What’s OT got to do with FMLA violations?
The short answer to the question is, if you violate the federal Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA), you could end up paying damages for overtime (OT) an employee missed.
The FMLA states that employees may be awarded “any wages, salary, employment benefits, or other compensation denied or lost to the employee by reason of the [FMLA] violation.” (825.400)
This also likely includes the amount of overtime the employee would have earned during the period of time involving the FMLA violation. If employers violate the FMLA by denying leave, a whole new set of damages beyond overtime can be involved.
The federal Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) requires employers to pay overtime to nonexempt (“hourly”) employees if they work more than 40 hours per week.
A 2012 case out of the First Circuit Court of Appeals can help guide employers today when trying to balance the FMLA and FLSA requirements.
The case
While at work, Juan began to experience chest pains, heart palpitations, and sweating. Later that day, his symptoms worsened, and he went to the emergency room. His wife came to the hospital and Juan asked her to contact Edwin, a company manager, and tell Edwin about the situation and that he did not know when he could return to work.
Juan had cardiac surgery, spent a week in the hospital, and took another week off to recover. After the leave, however, he was fired even though he kept his employer apprised of his situation and provided a certification.
Edwin, however, claimed that Juan’s situation was not communicated to him. After talking to a supervisor and corporate legal counsel, on May 19, Edwin crafted a letter to Juan, saying that he had not heard from Juan and had no explanation for his absence. The letter asked Juan to contact company management to determine his eligibility for disability leave and stated that if he did not do so within 48 hours there might be “negative consequences for [his] job.” Edwin did not, however, mail the letter until sometime on or after May 23.
Juan did not receive the letter until May 28, long after the expiration of the 48-hour deadline. Edwin did not try to contact Juan in any other way.
On May 23, Edwin and other company managers decided to fire Juan for job abandonment.
Juan sued and argued that a backpay award should include overtime compensation.
The verdict
The jury found in favor of Juan, awarding him $100,000 in damages, which was reduced to $47,145 to match Juan’s estimated lost wages (including $20,637 in overtime) and account for earnings at a new job.
The employer tried to eliminate or reduce the overtime pay included in the damages award, arguing that back pay for overtime is not available under the FMLA. The court disagreed with the employer.
Calculating overtime liability
The court calculated the amount of overtime pay that Juan was due by estimating that he would have worked 6.5 hours of overtime per week over the 125-week period between his termination and the judgment.
It obtained the 6.5 hours per week figure by looking at the year-to-date average of Juan’s weekly hours during the months prior to his termination, which was 46.5 hours.
Pagan-Colon, et al v. Walgreens of San Patricio, No 11-1089, First Circuit Court of Appeals, September 4, 2012.
Key to remember: Violating the FMLA can result in damages that can be unexpected, including overtime pay an employee missed during the violation.