Compliance Just Got Easier: Stay ahead of regulatory changes with instant notifications on updates that matter.
['Vehicle Technology']
['Vehicle Technology']
2024-05-31T05:00:00Z
JOIN TODAY TO CONTINUE READING THIS ARTICLE & OTHER INDUSTRY NEWS!
You'll also get exclusive access to:
A database of easy-to-understand regulationsAsk unlimited questions to our expertsPre-led discussions forumsAnd more
TRY IT FREE TODAY
Already have an account? Log in now.
NewsIndustry NewsFleet SafetyVehicle TechnologyIn-Depth ArticleFleet OperationsVehicle TechnologyEnglishFocus AreaTransportationUSA
Dash cam state laws: 4 areas to avoid legal pitfalls
2024-05-31T05:00:00Z
As the need for carriers to use dash cams to protect their businesses soars, so does the need to understand state pitfalls governing their use. Failure to comply with dash cam and privacy regulations can lead to hefty fines and legal complications.
Federal laws generally apply to interstate operations. This article sheds light on four areas where states have restrictions on dash cams and privacy applicable to intrastate operations.
1. Video recording
A commercial motor vehicle (CMV) is a public workspace and there are not federal or state laws prohibiting the use of cab- or road-facing cameras while a driver is performing their duties.
However, some states prohibit storing recordings except within a certain number of seconds before and after a triggering event, such as hard braking. For example, California’s limit is 30 seconds and continuous recording and storage is not allowed for intrastate operations.
2. Audio recording
Carriers may want to activate the audio-recording function to help protect them in the event of a crash. Several prominent carrier defense attorneys do not recommend recording audio for three reasons:
1. The invasion of privacy when recording drivers’ conversations;
2. The limited value of the pre-crash recording, likely to be expletives; and
3. The potential violation of all-party consent laws, which in some states such as Pennsylvania, is a felony.
All-party or dual-consent laws require the prior consent of all parties involved in a recorded conversation. Current states potentially requiring all-party consent include:
- California
- Connecticut
- Delaware
- Florida
- Illinois
- Maryland
- Massachusetts
- Michigan
- Montana
- Nevada
- New Hampshire
- Oregon
- Pennsylvania
- Vermont
- Washington
3. Biometric data
Biometric data such as facial geometry, fingerprints, digital voiceprints, and iris scans is increasingly used for signing into accounts, devices, or for facility access. Facial geometry collection and storage is also used in the process of unsafe driving detection by some artificial intelligence-powered dash cams. This data must be stored and protected per applicable regulations and with prior consent in many states.
The following states have biometric-specific laws (bolded) or privacy laws that include biometric information:
- California
- Colorado
- Connecticut
- Illinois
- Maryland
- New York
- Oregon
- Texas
- Utah
- Virginia
- Washington
The nation’s toughest law is Illinois’ Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA) with a maximum penalty of $5,000 per occurrence without prior consent regardless of whether the person is an Illinois resident.
4. Mounting
Interstate carriers must mount dash cams outside of the driver’s sight lines to the roadway, and traffic signs and signals, and if within the area swept by the windshield wipers:
- Not more than 8.5 inches below the upper edge; and
- Not more than 7.0 inches above the lower edge.
State dash laws for intrastate-only operations vary and restrict mounting to:
- The dashboard and not on the windshield,
- A specific area of the windshield out of the driver’s sight lines to the roadway and signs, or
- Anywhere that does not obstruct the driver’s vision of the roadway or signs.
Verify the state’s mounting restrictions for intrastate-only operations.
Dash cam policy privacy assurances
A dash cam policy should outline privacy assurances such as:
- Require written driver consent before collecting, storing, or using video clips or biometric data.
- Record and store video clips only for "x" seconds before and after a triggered event for coaching or legal defense and avoid continuous recording.
- Limit video access to safety personnel only and secure from unauthorized use.
- Refrain from monitoring drivers in real-time except in an emergency.
- Require cameras to be on and the lenses uncovered while on duty.
- Prohibit audio recording.
Key to remember: Carriers can use dash cams to protect their businesses and drivers but must know the requirements and restrictions regarding privacy and mounting.

NewsIndustry NewsFleet SafetyVehicle TechnologyIn-Depth ArticleFleet OperationsVehicle TechnologyEnglishFocus AreaTransportationUSA
Dash cam state laws: 4 areas to avoid legal pitfalls
2024-05-31T05:00:00Z
Written by
Mark Schedler
Mark Schedler
MBA - University of Wisconsin at Oshkosh, BS Finance - University of South Alabama
Senior editor and subject matter expert since 2016. Supports driver qualification, vehicle safety technology, and passenger-carrier regulations. Previously spent 25 years in truckload operations.
As the need for carriers to use dash cams to protect their businesses soars, so does the need to understand state pitfalls governing their use. Failure to comply with dash cam and privacy regulations can lead to hefty fines and legal complications.
Federal laws generally apply to interstate operations. This article sheds light on four areas where states have restrictions on dash cams and privacy applicable to intrastate operations.
1. Video recording
A commercial motor vehicle (CMV) is a public workspace and there are not federal or state laws prohibiting the use of cab- or road-facing cameras while a driver is performing their duties.
However, some states prohibit storing recordings except within a certain number of seconds before and after a triggering event, such as hard braking. For example, California’s limit is 30 seconds and continuous recording and storage is not allowed for intrastate operations.
2. Audio recording
Carriers may want to activate the audio-recording function to help protect them in the event of a crash. Several prominent carrier defense attorneys do not recommend recording audio for three reasons:
1. The invasion of privacy when recording drivers’ conversations;
2. The limited value of the pre-crash recording, likely to be expletives; and
3. The potential violation of all-party consent laws, which in some states such as Pennsylvania, is a felony.
All-party or dual-consent laws require the prior consent of all parties involved in a recorded conversation. Current states potentially requiring all-party consent include:
- California
- Connecticut
- Delaware
- Florida
- Illinois
- Maryland
- Massachusetts
- Michigan
- Montana
- Nevada
- New Hampshire
- Oregon
- Pennsylvania
- Vermont
- Washington
3. Biometric data
Biometric data such as facial geometry, fingerprints, digital voiceprints, and iris scans is increasingly used for signing into accounts, devices, or for facility access. Facial geometry collection and storage is also used in the process of unsafe driving detection by some artificial intelligence-powered dash cams. This data must be stored and protected per applicable regulations and with prior consent in many states.
The following states have biometric-specific laws (bolded) or privacy laws that include biometric information:
- California
- Colorado
- Connecticut
- Illinois
- Maryland
- New York
- Oregon
- Texas
- Utah
- Virginia
- Washington
The nation’s toughest law is Illinois’ Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA) with a maximum penalty of $5,000 per occurrence without prior consent regardless of whether the person is an Illinois resident.
4. Mounting
Interstate carriers must mount dash cams outside of the driver’s sight lines to the roadway, and traffic signs and signals, and if within the area swept by the windshield wipers:
- Not more than 8.5 inches below the upper edge; and
- Not more than 7.0 inches above the lower edge.
State dash laws for intrastate-only operations vary and restrict mounting to:
- The dashboard and not on the windshield,
- A specific area of the windshield out of the driver’s sight lines to the roadway and signs, or
- Anywhere that does not obstruct the driver’s vision of the roadway or signs.
Verify the state’s mounting restrictions for intrastate-only operations.
Dash cam policy privacy assurances
A dash cam policy should outline privacy assurances such as:
- Require written driver consent before collecting, storing, or using video clips or biometric data.
- Record and store video clips only for "x" seconds before and after a triggered event for coaching or legal defense and avoid continuous recording.
- Limit video access to safety personnel only and secure from unauthorized use.
- Refrain from monitoring drivers in real-time except in an emergency.
- Require cameras to be on and the lenses uncovered while on duty.
- Prohibit audio recording.
Key to remember: Carriers can use dash cams to protect their businesses and drivers but must know the requirements and restrictions regarding privacy and mounting.
See More
RELATED NEWS

Specialized Industries
Go beyond the regulations! Visit the Institute for in-depth guidance on a wide range of compliance subjects in safety and health, transportation, environment, and human resources.
J. J. Keller® COMPLIANCE NETWORK is a premier online safety and compliance community, offering members exclusive access to timely regulatory content in workplace safety (OSHA), transportation (DOT), environment (EPA), and human resources (DOL).

Interact With Our Compliance Experts
Puzzled by a regulatory question or issue? Let our renowned experts provide the answers and get your business on track to full compliance!

Upcoming Events
Reference the Compliance Network Safety Calendar to keep track of upcoming safety and compliance events. Browse by industry or search by keyword to see relevant dates and observances, including national safety months, compliance deadlines, and more.
SAFETY & COMPLIANCE NEWS
Keep up with the latest regulatory developments from OSHA, DOT, EPA, DOL, and more.
REGSENSE® REGULATORY REFERENCE
Explore a comprehensive database of word-for-word regulations on a wide range of compliance topics, with simplified explanations and best practices advice from our experts.
THE J. J. KELLER INSTITUTE
The Institute is your destination for in-depth content on 120+ compliance subjects. Discover articles, videos, and interactive exercises that will strengthen your understanding of regulatory concepts relevant to your business.
ADD HAZMAT, ENVIRONMENTAL, & HR RESOURCES
Unlock exclusive content offering expert insights into hazmat, environmental, and human resources compliance with a COMPLIANCE NETWORK EDGE membership.
DIRECT ACCESS TO COMPLIANCE EXPERTS
Struggling with a compliance challenge? Get the solution from our in-house team of experts! You can submit a question to our experts by email, set up a phone or video call, or request a detailed research report.
EVENTS
Register to attend live online events hosted by our experts. These webcasts and virtual conferences feature engaging discussions on important compliance topics in a casual, knowledge-sharing environment.
Most Recent Highlights In Environmental
NewsIndustry NewsCriteria Air PollutantsCAA ComplianceEnvironmentalIn-Depth ArticleFocus AreaEnglishAir PermittingAir ProgramsStationary Emission SourcesUSA
2025-12-17T06:00:00Z
Ripple effect: How data centers influence compliance strategies
The rapid growth of data centers creates new challenges for other regulated facilities. Expansion driven by artificial intelligence (AI) and cloud computing increases their impact on environmental compliance. Key areas include air permitting, attainment status, and regional power supply.
Data centers and air permitting
Data centers depend on backup power to stay online during outages. Most use natural gas or diesel generators. These units release pollutants such as nitrogen oxides (NOₓ) and particulate matter. When many generators operate together, their potential emissions can push regions close to or beyond national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS). This shift can threaten local attainment status and make it harder for nearby facilities to get new permits.
What EPA is doing
On December 11, 2025, EPA’s Office of Air and Radiation launched a “Clean Air Act Resource for Data Centers” webpage. It provides regulatory guidance, permitting tools, and technical letters. The goal is to make air permitting for data centers faster and more transparent while protecting air quality.
Why this matters for other regulated facilities
- Attainment status at risk
Large data centers add cumulative emissions from multiple generators. Even permitted emissions from nearby plants can combine and push an area into nonattainment. That change triggers stricter air permitting rules for everyone.
- Power demand competition
Data centers use large amounts of electricity. They often need on-site generators or new grid connections. This can strain local power supplies. In some cases, grid operators give data centers priority during peak demand, leaving other facilities with less reliable power.
- Stricter air quality modeling requirements
Some states now require detailed modeling for backup generators. For example, Illinois reviewed 34 generators for one data center before granting a permit. If modeling shows high emissions, regulators may limit operating hours or require extra controls.
Broader regulatory shifts
EPA recently updated its interpretation of New Source Review (NSR) rules. In September 2025, the agency said construction can start before full air permits are issued, as long as emission-related work waits for approval. This speeds up projects but makes it harder for neighboring facilities to predict cumulative emissions early.
What non-data center facilities should do
- Stay informed
Watch for new data center projects in your area. Their emissions could affect your permits.
- Engage early
Join public comment periods for data center permits. Push for full modeling of combined impacts.
- Plan for power
Work with grid operators. Understand how demand-response programs and EPA’s “50 Hour Rule” for emergency generators affect your reliability.
- Choose sites wisely
Consider locating new projects in areas with robust infrastructure and cleaner attainment status. Data centers might compete for the same grid upgrades or site approvals.
Key to remember: Data centers are more than tech hubs. They influence air permitting and power allocation. Their growth can affect your ability to expand, or even operate, under current compliance rules.
NewsAir QualityIndustry NewsEnvironmental Protection Agency (EPA)CAA ComplianceEnvironmentalIn-Depth ArticleFocus AreaEnglishAcid RainAir ProgramsStationary Emission SourcesUSA
2025-12-11T06:00:00Z
Acid Rain Program compliance: SO2 vs. NOx
Did you know that the federal government regulates the power sector’s impact on rain? The Acid Rain Program limits the amount of sulfur dioxide (SO2) and nitrogen oxides (NOx) — the main causes of acid rain — that fossil fuel-fired electric generating units (EGUs) may emit. However, the SO2 and NOx reduction programs operate differently, and the ways that facilities can meet the SO2 and NOx limits are distinct.
It's essential to know the compliance options because facilities that don’t meet the SO2 and NOx standards must pay penalties for their excess emissions. And in November 2025, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) set higher penalties for the next two compliance years.
So, what are the differences?
Who’s affected?
The first thing to confirm is whether your facility is subject to the Acid Rain Program (40 CFR 72.6). The program regulates fossil fuel-fired power plants. It applies to:
- EGUs that serve generators with an output capacity of more than 25 megawatts, and
- All new EGUs.
Note that the NOx program applies to a specific subset of coal-fired boilers.
SO2 reduction program
EPA operates the SO2 reduction program through an allowance trading system (Part 73). The agency sets a cap on the total SO2 emissions for the year and then allocates SO2 allowances to regulated units. One allowance represents 1 ton of SO2 emissions.
For each compliance year, a facility must show that it has enough allowances to cover its emissions of SO2. It’s similar to EPA’s hydrofluorocarbon allowance program.
There are multiple compliance options. Facilities may:
- Sell extra allowances if they have more allowances than needed,
- Save extra allowances if they have more allowances than needed (and use them in the future), or
- Buy extra allowances if they can’t keep emissions below their allocated level.
Facilities can purchase allowances from or sell allowances to individuals, companies, groups, or brokers. Additionally, facilities may bid on allowances at EPA’s annual Acid Rain Program SO2 Allowance Auction.
NOx reduction program
EPA sets annual emission limits for the NOx reduction program (Part 76), which applies to these types of boilers:
- Dry bottom wall-fired boilers,
- Tangentially fired boilers,
- Cell burner boilers,
- Cyclone boilers,
- Vertically fired boilers, and
- Wet bottom boilers.
