, and repeat.

Key to remember: Facilities with a Title V operating permit must certify compliance with the requirements at least annually.

Compliance guide: Air regulations for emergency generator installation
2025-05-21T05:00:00Z

Compliance guide: Air regulations for emergency generator installation

In today's rapidly evolving energy landscape, businesses are turning to back-up emergency generators to keep operations running smoothly. Several key factors are driving this growing trend:

  • Extreme heat and weather events

Climate change has led to more intense weather like hurricanes, wildfires, and heatwaves. These events put pressure on power grids, causing outages that disrupt business operations. Generators help by providing backup power during unexpected failures.

  • Power demand from AI and data centers

Artificial intelligence (AI) and data centers need a lot of electricity. As these technologies grow, power grids struggle to keep up. Companies use generators to prevent power shortages and keep essential systems running.

  • Grid reliability concerns

Aging infrastructure and unsteady energy supply from renewable sources can make electrical supply unstable. Industries like manufacturing, healthcare, and finance need steady power to avoid costly interruptions. Generators act as a safety net when the grid fails.

Compliance considerations

Backup generators help keep businesses running, but they also impact the environment. Companies must follow air quality regulations to reduce pollution and operate safely.

Air permits

•State agencies usually oversee air permits, but The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has granted many county and city agencies the authority to issue them. For major permits such as New Source Review (NSR) and Title V, federal regulations apply, but state or local governments may still manage the process.

•In some areas, businesses can apply for a general permit or permit-by-rule for emergency generators. These permits are often easier to obtain and take less time to process. Checking air permitting regulations will help determine if this option is available.

•Businesses should find out if they need a pre-construction or construction air permit before setting up an emergency generator. These permits are based on the proposed equipment’s potential to emit (PTE) of criteria pollutants such as NOx, SO2, CO, and CO2 and hazardous air pollutants (HAPs) such as formaldehyde and acrolein, which are emitted during the combustion of fuel. The type(s) of fuel used in the generator, such as diesel, natural gas, gasoline, or propane, will affect the calculated PTE. Read more about construction permits in this ezExplanation: NSR Permits.

(Note: many state and local permitting agencies allow for the use of 500 hours for calculating PTE from an emergency engine, as per EPA’s 2011 Fox Memo, but some agencies still require using 8,760 hours and only accept 500 hours as an enforceable limit defined in a permit.)

•Federal law sets a limit on emergency generators, allowing less than 100 hours of non-emergency use per year. This includes maintenance and testing. Some permits may also restrict the times of day when the generator can be used for non-emergency purposes.

•The permit may require businesses to use the generator according to the manufacturer’s specifications. This is especially important if the business used manufacturer guarantees to calculate PTE.

•Businesses must track fuel use and operating hours to stay within the limits used in emissions calculations. They can do this using fuel records, fuel measuring devices, and hour meters that log the generator’s usage time.

•After getting a construction permit, a facility may need to apply for an operating permit within a year of the generator beginning operation. Some state and local agencies have stricter rules and deadlines. Check out J. J. Keller’s ezExplanation for Operating Permits: Clean Air Act: Operating Permits

EPA emission standards

The EPA enforces strict emissions regulations for stationary engines. Businesses must ensure their generators meet the New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) for compression ignition (40 CFR 60 Subpart IIII) and spark ignition internal combustion engines (ICE) (40 CFR 60 Subpart JJJJ), which can be found here. Additionally, the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) apply to reciprocating internal combustion engines (RICE). 40 CFR 63 Subpart ZZZZ can be found here.

These rules, depending on the specific type of generator engine, will be required even if a permit is not necessary.

Other Regulations

Keep in mind that using an emergency generator may also involve other factors depending on the type and amount of fuel stored:

•Aboveground Storage Tank (AST) Requirements

•Spill Prevention Control and Countermeasure (SPCC) Plans

•EPCRA Tier II Reporting

Key to remember: When installing an emergency generator, companies must navigate complex air quality regulations to ensure compliance. By selecting the right fuel type and securing necessary permits, businesses can maintain reliable power while minimizing environmental impact.

Expert Insights: Hazardous waste vs hazardous materials explained
2025-05-16T05:00:00Z

Expert Insights: Hazardous waste vs hazardous materials explained

Several questions we receive from our customers use the terms “hazardous waste” and “hazardous materials” interchangeably. At a recent event, a few attendees admitted that they didn’t think there was a difference between the two. This is a common point of confusion and we want to ensure that our readers know the difference. Let’s dive into it!

Hazardous materials

The term hazardous material is defined by the Department of Transportation and refers to any substance or material that poses an unreasonable risk to health, safety, and property during transportation. Hazardous materials include hazardous substances, hazardous wastes, marine pollutants, and elevated-temperature materials. Essentially, if it’s dangerous and transported, it’s considered a hazardous material.

