Compliance Just Got Easier: Stay ahead of regulatory changes with instant notifications on updates that matter.

FREE TRIAL UPGRADE!
Thank you for investing in EnvironmentalHazmatHuman ResourcesHuman Resources, Hazmat & Environmental related content. Click 'UPGRADE' to continue.
CANCEL
YOU'RE ALL SET!
Enjoy your limited-time access to the Compliance Network!
A confirmation welcome email has been sent to your email address from ComplianceNetwork@t.jjkellercompliancenetwork.com. Please check your spam/junk folder if you can't find it in your inbox.
YOU'RE ALL SET!
Thank you for your interest in EnvironmentalHazmatHuman ResourcesHuman Resources, Hazmat & Environmental related content.
WHOOPS!
You've reached your limit of free access, if you'd like more info, please contact us at 800-327-6868.
You'll also get exclusive access to:
Already have an account? .

Blaming employees for causing an accident is a common problem. It can prevent the employer from determining the root cause, which often results in similar future accidents. Even though employee behaviors do contribute to incidents, employers are responsible for correcting behaviors just like they are responsible for correcting unsafe conditions.

J. J. Keller invited safety and HR professionals to share their challenges and success stories during an online Virtual Conference hosted on September 13, 2023. This virtual conference is separate from our webcasts and offers firsthand insight directly from other professionals. After an introduction, attendees entered breakout rooms for peer discussions. Read on for the event highlights.

Our next virtual conference, Let’s talk about workplace mental health, is scheduled for November 16, 2023. Visit the Expert Help area for details and registration links.

Discussion topics

An accident typically results from a combination of workplace conditions (hazards) and worker behaviors (actions). Too often, supervisors or accident investigators focus on the worker’s behavior and blame the worker. Although employee actions can contribute to incidents, the employee might have a reason for not following safety rules. Those reasons could include a lack of training, or even pressure from management to work faster. To help facilitate discussion, we offered two questions to get the conversation started:

  1. What strategies have you applied to address or avoid a “blame the employee” reaction?
  2. How have you encouraged upper management to hold supervisors accountable for safety?

Attendee discussions

On the first question of applying strategies to avoid blame, attendees shared their experiences in bringing about a culture change that increases emphasis on safety. Some highlights and suggestions shared included the following:

  • During safety and planning meetings, give reminders and safety tips (even if you get repetitive), and ensure the tips directly relate to the tasks performed. Remind workers that if they get hurt, they may end up waiting for help to arrive, and nobody wants that to happen.
  • Several attendees commented on the importance of developing a comprehensive safety program that involves all levels of the organization. Get as much of the corporate base as possible (including C-suite executives) involved in safety committees. This requires knowing who the players are to get the program going.
  • Don’t merely tell employees what to do, but explain why certain processes are required.
  • During accident investigations, emphasize to employees that the company is not looking to place blame. The investigation will focus on facts, not punishment, with a goal of preventing future incidents. One attendee noted that using the 5 Why process can help get beyond blame by digging deeper.
  • When evaluating how to prevent future incidents, consider two questions: What could the company have done to prevent it? What could the employee have done to prevent it? Recognize that there’s likely more that the company could have done.
  • Find ways to solve issues without spending a lot of money, and try to get some “wins” to encourage further change. One attendee posted Time Clock Tidbits with safety notes that employees would see every day.

For related information, see our article on Tips and tricks for Interviewing witnesses after accidents.

On the second question of supervisor accountability, attendees noted a need for upper management support for holding supervisors accountable. Too often, production has priority over safety, particularly if a supervisor has been fired for failing to meet production expectations. Other thoughts shared included:

  • Incorporate safety into supervisor performance reviews — not just negatives or failures, but include kudos and positive feedback. Related, safety professionals could share their experiences (especially positive experiences) with a supervisor’s superior to provide reinforcement.
  • Get supervisors involved in accident investigations. Have the supervisor deliver the investigation report, explaining what happened, how it happened, and what the supervisor could have done differently to prevent it.
  • If supervisors are not following safety rules, review documented policies with them to show that the company expects compliance. Ask the supervisor if they’d like to request a variance from upper management.

Employers can encourage a culture change through actions like tracking incidents and near misses, but a key is making things relatable and personable.

