FREE TRIAL UPGRADE!
Thank you for investing in EnvironmentalHazmatHuman ResourcesHuman Resources, Hazmat & Environmental related content. Click 'UPGRADE' to continue.
CANCEL
YOU'RE ALL SET!
Enjoy your limited-time access to the Compliance Network!
A confirmation welcome email has been sent to your email address from ComplianceNetwork@t.jjkellercompliancenetwork.com. Please check your spam/junk folder if you can't find it in your inbox.
YOU'RE ALL SET!
Thank you for your interest in EnvironmentalHazmatHuman ResourcesHuman Resources, Hazmat & Environmental related content.
WHOOPS!
You've reached your limit of free access, if you'd like more info, please contact us at 800-327-6868.
You'll also get exclusive access to:
Already have an account? .

Crossing a state or national border in a commercial vehicle just one time could make you subject to certain U.S. DOT regulations for months or even years to come.

That’s according to an announcement late last year from the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) in which the agency quietly reasserted its authority over motor vehicles and drivers that get involved in interstate commerce — even for a single, short trip.

The two-week HOS ‘rule’

For many years, the FMCSA has enforced a policy that requires in-state truck and bus operators to follow federal hours-of-service rules for the week before and the week after any interstate movement. One week after returning to in-state-only (intrastate) operations, the driver may then return to following their state’s hours-of-service rules, which may be less strict than federal rules.

This policy, found in the FMCSA’s official guidance for 49 CFR 390.3, refers only to the hours-of-service rules and not other safety regulations like driver qualification or vehicle maintenance. How do those other rules apply to an in-state operation that needs to cross state lines?

Read more about the two-week HOS rule in our ezExplanation: 14/15-day rule.

4 months can turn into years

According to the FMCSA’s November 2022 announcement, a motor carrier that gets involved in interstate commerce — even for a short period of time — must comply with all other Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations (FMCSRs) for the duration of the trip plus another four months.

(The agency says it could also enforce the hours-of-service rules for four months, but that length of time “is not necessary to prevent fatigue.”)

Compliance doesn’t end there, however.

The FMCSA “has jurisdiction over motor carriers, vehicles, and drivers for a 4-month period after a trip in interstate commerce,” the agency wrote. “However, records must be retained for whatever period is required by the FMCSRs, even if that period exceeds 4 months.”

This means a motor carrier may need to produce records for a federal DOT audit for many years after an interstate trip, and failure to produce those records could result in big fines.

For example ...

Suppose, for example, that a driver doing in-state-only work in a truck over 10,001 pounds is exempt from needing a driver qualification (DQ) file under state law, but now that driver needs to do a trip across state lines. This makes the driver and company subject to FMCSA compliance.

  • Prior to the trip, the company would need to create an FMCSA-compliant DQ file, complete with a medical card.
  • For the duration of the interstate work, the driver and motor carrier would need to comply with all the FMCSRs, including all recordkeeping requirements.
  • Once the driver returns to in-state-only work, the company must retain the DQ file (and other records) for as long as the FMCSRs require. For DQ files, this means the duration of the driver’s employment plus another three years.

If the FMCSA decides to audit the carrier a few years after the interstate trip but the carrier cannot produce the driver’s file, it could mean a hefty fine.

Know when the FMCSRs apply

If you’re normally engaged in intrastate operations but may have a need to cross state lines or otherwise get involved in interstate commerce, be sure you know which rules apply, when, and for how long.

Keep in mind that the FMCSRs apply to many types of vehicles that are not regulated when operating in intrastate commerce. The FMCSRs apply to all “commercial motor vehicles” as defined in 49 CFR 390.5, which includes vehicles operating in interstate commerce that weigh or are rated at 10,001 pounds or more (including all vehicles in a combination), even if a commercial driver’s license is not required.

Key to remember: The FMCSA has reasserted its authority to regulate in-state motor carriers for four months after they engage in interstate work, though recordkeeping requirements may continue to apply for years.

Specialized Industries

Go beyond the regulations! Visit the Institute for in-depth guidance on a wide range of compliance subjects in safety and health, transportation, environment, and human resources.

J. J. Keller® COMPLIANCE NETWORK is a premier online safety and compliance community, offering members exclusive access to timely regulatory content in workplace safety (OSHA), transportation (DOT), environment (EPA), and human resources (DOL).

Interact With Our Compliance Experts

Puzzled by a regulatory question or issue? Let our renowned experts provide the answers and get your business on track to full compliance!

Upcoming Events

Reference the Compliance Network Safety Calendar to keep track of upcoming safety and compliance events. Browse by industry or search by keyword to see relevant dates and observances, including national safety months, compliance deadlines, and more.

SAFETY & COMPLIANCE NEWS

Keep up with the latest regulatory developments from OSHA, DOT, EPA, DOL, and more.

REGSENSE® REGULATORY REFERENCE

Explore a comprehensive database of word-for-word regulations on a wide range of compliance topics, with simplified explanations and best practices advice from our experts.

THE J. J. KELLER INSTITUTE

The Institute is your destination for in-depth content on 120+ compliance subjects. Discover articles, videos, and interactive exercises that will strengthen your understanding of regulatory concepts relevant to your business.

ADD HAZMAT, ENVIRONMENTAL, & HR RESOURCES

Unlock exclusive content offering expert insights into hazmat, environmental, and human resources compliance with a COMPLIANCE NETWORK EDGE membership.

DIRECT ACCESS TO COMPLIANCE EXPERTS

Struggling with a compliance challenge? Get the solution from our in-house team of experts! You can submit a question to our experts by email, set up a phone or video call, or request a detailed research report.

