Compliance Just Got Easier: Stay ahead of regulatory changes with instant notifications on updates that matter.
['Carrier profiles, safety ratings and facility audits', 'Transportation Security', 'Registration and Permits - Motor Carrier', 'Fleet Taxes']
['International Fuel Tax Agreement (IFTA)', 'International Registration Plan (IRP)', 'Safety fitness certificates', 'Canadian border service agency (CBSA)']
2021-08-11T05:00:00Z
JOIN TODAY TO CONTINUE READING THIS ARTICLE & OTHER INDUSTRY NEWS!
You'll also get exclusive access to:
A database of easy-to-understand regulationsAsk unlimited questions to our expertsPre-led discussions forumsAnd more
TRY IT FREE TODAY
Already have an account? Log in now.
NewsCarrier profiles, safety ratings and facility auditsSafety fitness certificatesTransportationIn-Depth ArticleEnglishIndustry NewsFleet SafetyTransportation SecurityInternational Registration Plan (IRP)Canadian border service agency (CBSA)Fleet TaxesInternational Fuel Tax Agreement (IFTA)Focus AreaRegistration and Permits - Motor CarrierUSA
What U.S. carriers need to know when operating in Canada
2021-08-11T05:00:00Z
The Canadian ELD mandate is just one of many requirements that U.S. motor carriers and their drivers need to be aware of when operating in Canada.
The following topics and tips will assist you if you operate or are considering operating in Canada.
Can your driver enter Canada?
To operate into Canada, you’ll first need to contact Citizenship and Immigration for the proper clearances to enter Canada. Certain criminal convictions can make a person inadmissible to Canada, and it’s best to know about this before your drivers arrive at the border. It might be good to double-check even if you know your drivers meet the requirements.
Drivers will also require passports or passport cards to enter Canada and return to the United States. Some states issue enhanced driver’s licenses for border crossing purposes. A FAST card will also work.
Is your vehicle and load approved to cross the border?
Motor carriers must ensure their vehicles and loads are approved to enter Canada. This involves having the proper paperwork and registrations to get through Canadian customs (Canada Border Services Agency (CBSA)). Many carriers work with brokers to handle the requirements to cross the border, especially if they make regular trips to Canada. Working with a broker is not required, but it might make things easier.
Canada has implemented e-Manifest (similar to the Automated Commercial Environment (ACE)). It is mandatory.
Do IFTA and IRP requirements apply?
If your vehicles are already registered under International Registration Plan (IRP) and International Fuel Tax Agreement (IFTA), all that you would need for IFTA is to display your IFTA license/decals and track the mileage and fuel while you are in Canada. For IRP under Full Reciprocity you’re able to operate in all provinces; if you do not have IRP, trip permits would be required.
If operating in Alberta, Manitoba, Nunavut, Ontario, Saskatchewan, or Yukon, you’ll need to register for the federal fuel charge program. It’s another tax that would be filed quarterly directly with Canada Revenue Agency (you use your IFTA return to help you file it).
What provincial requirements should you be aware of?
Two provinces, Ontario and Quebec, require U.S.-based companies to obtain their provincial safety registrations.
If you’re operating into:
- Ontario, you need to obtain Ontario’s Commercial Vehicle Operator Registration (CVOR). Call the Ministry of Transportation Ontario for information on how to apply.
- Quebec, you need to obtain a Registration Identification Number (RIN).
- British Columbia, you’ll need to file proof of insurance with the Insurance Corporation of British Columbia. Call (800) 661-1866 for information.
Note: Ontario and Quebec also require certain vehicles to have their speed limiters set to 105 km/hour (65 mph).
Will Canada accept your U.S. daily vehicle inspections?
U.S. drivers operating U.S.-plated vehicles into Canada have reciprocity regarding trip inspections. Canada will accept a U.S. driver’s previous days’ post-trip inspection report, but the driver must carry it with him/her in the vehicle while operating in Canada. The report must be no more than 24 hours old. The no-defect driver vehicle inspection report (DVIR) rule does NOT extend into Canada — a U.S.-based driver operating in Canada would require a written DVIR, defects or no defects.
Do you follow U.S. or Canadian HOS rules while in Canada?
A U.S. carrier entering Canada is required to respect the Canadian hours-of-service (HOS) requirements, including having the required information on the daily log — or if using an ELD, a third-party certified ELD as of June 12, 2021.
Key to remember: Carriers and their drivers need to know what is required to enter Canada and transport freight BEFORE scheduling the trip.

NewsCarrier profiles, safety ratings and facility auditsSafety fitness certificatesTransportationIn-Depth ArticleEnglishIndustry NewsFleet SafetyTransportation SecurityInternational Registration Plan (IRP)Canadian border service agency (CBSA)Fleet TaxesInternational Fuel Tax Agreement (IFTA)Focus AreaRegistration and Permits - Motor CarrierUSA
What U.S. carriers need to know when operating in Canada
2021-08-11T05:00:00Z
['International Fuel Tax Agreement (IFTA)', 'International Registration Plan (IRP)', 'Safety fitness certificates', 'Canadian border service agency (CBSA)']
Written by
Corrina Peterson
Corrina Peterson
University of Michigan
Compliance Expert at J. J. Keller & Associates, specializing in fleet taxes, registration, permitting, and hazardous materials.
The Canadian ELD mandate is just one of many requirements that U.S. motor carriers and their drivers need to be aware of when operating in Canada.
The following topics and tips will assist you if you operate or are considering operating in Canada.
Can your driver enter Canada?
To operate into Canada, you’ll first need to contact Citizenship and Immigration for the proper clearances to enter Canada. Certain criminal convictions can make a person inadmissible to Canada, and it’s best to know about this before your drivers arrive at the border. It might be good to double-check even if you know your drivers meet the requirements.
Drivers will also require passports or passport cards to enter Canada and return to the United States. Some states issue enhanced driver’s licenses for border crossing purposes. A FAST card will also work.
Is your vehicle and load approved to cross the border?
Motor carriers must ensure their vehicles and loads are approved to enter Canada. This involves having the proper paperwork and registrations to get through Canadian customs (Canada Border Services Agency (CBSA)). Many carriers work with brokers to handle the requirements to cross the border, especially if they make regular trips to Canada. Working with a broker is not required, but it might make things easier.
Canada has implemented e-Manifest (similar to the Automated Commercial Environment (ACE)). It is mandatory.
Do IFTA and IRP requirements apply?
If your vehicles are already registered under International Registration Plan (IRP) and International Fuel Tax Agreement (IFTA), all that you would need for IFTA is to display your IFTA license/decals and track the mileage and fuel while you are in Canada. For IRP under Full Reciprocity you’re able to operate in all provinces; if you do not have IRP, trip permits would be required.
If operating in Alberta, Manitoba, Nunavut, Ontario, Saskatchewan, or Yukon, you’ll need to register for the federal fuel charge program. It’s another tax that would be filed quarterly directly with Canada Revenue Agency (you use your IFTA return to help you file it).
What provincial requirements should you be aware of?
Two provinces, Ontario and Quebec, require U.S.-based companies to obtain their provincial safety registrations.
If you’re operating into:
- Ontario, you need to obtain Ontario’s Commercial Vehicle Operator Registration (CVOR). Call the Ministry of Transportation Ontario for information on how to apply.
- Quebec, you need to obtain a Registration Identification Number (RIN).
- British Columbia, you’ll need to file proof of insurance with the Insurance Corporation of British Columbia. Call (800) 661-1866 for information.
Note: Ontario and Quebec also require certain vehicles to have their speed limiters set to 105 km/hour (65 mph).
Will Canada accept your U.S. daily vehicle inspections?
U.S. drivers operating U.S.-plated vehicles into Canada have reciprocity regarding trip inspections. Canada will accept a U.S. driver’s previous days’ post-trip inspection report, but the driver must carry it with him/her in the vehicle while operating in Canada. The report must be no more than 24 hours old. The no-defect driver vehicle inspection report (DVIR) rule does NOT extend into Canada — a U.S.-based driver operating in Canada would require a written DVIR, defects or no defects.
Do you follow U.S. or Canadian HOS rules while in Canada?
A U.S. carrier entering Canada is required to respect the Canadian hours-of-service (HOS) requirements, including having the required information on the daily log — or if using an ELD, a third-party certified ELD as of June 12, 2021.
Key to remember: Carriers and their drivers need to know what is required to enter Canada and transport freight BEFORE scheduling the trip.
See More
RELATED NEWS
NewsIndustry NewsCarrier profiles, safety ratings and facility auditsSafety fitness certificatesFleet SafetyTransportation SecurityTransportation SecurityFocus AreaIn-Depth ArticleUSAEnglishTransportationCanadian border service agency (CBSA)
12/14/2021
Plan ahead for commercial vehicles traveling to Canada

Specialized Industries
Go beyond the regulations! Visit the Institute for in-depth guidance on a wide range of compliance subjects in safety and health, transportation, environment, and human resources.
J. J. Keller® COMPLIANCE NETWORK is a premier online safety and compliance community, offering members exclusive access to timely regulatory content in workplace safety (OSHA), transportation (DOT), environment (EPA), and human resources (DOL).

Interact With Our Compliance Experts
Puzzled by a regulatory question or issue? Let our renowned experts provide the answers and get your business on track to full compliance!

Upcoming Events
Reference the Compliance Network Safety Calendar to keep track of upcoming safety and compliance events. Browse by industry or search by keyword to see relevant dates and observances, including national safety months, compliance deadlines, and more.
SAFETY & COMPLIANCE NEWS
Keep up with the latest regulatory developments from OSHA, DOT, EPA, DOL, and more.
REGSENSE® REGULATORY REFERENCE
Explore a comprehensive database of word-for-word regulations on a wide range of compliance topics, with simplified explanations and best practices advice from our experts.
THE J. J. KELLER INSTITUTE
The Institute is your destination for in-depth content on 120+ compliance subjects. Discover articles, videos, and interactive exercises that will strengthen your understanding of regulatory concepts relevant to your business.
ADD HAZMAT, ENVIRONMENTAL, & HR RESOURCES
Unlock exclusive content offering expert insights into hazmat, environmental, and human resources compliance with a COMPLIANCE NETWORK EDGE membership.
DIRECT ACCESS TO COMPLIANCE EXPERTS
Struggling with a compliance challenge? Get the solution from our in-house team of experts! You can submit a question to our experts by email, set up a phone or video call, or request a detailed research report.
EVENTS
Register to attend live online events hosted by our experts. These webcasts and virtual conferences feature engaging discussions on important compliance topics in a casual, knowledge-sharing environment.
Most Recent Highlights In Environmental
NewsSafe Drinking WaterChange NoticesChange NoticeWater ProgramsEnvironmentalCWA ComplianceEnglishWisconsinFocus Area
2026-05-04T05:00:00Z
Wisconsin adds requirements to federal lead and copper drinking water rule
Effective date: May 1, 2026
This applies to: Public water systems
Description of change: The Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources (department) finalized amendments to align state regulations with the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA’s) updated lead and copper control requirements for drinking water. While most of the amendments conform to federal standards, the state has additional standards. The department also:
- Requires community water systems to make four contact attempts (two more than federal requirements) by two different means for elementary schools and childcare facilities to schedule lead monitoring,
- Requires public water systems on reduced annual monitoring to analyze and report the same number of sample results for copper and lead (instead of the federal requirements that only half of the copper samples are analyzed),
- Requires public water systems undergoing temporary treatment or source water changes (unregulated by EPA) for more than 30 days to notify the department 10 days before the planned change or as soon as possible for an unplanned emergency change,
- Requires groundwater system water suppliers that request to limit their entry point sampling to obtain prior approval from the department,
- Requires water suppliers that provide point-of-use treatment devices for the corrosion control treatment compliance flexibility option to submit a written plan to the department (not required by the federal rule),
- Grants the department the authority to require analysis of total and dissolved lead during distribution system and site assessments where the federal rule doesn’t provide this authority to the state,
- Requires water suppliers that request to invalidate a reported sample result to provide substantial evidence that the sample meets one of the invalidation criteria in the rule, and
- Combines the lead and copper monitoring waivers into one waiver and requires public water systems to complete at least two 6-month rounds of standard tap water monitoring (for which the federal rule only requires one 6-month round).
NewsDistrict of ColumbiaChange NoticesChange NoticeCAA ComplianceEnvironmentalAir PermittingFocus AreaEnglishAir Programs
2026-05-04T05:00:00Z
District of Columbia updates odor control permit rules
Effective date: April 10, 2026
This applies to: Entities required to obtain an operating air permit under Nuisance Odor Regulations
Description of change: The District of Columbia’s Department of Energy and Environment (DOEE) finalized a rulemaking that allows sources of nuisance odors to implement odor controls before obtaining an operating air permit under 20 DCMR Section 200.
To qualify, an entity must obtain from the DOEE written approval of the controls in the Odor Control Plan (OCP) decision letter. Additionally, the source must apply for an operating permit under 200.2 within 60 days of receiving an OCP decision letter.
Related state info: Clean air operating permits state comparison
NewsChange NoticesChange NoticeCaliforniaMobile Emission SourcesCAA ComplianceEnvironmentalFocus AreaEnglishAir Programs
2026-05-04T05:00:00Z
California permanently adopts emergency vehicle rules
Effective date: April 1, 2026
This applies to: New vehicle and engine manufacturers
Description of change: The California Air Resources Board (CARB) permanently adopted the Emergency Vehicle Emissions Regulations, which CARB adopted in 2025 as a temporary measure.
The rule reverts the emission standards and requirements for vehicle and engine manufacturers to the regulations in effect before the adoption of:
- Advanced Clean Cars II (ACC II), and
- Heavy-Duty Engine and Vehicle Omnibus Low NOx (Omnibus).
CARB allows manufacturers to comply with ACC II and Omnibus requirements voluntarily.
In 2025, the Environmental Protection Agency revoked CARB’s waivers to implement the ACC II, Omnibus, and Advanced Clean Trucks rules.
