Be Part of the Ultimate Safety & Compliance Community
Trending news, knowledge-building content, and more – all personalized to you!
Bloodborne pathogens are microorganisms, such as human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and hepatitis B virus, that are transmitted through blood and certain other body fluids. Exposure to these materials represents a significant health hazard in the workplace. This hazard can be minimized or eliminated, however, using a combination of engineering and workplace practice controls, personal protective equipment, housekeeping measures, vaccination, post-exposure evaluation and follow-up, training, and other measures.
Bloodborne pathogens are microorganisms, such as human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and hepatitis B virus, that are transmitted through blood and certain other body fluids. Exposure to these materials represents a significant health hazard in the workplace. This hazard can be minimized or eliminated, however, using a combination of engineering and workplace practice controls, personal protective equipment, housekeeping measures, vaccination, post-exposure evaluation and follow-up, training, and other measures.
The laws and regulations laid out here work to protect employees from bloodborne pathogens. The Bloodborne Pathogens Standard (29 CFR 1910.1030) is the core regulation, but others apply as well.
While several regulations relate to bloodborne pathogens, one regulation stands out to provide comprehensive protections for covered employees. The Occupational Safety and Health Administration’s (OSHA) Bloodborne Pathogens Standard (29 CFR 1910.1030) is a general industry and shipyard regulation that prescribes safeguards to protect workers against health hazards related to bloodborne pathogens.
Section 1910.1030 is considered the core regulation for bloodborne pathogen exposure prevention, control, and response. It has provisions for the following:
The standard imposes requirements on employers of workers who may be exposed to blood or other potentially infectious materials (OPIM), such as certain body fluids and tissues.
The requirements applicable to shipyard employment under 1915.1030 are identical to those set forth at 1910.1030. Therefore, shipyard employers must follow 1910.1030 if they have one or more employees with occupational exposure.
Part 1904, the Recordkeeping and Reporting Occupational Injuries and Illnesses Standard, requires employers not in partially exempted industries (see Appendix A to Subpart B to Part 1904) to record work-related punctures, cuts, lacerations, and scratches from sharp objects that are contaminated with another person’s blood or OPIM.
Covered employers will record these types of incidents as an “injury” on the OSHA 300 Log (Log of Work-Related Injuries and Illnesses). If the employee develops a bloodborne disease, the entry must be updated and recorded as an “illness.”
However, if an employee is splashed or exposed to blood or OPIM without being cut, scratched, or punctured, the incident must be recorded on the OSHA 300 Log only if it results in the diagnosis of a bloodborne illness or it meets one or more of the recording criteria of 1904.7.
To protect privacy, the employee’s name may not be entered on the OSHA 300. Subparagraphs 1904.29(b)(6) through (b)(10) discuss privacy concerns. Employers must keep a separate, confidential list of case numbers and employee names in these privacy cases so they can update the cases and provide them if asked by the government.
The Hazardous Waste Operations and Emergency Response (HAZWOPER) Standard, 1910.120, covers three groups of employees:
The definition of hazardous substance includes any biological agent or infectious material that may cause disease or death. There are potential scenarios where the bloodborne and HAZWOPER standards may interface, such as:
Employers of employees engaged in these types of activities must comply with the requirements in 1910.120, as well as the Bloodborne Pathogens Standard at 1910.1030. If there is a conflict or overlap, the provision that is more protective of employee safety and health applies.
According to 1910.145, the Specifications for Accident Prevention Signs and Tags Standard, biohazard signs and tags are required:
Records concerning employee exposure to bloodborne pathogens and records about human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and/or hepatitis B (HBV) status are both considered employee medical records within the meaning of 1910.1020, the Access to Employee Exposure and Medical Records Standard.
This regulation simply states that the requirements for biohazard signage applicable to shipyard employment are identical to the requirements set forth in 1910.145. Therefore, biohazard signs and tags are required:
29 CFR 1926.21, .25, .28, and .200
Although 1910.1030 does not apply to the construction industry, employees in construction are not free from bloodborne pathogen hazards. Therefore, employees responsible for providing first aid or medical assistance at a construction site are expected to receive basic instruction in bloodborne pathogen hazards, as well as vaccination and follow-up in the event of an exposure incident. Appropriate personal protective equipment and sharps containers must be provided.
OSHA sections 1926.21, 1926.25, 1926.28, and 1926.200, plus Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health (OSH) Act, offer some protection for employees in this industry.
Two laws give the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) authority to issue regulations pertaining to bloodborne pathogens.
The OSH Act of 1970, Public Law 91-596
Section 5(a)(1) of the OSH Act states that “each employer shall furnish to each of his employees employment and a place of employment which is free from recognized hazards that are causing or are likely to cause death or serious physical harm to his employees.” This law, known as OSHA’s General Duty Clause, may be used to cite employers for failure to provide a workplace free from exposure to bloodborne pathogens. Where 1910.1030 does not apply, this clause may be used for enforcement.
See the full Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970.
Needlestick Safety and Prevention Act, Public Law 106-430, November 6, 2000
The Needlestick Safety and Prevention Act was signed into law (Public Law 106-430) on November 6, 2000. It directed OSHA to do the following:
OSHA published these revisions to 1910.1030 on January 18, 2001, with an effective date of April 18, 2001.
It’s important to know not only who has to comply but who doesn’t. This section goes over both.
Who has to comply?
According to the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), any general industry or shipyard employer (of any size) that has one or more employees with “occupational exposure” falls under 1910.1030. The standard is not meant solely for employers in healthcare settings.
In fact, the standard regulates over 701,000 employers nationwide and applies to many in the healthcare, manufacturing, services, retail, research, waste, educational, fire and rescue, security, law enforcement, correctional, and other industries. The bulk of 1910.1030 citations occur in the healthcare industry, but more than 40 percent have gone to industries other than healthcare in recent years. Although the regulation has existed for decades, it is still one of the most cited, with about 500 federal OSHA violations each year, plus all the citations issued by states and territories.
Twenty-eight states and territories operate their own “state plan” and either adopt 1910.1030 or have equivalent or stricter regulations for the private and/or public sectors. Other states and territories may also adopt the Bloodborne Pathogens Standard or similar requirements for the public sector, where OSHA does not have jurisdiction. Therefore, public- and private-sector employers must determine the applicability of not only federal but also state or territorial bloodborne pathogens requirements.
Who doesn’t have to comply?
Section 1910.1030 is a federal regulation that applies only to the general and shipyard industries in the private sector. It does not apply to all industries or in all states.
The Bloodborne Pathogens Standard does not apply to the following industries:
However, this doesn’t mean they’re free from bloodborne pathogen hazards. Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health (OSH) Act states that “each employer shall furnish to each of his employees employment and a place of employment which is free from recognized hazards that are causing or are likely to cause death or serious physical harm to his employees.” OSHA may use this General Duty Clause to cite for failure to provide a workplace free from bloodborne pathogen exposure.
More specifically, OSHA has indicated that first-aid providers at construction sites are expected to receive basic instruction in bloodborne pathogen hazards, as well as vaccination and follow-up in the event of an exposure incident. Appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) and waste containers must also be provided.
OSHA regulations also don’t apply to the public sector. Thus, it is up to the states and territories to determine whether they will protect employees that work for state and municipal government agencies. Some states and territories have chosen not to require 1910.1030 protections for these employees, so employers in these states and territories get to choose whether to provide these protections.
Probably the most confusing part of the Bloodborne Pathogens Standard is figuring out who’s protected by 1910.1030.
The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) estimates that more than 8.4 million employees in the U.S. require bloodborne pathogens training under 1910.1030.
Employers are required to train all employees with occupational exposure, whether their employment is full-time, part-time, contract, or temporary. However, OSHA jurisdiction extends only to employees, not to other people in the workplace such as unpaid students.
OSHA does not list jobs or tasks with occupational exposure, so employers must determine which jobs are covered at their workplace. If only some employees in a job class have occupational exposure, the employer must identify which tasks in those jobs present occupational exposure.
All employees who have occupational exposure must be trained in bloodborne pathogens procedures. This applies to all classifications of employees: full-time, part-time, contract, and temporary.
“Occupational exposure” refers to reasonably anticipated contact with blood or other potentially infectious materials (OPIM), in contrast to an “exposure incident,” in which actual contact occurs.
For bloodborne pathogens training to be required for an employee, contact with blood or OPIM must be reasonably anticipated, and this contact must result from the performance of the employee’s duties.
As an example, an office worker would not reasonably anticipate having contact with blood or OPIM. However, if the office worker is assigned to perform first aid when coworkers are bleeding, then that employee is considered to have occupational exposure.
Related job classifications
Job duties do not need to be healthcare-related to be covered. The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) doesn’t list jobs or tasks with occupational exposure, so this is left to employers to determine.
If only some employees in a job class have occupational exposure, the employer must identify which tasks in those jobs present occupational exposure.
Some job classifications that may have occupational exposure include:
*The first-aid provider category includes (1) employees designated to perform first aid, (2) employees who render first aid only as a collateral duty, and (3) employees who routinely provide first aid to fellow employees with the knowledge of the employer and fall de facto under this designation even if the employer has not officially designated the employee as a first-aid provider. Good Samaritans are not included unless they otherwise meet criteria (1), (2), or (3).
Contract and temporary workers
In contract situations, both the contractor employer and the client share responsibility for ensuring that contract employees are protected. Likewise, for temporary employees, both the staffing agency and host employer are considered joint employers of those employees. In either scenario, it’s in the interest of both employers to ensure that the required training is provided.
Typical host employer responsibilities | Typical staffing agency responsibilities |
---|---|
|
|
In addition, the employer who has day-to-day supervision over the temporary employees, typically the host employer, is required under 29 CFR 1904 to maintain a log of occupational injuries and illnesses, including for temporary workers. The Bloodborne Pathogens Standard requires that this employer must also keep a sharps injury log to record percutaneous (through the skin) injuries from contaminated sharps, including injuries to temporary employees. [Source: Temporary Worker Initiative Bulletin No. 6, OSHA 3888-09 2016]
Even when an employer is in general industry or shipyards, not everyone in the workplace is protected by 1910.1030.
Non-employees
The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) defines an employee as an “employee of an employer who is employed in a business of his employer which affects commerce.” If someone in the workplace is not an “employee” by definition, then that person is not protected.
For example, a private school may have students who work there, or a non-profit organization may have volunteers. Unpaid students and volunteers aren’t employees, so they’re not covered.
Good Samaritans
Section 1910.1030 also does not cover Good Samaritans. For example, if an employee helps a coworker who has a nosebleed or is bleeding as the result of a fall, this isn’t considered an occupational exposure unless first aid is one of that employee’s job duties.
For occupational exposure to exist, an employee’s job must involve reasonably anticipated contact with blood or other potentially infectious materials (OPIM). Good Samaritan acts can’t be reasonably anticipated by an employer, so they don’t qualify. Therefore, anyone who helps another person at work is not covered unless they are assigned or expected to do this.
OSHA concluded that it would be needlessly burdensome to require employers to implement 1910.1030 based on the chance of an employee having contact with blood or OPIM during a task that’s not required.
Although the Bloodborne Pathogens Standard is far from new, it continues to confuse employers. The standard defines 28 terms in its definitions paragraph at 1910.1030(b), and the use of these terms can be challenging. Some of the definitions are explained in Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) directive CPL 02-02-069 for clarification.
Blood: Human blood, human blood components, and products made from human blood. Animal blood is not covered under this definition.
OSHA gives the following examples of human blood components:
Bloodborne pathogens: Microorganisms that are present in human blood and can cause disease in humans. These include, but are not limited to, hepatitis B virus (HBV) and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV).
While HBV and HIV are specifically mentioned in the standard, the term includes any microorganism that is present in human blood and can cause disease in people who are exposed to blood containing the pathogen. CPL 02-02-069 lists 15 diseases related to bloodborne pathogens.
Contaminated: Having the presence or the reasonably anticipated presence of blood or other potentially infectious materials (OPIM) on an item or surface.
Contaminated items or surfaces can expose employees to blood or OPIM. If an employee has a cut or wound and the employee’s personal protective equipment (PPE) allows a contaminant to permeate through it or has even a pinhole, the bloodborne pathogen has a direct path into the body. Therefore, the goal is to keep contamination levels as low as possible.
Contaminated sharps: Any contaminated objects that can penetrate the skin, including but not limited to needles, scalpels, broken glass, broken capillary tubes, and exposed ends of dental wires.
When blades such as box cutters, razor blades, and knives are contaminated, these are also considered contaminated sharps.
An exposure incident: A specific eye, mouth, other mucous membrane, non-intact skin, or parenteral (piercing the skin or mucous membranes) contact with blood or other potentially infectious material (OPIM) that results from the performance of an employee’s duties.