Key to remember: Blaming employees for accidents could prevent identification of a root cause, resulting in a failure to prevent future incidents.

Specialized Industries

Go beyond the regulations! Visit the Institute for in-depth guidance on a wide range of compliance subjects in safety and health, transportation, environment, and human resources.

J. J. Keller® COMPLIANCE NETWORK is a premier online safety and compliance community, offering members exclusive access to timely regulatory content in workplace safety (OSHA), transportation (DOT), environment (EPA), and human resources (DOL).

Interact With Our Compliance Experts

Puzzled by a regulatory question or issue? Let our renowned experts provide the answers and get your business on track to full compliance!

Upcoming Events

Reference the Compliance Network Safety Calendar to keep track of upcoming safety and compliance events. Browse by industry or search by keyword to see relevant dates and observances, including national safety months, compliance deadlines, and more.

SAFETY & COMPLIANCE NEWS

Keep up with the latest regulatory developments from OSHA, DOT, EPA, DOL, and more.

REGSENSE® REGULATORY REFERENCE

Explore a comprehensive database of word-for-word regulations on a wide range of compliance topics, with simplified explanations and best practices advice from our experts.

THE J. J. KELLER INSTITUTE

The Institute is your destination for in-depth content on 120+ compliance subjects. Discover articles, videos, and interactive exercises that will strengthen your understanding of regulatory concepts relevant to your business.

ADD HAZMAT, ENVIRONMENTAL, & HR RESOURCES

Unlock exclusive content offering expert insights into hazmat, environmental, and human resources compliance with a COMPLIANCE NETWORK EDGE membership.

DIRECT ACCESS TO COMPLIANCE EXPERTS

Struggling with a compliance challenge? Get the solution from our in-house team of experts! You can submit a question to our experts by email, set up a phone or video call, or request a detailed research report.

EVENTS

Register to attend live online events hosted by our experts. These webcasts and virtual conferences feature engaging discussions on important compliance topics in a casual, knowledge-sharing environment.

Most Recent Highlights In Environmental

2026-06-24T05:00:00Z

Virginia reinstates power plant CO2 budget program

Effective date: April 24, 2026

This applies to: Power plant owners

Description of change: The Virginia Department of Environmental Quality reinstated the Virginia CO2 Budget Trading Program Regulation, which implements the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI). Participation in the RGGI was stopped in 2023, but the state will resume participation on July 1, 2026, the same date on which the compliance requirements take effect.

The regulation requires fossil fuel-fired units that serve an electricity generator with a capacity of 25 megawatts or more to obtain enough allowances to cover CO2 emissions, which they can purchase in the September and December RGGI auctions.

The department also adopted amendments to the regulations, including establishing a one-time 6-month control period from July 1, 2026, to December 31, 2026.

Related state info: Clean air operating permits state comparison

2026-06-24T05:00:00Z

New Hampshire updates sludge management rules

Effective date: May 15, 2026

This applies to: Owners and operators of drinking water and wastewater treatment plants that generate sludge; land application sites; and facilities that treat, manage, or dispose of sludge

Description of change: The New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services amended sludge management rules. Major changes include:

  • Reinstating 5-year site and facility permit renewals (instead of 10 years),
  • Adding annual reporting requirements for sludge haulers (which already apply to septage haulers), and
  • Requiring all applications to be submitted electronically.

The rule also codifies per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) sampling (implemented in 2019 for the sludge quality certificate program).

2026-06-24T05:00:00Z

New Jersey adopts permanent remediation standards for PFAS

Effective date: June 15, 2026

This applies to: Contaminated sites subject to the remediation regulations for contaminated groundwater, soil, and soil leachate

Description of change: The New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (NJDEP) formally adopted its interim remediation standards for specific per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), including:

  • Groundwater quality standards for hexafluoropropylene oxide dimer acid and its ammonium salt (GenX chemicals); and
  • Soil and soil leachate remediation standards for:
    • Perfluorononanoic acid (PFNA);
    • Perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS);
    • Perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA);
    • GenX chemicals; and
    • Methanol.

The interim standards have been in place since 2022 and 2023, requiring regulated entities to conduct remediation to ensure these PFAS are cleaned up.

