{{ post.roar_specific_data.subject }}
{{ post.roar_specific_data.subjecttopic }}
{{ post.roar_specific_data.PublishDate }}
JOIN TODAY TO CONTINUE READING THIS ARTICLE & OTHER INDUSTRY NEWS!
You'll also get exclusive access to:
A database of easy-to-understand regulationsAsk unlimited questions to our expertsPre-led discussions forumsAnd more
TRY IT FREE TODAY
Already have an account? Log in now.
See More
RELATED NEWS

Specialized Industries
Go beyond the regulations! Visit the Institute for in-depth guidance on a wide range of compliance subjects in safety and health, transportation, environment, and human resources.
J. J. Keller® COMPLIANCE NETWORK is a premier online safety and compliance community, offering members exclusive access to timely regulatory content in workplace safety (OSHA), transportation (DOT), environment (EPA), and human resources (DOL).

Interact With Our Compliance Experts
Puzzled by a regulatory question or issue? Let our renowned experts provide the answers and get your business on track to full compliance!

Upcoming Events
Reference the Compliance Network Safety Calendar to keep track of upcoming safety and compliance events. Browse by industry or search by keyword to see relevant dates and observances, including national safety months, compliance deadlines, and more.
SAFETY & COMPLIANCE NEWS
Keep up with the latest regulatory developments from OSHA, DOT, EPA, DOL, and more.
REGSENSE® REGULATORY REFERENCE
Explore a comprehensive database of word-for-word regulations on a wide range of compliance topics, with simplified explanations and best practices advice from our experts.
THE J. J. KELLER INSTITUTE
The Institute is your destination for in-depth content on 120+ compliance subjects. Discover articles, videos, and interactive exercises that will strengthen your understanding of regulatory concepts relevant to your business.
ADD HAZMAT, ENVIRONMENTAL, & HR RESOURCES
Unlock exclusive content offering expert insights into hazmat, environmental, and human resources compliance with a COMPLIANCE NETWORK EDGE membership.
DIRECT ACCESS TO COMPLIANCE EXPERTS
Struggling with a compliance challenge? Get the solution from our in-house team of experts! You can submit a question to our experts by email, set up a phone or video call, or request a detailed research report.
EVENTS
Register to attend live online events hosted by our experts. These webcasts and virtual conferences feature engaging discussions on important compliance topics in a casual, knowledge-sharing environment.
Most Recent Highlights In Environmental
NewsIndustry NewsSuperfundCERCLA, SARA, EPCRA CERCLA, SARA, EPCRASARA ComplianceEnvironmental Protection Agency (EPA)EnvironmentalIn-Depth ArticleEnglishSARA ComplianceFocus AreaUSA
2025-06-03T05:00:00Z
Conduct AAI before you buy: Shield against Superfund liability
There’s one question that all potential purchasers should ask before buying an industrial or commercial property: Could the business be held liable for hazardous substance contamination? The Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA), also called “Superfund,” allows the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to make both current and past facility owners and operators responsible for cleaning up sites contaminated by hazardous substances.
However, CERCLA offers liability protections to landowners and potential purchasers who didn’t cause or contribute to property contamination if they meet specific requirements, including conducting All Appropriate Inquiries (AAI).
Here’s how AAI can shield your organization from Superfund liability.
What’s AAI?
EPA defines AAI as “the process of evaluating a property’s environmental conditions and assessing potential liability for any contamination.” It encompasses the activities required by the AAI rule (40 CFR Part 312) to:
- Establish current and past uses and ownerships of the property; and
- Identify conditions that indicate releases or threatened releases of hazardous substances on, at, in, or to the property.
Potential property owners must comply with the AAI rule to claim protection from CERCLA liability. They may use one of three landowner defenses:
- Innocent landowners (who didn’t know and had no reason to know before purchase that the property was contaminated),
- Contiguous property owners (who didn’t know and had no reason to know before purchase that the property is or may be contaminated by a neighboring property), or
- Bona fide prospective purchasers (who knew or had reason to know before the purchase that the property was contaminated but were allowed to purchase it by meeting and continuing to meet certain criteria).
Who’s required to comply?
You must meet the AAI requirements if you plan to purchase a property for nonresidential use and may want to use CERCLA liability protections for hazardous substance releases or threatened releases after purchase.
The AAI rule requires an environmental professional to conduct most of the activities (312.21), but it also contains provisions that the potential owner must meet (312.22).
Who qualifies as an environmental professional?
An environmental professional has the needed background to identify conditions of a property that indicate releases or threatened releases of hazardous substances. According to 312.10, an environmental professional needs:
- A current professional engineer’s or professional geologist’s license or registration and three years of relevant work experience,
- A government-issued license or certification to perform environmental inquiries and three years of relevant work experience,
- A bachelor’s degree or higher in engineering or science and five years of relevant work experience, or
- Ten years of relevant work experience.
What’s required to comply?
The AAI rule lists the actions needed to qualify for CERCLA liability protection using the landowner defenses. All AAI tasks must be completed before acquiring the property. Most tasks need to be completed within one year prior to purchasing a property. However, a handful of actions must happen within 180 days before purchase:
- Interviews,
- Environmental cleanup lien searches,
- Governmental record reviews,
- Visual inspections, and
- Declaration by the environmental professional.
The environmental professional:
- Interviews current and past property owners, operators, and occupants;
- Reviews historical information sources;
- Reviews government records;
- Conducts visual inspections of the facility and adjoining properties;
- Reviews commonly known or reasonably ascertainable property information; and
- Assesses the degree of obviousness of the presence or likely presence of property contamination and the ability to detect the contamination.
The potential landowner:
- Searches for environmental cleanup liens not provided by the environmental professional,
- Assesses any personal specialized knowledge or experience,
- Assesses the relationship of the purchase price to the fair market value if the property isn’t contaminated, and
- Obtains any commonly known or reasonably ascertainable property information not provided by the environmental professional.
Report the results
The AAI results must be documented in a written report that’s signed by the environmental professional. It must include:
- The environmental professional’s determination of whether the property has conditions that indicate releases or threatened releases of hazardous substances,
- Any data gaps that impacted the ability to identify such conditions and how the missing information impacted the determination,
- The environmental professional’s qualifications, and
- The required certification statements at 312.21(d).
Get guidance from industry standards
The regulations don’t provide specific requirements for the AAI format, and although the rules outline the actions you must take, it can be daunting to implement AAI without further guidance.
Consider using industry standards! EPA even references ASTM International Standards at 312.11 that you can use to comply.
Key to remember: Potential landowners can shield themselves from CERCLA liability for hazardous substance contamination by conducting All Appropriate Inquiries.
2025-05-27T05:00:00Z
Site Announcement: New Homepage Coming Soon!!!
Thank you to all our members that have taken the time to provide the Compliance Network team with feedback on what they like and do not like about the site. We have taken this feedback to heart and have redesigned the homepage to better serve our members. Our goal is to make finding the information you need easier and faster.
Let’s take a tour!
Sitewide Search
We heard you. Search has been brought front and center to help you find the information you need quickly.
Activity Overview
The Activity Overview will provide quick access to items that matter to you.
- Profile Builder - Get the most from your membership. Complete your profile so the information important to you rises to the top.
- My Saves - Organize and save your content of interest for quick access later.
- Notifications - We will keep current with site updates, new content, network events, and most importantly, regulatory updates.
- Top Stories now - Recent news in your areas of interest.
Latest in your favorite Topics
This section will highlight any new content added to your selected topics of interest.
Network Polls and Discussion Activity
See what other professionals in your field are saying.
Premium Content
Exclusive content only available to Compliance Network members.
Trending
Catch up with what other professional like yourself are reading.
The new homepage will go live in June. Don’t hesitate to let us know what you think: compliancenetwork@jjkeller.com
NewsIndustry NewsEnvironmental Protection Agency (EPA)CAA ComplianceEnvironmentalIn-Depth ArticleFocus AreaEnglishAir PermittingAir ProgramsAir ProgramsUSA
2025-05-23T05:00:00Z
Title V operating permits: Comply, certify, repeat
A Title V operating permit is a legally enforceable document with the federal and state air emissions regulations that a facility must meet to operate. One requirement that applies to all Title V permit holders is the annual compliance certification. It answers whether a facility fulfills the permit’s terms and conditions (such as emissions limits, monitoring, recordkeeping, and reporting).
Whether the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) or a state or local regulatory agency issues the Title V permit, your facility must complete the annual compliance certification.
Discover what your facility needs to comply, certify, and repeat.
What’s required?
Facilities submit annual compliance certifications to the Title V permitting authority, which is usually a state or local regulatory agency (40 CFR 70.6). An EPA Regional Office serves as the permitting authority (71.6) for federally issued permits.
Title V tip:Check the state or local regulations for Title V compliance certification rules. They may require more frequent submissions and additional information.
At a minimum, the annual compliance certification covers two major areas for every permit term or condition:
- The compliance methods, and
- The compliance status.
Let’s take a closer look at each element.
Compliance methods
Your facility’s compliance methods are the ways it tracks whether it’s meeting the Title V permit requirements or not. When a term or condition isn’t met (like exceeding an emission limit), it’s known as a deviation.
Compliance methods consist of monitoring, recordkeeping, and reporting:
- Monitoring includes the procedures, test methods, and equipment used to track compliance data.
- Recordkeeping covers:
- The date, place, and time of monitoring;
- The date when monitoring results were analyzed, the entity that conducted the analysis, the analytical methods used, and the results; and
- The operating conditions during monitoring.
- Reporting consists of semiannual monitoring reports and deviation reports (which list the deviation, the applicable permit requirement, the probable cause, and any corrective or preventive actions).
Compliance status
Three questions determine the compliance status of each permit requirement during the covered period:
- Did the facility comply with the requirement?
- Was compliance continuous or intermittent?
- Were any deviations a “possible exception to compliance"?
Intermittent vs. continuous compliance
For each permit term or condition, your facility has intermittent compliance if it doesn’t meet the requirements at any time during the covered period. Your facility achieves continuous compliance only if it:
- Performs the necessary compliance methods,
- Has no unexcused deviations, and
- Records no contrary evidence.
Possible exception to compliance
EPA defines a possible exception to compliance as “any periods during which compliance is required and in which an excursion or exceedance … occurred” (70.6(c)(5)(iii)(C)).
Simply put, a possible exception to compliance is a deviation that occurs when compliance is mandated. If compliance isn’t required or another permit requirement excuses it, the deviation isn’t a possible exception.
How do I submit a compliance certification?
Your facility’s Title V permit provides instructions for how to submit the annual compliance certification, including the required forms and methods (via mail or electronic submission). You can also confirm requirements with your permitting authority. Generally, federally permitted facilities use the Annual Compliance Certification (EPA Form 5900-04).
Title V tip: Electronic submissions may be an option through the Compliance and Emissions Data Reporting Interface (CEDRI) on EPA’s Central Data Exchange. Check with your permitting authority to determine whether you may submit the annual compliance certification electronically via CEDRI.
Annual compliance certification is vital to maintaining your Title V permit. Keep in mind: comply, certify, and repeat.
Key to remember: Facilities with a Title V operating permit must certify compliance with the requirements at least annually.
NewsIndustry NewsAir ProgramsCAA ComplianceEnvironmentalIn-Depth ArticleEnglishAir PermittingFocus AreaAir ProgramsUSA
2025-05-21T05:00:00Z
Compliance guide: Air regulations for emergency generator installation
In today's rapidly evolving energy landscape, businesses are turning to back-up emergency generators to keep operations running smoothly. Several key factors are driving this growing trend:
- Extreme heat and weather events
Climate change has led to more intense weather like hurricanes, wildfires, and heatwaves. These events put pressure on power grids, causing outages that disrupt business operations. Generators help by providing backup power during unexpected failures.
- Power demand from AI and data centers
Artificial intelligence (AI) and data centers need a lot of electricity. As these technologies grow, power grids struggle to keep up. Companies use generators to prevent power shortages and keep essential systems running.
- Grid reliability concerns
Aging infrastructure and unsteady energy supply from renewable sources can make electrical supply unstable. Industries like manufacturing, healthcare, and finance need steady power to avoid costly interruptions. Generators act as a safety net when the grid fails.
Compliance considerations
Backup generators help keep businesses running, but they also impact the environment. Companies must follow air quality regulations to reduce pollution and operate safely.
Air permits
•State agencies usually oversee air permits, but The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has granted many county and city agencies the authority to issue them. For major permits such as New Source Review (NSR) and Title V, federal regulations apply, but state or local governments may still manage the process.
•In some areas, businesses can apply for a general permit or permit-by-rule for emergency generators. These permits are often easier to obtain and take less time to process. Checking air permitting regulations will help determine if this option is available.
•Businesses should find out if they need a pre-construction or construction air permit before setting up an emergency generator. These permits are based on the proposed equipment’s potential to emit (PTE) of criteria pollutants such as NOx, SO2, CO, and CO2 and hazardous air pollutants (HAPs) such as formaldehyde and acrolein, which are emitted during the combustion of fuel. The type(s) of fuel used in the generator, such as diesel, natural gas, gasoline, or propane, will affect the calculated PTE. Read more about construction permits in this ezExplanation: NSR Permits.
(Note: many state and local permitting agencies allow for the use of 500 hours for calculating PTE from an emergency engine, as per EPA’s 2011 Fox Memo, but some agencies still require using 8,760 hours and only accept 500 hours as an enforceable limit defined in a permit.)
•Federal law sets a limit on emergency generators, allowing less than 100 hours of non-emergency use per year. This includes maintenance and testing. Some permits may also restrict the times of day when the generator can be used for non-emergency purposes.
•The permit may require businesses to use the generator according to the manufacturer’s specifications. This is especially important if the business used manufacturer guarantees to calculate PTE.
•Businesses must track fuel use and operating hours to stay within the limits used in emissions calculations. They can do this using fuel records, fuel measuring devices, and hour meters that log the generator’s usage time.
•After getting a construction permit, a facility may need to apply for an operating permit within a year of the generator beginning operation. Some state and local agencies have stricter rules and deadlines. Check out J. J. Keller’s ezExplanation for Operating Permits: Clean Air Act: Operating Permits
EPA emission standards
The EPA enforces strict emissions regulations for stationary engines. Businesses must ensure their generators meet the New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) for compression ignition (40 CFR 60 Subpart IIII) and spark ignition internal combustion engines (ICE) (40 CFR 60 Subpart JJJJ), which can be found here. Additionally, the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) apply to reciprocating internal combustion engines (RICE). 40 CFR 63 Subpart ZZZZ can be found here.
These rules, depending on the specific type of generator engine, will be required even if a permit is not necessary.
Other Regulations
Keep in mind that using an emergency generator may also involve other factors depending on the type and amount of fuel stored:
•Aboveground Storage Tank (AST) Requirements
•Spill Prevention Control and Countermeasure (SPCC) Plans
•EPCRA Tier II Reporting
Key to remember: When installing an emergency generator, companies must navigate complex air quality regulations to ensure compliance. By selecting the right fuel type and securing necessary permits, businesses can maintain reliable power while minimizing environmental impact.
NewsHazardous WasteIndustry NewsWaste/HazWasteWasteEnvironmentalIn-Depth ArticleEnglishFocus AreaUSA
2025-05-16T05:00:00Z
Expert Insights: Hazardous waste vs. hazardous materials explained
Several questions we receive from our customers use the terms “hazardous waste” and “hazardous materials” interchangeably. At a recent event, a few attendees admitted that they didn’t think there was a difference between the two. This is a common point of confusion, and we want to ensure that our readers know the difference. Let’s dive into it!
Hazardous materials
The term hazardous material is defined by the Department of Transportation. It refers to any substance or material that poses an unreasonable risk to health, safety, and property during transportation. Hazardous materials include hazardous substances, hazardous wastes, marine pollutants, and elevated-temperature materials. Essentially, if it’s dangerous and transported, it’s considered a hazardous material.
Hazardous waste
On the other hand, hazardous waste is defined by the Environmental Protection Agency. It refers to contaminated chemicals or by-products that no longer serve their purpose and need to be disposed of. Hazardous wastes are either listed or exhibit characteristics like ignitability, corrosivity, toxicity, or reactivity. It’s essentially waste that poses a danger to health or the environment and requires special handling and disposal.
To put it simply, hazardous material is a broad term that includes various dangerous substances during transportation, while hazardous waste specifically refers to dangerous by-products that need disposal. Understanding these terms is crucial for compliance with environmental and safety regulations.
If you ever find yourself unsure, remember that hazardous materials are about transportation risks, and hazardous wastes are about disposal risks.
Most Recent Highlights In Transportation
NewsIndustry NewsIndustry NewsToxic Substances Control Act - EPAToxic Subtances Control Act - EPATSCA ComplianceToxic Substances - EPAEnvironmental Protection Agency (EPA)EnvironmentalEnglishFocus AreaUSA
2025-05-13T05:00:00Z
EPA further delays PFAS manufacturing report submission period
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) issued an interim final rule that further delays the submission period for the one-time reporting requirement for manufacturers of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS). It pushes the starting submission period to April 2026.
Under Section 8(a)(7) of the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA), EPA requires any business that manufactured (including imported) any PFAS or PFAS-containing article between 2011 and 2022 to submit the report.
What’s the new timeline?
