{{ post.roar_specific_data.subject }}
{{ post.roar_specific_data.subjecttopic }}
{{ post.roar_specific_data.PublishDate }}
JOIN TODAY TO CONTINUE READING THIS ARTICLE & OTHER INDUSTRY NEWS!
You'll also get exclusive access to:
A database of easy-to-understand regulationsAsk unlimited questions to our expertsPre-led discussions forumsAnd more
TRY IT FREE TODAY
Already have an account? Log in now.
See More
RELATED NEWS

Specialized Industries
Go beyond the regulations! Visit the Institute for in-depth guidance on a wide range of compliance subjects in safety and health, transportation, environment, and human resources.
J. J. Keller® COMPLIANCE NETWORK is a premier online safety and compliance community, offering members exclusive access to timely regulatory content in workplace safety (OSHA), transportation (DOT), environment (EPA), and human resources (DOL).

Interact With Our Compliance Experts
Puzzled by a regulatory question or issue? Let our renowned experts provide the answers and get your business on track to full compliance!

Upcoming Events
Reference the Compliance Network Safety Calendar to keep track of upcoming safety and compliance events. Browse by industry or search by keyword to see relevant dates and observances, including national safety months, compliance deadlines, and more.
SAFETY & COMPLIANCE NEWS
Keep up with the latest regulatory developments from OSHA, DOT, EPA, DOL, and more.
REGSENSE® REGULATORY REFERENCE
Explore a comprehensive database of word-for-word regulations on a wide range of compliance topics, with simplified explanations and best practices advice from our experts.
THE J. J. KELLER INSTITUTE
The Institute is your destination for in-depth content on 120+ compliance subjects. Discover articles, videos, and interactive exercises that will strengthen your understanding of regulatory concepts relevant to your business.
ADD HAZMAT, ENVIRONMENTAL, & HR RESOURCES
Unlock exclusive content offering expert insights into hazmat, environmental, and human resources compliance with a COMPLIANCE NETWORK EDGE membership.
DIRECT ACCESS TO COMPLIANCE EXPERTS
Struggling with a compliance challenge? Get the solution from our in-house team of experts! You can submit a question to our experts by email, set up a phone or video call, or request a detailed research report.
EVENTS
Register to attend live online events hosted by our experts. These webcasts and virtual conferences feature engaging discussions on important compliance topics in a casual, knowledge-sharing environment.
Most Recent Highlights In Environmental
NewsEnforcement and Audits - OSHAWaste/HazWasteSafety and Health Programs and TrainingOil RefineriesVideoMonthly Roundup VideoWalking Working SurfacesMiningGrain HandlingFocus Four HazardsUSALaddersEnglishAir ProgramsIndustry NewsEnforcement and Audits - OSHASafety & HealthConstruction SafetyGeneral Industry SafetyWasteSpecialized IndustriesEnvironmentalAir QualityFocus AreaMine SafetyAir ProgramsWaste Reporting
EHS Monthly Round Up - March 2025
In this March 2025 roundup video, we'll review the most impactful environmental health and safety news.
Hi everyone! Welcome to the monthly news roundup video, where we’ll review the most impactful environmental health and safety news. Let’s get started!
Ladders were the cause of over 22,000 workplace injuries and 161 deaths in 2020. Each March, the American Ladder Institute promotes ladder safety awareness with the goal of reducing ladder-related injuries and fatalities. Every Step Matters was the theme of this year’s National Ladder Safety Month.
Stand Up 4 Grain Safety Week kicked off on March 24. This annual event brings attention to preventable grain handling hazards and promotes safety in this high-hazard industry.
Federal agencies must review their regulations and report back to the White House by April 20. The priority is on “significant” rules, generally considered to be those with an annual effect on the economy of 100 million dollars or more. Once the regulations have been identified, the Office of Management and Budget and the Department of Government Efficiency will work with agency leaders to create a plan for rescinding or modifying the regulations and begin winding down their enforcement.
A highwall fatality at a surface mine prompted the Mine Safety and Health Administration to issue a safety alert. It outlines what miners should do to prevent similar incidents, including looking for hazards such as loose rocks and overhangs before beginning work.
The American Society of Safety Professionals revised its construction training standard. It outlines training requirements for new hires in construction and demolition operations, site procedures, regulatory compliance, and more.
And finally, turning to environmental news, EPA will reconsider a number of major rulemakings that may impact a variety of industries. This is in response to an executive order that federal agencies review their regulations. Among the rules under consideration include those related to clean power, oil and gas emission limits, greenhouse gas reporting, and risk management.
EPA’s Waste Emissions Charge on petroleum and natural gas facilities with high methane emissions is no longer in effect. The rule initially took effect in January and was then disapproved by Congress on March 14.
Thanks for tuning in to the monthly news roundup. We’ll see you next month!
NewsIndustry NewsWaste ManifestsWaste/HazWasteWasteEnvironmental Protection Agency (EPA)EnvironmentalIn-Depth ArticleEnglishFocus AreaUSA
2025-04-04T05:00:00Z
Hazardous waste manifest errors? Follow RCRA’s correction process
Hazardous waste manifests are like travel logs. They track the entire journey of regulated hazardous waste, from the starting point (the generator’s facility) to the final destination (the off-site waste management facility). Like travel logs, a manifest is only as accurate as the information provided. Thankfully, you can correct manifest errors.
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) finalized the Third Rule under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), which took effect in January 2025. It made noteworthy changes to the manifest corrections process. Here’s what hazardous waste generators, transporters, and treatment, storage, and disposal facilities (TSDFs) need to know.
Who’s impacted?
The Third Rule impacts entities subject to RCRA’s manifest regulations. This article focuses on the manifest correction rules that apply to these waste handlers:
- Small and large quantity generators,
- Transporters, and
- TSDFs.
Note that the final rule amends post-manifest correction regulations for other entities, such as exporters, that are beyond the scope of this article.
What are the Third Rule changes?
EPA’s final rule maintains most of the post-receipt manifest data corrections process.
What’s the same?
Specifically:
- Any waste handler named on the manifest may voluntarily submit data corrections at any time,
- Waste handlers can make an unlimited number of voluntary corrections,
- Corrections may be applied to an individual record or batch of them, and
- Submissions must include a signature that's compliant with the Cross-Media Electronic Reporting Rule (CROMERR).
What’s different?
Previously, when EPA or a state regulatory agency requested corrections to data on a manifest, waste handlers weren’t required to make them. The Third Rule now mandates that waste handlers:
- Correct errors on the manifest within 30 days of a corrections request from EPA or a state agency, and
- Make data correction submissions electronically for paper or electronic manifest records.
Post-receipt corrections are made via the Hazardous Waste Electronic Manifest System (e-Manifest) on the RCRA Information (RCRAInfo) system.
The Third Rule also clarifies that receiving facilities (TSDFs) can make corrections only after the manifest is completed (i.e., signed and submitted to the e-Manifest system).
What’s the post-receipt manifest correction process?
Waste handlers submitting voluntary or mandatory post-receipt corrections to hazardous waste manifests must follow the process established at 40 CFR 264.71(l).
Follow this general process on the e-Manifest System:
- Certify that the manifest is complete. It must have the status “Signed-Completed."
- Determine how to submit the corrected data to the e-Manifest system. You can enter the data directly into e-Manifest or upload a file with data corrections to the system.
- Include for each correction submission:
- The Manifest Tracking Number and date received by the facility associated with the data being corrected,
- The Item Number(s) of the affected data fields on the manifest form (EPA Form 8700-22), and
- The previously entered and corrected data.
- Save your corrections. The manifest’s status will change to “Under Correction."
- Re-sign the manifest to certify the corrections. The manifest’s status will change to “Corrected."
Manifest correction FAQs
Check out some top questions and answers about post-receipt manifest corrections.
What manifest information can I correct?
The type of waste handler your facility is considered determines which items on the manifest you can change for voluntary corrections or must change for mandatory corrections. Typically:
- Generators correct data in Items 1–15;
- Transporters correct data in Items 6–7, 14, and 17; and
- TSDFs correct data in Items 14 and 18–20.
What user role do I need on RCRAInfo to submit manifest corrections?
You must be registered in RCRAInfo as a user with the e-Manifest Certifier or Site Manager role for the facility’s site to submit manifest corrections.
What’s the CROMERR certification?
EPA requires manifest correction submitters to use a CROMERR-compliant electronic signature, which requires a higher level of identity proofing than the Quick Sign signature.
Can I revert to a previous manifest version?
Once the corrected manifest has been signed, you can’t revert it to a previous version. The e-Manifest system does, however, let you view all versions of the manifest.
Can brokers sign corrected manifests?
Although brokers can initiate a manifest correction for generators, they may not sign a corrected manifest unless they (a) operate at the generator’s facility and (b) can sign the manifest as an offeror of the waste shipment.
Key to remember: EPA’s Third Rule updates the process for making data corrections to RCRA hazardous waste manifests.
NewsHazardous WasteIndustry NewsWaste/HazWasteWasteEnvironmentalIn-Depth ArticleEnglishFocus AreaUSA
2025-04-01T05:00:00Z
The cost of cutting corners: What a toxic fire teaches us about waste management
Are you storing and disposing of hazardous waste correctly or sitting on a disaster? Hazardous waste storage is not just a regulatory headache — it is a time bomb for the environment and your company’s bottom line. A disaster in East London, England, is an ongoing issue for nearby residents that highlights the importance of hazardous waste management and why employers must take it seriously.
What happened?
Originally intended for construction waste disposal, the site eventually turned into a dumping ground for hazardous industrial materials. Investigations found plastics, asbestos, industrial chemicals, and carcinogenic substances illegally dumped, creating an environmental and public health hazard. These materials fuel fires, continuously releasing toxic smoke into the air. Residents have reported respiratory problems, skin irritation, and other health issues while authorities struggle to contain the situation. Even though this incident occurred in London, we can learn plenty of valuable lessons from it. Here’s how employers can take proactive measures to ensure compliance, protect workers, and prevent environmental harm.
1. Implement a robust hazardous waste management plan
A hazardous waste management plan should:
- Include waste classifications (reactive, corrosive, etc.) and an inventory of all hazardous materials used and generated;
- Ensure all storage and handling procedures, including labeling, segregation of incompatible waste, spill prevention, and containment measures, are followed;
- Document all waste accumulation and disposal methods, specifying the storage time limits for waste and the methods used for its disposal, such as incineration, recycling, or third-party handling; and
- Provide information on personal protective equipment (PPE) requirements, emergency contact information, reporting procedures, and an evacuation plan in case of a spill.
2. Train employees on hazardous waste handling
Train personnel on their roles and responsibilities when handling hazardous waste. Training should include:
- Initial and refresher training that complies with the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) and state laws,
- Identifying unsafe practices and reporting potential violations.
3. Conduct routine inspections and audits
- Perform internal audits to ensure compliance with RCRA regulations.
- Schedule third-party audits to identify risks and areas of improvement.
- Create a corrective action plan for any violations or inefficiencies discovered during audits.
4. Use licensed and certified waste disposal services
The primary reason behind illegal waste dumping is financial. We all know it is not cheap to dispose of hazardous waste, but waste generators are responsible for their waste from “cradle to grave.”
- Conduct due diligence to verify disposal methods to prevent third-party illegal dumping.
- Maintain records of manifest, disposal certificate, and compliance documentation.
5. Secure and label waste properly
- Labels should include “hazardous waste” clearly visible on the container, generator information, accumulation start date, proper shipping name, and waste identification.
- Store hazardous waste in compatible containers to prevent leaks or spills.
6. Reduce hazardous waste by using safer alternatives
One of the most effective ways to prevent hazardous waste incidents is to reduce reliance on them in the first place. By switching to safer alternatives, employers can lower their risk of exposure. Industries now offer eco-friendly coatings, adhesives, and cleaning agents that perform well without all the side effects. Safer alternatives also reduce compliance costs by lowering the burdens for hazardous waste disposal.
The disaster in London is a stark reminder of the consequences of negligent hazardous waste management. Businesses that cut corners on waste disposal risk legal penalties and contribute to long-term environmental and public health damage.
Keys to remember: Employers can protect their workforce, comply with regulations, and prevent environmental disasters by adopting proactive waste management strategies.
NewsGreenhouse GasesIndustry NewsIndustry NewsEnvironmental Protection Agency (EPA)Air ProgramsEnvironmentalAir QualityEnglishFocus AreaUSA
2025-03-25T05:00:00Z
Congress disapproves EPA's excess methane fees on oil, gas facilities
A joint Congressional resolution disapproved the 2024 Final Waste Emissions Charge (WEC) Rule on oil and gas facilities with high methane emissions. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) announced that the regulation, which initially took effect on January 17, 2025, is now no longer in effect.
Who’s impacted?
The WEC rule applied to facilities in the Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems category that:
- Report emitting more than 25,000 metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent per year to the Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (or GHGRP),
- Exceed specific waste emissions thresholds, and
- Qualify for no exemptions.
Facilities that were subject to the rule are no longer required to comply (i.e., submit WEC filings by September 2, 2025).
What’s next?
EPA stated it’s “currently evaluating options and obligations for implementing Clean Air Act Section 136(c–g) and will provide additional information to the regulated community at an appropriate time."
Section 136, added by the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022, mandates that EPA implement a methane reduction incentive program for petroleum and natural gas systems, including imposing and collecting a WEC on methane emissions above waste emissions limits.
The disapproval occurred on March 14, 2025, just two days after the agency announced 31 deregulatory actions it plans to take.
Key to remember: EPA’s Waste Emissions Charge on petroleum and natural gas facilities for excess methane is no longer in effect.
NewsWaste/HazWasteWasteWater ProgramsWater QualityWater ProgramsEnglishAir ProgramsIndustry NewsIndustry NewsWasteEnvironmentalAir QualityFocus AreaAir ProgramsUSA
2025-03-19T05:00:00Z
EPA announces major regulatory reviews, overhauls
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) announced on March 12, 2025, that it’s taking 31 actions to advance President Trump’s Day One executive orders and the new “Powering the Great American Comeback” Initiative. The agency’s actions will likely impact environmental regulations across various industries.
Rules under review
EPA will reconsider an assortment of rulemakings, including:
- The Clean Power Plan 2.0 (which sets carbon dioxide emission limits on new gas-fired combustion turbines and emissions guidelines for existing coal, oil, and gas-fired steam generating units),
- Oil and gas emission limits for new and existing sources (40 CFR Part 60 Subparts OOOOb and OOOOc),
- The Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Reporting Program (GHGRP) for petroleum and natural gas systems (Part 98 Subpart W),
- The GHGRP overall (Part 98),
- Mercury Air Toxics Standards for coal- and oil-fired power plants (Part 63 Subpart UUUUU),
- Effluent limitation guidelines (ELGs) for the steam electric power generating industry (Part 423),
- Treated wastewater use and discharge for coal-fired power plants (Part 435 Subpart E),
- The Risk Management Program rule (Part 68),
- Vehicle GHG rules (including the light-, medium-, and heavy-duty vehicle regulations),
- The 2009 Endangerment Finding (relied on for seven federal vehicle rules) and related regulations and actions (Chapter I),
- The Technology Transition Rule for refrigerant systems (Part 84 Subpart B),
- The National Ambient Air Quality Standards for fine particulate matter (Parts 50, 53, and 58),
- The National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (Part 63) for:
- Iron and steel manufacturing,
- Rubber tire manufacturing,
- Synthetic organic chemical manufacturing,
- Commercial sterilizers for medical devices and spices,
- Lime manufacturing,
- Coke ovens,
- Copper smelting, and
- Taconite ore processing.
- The Exceptional Events rulemaking related to allowing prescribed fires within State Implementation Plans (Parts 50–51),
- The Regional Haze Program implementing regulations (51.308), and
- The Good Neighbor Plan (Parts 52, 75, 78, and 97).
The agency will also take other actions, such as:
- Working with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to finalize the definition of “waters of the United States” related to Clean Water Act permits,
- Updating enforcement discretion by revising the National Enforcement and Compliance Initiatives, and
- Prioritizing the coal ash program to expedite state permit reviews and update the coal ash regulations (including amending the Legacy Coal Combustion Residuals Surface Impoundments and CCR Management Units rule).
About EPA’s new initiative
In February 2025, the agency announced the Powering the Great American Comeback Initiative, which outlines EPA’s priorities. The initiative consists of five pillars:
- Clean air, land, and water;
- Restore energy dominance;
- Permitting reforms, cooperative federalism, and cross-agency partnership;
- Make the U.S. the artificial intelligence capital of the world; and
- Protect and bring back American auto jobs.
EPA’s 31 actions will primarily address the first three pillars.
Key to remember: EPA will reconsider major rulemakings that may impact a variety of industries.
Most Recent Highlights In Transportation
NewsProcess Safety ManagementRisk Management ProgramRisk Management ProgramHAZWOPERIn-Depth ArticleEnglishEmergency Planning - OSHAIndustry NewsHAZWOPER Emergency ResponseSafety & HealthConstruction SafetyEmergency Planning (OSHA)General Industry SafetyAgriculture SafetyMaritime SafetyEnvironmentalAir QualityHazardous Materials Safety - OSHAFocus AreaUSA
2025-03-17T05:00:00Z
Lessons from blast: CSB video explores gas detection and emergency plans
Another riveting video is posted by the Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation Board (CSB)! The animated video covers a massive explosion at a Texas machine shop. Two workers and a member of the public were killed. Over 450 neighboring homes/businesses were damaged.
Video supports investigative report
The 14-minute video, “No Detection: Explosion …,” follows a June 2023 investigation report. When the 56-page report came out, CSB Chairperson Steve Owens said, “Our investigation found that [the company] did not have an effective program in place to assess potential hazards in its propylene process and did not have a mechanical integrity program or written operating procedures.”
The incident was compounded by emergency planning failures, says CSB. Owens argued, “This tragic incident was made even worse due to the lack of emergency response training for employees at the facility.”