NewsHazardous WasteIndustry NewsWaste GeneratorsWaste ManifestsWaste/HazWasteWaste HandlersWasteEnvironmental Protection Agency (EPA)TSD FacilitiesEnvironmentalIn-Depth ArticleEnglishFocus AreaUSA
2026-04-28T05:00:00Z
Hazardous waste manifests: Hybrid vs. fully electronic
More industries are embracing the exclusive use of electronic platforms. For example, digital payments are replacing cash, news sites are going fully online, and cloud storage is eclipsing external computer storage. And, based on recent proposed rulemaking, hazardous waste manifests may join the list.
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) proposed the Paper Manifest Sunset Rule in March 2026, planning to shift to electronic-only manifests for tracking hazardous waste that’s regulated by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA).
If the proposed rule is finalized, regulated entities will have to track all hazardous waste shipments electronically. Specifically, generators, transporters, and receiving facilities could only use hybrid or fully electronic manifests on the Hazardous Waste Electronic Manifest System (e-Manifest).
So, what are the differences between hybrid and fully electronic manifests? Let’s compare the distinctions and explore some of the benefits that electronic manifests can offer.
What’s a hybrid manifest?
EPA initially established the hybrid manifest for generators that couldn’t fully participate in electronic manifests when the e-Manifest launched in 2018. The hybrid manifest combines paper and electronic manifests, allowing generators that aren’t registered in e-Manifest or don’t have an EPA identification (ID) number to sign printed copies of electronic manifests.
Here’s the general hybrid manifest process:
- The first transporter initiates an electronic manifest in e-Manifest. A hard copy of the electronic manifest is printed out, and the generator and initial transporter sign the paper copy.
- The generator keeps a signed paper copy on-site. The transporter keeps a signed paper copy with the shipment until it’s delivered to the receiving facility.
- From that point forward, the initial transporter and all subsequent waste handlers track the shipment in e-Manifest (using electronic signatures and electronic transmissions).
- The manifest is complete when the receiving facility or exporter electronically signs it on e-Manifest.
What’s a fully electronic manifest?
The fully electronic manifest is tracked completely online. All handlers — generators, transporters, and receiving facilities or exporters — must have an EPA ID number and be registered in e-Manifest to use the fully electronic manifest.
The entire process is conducted on e-Manifest:
- The manifest is created electronically in e-Manifest.
- All handlers electronically sign the manifest in e-Manifest.
- The manifest is complete when the receiving facility or exporter electronically signs it on e-Manifest.
What benefits do electronic manifests offer?
Regardless of whether EPA’s rule is finalized as is, electronic manifests offer hazardous waste handlers a range of benefits. Consider the following potential perks.
Compliance with existing regulations
Many handlers are already required to embrace electronic manifesting. In July 2024, EPA finalized the e-Manifest Third Rule, which requires:
- Large quantity generators and small quantity generators to register for e-Manifest,
- Exporters to submit manifests and continuation sheets to e-Manifest (and pay the associated fees), and
- Waste handlers to submit manifest-related reports and data corrections to e-Manifest.
Streamlined recordkeeping for generators
Hazardous waste handlers using e-Manifest automatically meet the recordkeeping requirements to maintain records of manifests (paper or electronic) since the manifests are retained electronically in the system.
This eliminates the need to keep hard copies. It also provides a centralized place where handlers can access these documents at any time.
However, the provision doesn’t apply to generators using hybrid manifests; they must keep the initial paper copies of the electronic manifest for 3 years.
Reduced costs
Embracing electronic manifesting removes the costs associated with printing paper manifests from EPA-approved sources.
Keep in mind, there’s an unavoidable cost for receiving facilities and exporters. These entities have to pay user fees for each manifest they submit to e-Manifest.
Proactive preparation
EPA’s proposed Paper Manifest Sunset Rule would prohibit the use of paper manifests 2 years after the publication of a final rule. Hazardous waste handlers who transition to using only electronic manifests now will be better prepared to comply with future regulations. It gives businesses time to coordinate resources and address any unexpected issues.
Key to remember: Do you know the differences between hybrid and fully electronic hazardous waste manifests? The distinctions could be the difference between compliance and noncompliance.
NewsIndustry NewsIndustry NewsToxic Substances Control Act - EPAToxic Subtances Control Act - EPATSCA ComplianceEnvironmental Protection Agency (EPA)EnvironmentalEnglishFocus AreaUSA
2026-04-27T05:00:00Z
EPA publishes first round of expiring TSCA CBI claims
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) published the first list of expiring Confidential Business Information (CBI) claims for information submitted under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA). The list covers CBI claims that expire from June 22, 2026, to July 31, 2026.
What are expiring CBI claims?
The Frank R. Lautenberg Chemical Safety for the 21st Century Act (which became law in June 2016) set an automatic 10-year expiration for most CBI claims made under TSCA. The first round of claims submitted since the act took effect will expire in June 2026.
EPA allows businesses to request extensions of CBI protection for up to another 10 years.
How do I know if my CBI claims are expiring?
EPA will notify businesses of expiring CBI claims directly through the Central Data Exchange (CDX), the agency's electronic reporting platform.
The agency will also release public lists of upcoming expiring CBI claims monthly on the “CBI Claim Expiration” webpage. EPA encourages businesses to review the lists to verify whether any of their claims are included.
How do I request an extension of expiring CBI claims?
Businesses seeking to extend a CBI claim beyond its expiration date must submit an extension request at least 30 days before the claim expires using the newly launched TSCA Section 14(e) CBI Claim Extension Request application in EPA’s CDX.
Here’s the general process:
- EPA notifies the business of an expiring CBI claim directly through CDX and via the public lists on the “CBI Claim Expiration” webpage.
- The business submits a request for extension through EPA’s CDX at least 30 days before the CBI claim expires. Requests must comply with the substantiation requirements at 40 CFR 703.5(a) and (b).
- EPA reviews the submission and either grants or denies the request.
What are the possible outcomes?
If EPA approves the extension request, the information in the CBI claim will remain protected for up to another 10 years.
If EPA denies the extension request, the agency can publicize the information in the claim 30 days after notifying the submitter in CDX. Additionally, if a business doesn’t submit an extension request at least 30 days before the expiration date, EPA may publicize the information without notifying the submitter.
Key to remember: EPA published the first round of expiring CBI claims for information submitted under TSCA. Businesses must submit extension requests to keep the information protected.
Most Recent Highlights In Transportation
NewsChange NoticesAboveground Storage TanksChange NoticeEnvironmentalStorage TanksFocus AreaEnglishNorth DakotaTank Systems
2026-04-24T05:00:00Z
North Dakota establishes AST regulations
Effective date: April 1, 2026
This applies to: Owners and operators of aboveground storage tanks (ASTs) and liquid fuel storage tanks
Description of change: The Department of Environmental Quality adopted technical standards and corrective action requirements for ASTs. The department also approved amendments to the registration dates and fee categories of the Petroleum Tank Release Compensation Fund for liquid fuels storage tanks.
Related state info: Aboveground storage tanks (ASTs) state comparison — ASTs
NewsWater PermittingPublicly Owned Treatment WorksChange NoticesChange NoticeOhioWater ProgramsEnvironmentalWater ProgramsEnglishFocus AreaCWA Compliance
2026-04-24T05:00:00Z
Ohio finalizes sewage sludge amendments
Effective date: March 1, 2026
This applies to: Facilities regulated by the sewage sludge program
Description of change: The Ohio Environmental Protection Agency finalized changes to the sewage sludge program through its 5-year review of the regulations. The approved amendments:
- Add professional operator of record requirements for privately owned treatment works;
- Increase and add isolation distances for facilities;
- Prohibit beneficial use of biosolids within a vulnerable hydrogeological setting;
- Remove dioxin monitoring requirements; and
- Add requirements for beneficial user certification (including the application and examination process, recordkeeping requirements, and reasons for suspending or revoking a certification).
NewsNew MexicoNew Mexico Environment Department (NMED)Change NoticesChange NoticeMobile Emission SourcesCAA ComplianceEnvironmentalFocus AreaEnglishAir Programs
2026-04-24T05:00:00Z
New Mexico adopts Clean Transportation Fuel Program rules
Effective date: April 1, 2026
This applies to: Transportation fuel produced in, imported into, or dispensed for use in New Mexico
Description of change: The New Mexico Environment Department finalized regulations to implement the Clean Transportation Fuel Program (CTFP) to reduce the carbon intensity of transportation fuel (including gasoline and diesel). The program covers transportation fuel producers, importers, and dispensers.
The CTFP:
- Establishes annual statewide carbon intensity standards that apply to transportation fuel (e.g., gasoline and diesel) produced, imported, and dispensed for use in New Mexico;
- Allocates credits and calculates deficits for regulated entities based on the fuel’s carbon intensity; and
- Sets up a marketplace for selling and purchasing credits to comply with the carbon intensity standards.
The first compliance period runs from April 1, 2026, to December 31, 2027. The first compliance period report is due by April 30, 2028. Annual compliance reports will be due by April 30 for the previous calendar year.
NewsRecyclingChange NoticesChange NoticeMaineSustainabilityProduct StewardshipSustainabilityWaste MinimizationEnvironmentalEnglishSustainabilityFocus Area
2026-04-24T05:00:00Z
Maine lists materials covered for packaging stewardship program
Effective date: March 3, 2026
This applies to: Entities subject to the Stewardship Program for Packaging Regulations
Description of change: The Maine Department of Environmental Protection’s amendments to the Stewardship Program for Packaging Regulations (06-096 C.M.R. Chapter 428) include:
- Aligning the rules with changes made by An Act to Improve Recycling by Updating the Stewardship Program for Packaging (L.D. 1423), and
- Adding Appendix A — The Packaging Material Types List to the Stewardship Program for Packaging Regulations.
L.D. 1423:
- Excludes certain commercial, cosmetic, medical, environmental, dangerous, hazardous, and flammable product packaging from the program requirements;
- Excludes packaging of products related to public health and water quality testing from the program requirements;
- Requires the department to adopt a process for approving a producer payment system; and
- Updates definitions for clarity.
Appendix A defines packaging material and designates the material types readily recyclable as applicable. It may also designate materials as compostable or reusable.
NewsWaste/HazWasteChange NoticesChange NoticeWasteCaliforniaEnvironmentalSolid WasteEnglishFocus Area
2026-04-24T05:00:00Z
California adopts permanent illegal disposal rules
Effective date: March 4, 2026
This applies to: Entities that handle, transfer, compost, transform, or dispose of solid waste
Description of change: CalRecycle made permanent the current illegal disposal emergency regulations, allowing enforcement agencies to take action against any person who illegally disposes of solid waste.
The rule also:
- Adds the land application activities to the regulations, making the activities subject to the permitting tier structure and associated requirements (i.e., operator filing requirements, state minimum standards, recordkeeping, and enforcement agency inspection requirements); and
- Amends sampling and recordkeeping for solid waste facilities, operations, and activities.
Most Recent Highlights In Safety & Health
NewsWest VirginiaChange NoticesChange NoticeWater ProgramsEnvironmentalCWA ComplianceEnglishUnderground Injection ControlFocus Area
2026-04-24T05:00:00Z
West Virginia establishes fee schedule for UIC Program
Effective date: March 4, 2026
This applies to: Underground Injection Control (UIC) Program permittees
Description of change: This rule establishes the schedules of fees for carbon dioxide capture and sequestration authorized by the West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection’s (WVDEP’s) Division of Water and Waste Management.
EPA granted primacy to the WVDEP to implement the UIC Program for Class VI wells in February 2025.
NewsGreenhouse GasesChange NoticesChange NoticeColoradoCAA ComplianceEnvironmentalFocus AreaEnglishAir Programs
2026-04-24T05:00:00Z
Colorado extends timeline to comply with GHG intensity targets
Effective date: April 14, 2026
This applies to: Small operators in the oil and gas sector
Description of change: The Colorado Air Quality Control Commission revised the intensity targets for reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions for small oil and gas operators (those with less than 45 thousand barrels of oil equivalent (kBOE) production in 2025). The commission extended the first deadline to 2030 for small operators to meet applicable intensity requirements.
However, small operators must still submit the intensity plan for the 2027 targets, which is due by June 30, 2026.
Related state info: Clean air operating permits state comparison — Clean air operating permits
NewsWater PermittingChange NoticesChange NoticeWater ProgramsColoradoEnvironmentalCWA ComplianceEnglishFocus Area
2026-04-24T05:00:00Z
Colorado finalizes state dredge and fill permit regulations
Effective date: March 30, 2026
This applies to: Projects that require preconstruction notification or compensatory mitigation
Description of change: The Colorado Water Quality Control Division finalized rules for implementing a state dredge and fill discharge authorization program established by HB24-1379. The program covers state waters that aren’t subject to federal dredge and fill permitting requirements under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act.
The division will continue issuing Temporary Authorizations until August 31, 2026. After that, applicants must apply for coverage under General Authorizations. The division already accepts applications for Individual Authorizations.
Related state info: Construction water permitting — Colorado
NewsNew YorkWater PermittingPublicly Owned Treatment WorksMunicipal WastewaterChange NoticesChange NoticeWater ProgramsWater ReportingIndustrial WastewaterEnvironmentalCWA ComplianceEnglishFocus Area
2026-04-24T05:00:00Z
New York adds wastewater cybersecurity rules
Effective date: March 26, 2026
This applies to: Wastewater treatment facilities
Description of change: The New York State Department of Environmental Conservation added cybersecurity regulations for wastewater treatment facilities. The rules:
- Require all State Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (SPDES) permittees to report cybersecurity incidents,
- Require publicly owned treatment works (POTWs) to establish, maintain, and implement an Emergency Response Plan and certify compliance with the provisions annually by March 28;
- Establish baseline cybersecurity control requirements;
- Add network monitoring and logging for certain POTWs with design flows of 10 million+ gallons per day; and
- Require wastewater treatment plant operators to complete a minimum number of training hours within their existing required hours on cybersecurity to renew certification every 5 years.
