
Welcome to J. J. Keller COMPLIANCE NETWORK
Make regulatory compliance easier than ever at your company with expert guidance and resources custom-tailored to your exact needs.

Welcome to J. J. Keller COMPLIANCE NETWORK
Make regulatory compliance easier than ever at your company with expert guidance and resources custom-tailored to your exact needs.
Workplace safety (OSHA).
Transportation (DOT).
Environment (EPA).
Human resources (DOL).
Let’s be honest, managing compliance is tough. But when it comes to Universal Waste (UW), items like fluorescent bulbs, used batteries, aerosol cans, and old thermostats can expose employers to fines without them even realizing it. Why? Because Universal Waste is the ultimate regulatory paradox. These items are still classified as hazardous waste, but the EPA created a streamlined rule set (40 CFR Part 273) to make recycling easier. The problem is that many employers assume "streamlined" means "ignorable." Fixing these problems is incredibly straightforward. By tackling the most common UW mistakes, you don’t just avoid penalties; you build a predictable, efficient, and cost-effective waste program.
Keys to remember: Universal waste compliance hinges on keeping containers closed, labeled, dated, and ensuring employees managing these materials are trained and documenting their actions. When your program is consistent, simple, and intentional, you eliminate preventable violations and turn UW management into a predictable, low-risk process.
The rapid growth of data centers creates new challenges for other regulated facilities. Expansion driven by artificial intelligence (AI) and cloud computing increases their impact on environmental compliance. Key areas include air permitting, attainment status, and regional power supply.
Data centers depend on backup power to stay online during outages. Most use natural gas or diesel generators. These units release pollutants such as nitrogen oxides and particulate matter. When many generators operate together, their potential emissions can push regions close to or beyond National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS). This shift can threaten local attainment status and make it harder for nearby facilities to get new permits.
On December 11, 2025, the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA’s) Office of Air and Radiation launched the “Clean Air Act Resources for Data Centers” webpage. It provides regulatory guidance, permitting tools, and technical letters. The goal is to make air permitting for data centers faster and more transparent while protecting air quality.
Large data centers add cumulative emissions from multiple generators. Even permitted emissions from nearby plants can combine and push an area into nonattainment. That change triggers stricter air permitting rules for everyone.
Data centers use large amounts of electricity. They often need on-site generators or new grid connections. This can strain local power supplies. In some cases, grid operators give data centers priority during peak demand, leaving other facilities with less reliable power.
Some states now require detailed modeling for backup generators. For example, Illinois reviewed 34 generators for one data center before granting a permit. If modeling shows high emissions, regulators may limit operating hours or require extra controls.
EPA recently updated its interpretation of New Source Review (NSR) rules. In September 2025, the agency said construction can start before full air permits are issued, as long as emission-related work waits for approval. This speeds up projects but makes it harder for neighboring facilities to predict cumulative emissions early.
Watch for new data center projects in your area. Their emissions could affect your permits.
Join public comment periods for data center permits. Push for full modeling of combined impacts.
Work with grid operators. Understand how demand-response programs and EPA’s “50-hour rule” for emergency generators affect your reliability.
Consider locating new projects in areas with robust infrastructure and cleaner attainment status. Data centers might compete for the same grid upgrades or site approvals.
Key to remember: Data centers are more than tech hubs. They influence air permitting and power allocation. Their growth can affect your ability to expand, or even operate, under current compliance rules.
Did you know that the federal government regulates the power sector’s impact on rain? The Acid Rain Program limits the amount of sulfur dioxide (SO2) and nitrogen oxides (NOx) — the main causes of acid rain — that fossil fuel-fired electric generating units (EGUs) may emit. However, the SO2 and NOx reduction programs operate differently, and the ways that facilities can meet the SO2 and NOx limits are distinct.
It's essential to know the compliance options because facilities that don’t meet the SO2 and NOx standards must pay penalties for their excess emissions. And in November 2025, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) set higher penalties for the next two compliance years.
So, what are the differences?
The first thing to confirm is whether your facility is subject to the Acid Rain Program (40 CFR 72.6). The program regulates fossil fuel-fired power plants. It applies to:
Note that the NOx program applies to a specific subset of coal-fired boilers.
EPA operates the SO2 reduction program through an allowance trading system (Part 73). The agency sets a cap on the total SO2 emissions for the year and then allocates SO2 allowances to regulated units. One allowance represents 1 ton of SO2 emissions.
For each compliance year, a facility must show that it has enough allowances to cover its emissions of SO2. It’s similar to EPA’s hydrofluorocarbon allowance program.
There are multiple compliance options. Facilities may:
Facilities can purchase allowances from or sell allowances to individuals, companies, groups, or brokers. Additionally, facilities may bid on allowances at EPA’s annual Acid Rain Program SO2 Allowance Auction.
EPA sets annual emission limits for the NOx reduction program (Part 76), which applies to these types of boilers:
Like the SO2 program, the NOx program offers multiple compliance options. Facilities can:
Additional requirements apply to facilities that use options other than complying with the limits:
Excess emissions penalties can add up quickly. That’s why it’s vital to ensure your facility understands how to comply with the SO2 and NOx reduction programs properly.
The adjustment rates that EPA set for compliance years 2025 and 2026 (2.5265 and 2.6001, respectively) are used to calculate the total penalties a facility must pay if it exceeds SO2 or NOx limits during these compliance years.
Here are the formulas:
Let’s run through a couple of examples of what noncompliance could cost.
| Factors | Penalty Per Ton | Total Penalties |
|---|---|---|
| $2,000 x 2.5265 = $5,053 | $5,053 x 10 = $50,530 |
| $2,000 x 2.6001 = $5,200.20 | $5,200.20 x 5 = $26,001 |
As shown in the example above, excess emissions can cost facilities a lot in penalties. Just 1 ton of excess emissions will result in more than $5,000! Knowing your compliance options for the Acid Rain Program’s SO2 and NOx reduction programs can help your facility avoid steep fines.
Key to remember: The Acid Rain Program limits SO2 and NOx emissions from fossil fuel-fired power plants, but the compliance options for each type of emission differ. Understanding the distinct options can help facilities avoid penalties for excess emissions.
The clock is ticking for environmental teams. By 2026, several new EPA regulations will reshape compliance obligations for U.S. companies. Organizations that act now will avoid costly penalties and operational disruptions.
Although EPA has been deregulating or loosening some requirements, there are still some standards being tightened across multiple fronts in the coming year:
Failure to prepare could lead to fines, reputational damage, supply chain disruptions, and permit delays. Companies that weave compliance planning into their 2026 strategy will be positioned not just to meet legal deadlines but to sustain operations smoothly.
The EPA’s 2026 updates reflect a trend toward increased transparency and environmental accountability. Companies that treat compliance as strategic will not only avoid enforcement but also gain resilience and stakeholder trust.
Key to remember: Start planning now. Early action on EPA rule changes will save time, money, and headaches when enforcement begins.
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) issued a rule on December 3, 2025, that finalizes compliance deadline extensions for certain emissions standards applicable to crude oil and natural gas facilities. The final rule also further delays compliance timelines for two requirements.
EPA’s delays affect:
EPA’s December 2025 final rule is a direct response to the interim final rule (IFR) it issued in July 2025.
The July 2025 IFR extended the compliance deadline for net heating value (NHV) monitoring of flares and enclosed combustion devices (ECDs) to November 28, 2025. The IFR moved the rest of the compliance deadlines to January 22, 2027, for:
What’s the same?
EPA’s December 2025 final rule maintains the same compliance deadlines for all requirements delayed to January 22, 2027.
What’s different?
The agency’s December 2025 final rule sets a new compliance date of June 1, 2026, for the NHV monitoring requirements. This includes an alternative performance test (sampling demonstration) option for flares and ECDs.
Additionally, the rule moves the compliance date for annual reporting, establishing that no annual report is due before November 30, 2026. It gives owners and operators until November 30, 2026, to submit any reports that were originally due before this date. Note that the final rule specifies that annual reports due after November 30, 2026, must be submitted within 90 days of the end of each annual compliance period.
Key to remember: EPA’s final rule confirms deadline extensions for certain emissions standards that apply to crude oil and natural gas facilities. It also further delays a couple of the requirements.
