Dust collector to disposal: Understanding dust as a waste stream

What’s happened?

A quick look at the rule’s development shows:

• 7/28/2025 — OSHA received a petition for rulemaking that covers obligations for ladder retrofits under 1910.28(b)(9).
• 9/15/2025 — OSHA posted a memo confirming it intends to eliminate 1910.28(b)(9)(i)(D).
• 12/18/2025 — OSHA sent its Walking-Working Surfaces (WWS) - Fixed Ladders proposal to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA).
• 1/13/2026 — OIRA and OSHA met with the American Fuel and Petrochemical Manufacturers (AFPM).
• 1/21/2026 — OIRA and OSHA met with the Employers OSHA Modernization Coalition.
• 1/27/2026 — OIRA plans to meet with attorneys representing the American Petroleum Institute (API).

What did the petition request?

The seven-page petition, written by legal counsel on behalf of the AFPM, API, and American Chemistry Council (ACC), requests that OSHA:

• Withdraw the provision under the WWS standard for fixed ladders that extend more than 24 feet to be equipped with personal fall arrest systems (allowing the continued use of ladder cages or wells); or
• Grandfather fixed ladders installed before a particular date (authorizing the continued use of existing ladder cages or wells for those ladders).

Unjustified provision?

Petitioners argue that OSHA, in its 2010 proposed WWS rule, failed to:

• Take comments on the effectiveness of cages in protecting workers from falls,
• Disclose that the agency was evaluating whether to prohibit cages, and
• Give stakeholders a chance to submit evidence regarding cages.

The petition outlines the differences between the earlier proposed and final rules, noting that the 2010 proposal gave employers the choice to use any of four fall-protection types — cages, wells, ladder safety systems, or personal fall protection systems. However, the 2016 final rule gave a 2036 phase-out date for cages and wells.

The petition goes on to contend that:

• OSHA lacks sufficient evidence to justify prohibiting cages and wells;
• Data collected during the rulemaking process leaned toward preserving employer choices for fall protection; and
• Although the 2016 rulemaking preamble acknowledged the shift away from cages and wells, it did not fully discuss evidence in favor of cages and wells.

Other arguments in the petition

The petition raises several points questioning the benefits of paragraph (b)(9)(i)(D), stating that:

• In the past decade, AFPM, API, and ACC facilities have suffered only a few injuries, with no fatalities involving cages and wells;
• Cages offer passive protection, whereas ladder safety systems and personal fall arrest systems require workers to take action to comply;
• Personal protective equipment (PPE) lies at the bottom of the hierarchy of controls;
• Safety risks also exist for ladder safety systems and personal fall arrest systems; and
• Installing new ladders or retrofitting existing ones introduces hazards to those performing that work.

Finally, the petition addresses significant compliance costs, estimating several billion dollars for tens of thousands of ladders at U.S. refineries alone. Petitioners also cited additional expenses for rerating pressure vessels and engineering any process equipment changes.

What does OSHA say?

OSHA officially announced in a September 2025 memo that it is proposing to remove 1910.28(b)(9)(i)(D). The agency calls it a deregulatory action in line with Executive Order 14192. The memo reasons, “OSHA anticipates this change will allow employers to update their ladders when the ladders reach the end of their service lives, accommodating the lengthy service life of fixed ladders, while significantly reducing costs and offering greater flexibility.”

The WWS - Fixed Ladders proposal reached OIRA on December 18. OIRA typically takes 90 to 120 days for review, but recently a maximum 28-day review period for deregulatory actions was implemented. That means we anticipate OIRA will rush this proposal, so that OSHA may publish it in the Federal Register.

Key to remember

An upcoming OSHA proposal would withdraw 1910.28(b)(9)(i)(D). The rule was spurred by a petition.

What were the objections?

Examining the docket, we find several requests for withdrawal of the rule. Some of the concerns raised by commenters included:

• Misalignment with OSHA compliance dates — Commenters remarked that the rule does not align with the phased-in compliance deadlines in the OSHA Hazard Communication (HazCom) standard at 29 CFR 1910.1200(j). In fact, EPA’s compliance date precedes OSHA’s dates, making it “impossible to implement the required changes … for the 2026 reporting cycle,” asserted one commenter. This will force facilities to engage in premature self-classification, argued the commenter. “This misalignment introduces a high risk of inconsistent hazard reporting, undermining both regulatory clarity and the reliability of emergency planning data,” warned another.
• Unrealistic timeline — Commenters pointed out the fast-track schedule. “This timeline compresses the window for implementing critical updates to chemical management software systems [and] procedures [and] reconfiguring data collection processes,” explained a commenter who predicted that facilities will be unable to ensure compatibility between internal chemical management software systems and the new reporting structure, without timely access to updated EPA-provided Tier2Submit^® software.
• Implementation challenges — Facilities would be mandated to re-map each reported chemical (often before SDSs have been updated), claimed one commenter. State agencies would also have to incorporate the new hazard categories into their electronic reporting systems and revise guidance/training materials, according to another.
• New burdens with little benefit — While EPA announced that the rule was deregulatory, one commenter contends that it would make reporting “MORE burdensome.” The commenter also stressed that the rule would “not improve emergency planning or response.” Others emphasized that it exceeds what is necessary for harmonization with the OSHA HazCom standard and that the expanded reporting system would offer “little value.” Yet another commenter noted that using 112 hazard categories instead of 24 would overwhelm the public who have a right to know about the hazards in their communities.
• Rule characterization flaws — One commenter declared that “the rule’s characterization as ‘technical’ does not withstand scrutiny” because it substantively changes what information must be submitted; imposes non-trivial, potentially large costs on both the private sector and state/local programs; and conflicts with OSHA’s phased compliance framework.
• EPA obligation failures — Commenters also observed that EPA failed to assess or recognize “potentially large aggregate costs to the private sector and to state/local [agencies].” They also suggest that the agency estimate paperwork costs, determine whether small entities are affected, and request the Office of Management and Budget to review the rule. Finally, EPA has not meaningfully looked at costs and least-cost alternatives, one commenter said. The commenter gave alternative examples — “phased implementation aligned to OSHA’s schedule, optional dual-category reporting for one cycle, or a later effective date.”