NewsHazardous WasteWaste/HazWasteChange NoticesChange NoticeWasteSpecial WasteCaliforniaEnvironmentalEnglishFocus Area
2026-04-24T05:00:00Z
California permanently adopts EPA’s conditional exemption for airbag waste
Effective date: March 6, 2026
This applies to: Airbag waste handlers and transporters
Description of change: The California Department of Toxic Substances Control permanently adopted the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA’s) interim final rule that allows airbag waste handlers and transporters to meet less stringent hazardous waste requirements (e.g., not manifesting the waste) if they meet certain conditions. Once the airbag waste is received at a collection facility or designated facility for proper disposal, it must be managed as hazardous waste.
The scope of the rule applies to all airbag waste, including recalled airbag inflators.
Related state info: Hazardous waste generators — California
Most Recent Highlights In Human Resources
NewsWaste/HazWasteChange NoticesChange NoticeWasteNew JerseyEnvironmentalSolid WasteEnglishFocus Area
2026-04-24T05:00:00Z
New Jersey extends polystyrene foam exemption
Effective date: March 12, 2026
This applies to: Certain polystyrene foam food service products
Description of change: The New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection extended the exemption from the Single-Use Paper and Plastic Carryout Bags and Polystyrene Foam Food Service Products Rules for certain polystyrene foam products from May 4, 2026, to May 4, 2027. It applies to these polystyrene foam products:
- Trays used for raw or butchered meat or fish that’s sold from a refrigerator or similar retail appliance;
- Food products pre-packaged by the manufacturer in a polystyrene foam food service product;
- Polystyrene foam food service products that are used for the health or safety of hospital, nursing home, or correctional facility patients or residents; and
- Any other polystyrene foam food service product as determined needed by the department.
NewsIndustry NewsWater PermittingPoint SourcesWater ProgramsEnvironmental Protection Agency (EPA)Industrial WastewaterEnvironmentalIn-Depth ArticleWater ProgramsUSAEnglishFocus AreaCWA Compliance
2026-04-16T05:00:00Z
Effluent limitations: FAQs for direct dischargers of industrial wastewater
Facilities across the country conduct industrial activities that generate wastewater containing pollutants and then release it directly into nearby surface waters, such as streams, rivers, or lakes. However, before any industrial wastewater can be discharged from a site, the facility must obtain a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit.
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) uses effluent limitations as the primary method to regulate direct discharges of industrial wastewater into waters of the United States. These restrictions are incorporated into NPDES permits.
Meeting effluent limitations is the key to compliance with NPDES permits. But like other environmental regulations, these standards can get complex quickly without a solid foundation of understanding. We’ve compiled common FAQs to help you become fluent in effluent limitations.
What’s effluent?
There’s no specific statutory or regulatory definition of “effluent.” Thankfully, a 1997 document from EPA entitled Terms of Environment: Glossary, Abbreviations, and Acronyms, Revised December 1997 (EPA 175-B-97-001) provides clarity, defining effluent as “wastewater — treated or untreated — that flows out of a treatment plant, sewer, or industrial outfall.”
What’s the difference between effluent guidelines and limitations?
There are subtle but important distinctions between these two terms.
Effluent guidelines (also known as effluent limitations guidelines and standards or ELGs) are the national industrial wastewater discharge standards established by EPA for all facilities in an industrial category.
The federal agency develops effluent guidelines based on the performance of the best available technology that’s economically achievable for an industry. Notably, effluent guidelines are technology-based; they’re not based on risk or impacts to receiving waters (i.e., water quality-based).
Federal effluent guidelines (40 CFR Subchapter N) for direct dischargers of industrial wastewater are implemented through the NPDES permitting program.
Effluent limitations are any restrictions imposed “on quantities, discharge rates, and concentrations of pollutants” from industrial wastewater discharges (122.2). Simply put, effluent limitations are the specific numeric and non-numeric requirements developed for facilities to comply with the effluent guidelines. Unlike effluent guidelines, effluent limitations may be both technology- and water quality-based.
Most states issue NPDES permits, except for the District of Columbia, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, and New Mexico, where EPA serves as the permitting authority. The permit writer develops effluent limitations for NPDES permits and issues them to facilities. The permit may be general (covering multiple facilities with similar operations and discharges) or individual (customized with site-specific conditions).
What’s the bottom line? Effluent guidelines aren’t directly enforceable permit conditions, whereas effluent limitations are.
What are the types of effluent limitations?
Two categories of effluent limitations may appear in NPDES permits:
- Technology-based effluent limitations (TBELs), and
- Water quality-based effluent limitations (WQBELs).
TBELs are based on available treatment technologies and require facilities to meet a minimum level of treatment of pollutants in wastewater discharges.
WQBELs apply only when TBELs aren’t enough to achieve water quality standards. States develop total maximum daily loads (TMDLs). A TMDL is the maximum amount of a pollutant that can be discharged into a waterbody while still meeting the water quality standards. Specific portions of the TMDL are then allotted to permitted facilities (called wasteload allocation). Facilities can’t release more than their allocated amounts.
Any applicable wasteload allocations are incorporated into a facility’s NPDES permit.
Do facilities have to use specific control technologies?
Although EPA’s effluent guidelines are based on the use of a specific control technology, facilities aren’t required to install the same technology system. As long as they comply with the standards, facilities may implement other treatment technologies.
Key to remember: Understanding effluent limitations is key to complying with industrial wastewater discharge permits.
NewsClosuresIndustry NewsIndustry NewsWaste/HazWasteWasteEnvironmental Protection Agency (EPA)Waste ManagementEnvironmentalSolid WasteEnglishFocus AreaUSA
2026-04-16T05:00:00Z
EPA proposes major changes to coal combustion residuals rules
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) published a proposed rule on April 13, 2026, to revise the existing regulations governing the disposal of coal combustion residuals (CCR) in landfills and surface impoundments as well as the beneficial use of CCR.
Who’s impacted?
The proposed rule affects coal-fired electric utilities and independent power producers subject to the CCR disposal and beneficial use regulations at 40 CFR Part 257.
What are the changes?
Significant changes the EPA proposes include:
- Adding an option for facilities to certify the closure of legacy CCR surface impoundments by CCR removal that were closed before November 8, 2024, under regulatory oversight;
- Expanding the eligibility criteria for facilities to defer CCR closure requirements until site-specific determinations are made for legacy surface impoundments that were closed before November 8, 2024, under regulatory oversight;
- Exempting CCR dewatering structures (used to dewater CCR waste for the disposal of CCR elsewhere) from federal CCR regulations (Part 257);
- Rescinding all CCR management unit (CCRMU) requirements or revising the existing CCRMU regulations;
- Allowing permit authorities to make site-specific determinations regarding certain requirements during permitting for CCR units complying with federal CCR groundwater monitoring, corrective action, and closure requirements under a federal or an approved-state CCR permit; and
- Revising the beneficial use requirements by:
- Removing the environmental demonstration requirement for non-roadway use of more than 12,400 tons of unencapsulated CCR; and
- Excluding these beneficial uses from federal CCR regulations (Part 257):
- CCR used in cement manufacturing at cement kilns,
- Flue gas desulfurization (FGD) gypsum used in agriculture, and
- FGD gypsum used in wallboard.
Key to remember: EPA plans to make significant amendments to the coal combustion residuals requirements.
NewsHazardous WasteIndustry NewsEnglishWaste ManifestsSafety & HealthGeneral Industry SafetyWasteEnvironmentalIn-Depth ArticleEnvironmental Management SystemsFocus AreaUSA
2026-04-14T05:00:00Z
What to know about the EPA’s proposed manifest sunset rule
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is taking another major step toward modernizing hazardous waste tracking. The Agency’s proposed “manifest sunset rule” would officially phase out paper hazardous waste manifests and require the exclusive use of the e-Manifest system. For employers, especially those generating or managing hazardous waste, it’s a fundamental shift in how waste shipments are documented, tracked, and audited.
Since 2018, EPA’s e-Manifest system has been available as a digital alternative to paper manifests. Over the years, the agency has added requirements pushing the industry toward adoption, including mandatory registration and electronic data submission. But despite those efforts, many companies have continued to rely on paper manifests, either out of habit, convenience, or because parts of their waste chain weren’t ready to go digital. EPA even states in the proposed rule that less than one percent of all e-manifest users have completely switched to digital manifest. The proposed sunset rule is designed to close that gap. Once finalized, it would set a firm deadline (24 months) after which paper manifests would no longer be allowed.
Why EPA wants to eliminate paper manifests
EPA’s reasoning is pretty straightforward. Paper manifests are slower, easier to lose, and more prone to errors. They rely on manual handling and delayed processing, which can create gaps in tracking and compliance. A fully electronic system, on the other hand, allows for real-time visibility, standardized data entry, and faster correction of mistakes. It also gives regulators a clearer, more immediate picture of what’s happening across the entire waste life cycle.
Addressing one of the biggest digital barriers: signatures
One overlooked part of the proposed rule is how EPA is trying to solve one of the biggest barriers to going fully digital, which is signatures in the field. Anyone who has dealt with manifests knows that the weak point is often the hand-off between the generator and the transporter, especially when drivers don’t have system access or reliable connectivity. To address that, EPA is proposing new functionality that would allow users to sign manifests using quick response (QR) codes or even short message service (SMS). In practice, this could mean a driver scans a QR code or receives a text prompt, then completes the signature process directly from their phone. So, no login or full system access needed. EPA is also exploring the ability to use SMS and QR-based tools to make updates to manifest data without needing full system permissions. That’s a big deal operationally, because it removes one of the most common bottlenecks in needing a registered user at a specific site to make even minor corrections.
Operational challenges companies should expect
With that said, moving to a fully digital system still comes with potential issues. It requires coordination across your entire operation. Generators, transporters, and disposal facilities all have to be aligned and capable of using the system effectively. If one party in that chain struggles, it can create delays or compliance issues for everyone involved. There’s also an upfront investment to consider. Companies may need to upgrade internal systems, ensure reliable connectivity, and train employees in new work processes. For organizations with multiple sites or field operations, which can take some planning. But over time, many of those burdens are expected to decrease. Electronic signatures, reusable templates, and centralized record-keeping can significantly reduce administrative work.
One of the biggest shifts employers will notice is the level of visibility. With paper manifests, there’s often a lag between shipment and final documentation. In a digital system, that lag disappears. Information becomes available almost immediately, and regulators have access to the same data. That means errors or discrepancies are easier to find and harder to ignore.
The good news is that companies don’t have to wait for the final rule to start preparing. Taking a close look at your current manifest process is a good first step. If paper is still a major part of your workflow, that’s a clear signal that changes are coming. Making sure your e-Manifest account is fully set up and that employees understand how to use it, will go a long way in avoiding future disruptions.
Keys to remember: The EPA’s proposed Paper Manifest Sunset Rule would set a firm date to phase out paper hazardous waste manifests and require that all covered shipments be tracked through the agency’s electronic e‑Manifest system, in which the Agency says will improve hazardous‑waste tracking and transparency while reducing administrative burden and saving regulated entities roughly $28.5 million per year.
NewsIndustry NewsCAA ComplianceEnvironmentalIn-Depth ArticleFocus AreaEnglishAir PermittingAir ProgramsUSA
2026-04-13T05:00:00Z
How incinerators are permitted: A look at the regulatory framework and EPA’s new streamlining proposal
Incinerators in the United States operate under a complex permitting framework designed to protect air quality, public health, and the environment. Under the Clean Air Act (CAA), facilities that burn waste must meet strict emission standards, maintain operating controls, and follow extensive monitoring and reporting rules. These requirements ensure that incineration, while a valuable tool for waste management, wildfire mitigation, and disaster recovery, remains safe and consistent with federal air quality objectives. Against this backdrop, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) recently proposed a rule to streamline permitting for specific types of incinerators used in wildfire prevention and disaster cleanup, a move that could reduce delays for state and local governments.
The regulatory basis for incinerator permitting
Most incinerators fall under Section 129 of the CAA, which mandates EPA to establish performance standards and emission guidelines for categories of solid waste combustion units. These standards govern pollutants such as particulate matter, carbon monoxide, sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxides, lead, cadmium, mercury, hydrogen chloride, and dioxins/furans. Operators must also conduct emissions testing, maintain continuous monitoring equipment, track operational parameters, and submit regular compliance reports.
Permitting generally occurs through Title V operating permits, which consolidate all applicable air quality requirements into a single enforceable document. A Title V permit typically requires annual certifications, detailed recordkeeping, periodic emissions tests, and reporting of deviations. While the Title V program doesn't impose new standards, it ensures that incinerators comply with all existing federal and state air quality rules.
Different categories of incinerators, such as large municipal waste combustors (LMWC), small municipal waste combustors (SMWC), commercial and industrial solid waste incinerators (CISWI), and other solid waste incinerators (OSWI), have distinct requirements. These subcategories reflect variations in unit size, waste composition, and operational design, and each has its own subpart under EPA’s air quality regulations.
Air curtain incinerators: A special case
Air curtain incinerators (ACIs), which burn wood waste, yard debris, and clean lumber, occupy a niche segment of the permitting landscape. They use a mechanized “curtain” of air to increase combustion efficiency and reduce particulate emissions compared to open burning. However, their regulatory treatment has historically been inconsistent.
Because ACIs fit partly within several existing subparts, operators often face confusion about which monitoring, opacity limits, and reporting duties apply. Overlap across four regulatory categories can create delays, particularly during emergencies when ACIs are deployed to remove vegetative fuels that increase wildfire risk or to process debris after storms.
EPA’s emergent focus on streamlining
In March 2026, EPA announced a proposal to consolidate the regulatory requirements for ACIs used solely to burn wood-derived materials into a single subpart under Section 129 of the CAA. The proposal would also allow these ACIs to operate without a Title V permit unless located at a facility that otherwise requires one.