Hazardous waste

On the other hand, hazardous waste is defined by the Environmental Protection Agency. It refers to contaminated chemicals or by-products that no longer serve their purpose and need to be disposed of. Hazardous wastes are either listed or exhibit characteristics like ignitability, corrosivity, toxicity, or reactivity. It’s essentially waste that poses a danger to health or the environment and requires special handling and disposal.

To put it simply, hazardous material is a broad term that includes various dangerous substances during transportation, while hazardous waste specifically refers to dangerous by-products that need disposal. Understanding these terms is crucial for compliance with environmental and safety regulations.

If you ever find yourself unsure, remember that hazardous materials are about transportation risks, and hazardous wastes are about disposal risks.

EPA further delays PFAS manufacturing report submission period
2025-05-13T05:00:00Z

EPA further delays PFAS manufacturing report submission period

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) issued an interim final rule that further delays the submission period for the one-time reporting requirement for manufacturers of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS). It pushes the starting submission period to April 2026.

Under Section 8(a)(7) of the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA), EPA requires any business that manufactured (including imported) any PFAS or PFAS-containing article between 2011 and 2022 to submit the report.

What’s the new timeline?

The Section 8(a)(7) PFAS report’s opening submission period was moved from July 11, 2025, to April 13, 2026. Most manufacturers have six months to submit the report. Small manufacturers reporting only as importers of PFAS-containing articles have one year.

TSCA Section 8(a)(7) PFAS report submission period
Most manufacturersApril 13, 2026–October 13, 2026
Small manufacturers reporting solely as PFAS article importersApril 13, 2026–April 13, 2027

About the report

Manufacturers (including importers) covered by the TSCA Section 8(a)(7) PFAS reporting rule (40 CFR Part 705) must provide information about:

  • Chemical identity, uses, and volumes;
  • By-products;
  • Environmental and health effects;
  • Worker exposure; and
  • Disposal.

It’s the second time EPA has postponed the reporting period. In September 2024, the agency moved the beginning submission period from November 2024 to July 2025. This latest interim rule pushes the starting period from July 2025 to April 2026.

Why the delay?

EPA needs more time to prepare the online reporting tool on the Central Data Exchange that businesses will use to submit the data. The agency will conduct tests to ensure that the application can accept submissions and that reporters don’t encounter technical issues.

Key to remember: EPA further delayed TSCA Section 8(a)(7) PFAS reporting. The submission period now begins on April 13, 2026.

See More

Most Recent Highlights In Safety & Health

EHS Monthly Round Up - April 2025

EHS Monthly Round Up - April 2025

In this April 2025 roundup video, we'll review the most impactful environmental health and safety news.

Hi everyone! Welcome to the monthly news roundup video, where we’ll review the most impactful environmental health and safety news. Let’s take a look at what’s happened over the last month!

On April 17, OSHA released 2024 injury and illness data. This includes information from more than 370,000 establishments that submitted Form 300A, as well as partial data from more than 732,000 Form 300 and Form 301 records. OSHA provides public access to the data in an effort to identify unsafe conditions and workplace hazards that may lead to occupational injuries and illnesses.

This year’s National Stand-Down to Prevent Struck-by Incidents took place the week of April 21. Struck-by incidents are the second leading cause of death among construction workers and the leading cause of nonfatal injuries in the construction industry. The stand-down emphasized the importance of training and prevention on worksites.

A safety alert from the Mine Safety and Health Administration urges the mining community to implement effective safety and health programs, with a focus on identifying and eliminating health and safety hazards. The alert was issued due to a high number of mining fatalities in the first quarter of 2025.

The Mine Safety and Health Administration temporarily paused its silica enforcement for coal mine operators until August 18, four months from its original compliance date of April 14. Under the agency’s silica rule, mine operators must update their respiratory protection programs. This may require them to obtain additional respirators and sampling devices. The agency says this four-month pause provides time for operators to come into compliance.

And finally, turning to environmental news, EPA updated the process for making data corrections to hazardous waste manifests. Waste handlers must correct errors on the manifest within 30 days of a request from EPA or a state agency. They also must submit corrections electronically.

And finally, EPA streamlined its pesticide registration process. The agency updated its MyPest app and made policy changes regarding how to submit two of its registration forms.

Thanks for tuning in to the monthly news roundup. We’ll see you next month!

Small quantity generators: Ready for RCRA re-notifications?
2025-05-08T05:00:00Z

Small quantity generators: Ready for RCRA re-notifications?

You’ve likely never thought of “staying in touch” as a legal obligation, but that’s exactly what it is for facilities that generate small quantities of hazardous waste. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) mandates that small quantity generators (SQGs) give updates on their hazardous waste activities every four years. The next re-notification is right around the corner; it’s due by September 1, 2025.