EVENTS

Register to attend live online events hosted by our experts. These webcasts and virtual conferences feature engaging discussions on important compliance topics in a casual, knowledge-sharing environment.

Most Recent Highlights In Environmental

Ready, set, report! Prepare for EPA’s one-time PFAS report
2025-03-03T06:00:00Z

Ready, set, report! Prepare for EPA’s one-time PFAS report

A group of substances called “forever chemicals” lasts long in the environment, but the submission period for its one-time reporting requirement doesn’t. And it starts in just a few months. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) requires covered entities to report data about per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) they manufactured between 2011 and 2022.

Required by Section 8(a)(7) of the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA), the report covers PFAS production volumes, disposal, exposures, and hazards. The submission period opens on July 11, 2025. Here are answers to five common questions about the TSCA Section 8(a)(7) report.

Who must report?

The TSCA Section 8(a)(7) reporting requirements apply to any person who manufactured (including imported) a PFAS or PFAS-containing article between January 1, 2011, and December 31, 2022, for commercial purposes.

EPA defines terms for this reporting requirement at 40 CFR 705.3.

One vital thing to note is that the TSCA Section 8(a)(7) reporting requirement allows for no exemptions. The rule even covers PFAS manufactured as a byproduct, impurity, or non-isolated intermediate. The only activity that doesn’t require reporting is importing municipal solid waste streams to dispose of or destroy the waste.

What data does the report cover?

The information required depends on whether you use the standard or streamlined TSCA Section 8(a)(7) reporting form.

The standard form contains:

  • Company and plant site information;
  • Chemical-specific information (such as chemical identities);
  • Categories of use;
  • Total amounts manufactured in each year for each category of use;
  • Byproducts from PFAS manufacturing, processing, use, or disposal;
  • Existing environmental and health effect information;
  • Worker exposure data (including duration); and
  • Disposal methods or processes used (and any changes to them).

The streamlined form requires less information than the standard form. Two types of reporters qualify to use streamlined reporting:

  • Importers of PFAS-containing articles, and
  • Manufacturers of less than 10 kilograms of PFAS used solely for research and development (R&D).

Importers may choose to use the streamlined “PFAS in Imported Article” form. If you imported a PFAS-containing article and manufactured (including imported) the same PFAS (not in an article), you can either:

  • Report the imported article on the streamlined form and manufactured PFAS on the standard form, or
  • Report both the imported article and manufactured PFAS on the standard form.

Manufacturers of qualifying R&D PFAS can use the “Research & Development PFAS” form. However, you cannot use the streamlined form if you manufactured a PFAS in small quantities for R&D and otherwise manufactured (including imported) the same PFAS.

When is the report due?

The TSCA Section 8(a)(7) report submission period runs from July 11, 2025, to January 22, 2026, for most manufacturers. Small manufacturers who solely imported PFAS-containing articles have a longer submission period, from July 11, 2025, to July 11, 2026.

Where do I submit the report?

Reports must be submitted electronically through EPA’s Central Data Exchange (CDX). Go to the Chemical Information Submission System and choose the “TSCA Section 8(a)(7)” application.

Note that you must have a registered account on EPA’s CDX to submit the report, and the facility for which you’re submitting the report must also be registered on the platform.

Why is the Section 8(a)(7) report required?

TSCA Section 8(a)(7), as amended by the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020, required EPA to develop a rule to gather data about PFAS from entities that manufacture or have manufactured PFAS and PFAS-containing articles. The agency finalized the rule in October 2023 for this one-time reporting requirement.

The TSCA Section 8(a)(7) PFAS reports will give EPA a more complete picture of PFAS manufactured in the U.S. The agency will use the data to further its understanding of the forever chemicals and inform future regulatory actions.

Key to remember: The submission period for the one-time PFAS reporting requirement opens July 11, 2025. It applies to anyone who manufactured (including imported) PFAS or PFAS-containing articles between 2011 and 2022.

Used oil disposal: How to stay compliant with EPA, OSHA, and your state
2025-03-03T06:00:00Z

Used oil disposal: How to stay compliant with EPA, OSHA, and your state

Used oil disposal is a critical issue for safety managers and shop supervisors in industrial settings. Whether your facility generates used oil from machinery, vehicles, or hydraulic systems, you must understand the regulatory requirements to ensure compliance and avoid hefty fines.

Used oil is not always considered hazardous waste, but improper handling, storage, or disposal can lead to regulatory violations and environmental hazards. Understanding how used oil is classified, when it is considered hazardous, and how to manage it in compliance with 40 CFR Part 279 is essential.

Let’s uncover the regulatory framework for used oil disposal, including storage requirements, transportation rules, and best practices to ensure compliance at both the federal and state levels.

What is used oil?

The EPA defines used oil as any petroleum-based or synthetic oil that has been used and is contaminated by physical or chemical impurities. Common sources of used oil in industrial operations include:

  • Motor oil and lubricants from vehicle maintenance
  • Hydraulic fluids used in heavy machinery
  • Metalworking fluids and coolants
  • Compressor oils used in air compression systems

According to EPA regulations (40 CFR Part 279), used oil is presumed to be managed under the less stringent used oil management standards unless it meets hazardous waste criteria.

Used oil becomes hazardous waste if:

  • It is mixed with hazardous waste (e.g., solvents or heavy metals)
  • It contains more than 1,000 parts per million (ppm) of total halogens, unless proven otherwise, or
  • It is disposed of improperly, leading to environmental contamination.

If used oil is classified as hazardous waste, it must be managed in accordance with the applicable solid and hazardous waste requirements.

EPA requirements for used oil disposal

The EPA requirements for used oil consist of three different aspects, as outlined below.