Additionally, the NJDEP amended the technical requirements to mandate analyses of the following chemicals in all media when contaminants are unknown or not well documented at a contaminated site:

  • PFNA,
  • PFOS,
  • PFOA,
  • GenX chemicals, and
  • 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin.
2026-06-24T05:00:00Z

Nevada adds requirements for hazardous waste recyclers

Effective date: June 8, 2026

This applies to: Hazardous waste recyclers

Description of change: The State Environmental Commission adopted regulations to add requirements for entities that recycle certain hazardous waste, including compliance with:

  • Certain federal requirements;
  • Local zoning requirements, if applicable;
  • Specific reporting and notification requirements; and
  • Other particular regulations of the commission.

The rules also:

  • Exempt owners and operators of certain facilities that recycle certain hazardous materials without storing those materials before they’re recycled from the above requirements, and
  • Add fees for written determinations (required to construct or operate a facility or mobile unit for hazardous waste recycling) and for the facilities that recycle certain hazardous materials without storing those materials before they’re recycled.
2026-06-24T05:00:00Z

Virginia reinstates power plant CO2 budget program

Effective date: April 24, 2026

This applies to: Power plant owners

Description of change: The Virginia Department of Environmental Quality reinstated the Virginia CO2 Budget Trading Program Regulation, which implements the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI). Participation in the RGGI was stopped in 2023, but the state will resume participation on July 1, 2026, the same date on which the compliance requirements take effect.

The regulation requires fossil fuel-fired units that serve an electricity generator with a capacity of 25 megawatts or more to obtain enough allowances to cover CO2 emissions, which they can purchase in the September and December RGGI auctions.

The department also adopted amendments to the regulations, including establishing a one-time 6-month control period from July 1, 2026, to December 31, 2026.

Related state info: Clean air operating permits state comparison

See More

Most Recent Highlights In Transportation

2026-06-24T05:00:00Z

New Hampshire updates sludge management rules

Effective date: May 15, 2026

This applies to: Owners and operators of drinking water and wastewater treatment plants that generate sludge; land application sites; and facilities that treat, manage, or dispose of sludge

Description of change: The New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services amended sludge management rules. Major changes include:

  • Reinstating 5-year site and facility permit renewals (instead of 10 years),
  • Adding annual reporting requirements for sludge haulers (which already apply to septage haulers), and
  • Requiring all applications to be submitted electronically.

The rule also codifies per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) sampling (implemented in 2019 for the sludge quality certificate program).

2026-06-24T05:00:00Z

New Jersey adopts permanent remediation standards for PFAS

Effective date: June 15, 2026

This applies to: Contaminated sites subject to the remediation regulations for contaminated groundwater, soil, and soil leachate

Description of change: The New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (NJDEP) formally adopted its interim remediation standards for specific per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), including:

  • Groundwater quality standards for hexafluoropropylene oxide dimer acid and its ammonium salt (GenX chemicals); and
  • Soil and soil leachate remediation standards for:
    • Perfluorononanoic acid (PFNA);
    • Perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS);
    • Perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA);
    • GenX chemicals; and
    • Methanol.

The interim standards have been in place since 2022 and 2023, requiring regulated entities to conduct remediation to ensure these PFAS are cleaned up.

Additionally, the NJDEP amended the technical requirements to mandate analyses of the following chemicals in all media when contaminants are unknown or not well documented at a contaminated site:

  • PFNA,
  • PFOS,
  • PFOA,
  • GenX chemicals, and
  • 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin.
2026-06-24T05:00:00Z

Nevada adds requirements for hazardous waste recyclers

Effective date: June 8, 2026

This applies to: Hazardous waste recyclers

Description of change: The State Environmental Commission adopted regulations to add requirements for entities that recycle certain hazardous waste, including compliance with:

  • Certain federal requirements;
  • Local zoning requirements, if applicable;
  • Specific reporting and notification requirements; and
  • Other particular regulations of the commission.

The rules also:

  • Exempt owners and operators of certain facilities that recycle certain hazardous materials without storing those materials before they’re recycled from the above requirements, and
  • Add fees for written determinations (required to construct or operate a facility or mobile unit for hazardous waste recycling) and for the facilities that recycle certain hazardous materials without storing those materials before they’re recycled.
2026-06-24T05:00:00Z

Virginia reinstates power plant CO2 budget program

Effective date: April 24, 2026

This applies to: Power plant owners

Description of change: The Virginia Department of Environmental Quality reinstated the Virginia CO2 Budget Trading Program Regulation, which implements the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI). Participation in the RGGI was stopped in 2023, but the state will resume participation on July 1, 2026, the same date on which the compliance requirements take effect.

