Compliance Just Got Easier: Stay ahead of regulatory changes with instant notifications on updates that matter.

FREE TRIAL UPGRADE!
Thank you for investing in EnvironmentalHazmatHuman ResourcesHuman Resources, Hazmat & Environmental related content. Click 'UPGRADE' to continue.
CANCEL
YOU'RE ALL SET!
Enjoy your limited-time access to the Compliance Network!
A confirmation welcome email has been sent to your email address from ComplianceNetwork@t.jjkellercompliancenetwork.com. Please check your spam/junk folder if you can't find it in your inbox.
YOU'RE ALL SET!
Thank you for your interest in EnvironmentalHazmatHuman ResourcesHuman Resources, Hazmat & Environmental related content.
WHOOPS!
You've reached your limit of free access, if you'd like more info, please contact us at 800-327-6868.
You'll also get exclusive access to:
Already have an account? .

TIP: Ask drivers if they can explain the consequences on their career of a failed drug or alcohol test. If there is any uncertainty, make sure to go over the consequences.

Drugs aren’t cheap, and people with a substance use disorder may spend thousands of dollars a month to feed their addiction. Not only is this money that can’t be put towards other things, but people who have use disorders may steal money, credit cards, or other valuables; take out a second mortgage on their home; sell valuable items; or wipe out college and retirement accounts.

TIP: Not all use disorders require in-patient treatment, especially if caught early. It is possible to receive treatment without having to take time off of work. Knowing this may alleviate some financial worry for drivers who are considering seeking help.

When you use drugs or misuse alcohol, those things can take priority over the people you love. Family members and friends may say:

  • They can’t count on you to do what you say you’re going to do,
  • Your moods are unpredictable and irrational,
  • You’ve become verbally or physically abusive,
  • You don’t spend time with them or do the things you used to do together, or
  • You cause them to worry that you may hurt yourself or someone else.

When children are involved, the consequences of your drinking or drug use may have lasting effects on what they consider to be healthy loving relationships.

Both drugs and alcohol can cause a variety of serious health problems. For example, when alcohol is consumed in high doses, it causes organ damage because your body can’t get rid of it quickly enough. Chronic misuse may lead to liver damage, pancreatitis, heart attack, stroke, brain damage, or cancer of the liver, esophagus, or larynx. Alcohol misuse can also cause hypertension, a weakened immune system, and malnutrition. Heavy drinking will shorten your life span by 10 years, on average.

Drugs can also cause significant health problems. The most obvious risk of drug use is overdose, but drug use can also lead to memory loss, anxiety, organ damage, cancer, and a host of other health problems.

Yes, even marijuana use comes with health risks. Though the chances of overdosing on marijuana are extremely low, smoking marijuana exposes your throat and lungs to harmful smoke and can cause damage and scarring to lung tissue and small blood vessels. A connection between frequent marijuana smoking and testicular cancer has also been found.

Marijuana-infused edibles also pose a risk. Because the amount of THC they contain is hard to measure and because they can take up to two hours to kick in, some people will eat too much and then suffer from symptoms such as extreme confusion, anxiety, panic, or paranoia, hallucinations or delusions, or severe nausea and vomiting. Marijuana poisoning can result in hospitalization.

TIP: There has been a lot of confusion surrounding the use of recreational and medical marijuana in states where it has been legalized. Marijuana remains a Schedule I drug and its use by drivers is strictly prohibited.

The bottom line is that you stand to lose a lot by using drugs or misusing alcohol. If you think you might have a problem, talk to your doctor or contact a local substance abuse professional.

Specialized Industries

Go beyond the regulations! Visit the Institute for in-depth guidance on a wide range of compliance subjects in safety and health, transportation, environment, and human resources.

J. J. Keller® COMPLIANCE NETWORK is a premier online safety and compliance community, offering members exclusive access to timely regulatory content in workplace safety (OSHA), transportation (DOT), environment (EPA), and human resources (DOL).

Interact With Our Compliance Experts

Puzzled by a regulatory question or issue? Let our renowned experts provide the answers and get your business on track to full compliance!

Upcoming Events

Reference the Compliance Network Safety Calendar to keep track of upcoming safety and compliance events. Browse by industry or search by keyword to see relevant dates and observances, including national safety months, compliance deadlines, and more.

SAFETY & COMPLIANCE NEWS

Keep up with the latest regulatory developments from OSHA, DOT, EPA, DOL, and more.

REGSENSE® REGULATORY REFERENCE

Explore a comprehensive database of word-for-word regulations on a wide range of compliance topics, with simplified explanations and best practices advice from our experts.

THE J. J. KELLER INSTITUTE

The Institute is your destination for in-depth content on 120+ compliance subjects. Discover articles, videos, and interactive exercises that will strengthen your understanding of regulatory concepts relevant to your business.

ADD HAZMAT, ENVIRONMENTAL, & HR RESOURCES

Unlock exclusive content offering expert insights into hazmat, environmental, and human resources compliance with a COMPLIANCE NETWORK EDGE membership.

DIRECT ACCESS TO COMPLIANCE EXPERTS

Struggling with a compliance challenge? Get the solution from our in-house team of experts! You can submit a question to our experts by email, set up a phone or video call, or request a detailed research report.

EVENTS

Register to attend live online events hosted by our experts. These webcasts and virtual conferences feature engaging discussions on important compliance topics in a casual, knowledge-sharing environment.

Most Recent Highlights In Environmental

2026-06-24T05:00:00Z

EPA aligns EPCRA rules with OSHA’s HazCom amendments

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) published a final rule on June 22, 2026, conforming the hazardous chemical inventory reporting regulations under the Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act (EPCRA) to the Occupational Safety and Health Administration’s (OSHA’s) Hazardous Communication (HazCom) standard amendments of 2012 and 2024.

Who’s covered?

The final rule applies to facilities regulated under EPCRA Sections 311 and 312. These facilities are:

  • Required by OSHA’s HazCom standard to maintain Safety Data Sheets (SDSs) for hazardous chemicals on-site at or above the reporting threshold, and
  • Required by EPA’s EPCRA Section 312 rules (40 CFR Part 370) to submit annual hazardous chemical inventory reports (commonly known as Tier II reports) for the same chemicals by March 1.

Covered facilities submit SDSs and annual inventory reports to the State Emergency Response Commission (SERC), Local Emergency Planning Committee (LEPC), and local fire department.

How does this impact facilities?

EPA’s final rule replaces the previous EPCRA hazard categories with OSHA’s GHS-aligned hazard classes and hazard categories (totaling 118), which are already used in SDSs. Facilities must use OSHA’s hazard classes with their categories for SDS submissions and hazardous chemical inventory reports required under EPCRA Sections 311 and 312.