Deadly incident
CSB explains that a degraded and poorly crimped rubber welding hose disconnected from its fitting inside a coating booth. That prompted a release of propylene, a flammable vapor.
By the time workers arrived at the facility the early morning of January 24, 2020, an explosive concentration of propylene had formed inside the building. As workers entered and turned on the lights, the vapor ignited, triggering an explosion. It:
- Killed two workers,
- Injured two other workers,
- Fatally injured a nearby resident, and
- Damaged hundreds of structures.
The board’s investigation later found that the company had:
- Disconnected gas detectors from a computer control system. This meant the automatic gas detection shutoff system would not alert operators to a leak. It also would not start up exhaust fans or trigger two shutoff valves to stop the flow of propylene.
- Replaced a copper tubing connection with a rubber welding hose. Rubber hose is not recommended for propylene. Oils in the gas can cause a rubber hose to form cracks and lose pliability.
OSHA citations before/after the incident
OSHA cited the company 12 years earlier for failing to inspect gas system equipment for signs of deterioration or leaks. The 2008 OSHA visit was prompted by another explosion of propylene gas.
Following the later 2020 incident, OSHA issued citations for failing to:
- Provide effective training on chemical hazards,
- Prevent explosive concentrations from accumulating,
- Ensure coating equipment was maintained gas-tight, and
- Ensure the manual shutoff valve at the propylene storage tank was closed at the end of each workday.
Safety issues found by CSB
CSB explains that the shop’s propylene amount was below the threshold for OSHA’s Process Safety Management (PSM) standard at 29 CFR 1910.119 or EPA’s Risk Management Plan (RMP) standard at 40 CFR 68. Still, the CSB investigation identified these safety issues:
- PSM — Had the company had an effective PSM program to identify and control hazards, it could have prevented the incident. Suggested PSM program elements included process safety information, process hazard analysis, management of change, mechanical integrity, and operating procedures.
- Emergency planning — The company’s emergency response plan did not address responding to a propylene gas leak. The company also failed to train its workers to recognize or respond to a propylene gas release. Hence, workers did not evacuate from the area after suspecting a propylene leak nor contact responders for help.
Owens concludes that the deadly incident could have been mitigated if the company had implemented an effective PSM system for the hazards of its coating operation. Even if a leak occurred, Owens believes an emergency response plan could have prevented the tragic loss of life.
OSHA chemical emergency preparedness may include an emergency action plan and/or an emergency response plan.
Lessons for industry
To prevent chemical incidents, CSB urges you to:
- Ensure the safety of workers who handle hazardous chemicals (and protect surrounding communities). This is regardless of whether or not the chemicals meet the threshold under PSM and RMP standards.
- Ensure gas detection, alarm, exhaust, and shutdown systems are adequately designed, maintained, inspected, and tested. The idea is to ensure reliability if your facility handles hazardous chemicals.
- Ensure a written emergency response plan is implemented. Also, ensure that it adequately addresses all actions to be taken in a release. Workers too need to be trained in the plan and participate in periodic drills.
Have questions about chemical safety or emergency planning? Pose them to our J. J. Keller® experts! Visit our Expert Help page today! |
CSB videos are recognized
The latest video comes after the board received a “Silver Play Button” award. The CSB’s video channel boasts 364K subscribers and nearly 100 safety videos. The channel has had over 65M combined views since 2007. What’s more, CSB claims that the chemical industry itself and engineering schools use the videos for chemical safety training.
Key to remember
A new CSB video covers the 2020 massive explosion at a Texas machine shop. The board urges you to implement PSM systems even if not required. CSB also presses you to ensure that workers are trained in emergency response plans.
NewsAir QualityIndustry NewsAir EmissionsAir ProgramsEnvironmentalIn-Depth ArticleAir QualityEnglishFocus AreaAir ProgramsUSA
2025-03-14T05:00:00Z
Expert Insights: A case study in particulate matter control
During a recent discussion about the persistent challenges of maintaining air quality standards within heavy industrial operations, one colleague in the field shared about a large Midwestern industrial facility that faced allegations of significant Clean Air Act violations. Our casual lunch meeting turned into a case study on uncontrolled emissions of particulate matter (PM).
Case details
An investigation identified the facility’s clinker cooler and raw mill operations as primary sources of excess PM. Monitoring data revealed the facility consistently exceeded permitted emission limits, suggesting systemic deficiencies in pollution control systems. Further inspection pointed to potential inadequate maintenance and operation of existing baghouse filters, a critical technology for capturing airborne particles. The facility also appeared to struggle with fugitive dust emissions from material handling and storage areas, indicating a need for improved dust suppression measures.
Proactive management
The case clarifies the importance of rigorous, proactive environmental management within heavy industrial operations. To prevent similar violations, facilities should prioritize comprehensive monitoring and reporting. Continuous emission monitoring systems provide real-time data, enabling early detection of deviations from permitted limits. Regular inspections and preventative maintenance of pollution control equipment are essential. This includes ensuring baghouse filters operate within their design parameters and promptly replacing damaged or worn components.
Additionally, robust fugitive dust control plans are vital. They should address all potential sources of fugitive dust, encompassing material handling, storage, and transport. Implementing strategies such as water spraying, enclosure of conveyors, and optimized material stockpiling can significantly reduce emissions.
Beyond technology
Beyond technology, a strong environmental compliance culture is crucial. It involves employee training on environmental regulations, operational procedures, and the importance of adhering to pollution control measures. Regular audits and internal assessments can help identify potential weaknesses and ensure ongoing compliance.
Industrial facilities can minimize their environmental impact and avoid costly enforcement actions by focusing on:
- Proactive monitoring,
- Rigorous maintenance, and
- A strong compliance culture.
NewsEnforcement and Audits - OSHAWhistleblower RetaliationToxic Substances Control Act - EPAToxic Substance ControlPersonal Protective EquipmentWhistleblower Protection ProgramVideoMonthly Roundup VideoEnglishOSHA Violations and PenaltiesIndustry NewsSafety & HealthToxic Substances - EPAGeneral Industry SafetyHearing ProtectionEnvironmentalFocus AreaUSA
EHS Monthly Round Up - February 2025
In this February 2025 roundup video, we'll review the most impactful environmental health and safety news.
Hi everyone! Welcome to the monthly news roundup video, where we’ll review the most impactful environmental health and safety news. There’s a lot going on, so let’s get started!
Under a new Executive Order, federal agencies must eliminate 10 regulations for each new one they introduce. This applies to all new rules, regulations, or guidance issued by government agencies such as the Department of Labor, which includes OSHA, and the Environmental Protection Agency.
A new OSHA fact sheet outlines employee rights and protections when filing a whistleblower complaint. Employers may not retaliate against employees who exercise their rights under the Occupational Safety and Health Act.
OSHA will not cite employers for COVID-19 recordkeeping violations under its Healthcare Emergency Temporary Standard. These regulations are specific to healthcare settings. The provisions remain in effect, but until further notice, OSHA will not enforce them.
New guidance from the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health recommends that employers use individual, quantitative fit-testing for hearing protection. This helps evaluate how well workers’ hearing protection reduces noise levels and ensures a proper fit.
And finally, turning to environmental news, states across the country continue to consider and implement regulations related to PFAS. These “forever chemicals” are long-lasting chemicals that may pose risks to human and environmental health. A recent study anticipates that more than half of the states in the U.S. are likely to consider PFAS-related policies this year.
Thanks for tuning in to the monthly news roundup. We’ll see you next month!
NewsIndustry NewsToxic Substances Control Act - EPAToxic Subtances Control Act - EPAToxic Substance ControlToxic Substances - EPAEnvironmental Protection Agency (EPA)EnvironmentalIn-Depth ArticleEnglishFocus AreaUSA
2025-03-03T06:00:00Z
Ready, set, report! Prepare for EPA’s one-time PFAS report
A group of substances called “forever chemicals” lasts long in the environment, but the submission period for its one-time reporting requirement doesn’t. And it starts in just a few months. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) requires covered entities to report data about per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) they manufactured between 2011 and 2022.
Required by Section 8(a)(7) of the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA), the report covers PFAS production volumes, disposal, exposures, and hazards. The submission period opens on July 11, 2025. Here are answers to five common questions about the TSCA Section 8(a)(7) report.
Who must report?
The TSCA Section 8(a)(7) reporting requirements apply to any person who manufactured (including imported) a PFAS or PFAS-containing article between January 1, 2011, and December 31, 2022, for commercial purposes.
EPA defines terms for this reporting requirement at 40 CFR 705.3.
One vital thing to note is that the TSCA Section 8(a)(7) reporting requirement allows for no exemptions. The rule even covers PFAS manufactured as a byproduct, impurity, or non-isolated intermediate. The only activity that doesn’t require reporting is importing municipal solid waste streams to dispose of or destroy the waste.
What data does the report cover?
The information required depends on whether you use the standard or streamlined TSCA Section 8(a)(7) reporting form.
The standard form contains:
- Company and plant site information;
- Chemical-specific information (such as chemical identities);
- Categories of use;
- Total amounts manufactured in each year for each category of use;
- Byproducts from PFAS manufacturing, processing, use, or disposal;
- Existing environmental and health effect information;
- Worker exposure data (including duration); and
- Disposal methods or processes used (and any changes to them).
The streamlined form requires less information than the standard form. Two types of reporters qualify to use streamlined reporting:
- Importers of PFAS-containing articles, and
- Manufacturers of less than 10 kilograms of PFAS used solely for research and development (R&D).
Importers may choose to use the streamlined “PFAS in Imported Article” form. If you imported a PFAS-containing article and manufactured (including imported) the same PFAS (not in an article), you can either:
- Report the imported article on the streamlined form and manufactured PFAS on the standard form, or
- Report both the imported article and manufactured PFAS on the standard form.
Manufacturers of qualifying R&D PFAS can use the “Research & Development PFAS” form. However, you cannot use the streamlined form if you manufactured a PFAS in small quantities for R&D and otherwise manufactured (including imported) the same PFAS.
When is the report due?
For most manufacturers, the TSCA Section 8(a)(7) report submission period runs from July 11, 2025, to January 22, 2026. Small manufacturers who solely imported PFAS-containing articles have a longer submission period, from July 11, 2025, to July 11, 2026.
Where do I submit the report?
Reports must be submitted electronically through EPA’s Central Data Exchange (CDX). Go to the Chemical Information Submission System and choose the “TSCA Section 8(a)(7)” application.
Note that you must have a registered account on EPA’s CDX to submit the report, and the facility for which you’re submitting the report must also be registered on the platform.
Why is the Section 8(a)(7) report required?
TSCA Section 8(a)(7), as amended by the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020, required EPA to develop a rule to gather data about PFAS from entities that manufacture or have manufactured PFAS and PFAS-containing articles. The agency finalized the rule in October 2023 for this one-time reporting requirement.
The TSCA Section 8(a)(7) PFAS reports will give EPA a more complete picture of PFAS manufactured in the U.S. The agency will use the data to further its understanding of the forever chemicals and inform future regulatory actions.
Key to remember: The submission period for the one-time PFAS reporting requirement opens July 11, 2025. It applies to anyone who manufactured (including imported) PFAS or PFAS-containing articles between 2011 and 2022.
NewsIndustry NewsWaste/HazWasteSafety & HealthConstruction SafetyGeneral Industry SafetyWasteEnvironmentalWater QualityIn-Depth ArticleUsed OilEnglishFocus AreaUSA
2025-03-03T06:00:00Z
Used oil disposal: How to stay compliant with EPA, OSHA, and your state
Used oil disposal is a critical issue for safety managers and shop supervisors in industrial settings. Whether your facility generates used oil from machinery, vehicles, or hydraulic systems, you must understand the regulatory requirements to ensure compliance and avoid hefty fines.
Used oil is not always considered hazardous waste, but improper handling, storage, or disposal can lead to regulatory violations and environmental hazards. Understanding how used oil is classified, when it is considered hazardous, and how to manage it in compliance with 40 CFR Part 279 is essential.
Let’s uncover the regulatory framework for used oil disposal, including storage requirements, transportation rules, and best practices to ensure compliance at both the federal and state levels.
What is used oil?
The EPA defines used oil as any petroleum-based or synthetic oil that has been used and is contaminated by physical or chemical impurities. Common sources of used oil in industrial operations include:
- Motor oil and lubricants from vehicle maintenance
- Hydraulic fluids used in heavy machinery
- Metalworking fluids and coolants
- Compressor oils used in air compression systems
According to EPA regulations (40 CFR Part 279), used oil is presumed to be managed under the less stringent used oil management standards unless it meets hazardous waste criteria.
Used oil becomes hazardous waste if:
- It is mixed with hazardous waste (e.g., solvents or heavy metals)
- It contains more than 1,000 parts per million (ppm) of total halogens, unless proven otherwise, or
- It is disposed of improperly, leading to environmental contamination.
If used oil is classified as hazardous waste, it must be managed in accordance with the applicable solid and hazardous waste requirements.
EPA requirements for used oil disposal
The EPA requirements for used oil consist of three different aspects, as outlined below.
1. Storage Requirements
Use leak-proof tanks and containers made of durable, non-earthen materials (e.g., steel, plastic, or concrete). Label all used oil containers with the words "Used Oil" to prevent misidentification. Prevent leaks and spills by using secondary containment systems and regularly inspecting tanks. Never mix used oil with hazardous waste unless authorized.
2. Transportation and Disposal
Used oil generators may transport up to 55 gallons of used oil to a registered collection center without an EPA ID number. If contracting a used oil transporter, ensure they have an EPA Identification Number.
Used oil must be:
- Recycled or re-refined into new oil.
- Burned for energy recovery in approved furnaces or boilers.
- Disposed of at an authorized hazardous waste facility if deemed hazardous.
3. Spill Prevention and Cleanup
Facilities storing large amounts of used oil must have a Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasure (SPCC) Plan. SPCC plans establish procedures, methods, and equipment requirements to prevent oil from reaching waterways, and to contain discharges of oil.
Any spills must be cleaned up immediately, and absorbent materials must be disposed of properly. Rags and shop towels contaminated with hazardous materials may be classified as hazardous waste.
OSHA regulations for handling used oil
While the EPA focuses on environmental compliance, OSHA (29 CFR Part 1910) regulates worker safety when handling used oil. Key OSHA requirements include:
1. Personal Protective Equipment (PPE)
Workers handling used oil must wear gloves and protective clothing to prevent skin exposure. Safety goggles or face shields are also important to avoid eye contact.
2. Hazard communication (HazCom) program
Employers must label all used oil containers with appropriate hazard information and train employees on safe handling procedures and emergency response.
3. Fire and Explosion Safety
Always store used oil away from ignition sources to prevent fire hazards. Ensure storage areas are ventilated to avoid vapor buildup.
State-Specific used oil disposal regulations
Many states have stricter used oil regulations than federal laws. For example:
- California classifies used oil as hazardous waste unless it meets specific recycling criteria.
- Texas requires additional storage permits for large generators.
- New York mandates annual reporting on used oil disposal activities.
To ensure compliance, check with your state’s environmental agency for state-specific used oil disposal rules and whether used oil is considered hazardous. Additional permits for transporting or processing used oil may be necessary.
Staying compliant with used oil disposal requirements
Ensuring compliance with EPA, OSHA, and state laws is essential for safety managers and shop supervisors handling used oil. By following proper storage, transportation, and disposal practices, businesses can reduce environmental risks, improve workplace safety, and avoid costly fines.
Key to remember: By staying informed and proactive, your facility can maintain safe, sustainable, and compliant used oil management practices.
Most Recent Highlights In Safety & Health
NewsCERCLA, SARA, EPCRAMaterials Handling and StoragePersonal Protective EquipmentFire Protection and PreventionIn-Depth ArticleEnglishStorage RacksEmergency Planning - OSHAIndustry NewsEmergency Release PlanningSafety & HealthEmergency PreparednessConstruction SafetyGeneral Industry SafetyAgriculture SafetyMaritime SafetyEnvironmentalFire Protection and PreventionSARA ComplianceFocus AreaUSA
2025-02-26T06:00:00Z
NFPA sounds alarm: Warehouse firefighting challenges racking up
You might argue that warehouses have always posed challenges to fire service crews. However, today’s warehouses are pushing the boundaries on what firefighters can handle. Modern warehouses have far more square feet, sky-high storage racks, and compacted arrangements making it tougher for crews to reach a fire quickly. Commodities with lithium-ion batteries add another danger layer in a fire. Plus, robots can get in the way.
To sort this out, the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) released back-to-back reports and a podcast that give warehouse owners/operators and fire crews a lot to think about:
- The first report explores where the fire service is experiencing challenges when responding to warehouse fires,
- The second report breaks down the data on warehouse fires in the last five years, and
- The podcast shares an interview with veterans in the field of fire protection.
Big takeaway
Over 1,500 warehouse fires happen annually on average, NFPA estimates. That means warehouse fires are not rare. The first time that fire crews lay eyes on your warehouse should not be when there’s a roaring fire there in the middle of the night.
Ideally, fire service members should be involved before a warehouse is built. That way, things like water supplies and crew access can be part of the drawing board. If your warehouse is already in operation, it’s still critical for fire services to check out your warehouse. They can get familiar with your warehouse configuration, its fire suppression systems, and its stored commodities.
While the two reports detail challenges and trends for warehouse fires, one overarching takeaway prevails — pre-planning between the warehouse owner/operator and the fire service is a must. The concept is covered in the podcast too. Pre-incident planning inevitably helps fire crews to efficiently control and suppress an actual fire. It also informs the owner/operator about fire crew capabilities for the site.
OSHA’s Emergency Action Plan standard calls for covered employers to implement a plan to protect employees during fire emergencies. This requirement is found at 29 CFR 1910.38, 1915.502, 1917.30, 1918.100, and 1926.35, depending on your industry. However, the pre-incident planning that NFPA is talking about is pre-planning WITH the fire department so that there are better outcomes for people and property, in the event of a fire.