The regulation requires fossil fuel-fired units that serve an electricity generator with a capacity of 25 megawatts or more to obtain enough allowances to cover CO2 emissions, which they can purchase in the September and December RGGI auctions.

The department also adopted amendments to the regulations, including establishing a one-time 6-month control period from July 1, 2026, to December 31, 2026.

Related state info: Clean air operating permits state comparison

2026-06-24T05:00:00Z

North Carolina approved revisions to wastewater discharge rules

Effective date: May 1, 2026

This applies to: Facilities with domestic wastewater discharges up to 2 million gallons per day

Description of change: The North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) adopted a rule that adds a permitting option to the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) program for facilities with domestic wastewater discharges of up to 2 million gallons per day.

DEQ removed the ban on new or expanded discharges of oxygen-consuming waste when the 7Q10 and 30Q2 flows are both 0 for these facilities. In other words, it allows systems to discharge domestic wastewater to zero-flow receiving streams, provided the system:

  • Meets qualifying criteria,
  • Complies with specific effluent limits, and
  • Uses low-energy methods before discharging wastewater to the receiving stream.

It’ll likely benefit areas where the cost of piping to a higher-flowing stream farther away is prohibitive.

See More

Most Recent Highlights In Safety & Health

2026-06-24T05:00:00Z

New Hampshire updates sludge management rules

Effective date: May 15, 2026

This applies to: Owners and operators of drinking water and wastewater treatment plants that generate sludge; land application sites; and facilities that treat, manage, or dispose of sludge

Description of change: The New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services amended sludge management rules. Major changes include:

  • Reinstating 5-year site and facility permit renewals (instead of 10 years),
  • Adding annual reporting requirements for sludge haulers (which already apply to septage haulers), and
  • Requiring all applications to be submitted electronically.

The rule also codifies per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) sampling (implemented in 2019 for the sludge quality certificate program).

2026-06-24T05:00:00Z

New Jersey adopts permanent remediation standards for PFAS

Effective date: June 15, 2026

This applies to: Contaminated sites subject to the remediation regulations for contaminated groundwater, soil, and soil leachate

Description of change: The New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (NJDEP) formally adopted its interim remediation standards for specific per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), including:

  • Groundwater quality standards for hexafluoropropylene oxide dimer acid and its ammonium salt (GenX chemicals); and
  • Soil and soil leachate remediation standards for:
    • Perfluorononanoic acid (PFNA);
    • Perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS);
    • Perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA);
    • GenX chemicals; and
    • Methanol.

The interim standards have been in place since 2022 and 2023, requiring regulated entities to conduct remediation to ensure these PFAS are cleaned up.

Additionally, the NJDEP amended the technical requirements to mandate analyses of the following chemicals in all media when contaminants are unknown or not well documented at a contaminated site:

  • PFNA,
  • PFOS,
  • PFOA,
  • GenX chemicals, and
  • 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin.
2026-06-24T05:00:00Z

Nevada adds requirements for hazardous waste recyclers

Effective date: June 8, 2026

This applies to: Hazardous waste recyclers

Description of change: The State Environmental Commission adopted regulations to add requirements for entities that recycle certain hazardous waste, including compliance with:

  • Certain federal requirements;
  • Local zoning requirements, if applicable;
  • Specific reporting and notification requirements; and
  • Other particular regulations of the commission.

The rules also:

  • Exempt owners and operators of certain facilities that recycle certain hazardous materials without storing those materials before they’re recycled from the above requirements, and
  • Add fees for written determinations (required to construct or operate a facility or mobile unit for hazardous waste recycling) and for the facilities that recycle certain hazardous materials without storing those materials before they’re recycled.
2026-06-24T05:00:00Z

California adds TPhP nail products to Priority Products list

Effective date: October 1, 2026

This applies to: Nail products containing triphenyl phosphate (TPhP) at concentrations greater than 250 parts per million (ppm)

Description of change: The California Department of Toxic Substances Control added nail products with concentrations of 250 ppm or more of TPhP to the Priority Product list, making the substance subject to the Safer Consumer Products (SCP) Regulations.