Effective date: October 6, 2025
This applies to: Facilities with air permits in the counties of Anoka, Carver, Dakota, Hennepin, Ramsey, Scott, and Washington
Description of change: The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency adopted new rules mandating that facilities with air permits (except for Option B registration permits) in the Minnesota counties of Anoka, Carver, Dakota, Hennepin, Ramsey, Scott, and Washington submit annual air toxics emissions reports. The covered toxics include certain hazardous air pollutants (HAPs), per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), and other pollutants of concern. Annual emissions reports on HAPs, PFAS, and other covered pollutants are due by April 1.
View related state info: Clean air operating permits — Minnesota
Effective date: October 7, 2025
This applies to: All nonexempt new and unused products sold, offered for sale, or distributed for sale in Maine that contain intentionally added PFAS
Description of change: The Maine Department of Environmental Protection established designations for currently unavoidable uses of intentionally added per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in products subject to sales prohibitions that start on January 1, 2026.
Effective date: January 1, 2026
This applies to: Public water systems
Description of change: The Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation made multiple changes to the Water Supply Rule. Some of the major amendments include:
Effective date: November 5, 2025
This applies to: Emission units and source categories that qualify for an air permit by rule
Description of change: The Utah Department of Environmental Quality added new emission units and source categories that qualify for air permits by rule that are exempt from the requirement to obtain an Approval Order (per R307-401-8).
New emission units added include:
New source categories added include:
View related state info: Clean air operating permits — Utah
Effective date: December 1, 2025
This applies to: Owners and operators of composting facilities
Description of changes: The Ohio Environmental Protection Agency amended the regulations that apply to composting facilities. Major changes include:
Effective date: November 16, 2025
This applies to: Medium- and heavy-duty engine and vehicle manufacturers as well as heavy-duty internal combustion engine manufacturers
Description of change: The Washington State Department of Ecology amended the Clean Vehicles Program rules to incorporate changes made to the California Air Resources Board’s Advanced Clean Trucks and Heavy-Duty Vehicle and Engine Omnibus Low NOx regulations. The changes ease compliance requirements for the heaviest vehicles.
Effective date: October 1, 2025
This applies to: Entities participating in permanent underground carbon dioxide storage projects
Description of the change: The rule establishes carbon sequestration project applicability and establishes regulations for:
Effective date: November 20, 2025
This applies to: Title V permit holders
Description of change: The Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality requires all Title V operating permittees to use standard department-approved forms to submit the:
View related state info: Clean air operating permits — Louisiana
Effective date: October 2, 2025
This applies to: Entities subject to CARB’s vehicle emissions regulations
Description of change: Congressional resolutions disapproved the waivers for the California Air Resources Board’s (CARB’s) Advanced Clean Cars II and Heavy-Duty Vehicle and Engine Omnibus Low NOx (Omnibus) regulations.
Through an emergency rulemaking, CARB adopted the Emergency Vehicle Emissions Regulations, reinstating at a minimum earlier-adopted regulations displaced by Advanced Clean Cars II and Omnibus:
The regulation applies until litigation is resolved.
Regulated entities may follow either:
View related state info: Air programs — California Air Resources Board (CARB)
Effective date: November 13, 2025
This applies to: Owners and operators of wastewater treatment systems and businesses that install sanitary sewers
Description of changes: The Ohio Environmental Protection Agency amended the Permit to Install (PTI) program rules, which regulate the design and installation of wastewater conveyance and treatment systems. Most notably, the department extended the expiration date of PTIs from 18 months to start construction to 60 months to start construction. The amendments also exempt boat wash marinas and force mains serving one structure from PTIs.
View related state info: Industrial water permitting — Ohio
Effective date: November 6, 2025
This rule applies to: Out-of-state licensed treatment plant operators and distribution system operators
Description of change: The Florida Department of Environmental Protection adopted rules to:
Effective date: November 20, 2025
This applies to: Owners and operators of all facilities that generate, transport, treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste
Description of change: The Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality added hazardous waste aerosol cans to the universal waste program. The program streamlines hazardous waste management requirements and is identical to the federal universal waste requirements for aerosol cans.
View related state info: Universal waste — Louisiana
Effective date: March 28, 2026
This applies to: Mining operations with stormwater discharges
Description of change: The Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection reissued the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Permit for Stormwater Associated with Mining Activities (BMP GP-104). Mining operation sites must obtain an NPDES permit to discharge stormwater if the site has expected or potential stormwater runoff discharges.
The new permit made one substantial change to clarify that entities covered under this general permit must meet the 2-year, 24-hour event design standards at 25 Pa. Code Chapter 102. The BMP GP-104 takes effect on March 28, 2026, and expires on March 27, 2031.
View related state info: Industrial water permitting — Pennsylvania
What do the manufacturers of hairspray cans, foam wall insulation, and ice cream machines have in common? If their products contain hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), they have to report annually on the HFCs they use, and the first report due date is quickly approaching! Through the Technology Transitions Program, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regulates HFCs used for new products and equipment in three sectors: aerosols, foams, and refrigeration, air conditioning, and heat pumps (RACHP). Among other compliance requirements of the 2023 Technology Transitions Rule, manufacturers and importers of HFC-containing products and equipment must submit annual reports.
Note: EPA’s October 2025 proposed rule to amend the 2023 Technology Transitions Rule doesn’t impact annual reporting requirements.
Use this overview to help you determine whether your business needs to report and, if so, what’s required.
Annual reporting applies to manufacturers and importers of products and equipment that use HFCs. An organization has to submit an annual report if:
Reporting requirements apply to manufacturers and importers in all sectors and subsectors, and they start with data from calendar year 2025. The first annual report is due to EPA by March 31, 2026.
Note that the annual reporting requirements don’t apply to entities that only:
In each annual report, covered manufacturers and importers must provide:
Entities in all three sectors also have to report the total mass in metric tons of each HFC or HFC blend contained in all products and components manufactured, imported, and exported annually.
Further, sector-specific standards apply.
| Sector | Requires additional information for: | See 40 CFR: |
|---|---|---|
| Aerosol |
| 84.60(a)(5) |
| Foam |
| 84.60(a)(4) |
| RACHP |
| 84.60(a)(3) |
According to the latest information shared by EPA in the “Technology Transitions Program: What You Need to Know for January 1, 2025” webinar presentation, the agency is still designing the electronic platform for submitting annual reports. EPA plans to provide reporting instructions and forms before the upcoming deadline.
HFCs are greenhouse gases that were developed to replace ozone-depleting substances for use in various products and equipment (primarily refrigeration and air-conditioning systems). The American Innovation and Manufacturing Act of 2020 gives EPA the authority to address HFCs by:
The 2023 Technology Transition Rule established the Technology Transitions Program to restrict HFC uses in sectors and subsectors where lower global warming potential (GWP) technologies are or will soon be available. The regulations apply to manufacturers (including importers), exporters, sellers, distributors, and installers of systems or products in covered sectors that use HFCs.
What about the proposed changes to the 2023 Technology Transitions Rule?
On October 3, 2025, EPA proposed a rule to amend the existing 2023 Technology Transition Rule. However, the proposed changes don’t affect the annual reporting requirements for manufacturers and importers. All covered manufacturers and importers must submit the annual report by March 31, 2026.
The proposed rule impacts specific subsectors, including refrigerated transport, industrial process refrigeration, chillers, retail food (for supermarkets and remote condensing units), cold storage warehouses, and stationary residential and light commercial air conditioning and heat pumps. EPA proposes to:
Key to remember: The first annual reports required by the Technology Transitions Program for manufacturers and importers of HFC-containing products and equipment are due by March 31, 2026.
EPA issued a direct final rule to update its safety data sheet (SDS) reporting and Tier II inventory reporting requirements. The changes align EPA 40 CFR 370 with OSHA’s Hazard Communication (HazCom) standard at 29 CFR 1910.1200.
| News update: EPA extended the public comment period for this direct final rule that made technical amendments to 40 CFR 370 to conform to the 2024 OSHA HazCom standard. An EPA memo lodged in docket EPA-HQ-OLEM-2025-0299 at Regulations.gov, explains, “This document will be open for public comment until December 24, 2025.” Also, note that the docket offers 23 supporting and related materials, including a draft updated Tier II form, draft updated Tier II instructions, and a redline strikeout version of the rule changes. |
The biggest change is that facilities will be able to copy the hazard categories directly from section 2 of the SDSs to their Tier II report forms. This eliminates the guesswork. However, facilities may face added strain with their first Tier II submission under the rule. Instead of relying on the grouped hazard categories selected in the previous year’s forms, it looks like facilities will need to spend extra time retrieving specific categories from their SDSs.