Like the SO2 program, the NOx program offers multiple compliance options. Facilities can:
- Meet the standard annual emission limitations,
- Average the emissions rates of two or more boilers, or
- Apply for an alternative emission limit (AEL) if they can’t meet the standard emission limit.
Additional requirements apply to facilities that use options other than complying with the limits:
- Facilities that want to average emissions rates must submit an averaging plan that’s approved by the permitting authorities (76.11).
- Facilities that apply for an AEL are required to use the NOx emission control technology used as the basis for the emission limit and must demonstrate that the unit can’t comply using the technology (76.10).
It pays (or, at least, costs less) to comply!
Excess emissions penalties can add up quickly. That’s why it’s vital to ensure your facility understands how to comply with the SO2 and NOx reduction programs properly.
The adjustment rates that EPA set for compliance years 2025 and 2026 (2.5265 and 2.6001, respectively) are used to calculate the total penalties a facility must pay if it exceeds SO2 or NOx limits during these compliance years.
Here are the formulas:
- Penalty for excess SO2 emissions = $2,000/ton x annual adjustment factor x tons of excess SO2 emissions
- Penalty for excess NOx emissions = $2,000/ton x annual adjustment factor x tons of excess NOx emissions
Let’s run through a couple of examples of what noncompliance could cost.
| Factors | Penalty Per Ton | Total Penalties |
|---|---|---|
| $2,000 x 2.5265 = $5,053 | $5,053 x 10 = $50,530 |
| $2,000 x 2.6001 = $5,200.20 | $5,200.20 x 5 = $26,001 |
As shown in the example above, excess emissions can cost facilities a lot in penalties. Just 1 ton of excess emissions will result in more than $5,000! Knowing your compliance options for the Acid Rain Program’s SO2 and NOx reduction programs can help your facility avoid steep fines.
Key to remember: The Acid Rain Program limits SO2 and NOx emissions from fossil fuel-fired power plants, but the compliance options for each type of emission differ. Understanding the distinct options can help facilities avoid penalties for excess emissions.
NewsIndustry NewsTSCA ComplianceCAA ComplianceSustainabilityIn-Depth ArticleCWA ComplianceEnvironmentalEnglishSustainabilityESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance)Focus AreaUSA
2025-12-05T06:00:00Z
EPA’s 2026 regulatory shift: How environmental managers can stay ahead
The clock is ticking for environmental teams. By 2026, several new EPA regulations will reshape compliance obligations for U.S. companies. Organizations that act now will avoid costly penalties and operational disruptions.
What’s changing and why it matters
Although EPA has been deregulating or loosening some requirements, there are still some standards being tightened across multiple fronts in the coming year:
- Renewable fuel standards (RFS): The EPA proposed higher volume requirements for 2026, including 24.02 billion renewable identification numbers (RINs), up nearly 8% from 2025. This increase pushes stricter expectations on fuel producers and organizations purchasing renewable fuels.
- Stormwater multi-sector general permit (MSGP): A new MSGP set to take effect by February 2026 will require quarterly PFAS indicator monitoring, expanded benchmark sampling, and resiliency measures in stormwater control designs.
- PFAS Reporting under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA): TSCA Section 8(a)(7) mandates PFAS manufacturing and import data collection beginning in April 2026, through October 2026, with extended deadlines for certain small manufacturers.
Failure to prepare could lead to fines, reputational damage, supply chain disruptions, and permit delays. Companies that weave compliance planning into their 2026 strategy will be positioned not just to meet legal deadlines but to sustain operations smoothly.
Key areas of impact
- Renewable fuel standards (RFS) and air emissions The proposed increase in 2026 Renewable Identification Numbers (RIN) volumes, from 24.02 billion to 24.46 billion for 2027, signals tightening air and fuels policy that affects fuel use and emissions accounting.
- Stormwater management The upcoming 2026 MSGP requires expanded quarterly PFAS monitoring, new benchmark triggers, corrective action plans, and integration of climate resilience in design standards.
- PFAS disclosure (TSCA Section 8(a)(7)) Manufacturers and importers of PFAS must submit electronic reporting of usage, volumes, disposal, and exposure data between April and October 2026, with extensions available for smaller operations.
Steps to take now
- Audit compliance programs: Cross-check operations against RIN inventory, stormwater permits, and TSCA reporting duties.
- Upgrade monitoring and recordkeeping: Implement robust electronic systems to track PFAS, stormwater quality, fuel volumes, and emissions.
- Staff training: Educate teams on PFAS obligations, new stormwater protocols, and RFS structures.
- Engage regulators early: Comment on proposed rules, consult during permit drafting, and flag issues during the notice-and-comment period.
Looking ahead
The EPA’s 2026 updates reflect a trend toward increased transparency and environmental accountability. Companies that treat compliance as strategic will not only avoid enforcement but also gain resilience and stakeholder trust.
Key to remember: Start planning now. Early action on EPA rule changes will save time, money, and headaches when enforcement begins.
NewsGreenhouse GasesAir QualityAir EmissionsEnvironmental Protection Agency (EPA)CAA ComplianceEnglishAir ProgramsIndustry NewsIndustry NewsAir ProgramsEnvironmentalVolatile Organic CompoundsFocus AreaStationary Emission SourcesUSA
2025-12-05T06:00:00Z
EPA confirms oil, gas emissions compliance extensions
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) issued a rule on December 3, 2025, that finalizes compliance deadline extensions for certain emissions standards applicable to crude oil and natural gas facilities. The final rule also further delays compliance timelines for two requirements.
EPA’s delays affect:
- The New Source Performance Standards for crude oil and natural gas facilities (40 CFR 60 Subpart OOOOb), and
- The emissions guidelines (EGs) for crude oil and natural gas facilities (60 Subpart OOOOc).
EPA’s December 2025 final rule is a direct response to the interim final rule (IFR) it issued in July 2025.
The July 2025 IFR extended the compliance deadline for net heating value (NHV) monitoring of flares and enclosed combustion devices (ECDs) to November 28, 2025. The IFR moved the rest of the compliance deadlines to January 22, 2027, for:
- ECD performance tests;
- Cover and closed vent system requirements for no identifiable emissions (NIEs), including:
- Design and operation standards,
- Test methods and procedures, and
- Inspections.
- Equipment leak repair requirements;
- Phase two of zero-emission standards for process controllers;
- Storage vessel requirements, including:
- Using potential emissions limits that qualify as legally and practicably enforceable,
- Triggering throughput-based modifications, and
- Using a 30-day period of production to calculate potential emissions.
- Flare and ECD pilot flame rules, including:
- Ensuring the devices operate with a continuous pilot flame, and
- Installing and operating a system to send an alarm to the nearest control room when a pilot flame is unlit.
- Implementation of the Super Emitter Program, and
- Submission of state plans for implementing the updated EGs.
What’s the same?
EPA’s December 2025 final rule maintains the same compliance deadlines for all requirements delayed to January 22, 2027.
What’s different?
The agency’s December 2025 final rule sets a new compliance date of June 1, 2026, for the NHV monitoring requirements. This includes an alternative performance test (sampling demonstration) option for flares and ECDs.
Additionally, the rule moves the compliance date for annual reporting, establishing that no annual report is due before November 30, 2026. It gives owners and operators until November 30, 2026, to submit any reports that were originally due before this date. Note that the final rule specifies that annual reports due after November 30, 2026, must be submitted within 90 days of the end of each annual compliance period.
Key to remember: EPA’s final rule confirms deadline extensions for certain emissions standards that apply to crude oil and natural gas facilities. It also further delays a couple of the requirements.
NewsMinnesotaAir ProgramsChange NoticesChange NoticeHazardous Air PollutantsCAA ComplianceEnvironmentalAir PermittingFocus AreaEnglishAir ProgramsStationary Emission Sources
2025-12-02T06:00:00Z
Minnesota requires air toxics emissions reporting in 7 counties
Effective date: October 6, 2025
This applies to: Facilities with air permits in the counties of Anoka, Carver, Dakota, Hennepin, Ramsey, Scott, and Washington
Description of change: The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency adopted new rules mandating that facilities with air permits (except for Option B registration permits) in the Minnesota counties of Anoka, Carver, Dakota, Hennepin, Ramsey, Scott, and Washington submit annual air toxics emissions reports. The covered toxics include certain hazardous air pollutants (HAPs), per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), and other pollutants of concern. Annual emissions reports on HAPs, PFAS, and other covered pollutants are due by April 1.
View related state info: Clean air operating permits — Minnesota
Most Recent Highlights In Transportation
NewsToxic Substances Control Act - EPAToxic Subtances Control Act - EPAChange NoticesTSCA ComplianceMaineChange NoticeToxic Substances - EPAEnvironmentalEnglishFocus Area
2025-12-02T06:00:00Z
Maine designates currently unavoidable uses of PFAS
Effective date: October 7, 2025
This applies to: All nonexempt new and unused products sold, offered for sale, or distributed for sale in Maine that contain intentionally added PFAS
Description of change: The Maine Department of Environmental Protection established designations for currently unavoidable uses of intentionally added per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in products subject to sales prohibitions that start on January 1, 2026.
NewsWater PermittingSafe Drinking WaterChange NoticesChange NoticeWater ProgramsWater QualityVermontEnvironmentalWater ProgramsEnglishFocus AreaCWA Compliance
2025-12-02T06:00:00Z
Vermont updates drinking water rules
Effective date: January 1, 2026
This applies to: Public water systems
Description of change: The Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation made multiple changes to the Water Supply Rule. Some of the major amendments include:
- Changes to the per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) regulations,
- Additions to the contaminants covered by the rule, and
- A new method to calculate the impact of PFAS mixtures.
NewsStationary Emission SourcesUtahAir EmissionsChange NoticesChange NoticeCAA ComplianceEnvironmentalAir PermittingFocus AreaEnglishAir ProgramsAir Programs
2025-12-02T06:00:00Z
Utah adds emission units, source categories to air permit exemptions
Effective date: November 5, 2025
This applies to: Emission units and source categories that qualify for an air permit by rule
Description of change: The Utah Department of Environmental Quality added new emission units and source categories that qualify for air permits by rule that are exempt from the requirement to obtain an Approval Order (per R307-401-8).
New emission units added include:
- Fuel storage tanks,
- Abrasive blasting operations,
- Degreasing operations,
- Municipal solid waste landfills, and
- Emergency engines.
New source categories added include:
- Dry cleaners, and
- Automotive refinishing sources.
View related state info: Clean air operating permits — Utah
NewsChange NoticesChange NoticeOhioSustainabilitySustainabilityWaste MinimizationEnvironmentalEnglishSustainabilityFocus Area
2025-12-02T06:00:00Z
Ohio amends composting requirements
Effective date: December 1, 2025
This applies to: Owners and operators of composting facilities
Description of changes: The Ohio Environmental Protection Agency amended the regulations that apply to composting facilities. Major changes include:
- Registering the facility annually with the annual report (no fees associated),
- Submitting the most recent plan view drawing with the annual report, and
- Maintaining an operator in compliance with the new certification program requirements at the facility.
NewsAir EmissionsChange NoticesChange NoticeMobile Emission SourcesCAA ComplianceEnvironmentalWashingtonFocus AreaEnglishAir ProgramsAir Programs
2025-12-02T06:00:00Z
Washington amends Clean Vehicles Program
Effective date: November 16, 2025
This applies to: Medium- and heavy-duty engine and vehicle manufacturers as well as heavy-duty internal combustion engine manufacturers
Description of change: The Washington State Department of Ecology amended the Clean Vehicles Program rules to incorporate changes made to the California Air Resources Board’s Advanced Clean Trucks and Heavy-Duty Vehicle and Engine Omnibus Low NOx regulations. The changes ease compliance requirements for the heaviest vehicles.
Most Recent Highlights In Safety & Health
NewsIndianaWater PermittingSafe Drinking WaterChange NoticesChange NoticeWater ProgramsWater QualityEnvironmentalWater ProgramsEnglishFocus AreaCWA Compliance
2025-12-02T06:00:00Z
Indiana adopts permanent underground carbon sequestration regulations
Effective date: October 1, 2025
This applies to: Entities participating in permanent underground carbon dioxide storage projects
Description of the change: The rule establishes carbon sequestration project applicability and establishes regulations for:
- Obtaining a carbon dioxide transmission pipeline certificate of authority,
- Obtaining a carbon sequestration project permit,
- Administrative and procedural processes for carbon sequestration projects and carbon dioxide transmission pipelines,
- The ongoing responsibilities of storage operators, and
- Records of a storage operator.
NewsChange NoticesChange NoticeCAA ComplianceEnvironmentalAir PermittingFocus AreaEnglishLouisianaAir ProgramsAir Programs
2025-12-02T06:00:00Z
Louisiana requires state forms for Title V permittees
Effective date: November 20, 2025
This applies to: Title V permit holders
Description of change: The Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality requires all Title V operating permittees to use standard department-approved forms to submit the:
- Title V Semiannual Monitoring Report, and
- Title V Annual Compliance Certification.
View related state info: Clean air operating permits — Louisiana
NewsAir EmissionsChange NoticesChange NoticeCaliforniaMobile Emission SourcesCAA ComplianceEnvironmentalFocus AreaEnglishAir ProgramsAir Programs
2025-12-02T06:00:00Z
California adopts emergency vehicle emissions regulations
Effective date: October 2, 2025
This applies to: Entities subject to CARB’s vehicle emissions regulations
Description of change: Congressional resolutions disapproved the waivers for the California Air Resources Board’s (CARB’s) Advanced Clean Cars II and Heavy-Duty Vehicle and Engine Omnibus Low NOx (Omnibus) regulations.
Through an emergency rulemaking, CARB adopted the Emergency Vehicle Emissions Regulations, reinstating at a minimum earlier-adopted regulations displaced by Advanced Clean Cars II and Omnibus:
- The Low-Emission Vehicle Regulation (LEV) III regulation and associated on-board diagnostic requirements, and
- Medium- and heavy-duty regulations.
The regulation applies until litigation is resolved.
Regulated entities may follow either:
- The LEV IV (part of Advanced Clean Cars II) or Omnibus standards, or
- The LEV III and pre-Omnibus standards.
View related state info: Air programs — California Air Resources Board (CARB)
NewsWater PermittingChange NoticesChange NoticeOhioWater ProgramsWater QualityIndustrial WastewaterEnvironmentalWater ProgramsEnglishFocus AreaCWA Compliance
2025-12-02T06:00:00Z
Ohio extends expiration of Permit to Install
Effective date: November 13, 2025
This applies to: Owners and operators of wastewater treatment systems and businesses that install sanitary sewers
Description of changes: The Ohio Environmental Protection Agency amended the Permit to Install (PTI) program rules, which regulate the design and installation of wastewater conveyance and treatment systems. Most notably, the department extended the expiration date of PTIs from 18 months to start construction to 60 months to start construction. The amendments also exempt boat wash marinas and force mains serving one structure from PTIs.