Mucous membranes include the eye and inside the nose and mouth. Blood or OPIM that splatters into a worker’s eye, nose, or mouth is considered an exposure incident.
Non-intact skin includes skin with damage such as rashes, hangnails, cuts, abrasions, and chafing.
An exposure incident requires actual contact with blood and OPIM that results from the performance of an employee’s duties (as opposed to occupational exposure, which refers to reasonably anticipated contact). Examples of exposure incidents include
Occupational exposure: Reasonably anticipated skin, eye, mucous membrane, or parenteral (piercing the skin or mucous membranes) contact with blood or other potentially infectious materials (OPIM) that may result from the performance of an employee’s duties.
An office worker wouldn’t reasonably anticipate having contact with blood or OPIM. However, if that worker is assigned to perform first aid involving blood-related injuries of coworkers, that counts as occupational exposure. Job duties don’t need to be healthcare-related to be covered. A good Samaritan who helps someone out of kindness rather than as a work duty doesn’t have occupational exposure.
Other potentially infectious materials (OPIM):
Only certain body fluids are considered OPIM. Others, like urine, vomit, feces, nasal secretions, phlegm, sweat, and tears, may be unpleasant to encounter in a work environment but aren’t efficient modes of transmission for bloodborne pathogens. However, if any body fluid is visibly contaminated with blood, it counts as OPIM.
OPIM also includes any “unfixed” tissue or organ (other than intact skin) from a human (living or dead). While OSHA does not define the term unfixed, it would be the opposite of fixed.
The term fixed is not OSHA-defined but generally understood as being rendered not potentially infectious for bloodborne pathogens. Often, but not always, a fixed status may be achieved by preserving the tissue or organ in a preservative substance, health sources say.
Any substance that contains HIV or HBV also counts as OPIM, including:
Parenteral contact: Piercing mucous membranes or the skin barrier, such as with needlesticks, cuts, abrasions, or human bites.
Regulated waste: Refers to the following five types of waste:
If waste doesn’t fit into any of these categories, it’s not regulated waste. Some items only count as regulated waste if they can release OPIM, but under no circumstances should a bag of waste be squeezed or shaken to determine if it is regulated.
It’s not useful to specify an amount of blood as a determining factor because the same amount acts very differently depending on its location. Just as an example, 10 milliliters of blood on a bedsheet would appear as a spot (and not be regulated waste), while the same amount on a cotton ball would drip (and would be regulated waste).
In most cases, bandages, facial tissue, and feminine hygiene products would not be considered regulated waste. That’s because these are intended to absorb the blood, so it’s no longer in a liquid or semi-liquid state and wouldn’t be released.
While contaminated sharps are regulated waste, if a sharp is not contaminated with blood or OPIM, it is not regulated waste. Box cutter blades that are not contaminated are not regulated waste.
Exposure determination requires employers to identify and document which employees have occupational exposure, based on the definition of occupational exposure without the use of personal protective clothing or equipment. Employers should make the exposure determination by reviewing job classifications and dividing them into two groups:
The first group includes job classifications in which all employees have occupational exposure. Examples include pre-hospital care workers such as paramedics and emergency medical technicians. Where all employees have occupational exposure, it’s not necessary to list specific work tasks in the exposure determination.
The second group includes job classifications in which only some of the employees have occupational exposure. For this group, it’s necessary to list the specific tasks and procedures, or closely related groups of tasks and procedures, that can cause exposure. An example would be if some custodians are assigned to handle blood spills while others are not. In that case, the employer would list custodians in the second group and then list something like “blood spill cleanup tasks” under that job class.
If a job classification, task, or procedure involving occupational exposure is left off the list, but all employees in the job or performing the task or procedure have been included in all other aspects of the plan (such as vaccinations and training), this is considered an other-than-serious violation.
Once employees with occupational exposure are identified, the employers’ next step is to communicate the hazards to these employees. That means any employee with occupational exposure must be provided with information and training related to bloodborne pathogens.
What is the purpose of bloodborne pathogens training?
Providing bloodborne pathogens training does not just make compliance sense; it makes common sense. An employee’s health depends on receiving proper training on the job. Once employees understand bloodborne pathogen hazards, taking safety measures will be a routine part of their jobs. The key is to train them before they need to take action involving anticipated contact with blood or other potentially infectious materials (OPIM). That way, they can make the right decisions to safeguard themselves and their coworkers.
Without proper training, employees could put themselves at serious risk of disease or death from exposure to bloodborne pathogens.
Who should receive bloodborne pathogen training?
All employees in general and shipyard industries who have occupational exposure must receive initial and annual training on the hazards associated with blood and OPIM, and the protective measures they should take to minimize the risk of occupational exposure. Whenever there are changes in procedures or tasks that affect occupational exposure, employees must be trained again.
While 1910.1030 does not apply to the construction industry, employees in construction aren’t free of bloodborne pathogen hazards. Therefore, employees responsible for providing first aid or medical assistance at a construction site are expected to receive basic instruction in bloodborne pathogen hazards.
Bloodborne pathogens training must be conducted by someone who is knowledgeable about bloodborne pathogen hazards, and the required training elements as they relate to the specific workplace.
Possible trainers include a variety of healthcare professionals such as infection control practitioners, nurse practitioners, registered nurses, occupational health professionals, physician’s assistants, and emergency medical technicians. However, a trainer does not need to be a healthcare professional. Non-healthcare professionals, such as but not limited to industrial hygienists, epidemiologists, and professional trainers, may conduct the training if they have the necessary knowledge of the subject matter covered by the training program as it relates to the workplace. One way, but not the only way, knowledge can be demonstrated is if the person received specialized training. If no one at a workplace is qualified to do the training, the employer may need to send employees outside to get trained or bring a trainer in.
In some workplaces, such as dental or physicians’ offices, the individual employer may conduct the training, given the necessary knowledge of bloodborne pathogen hazards and the subject matter specified by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) in paragraphs (g)(2)(vii)(A) through (N) of 1910.1030.
If an OSHA inspector finds training deficiencies in a workplace, the inspector will look at the specialized courses, degrees, or work experience of that workplace’s trainer to verify competence. G
In contract situations, both the contractor and client employer share responsibility for ensuring that contract employees are protected. Likewise, for temporary employees, the staffing agency and host employer are considered joint employers. In either scenario, it is in the interest of both employers to ensure that required training has been provided:
The provisions for employee bloodborne pathogens training are performance oriented, with flexibility allowed to tailor the program to the employee’s background and responsibilities. However, the training elements listed in subparagraph (g)(2)(vii) of the Bloodborne Pathogens Standard must be covered, and some elements call for site-specific information.
At a minimum, the training program must include the following elements:
Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and hepatitis B must be covered in bloodborne pathogen training, but other bloodborne pathogens and bloodborne diseases also exist, such as hepatitis C virus (HCV) and syphilis. Training should acknowledge other diseases while focusing on the ones that are most relevant to the workplace. Uncommon diseases such as Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease don’t need to be covered unless, for example, employees are working in a research facility with that particular virus.
HCV is the most common chronic bloodborne infection in the United States, so the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) says it is important that training include information on its transmission and symptoms. People who are chronically infected with HCV may not be aware of their infection because they may not be clinically ill. The infection may lead to chronic liver disease that develops slowly, often taking two or more decades before it is recognized.
For comprehensive information about basic symptoms and modes of transmission of bloodborne diseases, see the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention website at www.cdc.gov.
Subparagraph 1910.1030(g)(2)(ix) lists additional training elements for employees in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and hepatitis B virus (HBV) laboratories and production facilities. Research laboratories produce or use research-laboratory-scale amounts of HIV or HBV, while production facilities engage in industrial-scale, large-volume, or high-concentration production of HIV or HBV.
In addition to the general training requirements at 1910.1030(g)(2)(vii), employers in HIV or HBV research laboratories and HIV or HBV production facilities must do the following as part of initial training:
Once the jobs and tasks with occupational exposure are identified, employers can quickly find out which employees have occupational exposure. These employees must be trained in accordance with 1910.1030(g)(2). Information and training are required:
It’s the employer’s responsibility to institute a bloodborne pathogens training program and ensure employee participation.
Bloodborne pathogen information and training must be provided during paid working hours, at no cost to the employee. Other considerations in how to train involve trainee comprehension, training format, opportunities for questions, and hands-on training.
Comprehension
Training content and vocabulary must be appropriate for trainees’ education level, literacy, and language. In practical terms, instruction needs to be provided using both a language and vocabulary trainees can understand. If a trainee does not speak or comprehend English, instruction must be provided in a language the trainee can understand. Moreover, if the trainee’s vocabulary is limited, the training must account for that limitation. If a trainee is illiterate, then instruction should be available that requires no reading; telling the trainee to read training materials doesn’t satisfy the training obligation.
Format
The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) doesn’t restrict the training format that employers use. Audiovisuals, classroom instruction, interactive video, and online and computer-based training are all good tools that can be used as part of an effective training program. Using a variety of audio, visual, and online tools may allow the training to fit with different learning styles and levels of experience among trainees.
However, acceptable training requires interaction and site-specific information. Training the employees solely by means of a film or video without the opportunity for a discussion would constitute a violation. Similarly, a generic online or computer program, even an interactive one, is not sufficient, unless the employer:
Opportunities for questions
During training, it is critical that trainees have the opportunity to ask questions and receive answers where material is unfamiliar to them. Frequently, a trainee may be unable to go further with the training or to understand related training content until a response is received. Therefore, under the standard, trainees must have direct access to a qualified trainer during training. However, the trainer does not need to be in the room with the trainee. OSHA’s requirement may be met if trainees have direct access to a trainer by way of a telephone hotline. Email is not considered direct access, unless the trainer is available to answer emailed questions as soon as they arise.
Hands-on training
Sufficient hands-on training is important because it allows trainees to interact with equipment and tools in the presence of a qualified trainer and to learn or refresh their skills through experience. It gives the trainer a chance to assess whether the trainees have mastered the proper techniques.
Must-read OSHA interpretations
While OSHA offers many letters of interpretation on 1910.1030, two letters are especially helpful for an employer looking to comply with the bloodborne pathogens training requirements:
Preventive measures keep the spread of bloodborne-related diseases from happening. The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) offers two preventive measures under 1910.1030:
Vaccination can help to prevent the transmission of preventable diseases and keep employees on the job. Currently, OSHA only requires vaccination for hepatitis B to be made available to employees with occupational exposure, and it must be offered free of charge, at a convenient time and place, and by a licensed and qualified healthcare professional. The employee may decline the vaccine.
Using universal precautions is the practice of treating all human blood and other potentially infectious materials (OPIM) as if they are known to be infectious for bloodborne pathogens. This approach ensures that employees exercise a high level of caution. It also guards privacy by avoiding any reason for workers to guess at or gauge anyone’s infection or risk status.
Currently, the only vaccine required by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) is the hepatitis B vaccine series.
Hepatitis B is a liver infection caused by the hepatitis B virus (HBV). Hepatitis infection represents a significant occupational hazard to all workers who contact blood or certain body fluids from infected persons. Although many people with hepatitis B may feel or look ill, many people with a hepatitis B infection are unaware that they have contracted the virus.
The best way to prevent hepatitis B is by getting vaccinated. The vaccine stimulates the immune system to protect against the virus. After the vaccine is given, the body makes antibodies that protect against the virus. An antibody is a substance found in the blood that is produced in response to a virus invading the body. These antibodies will fight off the infection if the person is exposed to HBV in the future.
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) say the hepatitis B vaccine is safe and effective.
Vaccine availability
Employers must make the hepatitis B vaccine and vaccination series available at no cost to all employees who have occupational exposure. Booster doses are not currently recommended by the CDC, but if that recommendation changes, those boosters must also be offered.
Vaccinations must be made available at a time and place that’s convenient for employees.
Employers must offer the hepatitis B vaccine and vaccination series after initial training and within 10 working days of initial assignment to employees who have occupational exposure, unless:
The employee has the option to decline the vaccination and follow-up programs.
General requirements for vaccination
The vaccine must be performed by (or under) the supervision of a licensed physician or other licensed healthcare professional, whose legally permitted scope of practice includes independently performing the vaccination.
Vaccinations need to follow the current recommendations of the U.S. Public Health Service. This simply means the CDC guidelines.
Cost of vaccination
Vaccination must be at no cost to the employee. This means, among other things, no “out of pocket” expense. Employers can’t require employees to use healthcare insurance to pay for the vaccine unless the employer pays all of the cost of the health insurance and there are no deductibles, copayments, or other expenses. A reimbursement process would also violate the no-cost rule, as would requiring workers to pay back the cost of the vaccine if they leave their jobs before a specified time period.