EPA 40 CFR 370 applies to a facility owner or operator if:
If the applicability criteria are met, the facility owner/operator must submit to the state emergency response commission (SERC), local emergency planning committee (LEPC), and local fire departments:
A state may make its own laws and regulations in addition to or more stringent than federal Part 370.
Last year, OSHA amended its HazCom standard to conform to the seventh edition of the United Nations Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals (GHS). Changes to the chemical hazard classifications and categories were part of the amendments to 1910.1200. This is important because EPA Part 370 relies on the OSHA HazCom standard for the definition of “hazardous chemical” and the hazard categories that must be reported.
In the latest rule published November 17, 2025, EPA takes several actions to harmonize its regulations with OSHA’s. The preamble offers a complete list of amendments to Part 370. Here’s a summary:
| Change: | Details: | Sections affected: |
| Adopts all 112 OSHA hazard categories |
| 370.3, 370.30, 370.41, and 370.42 |
| Updates terminology |
| 370.3 and 370.66 |
| Removes the term MSDS |
| 370.3, 370.10, 370.12, 370.13, 370.14, 370.20, 370.30, 370.31, 370.32, 370.33, 370.60, 370.62, 370.63, and 370.64 |
| Makes minor plain language, clarifying, and consistency corrections |
| 370.1, 370.2, 370.3, 370.10, 370.14, 370.30, 370.32, 370.33, 370.40, 370.41, 370.42, 370.43, 370.44, 370.45, 370.60, 370.61, 370.62, 370.64, 370.65, and 370.66 |
The direct final rule is effective January 16, 2026, unless EPA receives an adverse comment during its 30-day comment period. [However, see the "news update," earlier in this article.] If that happens, the agency will publish a timely withdrawal. Then, it will move along with the proposed rule (also published in the November 17, 2025, Federal Register) and address public comments in a subsequent final rule.
Assuming no adverse comment is received on the original direct final rule, EPA gives covered facilities time to prepare. The rule offers a compliance date of December 1, 2026, for both SDS reporting and Tier II reporting. Note that for Tier II reporting, the updates kick in for the 2026 inventory reporting year, which impacts forms due by March 1, 2027, and thereafter. (Forms due on or before March 1, 2026, are unchanged.)
EPA took action to harmonize Part 370 with the changes OSHA made to 1910.1200 last year. The latest amendments to Part 370 have a compliance date of December 1, 2026. For Tier II reporting, the updates start with forms due on or before March 1, 2027.

ENTER THE INSTITUTE
Be your company’s leading compliance authority with a robust library of articles, videos, and practical exercises designed to grow your knowledge of 120+ regulatory subjects.
Hi everyone! Welcome to the monthly news roundup video, where we’ll review the most impactful environmental health and safety news. Let’s get started!
Ladders were the cause of over 22,000 workplace injuries and 161 deaths in 2020. Each March, the American Ladder Institute promotes ladder safety awareness with the goal of reducing ladder-related injuries and fatalities. Every Step Matters was the theme of this year’s National Ladder Safety Month.
Stand Up 4 Grain Safety Week kicked off on March 24. This annual event brings attention to preventable grain handling hazards and promotes safety in this high-hazard industry.
Federal agencies must review their regulations and report back to the White House by April 20. The priority is on “significant” rules, generally considered to be those with an annual effect on the economy of 100 million dollars or more. Once the regulations have been identified, the Office of Management and Budget and the Department of Government Efficiency will work with agency leaders to create a plan for rescinding or modifying the regulations and begin winding down their enforcement.
A highwall fatality at a surface mine prompted the Mine Safety and Health Administration to issue a safety alert. It outlines what miners should do to prevent similar incidents, including looking for hazards such as loose rocks and overhangs before beginning work.
The American Society of Safety Professionals revised its construction training standard. It outlines training requirements for new hires in construction and demolition operations, site procedures, regulatory compliance, and more.
And finally, turning to environmental news, EPA will reconsider a number of major rulemakings that may impact a variety of industries. This is in response to an executive order that federal agencies review their regulations. Among the rules under consideration include those related to clean power, oil and gas emission limits, greenhouse gas reporting, and risk management.
EPA’s Waste Emissions Charge on petroleum and natural gas facilities with high methane emissions is no longer in effect. The rule initially took effect in January and was then disapproved by Congress on March 14.
Thanks for tuning in to the monthly news roundup. We’ll see you next month!
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) released the biannual update of the nonconfidential Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) Chemical Substance Inventory (TSCA Inventory) on January 17, 2025. It includes all nonexempt chemical substances manufactured, processed, and imported in the U.S. that TSCA regulates.
Please note that the nonconfidential TSCA Inventory contains no chemical identities claimed as confidential business information, so it’s not a comprehensive list. The TSCA Master Inventory File is the only complete list.
How does this impact my facility?
The TSCA Inventory helps facilities determine TSCA’s regulatory requirements for the chemicals they use or plan to use. Chemicals on the list (i.e., “existing chemicals”) may be subject to rules such as reporting requirements and manufacturing limits. Chemicals not on the list (i.e., “new chemicals”) have specific notification and review requirements before they can be used.
About the updated TSCA Inventory
The TSCA Inventory has 86,847 chemicals, and 42,495 of these chemicals are active (i.e., in use). EPA also updated commercial activity data as well as regulatory flags that indicate:
EPA plans to release the next updated TSCA Inventory by Summer 2025.
How to access the TSCA Inventory
You can download the nonconfidential TSCA Inventory from EPA’s website or view it online via the agency’s Substance Registry Services (search by list).
Key to remember: EPA updated the nonconfidential TSCA Inventory, including regulatory flags that indicate certain regulatory restrictions and/or reporting exemptions.
According to OSHA, “If you focus on achieving goals, monitoring performance, and evaluating outcomes, your workplace can progress along the path to higher levels of safety and health achievement.” Workplace safety apps can help.
Mobile safety apps are great resources for both employers and workers. They can help track hazards and perform inspections, identify exposures, and report incidents fast and efficiently. Many apps are available for any kind of mobile device, are free to download, and are applicable to a variety of industries.
The OSHA/NIOSH Heat Safety Tool automatically calculates the real-time Heat Index based on the worker’s current location and displays temperature and humidity percentage. The app provides protective measures for the risk level and can track hourly temperatures to prevent heat stress. The Heat Safety Tool also provides symptoms of heat-related illnesses and first aid steps, including hydration and reminders to take rest breaks.
| Need more information on the Heat safety? See our ezExplanation on Heat Stress. |
The NIOSH PPE tracker helps employers seamlessly track and log personal protective equipment (PPE) information. It allows for the recording and analysis of facility types where PPE is used as well as daily inventories. Reports generated from the app help with the management and procurement of PPE.
The NIOSH Pocket Guide to Chemical Hazards app allows worksite chemicals to be searched to better identify properties, storage and use requirements, and required PPE. Information provided by the app clarifies industrial hygiene information and recommendations for respirator use, symptoms of exposure, and first aid.
The NIOSH Sound Level Meter (SLM) app was developed by acoustics engineers and hearing loss experts to help workers better understand their noise environment and hearing health. The SLM measures sound levels in the workplace and uses a built-in microphone to identify noise levels that are considered hazardous. Information can be shared as HTML or PDF reports that help determine proper protective equipment and implement controls to combat hearing loss.
The NIOSH Ladder Safety app guides workers through important safety information when selecting and using a straight/extension or step ladder. From ladder setup, inspection, and safe use, workers are provided with the information they need to safely use ladders on the job.
The NIOSH Lifting Equation Calculator (NLE Calc) provides quick and easy calculation of Lifting Index (LI) and Composite Lifting Index (CLI). These indexes are based on information the user provides about the job such as hand location, load weight, and frequency and duration of the lift. The app gives recommendations for safe lifting before the lift is even started.
The NIOSH Mast Climbing Work Platform (MCWP) safety tool is an inspection app that assists construction workers to safely use elevating equipment when working at heights. The app helps workers identify hazards and helps employers and safety professionals with training and compliance.