View related state info: Industrial water permitting — Ohio
NewsWater PermittingChange NoticesChange NoticeWater ProgramsWater QualityWater ReportingFloridaEnvironmentalWater ProgramsEnglishFocus AreaCWA Compliance
2025-12-02T06:00:00Z
Florida allows reciprocity for water system operator licensing
Effective date: November 6, 2025
This rule applies to: Out-of-state licensed treatment plant operators and distribution system operators
Description of change: The Florida Department of Environmental Protection adopted rules to:
- Implement licensure reciprocity, allowing the department to issue licenses by reciprocity to water treatment, domestic water treatment, and water distribution system operators with out-of-state licenses; and
- Allow the department to issue temporary operator licenses during a declared state of emergency to out-of-state licensed treatment plant and distribution system operators during a declared state of emergency.
Most Recent Highlights In Human Resources
NewsWaste/HazWasteUniversal WasteChange NoticesChange NoticeWasteEnvironmentalEnglishLouisianaFocus Area
2025-12-02T06:00:00Z
Louisiana adds aerosol cans to universal waste program
Effective date: November 20, 2025
This applies to: Owners and operators of all facilities that generate, transport, treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste
Description of change: The Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality added hazardous waste aerosol cans to the universal waste program. The program streamlines hazardous waste management requirements and is identical to the federal universal waste requirements for aerosol cans.
View related state info: Universal waste — Louisiana
NewsWater PermittingChange NoticesChange NoticeWater ProgramsPennsylvaniaWater QualityEnvironmentalWater ProgramsStormwaterEnglishFocus AreaCWA Compliance
2025-12-02T06:00:00Z
Pennsylvania reissues NPDES General Permit for mining
Effective date: March 28, 2026
This applies to: Mining operations with stormwater discharges
Description of change: The Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection reissued the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Permit for Stormwater Associated with Mining Activities (BMP GP-104). Mining operation sites must obtain an NPDES permit to discharge stormwater if the site has expected or potential stormwater runoff discharges.
The new permit made one substantial change to clarify that entities covered under this general permit must meet the 2-year, 24-hour event design standards at 25 Pa. Code Chapter 102. The BMP GP-104 takes effect on March 28, 2026, and expires on March 27, 2031.
View related state info: Industrial water permitting — Pennsylvania
NewsGreenhouse GasesIndustry NewsEnvironmental Protection Agency (EPA)Air ProgramsCAA ComplianceEnvironmentalIn-Depth ArticleEnglishFocus AreaAir ProgramsUSA
2025-11-25T06:00:00Z
Annual HFC report: First submissions due March 2026
What do the manufacturers of hairspray cans, foam wall insulation, and ice cream machines have in common? If their products contain hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), they have to report annually on the HFCs they use, and the first report due date is quickly approaching! Through the Technology Transitions Program, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regulates HFCs used for new products and equipment in three sectors: aerosols, foams, and refrigeration, air conditioning, and heat pumps (RACHP). Among other compliance requirements of the 2023 Technology Transitions Rule, manufacturers and importers of HFC-containing products and equipment must submit annual reports.
Note: EPA’s October 2025 proposed rule to amend the 2023 Technology Transitions Rule doesn’t impact annual reporting requirements.
Use this overview to help you determine whether your business needs to report and, if so, what’s required.
Who reports?
Annual reporting applies to manufacturers and importers of products and equipment that use HFCs. An organization has to submit an annual report if:
- It manufactures or imports a product or component within a regulated sector or subsector (see 40 CFR 84.54), and
- The product or component uses or will use a regulated HFC or HFC blend.
Reporting requirements apply to manufacturers and importers in all sectors and subsectors, and they start with data from calendar year 2025. The first annual report is due to EPA by March 31, 2026.
Note that the annual reporting requirements don’t apply to entities that only:
- Sell or distribute equipment, or
- Install or operate new RACHP systems.
What’s reported?
In each annual report, covered manufacturers and importers must provide:
- The entity’s name and address;
- The entity’s contact person, the contact's email address, and the contact's phone number;
- The calendar year covered by the report and the submission date;
- All applicable North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) codes; and
- A statement certifying that the data is accurate and that the products use HFCs or HFC blends in compliance with the use restrictions and labeling requirements.
Entities in all three sectors also have to report the total mass in metric tons of each HFC or HFC blend contained in all products and components manufactured, imported, and exported annually.
Further, sector-specific standards apply.
| Sector | Requires additional information for: | See 40 CFR: |
|---|---|---|
| Aerosol |
| 84.60(a)(5) |
| Foam |
| 84.60(a)(4) |
| RACHP |
| 84.60(a)(3) |
How’s the report submitted?
According to the latest information shared by EPA in the “Technology Transitions Program: What You Need to Know for January 1, 2025” webinar presentation, the agency is still designing the electronic platform for submitting annual reports. EPA plans to provide reporting instructions and forms before the upcoming deadline.
About the 2023 Technology Transitions Rule
HFCs are greenhouse gases that were developed to replace ozone-depleting substances for use in various products and equipment (primarily refrigeration and air-conditioning systems). The American Innovation and Manufacturing Act of 2020 gives EPA the authority to address HFCs by:
- Phasing down production and consumption through the HFC Allowance Allocation Program,
- Implementing restrictions on HFC use in specific sectors, and
- Developing regulations to maximize the reclamation and minimize the release of HFCs from equipment.
The 2023 Technology Transition Rule established the Technology Transitions Program to restrict HFC uses in sectors and subsectors where lower global warming potential (GWP) technologies are or will soon be available. The regulations apply to manufacturers (including importers), exporters, sellers, distributors, and installers of systems or products in covered sectors that use HFCs.
What about the proposed changes to the 2023 Technology Transitions Rule?
On October 3, 2025, EPA proposed a rule to amend the existing 2023 Technology Transition Rule. However, the proposed changes don’t affect the annual reporting requirements for manufacturers and importers. All covered manufacturers and importers must submit the annual report by March 31, 2026.
The proposed rule impacts specific subsectors, including refrigerated transport, industrial process refrigeration, chillers, retail food (for supermarkets and remote condensing units), cold storage warehouses, and stationary residential and light commercial air conditioning and heat pumps. EPA proposes to:
- Exempt certain intermodal containers transporting cargo at very cold temperatures;
- Extend compliance dates for industrial process refrigeration used in semiconductor manufacturing;
- Raise global warming potential thresholds for remote condensing units, supermarket systems, and cold storage warehouses;
- Extend compliance dates for refrigerated centrifuges and laboratory shakers; and
- Allow existing residential and light commercial air-conditioning and heat pump equipment (i.e., manufactured or imported before January 1, 2025) to continue to be installed.
Key to remember: The first annual reports required by the Technology Transitions Program for manufacturers and importers of HFC-containing products and equipment are due by March 31, 2026.
NewsCERCLA, SARA, EPCRAEnvironmental Protection Agency (EPA)Safety Data Sheet ReportingIn-Depth ArticleHazard CommunicationEnglishTier II Inventory ReportingSafety Data SheetsIndustry NewsSafety & HealthConstruction SafetyGeneral Industry SafetyAgriculture SafetyMaritime SafetyEnvironmentalHazard CommunicationSARA ComplianceFocus AreaUSA
2025-11-25T06:00:00Z
EPA’s SDS/Tier II reporting now in lockstep with OSHA HazCom
EPA issued a direct final rule to update its safety data sheet (SDS) reporting and Tier II inventory reporting requirements. The changes align EPA 40 CFR 370 with OSHA’s Hazard Communication (HazCom) standard at 29 CFR 1910.1200.
| News update: EPA extended the public comment period for this direct final rule that made technical amendments to 40 CFR 370 to conform to the 2024 OSHA HazCom standard. An EPA memo lodged in docket EPA-HQ-OLEM-2025-0299 at Regulations.gov, explains, “This document will be open for public comment until December 24, 2025.” Also, note that the docket offers 23 supporting and related materials, including a draft updated Tier II form, draft updated Tier II instructions, and a redline strikeout version of the rule changes. |
The biggest change is that facilities will be able to copy the hazard categories directly from section 2 of the SDSs to their Tier II report forms. This eliminates the guesswork. However, facilities may face added strain with their first Tier II submission under the rule. Instead of relying on the grouped hazard categories selected in the previous year’s forms, it looks like facilities will need to spend extra time retrieving specific categories from their SDSs.
Who’s impacted by the rule?
EPA 40 CFR 370 applies to a facility owner or operator if:
- The OSHA HazCom standard requires the facility to prepare or have available an SDS or material safety data sheet (MSDS) for a hazardous chemical;
- The hazardous chemical is not exempted at 370.13 or 1910.1200(b)(6); and
- The hazardous chemical is present at or above certain threshold levels.
If the applicability criteria are met, the facility owner/operator must submit to the state emergency response commission (SERC), local emergency planning committee (LEPC), and local fire departments:
- An SDS or MSDS for each covered hazardous chemical or a list of all covered hazardous chemicals; and
- A Tier II hazardous chemical inventory form by March 1 annually for all covered hazardous chemicals.
A state may make its own laws and regulations in addition to or more stringent than federal Part 370.
What’s changing in Part 370?
Last year, OSHA amended its HazCom standard to conform to the seventh edition of the United Nations Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals (GHS). Changes to the chemical hazard classifications and categories were part of the amendments to 1910.1200. This is important because EPA Part 370 relies on the OSHA HazCom standard for the definition of “hazardous chemical” and the hazard categories that must be reported.
In the latest rule published November 17, 2025, EPA takes several actions to harmonize its regulations with OSHA’s. The preamble offers a complete list of amendments to Part 370. Here’s a summary:
| Change: | Details: | Sections affected: |
| Adopts all 112 OSHA hazard categories |
| 370.3, 370.30, 370.41, and 370.42 |
| Updates terminology |
| 370.3 and 370.66 |
| Removes the term MSDS |
| 370.3, 370.10, 370.12, 370.13, 370.14, 370.20, 370.30, 370.31, 370.32, 370.33, 370.60, 370.62, 370.63, and 370.64 |
| Makes minor plain language, clarifying, and consistency corrections |
| 370.1, 370.2, 370.3, 370.10, 370.14, 370.30, 370.32, 370.33, 370.40, 370.41, 370.42, 370.43, 370.44, 370.45, 370.60, 370.61, 370.62, 370.64, 370.65, and 370.66 |
When will the changes take effect?
The direct final rule is effective January 16, 2026, unless EPA receives an adverse comment during its 30-day comment period. [However, see the "news update," earlier in this article.] If that happens, the agency will publish a timely withdrawal. Then, it will move along with the proposed rule (also published in the November 17, 2025, Federal Register) and address public comments in a subsequent final rule.
Assuming no adverse comment is received on the original direct final rule, EPA gives covered facilities time to prepare. The rule offers a compliance date of December 1, 2026, for both SDS reporting and Tier II reporting. Note that for Tier II reporting, the updates kick in for the 2026 inventory reporting year, which impacts forms due by March 1, 2027, and thereafter. (Forms due on or before March 1, 2026, are unchanged.)
Key to remember
EPA took action to harmonize Part 370 with the changes OSHA made to 1910.1200 last year. The latest amendments to Part 370 have a compliance date of December 1, 2026. For Tier II reporting, the updates start with forms due on or before March 1, 2027.
NewsHazardous WasteIndustry NewsWaste GeneratorsWaste/HazWasteSatellite AccumulationWasteEnvironmentalIn-Depth ArticleEnglishFocus AreaUSA
2025-11-24T06:00:00Z
Avoiding costly mistakes: The most common RCRA hazardous waste violations
If your facility generates hazardous waste, compliance with the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) is not optional. Yet many businesses overlook key requirements, leading to violations that can cost thousands in fines and damage their reputation. Understanding the most common mistakes and how to prevent them can keep your operations safe and compliant.
The most frequent violations according to EPA
One of the most common errors is failing to determine whether a waste is hazardous. Businesses often assume leftover chemicals, contaminated rags, or spent filters are non-hazardous without testing or applying EPA criteria. Misclassification leads to improper storage and disposal, which can escalate into multiple violations.
Container management is another frequent problem. Inspectors often find containers without the required “Hazardous Waste” label or missing the accumulation start date. Some containers are left open or improperly sealed, allowing leaks or vapors to escape. These issues are easy to fix but often overlooked in busy facilities.
Weekly inspections are mandatory for central accumulation areas, yet many companies skip them or fail to document them correctly. Missing dates, signatures, or inspection logs can result in citations even if the area is otherwise compliant.
Employee training is another weak spot. Large Quantity Generators must train staff on handling hazardous waste and emergency procedures and keep records of that training. Training should be job specific including emergency response specific to the facility. When training is incomplete or undocumented, it counts as a violation even if employees know what to do.
Improper disposal is a serious and costly mistake. Pouring hazardous waste down drains, tossing it in regular trash, or shipping it without a manifest violates federal law. These actions can lead to severe penalties and, in some cases, criminal liability.
Other common issues include exceeding accumulation time limits, 90 days for large quantity generators and 180 days for small quantity generators, without obtaining a permit. Facilities also forget to maintain a valid EPA identification number or fail to update contingency plans and emergency contact information.
How to stay compliant
Start with a thorough waste determination. Identify all materials that could be hazardous and classify them correctly and keep a record of the waste determination. Review container labeling and make sure every container is closed, dated, and marked “Hazardous Waste.” Establish a routine for weekly inspections and keep detailed records.
Invest in employee training and refresh it regularly. Document every session and keep those records accessible. Monitor accumulation times and set reminders to move waste before deadlines. Always use the Uniform Hazardous Waste Manifest when shipping waste off-site, and verify that your transporter and disposal facility are authorized.
Finally, maintain your EPA site ID number and update your contingency plan. Make sure emergency equipment is available, and local responders have your contact information.
Key to Remember: RCRA compliance is detailed, but most violations stem from simple oversights such as open containers, missing labels, skipped inspections, or forgotten paperwork. By building strong procedures and training your team, you can avoid costly mistakes and keep your facility safe and compliant.
New Network Poll
Most Popular Highlights In Environmental
NewsGreenhouse GasesAir QualityAir EmissionsEnvironmental Protection Agency (EPA)CAA ComplianceEnglishAir ProgramsIndustry NewsIndustry NewsAir ProgramsEnvironmentalVolatile Organic CompoundsFocus AreaStationary Emission SourcesUSA
2025-12-05T06:00:00Z
EPA confirms oil, gas emissions compliance extensions
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) issued a rule on December 3, 2025, that finalizes compliance deadline extensions for certain emissions standards applicable to crude oil and natural gas facilities. The final rule also further delays compliance timelines for two requirements.