The Section 8(a)(7) PFAS report’s opening submission period was moved from July 11, 2025, to April 13, 2026. Most manufacturers have six months to submit the report. Small manufacturers reporting only as importers of PFAS-containing articles have one year.
TSCA Section 8(a)(7) PFAS report submission period | |
---|---|
Most manufacturers | April 13, 2026–October 13, 2026 |
Small manufacturers reporting solely as PFAS article importers | April 13, 2026–April 13, 2027 |
About the report
Manufacturers (including importers) covered by the TSCA Section 8(a)(7) PFAS reporting rule (40 CFR Part 705) must provide information about:
- Chemical identity, uses, and volumes;
- By-products;
- Environmental and health effects;
- Worker exposure; and
- Disposal.
It’s the second time EPA has postponed the reporting period. In September 2024, the agency moved the beginning submission period from November 2024 to July 2025. This latest interim rule pushes the starting period from July 2025 to April 2026.
Why the delay?
EPA needs more time to prepare the online reporting tool on the Central Data Exchange that businesses will use to submit the data. The agency will conduct tests to ensure that the application can accept submissions and that reporters don’t encounter technical issues.
Key to remember: EPA further delayed TSCA Section 8(a)(7) PFAS reporting. The submission period now begins on April 13, 2026.
NewsHazardous WasteWaste ManifestsWaste/HazWasteSafety and Health Programs and TrainingPesticidesPesticide Registration and LabelingMonthly Roundup VideoFocus Four HazardsUSAInjury and Illness RecordkeepingEnglishIndustry NewsWaste HandlersSafety & HealthInjury and Illness RecordkeepingConstruction SafetyGeneral Industry SafetyWaste300-A Annual SummaryEnvironmentalMine SafetyFocus AreaPesticidesVideo
EHS Monthly Round Up - April 2025
In this April 2025 roundup video, we'll review the most impactful environmental health and safety news.
Hi everyone! Welcome to the monthly news roundup video, where we’ll review the most impactful environmental health and safety news. Let’s take a look at what’s happened over the last month!
On April 17, OSHA released 2024 injury and illness data. This includes information from more than 370,000 establishments that submitted Form 300A, as well as partial data from more than 732,000 Form 300 and Form 301 records. OSHA provides public access to the data in an effort to identify unsafe conditions and workplace hazards that may lead to occupational injuries and illnesses.
This year’s National Stand-Down to Prevent Struck-by Incidents took place the week of April 21. Struck-by incidents are the second leading cause of death among construction workers and the leading cause of nonfatal injuries in the construction industry. The stand-down emphasized the importance of training and prevention on worksites.
A safety alert from the Mine Safety and Health Administration urges the mining community to implement effective safety and health programs, with a focus on identifying and eliminating health and safety hazards. The alert was issued due to a high number of mining fatalities in the first quarter of 2025.
The Mine Safety and Health Administration temporarily paused its silica enforcement for coal mine operators until August 18, four months from its original compliance date of April 14. Under the agency’s silica rule, mine operators must update their respiratory protection programs. This may require them to obtain additional respirators and sampling devices. The agency says this four-month pause provides time for operators to come into compliance.
And finally, turning to environmental news, EPA updated the process for making data corrections to hazardous waste manifests. Waste handlers must correct errors on the manifest within 30 days of a request from EPA or a state agency. They also must submit corrections electronically.
And finally, EPA streamlined its pesticide registration process. The agency updated its MyPest app and made policy changes regarding how to submit two of its registration forms.
Thanks for tuning in to the monthly news roundup. We’ll see you next month!
NewsIndustry NewsWaste GeneratorsWaste/HazWasteWaste ReportingWasteEnvironmental Protection Agency (EPA)EnvironmentalIn-Depth ArticleEnglishFocus AreaUSA
2025-05-08T05:00:00Z
Small quantity generators: Ready for RCRA re-notifications?
You’ve likely never thought of “staying in touch” as a legal obligation, but that’s exactly what it is for facilities that generate small quantities of hazardous waste. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) mandates that small quantity generators (SQGs) give updates on their hazardous waste activities every four years. The next re-notification is right around the corner; it’s due by September 1, 2025.
Here's what SQGs need to know to stay in touch — and in compliance — with EPA.
What’s the re-notification requirement?
The Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) enables EPA to control hazardous waste from generation to disposal. The agency keeps tabs on SQGs through the re-notification regulation at 40 CFR 262.18(d). It requires SQGs to re-notify EPA or the state environmental agency of their generator status and activities every four years by submitting the:
- Notification of RCRA Subtitle C Activities, also known as the Site Identification (ID) Form (EPA Form 8700-12), or
- State-equivalent form.
How do SQGs re-notify?
Regulated SQGs must submit the Site ID Form. EPA and many states use the myRCRAid module on RCRA Information (RCRAInfo) for re-notifications.
Here’s how to submit the Site ID Form on myRCRAid:
- Log in to RCRAInfo.
- Click “Create New Submission” on the myRCRAid tab.
- Select the reason for submittal as “Obtaining or updating an EPA ID number for on-going regulated activities (Items 10–17) that will continue for a period of time."
- Review and update the information about your site as needed, including the facility’s:
- EPA ID number,
- Name and location address,
- Mailing address,
- Land type,
- North American Industry Classification System (or NAICS) code,
- Site contact information,
- Legal owner/operator information,
- Type of regulated waste activity,
- Additional regulated waste activities, and
- Status as:
- An academic entity with laboratories,
- An episodic generator,
- A large quantity generator (LQG) consolidating very small quantity generator hazardous waste,
- An LQG site closing a Central Accumulation Area or facility,
- A secondary hazardous material manager, and
- A contractor of an electronic manifest broker.
- Include any additional information in the comments section (Item 18).
- Click “Review.” Make any needed corrections to the information. Once this is complete, myRCRAid will display the Review Source Record page.
- Submit the re-notification:
- If you don’t have Certifier permission, click “Mark Ready for Signature.” The application will save the form in the “In Progress” section on myRCRAid and notify individuals at your facility with Certifier and Site Manager permissions. The status will display “Ready for Signature."
- If you have Certifier permission, confirm that the data is correct and click “Sign & Submit” to electronically sign the submission.
Once you submit the Site ID Form, its status on myRCRAid will display “Pending.” EPA or the state regulator will approve or reject the re-notification submission.
Re-notification recommendations
Consider these tips when preparing your SQG re-notification:
- Most RCRA programs are implemented at the state level. Confirm the re-notification regulations with your state environmental agency. It may not use myRCRAid and may require more frequent submissions.
- Ensure you have the necessary RCRAInfo permissions to submit the SQG re-notification. A Preparer can enter information into the Site ID form, but only a Certifier or Site Manager with Certifier permission may sign and submit it.
- EPA accepts submission of the Site ID form at any time within the four years before the next re-notification deadline, so you can submit the re-notification before September 1. Verify with your state whether the same allowance applies.
Submitting the SQG re-notification properly keeps EPA updated and your facility compliant.
Key to remember: Small quantity generators of hazardous waste must re-notify EPA or the state agency by September 1, 2025.
NewsIndustry NewsUnderground Storage TanksWaste/HazWasteTank SystemsEnvironmental Protection Agency (EPA)Tank SystemsEnvironmentalIn-Depth ArticleEnglishFocus AreaRelease DetectionUSA
2025-04-24T05:00:00Z
UST release detection equipment: Testing 1, 2, 3
The next time you’re at a service station, consider the fact that you’re standing above underground tanks holding the fuel that you’re pumping into your vehicle. This brings up an important question about any underground tank: Since you can’t see the tank, how do you know if it starts to leak? The answer is a release detection system.
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) requires that all regulated underground storage tanks (USTs) have release detection systems and that owners and operators of USTs test the equipment annually to ensure it operates correctly.
Let’s look at three aspects of release detection equipment testing: how to conduct testing, what to test for, and what to record.
1. How do I test the equipment?
UST owners and operators may conduct release detection equipment testing according to:
- The manufacturer’s instructions,
- Industry codes and standards, or
- The implementing agency’s requirements.
Manufacturer’s instructions
Each piece of release detection equipment should have an associated manual or guide for owners to reference. The manual or guide will explain how to test the equipment.
Tip: Most equipment manufacturers provide online versions of their product manuals and guides, which you can likely find on the manufacturer’s website. If you can’t find guidance, contact the manufacturer directly.
Industry codes and standards
EPA’s regulations stipulate that UST owners and operators who follow industry codes and standards must choose ones developed by a nationally recognized association (like ASTM International or the Petroleum Equipment Institute (PEI)) or an independent testing laboratory.
For instance, the agency states at 280.40(a)(3) that UST owners and operators may use PEI/RP1200, Recommended Practices for the Testing and Verification of Spill, Overfill, Leak Detection and Secondary Containment Equipment at UST Facilities, to comply.
Implementing agency requirements
EPA’s rules for testing release detection equipment serve as the minimum standards. Most state regulatory agencies implement UST programs and may impose stricter or additional requirements. Plus, local regulations may apply.
Check state and local rules to ensure your UST complies with the right requirements.
2. What do I test?
At a minimum, UST owners and operators must test the following factors that apply to their release detection systems.
- Automatic tank gauges and other controllers: Test the alarms and battery backups. Verify the system’s configuration.
- Probes and sensors: Test alarm functionality and communication with the controller. Inspect the probes and sensors for residual buildup. Ensure that the floats move freely, the cables have no kinks or breaks, and the shaft isn’t damaged.
- Automatic line leak detectors: Simulate a leak to determine whether the detector meets the operation requirements of 280.44(a).
- Vacuum pumps and pressure gauges: Confirm correct communication with the sensors and controller.
- Handheld electronic groundwater and vapor sampling equipment: Ensure the monitoring equipment operates properly.
3. What records do I have to keep?
The regulation at 280.45(b)(1) mandates that UST owners and operators keep records of the annual release detection equipment testing results for at least three years.
For each annual testing record, list:
- Each device tested,
- If the devices operated according to 280.40(a)(3) or had issues that needed attention, and
- Any corrective actions applied.
Why is release detection equipment testing so important?
Petroleum and other hazardous substances that leak from USTs can endanger human and environmental health. A leaking UST’s primary threat is groundwater contamination. Groundwater supplies drinking water for almost half of Americans.
A release detection system enables a facility to respond sooner to accidental releases and, therefore, limit potential harmful impacts — only if the equipment used for the system operates properly.
Testing your UST’s release detection equipment is vital because it allows you to identify which components function accurately and which parts have problems that need correction. A well-functioning release detection system can help your facility:
- Maintain regulatory compliance (and avoid enforcement actions like penalties),
- Identify opportunities to upgrade existing equipment to improve operational efficiency, and
- Protect your employees and the community in which your facility operates.
Key to remember: EPA requires facilities to test the release detection equipment used on underground storage tanks each year to make sure it operates properly.
NewsIndustry NewsPesticidesSafety & HealthPesticide Registration and LabelingPesticidesGeneral Industry SafetyAgriculture SafetyFederal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide ActEnvironmentalIn-Depth ArticleEnglishFocus AreaPesticidesUSA
2025-04-23T05:00:00Z
EPA modernizes pesticide registration policy, tweaks tracking app
Pesticide registrations just became simpler, more modern, and more transparent! EPA recently updated an app and made policy changes regarding how to submit two forms. All these changes result in a streamlined pesticide registration process.
Pesticide registration tracking app
On April 18, EPA made enhancements to its MyPest app, which sources say was initially launched in mid-January. EPA is proud to say that MyPest already boasts over 1,200 registrants. The new app allows registrants of pesticide products to:
- Monitor the status of their registration submissions in real-time,
- Drill down to a detailed view of each application, and
- Communicate directly with EPA staff about registration packages in review.
Updates to MyPest include an enhanced dashboard page. The page offers information about the registrant’s cases and products. More updates are planned later this year.
Policy changes impacting two forms
On April 4, EPA announced in the Federal Register the issuance of Pesticide Registration (PR) Notice 2025-1. The notice itself is dated effective March 27, 2025. Its subject line reads, “Revised Procedures for Citing Data to Support Pesticide Registrations (EPA Forms No. 8570-34 and 8570-35).”
The latest PR notice supersedes PR Notice 98-5, dated June 12, 1998. While the revisions were proposed last June, the agency only finalized them now. According to PR Notice 2025-1:
- EPA Form 8570-34 — This is the Certification with Respect to Citation of Data. Pesticide registrants use this form to indicate how they will meet their data submission/citation obligations under the law. When a registrant refers to another company’s data, the registrant must certify that:
- It offered compensation to the original data submitter, or
- It has the original data submitter’s permission to cite the data.
- EPA Form 8570-35 — This is the Data Matrix. Pesticide registrants use this form to indicate to whom they made offers of compensation.
The two forms — EPA Forms 8570-34 and 8570-35 — have not been modified. Only policies regarding the submission of the two forms have changed. The agency:
- Eliminated the instruction to use “paper” submissions;
- Says registrants should complete and submit the two forms electronically through the Pesticide Submission Portal;
- Eliminated the instruction that registrants submit two versions of the Data Matrix, i.e., the ‘‘Internal Agency Use Copy’’ and the ‘‘Public File Copy’’; and
- Requires that registrants submit a single Data Matrix without redactions.
EPA contends that none of the information on Form 8570-35 is confidential. Put another way, none of the information on the Data Matrix is protected from public release. Therefore, the agency claims there is no reason to submit two versions of the form.
According to EPA, entities potentially affected by the policy changes include, but are not limited to:
- Crop production,
- Animal production,
- Food manufacturing, and
- Pesticide manufacturing.
Efficiencies and transparencies gained
Using electronic reporting for EPA Forms 8570-34 and 8570-35 brings efficient data transmittal, argues EPA. A bonus is that electronic reporting will also reduce errors. That’s because of automated validation tools in the portal. Submitters should experience lower costs and faster review and transmission of data, the agency adds.
In 2024, EPA received a total of 3,309 Data Matrices. Moving from two versions to just one for the Data Matrix form should save registrants and EPA time. Specifically, completing, submitting, and processing the Data Matrix should be quicker. EPA will also experience time savings when providing the public access to the information. Extra steps under the Freedom of Information Act would not be needed.
The MyPest app update is a step forward in efficiency and transparency, concludes EPA. The app enhancements are part of the agency’s overall move toward digital and streamlined processes. EPA projects that the app will improve the timeliness of pesticide registration decisions.
Key to remember
Recent actions streamline the pesticide registration process and make it more transparent. These actions relate to the MyPest app and EPA Forms 8570-34 and 8570-35.
Most Recent Highlights In Safety & Health
NewsIndustry NewsWaste/HazWasteRecyclingEnvironmentalIn-Depth ArticleEnglishSustainabilityFocus AreaUSA
2025-04-17T05:00:00Z
Workplace recycling in 2025: Why it matters now more than ever
Think recycling at work is just tossing paper in a blue bin? Think again. In 2025, workplace recycling is being redefined — from a basic office task to a strategic initiative that impacts your company’s bottom line, brand reputation, and environmental footprint.
From cardboard and plastics to e-waste and food scraps, today’s leading businesses are building smarter, circular systems that turn trash into opportunity — one department at a time.
Here are five reasons why recycling matters now more than ever.
1. Environmental responsibility impacts your brand reputation
Sustainability is no longer just a corporate social responsibility (CSR) talking point. It’s a core business differentiator. As a management or EHS leader, you’re often on the frontlines of implementing the visible changes that shape public perception. Recycling programs are a low-barrier, high-impact initiative that sends a clear message to customers, investors, and employees: We walk the talk.
Failing to prioritize environmental responsibility puts your company’s reputation at risk — especially in industries with public visibility or regulatory scrutiny. Forward-thinking competitors are already using circular economy models and zero-waste initiatives to win market share.
Champion a program that reflects your company’s values and positions you as a sustainability leader in your field.
2. Compliance with local, state, and federal regulations
Recycling is no longer a “nice-to-have.” Many jurisdictions now require commercial recycling, especially for packaging waste, e-waste, and food scraps. Increasingly, regulations also demand data transparency, such as tracking waste volumes, diversion rates, and sustainability goals.
Supervisors in environmental and safety roles are responsible for ensuring compliance and minimizing risk. Violations can result in hefty fines, bad press, or loss of contracts.
Stay ahead of compliance trends and implement a recycling program that satisfies current and future requirements while keeping auditreadiness top of mind.
3. Cost savings and operational efficiency
Landfill disposal is becoming more expensive due to tipping fees and transportation costs. By diverting materials through recycling or reuse programs, companies can reduce both their environmental footprint and their operational spend.
In addition, smart material handling and waste segregation can lead to process improvements — less clutter, fewer hauling pickups, and even opportunities to monetize recyclable materials like scrap metal, cardboard, or used electronics.
Use data from your waste audits and vendor reporting to identify high-volume waste streams and optimize for both cost reduction and resource efficiency.
4. Workforce engagement, retention, and culture
Today’s workforce, particularly younger employees, is drawn to employers who align with their values. A clean, green workplace that visibly supports recycling and sustainability reinforces a positive culture, boosts morale, and improves engagement — especially when employees feel like they’re contributing to something bigger.
Recycling initiatives are also an easy win for cross-departmental engagement. Whether through green teams, signage campaigns, or employee challenges, these programs offer hands-on ways to involve everyone.