The American Red Cross First Aid app provides instant access to lifesaving information from experts. Employees can use the app as a reminder of how to handle common first aid situations and stay prepared for various emergencies using videos and interactive quizzes. The ARC Workplace Safety app also allows calls to 911 directly from the app to summon emergency assistance.
The ErgoMine ergonomics audit tool is designed specifically for mining hazards such as slip, trip, and fall hazards; musculoskeletal disorder (MSD) risks, and management of identified safety deficiencies. Audits are available for bagging, haul truck, and maintenance and repair operations at surface mining and processing facilities. Based on audit entries and checklists responses, the tool provides recommendations for remediating hazards and making ergonomic improvements.
Ensuring workplace safety is a never-ending endeavor. Employers can benefit from workplace safety apps designed to monitor and evaluate hazards in the workplace. Check out the free apps mentioned above to see how it can benefit your workplace.
Quick action using cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and automated external defibrillators (AEDs) can save the lives of the nearly 350,000 cardiac event victims each year outside of a hospital setting. But what does OSHA require for the workplace? What you didn’t know about OSHA regulations regarding AEDs may surprise you.
For every minute a patient is in cardiac arrest, their chances of survival decrease dramatically. When a patient doesn’t have a pulse and isn’t breathing, CPR should be performed until an AED is available. It’s important to note that CPR alone does not restart the heart. CPR is an oxygen circulation procedure. AEDs, on the other hand, are meant for lifesaving intervention.
CPR and early defibrillation are vital components of the emergency medical services (EMS) chain of survival that increases the odds of cardiac patient survival. However, according to the American Heart Association (AHA), even the best CPR can’t provide enough circulation of oxygen to the brain and heart for more than a few minutes. In fact, a patient whose brain is deprived of oxygen for 10 minutes or more seldom recovers.
Just like a reliable vehicle, the circulatory system is the human body’s blood transportation system, and the heart is the engine. Amazingly, the heart generates its own electrical impulses, pumping in a regular, rhythmic manner. As with any engine, the heart requires a certain amount of pressure to function and doesn’t work well when clogged with grease or debris. The most common causes of sudden cardiac arrest include a heart attack, electrocution, and asphyxiation — all of which could occur in the workplace. Common signs and symptoms include:
CPR provides the pressure for the body’s “engine” to oxygen circulating, while an AED provides the electrical impulses to keep the engine pumping.
OSHA 1910.151 requires first aid treatment be provided in the absence of an infirmary, clinic, or hospital in near proximity to the workplace used to treat injured employees. This may include assisting a victim of cardiac arrest using CPR or defibrillation.
OSHA requirements for CPR and defibrillation differ considerably. Standards requiring CPR include:
OSHA recommends basic adult CPR refresher training and retesting every year, and first aid training at least once every three years. CPR training include facilitated discussion along with ’hands-on’ skills training that uses mannequins and partner practice.
Though OSHA recognizes AEDs as important lifesaving technology that plays a role in treating cardiac arrest, the agency doesn’t currently require their use in the workplace. Instead, OSHA wants employers to assess their own requirements for AEDs as part of their first aid response.
AEDs are considered Class III medical devices which means the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has some oversight on their use. Almost all AEDs require the purchaser to obtain a prescription from a physician under FDA regulations. The prescription process is meant as a quality control mechanism to ensure AEDs are properly maintained, that all designated responders are properly trained, and assist employers with establishing an emergency response plan for their workplace AED program.
The AHA requires AED operators to also receive CPR training as an “integral part of providing lifesaving aid to people suffering sudden cardiac arrest.” Though easy to use, each AED is slightly different, so training helps users understand the unique traits and supplies for the individual units at their workplace. Additionally, AED users must be trained to understand the signs of a sudden cardiac arrest, when to activate the EMS system, and how to perform CPR.
AEDs are light, portable, easy to use, and inexpensive. They’re best placed near high-hazard areas such as confined spaces, near electrical energy, or in remote work areas. Response time to reach AEDs should be kept within 3–5-minutes.
| Need more information on defibrillators in the workplace? See our ezExplanation on AEDs. |
Many states require or encourage CPR and AED training from nationally recognized organizations. Any AED training should include CPR training. OSHA doesn’t offer first aid or CPR training, nor certify trainers. Training by a nationally recognized organization, such as AHA, the American Red Cross, or National Safety Council is recommended.
While OSHA doesn’t currently require the use of AEDs in the workplace, they do expect employers to assess their own AED requirements as part of their first aid response. AED training is required by most states and should include CPR with a hands-on practical component.
Keeping pace with ever-changing environmental regulations can be a daunting task. In fact, a recent survey1 conducted by J. J. Keller’s Center for Market Insights found that 45 percent of the 222 Environmental, Health, and Safety Professionals who participated found the tracking of regulatory changes to be their biggest challenge. That’s not surprising because environmental rulemakings are published frequently, sometimes daily, and some rules fly through the rulemaking process quicker than others. Several resources can help Without a clear plan to stay on top of things, you could easily miss an important regulatory change that could disrupt processes, cost your company several thousands of dollars in penalties, and open your company up to a lawsuit. The good news is you have many good resources at your fingertips. Here are five you can use to help create a system for keeping up with new or revised environmental regulations that might apply at your facility:
Key to remember: A J. J. Keller Market Insights survey shows that almost half of the over 220 participants said that keeping up with new and additional environmental regulations was their top challenge. However, several resources may assist you with this task!
1Environmental & Sustainability Survey conducted by Customer & Market Insights x J. J. Keller Center for Market Insights, October 2022
A joint Congressional resolution disapproved the 2024 Final Waste Emissions Charge (WEC) Rule on oil and gas facilities with high methane emissions. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) announced that the regulation, which initially took effect on January 17, 2025, is now no longer in effect.
Who’s impacted?
The WEC rule applied to facilities in the Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems category that:
Facilities that were subject to the rule are no longer required to comply (i.e., submit WEC filings by September 2, 2025).
What’s next?
EPA stated it’s “currently evaluating options and obligations for implementing Clean Air Act Section 136(c–g) and will provide additional information to the regulated community at an appropriate time."
Section 136, added by the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022, mandates that EPA implement a methane reduction incentive program for petroleum and natural gas systems, including imposing and collecting a WEC on methane emissions above waste emissions limits.
The disapproval occurred on March 14, 2025, just two days after the agency announced 31 deregulatory actions it plans to take.
Key to remember: EPA’s Waste Emissions Charge on petroleum and natural gas facilities for excess methane is no longer in effect.
Driving a truck can be a dangerous profession at times, so it’s crucial to prepare for emergencies. Emergency equipment will help keep your drivers safe on the road. But what’s required to be in the vehicle? According to Transport Canada, there are no federal regulations relating to the emergency equipment required for your standard, everyday commercial motor vehicles in Canada. However, the National Safety Code (NSC), requires carriers to ensure that their vehicles meet maintenance and performance standards as prescribed in the standards. Carriers also have a duty to comply with jurisdictional health and safety legislation pertaining to the workplace. Even though there may not be detailed federal regulations in place, and the requirements can vary among Canadian jurisdictions, you still need to ensure your drivers have what they need in an emergency. Plus, if your drivers are operating across the U.S.-Canadian border, they may need additional equipment while in the United States.
The equipment requirements can vary slightly based on the type of vehicle, what it is hauling, and where it is operating. As a result, it can be confusing to find and understand minimum requirements. As a best practice, making sure the following emergency equipment is in your vehicles is a great start:
Carriers that haul certain types of dangerous goods in Canada must also carry fire extinguishers in accordance with the Transportation of Dangerous Goods Regulations, so be sure to check these regulations for specific details.
It is highly recommended that you check with the jurisdiction where you operate your commercial motor vehicle for the specific requirements and regulations that apply to you.
Whenever any commercial motor vehicle or trailer is disabled, stalled, broken down, or in a collision, the driver should quickly and calmly take the necessary actions to safeguard the vehicle and other motorists.
Having the vehicle equipped with the above-listed items will ensure that the driver can respond to the emergency efficiently and effectively. This is especially important on busy or high-speed roads. Ensure you also teach your drivers how to use the equipment. For example, if the truck breaks down – ensure they know where to put the emergency triangles, they know how to use the fire extinguisher properly and they have instructions on how to use jumper cables correctly.
It is recommended to use emergency warning devices for all emergencies, whether they occur during the day or night, or on-road or off the road, to ensure everyone’s safety.