EPA’s delays affect:
- The New Source Performance Standards for crude oil and natural gas facilities (40 CFR 60 Subpart OOOOb), and
- The emissions guidelines (EGs) for crude oil and natural gas facilities (60 Subpart OOOOc).
EPA’s December 2025 final rule is a direct response to the interim final rule (IFR) it issued in July 2025.
The July 2025 IFR extended the compliance deadline for net heating value (NHV) monitoring of flares and enclosed combustion devices (ECDs) to November 28, 2025. The IFR moved the rest of the compliance deadlines to January 22, 2027, for:
- ECD performance tests;
- Cover and closed vent system requirements for no identifiable emissions (NIEs), including:
- Design and operation standards,
- Test methods and procedures, and
- Inspections.
- Equipment leak repair requirements;
- Phase two of zero-emission standards for process controllers;
- Storage vessel requirements, including:
- Using potential emissions limits that qualify as legally and practicably enforceable,
- Triggering throughput-based modifications, and
- Using a 30-day period of production to calculate potential emissions.
- Flare and ECD pilot flame rules, including:
- Ensuring the devices operate with a continuous pilot flame, and
- Installing and operating a system to send an alarm to the nearest control room when a pilot flame is unlit.
- Implementation of the Super Emitter Program, and
- Submission of state plans for implementing the updated EGs.
What’s the same?
EPA’s December 2025 final rule maintains the same compliance deadlines for all requirements delayed to January 22, 2027.
What’s different?
The agency’s December 2025 final rule sets a new compliance date of June 1, 2026, for the NHV monitoring requirements. This includes an alternative performance test (sampling demonstration) option for flares and ECDs.
Additionally, the rule moves the compliance date for annual reporting, establishing that no annual report is due before November 30, 2026. It gives owners and operators until November 30, 2026, to submit any reports that were originally due before this date. Note that the final rule specifies that annual reports due after November 30, 2026, must be submitted within 90 days of the end of each annual compliance period.
Key to remember: EPA’s final rule confirms deadline extensions for certain emissions standards that apply to crude oil and natural gas facilities. It also further delays a couple of the requirements.
NewsWaste/HazWasteTransportationHazmat SafetyIn-Depth ArticleEnglishIndustry NewsFleet SafetyTransportation SecurityCPRSafety & HealthConstruction SafetyFirst Aid and MedicalGeneral Industry SafetyAgriculture SafetyMaritime SafetyEnvironmentalFocus AreaFleet OperationsMine SafetyFirst Aid and MedicalAutomated External DefibrillatorsUSA
2023-06-16T05:00:00Z
Are you meeting OSHA’s requirements for CPR and AEDs in the workplace?
Quick action using cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and automated external defibrillators (AEDs) can save the lives of the nearly 350,000 cardiac event victims each year outside of a hospital setting. But what does OSHA require for the workplace? What you didn’t know about OSHA regulations regarding AEDs may surprise you.
The importance of CPR and early defibrillation
For every minute a patient is in cardiac arrest, their chances of survival decrease dramatically. When a patient doesn’t have a pulse and isn’t breathing, CPR should be performed until an AED is available. It’s important to note that CPR alone does not restart the heart. CPR is an oxygen circulation procedure. AEDs, on the other hand, are meant for lifesaving intervention.
CPR and early defibrillation are vital components of the emergency medical services (EMS) chain of survival that increases the odds of cardiac patient survival. However, according to the American Heart Association (AHA), even the best CPR can’t provide enough circulation of oxygen to the brain and heart for more than a few minutes. In fact, a patient whose brain is deprived of oxygen for 10 minutes or more seldom recovers.
Signs and symptoms of cardiac compromise
Just like a reliable vehicle, the circulatory system is the human body’s blood transportation system, and the heart is the engine. Amazingly, the heart generates its own electrical impulses, pumping in a regular, rhythmic manner. As with any engine, the heart requires a certain amount of pressure to function and doesn’t work well when clogged with grease or debris. The most common causes of sudden cardiac arrest include a heart attack, electrocution, and asphyxiation — all of which could occur in the workplace. Common signs and symptoms include:
- Chest pain accompanied by a crushing or squeezing sensation,
- Pain that radiates to the jaw or arm,
- Irregular pulse and/or abnormal blood pressure,
- Shortness of breath,
- Cool and sweaty skin,
- Nausea and vomiting, and
- Anxiety or feeling of impending doom.
CPR provides the pressure for the body’s “engine” to oxygen circulating, while an AED provides the electrical impulses to keep the engine pumping.
OSHA requirements regarding CPR
OSHA 1910.151 requires first aid treatment be provided in the absence of an infirmary, clinic, or hospital in near proximity to the workplace used to treat injured employees. This may include assisting a victim of cardiac arrest using CPR or defibrillation.
OSHA requirements for CPR and defibrillation differ considerably. Standards requiring CPR include:
- 1910.146 Permit-required Confined Spaces
- 1910.266 Appendix B: Logging Operations – First Aid and CPR Training
- 1910.269 Electric Power Generation, Transmission, and Distribution
- 1910.410 Qualifications of Dive Team and
- 1926.950 Construction Subpart V, Power Transmission and Distribution
OSHA recommends basic adult CPR refresher training and retesting every year, and first aid training at least once every three years. CPR training include facilitated discussion along with ’hands-on’ skills training that uses mannequins and partner practice.
OSHA requirements regarding AEDs — you might need a prescription
Though OSHA recognizes AEDs as important lifesaving technology that plays a role in treating cardiac arrest, the agency doesn’t currently require their use in the workplace. Instead, OSHA wants employers to assess their own requirements for AEDs as part of their first aid response.
AEDs are considered Class III medical devices which means the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has some oversight on their use. Almost all AEDs require the purchaser to obtain a prescription from a physician under FDA regulations. The prescription process is meant as a quality control mechanism to ensure AEDs are properly maintained, that all designated responders are properly trained, and assist employers with establishing an emergency response plan for their workplace AED program.
The AHA requires AED operators to also receive CPR training as an “integral part of providing lifesaving aid to people suffering sudden cardiac arrest.” Though easy to use, each AED is slightly different, so training helps users understand the unique traits and supplies for the individual units at their workplace. Additionally, AED users must be trained to understand the signs of a sudden cardiac arrest, when to activate the EMS system, and how to perform CPR.
AEDs are light, portable, easy to use, and inexpensive. They’re best placed near high-hazard areas such as confined spaces, near electrical energy, or in remote work areas. Response time to reach AEDs should be kept within 3–5-minutes.
| Need more information on defibrillators in the workplace? See our ezExplanation on AEDs. |
Training requirements
Many states require or encourage CPR and AED training from nationally recognized organizations. Any AED training should include CPR training. OSHA doesn’t offer first aid or CPR training, nor certify trainers. Training by a nationally recognized organization, such as AHA, the American Red Cross, or National Safety Council is recommended.
Keys to Remember
While OSHA doesn’t currently require the use of AEDs in the workplace, they do expect employers to assess their own AED requirements as part of their first aid response. AED training is required by most states and should include CPR with a hands-on practical component.
NewsIndustry NewsIndustry NewsToxic Substances Control Act - EPAToxic Subtances Control Act - EPATSCA ComplianceToxic Substances - EPAEnvironmentalEnglishFocus AreaUSA
2021-12-20T06:00:00Z
Mercury inventory reporting rule revised by EPA
EPA has announced amendments to its 2018 mercury reporting rule to extend reporting requirements to companies that import pre-assembled products that contain a mercury-added component. These companies will now be obligated to report these imports to EPA.
The revision comes after a challenge to the original rule in the 2nd Circuit, where the court vacated the existing exemption for importers of products containing mercury-added components (e.g., a watch with a mercury-added battery). The court found that this exemption was an unlawful interpretation of the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) as it lacked a reasoned explanation, and EPA’s latest revision reflects the court’s decision.
The timing of the final rule offers impacted organizations adequate notice of the amended reporting requirements — the deadline for reporting 2021 data will be July 1, 2022. EPA says that the action will assist the agency in carrying out its requirements to identify products or manufacturing processes that intentionally add mercury as well as determine and recommend actions that can reduce mercury use overall in the U.S.
EPA will update its compliance guide and other supporting materials for the mercury inventory reporting rule to include information reflecting the new reporting requirements.
Key to remember: Revisions to the 2018 mercury inventory reporting rule will affect importers of pre-assembled products that contain mercury-added components. Under the final rule, the deadline for reporting 2021 data is July 1, 2022.
NewsAir QualityIndustry NewsEnvironmental Protection Agency (EPA)CAA ComplianceEnvironmentalIn-Depth ArticleFocus AreaEnglishAcid RainAir ProgramsStationary Emission SourcesUSA
2025-12-11T06:00:00Z
Acid Rain Program compliance: SO2 vs. NOx
Did you know that the federal government regulates the power sector’s impact on rain? The Acid Rain Program limits the amount of sulfur dioxide (SO2) and nitrogen oxides (NOx) — the main causes of acid rain — that fossil fuel-fired electric generating units (EGUs) may emit. However, the SO2 and NOx reduction programs operate differently, and the ways that facilities can meet the SO2 and NOx limits are distinct.
It's essential to know the compliance options because facilities that don’t meet the SO2 and NOx standards must pay penalties for their excess emissions. And in November 2025, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) set higher penalties for the next two compliance years.
So, what are the differences?
Who’s affected?
The first thing to confirm is whether your facility is subject to the Acid Rain Program (40 CFR 72.6). The program regulates fossil fuel-fired power plants. It applies to:
- EGUs that serve generators with an output capacity of more than 25 megawatts, and
- All new EGUs.
Note that the NOx program applies to a specific subset of coal-fired boilers.
SO2 reduction program
EPA operates the SO2 reduction program through an allowance trading system (Part 73). The agency sets a cap on the total SO2 emissions for the year and then allocates SO2 allowances to regulated units. One allowance represents 1 ton of SO2 emissions.
For each compliance year, a facility must show that it has enough allowances to cover its emissions of SO2. It’s similar to EPA’s hydrofluorocarbon allowance program.
There are multiple compliance options. Facilities may:
- Sell extra allowances if they have more allowances than needed,
- Save extra allowances if they have more allowances than needed (and use them in the future), or
- Buy extra allowances if they can’t keep emissions below their allocated level.
Facilities can purchase allowances from or sell allowances to individuals, companies, groups, or brokers. Additionally, facilities may bid on allowances at EPA’s annual Acid Rain Program SO2 Allowance Auction.
NOx reduction program
EPA sets annual emission limits for the NOx reduction program (Part 76), which applies to these types of boilers:
- Dry bottom wall-fired boilers,
- Tangentially fired boilers,
- Cell burner boilers,
- Cyclone boilers,
- Vertically fired boilers, and
- Wet bottom boilers.
Like the SO2 program, the NOx program offers multiple compliance options. Facilities can:
- Meet the standard annual emission limitations,
- Average the emissions rates of two or more boilers, or
- Apply for an alternative emission limit (AEL) if they can’t meet the standard emission limit.
Additional requirements apply to facilities that use options other than complying with the limits:
- Facilities that want to average emissions rates must submit an averaging plan that’s approved by the permitting authorities (76.11).
- Facilities that apply for an AEL are required to use the NOx emission control technology used as the basis for the emission limit and must demonstrate that the unit can’t comply using the technology (76.10).
It pays (or, at least, costs less) to comply!
Excess emissions penalties can add up quickly. That’s why it’s vital to ensure your facility understands how to comply with the SO2 and NOx reduction programs properly.
The adjustment rates that EPA set for compliance years 2025 and 2026 (2.5265 and 2.6001, respectively) are used to calculate the total penalties a facility must pay if it exceeds SO2 or NOx limits during these compliance years.
Here are the formulas:
- Penalty for excess SO2 emissions = $2,000/ton x annual adjustment factor x tons of excess SO2 emissions
- Penalty for excess NOx emissions = $2,000/ton x annual adjustment factor x tons of excess NOx emissions
Let’s run through a couple of examples of what noncompliance could cost.
| Factors | Penalty Per Ton | Total Penalties |
|---|---|---|
| $2,000 x 2.5265 = $5,053 | $5,053 x 10 = $50,530 |
| $2,000 x 2.6001 = $5,200.20 | $5,200.20 x 5 = $26,001 |
As shown in the example above, excess emissions can cost facilities a lot in penalties. Just 1 ton of excess emissions will result in more than $5,000! Knowing your compliance options for the Acid Rain Program’s SO2 and NOx reduction programs can help your facility avoid steep fines.
Key to remember: The Acid Rain Program limits SO2 and NOx emissions from fossil fuel-fired power plants, but the compliance options for each type of emission differ. Understanding the distinct options can help facilities avoid penalties for excess emissions.
NewsIndustry NewsTSCA ComplianceCAA ComplianceSustainabilityIn-Depth ArticleCWA ComplianceEnvironmentalEnglishSustainabilityESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance)Focus AreaUSA
2025-12-05T06:00:00Z
EPA’s 2026 regulatory shift: How environmental managers can stay ahead
The clock is ticking for environmental teams. By 2026, several new EPA regulations will reshape compliance obligations for U.S. companies. Organizations that act now will avoid costly penalties and operational disruptions.
What’s changing and why it matters
Although EPA has been deregulating or loosening some requirements, there are still some standards being tightened across multiple fronts in the coming year:
- Renewable fuel standards (RFS): The EPA proposed higher volume requirements for 2026, including 24.02 billion renewable identification numbers (RINs), up nearly 8% from 2025. This increase pushes stricter expectations on fuel producers and organizations purchasing renewable fuels.
- Stormwater multi-sector general permit (MSGP): A new MSGP set to take effect by February 2026 will require quarterly PFAS indicator monitoring, expanded benchmark sampling, and resiliency measures in stormwater control designs.
- PFAS Reporting under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA): TSCA Section 8(a)(7) mandates PFAS manufacturing and import data collection beginning in April 2026, through October 2026, with extended deadlines for certain small manufacturers.
Failure to prepare could lead to fines, reputational damage, supply chain disruptions, and permit delays. Companies that weave compliance planning into their 2026 strategy will be positioned not just to meet legal deadlines but to sustain operations smoothly.
Key areas of impact
- Renewable fuel standards (RFS) and air emissions The proposed increase in 2026 Renewable Identification Numbers (RIN) volumes, from 24.02 billion to 24.46 billion for 2027, signals tightening air and fuels policy that affects fuel use and emissions accounting.
- Stormwater management The upcoming 2026 MSGP requires expanded quarterly PFAS monitoring, new benchmark triggers, corrective action plans, and integration of climate resilience in design standards.
- PFAS disclosure (TSCA Section 8(a)(7)) Manufacturers and importers of PFAS must submit electronic reporting of usage, volumes, disposal, and exposure data between April and October 2026, with extensions available for smaller operations.