Note: SDSs for substances already contain the updated hazard classes and hazard categories. SDSs for mixtures must incorporate them by November 2027.

What’s the compliance timeline?

Covered facilities must use the new hazard categories by January 1, 2028. EPA expects facilities to incorporate them into the reporting year 2027 Tier II report (due March 1, 2028).

Key to remember: EPA has aligned regulations under EPCRA Sections 311 and 312 with OSHA’s HazCom amendments for hazardous chemical reporting requirements.

2026-06-23T05:00:00Z

CSB mounts pressure on OSHA, EPA over deadly process safety gap

Sugar may seem pretty harmless. However, a deadly explosion at a Kentucky caramel coloring facility reveals how this assumption can lead to disaster. The Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation Board (CSB) is again urging OSHA and EPA to address a gap in their chemical safety regulations.

The board is calling for them to tackle “reactive hazards.” These are the hazards CSB says triggered the tragedy. The familiar message has been repeated since 2002, but the alarm bells grow louder and more urgent now. These warnings are not just for OSHA and EPA. They are also for chemical plants and food ingredient manufacturers. Despite not being covered in the process safety and risk management standards, reactive hazards can and have led to catastrophe.

Runaway reaction

CSB determined that the explosion happened when a 2,500-gallon reactor experienced a runaway decomposition reaction. The reaction involved an “invert sugar” ingredient used to make caramel coloring. It rapidly increased the temperature and pressure. Then it overwhelmed the reactor’s emergency pressure relief system.

The reactor ruptured violently. Two workers died when the blast damaged a control room 40 feet from the reactor. Debris from the incident traveled as far as 400 feet beyond the facility fence line. It also caused approximately $40 million in damage.

CSB found that the reactor’s emergency pressure relief system would have needed to be about four times larger. This would have allowed it to safely relieve pressure generated during the runaway reaction.

Failure to recognize the hazard

CSB’s investigation found that the company did not understand the severe reactive hazards associated with the sugar ingredient. According to the board, this failure contributed to an undersized pressure relief system. It also created confusion on the day of the incident about the increasing pressure.

The report further states that the company’s lack of knowledge stemmed from:

  • An incomplete investigation of the ingredients’ reaction potential,
  • A lack of industry guidance on the safe manufacture of caramel coloring, and
  • No warning on the safety data sheet (SDS) of reaction hazards.

SDS lacked critical information

The board found that the SDS provided by the sugar manufacturer did not warn of its reactivity hazards. CSB concluded that safety information communicated in sugar ingredient SDSs can vary significantly among suppliers. The board noted that improved hazard information in SDSs can help prevent future sugar decomposition incidents. CSB is urging industry groups and suppliers who manufacture invert sugar or corn syrup to update their SDSs for decomposition hazards.

Known regulatory gap

The report emphasizes a gap in:

That gap is a lack of coverage of facilities processing chemicals with reactive hazards that could have catastrophic consequences.

The Kentucky caramel coloring plant was not subject to PSM and RMP. Had the facility been required to implement either regulation, the reactor designers would have had a better opportunity to be aware of the sugar ingredients’ decomposition hazards, says CSB. The board argues that this may have resulted in a safer design of the emergency pressure relief system.

Repeated recommendations

Since 2002, CSB has reiterated its recommendations for OSHA and EPA to fill the regulatory gap. Neither agency has implemented those recommendations.

Over that same period, the board investigated 15 additional incidents involving reactive chemicals not covered by PSM and RMP. Those incidents resulted in 31 fatalities and hundreds of injuries.

CSB is not deterred

CSB again recommends that OSHA and EPA broaden the coverage of PSM and RMP, respectively, to achieve more comprehensive control of reactive hazards.

Both OSHA and EPA currently use chemical lists to identify the processes subject to coverage. However, CSB claims the two agencies did not adequately consider reactive chemical hazards when developing those chemical lists. As a result, many reactive chemicals are currently not covered.

Word for employers and safety professionals

The latest report highlights the need for:

  • Facilities to review not just the SDS for their chemicals but also additional sources of information about their reactive hazards.
  • Chemical plants and food manufacturers to address reactive hazards regardless of coverage under 1910.119 and Part 68. At a minimum, these facilities may already be required to meet OSHA’s General Duty Clause and EPA’s Clean Air Act General Duty Clause.

Key to remember

The latest CSB report taps OSHA and EPA to address reactivity hazards. It is also a wake-up call for facilities to understand their reactive chemical hazards. What’s more, the report calls on chemical and food ingredient manufacturers to revisit their SDSs regarding reactive hazards.

2026-06-18T05:00:00Z

Hazardous waste determinations in practice: Lessons from aerosols, residues, and empty containers

Hazardous waste determinations remain one of the most common sources of noncompliance under RCRA. The requirement is simple on paper. Generators must determine whether a material is a hazardous waste at the point of generation. In practice, facilities often struggle with how the rules apply to everyday situations. Aerosol cans, process residues, and empty containers are frequent gray areas that lead to inconsistent decisions, inspection findings, and, in some cases, enforcement.

At the core, the regulatory expectation is clear: generators must evaluate each waste to determine if it is listed or exhibits a characteristic of hazardous waste (40 CFR 262.11). That evaluation must be made when the waste is first generated and must be documented. The challenge is not the rule itself, but how it applies to materials that fall between operational categories – products, wastes, and residuals.

Aerosols: When a common waste becomes a compliance risk

Aerosol cans are widely used across industries for maintenance, coatings, and cleaning. Facilities often assume that once a can is “empty” or depressurized, it is no longer subject to hazardous waste rules. That assumption can be risky.

If an aerosol can contains a listed solvent or exhibits ignitability (D001), it is a hazardous waste unless managed under an exclusion or alternative standard. Since 2019, many aerosol cans can be managed as universal waste (40 CFR Part 273), which simplifies handling. However, this option introduces its own requirements, including labeling, accumulation time limits, and proper puncturing practices.

A common issue arises at puncturing stations. For example, a maintenance shop installs a puncturing device and begins draining leftover propellant and product into a drum. The cans themselves may now meet the empty container standard, but the collected liquid often remains hazardous waste. In several inspections, regulators have cited facilities not for the cans, but for failing to characterize the accumulated liquid or for allowing it to evaporate without proper controls.

The lesson is straightforward: shifting management methods (e.g., puncturing or using universal waste standards) does not eliminate the obligation to evaluate all resulting waste streams.