Here's what SQGs need to know to stay in touch — and in compliance — with EPA.

What’s the re-notification requirement?

The Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) enables EPA to control hazardous waste from generation to disposal. The agency keeps tabs on SQGs through the re-notification regulation at 40 CFR 262.18(d). It requires SQGs to re-notify EPA or the state environmental agency of their generator status and activities every four years by submitting the:

  • Notification of RCRA Subtitle C Activities, also known as the Site Identification (ID) Form (EPA Form 8700-12), or
  • State-equivalent form.

How do SQGs re-notify?

Regulated SQGs must submit the Site ID Form. EPA and many states use the myRCRAid module on RCRA Information (RCRAInfo) for re-notifications.

Here’s how to submit the Site ID Form on myRCRAid:

  1. Log in to RCRAInfo.
  2. Click “Create New Submission” on the myRCRAid tab.
  3. Select the reason for submittal as “Obtaining or updating an EPA ID number for on-going regulated activities (Items 10–17) that will continue for a period of time."
  4. Review and update the information about your site as needed, including the facility’s:
    • EPA ID number,
    • Name and location address,
    • Mailing address,
    • Land type,
    • North American Industry Classification System (or NAICS) code,
    • Site contact information,
    • Legal owner/operator information,
    • Type of regulated waste activity,
    • Additional regulated waste activities, and
    • Status as:
      • An academic entity with laboratories,
      • An episodic generator,
      • A large quantity generator (LQG) consolidating very small quantity generator hazardous waste,
      • An LQG site closing a Central Accumulation Area or facility,
      • A secondary hazardous material manager, and
      • A contractor of an electronic manifest broker.
  5. Include any additional information in the comments section (Item 18).
  6. Click “Review.” Make any needed corrections to the information. Once this is complete, myRCRAid will display the Review Source Record page.
  7. Submit the re-notification:
    • If you don’t have Certifier permission, click “Mark Ready for Signature.” The application will save the form in the “In Progress” section on myRCRAid and notify individuals at your facility with Certifier and Site Manager permissions. The status will display “Ready for Signature."
    • If you have Certifier permission, confirm that the data is correct and click “Sign & Submit” to electronically sign the submission.

Once you submit the Site ID Form, its status on myRCRAid will display “Pending.” EPA or the state regulator will approve or reject the re-notification submission.

Re-notification recommendations

Consider these tips when preparing your SQG re-notification:

  • Most RCRA programs are implemented at the state level. Confirm the re-notification regulations with your state environmental agency. It may not use myRCRAid and may require more frequent submissions.
  • Ensure you have the necessary RCRAInfo permissions to submit the SQG re-notification. A Preparer can enter information into the Site ID form, but only a Certifier or Site Manager with Certifier permission may sign and submit it.
  • EPA accepts submission of the Site ID form at any time within the four years before the next re-notification deadline, so you can submit the re-notification before September 1. Verify with your state whether the same allowance applies.

Submitting the SQG re-notification properly keeps EPA updated and your facility compliant.

Key to remember: Small quantity generators of hazardous waste must re-notify EPA or the state agency by September 1, 2025.

UST release detection equipment: Testing 1, 2, 3
2025-04-24T05:00:00Z

UST release detection equipment: Testing 1, 2, 3

The next time you’re at a service station, consider the fact that you’re standing above underground tanks holding the fuel that you’re pumping into your vehicle. This brings up an important question about any underground tank: Since you can’t see the tank, how do you know if it starts to leak? The answer is a release detection system.

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) requires that all regulated underground storage tanks (USTs) have release detection systems and that owners and operators of USTs test the equipment annually to ensure it operates correctly.

Let’s look at three aspects of release detection equipment testing: how to conduct testing, what to test for, and what to record.

1. How do I test the equipment?

UST owners and operators may conduct release detection equipment testing according to:

  • The manufacturer’s instructions,
  • Industry codes and standards, or
  • The implementing agency’s requirements.

Manufacturer’s instructions

Each piece of release detection equipment should have an associated manual or guide for owners to reference. The manual or guide will explain how to test the equipment.

Tip: Most equipment manufacturers provide online versions of their product manuals and guides, which you can likely find on the manufacturer’s website. If you can’t find guidance, contact the manufacturer directly.

Industry codes and standards

EPA’s regulations stipulate that UST owners and operators who follow industry codes and standards must choose ones developed by a nationally recognized association (like ASTM International or the Petroleum Equipment Institute (PEI)) or an independent testing laboratory.

For instance, the agency states at 280.40(a)(3) that UST owners and operators may use PEI/RP1200, Recommended Practices for the Testing and Verification of Spill, Overfill, Leak Detection and Secondary Containment Equipment at UST Facilities, to comply.