Identifying challenges
The 125-page NFPA report, “Identifying Challenges to Fire Service Response in Storage Facilities,” emphasizes that warehouses are evolving to meet greater demand. The report:
- Flags 16 challenges that dog fire services in warehouse fires,
- Lists almost 250 articles and publications on fighting warehouse fires,
- Identifies over 20 gaps in knowledge related to warehouse firefighting,
- Makes a nine-category research plan, and
- Offers 12 recommendations.
One recommendation suggests that future study needs to focus on ways fire departments can improve communication with warehouse owners/operators about pre-planning. The idea is that more communication should happen not only for existing warehouses but before constructing them. It’s also vital when warehouses are about to experience a change. Similarly, fire departments and warehouse owners/operators need to work out how employees will be head counted during a fire incident.
Five years of warehouse fires
Another NFPA report, “Warehouse Structure Fires,” chronicles thousands of warehouse fires that happened between 2018 to 2022. In some cases, the 8-page report reflects on fires going back to 1980. It offers 13 charts that cover the:
- Number of warehouse fires,
- Property damage from warehouse fires,
- Warehouse structure status,
- Day of the week the fire occurred,
- Month the fire occurred,
- Time of day the fire occurred,
- Equipment involved in the fire ignition,
- Cause of ignition,
- Contributing factor to ignition,
- Heat source,
- Origin of the fire,
- First item to be ignited, and
- First material to be ignited.
The report concludes that four components are essential to protecting warehouses from fire: proper sprinkler systems, automatic alarms, pre-fire inspections, and pre-planning.
Take it from the pros
Finally, NFPA sat down with two fire protection professionals for 42 minutes to talk about “Big Storage, Bigger Questions.” The podcast sunk its teeth into some of the deeper concepts found in the new “Identifying Challenges” report, including:
- Automatic storage and retrieval systems,
- Unlimited area buildings,
- Tall racking systems,
- Pre-incident planning,
- Firefighting in rural areas,
- Communications between fire departments and warehouse owners/operators,
- Management of change and changing commodities,
- In-rack sprinklers,
- Standpipe systems,
- Limited air supply for respirators, and
- Adopting fire standards.
Again, pre-planning was reiterated. The pros explained that warehouses have many variables, so getting crews into these facilities before any fire happens is important for better outcomes if a fire were to occur.
Key to remember
NFPA released two reports and a podcast related to the challenges of combating warehouse fires and the history of fires in U.S. warehouses. Pre-planning is an overarching theme in all three.
NewsWaste/HazWastePersonal Protective EquipmentBloodborne Pathogens Prevention and ControlIn-Depth ArticleEnglishIndustry NewsSafety & HealthGeneral Industry SafetyWasteMedical WasteHand ProtectionEnvironmentalBloodborne PathogensFocus AreaUSA
2025-02-19T06:00:00Z
Needlestick jabs: Law enforcement officers at risk too
When you think of workers getting stuck by a contaminated needlestick, you think of healthcare. Right? Well, a recent NIOSH fact sheet argues that you also need to picture law enforcement officers. That’s because they’re at risk of these incidents when they search people, property, vehicles, or homes!
Syringes and needles are not the only sharps to worry about, however. Other sharps include lancets, scalpels, and auto-injectors. The thing is, contaminated needlesticks/sharps injuries can infect officers with viruses. These include hepatitis B virus (HBV), hepatitis C virus (HCV), HIV, and others.
Is it reasonably anticipated that your law enforcement officers will have contact with blood or other potentially infectious materials (OPIM) as part of their jobs? If so, they have what OSHA calls “occupational exposure.” That includes reasonably anticipated incidents involving contaminated needlesticks or other contaminated sharps as part of the duties of an officer, the subject of the latest fact sheet.
Does OSHA’s BBP standard cover law enforcement?
That's a trick question! The Occupational Safety and Health Act (OSH Act) only covers the private sector. There’s a gap in coverage for the public sector workers like law enforcement officers employed by a municipality or state agency. That means federal OSHA does not regulate the Bloodborne Pathogens (BBP) standard at 29 CFR 1910.1030 for these officers.
However, many states have filled that gap in one of two ways:
- About half the states are considered OSHA “state-plan” states. That means they must be equivalent to or more stringent than federal OSHA for the public sector OR both the public and private sectors. These state-plan states have regulations identical to, similar to, or tougher than the federal Bloodborne Pathogens standard.
- Some of the remaining non-state-plan states proactively filled the gap for the public sector. They adopted OSHA regulations like 1910.1030 under state laws and regulations, or otherwise created their own worker safety and health laws and regulations related to hazards like bloodborne pathogens.
If your state has bloodborne pathogens laws and regulations, it’s important to meet them if you have officers (or any workers) with occupational exposure. Note that occupational exposure is not the same thing as an exposure incident. An exposure incident is actual contact with blood or OPIM. Whereas occupational exposure is reasonably anticipated contact as part of the job duties.
NIOSH offers guidance for law enforcement
Regardless whether your officers are protected by bloodborne pathogens laws and regulations, NIOSH’s fact sheet (DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 2025-101) provides tips and best practices specific to the risks to law enforcement. For example, NIOSH suggests that officers complete training on:
- Search techniques,
- Evidence collection methods,
- Use and removal of personal protective equipment (PPE), and
- Reporting work injuries and illnesses.
Some ways officers can keep safe include, but are not limited to:
- Getting HBV vaccination,
- Wearing gloves while performing searches, and considering gloves with puncture resistance (such as those that meet ASTM Standard F2878-19),
- Asking a suspect if they have any sharp objects BEFORE making a search,
- Using mirrors and flashlights to search under or in the crevices of furniture, and
- Reporting sharps hazards and near misses.
When handling sharps, NIOSH recommends:
- Not handing needles/sharps to other officers,
- Never recapping needles or taking syringes apart,
- Using FDA-cleared sharps containers that meet sharps container requirements at 1910.1030(d)(4),
- Replacing sharps containers when they reach the “full” line of the containers, and
- Disposing sharps containers per your state environmental waste laws and regulations.
If an officer suffers an exposure incident involving a contaminated needlestick/sharp, the fact sheet urges the officer to:
- Wash the injured area with soap and water, and
- Follow your law enforcement department’s plan for what to do (e.g., report injuries according to plan) and where to seek treatment.
Treatment should be sought from a healthcare provider immediately. That provider may offer medication or a vaccine to prevent infection.
Earlier NIOSH guidance
The latest fact sheet comes on the heels of an 8-page guidance document from NIOSH — DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 2022-154. Learn more about that in our J. J. Keller® Compliance Network article, “NIOSH report points at sharps injuries in law enforcement,” from September 7, 2022.
Key to remember
A recent NIOSH fact sheet argues that law enforcement officers who do searches are at risk of needlestick/sharps incidents! The agency offers tips about how to stay safe and how to handle and dispose of sharps safely. It also explains what to do if there’s an exposure incident.
NewsHazardous WasteCERCLA, SARA, EPCRAWaste/HazWasteToxic Substance ControlToxic Substances Control Act - EPAToxics Release Inventory ReportingToxic Subtances Control Act - EPAWater ProgramsWater QualityIn-Depth ArticleWater ProgramsEnglishAir ProgramsIndustry NewsToxic Substances - EPAWasteEnvironmentalAir QualityFocus AreaAir ProgramsUSA
2025-02-19T06:00:00Z
The regulatory state of PFAS: Stay alert to state rules
Over the past few years, federal environmental regulations have targeted a specific group of chemicals: per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS). However, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) isn’t the only entity taking action to control PFAS; state agencies are too. A recent study anticipates that more than half of the states in the U.S. are likely to consider PFAS-related policies in 2025.
So, how should businesses respond? Stay alert to the PFAS regulations at the state level.
What are PFAS?
PFAS, called “forever chemicals,” are long-lasting manufactured chemicals that may pose risks to human and environmental health. With thousands of PFAS chemicals, however, controlling their use to reduce the risks is no easy task.
Additionally, PFAS appear in nearly every sector. They’re used in a wide range of products (like food packaging, cleaning products, and textiles) and for commercial and industrial applications.
Prepare for more state PFAS rules
Safer States, an alliance of environmental organizations that supports developing state regulatory policies for toxic chemicals, published the 2025 Analysis of State Policy Addressing Toxic Chemicals and Plastics. The evaluation covered states’ toxic chemical policies (a) introduced in 2025, (b) introduced in 2024 and considered through 2025, and (c) expected to be introduced in 2025. It also included related proposed regulations that would implement existing state laws.
The report projects that at least 29 states will likely consider policies to address PFAS in 2025, including:
|
|
|
Safer States expects these states to consider policies such as:
- Phasing out PFAS uses;
- Disclosing to consumers the presence of PFAS in products;
- Testing and monitoring for PFAS in water, sludge, and waste;
- Setting PFAS standards for drinking water, groundwater, and surface water; and
- Providing resources to clean up PFAS-contaminated sites.
Current state PFAS actions
Multiple states already have PFAS rules on the books. Check out these examples:
- California bans selling or distributing in commerce any new juvenile product that contains regulated PFAS chemicals (CA HSC Section 108946), such as changing pads, motor vehicle child restraint systems, playpens, and strollers.
- New York forbids selling or offering for sale new apparel with intentionally added PFAS (N.Y. Consolidated Laws Section 37-0121).
- Hawaii prohibits manufacturing, selling, offering for sale, and distributing for sale or use food packaging — wraps, liners, plates, food boats, and pizza boxes — with intentionally added PFAS (Act 152 Relating to environmental protection).
- Maryland bans manufacturing, selling, and delivering cosmetic products that contain any of 13 specified PFAS (Md. Code, Health-Gen. Section 21-259.2).
- Colorado requires manufacturers of cookware with intentionally added PFAS in the handle or any product surface that contacts food to, among other things, list the presence of PFAS on the product label (House Bill 22-1345).
Many states also have proposed PFAS rules under consideration, like Texas, Maine, Arizona, Illinois, and Virginia.
Stay alert to state PFAS actions
If your facility uses PFAS, it’s essential to know whether the state has regulations that apply to your operations. Plus, knowing the state’s potential future PFAS rules coming down the pipeline can help you better prepare to comply.
Consider these general tips to support your facility’s efforts to track state PFAS actions:
- EPA provides an online list of the state environmental agencies with links to their websites. Check the state environmental agency’s online news and press releases for policy updates.
- Search for a dedicated rulemaking webpage, as many states maintain a list of proposed and recently adopted regulations. Note that some state sites may be easier to navigate than others, and some state sites may not have a dedicated rulemaking webpage.
- Establish a contact at the state environmental agency. Each agency should list contact information, so don’t hesitate to reach out. You may be able to find someone at the agency who can answer questions about the state’s current and future PFAS rules.
Staying alert to state PFAS regulations can help your organization maintain compliance.
Key to remember: States across the country continue to consider and implement regulations related to PFAS. Staying alert to state PFAS actions is key for businesses to stay compliant.
NewsHazardous WasteEnforcement and Audits - OSHAWaste/HazWasteToxic Substance ControlToxic Substances Control Act - EPAToxic Subtances Control Act - EPAElectronic Reporting of Injury and Illness RecordsMonthly Roundup VideoUSAInjury and Illness RecordkeepingEnglishOSHA Violations and PenaltiesIndustry NewsCrystalline SilicaWaste HandlersSafety & HealthGeneral Industry SafetyWasteWaste TransportersEnvironmentalAir QualityFocus AreaToxic and Hazardous Substances - OSHAVideo
EHS Monthly Round Up - January 2025
In this January 2025 monthly roundup video, we'll review the most impactful environmental health and safety news.
Hi everyone! Welcome to the monthly news roundup video, where we’ll review the most impactful environmental health and safety news. There’s a lot going on, so let’s get started!
As happens at the start of most incoming presidential administrations, a freeze has been placed on all regulatory activity at the federal level, giving the new administration time to review agencies’ plans. The Office of Management and Budget, which must approve most rulemaking activities, has sent numerous pending rules back to the agencies for review. In addition, OSHA withdrew its infectious diseases proposed rule and its COVID-19 in healthcare rule prior to the inauguration.
OSHA’s penalties increased on January 15. The maximum penalty amounts for serious and other-than-serious violations increased to $16,550. For willful or repeated violations, the maximum penalty increased to $165,514 per violation.
OSHA updated its directive on injury and illness recordkeeping policies and procedures. While it’s intended for OSHA compliance officers, employers can use the information to help with recordkeeping compliance.
Fewer workers died on the job in 2023, as fatal work injuries decreased 3.7 percent from 2022. Transportation incidents remained the most frequent type of fatal event, accounting for over 36 percent of all occupational fatalities.
California’s Occupational Safety and Health Standards Board voted to adopt a permanent silica standard. If approved, it would extend and strengthen the state’s emergency temporary standard, which was put in place in December 2023.
The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health updated its List of Hazardous Drugs in Healthcare Settings. This is a resource for employers and employees in identifying drugs that are hazardous to the health and safety of those who handle them.
Turning to environmental news, EPA released the biannual update of the nonconfidential TSCA inventory. The inventory helps facilities determine their regulatory requirements for the chemicals they use or plan to use.
And finally, EPA added new Management Method Codes to describe how hazardous waste will be managed after temporary storage and transfer. As of January 1st, hazardous waste handlers must use the codes on the Biennial Report Waste Generation and Management forms.
Thanks for tuning in to the monthly news roundup. We’ll see you next month!
NewsIndustry NewsWater PermittingWater ProgramsEnvironmental Protection Agency (EPA)Industrial WastewaterEnvironmentalIn-Depth ArticleWater QualityStormwaterEnglishFocus AreaUSA
2025-02-04T06:00:00Z
Industrial stormwater vs. wastewater discharge permits
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) controls the amount of pollutants that reach the waters of the United States through the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit program. The NPDES program covers two types of discharges from industrial sources:
- Stormwater discharges, and
- Wastewater discharges.
Although they’re under the same federal permitting program, stormwater and wastewater discharges are distinct, and their permits are too. Know the basic differences between these types of industrial discharges to ensure your facility complies.
Stormwater discharges
Rain and snow that flow over land or impervious surfaces (like building rooftops and parking lots) and don’t soak into the ground generate stormwater runoff. The runoff can gather pollutants generated by industrial activities at a facility and transport them into nearby waterbodies. Your facility must have a permit to discharge stormwater associated with industrial activities to waters of the United States (40 CFR 122.26).
The NPDES program regulates stormwater discharges from 11 categories of industrial activities, listed at 122.26(b)(14). Examples of covered activities include:
- Heavy manufacturing at chemical plants;
- Treating, storing, and disposing of hazardous waste; and
- Processing industrial wastes at landfills.
Note, however, that construction sites that disturb 5 or more acres (the tenth category) are permitted individually.
The permit contains stormwater control measures (including “best management practices”) to limit pollutants that enter stormwater runoff. Containment systems, employee training, and infiltration devices are all ways to control runoff.
Most states issue industrial stormwater discharge permits. EPA issues individual permits and the Multi-Sector General Permits (MSGPs) to facilities where the agency is the permitting authority. The MSGP is EPA’s general permit for industrial stormwater discharges.
Wastewater discharges
Many industrial processes use or generate water that contains pollutants, referred to as industrial wastewater. There are two types of wastewater:
- Process wastewater (defined at 122.2) refers to water used in manufacturing or processing activities.
- Non-process wastewater refers to water used for activities other than processing products (e.g., sanitary wastewater).
Your facility must have a permit to discharge industrial wastewater to surface waters (122.21(a)).
The NPDES program regulates direct wastewater discharges from industrial sources through rules based on the type of facility and activity. The regulations also have industry-specific requirements for:
- Animal Feeding Operations,
- Mining,
- Oil and Gas,
- Pesticide Applications, and
- Vessels Incidental Discharges.
Effluent limitations are the primary control method for industrial wastewater discharges. EPA establishes Effluent Limitations Guidelines (ELGs) for industrial categories and subcategories. These pollution-reduction performance standards are based on the best available technology that’s economically achievable by facilities in the industry. The ELGs are then incorporated into the permits through effluent limitations.
Additionally, industrial facilities must meet water quality-based effluent limitations when the technology-based standards don’t achieve the required water quality standards. Both industrial stormwater and wastewater discharge permits may include technology- and water quality-based effluent limitations.
As with stormwater permits, most states issue industrial wastewater permits. Facilities in areas where EPA is the permitting authority must obtain either a general or individual NPDES permit.
Check your state requirements!
Because a majority of the states run stormwater and wastewater permitting programs, it’s crucial to check the state regulations. State permits must contain limits as stringent as EPA’s federal permits, and some states may impose stricter limits and/or additional requirements.
EPA’s website lists the states authorized to issue NPDES permits with links to the state agencies that run the NPDES program.
Key to remember: Industrial stormwater and wastewater discharges, and the permits that regulate them, are different.
Most Recent Highlights In Human Resources
NewsEnforcement and Audits - OSHAWaste/HazWasteToxic Substance ControlEnvironmental Management SystemsBusiness planning - Motor CarrierEnglishBusiness planning - Motor CarrierEnvironmental Management SystemsIndustry NewsIndustry NewsFederal Motor Carrier Safety RegulationsEnforcement and Audits - OSHASafety & HealthGovernment contractsGeneral Industry SafetyBusiness policies and procedures - Motor CarrierEnvironmentalAir QualityFocus AreaFleet OperationsTransportationUSA
2025-02-03T06:00:00Z
Administration announces 10-for-1 deregulation order
A new executive order from the Trump administration takes aim at government regulations, vowing to remove 10 rules for every new one issued.
The new directive, signed January 31, 2025, will apply to all new “rules, regulations, or guidance” issued by government agencies such as the Department of Transportation, the Department of Labor, and the Environmental Protection Agency.
The order says over-regulation has increased costs and inflation, killed jobs and businesses, reduced choice, discouraged innovation, and infringed on liberties.