EPA stated that the change would “cut red tape” and provide clarity for state, local, and Tribal governments, allowing them to respond more effectively to natural disasters and conduct wildfire mitigation activities without unnecessary administrative delays. The agency emphasized that unprocessed debris contributes to poor air and water quality and poses safety risks, particularly in post disaster environments.
Context: Broader federal actions on disaster-related incineration
The proposal follows earlier federal steps to ease the temporary use of incinerators during emergencies. In 2025, EPA issued an interim final rule permitting CISWI units to burn nonhazardous disaster debris for up to 8 weeks without prior EPA approval, a provision intended to accelerate cleanup after hurricanes, wildfires, and floods. These units must still operate their pollution control equipment, and extensions beyond 8 weeks require EPA authorization.
Such measures reflect the increasing volume of debris associated with severe weather events and the need for rapid, environmentally sound disposal mechanisms. The current proposal for ACIs builds on these efforts by targeting the specific regulatory bottlenecks associated with vegetative and wood waste disposal.
Looking ahead
EPA’s streamlined permitting proposal doesn't alter emission standards but rather clarifies and simplifies administrative pathways. If finalized, it may make ACIs more accessible during periods of heightened wildfire risk and in the critical early stages of disaster recovery.
Key to remember: At its core, the permitting system for incinerators aims to balance environmental protection with operational flexibility. The new proposal underscores EPA’s recognition that, in emergency contexts, speed matters but so does environmental stewardship.
New Network Poll
We have aisles that are defined by design i.e. racking/ shelving placement, but are not marked with tape or paint. Is this a violation?
May 04, 2026
According to 29 CFR 1910.22(b) and 1910.176(a), OSHA simply requires permanent aisles and passageways to be appropriately marked. Here is an excerpt from a 2/14/1977 OSHA letter of interpretation: “The wording of the standard, 29 CFR 1910.22(b)(2), that aisles and passageways be appropriately marked, does not require marking by painted yellow lines only. Painted yellow lines are usually recognized as the most convenient and inexpensive way to mark aisles and passageways since the lines normally last several years without maintenance or repainting.
“Other appropriate methods such as marking pillars, powder stripping, flags, traffic cones, barrels and many other devices are considered appropriate as long as recognition of such is included in the vehicle operator and employee training programs. However, where the need exists and there are no appropriate markings, citations will be issued.”
Most Popular Highlights In Environmental
NewsAir QualityIndustry NewsIndustry NewsAir ProgramsEnvironmental Protection Agency (EPA)Hazardous Air PollutantsCAA ComplianceEnvironmentalFocus AreaEnglishAir ProgramsStationary Emission SourcesUSA
2026-04-02T05:00:00Z
EPA releases final NESHAP for chemical manufacturing area sources
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) published a final rule on April 1, 2026, amending the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for Chemical Manufacturing Area Sources (CMAS). The NESHAP controls hazardous air pollutant (HAP) emissions from facilities that manufacture a range of chemicals and products, such as inorganic chemicals, plastics, and synthetic rubber.
Who’s impacted?
The final rule applies to nine area source categories in the chemical manufacturing sector that are regulated by the CMAS NESHAP (40 CFR 63 Subpart VVVVVV).
What are the changes?
EPA’s final rule:
- Establishes leak detection and repair requirements for equipment leaks and heat exchange systems in organic HAP service,
- Adds detectable emissions monitoring standards for pressure vessels in organic HAP service and emission management practice standards for pressure relief devices (PRDs) in organic HAP service,
- Prohibits closed vent systems in organic HAP service from bypassing an air pollution control device (APCD), and
- Requires recurring performance testing of non-flare APCDs to demonstrate compliance with process vent and storage tank provisions.
The final rule also mandates electronic reporting for notifications of compliance status (NOCs), performance test reports, and periodic reports. Facilities must submit these reports through the Compliance and Emissions Data Reporting Interface (CEDRI) on EPA’s Central Data Exchange.
What didn’t change?
Significantly, the final rule doesn’t add previously proposed regulations for area sources that use ethylene oxide (EtO) to produce materials described by code 325 of the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS).
EPA states that it intends to address the regulation of EtO from area sources and major sources in one final action.
What are the compliance timelines?
Existing facilities must comply with the amendments by April 1, 2029.
New facilities (those that begin construction or reconstruction after January 22, 2025) have to comply with the changes by April 1, 2026, or upon startup, whichever is later.
Additionally, facilities must start electronically submitting:
- Performance tests by June 1, 2026;
- NOCs by August 31, 2026; and
- Periodic reports by April 1, 2029.
Key to remember: EPA’s final HAP emissions rule for chemical manufacturing area sources adds new requirements for certain processing equipment and systems.
NewsIndustry NewsTSCA ComplianceCAA ComplianceSustainabilityIn-Depth ArticleCWA ComplianceEnvironmentalEnglishSustainabilityESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance)Focus AreaUSA
2025-12-05T06:00:00Z
EPA’s 2026 regulatory shift: How environmental managers can stay ahead
The clock is ticking for environmental teams. By 2026, several new EPA regulations will reshape compliance obligations for U.S. companies. Organizations that act now will avoid costly penalties and operational disruptions.
What’s changing and why it matters
Although EPA has been deregulating or loosening some requirements, there are still some standards being tightened across multiple fronts in the coming year:
- Renewable fuel standards (RFS): The EPA proposed higher volume requirements for 2026, including 24.02 billion renewable identification numbers (RINs), up nearly 8% from 2025. This increase pushes stricter expectations on fuel producers and organizations purchasing renewable fuels.
- Stormwater multi-sector general permit (MSGP): A new MSGP set to take effect by February 2026 will require quarterly PFAS indicator monitoring, expanded benchmark sampling, and resiliency measures in stormwater control designs.
- PFAS Reporting under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA): TSCA Section 8(a)(7) mandates PFAS manufacturing and import data collection beginning in April 2026, through October 2026, with extended deadlines for certain small manufacturers.
Failure to prepare could lead to fines, reputational damage, supply chain disruptions, and permit delays. Companies that weave compliance planning into their 2026 strategy will be positioned not just to meet legal deadlines but to sustain operations smoothly.
Key areas of impact
- Renewable fuel standards (RFS) and air emissions The proposed increase in 2026 Renewable Identification Numbers (RIN) volumes, from 24.02 billion to 24.46 billion for 2027, signals tightening air and fuels policy that affects fuel use and emissions accounting.
- Stormwater management The upcoming 2026 MSGP requires expanded quarterly PFAS monitoring, new benchmark triggers, corrective action plans, and integration of climate resilience in design standards.
- PFAS disclosure (TSCA Section 8(a)(7)) Manufacturers and importers of PFAS must submit electronic reporting of usage, volumes, disposal, and exposure data between April and October 2026, with extensions available for smaller operations.
Steps to take now
- Audit compliance programs: Cross-check operations against RIN inventory, stormwater permits, and TSCA reporting duties.
- Upgrade monitoring and recordkeeping: Implement robust electronic systems to track PFAS, stormwater quality, fuel volumes, and emissions.
- Staff training: Educate teams on PFAS obligations, new stormwater protocols, and RFS structures.
- Engage regulators early: Comment on proposed rules, consult during permit drafting, and flag issues during the notice-and-comment period.
Looking ahead
The EPA’s 2026 updates reflect a trend toward increased transparency and environmental accountability. Companies that treat compliance as strategic will not only avoid enforcement but also gain resilience and stakeholder trust.
Key to remember: Start planning now. Early action on EPA rule changes will save time, money, and headaches when enforcement begins.
NewsGreenhouse GasesIndustry NewsIndustry NewsEnvironmental Protection Agency (EPA)Mobile Emission SourcesCAA ComplianceEnvironmentalFocus AreaEnglishAir ProgramsUSA
2026-02-13T06:00:00Z
EPA reverses Endangerment Finding, scraps GHG emission standards for vehicles
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) published a final rule on February 18, 2026, to rescind the 2009 Endangerment Finding and repeal all federal greenhouse gas (GHG) emission standards for:
- On-highway light-, medium-, and heavy-duty vehicles; and
- On-highway heavy-duty vehicle engines.
The final rule takes effect on April 20, 2026, and applies to vehicles and engines of model years 2012 to 2027 and beyond.
What are the changes?
Manufacturers (including importers) of new motor vehicles and motor vehicle engines no longer have to measure, report, or comply with federal GHG emission standards. The final rule removes all GHG emission regulations in 40 CFR:
- Parts 85, 86, and 600 (light- and medium-duty vehicles);
- Part 1036 (heavy-duty vehicle engines); and
- Part 1037 (heavy-duty vehicles).
The final rule also eliminates:
- All off-cycle credits for the addition of certain technological features (e.g., high-efficiency exterior lighting, waste heat recovery, and active seat ventilation); and
- EPA’s incentives for manufacturers to add a start-stop system (which automatically shuts off a vehicle’s engine during idling).
What doesn’t change?
EPA’s following regulations remain in effect for new motor vehicles and vehicle engines:
- Criteria pollutant and air toxic measurement and standards,
- Corporate Average Fuel Economy testing, and
- Associated fuel economy labeling requirements.
About the 2009 Endangerment Finding
In 2009, EPA issued two findings: the Endangerment Finding and the Cause or Contribute Finding. Collectively, these findings are referred to as the 2009 Endangerment Finding. The agency used the 2009 Endangerment Finding as the legal basis to regulate GHG emissions from new motor vehicles and vehicle engines under Section 202(a) of the Clean Air Act.
EPA regulated GHG emissions from new motor vehicles and vehicle engines through:
- Emission standards and related requirements, and
- Engine and vehicle certification requirements.
However, upon reconsideration, EPA stated that it no longer believes it has the statutory authority under Section 202(a) of the Clean Air Act to regulate GHG emissions from new motor vehicles and vehicle engines. Therefore, the agency has simultaneously rescinded the 2009 Endangerment Finding and repealed the related federal GHG emission regulations.
Key to remember: EPA's final rule eliminates the 2009 Endangerment Finding and the related GHG emission requirements for on-highway vehicles and vehicle engines.
NewsIndustry NewsIndustry NewsCriteria Air PollutantsEnvironmental Protection Agency (EPA)CAA ComplianceEnvironmentalFocus AreaEnglishAir ProgramsUSA
2023-11-27T06:00:00Z
A particulate matter: Stricter emissions limits placed on lead recyclers
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) published a final rule for New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) for secondary lead smelters, which include facilities that recycle lead-bearing scrap material, typically lead acid batteries. The final rule imposes stricter regulations on particulate matter (PM) emissions and adds testing, recordkeeping, and reporting requirements.
Who’s impacted?
Secondary lead smelters subject to the NSPS that were constructed, reconstructed, or modified after June 11, 1973, and on or before December 1, 2022, are regulated by 40 CFR 60 Subpart L. While PM emissions and opacity standards remain the same, the final rule adds these requirements:
- Initial performance tests of PM emissions and opacity,
- Periodic performance tests of PM emissions (every 12 months or every 24 months if conditions are met),
- Electronic submission of performance tests through EPA’s Central Data Exchange,
- Monitoring, and
- Recordkeeping and reporting.
Regulated secondary lead smelters that are constructed, reconstructed, or modified after December 1, 2022, are regulated by the newly added Subpart La, which requires the same additions to Subpart L as well as:
- Stricter PM emissions and opacity standards that apply at all times (including periods of startup, shutdown, and malfunction),
- PM standards for all process fugitive emission sources, and
- Periodic performance tests of opacity.
EPA also added Method 22 as an alternative for showing compliance with opacity standards in efforts to reduce testing burdens.
NewsClosuresIndustry NewsIndustry NewsWaste/HazWasteWasteEnvironmental Protection Agency (EPA)Waste ManagementEnvironmentalSolid WasteEnglishFocus AreaUSA
2026-04-16T05:00:00Z
EPA proposes major changes to coal combustion residuals rules
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) published a proposed rule on April 13, 2026, to revise the existing regulations governing the disposal of coal combustion residuals (CCR) in landfills and surface impoundments as well as the beneficial use of CCR.
Who’s impacted?
The proposed rule affects coal-fired electric utilities and independent power producers subject to the CCR disposal and beneficial use regulations at 40 CFR Part 257.
What are the changes?
Significant changes the EPA proposes include:
- Adding an option for facilities to certify the closure of legacy CCR surface impoundments by CCR removal that were closed before November 8, 2024, under regulatory oversight;
- Expanding the eligibility criteria for facilities to defer CCR closure requirements until site-specific determinations are made for legacy surface impoundments that were closed before November 8, 2024, under regulatory oversight;
- Exempting CCR dewatering structures (used to dewater CCR waste for the disposal of CCR elsewhere) from federal CCR regulations (Part 257);
- Rescinding all CCR management unit (CCRMU) requirements or revising the existing CCRMU regulations;
- Allowing permit authorities to make site-specific determinations regarding certain requirements during permitting for CCR units complying with federal CCR groundwater monitoring, corrective action, and closure requirements under a federal or an approved-state CCR permit; and
- Revising the beneficial use requirements by:
- Removing the environmental demonstration requirement for non-roadway use of more than 12,400 tons of unencapsulated CCR; and
- Excluding these beneficial uses from federal CCR regulations (Part 257):
- CCR used in cement manufacturing at cement kilns,
- Flue gas desulfurization (FGD) gypsum used in agriculture, and
- FGD gypsum used in wallboard.
Key to remember: EPA plans to make significant amendments to the coal combustion residuals requirements.
NewsHazardous WasteIndustry NewsEnglishWaste ManifestsSafety & HealthGeneral Industry SafetyWasteEnvironmentalIn-Depth ArticleEnvironmental Management SystemsFocus AreaUSA
2026-04-14T05:00:00Z
What to know about the EPA’s proposed manifest sunset rule
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is taking another major step toward modernizing hazardous waste tracking. The Agency’s proposed “manifest sunset rule” would officially phase out paper hazardous waste manifests and require the exclusive use of the e-Manifest system. For employers, especially those generating or managing hazardous waste, it’s a fundamental shift in how waste shipments are documented, tracked, and audited.
