Welcome to COMPLIANCE NETWORK
Make regulatory compliance easier than ever at your company with expert guidance and resources custom-tailored to your exact needs.
Welcome to COMPLIANCE NETWORK
Make regulatory compliance easier than ever at your company with expert guidance and resources custom-tailored to your exact needs.
Workplace safety (OSHA).
Transportation (DOT).
Environment (EPA).
Human resources (DOL).
Just like all-terrain tires, mobile emission regulations are built for paved and unpaved landscapes. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) sets federal emission standards for mobile sources, and the rules extend beyond vehicles on the road. The requirements also apply to off-road mobile sources, ranging from the humble lawnmower to imposing construction equipment.
While most requirements affect off-road vehicle, engine, and equipment manufacturers, certain rules apply to owners and operators. So, before you fire up the forklift or any other mobile off-road source, ensure your equipment complies.
Mobile sources, according to EPA, include vehicles, engines, and motorized equipment with exhaust and evaporative emissions. There are two types of mobile sources:
Nonroad emission requirements are based on the source and emission system types.
Nonroad source | Emission system | Regulations (40 CFR) |
Aircraft | Exhaust | Part 1031 Part 1065 Part 1068 |
Nonroad compression-ignition engines | Exhaust | Part 1039 Part 1065 Part 1068 |
Nonroad large spark-ignition engines | Exhaust Evaporative | Part 1048 Part 1065 Part 1068 |
Locomotives | Exhaust | Part 1033 Part 1065 Part 1068 |
Marine compression-ignition engines and vessels | Exhaust | Part 1042 Part 1065 Part 1068 |
Marine spark-ignition engines and vessels | Exhaust Evaporative | Part 1045 Part 1065 Part 1068 |
Nonroad recreational engines and vehicles | Exhaust Evaporative | Part 1051 Part 1065 Part 1068 |
Nonroad small spark-ignition engines (up to 19 kilowatts) | Exhaust Evaporative | Part 1054 Part 1065 Part 1068 |
The rules for owners and operators primarily relate to handling, maintaining, and rebuilding the emission-controlling components on nonroad vehicles, engines, and equipment.
Don’t tamper with emission controls
The regulation at 1068.101(b) bans owners, operators, and everyone else from impeding or removing emission controls from certified mobile nonroad vehicles, engines, and equipment. Examples include using software to increase emissions, removing emission control devices from equipment, and operating engines with incorrect fuel.
It also prohibits anyone from making, selling, or using defeat devices to bypass, impair, defeat, or disable emission controls.
Follow the manufacturer’s instructions
Manufacturers are required to provide emission-related installation and maintenance instructions as well as a warranty that the nonroad engine or equipment complies with EPA’s regulations. Owners and operators are responsible for maintaining the product (1068.110(e)).
Implement these actions to help ensure proper maintenance of your nonroad engine or equipment:
Rebuild engines according to the regulations
Anyone who installs or has a rebuilt engine installed in a regulated piece of nonroad equipment must confirm that the engine complies with 1068.120. These are some of the major requirements:
Key to remember: EPA regulates emissions from all mobile sources, including off-road vehicles, engines, and equipment.
Hi everyone! Welcome to the monthly news roundup video, where we’ll review the most impactful environmental, health, and safety news. Please view the content links in the transcript for more information about the topics I’ll be covering today. Let’s get started!
OSHA’s personal protective equipment in construction final rule takes effect January 13. Employers must ensure PPE is of safe design and construction for the work to be performed and properly fits employees.
OSHA extended the comment deadline to January 14 for its proposed heat illness prevention rule. This gives stakeholders two more weeks to review the proposal and comment on it. An informal public hearing on the rule is scheduled for June 16.
OSHA released its Fall 2024 regulatory agenda on December 13. Many final and proposed rulemakings have been pushed into the first half of 2025, and a few have been bumped into the third quarter of the year.
OSHA updated its arc flash guidance for employees working on energized electrical equipment. Arc flash incidents can ignite clothing, cause structural fires, and cause severe or fatal burns. The guidance covers protecting employees from arc flash hazards, common electrical work myths, establishing boundaries around arc flash hazards, and being aware of arc flash hazards.
Warehouse, delivery, and retail workers are at increased risk for injuries and illnesses during the holidays due to higher volumes of work to meet consumer demand. OSHA reminds employers to protect workers by ensuring they’re trained to recognize and prevent hazards.
And finally, turning to environmental news, EPA released its Fall 2024 regulatory agenda on December 13. It includes projected publication dates for several final and proposed rules that may impact industry compliance with air, land, and water regulations.
Thanks for tuning in to the monthly news roundup. We’ll see you next month!
Hi everyone! Welcome to the monthly news roundup video, where we’ll review the most impactful environmental, health, and safety news. Please view the content links in the transcript for more information about the topics I’ll be covering today. Let’s get started!
A Government Accountability Office report says OSHA can do more to protect warehouse and delivery workers from ergonomic injuries. The report recommends several steps for OSHA to consider, including ensuring compliance officers can easily obtain data on when musculoskeletal disorders occurred.
OSHA updated its inspection guidance for animal slaughtering and processing industries. Inspections will focus on several hazards, including sanitation, ergonomics, and machine guarding. Among other changes, compliance officers will conduct inspections during off-shift times and identify workplace activities that impact employees most at risk such as temporary employees.
OSHA urges workers involved in hurricane cleanup and recovery efforts to be mindful of hazards, especially those associated with restoring electricity, removing debris, and trimming trees. Proper training, experience, and familiarity with related equipment helps ensure worker safety.
And finally, turning to environmental news, EPA extended the 2024 Chemical Data Reporting deadline to November 22 due to technical difficulties with its electronic reporting tool. The 2024 report covers activities that occurred between calendar years 2020 and 2023.
Thanks for tuning in to the monthly news roundup. We’ll see you next month!
Hi everyone! Welcome to the monthly news roundup video, where we’ll review the most impactful environmental, health, and safety news. Please view the content links in the transcript to take a deeper dive into the topics I’ll be covering today. With that said, let’s get started!
First, let’s take a look at what’s happening in safety and health. The week of May 1 marked the 10th annual Stand-Down to Prevent Falls in Construction. Employers were encouraged to have safety talks or demonstrations on the use of fall protection.
A new National Emphasis Program on fall prevention covers all industries, with a focus on construction and specific general industry activities. It took effect May 1; however, programmed inspections will begin after a 90-day outreach period.
With the start of lawn-care season, a recent OSHA case highlights some of the risks involved. The Agency found a lawn service contractor operating in Kentucky ignored safety requirements to save time.
A forklift operator suffered fatal injuries after falling into a recycling baler while trying to remove a jam. Investigators found a lack of training and communication were contributing factors.
In response to larger, more frequent wildfires, the state of Washington has proposed permanent wildfire smoke rules. They include year-round requirements for employers that will be in effect whenever there’s a risk that workers will be exposed to wildfire smoke.
And finally, turning to environmental news, EPA finalized changes to the new source performance standards for Automobile and Light Duty Truck Surface Coating Operations. The rule adds more emissions requirements for such operations.
Thanks for tuning in to the monthly news roundup. We’ll see you next month!
Hi everyone! Welcome to the monthly roundup video, where we’ll review the most impactful environmental, safety, and health news. First, let’s take a look at what’s happening in safety and health.
If you haven’t already done so, now is the time to post your OSHA 300A Summary. Employers are required to post the Summary in a conspicuous place from February 1st through April 30th.
As required by law, OSHA increased its penalties for inflation in mid-January. Penalties went up 7.7 percent, effective January 17th.
Also in January, OSHA released its long-awaited Fall 2022 regulatory agenda. Along with numerous proposed rules in the works, three major final rules are slated for 2023 – COVID-19 in healthcare, Injury and Illness tracking, and an update to the hazard communication standard.
OSHA recently released two new letters of interpretation, which address exit signs and lockout/tagout. Specifically, OSHA states that the International Standards Organization emergency exit symbol can be located beside the mandatory EXIT text on an existing sign.
The second letter addresses the applicability of lockout/tagout and the maintenance and operations of cathodic protection rectifiers when working on pipelines.
New York’s Warehouse Worker Protection Act was signed into law in December and takes effect in late February. It protects warehouse distribution workers from undisclosed or unlawful work speed quotas and includes protections for workers who fail to meet these quotas.
In 2021, a worker died every 101 minutes from a work-related injury, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics. A total of 5,190 fatal work injuries was recorded in the U.S. in 2021, an 8.9 percent increase over 2020.
Turning to environmental news, EPA automatically added nine per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, or PFAS, to the Toxics Release Inventory, or TRI, list. Four PFAS were added since they are no longer claimed as confidential business information.
EPA released its Fall 2022 regulatory agenda in early January. Included are major regulations impacting the National Ambient Air Quality Standards, waters of the United States, and modifications to the Risk Management Program under the Clean Air Act.
There are also a number of rules related to the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants in various rule stages.
And finally, beginning with model year 2027, heavy-duty trucks will be required to meet clean air standards that are 80 percent more stringent than current requirements.
EPA says this final rule is aimed at reducing smog- and soot-forming emissions, increasing the life of governed vehicles by up to 250 percent, and increasing emissions warranty periods up to 450 percent.
Thanks for tuning in to the monthly news roundup!
Hi everyone! Welcome to the monthly news roundup video, where we’ll go over the most impactful environmental, health, and safety news. Please view the content links in the transcript for more information about the topics I’ll be covering today. Let’s get started!
Effective January 15, OSHA penalties increased 3.2 percent for inflation. Most penalties increased to $16,131. Willful and serious violations, however, increased to $161,323.
Construction workers aged 45 and older suffer more severe injuries and higher associated costs than other age groups. Most injuries are due to slips, trips, and falls.
Washington State updated its process safety management rules to better protect workers in petroleum refineries from the hazards of volatile chemicals. The rules take effect December 27, 2024.
Bloodborne pathogens topped the list of OSHA violations for the healthcare industry in 2023. Hazard Communication was the second most cited standard, followed by respiratory protection.
OSHA Region 2 launched a regional emphasis program that targets tree trimming, tree removal, and land clearing operations. Region 2 includes New York, New Jersey, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands.
EPA continues to strengthen its regulation of per- and polyfluoroalkyl — or PFAS — substances. A new rule prevents facilities from using any of the 300+ inactive PFAS before EPA conducts a risk determination and, if necessary, regulates the activity.
Thanks for tuning in to the monthly news roundup. We’ll see you next month!
Hi everyone! Welcome to the monthly news roundup video, where we'll review the most impactful environmental, health, and safety news. Please view the content links in the transcript to take a deeper dive into the topics I'll be covering today. With that said, let's get started!