1. Storage Requirements

Use leak-proof tanks and containers made of durable, non-earthen materials (e.g., steel, plastic, or concrete). Label all used oil containers with the words "Used Oil" to prevent misidentification. Prevent leaks and spills by using secondary containment systems and regularly inspecting tanks. Never mix used oil with hazardous waste unless authorized.

2. Transportation and Disposal

Used oil generators may transport up to 55 gallons of used oil to a registered collection center without an EPA ID number. If contracting a used oil transporter, ensure they have an EPA Identification Number.

Used oil must be:

  • Recycled or re-refined into new oil.
  • Burned for energy recovery in approved furnaces or boilers.
  • Disposed of at an authorized hazardous waste facility if deemed hazardous.

3. Spill Prevention and Cleanup

Facilities storing large amounts of used oil must have a Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasure (SPCC) Plan. SPCC plans establish procedures, methods, and equipment requirements to prevent oil from reaching waterways, and to contain discharges of oil.

Any spills must be cleaned up immediately, and absorbent materials must be disposed of properly. Rags and shop towels contaminated with hazardous materials may be classified as hazardous waste.

OSHA regulations for handling used oil

While the EPA focuses on environmental compliance, OSHA (29 CFR 1910) regulates worker safety when handling used oil. Key OSHA requirements include:

1. Personal Protective Equipment (PPE)

Workers handling used oil must wear gloves and protective clothing to prevent skin exposure. Safety goggles or face shields are also important to avoid eye contact.

2. Hazard Communication (HazCom) Program

Employers must label all used oil containers with appropriate hazard information and train employees on safe handling procedures and emergency response.

3. Fire and Explosion Safety

Always store used oil away from ignition sources to prevent fire hazards. Ensure storage areas are ventilated to avoid vapor buildup.

State-Specific used oil disposal regulations

Many states have stricter used oil regulations than federal laws. For example:

  • California classifies used oil as hazardous waste unless it meets specific recycling criteria.
  • Texas requires additional storage permits for large generators.
  • New York mandates annual reporting on used oil disposal activities.

To ensure compliance, check with your state’s environmental agency for state-specific used oil disposal rules and whether used oil is considered hazardous. Additional permits for transporting or processing used oil may be necessary.

Staying compliant with used oil disposal requirements

Ensuring compliance with EPA, OSHA, and state laws is essential for safety managers and shop supervisors handling used oil. By following proper storage, transportation, and disposal practices, businesses can reduce environmental risks, improve workplace safety, and avoid costly fines.

Key to remember: By staying informed and proactive, your facility can maintain safe, sustainable, and compliant used oil management practices.

NFPA sounds alarm: Warehouse firefighting challenges racking up
2025-02-26T06:00:00Z

NFPA sounds alarm: Warehouse firefighting challenges racking up

You might argue that warehouses have always posed challenges to fire service crews. However, today’s warehouses are pushing the boundaries on what firefighters can handle. Modern warehouses have far more square feet, sky-high storage racks, and compacted arrangements making it tougher for crews to reach a fire quickly. Commodities with lithium-ion batteries add another danger layer in a fire. Plus, robots can get in the way.

To sort this out, the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) released back-to-back reports and a podcast that give warehouse owners/operators and fire crews a lot to think about:

  • The first report explores where the fire service is experiencing challenges when responding to warehouse fires,
  • The second report breaks down the data on warehouse fires in the last five years, and
  • The podcast shares an interview with veterans in the field of fire protection.

Big takeaway

Over 1,500 warehouse fires happen annually on average, NFPA estimates. That means warehouse fires are not rare. The first time that fire crews lay eyes on your warehouse should not be when there’s a roaring fire there in the middle of the night.

Ideally, fire service members should be involved before a warehouse is built. That way, things like water supplies and crew access can be part of the drawing board. If your warehouse is already in operation, it’s still critical for fire services to check out your warehouse. They can get familiar with your warehouse configuration, its fire suppression systems, and its stored commodities.

While the two reports detail challenges and trends for warehouse fires, one overarching takeaway prevails — pre-planning between the warehouse owner/operator and the fire service is a must. The concept is covered in the podcast too. Pre-incident planning inevitably helps fire crews to efficiently control and suppress an actual fire. It also informs the owner/operator about fire crew capabilities for the site.

OSHA’s Emergency Action Plan standard calls for covered employers to implement a plan to protect employees during fire emergencies. This requirement is found at 29 CFR 1910.38, 1915.502, 1917.30, 1918.100, and 1926.35, depending on your industry. However, the pre-incident planning that NFPA is talking about is pre-planning WITH the fire department so that there are better outcomes for people and property, in the event of a fire.

Identifying challenges

The 125-page NFPA report, “Identifying Challenges to Fire Service Response in Storage Facilities,” emphasizes that warehouses are evolving to meet greater demand. The report:

  • Flags 16 challenges that dog fire services in warehouse fires,
  • Lists almost 250 articles and publications on fighting warehouse fires,
  • Identifies over 20 gaps in knowledge related to warehouse firefighting,
  • Makes a nine-category research plan, and
  • Offers 12 recommendations.

One recommendation suggests that future study needs to focus on ways fire departments can improve communication with warehouse owners/operators about pre-planning. The idea is that more communication should happen not only for existing warehouses but before constructing them. It’s also vital when warehouses are about to experience a change. Similarly, fire departments and warehouse owners/operators need to work out how employees will be head counted during a fire incident.

Five years of warehouse fires

Another NFPA report, “Warehouse Structure Fires,” chronicles thousands of warehouse fires that happened between 2018 to 2022. In some cases, the 8-page report reflects on fires going back to 1980. It offers 13 charts that cover the:

  • Number of warehouse fires,
  • Property damage from warehouse fires,
  • Warehouse structure status,
  • Day of the week the fire occurred,
  • Month the fire occurred,
  • Time of day the fire occurred,
  • Equipment involved in the fire ignition,
  • Cause of ignition,
  • Contributing factor to ignition,
  • Heat source,
  • Origin of the fire,
  • First item to be ignited, and
  • First material to be ignited.