First aid providers and Good Samaritans
First aid is often a collateral, not a primary, duty of an employee. If an employer fails to provide the vaccination to employees for whom first aid is not a major job task, OSHA can cite the employer but will not issue a fine if the following conditions are met:
If workers’ potential bloodborne pathogen exposure results from Good Samaritan acts that are not part of their job duties, employers aren’t required to offer them the vaccine. However, OSHA recommends that the employer offer Good Samaritans post-exposure evaluation and follow-up, which may include vaccination.
Construction industry
While 1910.1030 does not apply to the construction industry, employees in construction are not free from bloodborne pathogen hazards. Therefore, OSHA has indicated that employees responsible for providing first aid or medical assistance at a construction site are expected to receive vaccination and follow-up in the event of an exposure incident.
In a letter of interpretation dated January 26, 1993, OSHA was asked about the provision of the hepatitis B vaccine to employees in the construction industry who have occupational exposure to blood or other potentially infectious materials. The letter explains, “Section 5(a)(1) of the [Occupational Safety and Health Act], which requires employers to furnish a workplace which is free from recognized hazards which may cause or are likely to cause death or serious physical harm, may be applied where appropriate to the construction industry … It is under the General Duty Clause that OSHA may require, where appropriate, the provision of the hepatitis B vaccine to those employees who have occupational exposure [in construction]."
Worker consent and confidentiality in regard to hepatitis B vaccination are crucial. Employees cannot be required to be screened for HBV antibodies before or after vaccination, or to release test results to their employers. They can choose not to receive the hepatitis B vaccine.
Consent forms and waivers
Section 1910.1030 does not refer to consent forms for employees accepting the vaccine, so they’re not required. According to the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), medical informed consent forms are acceptable, unless they require employees to release test results to their employers or they exaggerate the hazards of the vaccine. Any waiver of liability for any harm caused by the vaccine also violates the regulation.
Pre- and post-vaccination testing
According to OSHA, an employer cannot require an employee to be pre-screened for hepatitis B virus antibodies. However, pre-screening can be made available at no cost to the employee. If the antibody testing reveals that the employee is immune, the employer doesn’t have to provide vaccination to that employee. If an employee declines the pre-screening, then the employer must make the vaccination available.
An employer also cannot require post-vaccination testing unless the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) call for it. CDC guidelines do call for a post-vaccination titer for certain employees who have ongoing contact with patients or blood and who are at ongoing risk of percutaneous (through the skin) injuries.
All laboratory tests must be free of charge to the employee and conducted by an accredited lab. The healthcare professional must provide a written opinion to the employer as to whether hepatitis B vaccination is needed and if the employee has received it.
Vaccination declination statement
Any employee with occupational exposure who chooses not to receive the hepatitis B vaccine must sign OSHA’s statement of declination of hepatitis B vaccination. Before signing, the employee must be given appropriate training regarding the following:
The statement is not a waiver; employees can request and receive the hepatitis B vaccination at a later date, provided they still have occupational exposure.
Signing the statement of declination confirms that the employee is aware of the risk of hepatitis B and was given the chance to be vaccinated, but is declining it with the understanding that a free vaccination will be available at a later date if the employee still has occupational exposure.
Employers must use the declination form as provided by OSHA. Any additions to the form language should be made for the sole purpose of improving employee comprehension. Using a form that conveys the same information, but with different words, may be considered a de minimis (no penalty) violation. Employers must not add language that would discourage employee acceptance of the vaccine or add liability concerns. If an employer adds information that requires the employee to provide confidential medical information, either on the declination form or on a separate form, an OSHA citation may be issued.
Universal precautions is an approach to infection control under which all human blood and other potentially infectious materials (OPIM) are treated as if known to be infectious for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), hepatitis B virus (HBV), hepatitis C virus (HCV), and other bloodborne pathogens.
Universal precautions treat all people in the workplace the same way, removing any reason to speculate about anyone’s infection or risk status. If an employer has a policy of treating the blood or OPIM of some patients as potentially infectious and the blood or OPIM of others (e.g., the elderly or children) as not infectious, this is an Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) violation.
Universal precautions are to be observed in all situations where there is a potential for contact with blood or OPIM, whether or not this contact arises as part of a job duty. This is similar to an approach that is followed in hospitals and other healthcare facilities. If it’s difficult or impossible to differentiate between body fluid types, all body fluids are to be considered potentially infectious, and universal precautions must be observed.
Two alternative concepts in infection control, body substance isolation (BSI) and standard precautions, are discussed below. These concepts are acceptable alternatives to universal precautions, provided that facilities using them fulfill all other requirements of the Bloodborne Pathogens Standard.
Implementing universal precautions
Paragraph (d) of the Bloodborne Pathogens Standard sets forth the method by which employers must protect their employees from the hazards of bloodborne pathogens and comply with 1910.1030 through the use of universal precautions, engineering controls, work practice controls, personal protective equipment (PPE), proper housekeeping, and handling of regulated waste.
Body substance isolation
One alternative to universal precautions is called body substance isolation (BSI). This is an infection control method that defines all body fluids and substances as infectious, not just blood and OPIM as in the Bloodborne Pathogens Standard.
BSI is an acceptable alternative to universal precautions as long as facilities adhere to all other provisions of 1910.1030.
Standard precautions
Another alternative to universal precautions is known as standard precautions. This term refers to the minimum infection prevention measures that apply to all patient care, regardless of the suspected or confirmed infection status of a patient, in any setting where healthcare is delivered.
Standard precautions include:
For the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), standard precautions have replaced earlier guidance relating to universal precautions and BSI. Standard precautions are more stringent than universal precautions and are therefore acceptable to OSHA. However, OSHA currently only requires universal precautions.
Engineering and work practice controls are the primary methods used to control the transmission of hepatitis B virus (HBV) and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). As much as feasible, the employer must institute these engineering and work practice controls to eliminate or minimize employee exposure to bloodborne pathogens.
Engineering controls reduce employee exposure to bloodborne pathogens by either removing the hazard or isolating the employee from exposure. Examples include devices to minimize the risk of needlesticks, containers to safely contain contaminated waste, and handwashing and eyewash facilities.
Work practice controls reduce the possibility of exposure by changing the way tasks are performed. These include appropriate practices for handling and disposing of contaminated sharps and other regulated waste, handling specimens, handling laundry, and cleaning contaminated surfaces and items.
Other methods to control exposure to bloodborne pathogens include:
Engineering controls are devices that eliminate or reduce employee exposure to bloodborne pathogens in the workplace by either removing the hazard or isolating the worker from exposure.
Engineering controls should be used in combination with work practice controls to eliminate or minimize employee exposure. Where occupational exposure remains after institution of these controls, personal protective equipment (PPE) must also be used.
Types and locations of engineering controls
Examples of engineering controls include:
Engineering controls must be readily available in the area where they’re likely to be needed. Puncture-resistant sharps disposal containers must be easily accessible and located in areas where needles, syringes, or other sharp instruments are commonly used.
The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) does not require employers to provide personal sharps containers for employees who use lancets or insulin syringes for personal therapeutic reasons. However, to eliminate potential exposures to other employees, the employer may strongly insist that these employees bring their own sharps containers to the workplace.
Sharps used by employees for illegal drug use are covered under company-specific policies, which should be addressed when relevant during training.
According to OSHA, mouthpieces, resuscitation bags, pocket masks, or other ventilation devices are considered personal protective equipment; therefore, these would not fall under the engineering control category.
Maintenance of engineering controls
Engineering controls must be examined and maintained or replaced on a scheduled basis to ensure that each control is maintained and that it provides the protection intended. Regularly scheduled inspections are required to confirm, for instance:
Research labs and production facilities
Employers will want to note that human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and hepatitis B virus (HBV) research labs and production facilities may have more stringent engineering control requirements under 1910.1030(e).
Work practice controls reduce the possibility of exposure by changing the way tasks are performed. These include appropriate practices for handling and disposing of contaminated sharps, handling specimens, handling laundry, and cleaning contaminated surfaces and items.
Examples include:
All procedures involving blood or OPIM must be performed in such a manner as to minimize spattering, generating droplets, splashing, and spraying.
Disposal receptacles
Bags or receptacles containing regulated waste must be labeled or color-coded according to the requirements of the Bloodborne Pathogens Standard. Regulated waste is defined at 1910.1030(b).
Restrictions
In work areas where there is a reasonable likelihood of occupational exposure, safe work practices include restricting eating, drinking, smoking, applying cosmetics or lip balm, and the handling of contact lenses. Food and drink should not be stored in refrigerators or other locations where blood or OPIM are kept.
Contaminated equipment
Equipment, other than PPE, that during the course of operations could become contaminated with blood or OPIM must be checked routinely. It must be decontaminated prior to servicing or shipping, unless the employer can demonstrate that decontamination of the equipment or portions of it is not feasible.
Contaminated needles and sharps
The following are work practice controls to reduce the possibility of cuts or skin punctures involving contaminated sharps:
Research labs and production facilities
Employers will want to note that human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and hepatitis B virus (HBV) research labs and production facilities may have more stringent work practice control requirements under 1910.1030(e).
Handwashing facilities need three things:
Handwashing facilities must be readily accessible to employees. That’s because handwashing must be performed as soon as feasible, with soap and running water that’s at least tepid, to adequately flush contaminated material from the skin.
Readily accessible handwashing facilities must be within a reasonable distance from the area where the employee may be exposed to contaminated material. If an employee must, for example, leave the work area and navigate doorways and stairs in order to wash, there is a reasonable chance that environmental surface contamination will occur in the process. This situation is a violation.
When to require handwashing
Employers must ensure that employees wash hands and any other skin with soap and water, or flush mucous membranes with water, immediately or as soon as feasible following any contact of these body surfaces with blood or other potentially infectious materials (OPIM).
Employees must also wash their hands immediately or as soon as feasible after removal of gloves or other personal protective equipment (PPE). There is no requirement for handwashing upon leaving the work area unless contact with blood or OPIM has occurred or PPE has been removed.
Acceptable alternatives
At some sites, it is not feasible to provide soap and running water, such as a crime scene, traffic accident, or fire scene. In these situations, acceptable alternatives are:
These alternatives are only acceptable when handwashing facilities aren’t available. When alternatives are used, workers must wash with soap and running water as soon as feasible.
Research labs and production facilities
Employers will want to note that human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and hepatitis B virus (HBV) research labs and production facilities may have more stringent handwashing and handwashing facility requirements under 1910.1030(e).
Personal protective equipment (PPE) is a key factor in controlling exposure to blood or other potentially infective materials (OPIM). PPE is specialized clothing or equipment worn by an employee for protection against a hazard.
Examples of PPE include:
General work clothes (e.g., uniforms, pants, shirts, or blouses) not intended to function as protection against a hazard are not considered to be PPE. However, if laboratory jackets or uniforms are intended to protect the worker’s body or clothing from contamination, they’re considered PPE.
PPE is required when there’s occupational exposure after engineering and work practice controls are in place, and in situations when those controls aren’t feasible. The employer is responsible for providing appropriate and easily accessible PPE at no cost to the employee, and for laundering, decontaminating, maintaining, and replacing it as necessary.
Research labs and production facilities
Employers will want to note that human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and hepatitis B virus (HBV) research labs and production facilities may have more stringent PPE requirements under 1910.1030(e).
Personal protective equipment (PPE) is required if occupational exposure remains after engineering and work practice controls are in place, or if those controls are not feasible.
The employer must provide, at no cost to the employee, PPE that is appropriate to the employee’s level of risk. The employer must also train the employee in proper use of the PPE that’s available.
PPE includes but is not limited to the following:
What is “appropriate”?
The type and amount of PPE must be chosen to protect against contact with blood or other potentially infectious materials (OPIM) based upon the type of exposure and amount of these substances that the employee can reasonably anticipate encountering during a task or procedure.
PPE is considered ‘‘appropriate’’ if it does not permit blood or OPIM to pass through or reach the employee’s work clothes, street clothes, undergarments, skin, eyes, mouth, or other mucous membranes under normal conditions. PPE with any breach, even as small as a pinhole in a glove, is not considered appropriate because blood or OPIM could reach the skin.
Appropriate PPE also must fit employees correctly. Ill-fitting PPE could cause tearing or inadvertently expose skin, or employees may simply refuse to wear it. Thus, employers must provide a variety of sizes so that all employees can wear PPE that fits their bodies.
Accessibility
Proper PPE in the appropriate sizes must be readily accessible at the worksite or be issued to employees. Employee training must include the location of the PPE and how to put it on.
Resuscitator devices must be readily available and accessible to employees who can reasonably be expected to perform resuscitation procedures. The same is true of emergency ventilation devices such as masks, mouthpieces, resuscitation bags, and shields/overlay barriers.