In response to soaring temperatures across the country, OSHA issued a heat hazard alert reminding employers of their obligation to protect workers against heat illness. OSHA also ramped up enforcement activities in high-risk industries like construction and agriculture.
OSHA's annual Safe and Sound Week was held the week of August 7. It highlighted the importance of workplace safety and health programs. This year's focus was on mental health and well-being.
OSHA wants to know how you use your safety and health program to ensure a positive workplace safety culture. The agency has drawn up questions related to work safety values, safety messaging, and more, and will use your feedback to develop educational materials. November 30 is the deadline for comments.
Though the current hurricane season has been relatively quiet, it's important to be prepared as the height of the season approaches. Both OSHA and NIOSH have provided resources to help emergency responders, recovery workers, and employers prepare in advance for anticipated weather disasters.
Workplace deaths due to unintentional overdoses of fentanyl and methamphetamine continue to rise. In 2021, there were 464 such fatalities, a 19.6 percent increase over 2020.
And finally, turning to environmental news, receiving facilities will see increased user fees for the e-Manifest system in fiscal years 2024 and 2025. EPA sets these user fees based on how the manifest is submitted and processing costs for each manifest type. Using fully electronic waste manifests will cost significantly less.
Thanks for tuning in to the monthly news roundup. We'll see you next month!
Hi everyone! Welcome to the monthly news roundup video, where we’ll review the most impactful environmental, health, and safety news. Please view the content links in the transcript to take a deeper dive into the topics I’ll be covering today. With that said, let’s get started!
First, let’s take a look at what’s happening in safety and health. OSHA revised its combustible dust national emphasis program. It adds several industries with a higher likelihood of having combustible dust hazards.
California’s Safety and Health Appeals Board says drinking water must be “as close as practicable” to outdoor employees.
The Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration says that some forklift operators may be considered hazmat employees. If operators handle hazmat cargo, such as moving it from the truck to an aircraft, they need hazmat training.
OSHA posted a letter of interpretation that answers hazard communication questions related to lithium batteries. The agency says workers may be exposed to hazards during storage, handling, and maintenance activities.
Stand Up 4 Grain Safety Week was held the week of March 27. Employers were encouraged to hold toolbox talks or safety demonstrations related to grain handling and storage.
Turning to environmental news, EPA issued significant new use rules for chemical substances that were the subject of premanufacture notices. This change brings added reporting and recordkeeping.
Thanks for tuning in to the monthly news roundup. We’ll see you next month!
Hi everyone! Welcome to the monthly news roundup video, where we’ll review the most impactful environmental, health, and safety news. Please view the content links in the transcript for more information about the topics I’ll be covering today. Let’s get started!
OSHA published its proposed heat illness rule on August 30. It applies to both indoor and outdoor work in general industry, construction, agriculture, and maritime. Comments on the proposal will be accepted until December 30. OSHA encourages both employers and workers to submit comments.
Fall protection for construction remained number one on OSHA’s list of Top 10 violations for the 14th year in a row. There was little movement among the other Top 10 entries, with Hazard Communication at number 2 and ladders at number 3.
OSHA may exclude volunteer emergency response organizations from its proposed emergency response rule. During the rule’s public comment period, the agency received numerous comments that raised serious economic feasibility concerns.
During its silica enforcement inspections, OSHA also found violations of the hazard communication, respiratory protection, and noise standards. Over 200 companies were targeted as part of the agency’s respirable crystalline silica emphasis program.
Employers can view workplace injury and illness trends using OSHA’s Severe Injury Report dashboard. This new online tool allows users to search the agency’s severe injury report database. Severe injuries and illnesses are those that result in inpatient hospitalization, amputation, or loss of an eye.
And finally, turning to environmental news, an EPA final rule impacts facilities that reclassify from major to area source status under the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants program. These facilities must continue to meet the major source emission standards for seven hazardous air pollutants.
Thanks for tuning in to the monthly news roundup. We’ll see you next month!
Hi everyone! Welcome to the monthly news roundup video, where we’ll go over the most impactful environmental, health, and safety news. Please view the content links in the transcript for more information about the topics I’ll be covering today. Let’s get started!
OSHA’s worker walkaround rule takes effect May 31st. It expands the criteria for who employees can authorize to act as their representative during an inspection.
Between 2015 and 2022, there were about 1,500 worker injuries involving food processing machinery. A new OSHA alert raises awareness of these hazards. It addresses hazard recognition, corrective measures, and workers’ rights.
The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) seeks stakeholder input on protecting outdoor workers from wildfire smoke. The agency intends to develop a hazard review document that provides recommendations to protect workers.
The Mine Safety and Health Administration published a final rule that lowers miners’ exposure to silica dust. It also revises the standard to reflect the latest advances in respiratory protection and practices.
OSHA released 2023 injury and illness data. The agency provides public access to this information in an effort to identify unsafe conditions and workplace hazards that may lead to injuries and illnesses.
And turning to environmental news, EPA finalized a rule to designate two widely used PFAS as hazardous substances under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act, or CERCLA. The rule requires immediate release notifications for the two PFAS. It also gives EPA the authority to hold polluters responsible for contamination.
Thanks for tuning in to the monthly news roundup. We’ll see you next month!
Hi everyone! Welcome to the monthly roundup video, where we’ll review the most impactful environmental, safety, and health news.
First, let’s take a look at what’s happening in safety and health. Machine guarding and hazard communication topped OSHA’s list of most frequently cited serious violations in fiscal year 2022. Over 1,300 citations were issued for machine guarding and over 1,800 were issued for HazCom.
Effective March 26, OSHA will cite certain types of violations as “instance-by-instance” citations, when inspectors identify high-gravity, serious violations specific to the following: falls, trenching, machine guarding, respiratory protection, permit required confined space, and lockout/tagout, as well as other-than-serious violations specific to recordkeeping.
California’s COVID-19 prevention non-emergency regulations, which require employers to protect workers from the hazards related to COVID-19, took effect February 3, and will remain in effect for two years.
A new OSHA fact sheet outlines measures to protect shipyard employees from the physical hazards of confined spaces. In the maritime sector, physical hazards in confined spaces can increase a worker’s risk of injury.
OSHA says it will withdraw its proposal to revoke Arizona’s State Plan. The state has taken measures to remain compliant with federal OSHA. However, OSHA continues to work closely with Arizona to address other state-plan concerns that weren’t part of its original withdrawal proposal.
And turning to environmental news, EPA issued a rule that finalizes first-time standards for inorganic hazardous air pollutants in miscellaneous coating manufacturing that will limit emissions and require effective controls. Final amendments include provisions for inorganic hazardous air pollutant standards for process vessels. The rule took effect February 22.
Thanks for tuning in to the monthly news roundup. We'll see you next month!
Hi everyone! Welcome to the monthly news roundup video, where we’ll go over the most impactful environmental, health, and safety news. Please view the content links in the transcript for more information about the topics I’ll be covering today. Let’s get started! The Office of Management and Budget completed its review of OSHA’s worker walkaround final rule on March 20. The next step is publication in the Federal Register. The rule expands the criteria for who employees can authorize to act as their representative during an OSHA inspection.
Stand Up 4 Grain Safety Week was held the week of March 25. This annual event brings attention to hazards in the grain handling and storage industry and encourages employers to focus on safe work practices.
Over 100 people die in ladder-related deaths each year, and thousands more suffer disabling injuries. During Ladder Safety Month, which is held each March, the American Ladder Institute promotes ladder safety to decrease the number of injuries and fatalities.
Between 2010 and 2023, 11 miners drowned in incidents involving submerged mobile equipment. In response, the Mine Safety and Health Administration issued a safety alert. It recommends measures miners should take when operating equipment near water.
And finally, turning to environmental news, EPA finalized amendments to its Risk Management Program in an effort to improve safety at facilities that use and distribute hazardous chemicals. The rule seeks to improve chemical process safety; assist in planning for, preparing for, and responding to accidents; and increase public awareness of chemical hazards at regulated sites.
Thanks for tuning in to the monthly news roundup. We’ll see you next month!
Hi everyone! Welcome to the monthly news roundup video, where we’ll review the most impactful environmental, health, and safety news. Please view the content links in the transcript for more information about the topics I’ll be covering today. Let’s get started!
Two State Plan agencies allegedly provided advance notice of workplace inspections to employers, a practice that’s prohibited under the Occupational Safety and Health Act. Now, lawmakers have requested that the Department of Labor’s acting secretary address the allegations and explain what challenges OSHA faces when monitoring and enforcing State Plan compliance.
A recent study shows jobs in agriculture, forestry, fishing, and hunting are among California’s most dangerous, accounting for the highest number of fatalities among full-time workers. Transportation and utilities jobs ranked second and construction was third.
Remote isolation of process equipment can quickly stop the release of hazardous materials, which can help prevent fatalities and injuries, limit facility damage, and better protect communities and the environment. A U.S. Chemical Safety Board study explores their use and makes recommendations for their utilization in chemical facilities.
A National Safety Council report explores the role of diversity, equity, and inclusion on work-related musculoskeletal disorders, or MSDs. MSDs are the most common workplace injury and often lead to worker disability, early retirement, and employment limitations.
And finally, turning to environmental news, EPA published a final rule that revises its hazardous waste export manifest regulations. All hazardous waste shipments and manifest-related reports will be managed electronically through the agency’s e-Manifest program.
Thanks for tuning in to the monthly news roundup. We’ll see you next month!
Some commercial and industrial projects place materials (called fill) in a body of water for various reasons, such as building a facility, adding a road to a facility site, or installing intake and outfall pipes at a power plant. If the project affects any of the waters of the United States (WOTUS), you must first obtain a permit.
Section 404 of the Clean Water Act requires a permit to discharge dredged or fill material into any WOTUS (including wetlands). Before conducting any activities at your facility’s site, it’s crucial to find out whether your project requires a permit to fill.
The regulations at 40 CFR 232.2 define fill material as any material placed in WOTUS that:
Fill material excludes trash and garbage. Common examples of fill material are:
Whenever fill material is dumped, placed, or deposited in WOTUS, a “discharge of fill material” occurs. Examples (according to 232.2) range from road fills to commercial and industrial site development fills.
The Environmental Protection Agency and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) jointly administer the Section 404 permit program. The USACE typically issues the permits unless a state or tribal program is authorized to issue them.
To answer this question, you’ll need to address a few more questions:
The first step is to determine whether Section 404 regulations cover any on-site waterbodies.
The Aquatic Resource Delineation Report is a required part of the permitting process. It identifies any on-site aquatic resources (i.e., waterbodies or wetlands) subject to permitting rules. Businesses typically hire consultants to develop the report.