The report concludes that four components are essential to protecting warehouses from fire: proper sprinkler systems, automatic alarms, pre-fire inspections, and pre-planning.

Take it from the pros

Finally, NFPA sat down with two fire protection professionals for 42 minutes to talk about “Big Storage, Bigger Questions.” The podcast sunk its teeth into some of the deeper concepts found in the new “Identifying Challenges” report, including:

  • Automatic storage and retrieval systems,
  • Unlimited area buildings,
  • Tall racking systems,
  • Pre-incident planning,
  • Firefighting in rural areas,
  • Communications between fire departments and warehouse owners/operators,
  • Management of change and changing commodities,
  • In-rack sprinklers,
  • Standpipe systems,
  • Limited air supply for respirators, and
  • Adopting fire standards.

Again, pre-planning was reiterated. The pros explained that warehouses have many variables, so getting crews into these facilities before any fire happens is important for better outcomes if a fire were to occur.

Key to remember

NFPA released two reports and a podcast related to the challenges of combating warehouse fires and the history of fires in U.S. warehouses. Pre-planning is an overarching theme in all three.

Needlestick jabs: Law enforcement officers at risk too
2025-02-19T06:00:00Z

Needlestick jabs: Law enforcement officers at risk too

When you think of workers getting stuck by a contaminated needlestick, you think of healthcare. Right? Well, a recent NIOSH fact sheet argues that you also need to picture law enforcement officers. That’s because they’re at risk of these incidents when they search people, property, vehicles, or homes!

Syringes and needles are not the only sharps to worry about, however. Other sharps include lancets, scalpels, and auto-injectors. The thing is, contaminated needlesticks/sharps injuries can infect officers with viruses. These include hepatitis B virus (HBV), hepatitis C virus (HCV), HIV, and others.

Is it reasonably anticipated that your law enforcement officers will have contact with blood or other potentially infectious materials (OPIM) as part of their jobs? If so, they have what OSHA calls “occupational exposure.” That includes reasonably anticipated incidents involving contaminated needlesticks or other contaminated sharps as part of the duties of an officer, the subject of the latest fact sheet.

Does OSHA’s BBP standard cover law enforcement?

That's a trick question! The Occupational Safety and Health Act (OSH Act) only covers the private sector. There’s a gap in coverage for the public sector workers like law enforcement officers employed by a municipality or state agency. That means federal OSHA does not regulate the Bloodborne Pathogens (BBP) standard at 29 CFR 1910.1030 for these officers.

However, many states have filled that gap in one of two ways:

  • About half the states are considered OSHA “state-plan” states. That means they must be equivalent to or more stringent than federal OSHA for the public sector OR both the public and private sectors. These state-plan states have regulations identical to, similar to, or tougher than the federal Bloodborne Pathogens standard.
  • Some of the remaining non-state-plan states proactively filled the gap for the public sector. They adopted OSHA regulations like 1910.1030 under state laws and regulations, or otherwise created their own worker safety and health laws and regulations related to hazards like bloodborne pathogens.

If your state has bloodborne pathogens laws and regulations, it’s important to meet them if you have officers (or any workers) with occupational exposure. Note that occupational exposure is not the same thing as an exposure incident. An exposure incident is actual contact with blood or OPIM. Whereas occupational exposure is reasonably anticipated contact as part of the job duties.

NIOSH offers guidance for law enforcement

Regardless whether your officers are protected by bloodborne pathogens laws and regulations, NIOSH’s fact sheet (DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 2025-101) provides tips and best practices specific to the risks to law enforcement. For example, NIOSH suggests that officers complete training on:

Some ways officers can keep safe include, but are not limited to:

  • Getting HBV vaccination,
  • Wearing gloves while performing searches, and considering gloves with puncture resistance (such as those that meet ASTM Standard F2878-19),
  • Asking a suspect if they have any sharp objects BEFORE making a search,
  • Using mirrors and flashlights to search under or in the crevices of furniture, and
  • Reporting sharps hazards and near misses.

When handling sharps, NIOSH recommends:

If an officer suffers an exposure incident involving a contaminated needlestick/sharp, the fact sheet urges the officer to:

  • Wash the injured area with soap and water, and
  • Follow your law enforcement department’s plan for what to do (e.g., report injuries according to plan) and where to seek treatment.

Treatment should be sought from a healthcare provider immediately. That provider may offer medication or a vaccine to prevent infection.

Earlier NIOSH guidance

The latest fact sheet comes on the heels of an 8-page guidance document from NIOSH — DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 2022-154. Learn more about that in our J. J. Keller® Compliance Network article, “NIOSH report points at sharps injuries in law enforcement,” from September 7, 2022.

Key to remember

A recent NIOSH fact sheet argues that law enforcement officers who do searches are at risk of needlestick/sharps incidents! The agency offers tips about how to stay safe and how to handle and dispose of sharps safely. It also explains what to do if there’s an exposure incident.

The regulatory state of PFAS: Stay alert to state rules
2025-02-19T06:00:00Z

The regulatory state of PFAS: Stay alert to state rules

Over the past few years, federal environmental regulations have targeted a specific group of chemicals: per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS). However, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) isn’t the only entity taking action to control PFAS; state agencies are too. A recent study anticipates that more than half of the states in the U.S. are likely to consider PFAS-related policies in 2025.

So, how should businesses respond? Stay alert to the PFAS regulations at the state level.

