Thinking of not hiring someone who filed an FMLA claim? Think again.
The company was happy to see a record number of applicants, and Carlos rose to the top of the candidate pile rather quickly. He had the appropriate education, certifications, and years of experience. Even though, during his interview, he said that he had been terminated from his last position, the company still ranked Carlos as one of the top candidates for the open position.
From there, the company proceeded to perform background checks on the top candidates. From Carlos’ most recent employer, the company learned that he had an ongoing lawsuit regarding the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA). Since the company believed only employees have FMLA rights and protections, in light of this information about Carlos’ case, company leaders decided that it would not be in the company’s best interest to offer him the position.
Uh oh.
Carlos could file a claim against the prospective employer, alleging interference and retaliation on the grounds that the company chose not to hire him because he had filed an FMLA lawsuit against a prior employer.
In such situations, applicants can be protected by the FMLA.
Under the FMLA, any employer that:
- Interferes with,
- Denies, or
- Retaliates against
people for exercising their FMLA rights violates the law and is liable for damages.
This interference and retaliation include acts of discrimination by an employer against a perspective employee because that applicant exercised FMLA rights or opposed practices that are unlawful under the FMLA.
An FMLA claim in a case like this requires proof that an employer’s actions were motivated by prohibited discriminatory or retaliatory behaviors, including those under the FMLA.
If evidence could show, for example, that one of the hiring decision makers told Carlos that the FMLA lawsuit was the reason he was not hired, this could be seen as direct evidence of discrimination based on the exercise of FMLA rights. Other evidence could also point to illegal discrimination, but as usual, much would depend upon all the facts.
The bottom line is job applicants — not just employees — have FMLA rights. Employers may not discriminate against someone who took FMLA leave (or exercised FMLA rights) as a reason for negative employment action, including not hiring a job candidate.
Key to remember: While only employees may take FMLA leave, job applicants also have some FMLA protections. Employers that deny a job to someone who has filed an FMLA claim in the past could end up having an FMLA claim filed against them.