Since 2018, EPA’s e-Manifest system has been available as a digital alternative to paper manifests. Over the years, the agency has added requirements pushing the industry toward adoption, including mandatory registration and electronic data submission. But despite those efforts, many companies have continued to rely on paper manifests, either out of habit, convenience, or because parts of their waste chain weren’t ready to go digital. EPA even states in the proposed rule that less than one percent of all e-manifest users have completely switched to digital manifest. The proposed sunset rule is designed to close that gap. Once finalized, it would set a firm deadline (24 months) after which paper manifests would no longer be allowed.
Why EPA wants to eliminate paper manifests
EPA’s reasoning is pretty straightforward. Paper manifests are slower, easier to lose, and more prone to errors. They rely on manual handling and delayed processing, which can create gaps in tracking and compliance. A fully electronic system, on the other hand, allows for real-time visibility, standardized data entry, and faster correction of mistakes. It also gives regulators a clearer, more immediate picture of what’s happening across the entire waste life cycle.
Addressing one of the biggest digital barriers: signatures
One overlooked part of the proposed rule is how EPA is trying to solve one of the biggest barriers to going fully digital, which is signatures in the field. Anyone who has dealt with manifests knows that the weak point is often the hand-off between the generator and the transporter, especially when drivers don’t have system access or reliable connectivity. To address that, EPA is proposing new functionality that would allow users to sign manifests using quick response (QR) codes or even short message service (SMS). In practice, this could mean a driver scans a QR code or receives a text prompt, then completes the signature process directly from their phone. So, no login or full system access needed. EPA is also exploring the ability to use SMS and QR-based tools to make updates to manifest data without needing full system permissions. That’s a big deal operationally, because it removes one of the most common bottlenecks in needing a registered user at a specific site to make even minor corrections.
Operational challenges companies should expect
With that said, moving to a fully digital system still comes with potential issues. It requires coordination across your entire operation. Generators, transporters, and disposal facilities all have to be aligned and capable of using the system effectively. If one party in that chain struggles, it can create delays or compliance issues for everyone involved. There’s also an upfront investment to consider. Companies may need to upgrade internal systems, ensure reliable connectivity, and train employees in new work processes. For organizations with multiple sites or field operations, which can take some planning. But over time, many of those burdens are expected to decrease. Electronic signatures, reusable templates, and centralized record-keeping can significantly reduce administrative work.
One of the biggest shifts employers will notice is the level of visibility. With paper manifests, there’s often a lag between shipment and final documentation. In a digital system, that lag disappears. Information becomes available almost immediately, and regulators have access to the same data. That means errors or discrepancies are easier to find and harder to ignore.
The good news is that companies don’t have to wait for the final rule to start preparing. Taking a close look at your current manifest process is a good first step. If paper is still a major part of your workflow, that’s a clear signal that changes are coming. Making sure your e-Manifest account is fully set up and that employees understand how to use it, will go a long way in avoiding future disruptions.
Keys to remember: The EPA’s proposed Paper Manifest Sunset Rule would set a firm date to phase out paper hazardous waste manifests and require that all covered shipments be tracked through the agency’s electronic e‑Manifest system, in which the Agency says will improve hazardous‑waste tracking and transparency while reducing administrative burden and saving regulated entities roughly $28.5 million per year.
Most Popular Highlights In Transportation
NewsDriver qualification and hiringReasonable suspicion drug and alcohol testing - Motor CarrierRecruiting and hiringSafety & HealthFocus AreaAssociate RelationsTransportationDisabilities and ADAReasonable AccommodationsDrug and Alcohol TestingDrug and Alcohol TestingDisabilities and ADAMarijuanaHuman ResourcesUSADrug and Alcohol Testing - DOTDriver qualificationsDrug testing - Motor CarrierDrug and alcohol training - Motor CarrierHiring standards - Motor CarrierHR ManagementEnglishDriver recruiting and retentionTalent Management & RecruitingIndustry NewsIndustry NewsFleet SafetyGeneral Industry SafetyDrivers qualification (DQ file)HR GeneralistApplications/Applicants
2026-04-23T05:00:00Z
Federal government reschedules medical marijuana
Medical marijuana has been reclassified into a lower drug category, placing it into the same classification as some prescription painkillers.
Attorney General Todd Blanche issued an order on April 23 moving medical marijuana from Schedule I of the Controlled Substances Act to Schedule III, a class of drugs with a moderate to low potential for dependence, that includes ketamine, Tylenol with codeine, and anabolic steroids. Schedule III drugs can be obtained with a prescription.
Under the order, products containing marijuana approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and marijuana products regulated by a state medical marijuana law are now in the lower drug category.
Rescheduling the drug into a lower classification will support research into marijuana safety and use of the drug for medical purposes, the attorney general noted in a press release.
Impact on the workplace
The order doesn’t address how the rescheduling of medical marijuana impacts compliance with other federal laws, but to avoid the risk of a discrimination claim under the federal Americans with Disabilities Act, employers in states where medical marijuana is legal should treat individuals using medical marijuana as they would treat any individual using a prescription medication.
This includes having a discussion with the employee about accommodations, which may include off-duty use of medical marijuana.
In states where medical marijuana isn’t legal, employers would only need to consider accommodations for use of marijuana products approved by the FDA.
Recreational marijuana considerations
The order doesn’t legalize recreational marijuana, but does announce a June 29 hearing to evaluate broader changes to marijuana’s status under federal law.
The order notes that it doesn’t apply to synthetically derived THC, such as Delta-10 products. The final order notes that synthetically derived THC is outside of the definition of marijuana.
The order also establishes a federal licensing system for state medical marijuana manufacturers and dispensaries. It notes that states where medical marijuana is legal have established systems to regulate the sale and use of medical marijuana.
How does this affect safety-sensitive jobs?
The Drug Enforcement Administration’s reclassification order doesn’t address the impact the change would have on federal drug testing regulations. Specifically, it doesn’t offer insights into Department of Transportation (DOT) drug testing of truck drivers, airline pilots, pipeline operators, and others in safety-sensitive positions.
Before any changes can be implemented by the DOT, drug testing procedures in 49 CFR Part 40 must go through the rulemaking process.
Key to remember: The federal government has moved medical marijuana to a lower classification of drug. To reduce the risk of a discrimination claim, employers in states where medical marijuana is legal should treat it as a prescription medication to lower the risk of a discrimination claim. Employers in all states should consider accommodations for FDA-approved marijuana products.
NewsIndustry NewsIn-Depth ArticleExempt Carrier AuthorityFocus AreaOperating AuthorityFleet OperationsEnglishTransportationUSA
2022-08-31T05:00:00Z
What are exempt for-hire carriers exempt from?
With carriers looking for additional revenue streams, many otherwise private and new carriers wonder whether they can become “exempt” for-hire carriers.
The “exempt for hire” designation is for property carriers that carry certain “exempt commodities,” but do so for compensation. The designation is a holdover from the Interstate Commerce Commission (ICC). Most of the commodities are minimally processed agriculture items, but there’s a fair number of surprises – both in what’s included and what’s not.
The Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) provides a relatively short list of items that are not exempt in 49 CFR 372.115. The agency provides a much more robust list of both exempt and non-exempt commodities in Administrative Rule 119.
Exempt carriers are not required to have a motor carrier or MC number designating for-hire authority. However, exempt carriers are required to have a USDOT number. In order to maintain an exempt for-hire status, the carrier must never haul a commodity that is not exempt for compensation.
Do exempt carriers need to have proof of insurance?
Carriers that haul exempt commodities are required to have the minimum level of financial responsibility required by 49 CFR 387, and their insurance provider must provide the carrier with an MCS-90 endorsement. However, the insurance need not be on file with the FMCSA. Many states have insurance requirements both for the amount required and the need to carry proof of coverage in the vehicle. Federally exempt for-hire carriers are not exempted from any state requirement.
Are exempt for-hire carriers required to name process agents?
Currently, exempt-for hire carriers are not required to name process agents for each state of operation as other for-hire carriers are required to do so on the BOC-3 form. That may change when the FMCSA fully implements their Unified Registration System, or URS. The system was introduced with a final rule in the summer of 2013 and included a provision requiring exempt carriers to have process agents. Much of the rule was suspended at the beginning of 2017. At some point, the agency would like to get the URS ball rolling again.
Are exempt carriers exempt from IFTA, IRP, HVUT, and UCR?
Exempt for-hire carriers are not exempt from the alphabet soup of revenue generating programs of the International Fuel Tax Agreement (IFTA) allowing for the sharing of fuel tax revenue, the International Registration Plan (IRP) allowing for the sharing of vehicle registration fees, the Internal Revenue Service’s (IRS) tax for heavy vehicles that weight 55,000 pounds or more, or for the Unified Carrier Registration (UCR) revenue generating program.
Are exempt carriers exempt from the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations (FMCSRs)?
Exempt carriers are not automatically exempt from the safety regulations such as driver qualifications, drug and alcohol testing, commercial driver licenses, vehicle inspections, or the hours-of-service rules. Although livestock and agriculture commodity carriers may qualify for the hours-of-service agriculture exemption.
Key to remember: “Exempt” commodity haulers are exempt from very little. Primarily they are exempt from needing for-hire authority and designating process agents.
NewsIndustry NewsFleet OperationsEnglishFocus AreaIn-Depth ArticleHighway use - Mileage taxFleet TaxesInternational Fuel Tax Agreement (IFTA)Fleet taxesTransportationUSA
2024-09-19T05:00:00Z
Your HUT decals are expiring: Registration open Oct. 1
For carriers operating in New York, registration and decals expire December 31, 2024, for the Highway Use Tax (HUT) and Automotive Fuel Carrier (AFC) programs. Take steps now to make sure you receive your new decals before the current ones expire. You need a new certificate of registration and decal for each vehicle. And you must place the new decals on your vehicles before January 1, 2025.
The period to renew your 24th series HUT and AFC certificates of registration begins October 1, 2024. Act now to avoid delays and keep your highway use tax credentials active.
To-do before October 1
Get ready for renewal by taking the following steps now:
- File all your highway use tax returns that are due.
- Pay your taxes. The state will not issue a new certificate of registration if you owe back taxes. Before you apply to renew, make sure that you’ve paid all taxes due under any of the programs administered by the New York State Tax Department, including:
- HUT,
- personal income tax,
- International Fuel Tax Agreement (IFTA),
- sales tax, and
- withholding tax.
- Create an online account if you do not already have one and you want to renew your credentials and pay online (https://www.oscar.ny.gov/).
- Make sure your vehicle registration information is correct and accurate. Review and update your information as soon as possible. Incorrect information will delay the processing of your certificates and decals.
Beginning October 1
Once the renewal period opens, renew your credentials and pay your renewal fees online with One Stop Credentialing and Registration (OSCAR).
Submit your renewal application by November 30, 2024, to make sure you receive your decals in time to place them on your vehicles before January 1, 2025.
If you are already enrolled in OSCAR, use your current OSCAR password to renew online.
If you are not enrolled, visit OSCAR, and select Enroll Now. You must have a United States Department of Transportation (USDOT) number and an employer identification number (EIN).
To renew your registration:
- Visit the OSCAR website and select HUT Renewal from the Business Type drop-down.
- Enter your information in the USDOT#, NYS Tax ID#, and Password fields, then select Log in.
- If you have 300 or fewer vehicles, choose either:
- Renew all HUT/AFC Certificates of Registration to renew all your active current series permits, or
- Select HUT/AFC Certificates of Registration to renew specific permits.
- If you have more than 300 vehicles, choose either:
- Renew all to renew all your active current series permits, or
- File renewal to renew select permits.
If you are unable to renew electronically, you may file Form TMT-1.2, Renewal Application for Highway Use Tax (HUT) and Automotive Fuel Carrier (AFC) Certificates of Registrations and Decals – 25th Series.
Key to remember: Take steps now to renew your NY HUT and ensure you receive your new decals before the current ones expire.
NewsIndustry NewsFleet Safety150 air-mile radius exceptionHours of ServiceFocus AreaIn-Depth ArticleEnglishTransportationUSA
2022-08-29T05:00:00Z
The 150 air-mile short-haul exemptions: Widely used and widely misused
The 150 air-mile exemptions, which are in the regulations at 395.1(e)(1) and (2), allow a driver to use a time record in place of a log, provided that certain conditions are met. While this is possibly the most widely used hours-of-service exemption, it may be the most commonly misused exemption, as well.
The basics of logging exemptions
To be able to use this logging exemption in 395.1(e)(1), the driver must:
- Stay within 150 air-miles of the work reporting location for the day (draw a 150 air-mile radius circle around the work reporting location for the day — the driver must stay within this circle),
- Be back to — and released from — the work reporting location for his/her 8- or 10-hour break within 14 hours, and
- Include the starting and ending times for the day and the total hours on duty on the time record for the day.
The company must retain the time record and have it available for inspection for six months.
| Need more info? View our ezExplanation on the 150 air-mile exception. |
What if the driver goes too far or works too many hours?
If the driver cannot meet the terms of the exemption (he or she goes too far or works too many hours), the driver must complete a regular driver’s log for the day as soon as the exemption no longer applies.
If the driver has had to complete a log 8 or fewer days out of the last 30 days, the driver can use a paper log for the day. If the driver had to complete a log more than 8 days out of the last 30 days, the driver needs to use an electronic log for the day (unless one of the ELD exemptions applies, such as operating a vehicle older than model year 2000).
30-minute break exemption
When a property-carrying driver is operating under the 150 air-mile exemption, the driver is also exempt from having to take the required 30-minute break (see 395.3(a)(3)(ii)).