Five-fold increase
The move aims to cut much more than a similar “two-for-one” order issued at the start of President Trump’s first stint in the White House in 2017. That order applied only to regulations that would cost $100 million or more.
The White House says the 2017 order was “the most aggressive and successful regulatory reduction effort in history” and eliminated five and one-half regulations for every new one issued.
The new order, according to a White House fact sheet, says that whenever an agency promulgates a new rule, regulation, or guidance, it must identify at least 10 existing rules, regulations, or guidance documents to be repealed.
It will be up to the head of the White House Office of Management and Budget to enforce the order and ensure agencies use a standard measuring stick to verify compliance.
The order also requires that for fiscal year 2025 (which ends September 30), “the total incremental cost of all new regulations, including repealed regulations, be significantly less than zero,” the fact sheet says. The order itself was not available on the White House website when this article was published.
The new executive order comes on the heels of another directive, issued January 20, 2025, that put a freeze on all pending regulations until the new administration has time to review them.
NewsProcess Safety ManagementRisk Management ProgramRisk Management ProgramIn-Depth ArticleEnglishEmergency Planning - OSHAIndustry NewsSafety & HealthWeather and Natural DisastersConstruction SafetyGeneral Industry SafetyAgriculture SafetyMaritime SafetyEnvironmentalAir QualityHazardous Materials Safety - OSHAFocus AreaUSA
2025-01-31T06:00:00Z
CSB unveils eye-opening video, alert, and insider data on chemical incidents
With a backlog of 17 chemical incident investigations in the rearview mirror, the Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation Board (CSB) released three safety-related deliverables — an animated video, a hazard alert, and a compilation of incident summaries. The agency also updated its reporting form.
Expect even more videos and summaries “soon.” That’s the word from CSB Chairperson Steve Owens last week, during the board’s quarterly business meeting. The board also noted that it is forging ahead with nine new investigations. It means we’ll see investigative reports down the line.
‘Fire from the Storm’ video
The CSB’s new 17-minute safety video, "Fire from the Storm," includes a riveting animation of the events leading to a fire and toxic gas release. The incident occurred when Hurricane Laura damaged a chemical storage facility in Louisiana.
Rainwater then reached the chemical storage. The chemical decomposed, producing toxic chlorine gas and a fire. A large plume of chlorine traveled over the community.
The CSB video calls on OSHA and EPA to amend regulations on Process Safety and Risk Management, respectively. Five key safety issues contributing to the incident are covered:
- Extreme weather preparation,
- Process hazard analyses,
- Emergency preparedness and response,
- Adherence to hazardous materials codes, and
- Gaps in regulatory coverage of reactive chemical hazards.
The latest video follows two others issued in October and July. It also aligns with an alert shared last July on hurricane preparedness.
Cold weather alert
Cold weather can crack or break pipes. It can also lead to ruptured or damaged process equipment and/or failing instruments. In December, CSB rang alarm bells over an uptick in chemical incidents during cold weather. The CSB alert listed over a dozen safety steps and links to guidance on cold weather operations.
Process safety management programs are regulated at 29 CFR 1910.119. Per the alert, these programs should consider how low temperatures may affect piping, equipment, and instruments. Equipment susceptible to ice or hydrate formation should also be identified and properly winterized.
Extreme weather dangers are a recurring theme for CSB. Last July, during hurricane season, Owens said, “When it comes to extreme weather, chemical companies should expect the unexpected and must always be prepared for the worst-case scenario.”
Event summaries issued
In a move toward transparency, CSB compiled summaries for 26 of the chemical incident reports it has received. These events summarized in Incident Reports Volume 1 resulted in five fatalities, 17 serious injuries, and about $697M in property damage in 15 states since April 2020.
For over two years the board has posted “overall” data about incidents reported under 40 CFR 1604. That’s the Reporting of Accidental Releases standard. CSB now calls this standard the “Accidental Release Reporting Rule (ARRR).”
For the record, CSB has received 460 reports in the last five years. The reports reveal 68 fatalities and 249 serious injuries/illnesses. Over 200 of these incidents involved property damage of $1M or more.
The overall data reports provide:
- The name and location of the chemical facility,
- The date of the incident, and
- Whether the incident involved a fatality, serious injury, or substantial property damage.
However, the latest Volume 1 also reveals:
- A summary of the event,
- Its probable cause, and
- Images of the involved facility or incident scene.
Owens argued, “The American people have a right to know about the kinds of dangerous chemical incidents that happen across this country every week.”
Reporting form change
It’s worth noting that CSB updated its Accidental Release Reporting Form and Instructions last June. The changes:
- Merge the form and instructions into a single document;
- Make minor formatting and grammar corrections;
- Indicate a fourth reporting method (to call CSB to relay the National Response Center ID number);
- Clarify that only “substantial” property damage information is required; and
- Add a confidential and disclosure statement.
Key to remember
CSB continues to deliver videos, weather-related alerts, and data. The agency has also updated its reporting form and launched an initiative to reveal more incident details on a regular basis. Expect more from the board in 2025, along with any number of investigative reports.
NewsAir EmissionsChange NoticesChange NoticeOregonMobile Emission SourcesEnvironmentalAir QualityFocus AreaEnglishAir ProgramsAir Programs
2025-01-30T06:00:00Z
Oregon incorporates CARB updates, delaying heavy-duty omnibus rule
Effective date: January 1, 2025, to June 29, 2025
This applies to: Public and private fleets purchasing new model year 2025 medium- and heavy-duty vehicles, vehicle dealerships selling new medium- and heavy-duty vehicles with internal combustion or zero-emission engines, vehicle manufacturers selling medium- and heavy-duty vehicles with internal combustion or zero-emission engines, and engine manufacturers selling medium- and heavy-duty vehicle internal combustion engines
Description of change: The temporary rule incorporates additional compliance flexibilities for manufacturers to meet the requirements of the California Air Resource Board’s (CARB’s) Advanced Clean Trucks (ACT) rule, which CARB recently amended. The temporary rule also delays implementation of the Heavy-Duty Omnibus Regulation rules by a year, taking effect with engine model year 2026 and/or vehicle model year 2027 (based on the specific rule section). It also adds more certification options for complete medium-duty zero-emission vehicles.
NewsPesticidesPesticide Registration and LabelingChange NoticesChange NoticeCaliforniaEnvironmentalEnglishFocus AreaPesticides
2025-01-30T06:00:00Z
California shifts pesticide NOIs to electronic submissions
Effective date: February 24, 2025
This applies to: Agricultural use notices of intent (NOIs), soil fumigation NOIs, and restricted material NOIs
Description of change: The rule requires all agricultural use notices of intent (NOIs) must be submitted electronically on CalAgPermits.org unless granted an exemption. It also requires that NOIs for soil fumigation and restricted materials that require a permit to produce an agricultural commodity be electronically submitted on the same website. Finally, the rule requires the Department of Pesticide Regulation to publicize and provide status updates on NOI information it receives.
NewsWaste/HazWasteWaste HandlersWasteChange NoticesChange NoticeWasteWaste TransportersCaliforniaEnvironmentalWaste Collection CentersEnglishFocus Area
2025-01-30T06:00:00Z
California readopts conditional undeployed airbag waste exemption
Effective date: December 5, 2024
This applies to: Airbag waste handlers and collection facilities
Description of change: This emergency readoption adds definitions for “airbag waste,” “airbag waste collection facility,” and “airbag waste handler.” It also gives airbag waste handlers a conditional exemption for transporting airbag waste to the waste collection facility.
View related state info:Solid and hazardous waste - California
New Network Poll
Most Popular Highlights In Environmental
NewsHazmat SafetyIn-Depth ArticleSafety & HealthEnvironmentalTransportationHuman ResourcesWaste/HazWasteSanitationHR ManagementEnglishIndustry NewsFleet SafetyConstruction SafetyGeneral Industry SafetyAgriculture SafetyMaritime SafetySanitationRestroomsHandwashingFleet OperationsMine SafetyFocus AreaUSA
2023-04-06T05:00:00Z
Giving truck drivers rights to your restrooms
OSHA requires employers to provide all workers with immediately available and sanitary restroom or toilet facilities. But does this include truckers and delivery drivers that stop at your facilities? The sanitation standards (1910.141, 1926.51, and 1928.110) are meant to protect all workers from adverse health effects from unsanitary toilets facilities, or the unavailability of facilities when needed.
Proposed legislation
Bipartisan legislation has recently been introduced in the House that would require businesses to provide restroom access to truckers who are loading or delivering cargo at their warehouses, manufacturers, distribution centers, retailers, and ports.
Supported by leading organizations in the trucking industry, the Trucker Bathroom Access Act (H.R. 9592) was introduced on Dec. 15, 2022. The bill requires retailers, warehouses, and other establishments with existing restrooms to provide access to drivers who are loading or delivering cargo. Additionally, operators of ports and marine terminals must provide access for drayage and parking while accessing such restrooms.
This amendment to Title 49 would exempt some employers from the bill including filling and service stations, and restaurants 800-square feet or smaller with restrooms intended for employee use only. The bill doesn’t require employers to construct new restrooms but to give truck drivers the same access as employees or customers.
Your restroom availability affects their health
Commercial truckers and delivery drivers are the lifeline of our supply chain of supplies, products, and consumables. Working tirelessly all hours, during holidays and weekends, and throughout the pandemic, they continue to deliver critical food and emergency supplies to companies everywhere. Employers have the privilege of demonstrating gratitude to truckers and delivery drivers with a positive work environment.
The benefits of allowing truckers and delivery drivers the convenience and safety of readily available, sanitary restroom facilities are plenty. They’re able to rest and reset when necessary, which keeps them and others safer on the roads. Equally important, restroom availability prevents drivers from having to search for available facilities elsewhere, allowing them to keep a timely delivery schedule, limit supply chain delays, and ultimately lower costs for employers and customers.
Keys to remember
The proposed Trucker Bathroom Access Act will require retailers, warehouses, and other establishments with existing restrooms to provide access to truckers and delivery drivers who are loading or delivering cargo. Access to restrooms keeps them refreshed and ready to deliver essential supplies to companies across the country.
NewsEnforcement and Audits - OSHAWaste/HazWasteSafety and Health Programs and TrainingOil RefineriesVideoMonthly Roundup VideoWalking Working SurfacesMiningGrain HandlingFocus Four HazardsUSALaddersEnglishAir ProgramsIndustry NewsEnforcement and Audits - OSHASafety & HealthConstruction SafetyGeneral Industry SafetyWasteSpecialized IndustriesEnvironmentalAir QualityFocus AreaMine SafetyAir ProgramsWaste Reporting
EHS Monthly Round Up - March 2025
In this March 2025 roundup video, we'll review the most impactful environmental health and safety news.
Hi everyone! Welcome to the monthly news roundup video, where we’ll review the most impactful environmental health and safety news. Let’s get started!
Ladders were the cause of over 22,000 workplace injuries and 161 deaths in 2020. Each March, the American Ladder Institute promotes ladder safety awareness with the goal of reducing ladder-related injuries and fatalities. Every Step Matters was the theme of this year’s National Ladder Safety Month.
Stand Up 4 Grain Safety Week kicked off on March 24. This annual event brings attention to preventable grain handling hazards and promotes safety in this high-hazard industry.
Federal agencies must review their regulations and report back to the White House by April 20. The priority is on “significant” rules, generally considered to be those with an annual effect on the economy of 100 million dollars or more. Once the regulations have been identified, the Office of Management and Budget and the Department of Government Efficiency will work with agency leaders to create a plan for rescinding or modifying the regulations and begin winding down their enforcement.
A highwall fatality at a surface mine prompted the Mine Safety and Health Administration to issue a safety alert. It outlines what miners should do to prevent similar incidents, including looking for hazards such as loose rocks and overhangs before beginning work.
The American Society of Safety Professionals revised its construction training standard. It outlines training requirements for new hires in construction and demolition operations, site procedures, regulatory compliance, and more.
And finally, turning to environmental news, EPA will reconsider a number of major rulemakings that may impact a variety of industries. This is in response to an executive order that federal agencies review their regulations. Among the rules under consideration include those related to clean power, oil and gas emission limits, greenhouse gas reporting, and risk management.
EPA’s Waste Emissions Charge on petroleum and natural gas facilities with high methane emissions is no longer in effect. The rule initially took effect in January and was then disapproved by Congress on March 14.
Thanks for tuning in to the monthly news roundup. We’ll see you next month!
NewsIndustry NewsWaste/HazWasteSafety & HealthConstruction SafetyGeneral Industry SafetyWasteEnvironmentalWater QualityIn-Depth ArticleUsed OilEnglishFocus AreaUSA
2025-03-03T06:00:00Z
Used oil disposal: How to stay compliant with EPA, OSHA, and your state
Used oil disposal is a critical issue for safety managers and shop supervisors in industrial settings. Whether your facility generates used oil from machinery, vehicles, or hydraulic systems, you must understand the regulatory requirements to ensure compliance and avoid hefty fines.
Used oil is not always considered hazardous waste, but improper handling, storage, or disposal can lead to regulatory violations and environmental hazards. Understanding how used oil is classified, when it is considered hazardous, and how to manage it in compliance with 40 CFR Part 279 is essential.
Let’s uncover the regulatory framework for used oil disposal, including storage requirements, transportation rules, and best practices to ensure compliance at both the federal and state levels.
What is used oil?
The EPA defines used oil as any petroleum-based or synthetic oil that has been used and is contaminated by physical or chemical impurities. Common sources of used oil in industrial operations include:
- Motor oil and lubricants from vehicle maintenance
- Hydraulic fluids used in heavy machinery
- Metalworking fluids and coolants
- Compressor oils used in air compression systems
According to EPA regulations (40 CFR Part 279), used oil is presumed to be managed under the less stringent used oil management standards unless it meets hazardous waste criteria.
Used oil becomes hazardous waste if:
- It is mixed with hazardous waste (e.g., solvents or heavy metals)
- It contains more than 1,000 parts per million (ppm) of total halogens, unless proven otherwise, or
- It is disposed of improperly, leading to environmental contamination.
If used oil is classified as hazardous waste, it must be managed in accordance with the applicable solid and hazardous waste requirements.
EPA requirements for used oil disposal
The EPA requirements for used oil consist of three different aspects, as outlined below.
1. Storage Requirements
Use leak-proof tanks and containers made of durable, non-earthen materials (e.g., steel, plastic, or concrete). Label all used oil containers with the words "Used Oil" to prevent misidentification. Prevent leaks and spills by using secondary containment systems and regularly inspecting tanks. Never mix used oil with hazardous waste unless authorized.
2. Transportation and Disposal
Used oil generators may transport up to 55 gallons of used oil to a registered collection center without an EPA ID number. If contracting a used oil transporter, ensure they have an EPA Identification Number.
Used oil must be:
- Recycled or re-refined into new oil.
- Burned for energy recovery in approved furnaces or boilers.
- Disposed of at an authorized hazardous waste facility if deemed hazardous.
3. Spill Prevention and Cleanup
Facilities storing large amounts of used oil must have a Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasure (SPCC) Plan. SPCC plans establish procedures, methods, and equipment requirements to prevent oil from reaching waterways, and to contain discharges of oil.
Any spills must be cleaned up immediately, and absorbent materials must be disposed of properly. Rags and shop towels contaminated with hazardous materials may be classified as hazardous waste.
OSHA regulations for handling used oil
While the EPA focuses on environmental compliance, OSHA (29 CFR Part 1910) regulates worker safety when handling used oil. Key OSHA requirements include:
1. Personal Protective Equipment (PPE)
Workers handling used oil must wear gloves and protective clothing to prevent skin exposure. Safety goggles or face shields are also important to avoid eye contact.
2. Hazard communication (HazCom) program
Employers must label all used oil containers with appropriate hazard information and train employees on safe handling procedures and emergency response.
3. Fire and Explosion Safety
Always store used oil away from ignition sources to prevent fire hazards. Ensure storage areas are ventilated to avoid vapor buildup.
State-Specific used oil disposal regulations
Many states have stricter used oil regulations than federal laws. For example:
- California classifies used oil as hazardous waste unless it meets specific recycling criteria.
- Texas requires additional storage permits for large generators.
- New York mandates annual reporting on used oil disposal activities.
To ensure compliance, check with your state’s environmental agency for state-specific used oil disposal rules and whether used oil is considered hazardous. Additional permits for transporting or processing used oil may be necessary.
Staying compliant with used oil disposal requirements
Ensuring compliance with EPA, OSHA, and state laws is essential for safety managers and shop supervisors handling used oil. By following proper storage, transportation, and disposal practices, businesses can reduce environmental risks, improve workplace safety, and avoid costly fines.
Key to remember: By staying informed and proactive, your facility can maintain safe, sustainable, and compliant used oil management practices.
NewsWaste/HazWasteHazmat SafetyAutomated External DefibrillatorsIn-Depth ArticleEnglishIndustry NewsFleet SafetyTransportation SecurityCPRSafety & HealthConstruction SafetyFirst Aid and MedicalGeneral Industry SafetyAgriculture SafetyMaritime SafetyEnvironmentalFocus AreaFleet OperationsMine SafetyFirst Aid and MedicalTransportationUSA
2023-06-16T05:00:00Z
Are you meeting OSHA’s requirements for CPR and AEDs in the workplace?
Quick action using cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and automated external defibrillators(AEDs) can save the lives of the nearly 350,000 cardiac event victims each year outside of a hospital setting. But what does OSHA require for the workplace? What you didn’t know about OSHA regulations regarding AEDs may surprise you.
The importance of CPR and early defibrillation
For every minute a patient is in cardiac arrest, their chances of survival decrease dramatically. When a patient doesn’t have a pulse and isn’t breathing, CPR should be performed until an AED is available. It’s important to note that CPR alone does not restart the heart. CPR is an oxygen circulation procedure. AEDs, on the other hand, are meant for lifesaving intervention.
