EPA plans to use discretion for enforcement of violations resulting from COVID-19
EPA has developed a temporary enforcement policy to address environmental noncompliance resulting from regulated entities’ shortage of workers during the COVID-19 pandemic. The policy, which applies retroactively beginning on March 13, 2020, does not apply to any criminal violations, Superfund actions, RCRA corrective actions, or to imports, especially imported pesticides that claim to address COVID-19 impacts.
During this time, EPA says it expects to focus its resources on situations that may create an acute risk or imminent threat to public health or the environment. In addition, the policy does not remove the requirement for entities to prevent, respond to, or report accidental releases of oil, hazardous substances, hazardous chemicals, hazardous waste, or other pollutants as required by federal law.
Authorized states or tribes may take a different enforcement approach, but EPA encourages them to think about the health and safety of their inspectors and facility personnel when making decisions about conducting routine inspections. EPA says it will take the pandemic into consideration in any review of a state compliance and enforcement program.
EPA’s enforcement discretion policy of civil violations
EPA expects all regulated entities to make every effort to comply with their environmental compliance obligations. If compliance is not “reasonably practicable,” regulated entities should:
- Act responsibly under the circumstances in order to minimize the effects and duration of any noncompliance caused by COVID-19;
- Identify the specific nature and dates of the noncompliance;
- Identify how COVID-19 was the cause of the noncompliance, and the decisions and actions taken in response (including best efforts to comply and steps taken to come into compliance as soon as possible);
- Return to compliance as soon as possible; and
- Document the information, action, or conditions listed above.
Routine monitoring and reporting: EPA says it “does not expect to seek penalties for violations of routine compliance monitoring, integrity testing, sampling, laboratory analysis, training, and reporting or certification obligations in situations where the EPA agrees that COVID-19 was the cause of the noncompliance and the entity provides supporting documentation to the EPA upon request.” However, when the crisis is over, the agency expects “full compliance going forward.” EPA will not ask facilities to “catch-up” with any missed monitoring or reporting if the time frame is less than three months. For other monitoring or reporting, such as those required on an annual or bi-annual basis, EPA will expect facilities to take “reasonable measures” to resume compliance activities, including conducting late monitoring or submitting late reports.
Training: EPA points out that many training classes are offered online, meaning training can be conducted during social distancing. Further, EPA believes it is more important to keep experienced, trained operators on the job, even if a training or certification is missed due to the pandemic.
Facility operations: EPA is adamant that all regulated entities continue to manage and operate their facilities in a manner that is safe and that protect the public and the environment. Facilities should immediately contact EPA or their state authorities if the impact of the pandemic on the facility may create a danger to human health or the environment.
Public water systems regulated under the Safe Drinking Water Act: Because unsafe drinking water can lead to serious illnesses, EPA says it has “heightened expectations for public water systems.” These systems must operate as normal and continue their required maintenance and samplings. Laboratories servicing these systems must continue to provide timely analysis and results. Should there be worker shortages as a result of the virus, EPA lists its priorities for this sector.