Applicants (not just employees) have FMLA protections
The company was happy to have as many applicants as it did for its open position, given the tight labor market.
One applicant, Carlos, rose to the top of the candidate list quickly. He had the appropriate education, required certifications, and many years of applicable experience. Even though during his interview Carlos said that his previous employer had terminated him, the company still ranked him as one of the top-rated candidates for the position.
From there, the company proceeded to do background checks on the leading candidates. It also reviewed employment references and other information.
The company learned that Carlos had an on-going lawsuit with his most recent employer, in part to enforce his rights under the federal Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA). In light of this information, those making the hiring decision decided that it would not be in the company’s best interest to offer Carlos the position.
Oops.
Carlos could file a claim against the prospective employer, alleging interference and retaliation on the grounds that the company didn’t hire him because he had filed an FMLA lawsuit against a prior employer.
In such situations, the FMLA can protect applicants. Any employer that interferes with, denies, or retaliates against an individual (applicant or employee) based on the exercising FMLA rights is liable for damages.
Interference and retaliation claims include situations in which an employer discriminates against a prospective employee for exercising FMLA rights, or against an applicant or employee for opposing practices that are unlawful under the FMLA. If an applicant took FMLA leave in the past, employers should not hold it against them.
An FMLA discrimination or retaliation claim requires proof of an employer’s ill will to discriminate or retaliate against an applicant.
If, for example, one of the hiring decision makers told Carlos that the company didn’t hire him because of the FMLA lawsuit, he could testify to that in court. A judge could see this as direct evidence of discrimination based on the exercise of his FMLA rights. While it might seem illogical for a decision maker to share such information with Carlos, it has been known to happen.
Key to remember: Applicants (and employees) have FMLA rights. Employers may not use the taking of FMLA leave or exercising FMLA rights as a reason to take a negative employment action. This includes not hiring a candidate.