CPR and early defibrillation are vital components of the emergency medical services (EMS) chain of survival that increases the odds of cardiac patient survival. However, according to the American Heart Association (AHA), even the best CPR can’t provide enough circulation of oxygen to the brain and heart for more than a few minutes. In fact, a patient whose brain is deprived of oxygen for 10 minutes or more seldom recovers.
Signs and symptoms of cardiac compromise
Just like a reliable vehicle, the circulatory system is the human body’s blood transportation system, and the heart is the engine. Amazingly, the heart generates its own electrical impulses, pumping in a regular, rhythmic manner. As with any engine, the heart requires a certain amount of pressure to function and doesn’t work well when clogged with grease or debris. The most common causes of sudden cardiac arrest include a heart attack, electrocution, and asphyxiation — all of which could occur in the workplace. Common signs and symptoms include:
- Chest pain accompanied by a crushing or squeezing sensation,
- Pain that radiates to the jaw or arm,
- Irregular pulse and/or abnormal blood pressure,
- Shortness of breath,
- Cool and sweaty skin,
- Nausea and vomiting, and
- Anxiety or feeling of impending doom.
CPR provides the pressure for the body’s “engine” to oxygen circulating, while an AED provides the electrical impulses to keep the engine pumping.
OSHA requirements regarding CPR
OSHA 1910.151 requires first aid treatment be provided in the absence of an infirmary, clinic, or hospital in near proximity to the workplace used to treat injured employees. This may include assisting a victim of cardiac arrest using CPR or defibrillation.
OSHA requirements for CPR and defibrillation differ considerably. Standards requiring CPR include:
- 1910.146 Permit-required Confined Spaces
- 1910.266 Appendix B: Logging Operations – First Aid and CPR Training
- 1910.269 Electric Power Generation, Transmission, and Distribution
- 1910.410 Qualifications of Dive Team and
- 1926.950 Construction Subpart V, Power Transmission and Distribution
OSHA recommends basic adult CPR refresher training and retesting every year, and first aid training at least once every three years. CPR training include facilitated discussion along with ’hands-on’ skills training that uses mannequins and partner practice.
OSHA requirements regarding AEDs — you might need a prescription
Though OSHA recognizes AEDs as important lifesaving technology that plays a role in treating cardiac arrest, the agency doesn’t currently require their use in the workplace. Instead, OSHA wants employers to assess their own requirements for AEDs as part of their first aid response.
AEDs are considered Class III medical devices which means the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has some oversight on their use. Almost all AEDs require the purchaser to obtain a prescription from a physician under FDA regulations. The prescription process is meant as a quality control mechanism to ensure AEDs are properly maintained, that all designated responders are properly trained, and assist employers with establishing an emergency response plan for their workplace AED program.
The AHA requires AED operators to also receive CPR training as an “integral part of providing lifesaving aid to people suffering sudden cardiac arrest.” Though easy to use, each AED is slightly different, so training helps users understand the unique traits and supplies for the individual units at their workplace. Additionally, AED users must be trained to understand the signs of a sudden cardiac arrest, when to activate the EMS system, and how to perform CPR.
AEDs are light, portable, easy to use, and inexpensive. They’re best placed near high-hazard areas such as confined spaces, near electrical energy, or in remote work areas. Response time to reach AEDs should be kept within 3–5-minutes.
Need more information on defibrillators in the workplace? See our ezExplanation on AEDs. |
Training requirements
Many states require or encourage CPR and AED training from nationally recognized organizations. Any AED training should include CPR training. OSHA doesn’t offer first aid or CPR training, nor certify trainers. Training by a nationally recognized organization, such as AHA, the American Red Cross, or National Safety Council is recommended.
Keys to Remember
While OSHA doesn’t currently require the use of AEDs in the workplace, they do expect employers to assess their own AED requirements as part of their first aid response. AED training is required by most states and should include CPR with a hands-on practical component.
NewsIndustry NewsWaste ManifestsWaste/HazWasteWasteEnvironmental Protection Agency (EPA)EnvironmentalIn-Depth ArticleEnglishFocus AreaUSA
2025-04-04T05:00:00Z
Hazardous waste manifest errors? Follow RCRA’s correction process
Hazardous waste manifests are like travel logs. They track the entire journey of regulated hazardous waste, from the starting point (the generator’s facility) to the final destination (the off-site waste management facility). Like travel logs, a manifest is only as accurate as the information provided. Thankfully, you can correct manifest errors.
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) finalized the Third Rule under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), which took effect in January 2025. It made noteworthy changes to the manifest corrections process. Here’s what hazardous waste generators, transporters, and treatment, storage, and disposal facilities (TSDFs) need to know.
Who’s impacted?
The Third Rule impacts entities subject to RCRA’s manifest regulations. This article focuses on the manifest correction rules that apply to these waste handlers:
- Small and large quantity generators,
- Transporters, and
- TSDFs.
Note that the final rule amends post-manifest correction regulations for other entities, such as exporters, that are beyond the scope of this article.
What are the Third Rule changes?
EPA’s final rule maintains most of the post-receipt manifest data corrections process.
What’s the same?
Specifically:
- Any waste handler named on the manifest may voluntarily submit data corrections at any time,
- Waste handlers can make an unlimited number of voluntary corrections,
- Corrections may be applied to an individual record or batch of them, and
- Submissions must include a signature that's compliant with the Cross-Media Electronic Reporting Rule (CROMERR).
What’s different?
Previously, when EPA or a state regulatory agency requested corrections to data on a manifest, waste handlers weren’t required to make them. The Third Rule now mandates that waste handlers:
- Correct errors on the manifest within 30 days of a corrections request from EPA or a state agency, and
- Make data correction submissions electronically for paper or electronic manifest records.
Post-receipt corrections are made via the Hazardous Waste Electronic Manifest System (e-Manifest) on the RCRA Information (RCRAInfo) system.
The Third Rule also clarifies that receiving facilities (TSDFs) can make corrections only after the manifest is completed (i.e., signed and submitted to the e-Manifest system).
What’s the post-receipt manifest correction process?
Waste handlers submitting voluntary or mandatory post-receipt corrections to hazardous waste manifests must follow the process established at 40 CFR 264.71(l).
Follow this general process on the e-Manifest System:
- Certify that the manifest is complete. It must have the status “Signed-Completed."
- Determine how to submit the corrected data to the e-Manifest system. You can enter the data directly into e-Manifest or upload a file with data corrections to the system.
- Include for each correction submission:
- The Manifest Tracking Number and date received by the facility associated with the data being corrected,
- The Item Number(s) of the affected data fields on the manifest form (EPA Form 8700-22), and
- The previously entered and corrected data.
- Save your corrections. The manifest’s status will change to “Under Correction."
- Re-sign the manifest to certify the corrections. The manifest’s status will change to “Corrected."
Manifest correction FAQs
Check out some top questions and answers about post-receipt manifest corrections.
What manifest information can I correct?
The type of waste handler your facility is considered determines which items on the manifest you can change for voluntary corrections or must change for mandatory corrections. Typically:
- Generators correct data in Items 1–15;
- Transporters correct data in Items 6–7, 14, and 17; and
- TSDFs correct data in Items 14 and 18–20.
What user role do I need on RCRAInfo to submit manifest corrections?
You must be registered in RCRAInfo as a user with the e-Manifest Certifier or Site Manager role for the facility’s site to submit manifest corrections.
What’s the CROMERR certification?
EPA requires manifest correction submitters to use a CROMERR-compliant electronic signature, which requires a higher level of identity proofing than the Quick Sign signature.
Can I revert to a previous manifest version?
Once the corrected manifest has been signed, you can’t revert it to a previous version. The e-Manifest system does, however, let you view all versions of the manifest.
Can brokers sign corrected manifests?
Although brokers can initiate a manifest correction for generators, they may not sign a corrected manifest unless they (a) operate at the generator’s facility and (b) can sign the manifest as an offeror of the waste shipment.
Key to remember: EPA’s Third Rule updates the process for making data corrections to RCRA hazardous waste manifests.
NewsIndustry NewsWater PermittingWater ProgramsEnvironmental Protection Agency (EPA)Industrial WastewaterEnvironmentalIn-Depth ArticleWater QualityStormwaterEnglishFocus AreaUSA
2025-02-04T06:00:00Z
Industrial stormwater vs. wastewater discharge permits
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) controls the amount of pollutants that reach the waters of the United States through the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit program. The NPDES program covers two types of discharges from industrial sources:
- Stormwater discharges, and
- Wastewater discharges.
Although they’re under the same federal permitting program, stormwater and wastewater discharges are distinct, and their permits are too. Know the basic differences between these types of industrial discharges to ensure your facility complies.
Stormwater discharges
Rain and snow that flow over land or impervious surfaces (like building rooftops and parking lots) and don’t soak into the ground generate stormwater runoff. The runoff can gather pollutants generated by industrial activities at a facility and transport them into nearby waterbodies. Your facility must have a permit to discharge stormwater associated with industrial activities to waters of the United States (40 CFR 122.26).
The NPDES program regulates stormwater discharges from 11 categories of industrial activities, listed at 122.26(b)(14). Examples of covered activities include:
- Heavy manufacturing at chemical plants;
- Treating, storing, and disposing of hazardous waste; and
- Processing industrial wastes at landfills.
Note, however, that construction sites that disturb 5 or more acres (the tenth category) are permitted individually.
The permit contains stormwater control measures (including “best management practices”) to limit pollutants that enter stormwater runoff. Containment systems, employee training, and infiltration devices are all ways to control runoff.
Most states issue industrial stormwater discharge permits. EPA issues individual permits and the Multi-Sector General Permits (MSGPs) to facilities where the agency is the permitting authority. The MSGP is EPA’s general permit for industrial stormwater discharges.
Wastewater discharges
Many industrial processes use or generate water that contains pollutants, referred to as industrial wastewater. There are two types of wastewater:
- Process wastewater (defined at 122.2) refers to water used in manufacturing or processing activities.
- Non-process wastewater refers to water used for activities other than processing products (e.g., sanitary wastewater).
Your facility must have a permit to discharge industrial wastewater to surface waters (122.21(a)).
The NPDES program regulates direct wastewater discharges from industrial sources through rules based on the type of facility and activity. The regulations also have industry-specific requirements for:
- Animal Feeding Operations,
- Mining,
- Oil and Gas,
- Pesticide Applications, and
- Vessels Incidental Discharges.
Effluent limitations are the primary control method for industrial wastewater discharges. EPA establishes Effluent Limitations Guidelines (ELGs) for industrial categories and subcategories. These pollution-reduction performance standards are based on the best available technology that’s economically achievable by facilities in the industry. The ELGs are then incorporated into the permits through effluent limitations.
Additionally, industrial facilities must meet water quality-based effluent limitations when the technology-based standards don’t achieve the required water quality standards. Both industrial stormwater and wastewater discharge permits may include technology- and water quality-based effluent limitations.
As with stormwater permits, most states issue industrial wastewater permits. Facilities in areas where EPA is the permitting authority must obtain either a general or individual NPDES permit.
Check your state requirements!
Because a majority of the states run stormwater and wastewater permitting programs, it’s crucial to check the state regulations. State permits must contain limits as stringent as EPA’s federal permits, and some states may impose stricter limits and/or additional requirements.
EPA’s website lists the states authorized to issue NPDES permits with links to the state agencies that run the NPDES program.
Key to remember: Industrial stormwater and wastewater discharges, and the permits that regulate them, are different.
Most Popular Highlights In Transportation
NewsIndustry NewsIndustry NewsDriver qualificationsAnnual MVR reviewMedical waivers and exemptions - Motor CarrierDriving RecordsDriver qualification and hiringFocus AreaFleet OperationsEnglishDriver disqualification - Non-CDL driversTransportationUSA
2025-04-02T05:00:00Z
2 hot FMCSA medical news updates!
On April 1, 2025, new versions of commercial driver medical cards and physical exam forms were posted by the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) on its website.
Those who work with commercial driver medical certifications have been waiting for an update from the FMCSA on these two important medical forms, which originally expired on March 31, 2025.
Changes to the forms
The Medical Examination Report (MER) MCSA-5875, also called the "Long Form," and the Medical Examiner’s Certification (MCSA-5876), or the "Fed Med" card, were approved by the Office of Management and Budget on March 27, 2025. However, they were not available on the FMCSA website until April 1, 2025.
The changes include the new expiration date of March 31, 2028, and a revision date of March 27, 2025. The address in the Public Burden Statement at the top of the form was also updated. FMCSA reviews and updates these forms regularly, and the Office of Management and Budget must approve the final versions.
FMCSA expects medical examiners to start using the new forms as soon as possible, but they can still use their old forms with the 3/31/2025 expiration date until they run out.
CDL driver medical certification update
Another important update affects commercial driver’s licensed (CDL) drivers. By June 23, 2025, the process for updating CDL drivers’ medical certifications will be easier. By this date, all State Driver Licensing Agencies (SDLAs) must be connected to the National Registry of Certified Medical Examiners (NRCME). This system is where examiners enter medical certification information after each exam.
Each state will switch to the new process once their system can receive CDL driver medical certification information, which will then appear on the motor vehicle record (MVR). A copy of a CDL driver’s MVR must be in the driver’s qualification file after each exam.
FMCSA still requires a copy of a non-CDL driver’s medical card to be in the driver qualification file. This process is not changing for non-CDL drivers.
What’s changing by June 23, 2025:
- CDL drivers won’t need to self-certify their medical cards with the SDLA because this will be done through the NRCME to SDLA connection.
- Carriers won’t need to note that the examiner was on the NRCME on the date of the exam.
CDL drivers and carriers should check the SDLA websites for their transition dates and instructions on CDL driver medical certification.
What’s not changing on June 23, 2025:
- CDL drivers need to verify their driving type when they get a new CDL or Commercial Learner’s Permit (CLP), or when they upgrade or renew their CDL. They must choose one of the following:
- Non-excepted Interstate (requires medical certification)
- Excepted Interstate (DOT exam not required)
- Non-excepted Intrastate (intrastate-only and medical certification required)
- Excepted Intrastate (intrastate-only and DOT exam not required)
- Carriers must place a CDL motor vehicle record (MVR) in the driver qualification file after each exam. The number of days allowed for this may decrease from the current limit of 15 days.
Overall, carriers, CDL drivers, and medical examiners must understand how the medical certification changes will impact keeping medically qualified drivers on the road.
NewsIndustry News16-hour short-haul exceptionFleet Safety150 air-mile radius exceptionHours of ServiceHours of ServiceFocus AreaIn-Depth ArticleEnglishTransportationUSA
2025-04-03T05:00:00Z
5 short-haul exceptions and how to use them
Commercial drivers who stay relatively close to home are often required to follow the same DOT safety regulations as long-haul truckers, but there are some exceptions they can take advantage of.
Most of these “short-haul” exceptions relate to the hours-of-service rules and provide a break from either the recordkeeping requirements or the limits on work hours.
The following are five commonly used exceptions from the federal (interstate) hours-of-service requirements for drivers who stay close to home. Review the terms to see if your drivers qualify, and remember: Drivers should never try to claim an exception unless they have a clear understanding of how it works and when it can be used.
Note that state requirements and exceptions may vary for intrastate operations.
1. 150-air-mile (CDL) exception
Who’s eligible? Drivers of property-carrying vehicles (“trucks”) that require a commercial driver’s license (CDL), and drivers of passenger-carrying vehicles (shuttles/vans/buses), who return to the starting location at the end of the day.
What are they exempt from? Standard grid-style logs (records of duty status), supporting documents (see 395.11), and 30-minute breaks (see 395.3(a)(3)(ii)).
What’s the maximum distance? 172.6 miles away from the reporting location (150 air miles) measured in a straight line in any direction.
What other conditions apply? On any day the exception is used, the driver must:
- Not drive a commercial motor vehicle (CMV) beyond the 150-air-mile radius,
- Return to the work-reporting location at the end of the day (unless classified as a driver-salesperson),
- Be completely off duty within 14 consecutive hours of the starting time, and
- Be off work for 8 (bus) or 10 (truck) consecutive hours before coming back on duty.
The driver remains subject to the daily limit of 10 (bus) or 11 (truck) driving hours and the weekly on-duty limit of 60 or 70 hours.
Which records are required? The motor carrier must have a record of the driver’s starting time, ending time, and total on-duty time for the day, and it must be retained for six months. “Driving” time does not need to be recorded separately from on-duty time, and drivers are not required to have records in the vehicle (though it is a recommended practice).
Where’s the rule? 49 CFR 395.1(e)(1)
2. 150-air-mile (non-CDL) exception
Who’s eligible? Drivers of property-carrying vehicles (“trucks”) that do NOT require a CDL and who return to the starting location at the end of the day.
What are they exempt from? Standard grid-style logs (records of duty status), supporting documents (see 395.11), 30-minute breaks (see 395.3(a)(3)(ii)), and — up to twice per week — the 14-hour limit (395.3(a)(2)).
What’s the maximum distance? 172.6 miles away from the reporting location (150 air miles) measured in a straight line in any direction.
What other conditions apply? On any day the exception is used, the driver must:
- Not drive a CMV beyond the 150-air-mile radius;
- Return to the work-reporting location at the end of the day (but does not necessarily need to go off duty); and
- Not drive after the 14th consecutive hour on at least five days out of any seven consecutive days, or after the 16th consecutive hour on up to two days out of seven.
The driver remains subject to the daily limit of 11 driving hours and the weekly on-duty limit of 60 or 70 hours, as well as the need for 10 hours off between shifts.
Which records are required? The motor carrier must have a record of the driver’s starting time, ending time, and total on-duty time for the day, and it must be retained for six months. “Driving” time does not need to be recorded separately from on-duty time, and drivers are not required to have records in the vehicle (though it is a recommended practice).
Where’s the rule? 49 CFR 395.1(e)(2)
3. 16-hour “big day”
Who’s eligible? Drivers of property-carrying CMVs who return to the reporting location daily.
What are they exempt from? The 14-hour limit (395.3(a)(2)).
What’s the maximum distance? None. Drivers must remain close enough to home base that they can return there before hitting the 16-hour limit (or any other limit).