If the driver began the day as a 150 air-mile driver and has driven more than 8 consecutive hours without a break, and something unexpected happens and the driver can no longer use the 150 air-mile exemption, the driver must stop and immediately take the 30-minute break as well as start logging. If the driver went outside of the 150 air-mile area before the driver had 8 hours of driving without a break from driving, the driver would be expected to take the break at the appropriate time.
Common myths
Here are some of the common myths and misunderstandings about the 150 air-mile exemption:
- The driver must have the time records in the vehicle. Myth. The driver simply needs to explain to an officer during a roadside inspection that he/she does not have logs due to operating under the 150 air-mile exemption and that the required time records are back at the carrier’s office (just telling the officer, “I don’t have any logs” will lead to a violation, so the driver needs to know to provide the full explanation).
- The driver must log the previous seven days if he/she had been using this exemption and suddenly can’t. Myth. If the driver cannot use the exemption on one particular day, that is the only day the driver must use a regular log (either paper or electronic).
- Passenger-carrying drivers and drivers hauling hazardous materials cannot use this exemption. Myth. There are no restrictions on the use of this exemption, so any commercial driver can use it.
- A driver that crosses state lines cannot use this exemption. Myth. As this exemption appears in the Federal Motor Carrier Administration (FMCSA) regulations, it can be used by interstate drivers.
- Only drivers that operate out of a “company terminal” can use the 150 air-mile exemption. Myth. As long as the driver makes it back to the work reporting location for the day within the appropriate number of hours, the driver can use the exemption.
- Drivers that move from one jobsite to another every few weeks cannot use this exemption. Myth. If a driver that normally uses this exemption switches work reporting locations, the day the driver switches work reporting locations is the only day the driver cannot use the exemption.
- Drivers covered by this exemption are also exempt from the driver qualification (licensing and medical cards), driving, and vehicle inspection requirements. Myth. The only rules the driver is exempt from are the logging requirement in 395.8 and the 30-minute break requirement in 395.3.
- The driver cannot drive more than 150 miles for the day. Myth. The driver can drive as many miles as he/she wants to or needs to, as long as the driver stays within the 150 air-mile radius circle and gets back to the work reporting location within the appropriate number of hours.
- If a 150 air-mile driver gets into a vehicle with an ELD, the driver must use it. Myth. The carrier can have the driver log in and have the driver entered into the system as an “exempt driver,” or the carrier can request that the driver not log into the device and then attach a comment to the unassigned driving time generated by the driver’s movements. The comment would need to explain that the driver using the vehicle was a 150 air-mile driver who submitted a time record. It is up to the carrier to decide which option to use. If stopped for a roadside inspection, the driver will need to be able to explain to the inspector that he/she is an exempt driver using the 150 air-mile exemption, so using the electronic log is not required.
What’s different with the ‘150 air-mile non-CDL property-carrying drivers’
The 150 air-mile exemption at 395.1(e)(2) only applies to drivers that: Operate property-carrying vehicles that do not require a CDL to operate, and Stay within the 150 air-miles of their work reporting location.
If the driver stays within the 150 air-mile radius of the work reporting location, and returns to the work reporting location within 14 hours on 5 of the last 7 days, and 16 hours on 2 of the last seven days, the driver is allowed to use a time record in place of a log.
If the driver does not meet the terms of the exception, the driver will need to complete a log for the day. If the driver had to log more than 8 days out of the last 30 days, the driver will need to use an electronic log for the day. All of the other issues discussed above would apply to these drivers as well.
Managing the use
If you have drivers that use these exemptions, you will need to check time records to make sure they are complying with the appropriate time limits. You will also need to check movement records to verify that the drivers using these exemptions are staying within the mandated area (within 150 air-miles of the work reporting location for the day).
If a driver is over the hours limit, or has gone too far, you need to verify that the submitted a log for the day, either paper or electronic, depending on how many days the driver had to log out of the previous 30 days.
Verifying compliance is important
During an audit, if it is discovered that your drivers are using these exemptions incorrectly, you will be cited for not having drivers’ logs when required. Each day this occurred will be another violation, so the fine could be rather large if you are not managing the use of these exemptions!
NewsCommercial drivers license CDLIndustry NewsIndustry NewsCommercial learners permit CLPCommercial drivers license CDLFocus AreaFleet OperationsEnglishTransportationUSA
2026-04-23T05:00:00Z
FMCSA withholds more than $73 million from New York
The Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) is holding back over $73 million from New York. This withholding is in response to the state failing to revoke illegally issued non-domiciled commercial learner’s permits (CLPs) and commercial driver’s licenses (CDLs).
An FMCSA audit of New York’s non-domiciled commercial license issuance procedures noted:
- A 53 percent failure rate for issued licenses that violated federal law, and
- A default system that issued 8-year licenses to drivers regardless of when their legal status expires.
According to the FMCSA, New York has failed to execute corrective actions, including taking back noncompliant non-domiciled CDLs and CLPs.
The $73,502,543 being withheld represents 4 percent of the state’s National Highway Performance Program and Surface Transportation Program Block Grant funds.
NewsIndustry NewsPhysical exam - Motor CarrierFleet SafetyFocus AreaIn-Depth ArticleFleet OperationsUSAEnglishTransportationPhysical exam - Motor Carrier
2022-11-22T06:00:00Z
If time remains on their medical certification, can a driver be sent for a DOT exam?
A few frequently-asked questions about sending a driver for a DOT exam between medical certifications include the following:
- “Can I send my driver for a DOT exam if they were out for surgery or experienced a concerning event and have time left on their medical card?”
- “The driver was cleared by their treating provider for an injury or condition. Is that enough to let them operate a commercial motor vehicle (CMV)?”
- “My driver was off on a medical leave of absence for over 30 days. Do I need to send them for a DOT exam?”
Drivers must meet the medical qualifications standards found in 391.41 through the medical certification date. Suppose the driver’s ability to operate a commercial motor vehicle (CMV) safely is potentially affected before the medical certification expires. In that case, a carrier must send them for a DOT exam per 391.45(g) performed by a certified medical examiner (CME).
Two key points to note are:
- A driver is not required to undergo a DOT exam if off work for a medical reason or a period of time unless there is a safety concern or the medical certification expires.
- A treating clinician’s clearance to return to work is insufficient to allow the driver to operate a CMV if a specific safety risk exists. A CME must perform the DOT exam.
Risk management is important for carriers to keep in mind. A carrier should send a driver for a DOT medical certification rather than experience a crash in which a plaintiff’s attorney could question the driver’s mental or physical condition as the cause.
Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) considerations:
The ADA restricts when employers may make medical inquiries or require medical exams of employees. However, if another federal law (e.g., FMCSR) mandates such inquiries or exams, they do not violate the ADA.
Otherwise, to make such inquiries or require exams, employers need to have a reasonable belief, based on objective evidence, that a particular employee is unable to perform the job’s essential functions because of a medical condition or the employee will pose a direct threat because of a medical condition.
Simply claiming a direct threat isn’t enough. Employers need to be able to show the following:
- There is a significant risk of substantial harm;
- The specific risk is identified;
- It is a current risk, not one that is speculative or remote;
- The risk assessment was based on objective medical or other factual evidence regarding a particular individual; and
- If a genuine risk of substantial harm exists, you have to consider whether the risk can be eliminated or reduced below the level of a direct threat by reasonable accommodation.
For example, a driver was off work for three months to have multiple eye surgeries. Vision, including depth perception, is essential to operate a CMV safely. After being cleared to return to work, a DOT exam would likely be in order.
Key to remember:
If there is a reason to believe that a driver has a physical or mental condition that may pose a safety risk while operating a CMV, the carrier is required to send them for a DOT exam.
Most Popular Highlights In Human Resources
NewsElements of a General Duty Clause ViolationBehavior Based SafetyRisk Assessment and ManagementTraining & DevelopmentEmployee RelationsSafety CommitteesIn-Depth ArticleAssociate Benefits & CompensationSafety & HealthEmployee RelationsGeneral Duty ClauseHuman ResourcesSafety and Health Programs and TrainingTrainingTrainingGeneral Duty Clause Enforcement AreasWorkplace SecurityHR ManagementEnglishFacility SecurityIndustry NewsWorkplace ViolenceActive ShooterWorkplace ViolenceGeneral Industry SafetyGeneral Duty ClauseHR GeneralistAssociate RelationsFocus AreaUSA
2026-04-24T05:00:00Z
Workplace violence prevention: Working together to create safer work environments
April is Workplace Violence Awareness Month. Organizations earmark April to focus on ways to reduce the risk of a violent incident happening in the workplace. By increasing awareness and fostering a culture of safety, organizations can help protect their employees from harm.
Health care settings
Health workers worldwide face a high risk of violence, with 8–38 percent experiencing physical attacks, while others are subjected to threats or verbal abuse, according to the World Health Organization (WHO). Most incidents involve patients or visitors. Those at greatest risk include nurses, patient-facing staff, emergency room personnel, and paramedics.
Violence against health workers harms staff well-being, morale, and retention, ultimately compromising quality of care and causing significant financial loss.
An OSHA proposed rule — ‘Workplace Violence in Health Care and Social Assistance’ — was moved to Long-Term Action status, according to the Spring 2025 regulatory agenda that was released on September 4, 2025. Long-Term Actions are items under development, but the agency doesn’t expect to have a regulatory action within the 12 months after the latest edition of the agenda.
This turn of events was surprising since OSHA had been working on a standard for preventing workplace violence in health care and social assistance settings. OSHA had planned to publish the proposed rule in the Federal Register in June 2025.
Even without a federal standard addressing workplace violence in health care, several states have their own health care violence prevention laws in place.
General Duty Clause
Although OSHA doesn’t have a workplace violence standard, employers must provide a workplace that’s free of known health and safety hazards. This is addressed in OSHA’s General Duty Clause (GDC), Section 5(a) of the Occupational Safety and Health (OSH) Act.
The following elements are necessary for OSHA to prove a violation of the GDC:
- The employer failed to keep the workplace free of a hazard to which employees of that employer were exposed;
- The hazard was recognized;
- The hazard was causing or was likely to cause death or serious physical harm; and
- There was a feasible and useful method to correct the hazard.
A general duty citation must involve both the presence of a serious hazard and exposure of the cited employer’s own employees.
During a violent incident investigation, OSHA inspectors would likely gather evidence about whether an employer knew that a potential workplace violence hazard existed and whether there were feasible means to prevent or minimize such hazards. Investigators might also look at evidence of any potential whistleblower retaliation in which workers complained about workplace violence risks or reported injuries from workplace violence incidents.
Health care facilities have been cited when staff were injured by violent patients or visitors. In one case, nurses were regularly assaulted, but the hospital had no prevention program, no staff training, and no reporting system. OSHA stepped in using the GDC. Prevention could have included de-escalation training, secure facility layouts, panic buttons, and post-incident support.
Tips for preventing violent acts
In most workplaces where risk factors can be identified, violent acts can be prevented or minimized.
Building respectful workplaces is one way to do this. The most common forms of uncivil behaviors are when employees:
- Address others in disrespectful ways,
- Interrupt those who are speaking, and
- Micromanage people to an excessive degree.
Providing employees with civility training — which differs from anti-harassment training — can help to create more respectful work environments with less conflict. While civility training isn’t only focused on preventing harassment, that could be a component.
Research has shown that incivility can be a precursor to harassment. In contrast to anti-harassment training, civility training tends to give employees positive examples of how to behave, versus actions to avoid.
The training typically includes a focus on:
- Interpersonal communication,
- Conflict resolution, and
- Effective supervisory techniques.
How civility training is presented will depend on the size of the workforce, demographics, location, industry, etc. There is no one-size-fits-all approach. The point is to get employees to be more aware of how their words and actions impact others, and how they should treat everyone with respect.
It’s also important to watch for signs that someone could turn violent. While there’s no guarantee that one or more questionable behaviors equate to a potential incident, some warning signs come from someone experiencing personal or work issues.
They could be struggling financially, going through a divorce, or having health issues. Work triggers could stem from negative employment actions, like a demotion or termination, or other types of conflict.
Key to remember: April is Workplace Violence Prevention Month. Now’s the time to focus on ways to keep all employees safe.
NewsIndustry NewsIndustry NewsHR GeneralistFamily and Medical Leave Act (FMLA)Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA)USAHR ManagementEnglishFocus AreaHuman Resources
2023-09-06T05:00:00Z
Appellate court sided with employee's (almost) 3-year-delayed FMLA claim
Back in October 2018, Laffon had a medical emergency and needed some time off under the federal Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA).
Her leave lasted until November 15. Ten days after she returned to work, on November 26, her employer terminated her.
She sued, arguing that the employer retaliated against her because of her FMLA leave.
The catch? She didn't bring the suit until almost three years later.
No link between leave and termination
In court, the employer argued that there was no causal link between Laffon taking FMLA leave and her termination. Although the court documents aren't robust, they do reveal that the employer indicated that Laffon's allegations didn't show that her taking FMLA leave was a factor in the decision to terminate her. The documents showed only that the termination chronologically followed her leave.
The court agreed with the employer. It also agreed that Laffon failed to allege a willful violation of the FMLA, which would allow her to benefit from the FMLA's three-year statute of limitations.
Laffon appealed the case to the Ninth Circuit.
Statute of limitations
Under the FMLA, employees have two years from the date of the last event constituting the alleged violation for which they can bring a claim.
Those two years are extended to three years if the employer's actions were "willful." This means that an employee must show that the employer either knew or showed reckless disregard for whether its conduct violated the FMLA.
Ruling overturned
Fast forward to August 2023, when the Ninth Circuit reversed the lower court's decision. It indicated that, based on Laffon's amended complaint and liberally construing the law, her allegations establish that her leave was causally connected to her termination and that the employer's action (her termination) was willful.
Glymph v. CT Corporation Systems, No. 22-35735, Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, August 22, 2023.
Key to remember: Terminating an employee soon after returning from FMLA leave is risky, unless there is a clear, well-documented, non-leave-related reason. Case documents did not show such a clear reason, which can also increase the risk of a willful finding. Employees have time to file claims, even years.