Build internal buy-in by showing how your initiatives support company values, employee wellness, and sustainability goals through shared responsibility.
5. Alignment with data-driven ESG and sustainability goals
In 2025, companies are under increasing pressure from stakeholders to report measurable progress on environmental, social, and governance (ESG) initiatives. Waste reduction, recycling rates, and landfill diversion metrics are among the top data points requested in annual sustainability reports and RFPs.
Supervisors and EHS leaders are often the owners of the data. You're tasked with tracking, verifying, and reporting on these outcomes. Without a structured recycling program in place, those metrics are impossible to capture, and your ESG report falls flat.
Establish a system for measuring, improving, and communicating progress toward zero-waste or landfill diversion targets, and support leadership in meeting ESG benchmarks.
Key to remember: Embracing workplace recycling in 2025 isn’t just good for the planet — it’s a smart move that drives innovation, saves money, and positions your company as a leader in sustainability.
NewsEnforcement and Audits - OSHASafety and Health Programs and TrainingWaste/HazWasteOil RefineriesVideoMonthly Roundup VideoWalking Working SurfacesMiningGrain HandlingFocus Four HazardsUSALaddersEnglishAir ProgramsIndustry NewsEnforcement and Audits - OSHASafety & HealthConstruction SafetyGeneral Industry SafetyWasteSpecialized IndustriesEnvironmentalAir QualityFocus AreaMine SafetyAir ProgramsWaste Reporting
EHS Monthly Round Up - March 2025
In this March 2025 roundup video, we'll review the most impactful environmental health and safety news.
Hi everyone! Welcome to the monthly news roundup video, where we’ll review the most impactful environmental health and safety news. Let’s get started!
Ladders were the cause of over 22,000 workplace injuries and 161 deaths in 2020. Each March, the American Ladder Institute promotes ladder safety awareness with the goal of reducing ladder-related injuries and fatalities. Every Step Matters was the theme of this year’s National Ladder Safety Month.
Stand Up 4 Grain Safety Week kicked off on March 24. This annual event brings attention to preventable grain handling hazards and promotes safety in this high-hazard industry.
Federal agencies must review their regulations and report back to the White House by April 20. The priority is on “significant” rules, generally considered to be those with an annual effect on the economy of 100 million dollars or more. Once the regulations have been identified, the Office of Management and Budget and the Department of Government Efficiency will work with agency leaders to create a plan for rescinding or modifying the regulations and begin winding down their enforcement.
A highwall fatality at a surface mine prompted the Mine Safety and Health Administration to issue a safety alert. It outlines what miners should do to prevent similar incidents, including looking for hazards such as loose rocks and overhangs before beginning work.
The American Society of Safety Professionals revised its construction training standard. It outlines training requirements for new hires in construction and demolition operations, site procedures, regulatory compliance, and more.
And finally, turning to environmental news, EPA will reconsider a number of major rulemakings that may impact a variety of industries. This is in response to an executive order that federal agencies review their regulations. Among the rules under consideration include those related to clean power, oil and gas emission limits, greenhouse gas reporting, and risk management.
EPA’s Waste Emissions Charge on petroleum and natural gas facilities with high methane emissions is no longer in effect. The rule initially took effect in January and was then disapproved by Congress on March 14.
Thanks for tuning in to the monthly news roundup. We’ll see you next month!
NewsIndustry NewsWaste ManifestsWaste/HazWasteWasteEnvironmental Protection Agency (EPA)EnvironmentalIn-Depth ArticleEnglishFocus AreaUSA
2025-04-04T05:00:00Z
Hazardous waste manifest errors? Follow RCRA’s correction process
Hazardous waste manifests are like travel logs. They track the entire journey of regulated hazardous waste, from the starting point (the generator’s facility) to the final destination (the off-site waste management facility). Like travel logs, a manifest is only as accurate as the information provided. Thankfully, you can correct manifest errors.
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) finalized the Third Rule under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), which took effect in January 2025. It made noteworthy changes to the manifest corrections process. Here’s what hazardous waste generators, transporters, and treatment, storage, and disposal facilities (TSDFs) need to know.
Who’s impacted?
The Third Rule impacts entities subject to RCRA’s manifest regulations. This article focuses on the manifest correction rules that apply to these waste handlers:
- Small and large quantity generators,
- Transporters, and
- TSDFs.
Note that the final rule amends post-manifest correction regulations for other entities, such as exporters, that are beyond the scope of this article.
What are the Third Rule changes?
EPA’s final rule maintains most of the post-receipt manifest data corrections process.
What’s the same?
Specifically:
- Any waste handler named on the manifest may voluntarily submit data corrections at any time,
- Waste handlers can make an unlimited number of voluntary corrections,
- Corrections may be applied to an individual record or batch of them, and
- Submissions must include a signature compliant with the Cross-Media Electronic Reporting Rule (CROMERR).
What’s different?
Previously, when EPA or a state regulatory agency requested corrections to data on a manifest, waste handlers weren’t required to make them. The Third Rule now mandates that waste handlers:
- Correct errors on the manifest within 30 days of a corrections request from EPA or a state agency, and
- Make data correction submissions electronically for paper or electronic manifest records.
Post-receipt corrections are made via the Hazardous Waste Electronic Manifest System (e-Manifest) on the RCRA Information (RCRAInfo) system.
The Third Rule also clarifies that receiving facilities (TSDFs) can make corrections only after the manifest is completed (i.e., signed and submitted to the e-Manifest system).
What’s the post-receipt manifest correction process?
Waste handlers submitting voluntary or mandatory post-receipt corrections to hazardous waste manifests must follow the process established at 40 CFR 264.71(l).
Follow this general process on the e-Manifest System:
- Certify that the manifest is complete. It must have the status “Signed-Completed."
- Determine how to submit the corrected data to the e-Manifest system. You can enter the data directly into e-Manifest or upload a file with data corrections to the system.
- Include for each correction submission:
- The Manifest Tracking Number and date received by the facility associated with the data being corrected,
- The Item Number(s) of the affected data fields on the manifest form (EPA Form 8700-22), and
- The previously entered and corrected data.
- Save your corrections. The manifest’s status will change to “Under Correction."
- Re-sign the manifest to certify the corrections. The manifest’s status will change to “Corrected."
Manifest correction FAQs
Check out some top questions and answers about post-receipt manifest corrections.
What manifest information can I correct?
The type of waste handler your facility is determines which items on the manifest you can change for voluntary corrections or must change for mandatory corrections. Typically:
- Generators correct data in Items 1–15;
- Transporters correct data in Items 6–7, 14, and 17; and
- TSDFs correct data in Items 14 and 18–20.
What user role do I need on RCRAInfo to submit manifest corrections?
You must be registered in RCRAInfo as a user with the e-Manifest Certifier or Site Manager role for the facility’s site to submit manifest corrections.
What’s the CROMERR certification?
EPA requires manifest correction submitters to use a CROMERR-compliant electronic signature, which requires a higher level of identity proofing than the Quick Sign signature.
Can I revert to a previous manifest version?
Once the corrected manifest has been signed, you can’t revert it to a previous version. The e-Manifest system does, however, let you view all versions of the manifest.
Can brokers sign corrected manifests?
Although brokers can initiate a manifest correction for generators, they may not sign a corrected manifest unless they (a) operate at the generator’s facility and (b) can sign the manifest as an offeror of the waste shipment.
Key to remember: EPA’s Third Rule updates the process for making data corrections to RCRA hazardous waste manifests.
NewsHazardous WasteIndustry NewsWaste/HazWasteWasteEnvironmentalIn-Depth ArticleEnglishFocus AreaUSA
2025-04-01T05:00:00Z
The cost of cutting corners: What a toxic fire teaches us about waste management
Are you storing and disposing of hazardous waste correctly or sitting on disaster? Hazardous waste storage is not just a regulatory headache – it is a time bomb for the environment and your company’s bottom line. A disaster in east London, England, is an ongoing issue for nearby residents that highlights the importance of hazardous waste management and why employers must take it seriously.
What happened?
Originally intended for construction waste disposal, the site eventually turned into a dumping ground for hazardous industrial materials. Investigations found plastics, asbestos, industrial chemicals, and carcinogenic substances illegally dumped, creating an environmental and public health hazard. These materials fuel the fires, continuously releasing toxic smoke into the air. Residents have reported respiratory problems, skin irritation, and other health issues while authorities struggle to contain the situation. Even though this incident occurred in London, we can learn plenty of valuable lessons from the incident. Here’s how employers can take proactive measures to ensure compliance, protect workers, and prevent environmental harm:
1. Implement a robust hazardous waste management plan
A hazardous waste management plan should:
- Include waste classifications (reactive, corrosive, etc.) and an inventory of all hazardous materials used and generated.
- Ensure all storage and handling procedures, including labeling, segregation of incompatible waste, spill prevention, and containment measures, are followed.
- Document all waste accumulation and disposal methods. Specify the storage time limits for waste and the methods used for its disposal, such as incineration, recycling, or third-party handling.
- Provide information on personal protective equipment (PPE) requirements, emergency contact information, reporting procedures, and an evacuation plan in case of a spill.
2. Train employees on hazardous waste handling
Train personnel on their roles and responsibilities when handling hazardous waste. Training should include:
- Initial and refresher training that complies with the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) and state laws.
- Identifying unsafe practices and reporting potential violations.
3. Conduct routine inspections and audits
- Perform internal audits to ensure compliance with RCRA regulations.
- Schedule third-party audits to identify risks and areas of improvement.
- Create a corrective action plan for any violations or inefficiencies discovered during audits.
4. Use licensed and certified waste disposal services
The primary reason behind illegal waste dumping is financial. We all know it is not cheap to dispose of hazardous waste, but waste generators are responsible for their waste from “cradle to grave.”
- Conduct due diligence to verify disposal methods to prevent third-party illegal dumping.
- Maintain records of manifest, disposal certificate, and compliance documentation.
5. Secure and label waste properly
- Labels should include “hazardous waste” clearly visible on the container, generator information, accumulation start date, proper shipping name, and waste identification.
- Store hazardous waste in compatible containers to prevent leaks or spills.
6. Reduce hazardous waste by using safer alternatives
One of the most effective ways to prevent hazardous waste incidents is to reduce reliance on them in the first place. By switching to safer alternatives, employers can lower their risk of exposure. Industries now offer eco-friendly coatings, adhesives, and cleaning agents that perform well without all the side effects. Safer alternatives also reduce compliance costs by lowering the burdens for hazardous waste disposal.
The disaster near London is a stark reminder of the consequences of negligent hazardous waste management. Businesses that cut corners on waste disposal risk legal penalties and contribute to long-term environmental and public health damage.
Keys to remember: Employers can protect their workforce, comply with regulations, and prevent environmental disasters by adopting proactive waste management strategies.
NewsGreenhouse GasesIndustry NewsIndustry NewsEnvironmental Protection Agency (EPA)Air ProgramsEnvironmentalAir QualityEnglishFocus AreaUSA
2025-03-25T05:00:00Z
Congress disapproves EPA's excess methane fees on oil, gas facilities
A joint Congressional resolution disapproved the 2024 Final Waste Emissions Charge (WEC) Rule on oil and gas facilities with high methane emissions. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) announced that the regulation, which initially took effect on January 17, 2025, is now no longer in effect.
Who’s impacted?
The WEC rule applied to facilities in the Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems category that:
- Report emitting more than 25,000 metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent per year to the Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (or GHGRP),
- Exceed specific waste emissions thresholds, and
- Qualify for no exemptions.
Facilities that were subject to the rule are no longer required to comply (i.e., submit WEC filings by September 2, 2025).
What’s next?
EPA stated it’s “currently evaluating options and obligations for implementing Clean Air Act Section 136(c–g) and will provide additional information to the regulated community at an appropriate time."
Section 136, added by the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022, mandates that EPA implement a methane reduction incentive program for petroleum and natural gas systems, including imposing and collecting a WEC on methane emissions above waste emissions limits.
The disapproval occurred on March 14, 2025, just two days after the agency announced 31 deregulatory actions it plans to take.
Key to remember: EPA’s Waste Emissions Charge on petroleum and natural gas facilities for excess methane is no longer in effect.
Most Recent Highlights In Human Resources
NewsWaste/HazWasteWasteWater ProgramsWater QualityWater ProgramsEnglishAir ProgramsIndustry NewsIndustry NewsWasteAir ProgramsEnvironmentalAir QualityFocus AreaUSA
2025-03-19T05:00:00Z
EPA announces major regulatory reviews, overhauls
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) announced on March 12, 2025, that it’s taking 31 actions to advance President Trump’s Day One executive orders and the new “Powering the Great American Comeback” Initiative. The agency’s actions will likely impact environmental regulations across various industries.
Rules under review
EPA will reconsider an assortment of rulemakings, including:
- The Clean Power Plan 2.0 (which sets carbon dioxide emission limits on new gas-fired combustion turbines and emissions guidelines for existing coal, oil, and gas-fired steam generating units),
- Oil and gas emission limits for new and existing sources (40 CFR Part 60 Subparts OOOOb and OOOOc),
- The Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Reporting Program (GHGRP) for petroleum and natural gas systems (Part 98 Subpart W),
- The GHGRP overall (Part 98),
- Mercury Air Toxics Standards for coal- and oil-fired power plants (Part 63 Subpart UUUUU),
- Effluent limitation guidelines (ELGs) for the steam electric power generating industry (Part 423),
- Treated wastewater use and discharge for coal-fired power plants (Part 435 Subpart E),
- The Risk Management Program rule (Part 68),
- Vehicle GHG rules (including the light-, medium-, and heavy-duty vehicle regulations),
- The 2009 Endangerment Finding (relied on for seven federal vehicle rules) and related regulations and actions (Chapter I),
- The Technology Transition Rule for refrigerant systems (Part 84 Subpart B),
- The National Ambient Air Quality Standards for fine particulate matter (Parts 50, 53, and 58),
- The National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (Part 63) for:
- Iron and steel manufacturing,
- Rubber tire manufacturing,
- Synthetic organic chemical manufacturing,
- Commercial sterilizers for medical devices and spices,
- Lime manufacturing,
- Coke ovens,
- Copper smelting, and
- Taconite ore processing.
- The Exceptional Events rulemaking related to allowing prescribed fires within State Implementation Plans (Parts 50–51),
- The Regional Haze Program implementing regulations (51.308), and
- The Good Neighbor Plan (Parts 52, 75, 78, and 97).
The agency will also take other actions, such as:
- Working with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to finalize the definition of “waters of the United States” related to Clean Water Act permits,
- Updating enforcement discretion by revising the National Enforcement and Compliance Initiatives, and
- Prioritizing the coal ash program to expedite state permit reviews and update the coal ash regulations (including amending the Legacy Coal Combustion Residuals Surface Impoundments and CCR Management Units rule).
About EPA’s new initiative
In February 2025, the agency announced the Powering the Great American Comeback Initiative, which outlines EPA’s priorities. The initiative consists of five pillars:
- Clean air, land, and water;
- Restore energy dominance;
- Permitting reforms, cooperative federalism, and cross-agency partnership;
- Make the U.S. the artificial intelligence capital of the world; and
- Protect and bring back American auto jobs.
EPA’s 31 actions will primarily address the first three pillars.
Key to remember: EPA will reconsider major rulemakings that may impact a variety of industries.
NewsProcess Safety ManagementRisk Management ProgramRisk Management ProgramHAZWOPERIn-Depth ArticleEnglishEmergency Planning - OSHAIndustry NewsHAZWOPER Emergency ResponseSafety & HealthConstruction SafetyEmergency Planning (OSHA)General Industry SafetyAgriculture SafetyMaritime SafetyEnvironmentalAir QualityHazardous Materials Safety - OSHAFocus AreaUSA
2025-03-17T05:00:00Z
Lessons from blast: CSB video explores gas detection and emergency plans
Another riveting video is posted by the Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation Board (CSB)! The animated video covers a massive explosion at a Texas machine shop. Two workers and a member of the public were killed. Over 450 neighboring homes/businesses were damaged.
Video supports investigative report
The 14-minute video, “No Detection: Explosion …,” follows a June 2023 investigation report. When the 56-page report came out, CSB Chairperson Steve Owens said, “Our investigation found that [the company] did not have an effective program in place to assess potential hazards in its propylene process and did not have a mechanical integrity program or written operating procedures.”
The incident was compounded by emergency planning failures, says CSB. Owens argued, “This tragic incident was made even worse due to the lack of emergency response training for employees at the facility.”
Deadly incident
CSB explains that a degraded and poorly crimped rubber welding hose disconnected from its fitting inside a coating booth. That prompted a release of propylene, a flammable vapor.
By the time workers arrived at the facility the early morning of January 24, 2020, an explosive concentration of propylene had formed inside the building. As workers entered and turned on the lights, the vapor ignited, triggering an explosion. It:
- Killed two workers,
- Injured two other workers,
- Fatally injured a nearby resident, and
- Damaged hundreds of structures.
The board’s investigation later found that the company had:
- Disconnected gas detectors from a computer control system. This meant the automatic gas detection shutoff system would not alert operators to a leak. It also would not start up exhaust fans or trigger two shutoff valves to stop the flow of propylene.