Those of you that operate in the United States must meet U.S. regulations for emergency equipment in your vehicles. The minimum requirements can be found in section 393.95 of the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations, which requires:
Ensure your commercial vehicles carry additional emergency equipment to protect the driver, other workers, and any passengers. For example, extra food and water should be carried along with weather-appropriate clothing to protect the driver in the event the vehicle breaks down and the driver is stranded until help can arrive. And, as always, make sure drivers have tire chains easily accessible. If they get hit by a sudden snowstorm, then they will be prepared. In fact, carrying tire chains is a requirement in some jurisdictions.
Dealing with on-road emergencies is no fun for drivers. Don’t make it more difficult for them in an already stressful situation. Be sure to properly equip your trucks with emergency-related safety equipment and ensure drivers know how to use the equipment.
If you don’t have the proper emergency equipment in your truck, it can result in a fine or penalty. Commercial motor vehicles and their drivers must meet strict safety standards and follow all commercial vehicle-related regulations. Police and transportation enforcement officers regularly inspect vehicles, and the penalties for not having the proper safety equipment can be severe.
Key to remember: Before your drivers get in your trucks and hit the road, make sure you’ve equipped them with all the essential emergency safety gear. Safety is the first priority, especially on the road.
The Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) continues to tighten driver qualification (DQ) standards for carriers and drivers. Three areas stand out for 2026:
Each area brings challenges and questions for carriers striving to keep drivers qualified and avoid costly out-of-service (OOS) violations.
The FMCSA’s National Registry Integration Phase 2 (NRII) went live June 23, 2025, aiming to simplify medical certification updates and reduce fraud. Under NRII, CDL drivers no longer self-certify medical cards after exams, and carriers no longer verify examiners on the registry. However, eight states remain non-compliant, requiring old processes. The non-compliant states are:
Key watchouts:
Tip: Require drivers to report after every exam and provide a copy of their medical card — even if the licensing state is not NRII-compliant.
Common questions:
If a driver’s certification is expired on the MVR, can they operate?
Yes, if within FMCSA’s waiver period and carrying a valid medical card;
No, if outside the waiver or lacking required paperwork.
Will medical information transfer if a driver changes states?
Yes, provided the old state posted the certification before transfer.
How are medical exemptions handled?
Certification won’t transmit from the National Registry until the FMCSA issues the variance; drivers must carry the variance while operating.
FMCSA has long required drivers to read and speak English under §391.11(b)(2), but enforcement changed in June 2025. Following an executive order, Commercial Vehicle Safety Association (CVSA) made ELP violations an OOS condition. Drivers failing a two-step roadside assessment—interview and sign recognition—are immediately sidelined.
Impact: ELP violations now rank #18 among driver violations, with over 9,000 OOS orders in six months.
Key watchout:
Common questions:
If a driver is placed OOS for ELP, when can they return?
Only after demonstrating English proficiency. Carriers should document compliance, ideally via a mock roadside inspection.
Can another driver rescue the truck?
Yes, if the vehicle isn’t OOS and the rescue driver meets all requirements. The original driver may ride as a passenger but cannot drive.
How can carriers ensure new hires meet ELP standards?
Conduct interviews in English, avoid translation applications, and include a mock roadside inspection during the road test.
FMCSA’s interim final rule (IFR), effective September 29, 2025, introduced stricter requirements for states and non-domiciled CDL holders. Although enforcement is paused due to a court injunction, carriers should prepare for compliance.
Key watchouts:
Common Questions:
What documents are required?
An unexpired passport and Form I-94/94A with an eligible visa.
What should carriers do during the pause?
Monitor expiration dates, prevent drivers from operating with expired CDLs, and help them obtain required documents.
Keys to remember: Proof of medical certification delays, language proficiency enforcement, and immigration-related CDL rules can quickly sideline drivers, impacting Compliance, Safety, Accountability (CSA) scores and profitability. Carriers should adopt proactive practices to keep drivers safe and qualified.
As expected under the new Trump administration — and despite having an extensive wish-list — the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) took few significant rulemaking actions in 2025.
Nevertheless, the year brought a crackdown on noncompliance, at least one significant compliance deadline, several policy changes, and numerous rulemaking proposals that are still in the works.
Here’s a recap of the biggest news of the year related to motor carrier safety regulations. Note that many changes had merely been proposed and were not yet finalized as of late December.
Key to remember: Though light on regulation changes, 2025 nevertheless brought several impactful actions from the FMCSA and U.S. DOT.
For transportation professionals employing drivers with B-1 visas, understanding where international commerce ends and domestic restrictions begin isn’t just smart business, it’s essential to avoid costly penalties and keep operations on the road.
Simply stated, cabotage refers to point-to-point transportation of goods or passengers within one country. In the U.S., cabotage rules prevent foreign nationals in the U.S. on B-1 business-visitor visas from competing with U.S. truckers moving loads or passengers from point to point in the U.S.
Practically speaking, this means that foreign national truck drivers on B-1 visas may be admitted to the U.S. to deliver or pick up cargo traveling in the stream of international commerce, i.e., cargo that is entering or leaving the U.S.
However, those drivers cannot haul cargo between two U.S. locations.
Let’s look at how the requirements shape every international shipment, and the critical compliance points carriers employing these drivers must keep in mind.
Cargo must remain in international commerce stream (entering or leaving the U.S.). Goods that “come to rest” assume a domestic character (even if they originated from a foreign source) if the continual delivery is stopped for any reason that is not considered a “necessary incident” of international commerce, such as loading and unloading international cargo. Some examples of “coming to rest” include:
Drivers admitted under B-1 visas can only pick up and/or deliver international shipments. Additionally, the drivers must:
It’s important to note that U.S. Customs and Immigration regulations must be followed, as there can be subtle differences:
To demonstrate compliance:
Even with the correct paperwork, certain activities remain strictly off-limits under cabotage rules. The following examples describe movements that are not permitted for the foreign driver:
Failing to follow these rules isn’t just a technicality. It can have serious consequences for carriers and drivers alike. Violations can lead to:
Strict adherence to cabotage rules is essential for international drivers operating in the U.S. Non-compliance with these regulations — including requirements under both Customs and Immigration law — can result in severe penalties, including suspension from trusted programs and loss of credentials.
Key to remember: By consistently verifying visa status, maintaining accurate records, and ensuring all shipments remain in the stream of international commerce, drivers and carriers protect themselves and their business from costly enforcement actions.
The 150 air-mile exemptions, which are in the regulations at 395.1(e)(1) and (2), allow a driver to use a time record in place of a log, provided that certain conditions are met. While this is possibly the most widely used hours-of-service exemption, it may be the most commonly misused exemption, as well.
To be able to use this logging exemption in 395.1(e)(1), the driver must:
The company must retain the time record and have it available for inspection for six months.
| Need more info? View our ezExplanation on the 150 air-mile exception. |
If the driver cannot meet the terms of the exemption (he or she goes too far or works too many hours), the driver must complete a regular driver’s log for the day as soon as the exemption no longer applies.
If the driver has had to complete a log 8 or fewer days out of the last 30 days, the driver can use a paper log for the day. If the driver had to complete a log more than 8 days out of the last 30 days, the driver needs to use an electronic log for the day (unless one of the ELD exemptions applies, such as operating a vehicle older than model year 2000).
When a property-carrying driver is operating under the 150 air-mile exemption, the driver is also exempt from having to take the required 30-minute break (see 395.3(a)(3)(ii)).
If the driver began the day as a 150 air-mile driver and has driven more than 8 consecutive hours without a break, and something unexpected happens and the driver can no longer use the 150 air-mile exemption, the driver must stop and immediately take the 30-minute break as well as start logging. If the driver went outside of the 150 air-mile area before the driver had 8 hours of driving without a break from driving, the driver would be expected to take the break at the appropriate time.
Here are some of the common myths and misunderstandings about the 150 air-mile exemption:
The 150 air-mile exemption at 395.1(e)(2) only applies to drivers that: Operate property-carrying vehicles that do not require a CDL to operate, and Stay within the 150 air-miles of their work reporting location.
If the driver stays within the 150 air-mile radius of the work reporting location, and returns to the work reporting location within 14 hours on 5 of the last 7 days, and 16 hours on 2 of the last seven days, the driver is allowed to use a time record in place of a log.