Residues: Small quantities, big implications

Residues are another frequent source of confusion. These can include paint booth sludge, tank bottoms, or material left in process equipment. Facilities sometimes view these materials as insignificant or assume they take on the classification of the original product. In reality, residues must be evaluated as newly generated wastes.

For example, a facility cleaning a parts washer may generate a sludge that contains spent solvent. Even if the waste solvent was originally a listed waste (e.g., F003 or F005), the generator must determine whether the residue is itself a listed waste or exhibits a characteristic. Missteps often occur when facilities rely on outdated Safety Data Sheets (SDSs) or assume that dilution or drying changes the classification.

Another scenario involves “letting residues dry out” in containers before disposal. While intended to reduce volume, this practice can be interpreted as treatment if it is done to change the waste’s characteristics (40 CFR 260.10 definition of treatment). For generators without a permit, this creates additional compliance risk.

The key takeaway is that residues are not an afterthought. They are distinct waste streams that require their own evaluation and, in some cases, can trigger more stringent requirements than expected.

Empty containers: A rule often misapplied

The empty container rule (40 CFR 261.7) is widely cited but frequently misunderstood. A container that held hazardous waste is considered empty if all wastes have been removed using common practices (e.g., pouring, pumping), and no more than one inch of residue remains (or 3% by weight for smaller containers).

In practice, facilities often overapply this rule. For example, a drum that held a listed solvent may be declared “empty” even though significant sludge remains at the bottom. Inspectors routinely check this by tipping containers or visually assessing residue. If the container does not meet the standard, it is still subject to full hazardous waste requirements.

Another common issue involves containers that held acute hazardous waste (P-listed). These have stricter emptying standards, including triple rinsing. Facilities that overlook this distinction can inadvertently manage regulated containers as non-hazardous scrap.

Importantly, even when a container meets the empty standard, any removed residue must still be evaluated as a waste. The container may be exempt, but the material removed from it is not.

Bringing it together in practice

Across these examples, a consistent pattern emerges: compliance issues arise when facilities rely on assumptions rather than applying the regulatory framework to each specific situation. Aerosols, residues, and empty containers all sit at the boundary between product use and waste management. That boundary is where most determination errors occur.

Facilities can reduce risk by standardizing evaluation procedures, training staff on common gray areas, and documenting determinations clearly. In inspections, regulators often focus less on the conclusion and more on whether the generator followed a defensible process under 40 CFR 262.11.

Key to remember: Every waste stream, no matter how small or routine, requires a fresh, documented determination at the point of generation. Management shortcuts do not replace regulatory obligations.

Hazardous waste manifest S Codes: What storage and transfer facilities need to know
2026-06-15T05:00:00Z

Hazardous waste manifest S Codes: What storage and transfer facilities need to know

Have you cracked the “S Code” yet? Starting in 2027, facilities that receive regulated waste for temporary storage and disposal must use S Codes on hazardous waste manifests. If your facility hasn’t made the switch, now’s the time!

Under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) requires hazardous waste handlers to track shipments of regulated waste from the generating facility to final treatment, recycling, or disposal. Management Method Codes are key to hazardous waste manifests, and they also affect biennial reporting. The codes answer the vital question, “How’s the hazardous waste managed?"

Effective January 1, 2027, “S Codes” will officially replace Management MethodH141 for Storage and Transfer. EPA adopted these codes to improve the accuracy and transparency of waste tracking, specifically for wastes that travel through transfer facilities before final management. Use this overview to help your facility understand how to comply.

What are S Codes?

In January 2025, EPA added S Codes to the list of Management Method Codes, which identify the type of waste management system used to treat, recover, or dispose of a hazardous waste. Management Method Codes are used for:

  • The Uniform Hazardous Waste Manifest (EPA Form 8700-22) and Continuation Sheet (EPA Form 8700-22A); and
  • The National Biennial RCRA Hazardous Waste Report (EPA Form 8700-13 A/B), known as the Biennial Report.

S Codes apply to receiving facilities (primarily treatment, storage, and disposal facilities (TSDFs)) that temporarily store and then transfer regulated hazardous waste to another receiving facility without treating, recovering, or disposing of the waste. EPA established S Codes to provide more details than code H141 on waste handling activities, improving tracking and transparency. S Codes indicate two things:

  • A hazardous waste was received to be stored or transferred; and
  • The hazardous waste will be managed later by the final receiving facility using a certain method (i.e., the final management method).

EPA groups S Codes into three categories:

  • Transfer off-site for reclamation and recovery,
  • Transfer off-site for destruction or treatment prior to disposal, and
  • Transfer off-site for disposal.

Each S Code corresponds to a specific final management method. Examples include metals recovery (S010), chemical treatment (S070), and landfilling (S132).

What’s required?

On January 1, 2027, EPA will remove Management Method Code H141 for Storage and Transfer from the e-Manifest and the Biennial Report forms. As a result, hazardous waste handlers must use S Codes instead of code H141 on manifests and the Biennial Report.

S Codes apply to RCRA hazardous waste that’s transferred off-site, impacting:

  • Receiving facilities that store and transfer hazardous waste;
  • Permitted TSDFs that receive hazardous waste solely for temporary storage and transfer (i.e., it’s the facility’s only management type); and
  • Large quantity generators (LQGs) that report wastes shipped to transfer facilities on the Biennial Report.

Hazardous waste manifests

The first receiving TSDF is responsible for choosing and entering the S Codes on manifests. The storage and transfer facility must:

  • Identify the S code that best describes how the hazardous waste will be managed by the final receiving facility, and
  • Enter the S Code in Item 19 on the manifest and in Item 36 on the continuation sheet (if used).

Generators aren’t responsible for selecting or entering S Codes.

Biennial Reports

LQGs and TSDFs must use S Codes for the Biennial Report on the:

  • Waste Generation and Management (GM) Form in Item 3, and
  • Waste Received From Off-site (WR) Form in Item F.

LQGs use S Codes on the GM Form for shipments of hazardous waste off-site to a transfer facility for temporary storage and transfer.

TSDFs that receive hazardous waste for temporary storage and transfer off-site use S Codes on the WR Form. These TSDFs must also use Source Code G61 on the GM Form to report shipments of these transferred wastes.

How can facilities prepare?

Help your facility achieve a smooth shift to S Codes by January 1, 2027, with these tips:

  • Identify where your facility currently uses code H141.
  • Develop a process for transitioning to S Codes exclusively. Consider any changes your facility may need to make to its operations, such as updating software, adjusting procedures, and revising internal guidance documents.
  • Train your employees accordingly.
  • Set a deadline for making the switch to S Codes. Aim for a date well ahead of January 1, 2027, to give your facility enough time to address any issues that arise.