What’s next?

Now, EPA is proceeding with writing a new final rule addressing all public comments. The agency published a parallel proposed rule on the same November date as the direct final rule. That proposal took comments (through December 24, 2025) on the substance of the direct final rule.

That means the agency has all it needs to work on a final rule. EPA made clear that no second round of comments will be collected, but the agency gave no hints as to when it might publish a new final rule.

Until then, the existing CFRs remain in place. In other words, the changes in the November 17, 2025, direct final rule will not take effect on January 16, 2026, as planned because they are now withdrawn.

Note that the direct final rule, had it taken effect, would not have impacted the Tier II forms due on or before March 1, 2026. Rest assured that it is “business as usual” for Tier II reporting due by March 1, 2026. Similarly, SDS reporting requirements continue as is.

For background information, check out our November 25th article, “EPA’s SDS/Tier II reporting now in lockstep with OSHA HazCom.”

Key to remember

On January 9th, EPA withdrew the November 17th direct final rule that would have amended Part 370. The withdrawal is prompted by an adverse comment. A new final rule is in the works.

The importance of CPR and early defibrillation

For every minute a patient is in cardiac arrest, their chances of survival decrease dramatically. When a patient doesn’t have a pulse and isn’t breathing, CPR should be performed until an AED is available. It’s important to note that CPR alone does not restart the heart. CPR is an oxygen circulation procedure. AEDs, on the other hand, are meant for lifesaving intervention.

CPR and early defibrillation are vital components of the emergency medical services (EMS) chain of survival that increases the odds of cardiac patient survival. However, according to the American Heart Association (AHA), even the best CPR can’t provide enough circulation of oxygen to the brain and heart for more than a few minutes. In fact, a patient whose brain is deprived of oxygen for 10 minutes or more seldom recovers.

Signs and symptoms of cardiac compromise

Just like a reliable vehicle, the circulatory system is the human body’s blood transportation system, and the heart is the engine. Amazingly, the heart generates its own electrical impulses, pumping in a regular, rhythmic manner. As with any engine, the heart requires a certain amount of pressure to function and doesn’t work well when clogged with grease or debris. The most common causes of sudden cardiac arrest include a heart attack, electrocution, and asphyxiation — all of which could occur in the workplace. Common signs and symptoms include:

• Chest pain accompanied by a crushing or squeezing sensation,
• Pain that radiates to the jaw or arm,
• Irregular pulse and/or abnormal blood pressure,
• Shortness of breath,
• Cool and sweaty skin,
• Nausea and vomiting, and
• Anxiety or feeling of impending doom.

CPR provides the pressure for the body’s “engine” to oxygen circulating, while an AED provides the electrical impulses to keep the engine pumping.

OSHA requirements regarding CPR

OSHA 1910.151 requires first aid treatment be provided in the absence of an infirmary, clinic, or hospital in near proximity to the workplace used to treat injured employees. This may include assisting a victim of cardiac arrest using CPR or defibrillation.

OSHA requirements for CPR and defibrillation differ considerably. Standards requiring CPR include:

• 1910.146 Permit-required Confined Spaces
• 1910.266 Appendix B: Logging Operations – First Aid and CPR Training
• 1910.269 Electric Power Generation, Transmission, and Distribution
• 1910.410 Qualifications of Dive Team and
• 1926.950 Construction Subpart V, Power Transmission and Distribution

OSHA recommends basic adult CPR refresher training and retesting every year, and first aid training at least once every three years. CPR training include facilitated discussion along with ’hands-on’ skills training that uses mannequins and partner practice.

OSHA requirements regarding AEDs — you might need a prescription

Though OSHA recognizes AEDs as important lifesaving technology that plays a role in treating cardiac arrest, the agency doesn’t currently require their use in the workplace. Instead, OSHA wants employers to assess their own requirements for AEDs as part of their first aid response.

AEDs are considered Class III medical devices which means the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has some oversight on their use. Almost all AEDs require the purchaser to obtain a prescription from a physician under FDA regulations. The prescription process is meant as a quality control mechanism to ensure AEDs are properly maintained, that all designated responders are properly trained, and assist employers with establishing an emergency response plan for their workplace AED program.