If you need help figuring out the status of your aquatic resources, you can request the USACE to make a written jurisdictional determination of whether Section 404 rules apply to any on-site waterbodies or wetlands.
Not all fill discharges require a Section 404 permit. Examples include:
See 232.3 for the comprehensive list of discharge activities that don’t require a permit.
The potential impact that your project will have on WOTUS determines the type of permit you need: general or individual.
General permits are issued for discharges that have only minimal adverse effects on WOTUS. They’re based on specific activities and typically require much less processing time, allowing projects to begin sooner. The types of general permits include:
Individual permits are issued for discharges that may have significant impacts on WOTUS. They require case-by-case evaluations of each project.
When starting the Section 404 permitting process, keep these things in mind:
Key to remember: If a project’s discharges of fill material could impact the waters of the United States, it may require a Section 404 permit under the Clean Water Act.
Are the chemicals in your home and workplace safe? The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is working to answer this question with the recent launch of risk evaluations for five chemicals under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA):
EPA selected the chemicals through a rigorous process (under TSCA section 6(b)(1)(A)) that considers potential hazards, exposure levels, and other relevant factors. A critical component of this process is the prioritization of chemicals for risk evaluation.
The prioritization process is the cornerstone of EPA's TSCA implementation. It ensures that the agency's resources are directed toward chemicals with the greatest potential to cause harm. This systematic approach allows the agency to efficiently evaluate a vast number of existing chemicals and make informed decisions about their safety.
Prioritizing existing chemicals under TSCA can include up to seven stages:
Following prioritization, EPA immediately starts risk evaluations for chemicals designated as High-Priority Substances. The evaluations involve a comprehensive assessment of potential hazards, exposure pathways, and potential risks to human health and the environment. The goal is to determine whether a chemical presents an "unreasonable risk of injury to health or the environment."
If a risk evaluation identifies an unreasonable risk, EPA can take various regulatory actions under TSCA. These actions may include restrictions on the use, manufacture, or distribution of the chemical. The agency tailors the regulatory approach to the unique characteristics and risks of each chemical.
Key to remember: EPA recently announced the initiation of risk evaluations for five chemicals under TSCA. The chemicals were selected through a rigorous prioritization process that considers potential hazards, exposure levels, and other relevant factors.
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has added new Management Method Codes to describe how hazardous waste will be managed after temporary storage and transfer. The codes are used for Biennial Hazardous Waste Reports and e-Manifests required by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA).
What are the changes?
The new “S Codes” are effective as of January 1, 2025. The S Codes will ultimately replace code H141 for Storage and Transfer for the RCRA Biennial Reports and e-Manifests. EPA will remove Code H141 from the Biennial Report and e-Manifest on January 1, 2027.
Hazardous waste handlers will use the S Codes on the Biennial Report Waste Generation and Management (GM) forms. The S Codes indicate that (a) hazardous waste was received to be stored or transferred and (b) the hazardous waste will later be managed by a final receiving facility using a specific method.
What are the new codes?
The new Management Method Codes include the following:
S Code | Description |
S010 | Stored and transferred for metals recovery |
S011 | Stored and transferred for mercury recovery |
S015 | Stored and transferred for deployment/deactivation of airbag waste |
S020 | Stored and transferred for solvents recovery |
S039 | Stored and transferred for other recovery or reclamation for reuse |
S040 | Stored and transferred for incineration |
S041 | Stored and transferred for open burning/open detonation |
S042 | Stored and transferred for thermal desorption |
S070 | Stored and transferred for chemical treatment |
S081 | Stored and transferred for biological treatment |
S090 | Stored and transferred for polymerization |
S100 | Stored and transferred for physical treatment only |
S110 | Stored and transferred for stabilization |
S113 | Stored and transferred for stabilization to remove HW characteristics or to achieve delisting levels |
S120 | Stored and transferred for comb. of chemical, biological, and/or physical TRT |
S121 | Stored and transferred for neutralization only |
S122 | Stored and transferred for evaporation |
S129 | Stored and transferred for other treatment |
S130 | Stored and transferred for surface impoundment that will be closed as landfill |
S131 | Stored and transferred for land treatment or application |
S132 | Stored and transferred for landfill (with prior treatment and/or stabilization) |
S134 | Stored and transferred for deepwell or underground injection |
When do the new codes apply?
Handlers may use the new S Codes on the 2025 Biennial Report GM form, on the 2026 Annual Report in some states, and for e-Manifests. While handlers may continue using code H141, EPA recommends shifting to S Codes before January 1, 2027, when code H141 will be removed.
Key to remember: EPA’s new S Codes for Biennial Reports and e-Manifests indicate how the final receiving facility will manage temporarily stored and transferred hazardous waste.
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) published the Fall 2024 Semiannual Agenda of Regulatory and Deregulatory Actions on December 13, 2024. The agenda reveals the agency’s upcoming regulatory actions and where each action is in the rulemaking process.
The agenda includes major EPA updates, such as:
This article highlights some of the major rules we’re watching closely. You’ll want to review the entire agenda to learn about all the rulemakings on EPA’s docket. Please note that the agenda dates are tentative; they're when the agency seeks to publish the rulemakings in the Federal Register.
Final Rule Stage | |
Project Publication Date | Title |
December 2024 | New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) and Emission Guidelines (EG) for Large Municipal Waste Combustors (MWCs) |
December 2024 | Removal of Affirmative Defense Provisions From Specified New Source Performance Standards and National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants |
January 2025 | Water System Restructuring Assessment Rule |
March 2025 | Regulatory Requirements for New HAP Additions to Part 63 |
July 2025 | Listing of Specific PFAS as Hazardous Constituents |
August 2025 | Clean Water Act Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Meat and Poultry Products Point Source Category |
October 2025 | Revisions to Standards for the Open Burning/Open Detonation of Waste Explosives |
November 2025 | Stationary Combustion Turbines New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) Technology Review |
Proposed Rule Stage | |
Projected publication date of Notice of Proposed Rulemaking | Title |
December 2024 | Reconsideration of Standards of Performance for New, Reconstructed and Modified Sources and Emissions Guidelines for Existing Sources: Oil and Natural Gas Sector Climate Review |
January 2025 | National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for the Polyether Polyols Production Industry |
March 2025 | Clean Water Act Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for PFAS Manufacturers Under the Organic Chemicals, Plastics and Synthetic Fibers Point Source Category |
April 2025 | Phasedown of Hydrofluorocarbons: Reconsideration of Technology Transitions Final Rule Under the American Innovation and Manufacturing Act of 2020 |
May 2025 | National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants: Stationary Combustion Turbines; Amendments |
June 2025 | Improving Recycling and Management of Renewable Energy Wastes: Universal Waste Regulations for Solar Panels and Lithium Batteries |
June 2025 | PFAS Requirements in NPDES Permit Applications |
June 2025 | Tiered Data Reporting to Inform Prioritization, Risk Evaluation and Risk Management Under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) |
November 2025 | Revisions to Establish the Sixth Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule (UCMR 6) for Public Water Systems |
November 2025 | Revise/Update the Standards of Performance and Emission Guidelines for Municipal Solid Waste Landfills |
Pre-Rule Stage | |
Projected publication date or other action | Title |
December 2024 (Notice of Proposed Rulemaking) | Lead Wheel Weights; Regulatory Investigation Under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) |
January 2025 (End Review) | 610 Review of Standards of Performance for New Residential Wood Heathers, New Residential Hydronic Heaters and Forced-Air Furnaces |
January 2025 (Advanced Notice of Proposed Rulemaking Comment Period End) | Regulatory Investigation of N-(1,3-Dimethylbutyl)-N′-phenyl-p-phenylenediamine ("6PPD") and its Transformation Product, 6PPD-quinone Under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) |
Before a new chemical substance can enter the marketplace, it first travels through the New Chemicals Review Program. Section 5 of the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) requires the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to review new chemicals for any unreasonable risk of injury they may pose to human or environmental health. The agency determines (a) whether the substances can enter the marketplace and (b) if they require restrictions to manage any unreasonable risk.
To manufacture (including import) a chemical for commercial purposes that’s not on the TSCA Chemical Substance Inventory (i.e., a new chemical), you have to submit a premanufacture notice (PMN) to EPA. In December 2024, EPA finalized the new chemicals review rule. It clarifies that when you submit a PMN, you may not manufacture the new chemical substance until the agency issues a safety determination and completes any associated actions (like developing rules to limit its use).
Start the PMN process by conducting your own review! Evaluate and prepare for the possible determinations EPA will make for your new chemical substance.
Submitting a PMN sparks the beginning of the new chemicals review process. EPA completes the review process by making one of five possible safety determinations for the new chemical.
It’s important to note that three types of determinations fall under the scope of Section 5(e) actions. If EPA makes any determination under Section 5(e), it must issue a Section 5(e) order with requirements that limit or ban the manufacture, processing, distribution in commerce, use, or disposal of the new chemical. Examples include toxicity testing, personal protective equipment for exposed workers, and environmental release restrictions.
Let’s take a look at each one.
In the most straightforward scenario, EPA can find that the new chemical isn’t likely to pose an unreasonable risk.
In this case, the agency will notify you and publish its findings in the Federal Register. Once you receive the Section 5(a)(3)(C) notice from EPA, you may begin manufacturing the new chemical substance, even if the applicable review period isn’t over.
The agency may find that a new chemical presents an unreasonable risk of injury.
It will use Section 5(f) to limit or ban the manufacture, processing, distribution in commerce, use, or disposal of the new chemical through either:
The agency may determine that it doesn’t have enough information to make a “reasoned evaluation” of the new chemical’s impact on health and the environment.
EPA will issue a Section 5(e) order with restrictions to mitigate or eliminate the unreasonable risk.
If EPA doesn’t have enough information, it can alternatively determine that the new chemical poses an unreasonable risk due to insufficient information.
The agency will issue a Section 5(e) order with restrictions to mitigate or eliminate the unreasonable risk.
On the other hand, EPA may determine that the new chemical will be produced in substantial quantities that could (a) be released in large amounts to the environment or (b) result in significant human exposure.
EPA will issue a Section 5(e) order with restrictions to mitigate or eliminate the unreasonable risk.
In December 2024, EPA finalized changes to the rule for new chemical reviews. It clarifies that the agency must make one of five statutory determinations for each PMN, significant new use notice, and microbial commercial activity notice it receives.
The final rule also:
Key to remember: EPA reviews each new chemical and makes one of five possible safety determinations that dictate both if and how the substance can enter the marketplace.