Key to remember: Starting in 2027, storage and transfer facilities must use S Codes in place of Management Method Code H141 on RCRA hazardous waste manifests and Biennial Reports.

Hazardous waste manifest S Codes: What storage and transfer facilities need to know
2026-06-15T05:00:00Z

Hazardous waste manifest S Codes: What storage and transfer facilities need to know

Have you cracked the “S Code” yet? Starting in 2027, facilities that receive regulated waste for temporary storage and disposal must use S Codes on hazardous waste manifests. If your facility hasn’t made the switch, now’s the time!

Under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) requires hazardous waste handlers to track shipments of regulated waste from the generating facility to final treatment, recycling, or disposal. Management Method Codes are key to hazardous waste manifests, and they also affect biennial reporting. The codes answer the vital question, “How’s the hazardous waste managed?"

Effective January 1, 2027, “S Codes” will officially replace code H141 for Storage and Transfer. EPA adopted these codes to improve the accuracy and transparency of waste tracking, specifically for wastes that travel through transfer facilities before final management. Use this overview to help your facility understand how to comply.

What are S Codes?

In January 2025, EPA added S Codes to the list of Management Method Codes, which identify the type of waste management system used to treat, recover, or dispose of a hazardous waste. Management Method Codes are used for:

  • The Uniform Hazardous Waste Manifest (EPA Form 8700-22) and Continuation Sheet (EPA Form 8700-22A); and
  • The National Biennial RCRA Hazardous Waste Report (EPA Form 8700-13 A/B), known as the Biennial Report.

S Codes apply to receiving facilities (primarily treatment, storage, and disposal facilities (TSDFs)) that temporarily store and then transfer regulated hazardous waste to another receiving facility without treating, recovering, or disposing of the waste. EPA established S Codes to provide more details than code H141 on waste handling activities, improving tracking and transparency. S Codes indicate two things:

  • A hazardous waste was received to be stored or transferred; and
  • The hazardous waste will be managed later by the final receiving facility using a certain method (i.e., the final management method).

EPA groups S Codes into three categories:

  • Transfer off-site for reclamation and recovery,
  • Transfer off-site for destruction or treatment prior to disposal, and
  • Transfer off-site for disposal.

Each S Code corresponds to a specific final management method. Examples of these methods include metals recovery (S010), chemical treatment (S070), and landfilling (S132).

What’s required?

On January 1, 2027, EPA will remove Management Method Code H141 for Storage and Transfer from the e-Manifest and the Biennial Report forms. As a result, hazardous waste handlers must use S Codes instead of code H141 on manifests and the Biennial Report.

S Codes apply to RCRA hazardous waste that’s transferred off-site, impacting:

  • Receiving facilities that store and transfer hazardous waste;
  • Permitted TSDFs that receive hazardous waste solely for temporary storage and transfer (i.e., it’s the facility’s only management type); and
  • Large quantity generators (LQGs) that report wastes shipped to transfer facilities on the Biennial Report.

Hazardous waste manifests

The first receiving TSDF is responsible for choosing and entering the S Codes on manifests. The storage and transfer facility must:

  • Identify the S code that best describes how the hazardous waste will be managed by the final receiving facility, and
  • Enter the S Code in Item 19 on the manifest and in Item 36 on the continuation sheet (if used).

Generators aren’t responsible for selecting or entering S Codes.

Biennial Reports

LQGs and TSDFs must use S Codes for the Biennial Report on the:

  • Waste Generation and Management (GM) Form in Item 3, and
  • Waste Received From Off-site (WR) Form in Item F.

LQGs use S Codes on the GM Form for shipments of hazardous waste off-site to a transfer facility for temporary storage and transfer.

TSDFs that receive hazardous waste for temporary storage and transfer off-site use S Codes on the WR Form. These TSDFs must also use Source Code G61 on the GM Form to report shipments of these transferred wastes.

How can facilities prepare?

Help your facility achieve a smooth shift to S Codes by January 1, 2027, with these tips:

  • Identify where your facility currently uses code H141.
  • Develop a process for transitioning to S Codes exclusively. Consider any changes your facility may need to make to its operations, such as updating software, adjusting procedures, and revising internal guidance documents.
  • Train your employees accordingly.
  • Set a deadline for making the switch to S Codes. Aim for a date well ahead of January 1, 2027, to give your facility enough time to address any issues that arise.

Key to remember: Starting in 2027, storage and transfer facilities must use S Codes in place of code H141 on RCRA hazardous waste manifests and Biennial Reports.

See More

Most Recent Highlights In Transportation

2026-06-15T05:00:00Z

Hazardous waste manifest S Codes: What storage and transfer facilities need to know

Have you cracked the “S Code” yet? Starting in 2027, facilities that receive regulated waste for temporary storage and disposal must use S Codes on hazardous waste manifests. If your facility hasn’t made the switch, now’s the time!

Under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) requires hazardous waste handlers to track shipments of regulated waste from the generating facility to final treatment, recycling, or disposal. Management Method Codes are key to hazardous waste manifests, and they also affect biennial reporting. The codes answer the vital question, “How’s the hazardous waste managed?"

Effective January 1, 2027, “S Codes” will officially replace code H141 for Storage and Transfer. EPA adopted these codes to improve the accuracy and transparency of waste tracking, specifically for wastes that travel through transfer facilities before final management. Use this overview to help your facility understand how to comply.

What are S Codes?

In January 2025, EPA added S Codes to the list of Management Method Codes, which identify the type of waste management system used to treat, recover, or dispose of a hazardous waste. Management Method Codes are used for:

  • The Uniform Hazardous Waste Manifest (EPA Form 8700-22) and Continuation Sheet (EPA Form 8700-22A); and
  • The National Biennial RCRA Hazardous Waste Report (EPA Form 8700-13 A/B), known as the Biennial Report.

S Codes apply to receiving facilities (primarily treatment, storage, and disposal facilities (TSDFs)) that temporarily store and then transfer regulated hazardous waste to another receiving facility without treating, recovering, or disposing of the waste. EPA established S Codes to provide more details than code H141 on waste handling activities, improving tracking and transparency. S Codes indicate two things:

  • A hazardous waste was received to be stored or transferred; and
  • The hazardous waste will be managed later by the final receiving facility using a certain method (i.e., the final management method).

EPA groups S Codes into three categories:

  • Transfer off-site for reclamation and recovery,
  • Transfer off-site for destruction or treatment prior to disposal, and
  • Transfer off-site for disposal.