Steps to take now
- Audit compliance programs: Cross-check operations against RIN inventory, stormwater permits, and TSCA reporting duties.
- Upgrade monitoring and recordkeeping: Implement robust electronic systems to track PFAS, stormwater quality, fuel volumes, and emissions.
- Staff training: Educate teams on PFAS obligations, new stormwater protocols, and RFS structures.
- Engage regulators early: Comment on proposed rules, consult during permit drafting, and flag issues during the notice-and-comment period.
Looking ahead
The EPA’s 2026 updates reflect a trend toward increased transparency and environmental accountability. Companies that treat compliance as strategic will not only avoid enforcement but also gain resilience and stakeholder trust.
Key to remember: Start planning now. Early action on EPA rule changes will save time, money, and headaches when enforcement begins.
NewsSpecies ProtectionSpecies ProtectionEnvironmental Management SystemsCAA ComplianceIn-Depth ArticleCWA ComplianceEnglishAir ProgramsEnvironmental Management SystemsIndustry NewsEnvironmental EdgeAir ProgramsEnvironmentalFocus AreaPesticidesUSA
2022-12-19T06:00:00Z
5 easy ways to keep up with environmental regulatory changes
Keeping pace with ever-changing environmental regulations can be a daunting task. In fact, a recent survey1 conducted by J. J. Keller’s Center for Market Insights found that 45 percent of the 222 Environmental, Health, and Safety Professionals who participated found the tracking of regulatory changes to be their biggest challenge. That’s not surprising because environmental rulemakings are published frequently, sometimes daily, and some rules fly through the rulemaking process quicker than others. Several resources can help Without a clear plan to stay on top of things, you could easily miss an important regulatory change that could disrupt processes, cost your company several thousands of dollars in penalties, and open your company up to a lawsuit. The good news is you have many good resources at your fingertips. Here are five you can use to help create a system for keeping up with new or revised environmental regulations that might apply at your facility:
- Visit the websites of state and federal regulatory agencies — Going directly to the source might seem like the most obvious solution, but we know catching up with these sites over time may prove to be difficult. Try setting a calendar reminder to make this a regular habit.
- Follow the state and federal regulatory agencies on social media — Most agencies have active social media platforms to inform the public. If you or your company already have social media accounts, this one should be an easy lift.
- Join industry associations that track regulatory activity — Industry associations host meetings and events that provide updates on the latest regulatory developments impacting their members. It’s also a great way to network and exchange ideas with other industry professionals.
- Subscribe to listservs — Many federal and state regulatory agencies have listservs that send out regulatory updates. In addition, many industry associations and other organizations have listservs that will help keep you posted. For example, you may wish to sign up for news, regulatory updates, and compliance tips at www.jjkeller.com.
- Complete your J. J. Keller® Compliance Network profile builder — As a subscriber of this platform, you have an opportunity to curate the content you’re alerted to. This allows you to select your focus areas and the regulatory areas that most impact your role and responsibilities for a tailored and meaningful compliance experience. Be sure to review any new or revised requirements After you’ve identified upcoming regulatory changes that might impact your facilities, it’s a good idea to conduct a review of how the new requirements will impact your existing processes. Being proactive and having a plan in place will certainly help reduce the potential risk of non-compliance.
Key to remember: A J. J. Keller Market Insights survey shows that almost half of the over 220 participants said that keeping up with new and additional environmental regulations was their top challenge. However, several resources may assist you with this task!
1Environmental & Sustainability Survey conducted by Customer & Market Insights x J. J. Keller Center for Market Insights, October 2022
Most Popular Highlights In Transportation
NewsIndustry NewsEnglishFleet SafetyDrug testing - Motor CarrierDrug and Alcohol Testing - DOTRandom alcohol and drug testing- Motor CarrierFocus AreaIn-Depth ArticleSafety-sensitive function - Motor CarrierAlcohol testing - Motor CarrierRefusal to be tested - Motor CarrierTransportationUSA
2025-12-10T06:00:00Z
Timing drug and alcohol tests is not a random act
The element of surprise built into DOT random testing helps catch impaired drivers. So, the timing of driver notifications is vitally important.
To ensure random selections are kept confidential and unannounced, DOT regulations specify how to carry out testing. A misunderstanding of these requirements can create a messy situation and may inadvertently create a violation.
Consider the following random-notification scenarios and the issues each produces.
‘Go when you have time’
Scenario: Samantha was selected for a random DOT drug and alcohol test. Her supervisor informed her about the test at the beginning of her shift. She was told she had two hours to show up for her appointment at a clinic that’s 15 minutes away.
Notification error: Drivers don’t have a “window of time” to show up for random tests. The regulations require that drivers immediately proceed to the collection site once they’re notified of a random drug or alcohol test. Giving drivers a cushion (other than travel time) is considered advance notice. In fact, this type of heads-up could:
- Provide a driver with enough time to come up with a substituted urine sample or consume a drug-masking substance.
- Keep a driver from engaging in prohibited behavior (e.g., drug or alcohol use) that they would have otherwise.
- Allow enough time for alcohol to metabolize in the driver’s body.
Drivers CANNOT be given an hour or two to show up at the collection site, and they can’t wait until later or at the end of their shift when it’s more convenient.
Alcohol tests and SSFs
Scenario: Phil is a warehouse employee who occasionally fills in as a driver. He’s in the random pool and was selected for alcohol testing.
Today, Phil is scheduled to work solely in the warehouse operating a forklift. The safety manager approaches Phil and instructs him to go for a DOT alcohol test. Phil goes for testing and blows 0.00% BAC, indicating he was not impaired. All’s good, right? Not quite.
Notification error: Since alcohol is a legal substance, prohibited use is timed around performing safety-sensitive functions (SSFs). A random alcohol test can only be requested right before, during, or right after performing SSFs.
If a driver is working in another capacity at the motor carrier (e.g., working in the warehouse) with no expectation of operating a CDL vehicle, they’re not performing SSFs. The motor carrier is unable to arrange DOT alcohol testing during this shift. The notification must wait until the driver is scheduled to operate or is in readiness to operate a vehicle requiring a CDL.
In this case, the safety manager caught a break — the test was negative. Had Phil’s test result been at least 0.04% BAC, the error would have resulted in a DOT testing violation. The carrier’s designated employer representative (DER) would decide whether to report the failed test to the Clearinghouse or work to cancel the test due to the error.
‘I never received a text’
Scenario: Robert, the company’s DER, received the quarterly list of randomly selected drivers. Randy was selected for drug testing, and Robert knows Randy should be available for testing shortly. Randy just dropped off his load and is on his way back to the terminal, which is about an hour’s drive. Robert texts Randy with instructions to immediately proceed to ABC Clinic which is close to the drop off. Randy doesn’t respond to the text.
The clinic calls Robert stating that Randy never showed up. An hour later, Randy shows up at the motor carrier and is clocking out for the day. Robert asks Randy, “Why didn’t you go for your random drug test? I texted you!” Randy states, “I never got a text.”
Best practice: The regulations don’t restrict the use of electronic notifications. However, in this scenario, Robert is in a difficult position. Does he consider this a refusal to test or take Randy’s word? As DER, he must decide.
Use of text, voicemail, or email isn’t the best choice for remote notifications of random testing. A documented phone call where you speak with the driver backs up any claims of refusal to test.
Notification tips
Your random drug and/or alcohol notifications may require planning. You don’t want to set your driver up for failure or to create a motor carrier violation through improper procedures.
Avoid messy situations:
- Instruct front-line managers on the regulatory basics.
- Prevent scheduling conflicts (e.g., childcare, personal appointments):
- Don’t notify drivers at the end of their shift if the test may extend into the driver’s free time;
- Check the driver’s time-off requests (e.g., doctor’s appointment, leaving early for the day, etc.); and
- Avoid an off-duty notification policy.
- Remind drivers during notification to immediately proceed to the clinic, so there is never a doubt.
- Use the company policy to ensure:
- Drivers know what “immediate” means, and
- The DER knows what constitutes a refusal to test.
Key to remember: The element of surprise for random tests helps uncover CDL drivers’ drug use or alcohol misuse. But your timing of these random tests should be far from random.
NewsIndustry NewsFleet SafetySafety & HealthConstruction SafetyGeneral Industry SafetyTransportationWork ZonesSignals and BarricadesIn-Depth ArticleEnglishWork ZonesFocus AreaUSA
2025-12-10T06:00:00Z
The fatal truth about workplace vehicles and moving equipment
Forklifts, trucks and other moving equipment are the backbone of many jobs, but they also are among the deadliest hazards in the workplace. These machines are heavy, powerful, and unpredictable; and they don’t forgive mistakes. One split second of inattention, one blind spot, one wrong move and someone’s life changes forever.
Tight spaces, blind corners, and constant movement make every interaction a risk—for operators and anyone on foot. So, ask yourself: Are you treating operational and behavioral safety with the urgency it deserves? Pre-shift inspections matter, but they’re not enough. Communicate the dangers, enforce the rules, and stay alert. Because when it comes to moving equipment, safety isn’t just a checklist; it could be the difference between life or death.
Staggering statistics
Lives are lost every year in incidents involving moving vehicles and equipment. Tragically, in many cases, these incidents were preventable and serve as a stark reminder that even routine tasks can turn deadly when safety measures are overlooked. These 2025 stories speak loud and clear:
- November 11: A 19-year-old mini excavator operator died after the equipment they were operating slid down a slippery embankment, rolled over, and partially threw the worker out of the vehicle. The excavator landed on the operator resulting in fatal injuries.
- October 27: OSHA is investigating the death of a 27-year-old worker found unconscious inside a freezer with blunt trauma to their lower extremity believed to have been caused by a forklift.
- June 30: A 23-year-old laborer was killed when an excavator bucket crushed them into a concrete structure. The excavator operator didn’t see the laborer when moving the bucket.
- April 15: A 64-year-old truck driver was fatally wounded when the rear dump trailer they were unhooking began rolling down the hill, striking the driver.
- March 21: OSHA has fined three affiliated companies in the vehicle battery industry for safety violations related to the death of 45-year-old worker who was run over by a forklift.
- February 27: A 35-year-old worker sustained fatal injuries from material that fell from a narrow aisle reach truck while walking along a pedestrian walkway.
Historical numbers continue to tell the story:
- While 2024 statistics are still being finalized, an industry estimate of forklift fatalities alone is at 85.
- In 2023, the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) reported 205 fatalities from non-roadway motor vehicle incidents (e.g., forklifts, industrial equipment). The agency also reported 1,942 transportation-related fatalities and 1,252 motorized land vehicle deaths in 2023.
- The National Safety Council (NSC) reinforced the message with a report of 67 workers dying in 2023 alone in incidents involving forklifts, order pickers, or platform trucks.
- In 2022, the BLS reported 1,620 fatalities of transportation and material moving workers, making it the occupational group with the highest number of fatal work injuries for that year.
- Even the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) highlights the seriousness with their 2020 report of 150 struck-by fatalities in the construction industry and additional report of 66–87 construction worker struck-by deaths per year from 2011 to 2019.
Keep history from repeating itself
We must do more than just the minimum or wait for inspection results to protect workers from moving equipment and vehicle hazards. Regulations and compliance are the foundation for safety. However, we should strive to use statistics like these to drive conversations in the workplace. Zero in on the areas where your team faces the greatest risk.
- Engage workers in workplace assessments of vehicle use, moving equipment, and heavy machinery operation. The more workers can recognize the hazards while operating dangerous equipment, the more effective they can be with control measures.
- Take your time with training! Avoid the pressure of the clock and include hands-on training for operational skills. Allowing workers to practice real world scenarios gives them confidence they need and you the peace of mind you need.
- Stretch the conversation beyond inspections. Provide daily reminders, encourage near miss reporting, and engage leadership to reinforce safety and compliance daily.
- Implement engineering and administrative controls such as routine maintenance programs and traffic rules, designated travel paths, and visibility aids (e.g., mirrors, alarms).
- Ensure workers are certified in equipment and vehicle operation and are comfortable in operating the equipment. Not everyone is confident handling heavy machinery or moving equipment, which can lead to dangerous situations.
- Practice emergency response procedures for unexpected events like rollovers, load failures, and collisions.
- Remind workers that statistics like these represent a real person who has family and friends whose lives have changed forever.
Key to remember: Statistics aren’t just numbers; they’re lessons. By understanding the data behind moving vehicle and equipment fatalities, we can identify risks, change unsafe behaviors, and create a culture where every decision or behavior puts safety first.
NewsIndustry NewsIndustry NewsFleet SafetyElectronic logging device (ELD)Electronic logging device (ELD)Focus AreaFleet OperationsEnglishTransportationUSA
2025-12-11T06:00:00Z
3 ELDs removed from FMCSA’s list
Three devices were recently removed from the FMCSA’s list of registered electronic logging devices (ELDs):
- PSS ELD (from Pioneer Safety Solutions LLC)
- Black Bear ELD (from Black Bear ELD)
- RT ELD Plus - ACCURATE ELITE (from Rollingtrans)
Due to a failure to meet the minimum requirements of 49 CFR 395, Subpart B, Appendix A, the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) has moved these devices to its “revoked devices” list as of December 8, 2025.
Many ELD providers remove their devices from the list voluntarily, but the FMCSA has the authority to remove any ELD that does not comply with regulations.
Next steps for commercial carriers
Commercial carriers and drivers who use the above-listed devices must stop using the devices and switch to paper logs or logging software to record their hours of service.
In addition, before February 7, 2026, they must replace the devices with ELDs listed on the FMCSA’s ELD registry and begin using those compliant devices.
ELD providers who correct device deficiencies can be placed back on the list of registered devices. The FMCSA will inform the industry when revoked devices are compliant again.
ELD compliance standards
During the 60-day replacement period, the FMCSA has instructed safety officials to review affected drivers’ hours-of-service data using logging software, paper logs, or the ELD display.
After February 7, 2026, any motor carrier that continues to use the revoked devices will be considered operating without an ELD. Drivers will be placed out of service and cited for “No record of duty status” (395.8(a)(1)).
Review the full list of registered devices at https://eld.fmcsa.dot.gov/List.
NewsIndustry NewsFleet OperationsEnglishFocus AreaIn-Depth ArticleHighway use - Mileage taxFleet TaxesInternational Fuel Tax Agreement (IFTA)Fleet taxesTransportationUSA
2024-09-19T05:00:00Z
Your HUT decals are expiring: Registration open Oct. 1
For carriers operating in New York, registration and decals expire December 31, 2024, for the Highway Use Tax (HUT) and Automotive Fuel Carrier (AFC) programs. Take steps now to make sure you receive your new decals before the current ones expire. You need a new certificate of registration and decal for each vehicle. And you must place the new decals on your vehicles before January 1, 2025.