The AHA requires AED operators to also receive CPR training as an “integral part of providing lifesaving aid to people suffering sudden cardiac arrest.” Though easy to use, each AED is slightly different, so training helps users understand the unique traits and supplies for the individual units at their workplace. Additionally, AED users must be trained to understand the signs of a sudden cardiac arrest, when to activate the EMS system, and how to perform CPR.

AEDs are light, portable, easy to use, and inexpensive. They’re best placed near high-hazard areas such as confined spaces, near electrical energy, or in remote work areas. Response time to reach AEDs should be kept within 3–5-minutes.

Training requirements

Many states require or encourage CPR and AED training from nationally recognized organizations. Any AED training should include CPR training. OSHA doesn’t offer first aid or CPR training, nor certify trainers. Training by a nationally recognized organization, such as AHA, the American Red Cross, or National Safety Council is recommended.

Keys to Remember

While OSHA doesn’t currently require the use of AEDs in the workplace, they do expect employers to assess their own AED requirements as part of their first aid response. AED training is required by most states and should include CPR with a hands-on practical component.

What’s changing and why it matters

Although EPA has been deregulating or loosening some requirements, there are still some standards being tightened across multiple fronts in the coming year:

• Renewable fuel standards (RFS): The EPA proposed higher volume requirements for 2026, including 24.02 billion renewable identification numbers (RINs), up nearly 8% from 2025. This increase pushes stricter expectations on fuel producers and organizations purchasing renewable fuels.
• Stormwater multi-sector general permit (MSGP): A new MSGP set to take effect by February 2026 will require quarterly PFAS indicator monitoring, expanded benchmark sampling, and resiliency measures in stormwater control designs.
• PFAS Reporting under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA): TSCA Section 8(a)(7) mandates PFAS manufacturing and import data collection beginning in April 2026, through October 2026, with extended deadlines for certain small manufacturers.

Failure to prepare could lead to fines, reputational damage, supply chain disruptions, and permit delays. Companies that weave compliance planning into their 2026 strategy will be positioned not just to meet legal deadlines but to sustain operations smoothly.

Key areas of impact

• Renewable fuel standards (RFS) and air emissions The proposed increase in 2026 Renewable Identification Numbers (RIN) volumes, from 24.02 billion to 24.46 billion for 2027, signals tightening air and fuels policy that affects fuel use and emissions accounting.
• Stormwater management The upcoming 2026 MSGP requires expanded quarterly PFAS monitoring, new benchmark triggers, corrective action plans, and integration of climate resilience in design standards.
• PFAS disclosure (TSCA Section 8(a)(7)) Manufacturers and importers of PFAS must submit electronic reporting of usage, volumes, disposal, and exposure data between April and October 2026, with extensions available for smaller operations.

Steps to take now

• Audit compliance programs: Cross-check operations against RIN inventory, stormwater permits, and TSCA reporting duties.
• Upgrade monitoring and recordkeeping: Implement robust electronic systems to track PFAS, stormwater quality, fuel volumes, and emissions.
• Staff training: Educate teams on PFAS obligations, new stormwater protocols, and RFS structures.
• Engage regulators early: Comment on proposed rules, consult during permit drafting, and flag issues during the notice-and-comment period.

Looking ahead

The EPA’s 2026 updates reflect a trend toward increased transparency and environmental accountability. Companies that treat compliance as strategic will not only avoid enforcement but also gain resilience and stakeholder trust.

Key to remember: Start planning now. Early action on EPA rule changes will save time, money, and headaches when enforcement begins.

1. Activate your FMCSA Portal account

Carriers should log into their Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) Portal account to either create or confirm active status for those accounts. An active Portal account allows you to claim your existing USDOT Number and to create a company account in Motus later this year.

You can log into an existing account by navigating to the Portal login page, and create a new account on the Portal’s registration page.

2. Verify your Portal user list

You can use the “Account Management” tab in the Portal to view and confirm which users have access to your Portal account. Double check to make sure the Company Official listed on the site is either the company owner or the employee who’s in charge of handling FMCSA registration.

Keep in mind that the Company Official’s Login.gov email for the Portal must be the same Login.gov email used for logging into Motus. This is the only way to link your USDOT Number with the Motus account.

The FMCSA recommends ensuring that the Company Official isn’t a transportation service provider or outside consultant.

3. Update your company info

The FMCSA recommends submitting an online Biennial Update (MCS-150) under the Portal’s “Registration” tab. This will make sure the most up-to-date information is on file and help make the transition to Motus even smoother.

Further assistance

For help with any of these steps or answers to your questions about how to manage your Portal account, please see the FMCSA Portal Registration User Guide for more specific guidance.

A restart

The rescheduling proposal would move marijuana to the same drug class as prescription drugs such as Tylenol with codeine, ketamine, and steroids. It would also make it possible for medical marijuana to be prescribed to patients.

While the executive order revives the marijuana rescheduling issue, it will likely be 6-12 months before a final rule is issued.

Hearings will need to be scheduled, and comments from the hearings will need to be considered before a final rule is published.