In 2022, the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) reported a staggering 658,000 workers were exposed to harmful chemicals, resulting in 839 fatalities. These statistics highlight the significant health and safety risks that an unexpected exposure to a hazardous chemical, or a substantial threat of a hazardous substance release, can pose to workers, organizations, and communities. A thorough understanding of chemical management regulations is crucial to ensure potential hazardous exposures are minimized.
OSHA’s HazCom standard (29 CFR 1910.1200) is designed to inform workers about chemical hazards and how to protect themselves.
Key definitions: A "hazardous chemical" is any chemical which is classified as a physical hazard or a health hazard, a simple asphyxiant, combustible dust, or other hazards not that may not be classified but still pose a serious danger.
Indicators: Any workplace where hazardous chemicals are used, stored, or processed needs a hazard communication program. Labels, safety data sheets (SDSs), and employee training are essential components.
Training requirements: Training must cover how to read and understand labels, the purpose and location of SDSs, and specific protective measures when handling hazardous chemicals. Training must be provided upon initial assignment and updated whenever new chemical hazards are introduced.
The DOT’s hazmat regulations (DOT 49 CFR Parts 171-180) include substances that, if transported improperly, can harm people, property, or the environment. By correctly handling and moving these materials, organizations can avoid accidents and safeguard both public health and the environment.
Key definitions: A "hazardous material" is any substance or material capable of posing an unreasonable risk when transported in commerce. This can include flammable, toxic, and reactive substances.
Indicators: Activities involving the loading, unloading, and handling of hazardous materials require adherence to hazmat regulations. This requirement also applies to organizations that make or maintain packaging, or a part of packaging, that's marked or sold as suitable for transporting hazardous materials commercially.
Training requirements: Workers handling hazmat must undergo specific training on material classification, safe handling, emergency response, and transportation. Training must be provided within 90 days of initial assignment and a refresher at least once every three years. Training must also be documented and retained for a minimum of three years.
The EPA’s hazwaste regulations (40 CFR Parts 260-299) refer to any waste material that could potentially harm the environment or human health if not managed correctly. Additionally, many states have hazardous waste requirements beyond EPA regulations.
Key Definitions: Hazardous waste includes materials classified as toxic, ignitable, corrosive, or reactive, based on specific criteria.
Indicators: Managing hazardous waste follows the material’s entire lifecycle including the generation, transportation, treatment, storage, and disposal, known as "cradle-to-grave." Requirements are based on the quantity of waste generated.
Training requirements: Employees involved in hazardous waste management must receive training on waste handling, storage, labeling, and disposal procedures. Annual training requirements are based on generator quantity status.
OSHA’s HAZWOPER standard (29 CFR 1910.120) protects workers involved in hazardous waste management and emergency response. HAZWOPER covers a wide range of activities, including cleanup operations and responses to hazardous substance releases.
Key definitions: A hazardous substance is any material that can harm health and safety if released into the environment. In the context of HAZWOPER, this includes materials that pose risks in emergencies, such as spills, leaks, or other uncontrolled releases.
Indicators: Workers and organizations tasked with hazardous waste cleanup, spill response, and emergency operations require specialized training, equipment, and procedures.
Training requirements: HAZWOPER training is intensive and includes specific requirements depending on job roles. Training levels include 24-hour, 40-hour, and 8-hour refresher courses for different exposure risks. Employees learn about hazardous substance properties, emergency response procedures, PPE use, and decontamination processes.
OSHA’s PSM standard (29 CFR 1910.119) aims to prevent accidental chemical releases that could seriously harm employees or the environment by including safety measures, risk assessments, and employee training to ensure safe operations. It is especially important in industries handling highly hazardous chemicals including facilities with high-risk chemical processes.
Key definitions: OSHA defines a "highly hazardous chemical" as any substance that poses a significant risk of causing serious harm to people, property, or the environment due to its toxic, reactive, flammable, or explosive properties.
Indicators: Any workplace handling large volumes of hazardous chemicals or using complex chemical processes including chemicals that are specifically listed by OSHA in appendix A of the standard, are present in quantities above specified thresholds, or exhibit properties that make them likely to cause a major incident.
Training requirements: PSM training covers safe operating procedures, hazard analysis, and incident investigation for employees involved in high-risk processes. Training must be provided at initial assignment and a refresher at least once every three years.
Key to remember: Chemical management is a complex task. Understanding what regulatory requirements apply will ensure compliance as well as minimize the chance for dangerous incidents.
December 2024 marks the 40th anniversary of one of history’s worst industrial incidents — the release of a deadly gas at a chemical plant in Bhopal, India. This incident, along with another in West Virginia in 1985, spurred U.S. legislative and regulatory action. However, some might say that work is not finished.
Think of the Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act (EPCRA) of 1986, the EPA Risk Management Program (RMP) standard, and the OSHA Process Safety Management (PSM) standard, for example. You’ll find roots to the Bhopal disaster.
It was late on December 2, 1984, at a chemical facility. A faulty valve leaked water into a tank of methyl isocyanate (or MIC). This prompted a violent reaction inside the tank. History tells us that at about 1:00 a.m. on that fateful December 3, the failure of a safety valve triggered a massive release. A dense, lethal cloud of MIC and other chemicals drifted over the city of Bhopal.
By dawn, thousands of residents were dead, along with birds, dogs, cows, and other animals. The injured flocked to hospitals in overwhelming numbers. A lack of information about just what the chemicals were, however, compounded the catastrophe.
India officials reported half a million or more chemical exposures. Estimates vary, but as many as 10,000 people perished in the initial few days. Tens of thousands died prematurely in the decades to follow, according to sources.
In August 1985, a chemical release in Institute, West Virginia, showed Americans that a “Bhopal-like” incident could happen here. Aldicarb oxime and other chemicals released from the facility, and over 125 residents landed in the hospital. Again, a lack of available chemical information was noteworthy. Many U.S. citizens began to fear they faced catastrophic risks.
In the wake of the incidents, Congress enacted laws:
Together, they required EPA and OSHA to issue regulations to:
Congress also established the Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation Board (CSB) to investigate chemical incidents and recommend measures to prevent them. Despite these actions, the U.S. continues to experience serious chemical incidents. A visit to the CSB or National Response Center (NRC) websites reveals countless incident reports since 1990. A look at the 2024 data finds:
Ten years ago, on the 30th anniversary of the Bhopal disaster, CSB posted a six-minute video explaining how the tragedy occurred. The video also examines more recent U.S. incidents. It emphasizes what more could be done to prevent similar incidents.
CSB investigations around the time of the video found deficiencies in design and PSM, similar to those uncovered in Bhopal! CSB Chairperson Rafael Moure-Eraso argued: “Process safety management regulations are in need of reform. There must be more emphasis on preventing the occurrence of major chemical accidents through safer design. Responding to emergencies and punishing people after the fact are not enough.”
Another headline-making incident in April 2013 involved a massive explosion of ammonium nitrate at a fertilizer storage/distribution facility in West, Texas. It fatally injured 12 volunteer firefighters and two members of the public and caused hundreds of injuries. The incident prompted the Executive Order on Improving Chemical Facility Safety and Security (EO 13650) on August 1, 2013. The order directed the federal government to:
The feds held listening sessions and issued a flurry of fact sheets, alerts, and enforcement policy changes (See here and here.). Note that the RMP regulation at 40 CFR 68 was eventually amended this year on March 11, 2024. The PSM standard remains unchanged, despite a request for information on December 9, 2013. In an about-face, Congress allowed the Chemical Facility Anti-Terrorism Standards program (at 6 CFR 27) to expire on July 28, 2023, but many in Congress and industry would like to see its return.
This month marks the 40th anniversary of the Bhopal chemical disaster. It sparked the U.S. Congress to take steps back then to prevent such a disaster from occurring here. Those actions did not spell the end to all chemical disasters in the U.S. In response, a renewed push for regulatory reforms popped up in the last decade.
ENTER THE INSTITUTE
Be your company’s leading compliance authority with a robust library of articles, videos, and practical exercises designed to grow your knowledge of 120+ regulatory subjects.
Are the chemicals in your home and workplace safe? The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is working to answer this question with the recent launch of risk evaluations for five chemicals under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA):
EPA selected the chemicals through a rigorous process (under TSCA section 6(b)(1)(A)) that considers potential hazards, exposure levels, and other relevant factors. A critical component of this process is the prioritization of chemicals for risk evaluation.
The prioritization process is the cornerstone of EPA's TSCA implementation. It ensures that the agency's resources are directed toward chemicals with the greatest potential to cause harm. This systematic approach allows the agency to efficiently evaluate a vast number of existing chemicals and make informed decisions about their safety.
Prioritizing existing chemicals under TSCA can include up to seven stages:
Following prioritization, EPA immediately starts risk evaluations for chemicals designated as High-Priority Substances. The evaluations involve a comprehensive assessment of potential hazards, exposure pathways, and potential risks to human health and the environment. The goal is to determine whether a chemical presents an "unreasonable risk of injury to health or the environment."
If a risk evaluation identifies an unreasonable risk, EPA can take various regulatory actions under TSCA. These actions may include restrictions on the use, manufacture, or distribution of the chemical. The agency tailors the regulatory approach to the unique characteristics and risks of each chemical.
Key to remember: EPA recently announced the initiation of risk evaluations for five chemicals under TSCA. The chemicals were selected through a rigorous prioritization process that considers potential hazards, exposure levels, and other relevant factors.
OSHA requires employers to provide all workers with immediately available and sanitary restroom or toilet facilities. But does this include truckers and delivery drivers that stop at your facilities? The sanitation standards (1910.141, 1926.51, and 1928.110) are meant to protect all workers from adverse health effects from unsanitary toilets facilities, or the unavailability of facilities when needed.
Bipartisan legislation has recently been introduced in the House that would require businesses to provide restroom access to truckers who are loading or delivering cargo at their warehouses, manufacturers, distribution centers, retailers, and ports.
Supported by leading organizations in the trucking industry, the Trucker Bathroom Access Act (H.R. 9592) was introduced on Dec. 15, 2022. The bill requires retailers, warehouses, and other establishments with existing restrooms to provide access to drivers who are loading or delivering cargo. Additionally, operators of ports and marine terminals must provide access for drayage and parking while accessing such restrooms.
This amendment to Title 49 would exempt some employers from the bill including filling and service stations, and restaurants 800-square feet or smaller with restrooms intended for employee use only. The bill doesn’t require employers to construct new restrooms but to give truck drivers the same access as employees or customers.
Commercial truckers and delivery drivers are the lifeline of our supply chain of supplies, products, and consumables. Working tirelessly all hours, during holidays and weekends, and throughout the pandemic, they continue to deliver critical food and emergency supplies to companies everywhere. Employers have the privilege of demonstrating gratitude to truckers and delivery drivers with a positive work environment.
