Experience Everything Compliance Network Has to Offer
Copyright 2023 J. J. Keller & Associate, Inc. For re-use options please contact copyright@jjkeller.com or call 800-558-5011.
Copyright 2023 J. J. Keller & Associate, Inc. For re-use options please contact copyright@jjkeller.com or call 800-558-5011.
NewsIndustry NewsFederal Motor Carrier Safety RegulationsFleet SafetyCompliance, Safety, Accountability CSAAccident responseCompliance, Safety, Accountability CSAAccident investigation - Motor CarrierFocus AreaIn-Depth ArticleEnglishTransportationBusiness planning - Motor CarrierUSA
Be more successful with these Crash Preventability Determination Program tips
2020-11-19T06:00:00Z
A customer recently filed a DataQs request asking that a crash be considered non-preventable under the Crash Preventability Determination Program, and the response was, “the request was automatically closed with no data correction made.” The crash involved a vehicle being rear-ended, so it should fall into one of the 10 eligible crash types. The customer’s main question for us was, “What should I do differently on my second attempt?”
Make sure the crash fits the program
First, you need to verify that:
- The crash is in the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) data system and is visible in either your Portal or CSA data,
- The crash falls into one of the 10 categories of crashes that are eligible, and
- You have the police accident report in hand (and that you upload it as a supporting document).
Follow the instructions to the letter
Next, you need to follow the DataQs filing requirements related to this program. The link below is to a job aid on filing DataQs requests related to non-preventable crashes:
https://roar-assets-auto.rbl.ms/documents/18362/DataQs CPDP Submitters Job Aid.pdf
In your narrative and supporting materials, make sure you provide an argument that the crash could not have been prevented. If you make an error, such as failing to select an eligible crash type, or fail to complete all steps in the request process, you may receive an error message like the one quoted above.
Additional considerations
Your request will also be rejected if the crash occurred prior to August 1, 2019. The Crash Preventability Determination Program will only review crashes that occurred on or after August 1, 2019.
If you are successful, the crash will not be removed from your data, but it will not be used in the calculation of your Crash BASIC score. You’ll find the crash displayed separately in your CSA data. The only time a crash is completely removed is if you can prove the crash was not DOT recordable (i.e., it did not involve a vehicle being towed, an injury, or a fatality).
Key to remember: When filing a DataQs request related to the Crash Preventability Determination Program, you must follow the directions to the letter, the crash must fit one of the eligible crash types, and you must submit proof the crash was non-preventable.
NewsIndustry NewsFederal Motor Carrier Safety RegulationsFleet SafetyCompliance, Safety, Accountability CSAAccident responseCompliance, Safety, Accountability CSAAccident investigation - Motor CarrierFocus AreaIn-Depth ArticleEnglishTransportationBusiness planning - Motor CarrierUSA
Be more successful with these Crash Preventability Determination Program tips
2020-11-19T06:00:00Z
A customer recently filed a DataQs request asking that a crash be considered non-preventable under the Crash Preventability Determination Program, and the response was, “the request was automatically closed with no data correction made.” The crash involved a vehicle being rear-ended, so it should fall into one of the 10 eligible crash types. The customer’s main question for us was, “What should I do differently on my second attempt?”
Make sure the crash fits the program
First, you need to verify that:
- The crash is in the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) data system and is visible in either your Portal or CSA data,
- The crash falls into one of the 10 categories of crashes that are eligible, and
- You have the police accident report in hand (and that you upload it as a supporting document).
Follow the instructions to the letter
Next, you need to follow the DataQs filing requirements related to this program. The link below is to a job aid on filing DataQs requests related to non-preventable crashes:
https://roar-assets-auto.rbl.ms/documents/18362/DataQs CPDP Submitters Job Aid.pdf
In your narrative and supporting materials, make sure you provide an argument that the crash could not have been prevented. If you make an error, such as failing to select an eligible crash type, or fail to complete all steps in the request process, you may receive an error message like the one quoted above.
Additional considerations
Your request will also be rejected if the crash occurred prior to August 1, 2019. The Crash Preventability Determination Program will only review crashes that occurred on or after August 1, 2019.