DOT drug testing

A lot must happen before any changes will occur under the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) drug testing regulations. The DOT is required to follow U.S. Health and Human Services (HHS) guidelines for DOT drug testing, including the drug testing panel.

Until the federal Drug Enforcement Administration acts on rescheduling marijuana, neither the HHS nor DOT can move forward. Changes to the DOT drug testing panel can’t occur until:

• The HHS provides new guidelines, and
• Regulation 49 CFR Part 40 is revised through the rulemaking process.

At this time, it’s unknown whether there will be any stipulations built into the rescheduling allowing the HHS and DOT to continue testing for marijuana.

Stay the course for now

As the process plays out, employers not covered by federal drug and alcohol testing regulations should continue to follow state medical marijuana laws and watch for updates on workplace drug policy implications.

More will be known about how this executive order will influence workplace drug policies after hearings are completed and a final rule is issued. It’s likely that state laws will continue to make an impact on how employers handle marijuana in the workplace, however.

Key to remember: The federal government is once again looking at moving marijuana to a lower classification of drug. Until a final rule is issued, employers should continue to follow their current workplace drug policies. DOT testing panel may see changes, unless stipulations are built into rulemaking. The transportation industry anxiously waits to see how Executive Order will (or will not) impact DOT testing.

Learning from others

In August 2022, OSHA responded to an allegation that the U.S. Postal Service (USPS) was not providing potable water to one of its facilities, nor was there an operating bathroom for workers.

OSHA inspectors discovered that the USPS had not paid water and sanitation bills dating back to February 2022. As a result, in July 2022, the water supply was shut off and was not returned to service until the day after OSHA’s inspection.

It was determined that an employee was required to work at the facility without running water or a usable bathroom for more than a month. The investigation resulted in $13,840 in proposed penalties and serves as a great reminder for others.

Regulatory requirements

OSHA’s sanitation standard applies to all places of employment and requires the following:

• All places of employment shall be kept clean to the extent that the nature of the work allows. 1910.141(a)(3)(i)
• Every workroom floor shall be maintained, as far as practicable, in a dry condition. Where practical, waterproof footgear shall be provided. 1910.141(a)(3)(ii)
• Every floor, working place, and passageway shall be kept free from protruding nails, splinters, loose boards, and unnecessary holes and openings. 1910.141(a)(3)(iii)
• Any receptacle used for putrescible solid or liquid waste or refuse shall be leak-proof and must be thoroughly cleaned and maintained in a sanitary condition. 1910.141(a)(4)(i)
• All sweepings, solid or liquid wastes, refuse, and garbage shall be removed in such a manner as to avoid creating a menace to health and as often as necessary to maintain a sanitary workplace. 1910.141(a)(4)(ii)
• Every enclosed workplace shall be constructed, equipped, and maintained, as far as reasonably practicable, as to prevent the entrance or harborage of rodents, insects, and other vermin. A continuing and effective extermination program shall be instituted where their presence is detected. 1910.141(a)(5)
• Potable water shall be provided in all places of employment, for drinking, washing of the person, cooking, washing of foods, washing of cooking or eating utensils, washing of food preparation or processing premises, and personal service rooms. 1910.141(b)(1)(i)
• Portable drinking water dispensers shall be designed, constructed, and serviced so that sanitary conditions are maintained, shall be capable of being closed, and shall be equipped with a tap. 1910.141(b)(1)(iii)
• Except as otherwise indicated in 1910.141(c)(1)(i), toilet facilities, in toilet rooms separate for each sex, shall be provided in all places of employment in accordance with regulations. 1910.141(c)(1)(i) (NOTE: The toilet facility requirements of paragraph (c)(1)(i) do not apply to mobile crews or to normally unattended work locations so long as employees working at these locations have transportation immediately available to nearby toilet facilities which meet the other requirements of the regulation.)
• Lavatories shall be made available in all places of employment. They must also have hot and cold (or tepid) running water, hand soap, and hand towels or blowers provided. 1910.141(d)(2)

Keys to remember

OSHA’s sanitation standard, 1910.141, requires all employers to provide workers with access to clean drinking water, properly functioning restrooms, and sanitary working conditions.

FMCSA’s guidance on second opinions

According to the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) guidance, a driver who receives a disqualified status may seek a second opinion from another National Registry Certified Medical Examiner.

However, the process has important requirements:

• Drivers should obtain permission from their motor carrier before scheduling a second exam. Carrier that allow drivers to seek a second opinion may choose which Certified Medical Examiner drivers visit.
• Carriers should maintain a list of approved medical vendors to ensure consistent and reliable examinations. Understanding these rules helps carriers manage risk and maintain compliance.
• Carriers, however, should also watch out for these four areas of compliance that, if not followed, could steer them off course when it comes to driver medical exams.

Four watch-outs for motor carriers

1. Drivers must provide the same health information to every examiner

Drivers are required to give complete and truthful medical information at each exam. If a driver withholds or changes information to obtain a medical certificate from a second examiner, it can create serious problems:

• Drivers can face civil penalties.
• Motor carriers may also be liable if the driver is involved in a crash and was certified based on incomplete or inaccurate information.
• Motor carriers could inadvertently place a medically unfit driver behind the wheel of a commercial motor vehicle .
• Let’s say a driver previously reported severe fatigue that raised concerns about possible sleep apnea. That information must be shared with any second examiner. Withholding it in hopes of receiving a 2-year medical card creates significant compliance, legal, and safety risks to both the driver and motor carrier.