NewsIndustry NewsAssociate Benefits & CompensationHR GeneralistFamily and Medical Leave Act (FMLA)In-Depth ArticleFamily and Medical Leave Act (FMLA)Associate RelationsEnglishHR ManagementFocus AreaHuman ResourcesUSA
2025-03-27T05:00:00Z
Who can fill out FMLA forms? The answer might surprise you
One of the most common questions involving the federal Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) that we see is: “Can ________ fill out the medical certification?”
This question stumps a lot of HR people and can be a little confusing.
It might be easier to start with who CAN’T fill out an FMLA certification. That includes your coworker, best friend, neighbor, or pet.
Jokes aside, often (but not always) a doctor fills out the FMLA certification, and since March 30 is “Doctors’ Day,” this is a great time to discuss this topic.
FMLA certification basics
Employers aren’t required to use certifications, but if they do, the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) has five different certification forms to use for various FMLA leave situations.
The forms are as follows:
- Certification of Health Care Provider for Employee's Serious Health Condition,
- Certification of Health Care Provider for Family Member's Serious Health Condition,
- Certification of Qualifying Exigency for Military Family Leave,
- Certification for Serious Injury or Illness of a Current Servicemember for Military Family Leave, and
- Certification for Serious Injury or Illness of a Veteran for Military Family Leave.
Let’s focus on the first two, as these are the most common ones HR administrators use.
Who can fill out an FMLA certification?
The FMLA regulations describe the person who has the authority to fill out a certification as a “health care provider.” The good news is, the regulations include a lengthy list of medical professionals who fit this role.
Under the FMLA, a health care provider includes:
- A doctor of medicine or osteopathy,
- A podiatrist,
- A dentist,
- A clinical psychologist,
- An optometrist,
- A chiropractor (limited to manual manipulation of the spine as demonstrated by X-ray),
- A nurse practitioner,
- A nurse midwife,
- A clinical social worker,
- A physician assistant,
- A Christian Science practitioner, and
- Any health care provider from whom the employer or the employer's group health plan's benefits manager will accept a medical certification to substantiate a claim for benefits.
To be qualified to fill out FMLA forms, medical professionals must be authorized to practice in the state and perform within the scope of their practice. This means that the provider must be authorized to diagnose and treat physical or mental health conditions.
What about doctors in a foreign country?
If an employee or an employee's family member is visiting another country, or a family member resides in another country, and a serious health condition develops, the employer must accept a medical certification from a health care provider who practices in that country. This includes second and third opinions.
If a medical certification from a foreign health care provider is not in English, the employee may be required to provide a written translation of the certification.
Key to remember: The FMLA regulations spell out which medical professionals can fill out certification forms.
NewsIndustry NewsIn-Depth ArticleFamily and Medical Leave Act (FMLA)Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA)USAHR ManagementEnglishFocus AreaHuman Resources
2023-07-20T05:00:00Z
Dealing with FMLA Monday/Friday absences
The federal Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) allows eligible employees to take job-protected leave for certain qualifying reasons. Over the years, employees have gotten creative when scheduling such leave, including taking it on Mondays and/or Fridays to extend a weekend.
Employers trying to oversee schedules and meet other business needs might get frustrated when employees take leave. When employees take leave in suspicious patterns, the frustration swells.
It doesn’t help that the FMLA restricts when and how employers may obtain information on the reasons behind leave.
Employers, however, do have some resources available to them when determining whether a Monday/Friday absence pattern is valid, or if the employee is abusing leave.
Recertifying FMLA leave
Once employers have a certification supporting the need for a leave, they may not request recertification more often than every 30 days, or until the minimum duration of the condition listed on the certification has expired.
Employers may, however, request recertification more often if:
- The employee requests an extension of leave,
- Circumstances described by the initial certification have changed significantly, or
- They receive information that casts doubt upon the reason for leave or the continuing validity of the certification.
When employers suspect FMLA abuse, they should review the information contained in the certification to see if the absences match. If not, they may investigate the situation further.
Asking about absence patterns
To help with this investigation, when requesting a recertification, employers may include a record of the employee’s absences and ask the health care provider if the pattern is consistent with the serious health condition.
It’s true that employers may not generally contact the employee’s health care provider directly for this information, but they may add this type of question to the medical recertification form, and direct the employee to have it completed.
Tracking absences
In such situations, employers might want to review the absence patterns of employees in question and be on the lookout for suspicious absences in the future.
Effectively tracking all leave is a must to identify patterns that could indicate FMLA leave abuse. If employers learn that an absence is not for a valid FMLA-qualifying reason, the employee is not entitled to the protections of the law for such an absence.
Key to remember: If employees are suspiciously taking FMLA leave such as on Mondays and Fridays, employers may request a recertification supporting the leave pattern.
NewsDrug and Alcohol TestingDrug Free WorkplaceMarijuanaSubstance AbuseFamily and Medical Leave Act (FMLA)In-Depth ArticleFamily and Medical Leave Act (FMLA)HR ManagementEnglishHuman ResourcesIndustry NewsHR GeneralistAssociate RelationsFocus AreaUSA
2022-11-30T06:00:00Z
Drugs, alcohol, and the FMLA
The U.S. has an opioid crisis, according to the National Institutes of Health, with opioid-involved deaths at 68,630 in 2020. Based on a survey conducted by the National Safety Council, in 2019, 75 percent of employers reported that opioid use impacted their workplace.
Enter the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA). This federal law entitles eligible employees to take job-protected, unpaid leave for qualifying reasons. Substance abuse treatment, some employers might not realize, can be one of those reasons.
Serious health condition
Substance abuse can be an FMLA-qualifying serious health condition as long as it meets the definition. If an employee (or family member) is kept overnight in a health care facility or if continuing treatment is involved, a serious health condition exists.
An FMLA serious health condition involving continuing treatment includes, for example:
- A period of incapacity of more than three, consecutive, full calendar days, and any subsequent treatment.
- Any period of incapacity (or treatment for) a chronic serious health condition requiring treatments at least twice per year.
- A period of incapacity for a permanent or long-term condition in which treatment might not be effective.
- Any period of absence to receive multiple treatments for a condition that would likely result in a period of incapacity of more than three consecutive, full calendar days in the absence of treatment.
Employees in substance abuse treatment programs could be experiencing any of these. As with most FMLA leave requests, you may require that an employee provide a certification to support the need for such leave. A certification should give you enough information to determine if the condition meets the criteria.
Treatment
One of the key words here is “treatment.” An employee who is not receiving treatment for substance abuse might not be entitled to FMLA leave for substance abuse. Employees are not, however, entitled to FMLA leave, for example, due to being under the influence of drugs or alcohol even if they indicate that they are going to obtain treatment in the future. FMLA leave is only for someone actually receiving treatment.
Let’s say, for example, that Jo Employee is selected for a random drug test and tests positive for illegal narcotics. If Jo never requested FMLA leave for the condition, under your company’s drug policy, Jo could be subject to termination. If you don’t have such a policy, your actions, however, may be more limited.
The federal Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) does not protect employees who illegally use drugs, and neither the FMLA nor the ADA protects employees who are impaired on the job. The ADA could, however, protect employees who receive medication-assisted treatment (MAT) to help reduce or quit the use of opiates, even if the medication is methadone (a narcotic) and shows up in a drug test.
Key takeaway: Employees could be entitled to FMLA leave to receive treatment for a substance abuse disorder, but they are not entitled to FMLA leave simply because they are impaired by a legal or illegal substance. The details of each case need to be considered.
NewsIndustry NewsHR GeneralistFamily and Medical Leave Act (FMLA)In-Depth ArticleFamily and Medical Leave Act (FMLA)HR ManagementEnglishUSAFocus AreaHuman Resources
2024-05-07T05:00:00Z
May employees take FMLA leave to care for family members outside the U.S.?
Yes, employees may take leave under the federal Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) to care for family members who are outside U.S. borders.
If the employee meets the eligibility criteria of the FMLA, the family member has an FMLA serious health condition, and the employee is needed to care for the family member, the employee’s time off would be protected. It doesn’t really matter where the family member is.
To figure out whether the family member’s condition meets the criteria under the FMLA, employers may require that the employee provide a certification supporting the leave.
Certifications in other languages
If an employee or a family member is visiting in another country, or a family member lives in another country, and a serious health condition develops, employers must accept a medical certification from a health care provider who practices in that country. This rule applies to an original certification, a recertification, and when requesting a second or third opinion from a provider.
If a certification by a health care provider from another country is in a language other than English, employers may require that the employee provide a written translation of the certification.
Traveling to care for family member
If family members are outside the U.S., employees will need to spend some time traveling. The employee’s travel time would likely be seen as part of the FMLA leave if:
- The travel is so intertwined with the care, or
- If it is needed to obtain the care.
Handling intermittent leave
Employees may also take intermittent FMLA leave to care for far-away family members. Employers would manage such leave the same way they do for intermittent leave inside the U.S. Employers should:
- Give the employee an eligibility/rights & responsibilities notice within five days of being put on notice,
- Ask for a certification if desired (including a translation),
- Give the employee a designation notice within five days of getting enough information, and
- Track the employee’s leave time.
Whenever employees are away from the physical worksite, tracking how much intermittent FMLA leave they are taking has its own challenges. Employers may use a simple honor system of self-reporting or technology to keep track of when the employee is taking FMLA leave and when the employee is working.
Key to remember: Eligible employees may take FMLA leave to care for family members who are outside the U.S.
Most Popular Highlights In Safety & Health
NewsIndustry NewsSafety and Health Programs and TrainingSafety & HealthConstruction SafetyGeneral Industry SafetySafety and Health Programs and TrainingIn-Depth ArticleEnglishFocus AreaUSA
2026-04-23T05:00:00Z
Got safety handbooks? We asked, you answered
Employee training, onboarding, ongoing reference … We asked the J. J. Keller Insights Community, a group of customers who share feedback about safety-related topics, how they use safety handbooks in their workplaces. These handbooks are purchased – not created in-house by the panelists or their company – and may focus on a specific topic, like personal protective equipment (PPE), or cover a broad range of environmental, health, and safety (EHS) topics.
More than 70 percent of respondents said they require new employees to review safety handbooks during onboarding. Another 58 percent said they use them for refresher or ongoing training, and several respondents mentioned using them for reference purposes.
Handbooks can play an important role in workplace safety and health programs. For new employees, they help set clear expectations before starting work, identify where to find vital safety information, and build safe habits early on. Handbooks also help ensure consistency by delivering the same core safety information to all employees regardless of department, shift, or trainer.
For supervisors and managers, safety handbooks are practical tools for leading toolbox talks, reinforcing or developing training materials, and addressing unsafe behaviors.
Shared versus individual handbooks
Nearly 60 percent of survey respondents bought one handbook (or a few) and shared them among employees, while 42 percent provided individual handbooks for each employee. Of those who purchased one or a few, they typically kept the handbooks in central or safety-related locations, such as:
- Main offices
- Safety or compliance offices
- EHS departments
- Classroom or training spaces
- Shared libraries near Safety Data Sheet binders or training areas
- Shop floors near work areas
Use in training programs
As mentioned, the majority of those surveyed said they use safety handbooks as part of new hire, ongoing, and refresher training. This includes the following uses:
- Building or supporting existing training programs
- Creating quizzes or review questions
- Supporting skills testing (e.g., forklift, ladder, PPE)
- Providing supplementary materials for:
- Toolbox talks
- OSHA 30 courses
- Job-specific trainings (e.g., load securement, bloodborne pathogens, Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations)
Additional survey feedback
Open-ended survey responses highlighted that some companies prefer visual presentations or digital formats over print publications, with some expressing concern that hard copy materials may quickly become outdated. Others said they use handbooks only as background reference for the EHS team and see a need to increase handbook use in their company.
Key to remember: Safety handbooks can serve as a core part of safety and health programs by giving employees and supervisors a shared reference for training conversations and expectations.
NewsIndustry NewsSafety & HealthForklifts and Powered TrucksConstruction SafetyGeneral Industry SafetyForklifts and Powered TrucksPIT Training RequirementsIn-Depth ArticleEnglishSafe Operation of PITsFocus AreaUSA
2024-01-10T06:00:00Z
Clear vision, sound safety: The role of vision and hearing tests for forklift operators
The powered industrial truck standard at 1910.178 does not specifically address the vision and hearing requirements of operators. However, there are obviously some potential concerns and safety issues. These need to be evaluated by the employer (and appropriate medical personnel) in light of specific operations and work environment.
OSHA has issued letters of interpretation (LOI) addressing both vision (LOI dated October 20,1976) and hearing (LOI dated January 26, 1998) impaired potential forklift operators. These letters make no mention of vision or hearing requirements but do point out an ANSI B56.1 standard which suggests “an examination…include such things as field of vision, hearing, depth perception and reaction timing”, as well as “require employers to assure that operators are qualified as to visual, auditory, and mental ability to operate the equipment safely."
It should be noted that OSHA has not incorporated these ANSI requirements as an OSHA standard as of yet. That means it is up to the employer, through consultation with the appropriate medical personnel, to ensure their forklift operators can operate the equipment safely. Employers may not discriminate against an employee based on any impairment.
OSHA encourages employers to explore reasonable accommodations that will allow otherwise-qualified individuals to remain on the job while eliminating threats to the health or safety of others in the workplace.
Understand impairment concerns
Employers may have concerns for those workers with a hearing and/or vision impairment that wish to be trained as forklift operators. By recognizing potential safety issues, they can work to implement appropriate measures for the operator.
Around 15 percent of adult Americans say they have trouble hearing. For those with a hearing impairment, potential safety concerns with forklift operation may include difficulty or inability to hear the following:
- pedestrians nearby;
- horns or other warning signals;
- verbal instructions and training;
- other equipment;
- potential malfunction of the forklift; and
- emergency signals.