- Replaced a copper tubing connection with a rubber welding hose. Rubber hose is not recommended for propylene. Oils in the gas can cause a rubber hose to form cracks and lose pliability.
OSHA citations before/after the incident
OSHA cited the company 12 years earlier for failing to inspect gas system equipment for signs of deterioration or leaks. The 2008 OSHA visit was prompted by another explosion of propylene gas.
Following the later 2020 incident, OSHA issued citations for failing to:
- Provide effective training on chemical hazards,
- Prevent explosive concentrations from accumulating,
- Ensure coating equipment was maintained gas-tight, and
- Ensure the manual shutoff valve at the propylene storage tank was closed at the end of each workday.
Safety issues found by CSB
CSB explains that the shop’s propylene amount was below the threshold for OSHA’s Process Safety Management (PSM) standard at 29 CFR 1910.119 or EPA’s Risk Management Plan (RMP) standard at 40 CFR 68. Still, the CSB investigation identified these safety issues:
- PSM — Had the company had an effective PSM program to identify and control hazards, it could have prevented the incident. Suggested PSM program elements included process safety information, process hazard analysis, management of change, mechanical integrity, and operating procedures.
- Emergency planning — The company’s emergency response plan did not address responding to a propylene gas leak. The company also failed to train its workers to recognize or respond to a propylene gas release. Hence, workers did not evacuate from the area after suspecting a propylene leak nor contact responders for help.
Owens concludes that the deadly incident could have been mitigated if the company had implemented an effective PSM system for the hazards of its coating operation. Even if a leak occurred, Owens believes an emergency response plan could have prevented the tragic loss of life.
OSHA chemical emergency preparedness may include an emergency action plan and/or an emergency response plan.
Lessons for industry
To prevent chemical incidents, CSB urges you to:
- Ensure the safety of workers who handle hazardous chemicals (and protect surrounding communities). This is regardless of whether or not the chemicals meet the threshold under PSM and RMP standards.
- Ensure gas detection, alarm, exhaust, and shutdown systems are adequately designed, maintained, inspected, and tested. The idea is to ensure reliability if your facility handles hazardous chemicals.
- Ensure a written emergency response plan is implemented. Also, ensure that it adequately addresses all actions to be taken in a release. Workers too need to be trained in the plan and participate in periodic drills.
Have questions about chemical safety or emergency planning? Pose them to our J. J. Keller® experts! Visit our Expert Help page today! |
CSB videos are recognized
The latest video comes after the board received a “Silver Play Button” award. The CSB’s video channel boasts 364K subscribers and nearly 100 safety videos. The channel has had over 65M combined views since 2007. What’s more, CSB claims that the chemical industry itself and engineering schools use the videos for chemical safety training.
Key to remember
A new CSB video covers the 2020 massive explosion at a Texas machine shop. The board urges you to implement PSM systems even if not required. CSB also presses you to ensure that workers are trained in emergency response plans.
NewsAir QualityIndustry NewsAir EmissionsAir ProgramsEnvironmentalIn-Depth ArticleAir QualityEnglishFocus AreaAir ProgramsUSA
2025-03-14T05:00:00Z
Expert Insights: A case study in particulate matter control
During a recent discussion about the persistent challenges of maintaining air quality standards within heavy industrial operations, one colleague in the field shared about a large Midwestern industrial facility that faced allegations of significant Clean Air Act violations. Our casual lunch meeting turned into a case study on uncontrolled emissions of particulate matter (PM).
Case details
An investigation identified the facility’s clinker cooler and raw mill operations as primary sources of excess PM. Monitoring data revealed the facility consistently exceeded permitted emission limits, suggesting systemic deficiencies in pollution control systems. Further inspection pointed to potential inadequate maintenance and operation of existing baghouse filters, a critical technology for capturing airborne particles. The facility also appeared to struggle with fugitive dust emissions from material handling and storage areas, indicating a need for improved dust suppression measures.
Proactive management
The case clarifies the importance of rigorous, proactive environmental management within heavy industrial operations. To prevent similar violations, facilities should prioritize comprehensive monitoring and reporting. Continuous emission monitoring systems provide real-time data, enabling early detection of deviations from permitted limits. Regular inspections and preventative maintenance of pollution control equipment are essential. This includes ensuring baghouse filters operate within their design parameters and promptly replacing damaged or worn components.
Additionally, robust fugitive dust control plans are vital. They should address all potential sources of fugitive dust, encompassing material handling, storage, and transport. Implementing strategies such as water spraying, enclosure of conveyors, and optimized material stockpiling can significantly reduce emissions.
Beyond technology
Beyond technology, a strong environmental compliance culture is crucial. It involves employee training on environmental regulations, operational procedures, and the importance of adhering to pollution control measures. Regular audits and internal assessments can help identify potential weaknesses and ensure ongoing compliance.
Industrial facilities can minimize their environmental impact and avoid costly enforcement actions by focusing on:
- Proactive monitoring,
- Rigorous maintenance, and
- A strong compliance culture.
NewsEnforcement and Audits - OSHAWhistleblower RetaliationToxic Substances Control Act - EPAToxic Substance ControlPersonal Protective EquipmentWhistleblower Protection ProgramMonthly Roundup VideoUSAEnglishOSHA Violations and PenaltiesIndustry NewsSafety & HealthToxic Substances - EPAGeneral Industry SafetyHearing ProtectionEnvironmentalFocus AreaVideo
EHS Monthly Round Up - February 2025
In this February 2025 roundup video, we'll review the most impactful environmental health and safety news.
Hi everyone! Welcome to the monthly news roundup video, where we’ll review the most impactful environmental health and safety news. There’s a lot going on, so let’s get started!
Under a new Executive Order, federal agencies must eliminate 10 regulations for each new one they introduce. This applies to all new rules, regulations, or guidance issued by government agencies such as the Department of Labor, which includes OSHA, and the Environmental Protection Agency.
A new OSHA fact sheet outlines employee rights and protections when filing a whistleblower complaint. Employers may not retaliate against employees who exercise their rights under the Occupational Safety and Health Act.
OSHA will not cite employers for COVID-19 recordkeeping violations under its Healthcare Emergency Temporary Standard. These regulations are specific to healthcare settings. The provisions remain in effect, but until further notice, OSHA will not enforce them.
New guidance from the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health recommends that employers use individual, quantitative fit-testing for hearing protection. This helps evaluate how well workers’ hearing protection reduces noise levels and ensures a proper fit.
And finally, turning to environmental news, states across the country continue to consider and implement regulations related to PFAS. These “forever chemicals” are long-lasting chemicals that may pose risks to human and environmental health. A recent study anticipates that more than half of the states in the U.S. are likely to consider PFAS-related policies this year.
Thanks for tuning in to the monthly news roundup. We’ll see you next month!
NewsIndustry NewsToxic Substances Control Act - EPAToxic Subtances Control Act - EPATSCA ComplianceToxic Substances - EPAEnvironmental Protection Agency (EPA)EnvironmentalIn-Depth ArticleEnglishFocus AreaUSA
2025-03-03T06:00:00Z
Ready, set, report! Prepare for EPA’s one-time PFAS report
A group of substances called “forever chemicals” lasts long in the environment, but the submission period for its one-time reporting requirement doesn’t. And it starts in just a few months. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) requires covered entities to report data about per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) they manufactured between 2011 and 2022.
Required by Section 8(a)(7) of the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA), the report covers PFAS production volumes, disposal, exposures, and hazards. The submission period opens on April 13, 2026. Here are answers to five common questions about the TSCA Section 8(a)(7) report.
Who must report?
The TSCA Section 8(a)(7) reporting requirements apply to any person who manufactured (including imported) a PFAS or PFAS-containing article between January 1, 2011, and December 31, 2022, for commercial purposes.
EPA defines terms for this reporting requirement at 40 CFR 705.3.
One vital thing to note is that the TSCA Section 8(a)(7) reporting requirement allows for no exemptions. The rule even covers PFAS manufactured as a byproduct, impurity, or non-isolated intermediate. The only activity that doesn’t require reporting is importing municipal solid waste streams to dispose of or destroy the waste.
What data does the report cover?
The information required depends on whether you use the standard or streamlined TSCA Section 8(a)(7) reporting form.
The standard form contains:
- Company and plant site information;
- Chemical-specific information (such as chemical identities);
- Categories of use;
- Total amounts manufactured in each year for each category of use;
- Byproducts from PFAS manufacturing, processing, use, or disposal;
- Existing environmental and health effect information;
- Worker exposure data (including duration); and
- Disposal methods or processes used (and any changes to them).
The streamlined form requires less information than the standard form. Two types of reporters qualify to use streamlined reporting:
- Importers of PFAS-containing articles, and
- Manufacturers of less than 10 kilograms of PFAS used solely for research and development (R&D).
Importers may choose to use the streamlined “PFAS in Imported Article” form. If you imported a PFAS-containing article and manufactured (including imported) the same PFAS (not in an article), you can either:
- Report the imported article on the streamlined form and the manufactured PFAS on the standard form, or
- Report both the imported article and the manufactured PFAS on the standard form.
Manufacturers of qualifying R&D PFAS can use the “Research & Development PFAS” form. However, you cannot use the streamlined form if you manufactured a PFAS in small quantities for R&D and otherwise manufactured (including imported) the same PFAS.
When is the report due?
The TSCA Section 8(a)(7) report submission period runs from April 13, 2026, to October 13, 2026, for most manufacturers. Small manufacturers who solely imported PFAS-containing articles have a longer submission period, from April 13, 2026, to April 13, 2027.
Where do I submit the report?
Reports must be submitted electronically through EPA’s Central Data Exchange (CDX). Go to the Chemical Information Submission System and choose the “TSCA Section 8(a)(7)” application.
Note that you must have a registered account on EPA’s CDX to submit the report, and the facility for which you’re submitting the report must also be registered on the platform.
Why is the Section 8(a)(7) report required?
TSCA Section 8(a)(7), as amended by the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020, required EPA to develop a rule to gather data about PFAS from entities that manufacture or have manufactured PFAS and PFAS-containing articles. The agency finalized the rule in October 2023 for this one-time reporting requirement.
The TSCA Section 8(a)(7) PFAS reports will give EPA a more complete picture of PFAS manufactured in the U.S. The agency will use the data to further its understanding of the forever chemicals and inform future regulatory actions.
Key to remember: The submission period for the one-time PFAS reporting requirement opens April 13, 2026. It applies to anyone who manufactured (including imported) PFAS or PFAS-containing articles between 2011 and 2022.
New Network Poll
Most Popular Highlights In Environmental
NewsHazardous WasteIndustry NewsWaste/HazWasteWasteEnvironmentalIn-Depth ArticleEnglishFocus AreaUSA
2025-05-16T05:00:00Z
Expert Insights: Hazardous waste vs. hazardous materials explained
Several questions we receive from our customers use the terms “hazardous waste” and “hazardous materials” interchangeably. At a recent event, a few attendees admitted that they didn’t think there was a difference between the two. This is a common point of confusion, and we want to ensure that our readers know the difference. Let’s dive into it!
Hazardous materials
The term hazardous material is defined by the Department of Transportation. It refers to any substance or material that poses an unreasonable risk to health, safety, and property during transportation. Hazardous materials include hazardous substances, hazardous wastes, marine pollutants, and elevated-temperature materials. Essentially, if it’s dangerous and transported, it’s considered a hazardous material.
Hazardous waste
On the other hand, hazardous waste is defined by the Environmental Protection Agency. It refers to contaminated chemicals or by-products that no longer serve their purpose and need to be disposed of. Hazardous wastes are either listed or exhibit characteristics like ignitability, corrosivity, toxicity, or reactivity. It’s essentially waste that poses a danger to health or the environment and requires special handling and disposal.
To put it simply, hazardous material is a broad term that includes various dangerous substances during transportation, while hazardous waste specifically refers to dangerous by-products that need disposal. Understanding these terms is crucial for compliance with environmental and safety regulations.
If you ever find yourself unsure, remember that hazardous materials are about transportation risks, and hazardous wastes are about disposal risks.
2025-05-27T05:00:00Z
Site Announcement: New Homepage Coming Soon!!!
Thank you to all our members that have taken the time to provide the Compliance Network team with feedback on what they like and do not like about the site. We have taken this feedback to heart and have redesigned the homepage to better serve our members. Our goal is to make finding the information you need easier and faster.
Let’s take a tour!
Sitewide Search
We heard you. Search has been brought front and center to help you find the information you need quickly.
Activity Overview
The Activity Overview will provide quick access to items that matter to you.
- Profile Builder - Get the most from your membership. Complete your profile so the information important to you rises to the top.
- My Saves - Organize and save your content of interest for quick access later.
- Notifications - We will keep current with site updates, new content, network events, and most importantly, regulatory updates.
- Top Stories now - Recent news in your areas of interest.
Latest in your favorite Topics
This section will highlight any new content added to your selected topics of interest.
Network Polls and Discussion Activity
See what other professionals in your field are saying.
Premium Content
Exclusive content only available to Compliance Network members.
Trending
Catch up with what other professional like yourself are reading.
The new homepage will go live in June. Don’t hesitate to let us know what you think: compliancenetwork@jjkeller.com
NewsIndustry NewsAir ProgramsCAA ComplianceEnvironmentalIn-Depth ArticleEnglishAir PermittingFocus AreaAir ProgramsUSA
2025-05-21T05:00:00Z
Compliance guide: Air regulations for emergency generator installation
In today's rapidly evolving energy landscape, businesses are turning to back-up emergency generators to keep operations running smoothly. Several key factors are driving this growing trend:
- Extreme heat and weather events
Climate change has led to more intense weather like hurricanes, wildfires, and heatwaves. These events put pressure on power grids, causing outages that disrupt business operations. Generators help by providing backup power during unexpected failures.
- Power demand from AI and data centers
Artificial intelligence (AI) and data centers need a lot of electricity. As these technologies grow, power grids struggle to keep up. Companies use generators to prevent power shortages and keep essential systems running.
- Grid reliability concerns
Aging infrastructure and unsteady energy supply from renewable sources can make electrical supply unstable. Industries like manufacturing, healthcare, and finance need steady power to avoid costly interruptions. Generators act as a safety net when the grid fails.
Compliance considerations
Backup generators help keep businesses running, but they also impact the environment. Companies must follow air quality regulations to reduce pollution and operate safely.
Air permits
•State agencies usually oversee air permits, but The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has granted many county and city agencies the authority to issue them. For major permits such as New Source Review (NSR) and Title V, federal regulations apply, but state or local governments may still manage the process.
•In some areas, businesses can apply for a general permit or permit-by-rule for emergency generators. These permits are often easier to obtain and take less time to process. Checking air permitting regulations will help determine if this option is available.
•Businesses should find out if they need a pre-construction or construction air permit before setting up an emergency generator. These permits are based on the proposed equipment’s potential to emit (PTE) of criteria pollutants such as NOx, SO2, CO, and CO2 and hazardous air pollutants (HAPs) such as formaldehyde and acrolein, which are emitted during the combustion of fuel. The type(s) of fuel used in the generator, such as diesel, natural gas, gasoline, or propane, will affect the calculated PTE. Read more about construction permits in this ezExplanation: NSR Permits.
(Note: many state and local permitting agencies allow for the use of 500 hours for calculating PTE from an emergency engine, as per EPA’s 2011 Fox Memo, but some agencies still require using 8,760 hours and only accept 500 hours as an enforceable limit defined in a permit.)
•Federal law sets a limit on emergency generators, allowing less than 100 hours of non-emergency use per year. This includes maintenance and testing. Some permits may also restrict the times of day when the generator can be used for non-emergency purposes.
•The permit may require businesses to use the generator according to the manufacturer’s specifications. This is especially important if the business used manufacturer guarantees to calculate PTE.
•Businesses must track fuel use and operating hours to stay within the limits used in emissions calculations. They can do this using fuel records, fuel measuring devices, and hour meters that log the generator’s usage time.
•After getting a construction permit, a facility may need to apply for an operating permit within a year of the generator beginning operation. Some state and local agencies have stricter rules and deadlines. Check out J. J. Keller’s ezExplanation for Operating Permits: Clean Air Act: Operating Permits
EPA emission standards
The EPA enforces strict emissions regulations for stationary engines. Businesses must ensure their generators meet the New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) for compression ignition (40 CFR 60 Subpart IIII) and spark ignition internal combustion engines (ICE) (40 CFR 60 Subpart JJJJ), which can be found here. Additionally, the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) apply to reciprocating internal combustion engines (RICE). 40 CFR 63 Subpart ZZZZ can be found here.
These rules, depending on the specific type of generator engine, will be required even if a permit is not necessary.
Other Regulations
Keep in mind that using an emergency generator may also involve other factors depending on the type and amount of fuel stored:
•Aboveground Storage Tank (AST) Requirements
•Spill Prevention Control and Countermeasure (SPCC) Plans
•EPCRA Tier II Reporting
Key to remember: When installing an emergency generator, companies must navigate complex air quality regulations to ensure compliance. By selecting the right fuel type and securing necessary permits, businesses can maintain reliable power while minimizing environmental impact.