What other conditions apply? This is the only short-haul exception with a “look back” requirement. On the day the exception is used, the driver must:
- Have returned to the starting location on the prior five work days (not including days off, and even if the driver got a 34-hour restart);
- Be back to the starting location and released from duty within 16 consecutive hours after the start of the day; and
- Only use the exception if it was not already used within the previous six consecutive days, unless the driver got a 34-hour restart.
The driver must also comply with the 30-minute break rule, the 11-hour driving limit, the 60/70-hour limit, and the need for 10 hours off.
Which records are required? The driver must use a standard grid-style log (395.8) and keep supporting documents (395.11). A driver cannot claim both this exception and one of the 150-air-mile exceptions on the same day.
Where’s the rule? 49 CFR 395.1(o)
4. Construction materials & equipment
Who’s eligible? Any driver primarily transporting construction materials and equipment. This means the transportation of construction and pavement materials, construction equipment, and construction maintenance vehicles, to or from an active construction site (a construction site between mobilization of equipment and materials to the site to the final completion of the construction project). Placarded vehicles are not eligible.
What are they exempt from? The need to remain off duty for 34 hours to restart the 60/70-hour limit. Instead, these drivers may get a restart with just 24 hours off.
What’s the maximum distance? 86.3 miles (75 air miles) away from the work-reporting location, measured in a straight line in any direction (though states are allowed to set the limit as low as 50 air miles for in-state-only operations).
What other conditions apply? Drivers remain subject to all other requirements: 10 hours off, 11 hours of driving within a 14-hour period, 30-minute breaks, and the 60/70-hour on-duty limit.
Which records are required? These drivers should qualify for a 150-air-mile exception as described above. Otherwise, a standard grid-style log and supporting documents are required (395.8 and 395.11).
Where’s the rule? 49 CFR 395.1(m)
5. Driver-salespersons
Who’s eligible? Any driver for a private carrier of property who:
- Is engaged both in selling goods*, services, or the use of goods, and in delivering (by CMV) the goods sold or provided or upon which the services are performed;
- Drives no more than half the total work hours; and
- Drives no more than 40 hours in any seven consecutive days.
*“Selling goods” includes soliciting or obtaining reorders or new accounts, or other selling or merchandising activities designed to retain customers or to increase the sale of goods or services.
What are they exempt from? The 60-hour/7-day or 70-hour/8-day limit.
What’s the maximum distance? 100 miles (not air miles) away from the work-reporting location, measured in a straight line in any direction.
What other conditions apply? Drivers remain subject to all other requirements: 10 hours off, 11 hours of driving within a 14-hour period, and 30-minute breaks.
Which records are required? These drivers should qualify for a 150-air-mile exception as described above. Otherwise, a standard grid-style log and supporting documents are required (395.8 and 395.11). Note that if a driver-salesperson wants to take advantage of the option to not return to the starting location when using the 150-air-mile exception in 395.1(e)(1), the driver must remain within a radius of 100 miles.
Where’s the rule? 49 CFR 395.1(c)
What’s an ‘air mile’?
An air mile (also known as a nautical mile) is a bit longer than the standard “land” (statute) mile tracked on a vehicle’s odometer. One air mile is equivalent to 1.15 miles on the road. Therefore:
- 100 air miles = 115.1 land miles, and
- 150 air miles = 172.6 land miles.
What’s an “air-mile radius”?
A radius is a straight line from the center of a circle to its edge. If a driver must remain within a 150-air-mile radius of the starting location, for example, then the driver may travel up to 172.6 miles away from that location, measured in a straight line (“as the crow flies”) in any direction. Because most roads aren’t built in a straight line, drivers and motor carriers must refer to a map — or better yet, an online mapping tool — to determine where the geographic boundary lies.
Note that a driver limited to a 150-air-mile radius is not limited to driving a specific number of miles within the radius. For example, a truck driver may drive much more than 172 miles in a day and still claim the 150-air-mile exception, as long as all driving (up to 11 hours) took place within the 150-air-mile radius.
Aren’t we exempt from other safety rules?
Most short-haul exceptions are tied to the hours-of-service rules only. Short-haul operations are NOT exempt from rules governing driver qualification files, vehicle markings, daily and annual vehicle inspections, cargo securement, insurance, licensing, drug testing, and many other safety mandates.
Key to remember: Short-haul and regional drivers who return home each day are eligible for certain exceptions from portions of the hours-of-service rules, though state requirements may vary.
NewsIndustry NewsFleet Safety150 air-mile radius exceptionHours of ServiceFocus AreaIn-Depth ArticleEnglishTransportationUSA
2022-08-29T05:00:00Z
The 150 air-mile short-haul exemptions: Widely used and widely misused
The 150 air-mile exemptions, which are in the regulations at 395.1(e)(1) and (2), allow a driver to use a time record in place of a log, provided that certain conditions are met. While this is possibly the most widely used hours-of-service exemption, it may be the most commonly misused exemption, as well.
The basics of logging exemptions
To be able to use this logging exemption in 395.1(e)(1), the driver must:
- Stay within 150 air-miles of the work reporting location for the day (draw a 150 air-mile radius circle around the work reporting location for the day — the driver must stay within this circle),
- Be back to — and released from — the work reporting location for his/her 8- or 10-hour break within 14 hours, and
- Include the starting and ending times for the day and the total hours on duty on the time record for the day.
The company must retain the time record and have it available for inspection for six months.
Need more info? View our ezExplanation on the 150 air-mile exception. |
What if the driver goes too far or works too many hours?
If the driver cannot meet the terms of the exemption (he or she goes too far or works too many hours), the driver must complete a regular driver’s log for the day as soon as the exemption no longer applies.
If the driver has had to complete a log 8 or fewer days out of the last 30 days, the driver can use a paper log for the day. If the driver had to complete a log more than 8 days out of the last 30 days, the driver needs to use an electronic log for the day (unless one of the ELD exemptions applies, such as operating a vehicle older than model year 2000).
30-minute break exemption
When a property-carrying driver is operating under the 150 air-mile exemption, the driver is also exempt from having to take the required 30-minute break (see 395.3(a)(3)(ii)).
If the driver began the day as a 150 air-mile driver and has driven more than 8 consecutive hours without a break, and something unexpected happens and the driver can no longer use the 150 air-mile exemption, the driver must stop and immediately take the 30-minute break as well as start logging. If the driver went outside of the 150 air-mile area before the driver had 8 hours of driving without a break from driving, the driver would be expected to take the break at the appropriate time.
Common myths
Here are some of the common myths and misunderstandings about the 150 air-mile exemption:
- The driver must have the time records in the vehicle. Myth. The driver simply needs to explain to an officer during a roadside inspection that he/she does not have logs due to operating under the 150 air-mile exemption and that the required time records are back at the carrier’s office (just telling the officer, “I don’t have any logs” will lead to a violation, so the driver needs to know to provide the full explanation).
- The driver must log the previous seven days if he/she had been using this exemption and suddenly can’t. Myth. If the driver cannot use the exemption on one particular day, that is the only day the driver must use a regular log (either paper or electronic).
- Passenger-carrying drivers and drivers hauling hazardous materials cannot use this exemption. Myth. There are no restrictions on the use of this exemption, so any commercial driver can use it.
- A driver that crosses state lines cannot use this exemption. Myth. As this exemption appears in the Federal Motor Carrier Administration (FMCSA) regulations, it can be used by interstate drivers.
- Only drivers that operate out of a “company terminal” can use the 150 air-mile exemption. Myth. As long as the driver makes it back to the work reporting location for the day within the appropriate number of hours, the driver can use the exemption.
- Drivers that move from one jobsite to another every few weeks cannot use this exemption. Myth. If a driver that normally uses this exemption switches work reporting locations, the day the driver switches work reporting locations is the only day the driver cannot use the exemption.
- Drivers covered by this exemption are also exempt from the driver qualification (licensing and medical cards), driving, and vehicle inspection requirements. Myth. The only rules the driver is exempt from are the logging requirement in 395.8 and the 30-minute break requirement in 395.3.
- The driver cannot drive more than 150 miles for the day. Myth. The driver can drive as many miles as he/she wants to or needs to, as long as the driver stays within the 150 air-mile radius circle and gets back to the work reporting location within the appropriate number of hours.
- If a 150 air-mile driver gets into a vehicle with an ELD, the driver must use it. Myth. The carrier can have the driver log in and have the driver entered into the system as an “exempt driver,” or the carrier can request that the driver not log into the device and then attach a comment to the unassigned driving time generated by the driver’s movements. The comment would need to explain that the driver using the vehicle was a 150 air-mile driver who submitted a time record. It is up to the carrier to decide which option to use. If stopped for a roadside inspection, the driver will need to be able to explain to the inspector that he/she is an exempt driver using the 150 air-mile exemption, so using the electronic log is not required.
What’s different with the ‘150 air-mile non-CDL property-carrying drivers’
The 150 air-mile exemption at 395.1(e)(2) only applies to drivers that: Operate property-carrying vehicles that do not require a CDL to operate, and Stay within the 150 air-miles of their work reporting location.
If the driver stays within the 150 air-mile radius of the work reporting location, and returns to the work reporting location within 14 hours on 5 of the last 7 days, and 16 hours on 2 of the last seven days, the driver is allowed to use a time record in place of a log.
If the driver does not meet the terms of the exception, the driver will need to complete a log for the day. If the driver had to log more than 8 days out of the last 30 days, the driver will need to use an electronic log for the day. All of the other issues discussed above would apply to these drivers as well.
Managing the use
If you have drivers that use these exemptions, you will need to check time records to make sure they are complying with the appropriate time limits. You will also need to check movement records to verify that the drivers using these exemptions are staying within the mandated area (within 150 air-miles of the work reporting location for the day).
If a driver is over the hours limit, or has gone too far, you need to verify that the submitted a log for the day, either paper or electronic, depending on how many days the driver had to log out of the previous 30 days.
Verifying compliance is important
During an audit, if it is discovered that your drivers are using these exemptions incorrectly, you will be cited for not having drivers’ logs when required. Each day this occurred will be another violation, so the fine could be rather large if you are not managing the use of these exemptions!
NewsEnglishIndustry NewsFleet SafetyIn-Depth ArticlePrivate carrier authorityFocus AreaOperating AuthorityFor-Hire Carrier AuthorityTransportationUSA
2021-03-10T06:00:00Z
For-hire and private carriers: What’s the difference?
If you’re planning to start a motor carrier operation or add a different type of service to an existing business, you need to know what type of carrier you will be. Motor carriers are considered either a for-hire carrier or a private carrier. To be a private carrier, 100 percent of the company’s movements must be to support its own operation. If the carrier is engaged in any for-hire activities, the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) considers them a for-hire carrier.
For-hire vs. private
For-hire carriers use vehicles to transport people or property and are paid for their service. The fee could be a direct fee like a fare or a rate but could also be other indirect forms of compensation. Examples of for-hire operations include a trucking company that hauls other people’s property for a fee (direct compensation) or a hotel that includes in its service the transportation to and from the airport to the hotel (indirect compensation).
Private carriers, on the other hand, transport only their own goods or people. Examples include a manufacturer that uses its own commercial vehicles to transport its product, a construction or landscaping company that uses commercial vehicles to transport equipment and employees to job sites, or a utility company that operates commercial vehicles in support of its operations.
For-hire operating authority
While private carriers are not required to obtain operating authority from the FMCSA, for-hire carriers are required to get authority to move property or people that belong to somebody else and get paid for their service. Having authority is often referred to as having an MC Number.
The most common types of authority are:
- Property for-hire
- Passenger for-hire
- Household goods
- Broker
- Freight forwarder
If a company never operates a commercial motor vehicle (CMV), it is possible to have authority, but not have a USDOT number. For example, straight brokers or freight forwarders.
As part of obtaining for-hire authority, carriers must designate process agents and demonstrate financial responsibility (have proper insurance coverage).
One size does not fit all
Authorities are not all-inclusive. Separate authority is needed for each type of service offered. For instance, a for-hire, over-the-road carrier that also wants to be able to resell its extra demand will need both for-hire and brokerage authorities. A company is required to pay a $300 one-time fee for each type of authority needed.
Permanent authority required
There are no temporary permits available to substitute for authority. For-hire operations may not be performed until the proper authority has been granted. It’s not uncommon for otherwise private carriers to become for-hire carriers to generate revenue on back-hauls or help balance capacity and demand during slow periods or seasons.
Getting it right
Carriers need to get it right when it comes to authority. Carriers required to have authority — but don’t and operate anyway — can get themselves into trouble. Penalties for operating without proper authority can get expensive and can result in out-of-service orders.
Key to remember: Carriers are either for-hire or private, with for-hire carriers being paid for their services while private carriers transport only their own goods or people.
Related article: Process agents — what are they and do you need them?
NewsIndustry NewsFleet SafetyCompliance, Safety, Accountability CSACompliance, Safety, Accountability CSAEnforcement - DOTFocus AreaIn-Depth ArticleEnglishRoadside InspectionsTransportationUSA
2022-12-29T06:00:00Z
What does 392.2C mean on a roadside inspection report?
Most motor carriers review their roadside inspection reports for the obvious reasons: fixing mechanical defects and identifying unsafe or noncompliant driver behavior.
Some violations are easy to decipher, such as a burned-out light bulb or exceeding the speed limit by a specific range. Others take a little more to figure out, such as doing the math to determine when and how a driver exceeded hours-of-service (HOS) limits. Then there are all those 392.2 violations with suffixes. Some count against a carrier’s Compliance, Safety, Accountability (CSA) scores, while others do not, depending on whether they contribute to causing a crash.
One that often baffles motor carriers is 392.2C.
What is 392.2C?
Section 392.2C is enforcement’s code for “failure to obey traffic control device.” The C stands for control.
The citation appears in the severity table for the Unsafe Driving BASIC (Behavior Analysis and Safety Improvement Category). The violation has been assigned a value of 5 out 10, with 10 being the most severe. The violation is used when calculating both the carrier’s and driver’s Unsafe Driving BASIC scores.
In most instances, the traffic control device is not a signal light or stop or yield sign. Rather, it is the sign that instructs the driver to pull into a weigh station.
View our Weigh Stations ezExplanation for additional information. |
Who must pull into a weigh station?
The vehicles that must stop at scales and inspection locations vary from state to state and even from location to location within a state. The “weigh scale ahead” or similar sign should be the driver’s guide.
If the sign reads:
- All vehicles over 16,000 pounds, the driver can safely bypass the scale if under the weight threshold.
- All commercial motor vehicles, the driver should pull in. It is far better to be waived or green lighted through than to be chased down.
Often those who operate commercial vehicles not requiring a commercial driver’s license, such as a large pickup truck or small box truck, mistakenly believe weigh scale inspections are just for larger rigs.
What happens when a driver ignores signage?
If a driver goes past a weigh station without pulling in as directed by a traffic control device, enforcement will pursue and pull over the driver. The officer will then escort the driver back to the weigh station for a roadside inspection.
Even if the driver was honestly confused whether the sign applied to the vehicle, it is too late. And more than likely enforcement’s interest has been piqued. It is highly unlikely the driver will be waived through at this point, and 392.2C will be entered on the roadside inspection report.
Handling violations
CSA’s enforcement model suggests finding the root cause of roadside inspection violations to prevent future occurrences and ultimately improve BASIC scores.
A violation of 392.2C may have one of several root causes, such as:
- Confusion over applicability
- Inattentiveness (missing the sign)
- Running late
- Risky behavior (taking the chance that no one will pursue)
- Concern over other violations discovered once stopped
Whatever the reason, it must be addressed with the driver. Corrective actions range from refresher training to termination. If the driver was trying to avoid enforcement for other reasons (drugs, alcohol, over HOS limits), these other violations need to be addressed accordingly.
Key to remember: Failing to obey a traffic control device will be used in calculation of the CSA Unsafe Driving BASIC scores. Motor carriers should address the root cause of the violation so it does not recur.
NewsIndustry NewsFleet SafetyCMV Parts and MaintenanceParts and Accessories - Motor CarrierFocus AreaIn-Depth ArticleEnglishTransportationUSA
2025-04-07T05:00:00Z
What harm can aftermarket parts and modifications do? Plenty!
Carriers often encounter drivers or others at the company who want to customize or repair their vehicles using aftermarket parts. While harmless in many cases, there are situations where this can create problems for the carrier.
Horns
One cautionary tale about aftermarket parts has to do with horns. A driver installed a “train horn” on a truck in place of the factory air horn. The horn, by design, emitted a train horn sound at over 145 decibels. At a job site, the driver blew the horn for 10-consecutive seconds at a laborer who was directly in front of the truck, blocking its path. Due to the proximity of the worker to the horn, the worker suffered serious and permanent hearing loss. After a protracted legal battle, the carrier was forced to pay a settlement of over $1 million.
Lights
Installing additional lights is a common modification request. These additional lights add to maintenance in an already problematic area since keeping lights working has always been a challenge. It can also bring unwanted attention and violations.
If the lights create a compliance issue with Subpart B of Part 393 you could receive a violation for these extra or modified lights. If the extra or modified lights do not match the requirements in table in 393.11, the prohibition in 393.22(a)(2) that states an additional light cannot reduce the effectiveness of a required lamp and cannot be inconsistent with the Part 393 requirements, or 393.25(e), which requires all lights to be steady burning (with only a few exceptions), a violation could be written.
There is also the risk of running afoul of the basic vehicle and traffic codes when it comes to the color coding of lights (such as the yellow facing forward and to the side and red to the rear requirements) or the restrictions on color uses (such as limitations on the use of blue, green, and white lights). Disregarding these regulations could lead to a violation.
If you are going to allow your drivers or others to install additional lights or to modify the existing lights with aftermarket lights, be sure to verify that the vehicle will still be in compliance with the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) regulation and the vehicle and traffic codes.