In addition, 18.4 percent of adult Americans are either blind or experience “a lot” or “some” visual impairment, even with corrective glasses in place . Potential safety risks associated with forklift operation for those who have a vision impairment may include:
- inadequate depth perception;
- insufficient peripheral vision;
- difficulty seeing pedestrians; and
- trouble differentiating different work environments.
Focus on appropriate measures
Hearing and vision impairment does not mean forklift operation is impossible, it simply suggests the employer may need to consider reasonable accommodations and implement appropriate measures for the operator.
For those with hearing impairments, this could include:
- installing vibrating alarms or lights to notify the operator of potential threats;
- utilizing hand signals or written instructions as a form of communication;
- increasing usage of mirrors and/or cameras to improve situational awareness; and
- providing specialized training for operators with hearing impairments.
For those with vision impairments, this could include:
- installing audible proximity detectors or sensors;
- enforcing pedestrian walkways and requiring hi-vis apparel;
- establishing clear communication methods and large signage where appropriate;
- maintaining floor markings, clear pathways, and adequate lighting; and
- providing specialized training for operators with vision impairments.
Remember the operation requirements
At a minimum, workers must receive proper training and certification before being allowed to operate a forklift. Such training includes a combination of formal instruction, practical training, and evaluation. Operators must be re-evaluated every three years, and refresher training provided to those who meet certain criteria. Also keep in mind, it is a violation of Federal law for anyone under the age of 18 to operate a forklift regardless of ability.
Key to remember
Ultimately, it is up to each employer (with a physician’s guidance, if necessary) to determine if an employee can operate the forklift in a safe manner.
NewsIndustry NewsSafety & HealthConstruction SafetyGeneral Industry SafetyWalking Working SurfacesIn-Depth ArticleLaddersEnglishFocus AreaUSA
2026-04-22T05:00:00Z
Ladders, familiar work, serious risks
Ladder-related standards consistently rank among OSHA’s top 10 most cited violations. Every year, serious injuries continue to occur, not because ladders are unsafe, but because they’re used in ways people don’t recognize them as risky.
Preventing ladder incidents starts with recognizing when everyday tasks introduce risk and making deliberate choices to use, position, and reassess ladders before unsafe habits take hold.
Ladders feel safe, until they’re not
Ladders don’t usually trigger a sense of risk because they’re seen as a part of everyday work. When tasks feel quick and familiar, people don’t always stop reassessing the setup. That’s how unsafe ladder habits with big consequences can develop, including:
- standing on the top step “just for a second;”
- reaching too far instead of climbing down;
- using whatever ladder is closest, not the right one; and
- skipping ladder inspections because “it worked last time.”
Ladder safety isn’t going away, and that’s not a bad thing
If ladder safety feels like a repeat conversation, that’s because the same risks keep showing up. New employees are hired; facilities and equipment changes, and old habits stick around longer than they should. Even experienced workers fall into this trap. Familiar tasks start to invite rushing. Rushing leads to shortcuts, and shortcuts are where ladder injuries happen.
Emphasis must be placed on recognizing the risk before the climb starts. This means knowing when a ladder is the wrong choice, repositioning is safer than reaching, and when a quick task deserves the same setup as a longer one.
Most incidents don’t start with bad intentions. They start with “just this once” decisions, one more rung, one quick reach, one skipped check. Effective ladder safety training is about breaking routines and refocusing attention on the decisions that make ladder work safer.
Routine work, repeat injuries
Ladder injuries follow a familiar pattern. They don’t usually come from unusual jobs or unexpected hazards, and they happen during everyday tasks that feel common. Injury reports often look the same, such as short tasks, quick setups, and decisions made under time pressure. The ladder didn’t fail. The setup and the decisions around it did.
Injury data from OSHA and the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) consistently point to the same causes. That’s why the same types of ladder injuries keep occurring repeatedly, not because the hazards are unknown, but because routine work makes those hazards easier to overlook. These reasons include:
- people underestimate the risk because ladders feel familiar;
- jobs feel “too small” to stop and reset the ladder;
- time pressure encourages leaning, rushing, and overreaching; and
- experience leads to comfort, and comfort leads to shortcuts.
The rules are written in injuries
OSHA ladder requirements are built around real injury trends and are based on decades of injury data. Falls from ladders remain one of the leading causes of workplace injuries, which is why OSHA keeps ladders near the top of its enforcement priorities year after year:
OSHA 29 CFR 1910.23 defines how ladders are intended to be used, specifically prohibiting practices such as standing on the top step of a stepladder, using ladders for purposes they were not designed for, and climbing ladders that have not been inspected. These requirements exist because improper use, poor setup, and skipped inspections consistently show up in ladder fall investigations.
OSHA 29 CFR 1910.30 reinforces that preventing ladder injuries depends on training employees to recognize hazards before they climb, understand proper ladder selection and positioning, and know when a ladder is not the right tool for the task. Together, these standards emphasize that ladder injuries are not random events, they are predictable outcomes of routine decisions made during everyday work.
Small choices make a big difference
Ladder safety isn’t only about compliance. Incidents develop from a series of small, moment to moment decisions made during routine work. These choices made daily either reduce risk or quietly add to it. Ladder injuries can be avoided by taking the time to make simple improvements including:
- inspecting and securing the ladder,
- climbing down and repositioning,
- selecting the proper ladder for the task, and
- stopping when the ladder no longer feels stable or safe.
Key to remember: Take the time to choose safer setups, stay alert, and prevent routine decisions from turning into preventable injuries. When employees choose the correct ladder, reposition instead of reaching, and inspect before use, the risk of ladder injuries falls, not your employees.
NewsIndustry NewsSafety & HealthWork-Relatedness DeterminationGeneral Industry SafetyIn-Depth ArticleUSAEnglishFocus AreaInjury and Illness Recordkeeping
2021-05-05T05:00:00Z
Can you fire someone who’s out for a work-related injury?
Many supervisors have wondered if they can fire an employee who is off work because of a work-related injury. The short answer is yes, but you’ll need to provide a legitimate reason for termination in order to avoid the appearance of retaliation. In many cases, you can even fire an employee for refusing a light duty offer.
You cannot fire an employee simply for reporting an injury or filing a workers’ compensation claim, but you can fire them for other valid reasons, even after they report an injury or file a claim.
Most states allow you to fire an employee without giving a specific reason, although most employers won’t agree to terminate someone unless they have a reason. In addition, that reason needs to be supported by documentation such as written warnings.
Documentation
Laws that protect employees from discrimination or retaliation do not protect them from termination, if you have a valid reason. For example, an employee cannot be fired because of race, gender, or national origin. However, any employee could still be fired for reasons like theft, workplace violence, or violating company policies.
If an employee engaged in protected activity (such as filing a workers’ compensation claim) and you want to fire that employee, you’ll need to show that anyone would have been fired in that situation, and the protected activity was not a consideration.
To accomplish that, you’ll need to show documentation of the reason, such as repeated warnings for violating safety rules. Even if warning are delivered verbally, you should document the date and nature of the warning. Simply claiming that “I’ve warned him verbally several times” usually won’t be sufficient.
Refusing light duty
If a doctor releases an injured employee to work with restrictions, and the company offers work within those restrictions, you can expect the employee to show up for work. In many cases, refusing to report for light duty can be treated the same as a refusing to work any other shift. The employee might be fired or told that refusal to work is considered job abandonment.
However, if the employee is protected under the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA), termination is not an option. The FMLA can apply to a workers’ compensation injury, and gives the employee a right to time off until he or she can return to the former position (not merely to a light duty position).
If an employee refuses a light duty offer, he or she will likely lose wage replacement benefits under workers’ compensation. Still, an employee protected by the FMLA can take unpaid leave until he or she can return to the same job, or until the 12 weeks of FMLA leave are exhausted.
Even employees protected by the FMLA can be fired for valid reasons, such as theft or violations of company policies. However, any termination should proceed with caution, and employers should consider consulting with an employment law attorney about the situation.
NewsAccident Investigation Preparation and ResponseIndustry NewsAccident Investigation - OSHASafety & HealthConstruction SafetyGeneral Industry SafetyAgriculture SafetyIn-Depth ArticleEnglishFocus AreaUSA
2023-05-04T05:00:00Z
Tips and tricks for interviewing witnesses after an accident
Witness interviews are critical to any accident investigation and should be taken as quickly as possible after an accident. That’s when the information is fresh, and there’s less time for witnesses to talk with each other or come up with creative versions of the events that occurred. Interviews should focus on the facts of the event, including what happened before and after, and should avoid opinions and assumptions. Ultimately, the investigator needs to know who was involved, what they were doing, what was happening at the time, and when and where the accident occurred.
Interviews should be conducted privately with no more than two interviewers. By keeping the interviews small and away from others, you have a much better chance of having a factual and productive conversation. It may be tempting to let management sit in, but they’re likely to cause the employee to clam up and not be forthcoming. Keeping this conversation informal can help employees relax and talk more freely. Simply ask what happened and let the witnesses tell the story in their own words. Remind them that the goal of this conversation isn’t to get anyone in trouble.
Ask open-ended questions like “what happened next?” and avoid leading questions. A leading question might cause someone to make things up in an attempt to answer the question. Witnesses might give their opinions, and you can make notes, but distinguish between the facts and their opinions. Along the same lines, avoid questions that suggest an accusation, such as “do you think he wasn’t paying attention?” Repeat their conclusions back to them to confirm your understanding.
Something else to remember when interviewing is that people aren’t perfect. Statements from multiple witnesses might be contradictory because both statements can’t possibly be factual. This doesn’t mean either worker is lying. It could just be how they remember the events or are worried they may get in trouble.
Suppose the incident involved a forklift operator who stopped suddenly, and the load he was carrying slid off the tines, nearly striking a pedestrian. You might hear statements like, “I didn’t see the forklift” or “the pedestrian just came out of nowhere.” Now, that may be how the witnesses remember things. But there’s probably something else going on here. Follow-up questions might be along the lines of, “what were you focused on at the time of the accident?” Maybe the pedestrian was checking his cell phone and didn’t see or hear the forklift approaching. Or perhaps the forklift operator was going too fast or failed to stop and sound the horn at an intersection. There could be several contributing factors, and you’ll want to identify all of them.
Key to remember
Witness interviews provide valuable information in determining what happened when an incident occurs. It’s essential to make the witnesses comfortable and remind them the goal of investigating is to help prevent reoccurrence, not to blame employees.
NewsIndustry NewsHead ProtectionEye and Face ProtectionPersonal Protective EquipmentSafety & HealthConstruction SafetyHand ProtectionIn-Depth ArticleEnglishFocus AreaUSA
2023-03-15T05:00:00Z
Three reasons construction workers don’t wear their PPE
The hazards in construction work require personal protective equipment (PPE) to be worn on many jobsites. However, serious issues can arise when employees don’t wear their PPE. There are numerous reasons this occurs, but let’s focus on three.
It doesn’t fit properly
PPE that doesn’t fit is often the reason construction workers don’t wear it. Things like safety footwear, hardhats, safety glasses, and gloves all come to mind.
Safety footwear needs to be the proper size and often it’s not. That’s because when it’s tried on in the store, the wrong size is purchased. Feet tend to be smaller in the morning and during the day they expand. That’s because the feet swell, especially if workers are walking around a jobsite all day. That’s why it’s recommended to try on shoes in the late afternoon to ensure they fit right.
Hardhats need to be adjusted correctly to fit properly. That’s why workers are given their own hard hat. Once it’s adjusted properly, you typically don’t have to mess with it again. The hat’s suspension is what’s adjusted, so if the suspension is worn out, or not installed correctly, the hat won’t fit and will be uncomfortable to wear.
People’s heads are different sizes and safety glasses need to be matched to that size. If not, the glasses won’t sit on the face properly. That’s why employers need to have a selection of safety glasses on hand to provide the correct size. If you need a smaller size look for the letter “H” on the frame.
Gloves that don’t fit the user are certainly uncomfortable and potentially dangerous. Hand size can vary greatly from person to person. That’s why gloves come in different sizes and why you need to have all sizes on hand (no pun intended). Measuring the hand is the best way to find the correct size (from XS to XXL).
It gets lost or stolen
Safety glasses, hearing protection, gloves, are three types of PPE that can get misplaced or lost. In fact, some safety glasses are very stylish and rather expensive, compared to your run-of-the mill safety glasses. These stylish glasses tend to disappear if left unattended, which is why workers often have a special place to keep them when wearing them, such as in a locked toolbox.
Employers are often reluctant to keep replacing these high-end safety glasses if they consistently get lost. They may just hand workers a pair of cheaper, but just as effective, glasses.
Other employees aren’t wearing their PPE
On some jobsites every employee is wearing the PPE they’re required to wear, and on other jobsites very few are doing so. There are several reasons for this, including peer pressure or forgetfulness. However, a common dealbreaker for workers failing to wear PPE is not seeing their supervisors or other safety professionals wear theirs.
That sends mixed signals and makes it difficult to enforce PPE usage. Consistent messaging on wearing required PPE must be communicated and enforced as needed.
Key to remember
Because construction jobsites can be hazardous places, it’s important for employees to wear their issued PPE. If it doesn’t fit properly, it’s lost or missing, or if there’s a lack of consistent messaging, injuries will continue to occur.
Saved to my EVENT CALENDAR!
View your saved links by clicking the arrow next to your profile picture located in the header. Then, click “My Activity” to view the Event Calendar on your Activity page.
OK
J. J. Keller is the trusted source for DOT / Transportation, OSHA / Workplace Safety, Human Resources, Construction Safety and Hazmat / Hazardous Materials regulation compliance products and services. J. J. Keller helps you increase safety awareness, reduce risk, follow best practices, improve safety training, and stay current with changing regulations.
Copyright 2026 J. J. Keller & Associate, Inc. For re-use options please contact copyright@jjkeller.com or call 800-558-5011.














