The benefits of allowing truckers and delivery drivers the convenience and safety of readily available, sanitary restroom facilities are plenty. They’re able to rest and reset when necessary, which keeps them and others safer on the roads. Equally important, restroom availability prevents drivers from having to search for available facilities elsewhere, allowing them to keep a timely delivery schedule, limit supply chain delays, and ultimately lower costs for employers and customers.
The proposed Trucker Bathroom Access Act will require retailers, warehouses, and other establishments with existing restrooms to provide access to truckers and delivery drivers who are loading or delivering cargo. Access to restrooms keeps them refreshed and ready to deliver essential supplies to companies across the country.
Hi everyone! Welcome to the monthly news roundup video, where we’ll review the most impactful environmental, health, and safety news. Please view the content links in the transcript for more information about the topics I’ll be covering today. Let’s get started!
OSHA’s personal protective equipment in construction final rule takes effect January 13. Employers must ensure PPE is of safe design and construction for the work to be performed and properly fits employees.
OSHA extended the comment deadline to January 14 for its proposed heat illness prevention rule. This gives stakeholders two more weeks to review the proposal and comment on it. An informal public hearing on the rule is scheduled for June 16.
OSHA released its Fall 2024 regulatory agenda on December 13. Many final and proposed rulemakings have been pushed into the first half of 2025, and a few have been bumped into the third quarter of the year.
OSHA updated its arc flash guidance for employees working on energized electrical equipment. Arc flash incidents can ignite clothing, cause structural fires, and cause severe or fatal burns. The guidance covers protecting employees from arc flash hazards, common electrical work myths, establishing boundaries around arc flash hazards, and being aware of arc flash hazards.
Warehouse, delivery, and retail workers are at increased risk for injuries and illnesses during the holidays due to higher volumes of work to meet consumer demand. OSHA reminds employers to protect workers by ensuring they’re trained to recognize and prevent hazards.
And finally, turning to environmental news, EPA released its Fall 2024 regulatory agenda on December 13. It includes projected publication dates for several final and proposed rules that may impact industry compliance with air, land, and water regulations.
Thanks for tuning in to the monthly news roundup. We’ll see you next month!
Quick action using cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and automated external defibrillators(AEDs) can save the lives of the nearly 350,000 cardiac event victims each year outside of a hospital setting. But what does OSHA require for the workplace? What you didn’t know about OSHA regulations regarding AEDs may surprise you.
For every minute a patient is in cardiac arrest, their chances of survival decrease dramatically. When a patient doesn’t have a pulse and isn’t breathing, CPR should be performed until an AED is available. It’s important to note that CPR alone does not restart the heart. CPR is an oxygen circulation procedure. AEDs, on the other hand, are meant for lifesaving intervention.
CPR and early defibrillation are vital components of the emergency medical services (EMS) chain of survival that increases the odds of cardiac patient survival. However, according to the American Heart Association (AHA), even the best CPR can’t provide enough circulation of oxygen to the brain and heart for more than a few minutes. In fact, a patient whose brain is deprived of oxygen for 10 minutes or more seldom recovers.
Just like a reliable vehicle, the circulatory system is the human body’s blood transportation system, and the heart is the engine. Amazingly, the heart generates its own electrical impulses, pumping in a regular, rhythmic manner. As with any engine, the heart requires a certain amount of pressure to function and doesn’t work well when clogged with grease or debris. The most common causes of sudden cardiac arrest include a heart attack, electrocution, and asphyxiation — all of which could occur in the workplace. Common signs and symptoms include:
CPR provides the pressure for the body’s “engine” to oxygen circulating, while an AED provides the electrical impulses to keep the engine pumping.
OSHA 1910.151 requires first aid treatment be provided in the absence of an infirmary, clinic, or hospital in near proximity to the workplace used to treat injured employees. This may include assisting a victim of cardiac arrest using CPR or defibrillation.
OSHA requirements for CPR and defibrillation differ considerably. Standards requiring CPR include:
OSHA recommends basic adult CPR refresher training and retesting every year, and first aid training at least once every three years. CPR training include facilitated discussion along with ’hands-on’ skills training that uses mannequins and partner practice.
Though OSHA recognizes AEDs as important lifesaving technology that plays a role in treating cardiac arrest, the agency doesn’t currently require their use in the workplace. Instead, OSHA wants employers to assess their own requirements for AEDs as part of their first aid response.
AEDs are considered Class III medical devices which means the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has some oversight on their use. Almost all AEDs require the purchaser to obtain a prescription from a physician under FDA regulations. The prescription process is meant as a quality control mechanism to ensure AEDs are properly maintained, that all designated responders are properly trained, and assist employers with establishing an emergency response plan for their workplace AED program.
The AHA requires AED operators to also receive CPR training as an “integral part of providing lifesaving aid to people suffering sudden cardiac arrest.” Though easy to use, each AED is slightly different, so training helps users understand the unique traits and supplies for the individual units at their workplace. Additionally, AED users must be trained to understand the signs of a sudden cardiac arrest, when to activate the EMS system, and how to perform CPR.
AEDs are light, portable, easy to use, and inexpensive. They’re best placed near high-hazard areas such as confined spaces, near electrical energy, or in remote work areas. Response time to reach AEDs should be kept within 3–5-minutes.
Need more information on defibrillators in the workplace? See our ezExplanation on AEDs. |
Many states require or encourage CPR and AED training from nationally recognized organizations. Any AED training should include CPR training. OSHA doesn’t offer first aid or CPR training, nor certify trainers. Training by a nationally recognized organization, such as AHA, the American Red Cross, or National Safety Council is recommended.
While OSHA doesn’t currently require the use of AEDs in the workplace, they do expect employers to assess their own AED requirements as part of their first aid response. AED training is required by most states and should include CPR with a hands-on practical component.
Hi everyone! Welcome to the monthly news roundup video, where we’ll review the most impactful environmental, health, and safety news. Please view the content links in the transcript for more information about the topics I’ll be covering today. Let’s get started!
A Government Accountability Office report says OSHA can do more to protect warehouse and delivery workers from ergonomic injuries. The report recommends several steps for OSHA to consider, including ensuring compliance officers can easily obtain data on when musculoskeletal disorders occurred.
OSHA updated its inspection guidance for animal slaughtering and processing industries. Inspections will focus on several hazards, including sanitation, ergonomics, and machine guarding. Among other changes, compliance officers will conduct inspections during off-shift times and identify workplace activities that impact employees most at risk such as temporary employees.
OSHA urges workers involved in hurricane cleanup and recovery efforts to be mindful of hazards, especially those associated with restoring electricity, removing debris, and trimming trees. Proper training, experience, and familiarity with related equipment helps ensure worker safety.
And finally, turning to environmental news, EPA extended the 2024 Chemical Data Reporting deadline to November 22 due to technical difficulties with its electronic reporting tool. The 2024 report covers activities that occurred between calendar years 2020 and 2023.
Thanks for tuning in to the monthly news roundup. We’ll see you next month!
Hi everyone! Welcome to the monthly news roundup video, where we’ll review the most impactful environmental, health, and safety news. Please view the content links in the transcript to take a deeper dive into the topics I’ll be covering today. With that said, let’s get started!
First, let’s take a look at what’s happening in safety and health. The week of May 1 marked the 10th annual Stand-Down to Prevent Falls in Construction. Employers were encouraged to have safety talks or demonstrations on the use of fall protection.
A new National Emphasis Program on fall prevention covers all industries, with a focus on construction and specific general industry activities. It took effect May 1; however, programmed inspections will begin after a 90-day outreach period.
With the start of lawn-care season, a recent OSHA case highlights some of the risks involved. The Agency found a lawn service contractor operating in Kentucky ignored safety requirements to save time.
A forklift operator suffered fatal injuries after falling into a recycling baler while trying to remove a jam. Investigators found a lack of training and communication were contributing factors.
In response to larger, more frequent wildfires, the state of Washington has proposed permanent wildfire smoke rules. They include year-round requirements for employers that will be in effect whenever there’s a risk that workers will be exposed to wildfire smoke.
And finally, turning to environmental news, EPA finalized changes to the new source performance standards for Automobile and Light Duty Truck Surface Coating Operations. The rule adds more emissions requirements for such operations.
Thanks for tuning in to the monthly news roundup. We’ll see you next month!
With DOT regulation changes in recent years, the process of hiring and qualifying a commercial motor vehicle (CMV) driver has become more complex. More rules mean more paperwork, and keeping it all straight can be difficult at best.
Do you know which records you need to create — and which steps you need to take — to hire a qualified truck or bus driver?
The following is a basic timeline for complying with rules from the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA). It also includes certain best practices for hiring new drivers and getting them qualified to be on the road. Though it’s 27 steps long, don’t panic — some items apply only to drivers who hold a commercial driver’s license (CDL), and some are optional.
The order in which many of these steps are performed can be customized to your needs. Be sure to consult with an attorney or HR expert for guidance on complying with all labor and employment laws.
Key to remember: Follow these steps to properly hire and qualify a commercial motor vehicle driver.
NOTE: The timeline above is designed to provide reasonably accurate and authoritative information in regard to the subject matter covered. It is made available with the understanding that J. J. Keller is not engaged in rendering legal, accounting, or other professional service. If legal advice or other expert service is required, the services of such a professional should be sought. J. J. Keller shall not be held liable in any degree for any loss, damage, or injury caused by any omission, error, misprinting, or ambiguity present in this material.
The 150 air-mile exemptions, which are in the regulations at 395.1(e)(1) and (2), allow a driver to use a time record in place of a log, provided that certain conditions are met. While this is possibly the most widely used hours-of-service exemption, it may be the most commonly misused exemption, as well.
To be able to use this logging exemption in 395.1(e)(1), the driver must:
The company must retain the time record and have it available for inspection for six months.
Need more info? View our ezExplanation on the 150 air-mile exception. |
If the driver cannot meet the terms of the exemption (he or she goes too far or works too many hours), the driver must complete a regular driver’s log for the day as soon as the exemption no longer applies.
If the driver has had to complete a log 8 or fewer days out of the last 30 days, the driver can use a paper log for the day. If the driver had to complete a log more than 8 days out of the last 30 days, the driver needs to use an electronic log for the day (unless one of the ELD exemptions applies, such as operating a vehicle older than model year 2000).
When a property-carrying driver is operating under the 150 air-mile exemption, the driver is also exempt from having to take the required 30-minute break (see 395.3(a)(3)(ii)).
