Leave as an accommodation and no-fault attendance points don’t mix
When a court opinion begins with “This case illustrates one reason why the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) exists,” you know you’re in trouble.
Employees must miss work sometimes. When that leave is for valid reasons, like a disability, employers must ensure their disciplinary steps aren’t an ADA violation. Employers with no-fault attendance policies should not apply attendance points to such ADA-related absences, one employer learned.
Employee collapsed at work
Brandon was a solid employee who had a chronic disease that caused kidney stones to develop. About once every two years, he developed a large kidney stone that required surgical removal.
The company had a policy that counted any unexcused absence, tardy, or leave early as an attendance point. The company fired employees who accrued seven points in a year. Employees could accrue just one point without applying for an ADA accommodation. Ty, Brandon’s manager, was not aware that leave was available for those with an ADA disability.
Brandon had one accrued attendance point before he accrued four points because of his condition. When his doctor recommended that he take about a week off, he instead returned to work to avoid any further points.
The day he returned, however, Brandon collapsed at work in excruciating pain and was transported by ambulance to the hospital. The general manager rode with Brandon, where he learned of Brandon’s condition. The company assessed only one attendance point for the two days Brandon was absent.
Seventh attendance point meant termination
Brandon’s doctor told him he needed surgery to remove a large stone. Ty warned Brandon that a seventh point would lead to termination.
Because Brandon needed surgeries to remove the stone, he:
- Missed more work,
- Accrued seven points, and
- Was fired.
Ty told him he could reapply in 60 days. Instead, a lawsuit ensued.
Employer didn’t try to find a solution
In court, the company claimed that, because Brandon did not provide a return-to-work date, he requested unlimited leave, which is not a reasonable accommodation. The company did not, however, ask when Brandon could return to work.
In ruling for Brandon, the court didn’t buy the company’s argument. The history showed that Brandon returned to work promptly. The court also said that the company failed to engage in the ADA’s interactive process (i.e., conversation with an employee to find a possible reasonable accommodation), and it chose to remain in the dark about when Brandon could return to work.
EEOC v. Keystone RV Company, Northern District of Indiana, No. 3:22-CV-831, March 27, 2024.
Key to remember: Time off can be a reasonable accommodation under the ADA, and employers should not apply attendance points to such time off.