By November 30, 2026, manufacturers must submit a Priority Product Notification. By March 30, 2027, manufacturers must submit:

  • A Chemical Removal Intent/Confirmation Notification,
  • A Product Removal Intent/Confirmation Notification,
  • A Product-Chemical Replacement Intent/Confirmation Notification, or
  • A Preliminary Alternatives Analysis Report or alternate reporting options.
2026-06-24T05:00:00Z

Indiana adds permanent underground carbon dioxide storage rules

Effective date: June 10, 2026

This applies to: Entities that seek to participate in carbon sequestration projects

Description of change: The Natural Resources Commission adopted rules for permanent underground carbon dioxide storage, establishing:

  • The applicability of carbon sequestration projects, and
  • The rules for the Department of Natural Resources issuing involuntary integration orders and certificates of project completion.

The rules impact entities seeking to participate in carbon sequestration projects under IC 14-39. The regulations also affect pore space owners and surface owners.

See More

Most Recent Highlights In Human Resources

2026-06-24T05:00:00Z

EPA aligns EPCRA rules with OSHA’s HazCom amendments

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) published a final rule on June 22, 2026, conforming the hazardous chemical inventory reporting regulations under the Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act (EPCRA) to the Occupational Safety and Health Administration’s (OSHA’s) Hazardous Communication (HazCom) standard amendments of 2012 and 2024.

Who’s covered?

The final rule applies to facilities regulated under EPCRA Sections 311 and 312. These facilities are:

  • Required by OSHA’s HazCom standard to maintain Safety Data Sheets (SDSs) for hazardous chemicals on-site at or above the reporting threshold, and
  • Required by EPA’s EPCRA Section 312 rules (40 CFR Part 370) to submit annual hazardous chemical inventory reports (commonly known as Tier II reports) for the same chemicals by March 1.

Covered facilities submit SDSs and annual inventory reports to the State Emergency Response Commission (SERC), Local Emergency Planning Committee (LEPC), and local fire department.

How does this impact facilities?

EPA’s final rule replaces the previous EPCRA hazard categories with OSHA’s GHS-aligned hazard classes and hazard categories (totaling 118), which are already used in SDSs. Facilities must use OSHA’s hazard classes with their categories for SDS submissions and hazardous chemical inventory reports required under EPCRA Sections 311 and 312.

Note: SDSs for substances already contain the updated hazard classes and hazard categories. SDSs for mixtures must incorporate them by November 2027.

What’s the compliance timeline?

Covered facilities must use the new hazard categories by January 1, 2028. EPA expects facilities to incorporate them into the reporting year 2027 Tier II report (due March 1, 2028).

Key to remember: EPA has aligned regulations under EPCRA Sections 311 and 312 with OSHA’s HazCom amendments for hazardous chemical reporting requirements.

2026-06-24T05:00:00Z

EPA aligns EPCRA rules with OSHA’s HazCom amendments

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) published a final rule on June 22, 2026, conforming the hazardous chemical inventory reporting regulations under the Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act (EPCRA) to the Occupational Safety and Health Administration’s (OSHA’s) Hazardous Communication (HazCom) standard amendments of 2012 and 2024.

Who’s covered?

The final rule applies to facilities regulated under EPCRA Sections 311 and 312. These facilities are:

  • Required by OSHA’s HazCom standard to maintain Safety Data Sheets (SDSs) for hazardous chemicals on-site at or above the reporting threshold, and
  • Required by EPA’s EPCRA Section 312 rules (40 CFR Part 370) to submit annual hazardous chemical inventory reports (commonly known as Tier II reports) for the same chemicals by March 1.

Covered facilities submit SDSs and annual inventory reports to the State Emergency Response Commission (SERC), Local Emergency Planning Committee (LEPC), and local fire department.

How does this impact facilities?

EPA’s final rule replaces the previous EPCRA hazard categories with OSHA’s GHS-aligned hazard classes and hazard categories (totaling 118), which are already used in SDSs. Facilities must use OSHA’s hazard classes with their categories for SDS submissions and hazardous chemical inventory reports required under EPCRA Sections 311 and 312.

Note: SDSs for substances already contain the updated hazard classes and hazard categories. SDSs for mixtures must incorporate them by November 2027.