If an employee wants to choose, wear, and maintain a personal uniform or laboratory coat, that employee needs to wear additional employer-handled and employer-controlled PPE when performing tasks where it’s reasonable to anticipate exposure to blood or OPIM.
In the rare case that an employee has a good reason to decline wearing PPE (see “Special Circumstances” below), the employer still is responsible for ensuring that PPE is readily accessible at all times.
Proper use
Employees must receive training in proper use of the PPE. Inadequate training and improper use, including failure to follow the manufacturer’s instructions or accepted medical practice, will be cited.
Employees must remove any contaminated clothing before leaving a work area (such as to enter designated lunchrooms or break rooms). A work area is generally considered to be an area where work involving occupational exposure occurs or where the contamination of surfaces may occur.
Employees are not required to change PPE when traveling, for example, from one hospital laboratory area to another, as long as the connecting hallway is also considered to be a work area.
An example of a violation would be if an employee wearing contaminated gloves leaves a pathology laboratory to use a public telephone in a public hallway of the hospital. The surface of the phone would be likely to become contaminated, and it can be reasonably anticipated that another employee would use the phone without gloves and unwittingly pick up the contamination.
Under some rare and extraordinary circumstances, an employee might make the professional judgment that using personal protective equipment (PPE) during a specific incident would prevent the delivery of healthcare or public safety services or would risk the safety of the worker or a coworker.
Another specific (though not rare or extraordinary) circumstance concerns the status of scrubs, which generally function more as street clothing than as PPE, but do encounter blood and other potentially infectious materials (OPIM) more than is traditional for street clothing.
Declining PPE
The decision not to use PPE is to be made on a case-by-case basis and must have been prompted by legitimate and truly extenuating circumstances. Examples include:
These situations don’t relieve the employer of the responsibility to ensure that PPE is readily accessible at all times. The employer must investigate and document why PPE was not used in each case and evaluate the surrounding circumstances to reduce the likelihood of a future unprotected incident.
Scrubs safety
Scrubs are usually worn similarly to street clothing and don’t count as PPE. They normally should be covered by appropriate gowns, aprons, or laboratory coats when splashes to skin or clothes are reasonably anticipated.
However, if a pullover scrub (as opposed to a scrub with snap closures) becomes minimally contaminated, employees should be trained to remove the pullover scrub in such a way as to avoid contact with the outer surface, such as rolling up the scrub while pulling it toward the head for removal.
If the amount of blood exposure is such that the blood penetrates the scrub and contaminates the inner surface, not only is it impossible to remove the scrub without exposure to blood, but just wearing the scrub is skin exposure. Scrubs are not appropriate protection against exposures of this magnitude, but it may be wise to train employees on how to remove grossly contaminated scrubs and prevent exposure to the face.
The employer is responsible for laundering, cleaning, repairing, replacing, and disposing of PPE at no cost to workers. This includes laboratory jackets or uniforms that are intended to protect the worker’s body or clothing from contamination. However, employers are not obligated to provide general work clothes to employees.
Employees must remove all PPE before leaving the work area. They must then place it in an appropriately designated area or container for storage, washing, decontamination, or disposal.
Home laundering of PPE by employees is not permitted for three reasons:
The employer shall repair or replace PPE as needed to maintain its effectiveness, at no cost to the employee. Any hole in PPE, even a pinhole, can be a pathway for exposure. A gown that is frequently ripped or falls apart under normal use would not be considered “appropriate PPE.”
Any break in the skin on the hands — a paper cut, a scratch, or even a hangnail — can offer a route for bloodborne pathogen infection. For this reason, gloves are the most commonly used personal protective equipment (PPE).
The employer must provide PPE, including gloves, in appropriate sizes and accessible locations. Gloves must be worn under the following circumstances:
Acceptable gloves
There is no single type or thickness of glove appropriate for all situations. Selection criteria should include dexterity, durability, fit, and the tasks that will be undertaken while the gloves are worn.
Disposable gloves should be a standard component of emergency response equipment and should be put on by all personnel before beginning any emergency patient care tasks that involve occupational exposure. Extra pairs should always be available.
For those employees who are allergic to the gloves normally provided, “hypoallergenic” gloves (which cannot contain natural rubber or latex), glove liners, powderless gloves, or other similar alternatives must be readily available and accessible at no cost. These alternatives must supply appropriate barrier protection and must be approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for use as a medical glove.
Plastic film food handling gloves (“cafeteria” or “baggie” gloves) are not appropriate for use in exposure-related tasks. They would not fit the employee as required by paragraph (d)(3)(iii) of the standard.
Use
At a minimum, gloves must be used:
Gloves are usually not necessary when administering intramuscular or subcutaneous injections, as long as bleeding that could result in hand contact with blood or OPIM is not anticipated.
Employees should inspect their gloves before use and know how to put them on properly and remove them safely. In addition, they should always wash their hands immediately after removing gloves. This is because studies have shown that gloves provide a barrier, but that neither vinyl nor latex procedure gloves are completely impermeable.
Disposable gloves must be replaced as soon as practical after they’ve become contaminated, or as soon as feasible if they’re torn or punctured or their ability to function as a barrier is otherwise compromised. However, some critical procedures (e.g., surgery, delivery) cannot be interrupted to change gloves.
Decontamination and reuse
Disposable (single-use) gloves must not be washed or decontaminated for reuse. This is because disinfecting agents may cause deterioration of the glove material, and washing with surfactants could result in “wicking” or penetration of liquids into the glove via undetected pores, which could transport blood or OPIM into contact with the hand.
Utility gloves may be decontaminated for reuse if the integrity of the glove is not compromised. However, they must be discarded if
Certain solutions, such as iodine, may cause discoloration of gloves without affecting their integrity and function.
Phlebotomy exception
An employer in a volunteer blood donation center may judge that routine gloving for all phlebotomies is not necessary. This applies only to employees of such centers, and not to phlebotomy conducted in other settings such as plasmapheresis centers or hospitals.
In this case, the employer must
The employer must also require that gloves be used for phlebotomy in the following circumstances:
Gloves are the most commonly used type of personal protective equipment (PPE), but employees with occupational exposure may require protection for other parts of the body as well, depending on their job environment and duties.
Face and eye protection
The mucous membranes of the face and upper respiratory tract are required to be protected from exposure. If splashes, sprays, spatters, or droplets of blood or other potentially infectious materials (OPIM) pose a hazard to the eye, nose, or mouth, then employees need to wear appropriate face and eye protection.
Depending on the degree and type of anticipated exposure, protection for the face would consist of a mask and:
The employer must provide this PPE but would not necessarily have to provide prescription eyewear for employees. Instead, the employer could provide and mandate the use of side shields, goggles, and/or protective face shields, and provide proper training in decontamination procedures.
During microsurgery, in which splattering is not reasonably anticipated, a surgeon would not be required to wear eye protection while observing surgery through the microscope.
Other protective clothing
Occupational exposure situations may require other appropriate protective clothing, including but not limited to the following:
The requirements for this category of PPE are performance based, depending on the task, the type of exposure expected, and the degree to which such PPE must resist penetration. The employer must evaluate the situation and select appropriate PPE in accordance with 1910.1030(d)(3)(i).
Examples include the following:
PPE for construction workers
While 1910.1030 does not apply to the construction industry, employees in construction are not free from bloodborne pathogen hazards. Employees responsible for giving first aid or medical assistance at a construction site are expected to be provided with appropriate PPE.
Housekeeping involves cleaning floors, work surfaces, and equipment. Visible contamination is easy to address when housekeeping because blood or other potentially infectious materials (OPIM) can be seen on surfaces or equipment. However, bloodborne pathogens and OPIM can remain infectious for up to seven days and may not be visible, so it is very important to use disinfectants and techniques approved by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) when cleaning in areas that are, or may be, contaminated.
Decontamination is not the same as cleaning. Decontamination refers to using physical or chemical means to remove, inactivate, or destroy bloodborne pathogens on a surface or item to the point where they are no longer capable of transmitting infectious particles, and the surface or item is rendered safe for handling, use, or disposal.
Generally, work surfaces must be cleaned and decontaminated when contaminated with blood or OPIM, after medical or other procedures, and at the end of the work shift. Equipment must also be cleaned and decontaminated after contact with blood or OPIM.
It is the employer’s responsibility to ensure that the workplace is kept clean and sanitary. This includes determining and implementing a cleaning schedule that includes decontamination tasks or procedures. The decontamination schedule will depend on the location within the facility, the type of surfaces being cleaned, the type of contamination, and the tasks and procedures being performed in the area.
Decontamination procedures
Mopping up liquid blood or OPIM may only spread it around by splashing. It’s safer to use a loose absorbent material. Absorbent material and a small disposable scraper and dustpan are often included in commercially available body fluid cleanup kits.
After the liquid is absorbed, the material should be carefully scraped into a dustpan, then disposed of in a biohazard bag or receptacle. After that, the area must be decontaminated with an acceptable disinfectant. EPA-registered tuberculocides or sterilants (see “Tools for Cleanup” below) are appropriate.
The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) also says using fresh household bleach diluted to the appropriate strength for the cleanup job at hand is also an effective disinfectant; although, bleach may cause damage to some medical instruments and therefore cannot be used in all cases. An April 30, 1993, OSHA letter of interpretation explains, “Under the bloodborne pathogens standard, OSHA requires that contaminated items and surfaces be decontaminated with an appropriate disinfectant … Solutions of 5.25 sodium hypochlorite (household bleach) diluted between 1:10 and 1:100 with water are considered appropriate for this purpose.”
Employees must also properly dispose of or decontaminate any tools they used in cleanup. If it’s necessary to disinfect equipment used during cleanup that has been exposed to blood or OPIM, they should do so in a sink dedicated to industrial use. It’s a good idea not to use a bathroom, break room, or kitchen sink where employees will be likely to wash their hands, apply cosmetics, or clean dishes or food items.
Specific issues
Some cleanup work procedures depend on the type of pathogen or material involved, as well as whether it’s a healthcare or non-healthcare setting. For example, OSHA provides guidance for workers and employers in non-healthcare/non-laboratory settings on cleaning and decontamination of Ebola on surfaces. (View the OSHA Fact Sheet “Cleaning and Decontamination of Ebola on Surfaces.” OSHA also has guidance and requirements for healthcare workers.
In addition, healthcare workers/employers can review the CDC’s “Procedures for Safe Handling and Management of Ebola-Associated Waste.”
Work surfaces and containers
All equipment and working surfaces that could have become contaminated must be cleaned and decontaminated as necessary. If thorough decontamination can’t be done immediately, employees should label the equipment stating which parts of the equipment remain contaminated so that other employees are aware of the hazard and know to take precautions.
All coverings used for protecting working surfaces, such as plastic wrap, foil, and impervious-backed absorbent paper, should be removed and replaced as soon as possible after they have been contaminated, or at the end of the work shift if there’s a possibility that they became contaminated during the shift.
All bins, pails, cans, and similar reusable receptacles that are reasonably likely to become contaminated with blood or OPIM must be inspected and decontaminated on a regularly scheduled basis. After visible contamination, these must be cleaned and decontaminated immediately, or as soon as possible.
Sharp objects
Broken glassware that may be contaminated must be picked up only by using mechanical means such as tongs, brush and dustpan, or forceps — never with bare or gloved hands. Contaminated reusable items, such as sharps, may not be stored or processed in a way that requires employees to reach into containers where they can’t see or safely handle the contents.
Research labs and production facilities
Employers will want to note that human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and hepatitis B virus (HBV) research labs and production facilities may have more stringent housekeeping practice requirements under 1910.1030(e).
Bloodborne pathogens require more stringent cleanup measures than regular messes. Using disinfectants accepted by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), along with effective equipment as specified in 1910.1030, allows for effective and compliant cleaning and disinfecting.
Acceptable disinfectants
Only certain disinfectants kill bloodborne pathogens. OSHA accepts four types of substances as appropriate disinfectants to clean contaminated surfaces:
OSHA allows the use of the above products unless the surfaces are contaminated with agents, volumes, or concentrations for which higher-level disinfection is recommended.
See the lists of selected EPA-registered disinfectants.
Following the instructions on the labels of disinfectant products is crucial. EPA-registered product instructions, for example, require that:
Employees must follow the label instructions regarding the amount of disinfectant and the length of time it must remain wet on the surface. Training must include proper disinfectant use for employees whose job duties involve cleanup following a bloodborne-pathogen-related incident.
While bleach may cause damage to some medical instruments and therefore cannot be used in all cases, fresh solutions of diluted household bleach may be appropriate for disinfection of environmental surfaces and for decontamination of sites after blood or other potentially infectious materials (OPIM) have been wiped up. Contact time for bleach is generally considered to be the time it takes to air dry. Solutions of bleach should not be stored in glass containers, but in material such as the plastic the bleach comes packaged in.