The period to renew your 24th series HUT and AFC certificates of registration begins October 1, 2024. Act now to avoid delays and keep your highway use tax credentials active.
To-do before October 1
Get ready for renewal by taking the following steps now:
- File all your highway use tax returns that are due.
- Pay your taxes. The state will not issue a new certificate of registration if you owe back taxes. Before you apply to renew, make sure that you’ve paid all taxes due under any of the programs administered by the New York State Tax Department, including:
- HUT,
- personal income tax,
- International Fuel Tax Agreement (IFTA),
- sales tax, and
- withholding tax.
- Create an online account if you do not already have one and you want to renew your credentials and pay online (https://www.oscar.ny.gov/).
- Make sure your vehicle registration information is correct and accurate. Review and update your information as soon as possible. Incorrect information will delay the processing of your certificates and decals.
Beginning October 1
Once the renewal period opens, renew your credentials and pay your renewal fees online with One Stop Credentialing and Registration (OSCAR).
Submit your renewal application by November 30, 2024, to make sure you receive your decals in time to place them on your vehicles before January 1, 2025.
If you are already enrolled in OSCAR, use your current OSCAR password to renew online.
If you are not enrolled, visit OSCAR, and select Enroll Now. You must have a United States Department of Transportation (USDOT) number and an employer identification number (EIN).
To renew your registration:
- Visit the OSCAR website and select HUT Renewal from the Business Type drop-down.
- Enter your information in the USDOT#, NYS Tax ID#, and Password fields, then select Log in.
- If you have 300 or fewer vehicles, choose either:
- Renew all HUT/AFC Certificates of Registration to renew all your active current series permits, or
- Select HUT/AFC Certificates of Registration to renew specific permits.
- If you have more than 300 vehicles, choose either:
- Renew all to renew all your active current series permits, or
- File renewal to renew select permits.
If you are unable to renew electronically, you may file Form TMT-1.2, Renewal Application for Highway Use Tax (HUT) and Automotive Fuel Carrier (AFC) Certificates of Registrations and Decals – 25th Series.
Key to remember: Take steps now to renew your NY HUT and ensure you receive your new decals before the current ones expire.
NewsIndustry NewsHazmat SafetyHazmatIn-Depth ArticleFocus AreaUSAEnglishTransportationHazmat Rulemaking procedures
2025-12-11T06:00:00Z
Preparing the HMR for the age of automation
Imagine a drone delivering a package that contains hazmat, or a driverless truck hauling chemicals down the interstate. These scenarios aren’t science fiction, they’re closer than you think. The Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA) is asking a critical question: how do we keep hazmat transportation safe in an era of automation?
PHMSA has issued an Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (ANPR) to gather input on updating the Hazardous Materials Regulations (HMR) to accommodate highly automated transportation systems. These systems include technologies like unmanned aircraft, automated driving systems, and even autonomous ships. The goal is to modernize regulations without sacrificing safety, while supporting innovation that could reshape how hazardous materials move across the country.
Why now?
Current regulations were designed for traditional transportation human drivers, crewed aircraft, and manual loading. Automation changes everything. It’s intended to improve efficiency and have fewer human errors, but it also introduces new challenges:
- How do emergency responders access shipping papers when there’s no driver?
- What happens if a drone carrying hazmat crashes in a neighborhood?
PHMSA officials indicate they want to support innovation without compromising safety. To do that, they need input from the hazmat community.
Areas under review
PHMSA’s ANPR outlined several topics where automation could impact compliance:
- Special permits — Should the process be adopted for automated systems like drones?
- Shipping papers and emergency response — How do we provide critical information when no one is on board?
- Hazard communication — Labels and placards work for trucks and railcars, but what about drones?
- Training — If automation reduces human involvement, what does hazmat training look like?
- Security — Cybersecurity risks are now part of the equation.
- Packaging and handling — New platforms may require new packaging standards.
Mode-specific considerations
PHMSA is also looking at how automation affects each mode of transportation:
- Rail — No automated hazmat rail yet, but waivers for automation exist.
- Air — Drones and advanced air mobility systems are already moving toward package delivery.
- Vessel — International efforts are underway for autonomous ships.
- Highway — Driverless trucks could change everything from loading to emergency response.
Your voice matters
PHMSA’s not making changes yet. However, they are gathering input. They want to know:
- What safety concerns and benefits do you see?
- Are current packaging and hazard communication rules adequate?
- How should cybersecurity risks be addressed?
- What economic impacts could these changes have, especially for small businesses
Comments are due by March 4, 2026, and can be submitted via regulations.gov under Docket No. PHMSA-2024-0064 (HM-266).
Key to remember: Automation is coming, and it’s coming fast. Whether you’re a carrier, shipper, emergency responder, or safety advocate, your input will help PHMSA find a balance.
NewsIndustry NewsFleet SafetyDrug and Alcohol Testing - DOTFocus AreaIn-Depth ArticleEnglishDilute specimen - motor carrerTransportationUSA
2023-06-26T05:00:00Z
Dilute drug test? Follow these steps to compliance
For truck and bus drivers, having too much to drink can be problematic in several ways — even if the drink is just water.
Staying hydrated is normally a good thing, but drinking too much water can cause a driver’s urine to become so diluted that testing it for drugs becomes difficult. There can be multiple (and legitimate) reasons for dilute urine, but so far this year, over 1,000 drivers have tested positive but dilute, according to the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA).
If your medical review officer (MRO) reports that a driver’s urine was dilute, do you know what to do next? The actions you need to take will depend on a few specifics.
Positive dilute
If a test result is positive but dilute, you’ll need to treat it the same as a positive test result. You must:
- Not order another test;
- Notify the driver;
- Remove the driver from safety-sensitive functions;
- Give the driver a list of substance abuse professionals (SAPs) from whom the driver can seek treatment;
- Not use the driver again until the driver completes treatment and passes a return-to-duty test; and
- Retain the test results for five years.
The MRO will report the test result to the Drug & Alcohol Clearinghouse, the same as any other positive test.
| Learn more about Clearinghouse reporting in our ez Explanation! |
Negative dilute
For results that are negative but dilute, your actions will depend on the creatinine level (creatinine is a waste product found in urine), as follows:
2 to 5 mg/dL — The MRO will contact you to request an immediate re-collection under direct observation.
- If the driver refuses this test, it’s treated the same as any refusal (which means following the steps above for a positive test, including reporting to the Clearinghouse).
- If the driver goes for this follow-up test, the result becomes the official result of record.
- If the result comes back as negative dilute again, the test is declared negative.
Over 5 mg/dL — No retest required. However, you can have a company policy requiring a retest, as long as you communicate it to drivers and enforce it uniformly. If you do retests in this situation, be aware that:
- The test cannot be under direct observation;
- A refusal of the test is treated the same as any other refusal;
- If the result is once again negative dilute with a creatinine level over 5 mg/dL, you cannot retest the driver (i.e., no third test) and it’s deemed a negative result.
- If the result is negative dilute with a creatinine level of 2 to 5 mg/dL, the MRO will demand yet another test immediately under direct observation.
A positive, adulterated, or substituted test result on any retest becomes the result of record, and all the consequences of a drug testing violation apply.
Key to Remember: If a driver’s drug test result comes back as dilute, be sure you know what to do next.
Most Popular Highlights In Human Resources
NewsIndustry NewsIndustry NewsHR GeneralistFamily and Medical Leave Act (FMLA)Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA)USAHR ManagementEnglishFocus AreaHuman Resources
2023-09-06T05:00:00Z
Appellate court sided with employee's (almost) 3-year-delayed FMLA claim
Back in October 2018, Laffon had a medical emergency and needed some time off under the federal Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA).
Her leave lasted until November 15. Ten days after she returned to work, on November 26, her employer terminated her.
She sued, arguing that the employer retaliated against her because of her FMLA leave.
The catch? She didn't bring the suit until almost three years later.
No link between leave and termination
In court, the employer argued that there was no causal link between Laffon taking FMLA leave and her termination. Although the court documents aren't robust, they do reveal that the employer indicated that Laffon's allegations didn't show that her taking FMLA leave was a factor in the decision to terminate her. The documents showed only that the termination chronologically followed her leave.
The court agreed with the employer. It also agreed that Laffon failed to allege a willful violation of the FMLA, which would allow her to benefit from the FMLA's three-year statute of limitations.
Laffon appealed the case to the Ninth Circuit.
Statute of limitations
Under the FMLA, employees have two years from the date of the last event constituting the alleged violation for which they can bring a claim.
Those two years are extended to three years if the employer's actions were "willful." This means that an employee must show that the employer either knew or showed reckless disregard for whether its conduct violated the FMLA.
Ruling overturned
Fast forward to August 2023, when the Ninth Circuit reversed the lower court's decision. It indicated that, based on Laffon's amended complaint and liberally construing the law, her allegations establish that her leave was causally connected to her termination and that the employer's action (her termination) was willful.
Glymph v. CT Corporation Systems, No. 22-35735, Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, August 22, 2023.
Key to remember: Terminating an employee soon after returning from FMLA leave is risky, unless there is a clear, well-documented, non-leave-related reason. Case documents did not show such a clear reason, which can also increase the risk of a willful finding. Employees have time to file claims, even years.
NewsIndustry NewsTrainingEmployee DevelopmentAssociate RelationsHR GeneralistOn-the-job TrainingIn-Depth ArticleUSAHR ManagementEnglishFocus AreaHuman Resources
2025-12-05T06:00:00Z
CEOs want more AI: What should HR do about it?
A recent survey from the Society for Human Resource Management (SHRM) found that artificial intelligence (AI) is on the minds of CEOs, who anticipate that technology will drive a need for upskilled and reskilled workers in 2026.
Figuring out how to meet this need is a challenge facing HR professionals, who have the opportunity to determine how to integrate new and necessary skills into their company’s workforce.
What CEOs expect
The CEO Priorities and Perspectives study from SHRM, released in early December, found that in 2026:
- 40 percent of CEOs are prioritizing the adoption of AI
- 56 percent identify technological advancements as a top macroeconomic challenge
- 54 percent identify adapting to technological advances as a top organizational challenge
- 87 percent anticipate a growing emphasis on collaboration tools
- 87 percent expect AI-driven upskilling and reskilling will be prevalent
What HR can do
To help their workplace capitalize on the improvements AI offers, HR professionals can:
Adopt an AI policy: A policy provides structure, letting employees know when and if it’s acceptable to use AI on the job. It also helps ensure your workforce is using AI in a legal, responsible, and ethical way.
Assess: Across the company, determine where your workers are at with AI. More workers in your company are likely using AI than they were last year, but adoption might not be uniform across your company. Be familiar with the AI tools being used and where AI skills are lacking.
Be future-ready: Bringing AI into the workplace may require a cultural shift. While some areas of the company may be eagerly adopting AI tools, others may not trust the technology. To create a sense of ownership, get input from workers on how AI could enhance their jobs.
Address the stress: Fear and uncertainty about how AI will impact their jobs may be ramping up employee anxiety and impacting mental health. Be open to answering questions and addressing concerns. Also raise awareness of your company’s resources for mental health support through posters, newsletters, and articles on the company intranet.
Upskill and reskill: Help employees adapt to new technologies by upskilling to expand their abilities with AI. Also consider how employees could reskill to prepare for a new role that uses AI. Offer training opportunities through classes, videos, or learning development platforms.
Make training meaningful: Offer opportunities for project-based learning. This could include developing a strategy for implementing AI in a certain role or process, or finding ways to increase a team’s AI skills and proficiency.
Use internal resources: Allow for collaboration across the company. Provide a way for employees to share information about how AI is being used in their areas. Use mentorships and peer support groups to give employees an opportunity to discuss successes, address roadblocks, and brainstorm new ways to use AI.
Key to remember: CEOs are looking for more ways to use AI, and HR professionals can help employees gain necessary skills.
NewsIndustry NewsAt-Will EmploymentSafety & HealthGeneral Industry SafetyTerminationHR GeneralistIn-Depth ArticleUSAHR ManagementEnglishTerminationFocus AreaHuman Resources
2024-08-28T05:00:00Z
When to skip a PIP and move to terminate an employee
The U.S. Bureau of Labor statistics reported in July 2024 that there are 8.2 million job openings in the U.S., but only 7.2 million unemployed workers.
With that in mind, employers might choose to hang onto employees even if they’re under performing. But what about when complaints are rolling in from different angles? Take, for example, a lackluster supervisor who’s annoying employees and disappointing customers.
An employer could be hesitant to let the supervisor go, especially if there’s no documentation backing up claims of misconduct. The employer must weigh their options to decide if putting the supervisor on a performance improvement plan (PIP) or moving right to termination is the ideal choice.
At-will employment
For starters, in most states employers may terminate an employee at-will, meaning they can fire employees for pretty much any reason as long as it doesn’t discriminate against someone in a protected class based on sex, age, race, religion, etc. Employers also cannot terminate in retaliation for an employee making a claim of harassment, discrimination, or safety concerns.
Aside from these limits, employers can terminate employees for good cause, bad cause, or no cause at all.
PIP or terminate
Deciding whether to put an employee on a PIP or terminate must be decided on a case-by-case basis.
A PIP is usually for job performance issues (hence, performance improvement plan). This could mean anything from not making enough sales to being inept at the job’s essential functions. If job performance doesn’t improve under the PIP, termination may be the end result depending on company policies and practices.
Even if an employee has job performance issues, the employer can terminate without going through the PIP process first, unless the usual process is to implement a PIP with employees who have had similar problems. In that case, not doing a PIP could be seen as discrimination against an employee, especially if the person falls into a protected class.
Workplace misconduct, however, is another situation altogether. This could be anything from a one-off poor joke to pervasive harassment. Snapping at customers or coworkers (or worse), for example, is a conduct issue. An employer could issue a warning or move right to termination if the behavior is clearly illegal or a serious threat to workplace safety.
| Read more: ezExplanation on discharging employees |
Termination tips
If an employer decides to terminate, they should treat the employee as respectfully as possible during the termination process. Also, an employer should carefully and clearly communicate the job-related reasons for the termination to avoid any hint of discrimination. Lastly, an employer should document the reasons and reiterate the steps taken leading up to the termination and keep those records handy in case the employee files a wrongful termination lawsuit.
Key to remember: Employers sometimes struggle when making termination decisions. Having a process in place and documenting steps along the way can help if a case lands in court.
NewsIndustry NewsHR PoliciesPolicies and ProceduresHR GeneralistIn-Depth ArticleUSAAssociate RelationsEnglishHR ManagementFocus AreaHuman Resources
2025-12-11T06:00:00Z
Has remote work killed the snow day?
When a business shuts down because of severe weather, it affects productivity and revenue. Conversely, staying open can put employees’ safety at risk.
The increase in remote work, however, may mean fewer employees calling out when they’re snowed in, mitigating both revenue loss and risk for employers.