If the driver does not meet the terms of the exception, the driver will need to complete a log for the day. If the driver had to log more than 8 days out of the last 30 days, the driver will need to use an electronic log for the day. All of the other issues discussed above would apply to these drivers as well.
If you have drivers that use these exemptions, you will need to check time records to make sure they are complying with the appropriate time limits. You will also need to check movement records to verify that the drivers using these exemptions are staying within the mandated area (within 150 air-miles of the work reporting location for the day).
If a driver is over the hours limit, or has gone too far, you need to verify that the submitted a log for the day, either paper or electronic, depending on how many days the driver had to log out of the previous 30 days.
During an audit, if it is discovered that your drivers are using these exemptions incorrectly, you will be cited for not having drivers’ logs when required. Each day this occurred will be another violation, so the fine could be rather large if you are not managing the use of these exemptions!
Any visitor who enters your facility on a temporary basis has the potential to be both a safety and security risk.
Address all visitors — including vendors, temporary workers, and even family or friends of employees — in your corporate safety and security policies.
*Employee escorts should also be reminded of rules of contact.
The U.S. Bureau of Labor statistics reported in July 2024 that there are 8.2 million job openings in the U.S., but only 7.2 million unemployed workers.
With that in mind, employers might choose to hang onto employees even if they’re under performing. But what about when complaints are rolling in from different angles? Take, for example, a lackluster supervisor who’s annoying employees and disappointing customers.
An employer could be hesitant to let the supervisor go, especially if there’s no documentation backing up claims of misconduct. The employer must weigh their options to decide if putting the supervisor on a performance improvement plan (PIP) or moving right to termination is the ideal choice.
At-will employment
For starters, in most states employers may terminate an employee at-will, meaning they can fire employees for pretty much any reason as long as it doesn’t discriminate against someone in a protected class based on sex, age, race, religion, etc. Employers also cannot terminate in retaliation for an employee making a claim of harassment, discrimination, or safety concerns.
Aside from these limits, employers can terminate employees for good cause, bad cause, or no cause at all.
PIP or terminate
Deciding whether to put an employee on a PIP or terminate must be decided on a case-by-case basis.
A PIP is usually for job performance issues (hence, performance improvement plan). This could mean anything from not making enough sales to being inept at the job’s essential functions. If job performance doesn’t improve under the PIP, termination may be the end result depending on company policies and practices.
Even if an employee has job performance issues, the employer can terminate without going through the PIP process first, unless the usual process is to implement a PIP with employees who have had similar problems. In that case, not doing a PIP could be seen as discrimination against an employee, especially if the person falls into a protected class.
Workplace misconduct, however, is another situation altogether. This could be anything from a one-off poor joke to pervasive harassment. Snapping at customers or coworkers (or worse), for example, is a conduct issue. An employer could issue a warning or move right to termination if the behavior is clearly illegal or a serious threat to workplace safety.
| Read more: ezExplanation on discharging employees |
Termination tips
If an employer decides to terminate, they should treat the employee as respectfully as possible during the termination process. Also, an employer should carefully and clearly communicate the job-related reasons for the termination to avoid any hint of discrimination. Lastly, an employer should document the reasons and reiterate the steps taken leading up to the termination and keep those records handy in case the employee files a wrongful termination lawsuit.
Key to remember: Employers sometimes struggle when making termination decisions. Having a process in place and documenting steps along the way can help if a case lands in court.
A blanket policy against drug use might sound like a simple way to keep abuse out of the workplace, but doing it the wrong way can land a company in trouble.
A concrete and construction company recently learned about the problems these policies can cause when its practice of refusing to hire applicants who used methadone brought a lawsuit from the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC).
Methadone is an opioid and can be abused, but it can also be used as a treatment for opioid addiction. A drug policy that fails to take those differences into account, and always treats methadone use the same way, opens the door to a disability discrimination claim.
The issue with the company’s policy was brought to light when a job applicant applied for a laborer position and the hiring manager asked him about medications he was taking. The applicant said he was taking methadone, and the hiring manager said the company would not hire him due to its policy prohibiting employment of people who took the drug.
The applicant then checked with the company’s head of HR who confirmed that this was the company’s policy.
The EEOC charged the company with violating federal law because a policy of barring applicants who used methadone violates the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA).
Employers covered by the ADA cannot impose unlawful barriers to a job for people with disabilities, the agency noted, and this includes workers with records of opioid addiction who are taking methadone or other medication as part of their recovery.
In addition, the timing of the employer’s question about methadone use was problematic. The applicant was at the stage of applying for a job and had not yet been offered a position.
Before a job offer is made, the ADA does not allow employers to ask job applicants for information that may reveal the existence, nature, or severity of a disability. This includes questions about medication.
Even after a job offer is extended, a question like this must be carefully considered. Employers cannot have a job qualification standard that tends to screen out workers with disabilities (such as requiring applicants not to use methadone) unless it is job-related for the position and is also consistent with business necessity.
When applicants ask about a job, questions about medications such as methadone should not be part of the conversation. The ADA prohibits employers from asking about prescription medications until after an offer of employment is made. While it’s fine to ask about medications or give a drug test after offering an applicant a job, it’s also risky at that stage to have a policy of turning an applicant away because of methadone use or a positive drug test for methadone.
Instead, the employer should give the applicant an opportunity to provide information about lawful medication use. An employer never needs to accommodate the illegal use of drugs, but an employee taking a lawfully prescribed medication should not be automatically disqualified from a job.
If there are concerns that the employee’s legal opioid use or treatment for opioid addiction would interfere with safe and effective job performance, an employer should consider whether there is a reasonable accommodation that resolves the concerns. The employee can check with their healthcare provider for risks the medication poses in light of job duties, and the employee and employer can discuss possible accommodations.
Moving too quickly to dismiss an employee using prescription medication, and skipping this step, risks a discrimination claim.
Key to remember: An employee legally using prescribed medication, including methadone, has ADA protections. Employers should not automatically disqualify an applicant because of methadone use.
Employers sometimes get tripped up on how to calculate the 1,250 hours worked eligibility criterion when employees need leave under the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA).
Does working overtime count toward the 1,250?
Recently, someone asked if overtime hours counted toward the 1,250 hours worked requirement (it does).
All hours actually worked apply to the 1,250, whether overtime or regular time, even if the overtime is not mandatory.
The 1,250 hours is calculated in relation to when the leave will begin, not when the employee puts an employer on notice of the need for leave.
Whether an employee is allowed to work overtime, however, is generally up to company policy. As far as pay goes, remember, if the employee is nonexempt (“hourly”) and works any overtime (mandatory or voluntary) the employee must be paid time and one-half for all hours worked over 40 within the workweek.
More about FMLA leave requirements
To be eligible to take FMLA leave, employees must:
Whether an employee has worked the minimum 1,250 hours is calculated based on determining compensable hours or work under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA).
Calculating the 1,250 hours worked
When it comes to figuring out if an employee has worked at least 1,250 hours, it can get tricky. As was mentioned above, all hours worked, regular and overtime, must be counted.
Hours not worked should not be counted. The “not worked hours” include such time off as vacation time, sick leave, paid or unpaid holidays, or any other time in which an employee isn’t actually working — which can include disability, bereavement, FMLA and other forms of leave.
Once an employee meets the three eligibility criteria, including the 1,250 hours worked, for a particular leave reason, the employee remains eligible for the duration of the 12-month leave year period.
If the employee needs leave for another, different reason, eligibility would be recalculated.
Key to remember: All hours worked must be included in the 1,250 hours criterion when determining whether an employee is eligible for FMLA leave. Hours that aren’t worked (like vacation) are not included.
When the new year arrives, so do updated state labor law posters. To comply with posting regulations, display these revised postings on January 1:
In addition, the District of Columbia also has a New Year’s Day update. Employers there must post the latest version of the Paid Family Leave posting.
Employers in Montana, South Dakota, Virginia, and Washington should note that a minimum wage poster isn’t required under the law. However, the states make a posting available, and it’s a good idea to inform employees of the rate currently in effect.
Mandatory posting changes take place throughout the year. Here are a few more to watch for in early 2026:
Key to remember: Minimum wage updates and other regulatory changes require employers to display updated state labor law posters in January.
Effective January 1, 2024, California employers with five or more employees will need to provide leave for another reason — reproductive loss. California is the second state to enact a law for this reason, following Illinois.