Brake adjusters and brake hoses
Another area that routinely leads to problems is the installation of manual brake slack adjusters in place of automatic slack adjusters. Some drivers and carriers believe that manual slack adjusters are more reliable and install them in place of the automatic slack adjusters that came with the vehicle. The problem is that the regulations at 393.53 require automatic slack adjusters on all vehicles built since either 1993 (hydraulic brake system) or 1994 (air brake system). Therefore, when installing aftermarket slack adjusters, make sure the correct type is installed.
Another brake system issue is installing aftermarket tubes and hoses that are not DOT certified as a brake tube or hose. Using an aftermarket hose that is not a designed brake hose can lead to a violation.
Other components
Another factor to be aware of when it comes to aftermarket parts is reliability. If you are not familiar with the source of the aftermarket parts, remember the old adage, “buyer beware.” Some discount aftermarket parts are not built to the same standard as others.
Key to remember: To avoid issues, be picky when it comes to aftermarket parts and modifications. If you aren’t, you may have compliance and breakdown problems.
Most Popular Highlights In Human Resources
NewsIndustry NewsIndustry NewsHR GeneralistFamily and Medical Leave Act (FMLA)Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA)USAHR ManagementEnglishFocus AreaHuman Resources
2023-09-06T05:00:00Z
Appellate court sided with employee's (almost) 3-year-delayed FMLA claim
Back in October 2018, Laffon had a medical emergency and needed some time off under the federal Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA).
Her leave lasted until November 15. Ten days after she returned to work, on November 26, her employer terminated her.
She sued, arguing that the employer retaliated against her because of her FMLA leave.
The catch? She didn't bring the suit until almost three years later.
No link between leave and termination
In court, the employer argued that there was no causal link between Laffon taking FMLA leave and her termination. Although the court documents aren't robust, they do reveal that the employer indicated that Laffon's allegations didn't show that her taking FMLA leave was a factor in the decision to terminate her. The documents showed only that the termination chronologically followed her leave.
The court agreed with the employer. It also agreed that Laffon failed to allege a willful violation of the FMLA, which would allow her to benefit from the FMLA's three-year statute of limitations.
Laffon appealed the case to the Ninth Circuit.
Statute of limitations
Under the FMLA, employees have two years from the date of the last event constituting the alleged violation for which they can bring a claim.
Those two years are extended to three years if the employer's actions were "willful." This means that an employee must show that the employer either knew or showed reckless disregard for whether its conduct violated the FMLA.
Ruling overturned
Fast forward to August 2023, when the Ninth Circuit reversed the lower court's decision. It indicated that, based on Laffon's amended complaint and liberally construing the law, her allegations establish that her leave was causally connected to her termination and that the employer's action (her termination) was willful.
Glymph v. CT Corporation Systems, No. 22-35735, Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, August 22, 2023.
Key to remember: Terminating an employee soon after returning from FMLA leave is risky, unless there is a clear, well-documented, non-leave-related reason. Case documents did not show such a clear reason, which can also increase the risk of a willful finding. Employees have time to file claims, even years.
NewsIndustry NewsHuman Resource ManagementHuman Resource ManagementStrategic planningHR GeneralistIn-Depth ArticleUSAHR ManagementEnglishFocus AreaHuman ResourcesAssociate Benefits & Compensation
2025-04-10T05:00:00Z
Navigating federal, state, and local employment laws
In February, J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc., surveyed HR professionals on their compliance challenges. The number one issue the 572 respondents noted was navigating the intersection of federal, state, and local laws.
The world of employment laws is never quiet, and the current pace at which the landscape is changing shows no signs of slowing down. Employers can have a tough time keeping track of the laws at all levels, particularly if they have employees in multiple states.
Businesses must comply with various employment laws to avoid costly legal fines, penalties, lawsuits, and reputational damage.
How these laws work together
Federal laws provide a baseline on which state laws can, and often do, build upon. Where federal laws have gaps, state or local laws serve to fill in. Some details to keep in mind include:
- Laws don’t generally contradict each other, but often overlap or intertwine.
- Employee leave, for example, which falls under both federal and state laws can usually run concurrently.
- The state employment laws of the state in which the employee works govern. It doesn’t generally matter where the employee lives or where the corporate office is.
- If, for example, an employee works from their home in Minnesota while the corporate office is in Illinois, the Minnesota employment laws apply to the employee.
- One law doesn’t generally supersede another; employers must look at all provisions of the applicable laws and apply the one that gives employees the greater benefit.
- If, for example, a municipal ordinance’s minimum wage is $15 per hour, while the state minimum wage is $14 and the federal minimum wage is $7.25, employees who work in the municipality must be paid $15 per hour.
Common themes
Topics that many state laws govern include:
- Minimum wage*
- Employee leave*
- Sexual harassment training
- Pay transparency*
- Meals and breaks
- Child labor
*These have currently seen several changes.
Employers should regularly review and update workplace policies and handbooks to reflect changing requirements.
How to stay up to date
Employers must stay informed of applicable employment law changes. Finding resources to help notify them of changes can help. These can include government entities. Other sources include services that track such changes, such as J. J. Keller’s® Compliance Network™.
Whichever method employers use, they might assign a specific individual (or individuals) responsible for tracking developments.
Key to remember: Learning about the various employment laws and applicable changes continues to be a challenge for employers.
NewsIndustry NewsAt-Will EmploymentSafety & HealthGeneral Industry SafetyTerminationHR GeneralistIn-Depth ArticleHR ManagementEnglishTerminationFocus AreaHuman ResourcesUSA
2024-08-28T05:00:00Z
When to skip a PIP and move to terminate an employee
The U.S. Bureau of Labor statistics reported in July 2024 that there are 8.2 million job openings in the U.S., but only 7.2 million unemployed workers.
With that in mind, employers might choose to hang onto employees even if they’re under performing. But what about when complaints are rolling in from different angles? Take, for example, a lackluster supervisor who’s annoying employees and disappointing customers.
An employer could be hesitant to let the supervisor go, especially if there’s no documentation backing up claims of misconduct. The employer must weigh their options to decide if putting the supervisor on a performance improvement plan (PIP) or moving right to termination is the ideal choice.
At-will employment
For starters, in most states employers may terminate an employee at-will, meaning they can fire employees for pretty much any reason as long as it doesn’t discriminate against someone in a protected class based on sex, age, race, religion, etc. Employers also cannot terminate in retaliation for an employee making a claim of harassment, discrimination, or safety concerns.
Aside from these limits, employers can terminate employees for good cause, bad cause, or no cause at all.
PIP or terminate
Deciding whether to put an employee on a PIP or terminate must be decided on a case-by-case basis.
A PIP is usually for job performance issues (hence, performance improvement plan). This could mean anything from not making enough sales to being inept at the job’s essential functions. If job performance doesn’t improve under the PIP, termination may be the end result depending on company policies and practices.
Even if an employee has job performance issues, the employer can terminate without going through the PIP process first, unless the usual process is to implement a PIP with employees who have had similar problems. In that case, not doing a PIP could be seen as discrimination against an employee, especially if the person falls into a protected class.
Workplace misconduct, however, is another situation altogether. This could be anything from a one-off poor joke to pervasive harassment. Snapping at customers or coworkers (or worse), for example, is a conduct issue. An employer could issue a warning or move right to termination if the behavior is clearly illegal or a serious threat to workplace safety.
Read more: ezExplanation on discharging employees |
Termination tips
If an employer decides to terminate, they should treat the employee as respectfully as possible during the termination process. Also, an employer should carefully and clearly communicate the job-related reasons for the termination to avoid any hint of discrimination. Lastly, an employer should document the reasons and reiterate the steps taken leading up to the termination and keep those records handy in case the employee files a wrongful termination lawsuit.
Key to remember: Employers sometimes struggle when making termination decisions. Having a process in place and documenting steps along the way can help if a case lands in court.
NewsIndustry NewsAssociate Benefits & CompensationAssociate RelationsHR GeneralistFamily and Medical Leave Act (FMLA)In-Depth ArticleFamily and Medical Leave Act (FMLA)HR ManagementEnglishFocus AreaHuman ResourcesUSA
2025-03-27T05:00:00Z
Who can fill out FMLA forms? The answer might surprise you
One of the most common questions involving the federal Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) that we see is: “Can ________ fill out the medical certification?”
This question stumps a lot of HR people and can be a little confusing.
It might be easier to start with who CAN’T fill out an FMLA certification. That includes your coworker, best friend, neighbor, or pet.
Jokes aside, often (but not always) a doctor fills out the FMLA certification, and since March 30 is “Doctors’ Day,” this is a great time to discuss this topic.
FMLA certification basics
Employers aren’t required to use certifications, but if they do, the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) has five different certification forms to use for various FMLA leave situations.
The forms are as follows:
- Certification of Health Care Provider for Employee's Serious Health Condition,
- Certification of Health Care Provider for Family Member's Serious Health Condition,
- Certification of Qualifying Exigency for Military Family Leave,
- Certification for Serious Injury or Illness of a Current Servicemember for Military Family Leave, and
- Certification for Serious Injury or Illness of a Veteran for Military Family Leave.
Let’s focus on the first two, as these are the most common ones HR administrators use.
Who can fill out an FMLA certification?
The FMLA regulations describe the person who has the authority to fill out a certification as a “health care provider.” The good news is, the regulations include a lengthy list of medical professionals who fit this role.
Under the FMLA, a health care provider includes:
- A doctor of medicine or osteopathy,
- A podiatrist,
- A dentist,
- A clinical psychologist,
- An optometrist,
- A chiropractor (limited to manual manipulation of the spine as demonstrated by X-ray),
- A nurse practitioner,
- A nurse midwife,
- A clinical social worker,
- A physician assistant,
- A Christian Science practitioner, and
- Any health care provider from whom the employer or the employer's group health plan's benefits manager will accept a medical certification to substantiate a claim for benefits.
To be qualified to fill out FMLA forms, medical professionals must be authorized to practice in the state and perform within the scope of their practice. This means that the provider must be authorized to diagnose and treat physical or mental health conditions.
What about doctors in a foreign country?
If an employee or an employee's family member is visiting another country, or a family member resides in another country, and a serious health condition develops, the employer must accept a medical certification from a health care provider who practices in that country. This includes second and third opinions.
If a medical certification from a foreign health care provider is not in English, the employee may be required to provide a written translation of the certification.
Key to remember: The FMLA regulations spell out which medical professionals can fill out certification forms.
NewsIndustry NewsHR GeneralistFamily and Medical Leave Act (FMLA)In-Depth ArticleFamily and Medical Leave Act (FMLA)HR ManagementEnglishFocus AreaHuman ResourcesUSA
2022-11-18T06:00:00Z
FMLA — What does (and doesn’t) count toward 1,250 hours worked?
Employers sometimes get tripped up on how to calculate the 1,250 hours worked eligibility criterion when employees need leave under the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA).
Does working overtime count toward the 1,250?
Recently, someone asked if overtime hours counted toward the 1,250 hours worked requirement (it does).
All hours actually worked apply to the 1,250, whether overtime or regular time, even if the overtime is not mandatory.
The 1,250 hours is calculated in relation to when the leave will begin, not when the employee puts an employer on notice of the need for leave.
Whether an employee is allowed to work overtime, however, is generally up to company policy. As far as pay goes, remember, if the employee is nonexempt (“hourly”) and works any overtime (mandatory or voluntary) the employee must be paid time and one-half for all hours worked over 40 within the workweek.
More about FMLA leave requirements
To be eligible to take FMLA leave, employees must:
- Have worked at least 1,250 hours in the 12 months before leave is to begin,
- Have worked for their employer at least 12 months, and
- Work at a location with at least 50 company employees within 75 miles.
Whether an employee has worked the minimum 1,250 hours is calculated based on determining compensable hours or work under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA).
Calculating the 1,250 hours worked
When it comes to figuring out if an employee has worked at least 1,250 hours, it can get tricky. As was mentioned above, all hours worked, regular and overtime, must be counted.
Hours not worked should not be counted. The “not worked hours” include such time off as vacation time, sick leave, paid or unpaid holidays, or any other time in which an employee isn’t actually working — which can include disability, bereavement, FMLA and other forms of leave.
Once an employee meets the three eligibility criteria, including the 1,250 hours worked, for a particular leave reason, the employee remains eligible for the duration of the 12-month leave year period.
If the employee needs leave for another, different reason, eligibility would be recalculated.
Key to remember: All hours worked must be included in the 1,250 hours criterion when determining whether an employee is eligible for FMLA leave. Hours that aren’t worked (like vacation) are not included.
NewsIndustry NewsWellnessWork-life balanceHR GeneralistIn-Depth ArticleEmployee Mental HealthAssociate RelationsEnglishHR ManagementFocus AreaHuman ResourcesUSA
2025-04-04T05:00:00Z
What makes employees happy at work? A happy life!
A study exploring the long-term relationship between job satisfaction and life satisfaction shows that personal happiness leads to a positive work life, not the other way around.
This conclusion by researchers is the opposite of the long-held belief that a happy work life has a stronger influence on one’s personal life.
The findings, published in the Journal of Organizational Behavior, could help employers better understand work-life balance.
Researchers from the U.S., Germany, and Australia looked at data in the study from more than 160,000 people globally. The information showed how job and life satisfaction evolve and affect each other over time.
The study found that individuals with higher life satisfaction were 32 percent more likely to experience an increase in job satisfaction. While job satisfaction does have a positive effect on future life satisfaction, it is comparatively weaker and lessens over time.
Overall well-being increases job satisfaction
One of the authors of the study said the data highlights the vital role of overall personal well-being in professional performance and career fulfillment, adding that organizations focused only on job satisfaction plans may be missing a main component of employee happiness. That component is a focus on employee well-being strategies, including:
- Mental health support,
- Work-life balance policies and programs, and
- Personal development.
Based on the study’s findings, a focus on overall well-being can foster a more engaged and satisfied workforce. As such, the researchers recommended that employers:
- Implement flexible work arrangements to support employees’ personal commitments;
- Encourage mental health and wellness programs to improve overall life satisfaction;
- Provide opportunities for personal and professional growth that extend beyond job-related tasks; and
- Foster a workplace culture that values employees’ lives outside of work.
Key to remember: A new global study found that life satisfaction has more of an impact on job satisfaction than was previously assumed. This led researchers to conclude that employers who focus on overall employee well-being can foster a more engaged and satisfied workforce.
Most Popular Highlights In Safety & Health
NewsIndustry NewsSafety & HealthGeneral Industry SafetyIn-Depth ArticleHazard CommunicationHazard CommunicationEnglishFocus AreaUSA
2025-04-11T05:00:00Z
Exemptions, SDSs, and labels: Your recent HazCom questions answered
We’ve had some great Hazard Communication (HazCom) questions come in through our Expert Help feature and our webcasts lately. Thank you! The following are answers to popular questions asked last quarter.
If we purchase a chemical from a local store, is it exempt from HazCom?
Assuming the chemical is, in fact, a hazardous chemical by definition, the answer depends. The standard contains 12 exemptions at 29 CFR 1910.1200(b)(6), which may apply to your situation. Often employers can spot an exemption for some of their hazardous chemicals, so it’s worth checking the list.
Consumer products, for instance, are exempt if they’re only used at work as intended by the manufacturer or importer and that use is in a duration and frequency no greater than the range a consumer would reasonably experience. On the flip side, if a consumer product is not used as intended or is used longer or more frequently than a reasonable consumer would, it is covered by the HazCom standard.
In many cases, OSHA lists a substance as exempt at paragraph (b)(6) because it’s regulated by another OSHA standard or another federal agency. In this way, OSHA did not duplicate employer efforts with a HazCom requirement. Hazardous waste covered under EPA’s Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), is an example.
If a contractor brings a hazardous chemical into our facility to perform work but our employees aren’t exposed and there’s no potential for exposure, do we need an SDS for it?
If there’s no exposure or potential for exposure to your own employees during normal operating conditions or in a foreseeable emergency, then you don’t need a safety data sheet (SDS) for that hazardous chemical. To help make that determination, see the term “exposure” as defined in 1910.1200(c).
As a contractor specializing in overnight cleaning, we sometimes assign associates to different sites. Would it be compliant to use one binder across multiple locations?
The HazCom Standard does allow you to maintain a single binder at the primary workplace, provided workers can immediately obtain the information in an emergency. This is explained at 1910.1200(g)(9): “Where employees must travel between workplaces during a workshift, i.e., their work is carried out at more than one geographical location, the safety data sheets may be kept at the primary workplace facility. In this situation, the employer shall ensure that employees can immediately obtain the required information in an emergency.”
OSHA offers further clarification in CPL 02-02-079, the agency's guidance document for its inspectors: “If the SDSs are stored at the primary workplace, the employer must ensure there is no delay in a worker receiving a requested SDS while at any mobile, remote, or temporary worksite.
“Access may be accomplished by having a representative always available at the primary workplace or through other technological means (e.g., email, smart phone, electronic tablet).
“The employer must address in their written hazard communication program how SDS information will be conveyed to remote worksites.”
How often do SDSs have to be updated?
From an SDS creation standpoint, when the manufacturer, importer, or employer preparing the SDS becomes aware of any significant information regarding a chemical’s hazards, or ways to protect against the hazards, the new information must be added to the SDS within three months. This is spelled out at 1910.1200(g)(5).
However, as an employer maintaining SDSs for the covered hazardous chemicals in your workplace, the requirement is to keep the most recently received SDS for the product. You’re not required to seek out a newer SDS. It’s worth noting that other countries may require employers to replace SDSs that are a certain age. However, that’s not the case in the U.S.
Can we still use NFPA or HMIS® labels for workplace labels or did that change with the revisions to HazCom last year?
OSHA’s revisions to the HazCom Standard in May 2024 didn’t change the requirements at 1910.1200(f)(6) for workplace (in-house) labels. Let’s take a closer look at that paragraph.
While you’re still not required to relabel incoming containers of hazardous chemicals that are already properly labeled, some employers choose to do so. Additionally, if you transfer chemicals from one container to another, and that container doesn’t meet the “immediate use” definition, it still must be labeled under paragraph (f)(6).