Each S Code corresponds to a specific final management method. Examples of these methods include metals recovery (S010), chemical treatment (S070), and landfilling (S132).

What’s required?

On January 1, 2027, EPA will remove Management Method Code H141 for Storage and Transfer from the e-Manifest and the Biennial Report forms. As a result, hazardous waste handlers must use S Codes instead of code H141 on manifests and the Biennial Report.

S Codes apply to RCRA hazardous waste that’s transferred off-site, impacting:

  • Receiving facilities that store and transfer hazardous waste;
  • Permitted TSDFs that receive hazardous waste solely for temporary storage and transfer (i.e., it’s the facility’s only management type); and
  • Large quantity generators (LQGs) that report wastes shipped to transfer facilities on the Biennial Report.

Hazardous waste manifests

The first receiving TSDF is responsible for choosing and entering the S Codes on manifests. The storage and transfer facility must:

  • Identify the S code that best describes how the hazardous waste will be managed by the final receiving facility, and
  • Enter the S Code in Item 19 on the manifest and in Item 36 on the continuation sheet (if used).

Generators aren’t responsible for selecting or entering S Codes.

Biennial Reports

LQGs and TSDFs must use S Codes for the Biennial Report on the:

  • Waste Generation and Management (GM) Form in Item 3, and
  • Waste Received From Off-site (WR) Form in Item F.

LQGs use S Codes on the GM Form for shipments of hazardous waste off-site to a transfer facility for temporary storage and transfer.

TSDFs that receive hazardous waste for temporary storage and transfer off-site use S Codes on the WR Form. These TSDFs must also use Source Code G61 on the GM Form to report shipments of these transferred wastes.

How can facilities prepare?

Help your facility achieve a smooth shift to S Codes by January 1, 2027, with these tips:

  • Identify where your facility currently uses code H141.
  • Develop a process for transitioning to S Codes exclusively. Consider any changes your facility may need to make to its operations, such as updating software, adjusting procedures, and revising internal guidance documents.
  • Train your employees accordingly.
  • Set a deadline for making the switch to S Codes. Aim for a date well ahead of January 1, 2027, to give your facility enough time to address any issues that arise.

Key to remember: Starting in 2027, storage and transfer facilities must use S Codes in place of Management Method Code H141 on RCRA hazardous waste manifests and Biennial Reports.

EHS Monthly Round Up - May 2026

EHS Monthly Round Up - May 2026

In this May 2026 roundup video, we’ll review the most impactful environmental health and safety news.

Hi everyone! Welcome to the monthly news roundup video, where we’ll review the most impactful environmental health and safety news. Let’s take a look at what happened over the past month.

The first compliance date for the revised HazCom standard took effect May 19. Employers who work with chemical substances that are aerosols, desensitized explosives, or flammable gases should start to see updated safety data sheets and labels. On a related note, OSHA revised its HazCom directive for inspectors. It instructs OSHA officers on how to conduct inspections and issue citations under the standard. However, it also provides chemical manufacturers, importers, distributors, and employers with insight into what officers will be assessing.

OSHA revoked a standard that prohibited open fires and fires in drums or similar containers in marine terminals. The agency stated that since this is no longer typical practice, removing the standard would lessen the compliance burden without compromising worker safety.

OSHA received the backing of an advisory committee as it advances a comprehensive Tree Care Operations proposal. During the Advisory Committee on Construction Safety and Health meeting, the group unanimously voted in favor of moving ahead. This clears the path for OSHA to publish its long-awaited proposal.

Turning to environmental news, EPA extended the submission date for the TSCA Section 8(d) Health and Safety Data Reporting Rule one-time report from May 22, 2026, to May 21, 2027.

EPA published the first round of expiring confidential business information claims for information submitted under TSCA. The list covers claims that expire from June 22 to July 31, 2026. Businesses must submit extension requests to keep the information protected.

EPA postponed the effective compliance date for trichloroethylene users with TSCA Section 6(g) exemptions until pending judicial review is concluded. The agency has yet to establish a new compliance date.

And finally, EPA revised HFC use restrictions for certain subsectors. This applies to entities that are subject to the 2023 Technology Transition Rule requirements. The agency also proposed a rule that would exempt transportation refrigeration units from leak repair requirements regardless of charge size.

Thanks for tuning in to the monthly news roundup. We’ll see you next month!

EHS Monthly Round Up - February 2026

EHS Monthly Round Up - February 2026

In this Februrary 2026 roundup video, we'll discuss the most impactful environmental health and safety news.

Hi everyone! Welcome to the monthly news roundup video, where we’ll review the most impactful environmental health and safety news. Let’s take a look at what happened over the past month.

Fatal work injuries fell 4 percent in 2024, largely due to a decline in workplace drug- and alcohol-related overdoses. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, overdose fatalities fell from 512 in 2023 to 410 in 2024. Across all types of workplace incidents, there were 5,070 fatal work injuries in 2024, compared to 5,283 in 2023. Transportation incidents continue to be the most frequent type of fatal event, accounting for over 38 percent of all occupational fatalities in 2024.

OSHA is fast-tracking a proposal to remove the 2036 obligation to upgrade fall protection systems on fixed ladders that extend over 24 feet. This follows an industry petition from major chemical and petroleum industry groups, which argue the provision is unjustified, costly, and not supported by the rulemaking record. OSHA frames the upcoming proposed action as deregulatory, allowing employers to update fixed ladders at the end of their service lives. We’ll provide updates as more information becomes available.

As OSHA leans into “deregulatory” actions, lawmakers are moving to pressure the agency to issue “regulatory” rulemaking to protect American workers. The latest legislative wave of bills aims to fill regulatory gaps, tackle emerging hazards, expand OSHA authority, and raise penalties. Topics addressed by these bills include musculoskeletal disorders, heat stress, infectious diseases, wildfire smoke, and workplace violence.

In a recently issued letter of interpretation, OSHA states that a burn injury caused by a personal lithium-ion battery fire is work related if it occurs in the workplace during assigned working hours. The letter details an incident where an employee was burned when their rechargeable lithium-ion batteries for e-cigarettes sparked a fire after coming into contact with a key used for work.

A new report from the Department of Labor Office of Inspector General concludes that OSHA struggles to meet its mission, particularly in high-risk industries like healthcare, construction, and manufacturing. Several pages point to OSHA’s difficulties in effectively enforcing annual injury and illness reporting requirements, reaching the nation’s high-risk worksites for inspection, and addressing workplace violence by regulatory or other action.