Whether or not remote work is an option, employers should address concerns that can accompany bad weather in an inclement weather policy. The policy should include contingencies for both closing and remaining open during storms, as well as other disasters (natural or otherwise). It should specify if those who can’t make it in are expected to work remotely.
The policy can be in an employee handbook, but it’s also a good idea to provide employees with a reminder at the beginning of every severe weather season, or when severe conditions are forecast.
What to include in an inclement weather policy
For employees who always work from home: Specify that it’s business as usual unless the severe weather somehow impacts their ability to do their jobs remotely. For example, an employee who experiences a power outage at their remote location can’t be expected to work during the outage. Or, if coworkers and systems they depend on to do their jobs are affected by the storm, they may not be able to work.
For hybrid employees: If bad weather occurs on a day they were scheduled to come in, they should opt to work from home that day instead.
In-office employees able to work from home: Providing an option for telecommuting on bad weather days could help alleviate issues. Your policy should outline which employees are allowed to work from home if they feel it’s unsafe to travel to work, and which positions are essential, meaning they must report to the physical workplace. Those who are able to work from home must take their laptops and other necessary tools home with them every night to ensure they’re able to work from home should a storm blow in overnight.
Defining inclement weather: Your policy should indicate who decides whether to remain open, close early, or close all day. Provide this person with guidelines for what constitutes “inclement weather” in your area. It’s usually defined as weather that causes major disruption to transportation, businesses, and schools. While 3 inches of snow may shut down roads in Texas, it would not likely cause alarm in Minnesota.
Assessing liability risk: The decision maker should also understand the liability risks your company faces if it stays open during severe weather. For example, with the onset of winter, employers in northern climates can expect snow to occasionally create hazardous traveling conditions. While there are always exceptions to the rule, commuting to and from work — even in a blizzard — isn’t generally covered by workers’ compensation. Employers aren’t typically liable for accidents that may occur during an employee’s regular commute. However, employers can be liable for accidents, such as slips, trips, and falls, on company property caused by weather conditions. When evaluating whether to close, employers will want to consider their ability to provide a safe working environment (including parking lots and sidewalks) during inclement weather.
Notifying employees: The policy should clearly outline how closures will be communicated to employees. Companies might notify employees via email or text message or provide a telephone number for employees to hear a recorded message. Some companies also submit notices to the local radio and television stations to be included with school and community closures.
Paying employees: The obligation to pay employees during a shutdown depends on whether the employees are exempt (“salaried”) or nonexempt (“hourly”). Under federal law, for nonexempt employees, the answer is simple; they’re paid only for hours actually worked. If they don’t work because the business is closed or the employer sends them home early, they need not be paid (state laws may vary). They could, perhaps, use paid time off (i.e., PTO, vacation time, etc.) to cover an absence. Exempt employees must generally be paid their normal weekly salary, unless the business is closed, and no work is performed for a full workweek. Federal regulations prohibit salary deductions for exempt workers for days when work isn’t available, including weather closings. In most states, exempt employees could be required to use PTO.
Impact on morale: Staying open during hazardous weather could negatively impact employee morale. If schools are closed, parents will have an unexpected need for childcare, and poor driving conditions may result in more stressful commutes. It could also give employees the impression that you aren’t concerned about their safety and well-being.
Key to remember: Before the snow flies, make sure your inclement weather policy is ready. In addition to creating a policy, you might need to communicate with managers on how to address essential employees who choose not to report during inclement weather, even when the business remains open.
NewsIndustry NewsAssociate Benefits & CompensationAssociate RelationsHR GeneralistFamily and Medical Leave Act (FMLA)In-Depth ArticleFamily and Medical Leave Act (FMLA)HR ManagementEnglishFocus AreaHuman ResourcesUSA
2025-03-27T05:00:00Z
Who can fill out FMLA forms? The answer might surprise you
One of the most common questions involving the federal Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) that we see is: “Can ________ fill out the medical certification?”
This question stumps a lot of HR people and can be a little confusing.
It might be easier to start with who CAN’T fill out an FMLA certification. That includes your coworker, best friend, neighbor, or pet.
Jokes aside, often (but not always) a doctor fills out the FMLA certification, and since March 30 is “Doctors’ Day,” this is a great time to discuss this topic.
FMLA certification basics
Employers aren’t required to use certifications, but if they do, the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) has five different certification forms to use for various FMLA leave situations.
The forms are as follows:
- Certification of Health Care Provider for Employee's Serious Health Condition,
- Certification of Health Care Provider for Family Member's Serious Health Condition,
- Certification of Qualifying Exigency for Military Family Leave,
- Certification for Serious Injury or Illness of a Current Servicemember for Military Family Leave, and
- Certification for Serious Injury or Illness of a Veteran for Military Family Leave.
Let’s focus on the first two, as these are the most common ones HR administrators use.
Who can fill out an FMLA certification?
The FMLA regulations describe the person who has the authority to fill out a certification as a “health care provider.” The good news is, the regulations include a lengthy list of medical professionals who fit this role.
Under the FMLA, a health care provider includes:
- A doctor of medicine or osteopathy,
- A podiatrist,
- A dentist,
- A clinical psychologist,
- An optometrist,
- A chiropractor (limited to manual manipulation of the spine as demonstrated by X-ray),
- A nurse practitioner,
- A nurse midwife,
- A clinical social worker,
- A physician assistant,
- A Christian Science practitioner, and
- Any health care provider from whom the employer or the employer's group health plan's benefits manager will accept a medical certification to substantiate a claim for benefits.
To be qualified to fill out FMLA forms, medical professionals must be authorized to practice in the state and perform within the scope of their practice. This means that the provider must be authorized to diagnose and treat physical or mental health conditions.
What about doctors in a foreign country?
If an employee or an employee's family member is visiting another country, or a family member resides in another country, and a serious health condition develops, the employer must accept a medical certification from a health care provider who practices in that country. This includes second and third opinions.
If a medical certification from a foreign health care provider is not in English, the employee may be required to provide a written translation of the certification.
Key to remember: The FMLA regulations spell out which medical professionals can fill out certification forms.
NewsIndustry NewsHR GeneralistFamily and Medical Leave Act (FMLA)In-Depth ArticleFamily and Medical Leave Act (FMLA)HR ManagementEnglishFocus AreaHuman ResourcesUSA
2025-03-18T05:00:00Z
FMLA leave triggered? Employees don’t have to miss three days of work
Employees may take leave under the federal Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) for several reasons, and one of those reasons is to care for their own or a family member’s medical condition. There’s no list of qualifying medical conditions, so employers have to gather all the facts to see if FMLA applies.
FMLA-related medical conditions can be short- or long-term. Some employers believe that their FMLA obligations aren’t triggered unless and until an employee misses three days of work. That’s just not true in many situations, and here’s why.
The FMLA defines a serious health condition as an illness, injury, impairment, or physical or mental condition that involves inpatient care or continuing treatment by a health care provider.
Inpatient care explained
Inpatient care is an overnight stay in a health care facility. If the employee or family member had an overnight stay, it’s an FMLA serious health condition regardless of how many days of work the employee missed.
If the employee or family member did not have an overnight stay, employers move on to the continuing treatment part of the definition.
Continuing treatment defined
A serious health condition involving continuing treatment includes the following:
- A period of incapacity of more than three, consecutive, full calendar days, and any subsequent treatment that also involves:
- Treatment two or more times within 30 days of the first day of incapacity by a health care provider, or
- Treatment at least once, resulting in a regimen of continuing treatment.
- Any period of incapacity due to pregnancy or for prenatal care.
- Any period of incapacity (or treatment for) a chronic serious health condition requiring treatments at least twice per year and continuing over an extended period of time. These may cause episodic rather than continuing periods of incapacity.
- A period of incapacity for a permanent or long-term condition in which treatment may not be effective.
- Any period of absence to receive multiple treatments (i.e., chemotherapy, radiation, physical therapy, dialysis), for restorative surgery, or for a condition that would likely result in a period of incapacity of more than three consecutive, full, calendar days if treatment isn’t received.
Not all parts of the definition above will apply to a particular situation. The only part of the continuing treatment segment that involves three days, for example, falls under the first bullet. For all the other parts, any period of incapacity would be FMLA leave. An employee doesn’t need to miss three days of work.
Focus on incapacity not absence when applying FMLA leave
The period of more than three days applies to how long the individual is incapacitated, not how many days of work the employee missed. If, for example, an employee who normally works Monday through Friday suffers a serious health condition on Friday evening and is incapacitated until Wednesday, the period of incapacity is more than three days. The employee missed only two days of work, but those two days would be FMLA leave.
Failure to designate an absence as FMLA leave when it is called for risks a claim that the employer interfered with the employee’s FMLA rights.
Key to remember: Employees don’t have to miss three days of work to trigger an employer’s FMLA obligations.
Most Popular Highlights In Safety & Health
NewsIndustry NewsSafety and Health Programs and TrainingSafety & HealthConstruction SafetyGeneral Industry SafetySafety and Health Programs and TrainingIn-Depth ArticleEnglishFocus AreaUSA
2025-12-04T06:00:00Z
Making safety stick: Seven steps for supervisors
Safety professionals know that building a strong safety culture is more than just repeating slogans like “stay safe out there.” Sustainable safety happens when it’s woven into the daily routines and attitudes of every worker.
Supervisors play a critical role in this process and bridge the gap between high-level safety goals and what actually happens on the job site. To make safety stick, supervisors must turn broad initiatives into clear, practical actions that workers can see, understand, and follow every day.
1. Start with inclusion
One of the most effective ways to build a safety culture is to involve front-line workers from the beginning. When workers participate in hazard assessments or help pilot new safety initiatives, they’re more likely to take ownership. This sense of ownership makes safety feel like something they control, not just something imposed from above.
For example, a manufacturing supervisor might invite experienced machine operators to help evaluate a new lockout/tagout procedure. Their insights can improve the process and ensure it’s realistic for daily use.
Actionable step:
- Invite workers to join hazard assessments and pilot programs.
- Ask for feedback on new procedures before rolling them out.
2. Define specific behaviors
Vague goals like “improve safety culture” don’t necessarily resonate with workers. Instead, break initiatives into specific, observable actions. If the goal is to reduce slips and falls, define behaviors such as “wipe up spills immediately” or “wear slip-resistant footwear in wet zones.” These clear expectations help workers know exactly what’s required.
Actionable step:
- List out specific behaviors for each safety goal.
- Communicate these behavioral expectations clearly to all team members.
3. Communicate simply and visually
Safety messages should be easy to understand and remember. Use plain language and visuals such as posters, infographics, and short videos to reinforce key points.
For instance, a warehouse might display a visual checklist near the loading dock showing proper lifting techniques and PPE requirements. This keeps safety top-of-mind without overwhelming workers with too much reading required.
Actionable step:
- Use posters and infographics, especially in high-traffic or high-hazard areas.
- Share short videos or visual guides during meetings.
4. Integrate safety into daily routines
Repetition builds habits. Supervisors should weave safety into daily routines through shift huddles, toolbox talks, and pre-task checklists.
As an example, a construction supervisor might start each morning with a five-minute safety briefing, highlighting potential hazards for the day and encouraging questions. These micro-interactions reinforce safety as a shared responsibility.
Actionable step:
- Begin each shift with a brief safety talk.
- Use checklists before starting tasks.
5. Recognize and reward safe behavior
Positive reinforcement is a powerful motivator. Recognize workers who consistently follow safety rules or report hazards. This could be as simple as a shout-out during a team meeting or a small reward like a gift card or company swag. When workers see that safety is valued, they’re more likely to prioritize it.
Actionable step:
- Publicly acknowledge safe behavior.
- Offer small rewards for safety milestones.
6. Provide hands-on training
People learn best by doing. Offer hands-on training that simulates real scenarios. For example, a manufacturing plant might run spill response drills where workers practice containment and cleanup procedures. This experience builds confidence and ensures workers are prepared when it counts.
Actionable step:
- Schedule regular drills and hands-on training sessions.
- Use realistic scenarios to reinforce learning.
7. Make reporting easy and safe
Workers won’t report hazards if the process is complicated or if they fear retaliation. Provide simple, anonymous reporting tools such as mobile apps, paper forms, or even an anonymous drop box. Most importantly, act on reports and communicate what’s been done or not done. Closing the loop shows workers that their voices matter.
Actionable step:
- Set up easy-to-use reporting systems.
- Follow up on reports and share outcomes with the team.
Key to remember: Make safety stick by turning it into something simple and actionable. Empower your team by listening, teaching, and rewarding safe choices. When people feel involved and valued, safety becomes a natural part of the job and a shared responsibility.
NewsIndustry NewsEnforcement and Audits - OSHASafety & HealthGeneral Industry SafetyIn-Depth ArticleOSHA Violations and PenaltiesEnglishFocus AreaUSA
2025-12-03T06:00:00Z
Under 100 employees? Top 10 OSHA pitfalls for non-construction
If you’re a smaller-size, non-construction employer, you know you have OSHA requirements. Yet, you may not have a team of safety professionals to ensure you stay on track. The good news is you have one trick up your sleeve! You can see where the peers in your size bracket went wrong. Reviewing the top 10 OSHA violations for your size may help you to tackle some of your bigger OSHA obligations. It will also give you an edge in an OSHA inspection if you can get “up to code” with these major standards.
Each year, OSHA identifies frequently cited standards for the previous fiscal year. While these violations can lead to costly penalties, they also reveal gaps in safety and health training, inspections, written safety plans, signs/labels, and other duties. Our table shows the top 10 non-construction violations in fiscal year 2025 for employers with fewer than 100 employees, as well as the three industries that violated them the most. (Data reflect October 2024 through September 2025.)
| Rank | OSHA requirement | Top 3 violators |
| 1 | 1910.1200 - Hazard communication (HazCom) |
|
| 2 | 1910.134 – Respiratory protection |
|
| 3 | 1910.178 – Powered industrial trucks |
|
| 4 | 1910.147 – The control of hazardous energy (lockout/tagout) |
|
| 5 | 1910.212 – Machine guarding |
|
| 6 | 1903.19 – Abatement verification |
|
| 7 | 1910.303 – Electrical – General |
|
| 8 | 1910.132 – Personal protective equipment (PPE) – General requirements |
|
| 9 | 1910.305 – Electrical – Wiring methods, components, and equipment for general use |
|
| 10 | Section 5(a) of OSH Act – General Duty Clause |
|
Breaking it down
The HazCom standard rose to first place on our list of violations for non-construction employers with less than 100 employees. HazCom is about the employees’ right to understand the hazardous chemicals they are exposed to at work. That standard was followed by the Respiratory Protection and Powered Industrial Trucks standards. Three industries dominated the violations for all three — fabricated metal product manufacturing, repair and maintenance, and non-metallic mineral product manufacturing.