Implementing agency requirements

EPA’s rules for testing release detection equipment serve as the minimum standards. Most state regulatory agencies implement UST programs and may impose stricter or additional requirements. Plus, local regulations may apply.

Check state and local rules to ensure your UST complies with the right requirements.

2. What do I test?

At a minimum, UST owners and operators must test the following factors that apply to their release detection systems.

  • Automatic tank gauges and other controllers: Test the alarms and battery backups. Verify the system’s configuration.
  • Probes and sensors: Test alarm functionality and communication with the controller. Inspect the probes and sensors for residual buildup. Ensure that the floats move freely, the cables have no kinks or breaks, and the shaft isn’t damaged.
  • Automatic line leak detectors: Simulate a leak to determine whether the detector meets the operation requirements of 280.44(a).
  • Vacuum pumps and pressure gauges: Confirm correct communication with the sensors and controller.
  • Handheld electronic groundwater and vapor sampling equipment: Ensure the monitoring equipment operates properly.

3. What records do I have to keep?

The regulation at 280.45(b)(1) mandates that UST owners and operators keep records of the annual release detection equipment testing results for at least three years.

For each annual testing record, list:

  • Each device tested,
  • If the devices operated according to 280.40(a)(3) or had issues that needed attention, and
  • Any corrective actions applied.

Why is release detection equipment testing so important?

Petroleum and other hazardous substances that leak from USTs can endanger human and environmental health. A leaking UST’s primary threat is groundwater contamination. Groundwater supplies drinking water for almost half of Americans.

A release detection system enables a facility to respond sooner to accidental releases and, therefore, limit potential harmful impacts — only if the equipment used for the system operates properly.

Testing your UST’s release detection equipment is vital because it allows you to identify which components function accurately and which parts have problems that need correction. A well-functioning release detection system can help your facility:

  • Maintain regulatory compliance (and avoid enforcement actions like penalties),
  • Identify opportunities to upgrade existing equipment to improve operational efficiency, and
  • Protect your employees and the community in which your facility operates.

Key to remember: EPA requires facilities to test the release detection equipment used on underground storage tanks each year to make sure it operates properly.

EPA modernizes pesticide registration policy, tweaks tracking app
2025-04-23T05:00:00Z

EPA modernizes pesticide registration policy, tweaks tracking app

Pesticide registrations just became simpler, more modern, and more transparent! EPA recently updated an app and made policy changes regarding how to submit two forms. All these changes result in a streamlined pesticide registration process.

Pesticide registration tracking app

On April 18, EPA made enhancements to its MyPest app, which sources say was initially launched in mid-January. EPA is proud to say that MyPest already boasts over 1,200 registrants. The new app allows registrants of pesticide products to:

  • Monitor the status of their registration submissions in real-time,
  • Drill down to a detailed view of each application, and
  • Communicate directly with EPA staff about registration packages in review.

Updates to MyPest include an enhanced dashboard page. The page offers information about the registrant’s cases and products. More updates are planned later this year.

Policy changes impacting two forms

On April 4, EPA announced in the Federal Register the issuance of Pesticide Registration (PR) Notice 2025-1. The notice itself is dated effective March 27, 2025. Its subject line reads, “Revised Procedures for Citing Data to Support Pesticide Registrations (EPA Forms No. 8570-34 and 8570-35).”

The latest PR notice supersedes PR Notice 98-5, dated June 12, 1998. While the revisions were proposed last June, the agency only finalized them now. According to PR Notice 2025-1:

  • EPA Form 8570-34 — This is the Certification with Respect to Citation of Data. Pesticide registrants use this form to indicate how they will meet their data submission/citation obligations under the law. When a registrant refers to another company’s data, the registrant must certify that:
    • It offered compensation to the original data submitter, or
    • It has the original data submitter’s permission to cite the data.
  • EPA Form 8570-35 — This is the Data Matrix. Pesticide registrants use this form to indicate to whom they made offers of compensation.

The two forms — EPA Forms 8570-34 and 8570-35 — have not been modified. Only policies regarding the submission of the two forms have changed. The agency:

  • Eliminated the instruction to use “paper” submissions;
  • Says registrants should complete and submit the two forms electronically through the Pesticide Submission Portal;
  • Eliminated the instruction that registrants submit two versions of the Data Matrix, i.e., the ‘‘Internal Agency Use Copy’’ and the ‘‘Public File Copy’’; and
  • Requires that registrants submit a single Data Matrix without redactions.

EPA contends that none of the information on Form 8570-35 is confidential. Put another way, none of the information on the Data Matrix is protected from public release. Therefore, the agency claims there is no reason to submit two versions of the form.