What are PFAS?

PFAS, called “forever chemicals,” are long-lasting manufactured chemicals that may pose risks to human and environmental health. With thousands of PFAS chemicals, however, controlling their use to reduce the risks is no easy task.

Additionally, PFAS appear in nearly every sector. They’re used in a wide range of products (like food packaging, cleaning products, and textiles) and for commercial and industrial applications.

Prepare for more state PFAS rules

Safer States, an alliance of environmental organizations that supports developing state regulatory policies for toxic chemicals, published the 2025 Analysis of State Policy Addressing Toxic Chemicals and Plastics. The evaluation covered states’ toxic chemical policies (a) introduced in 2025, (b) introduced in 2024 and considered through 2025, and (c) expected to be introduced in 2025. It also included related proposed regulations that would implement existing state laws.

The report projects that at least 29 states will likely consider policies to address PFAS in 2025, including:

  • Alaska,
  • Arizona,
  • California,
  • Connecticut,
  • Hawaii,
  • Illinois,
  • Indiana,
  • Kentucky,
  • Maine,
  • Maryland
  • Massachusetts,
  • Michigan,
  • Minnesota,
  • Mississippi,
  • Montana,
  • Nevada,
  • New Jersey,
  • New Mexico,
  • New York,
  • Oklahoma
  • Oregon,
  • Pennsylvania,
  • Rhode Island,
  • South Carolina,
  • South Dakota,
  • Texas,
  • Vermont,
  • Virginia, and
  • Washington.

Safer States expects these states to consider policies such as:

  • Phasing out PFAS uses;
  • Disclosing to consumers the presence of PFAS in products;
  • Testing and monitoring for PFAS in water, sludge, and waste;
  • Setting PFAS standards for drinking water, groundwater, and surface water; and
  • Providing resources to clean up PFAS-contaminated sites.

Current state PFAS actions

Multiple states already have PFAS rules on the books. Check out these examples:

  • California bans selling or distributing in commerce any new juvenile product that contains regulated PFAS chemicals (CA HSC Section 108946), such as changing pads, motor vehicle child restraint systems, playpens, and strollers.
  • New York forbids selling or offering for sale new apparel with intentionally added PFAS (N.Y. Consolidated Laws Section 37-0121).
  • Hawaii prohibits manufacturing, selling, offering for sale, and distributing for sale or use food packaging — wraps, liners, plates, food boats, and pizza boxes — with intentionally added PFAS (Act 152 Relating to environmental protection).
  • Maryland bans manufacturing, selling, and delivering cosmetic products that contain any of 13 specified PFAS (Md. Code, Health-Gen. Section 21-259.2).
  • Colorado requires manufacturers of cookware with intentionally added PFAS in the handle or any product surface that contacts food to, among other things, list the presence of PFAS on the product label (House Bill 22-1345).

Many states also have proposed PFAS rules under consideration, like Texas, Maine, Arizona, Illinois, and Virginia.

Stay alert to state PFAS actions

If your facility uses PFAS, it’s essential to know whether the state has regulations that apply to your operations. Plus, knowing the state’s potential future PFAS rules coming down the pipeline can help you better prepare to comply.

Consider these general tips to support your facility’s efforts to track state PFAS actions:

  • EPA provides an online list of the state environmental agencies with links to their websites. Check the state environmental agency’s online news and press releases for policy updates.
  • Search for a dedicated rulemaking webpage, as many states maintain a list of proposed and recently adopted regulations. Note that some state sites may be easier to navigate than others, and some state sites may not have a dedicated rulemaking webpage.
  • Establish a contact at the state environmental agency. Each agency should list contact information, so don’t hesitate to reach out. You may be able to find someone at the agency who can answer questions about the state’s current and future PFAS rules.

Staying alert to state PFAS regulations can help your organization maintain compliance.

Key to remember: States across the country continue to consider and implement regulations related to PFAS. Staying alert to state PFAS actions is key for businesses to stay compliant.

See More

Most Recent Highlights In Transportation

EHS Monthly Round Up - January 2025

EHS Monthly Round Up - January 2025

In this January 2025 monthly roundup video, we'll review the most impactful environmental health and safety news.

Hi everyone! Welcome to the monthly news roundup video, where we’ll review the most impactful environmental health and safety news. There’s a lot going on, so let’s get started!

As happens at the start of most incoming presidential administrations, a freeze has been placed on all regulatory activity at the federal level, giving the new administration time to review agencies’ plans. The Office of Management and Budget, which must approve most rulemaking activities, has sent numerous pending rules back to the agencies for review. In addition, OSHA withdrew its infectious diseases proposed rule and its COVID-19 in healthcare rule prior to the inauguration.

OSHA’s penalties increased on January 15. The maximum penalty amounts for serious and other-than-serious violations increased to $16,550. For willful or repeated violations, the maximum penalty increased to $165,514 per violation.

OSHA updated its directive on injury and illness recordkeeping policies and procedures. While it’s intended for OSHA compliance officers, employers can use the information to help with recordkeeping compliance.

Fewer workers died on the job in 2023, as fatal work injuries decreased 3.7 percent from 2022. Transportation incidents remained the most frequent type of fatal event, accounting for over 36 percent of all occupational fatalities.

California’s Occupational Safety and Health Standards Board voted to adopt a permanent silica standard. If approved, it would extend and strengthen the state’s emergency temporary standard, which was put in place in December 2023.

The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health updated its List of Hazardous Drugs in Healthcare Settings. This is a resource for employers and employees in identifying drugs that are hazardous to the health and safety of those who handle them.

Turning to environmental news, EPA released the biannual update of the nonconfidential TSCA inventory. The inventory helps facilities determine their regulatory requirements for the chemicals they use or plan to use.