If you are successful, the crash will not be removed from your data, but it will not be used in the calculation of your Crash BASIC score. You’ll find the crash displayed separately in your CSA data. The only time a crash is completely removed is if you can prove the crash was not DOT recordable (i.e., it did not involve a vehicle being towed, an injury, or a fatality).
Key to remember: When filing a DataQs request related to the Crash Preventability Determination Program, you must follow the directions to the letter, the crash must fit one of the eligible crash types, and you must submit proof the crash was non-preventable.
Recent Industry highlights
Manufacturing (31/Food/Textiles)Waste ManagementWholesale DistributionPersonal ServicesWarehousingProfessional ServicesRepair ServicesEntertainmentHealthcareMiningConstructionReal EstateRetailTransportationPublic AdministrationManufacturing (32/Non-Durable)Manufacturing (33/Durable)UtilitiesRecyclingTrashListed WasteCAAClean Air ActPrecious MetalsUsed BatteriesOily RagsHazWasteConditionally Excluded WasteCathode Ray TubesWaste BurnersResource Conservation and RecoveryWaste BurningGarbageSolvent Contaminated WipesIndustrial FurnacesMunicipal Solid WastePharmaceutical WasteCharacteristic WasteShop RagsCRTsAcute WasteLandfillingBoilersSolvent WasteRCRAHazardous Secondary MaterialsNon-Acute WasteSMS Trial EnterpriseSMS AdvancedSMS PremiumSMS TrialSMS Essentialr40CFR60.17r40CFR63.1208r40CFR63SubpartAAAAAAAr40CFR60AppendixA-7r40CFR266.104r40CFR60.2125r40CFR63.1625r40CFR60.2690r40CFR63.84940 CFR 60.1740 CFR 63.120840 CFR 63 Subpart AAAAAAA40 CFR 60 Appendix A-740 CFR 266.10440 CFR 60.212540 CFR 63.162540 CFR 60.269040 CFR 63.84940 CFR 60.17 Incorporations by reference.40 CFR 63.1208 What are the test methods?40 CFR 60 Appendix A-7 Appendix A-7 to Part 60 - Test Methods 19 through 25E40 CFR 266.104 Standards to control organic emissions.40 CFR 60.2125 How do I conduct the initial and annual performance test?40 CFR 63.1625 What are the performance test and compliance requirements for new, reconstructed, and existing facilities?40 CFR 60.2690 How do I conduct the initial and annual performance test?40 CFR 63.849 Test methods and procedures.
Popular Industry highlights
NewsIndustry NewsEnglishHAZWOPER Emergency ResponseSafety & HealthInjury and Illness RecordkeepingGeneral Industry SafetyMaritime SafetyOil Spill PreventionHAZWOPEREnvironmentalIn-Depth ArticleWater QualityUSAOil SpillsFocus AreaInjury and Illness Recordkeeping
2023-03-15T05:00:00Z
Will OSHA require records for flu-like illness in oil-spill workers?
RELATED NEWS
03/21/2023
NewsIndustry NewsFleet SafetyIn-Depth ArticleCompliance, Safety, Accountability CSACompliance, Safety, Accountability CSAOperating authority - CanadaBusiness planning - Motor CarrierFocus AreaOperating AuthorityFleet OperationsEnglishTransportationBusiness planning - Motor CarrierUSA
Understanding Canada’s National Safety Code (NSC): Part 2
03/16/2023
NewsIndustry NewsEnglishFleet SafetyRisk Management TransportationRisk Management - Motor CarrierCompliance, Safety, Accountability CSAMonthly Roundup VideoEntry-Level driver trainingEntry-level driver trainingCompliance, Safety, Accountability CSAHazmatFocus AreaUSAFleet TaxesFleet taxesTransportationVideo
Transportation Monthly Roundup - January 2023
01/26/2023
NewsIndustry NewsFederal Motor Carrier Safety RegulationsVehicle inspector requirementsFleet SafetyDriver qualificationsDriving RecordsDriver qualification and hiringFocus AreaIn-Depth ArticleUSAEnglishTransportationBusiness planning - Motor CarrierCMV Inspections
5 DOT records you may have overlooked
12/20/2022
NewsIndustry NewsIndustry NewsFleet SafetyElectronic logging device (ELD)Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA), DOTElectronic logging device (ELD)Compliance, Safety, Accountability CSACompliance, Safety, Accountability CSAFocus AreaEnglishTransportationUSA
A new violation is coming to a CSA screen near you!