According to EPA, entities potentially affected by the policy changes include, but are not limited to:

  • Crop production,
  • Animal production,
  • Food manufacturing, and
  • Pesticide manufacturing.

Efficiencies and transparencies gained

Using electronic reporting for EPA Forms 8570-34 and 8570-35 brings efficient data transmittal, argues EPA. A bonus is that electronic reporting will also reduce errors. That’s because of automated validation tools in the portal. Submitters should experience lower costs and faster review and transmission of data, the agency adds.

In 2024, EPA received a total of 3,309 Data Matrices. Moving from two versions to just one for the Data Matrix form should save registrants and EPA time. Specifically, completing, submitting, and processing the Data Matrix should be quicker. EPA will also experience time savings when providing the public access to the information. Extra steps under the Freedom of Information Act would not be needed.

The MyPest app update is a step forward in efficiency and transparency, concludes EPA. The app enhancements are part of the agency’s overall move toward digital and streamlined processes. EPA projects that the app will improve the timeliness of pesticide registration decisions.

Key to remember

Recent actions streamline the pesticide registration process and make it more transparent. These actions relate to the MyPest app and EPA Forms 8570-34 and 8570-35.

Workplace recycling in 2025: Why it matters now more than ever
2025-04-17T05:00:00Z

Workplace recycling in 2025: Why it matters now more than ever

Think recycling at work is just tossing paper in a blue bin? Think again. In 2025, workplace recycling is being redefined — from a basic office task to a strategic initiative that impacts your company’s bottom line, brand reputation, and environmental footprint.

From cardboard and plastics to e-waste and food scraps, today’s leading businesses are building smarter, circular systems that turn trash into opportunity — one department at a time.

Here are five reasons why recycling matters now more than ever.

1. Environmental responsibility impacts your brand reputation

Sustainability is no longer just a corporate social responsibility (CSR) talking point. It’s a core business differentiator. As a management or EHS leader, you’re often on the frontlines of implementing the visible changes that shape public perception. Recycling programs are a low-barrier, high-impact initiative that sends a clear message to customers, investors, and employees: We walk the talk.

Failing to prioritize environmental responsibility puts your company’s reputation at risk — especially in industries with public visibility or regulatory scrutiny. Forward-thinking competitors are already using circular economy models and zero-waste initiatives to win market share.

Champion a program that reflects your company’s values and positions you as a sustainability leader in your field.

2. Compliance with local, state, and federal regulations

Recycling is no longer a “nice-to-have.” Many jurisdictions now require commercial recycling, especially for packaging waste, e-waste, and food scraps. Increasingly, regulations also demand data transparency, such as tracking waste volumes, diversion rates, and sustainability goals.

Supervisors in environmental and safety roles are responsible for ensuring compliance and minimizing risk. Violations can result in hefty fines, bad press, or loss of contracts.

Stay ahead of compliance trends and implement a recycling program that satisfies current and future requirements while keeping auditreadiness top of mind.

3. Cost savings and operational efficiency

Landfill disposal is becoming more expensive due to tipping fees and transportation costs. By diverting materials through recycling or reuse programs, companies can reduce both their environmental footprint and their operational spend.

In addition, smart material handling and waste segregation can lead to process improvements — less clutter, fewer hauling pickups, and even opportunities to monetize recyclable materials like scrap metal, cardboard, or used electronics.

Use data from your waste audits and vendor reporting to identify high-volume waste streams and optimize for both cost reduction and resource efficiency.

4. Workforce engagement, retention, and culture

Today’s workforce, particularly younger employees, is drawn to employers who align with their values. A clean, green workplace that visibly supports recycling and sustainability reinforces a positive culture, boosts morale, and improves engagement — especially when employees feel like they’re contributing to something bigger.

Recycling initiatives are also an easy win for cross-departmental engagement. Whether through green teams, signage campaigns, or employee challenges, these programs offer hands-on ways to involve everyone.

Build internal buy-in by showing how your initiatives support company values, employee wellness, and sustainability goals through shared responsibility.

5. Alignment with data-driven ESG and sustainability goals

In 2025, companies are under increasing pressure from stakeholders to report measurable progress on environmental, social, and governance (ESG) initiatives. Waste reduction, recycling rates, and landfill diversion metrics are among the top data points requested in annual sustainability reports and RFPs.

Supervisors and EHS leaders are often the owners of the data. You're tasked with tracking, verifying, and reporting on these outcomes. Without a structured recycling program in place, those metrics are impossible to capture, and your ESG report falls flat.

Establish a system for measuring, improving, and communicating progress toward zero-waste or landfill diversion targets, and support leadership in meeting ESG benchmarks.

Key to remember: Embracing workplace recycling in 2025 isn’t just good for the planet — it’s a smart move that drives innovation, saves money, and positions your company as a leader in sustainability.