Turning to environmental news, EPA extended the deadlines for Facility Evaluation Reports and related requirements for coal combustion residuals facilities. In most instances, the deadlines have been moved one or two years out.

And finally, EPA announced a final rule eliminating the 2009 Endangerment Finding and related greenhouse gas emission requirements for on-highway vehicles and vehicle engines. When the final rule takes effect, manufacturers and importers of new motor vehicles and motor vehicle engines will no longer have to measure, report, certify, or comply with federal greenhouse gas emission standards.

Thanks for tuning in to the monthly news roundup. We’ll see you next month!

EHS Monthly Round Up - March 2026

EHS Monthly Round Up - March 2026

In this March 2026 roundup video, we'll review the most impactful environmental health and safety news.

Hi everyone! Welcome to the monthly news roundup video, where we’ll review the most impactful environmental health and safety news. Let’s take a look at what happened over the past month.

OSHA released an updated Job Safety and Health poster. Employers can use either the revised version or the older one, but the poster must be displayed in a conspicuous place where workers can easily see it.

OSHA recently removed a link from its Data topic webpage that displayed a list of “high-penalty cases” at or over $40,000 since 2015. The agency says it discontinued and removed it in December. The data is frozen and archived elsewhere.

OSHA published two new resources as part of its newly launched Safety Champions Program. The fact sheet provides an overview of how the program works, eligibility criteria, and key benefits. The step-by-step guide helps businesses navigate the core elements of OSHA’s Recommended Practices for Safety and Health Programs.

Several forces are nudging OSHA to address a number of workplace hazards and high-hazard industries. This comes from other agencies, safety organizations, watchdogs, legislative proposals, and persistent injury/fatality data. Among the hazards are combustible dust; first aid; personal protective equipment; and workplace violence. How all this translates into new regulations, guidance, programmed inspections, or other initiatives remains to be seen.

Turning to environmental news, EPA issued a proposed rule to require waste handlers to use electronic manifests to track all RCRA hazardous waste shipments. Stakeholders have until May 4 to comment on the proposal.

On March 10, EPA finalized stronger emission limits for new and existing large municipal waste combustors and made other changes to related standards.

And finally, EPA temporarily extended coverage under the 2021 Multi-Sector General Permit for industrial stormwater discharges until the agency issues a new general permit. The permit expired February 28 and remains in effect for facilities previously covered. EPA won’t take enforcement action against new facilities for unpermitted stormwater discharges if the facilities meet specific conditions.

Thanks for tuning in to the monthly news roundup. We’ll see you next month!

EHS Monthly Round Up - April 2026

EHS Monthly Round Up - April 2026

In this April 2026 roundup video, we’ll review the most impactful environmental health and safety news.

Hi everyone! Welcome to the monthly news roundup video, where we’ll review the most impactful environmental health and safety news. Let’s take a look at what happened over the past month.

OSHA revised its National Emphasis Program on heat-related hazards. Going forward, the agency will prioritize inspections in 55 high-risk industries in indoor and outdoor work settings. The program remains in effect for 5 years from its April 10 effective date.

An OSHA proposed rule seeks to eliminate the November 18, 2036, deadline in the Walking-Working Surfaces standard that would require all fixed ladders extending more than 24 feet above a lower level to be equipped with personal fall arrest systems or ladder safety systems. OSHA also seeks feedback on nine specific questions related to the proposal, with comments due on June 5.

On April 17, OSHA revoked its House Falls in Marine Terminals standard at 1917.41. The agency said that because most cargo has been containerized and is moved by cranes, the standard is no longer necessary to protect employees.

Turning to environmental news, an EPA final rule further delays the submission period for the one-time PFAS report required of manufacturers. It pushes the start of the submission period to either 60 days after the effective date of a future final rule updating the PFAS Reporting Rule or January 31, 2027, whichever comes first.

An EPA final rule makes technical changes to the emission standards established in March 2024 for crude oil and natural gas facilities. The changes take effect June 8.

EPA published the draft 6th Contaminant Candidate List for the next group of contaminants to be considered for regulation under the Safe Drinking Water Act. The proposed list designates microplastics and pharmaceuticals as priority contaminant groups for the first time.

And finally, EPA plans to make significant changes to coal combustion residuals requirements. A proposed rule published April 13 would revise the regulations governing the disposal of coal combustion residuals in landfills and surface impoundments, as well as the beneficial use of coal combustion residuals.

Thanks for tuning in to the monthly news roundup. We’ll see you next month!

See More

Most Recent Highlights In Safety & Health

EHS Monthly Round Up - January 2026

EHS Monthly Round Up - January 2026

In this January 2026 roundup video, we'll review the most impactful environmental health and safety news.

Hi everyone! Welcome to the monthly news roundup video, where we’ll review the most impactful environmental health and safety news. Let’s take a look at what happened over the past month.

Chemical manufacturers, importers, distributors, and employers will have an extra four months to comply with the provisions of OSHA’s revised Hazard Communication standard. When the rule was revised in 2024, it contained staggered compliance dates for those who classify or use chemical substances and mixtures. The first compliance date is now May 19 rather than January 19 of 2026.

On January 8, OSHA issued further technical corrections to its Hazard Communication final rule. An initial set of corrections was published in October 2024, and OSHA continued to review the standard for errors. The agency said these corrections should reduce confusion during the chemical classification process and prevent errors on labels and safety data sheets.

In 2024, private industry employers reported 2.5 million nonfatal workplace injuries and illnesses, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics. This is down 3.1 percent from 2023 and largely due to a decrease in respiratory illnesses. The greatest number of cases involving days away from work, job restriction, or transfer were caused by overexertion, repetitive motion, and bodily conditions, followed by contact incidents.

Registration is open for OSHA’s Safety Champions Program, which is designed to help employers develop and implement effective safety and health programs. Participants can work at their own pace through Introductory, Intermediate, and Advanced levels.

Turning to environmental news, on January 9, EPA withdrew its direct final rule on SDS/Tier II reporting tied to OSHA HazCom, before it had a chance to take effect. The direct final rule was published back on November 17, 2025, and was intended to relax the Tier II and safety data sheet reporting requirements and align with OSHA’s HazCom standard. EPA said it plans to write a new rule addressing all public comments.

And finally, EPA published a final rule that changes certain requirements for wastewater discharges from coal-fired steam electric power plants. It applies to the deadlines established by the preceding rule finalized in 2024.

Thanks for tuning in to the monthly news roundup. We’ll see you next month!