NewsIndustry NewsEnvironmental Protection Agency (EPA)CAA ComplianceEnvironmentalIn-Depth ArticleFocus AreaEnglishAir PermittingAir ProgramsAir ProgramsUSA
2025-05-23T05:00:00Z
Title V operating permits: Comply, certify, repeat
A Title V operating permit is a legally enforceable document with the federal and state air emissions regulations that a facility must meet to operate. One requirement that applies to all Title V permit holders is the annual compliance certification. It answers whether a facility fulfills the permit’s terms and conditions (such as emissions limits, monitoring, recordkeeping, and reporting).
Whether the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) or a state or local regulatory agency issues the Title V permit, your facility must complete the annual compliance certification.
Discover what your facility needs to comply, certify, and repeat.
What’s required?
Facilities submit annual compliance certifications to the Title V permitting authority, which is usually a state or local regulatory agency (40 CFR 70.6). An EPA Regional Office serves as the permitting authority (71.6) for federally issued permits.
Title V tip:Check the state or local regulations for Title V compliance certification rules. They may require more frequent submissions and additional information.
At a minimum, the annual compliance certification covers two major areas for every permit term or condition:
- The compliance methods, and
- The compliance status.
Let’s take a closer look at each element.
Compliance methods
Your facility’s compliance methods are the ways it tracks whether it’s meeting the Title V permit requirements or not. When a term or condition isn’t met (like exceeding an emission limit), it’s known as a deviation.
Compliance methods consist of monitoring, recordkeeping, and reporting:
- Monitoring includes the procedures, test methods, and equipment used to track compliance data.
- Recordkeeping covers:
- The date, place, and time of monitoring;
- The date when monitoring results were analyzed, the entity that conducted the analysis, the analytical methods used, and the results; and
- The operating conditions during monitoring.
- Reporting consists of semiannual monitoring reports and deviation reports (which list the deviation, the applicable permit requirement, the probable cause, and any corrective or preventive actions).
Compliance status
Three questions determine the compliance status of each permit requirement during the covered period:
- Did the facility comply with the requirement?
- Was compliance continuous or intermittent?
- Were any deviations a “possible exception to compliance"?
Intermittent vs. continuous compliance
For each permit term or condition, your facility has intermittent compliance if it doesn’t meet the requirements at any time during the covered period. Your facility achieves continuous compliance only if it:
- Performs the necessary compliance methods,
- Has no unexcused deviations, and
- Records no contrary evidence.
Possible exception to compliance
EPA defines a possible exception to compliance as “any periods during which compliance is required and in which an excursion or exceedance … occurred” (70.6(c)(5)(iii)(C)).
Simply put, a possible exception to compliance is a deviation that occurs when compliance is mandated. If compliance isn’t required or another permit requirement excuses it, the deviation isn’t a possible exception.
How do I submit a compliance certification?
Your facility’s Title V permit provides instructions for how to submit the annual compliance certification, including the required forms and methods (via mail or electronic submission). You can also confirm requirements with your permitting authority. Generally, federally permitted facilities use the Annual Compliance Certification (EPA Form 5900-04).
Title V tip: Electronic submissions may be an option through the Compliance and Emissions Data Reporting Interface (CEDRI) on EPA’s Central Data Exchange. Check with your permitting authority to determine whether you may submit the annual compliance certification electronically via CEDRI.
Annual compliance certification is vital to maintaining your Title V permit. Keep in mind: comply, certify, and repeat.
Key to remember: Facilities with a Title V operating permit must certify compliance with the requirements at least annually.
NewsWaste/HazWasteWasteWater ProgramsWater QualityWater ProgramsEnglishAir ProgramsIndustry NewsIndustry NewsWasteAir ProgramsEnvironmentalAir QualityFocus AreaUSA
2025-03-19T05:00:00Z
EPA announces major regulatory reviews, overhauls
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) announced on March 12, 2025, that it’s taking 31 actions to advance President Trump’s Day One executive orders and the new “Powering the Great American Comeback” Initiative. The agency’s actions will likely impact environmental regulations across various industries.
Rules under review
EPA will reconsider an assortment of rulemakings, including:
- The Clean Power Plan 2.0 (which sets carbon dioxide emission limits on new gas-fired combustion turbines and emissions guidelines for existing coal, oil, and gas-fired steam generating units),
- Oil and gas emission limits for new and existing sources (40 CFR Part 60 Subparts OOOOb and OOOOc),
- The Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Reporting Program (GHGRP) for petroleum and natural gas systems (Part 98 Subpart W),
- The GHGRP overall (Part 98),
- Mercury Air Toxics Standards for coal- and oil-fired power plants (Part 63 Subpart UUUUU),
- Effluent limitation guidelines (ELGs) for the steam electric power generating industry (Part 423),
- Treated wastewater use and discharge for coal-fired power plants (Part 435 Subpart E),
- The Risk Management Program rule (Part 68),
- Vehicle GHG rules (including the light-, medium-, and heavy-duty vehicle regulations),
- The 2009 Endangerment Finding (relied on for seven federal vehicle rules) and related regulations and actions (Chapter I),
- The Technology Transition Rule for refrigerant systems (Part 84 Subpart B),
- The National Ambient Air Quality Standards for fine particulate matter (Parts 50, 53, and 58),
- The National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (Part 63) for:
- Iron and steel manufacturing,
- Rubber tire manufacturing,
- Synthetic organic chemical manufacturing,
- Commercial sterilizers for medical devices and spices,
- Lime manufacturing,
- Coke ovens,
- Copper smelting, and
- Taconite ore processing.
- The Exceptional Events rulemaking related to allowing prescribed fires within State Implementation Plans (Parts 50–51),
- The Regional Haze Program implementing regulations (51.308), and
- The Good Neighbor Plan (Parts 52, 75, 78, and 97).
The agency will also take other actions, such as:
- Working with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to finalize the definition of “waters of the United States” related to Clean Water Act permits,
- Updating enforcement discretion by revising the National Enforcement and Compliance Initiatives, and
- Prioritizing the coal ash program to expedite state permit reviews and update the coal ash regulations (including amending the Legacy Coal Combustion Residuals Surface Impoundments and CCR Management Units rule).
About EPA’s new initiative
In February 2025, the agency announced the Powering the Great American Comeback Initiative, which outlines EPA’s priorities. The initiative consists of five pillars:
- Clean air, land, and water;
- Restore energy dominance;
- Permitting reforms, cooperative federalism, and cross-agency partnership;
- Make the U.S. the artificial intelligence capital of the world; and
- Protect and bring back American auto jobs.
EPA’s 31 actions will primarily address the first three pillars.
Key to remember: EPA will reconsider major rulemakings that may impact a variety of industries.
NewsWaste/HazWasteHazmat SafetyTraining & DevelopmentIn-Depth ArticleUSAEnglishIndustry NewsFleet SafetyTransportation SecuritySafety & HealthConstruction SafetyFirst Aid and MedicalGeneral Industry SafetyAgriculture SafetyMaritime SafetyEnvironmentalFocus AreaFleet OperationsMine SafetyFirst Aid and MedicalTransportationHuman Resources
2023-06-16T05:00:00Z
Do I need a first responder or someone first aid trained?
You’ve evaluated your workplace injury risks, estimated emergency medical services (EMS) response times, and have determined you need trained first aid providers according to OSHA. But what’s considered a first aid provider — someone that’s first aid trained, or someone considered a first aid responder?
What does the standard require?
The OSHA First Aid standard (29 CFR 1910.151) requires trained first aid providers at all workplaces of any size if there is no “infirmary, clinic, or hospital in near proximity to the workplace which is used for the treatment of all injured employees.”
In addition to first aid requirements, several OSHA standards also require training in cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) because sudden cardiac arrest from asphyxiation, electrocution, or exertion may occur. These standards include permit-required confined spaces; logging; diving; and electrical power generation, transmission, and distribution.
First aid trained or first responder?
OSHA requires prompt first aid treatment for injured employees, either by providing for the availability of a trained first aid provider at the worksite, or by ensuring that emergency services are within reasonable proximity of the worksite. Whether the first aid provider is a first responder or is first aid trained is up to you and your risk assessment.
Employees considered first aid trained can provide initial treatment to an injured person until more qualified personnel arrive. First aid trained individuals can triage injuries, control the scene to keep others safe, and call for emergency services when needed. Not all first aid trained employees will feel comfortable performing CPR, using an automated external defibrillator (AED), or splinting a broken bone, however.
First responders, though similar in their role, typically have a higher degree of training than first aid trained individuals. Generally speaking, first responders are those that beat the ambulance to the scene such as firefighters or police officers. These responders can perform rescue services or escalate emergency care as needed, such as performing cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) or controlling severe bleeding.
Who is more vital for handling an emergency at your facility? Both! First aid trained employees have process and facility training that first responders may not. For example, they may be more familiar with chemicals on site or process operations. Therefore, they can navigate facilities to reach injured employees quicker to begin initial treatment. First responders, on the other hand, will have a higher level of training for first aid treatment of more complicated injuries.
What’s considered “near proximity”?
OSHA clarifies in a letter of interpretation (LOI) from March 23, 2007, that, “While the first aid standards do not prescribe a number of minutes, OSHA has long interpreted the term ’near proximity’ to mean that emergency care must be available within no more than 3-4 minutes from the workplace. Medical literature establishes that, for serious injuries such as those involving stopped breathing, cardiac arrest, or uncontrolled bleeding, first aid treatment must be provided within the first few minutes to avoid permanent medical impairment or death. Accordingly, in workplaces where serious accidents such as those involving falls, suffocation, electrocution, or amputation are possible, emergency medical services must be available within 3-4 minutes, if there is no employee on the site who is trained to render first aid.”
Regarding work areas, such as offices, where the possibility of such serious work-related injuries is less likely, a longer response time of up to 15 minutes may be reasonable. OSHA gives employers discretion in determining higher risk areas that may need sooner response times.
Employers choosing to rely on assistance from outside emergency responders as an alternative to providing trained responders must ascertain that emergency medical assistance will be promptly available when an injury occurs.
Training requirements
OSHA doesn’t offer first aid or CPR training, nor certify trainers. Training by a nationally recognized organization, such as the American Heart Association or the American Red Cross is recommended. Successful completion of any first aid training program should include instructor observation of acquired hands-on skills and written performance assessments.
Keys to remember
OSHA 1910.151 requires employers to ensure prompt first aid treatment for injured employees, either by providing for the availability of a trained first aid provider at the worksite, or by ensuring that emergency services are within reasonable proximity of the worksite. Employers should consider the workplace, hazards, workforce, and location when determining whether to have first aid trained employees or first responders for medical aid.
Most Popular Highlights In Transportation
NewsIndustry NewsPhysical exam - Motor CarrierFleet SafetyPhysical exam - Motor CarrierDriver qualificationsTransportationDrivers qualification (DQ file)Driving RecordsIn-Depth ArticleEnglishFocus AreaUSA
2025-05-21T05:00:00Z
Countdown to CDL Medical Certification Integration - 6 FAQs to help you prepare
Within a month, commercial driver’s license (CDL) and commercial learner's permit (CLP) holders won't have to submit each medical certificate to their state driver licensing agency (SDLA). By June 23, 2025, all SDLAs will get automatic updates from the National Registry of Certified Medical Examiners (NRCME).
6 frequently asked questions
1. What should CDL/CLP drivers and employers do to get ready for these changes?
- Monitor the SDLA: Drivers and employers should check their SDLA’s transition date and procedures. All SDLAs must switch to the new system on or before June 22nd.
The FMCSA link below displays the states that have transitioned so far:
- Follow the current process until transition: CDL/CLP drivers must keep submitting copies of each medical certificate until their SDLA tells them to stop.
- Prepare for the transition: Update internal processes and train staff in the new procedures. If more than one licensing state is involved, there may be more than one process to update driver qualification (DQ) files until all SDLAs transition.
2. What should be done after the transition date or by June 23,2025?
- Carriers: Must place motor vehicle records (MVRs) in the driver qualification (DQ) file within the required timeframe (to be determined). They no longer need to note that the certified medical examiner (CME) was on the Registry.
- CDL/CLP drivers: Must continue to self-certify their driving tier (interstate or intrastate) and whether they need to be medically certified (Excepted/Non-excepted) when they apply for a new, renewed, or upgraded CDL/CLP.
- Carriers and/or drivers: Schedule exams well before the expiration date. Enforcement must go by what is in the CDL Information System (CDLIS). If a CDL driver does not have the medical card that was just issued, the system may show their certification as expired if there is any delay in transmission and the old expiration date has passed.
3. Will clinics automatically issue medical cards to CDL/CLP drivers? What if they don’t?
On and after June 23,2025, examiners don’t have to issue CDL/CLP drivers’ medical cards unless they ask for one. It is not known if every clinic will issue medical certificates.
There is a potential 2 to 4-day gap for the information to show on the MVR.
- Examiners must enter the exam results by midnight of the day after the exam.
- The data transfer from the registry to the SDLA takes about two days.
Given the potential gap in proof of medical certification, two best practices to consider:
- To minimize roadside inspection concerns, carriers should direct CDL/CLP drivers to ask for a medical card to carry until the new medical certification information is on their MVR.
- The driver should give a medical certificate copy to the carrier to show they have passed the exam.
4. How long will carriers have to place an updated MVR in the DQ file?
Currently, carriers have 15 days after each exam to place a CDL MVR in the DQ file. On and after June 23rd, this time may be shorter if FMCSA changes the rule. By June 23, 2025, the MVR should reflect the current information in 2-4 days after the exam.
5. Why are procedures changing?
FMCSA published a rulemaking in 2015 that requires SDLAs to connect to NRCME, but the initiative was delayed more than once. The connection simplifies the CDL medical certification documentation process and accounts for every medical examination, even disqualifications.
6. Does this rule impact non-CDL drivers?
No. Drivers who hold non-CDL licenses will still receive a medical certificate which should not be submitted to their SDLA.
Key to remember: Carriers and drivers must understand their responsibilities in this critical transition to avoid CDL driver medical qualification issues.
NewsIndustry NewsFederal Motor Carrier Safety RegulationsFleet SafetyFocus AreaIn-Depth ArticleEnglishTransportationBusiness planning - Motor CarrierUSA
2025-05-29T05:00:00Z
Rule changes may spell savings for drivers, motor carriers
A series of proposed rule changes from the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) could result in less work and cost for drivers and motor carriers alike.
The agency released a whopping 18 proposals in one day, taking aim at a broad range of requirements related to electronic logs, railroad crossings, violation reporting, vehicle parts, and more.
Though the proposed changes are relatively minor, they may represent the first salvo in the new administration’s deregulatory efforts.
The proposals were due to be published on May 30, 2025, and the FMCSA is accepting public comments on them until late July.
How would they help?
The following is a summary of how the proposed changes, if finalized, would ease burdens on commercial drivers and motor carriers:
ELD manuals: Drivers would no longer need to carry a user manual (either paper or electronic) for their electronic logging device (ELD). This violation alone was cited over 3,660 times last year. Other ELD-related documents would still be required, however, such as malfunction and transfer instructions and blank logs.
Railroad crossings: Bus drivers and those hauling certain hazardous materials would no longer need to stop before crossing a railroad track equipped with an active warning device (i.e., lights or gates), as long as the device is not activated.
Accident recording/reporting: Motor carriers would no longer need to record information about accidents where the only medical treatment that occurred involved imaging (such as x-rays or CT scans) or a prescription but no treatment for diagnosed injuries or other medical interventions directly related to the accident.
Inspections
- Motor carriers would only need to complete and return roadside inspection reports to the issuing state agency if that agency requests them (though the forms must still be retained for 12 months). Currently, 49 CFR 396.9 requires that all such reports be returned within 15 days.
- Though already allowed under 390.32, the rules would explicitly allow drivers and motor carriers to use electronic drivers’ vehicle inspection reports (DVIRs).
CDLs
- Commercial driver’s license (CDL) holders would no longer need to self-report motor vehicle violations to their state licensing agency, as currently required under 383.31.
- Dual-status military technicians, regardless of whether they’re members of either the Reserves or the National Guard, would qualify for the military exemption from needing a CDL, which also means being exempt from entry-level driver training and drug/alcohol testing.
Parts and accessories
- Drivers would no longer be required to carry spare fuses. The FMCSA says today’s vehicles don’t commonly suffer from blown fuses.
- Motor carriers would no longer need to ensure that their vehicles’ rear-impact guards have a permanent certification marking from the manufacturer.
- Tractors would no longer need a working rear license-plate lamp while pulling a trailer.
- It would no longer be a violation to use fuel tanks that can be filled beyond 95 percent of their capacity. Modern liquid-fuel tanks have vented caps that can safely accommodate a 100-percent fill, the FMCSA says.
- Drivers and motor carriers would no longer need to worry about being cited if their tire sidewalls are not marked with a maximum load rating. It’s up to tire manufacturers to determine if and when such markings are required.
- Drivers would be allowed to use small gravity- or siphon-fed auxiliary fuel pumps mounted on the trailer, as long as their tank capacity is less than 5 gallons and they’re not used for operating the vehicle or while the vehicle is moving. This would be a new exception to the current prohibition in 393.65(d).
- It would no longer be a violation to operate portable conveyors used in the aggregate industry without having brakes acting on all wheels, as long as the conveyor was manufactured before 2010 and the towing vehicle is large enough.
Other changes
The FMCSA issued a few other final or proposed changes that will have limited impact:
- Liquid-burning flares will no longer be an option. Drivers will need to use solid-fuel flares or reflective triangles to warn other motorists of a stopped vehicle.