When coming up with an in-house label, one option is to use the same label elements as those required on “shipped” containers of hazardous chemicals, found in paragraphs (f)(1)(i) through (iv), without the supplier information. The second option is to use the product identifier and words, pictures, symbols, or a combination of these, which provide “general information” of the chemical’s hazards. The HMIS® or NFPA® system may be used to meet the second option, though you must ensure employees are trained to use and understand the system. Plus, any OSHA chemical hazards missing from the rating system must be added to the label to make it OSHA compliant.
Could you please help me get a big-picture view of the NFPA® and HMIS® labeling systems?
National Fire Protection Association (or NFPA) is a leading expert in fire safety and prevention. One of its consensus standards, NFPA 704, Standard System for the Identification of the Hazards of Materials for Emergency Response, offers a marking system to help emergency responders determine chemical hazards in a building or storage area. This NFPA® system uses a square-on-point configuration with:
- Four hazard quadrants to depict health (blue), flammability (red), instability (yellow), and special hazards (white); and
- Five ratings ranging from zero (no hazard) to four (severe hazard) to indicate the degree of severity for each hazard. Plus, special hazards are depicted by certain letters.
HMIS stands for Hazardous Materials Identification System, an in-house labeling system copyrighted by the American Coatings Association (ACA). It was originally developed for use by the paint manufacturing industry to indicate chemical hazards in the workplace. The system has since spread to other service and manufacturing industries. HMIS® labels appear as a rectangle-shaped block of colored bars with hazard ratings of zero through four, plus personal protective equipment symbols/letters and a carcinogen indicator.
Key to remember: OSHA’s HazCom Standard continues to pose a challenge for employers and safety professionals. Feel free to submit your questions through our Expert Help feature and our regulatory experts will respond to you within one business day.
NewsIndustry NewsSafety & HealthConstruction SafetyGeneral Industry SafetyGeneral Duty ClauseIn-Depth ArticleEnglishGeneral Duty ClauseFocus AreaUSA
2025-04-10T05:00:00Z
Ensure that employees who work alone prioritize their own safety
Despite a common misconception, OSHA doesn’t regulate employees working alone, at least in most cases. However, lone workers should understand any risks or hazards and place their own safety above any other concerns.
A few OSHA regulations address working alone, such as interior structural firefighting or working in permit required confined spaces. However, working alone is unavoidable for some jobs, like a night security guard. OSHA encourages employers to develop emergency procedures and provide communication options (like cell phones) for employees working alone.
What prompted the concern?
To determine if someone could safely work alone in a specific situation, the first step is to evaluate why that concern arose. Questions to consider might include:
- What hazards will the employee face, and what is the likelihood the employee will need help in an emergency? Consider both the probability of an incident as well as the severity.
- Did the concern arise because of external threats, such as a security guard who could face a violent situation? Or did the concern arise because of job hazards, such as working with dangerous equipment? How can those hazards be reduced or eliminated?
- Will the employee have a cell phone and designated contact? Will another employee or manager be on call? How long would someone else take to respond?
Keep in mind that unless security cameras are continually monitored, they do not provide any protection for lone workers. If an incident occurs, video recordings might help determine what happened, but cameras cannot prevent an incident from occurring.
For related information, see our article One is the loneliest number: Five steps to lone worker safety.
Trusting the worker
When a job requires working alone, the employer will presumably select a responsible and trustworthy employee. The employer should train that person to recognize hazards, use caution, and avoid any tasks that create an unacceptable level of risk. Lone workers must understand that they are responsible for their own safety and should carefully consider the potential consequences of any actions. If they have to stop and think about whether they can perform a specific task safely, then skipping that task may be best.
Supervisors should be wary of reprimanding lone workers for “not doing the job.” If tasks were not completed because lone workers felt uncomfortable, they should be praised for prioritizing their safety and refusing to put themselves at risk. Supervisors should not inadvertently encourage them to take risks. Instead, ask the employee to explain why they could not complete the task and try to think of alternative procedures that might get the job done with lower risk.
Establishing a check-in procedure could also be an option. Determine how the worker should check in, with whom, and how frequently. That could mean calling a manager before starting a particular task and again upon completion. In addition, decide on a response if the employee misses a call. Will the manager visit the site to check on the worker? For related information, see our article Lone Workers: A recommended policy.
Employers must balance the potential risks to someone working alone against the costs of scheduling a second worker. Options may range from having someone on call to simply delaying specific projects until additional workers are on duty.
Key to remember: OSHA does not prohibit employees from working alone, but employers should carefully evaluate the hazards and ensure that lone workers do not take unnecessary risks.
NewsIndustry NewsEnforcement and Audits - OSHAHead ProtectionPersonal Protective EquipmentSafety & HealthConstruction SafetyGeneral Industry SafetyIn-Depth ArticleEnglishFocus AreaPersonal Protective EquipmentUSA
2024-04-03T05:00:00Z
Does OSHA suddenly require “helmets” now instead of hard hats?
Ever since OSHA published its Trade Release on December 11, 2023, people have been scratching their heads about the “new” PPE requirement.
But here’s the thing. There isn’t a new requirement for “helmets” instead of hard hats.
So where’s the confusion? And what is actually required?
OSHA’s announcement on helmets vs. hard hats
OSHA released a Safety and Health Bulletin (SHIB 11-22-2023) on November 22, 2023, detailing the key differences and benefits of using modern safety helmets over traditional hard hats.
And just a few weeks later, in the December 11, 2023 Trade Release, the Agency announced it would now require its inspectors to wear Type II head protection, which is also commonly referred to as safety helmets.
The two main benefits of Type II safety helmets
The November 22, 2023 SHIB discussed two main benefits of choosing modern safety helmets over traditional hard hats -- the construction of materials and the use of chinstraps.
Construction of Materials: | The SHIB first explained that one of the benefits of safety helmets lies in their construction materials. While hard hats are made from hard plastics, safety helmets incorporate a combination of materials, including lightweight composites, fiberglass, and advanced thermoplastics. Such materials can help enhance the impact resistance of the helmets but also include the added benefit of reducing the overall weight of the helmet. This reduces neck strain and improves comfort during extended use. |
Use of Chinstraps: | The SHIB also discussed the potential benefits of chinstraps used in conjunction with Type II safety helmets. The general idea here is that chinstraps can be helpful in maintaining the position of the safety helmet and protecting the worker’s head in the event of a slip, trip, or fall. According to data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, head injuries accounted for nearly 6% of non-fatal occupational injuries involving days away from work. About 20% of those were caused by slips, trips, and falls. |
And while OSHA has recognized the benefits of Type II safety helmets, and is actively taking steps to protect its own employees, it’s important to understand that there is not a new requirement for employers to make the switch to safety helmets.
That being said, a growing number of employers have recognized the benefits of added head protection and are choosing to use Type II helmets for their workers. In addition, some clients are starting to contractually require their construction contractors to make the switch as well.
Understanding the different types of head protection
Hard hats will have a Type I or Type II rating on the manufacturer’s sticker. These markings are based on ANSI Z89.1’s impact ratings.
Type I hard hats protect from objects or impacts from the top center area of the hard hat and are often used in work areas with no lateral head impact hazards.
Type II hard hats, on the other hand, offers protection from both top and lateral impacts and objects and is often found on construction job sites or complex general industry settings where workers face multiple head contact exposures.
Hard hats are classified based on their level of voltage protection. See the chart below.
Class G – (General) low voltage protection. Class E – (Electrical) high voltage protection. Class C – (Conductive) no voltage protection. |
Choosing the right head protection for your employees
Employers should conduct a job hazard analysis and/or a PPE assessment to determine which style hard hat is best for their workers. In general, OSHA recommends the use of Type II safety helmets at the following locations:
1. Construction Sites: For construction sites, especially those with high risks of falling objects and debris, impacts from equipment, or slips, trips, and falls, safety helmets have enhanced impact resistance and additional features that offer superior protection compared to the components and construction of traditional hard hats.
2. Oil and Gas Industry: In these sectors where workers face multiple hazards, including potential exposure to chemicals and severe impacts, safety helmets with additional features can provide comprehensive protection.
3. Working from Heights: For tasks or jobs that involve working from heights, safety helmets offer protection of the entire head and include features that prevent the safety helmet from falling off.
4. Electrical Work: For tasks involving electrical work or proximity to electrical hazards, safety helmets with non-conductive materials (Class G and Class E) provide protection to prevent electrical shocks. However, some traditional hard hats also offer electrical protection.
5. High-Temperature Environments: In high temperatures or where there is exposure to molten materials, safety helmets with advanced heat-resistant properties can provide additional protection to workers.
Key to remember: While there isn’t a new requirement for safety helmets, employers should review their workplace hazards to determine which style of hard hat will best protect their employees.
NewsIndustry NewsInfectious DiseasesSafety & HealthConstruction SafetyInfectious DiseasesGeneral Industry SafetyIn-Depth ArticleEnglishFocus AreaUSA
2025-04-09T05:00:00Z
Battle of the sniffles: Allergies vs. the common cold
What is the difference?
The common cold is caused by various respiratory viruses, with rhinoviruses being the most common. These viruses are highly contagious and spread simply through close personal contact with an infected person, respiratory droplets when they cough or sneeze, or even by touching contaminated surfaces and then touching your eyes, nose, or mouth.
The CDC emphasizes that colds are more frequent in colder months, but many cold viruses can spread effectively anytime of the year. Adults in the United States experience an average of two to three colds per year.
Allergies, on the other hand, are immune system reactions to substances known as allergens, such as pollen, dust mites, pet dander, and mold. The CDC clarifies that allergies are not contagious and are triggered by exposure to specific allergens.
OSHA highlights that workplace allergens can include chemicals, dust, mold, and other environmental factors. Approximately 31.8% of adults in the United States have some form of allergy.
What are the symptoms?
Cold symptoms typically include a runny or stuffy nose, sore throat, cough, sneezing, mild body aches, headache, and low-grade fever. These symptoms usually peak within two to three days of infection and typically last for about seven to ten days.
Allergy symptoms, as described by the CDC, include sneezing, runny or stuffy nose, itchy or watery eyes, itchy skin or throat, and cough. Unlike colds, allergy symptoms can persist as long as the person is exposed to the allergen. OSHA adds that workplace exposure to allergens can worsen these symptoms.
How can we prevent it from affecting the workplace?
To prevent the common cold from affecting the workplace, the CDC recommends good hygiene practices such as frequent hand washing, avoiding close contact with infected individuals, and disinfecting commonly touched surfaces.
OSHA supports these measures and encourages employers to provide hand sanitizers and promote a clean work environment. Additionally, employers can implement policies that encourage sick employees to stay home to prevent the spread of illness.
Preventing allergy symptoms requires minimizing exposure to allergens. The CDC suggests using air purifiers, keeping windows closed during high pollen seasons, regular cleaning to reduce dust and pet dander, and avoiding known food allergens.
OSHA highlights the importance of controlling workplace allergens through proper housekeeping and maintenance, including regular cleaning of ventilation systems and commonly touched surfaces.
Additionally, certain chemicals can cause allergic reactions, so reviewing your chemical inventory and minimizing chemicals that contain known allergens should be considered in workplaces.
Key to remember: While the common cold and allergies share some symptoms, they have distinct differences in their causes, duration, treatment, and prevention. Understanding these differences can help individuals manage their symptoms more effectively and ensure a healthier workplace.
NewsIndustry NewsSafety & HealthConstruction SafetyInjury and Illness Recording CriteriaGeneral Industry SafetyIn-Depth ArticleUSAEnglishFocus AreaInjury and Illness Recordkeeping
2023-06-21T05:00:00Z
If an injured employee requests a day off, is that Days Away?
When injured employees return to work, they may request time off because of the injury. Does that require recording days away on the OSHA 300 Log? Not necessarily.
An employee’s decision to take a day off cannot change how a case gets recorded. Only the employer or a health care professional can impose restrictions or days away. However, if you agree that the worker needed one or more days off because of the injury, you must record that time as days away.
See our related article Can you fire someone who’s out for a work-related injury? |
OSHA addressed these situations in a letter of interpretation dated March 22, 2011. The letter explains that employers must make a determination on whether the employee could have worked or whether the employee needed the time off for recovery. If you decide that the injured employee could have worked, you don’t need to record days away. However, if you agree that the employee needed time off due to the injury, you must count that employer-approved time off as days away.
Example illustrations
Suppose an employee suffered an ankle injury and was given restrictions that your company could accommodate. You expect him to show up at work the next day. The next morning, he calls in saying that his ankle is swollen so he can’t put on a shoe, and he doesn’t think he can drive. He wants to take the day off. If you agree that he should take the day off to recover, you must record that as a day away.
Another employee gets a cut on his hand and visits a doctor. The doctor cleans and bandages the wound but doesn’t impose restrictions. The next day, the employee texts his supervisor that, “My hand hurts, so I’m staying home today.” Attempts to contact the worker for details yield no response. If you believe the employee could have reported for work and performed all job duties, you don’t have to count it as a day away on the OSHA 300 Log.
Making the determination
OSHA’s FAQ search page addresses two questions involving employees choosing to take days off due to injury. Both responses state that the employer “must make a good faith decision” on whether or not the injured worker needed the time off.
The letter of interpretation clarifies that whether the employer records the time as vacation, sick time, or unexcused absence doesn’t matter since employers must count all calendar days, including non-working days. The key is the employer’s determination of whether the employee needed time off, or whether the employee could have worked.
When making a good-faith decision, you would likely consider the nature and severity of the injury. You’ll probably need to rely on whatever information the injured worker provides. The employee might indicate severe pain, a reaction to a medication, or other reasons for taking time off.
In addition, you might consider the injured employee’s work history. Does this person reliably come to work, or does the injured worker have a history of calling in sick for unusual reasons?
Finally, remember that calling off work for reasons unrelated to the injury (such as car trouble or staying home to care for a sick child) would not require a determination on whether the employee could have worked. If the employee didn’t request time off “because of” the injury, then the absence would not count as days away.
Key to remember: Only the employer or a doctor, not an employee, can create a days away case. However, if the employer agrees that an employee needed time off to recover, the employer must count that as days away.
NewsIndustry NewsMaterials Handling and StorageSafety & HealthGeneral Industry SafetyIn-Depth ArticleEnglishFocus AreaStorage RacksUSA
2023-11-16T06:00:00Z
Lack of posted weight capacity on racking can lead to OSHA citations
Pallet racks are utilized to house millions of pounds of material each day. How much weight a racking system can hold depends on a number of factors. While OSHA does not specifically require posting the load capacity rating on steel racking, they are consistently citing employers for not displaying it.
Aside from a very general “stored items must be secured” mention in 1910.176(b), OSHA has no specific racking safety standards or guidelines. Because of this, they typically cite racking hazards under the General Duty Clause of the OSH Act, which simply states that each employer must provide a workplace that is free from recognized hazards.
Exact loads can vary depending on the configuration of the pallet rack and the types of pallets used. If workers are placing loads in racks, they need to be trained to understand the weight of the load and whether or not the rack can handle it. Employers should have systems in place that include weighing pallets and materials prior to placement on the racking system. They should also maintain, and continually update, a weight inventory of all materials being stored and/or removed from the racks.
During enforcement actions, OSHA can reference other standards that could be used in times of abatement. In the case of load capacity rating, they often reference the industry standard ANSI MH16.1.
About ANSI MH16.1
Industrial steel storage racks, moveable shelf racks, rack-supported systems, and stacker racks made of hot-rolled and/or cold-formed steel structural members are covered by the MH16.1 standard. The standard is intended to be applied to the design of the storage rack structure.
One particular section (1.4.2 – Plaque) requires displaying one or more permanent plaques that contain information including:
- maximum permissible unit load,
- maximum uniformly distributed load per level,
- average unit load, and
- maximum total load per bay.
This is not to say that employers need to display a plaque on every section of steel racking. What they should pay particular attention to is where the standard mentions displaying the maximum total load per bay.
Inspectors reference section 1.4.2 of the MH16.1 standard when identifying racking hazards. For example, OSHA may state that one way to abate a racking hazard would be to include the wording on a rack label that communicates the load capacity so employees don’t overload the racking.
Other considerations
If an OSHA inspector is on site to review your racking system, they may also look for hazards associated with anchoring of the system, as well as inspection and maintenance.
It is recommended that the bottom of all columns be furnished with column base plates and be anchored to the floor with anchor bolts capable of resisting the forces caused by the loads on the rack.
Storage racks should also be inspected regularly, with sufficient clearance around them, and should not be damaged, out of plumb, or overloaded. An effective maintenance and inspection program will bring awareness to things such as keeping aisles clear and providing sufficient clearance for material handling equipment; ensuring racks are properly aligned, plumb, and level, per manufacturer’s instructions; and encourage employees to promptly report any damage to racks.
The OSHA requirements for steel racking are vague. Even though there are no specific standards that require displaying the load rating on racking, being anchored to the floor, or inspected, citations have and will be given under the General Duty Clause if discovered.
Keep in mind also, OSHA may reference other standards during enforcement actions — sometimes there are other means of abatement, so an employer doesn’t have to follow the ANSI standard, but other times, there isn’t much alternative.
Key to remember: Steel storage racks should display the maximum load capacity rating, be bolted to the floor, and inspected.
Saved to my EVENT CALENDAR!
View your saved links by clicking the arrow next to your profile picture located in the header. Then, click “My Activity” to view the Event Calendar on your Activity page.
OK
J. J. Keller is the trusted source for DOT / Transportation, OSHA / Workplace Safety, Human Resources, Construction Safety and Hazmat / Hazardous Materials regulation compliance products and services. J. J. Keller helps you increase safety awareness, reduce risk, follow best practices, improve safety training, and stay current with changing regulations.
Copyright 2025 J. J. Keller & Associate, Inc. For re-use options please contact copyright@jjkeller.com or call 800-558-5011.