If the driver began the day as a 150 air-mile driver and has driven more than 8 consecutive hours without a break, and something unexpected happens and the driver can no longer use the 150 air-mile exemption, the driver must stop and immediately take the 30-minute break as well as start logging. If the driver went outside of the 150 air-mile area before the driver had 8 hours of driving without a break from driving, the driver would be expected to take the break at the appropriate time.
Here are some of the common myths and misunderstandings about the 150 air-mile exemption:
The 150 air-mile exemption at 395.1(e)(2) only applies to drivers that: Operate property-carrying vehicles that do not require a CDL to operate, and Stay within the 150 air-miles of their work reporting location.
If the driver stays within the 150 air-mile radius of the work reporting location, and returns to the work reporting location within 14 hours on 5 of the last 7 days, and 16 hours on 2 of the last seven days, the driver is allowed to use a time record in place of a log.
If the driver does not meet the terms of the exception, the driver will need to complete a log for the day. If the driver had to log more than 8 days out of the last 30 days, the driver will need to use an electronic log for the day. All of the other issues discussed above would apply to these drivers as well.
If you have drivers that use these exemptions, you will need to check time records to make sure they are complying with the appropriate time limits. You will also need to check movement records to verify that the drivers using these exemptions are staying within the mandated area (within 150 air-miles of the work reporting location for the day).
If a driver is over the hours limit, or has gone too far, you need to verify that the submitted a log for the day, either paper or electronic, depending on how many days the driver had to log out of the previous 30 days.
During an audit, if it is discovered that your drivers are using these exemptions incorrectly, you will be cited for not having drivers’ logs when required. Each day this occurred will be another violation, so the fine could be rather large if you are not managing the use of these exemptions!
Most motor carriers review their roadside inspection reports for the obvious reasons: fixing mechanical defects and identifying unsafe or noncompliant driver behavior.
Some violations are easy to decipher, such as a burned-out light bulb or exceeding the speed limit by a specific range. Others take a little more to figure out, such as doing the math to determine when and how a driver exceeded hours-of-service (HOS) limits. Then there are all those 392.2 violations with suffixes. Some count against a carrier’s Compliance, Safety, Accountability (CSA) scores, while others do not, depending on whether they contribute to causing a crash.
One that often baffles motor carriers is 392.2C.
Section 392.2C is enforcement’s code for “failure to obey traffic control device.” The C stands for control.
The citation appears in the severity table for the Unsafe Driving BASIC (Behavior Analysis and Safety Improvement Category). The violation has been assigned a value of 5 out 10, with 10 being the most severe. The violation is used when calculating both the carrier’s and driver’s Unsafe Driving BASIC scores.
In most instances, the traffic control device is not a signal light or stop or yield sign. Rather, it is the sign that instructs the driver to pull into a weigh station.
View our Weigh Stations ezExplanation for additional information. |
The vehicles that must stop at scales and inspection locations vary from state to state and even from location to location within a state. The “weigh scale ahead” or similar sign should be the driver’s guide.
If the sign reads:
Often those who operate commercial vehicles not requiring a commercial driver’s license, such as a large pickup truck or small box truck, mistakenly believe weigh scale inspections are just for larger rigs.
If a driver goes past a weigh station without pulling in as directed by a traffic control device, enforcement will pursue and pull over the driver. The officer will then escort the driver back to the weigh station for a roadside inspection.
Even if the driver was honestly confused whether the sign applied to the vehicle, it is too late. And more than likely enforcement’s interest has been piqued. It is highly unlikely the driver will be waived through at this point, and 392.2C will be entered on the roadside inspection report.
CSA’s enforcement model suggests finding the root cause of roadside inspection violations to prevent future occurrences and ultimately improve BASIC scores.
A violation of 392.2C may have one of several root causes, such as:
Whatever the reason, it must be addressed with the driver. Corrective actions range from refresher training to termination. If the driver was trying to avoid enforcement for other reasons (drugs, alcohol, over HOS limits), these other violations need to be addressed accordingly.
Key to remember: Failing to obey a traffic control device will be used in calculation of the CSA Unsafe Driving BASIC scores. Motor carriers should address the root cause of the violation so it does not recur.
If you’re planning to start a motor carrier operation or add a different type of service to an existing business, you need to know what type of carrier you will be. Motor carriers are considered either a for-hire carrier or a private carrier. To be a private carrier, 100 percent of the company’s movements must be to support its own operation. If the carrier is engaged in any for-hire activities, the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) considers them a for-hire carrier.
For-hire carriers use vehicles to transport people or property and are paid for their service. The fee could be a direct fee like a fare or a rate but could also be other indirect forms of compensation. Examples of for-hire operations include a trucking company that hauls other people’s property for a fee (direct compensation) or a hotel that includes in its service the transportation to and from the airport to the hotel (indirect compensation).
Private carriers, on the other hand, transport only their own goods or people. Examples include a manufacturer that uses its own commercial vehicles to transport its product, a construction or landscaping company that uses commercial vehicles to transport equipment and employees to job sites, or a utility company that operates commercial vehicles in support of its operations.
While private carriers are not required to obtain operating authority from the FMCSA, for-hire carriers are required to get authority to move property or people that belong to somebody else and get paid for their service. Having authority is often referred to as having an MC Number.
The most common types of authority are:
If a company never operates a commercial motor vehicle (CMV), it is possible to have authority, but not have a USDOT number. For example, straight brokers or freight forwarders.
As part of obtaining for-hire authority, carriers must designate process agents and demonstrate financial responsibility (have proper insurance coverage).
Authorities are not all-inclusive. Separate authority is needed for each type of service offered. For instance, a for-hire, over-the-road carrier that also wants to be able to resell its extra demand will need both for-hire and brokerage authorities. A company is required to pay a $300 one-time fee for each type of authority needed.
There are no temporary permits available to substitute for authority. For-hire operations may not be performed until the proper authority has been granted. It’s not uncommon for otherwise private carriers to become for-hire carriers to generate revenue on back-hauls or help balance capacity and demand during slow periods or seasons.
Carriers need to get it right when it comes to authority. Carriers required to have authority — but don’t and operate anyway — can get themselves into trouble. Penalties for operating without proper authority can get expensive and can result in out-of-service orders.
Key to remember: Carriers are either for-hire or private, with for-hire carriers being paid for their services while private carriers transport only their own goods or people.
Related article: Process agents — what are they and do you need them?
Fleet management is no easy job. But you may not be the only one struggling with a specific set of challenges. Sharing your insights with others could help those with similar experiences.
J. J. Keller® Center for Market Insights is currently working on its fifth annual study, 2025 State of Fleet Management Survey. The research covers a wide range of topics, including regulatory compliance, safety, driver knowledge and skill, and leadership buy-in.
The survey runs from January 6 through January 19, 2025, and results will be shared with the public through several platforms, including a webcast.
Share your experiences by accessing the survey.
The annual survey provides invaluable information, including industry hurdles and how they’ve changed over the past few years.
The information shared in the 2024 study helped stakeholders address the challenges of fleet management, including:
Click to view The State of Fleet Management: Insights on Priorities for Today's Fleet Managers — 2024 Study.
For carriers operating in New York, registration and decals expire December 31, 2024, for the Highway Use Tax (HUT) and Automotive Fuel Carrier (AFC) programs. Take steps now to make sure you receive your new decals before the current ones expire. You need a new certificate of registration and decal for each vehicle. And you must place the new decals on your vehicles before January 1, 2025.
The period to renew your 24th series HUT and AFC certificates of registration begins October 1, 2024. Act now to avoid delays and keep your highway use tax credentials active.
Get ready for renewal by taking the following steps now:
Once the renewal period opens, renew your credentials and pay your renewal fees online with One Stop Credentialing and Registration (OSCAR).
Submit your renewal application by November 30, 2024, to make sure you receive your decals in time to place them on your vehicles before January 1, 2025.
If you are already enrolled in OSCAR, use your current OSCAR password to renew online.
If you are not enrolled, visit OSCAR, and select Enroll Now. You must have a United States Department of Transportation (USDOT) number and an employer identification number (EIN).
To renew your registration:
If you are unable to renew electronically, you may file Form TMT-1.2, Renewal Application for Highway Use Tax (HUT) and Automotive Fuel Carrier (AFC) Certificates of Registrations and Decals – 25th Series.
Key to remember: Take steps now to renew your NY HUT and ensure you receive your new decals before the current ones expire.
The Department of Labor recently raised the potential maximum fine for posting noncompliance to more than $43,000, making this a great time to ensure you have the right labor law posters on the wall.
Posters must be kept up-to-date, and one way to make sure you are displaying the correct version of a posting is to check the date on the poster. Most federal agencies place a revision date in the lower right corner of a posting.
In some cases, employers need to display only the latest version of a poster, the one with the most recent revision date. In other cases, multiple versions of a poster will be complaint, and an employer can display either the most recent version or a previous one.
Here are revision dates to look for on the federal postings on your wall:
In addition to displaying the most recent version of a poster, it is important to place the poster in a location where it is easily visible and readily accessible to employees. This could be in a hallway near a common entrance, in a cafeteria or break room, or near a time clock.
In a large building with multiple entrances or break rooms, more than one set of posters may need to be displayed. When a company has multiple buildings on a large corporate campus, posters must be placed in each building where employees are reporting to work.
If labor law posters are not properly displayed, a company may face a fine or the increased risk of a lawsuit from employees who were not made aware of their rights.
Higher DOL posting penalties took effect on January 15, and the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) is expected to raise the penalty for the Know Your Rights posting soon. The current maximum posting penalties are:
The maximum fine is more likely to be levied in cases of willful noncompliance or in conjunction with other penalties.
State and sometimes local postings must also be kept up-to-date. Fines for non-compliance for these posters vary.
Key to remember: Failing to display the correct labor law posters can be a costly mistake. One way to ensure that the right posters are displayed is to check the date on the poster.
The U.S. Bureau of Labor statistics reported in July 2024 that there are 8.2 million job openings in the U.S., but only 7.2 million unemployed workers.
With that in mind, employers might choose to hang onto employees even if they’re under performing. But what about when complaints are rolling in from different angles? Take, for example, a lackluster supervisor who’s annoying employees and disappointing customers.
An employer could be hesitant to let the supervisor go, especially if there’s no documentation backing up claims of misconduct. The employer must weigh their options to decide if putting the supervisor on a performance improvement plan (PIP) or moving right to termination is the ideal choice.
At-will employment
For starters, in most states employers may terminate an employee at-will, meaning they can fire employees for pretty much any reason as long as it doesn’t discriminate against someone in a protected class based on sex, age, race, religion, etc. Employers also cannot terminate in retaliation for an employee making a claim of harassment, discrimination, or safety concerns.