And finally, EPA added new Management Method Codes to describe how hazardous waste will be managed after temporary storage and transfer. As of January 1st, hazardous waste handlers must use the codes on the Biennial Report Waste Generation and Management forms.

Thanks for tuning in to the monthly news roundup. We’ll see you next month!

Industrial stormwater vs. wastewater discharge permits
2025-02-04T06:00:00Z

Industrial stormwater vs. wastewater discharge permits

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) controls the amount of pollutants that reach the waters of the United States through the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit program. The NPDES program covers two types of discharges from industrial sources:

  • Stormwater discharges, and
  • Wastewater discharges.

Although they’re under the same federal permitting program, stormwater and wastewater discharges are distinct, and their permits are too. Know the basic differences between these types of industrial discharges to ensure your facility complies.

Stormwater discharges

Rain and snow that flow over land or impervious surfaces (like building rooftops and parking lots) and don’t soak into the ground generate stormwater runoff. The runoff can gather pollutants generated by industrial activities at a facility and transport them into nearby waterbodies. Your facility must have a permit to discharge stormwater associated with industrial activities to waters of the United States (40 CFR 122.26).

The NPDES program regulates stormwater discharges from 11 categories of industrial activities, listed at 122.26(b)(14). Examples of covered activities include:

  • Heavy manufacturing at chemical plants;
  • Treating, storing, and disposing of hazardous waste; and
  • Processing industrial wastes at landfills.

Note, however, that construction sites that disturb 5 or more acres (the tenth category) are permitted individually.

The permit contains stormwater control measures (including “best management practices”) to limit pollutants that enter stormwater runoff. Containment systems, employee training, and infiltration devices are all ways to control runoff.

Most states issue industrial stormwater discharge permits. EPA issues individual permits and the Multi-Sector General Permits (MSGPs) to facilities where the agency is the permitting authority. The MSGP is EPA’s general permit for industrial stormwater discharges.

Wastewater discharges

Many industrial processes use or generate water that contains pollutants, referred to as industrial wastewater. There are two types of wastewater:

  • Process wastewater (defined at 122.2) refers to water used in manufacturing or processing activities.
  • Non-process wastewater refers to water used for activities other than processing products (e.g., sanitary wastewater).

Your facility must have a permit to discharge industrial wastewater to surface waters (122.21(a)).

The NPDES program regulates direct wastewater discharges from industrial sources through rules based on the type of facility and activity. The regulations also have industry-specific requirements for:

  • Animal Feeding Operations,
  • Mining,
  • Oil and Gas,
  • Pesticide Applications, and
  • Vessels Incidental Discharges.

Effluent limitations are the primary control method for industrial wastewater discharges. EPA establishes Effluent Limitations Guidelines (ELGs) for industrial categories and subcategories. These pollution-reduction performance standards are based on the best available technology that’s economically achievable by facilities in the industry. The ELGs are then incorporated into the permits through effluent limitations.

Additionally, industrial facilities must meet water quality-based effluent limitations when the technology-based standards don’t achieve the required water quality standards. Both industrial stormwater and wastewater discharge permits may include technology- and water quality-based effluent limitations.

As with stormwater permits, most states issue industrial wastewater permits. Facilities in areas where EPA is the permitting authority must obtain either a general or individual NPDES permit.

Check your state requirements!

Because a majority of the states run stormwater and wastewater permitting programs, it’s crucial to check the state regulations. State permits must contain limits as stringent as EPA’s federal permits, and some states may impose stricter limits and/or additional requirements.

EPA’s website lists the states authorized to issue NPDES permits with links to the state agencies that run the NPDES program.

Key to remember: Industrial stormwater and wastewater discharges, and the permits that regulate them, are different.

Administration announces 10-for-1 deregulation order
2025-02-03T06:00:00Z

Administration announces 10-for-1 deregulation order

A new executive order from the Trump administration takes aim at government regulations, vowing to remove 10 rules for every new one issued.

The new directive, signed January 31, 2025, will apply to all new “rules, regulations, or guidance” issued by government agencies such as the Department of Transportation, the Department of Labor, and the Environmental Protection Agency.

The order says over-regulation has increased costs and inflation, killed jobs and businesses, reduced choice, discouraged innovation, and infringed on liberties.

Five-fold increase

The move aims to cut much more than a similar “two-for-one” order issued at the start of President Trump’s first stint in the White House in 2017. That order applied only to regulations that would cost $100 million or more.

The White House says the 2017 order was “the most aggressive and successful regulatory reduction effort in history” and eliminated five and one-half regulations for every new one issued.

The new order, according to a White House fact sheet, says that whenever an agency promulgates a new rule, regulation, or guidance, it must identify at least 10 existing rules, regulations, or guidance documents to be repealed.

It will be up to the head of the White House Office of Management and Budget to enforce the order and ensure agencies use a standard measuring stick to verify compliance.

The order also requires that for fiscal year 2025 (which ends September 30), “the total incremental cost of all new regulations, including repealed regulations, be significantly less than zero,” the fact sheet says. The order itself was not available on the White House website when this article was published.

The new executive order comes on the heels of another directive, issued January 20, 2025, that put a freeze on all pending regulations until the new administration has time to review them.

CSB unveils eye-opening video, alert, and insider data on chemical incidents
2025-01-31T06:00:00Z

CSB unveils eye-opening video, alert, and insider data on chemical incidents

With a backlog of 17 chemical incident investigations in the rearview mirror, the Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation Board (CSB) released three safety-related deliverables — an animated video, a hazard alert, and a compilation of incident summaries. The agency also updated its reporting form.