2. Carriers aren’t required to review the 'long form' medical report

Motor carriers aren’t required to obtain or review the driver’s DOT Medical Examination Report Form MCSA-5875 (long form). Without this information, it may be difficult for carriers to determine whether the driver disclosed accurate medical history during a second exam.

Carriers that choose to collect or review long form medical information must:

• Obtain written consent from the driver.
• Work closely with HR to ensure a consistent and compliant policy.
• Use clear procedures for authorizing and storing medical information.

3. The FMCSA receives all exam results

All DOT medical exam results are submitted to the FMCSA National Registry. This means:

• A disqualified exam will appear in the driver’s National Registry record.
• If the driver quickly receives a second exam that results in a valid certification, the FMCSA may choose to review the situation more closely.

4. Carriers should watch for ‘doctor shopping’

Motor carriers should be alert for patterns that may indicate drivers are "doctor shopping.” Drivers who repeatedly seek new examiners that will overlook medical concerns pose risks for carriers. The FMCSA frowns upon “doctor shopping” because it undermines the integrity of the medical certification process. Carriers that allow drivers to do this will certainly raise red flags with the FMCSA if multiple exams occur within a short time frame.

Key to remember: Allowing a second opinion can be appropriate when handled correctly, but it must be managed carefully. Carriers should communicate clear guidelines to drivers, understand the FMCSA requirements, and maintain strong internal policies to protect both the company and the public.

Federal law

Under the federal Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), employers may deduct overpayments from employees’ future wages, even if that would result in the employees being paid below the minimum wage.

Big lump-sum deductions, however, might not sit well with employees, risking negative employee relations and trust.

State laws

Just because the federal FLSA allows related deductions, many state laws have limits on how much employers may deduct.

In California, for example, employers may not make deductions to recover overpayments unless the employer and employee have a written agreement, and the employee voluntarily consents to the deduction. The deduction also can’t cause the employee’s pay to fall below the state’s minimum wage.

An ounce of prevention

To help prevent overpaying employees, employers may take a few steps, such as the following:

• Automate payroll processes as much as possible;
• Audit all related processes and tools regularly;
• Have clear timekeeping and payroll policies; and
• Encourage employees to review their payments and paystubs regularly, and ask them to report any issues quickly so mistakes can be resolved.

Key to remember: Mistakes happen, including those that result in overpaying employees. Employers can, however, take steps to fix them and prevent them from recurring.

Focus on filing

A good place to start the organizational process is by auditing employee files. Employee personnel files need to be organized in a manner that allows for quick access, whether electronic or paper files. The information also needs to be as complete as possible.

These files might be the source of a company’s defense if an employee ever decides to lodge a complaint with a government agency or file a suit against the employer. If the information isn’t accessible or complete, an agency representative could see this as the employer’s noncompliance with a law, or a judge may see this as a lack of evidence of fair employee treatment.

No matter how HR professionals organize their files, some information must NOT be included in the general employee files. Employee and applicant medical information, for example, must be kept separate and confidential.

3 focus areas to start getting more organized this year

1. FLSA recordkeeping. The federal Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) has certain recordkeeping requirements. The FLSA doesn’t require a particular form for the records, but does require that the records include certain identifying information about each employee and data about the hours worked and the wages earned. The law requires this information to be accurate. Basic payroll and identifying employee data include such information as:

• Name,
• Address,
• Occupation,
• Rate or basis of pay and terms of compensation (i.e., benefits),
• Daily and weekly hours worked per pay period,
• Additions to or deductions from wages, and
• Total compensation paid.

Employers must keep payroll records and collective bargaining agreements for at least 3 years. Records on which wage computations are based should be kept for 2 years. This would include such data as time cards, wage rate tables, work and time schedules, records of additions to or deductions from wages, etc. These records must be open for inspection by the government representatives, and may be kept at the place of employment or in a central records office.

2. EEOC recordkeeping. The federal Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) regulations require that employers keep all personnel or employment records for 1 year. If an employee is involuntarily terminated, their personnel records must be retained for 1year from the date of termination. Additionally, employers must keep any employee benefit plan (such as pension and insurance plans) and any written seniority or merit system for the full period the plan or system is in effect and for at least 1 year after its termination.

3. FMLA recordkeeping. Covered employers are required to make and keep records about the company’s obligations under the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) in accordance with the FLSA recordkeeping requirements. The FMLA also refers to the confidentiality provisions of the Americans with Disabilities Act and Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act of 2008. Generally, employers must keep FMLA-related records for at least 3 years. No particular order or form of the records, however, is required. Other FMLA information to keep includes such details as:

• Dates when employees take FMLA leave. Employers may want to include copies of timesheets or records, written requests for leave, etc.
• Specific hours of leave if it’s taken in increments of less than one full day.
• Written copies of employee notices of leave they give to the employer and copies of all required general and specific written notices given to employees.
• Any documents, including written and electronic records, describing employee benefits or a company’s policies and practices regarding the taking of paid and unpaid leave.
• Premium payments for employee benefits.
• Records of any disputes between the employer and an employee regarding the designation of leave as FMLA leave, including any written statement from the employer or employee of the reasons for the designation and for the disagreement.