See More

Most Recent Highlights In Human Resources

EHS Monthly Round Up - March 2025

EHS Monthly Round Up - March 2025

In this March 2025 roundup video, we'll review the most impactful environmental health and safety news.

Hi everyone! Welcome to the monthly news roundup video, where we’ll review the most impactful environmental health and safety news. Let’s get started!

Ladders were the cause of over 22,000 workplace injuries and 161 deaths in 2020. Each March, the American Ladder Institute promotes ladder safety awareness with the goal of reducing ladder-related injuries and fatalities. Every Step Matters was the theme of this year’s National Ladder Safety Month.

Stand Up 4 Grain Safety Week kicked off on March 24. This annual event brings attention to preventable grain handling hazards and promotes safety in this high-hazard industry.

Federal agencies must review their regulations and report back to the White House by April 20. The priority is on “significant” rules, generally considered to be those with an annual effect on the economy of 100 million dollars or more. Once the regulations have been identified, the Office of Management and Budget and the Department of Government Efficiency will work with agency leaders to create a plan for rescinding or modifying the regulations and begin winding down their enforcement.

A highwall fatality at a surface mine prompted the Mine Safety and Health Administration to issue a safety alert. It outlines what miners should do to prevent similar incidents, including looking for hazards such as loose rocks and overhangs before beginning work.

The American Society of Safety Professionals revised its construction training standard. It outlines training requirements for new hires in construction and demolition operations, site procedures, regulatory compliance, and more.

And finally, turning to environmental news, EPA will reconsider a number of major rulemakings that may impact a variety of industries. This is in response to an executive order that federal agencies review their regulations. Among the rules under consideration include those related to clean power, oil and gas emission limits, greenhouse gas reporting, and risk management.

EPA’s Waste Emissions Charge on petroleum and natural gas facilities with high methane emissions is no longer in effect. The rule initially took effect in January and was then disapproved by Congress on March 14.

Thanks for tuning in to the monthly news roundup. We’ll see you next month!

Hazardous waste manifest errors? Follow RCRA’s correction process
2025-04-04T05:00:00Z

Hazardous waste manifest errors? Follow RCRA’s correction process

Hazardous waste manifests are like travel logs. They track the entire journey of regulated hazardous waste, from the starting point (the generator’s facility) to the final destination (the off-site waste management facility). Like travel logs, a manifest is only as accurate as the information provided. Thankfully, you can correct manifest errors.

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) finalized the Third Rule under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), which took effect in January 2025. It made noteworthy changes to the manifest corrections process. Here’s what hazardous waste generators, transporters, and treatment, storage, and disposal facilities (TSDFs) need to know.

Who’s impacted?

The Third Rule impacts entities subject to RCRA’s manifest regulations. This article focuses on the manifest correction rules that apply to these waste handlers:

  • Small and large quantity generators,
  • Transporters, and
  • TSDFs.

Note that the final rule amends post-manifest correction regulations for other entities, such as exporters, that are beyond the scope of this article.

What are the Third Rule changes?

EPA’s final rule maintains most of the post-receipt manifest data corrections process.

What’s the same?

Specifically:

  • Any waste handler named on the manifest may voluntarily submit data corrections at any time,
  • Waste handlers can make an unlimited number of voluntary corrections,
  • Corrections may be applied to an individual record or batch of them, and
  • Submissions must include a signature compliant with the Cross-Media Electronic Reporting Rule (CROMERR).

What’s different?

Previously, when EPA or a state regulatory agency requested corrections to data on a manifest, waste handlers weren’t required to make them. The Third Rule now mandates that waste handlers:

  • Correct errors on the manifest within 30 days of a corrections request from EPA or a state agency, and
  • Make data correction submissions electronically for paper or electronic manifest records.

Post-receipt corrections are made via the Hazardous Waste Electronic Manifest System (e-Manifest) on the RCRA Information (RCRAInfo) system.

The Third Rule also clarifies that receiving facilities (TSDFs) can make corrections only after the manifest is completed (i.e., signed and submitted to the e-Manifest system).

What’s the post-receipt manifest correction process?

Waste handlers submitting voluntary or mandatory post-receipt corrections to hazardous waste manifests must follow the process established at 40 CFR 264.71(l).

Follow this general process on the e-Manifest System:

  • Certify that the manifest is complete. It must have the status “Signed-Completed."
  • Determine how to submit the corrected data to the e-Manifest system. You can enter the data directly into e-Manifest or upload a file with data corrections to the system.
  • Include for each correction submission:
    • The Manifest Tracking Number and date received by the facility associated with the data being corrected,
    • The Item Number(s) of the affected data fields on the manifest form (EPA Form 8700-22), and
    • The previously entered and corrected data.
  • Save your corrections. The manifest’s status will change to “Under Correction."
  • Re-sign the manifest to certify the corrections. The manifest’s status will change to “Corrected."