Expect even more videos and summaries “soon.” That’s the word from CSB Chairperson Steve Owens last week, during the board’s quarterly business meeting. The board also noted that it is forging ahead with nine new investigations. It means we’ll see investigative reports down the line.

‘Fire from the Storm’ video

The CSB’s new 17-minute safety video, "Fire from the Storm," includes a riveting animation of the events leading to a fire and toxic gas release. The incident occurred when Hurricane Laura damaged a chemical storage facility in Louisiana.

Rainwater then reached the chemical storage. The chemical decomposed, producing toxic chlorine gas and a fire. A large plume of chlorine traveled over the community.

The CSB video calls on OSHA and EPA to amend regulations on Process Safety and Risk Management, respectively. Five key safety issues contributing to the incident are covered:

  • Extreme weather preparation,
  • Process hazard analyses,
  • Emergency preparedness and response,
  • Adherence to hazardous materials codes, and
  • Gaps in regulatory coverage of reactive chemical hazards.

The latest video follows two others issued in October and July. It also aligns with an alert shared last July on hurricane preparedness.

Cold weather alert

Cold weather can crack or break pipes. It can also lead to ruptured or damaged process equipment and/or failing instruments. In December, CSB rang alarm bells over an uptick in chemical incidents during cold weather. The CSB alert listed over a dozen safety steps and links to guidance on cold weather operations.

Process safety management programs are regulated at 29 CFR 1910.119. Per the alert, these programs should consider how low temperatures may affect piping, equipment, and instruments. Equipment susceptible to ice or hydrate formation should also be identified and properly winterized.

Extreme weather dangers are a recurring theme for CSB. Last July, during hurricane season, Owens said, “When it comes to extreme weather, chemical companies should expect the unexpected and must always be prepared for the worst-case scenario.”

Event summaries issued

In a move toward transparency, CSB compiled summaries for 26 of the chemical incident reports it has received. These events summarized in Incident Reports Volume 1 resulted in five fatalities, 17 serious injuries, and about $697M in property damage in 15 states since April 2020.

For over two years the board has posted “overall” data about incidents reported under 40 CFR 1604. That’s the Reporting of Accidental Releases standard. CSB now calls this standard the “Accidental Release Reporting Rule (ARRR).”

For the record, CSB has received 460 reports in the last five years. The reports reveal 68 fatalities and 249 serious injuries/illnesses. Over 200 of these incidents involved property damage of $1M or more.

The overall data reports provide:

  • The name and location of the chemical facility,
  • The date of the incident, and
  • Whether the incident involved a fatality, serious injury, or substantial property damage.

However, the latest Volume 1 also reveals:

  • A summary of the event,
  • Its probable cause, and
  • Images of the involved facility or incident scene.

Owens argued, “The American people have a right to know about the kinds of dangerous chemical incidents that happen across this country every week.”

Reporting form change

It’s worth noting that CSB updated its Accidental Release Reporting Form and Instructions last June. The changes:

  • Merge the form and instructions into a single document;
  • Make minor formatting and grammar corrections;
  • Indicate a fourth reporting method (to call CSB to relay the National Response Center ID number);
  • Clarify that only “substantial” property damage information is required; and
  • Add a confidential and disclosure statement.

Key to remember

CSB continues to deliver videos, weather-related alerts, and data. The agency has also updated its reporting form and launched an initiative to reveal more incident details on a regular basis. Expect more from the board in 2025, along with any number of investigative reports.

2025-01-30T06:00:00Z

Oregon incorporates CARB updates, delaying heavy-duty omnibus rule

Effective date: January 1, 2025, to June 29, 2025

This applies to: Public and private fleets purchasing new model year 2025 medium- and heavy-duty vehicles, vehicle dealerships selling new medium- and heavy-duty vehicles with internal combustion or zero-emission engines, vehicle manufacturers selling medium- and heavy-duty vehicles with internal combustion or zero-emission engines, and engine manufacturers selling medium- and heavy-duty vehicle internal combustion engines

Description of change: The temporary rule incorporates additional compliance flexibilities for manufacturers to meet the requirements of the California Air Resource Board’s (CARB’s) Advanced Clean Trucks (ACT) rule, which CARB recently amended. The temporary rule also delays implementation of the Heavy-Duty Omnibus Regulation rules by a year, taking effect with engine model year 2026 and/or vehicle model year 2027 (based on the specific rule section). It also adds more certification options for complete medium-duty zero-emission vehicles.

See More

Most Recent Highlights In Safety & Health

2025-01-30T06:00:00Z

California shifts pesticide NOIs to electronic submissions

Effective date: February 24, 2025

This applies to: Agricultural use notices of intent (NOIs), soil fumigation NOIs, and restricted material NOIs

Description of change: The rule requires all agricultural use notices of intent (NOIs) must be submitted electronically on CalAgPermits.org unless granted an exemption. It also requires that NOIs for soil fumigation and restricted materials that require a permit to produce an agricultural commodity be electronically submitted on the same website. Finally, the rule requires the Department of Pesticide Regulation to publicize and provide status updates on NOI information it receives.

2025-01-30T06:00:00Z

California readopts conditional undeployed airbag waste exemption

Effective date: December 5, 2024

This applies to: Airbag waste handlers and collection facilities

Description of change: This emergency readoption adds definitions for “airbag waste,” “airbag waste collection facility,” and “airbag waste handler.” It also gives airbag waste handlers a conditional exemption for transporting airbag waste to the waste collection facility.

View related state info:Solid and hazardous waste - California

2025-01-30T06:00:00Z

Arkansas streamlines disposal well regulations

Effective date: November 28, 2024

This applies to: Operators of surface facilities of high-volume Class II Disposal and Class II Commercial Disposal Wells

Description of change: The rule gives full regulatory authority to the Oil and Gas Commission, from which operators must obtain a permit to drill and operate disposal wells. It removes the need for operators to obtain an additional permit from the Department of Environmental Quality to operate the surface facilities. The Oil and Gas Commission assumes all regulatory responsibility for Class II well operations.