Spill kits
Section 1910.1030 doesn’t specifically require a spill kit. Instead, the regulation calls for certain personal protective equipment (PPE), waste containers, biohazard labels, and proper decontamination of surfaces. The necessary equipment could be assembled in something like a pail, bin, or duffle bag.
A commercial bloodborne pathogens spill kit can also be purchased. A typical kit might have any combination of gloves, paper apron or gown, face shield, goggles, mask, shoe covers, absorbent powder, a small scoop, red or labeled plastic bags, toweling, absorbent pads, disinfectant spray, and towelettes. A sharps container will probably not be offered in a commercial kit.
Proper disposal of biohazard waste is essential for preventing exposure to bloodborne pathogens. One major element of this process is using biohazard receptacles so that no one accidentally handles the waste container without recognizing its potential dangers.
“Regulated waste” must be placed in closeable, leak-proof, and appropriately labeled or colored containers that are built to contain all contents during handling, storing, transporting, or shipping.
Regulated waste is defined as:
The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) does not generally consider the following to be regulated waste:
While not regulated waste, these items should be discarded in waste containers that are lined in order to prevent contact with the contents.
OSHA notes, however, that it is the employer’s responsibility to determine which job classifications or specific tasks and procedures involve occupational exposure. For example, the employer must determine whether employees can come into contact with blood during the normal handling of waste, from initial pickup through disposal in the outgoing trash.
The amount of blood is not a good determining factor because the Bloodborne Pathogens Standard is concerned with an item’s level of saturation. Ten milliliters of blood on a disposable bed sheet would appear as a spot (not regulated waste), while the same amount of blood on a cotton ball would drip (regulated waste).
Appropriate disposal for regulated waste can mean using red or labeled sharps containers for contaminated sharps. However, for contaminated waste other than sharps, it means using red leak-proof bags, or bags and receptacles marked prominently with biohazard labels. (See Labels, tags, signs, symbols, and colors section.)
Regulating bodies other than OSHA may call for more stringent disposal practices. Infectious waste disposal is primarily regulated at the state level, so employers should be aware of (and train employees in) any requirements made by their state’s environmental agency. In addition, employees must be trained in their company’s disposal practices if those practices include disposal of items beyond those items listed in OSHA’s definition of regulated waste.
Waste disposal in the construction industry
While 1910.1030 does not apply to the construction industry, employees in construction are not free from bloodborne pathogen hazards. Therefore, appropriate regulated waste containers must be provided when needed by employees responsible for giving first aid or medical assistance at a construction site, per 1926.25.
Research labs and production facilities
Employers will want to note that human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and hepatitis B virus (HBV) research labs and production facilities may have more stringent waste disposal requirements under 1910.1030(e).
The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) specifies disposal procedures for contaminated sharps and other regulated waste.
Contaminated sharps
OSHA defines a contaminated sharp as any contaminated object that can penetrate the skin. Needles are the most common type, but sharps can also include items like box cutter blades and broken glass, if they’re contaminated.
Workers must dispose of contaminated sharps immediately or as soon as feasible in containers that are:
Containers for contaminated sharps must be as close as feasible to where sharps are used or anticipated. If an employee must travel to a remote location to discard a sharp, it will increase the possibility of an accidental needlestick injury or improper disposal.
Sharps containers must be kept upright throughout use and replaced routinely. Overfilling a sharps container is a violation, so the container should either have a transparent window or be placed at a height that allows workers to see inside it.
When a container of contaminated sharps is moved from the area of use, the container must be closed immediately before removal or replacement to prevent spilling or protrusion of its contents during handling, storage, transport, or shipping. If leakage is possible, the container should be put into another container, which must be:
Workers must not manually open, empty, or clean reusable sharps containers. Instead, this must be done using an automated process.
The final disposal process and where to send the contaminated sharps waste depends on state environmental agency requirements.
An employer isn’t required to provide a sharps container to a worker who uses lancets or insulin syringes for personal therapeutic reasons. However, to eliminate potential exposures to other workers, the employer could require that employees bring their own sharps containers to work for those purposes. OSHA has several letters of interpretation about this.
Uncontaminated sharps and blades
Uncontaminated sharps and blades are not regulated wastes, but they still should be disposed of carefully so that no one gets cut or punctured. Workers can collect these instruments in a container labeled “Uncontaminated sharps.” When the container is full, it can be closed and put into the regular trash.
Other regulated waste
Regulated waste that’s not a sharp must be disposed of in a container that’s:
If the outside of the container becomes contaminated, it should be placed into a second container that meets all the above requirements.
The final disposal process depends on state environmental agency requirements. The facility’s waste hauler may also have suggestions.
Contaminated laundry is laundry that is soiled with blood or other potentially infectious materials (OPIM) or may contain contaminated sharps.
Handling contaminated laundry
Laundry that has been contaminated with blood or OPIM should be handled as little as possible with a minimum of agitation. Employees who handle these materials must wear protective gloves and other appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE).
Employees should bag or containerize contaminated laundry as soon as possible at the location it was used. They shouldn’t sort or rinse the laundry first.
If the contaminated laundry is wet and seems reasonably likely to soak through or leak, the material for the bags or containers used in laundry collection must prevent fluids from reaching the outside of the bags or containers.
Laundry should only be sorted in a designated laundry area, not at the location of use.
Contaminated laundry must be easily identifiable. The employer has two choices:
Washing contaminated laundry
The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) regulations stop short of giving instructions for actually cleaning and disinfecting contaminated laundry. Instead, an OSHA directive and interpretation say that clothing manufacturer’s instructions should be met, and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines are available. The CDC guidelines offer two choices:
Who can wash contaminated laundry?
Employees aren’t allowed to take laundry home, both because the employer cannot ensure proper handling or laundering procedures and because contamination could migrate to the homes of employees.
It is the employer’s responsibility to launder, repair, replace, and dispose of contaminated PPE.
If uniforms are intended to protect workers from blood or OPIM (or if uniforms are contaminated), then the employer is responsible for laundering them.
Employers can have employees wash contaminated laundry onsite as long as proper safety procedures such as providing PPE are followed. Laundry can also be contracted out.
When a facility that uses universal precautions in handling laundry ships it out to a second facility that does not, the first facility must place the laundry in bags or containers labeled or color-coded in accordance with 1910.1030(g)(1)(i) so that workers at the second facility can easily identify contaminated laundry.
Employees must receive sufficient visual warning to eliminate or minimize their exposure to bloodborne pathogens.
When employees aren’t routinely required to deal with blood or other potentially infectious materials (OPIM), they can easily become complacent about the hazards. Employers must provide appropriate signs, tags, labels, and color-coded containers to clearly mark biohazards, and make sure that employees are thoroughly trained in recognizing, using, and complying with them.
Biohazard warning signs, labels, tags, and color-coding signify the actual or potential presence of a biohazard. They’re used to identify equipment, containers, or work areas that contain, or are contaminated with, blood or OPIM.
In general industry, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) regulates biohazard markings not only at 1910.1030 but also at 1910.145. Employers should review and follow the marking requirements for both regulations. Note that for the shipyard industry, 1915.1030 says its requirements are identical to 1910.1030.
Likewise, 1915.91 says its requirements are identical to 1910.145. The construction industry, on the other hand, has its own signs and tags provisions at 1926.200.
When labels are required
If 1910.1030 applies, then labels must be provided on the following:
The label must:
As an alternative to a label, red bags or red containers can be used.
For contaminated equipment being serviced or shipped, the label must state which parts of the equipment are contaminated. This requirement alerts employees to possible exposure, since the nature of the material or contents will not always be readily identifiable as blood or OPIM.
The labeling requirements do not preempt either the U.S. Postal Service labeling requirements (39 CFR and 18 U.S. Code Section 1691 to 1738) or the Department of Transportation’s (DOT) Hazardous Materials Regulations (49 CFR 171 to 180).
DOT labeling is required on transport containers that contain “known infectious substances.” It is not required on all containers for which 1910.1030 requires the biohazard label. Where there is an overlap between the OSHA-mandated label and the DOT-required label, the DOT label will be considered acceptable on the outside of the transport container, provided that the OSHA-mandated label (or red color-coding) appears on any internal containers that are present.
Containers serving as collection receptacles within a facility are not covered by the DOT requirements, so these must have the OSHA label.
When labels are not required
Biohazard labels are not required:
If universal precautions are used for handling all soiled laundry, the employer may use an alternative color or label for the containers, as long as all employees are trained to recognize them.
Tags
Biohazard tags made of card, paper, pasteboard, plastic, or other material are affixed as close as safely possible to a biohazard by string, wire, or adhesive that prevents the tags’ loss or unintentional removal. Biohazard tags are intended to:
Paragraph 1910.145(f) explains that the tag must use a signal word, DANGER,” “CAUTION,” “BIOHAZARD,” “Biological Hazard,” or the biological hazard symbol itself, shown in the regulation. The OSHA-recommended color scheme is fluorescent orange or orange-red, or predominantly so, with lettering or symbols in a contrasting color.
Tags need not be used where signs are posted to communicate a biohazard.
For construction, paragraph 1926.200(h) and (i) offer both:
The old BIOHAZARD tag is white with a fluorescent-orange or orange-red panel with black letters. The biohazard symbol is fluorescent-orange or orange-red against the white background.
Signs
In HIV and HBV research laboratories and production facilities, signs must be posted at all access doors when OPIM or infected animals are present in the work area or containment module. According to 1910.1030, these signs must be fluorescent orange-red or predominantly so, with lettering and symbols in a contrasting color. They must also contain the following information:
Other general industry and shipyard workplaces should follow 1910.145 for biological hazard signs, which have a biological hazard warning to signify the actual or potential presence of a biohazard and to identify things that contain, or are contaminated with, viable hazardous agents. Section 1910.145 doesn’t specify the text, symbol, color, or format of biological hazard signs, giving the employer flexibility.
For construction, 1926.200 calls for employers to follow either:
The old BIOHAZARD sign does not have a color scheme for the signal word or message but does call for a biohazard symbol that is fluorescent orange or orange-red on contrasting background.
Symbols
Below is the universal biohazard symbol legend as it appears in 1910.1030, as well as a diagram of the symbol that appeared in the Federal Register in 1974, complete with dimensions:
According to 1910.145, the symbol design for biological hazard tags must conform to the design below:
While preventive and control measures are intended to eliminate or minimize the risks of occupational exposure, exposure incidents still occur.
An exposure incident is an actual contact with blood or other potentially infectious materials (OPIM) that results from the performance of an employee’s duties. It is an exposure incident if contact is:
The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) has several requirements in place for procedures after an exposure incident. These ensure that an exposed employee receives prompt, confidential medical evaluation and prophylaxis.
Follow-up measures must be undertaken immediately, with appropriate safety precautions.
The appropriate course of action after an exposure incident depends on the person’s relationship to the incident and level of training.
An exposed person
An employee who suffers an exposure incident should take the following actions:
Immediately reporting exposure incidents allows for timely medical evaluation and follow-up, testing of the source person’s blood, and exploring measures to prevent similar incidents in the future. Employers must treat reports in the strictest confidence.
A witness to the incident
An employee who witnesses an exposure incident should take the following actions:
A trained responder
An employee who is a designated and trained responder or cleanup person should take the following actions:
After any worker with occupational exposure experiences an exposure incident, the employer must make a confidential medical evaluation and follow-up available to the worker immediately. This evaluation and follow-up must be at no cost to the worker.
An exposure incident is a specific eye, mouth, other mucous membrane, non-intact skin, or parenteral (under the skin) contact with blood or other potentially infectious materials (OPIM). The exposed employee is the one who suffers the exposure incident. The source individual is a person, living or dead, whose blood or OPIM may be a source of exposure to the employee.
It’s the employer’s responsibility to establish procedures for evaluating exposure incidents. Thorough assessment and confidentiality are critical issues. The medical evaluation and follow-up must at the very least:
If an employee who does not have occupational exposure suffers an exposure incident (e.g., a Good Samaritan), medical evaluation and follow-up are not required. However, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) does recommend that employers make them available.
Timing
The word “immediately” is used in the Bloodborne Pathogens Standard to emphasize the importance of prompt medical evaluation and prophylaxis. An exact time is not given, but OSHA requires them to be given as soon as possible after exposure. An OSHA inspector who believes that access to care was delayed is recommended to investigate.
Tools made available to OSHA trainers suggest that treatment should begin preferably within 24 hours, and no later than seven days. However, this suggestion is not in the regulation.
The hepatitis B vaccine is most effective when given within 24 hours of exposure, so if the employee hasn’t received this vaccine previously, there’s no time to waste.