Employees are eligible to take the leave if they have worked for the employer for at least 30 days before leave begins. Employees may take up to five days, which can be intermittent, of reproductive loss leave.
What qualifies for leave?
Employees may take the leave for “a reproductive loss event,” which means the day, or for a multiple-day event, the final day of:
What are the leave terms?
Signed into law on October 10, the law requires that employees take the leave within three months of the event, with some exceptions, and pursuant to any existing company leave policy.
If an employee experiences more than one reproductive loss event within a 12-month period, employers don’t have to grant a total amount of reproductive loss leave time in excess of 20 days within a 12-month period.
If employers don’t have an existing policy, the reproductive loss leave may be unpaid. Employees may, however, choose to use certain other leave balances otherwise available, including accrued and available paid sick leave.
Employers may not retaliate against employees for taking the leave, giving information about the leave, or making a formal statement regarding the leave.
Employers must maintain employee confidentiality relating to reproductive loss leave.
Key to remember: The state employee leave law trend continues, and for more diverse leave reasons. Employers with employees in California must be aware of this new leave law that is effective January 1, 2024.
The Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) isn’t the only federal law employers must consider if an employee needs time off for their own condition. They might have to think about how the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) applies to situations.
Under the ADA, when an employee asks for a workplace change because of a medical condition, employers’ ADA obligations are generally triggered, including engaging in what’s known as an interactive process with the employee. Employers must include the employee in this process.
The objective of this discussion is to identify a reasonable and effective accommodation that enables the employee to perform the essential functions of their job.
The interactive process has 6 general steps, but these steps can be more or less formal, depending on the situation.
Employers should not delay this process. Whether it takes 15 minutes or 5 days, employers should document it to help maintain consistency, demonstrate good-faith efforts, and ensure continuity when roles, needs, or personnel change. It also helps protect both the employer and employee by creating a transparent, verifiable record of the accommodation process.
Key to remember: To comply with the ADA, employers should follow 6 basic steps when employees ask for a workplace change because of a medical condition.
OSHA just posted its most frequently cited serious violations for general industry, maritime, and construction for fiscal year (FY) 2025. The agency highlights the violations in three slide presentations with 44 bar charts. You might call them a gold mine of data!
Five of the charts offer either the top 10 or top 5 lists for 29 CFR 1910, 1915, 1917, 1918, and 1926. The remaining charts examine the top 5 lists for each subpart of 29 CFR 1910 and 1926. Explore all 44 bar charts in the three presentations found here.
If death or serious physical harm can result from a work hazard and the employer knew or should have known the hazard exists, OSHA calls it a “serious” violation, as explained in section 666 of Title 29 of the U.S. Code.
OSHA can stick an employer with a $16,550 penalty for EACH serious violation. The thing is, on average, inspectors spot about three violations per visit. That could multiply to almost $50,000 after one visit! Knowing where your peers went wrong may help YOU prioritize your compliance efforts.
Note that the maximum penalty amount is specified at 29 CFR 1903.15. That maximum is expected to be adjusted each January! Why? OSHA is required by law to hike civil penalties annually for inflation.
Of all the industries, violations of 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13) were hit most in fiscal year 2025, with 5,276 citations. That provision requires fall protection for residential construction. OSHA cited construction 14,322 times for the 10 most frequently cited serious violations for that industry. This is up 1 percent from FY 2024. It appears OSHA inspectors are keenly focused on construction enforcement.
In contrast, the agency cited general industry “just” 5,537 times in its top 10 for FY 2025. This was a decrease of 6.6 percent from the previous year. Shipyards, marine terminals, and longshoring received 31, 13, and 9 citations, respectively, in each of their top 5 lists for FY 2025. This reflected a 29 percent increase for shipyards, 50 percent free fall for marine terminals, and 44 percent slide for longshoring.
When comparing the data between FY 2025 and 2024, the top serious violation paragraphs stayed relatively unchanged for general industry and construction. Nine entries each reappeared in the general industry and construction dominant 10 lists. Maritime did not maintain their number ones year over year, however.
The subparagraph for lockout/tagout periodic inspections made its debut on the 10 most cited for general industry in FY 2025. The subparagraph for scaffolding fall protection above 10 feet was the new ranking on the construction top 10 list. The subparagraphs for types of machine guarding methods and residential fall protection remained the number one serious violations for general industry and construction, respectively.
For general industry, the serious regulatory paragraphs with the highest number of citations included:
| General industry | ||||||
| FY 2024 | FY 2025 | |||||
| Rank | 29 CFR 1910 | Description | Violations | 29 CFR 1910 | Description | Violations |
| 1 | .212(a)(1) | Machine guarding — Types of guarding methods | 1,099 | .212(a)(1) | Machine guarding — Types of guarding methods | 1,049 |
| 2 | .1200(e)(1) | HazCom — Written program | 988 | .1200(e)(1) | HazCom — Written program | 977 |
| 3 | .1200(h)(1) | HazCom — Info & training | 820 | .1200(h)(1) | HazCom — Info & training | 769 |
| 4 | .134(e)(1) | Respirators — Medical evaluations | 557 | .147(c)(4)(i) | Lockout/tagout — Develop procedures | 532 |
| 5 | .147(c)(4)(i) | Lockout/tagout — Develop procedures | 540 | .134(e)(1) | Respirators — Medical evaluations | 481 |
| 6 | .178(l)(1)(i) | Powered industrial trucks — Competency training | 441 | .178(l)(1)(i) | Powered industrial trucks — Competency training | 388 |
| 7 | .151(c) | Eye & body flushing facilities | 385 | .1200(g)(8) | HazCom — Readily accessible SDSs | 377 |
| 8 | .212(a)(3)(ii) | Machine guarding — Point of operation | 375 | .147(c)(6)(i) | Lockout/tagout — Periodic inspection | 330 |
| 9 | .134(c)(1) | Respirators — Written program | 374 | .134(c)(1) | Respirators — Written program | 323 |
| 10 | .1200(g)(8) | HazCom — Readily accessible SDSs | 350 | .151(c) | Eye & body flushing facilities | 311 |
| Total | 5,929 | 5,537 | ||||
For maritime, you won’t find large numbers of violations, so the number one violation in each of the three maritime industries included the following:
| Maritime | ||||||
| FY 2024 | FY 2025 | |||||
| Industry | 29 CFR | Description | Violations | 29 CFR | Description | Violations |
| Shipyards | 1915.73(d) | Guarding of deck opening/edges | 8 | 1915.152(b) | Assess work area | 7 |
| Marine terminals | 1917.26(f) | USCG-approved life ring available | 6 | 1917.43(c)(5) | Powered industrial trucks maintained in safe working order | 4 |
| Longshoring | 1918.22(e) | Fall protection for gangways over water | 6 | 1918.35 | Open weather deck hatches | 2 |
| Total | 20 | 13 | ||||
For construction, OSHA tallies the following top 10 serious paragraphs as follows:
| Construction | ||||||
| FY 2024 | FY 2025 | |||||
| Rank | 29 CFR 1926 | Description | Violations | 29 CFR 1926 | Description | Violations |
| 1 | .501(b)(13) | Fall protection — Residential construction | 5,110 | .501(b)(13) | Fall protection — Residential construction | 5,276 |
| 2 | .1053(b)(1) | Ladders — Extend 3 ft above landing | 1,927 | .1053(b)(1) | Ladders — Extend 3 ft above landing | 1,967 |
| 3 | .102(a)(1) | Eye & face protection — Use appropriate protection | 1,917 | .102(a)(1) | Eye & face protection — Use appropriate protection | 1,955 |
| 4 | .503(a)(1) | Fall protection — Training | 1,466 | .503(a)(1) | Fall protection — Training | 1,386 |
| 5 | .100(a) | Head protection — Use of protection | 804 | .100(a) | Head protection — Use of protection | 885 |
| 6 | .501(b)(1) | Fall protection — Unprotected sides/edges | 750 | .20(b)(2) | General safety & health — Inspection by competent person | 673 |
| 7 | .20(b)(2) | General safety & health — Inspection by competent person | 734 | .501(b)(1) | Fall protection — Unprotected sides/edges | 669 |
| 8 | .503(b)(1) | Fall protection — Written certification record of training | 555 | .503(b)(1) | Fall protection — Written certification record of training | 555 |
| 9 | .453(b)(2)(v) | Aerial lifts — Fall protection while in basket | 517 | .453(b)(2)(v) | Aerial lifts — Fall protection while in basket | 511 |
| 10 | .21(b)(2) | General safety and health – Unsafe hazards recognition/avoidance | 396 | .451(g)(1) | Scaffolding — Fall protection above 10 ft | 445 |
| Total | 14,176 | 14,322 | ||||
OSHA posted its Most Frequently Cited Serious Violations slide presentations for FY 2025. Knowing where your peers went wrong may help you prioritize your compliance efforts.
