Enforcement Focus
A look at where regulators are focusing their environmental efforts
Enforcement action and monetary penalties are unfortunately common in environmental programs and prove costly to companies. Beyond the penalty assessed, companies often spend even more improving processes to prevent recurrence. This section shares some of the headlines and presents take-away lessons. What happened and how do you avoid the same situation?
Air
Through a consent agreement with EPA, an aluminum processing plant in Minnesota will be paying a hefty penalty as well as having to invest more than a million dollars in equipment upgrades. The facility had several Clean Air Act violations identified by the federal agency in 2020, including: Furnace stack emissions exceeding allowable limits, A dryer vent system with incorrect seals, and Inadequate monitoring of a baghouse lime injection system.
Enforcement action: $110,000 civil penalty
Lessons learned: Along with pollution control equipment being installed, must come maintenance and inspections plans to ensure operational efficiency.
Hazardous waste
EPA and a chemical manufacturer in Pennsylvania have reached a settlement for a number of RCRA violations. The company was found to be storing hazardous waste for more than 90 days without a permit, had not properly marked hazardous waste containers, failed to keep hazardous waste containers closed, had not made waste determinations, and did not provide annual RCRA training. The settlement reflects the company’s efforts to resolve the violations and their cooperation with EPA during the investigation.
Enforcement action: $44,880 civil penalty
Lessons learned: Working with EPA and quickly resolving compliance issues can result in a reduced monetary penalty, even when several violations are found.
Risk Management Program
A manufacturing facility in Illinois reached a final consent agreement and penalty stemming from non-compliances found during a 2018 EPA inspection. The inspection cited multiple violations of the Risk Management Program. Specifically, EPA found that the company had failed to develop written operating procedures, had not implemented a mechanical integrity program, did not have an emergency response program, and was not meeting record-keeping requirements.
Enforcement action: $$527,144 civil penalty
Lessons learned: The Risk Management Program includes numerous specific recordkeeping elements, each requiring specific actions.
Water quality
A landowner and a construction company in Kansas reached a settlement with EPA because of broken concrete having been placed into the river adjacent to the landowner’s property. The construction company put approximately 400 cubic yards of the material, covering about 240 feet of shoreline, as an attempt to stabilize the riverbank. The work was completed without first obtaining a permit from the U.S. Corps of Engineers as required by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act.
Enforcement action: $60,000 civil penalty
Lessons learned: Unpermitted activities can result in shared liability by both the landowner and company conducting the work.