Manifest correction FAQs

Check out some top questions and answers about post-receipt manifest corrections.

What manifest information can I correct?

The type of waste handler your facility is determines which items on the manifest you can change for voluntary corrections or must change for mandatory corrections. Typically:

  • Generators correct data in Items 1–15;
  • Transporters correct data in Items 6–7, 14, and 17; and
  • TSDFs correct data in Items 14 and 18–20.

What user role do I need on RCRAInfo to submit manifest corrections?

You must be registered in RCRAInfo as a user with the e-Manifest Certifier or Site Manager role for the facility’s site to submit manifest corrections.

What’s the CROMERR certification?

EPA requires manifest correction submitters to use a CROMERR-compliant electronic signature, which requires a higher level of identity proofing than the Quick Sign signature.

Can I revert to a previous manifest version?

Once the corrected manifest has been signed, you can’t revert it to a previous version. The e-Manifest system does, however, let you view all versions of the manifest.

Can brokers sign corrected manifests?

Although brokers can initiate a manifest correction for generators, they may not sign a corrected manifest unless they (a) operate at the generator’s facility and (b) can sign the manifest as an offeror of the waste shipment.

Key to remember: EPA’s Third Rule updates the process for making data corrections to RCRA hazardous waste manifests.

The cost of cutting corners: What a toxic fire teaches us about waste management
2025-04-01T05:00:00Z

The cost of cutting corners: What a toxic fire teaches us about waste management

Are you storing and disposing of hazardous waste correctly or sitting on disaster? Hazardous waste storage is not just a regulatory headache – it is a time bomb for the environment and your company’s bottom line. A disaster in east London, England, is an ongoing issue for nearby residents that highlights the importance of hazardous waste management and why employers must take it seriously.

What happened?

Originally intended for construction waste disposal, the site eventually turned into a dumping ground for hazardous industrial materials. Investigations found plastics, asbestos, industrial chemicals, and carcinogenic substances illegally dumped, creating an environmental and public health hazard. These materials fuel the fires, continuously releasing toxic smoke into the air. Residents have reported respiratory problems, skin irritation, and other health issues while authorities struggle to contain the situation. Even though this incident occurred in London, we can learn plenty of valuable lessons from the incident. Here’s how employers can take proactive measures to ensure compliance, protect workers, and prevent environmental harm:

1. Implement a robust hazardous waste management plan

A hazardous waste management plan should:

  • Include waste classifications (reactive, corrosive, etc.) and an inventory of all hazardous materials used and generated.
  • Ensure all storage and handling procedures, including labeling, segregation of incompatible waste, spill prevention, and containment measures, are followed.
  • Document all waste accumulation and disposal methods. Specify the storage time limits for waste and the methods used for its disposal, such as incineration, recycling, or third-party handling.
  • Provide information on personal protective equipment (PPE) requirements, emergency contact information, reporting procedures, and an evacuation plan in case of a spill.

2. Train employees on hazardous waste handling

Train personnel on their roles and responsibilities when handling hazardous waste. Training should include:

  • Initial and refresher training that complies with the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) and state laws.
  • Identifying unsafe practices and reporting potential violations.

3. Conduct routine inspections and audits

  • Perform internal audits to ensure compliance with RCRA regulations.
  • Schedule third-party audits to identify risks and areas of improvement.
  • Create a corrective action plan for any violations or inefficiencies discovered during audits.

4. Use licensed and certified waste disposal services

The primary reason behind illegal waste dumping is financial. We all know it is not cheap to dispose of hazardous waste, but waste generators are responsible for their waste from “cradle to grave.”

  • Conduct due diligence to verify disposal methods to prevent third-party illegal dumping.
  • Maintain records of manifest, disposal certificate, and compliance documentation.

5. Secure and label waste properly

  • Labels should include “hazardous waste” clearly visible on the container, generator information, accumulation start date, proper shipping name, and waste identification.
  • Store hazardous waste in compatible containers to prevent leaks or spills.

6. Reduce hazardous waste by using safer alternatives

One of the most effective ways to prevent hazardous waste incidents is to reduce reliance on them in the first place. By switching to safer alternatives, employers can lower their risk of exposure. Industries now offer eco-friendly coatings, adhesives, and cleaning agents that perform well without all the side effects. Safer alternatives also reduce compliance costs by lowering the burdens for hazardous waste disposal.

The disaster near London is a stark reminder of the consequences of negligent hazardous waste management. Businesses that cut corners on waste disposal risk legal penalties and contribute to long-term environmental and public health damage.  

Keys to remember: Employers can protect their workforce, comply with regulations, and prevent environmental disasters by adopting proactive waste management strategies.