What’s the compliance timeline?

Covered facilities must use the new hazard categories by January 1, 2028. EPA expects facilities to incorporate them into the reporting year 2027 Tier II report (due March 1, 2028).

Key to remember: EPA has aligned regulations under EPCRA Sections 311 and 312 with OSHA’s HazCom amendments for hazardous chemical reporting requirements.

2026-06-24T05:00:00Z

EPA aligns EPCRA rules with OSHA’s HazCom amendments

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) published a final rule on June 22, 2026, conforming the hazardous chemical inventory reporting regulations under the Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act (EPCRA) to the Occupational Safety and Health Administration’s (OSHA’s) Hazardous Communication (HazCom) standard amendments of 2012 and 2024.

Who’s covered?

The final rule applies to facilities regulated under EPCRA Sections 311 and 312. These facilities are:

  • Required by OSHA’s HazCom standard to maintain Safety Data Sheets (SDSs) for hazardous chemicals on-site at or above the reporting threshold, and
  • Required by EPA’s EPCRA Section 312 rules (40 CFR Part 370) to submit annual hazardous chemical inventory reports (commonly known as Tier II reports) for the same chemicals by March 1.

Covered facilities submit SDSs and annual inventory reports to the State Emergency Response Commission (SERC), Local Emergency Planning Committee (LEPC), and local fire department.

How does this impact facilities?

EPA’s final rule replaces the previous EPCRA hazard categories with OSHA’s GHS-aligned hazard classes and hazard categories (totaling 118), which are already used in SDSs. Facilities must use OSHA’s hazard classes with their categories for SDS submissions and hazardous chemical inventory reports required under EPCRA Sections 311 and 312.

Note: SDSs for substances already contain the updated hazard classes and hazard categories. SDSs for mixtures must incorporate them by November 2027.

What’s the compliance timeline?

Covered facilities must use the new hazard categories by January 1, 2028. EPA expects facilities to incorporate them into the reporting year 2027 Tier II report (due March 1, 2028).

Key to remember: EPA has aligned regulations under EPCRA Sections 311 and 312 with OSHA’s HazCom amendments for hazardous chemical reporting requirements.

2026-06-24T05:00:00Z

EPA aligns EPCRA rules with OSHA’s HazCom amendments

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) published a final rule on June 22, 2026, conforming the hazardous chemical inventory reporting regulations under the Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act (EPCRA) to the Occupational Safety and Health Administration’s (OSHA’s) Hazardous Communication (HazCom) standard amendments of 2012 and 2024.

Who’s covered?

The final rule applies to facilities regulated under EPCRA Sections 311 and 312. These facilities are:

  • Required by OSHA’s HazCom standard to maintain Safety Data Sheets (SDSs) for hazardous chemicals on-site at or above the reporting threshold, and
  • Required by EPA’s EPCRA Section 312 rules (40 CFR Part 370) to submit annual hazardous chemical inventory reports (commonly known as Tier II reports) for the same chemicals by March 1.

Covered facilities submit SDSs and annual inventory reports to the State Emergency Response Commission (SERC), Local Emergency Planning Committee (LEPC), and local fire department.

How does this impact facilities?

EPA’s final rule replaces the previous EPCRA hazard categories with OSHA’s GHS-aligned hazard classes and hazard categories (totaling 118), which are already used in SDSs. Facilities must use OSHA’s hazard classes with their categories for SDS submissions and hazardous chemical inventory reports required under EPCRA Sections 311 and 312.

Note: SDSs for substances already contain the updated hazard classes and hazard categories. SDSs for mixtures must incorporate them by November 2027.

What’s the compliance timeline?

Covered facilities must use the new hazard categories by January 1, 2028. EPA expects facilities to incorporate them into the reporting year 2027 Tier II report (due March 1, 2028).

Key to remember: EPA has aligned regulations under EPCRA Sections 311 and 312 with OSHA’s HazCom amendments for hazardous chemical reporting requirements.

2026-06-23T05:00:00Z

CSB mounts pressure on OSHA, EPA over deadly process safety gap

Sugar may seem pretty harmless. However, a deadly explosion at a Kentucky caramel coloring facility reveals how this assumption can lead to disaster. The Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation Board (CSB) is again urging OSHA and EPA to address a gap in their chemical safety regulations.