Cold environments brings hazards ranging from slips and falls to cold stress injuries like hypothermia, frostbite, and trench foot. Working in cold conditions can be uncomfortable and potentially very dangerous. The most effective way to protect workers is by following the hierarchy of controls, starting with strategies that eliminate or reduce exposure before relying on personal protective equipment (PPE).
OSHA emphasizes that, even without a specific “cold stress” standard, employers are obligated under the General Duty Clause (Section 5(a)(1)) to provide a workplace free from recognized hazards and must comply with PPE requirements in 29 CFR 1910.132. Workers commonly exposed to cold stress include:
This list is not all inclusive; however, these jobs often involve long exposure to low temperatures, wind, wetness and physical exertion that test fine-motor tasks as dexterity drops in the cold.
When the temperature drops, quick action matters. The hierarchy of controls gives employers a step-by-step plan to reduce cold stress risks before they turn into emergencies. Below are practical steps and examples for each level of the hierarchy from most protective to least:
Elimination/substitution - Remove or replace the hazard entirely.
Engineering controls - Modify the work environment to reduce exposure.
Administrative controls - Change how work is performed to limit risk.
PPE - Provide gear when other controls can’t fully eliminate risk.
Wind chill is the temperature your body “feels” when wind speed and air temperature are combined. Wind strips away the thin layer of warm air next to the skin, accelerating convective heat loss. As wind speed rises, exposed skin cools faster, dramatically increasing frostbite and hypothermia risk.
OSHA and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Organization (NOAA) use Wind Chill Advisories and Warnings to signal when conditions are hazardous or life-threatening. As an example, at 20 °F with a 20-mph wind, the wind chill is ~4 °F, meaning cold stress sets in much faster than the air temperature alone would suggest.
Key to remember: By integrating wind chill awareness with the hierarchy of controls, supervisors can drastically reduce cold-related injuries by keeping crews safe and productive throughout the winter season.
Did you know that to prevent accidents and ensure worker safety, employers must proactively identify and address hazards in accordance with OSHA's Walking-Working Surfaces rule? From regular inspections to implementing fall protection measures, staying vigilant is crucial in maintaining a safe working environment.
Slips, trips, and falls account for most general industry workplace accidents, with nearly 700 of these accidents resulting in death each year. The U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reports that there were 450,540 days away from work due to slips, trips, and falls that were reported in 2021 – 2022. Slips, trips, and falls are preventable and following OSHA’s walking-working surfaces standards and safe work practices can ensure workers are protected from these types of injuries.
Slips and trips can lead to falls, but the reason for either occurrence differs. Slips happen when there is a lack of friction between your feet and the surface you’re walking on, while trips occur when your foot hits an object and throws you off balance. Falls occur whenever you move too far off your center of balance. Falls from an elevated position present the greatest chance for injury or death, but same-level falls can also lead to serious injuries.
Slip hazards include:
Trip hazards include:
Additionally, other factors can contribute to slips, trips, and falls, including walking while distracted, fatigue, poor vision, and poor lighting. Ensure you perform a thorough hazard assessment. Don’t overlook the less-than-obvious hazards such as wet work surfaces or morning dew that workers may need to address before going to work.
General industry requirements can be found under 1910 Subpart D, Walking-working surfaces. The regulations cover all walking and work surfaces, including floors, aisles, stairs, and ladders to name a few. Under OSHA’s Walking-working surfaces regulations, employers must ensure:
To mitigate slip, trip, and fall hazards, employers should provide:
Workers can also help prevent slip, trip, and fall accidents by:
When was the last time you checked your workers’ footwear? You may be surprised by what you find. Worn soles increase the risk of slipping over walking-working surfaces.
Employers should use guidance from OSHA’s Walking-working surfaces regulations to ensure workers’ protection from slip, trip, and fall hazards.
Most employers know that OSHA requires chocking or similarly securing trailers for loading and unloading, but many also know about an exemption for commercial motor vehicles (CMVs). In short, that exemption is narrow and applies only to employers that are motor carriers.
Several OSHA regulations require using chocks or similar measures (such as dock locks) during loading or unloading operations. To avoid conflicts, federal OSHA created an agreement with the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) for that agency to retain jurisdiction over CMVs. That means OSHA cannot (in theory) enforce chocking requirements on CMVs.
There is a catch to OSHA’s enforcement limitation, however. In fact, there are several issues that employers should know.
First, many states run their own OSHA programs (state-plan states). Since the FMSCA jurisdiction agreement is with federal OSHA, states are not subject to the agreement could enforce chocking requirements in all cases, even for CMVs.
Second, OSHA expects employers to require chocking on CMVs if the employer’s workers (such as forklift drivers) will enter the trailer. Basically, OSHA stated that the FMCSA regulations (and jurisdiction issues) apply only to motor carrier employers that fall under FMCSA authority, not to other employers. To illustrate, if a CMV backs into the dock at a grocery store, and the store workers will unload the trailer, then OSHA has jurisdiction over the store workers.
OSHA addressed these issues in a letter of interpretation dated March 7, 2011, outlining the history of the agency’s agreement with the FMCSA. The letter clarifies that the FMSCA parking brake regulations “do not apply to companies which do not own, operate, or lease CMVs” and therefore OSHA can enforce chocking requirements against those employers.
If a manufacturing or retail employer is not subject to FMCSA regulations, but that employer has forklift operators unloading trailers, OSHA expects that employer to “take precautions to protect their workers ... from the movement of trailers.” Further, the letter clarifies that forklift operators “must be trained” not to enter a trailer “unless the trailer is properly secured or restricted from movement prior to boarding.”
For similar information, see our article, Five forklift facts that are not in the OSHA regulations.
The above letter also asked who is responsible for confirming that no employees are injured when the truck driver attempts to move the trailer. OSHA responded that the employer must “ensure that forklift operators are not in the trailer or hostler when the driver attempts to remove the trailer from the loading dock.” Employers may adopt whatever procedures are necessary to ensure this.
The bottom line is that OSHA won’t enforce wheel chocking requirements on CMVs that are operated by a company under FMSCA jurisdiction. Other employers (like warehouses and manufacturing facilities) not under FMCSA jurisdiction must still take steps to protect workers from unexpected trailer movement — and OSHA will enforce those provisions.
Key to Remember: Although FMSCA regulations allow motor carriers to rely on parking brakes to secure trailers during loading and unloading operations, OSHA requires employers who are not motor carriers to secure trailers with chocks or similar means.
Each year, the National Fire Protection Agency (NFPA) reminds employers not to prop open fire doors for convenience. Propping open doors has become a common violation of fire codes after the pandemic because workers didn’t want to become exposed to germs on common touchpoints.
I know firsthand this is an issue at construction jobsites and remember telling workers not to prop open fire doors in our clients’ facilities. Workers were doing this out of convenience because they carried things into and out of the existing facility. Propping open a fire door, or wedging it open, are serious fire and safety hazards. Keep fire doors closed to prevent smoke and fire from spreading into the fire evacuation route, like a stairwell. OSHA and NFPA don’t prohibit propping open a fire exit door but caution employers against doing this for safety and security reasons.
Fire doors must remain closed, although some may be designed to automatically close when fire and smoke are sensed by jobsite fire detection equipment. To reduce the need to disinfect frequently touched points, workers can push open fire doors using their sleeves by pushing against the push bar instead of using their hands. You can also increase housekeeping efforts and the frequency that doorknobs, handles, and push bars are cleaned throughout the shift.
On November 26, the Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA) provided a status update indicating its intent to reconsider certain portions of its respirable crystalline silica rule due to ongoing litigation. No further details were provided. The rule, which took effect in June 2024, introduced significant changes aimed at protecting miners from the health risks associated with silica dust exposure.
The rule:
While there have been several enforcement delays, the April 8, 2026, compliance date for metal and nonmetal mines remains unchanged.