Paid military leave - Employer policies can inadvertently require it
The federal Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act (USERRA) entitles employees to job-protected leave for military duty. The law does not, however, dictate that employers pay employees during the leave.
USERRA requires employers to give the same rights and benefits (i.e., terms, conditions, and privileges of employment) to employees on military leave as they do for employees on comparable non-military leave.
Employer policies and practices, therefore, can wind up requiring employers to pay employees while on such leave. Since military leave can last years, employers might want to ensure their policies do not require such pay. The following case explains why.
The claim
A handful of police officers also served as military reservists. Over about 20 years, they were summoned to active duty a combined total of 13 times.
The employer offered various employee benefits, two of which were pertinent to the case.
- The employer allowed employees to accrue different types of leave and convert their accrued leave to compensation.
- The employer gave employees 12 paid holidays each year, equal to eight hours of pay per holiday.
The policies
To qualify for these benefits, employees had to be on “paid status.” Employees were on paid status when they were on the payroll or using paid administrative leave. Usually, the paid administrative leave was short, but three officers took administrative leave for an average of 16 months each.
The employer also provided 168 hours of paid military leave annually. During those hours, military employees:
- Remained on paid status,
- Continued to accrue benefits, and
- Earned holiday pay.
Once employees on military leave exhausted those hours, however, they converted to unpaid status.
While they were on military leave, the employer did not give the officers the same holiday pay and accrued benefits that it gave employees who were on paid administrative leave.
The suit
This disparity in pay and benefits prompted the officers to sue the employer under the USERRA.
The employer argued that military leave was not similar to administrative leave, and the officers were not similar to other employees. The officers, said the employer, were on unpaid status.
But USERRA regulations indicate that benefits are not dependent on how the employer characterizes the employee’s status during military leave. While on military leave, employers must give employees the most favorable treatment they give to non-military employees on any “comparable form of leave.”
The decision
The court sided with the employees, ruling that officers on military leave were comparable to other employees, and the administrative leave was comparable to the military leave. Therefore, the employer violated the USERRA by not providing the officers the same benefits while on military leave that it afforded similar employees on paid administrative leave.
The court pointed out that the USERRA looks at three criteria to determine if leave is similar:
- The duration of the leave (the employer applied administrative leave to employees who took many months off similar to military leave),
- The purpose of the leave (both leaves protected employees from hardship), and
- The ability of employees to choose when to take the leave (employees could not choose the timing of either form of leave).
Due to the employer’s policy and practice regarding paid administrative leave, the court said, the military leave was comparable and had to have comparable benefits.
Key to remember: This is not the first case to find an employer’s policy led to paid military leave. Employers need to ensure their policies regarding paid leave are not comparable to military leave in terms of eligible employees, leave length, and qualifying reason.
Myrick v. City of Hoover, Alabama, 11th Circuit Court of Appeals, No. 22-11621, June 8, 2023.