Agency offers electronic submission of PCB annual reports
2026-06-05T05:00:00Z

Agency offers electronic submission of PCB annual reports

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) now allows facilities to submit polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB) annual reports electronically through the agency’s Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) Info System (RCRAInfo). Facilities may submit reports electronically starting with the upcoming annual report due by July 15, 2026.

Who’s impacted?

EPA’s electronic reporting option applies to PCB commercial storage facilities and PCB disposal facilities (including those that dispose of their own waste and don’t receive or generate manifests) that are:

  • Required to submit the PCB Annual Report Form (PCB Annual Report) per 40 CFR 761.180(b)(3), and
  • Have a RCRA-issued EPA identification (ID) number.

RCRAInfo doesn’t currently support submissions from PCB facilities with EPA ID numbers issued under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA), but the agency plans to update the system to allow such submissions in the future. Until then, PCB facilities with TSCA-issued EPA IDs must continue submitting the annual report by mail and email.

What are the changes?

Qualifying PCB facilities may now submit the PCB Annual Report (EPA Form 6200-025):

  • Electronically through RCRAInfo, or
  • By mail and email.

Electronic submissions

Facilities must establish a RCRAInfo Industry Application account to submit PCB Annual Reports electronically. RCRAInfo offers an in-depth user guide for registering as an industry user.

Mail and email

Facilities that submit paper reports must:

  • Mail the printed form and any attachments to EPA, and
  • Email an electronic copy of the form and any attachments to EPA.

Key to remember: PCB commercial storage and disposal facilities with RCRA-issued EPA ID numbers now have the option to submit the PCB Annual Report electronically.

2026-06-05T05:00:00Z

Agency offers electronic submission of PCB annual reports

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) now allows facilities to submit polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB) annual reports electronically through the agency’s Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) Info System (RCRAInfo). Facilities may submit reports electronically starting with the upcoming annual report due by July 15, 2026.

Who’s impacted?

EPA’s electronic reporting option applies to PCB commercial storage facilities and PCB disposal facilities (including those that dispose of their own waste and don’t receive or generate manifests) that are:

  • Required to submit the PCB Annual Report Form (PCB Annual Report) per 40 CFR 761.180(b)(3), and
  • Have a RCRA-issued EPA identification (ID) number.

RCRAInfo doesn’t currently support submissions from PCB facilities with EPA ID numbers issued under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA), but the agency plans to update the system to allow such submissions in the future. Until then, PCB facilities with TSCA-issued EPA IDs must continue submitting the annual report by mail and email.

What are the changes?

Qualifying PCB facilities may now submit the PCB Annual Report (EPA Form 6200-025):

  • Electronically through RCRAInfo, or
  • By mail and email.

Electronic submissions

Facilities must establish a RCRAInfo Industry Application account to submit PCB Annual Reports electronically. RCRAInfo offers an in-depth user guide for registering as an industry user.

Mail and email

Facilities that submit paper reports must:

  • Mail the printed form and any attachments to EPA, and
  • Email an electronic copy of the form and any attachments to EPA.

Key to remember: PCB commercial storage and disposal facilities with RCRA-issued EPA ID numbers now have the option to submit the PCB Annual Report electronically.

EPA adds new HAPs to hazardous waste combustor requirements
2026-06-03T05:00:00Z

EPA adds new HAPs to hazardous waste combustor requirements

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) finalized the residual risk and technology review of the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) from Hazardous Waste Combustors (HWCs). Most significantly, the final rule:

  • Maintains the existing standards;
  • Adds requirements for previously unregulated hazardous air pollutants from specific major source HWCs; and
  • Establishes work practice standards for periods of startup, shutdown, and malfunction (SSM).

Who’s impacted?

EPA’s final rule applies to major sources subject to the HWC NESHAP at 40 CFR 63 Subpart EEE, including:

  • Hazardous waste-burning incinerators,
  • Cement kilns,
  • Lightweight aggregate kilns,
  • Solid fuel-fired boilers,
  • Liquid fuel-fired boilers, and
  • Hydrochloric acid production furnaces.

What are the changes?

The final rule adds hydrogen fluoride (HF) and hydrogen cyanide (HCN) emission standards for specific sources:

Major source HWCNew regulation(s)
Incinerators
  • Work practice standard for HF (3 options)
Cement kilns
  • Emission limits for HCN
Solid fuel boilers
  • Emission limits for HF and HCN
Liquid fuel boilers
  • Work practice standard for HF (3 options)
    (all liquid fuel boilers)
  • Emission limits for HCN
    (liquid fuel boilers with capacities > 50 million British thermal units per hour (MMBTU/hr))

The final rule also:

  • Establishes work practice standards for periods of SSM;
  • Requires electronic reporting for specific reports (e.g., compliance progress reports, performance tests, Notifications of Compliance); and
  • Makes technical changes.

What’s the compliance timeline?

Existing HWCs must:

  • Develop, submit to the regulatory authority for approval, and implement SSM plans and start complying with SSM requirements by November 30, 2026;
  • Comply with any applicable HF and HCN emission limits and work practice standards by June 3, 2029; and
  • Begin electronic reporting by August 3, 2026.

New HWCs must comply upon startup.

Key to remember: EPA's final rule maintains the existing NESHAP regulations for hazardous waste combustors and establishes emission limits and work practice standards for previously unregulated HAPs.

2026-06-03T05:00:00Z

Colorado finalizes emission regulations for priority toxic air contaminants

Effective date: June 14, 2026

This applies to: New, modified, and existing stationary sources of priority toxic air contaminants (PTACs)

Description of change: The Colorado Air Quality Control Commission adopted state-level emission control requirements for PTACs. The rules apply to specific source categories of stationary sources that emit one or more PTAC, including benzene, hexavalent chromium, ethylene oxide (EtO), formaldehyde, and hydrogen sulfide. The commission revised Regulation Numbers 24, 26, and 30.

Regulated sources must reduce emissions by implementing new technologies, adjusting work practices, and using fewer toxic materials. The revisions add regulations for emissions of:

  • Benzene from petroleum refineries,
  • Formaldehyde from stationary spark-ignition reciprocating internal combustion engines and combustion turbines,
  • Hexavalent chromium from decorative and functional chrome plating,
  • EtO from sterilization facilities, and
  • Hydrogen sulfide from asphalt processing products, roofing products, and manure digesters.

Various requirements for different PTACs and sources start on June 14, 2026.

Related state info: Clean air operating permits state comparison

See More

Most Recent Highlights In Human Resources

2026-06-03T05:00:00Z

Maryland adopts regulations for packaging and paper products

Effective date: May 25, 2026

This applies to: Producers of packaging and paper products (covered materials)

Description of change: Maryland’s Department of the Environment adopted regulations to implement the Packaging and Paper Products — Producer Responsibility Plans Act under the department’s Extended Producer Responsibility program.