2025-01-30T06:00:00Z

California receives 4 amendment authorizations

Effective date: January 2025 (dates vary by amendment)

This applies to: Entities subject to certain nonroad vehicle and engine emissions regulations under the California Air Resources Board (CARB)

Description of change: The Environmental Protection Agency granted four amendment authorizations to CARB, allowing the state to implement and enforce more stringent emission standards for certain off-road (nonroad) vehicles and engines.

Small Off-Road Engine (SORE) regulation

Nearly all new SOREs with Model Year (MY) 2024 or later must achieve zero emissions of hydrocarbons and NOx and zero evaporative emissions. Large pressure washers and portable generators must meet the same zero-emission standards starting with MY 2028.

Effective date: January 6, 2025

In-Use Off-Road Diesel-Fueled Fleets regulation

The amendments require fleets to replace older vehicles with newer ones gradually through 2036. The phaseout timeline is based on fleet size and MY. The rule also restricts fleets from adding older vehicles (with a timeline also based on fleet size and MY through 2035) and requires all fleets to use specific renewable diesel.

Effective date: January 10, 2025

Airborne Toxic Control Measure for In-Use Diesel-Fueled Transport Refrigeration Units (TRU) and TRU Generator Sets regulation

CARB’s rule imposes refrigerant use requirements for certain TRUs, sets particulate matter standards for non-truck TRUs, requires fleets to transition a percentage of TRUs to zero-emission technology refrigeration units (ZETRUs), and contains registration and reporting requirements for facilities with TRUs. The authorization, however, excludes CARB’s requirement for TRU owners to turn over 15 percent or more of its TRU fleet to ZETRUs by December 31, 2023, and each subsequent year.

In January 2025, CARB withdrew its authorization request for the rule’s mandate that TRU owners turn over 15 percent or more of their TRU fleet to ZETRUs by December 31, 2023, and each subsequent year.

Effective date: January 10, 2025

Commercial Harbor Craft regulation

EPA’s authorization excludes decisions on the Zero-Emission and Advanced Technologies standards for in-use short-run ferries and the standards for specific in-use engines and vessels with expiring feasibility extensions.

In January 2025, CARB withdrew its authorization request for the rule’s Zero-Emission and Advanced Technologies standards for in-use short-run ferries as well as the standards for specific in-use engines and vessels with expiring feasibility extensions.

Effective date: January 10, 2025

2025-01-30T06:00:00Z

Texas shifts injection well authority to RRC

Effective date: December 12, 2024

This applies to: Operators of closed-loop geothermal injection wells and Class V injection wells used for brine mining

Description of change: The amendment gives the Railroad Commission of Texas (RRC) jurisdiction over closed-loop geothermal injection wells and injection wells used for brine mining as established by Senate Bills 786 and 1186. Operators of closed-loop geothermal injection wells and Class V injection wells used for brine mining are subject to RRC regulation and authority.

See More

Most Recent Highlights In Human Resources

2025-01-30T06:00:00Z

Maryland extends Advanced Clean Trucks Program credit banking

Effective date: December 23, 2024

This applies to: Manufacturers that sell vehicles in Maryland with a gross vehicle weight rating above 8,500 pounds

Description of change: The rule adds a year to the time frame for manufacturers to earn, bank, and trade credits, giving them two years before the Advanced Clean Truck Program begins (in model year 2027).

2025-01-30T06:00:00Z

Missouri establishes Agricultural Anhydrous Ammonia Program

Effective date: December 23, 2024

This applies to: Agricultural anhydrous ammonia facilities (including retailers) and distributor or terminal agricultural anhydrous ammonia facilities

Description of change: The rule defines the Agricultural Anhydrous Ammonia Program and facility requirements.

2025-01-30T06:00:00Z

Maine approves Stewardship Program for Packaging

Effective date: December 25, 2024

This applies to: Packaging material producers that sell their products in or import their products into Maine

Description of change: The rule requires producers to pay annually into the packaging stewardship fund based on the amount of packaging material associated with the products it sells in or imports into Maine. Certain producers and packaging materials are exempt. The program will be fully operational in 2027. Producers first register and report in May 2026 and make the first annual payment to the fund in September 2027.

2025-01-30T06:00:00Z

Colorado updates maximum civil penalty for water quality violations

Effective date: January 1, 2025

This applies to: Entities regulated by the Colorado Water Quality Control Act (CWQCA)

Description of change: The maximum civil penalty for violating the CWQCA, an issued permit under the Act, a related control regulation, or a final cease-and-desist order or clean-up order is $65,544 per day per violation.

View related state info:Industrial water permitting state comparison

2025-01-30T06:00:00Z

Alabama clarifies medical waste generator storage rules

Effective Date: February 14, 2025

This applies to: Regulated medical waste generators storing untreated medical waste

Description of change: This final rule clarifies how medical waste generators (that generate 220 or more pounds of medical waste per month) store untreated medical waste, including:

  • When storage begins,
  • How long the medical waste may be stored and at what refrigeration, and
  • When medical waste may be discharged.

View related state info:Medical waste - Alabama

See More
New Network Poll
Do you require the use of security seals for loaded trailers?

Do you require the use of security seals for loaded trailers?


No active poll
Please come back soon!
See More
See More
See More
See More
Saved to my EVENT CALENDAR!
View your saved links by clicking the arrow next to your profile picture located in the header. Then, click “My Activity” to view the Event Calendar on your Activity page.