The bottom line

Remember, employers may keep records either electronically or have physical paper copies, but either method needs to be locked down and kept secure. Only designated personnel should be able to access the information within the rules of each applicable law.

It’s also good to set up a “purge” schedule to go through and discard old records once the time requirements have passed.

Key to remember: If getting more organized is a goal for this year, January’s a great time to get started. Focusing on the recordkeeping requirements of the FLSA, EEOC, and FMLA can help set the tone for the year.

What to include in an inclement weather policy

For employees who always work from home: Specify that it’s business as usual unless the severe weather somehow impacts their ability to do their jobs remotely. For example, an employee who experiences a power outage at their remote location can’t be expected to work during the outage. Or, if coworkers and systems they depend on to do their jobs are affected by the storm, they may not be able to work.

For hybrid employees: If bad weather occurs on a day they were scheduled to come in, they should opt to work from home that day instead.

In-office employees able to work from home: Providing an option for telecommuting on bad weather days could help alleviate issues. Your policy should outline which employees are allowed to work from home if they feel it’s unsafe to travel to work, and which positions are essential, meaning they must report to the physical workplace. Those who are able to work from home must take their laptops and other necessary tools home with them every night to ensure they’re able to work from home should a storm blow in overnight.

Defining inclement weather: Your policy should indicate who decides whether to remain open, close early, or close all day. Provide this person with guidelines for what constitutes “inclement weather” in your area. It’s usually defined as weather that causes major disruption to transportation, businesses, and schools. While 3 inches of snow may shut down roads in Texas, it would not likely cause alarm in Minnesota.

Assessing liability risk: The decision maker should also understand the liability risks your company faces if it stays open during severe weather. For example, with the onset of winter, employers in northern climates can expect snow to occasionally create hazardous traveling conditions. While there are always exceptions to the rule, commuting to and from work — even in a blizzard — isn’t generally covered by workers’ compensation. Employers aren’t typically liable for accidents that may occur during an employee’s regular commute. However, employers can be liable for accidents, such as slips, trips, and falls, on company property caused by weather conditions. When evaluating whether to close, employers will want to consider their ability to provide a safe working environment (including parking lots and sidewalks) during inclement weather.

Notifying employees: The policy should clearly outline how closures will be communicated to employees. Companies might notify employees via email or text message or provide a telephone number for employees to hear a recorded message. Some companies also submit notices to the local radio and television stations to be included with school and community closures.

Paying employees: The obligation to pay employees during a shutdown depends on whether the employees are exempt (“salaried”) or nonexempt (“hourly”). Under federal law, for nonexempt employees, the answer is simple; they’re paid only for hours actually worked. If they don’t work because the business is closed or the employer sends them home early, they need not be paid (state laws may vary). They could, perhaps, use paid time off (i.e., PTO, vacation time, etc.) to cover an absence. Exempt employees must generally be paid their normal weekly salary, unless the business is closed, and no work is performed for a full workweek. Federal regulations prohibit salary deductions for exempt workers for days when work isn’t available, including weather closings. In most states, exempt employees could be required to use PTO.

Impact on morale: Staying open during hazardous weather could negatively impact employee morale. If schools are closed, parents will have an unexpected need for childcare, and poor driving conditions may result in more stressful commutes. It could also give employees the impression that you aren’t concerned about their safety and well-being.

Key to remember: Before the snow flies, make sure your inclement weather policy is ready. In addition to creating a policy, you might need to communicate with managers on how to address essential employees who choose not to report during inclement weather, even when the business remains open.

Consecutive 12-month leave years

Eligible employees may use FMLA leave for bonding with a new child any time during the first year of the child's birth or placement. In addition, eligible employees are entitled to 12 workweeks of leave during each new FMLA leave year.

As a result, depending on the leave year an employer chooses, an employee may be entitled to more than 12 weeks of leave for bonding with a child during consecutive 12-month leave years. This means an employee could “stack” their leave time.

For example:

Rebekah's employer uses a 12-month period from July 1 through June 30 for its FMLA leave year. Rebekah has a baby on April 29 and uses FMLA leave for 8 weeks from her child's birth through June 30.

During the next leave year that begins July 1, Rebekah remains eligible for this same FMLA leave reason and stays on leave for another 8 workweeks. She also reaches an agreement with her employer to take another 4 workweeks of reduced-schedule leave to bond with her child before her child's first birthday. Employees may use FMLA leave for bonding intermittently or to work a reduced schedule, only if the employer agrees.

If, in the new leave year, Rebekah needs FMLA leave for a different reason, her employer would recalculate her FMLA eligibility.

Key to remember: Depending on when the leave begins and which method employers use to calculate the 12-month leave year period, employees could end up with more than 12 weeks of FMLA leave for bonding.