Aside from these limits, employers can terminate employees for good cause, bad cause, or no cause at all.
PIP or terminate
Deciding whether to put an employee on a PIP or terminate must be decided on a case-by-case basis.
A PIP is usually for job performance issues (hence, performance improvement plan). This could mean anything from not making enough sales to being inept at the job’s essential functions. If job performance doesn’t improve under the PIP, termination may be the end result depending on company policies and practices.
Even if an employee has job performance issues, the employer can terminate without going through the PIP process first, unless the usual process is to implement a PIP with employees who have had similar problems. In that case, not doing a PIP could be seen as discrimination against an employee, especially if the person falls into a protected class.
Workplace misconduct, however, is another situation altogether. This could be anything from a one-off poor joke to pervasive harassment. Snapping at customers or coworkers (or worse), for example, is a conduct issue. An employer could issue a warning or move right to termination if the behavior is clearly illegal or a serious threat to workplace safety.
Read more: ezExplanation on discharging employees |
Termination tips
If an employer decides to terminate, they should treat the employee as respectfully as possible during the termination process. Also, an employer should carefully and clearly communicate the job-related reasons for the termination to avoid any hint of discrimination. Lastly, an employer should document the reasons and reiterate the steps taken leading up to the termination and keep those records handy in case the employee files a wrongful termination lawsuit.
Key to remember: Employers sometimes struggle when making termination decisions. Having a process in place and documenting steps along the way can help if a case lands in court.
The last few years have been a flurry of legislative activity, especially on the state level with the approval of paid leave laws, pay transparency rules, and other employer mandates.
Combining that with ongoing remote and hybrid work arrangements, previously single-state companies have transformed into multi-state employers. This means it might be time for an HR audit to make sure all your “Ts” are crossed and your “Is” dotted.
Yes, an HR audit is a lot of work, but if you are unaware of new or changing employment laws and regulations, or if you don’t follow them, your business may have to pay fines, damages, or risk being sued and face a costly court case.
If you decide an audit would be beneficial for your organization, here are the basic steps to share with leadership to make sure everyone is on board.
Key to remember: With the flurry of employment law changes in the past several years, 2025 may be a good year to do an HR audit.
Eligible employees may take up to 12 weeks of leave under the federal Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA). Employers may not require employees to work during FMLA leave. If an employee does any work, employers may not count that time as FMLA leave.
Particularly for extended periods of leave, employers might want to ensure employees don’t do any work by cutting off access to it. Otherwise, employers must track the time employees spend working and the time they spend on leave.
For hourly (nonexempt) employees, employers must pay employees for any hours worked and keep track of that time. If employees work remotely, they might be required to track and report their work hours.
For salaried (exempt) employees, employers don’t have to track their work hours, but must still keep accurate records of the time spent on FMLA leave.
To avoid non-compliance risks with tracking leaves, employers might choose to cut employees’ work access while on extended leave. This can include not only access to the physical workplace but also access to the virtual workplace, including emails and messages. Someone from IT might need to be involved.
If employers don’t want all communications shut down, they could work with employees to identify other means of communication, such as a personal email or phone number. That way, employees can continue to share information such as their intended return date. Employers should also ensure that important messages get through.
If access is not cut off, employers need to make sure that employees know that they should not work during leave and that there could be consequences for doing so.
To help ensure consistency, employers should have well-communicated policies on not working during leave and what employees can expect. A well-written and communicated policy can:
If an employee violates the policy and does any work during leave, employers can look at it as a policy violation and apply their applicable discipline.
Key to remember: Employers may cut off access to work during leave, but doing so requires some careful forethought.
Employers sometimes get tripped up on how to calculate the 1,250 hours worked eligibility criterion when employees need leave under the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA).
Does working overtime count toward the 1,250?
Recently, someone asked if overtime hours counted toward the 1,250 hours worked requirement (it does).
All hours actually worked apply to the 1,250, whether overtime or regular time, even if the overtime is not mandatory.
The 1,250 hours is calculated in relation to when the leave will begin, not when the employee puts an employer on notice of the need for leave.
Whether an employee is allowed to work overtime, however, is generally up to company policy. As far as pay goes, remember, if the employee is nonexempt (“hourly”) and works any overtime (mandatory or voluntary) the employee must be paid time and one-half for all hours worked over 40 within the workweek.
More about FMLA leave requirements
To be eligible to take FMLA leave, employees must:
Whether an employee has worked the minimum 1,250 hours is calculated based on determining compensable hours or work under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA).
Calculating the 1,250 hours worked
When it comes to figuring out if an employee has worked at least 1,250 hours, it can get tricky. As was mentioned above, all hours worked, regular and overtime, must be counted.
Hours not worked should not be counted. The “not worked hours” include such time off as vacation time, sick leave, paid or unpaid holidays, or any other time in which an employee isn’t actually working — which can include disability, bereavement, FMLA and other forms of leave.
Once an employee meets the three eligibility criteria, including the 1,250 hours worked, for a particular leave reason, the employee remains eligible for the duration of the 12-month leave year period.
If the employee needs leave for another, different reason, eligibility would be recalculated.
Key to remember: All hours worked must be included in the 1,250 hours criterion when determining whether an employee is eligible for FMLA leave. Hours that aren’t worked (like vacation) are not included.
Captive-audience meetings, where an employer holds a mandatory meeting to express its views on unionization, have been receiving a great deal of attention.
The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) ruled on November 13 that these meetings are unlawful, as they violate employee rights under the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA). The board determined that they interfere with an employee’s right to freely decide how to participate in a conversation about unionization.
A number of states have also passed laws banning captive-audience meetings. Employers in these states must make sure any meetings about unionization comply with both NLRB guidelines and state laws.
Some state captive-audience-meeting laws also require employers to do one more thing: Make workers aware of their rights by posting information about the law in the workplace. In some cases, states provide a standardized poster. When a standardized poster is not available, employers can post the text of the law to comply with the posting requirement.
The posting requirements for captive meeting laws vary by state:
Illinois: Post information about the Worker Freedom of Speech law as of January 1, 2025.
Maine: Display information about the state’s Captive Audience statute after a standardized posting is made available by the state.
Minnesota: Display the Employer-Sponsored Meetings posting from the state.
New York: Post the text of the state’s Discrimination Against Engagement in Certain Activities law.
Oregon: Display the Captive Audiences poster from the state.
Washington: Display the text of the state’s Free Choice Act or a posting from the state when one is made available.
Alaska, California, Connecticut, Hawaii, and Vermont have captive-audience meeting laws, but do not require employers to display related information .
Key to remember: Employers in some states need to display a captive-audience meeting posting to make employees aware of their rights.
Have you used our Expert Help feature lately? The compliance experts responsible for J. J. Keller’s regulatory content are acknowledged leaders in the safety and compliance fields with over 500 years of combined experience. All questions are kept confidential and are included in your membership.
This article explores some of the top questions we received in 2024 on electrical safety.
Training is required for employees who are at risk of electric shock that cannot be eliminated by safe electrical installations. Some occupations listed by OSHA (Table S-4) are automatically included, but other workers who might reasonably face similar risks must also be trained.
All employees need to know the safety-related work practices relevant to their jobs, as specified in OSHA's standards (§§ 1910.331–1910.335).
Unqualified Workers:
These are employees who don’t work directly with live electrical systems but might be exposed to hazards. They need to learn any safety practices related to electricity that are important for their safety, even if those practices aren’t specifically listed in the OSHA standards.
Qualified Workers:
These are employees allowed to work on or near exposed live electrical parts. They must be trained to:
This training ensures that employees understand the electrical risks they may face and know how to protect themselves and others from harm. By meeting these requirements, employers can reduce workplace injuries and comply with OSHA standards.
OSHA has not incorporated NFPA 70E by reference into its health and safety regulations. However, the agency does view the NFPA as a valuable resource and encourages employers to adhere to the NFPA standards. OSHA will sometimes use the general duty clause to issue citations for noncompliance with NFPA 70E standards.
The following is OSHA’s position on NFPA 70E from a Letter of Interpretation dated 10/18/2006:
“A national consensus standard can sometimes be relevant to a general duty clause citation. The standard may be used as evidence of hazard recognition and the availability of feasible means of abatement. The general duty clause, Section 5(a)(1) of the OSH Act, is violated if an employer has failed to furnish a workplace that is free from recognized hazards causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm.”
If/When an arc flash study is performed on electrical equipment, the arc flash study labels should be affixed to the outside cabinets.
You may need to conduct an arc flash study to determine if it is possible or likely for an arc flash or arc blast to occur in each electrical panel/location. NFPA 70E explains further when an arc flash study may be necessary and how to complete one.
In addition, OSHA states the following for electrical panel labels:
1910.303(e) Marking.
(1) Identification of manufacturer and ratings: Electric equipment may not be used unless the following markings have been placed on the equipment:
(2) Durability. The marking shall be of sufficient durability to withstand the environment involved.
Unfortunately, there isn’t a straightforward answer to this question. OSHA requires employers to perform a hazard assessment under 1910.132(d) to help determine the PPE requirements. This, in addition to the electrical safety PPE requirements at 1910.137, would identify the PPE you need.
The primary source of arc flash analysis is NFPA 70E, which is a copyrighted publication. OSHA doesn’t adopt it by reference. However, they recognize it as an accurate source of information and can use it as part of a citation. The requirements to perform an arc flash risk assessment are found in NFPA 130.5.
There are specific requirements in Table 130.7(C)(15)(a) and (b) that match the type of equipment being worked with the arc-flash PPE category and arc-flash boundary. Also, table 130.7(C)(15)(c) indicates the type of PPE required for each arc-flash PPE category.
Key to remember: Have more electrical safety questions? Be sure to submit them through theExpert Help feature.
We know that healthcare workers are more susceptible to OSHA recordable infectious diseases from close contact with sick people and viruses because of their work activities with sick patients. But what about the average worker who gets the winter flu bug? Is that recordable?
Seasonal influenza (flu) is extremely common, especially during the winter season. With almost 30 million cases each year, this contagious respiratory illness can easily infiltrate the workplace. Flu can be spread from direct contact with others, sneezing, coughing, or simply talking to an infected person. Symptoms can range from a mild runny nose to hospitalization due to complications from the virus. So, when does the flu become recordable on the OSHA log?
OSHA's recordkeeping regulation at 1904.5(a) requires employers to consider an illness to be work-related if an event or exposure in the work environment either caused, contributed to, or significantly aggravated a pre-existing illness. Work-relatedness is presumed for illnesses resulting from events or workplace exposures unless they fall within one of the exceptions listed in the standard. The common cold and flu is one of those exceptions.
