FMLA and common-law marriages
In recent years, marriage rates have gone down and the number of U.S. adults living with an unmarried partner has gone up. How might this have an impact when employees request leave under the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA)?
Have you ever had an employee ask for FMLA leave to care for their common law spouse? If so, have you ever wondered if the state in which the relationship was established recognizes common law marriages?
Usually, employers don’t ask to see marriage certificates when employees need leave to care for a spouse, so they might not even think to question the marriage. But whether a marriage is considered “legal” can come into play when it comes to FMLA leave.
Legal marriage under the FMLA
Eligible employees may take FMLA leave to care for a spouse, but that spouse needs to be part of a legal marriage.
Legal marriages include those recognized under state laws, and some states recognize common-law marriages. While many people believe that if a couple lives together for a certain number of years (seven seems to be popular), they are automatically seen as having a common-law marriage. Many state laws, however, do not contain such a provision.
Some common-law marriage provisions require couples to live together and refer to themselves as a married couple. Many, however, do not put a time frame on how many years the couple needs to cohabitate. For example, in Texas, the couple needs to meet only the following:
- Agree to be married,
- Live together in Texas as husband and wife (no specific time frame), and
- Represent to others that they are married.
The latter generally includes telling other people they are married and otherwise referring to themselves as married. This could include, for example, introducing each other as husband and wife, or applying for credit as a couple. State laws, however, have different requirements.
States that recognize common-law marriages to some degree
- Alabama (if before 1/1/17)
- Colorado
- District of Columbia
- Florida (if before 1/1/68)
- Georgia (if before 1/1/97)
- Idaho (if before 1/1/96)
- Indiana (if before 1/1/58)
- Iowa
- Kansas
- Montana
- New Hampshire (for inheritance purposes only)
- Ohio (if before 10/10/91)
- Oklahoma (better if before 11/1/98)
- Pennsylvania (if before 1/1/05)
- Rhode Island
- South Carolina (if before 7/24/19)
- Texas
- Utah
As this list illustrates, state marriage laws can be complex. Determining if a relationship meets state law can be a challenge. When in doubt, contact appropriate counsel.
While you may ask for reasonable documentation of a family relationship for purposes of the FMLA, employees in a common-law marriage might not have any. Employees can satisfy this requirement by providing a simple statement asserting that the requisite family relationship exists. You may, however, ask for such a statement to be put into writing.
Key to remember: If you have employees asking for leave to care for a common law spouse, and the relationship meets the state law criteria, the employees could be entitled to FMLA leave to care for their spouse. State marriage laws, however, can require some research.