Construction industry
While 1910.1030 does not apply to the construction industry, employees in construction are not free from bloodborne pathogens hazards. Therefore, OSHA has indicated that employees responsible for providing first aid or medical assistance at a construction site are expected to be offered vaccination and follow-up in the event of an exposure incident.
Testing cannot be done in most states without written consent. If consent is not obtained, the employer must show that legally required consent could not be obtained. Where consent is not required by law, the source individual’s blood, if available, should be tested and the results documented.
The employer must have established a system that maintains the confidentiality of the employee’s identity and test results. If the employer has contracted with a clinic or other healthcare facility to provide the follow-up programs, the confidentiality requirements must be part of the contract.
In a medical setting, the boundary between employer and healthcare professional may be blurred (e.g., the physician is both the employer and the evaluating healthcare professional, or the employer’s certified medical laboratory analyzes the blood). In such cases, consent and confidentiality are especially important. Medical information must be confined to the medical department and not discussed with or revealed to others.
Information is dispersed as follows:
Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) testing
Employees have the opportunity for future testing without the need for an immediate decision. Employees involved in an exposure incident have at least 90 days following baseline blood collection to decide if they wish to have their blood tested for HIV. This approach should encourage employees to consent to blood collection at the time of exposure because there’s no pressure for an immediate decision.
To the employee, HIV testing may present risks regarding confidentiality, employment, prejudice, or lack of medical information. Therefore, the 90-day time frame gives the employee the opportunity to learn about the testing and to participate in further discussion, education, or counseling.
If an employee’s blood is not tested for HIV initially, the employer is required to preserve the blood for at least the 90-day period. If post-exposure follow-up is contracted out, the contractor must be informed of the 90-day requirement. If, within 90 days of the exposure incident, the employee agrees to have the baseline sample tested, the testing must be conducted as soon as feasible.
Following an exposure incident, employers are required to document, at a minimum, the route of exposure and the circumstances under which exposure occurred. Documenting the circumstances surrounding an incident allows the employer to identify and correct hazards.
To be useful, the documentation must contain sufficient detail about the incident. There should be information about the following:
Additional information might also include a comparison of similar occurrences and recommendations to avoid future incidents; although, this is not mandatory.
The employer must also document in writing the identity of the source individual, or the reasons that identification is not feasible. Examples of when it may not be feasible to identify the source individual:
At the time of an exposure incident, the exposed employee must be directed to a healthcare professional. The employer must ensure that the healthcare professional evaluating the employee is provided with the following information:
The employer does not have a right to know the results of the source individual’s blood testing, but must ensure that the information is provided to the evaluating healthcare professional. If the evaluating healthcare professional is also the employer, the information that must go to the healthcare professional must still be in the exposed employee’s record and made available at the time of a post-exposure incident. All applicable laws and standards of confidentiality apply.
If the employee requires hepatitis B vaccination, the employer must ensure that the healthcare professional giving the vaccination is provided with a copy of the Bloodborne Pathogens Standard.
Written opinion
Following the post-exposure evaluation, the healthcare professional must provide a written opinion to the employer. The employer must provide a copy of this written opinion to the employee within 15 days of the evaluation.
The written opinion for hepatitis B vaccination shall be limited to the following information:
The healthcare professional’s written opinion for post-exposure evaluation and follow-up shall be limited to the following information:
The employer is allowed access only to this limited information. All other findings or diagnoses must remain confidential and not be included in the written report. Any information regarding the results of the employee’s evaluation or medical conditions must be conveyed by the healthcare professional to the employee alone.
Keeping good records provides a view of the bigger picture, such as commonalities across incidents and trends over time, and makes it easier to identify places for improvement.
Employers covered by 1910.1030 are required to maintain certain types of records that relate to bloodborne pathogen hazards and exposures:
Records must be available to the employees they concern, to representatives of those employees in certain circumstances, and to officials of the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) and the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) upon request.
Research labs and production facilities
Employers will want to note that human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and hepatitis B virus (HBV) research labs and production facilities may have additional and more stringent documentation requirements under 1910.1030(e).
Employers covered by 1910.1030 need to develop a written plan. This plan is referred to as the “exposure control plan.” It’s basically designed to eliminate or minimize employee exposure to blood and other potentially infectious materials (OPIM).
The primary purpose of the exposure control plan is to identify employees who have occupational exposure and to commit the employer to a timetable for implementing the standard’s requirements. However, the plan must also address paragraphs (d)-(h) of the standard in a way that’s appropriate to the circumstances of the particular workplace.
Broadly, these paragraphs cover
For small facilities, an annotated copy of 1910.1030 may be adequate to address paragraphs (d)-(h). Larger facilities could develop a broad facility-wide program that incorporates provisions from the standard that apply to them.
Any employer who has at least one employee with occupational exposure must establish a written exposure control plan that’s designed to eliminate or minimize employee exposure. At a minimum, the plan must include:
The employer may wish to also include in the written exposure control plan the required documentation (per 1910.1030(c)(1)(iv)) that the employer annually considered and implemented appropriate commercially available and effective safer medical devices designed to eliminate or minimize occupational exposure.
If a plan element isn’t applicable to the specific workplace, the plan should include it but state directly that the element does not apply and explain why.
Any employer who’s required to have an exposure control plan must solicit input from non-managerial employees who are responsible for direct patient care and who are potentially exposed to injuries from contaminated sharps. These employees must have input into the identification, selection, and evaluation of effective engineering and work practice controls. The employer then must document the solicitation in the written exposure control plan.
The employer must solicit employee input in ways that are appropriate to the circumstances in the workplace. These may include:
Employers must clearly and effectively communicate these opportunities to employees.
Employers don’t need to receive input from every employee who provides direct patient care and who is potentially exposed to contaminated sharps. However, the employees selected to provide input must represent the range of exposure situations encountered in the workplace (e.g., emergency department, pediatrics, nuclear medicine).
The employer must document the process by which the input was requested and identify the employees or the positions of those employees who were involved.
If employees with occupational exposure are not responsible for patient care, this solicitation isn’t necessary. Laboratory workers, for example, who do not have patient contact, would not be included in this provision. However, where this solicitation provision is not required, the written plan needs to document that this element does not apply because the employees don’t perform direct patient care or are not potentially exposed to contaminated sharps.
Employers must review and update the exposure control plan at least annually and whenever necessary to reflect changes in tasks, procedures, and positions that affect occupational exposure. These plan reviews and updates include the following:
A periodic review ensures that the exposure control plan remains current with the latest information and scientific knowledge pertaining to bloodborne pathogens. A review of the sharps log required in 1910.1030(h)(5) can also identify problem areas and/or ineffective devices that may need replacement.
The exposure control plan must include the procedure for evaluating the circumstances surrounding exposure incidents, which might also lead to changes during reviews of the plan.
It is noteworthy that the above-mentioned annual consideration and implementation of safer medical devices must also be documented. Rather than a separate record, it may be a good idea to include this documentation in the written exposure plan itself, such as in an appendix to the plan. If employees do not use medical devices, the documentation should state directly that the provision at 1910.1030(c)(1)(iv)(B) does not apply and explain why.
Employers must maintain a confidential medical record for each employee with potential for exposure, according to the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) standard governing access to employee exposure and medical records at 1910.1020.
This record shall include:
Records storage
The employer shall maintain the required records for at least the duration of the employee’s employment plus 30 years. The requirements of 1910.1020, the Access to Employee Exposure and Medical Records Standard, apply.
The medical records of employees who have worked for less than one year don’t need to be retained beyond the term of employment if they are provided to the employee at the end of employment.
If an employer contracts for the services of a healthcare provider, the medical records may be kept at the provider’s worksite.
Confidentiality and availability
The employer shall ensure that the required employee medical records are:
Medical records should be kept confidential in accordance with 1910.1020. If recordkeeping is carried out by another party on the employer’s behalf, the employer is responsible for exercising reasonable diligence to make sure that party fulfills the preservation and access requirements.
All medical records required to be kept under the Bloodborne Pathogens Standard must be made available to OSHA.
The Bloodborne Pathogens Standard requires employers to maintain and keep accurate training records. These records help to:
Employee training records must include the following:
Unlike medical records, training records are not considered to be confidential. Training records may be stored onsite where the actual documents are readily accessible, and they must be retained for three years from the training date. Upon request, employees and their representatives have a right to examine and copy employee training records.
The information kept on injury and illness and sharps injury logs help covered employers evaluate the safety of the workplace, understand bloodborne pathogens and other hazards in the workplace, and implement employee protections to reduce or eliminate those hazards. The idea is to prevent future workplace injuries and illnesses, including those related to bloodborne pathogens.
OSHA recordkeeping
OSHA lists “partially exempted industries” at Appendix A to Subpart B of 29 CFR 1904. Employers who are not in a partially exempted industry must keep injury and illness logs under Part 1904.
Section 1904.8 requires all work-related needlesticks and cuts from sharp objects that are contaminated with another person’s blood or other potentially infectious material (OPIM) to be first recorded on the OSHA 300 Log as an “injury.” Later, if the employee is diagnosed with an infectious bloodborne disease, the identity of the disease must be entered and the classification must be changed to an “illness.”
On the other hand, if an employee is splashed or exposed to blood or OPIM without being cut or punctured, the incident must be recorded on the OSHA 300 only if it results in the diagnosis of a bloodborne illness or it meets one or more of the recording criteria of 1904.7.
To protect privacy, the employee’s name must not to be entered on the 300 Log. See the requirements for privacy cases in subparagraphs 1904.29(b)(6) through (b)(10). Employers must keep a separate, confidential list of case numbers and employee names so they can update the cases and provide them if asked by the government.
For more information, see 29 CFR 1904 under Other related regulations.
Sharps injury log
Employers not in partially exempted industries and having employees with occupational exposure to bloodborne pathogens must also establish and maintain a sharps injury log for the recording of percutaneous (through the skin) injuries from contaminated sharps. The information in the log has to be recorded and maintained in such a manner as to protect the confidentiality of the injured employee.
This applies to any employer who is required to maintain a log of occupational injuries and illnesses under the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) injury and illness recordkeeping standard, Part 1904. The sharps injury log is separate from the log of injuries and illnesses kept under the Part 1904 recordkeeping rule.
The purpose of the log is to aid in the evaluation of devices being used and to quickly identify problem areas in the facility. Thus, it should be reviewed regularly and during the annual review and update of the written exposure control plan.
The sharps injury log needs to contain, at a minimum:
If determining the type and brand of the device would increase the potential for additional exposure (e.g., a housekeeper suffer a needlestick injury through a trash bag), the type/brand may be recorded as “Unknown.”
More information may be included in the log. However, the confidentiality of the injured employee must be maintained throughout the process. If the data are made available to other parties (e.g., supervisors, safety committees, employees, or employee representatives), any information that identifies or could reasonably be used to identify the employee must be withheld.
The employer can determine the format in which to maintain the log (e.g., paper or electronic). Many employers already compile reports of percutaneous injuries to comply with 1910.1030(f)(3). Existing mechanisms for collecting these reports could be sufficient, provided that the information meets the minimum requirements of the Bloodborne Pathogens Standard and protects employee confidentiality.
Employers may use the OSHA 300 log and 301 incident report to meet the sharps injury log requirements. To use these recordkeeping forms, the type and brand of the device have to be entered on either the 300 or 301 form, and the records must be maintained in a way that segregates sharps injuries from other types of work injuries.
Logs must be saved for at least five years following the end of the calendar year that they cover.
Employers partially exempt from recordkeeping requirements under Part 1904 are not required to maintain a sharps injury log, but are encouraged to do so.
However, all employers must comply with the post-exposure documentation requirements of 1910.1030(f)(3) and the annual review documentation requirements of 1910.1030(c)(1)(iv), even when a sharps log is not required.
Records must be available to the employees they concern, to representatives of those employees in certain circumstances, and to officials of the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) and National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) upon request.
Exposure control plan
Employers must make their written exposure control plan accessible to employees. The location and format of the plan may be adapted to a workplace’s circumstances, provided that workers can access a copy at the workplace during their shift. OSHA allows a written program to be in either paper or electronic format, as long as the program meets all other requirements of the Bloodborne Pathogens Standard.
The employer must ensure that employees know how to access the document and that there are no barriers to employee access. So if a plan is maintained solely on computer, workers must be trained to operate the computer.
The plan may be part of a larger document (such as one addressing all health and safety hazards in the workplace). However, to be accessible to employees, it must be cohesive by itself, or there must be a guiding document that states the overall policy goals and references the elements of existing separate policies that make up the plan.
If employees request a hard copy of the plan, employers must make it available to them within 15 working days of that request. Upon request, employers must also make the plan available to OSHA and the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), or their designated representatives, for examination and copying.