- The agency plans to remove the requirement that motor carriers retrofit pre-1994 trailers with reflective tape or reflectors, saying the requirement is no longer necessary given the passage of time.
- The FMCSA intends to remove an obsolete grandfathering provision related to an old vision waiver study program.
- The agency will remove all references to “water carriers” in its regulations, since the FMCSA does not regulate such carriers. The agency says the term was carried over from when its predecessor agencies regulated water carriers.
- The regulations no longer say that motor carriers can be fined for violating Part 40 (the DOT drug/alcohol testing rules) since the FMCSA only has authority to issue fines for its own rules under Part 382.
- Some old routing regulations in Part 356 have been eliminated. The FMCSA says it’s not authorized to impose routing limitations when granting operating authority to U.S.-domiciled carriers, making the regulations both “unlawful and obsolete.”
Take action
Though you can’t take advantage of the changes until they’re finalized (probably later this year), you can help sway whether the changes actually take place. You can go online to submit comments about any of the FMCSA’s active proposals, at www.regulations.gov. Just look for the latest dockets from the FMCSA.
Key to remember: The FMCSA has issued a wide variety of proposed rule changes that could save time and money for both motor carriers and drivers.
NewsIndustry NewsExceptions - HazmatHazmat SafetyHazmatIn-Depth ArticleFocus AreaEnglishTransportationUSA
2025-05-22T05:00:00Z
Understanding the MOT exception for the construction industry
Imagine a construction crew rolling out at dawn, their truck loaded with propane tanks, cans of adhesive, and cleaning solvents, all tools of the trade essential for getting the job done. What many don’t realize is that transporting these materials, even in small amounts, can trigger complex hazardous materials regulations. Fortunately, the Materials of Trade (MOT) exception, found in 49 CFR 173.6, offers a practical solution.
This exception allows businesses like construction companies to legally transport smaller quantities of hazardous materials without the full burden of hazmat compliance, provided they follow specific rules. For the construction industry, understanding when and how this exception applies can mean the difference between smooth operations and costly violations.
What qualifies as MOT
To use the MOT exception, the hazardous materials you transport must meet specific criteria outlined in the regulations. A "material of trade" refers to hazardous materials that are transported by a private motor carrier in direct support of its primary business activities. These materials are not offered for sale or distribution but are instead used by the operator or business for operational purposes.
According to the DOT, a hazardous material qualifies as a MOT if it is:
- Used to protect the health or safety of the driver or passengers, such as insect repellents, first aid chemicals, or breathing apparatus.
- Necessary for the maintenance of the vehicle or its equipment, including items like fuel, lubricants, or spare batteries.
- Directly related to the operator’s business activities, such as tools and supplies used in construction, landscaping, pest control, or similar trades.
What you won't have to do
When these conditions are met, the MOT exception allows for relief from many of the requirements listed in the hazardous materials regulations. Specifically, materials transported under this exception are not subject to the following requirements:
- Hazmat shipping papers
- Emergency response information
- Vehicle placarding
- Formal hazmat training
This exception is especially valuable for small businesses and field crews, such as those in the construction industry, who frequently need to transport smaller quantities of hazmat like adhesives, paints, solvents, fuels, and compressed gases to job sites. By using the MOT exception, these businesses can operate more efficiently while still maintaining safety and compliance.
Quantity and packaging limits apply
The MOT exception does have strict limits on the type and amount of hazmat that can be transported, which includes:
- Class 3, 8, 9 and Division 4.1, 5.1, 5.2, or 6.1 materials:
- 1 lb. or 1 pint for Packing Group I;
- 66 lbs. or 8 gallons per container for Packing Group II or III; and
- 400 gallons of a diluted mixture, not exceeding 2% concentration for Class 9.
- Division 2.1 or 2.2 gases: Cylinders not exceeding 220 lbs.
- Division 4.3 materials: Limited to 1 ounce per container for Packing Group II or III.
When transporting multiple MOT together, the total weight of all MOT cannot exceed 440 pounds per vehicle. In addition, all materials must be properly marked, labeled, and secured in the vehicle.
Key to remember: The MOT exception provides a practical and efficient way for construction companies to transport smaller quantities of hazardous materials without the full burden of hazmat regulations.
NewsIndustry NewsFleet SafetyRisk Management TransportationRisk Management - Motor CarrierTransportationIn-Depth ArticleEnglishFocus AreaUSA
2025-05-21T05:00:00Z
Don’t fall for emails pretending to be FMCSA
Fraudulent emails are making their way into motor carrier in-boxes — again. The Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) warns motor carriers that a recent email asking for corporate documents is not from the agency.
The email uses several common phishing ploys, including:
- Requesting immediate action (or else), and
- Using an email appearing to originate from a legitimate party.
A phishing email is a fake email used to trick users into providing private information that could be used for identity theft (including corporate).
Tell-tale signs of phishing
This recent email uses an email address that implies it’s related to FMCSA, which it is not.
And the email’s subject line is meant to draw you in by stating, “Immediate Action Required: Submit Documents for FMCSA Compliance.”
Ironically, this fraudulent email is using cybersecurity to gain the confidence of the reader. The email tells the carrier that specific information is needed to ensure compliance and protect their information from potential fraud. They are instructed to reply with the following sensitive corporate information:
- Certificate of Insurance
- IRS-issued EIN Verification Letter
- Certificate of Organization
- Clear copies of your driver’s license (front and back)
The phishing expedition tries to illicit yet another emotional response from the recipient; the email cites 385.337(b) implying there is a safety audit within two business days and threatens penalties and fines for those who fail to respond with the sensitive information.
Suggested cybersecurity practices
Some phishing emails are obviously a scam and immediately deleted by recipients. Others are clever and require receivers to be alert to the subtleties.
Use the following characteristics of a phishing email to help identify those that show up in your in-box:
- A sense of urgency to respond,
- An unsolicited email appearing to come from a party you know,
- A negative consequence if you don’t respond,
- Poor grammar and spelling errors,
- Request for personal information,
- Odd payment requests,
- Suspicious links that resemble legitimate URLs with small changes, and
- Suspicious attachments.
If you receive an email with phishing attributes:
- Don’t click on any links or open any attachments. Hover over suspicious links to see the real email address or URL.
- Contact the person, business, or agency for confirmation using a known phone number or email address. Don’t reply to the fake email address or call the number provided in the email.
These same concepts apply to suspicious text messages on your phone. Many cell users rely on text alerts from their services (e.g., banks, vendors). Smishing, or SMS phishing, uses the everyday usage of text alerts to catch individuals off guard. Smishing attempts:
- Direct individuals to a website or phone number,
- Prompt users to download malware, and
- Nudge the user to act with a sense of urgency (just like the other methods of fraud).
Preventing and reporting scams
This phishing email is not the first, and probably not the last, fraudulent attempt to gain information from motor carriers.
It has happened so frequently in recent years that FMCSA has set up a Fraud Alerts webpage to warn stakeholders of impersonations.
If you have been a target of a suspicious communication, the event should be reported to U.S. Federal Trade Commission, the Federal Bureau of Investigation Internet Complaint Center, your local police, and/or state attorney general's office.
Specific to scams against motor carriers, you can reach out to the FMCSA Contact Center or call (800) 832-5660.
Key to remember: Cyber criminals continue to use the same ploys with the same objective (e.g., bank accounts, personal identifiable information). Train your employees to be suspicious and slow to open, click, and respond to any requests — whether personal or business-related communication.
NewsIndustry NewsFleet Safety150 air-mile radius exceptionHours of ServiceFocus AreaIn-Depth ArticleEnglishTransportationUSA
2022-08-29T05:00:00Z
The 150 air-mile short-haul exemptions: Widely used and widely misused
The 150 air-mile exemptions, which are in the regulations at 395.1(e)(1) and (2), allow a driver to use a time record in place of a log, provided that certain conditions are met. While this is possibly the most widely used hours-of-service exemption, it may be the most commonly misused exemption, as well.
The basics of logging exemptions
To be able to use this logging exemption in 395.1(e)(1), the driver must:
- Stay within 150 air-miles of the work reporting location for the day (draw a 150 air-mile radius circle around the work reporting location for the day — the driver must stay within this circle),
- Be back to — and released from — the work reporting location for his/her 8- or 10-hour break within 14 hours, and
- Include the starting and ending times for the day and the total hours on duty on the time record for the day.
The company must retain the time record and have it available for inspection for six months.
Need more info? View our ezExplanation on the 150 air-mile exception. |
What if the driver goes too far or works too many hours?
If the driver cannot meet the terms of the exemption (he or she goes too far or works too many hours), the driver must complete a regular driver’s log for the day as soon as the exemption no longer applies.
If the driver has had to complete a log 8 or fewer days out of the last 30 days, the driver can use a paper log for the day. If the driver had to complete a log more than 8 days out of the last 30 days, the driver needs to use an electronic log for the day (unless one of the ELD exemptions applies, such as operating a vehicle older than model year 2000).
30-minute break exemption
When a property-carrying driver is operating under the 150 air-mile exemption, the driver is also exempt from having to take the required 30-minute break (see 395.3(a)(3)(ii)).
If the driver began the day as a 150 air-mile driver and has driven more than 8 consecutive hours without a break, and something unexpected happens and the driver can no longer use the 150 air-mile exemption, the driver must stop and immediately take the 30-minute break as well as start logging. If the driver went outside of the 150 air-mile area before the driver had 8 hours of driving without a break from driving, the driver would be expected to take the break at the appropriate time.
Common myths
Here are some of the common myths and misunderstandings about the 150 air-mile exemption:
- The driver must have the time records in the vehicle. Myth. The driver simply needs to explain to an officer during a roadside inspection that he/she does not have logs due to operating under the 150 air-mile exemption and that the required time records are back at the carrier’s office (just telling the officer, “I don’t have any logs” will lead to a violation, so the driver needs to know to provide the full explanation).
- The driver must log the previous seven days if he/she had been using this exemption and suddenly can’t. Myth. If the driver cannot use the exemption on one particular day, that is the only day the driver must use a regular log (either paper or electronic).
- Passenger-carrying drivers and drivers hauling hazardous materials cannot use this exemption. Myth. There are no restrictions on the use of this exemption, so any commercial driver can use it.
- A driver that crosses state lines cannot use this exemption. Myth. As this exemption appears in the Federal Motor Carrier Administration (FMCSA) regulations, it can be used by interstate drivers.
- Only drivers that operate out of a “company terminal” can use the 150 air-mile exemption. Myth. As long as the driver makes it back to the work reporting location for the day within the appropriate number of hours, the driver can use the exemption.
- Drivers that move from one jobsite to another every few weeks cannot use this exemption. Myth. If a driver that normally uses this exemption switches work reporting locations, the day the driver switches work reporting locations is the only day the driver cannot use the exemption.
- Drivers covered by this exemption are also exempt from the driver qualification (licensing and medical cards), driving, and vehicle inspection requirements. Myth. The only rules the driver is exempt from are the logging requirement in 395.8 and the 30-minute break requirement in 395.3.
- The driver cannot drive more than 150 miles for the day. Myth. The driver can drive as many miles as he/she wants to or needs to, as long as the driver stays within the 150 air-mile radius circle and gets back to the work reporting location within the appropriate number of hours.
- If a 150 air-mile driver gets into a vehicle with an ELD, the driver must use it. Myth. The carrier can have the driver log in and have the driver entered into the system as an “exempt driver,” or the carrier can request that the driver not log into the device and then attach a comment to the unassigned driving time generated by the driver’s movements. The comment would need to explain that the driver using the vehicle was a 150 air-mile driver who submitted a time record. It is up to the carrier to decide which option to use. If stopped for a roadside inspection, the driver will need to be able to explain to the inspector that he/she is an exempt driver using the 150 air-mile exemption, so using the electronic log is not required.
What’s different with the ‘150 air-mile non-CDL property-carrying drivers’
The 150 air-mile exemption at 395.1(e)(2) only applies to drivers that: Operate property-carrying vehicles that do not require a CDL to operate, and Stay within the 150 air-miles of their work reporting location.
If the driver stays within the 150 air-mile radius of the work reporting location, and returns to the work reporting location within 14 hours on 5 of the last 7 days, and 16 hours on 2 of the last seven days, the driver is allowed to use a time record in place of a log.
If the driver does not meet the terms of the exception, the driver will need to complete a log for the day. If the driver had to log more than 8 days out of the last 30 days, the driver will need to use an electronic log for the day. All of the other issues discussed above would apply to these drivers as well.
Managing the use
If you have drivers that use these exemptions, you will need to check time records to make sure they are complying with the appropriate time limits. You will also need to check movement records to verify that the drivers using these exemptions are staying within the mandated area (within 150 air-miles of the work reporting location for the day).
If a driver is over the hours limit, or has gone too far, you need to verify that the submitted a log for the day, either paper or electronic, depending on how many days the driver had to log out of the previous 30 days.
Verifying compliance is important
During an audit, if it is discovered that your drivers are using these exemptions incorrectly, you will be cited for not having drivers’ logs when required. Each day this occurred will be another violation, so the fine could be rather large if you are not managing the use of these exemptions!
NewsIndustry NewsFleet SafetyTransportation SecurityRisk Management TransportationRisk Management - Motor CarrierFocus AreaIn-Depth ArticleEnglishTransportationUSA
2022-10-03T05:00:00Z
Delivering freight to military bases
Truck drivers deliver everything from food to hazmat commodities at military bases every day, but they always go through an inspection process prior to entry. Security tensions are high because of the Russia-Ukraine conflict, and military bases are following strict protocol. Follow along to understand how drivers gain access to military bases.
Prior to entry
When a carrier needs to access a military base for delivery, they must communicate with the base in advance to validate the request.
Base inspection officers will request:
- The driver’s name,
- Carrier information, and
- The commodity being delivered.
The officers will verify the request to ensure that the driver has a valid reason to be on the installation.
Possess the correct identification forms
Drivers checking in at the inspection station should be prepared to provide the requested identification documents. Military bases typically accept the Transportation Workers Identification Credential (TWIC), military ID cards, and Real ID commercial driver licenses. Many drivers carry company-issued employee ID cards to prevent identify theft, but military installations and government contractors require verified identification.
The identification credentials are scanned through a law enforcement system to check the driver for active and previous criminal issues. After the driver has been processed, the tractor inspection will follow.
Tractor-and-trailer inspection
Officers will thoroughly inspect the tractor and trailer for contraband. Even if drivers are permitted to possess certain items in the general public, this is not the case on military bases. Firearms, knives, and anything else identified as a weapon will be confiscated, and the driver will be refused entry. Additionally, the carrier may be denied entry for subsequent deliveries because of a single failed inspection.
Drivers should not have a reasonable expectation of privacy during the inspection process. If illegal drugs are identified, the officers will request additional resources through the military police.
Final steps
After officers have verified the driver’s identity and searched the tractor and trailer, they will identify any cameras that may be visible. Forward- and rear-facing dash cameras are prohibited, but security tape can be placed over the lens to prevent recording. Drivers will also receive specific instructions about the travel route and delivery process.
Just doing their job
Making deliveries at military bases can appear intimidating, but security officers at the front gate are tasked with preventing explosive devices, drugs, and weapons from entering the facility. If they fail to do their job, then the entire base could be in jeopardy.
Key to remember: Understanding the process and being prepared is essential for deliveries on military bases.
Most Popular Highlights In Human Resources
NewsDrug and Alcohol TestingIndustry NewsDrug and Alcohol TestingSafety & HealthGeneral Industry SafetyAssociate RelationsHR GeneralistIn-Depth ArticleUSAHR ManagementEnglishFocus AreaHuman Resources
2025-05-28T05:00:00Z
Be cautious when diving into a drug testing pool
Pools always require a degree of caution, whether you’re using one to cool off or to help ensure workers stay free and clear of drug use.
A workplace drug testing pool is very different than the backyard variety, of course, and it might come with its own set of rules. Those rules can be very detailed, and failing to follow them has consequences, as an Iowa employer learned when an employee challenged a drug test.
Improper pool construction
In a recent case, the Iowa Supreme Court ruled that an employer violated the state’s drug testing law because it did not properly create a drug-testing pool.
Few states regulate drug testing as strictly as Iowa. Employers testing in the state must follow the state's law unless they are required to follow federal drug and alcohol testing regulations that cover employees doing safety-sensitive work, such as certain truck drivers.
For tests conducted under the state’s comprehensive drug testing law, employers must use one of three methods to create an employee testing pool for an unannounced drug test.
One method uses a pool comprised of the entire population of employees at a work site, except for those:
- Not subject to testing because of a collective bargaining agreement;
- Who are not scheduled to be at work at the time the testing is conducted because of their status; or
- Who have been excused from work pursuant to the employer’s work policy before the testing is announced to employees.
Testing troubles
For the company’s random test, a list of all active employees was used. From this list, a computer-based random generator produced a testing list of 15 employees and eight alternates. If an employee selected for the test was not at work on the day the test was given, an alternate was selected.
One of the alternates subject to testing provided a urine sample that was outside of the acceptable temperature range. The employee was directed to provide another sample, but the sample wasn’t large enough for testing.