TransportationSleeper-Berth Provision150-Air-Mile Non-CDL ProvisionOilfield ExceptionELDs100-Air-Mile ExceptionMandatory Break Provision11-Hour Daily Driving Limit16-Hour Short Haul ExceptionAdverse Driving Conditions10-Hour Off-Duty RuleHOS60-Hour/7-Day LimitRecord of Duty StatusSplit-Sleeper Option100-Air-Mile Radius Driver70-Hour/8-Day Limit34-Hour Restart Provision14-Hour On-Duty RuleSMS PremiumEncompass PremiumSMS AdvancedSMS Trial EnterpriseEncompass AdvancedEncompass EssentialSMS TrialSMS Essentialr49CFR395.24r49CFR395.849 CFR 395.2449 CFR 395.849 CFR 395.24 Driver responsibilitiesIn general.49 CFR 395.8 Drivers record of duty status.
12/19/2022
NewsIndustry NewsEnglishFleet SafetyElectronic logging device (ELD)Electronic logging device (ELD)Compliance, Safety, Accountability CSACompliance, Safety, Accountability CSAFocus AreaIn-Depth ArticleEnforcement - DOTRoadside InspectionsTransportationUSA
ELD transfer violations now affecting CSA scores
11/15/2022
NewsIndustry NewsIndustry NewsFleet SafetyFederal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA), DOTPassenger vehiclesCompliance, Safety, Accountability CSACompliance, Safety, Accountability CSAPassenger carriersFocus AreaEnglishSchool busesTransportationUSA
FMCSA updated passenger-carrier guidance
EducationTransportationHealthcareEncompass EssentialEncompass PremiumSMS AdvancedEncompass AdvancedSMS EssentialSMS PremiumSMS Trial EnterpriseSMS Trialr49CFR390AppendixA49 CFR 390 Appendix A49 CFR 390 Appendix A Applicability of the Registration, Financial Responsibility, and Safety Regulations to Motor Carriers of Passengers
09/29/2022
NewsPost-accident drug and alcohol testing - Motor CarrierIndustry NewsFederal Motor Carrier Safety RegulationsFleet SafetyHours of ServiceHours of ServiceDrug and Alcohol Testing - DOTFocus AreaIn-Depth ArticleEnglishTransportationBusiness planning - Motor CarrierUSA
‘Technical’ but significant rule changes may affect you
RELATED TOPICS
['Revenue - Motor Carrier']
Introduction
['Reports - motor carrier financial']
Introduction
['New entrant requirements - Motor Carrier']
Introduction
['Insurance and risk management - Motor Carrier']
Introduction
['Cost management and strategy - Motor Carrier']
Introduction
['Claims and lawsuits filing deadlines - Motor Carrier']
Introduction
['Cargo liability']
Introduction
['Cabotage - point to point transportation']
Introduction
['Business policies and procedures - Motor Carrier']
Introduction
['Business planning - Motor Carrier']
Introduction
['Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations']
Introduction
['Compliance, Safety, Accountability CSA']
Introduction
['Accident reporting - Motor Carrier']
Introduction
['Accident investigation - Motor Carrier']
Introduction
['Trip planning']
Introduction
['Accident recording - Motor Carrier']
Introduction
['Company growth - Motor Carrier']
Introduction
['Equipment specing and purchasing - Motor Carrier']
Introduction
J. J. Keller is the trusted source for DOT / Transportation, OSHA / Workplace Safety, Human Resources, Construction Safety and Hazmat / Hazardous Materials regulation compliance products and services. J. J. Keller helps you increase safety awareness, reduce risk, follow best practices, improve safety training, and stay current with changing regulations.