Training and medical records
Upon request, both medical and training records must be made available to both NIOSH and OSHA officials. Training records must be available to employees or employee representatives upon request. Medical records can be obtained only by the employee, OSHA, NIOSH, or anyone having the employee’s written consent, in accordance with 1910.1020.
The employer must comply with the requirements involving transfer of records set forth in 1910.1020(h).
In addition to all the other requirements in 1910.1030, employers in research labs and production facilities that culture, produce, concentrate, experiment with, and manipulate human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and hepatitis B virus (HBV) have even more requirements in paragraph (e) of the standard. These specific requirements are largely based on information from guidelines published by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and National Institutes of Health (NIH).
A research laboratory means a laboratory that produces or uses research-laboratory-scale amounts of HIV or HBV, including for academic research. Research laboratories may produce high concentrations of HIV or HBV, but not in the volume found in production facilities. They deal with solutions containing higher viral titers than those normally found in patients’ blood.
Laboratories that conduct research on blood and other body fluids unrelated to HIV or HBV, or that use unconcentrated blood or blood components as the source of HIV or HBV, are not considered research laboratories.
A production facility means a facility engaged in industrial-scale, large-volume, or high-concentration production of HIV or HBV.
Paragraph 1910.1030(e) applies to research laboratories and production facilities engaged in the culture, production, concentration, experimentation, and manipulation of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and hepatitis B virus (HBV). They are in addition to the other requirements of the standard. They don’t apply to clinical or diagnostic laboratories engaged solely in the analysis of blood, tissues, or organs.
The following practices are required of both research laboratories and production facilities.
Standard microbiological practices
Special practices
Containment equipment
Additional training requirements for employees in HIV and HBV research laboratories and HIV and HBV production facilities are specified in 1910.1030(g)(2)(ix).
In addition to the requirements that apply to both research laboratories and production facilities, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and hepatitis B virus (HBV) research laboratories shall meet the following criteria:
In addition to the requirements that apply to both research laboratories and production facilities, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and hepatitis B virus (HBV) production facilities shall meet the following criteria:
The Bloodborne Pathogens Standard is a central resource for establishing a workplace that is safe and compliant with regard to bloodborne pathogens, but other resources may apply or assist the employer as well.
State requirements for bloodborne pathogens
While the federal OSHA Bloodborne Pathogens Standard is found at 29 CFR 1910.1030, each state manages bloodborne pathogens differently. Employers should check the information for their state(s) to determine if additional requirements apply to their operation.
OSHA must-read guidance
Two Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) documents are key supplements for understanding and complying with 1910.1030. These documents answer many questions about the Bloodborne Pathogens Standard and are “must-reads.”
The laws and regulations laid out here work to protect employees from bloodborne pathogens. The Bloodborne Pathogens Standard (29 CFR 1910.1030) is the core regulation, but others apply as well.
While several regulations relate to bloodborne pathogens, one regulation stands out to provide comprehensive protections for covered employees. The Occupational Safety and Health Administration’s (OSHA) Bloodborne Pathogens Standard (29 CFR 1910.1030) is a general industry and shipyard regulation that prescribes safeguards to protect workers against health hazards related to bloodborne pathogens.
Section 1910.1030 is considered the core regulation for bloodborne pathogen exposure prevention, control, and response. It has provisions for the following:
The standard imposes requirements on employers of workers who may be exposed to blood or other potentially infectious materials (OPIM), such as certain body fluids and tissues.
The requirements applicable to shipyard employment under 1915.1030 are identical to those set forth at 1910.1030. Therefore, shipyard employers must follow 1910.1030 if they have one or more employees with occupational exposure.
Part 1904, the Recordkeeping and Reporting Occupational Injuries and Illnesses Standard, requires employers not in partially exempted industries (see Appendix A to Subpart B to Part 1904) to record work-related punctures, cuts, lacerations, and scratches from sharp objects that are contaminated with another person’s blood or OPIM.
Covered employers will record these types of incidents as an “injury” on the OSHA 300 Log (Log of Work-Related Injuries and Illnesses). If the employee develops a bloodborne disease, the entry must be updated and recorded as an “illness.”
However, if an employee is splashed or exposed to blood or OPIM without being cut, scratched, or punctured, the incident must be recorded on the OSHA 300 Log only if it results in the diagnosis of a bloodborne illness or it meets one or more of the recording criteria of 1904.7.
To protect privacy, the employee’s name may not be entered on the OSHA 300. Subparagraphs 1904.29(b)(6) through (b)(10) discuss privacy concerns. Employers must keep a separate, confidential list of case numbers and employee names in these privacy cases so they can update the cases and provide them if asked by the government.
The Hazardous Waste Operations and Emergency Response (HAZWOPER) Standard, 1910.120, covers three groups of employees:
The definition of hazardous substance includes any biological agent or infectious material that may cause disease or death. There are potential scenarios where the bloodborne and HAZWOPER standards may interface, such as:
Employers of employees engaged in these types of activities must comply with the requirements in 1910.120, as well as the Bloodborne Pathogens Standard at 1910.1030. If there is a conflict or overlap, the provision that is more protective of employee safety and health applies.
According to 1910.145, the Specifications for Accident Prevention Signs and Tags Standard, biohazard signs and tags are required:
Records concerning employee exposure to bloodborne pathogens and records about human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and/or hepatitis B (HBV) status are both considered employee medical records within the meaning of 1910.1020, the Access to Employee Exposure and Medical Records Standard.
This regulation simply states that the requirements for biohazard signage applicable to shipyard employment are identical to the requirements set forth in 1910.145. Therefore, biohazard signs and tags are required:
29 CFR 1926.21, .25, .28, and .200
Although 1910.1030 does not apply to the construction industry, employees in construction are not free from bloodborne pathogen hazards. Therefore, employees responsible for providing first aid or medical assistance at a construction site are expected to receive basic instruction in bloodborne pathogen hazards, as well as vaccination and follow-up in the event of an exposure incident. Appropriate personal protective equipment and sharps containers must be provided.
OSHA sections 1926.21, 1926.25, 1926.28, and 1926.200, plus Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health (OSH) Act, offer some protection for employees in this industry.
Two laws give the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) authority to issue regulations pertaining to bloodborne pathogens.
The OSH Act of 1970, Public Law 91-596
Section 5(a)(1) of the OSH Act states that “each employer shall furnish to each of his employees employment and a place of employment which is free from recognized hazards that are causing or are likely to cause death or serious physical harm to his employees.” This law, known as OSHA’s General Duty Clause, may be used to cite employers for failure to provide a workplace free from exposure to bloodborne pathogens. Where 1910.1030 does not apply, this clause may be used for enforcement.
See the full Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970.
Needlestick Safety and Prevention Act, Public Law 106-430, November 6, 2000
The Needlestick Safety and Prevention Act was signed into law (Public Law 106-430) on November 6, 2000. It directed OSHA to do the following:
OSHA published these revisions to 1910.1030 on January 18, 2001, with an effective date of April 18, 2001.
Part 1904, the Recordkeeping and Reporting Occupational Injuries and Illnesses Standard, requires employers not in partially exempted industries (see Appendix A to Subpart B to Part 1904) to record work-related punctures, cuts, lacerations, and scratches from sharp objects that are contaminated with another person’s blood or OPIM.
Covered employers will record these types of incidents as an “injury” on the OSHA 300 Log (Log of Work-Related Injuries and Illnesses). If the employee develops a bloodborne disease, the entry must be updated and recorded as an “illness.”
However, if an employee is splashed or exposed to blood or OPIM without being cut, scratched, or punctured, the incident must be recorded on the OSHA 300 Log only if it results in the diagnosis of a bloodborne illness or it meets one or more of the recording criteria of 1904.7.
To protect privacy, the employee’s name may not be entered on the OSHA 300. Subparagraphs 1904.29(b)(6) through (b)(10) discuss privacy concerns. Employers must keep a separate, confidential list of case numbers and employee names in these privacy cases so they can update the cases and provide them if asked by the government.
The Hazardous Waste Operations and Emergency Response (HAZWOPER) Standard, 1910.120, covers three groups of employees:
The definition of hazardous substance includes any biological agent or infectious material that may cause disease or death. There are potential scenarios where the bloodborne and HAZWOPER standards may interface, such as:
Employers of employees engaged in these types of activities must comply with the requirements in 1910.120, as well as the Bloodborne Pathogens Standard at 1910.1030. If there is a conflict or overlap, the provision that is more protective of employee safety and health applies.
According to 1910.145, the Specifications for Accident Prevention Signs and Tags Standard, biohazard signs and tags are required:
Records concerning employee exposure to bloodborne pathogens and records about human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and/or hepatitis B (HBV) status are both considered employee medical records within the meaning of 1910.1020, the Access to Employee Exposure and Medical Records Standard.
This regulation simply states that the requirements for biohazard signage applicable to shipyard employment are identical to the requirements set forth in 1910.145. Therefore, biohazard signs and tags are required:
29 CFR 1926.21, .25, .28, and .200
Although 1910.1030 does not apply to the construction industry, employees in construction are not free from bloodborne pathogen hazards. Therefore, employees responsible for providing first aid or medical assistance at a construction site are expected to receive basic instruction in bloodborne pathogen hazards, as well as vaccination and follow-up in the event of an exposure incident. Appropriate personal protective equipment and sharps containers must be provided.
OSHA sections 1926.21, 1926.25, 1926.28, and 1926.200, plus Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health (OSH) Act, offer some protection for employees in this industry.
Two laws give the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) authority to issue regulations pertaining to bloodborne pathogens.
The OSH Act of 1970, Public Law 91-596
Section 5(a)(1) of the OSH Act states that “each employer shall furnish to each of his employees employment and a place of employment which is free from recognized hazards that are causing or are likely to cause death or serious physical harm to his employees.” This law, known as OSHA’s General Duty Clause, may be used to cite employers for failure to provide a workplace free from exposure to bloodborne pathogens. Where 1910.1030 does not apply, this clause may be used for enforcement.
See the full Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970.
Needlestick Safety and Prevention Act, Public Law 106-430, November 6, 2000
The Needlestick Safety and Prevention Act was signed into law (Public Law 106-430) on November 6, 2000. It directed OSHA to do the following:
OSHA published these revisions to 1910.1030 on January 18, 2001, with an effective date of April 18, 2001.
It’s important to know not only who has to comply but who doesn’t. This section goes over both.
Who has to comply?
According to the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), any general industry or shipyard employer (of any size) that has one or more employees with “occupational exposure” falls under 1910.1030. The standard is not meant solely for employers in healthcare settings.
In fact, the standard regulates over 701,000 employers nationwide and applies to many in the healthcare, manufacturing, services, retail, research, waste, educational, fire and rescue, security, law enforcement, correctional, and other industries. The bulk of 1910.1030 citations occur in the healthcare industry, but more than 40 percent have gone to industries other than healthcare in recent years. Although the regulation has existed for decades, it is still one of the most cited, with about 500 federal OSHA violations each year, plus all the citations issued by states and territories.
Twenty-eight states and territories operate their own “state plan” and either adopt 1910.1030 or have equivalent or stricter regulations for the private and/or public sectors. Other states and territories may also adopt the Bloodborne Pathogens Standard or similar requirements for the public sector, where OSHA does not have jurisdiction. Therefore, public- and private-sector employers must determine the applicability of not only federal but also state or territorial bloodborne pathogens requirements.
Who doesn’t have to comply?
Section 1910.1030 is a federal regulation that applies only to the general and shipyard industries in the private sector. It does not apply to all industries or in all states.
The Bloodborne Pathogens Standard does not apply to the following industries:
However, this doesn’t mean they’re free from bloodborne pathogen hazards. Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health (OSH) Act states that “each employer shall furnish to each of his employees employment and a place of employment which is free from recognized hazards that are causing or are likely to cause death or serious physical harm to his employees.” OSHA may use this General Duty Clause to cite for failure to provide a workplace free from bloodborne pathogen exposure.
More specifically, OSHA has indicated that first-aid providers at construction sites are expected to receive basic instruction in bloodborne pathogen hazards, as well as vaccination and follow-up in the event of an exposure incident. Appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) and waste containers must also be provided.
OSHA regulations also don’t apply to the public sector. Thus, it is up to the states and territories to determine whether they will protect employees that work for state and municipal government agencies. Some states and territories have chosen not to require 1910.1030 protections for these employees, so employers in these states and territories get to choose whether to provide these protections.
Probably the most confusing part of the Bloodborne Pathogens Standard is figuring out who’s protected by 1910.1030.
The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) estimates that more than 8.4 million employees in the U.S. require bloodborne pathogens training under 1910.1030.
Employers are required to train all employees with occupational exposure, whether their employment is full-time, part-time, contract, or temporary. However, OSHA jurisdiction extends only to employees, not to other people in the workplace such as unpaid students.