Section 1904.5(b)(2)(viii) states that employers are not required to record injuries and illnesses if, ". . . the illness is the common cold or flu. The exception for cold or flu cases applies even if the illness was contracted at work or outside of work. However, contagious diseases such as tuberculosis, brucellosis, hepatitis A, or plague are considered work-related if the employee is infected at work.
While OSHA's regulations don’t require the employers to record flu cases, employers should never assume the recordability exception without a careful look at each instance. Employers should make every effort to investigate cases of illnesses to rule out any underlying issues that may be work-related, such as the exposure to hazardous substances that could be creating chemical sensitization which may mimic flu-like symptoms.
Additionally, employers should seek an opinion from a medical professional to confirm an illness is seasonal influenza. The illness may meet recording criteria if it is determined as significant following a diagnosis by a physician or other licensed health care professional, even if it does not result in medical treatment beyond first aid or other recordable criteria.
Not sure if an incident is a recordable versus a reportable? Check out our article, "Recordable and reportable are the same, right?" |
OSHA’s Bloodborne Pathogens standard at 1910.1030 has been effective for worker protection from exposures to blood or other potentially infectious material (OPIM) like saliva, tears, or other bodily fluids. However, the standard doesn’t address the flu “bug.”
A standard has been considered for consistent management of workplace transmission-based infection control. OSHA has published an Infectious Disease Request for Information (RFI), Stakeholder Summary Report, and Small Business Advocacy Review (SBAR) Panel Final Report that demonstrate a focus on worker protection from infectious diseases. These reports and information on the Agency’s Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) are available at www.osha.gov/infectious-diseases/rulemaking. In the meantime, employers have a duty to protect workers from recognized hazards under the General Duty Clause.
Key to remember: Employers are not required to record on the OSHA 300 Log when an employee has the flu or common cold, regardless of whether the illness resulted from a workplace exposure.
Ever since OSHA published its Trade Release on December 11, 2023, people have been scratching their heads about the “new” PPE requirement.
But here’s the thing. There isn’t a new requirement for “helmets” instead of hard hats.
So where’s the confusion? And what is actually required?
OSHA released a Safety and Health Bulletin (SHIB 11-22-2023) on November 22, 2023, detailing the key differences and benefits of using modern safety helmets over traditional hard hats.
And just a few weeks later, in the December 11, 2023 Trade Release, the Agency announced it would now require its inspectors to wear Type II head protection, which is also commonly referred to as safety helmets.
The November 22, 2023 SHIB discussed two main benefits of choosing modern safety helmets over traditional hard hats -- the construction of materials and the use of chinstraps.
Construction of Materials: | The SHIB first explained that one of the benefits of safety helmets lies in their construction materials. While hard hats are made from hard plastics, safety helmets incorporate a combination of materials, including lightweight composites, fiberglass, and advanced thermoplastics. Such materials can help enhance the impact resistance of the helmets but also include the added benefit of reducing the overall weight of the helmet. This reduces neck strain and improves comfort during extended use. |
Use of Chinstraps: | The SHIB also discussed the potential benefits of chinstraps used in conjunction with Type II safety helmets. The general idea here is that chinstraps can be helpful in maintaining the position of the safety helmet and protecting the worker’s head in the event of a slip, trip, or fall. According to data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, head injuries accounted for nearly 6% of non-fatal occupational injuries involving days away from work. About 20% of those were caused by slips, trips, and falls. |
And while OSHA has recognized the benefits of Type II safety helmets, and is actively taking steps to protect its own employees, it’s important to understand that there is not a new requirement for employers to make the switch to safety helmets.
That being said, a growing number of employers have recognized the benefits of added head protection and are choosing to use Type II helmets for their workers. In addition, some clients are starting to contractually require their construction contractors to make the switch as well.
Hard hats will have a Type I or Type II rating on the manufacturer’s sticker. These markings are based on ANSI Z89.1’s impact ratings.
Type I hard hats protect from objects or impacts from the top center area of the hard hat and are often used in work areas with no lateral head impact hazards.
Type II hard hats, on the other hand, offers protection from both top and lateral impacts and objects and is often found on construction job sites or complex general industry settings where workers face multiple head contact exposures.
Hard hats are classified based on their level of voltage protection. See the chart below.
Class G – (General) low voltage protection. Class E – (Electrical) high voltage protection. Class C – (Conductive) no voltage protection. |
Employers should conduct a job hazard analysis and/or a PPE assessment to determine which style hard hat is best for their workers. In general, OSHA recommends the use of Type II safety helmets at the following locations:
1. Construction Sites: For construction sites, especially those with high risks of falling objects and debris, impacts from equipment, or slips, trips, and falls, safety helmets have enhanced impact resistance and additional features that offer superior protection compared to the components and construction of traditional hard hats.
2. Oil and Gas Industry: In these sectors where workers face multiple hazards, including potential exposure to chemicals and severe impacts, safety helmets with additional features can provide comprehensive protection.
3. Working from Heights: For tasks or jobs that involve working from heights, safety helmets offer protection of the entire head and include features that prevent the safety helmet from falling off.
4. Electrical Work: For tasks involving electrical work or proximity to electrical hazards, safety helmets with non-conductive materials (Class G and Class E) provide protection to prevent electrical shocks. However, some traditional hard hats also offer electrical protection.
5. High-Temperature Environments: In high temperatures or where there is exposure to molten materials, safety helmets with advanced heat-resistant properties can provide additional protection to workers.
Key to remember: While there isn’t a new requirement for safety helmets, employers should review their workplace hazards to determine which style of hard hat will best protect their employees.
The COVID-19 outbreak created a shortage of latex and nitrile gloves in many workplaces.
Latex and nitrile gloves are used extensively in health care, and their disposable (single use) nature meant that large quantities were consumed during the peak of the pandemic. The shortage was also worsened because of hoarding by some consumers. In addition, certain businesses and government agencies began using these gloves to protect employees, even if their workers didn’t normally require gloves on the job.
If you have trouble obtaining your staff’s usual gloves, be prepared to identify feasible alternatives. You don’t want to endanger them by having them wear any old gloves they find lying around.
To identify alternatives for workers who rely on latex or nitrile gloves as PPE, you must know which chemicals workers handle or come in contact with. That’s because all glove materials are not suitable for all hazards.
Evaluate which materials offer appropriate protection from the specific chemicals that workers handle to select appropriate alternative gloves.
Here’s a summary of glove types and the protection given to help evaluate alternatives.
Butyl gloves protect against a variety of chemicals such as peroxide, highly corrosive acids, strong bases, alcohols, aldehydes, ketones, esters and nitrocompounds. Butyl gloves also resist oxidation, ozone corrosion and abrasion, and remain flexible at low temperatures. However, they do not perform well with aliphatic and aromatic hydrocarbons and halogenated solvents.
Natural (latex) rubber gloves have good elasticity and temperature resistance, and resist abrasions well. They protect against most water solutions of acids, alkalis, salts, and ketones. Latex gloves may cause allergic reactions and may not be appropriate for all employees. Hypoallergenic gloves, glove liners, and powderless gloves are possible alternatives for employees who are allergic.
Neoprene gloves protect against hydraulic fluids, gasoline, alcohols, organic acids, and alkalis. Their chemical and wear resistance are generally better than gloves of natural rubber.
Nitrile gloves are intended for jobs requiring dexterity, and they stand up even after prolonged exposure to substances that cause other gloves to deteriorate. They offer protection when working with greases, oils, acids, caustics, and alcohols but are not recommended for use with strong oxidizing agents, aromatic solvents, ketones, and acetates.
Effective January 15, OSHA terminated its COVID-19 in healthcare rulemaking. The agency says it will now focus on completing its Infectious Diseases rulemaking for healthcare, which will protect workers from occupational exposure to COVID-19, as well as other infectious diseases.
In June 2021, OSHA issued an Emergency Temporary Standard (ETS) to protect workers from COVID-19 in healthcare settings. The ETS also served as a proposed rule with public comment periods. OSHA held public hearings on the proposal from June 2021 through May 2022, and submitted a draft final rule to the Office of Management and Budget in December 2022. In April 2023, the White House terminated the national emergency related to the COVID-19 pandemic.
In January, employers that maintain an OSHA 300 Log must prepare a 300A Annual Summary and many will need to electronically report injury data to OSHA. This raises many questions like how to handle open cases from the previous year. Here are a few basics to get started.
Every establishment required to maintain a 300 Log must have its own Log. OSHA defines an establishment as a single physical location. Organizations with multiple locations might have different obligations for each one based on the number of employees or the industry code.
Verify the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code for each establishment. The code determines whether the establishment must keep a 300 Log and whether it must electronically report data (not all employers have to report). For related information, see our article Which NAICS code should you use for OSHA?
Finally, if an employee got injured last year but is still on restrictions or days away in the new year, estimate the day count on the 300 Log. Use that estimate to prepare the Annual Summary, then update the 300 Log when the actual number of days is known. The regulation covers this at 1904.7(b)(3)(ix).
Employers that maintain a 300 Log must prepare a 300A Annual Summary and post it from February 1 though April 30. Even if the establishment had zero recordable incidents, the employer must post the summary. OSHA requires posting physical copies, but employers can post on a company intranet in addition to the physical poster.
Before creating the 300A, review the 300 Log for accuracy. Employers don’t have to examine every entry but should spot check a number of cases. Typical problems include:
To complete the 300A, employers need to calculate the average number of employees and the total hours worked. For more information, see our article Completing the 300A: Tips for the mathematically challenged.
Once completed, a company executive must certify the summary before posting. The regulation defines an executive to include the owner, an officer, or the highest ranking official at the establishment.
Many employers must submit injury data through OSHA’s Injury Tracking Application (ITA) by March 2nd each year. Reporting obligations are based on two variables:
The employee count is based on peak employment, not the annual average. If the location reached 20 or more employees during any pay period, it may have to report. This includes part-time and temporary workers, if the location was responsible for recording those workers’ injuries.
To illustrate, suppose a furniture store has 17 retail locations, plus a distribution center, for 18 establishments. Each retail store had fewer than 20 employees all year, but the distribution center had 35 employees. None of the retail locations would need to e-report. Only the distribution center must electronically file.
As noted, not every employer is covered, but even furniture stores and grocery stores must report if an establishment had 20 or more employees. In brief:
Since 2025 is only the second year for e-reporting under the revised regulation, check out the requirements in our article Are you ready for OSHA's new injury e-reporting rule on January 1, 2024?
Key to remember: If your company must maintain an OSHA 300 Log, you must prepare and post a 300A Annual Summary by February 1st and you might need to electronically report injury data to OSHA’s ITA by March 2nd.