A closer look at the top serious violations

Machine guarding – Types of guarding methods. Operating machinery or equipment can be extremely dangerous when it’s not properly guarded or maintained. Injuries involving machinery or equipment often result in death or permanent disability. One or more methods of machine guarding must be provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks. Examples of guarding methods include barrier guards, two-hand tripping devices, and electronic safety devices.

Hazard communication – Written program; information and training; safety data sheets (SDSs) readily accessible. HazCom gives employees the right to know the hazards of the chemicals they’re exposed to. Covered employers must develop and implement a written program that describes how they’re complying with the provisions of 1910.1200, provide information and training, and ensure SDSs are readily accessible in employees’ work area throughout each shift.

Lockout/tagout – Procedures shall be developed; periodic inspection. Workers servicing or maintaining machines or equipment may be seriously injured or killed if hazardous energy is not properly controlled. Employers must develop energy control procedures for machines and equipment when they’re being serviced or maintained, following the criteria in 1910.147(c)(4). Procedures must be reviewed annually (the “periodic inspection”) to ensure they’re being followed and to correct any deficiencies.

Powered industrial trucks (PITs) – Operator competency. Employers must ensure that each PIT operator is competent to operate a powered industrial truck safely, as demonstrated by the successful completion of the training and evaluation specified in 1910.178(l)(1). Certification of training and evaluation must include the name of the operator, the date of the training, the date of the evaluation, and the identity of the person(s) performing the training or evaluation.

Respiratory protection – Written program; medical evaluation. In workplaces where respirators are necessary to protect the health of the employee or whenever respirators are required by the employer, a written respiratory protection program with worksite-specific procedures must be developed and implemented, following the requirements in 1910.134(c)(1). Employers must provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee is fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace.

Medical services and first aid – Eye and body flushing facilities provided. Where the eyes or body of any person may be exposed to injurious corrosive materials, suitable facilities for quick drenching or flushing of the eyes and body must be provided within the work area for immediate emergency use. OSHA uses the associated ANSI standard, ANSI Z358.1: Emergency Eyewash & Shower Standard, during inspections when evaluating the suitability of emergency eyewash and shower protection provided by the employer.

Key to remember: Employers who fall under 29 CFR 1910 can use OSHA’s list of most frequently cited serious violations to strengthen their safety programs and protect their workforce.

For a deeper dive, check out our related article: Avoid $50K in 'serious' OSHA fines: Learn where others slipped up in FY 2025.

Applying exemptions

Employers with 10 or fewer employees do not need to maintain a 300 Log, but this exemption counts all employees at all locations. If an employer has three locations, each with four employees, it has more than 10 employees and the size exemption will not apply.

The other exemption is based on each establishment’s North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code. Employers might have some establishments that must keep a 300 Log and others that do not, like a manufacturing facility that maintains a 300 Log and an administrative office that is exempt.

In some cases, an establishment’s activities fit under more than one NAICS code, like a manufacturing plant with a distribution warehouse. OSHA advises using the code that either generates the most revenue or has the most employees, whichever the employer deems most applicable. Employers should check their workers’ compensation coverage to see which code they use.

For more information, see our article Which NAICS code should you use for OSHA?

Traveling and remote workers

If an employee has a recordable incident while visiting another establishment, the employer must record the case on the 300 Log for the establishment where the incident occurred, even if the employee normally works elsewhere.

However, if an employee has a recordable incident and is not at an establishment (such as traveling), the employer must record the case on the 300 Log for the establishment where the employee normally works.

Remote workers must be linked to a fixed establishment, typically the location from which they are supervised or receive job assignments. Recordable incidents to remote workers must be recorded on the 300 Log of the establishment to which they are linked. Employers also count remote workers as employees of the linked location, even if they work in another state.

Annual summaries

On February 1, each establishment that maintains a 300 Log must post a 300A annual summary for the previous calendar year. This is required even if the location has 10 or fewer employees, and even if the establishment had zero recordable incidents. Employers cannot combine multiple establishments on a 300A (although short-term establishments can be combined).

If some employees split their work time between locations, employers may distribute their hours worked between locations. However, if someone spends only a small amount of time visiting various locations, the employer may count all hours worked at the primary or linked location. Usually, this would not significantly impact the total hours worked for an establishment.

For more information, see our article Completing the 300A: Tips for the mathematically challenged.

OSHA requires a posting a physical copy of the 300A in the workplace until April 30, but employers may also post the summary on a company intranet for remote workers. OSHA does not require sending the 300A to remote workers who never visit the site, although California does require that.

Key to remember: Employers with multiple locations should confirm that the NAICS code for each location is correct, verify that incidents to traveling or remote workers are properly recorded, and ensure that each covered establishment posts a 300A as required.

Walking-Working Surfaces

For many years, employers were required to post a plate on mezzanines, platforms, or similar work areas showing the weight capacity or load rating approved by a building official. OSHA removed that requirement in 2017, so these capacity plates are no longer required.

The current regulation at 1910.22(b) simply requires employers to ensure that each walking-working surface can support the maximum intended load. OSHA reasoned that builders consider maximum loads during design and construction.

Employers can certainly leave existing capacity plates in place and may want to check local building codes, which may still require a weight capacity posting.