The employee waited at the worksite for a time and then told the company’s human resources director he was leaving to take care of a sick child. He was warned that he would be fired if he left. He left the area and was later fired.
The employee filed a lawsuit claiming that the employer’s testing pool did not meet state requirements.
Strict state standards
The employer argued that because no employees who were not scheduled to work could have been tested, it substantially complied with the state law and the pool met requirements.
The court ruled, however, that the company’s testing pool didn’t meet the law's standards. The law places limits on how the testing pool can be constructed, and to substantially comply with the law the company would have had to make an effort to properly create the testing pool.
It fell short because its testing pool consisted of all active employees in the company, and didn’t exclude employees who were not scheduled to be at work when the test was conducted or who had been excused from work under the employer’s work policy.
Compliance with the law would have required the employer to compile a list of employees who were scheduled to work on the planned testing day. That list could have been the testing pool, and names could have been randomly selected from that list.
Because the company didn’t substantially comply with the law and make reasonable efforts to ensure that the pool was constructed properly, the court found in favor of the employee.
State laws vary
Most states don’t have drug testing laws that are as detailed as Iowa’s, and some states don’t have any drug testing laws at all. In those states, employers may determine how the selection pool is created. Having this outlined in a workplace policy allows for consistency and can help avoid the claim that a test was conducted in a discriminatory manner.
Key to remember: In all cases, employers should pay attention to the details of state regulations that impact employee drug testing. In some states, such as Iowa, drug testing must be very carefully conducted to avoid violating state law.
Scott Hampe vs. Charles Gabus Motors, Iowa Supreme Court, No. 22-1599, April 11, 2025.
NewsIndustry NewsEnglishAssociate RelationsHR GeneralistIn-Depth ArticleUSAHR ManagementWellnessWellnessFocus AreaHuman Resources
2025-05-28T05:00:00Z
New sodas add fizz to summer but have drawbacks
New fizzy drinks bubbling up on grocery store shelves may make workers wonder if they should make this a prebiotic soda summer.
While prebiotic sodas do contain dietary fiber, and are a healthier alternative to sugary sodas with no nutritional benefits, they bring their own health concerns.
What are prebiotic sodas?
Prebiotic sodas are carbonated beverages that contain dietary fibers called prebiotics. Prebiotics help support the good bacteria in the gut.
Fiber isn’t digested but supports digestion and helps you feel full. Most Americans don’t eat enough fiber, falling short of the recommended 28 - 35 grams of fiber each day.
Since 2016, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has expanded its definition of dietary fiber to include non-digestive carbohydrates, such as inulin and acacia. These fibers come from plants such as chicory root and the acacia tree. Prebiotic sodas often contain these plant-based fibers.
What problems can prebiotic sodas cause?
Drinking prebiotic soda can have side effects, as inulin can be hard to digest. If you’re not used to consuming a lot of fiber, it can cause bloating, diarrhea, and gas pains.
In addition, prebiotic sodas often contain artificial ingredients as well as sugar, which has been linked to heart disease and diabetes.
Because of these drawbacks, a better choice for increasing fiber intake is a diet that includes plenty of fruits, vegetables, and whole grains. These foods are natural sources of fiber.
When you’re thirsty, and especially if you’re working in hot weather, water is a great choice. The Occupational Safety and Health Administration advises employers to provide cool water to workers in outdoor environments. Employees should be encouraged to drink at least one 8-ounce cup every 20 minutes while working in the heat.
Key to remember: There’s nothing wrong with swapping out a prebiotic soda for a regular one when you’re looking for a treat. If you’re focusing on getting more prebiotic fiber into your diet, however, it’s found naturally in bananas, asparagus, almonds, beans, peas, garlic, and onions. When you’re focused on calorie-free thirst quenching, water still rises to the top.
NewsIndustry NewsHR GeneralistFocus AreaIn-Depth ArticleUSAHR ManagementEnglishDisabilities and ADAHuman ResourcesReasonable Accommodations
2022-06-17T05:00:00Z
Help! An employee wants to bring an emotional support animal to work
The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) has many parts. Some of the provisions apply to employers and some apply to public places, such as restaurants and movie theaters. For employers, employees may request to bring a service dog or an emotional support animal into work. Your response would be the same for either type of animal. Both are requests for a workplace change and, as long as the change is based on a medical condition, your ADA obligations are triggered.
For public accommodations (restaurants, etc.), patrons must be allowed to have a service animal, but not emotional support animals. Service animals are not pets. They are defined as animals that have been individually trained to do work or perform tasks for the benefit of a person with a disability, also known as the animal’s handler. Only dogs and miniature horses are considered service animals under the public accommodation provisions of the ADA.
Emotional support animals, which can also be pets, can provide aid to a person with a disability, but do not perform a specific task or duty, as they are not trained to do so. Emotional support animals, therefore, do not meet the definition of a service animal. Obedience training alone is not enough to make it a service animal.
For employers, however, neither service animal nor emotional support animal is defined. A request to bring an emotional support animal into the workplace as an accommodation usually falls under the category of modifying a workplace policy, assuming you have a no-animal policy.
What would you do?
So, if Joe Employee were to ask to bring in his emotional support squirrel, what do you do?
Treat the request as you would any accommodation request. You would do the same if Joe asked to bring in a service dog. Look at the particulars of the situation, including the employee’s job, the work environment, and so forth. Talk to the employee. This is all part of the ADA’s interactive process.
Assuming it’s possible to modify the no-animal policy, you may (but are not required to) ask for medical documentation if the disability and need for accommodation are not obvious or already verified. You have to consider only those accommodations that are needed because of a disability. Documentation might include a detailed description of how the animal would help the employee in performing job tasks and how the animal is trained to behave in the workplace.
Once the need for accommodation is established, the next step is to talk with the employee about whether the animal is trained to be in a work environment and if it will be under the employee’s control at all times. You do not have to provide any accommodation that poses an undue hardship. One factor in determining undue hardship is whether the accommodation will be unduly disruptive to other employees or to the ability to conduct business.
Finally, possibly the best way to determine whether to permit the employee to bring an animal to work is to allow it on a trial basis and see if it works. You might want to make a written agreement with the employee that there will be a trial period, how long it will last, and what factors might end the trial period early. If, for example, the animal shows any sign of aggression or if the employee cannot keep the animal quiet or under control, you will immediately end the trial period and deny the request.
If you do not have a no-animal policy and allow other employees to bring in animals, then you should allow employees with disabilities to bring in animals without going through the accommodation process.
NewsIndustry NewsAssociate Benefits & CompensationHR GeneralistFamily and Medical Leave Act (FMLA)In-Depth ArticleFamily and Medical Leave Act (FMLA)Associate RelationsEnglishHR ManagementFocus AreaHuman ResourcesUSA
2025-03-27T05:00:00Z
Who can fill out FMLA forms? The answer might surprise you
One of the most common questions involving the federal Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) that we see is: “Can ________ fill out the medical certification?”
This question stumps a lot of HR people and can be a little confusing.
It might be easier to start with who CAN’T fill out an FMLA certification. That includes your coworker, best friend, neighbor, or pet.
Jokes aside, often (but not always) a doctor fills out the FMLA certification, and since March 30 is “Doctors’ Day,” this is a great time to discuss this topic.
FMLA certification basics
Employers aren’t required to use certifications, but if they do, the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) has five different certification forms to use for various FMLA leave situations.
The forms are as follows:
- Certification of Health Care Provider for Employee's Serious Health Condition,
- Certification of Health Care Provider for Family Member's Serious Health Condition,
- Certification of Qualifying Exigency for Military Family Leave,
- Certification for Serious Injury or Illness of a Current Servicemember for Military Family Leave, and
- Certification for Serious Injury or Illness of a Veteran for Military Family Leave.
Let’s focus on the first two, as these are the most common ones HR administrators use.
Who can fill out an FMLA certification?
The FMLA regulations describe the person who has the authority to fill out a certification as a “health care provider.” The good news is, the regulations include a lengthy list of medical professionals who fit this role.
Under the FMLA, a health care provider includes:
- A doctor of medicine or osteopathy,
- A podiatrist,
- A dentist,
- A clinical psychologist,
- An optometrist,
- A chiropractor (limited to manual manipulation of the spine as demonstrated by X-ray),
- A nurse practitioner,
- A nurse midwife,
- A clinical social worker,
- A physician assistant,
- A Christian Science practitioner, and
- Any health care provider from whom the employer or the employer's group health plan's benefits manager will accept a medical certification to substantiate a claim for benefits.
To be qualified to fill out FMLA forms, medical professionals must be authorized to practice in the state and perform within the scope of their practice. This means that the provider must be authorized to diagnose and treat physical or mental health conditions.
What about doctors in a foreign country?
If an employee or an employee's family member is visiting another country, or a family member resides in another country, and a serious health condition develops, the employer must accept a medical certification from a health care provider who practices in that country. This includes second and third opinions.
If a medical certification from a foreign health care provider is not in English, the employee may be required to provide a written translation of the certification.
Key to remember: The FMLA regulations spell out which medical professionals can fill out certification forms.
NewsIndustry NewsWage and HourWage and HourAssociate Benefits & CompensationHours WorkedHR GeneralistFair Labor Standards Act (FLSA)OvertimeIn-Depth ArticleHR ManagementEnglishFocus AreaHuman ResourcesUSA
2025-05-29T05:00:00Z
Must employers pay extra for weekend or night work?
When questioning whether or not employers need to pay employees extra for working nights or weekends, the short answer is no, unless a state law requires it. Employers may have agreements or contracts with employees that require such additional pay, however, to make these shifts more enticing.
Extra pay (sometimes referred to as “premium pay”) for working weekends or nights is a matter of agreement between employers and their employees (or the employees’ representative). The federal Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), which sets the base for employee pay, does not require extra pay for working the night shift or on weekends.
If the night or weekend hours cause an employee’s total hours for the week to top 40, however, it’s a different story. The FLSA does require covered employers to pay nonexempt workers not less than time and a half their regular rate for time worked over 40 hours in a workweek.
Paid time off
In addition to not requiring bonus pay for night or weekend work, the FLSA does not require employers to give employees paid time off, such as vacation, sick leave, or general paid time off (PTO). If an employee works while on PTO, the FLSA does not require employers to pay extra for that time.
Many states, however, have laws that entitle eligible employees to paid time off for a variety of qualifying reasons. Employers should pay close attention to the details of these leave laws, as they may restrict employees from working while on leave.
State laws
Concerning time off, some states have “day of rest” or similar laws requiring employers to give employees at least one day off in a seven-day workweek.
Certain states also require premium pay for weekend work, even if the total hours worked do not exceed 40 in a workweek. This premium pay, often at a rate higher than standard overtime, varies by state.
Under California law, for example, employers must pay overtime for any work beyond eight hours in one workday and any work beyond 40 hours in one workweek. They must also pay overtime for the first eight hours worked on the seventh day of work in any one workweek. Employers must pay double time for any work beyond 12 hours in one day and any work above eight hours on any seventh day of a work week.
Key to remember: Employers don’t have to pay employees extra for working weekends or night shifts under federal law, but state laws might require it.
NewsIndustry NewsIndustry NewsHR GeneralistFamily and Medical Leave Act (FMLA)Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA)USAHR ManagementEnglishFocus AreaHuman Resources
2023-09-06T05:00:00Z
Appellate court sided with employee's (almost) 3-year-delayed FMLA claim
Back in October 2018, Laffon had a medical emergency and needed some time off under the federal Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA).
Her leave lasted until November 15. Ten days after she returned to work, on November 26, her employer terminated her.
She sued, arguing that the employer retaliated against her because of her FMLA leave.
The catch? She didn't bring the suit until almost three years later.
No link between leave and termination
In court, the employer argued that there was no causal link between Laffon taking FMLA leave and her termination. Although the court documents aren't robust, they do reveal that the employer indicated that Laffon's allegations didn't show that her taking FMLA leave was a factor in the decision to terminate her. The documents showed only that the termination chronologically followed her leave.
The court agreed with the employer. It also agreed that Laffon failed to allege a willful violation of the FMLA, which would allow her to benefit from the FMLA's three-year statute of limitations.
Laffon appealed the case to the Ninth Circuit.
Statute of limitations
Under the FMLA, employees have two years from the date of the last event constituting the alleged violation for which they can bring a claim.
Those two years are extended to three years if the employer's actions were "willful." This means that an employee must show that the employer either knew or showed reckless disregard for whether its conduct violated the FMLA.
Ruling overturned
Fast forward to August 2023, when the Ninth Circuit reversed the lower court's decision. It indicated that, based on Laffon's amended complaint and liberally construing the law, her allegations establish that her leave was causally connected to her termination and that the employer's action (her termination) was willful.
Glymph v. CT Corporation Systems, No. 22-35735, Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, August 22, 2023.
Key to remember: Terminating an employee soon after returning from FMLA leave is risky, unless there is a clear, well-documented, non-leave-related reason. Case documents did not show such a clear reason, which can also increase the risk of a willful finding. Employees have time to file claims, even years.
Most Popular Highlights In Safety & Health
NewsIndustry NewsSafety & HealthConstruction SafetyGeneral Industry SafetyForklifts and Powered TrucksPIT Training RequirementsIn-Depth ArticleEnglishFocus AreaUSA
2023-08-07T05:00:00Z
Want to provide forklift training in-house? No problem, here’s how!
Training forklift operators is an OSHA requirement per 1910.178(l). Do you want to do it in house? If you said yes, follow this step-by-step guide.
It all starts with a competent trainer. OSHA’s view is that all operator training and evaluation must be conducted by persons who have the “knowledge, training, and experience” to train operators and evaluate their competence. The standard doesn’t go into any more detail. It’s up to the employer to ensure trainers meet these general qualifications, but OSHA has no requirements for trainers to take certain classes, hold any sort of certifications, or be re-certified as trainers at specified intervals.
Need more information on OSHA’s Forklift Standard? See our ezExplanation on Powered Industrial Trucks. |
The only aspect that OSHA has clarified is that the trainer does need to have experience operating the equipment and attachments. However, the standard doesn’t require that the trainers operate a forklift regularly (that is, outside of their operator training duties) as part of their job function or responsibility.
#1 Start here
First, OSHA requires that all operators must be trained prior to being allowed to operate forklifts. And the same thing goes for pallet trucks, order pickers, and stand-up units…. Any powered type of material handling equipment requires training.
But what does training entail? Well, the OSHA regulations are very specific. All operators must receive a combination of training. Training must consist of formal training, which is a lecture, discussion, interactive computer learning, video tape, written material, and so on.
They must also receive practical training, which means demonstrations performed by the trainer and practical exercises performed by the trainee.
And the third component is that operators must receive a performance evaluation. So, they must operate the equipment and be observed and evaluated before being considered trained per the OSHA standard.
Usually, you’ll introduce the concepts during the classroom portion of training, the more informational aspects, such as the OSHA requirements. Then you’ll use the practical part of training to familiarize trainees with controls, talk about load handling, and so on. With the practical part, it’s usually best to ramp up the training, meaning start with simple skills and then build on those.
#2 Train on these topics
Aside from requirements for how to do the training, OSHA gives us a detailed list of topics to cover during the training.
The main categories are truck-related and workplace-related topics. And remember that OSHA does require you to include information on OSHA’s forklift standard as part of the training program. This requirement can be easy to overlook, but a good way to approach it is in the classroom portion of the program.
Keep in mind that if a topic doesn’t apply to your trucks or workplace, you don’t have to train on it. For example, if you don’t have any ramps or hazardous (classified) locations in your facility, your forklift operators don’t need training on these topics.
Truck-related topics include the following:
- Operation instruction, warnings
- Differences between forklift and automobile
- Controls, instrumentation
- Engine, motor operation
- Steering
- Visibility, restrictions
- Fork, attachment operation
- Capacity
- Stability
- Inspection, maintenance
- Refueling, recharging
- Operating limitations
- Operator’s manual instructions, precautions
Workplace-related topics are examples like these:
- Surfaces
- Load composition
- Load handling
- Pedestrians
- Narrow, restricted areas
- Hazardous (classified) locations
- Ramps
- Poor ventilation
- Other hazards
#3 Determine success
The trainees must successfully complete the formal and practical instruction, but how you determine success is up to you. For the classroom portion, you could give a written or oral test or otherwise evaluate the trainees’ knowledge. For the practical training, the trainee must be able to safely perform all the operations used on the job.
#4 End here
An evaluation of the operator’s performance in the workplace must be conducted at the time of initial training. And an evaluation is required to determine the effectiveness of any refresher training.
Also, you must conduct an evaluation at least every three years. This means that at least once every three years every operator must be observed while they operate in the workplace under actual workplace conditions. During the evaluation, the operator must also be able to answer pertinent questions to demonstrate they have the knowledge to operate the forklift safely.
A key point to note here, this evaluation must be more than just a written or verbal test. The employer must observe the operator in action performing all typical tasks related to running the forklift. And, going back to where we started, the evaluation must be conducted by someone who has the knowledge, training, and experience to evaluate the truck operator’s competence.
Document the evaluation — this means placing a record in your training file that includes the name of the operator, the date of the training, the date of the evaluation, and the identity of the person(s) performing the training or evaluation.
Action item
This may be a good time for you to review your options for training forklift operators to ensure they’re meeting these guidelines. And, it’s always a great idea to have all your training procedures in written format for consistency.