The rules establish requirements for producers of covered materials to submit producer responsibility plans and comply with other requirements, such as:

  • Annual registration of covered materials,
  • Recordkeeping, and
  • Reporting.

Producers of covered materials must:

  • Pay fees;
  • Either:
    • Join a Producer Responsibility Organization (PRO) Producer Responsibility Plan;
    • Have an approved Individual Producer Responsibility Plan (IPP); or
    • Have an approved IPP for a specific covered material and join a PRO plan for other covered materials;
  • Register annually with the PRO or department;
  • Submit reports to the PRO or department; and
  • Comply with recordkeeping requirements.
2026-06-03T05:00:00Z

Michigan adds requirements to wastewater collection systems

Effective date: April 29, 2026

This applies to: Wastewater collection systems with more than 50 connections and retention treatment basin (RTB) facilities

Description of change: The Michigan Department of Environment, Great Lakes, and Energy amended regulations for wastewater collection systems and RTB facilities by requiring:

  • Facility classification, and
  • Collection system operators to have system-specific certification (and recertify every 3 years).

The rules also streamline wastewater construction permitting, clarifying requirements for privately owned, publicly used systems when applying for Part 41 Permits.

Related state info: Industrial water permitting — Michigan

2026-06-03T05:00:00Z

Florida amends on-site sewage treatment and disposal rules

Effective date: June 8, 2026

This applies to: On-site sewage treatment and disposal systems (OSTDS)

Description of change: The Florida Department of Environmental Protection amended the regulatory requirements for OSTDS. In addition to streamlining specific permit application processing procedures, the final rule amends the requirements for:

  • Installing and locating OSTDS,
  • Abandoning OSTDS,
  • Treatment receptacle construction standards,
  • Registration requirements for septic tanks and Master Septic Tank Contractors,
  • Registration certificate renewals,
  • Discipline and penalties for registered persons,
  • Certification of partnerships and corporations as septic tank contracting businesses, and
  • Service and registration fees.

Related state info: Industrial water permitting — Florida

2026-06-03T05:00:00Z

EPA adds new HAPs to hazardous waste combustor requirements

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) finalized the residual risk and technology review of the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) from Hazardous Waste Combustors (HWCs). Most significantly, the final rule:

  • Maintains the existing standards;
  • Adds requirements for previously unregulated hazardous air pollutants from specific major source HWCs; and
  • Establishes work practice standards for periods of startup, shutdown, and malfunction (SSM).

Who’s impacted?

EPA’s final rule applies to major sources subject to the HWC NESHAP at 40 CFR 63 Subpart EEE, including:

  • Hazardous waste-burning incinerators,
  • Cement kilns,
  • Lightweight aggregate kilns,
  • Solid fuel-fired boilers,
  • Liquid fuel-fired boilers, and
  • Hydrochloric acid production furnaces.

What are the changes?

The final rule adds hydrogen fluoride (HF) and hydrogen cyanide (HCN) emission standards for specific sources:

Major source HWCNew regulation(s)
Incinerators
  • Work practice standard for HF (3 options)
Cement kilns
  • Emission limits for HCN
Solid fuel boilers
  • Emission limits for HF and HCN
Liquid fuel boilers
  • Work practice standard for HF (3 options)
    (all liquid fuel boilers)

  • Emission limits for HCN
    (liquid fuel boilers with capacities > 50 million British thermal units per hour (MMBTU/hr))

The final rule also:

  • Establishes work practice standards for periods of SSM;
  • Requires electronic reporting for specific reports (e.g., compliance progress reports, performance tests, Notifications of Compliance); and
  • Makes technical changes.

What’s the compliance timeline?

Existing HWCs must:

  • Develop, submit to the regulatory authority for approval, and implement SSM plans and start complying with SSM requirements by November 30, 2026;
  • Comply with any applicable HF and HCN emission limits and work practice standards by June 3, 2029; and
  • Begin electronic reporting by August 3, 2026.

New HWCs must comply upon startup.

Key to remember: EPA's final rule maintains the existing NESHAP regulations for hazardous waste combustors and establishes emission limits and work practice standards for previously unregulated HAPs.

EPA restores emergency-related affirmative defense provisions for Title V operating permits
2026-06-01T05:00:00Z

EPA restores emergency-related affirmative defense provisions for Title V operating permits

In response to a court mandate, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has rescinded a 2023 final rule that removed emergency-related affirmative defense provisions from the Title V operating permit regulations (the 2023 Affirmative Defense Rule) under the Clean Air Act.

The final rule (published on June 1, 2026) reinstates the emergency-related affirmative defense provisions for state and federal Title V operating permit programs (at 40 CFR 70.6(g) and 71.6(g), respectively).

Who’s impacted?

EPA’s final rule affects stationary sources subject to Title V operating permit requirements.

What does this mean?

The emergency-related affirmative defense provisions establish a framework for regulated facilities to assert an affirmative defense in enforcement proceedings for violations of technology-based emission limits caused by sudden, unavoidable emergencies, provided certain conditions are met.

To rely on the emergency-related affirmative defense, stationary sources must demonstrate that:

  • A qualifying emergency occurred,
  • The facility was being properly operated,
  • The facility took all reasonable actions to limit excess emissions, and
  • The facility properly notified the permitting authority.

EPA’s demonstration requirements are listed at 70.6(g)(3)/71.6(g)(3).

What affirmative defense covers

An “emergency,” as defined by 70.6(g)(1)/71.6(g)(1), generally refers to a sudden, unforeseeable event beyond the facility’s control that causes noncompliance with technology-based emission limits established in its Title V operating permit.

What affirmative defense doesn’t cover

The provisions don’t apply to noncompliance due to:

  • Improperly designed equipment,
  • Lack of preventive maintenance,
  • Careless or improper operation, or
  • Operator error.

Key to remember: EPA has restored the emergency-related affirmative defense provisions for Title V operating permits, allowing stationary sources to assert a regulatory affirmative defense for certain emission violations caused by events beyond the facility’s control.

See More
New Network Poll
What's your opinion on using Performance Improvement Plans (PIPs) as an employee performance management tool?

What's your opinion on using Performance Improvement Plans (PIPs) as an employee performance management tool?

No active poll
Please come back soon!
See More
See More
See More
See More
Saved to my EVENT CALENDAR!
View your saved links by clicking the arrow next to your profile picture located in the header. Then, click “My Activity” to view the Event Calendar on your Activity page.