Storage areas and racks

OSHA doesn’t explicitly require posting storage areas or shelves with weight capacities. Still, the agency has cited employers for unposted storage systems, particularly if a collapse occurred.

The weight of stored materials must not exceed the safe weight limits of shelving. Most industrial shelving is already labeled, helping identify capacities for each shelf or shelving unit. For shelving not labeled or built in-house, OSHA recommends determining capacity limits using sound engineering calculations, then clearly marking storage equipment with safe load capacities. Again, this isn’t technically required, but it can go a long way toward reducing human error and avoiding a possible General Duty Clause citation.

Other storage hazards

OSHA also looks to ANSI/RMI MH16.1 – Specification for the Design, Testing and Utilization of Industrial Steel Storage Racks, which recommends securing storage racks of various types and heights. This increases their stability and decreases the potential for tipping over.

Damaged shelves or supports, improper installation, and unsafe modifications can all increase the risk of worker injury. Storage shelving must be installed appropriately, limited to a safe height, secured properly, and guarded to prevent damage.

Mitigating shelving hazards

Employers are responsible for identifying and mitigating shelving hazards in the workplace. Some effective ways of protecting workers include:

• Inspect shelving and racking regularly for damage or defects. Train workers to report any damage, loose bolts, or other concerns immediately.
• Remove any damaged shelving or immediately isolate the affected area until it can be repaired or replaced.
• Label shelving and storage racks with load capacities and do not exceed storage capacities.
• Install guards on shelving uprights to prevent damage from incidental vehicle or forklift contact.
• Ensure materials stored on shelving, racks, and other storage devices are stacked, blocked, interlocked, and limited in height so they remain stable and secure.
• Ensure that materials don’t protrude from storage areas, such as boards or other items extending into pedestrian or vehicle aisles.
• Train workers to store heavier loads on lower or middle shelves and lighter loads on higher shelves.

Every employer that maintains sales stock or manufacturing supplies needs a safe and secure way to store those items. Following these best practices helps ensure that the storage itself doesn’t create additional hazards to workers.

Key to remember: Although OSHA no longer requires posting load ratings on working surfaces, employers should have load ratings on storage areas to help prevent overloading.

Total hours worked

Determining the total hours worked probably involves your Human Resources or payroll department. They key is to count only hours worked, not hours paid. Do not include vacation, sick leave, holidays, or other non-working time even if employees were paid for that time. If some employees are not paid the by the hour (such as salaried or commission employees) you can estimate their total hours.

The total hours are used to calculate the Total Recordable Incident Rate (TRIR), or incident rate, which is expressed as a ratio of injuries per 100 workers. For instance, a rate of 2.3 means that for every 100 employees, 2.3 employees had recordable injuries.

However, the incident rate is actually a ratio of injuries per 200,000 hours worked (representing 100 employees working 40 hours per week for 50 weeks). This allows OSHA to compare locations regardless of part-time staff, since the rate depends on hours worked, not on the number of people. This is also why employers don’t count vacation or holiday hours; employees cannot get work-related injuries during those hours.

Key to remember: Correctly calculating your workforce size and total hours worked ensures an accurate 300A summary and incident rate.

How to find legitimate OSHA Outreach trainers and classes

There’s been an increase in fraudulent activity related to these courses over the past several years. The following points can help workers and employers avoid fraudulent trainers and courses.

1. Only OSHA-authorized trainers may teach 10- and 30-hour safety courses and issue OSHA student course completion cards. OSHA-authorized Outreach trainers – that is, trainers that deliver OSHA 10- and 30-hour training - are not OSHA personnel. Trainers are authorized (not certified) through the Outreach program to deliver OSHA 10- and 30-hour classes. All authorized trainers must possess a trainer card which includes an expiration date along with the name of the authorizing OSHA Training Institute (OTI) Education Center.
   Trainers are independent service providers, and their schedules and fees may vary. OSHA recommends contacting multiple trainers to find one that best meets the student’s needs. Students may verify the status of an authorized Outreach trainer.
2. Qualified individuals can become authorized OSHA Outreach trainers through OTI Education Centers. Individuals must meet industry safety experience requirements and complete a training course in the applicable OSHA standards and a trainer course to become authorized. Trainers must attend an update course, available through OTI Education Centers, every four years.
3. On its website, OSHA provides a list of authorized trainers to find instructors for the 10- and 30-hour safety courses. The list provides trainer names and contact information and denotes which course each trainer is authorized to teach (i.e., construction, general industry, maritime, disaster site worker). Courses are also available in Spanish and online from the appropriate authorized trainer.
   A trainer “watch list” contains a list of individuals whose status as authorized OSHA Outreach trainers has been suspended or revoked as a result of failing to comply with the Outreach training program requirements.
4. OSHA’s website also contains a program overview, FAQs, and resources for finding an OTI center, replacing a card, avoiding card fraud, and searching for classes.
5. Taking a 10- or 30-hour course does not guarantee employment. While OSHA believes this training is an important first step towards workplace safety, beware of advertisements “guaranteeing” jobs after taking the course.

Key to Remember: If a trainer’s offer sounds too good to be true, it probably is. To find a legitimate OSHA Outreach trainer and classes, start at osha.gov and look for Outreach Training Program under Help and Resources.