The board is calling for them to tackle “reactive hazards.” These are the hazards CSB says triggered the tragedy. The familiar message has been repeated since 2002, but the alarm bells grow louder and more urgent now. These warnings are not just for OSHA and EPA. They are also for chemical plants and food ingredient manufacturers. Despite not being covered in the process safety and risk management standards, reactive hazards can and have led to catastrophe.

Runaway reaction

CSB determined that the explosion happened when a 2,500-gallon reactor experienced a runaway decomposition reaction. The reaction involved an “invert sugar” ingredient used to make caramel coloring. It rapidly increased the temperature and pressure. Then it overwhelmed the reactor’s emergency pressure relief system.

The reactor ruptured violently. Two workers died when the blast damaged a control room 40 feet from the reactor. Debris from the incident traveled as far as 400 feet beyond the facility fence line. It also caused approximately $40 million in damage.

CSB found that the reactor’s emergency pressure relief system would have needed to be about four times larger. This would have allowed it to safely relieve pressure generated during the runaway reaction.

Failure to recognize the hazard

CSB’s investigation found that the company did not understand the severe reactive hazards associated with the sugar ingredient. According to the board, this failure contributed to an undersized pressure relief system. It also created confusion on the day of the incident about the increasing pressure.

The report further states that the company’s lack of knowledge stemmed from:

  • An incomplete investigation of the ingredients’ reaction potential,
  • A lack of industry guidance on the safe manufacture of caramel coloring, and
  • No warning on the safety data sheet (SDS) of reaction hazards.

SDS lacked critical information

The board found that the SDS provided by the sugar manufacturer did not warn of its reactivity hazards. CSB concluded that safety information communicated in sugar ingredient SDSs can vary significantly among suppliers. The board noted that improved hazard information in SDSs can help prevent future sugar decomposition incidents. CSB is urging industry groups and suppliers who manufacture invert sugar or corn syrup to update their SDSs for decomposition hazards.

Known regulatory gap

The report emphasizes a gap in:

That gap is a lack of coverage of facilities processing chemicals with reactive hazards that could have catastrophic consequences.

The Kentucky caramel coloring plant was not subject to PSM and RMP. Had the facility been required to implement either regulation, the reactor designers would have had a better opportunity to be aware of the sugar ingredients’ decomposition hazards, says CSB. The board argues that this may have resulted in a safer design of the emergency pressure relief system.

Repeated recommendations

Since 2002, CSB has reiterated its recommendations for OSHA and EPA to fill the regulatory gap. Neither agency has implemented those recommendations.

Over that same period, the board investigated 15 additional incidents involving reactive chemicals not covered by PSM and RMP. Those incidents resulted in 31 fatalities and hundreds of injuries.

CSB is not deterred

CSB again recommends that OSHA and EPA broaden the coverage of PSM and RMP, respectively, to achieve more comprehensive control of reactive hazards.

Both OSHA and EPA currently use chemical lists to identify the processes subject to coverage. However, CSB claims the two agencies did not adequately consider reactive chemical hazards when developing those chemical lists. As a result, many reactive chemicals are currently not covered.

Word for employers and safety professionals

The latest report highlights the need for:

  • Facilities to review not just the SDS for their chemicals but also additional sources of information about their reactive hazards.
  • Chemical plants and food manufacturers to address reactive hazards regardless of coverage under 1910.119 and Part 68. At a minimum, these facilities may already be required to meet OSHA’s General Duty Clause and EPA’s Clean Air Act General Duty Clause.

Key to remember

The latest CSB report taps OSHA and EPA to address reactivity hazards. It is also a wake-up call for facilities to understand their reactive chemical hazards. What’s more, the report calls on chemical and food ingredient manufacturers to revisit their SDSs regarding reactive hazards.

See More
New Network Poll
What's your opinion on using Performance Improvement Plans (PIPs) as an employee performance management tool?

What's your opinion on using Performance Improvement Plans (PIPs) as an employee performance management tool?

No active poll
Please come back soon!
See More
See More
See More
See More
Saved to my EVENT CALENDAR!
View your saved links by clicking the arrow next to your profile picture located in the header. Then, click “My Activity” to view the Event Calendar on your Activity page.