Key to remember
Training forklift operators is an OSHA requirement. Follow this step-by-step guide and you can do it in-house.
NewsIndustry NewsSafety & HealthForklifts and Powered TrucksGeneral Industry SafetyForklifts and Powered TrucksIn-Depth ArticleEnglishFocus AreaUSA
2025-05-28T05:00:00Z
Five forklift facts that are not in the OSHA regulations
Many common areas of confusion regarding forklift operation do not appear in the OSHA regulations. Perhaps the lack of regulatory information adds to the confusion. Below are the answers to some frequently asked questions.
No driver’s license but must be 18 years old
Since forklifts are not operated on public roads, the operator does not need a driver’s license. In fact, OSHA requires training on the differences between a forklift and a car. Someone with a driver's license might assume that forklifts handle like cars, but they do not!
A forklift operator must, however, be at least 18 years old. That’s not in the OSHA regulations, but appears in the child labor regulations. Minors under 18 years of age cannot operate (or even ride on) equipment like forklifts or scissor lifts.
Seatbelts required
Everyone knows that forklift operators must use the seatbelt if the forklift has one. That does not appear in the OSHA standard, but it’s usually a safety warning in the forklift operator manual. Since failing to wear a seat belt is a recognized hazard that could cause serious injury, OSHA uses the General Duty Clause to cite employers that don’t enforce seatbelt use.
Hearing or vision impairments
Employers occasionally hire trainees with hearing loss, vision impairment, or other physical limitations. Alternatively, an experienced forklift operator could get injured or experience similar impairments. OSHA does not establish specific requirements for vision, hearing, or other qualifications, and physical limitations are not necessarily disqualifying.
Instead, employers must evaluate the individual and determine if the person can operate safely. Trainers should work with their Human Resources team to evaluate possible accommodations under the Americans with Disabilities Act. Do not assume that a physical limitation would prevent someone from becoming a safe forklift operator. If an evaluation finds that the person cannot meet acceptable safety standards, the employer may refuse to certify the operator.
Trainers might need training
The employer determines who is qualified to deliver powered industrial truck training. The trainer must have the “knowledge, training, and experience” to train and evaluate operators. Attending a “train the trainer” class and getting a certification isn’t a bad idea, but OSHA doesn’t require any particular course or certification to be a trainer.
OSHA does, however, require that the trainer have experience using the type of equipment that trainees will operate. Since experience is required, the trainer likely received training on using that equipment. Further, if the employer purchases a new type of truck or attachment that the trainer has never used, the trainer will need experience using that equipment before training others.
For related information, see our articles on Debunking the mysteries of forklift training (Part 1) and Debunking the mysteries of forklift training (Part 2).
Even minor modifications require approval
Modifications that affect “safe operation” require the manufacturer’s written approval per 1910.178(a)(4). In OSHA’s view, that covers nearly any change, even adding a warning light or backup alarm. A Letter of Interpretation dated April 11, 1997, clarified that if the manufacturer does not respond or refuses to approve a modification, employers may instead get approval from a Qualified Registered Professional Engineer. Employers should ensure that forklift operators don’t modify equipment, like adding plywood or tarps to the cage as a sun shade. Those changes could affect safe operation and would require approval.
Key to remember: The powered industrial truck standard does not address every issue that employers might face, but employers can find answers in other regulations or guidance.
NewsIndustry NewsHeat and Cold ExposureSafety & HealthConstruction SafetyGeneral Industry SafetyIn-Depth ArticleEnglishHeat StressFocus AreaUSA
2025-05-29T05:00:00Z
Q&As: OSHA’s Heat rule, state heat regulations, and more
Heat is the leading cause of death among all hazardous weather conditions in the United States, according to OSHA. Data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics show nearly 480 workers died from exposure to environmental heat from 2011-2022, an average of 40 fatalities per year.
Although outdoor workers come to mind when we think about heat exposure, indoor workers also can be affected. Indoor work settings without adequate climate controls are at risk of hazardous heat, especially when heat-generating processes or equipment, such as furnaces and hot ovens, are present.
Below are popular questions our experts receive related to heat.
Q: When will OSHA’s proposed Heat rule become final?
A: The agency has scheduled a virtual public hearing for June 16 on its proposed Heat rule. Following the hearing, OSHA will analyze comments it received, which can take several months. Once this step is completed, OSHA will determine what’s next. This may include finalizing the rule.
Q: How does the proposed heat rule define indoor work?
A: “Indoor” is defined in the proposed rule as “an area under a ceiling or overhead covering that restricts airflow and has along its entire perimeter walls, doors, windows, dividers, or other physical barriers that restrict airflow, whether open or closed.” Examples include:
- A garage, even if the door is open;
- The interior of a warehouse, even if multiple doors are open on loading docks; and
- A shed with four walls and a ceiling, even if the windows are open.
Construction activity is considered “indoors” when performed inside a structure after the outside walls and the roof are built.
Q: Which states have their own heat regulations?
A: Several states have their own heat-related regulations. Note that they vary in the type of industries covered, whether they apply to indoor and/or outdoor workplaces, and the expectations and requirements for employers. These states are:
Additionally, Arizona and OSHA Region IX have launched emphasis programs.
- Arizona — In July 2023, Arizona implemented a state emphasis program (SEP) to reduce worker exposure to heat-related hazards in indoor and outdoor workplaces. In May 2025, the state’s governor formed a heat safety task force, with the goal of developing employer guidelines on heat safety by the end of 2025.
- OSHA Region IX — This region adopted a regional emphasis program (REP) for heat illness in November 2022. It applies to indoor and outdoor worksites where potential heat-related hazards exist in Alaska, American Samoa, Arizona, California, Guam, Hawaii, Idaho, Nevada, the Northern Mariana Islands, Oregon, and Washington.
And finally, several states and territories adopted OSHA’s National Emphasis Program (NEP) for indoor and outdoor heat hazards (CPL 03-00-024). Some adopt it identically and others made changes. These include California, Connecticut, Hawaii, Massachusetts, Maryland, Maine, Michigan, New Jersey, New Mexico, Nevada, New York, Oregon, Puerto Rico, South Carolina, Virginia, the Virgin Islands, Vermont, and Washington.
Q: Can OSHA cite our warehouse for heat hazards?
A: Yes, OSHA can cite your warehouse for heat hazards. In fact, under the agency’s NEP (CPL 03-00-024), OSHA compliance officers must initiate inspections in any of the 70 listed, high-risk industries (including the warehousing and storage industry) in outdoor and indoor work settings when the National Weather Service issues a heat warning or advisory for a local area. Inspectors will review illness logs and other records, interview workers, determine if the employer has a heat illness prevention program, document ambient conditions, and identify work activities relevant to heat-related hazards.
If there’s sufficient evidence to issue a citation for heat-related hazards, a citation under the General Duty Clause, Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act will be issued.
Q: Does heat stress have to be reported on our OSHA Logs?
A: Heat illness cases must be recorded if they meet OSHA’s recording criteria. To be recordable, the condition must involve medical treatment beyond first aid. First aid treatments listed in 29 CFR 1904.7 include “drinking fluids for relief of heat stress.” For instance, if an employee showed heat stress symptoms and needed a break to cool down and drink fluids, this alone is not a “recordable” case for the 300 Log. However, if the employee went to the hospital for intravenous (IV) fluid replacement, that would be recordable as medical treatment. Similarly, OSHA says if the employee went unconscious or oxygen was administered, the case is required to be recorded.
A case of heat stress will also become recordable if the employee needs restrictions or days away from work.
Key to remember: In the absence of a final Heat rule at the federal level, OSHA can use the General Duty Clause to cite for heat-related hazards. On June 16, the agency will hold a virtual public hearing on its proposed Heat rule. Meanwhile, some states already have heat regulations in place.
NewsIndustry NewsAt-Will EmploymentSafety & HealthGeneral Industry SafetyTerminationHR GeneralistIn-Depth ArticleUSAHR ManagementEnglishTerminationFocus AreaHuman Resources
2024-08-28T05:00:00Z
When to skip a PIP and move to terminate an employee
The U.S. Bureau of Labor statistics reported in July 2024 that there are 8.2 million job openings in the U.S., but only 7.2 million unemployed workers.
With that in mind, employers might choose to hang onto employees even if they’re under performing. But what about when complaints are rolling in from different angles? Take, for example, a lackluster supervisor who’s annoying employees and disappointing customers.
An employer could be hesitant to let the supervisor go, especially if there’s no documentation backing up claims of misconduct. The employer must weigh their options to decide if putting the supervisor on a performance improvement plan (PIP) or moving right to termination is the ideal choice.
At-will employment
For starters, in most states employers may terminate an employee at-will, meaning they can fire employees for pretty much any reason as long as it doesn’t discriminate against someone in a protected class based on sex, age, race, religion, etc. Employers also cannot terminate in retaliation for an employee making a claim of harassment, discrimination, or safety concerns.
Aside from these limits, employers can terminate employees for good cause, bad cause, or no cause at all.
PIP or terminate
Deciding whether to put an employee on a PIP or terminate must be decided on a case-by-case basis.
A PIP is usually for job performance issues (hence, performance improvement plan). This could mean anything from not making enough sales to being inept at the job’s essential functions. If job performance doesn’t improve under the PIP, termination may be the end result depending on company policies and practices.
Even if an employee has job performance issues, the employer can terminate without going through the PIP process first, unless the usual process is to implement a PIP with employees who have had similar problems. In that case, not doing a PIP could be seen as discrimination against an employee, especially if the person falls into a protected class.
Workplace misconduct, however, is another situation altogether. This could be anything from a one-off poor joke to pervasive harassment. Snapping at customers or coworkers (or worse), for example, is a conduct issue. An employer could issue a warning or move right to termination if the behavior is clearly illegal or a serious threat to workplace safety.
Read more: ezExplanation on discharging employees |
Termination tips
If an employer decides to terminate, they should treat the employee as respectfully as possible during the termination process. Also, an employer should carefully and clearly communicate the job-related reasons for the termination to avoid any hint of discrimination. Lastly, an employer should document the reasons and reiterate the steps taken leading up to the termination and keep those records handy in case the employee files a wrongful termination lawsuit.
Key to remember: Employers sometimes struggle when making termination decisions. Having a process in place and documenting steps along the way can help if a case lands in court.
NewsIndustry NewsEnforcement and Audits - OSHAHead ProtectionPersonal Protective EquipmentSafety & HealthConstruction SafetyGeneral Industry SafetyIn-Depth ArticleEnglishFocus AreaPersonal Protective EquipmentUSA
2024-04-03T05:00:00Z
Does OSHA suddenly require “helmets” now instead of hard hats?
Ever since OSHA published its Trade Release on December 11, 2023, people have been scratching their heads about the “new” PPE requirement.
But here’s the thing. There isn’t a new requirement for “helmets” instead of hard hats.
So where’s the confusion? And what is actually required?
OSHA’s announcement on helmets vs. hard hats
OSHA released a Safety and Health Bulletin (SHIB 11-22-2023) on November 22, 2023, detailing the key differences and benefits of using modern safety helmets over traditional hard hats.
And just a few weeks later, in the December 11, 2023 Trade Release, the Agency announced it would now require its inspectors to wear Type II head protection, which is also commonly referred to as safety helmets.
The two main benefits of Type II safety helmets
The November 22, 2023 SHIB discussed two main benefits of choosing modern safety helmets over traditional hard hats -- the construction of materials and the use of chinstraps.
Construction of Materials: | The SHIB first explained that one of the benefits of safety helmets lies in their construction materials. While hard hats are made from hard plastics, safety helmets incorporate a combination of materials, including lightweight composites, fiberglass, and advanced thermoplastics. Such materials can help enhance the impact resistance of the helmets but also include the added benefit of reducing the overall weight of the helmet. This reduces neck strain and improves comfort during extended use. |
Use of Chinstraps: | The SHIB also discussed the potential benefits of chinstraps used in conjunction with Type II safety helmets. The general idea here is that chinstraps can be helpful in maintaining the position of the safety helmet and protecting the worker’s head in the event of a slip, trip, or fall. According to data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, head injuries accounted for nearly 6% of non-fatal occupational injuries involving days away from work. About 20% of those were caused by slips, trips, and falls. |
And while OSHA has recognized the benefits of Type II safety helmets, and is actively taking steps to protect its own employees, it’s important to understand that there is not a new requirement for employers to make the switch to safety helmets.
That being said, a growing number of employers have recognized the benefits of added head protection and are choosing to use Type II helmets for their workers. In addition, some clients are starting to contractually require their construction contractors to make the switch as well.
Understanding the different types of head protection
Hard hats will have a Type I or Type II rating on the manufacturer’s sticker. These markings are based on ANSI Z89.1’s impact ratings.
Type I hard hats protect from objects or impacts from the top center area of the hard hat and are often used in work areas with no lateral head impact hazards.
Type II hard hats, on the other hand, offers protection from both top and lateral impacts and objects and is often found on construction job sites or complex general industry settings where workers face multiple head contact exposures.
Hard hats are classified based on their level of voltage protection. See the chart below.
Class G – (General) low voltage protection. Class E – (Electrical) high voltage protection. Class C – (Conductive) no voltage protection. |
Choosing the right head protection for your employees
Employers should conduct a job hazard analysis and/or a PPE assessment to determine which style hard hat is best for their workers. In general, OSHA recommends the use of Type II safety helmets at the following locations:
1. Construction Sites: For construction sites, especially those with high risks of falling objects and debris, impacts from equipment, or slips, trips, and falls, safety helmets have enhanced impact resistance and additional features that offer superior protection compared to the components and construction of traditional hard hats.
2. Oil and Gas Industry: In these sectors where workers face multiple hazards, including potential exposure to chemicals and severe impacts, safety helmets with additional features can provide comprehensive protection.
3. Working from Heights: For tasks or jobs that involve working from heights, safety helmets offer protection of the entire head and include features that prevent the safety helmet from falling off.
4. Electrical Work: For tasks involving electrical work or proximity to electrical hazards, safety helmets with non-conductive materials (Class G and Class E) provide protection to prevent electrical shocks. However, some traditional hard hats also offer electrical protection.
5. High-Temperature Environments: In high temperatures or where there is exposure to molten materials, safety helmets with advanced heat-resistant properties can provide additional protection to workers.
Key to remember: While there isn’t a new requirement for safety helmets, employers should review their workplace hazards to determine which style of hard hat will best protect their employees.
NewsIndustry NewsPersonal Protective EquipmentSafety & HealthGeneral Industry SafetyHand ProtectionIn-Depth ArticleEnglishFocus AreaUSA
2022-09-06T05:00:00Z
What are some alternatives to nitrile gloves?
The COVID-19 outbreak created a shortage of latex and nitrile gloves in many workplaces.
Latex and nitrile gloves are used extensively in health care, and their disposable (single use) nature meant that large quantities were consumed during the peak of the pandemic. The shortage was also worsened because of hoarding by some consumers. In addition, certain businesses and government agencies began using these gloves to protect employees, even if their workers didn’t normally require gloves on the job.
If you have trouble obtaining your staff’s usual gloves, be prepared to identify feasible alternatives. You don’t want to endanger them by having them wear any old gloves they find lying around.
To identify alternatives for workers who rely on latex or nitrile gloves as PPE, you must know which chemicals workers handle or come in contact with. That’s because all glove materials are not suitable for all hazards.
Evaluate which materials offer appropriate protection from the specific chemicals that workers handle to select appropriate alternative gloves.
Alternative glove selection for COVID-19
Here’s a summary of glove types and the protection given to help evaluate alternatives.
Butyl gloves protect against a variety of chemicals such as peroxide, highly corrosive acids, strong bases, alcohols, aldehydes, ketones, esters and nitrocompounds. Butyl gloves also resist oxidation, ozone corrosion and abrasion, and remain flexible at low temperatures. However, they do not perform well with aliphatic and aromatic hydrocarbons and halogenated solvents.
Natural (latex) rubber gloves have good elasticity and temperature resistance, and resist abrasions well. They protect against most water solutions of acids, alkalis, salts, and ketones. Latex gloves may cause allergic reactions and may not be appropriate for all employees. Hypoallergenic gloves, glove liners, and powderless gloves are possible alternatives for employees who are allergic.
Neoprene gloves protect against hydraulic fluids, gasoline, alcohols, organic acids, and alkalis. Their chemical and wear resistance are generally better than gloves of natural rubber.
Nitrile gloves are intended for jobs requiring dexterity, and they stand up even after prolonged exposure to substances that cause other gloves to deteriorate. They offer protection when working with greases, oils, acids, caustics, and alcohols but are not recommended for use with strong oxidizing agents, aromatic solvents, ketones, and acetates.
Saved to my EVENT CALENDAR!
View your saved links by clicking the arrow next to your profile picture located in the header. Then, click “My Activity” to view the Event Calendar on your Activity page.
OK
J. J. Keller is the trusted source for DOT / Transportation, OSHA / Workplace Safety, Human Resources, Construction Safety and Hazmat / Hazardous Materials regulation compliance products and services. J. J. Keller helps you increase safety awareness, reduce risk, follow best practices, improve safety training, and stay current with changing regulations.
Copyright 2025 J. J. Keller & Associate, Inc. For re-use options please contact copyright@jjkeller.com or call 800-558-5011.