Citations in our top 10 were heavily concentrated in manufacturing industries, perhaps not surprising as these work environments can present a wide range of hazards such as chemicals, moving machinery and equipment, and temperature extremes. However, don’t let that fool you! Any general industry employer could be slapped with the violations in our list, if applicable. Don’t forget that OSHA can use the General Duty Clause (our number 10 violation on the list) to cite serious, recognized hazards for which no regulatory standard exists, such as heat, ergonomics, workplace violence, and unanchored metal racks.
Interestingly, food manufacturers were roped in the top three violators for lockout/tagout and electrical citations. Because employees in this industry may perform equipment maintenance or otherwise be exposed to hazards during this maintenance, lockout/tagout covers these activities. OSHA’s electrical standards are designed to protect employees exposed to dangers such as electric shock and electrocution. Section 1910.303 applies to the examination, installation, and use of electrical equipment, particularly the safety of equipment like appropriate markings, space around equipment, and guarding of live parts. Red flags for OSHA compliance officers are blocked electrical panels, missing markings on electrical panels, and improper use of PPE. Section 1910.305 applies to grounding; temporary wiring; cable trays, boxes, and fittings; switches and panelboards; enclosures for damp or wet location; insulation; and flexible cords and cables. OSHA will look for things like burned electrical outlets, damaged extension cords, and lack of training for employees doing electrical work.
Number six on the list, abatement verification, was a surprise. Under 1903.19, “abatement” means action by an employer to comply with a cited standard or regulation or to eliminate a recognized hazard identified by OSHA during an inspection. OSHA sets a date for hazards to be corrected, and employers must:
- Certify and document that the hazards are corrected;
- Submit an abatement plan and/or a progress report, in some cases; and
- Inform affected employees and their representative(s) about abatement activities by posting a copy of each document submitted to OSHA or a summary of the document near the place where the violation occurred.
Failure to abate a cited hazard can cost you $16,550 per day beyond the abatement date, up to 30 days. That amounts to almost $500,000 per citation in addition to the original penalty amount!
Key to remember: Although the top violators in our list were concentrated in manufacturing in fiscal year 2025, all small, non-construction employers who fall under OSHA jurisdiction can use the top 10 table to strengthen their safety programs, protect their workforce, and reduce their chances of a citation.
NewsIndustry NewsSafety & HealthGeneral Industry SafetyFire Protection and PreventionIn-Depth ArticleEnglishFire Protection and PreventionFocus AreaUSA
2022-08-29T05:00:00Z
Don’t prop open fire doors on your jobsite
Propping open fire doors is a common violation
Each year, the National Fire Protection Agency (NFPA) reminds employers not to prop open fire doors for convenience. Propping open doors has become a common violation of fire codes after the pandemic because workers didn’t want to become exposed to germs on common touchpoints.
I know firsthand this is an issue at construction jobsites and remember telling workers not to prop open fire doors in our clients’ facilities. Workers were doing this out of convenience because they carried things into and out of the existing facility. Propping open a fire door, or wedging it open, are serious fire and safety hazards. Keep fire doors closed to prevent smoke and fire from spreading into the fire evacuation route, like a stairwell. OSHA and NFPA don’t prohibit propping open a fire exit door but caution employers against doing this for safety and security reasons.
Fire doors must remain closed, although some may be designed to automatically close when fire and smoke are sensed by jobsite fire detection equipment. To reduce the need to disinfect frequently touched points, workers can push open fire doors using their sleeves by pushing against the push bar instead of using their hands. You can also increase housekeeping efforts and the frequency that doorknobs, handles, and push bars are cleaned throughout the shift.
NewsIndustry NewsSafety & HealthGeneral Industry SafetyFire Protection and PreventionIn-Depth ArticleFire ExtinguishersEnglishFocus AreaUSA
2022-07-13T05:00:00Z
The portable fire extinguisher triad — defining “readibly accessible”
A portable fire extinguisher provides zero benefit if the employee can’t access it. To counter this, OSHA created requirements relating to fire extinguisher placement based on travel distance between the employee and the fire extinguisher. This distance will vary depending on the type of fire.
Note that local ordinances or insurance agency expectations may be more stringent. The OSHA requirements described here apply only if the employer provides extinguishers for employee use.
OSHA specifies in 1910.157(c)(1) that employers provide portable fire extinguishers and mount, locate, and identify them so that they are readily accessible to employees. While lacking a formal definition, the term “readily accessible” typically means immediately available and within normal paths of travel. To help fill in the gaps regarding mounting, locating, and identifying, the National Fire Protection Agency (NFPA) offers additional guidance.
Mounting
Depending on the type and size, portable fire extinguishers should be mounted on brackets or in wall cabinets to prevent them from being moved or damaged. Those with a gross weight of 40 pounds or less should be mounted with their carrying handles no higher than 5 feet from the floor. Any fire extinguishers over 40 pounds need to be mounted with their carrying handles no more than 3 ½ feet from the floor. All portable fire extinguishers need to have at least 4 inches of clearance between their bottoms and the floor.
Locating
You can usually find portable fire extinguishers in offices, hallways, storage areas, meeting rooms, kitchens, mechanical/electrical rooms, and near exit doors. The fire extinguisher must be positioned based on the potential type and size of fire that can occur.
- Class A (combustible material fire) – OSHA requires access to an extinguisher within 75 feet of travel distance. NFPA recommends one extinguisher for every 3,000 square feet.
- Class B (flammable liquid fire) – OSHA requires access within 50 feet. NFPA identifies different sizes of extinguishers and variable spacing depending on the hazards present. This varies from low hazard requiring a 5-B extinguisher every 30 feet to a high hazard requiring an 80-B extinguisher every 50 feet.
- Class C (electronic equipment fire) – extinguisher size and spacing is based on its Class A or B hazard.
- Class D (combustible metal fire) – OSHA requires access within 75 feet from the hazard.
- Class K (cooking media fire) – OSHA requires access within 30 feet from the hazard.
Identifying
While not specified in the OSHA standard, NFPA does mention that in areas where fire extinguishers aren’t visible due to obstructions, signs or other means must be provided to indicate the extinguisher location. It is seen as a best practice, especially when extinguishers are stored in a cabinet, to mount a sign near the extinguisher to identify its location.
By looking further into the regulations and NFPA guidance, employers can assure that extinguishers are available in a way that is compliant with OSHA requirements, are available if a fire occurs and those extinguishers are needed immediately.
NewsIndustry NewsEnforcement and Audits - OSHAHead ProtectionPersonal Protective EquipmentSafety & HealthConstruction SafetyGeneral Industry SafetyIn-Depth ArticleEnglishFocus AreaPersonal Protective EquipmentUSA
2024-04-03T05:00:00Z
Does OSHA suddenly require “helmets” now instead of hard hats?
Ever since OSHA published its Trade Release on December 11, 2023, people have been scratching their heads about the “new” PPE requirement.
But here’s the thing. There isn’t a new requirement for “helmets” instead of hard hats.
So where’s the confusion? And what is actually required?
OSHA’s announcement on helmets vs. hard hats
OSHA released a Safety and Health Bulletin (SHIB 11-22-2023) on November 22, 2023, detailing the key differences and benefits of using modern safety helmets over traditional hard hats.
And just a few weeks later, in the December 11, 2023 Trade Release, the Agency announced it would now require its inspectors to wear Type II head protection, which is also commonly referred to as safety helmets.
The two main benefits of Type II safety helmets
The November 22, 2023 SHIB discussed two main benefits of choosing modern safety helmets over traditional hard hats -- the construction of materials and the use of chinstraps.
| Construction of Materials: | The SHIB first explained that one of the benefits of safety helmets lies in their construction materials. While hard hats are made from hard plastics, safety helmets incorporate a combination of materials, including lightweight composites, fiberglass, and advanced thermoplastics. Such materials can help enhance the impact resistance of the helmets but also include the added benefit of reducing the overall weight of the helmet. This reduces neck strain and improves comfort during extended use. |
| Use of Chinstraps: | The SHIB also discussed the potential benefits of chinstraps used in conjunction with Type II safety helmets. The general idea here is that chinstraps can be helpful in maintaining the position of the safety helmet and protecting the worker’s head in the event of a slip, trip, or fall. According to data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, head injuries accounted for nearly 6% of non-fatal occupational injuries involving days away from work. About 20% of those were caused by slips, trips, and falls. |
And while OSHA has recognized the benefits of Type II safety helmets, and is actively taking steps to protect its own employees, it’s important to understand that there is not a new requirement for employers to make the switch to safety helmets.
That being said, a growing number of employers have recognized the benefits of added head protection and are choosing to use Type II helmets for their workers. In addition, some clients are starting to contractually require their construction contractors to make the switch as well.
Understanding the different types of head protection
Hard hats will have a Type I or Type II rating on the manufacturer’s sticker. These markings are based on ANSI Z89.1’s impact ratings.
Type I hard hats protect from objects or impacts from the top center area of the hard hat and are often used in work areas with no lateral head impact hazards.
Type II hard hats, on the other hand, offers protection from both top and lateral impacts and objects and is often found on construction job sites or complex general industry settings where workers face multiple head contact exposures.
Hard hats are classified based on their level of voltage protection. See the chart below.
| Class G – (General) low voltage protection. Class E – (Electrical) high voltage protection. Class C – (Conductive) no voltage protection. |
Choosing the right head protection for your employees
Employers should conduct a job hazard analysis and/or a PPE assessment to determine which style hard hat is best for their workers. In general, OSHA recommends the use of Type II safety helmets at the following locations:
1. Construction Sites: For construction sites, especially those with high risks of falling objects and debris, impacts from equipment, or slips, trips, and falls, safety helmets have enhanced impact resistance and additional features that offer superior protection compared to the components and construction of traditional hard hats.
2. Oil and Gas Industry: In these sectors where workers face multiple hazards, including potential exposure to chemicals and severe impacts, safety helmets with additional features can provide comprehensive protection.
3. Working from Heights: For tasks or jobs that involve working from heights, safety helmets offer protection of the entire head and include features that prevent the safety helmet from falling off.
4. Electrical Work: For tasks involving electrical work or proximity to electrical hazards, safety helmets with non-conductive materials (Class G and Class E) provide protection to prevent electrical shocks. However, some traditional hard hats also offer electrical protection.
5. High-Temperature Environments: In high temperatures or where there is exposure to molten materials, safety helmets with advanced heat-resistant properties can provide additional protection to workers.
Key to remember: While there isn’t a new requirement for safety helmets, employers should review their workplace hazards to determine which style of hard hat will best protect their employees.
NewsIn-Depth ArticleSanitationEnglishIndustry NewsSafety & HealthConstruction SafetyGeneral Industry SafetyAgriculture SafetyMaritime SafetySanitationRestroomsHandwashingFocus AreaFleet OperationsMine SafetyTransportationUSA
2023-03-21T05:00:00Z
Is your bathroom water going to get you into hot water with OSHA?
One of the ways OSHA requires employers to ensure a safe and healthful workplace is by providing access to sanitary water for drinking and handwashing. The sanitation standard, 1910.141, is intended to protect workers from adverse health effects caused by unsanitary toilets facilities, a lack of available restroom facilities when needed, and unavailable or contaminated potable water. So, are your facilities and bathroom water going to get you into hot water with OSHA?
Learning from others
In August 2022, OSHA responded to an allegation that the U.S. Postal Service (USPS) was not providing potable water to one of its facilities, nor was there an operating bathroom for workers.
OSHA inspectors discovered that the USPS had not paid water and sanitation bills dating back to February 2022. As a result, in July 2022, the water supply was shut off and was not returned to service until the day after OSHA’s inspection.
It was determined that an employee was required to work at the facility without running water or a usable bathroom for more than a month. The investigation resulted in $13,840 in proposed penalties and serves as a great reminder for others.
Regulatory requirements
OSHA’s sanitation standard applies to all places of employment and requires the following:
- All places of employment shall be kept clean to the extent that the nature of the work allows. 1910.141(a)(3)(i)
- Every workroom floor shall be maintained, as far as practicable, in a dry condition. Where practical, waterproof footgear shall be provided. 1910.141(a)(3)(ii)
- Every floor, working place, and passageway shall be kept free from protruding nails, splinters, loose boards, and unnecessary holes and openings. 1910.141(a)(3)(iii)
- Any receptacle used for putrescible solid or liquid waste or refuse shall be leak-proof and must be thoroughly cleaned and maintained in a sanitary condition. 1910.141(a)(4)(i)
- All sweepings, solid or liquid wastes, refuse, and garbage shall be removed in such a manner as to avoid creating a menace to health and as often as necessary to maintain a sanitary workplace. 1910.141(a)(4)(ii)
- Every enclosed workplace shall be constructed, equipped, and maintained, as far as reasonably practicable, as to prevent the entrance or harborage of rodents, insects, and other vermin. A continuing and effective extermination program shall be instituted where their presence is detected. 1910.141(a)(5)
- Potable water shall be provided in all places of employment, for drinking, washing of the person, cooking, washing of foods, washing of cooking or eating utensils, washing of food preparation or processing premises, and personal service rooms. 1910.141(b)(1)(i)
- Portable drinking water dispensers shall be designed, constructed, and serviced so that sanitary conditions are maintained, shall be capable of being closed, and shall be equipped with a tap. 1910.141(b)(1)(iii)
- Except as otherwise indicated in 1910.141(c)(1)(i), toilet facilities, in toilet rooms separate for each sex, shall be provided in all places of employment in accordance with regulations. 1910.141(c)(1)(i) (NOTE: The toilet facility requirements of paragraph (c)(1)(i) do not apply to mobile crews or to normally unattended work locations so long as employees working at these locations have transportation immediately available to nearby toilet facilities which meet the other requirements of the regulation.)
- Lavatories shall be made available in all places of employment. They must also have hot and cold (or tepid) running water, hand soap, and hand towels or blowers provided. 1910.141(d)(2)
Keys to remember
OSHA’s sanitation standard, 1910.141, requires all employers to provide workers with access to clean drinking water, properly functioning restrooms, and sanitary working conditions.
Saved to my EVENT CALENDAR!
View your saved links by clicking the arrow next to your profile picture located in the header. Then, click “My Activity” to view the Event Calendar on your Activity page.
OK
J. J. Keller is the trusted source for DOT / Transportation, OSHA / Workplace Safety, Human Resources, Construction Safety and Hazmat / Hazardous Materials regulation compliance products and services. J. J. Keller helps you increase safety awareness, reduce risk, follow best practices, improve safety training, and stay current with changing regulations.
Copyright 2025 J. J. Keller & Associate, Inc. For re-use options please contact copyright@jjkeller.com or call 800-558-5011.















