Congress disapproves EPA's excess methane fees on oil, gas facilities
2025-03-25T05:00:00Z

Congress disapproves EPA's excess methane fees on oil, gas facilities

A joint Congressional resolution disapproved the 2024 Final Waste Emissions Charge (WEC) Rule on oil and gas facilities with high methane emissions. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) announced that the regulation, which initially took effect on January 17, 2025, is now no longer in effect.

Who’s impacted?

The WEC rule applied to facilities in the Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems category that:

  • Report emitting more than 25,000 metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent per year to the Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (or GHGRP),
  • Exceed specific waste emissions thresholds, and
  • Qualify for no exemptions.

Facilities that were subject to the rule are no longer required to comply (i.e., submit WEC filings by September 2, 2025).

What’s next?

EPA stated it’s “currently evaluating options and obligations for implementing Clean Air Act Section 136(c–g) and will provide additional information to the regulated community at an appropriate time."

Section 136, added by the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022, mandates that EPA implement a methane reduction incentive program for petroleum and natural gas systems, including imposing and collecting a WEC on methane emissions above waste emissions limits.

The disapproval occurred on March 14, 2025, just two days after the agency announced 31 deregulatory actions it plans to take.

Key to remember: EPA’s Waste Emissions Charge on petroleum and natural gas facilities for excess methane is no longer in effect.

EPA announces major regulatory reviews, overhauls
2025-03-19T05:00:00Z

EPA announces major regulatory reviews, overhauls

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) announced on March 12, 2025, that it’s taking 31 actions to advance President Trump’s Day One executive orders and the new “Powering the Great American Comeback” Initiative. The agency’s actions will likely impact environmental regulations across various industries.

Rules under review

EPA will reconsider an assortment of rulemakings, including:

  • The Clean Power Plan 2.0 (which sets carbon dioxide emission limits on new gas-fired combustion turbines and emissions guidelines for existing coal, oil, and gas-fired steam generating units),
  • Oil and gas emission limits for new and existing sources (40 CFR Part 60 Subparts OOOOb and OOOOc),
  • The Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Reporting Program (GHGRP) for petroleum and natural gas systems (Part 98 Subpart W),
  • The GHGRP overall (Part 98),
  • Mercury Air Toxics Standards for coal- and oil-fired power plants (Part 63 Subpart UUUUU),
  • Effluent limitation guidelines (ELGs) for the steam electric power generating industry (Part 423),
  • Treated wastewater use and discharge for coal-fired power plants (Part 435 Subpart E),
  • The Risk Management Program rule (Part 68),
  • Vehicle GHG rules (including the light-, medium-, and heavy-duty vehicle regulations),
  • The 2009 Endangerment Finding (relied on for seven federal vehicle rules) and related regulations and actions (Chapter I),
  • The Technology Transition Rule for refrigerant systems (Part 84 Subpart B),
  • The National Ambient Air Quality Standards for fine particulate matter (Parts 50, 53, and 58),
  • The National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (Part 63) for:
    • Iron and steel manufacturing,
    • Rubber tire manufacturing,
    • Synthetic organic chemical manufacturing,
    • Commercial sterilizers for medical devices and spices,
    • Lime manufacturing,
    • Coke ovens,
    • Copper smelting, and
    • Taconite ore processing.
  • The Exceptional Events rulemaking related to allowing prescribed fires within State Implementation Plans (Parts 50–51),
  • The Regional Haze Program implementing regulations (51.308), and
  • The Good Neighbor Plan (Parts 52, 75, 78, and 97).

The agency will also take other actions, such as:

  • Working with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to finalize the definition of “waters of the United States” related to Clean Water Act permits,
  • Updating enforcement discretion by revising the National Enforcement and Compliance Initiatives, and
  • Prioritizing the coal ash program to expedite state permit reviews and update the coal ash regulations (including amending the Legacy Coal Combustion Residuals Surface Impoundments and CCR Management Units rule).

About EPA’s new initiative

In February 2025, the agency announced the Powering the Great American Comeback Initiative, which outlines EPA’s priorities. The initiative consists of five pillars:

  • Clean air, land, and water;
  • Restore energy dominance;
  • Permitting reforms, cooperative federalism, and cross-agency partnership;
  • Make the U.S. the artificial intelligence capital of the world; and
  • Protect and bring back American auto jobs.

EPA’s 31 actions will primarily address the first three pillars.

Key to remember: EPA will reconsider major rulemakings that may impact a variety of industries.

See More
New Network Poll
No active poll
Please come back soon!
See More
See More
See More
See More
Saved to my EVENT CALENDAR!
View your saved links by clicking the arrow next to your profile picture located in the header. Then, click “My Activity” to view the Event Calendar on your Activity page.