OSHA does not list jobs or tasks with occupational exposure, so employers must determine which jobs are covered at their workplace. If only some employees in a job class have occupational exposure, the employer must identify which tasks in those jobs present occupational exposure.
All employees who have occupational exposure must be trained in bloodborne pathogens procedures. This applies to all classifications of employees: full-time, part-time, contract, and temporary.
“Occupational exposure” refers to reasonably anticipated contact with blood or other potentially infectious materials (OPIM), in contrast to an “exposure incident,” in which actual contact occurs.
For bloodborne pathogens training to be required for an employee, contact with blood or OPIM must be reasonably anticipated, and this contact must result from the performance of the employee’s duties.
As an example, an office worker would not reasonably anticipate having contact with blood or OPIM. However, if the office worker is assigned to perform first aid when coworkers are bleeding, then that employee is considered to have occupational exposure.
Related job classifications
Job duties do not need to be healthcare-related to be covered. The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) doesn’t list jobs or tasks with occupational exposure, so this is left to employers to determine.
If only some employees in a job class have occupational exposure, the employer must identify which tasks in those jobs present occupational exposure.
Some job classifications that may have occupational exposure include:
*The first-aid provider category includes (1) employees designated to perform first aid, (2) employees who render first aid only as a collateral duty, and (3) employees who routinely provide first aid to fellow employees with the knowledge of the employer and fall de facto under this designation even if the employer has not officially designated the employee as a first-aid provider. Good Samaritans are not included unless they otherwise meet criteria (1), (2), or (3).
Contract and temporary workers
In contract situations, both the contractor employer and the client share responsibility for ensuring that contract employees are protected. Likewise, for temporary employees, both the staffing agency and host employer are considered joint employers of those employees. In either scenario, it’s in the interest of both employers to ensure that the required training is provided.
Typical host employer responsibilities | Typical staffing agency responsibilities |
---|---|
|
|
In addition, the employer who has day-to-day supervision over the temporary employees, typically the host employer, is required under 29 CFR 1904 to maintain a log of occupational injuries and illnesses, including for temporary workers. The Bloodborne Pathogens Standard requires that this employer must also keep a sharps injury log to record percutaneous (through the skin) injuries from contaminated sharps, including injuries to temporary employees. [Source: Temporary Worker Initiative Bulletin No. 6, OSHA 3888-09 2016]
Even when an employer is in general industry or shipyards, not everyone in the workplace is protected by 1910.1030.
Non-employees
The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) defines an employee as an “employee of an employer who is employed in a business of his employer which affects commerce.” If someone in the workplace is not an “employee” by definition, then that person is not protected.
For example, a private school may have students who work there, or a non-profit organization may have volunteers. Unpaid students and volunteers aren’t employees, so they’re not covered.
Good Samaritans
Section 1910.1030 also does not cover Good Samaritans. For example, if an employee helps a coworker who has a nosebleed or is bleeding as the result of a fall, this isn’t considered an occupational exposure unless first aid is one of that employee’s job duties.
For occupational exposure to exist, an employee’s job must involve reasonably anticipated contact with blood or other potentially infectious materials (OPIM). Good Samaritan acts can’t be reasonably anticipated by an employer, so they don’t qualify. Therefore, anyone who helps another person at work is not covered unless they are assigned or expected to do this.
OSHA concluded that it would be needlessly burdensome to require employers to implement 1910.1030 based on the chance of an employee having contact with blood or OPIM during a task that’s not required.
All employees who have occupational exposure must be trained in bloodborne pathogens procedures. This applies to all classifications of employees: full-time, part-time, contract, and temporary.
“Occupational exposure” refers to reasonably anticipated contact with blood or other potentially infectious materials (OPIM), in contrast to an “exposure incident,” in which actual contact occurs.
For bloodborne pathogens training to be required for an employee, contact with blood or OPIM must be reasonably anticipated, and this contact must result from the performance of the employee’s duties.
As an example, an office worker would not reasonably anticipate having contact with blood or OPIM. However, if the office worker is assigned to perform first aid when coworkers are bleeding, then that employee is considered to have occupational exposure.
Related job classifications
Job duties do not need to be healthcare-related to be covered. The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) doesn’t list jobs or tasks with occupational exposure, so this is left to employers to determine.
If only some employees in a job class have occupational exposure, the employer must identify which tasks in those jobs present occupational exposure.
Some job classifications that may have occupational exposure include:
*The first-aid provider category includes (1) employees designated to perform first aid, (2) employees who render first aid only as a collateral duty, and (3) employees who routinely provide first aid to fellow employees with the knowledge of the employer and fall de facto under this designation even if the employer has not officially designated the employee as a first-aid provider. Good Samaritans are not included unless they otherwise meet criteria (1), (2), or (3).
Contract and temporary workers
In contract situations, both the contractor employer and the client share responsibility for ensuring that contract employees are protected. Likewise, for temporary employees, both the staffing agency and host employer are considered joint employers of those employees. In either scenario, it’s in the interest of both employers to ensure that the required training is provided.
Typical host employer responsibilities | Typical staffing agency responsibilities |
---|---|
|
|
In addition, the employer who has day-to-day supervision over the temporary employees, typically the host employer, is required under 29 CFR 1904 to maintain a log of occupational injuries and illnesses, including for temporary workers. The Bloodborne Pathogens Standard requires that this employer must also keep a sharps injury log to record percutaneous (through the skin) injuries from contaminated sharps, including injuries to temporary employees. [Source: Temporary Worker Initiative Bulletin No. 6, OSHA 3888-09 2016]
Even when an employer is in general industry or shipyards, not everyone in the workplace is protected by 1910.1030.
Non-employees
The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) defines an employee as an “employee of an employer who is employed in a business of his employer which affects commerce.” If someone in the workplace is not an “employee” by definition, then that person is not protected.
For example, a private school may have students who work there, or a non-profit organization may have volunteers. Unpaid students and volunteers aren’t employees, so they’re not covered.
Good Samaritans
Section 1910.1030 also does not cover Good Samaritans. For example, if an employee helps a coworker who has a nosebleed or is bleeding as the result of a fall, this isn’t considered an occupational exposure unless first aid is one of that employee’s job duties.
For occupational exposure to exist, an employee’s job must involve reasonably anticipated contact with blood or other potentially infectious materials (OPIM). Good Samaritan acts can’t be reasonably anticipated by an employer, so they don’t qualify. Therefore, anyone who helps another person at work is not covered unless they are assigned or expected to do this.
OSHA concluded that it would be needlessly burdensome to require employers to implement 1910.1030 based on the chance of an employee having contact with blood or OPIM during a task that’s not required.
Although the Bloodborne Pathogens Standard is far from new, it continues to confuse employers. The standard defines 28 terms in its definitions paragraph at 1910.1030(b), and the use of these terms can be challenging. Some of the definitions are explained in Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) directive CPL 02-02-069 for clarification.
Blood: Human blood, human blood components, and products made from human blood. Animal blood is not covered under this definition.
OSHA gives the following examples of human blood components:
Bloodborne pathogens: Microorganisms that are present in human blood and can cause disease in humans. These include, but are not limited to, hepatitis B virus (HBV) and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV).
While HBV and HIV are specifically mentioned in the standard, the term includes any microorganism that is present in human blood and can cause disease in people who are exposed to blood containing the pathogen. CPL 02-02-069 lists 15 diseases related to bloodborne pathogens.
Contaminated: Having the presence or the reasonably anticipated presence of blood or other potentially infectious materials (OPIM) on an item or surface.
Contaminated items or surfaces can expose employees to blood or OPIM. If an employee has a cut or wound and the employee’s personal protective equipment (PPE) allows a contaminant to permeate through it or has even a pinhole, the bloodborne pathogen has a direct path into the body. Therefore, the goal is to keep contamination levels as low as possible.
Contaminated sharps: Any contaminated objects that can penetrate the skin, including but not limited to needles, scalpels, broken glass, broken capillary tubes, and exposed ends of dental wires.
When blades such as box cutters, razor blades, and knives are contaminated, these are also considered contaminated sharps.
An exposure incident: A specific eye, mouth, other mucous membrane, non-intact skin, or parenteral (piercing the skin or mucous membranes) contact with blood or other potentially infectious material (OPIM) that results from the performance of an employee’s duties.
Mucous membranes include the eye and inside the nose and mouth. Blood or OPIM that splatters into a worker’s eye, nose, or mouth is considered an exposure incident.
Non-intact skin includes skin with damage such as rashes, hangnails, cuts, abrasions, and chafing.
An exposure incident requires actual contact with blood and OPIM that results from the performance of an employee’s duties (as opposed to occupational exposure, which refers to reasonably anticipated contact). Examples of exposure incidents include
Occupational exposure: Reasonably anticipated skin, eye, mucous membrane, or parenteral (piercing the skin or mucous membranes) contact with blood or other potentially infectious materials (OPIM) that may result from the performance of an employee’s duties.
An office worker wouldn’t reasonably anticipate having contact with blood or OPIM. However, if that worker is assigned to perform first aid involving blood-related injuries of coworkers, that counts as occupational exposure. Job duties don’t need to be healthcare-related to be covered. A good Samaritan who helps someone out of kindness rather than as a work duty doesn’t have occupational exposure.
Other potentially infectious materials (OPIM):
Only certain body fluids are considered OPIM. Others, like urine, vomit, feces, nasal secretions, phlegm, sweat, and tears, may be unpleasant to encounter in a work environment but aren’t efficient modes of transmission for bloodborne pathogens. However, if any body fluid is visibly contaminated with blood, it counts as OPIM.
OPIM also includes any “unfixed” tissue or organ (other than intact skin) from a human (living or dead). While OSHA does not define the term unfixed, it would be the opposite of fixed.
The term fixed is not OSHA-defined but generally understood as being rendered not potentially infectious for bloodborne pathogens. Often, but not always, a fixed status may be achieved by preserving the tissue or organ in a preservative substance, health sources say.
Any substance that contains HIV or HBV also counts as OPIM, including:
Parenteral contact: Piercing mucous membranes or the skin barrier, such as with needlesticks, cuts, abrasions, or human bites.
Regulated waste: Refers to the following five types of waste:
If waste doesn’t fit into any of these categories, it’s not regulated waste. Some items only count as regulated waste if they can release OPIM, but under no circumstances should a bag of waste be squeezed or shaken to determine if it is regulated.
It’s not useful to specify an amount of blood as a determining factor because the same amount acts very differently depending on its location. Just as an example, 10 milliliters of blood on a bedsheet would appear as a spot (and not be regulated waste), while the same amount on a cotton ball would drip (and would be regulated waste).
In most cases, bandages, facial tissue, and feminine hygiene products would not be considered regulated waste. That’s because these are intended to absorb the blood, so it’s no longer in a liquid or semi-liquid state and wouldn’t be released.
While contaminated sharps are regulated waste, if a sharp is not contaminated with blood or OPIM, it is not regulated waste. Box cutter blades that are not contaminated are not regulated waste.
Exposure determination requires employers to identify and document which employees have occupational exposure, based on the definition of occupational exposure without the use of personal protective clothing or equipment. Employers should make the exposure determination by reviewing job classifications and dividing them into two groups:
The first group includes job classifications in which all employees have occupational exposure. Examples include pre-hospital care workers such as paramedics and emergency medical technicians. Where all employees have occupational exposure, it’s not necessary to list specific work tasks in the exposure determination.
The second group includes job classifications in which only some of the employees have occupational exposure. For this group, it’s necessary to list the specific tasks and procedures, or closely related groups of tasks and procedures, that can cause exposure. An example would be if some custodians are assigned to handle blood spills while others are not. In that case, the employer would list custodians in the second group and then list something like “blood spill cleanup tasks” under that job class.
If a job classification, task, or procedure involving occupational exposure is left off the list, but all employees in the job or performing the task or procedure have been included in all other aspects of the plan (such as vaccinations and training), this is considered an other-than-serious violation.
Once employees with occupational exposure are identified, the employers’ next step is to communicate the hazards to these employees. That means any employee with occupational exposure must be provided with information and training related to bloodborne pathogens.
What is the purpose of bloodborne pathogens training?
Providing bloodborne pathogens training does not just make compliance sense; it makes common sense. An employee’s health depends on receiving proper training on the job. Once employees understand bloodborne pathogen hazards, taking safety measures will be a routine part of their jobs. The key is to train them before they need to take action involving anticipated contact with blood or other potentially infectious materials (OPIM). That way, they can make the right decisions to safeguard themselves and their coworkers.
Without proper training, employees could put themselves at serious risk of disease or death from exposure to bloodborne pathogens.
Who should receive bloodborne pathogen training?
All employees in general and shipyard industries who have occupational exposure must receive initial and annual training on the hazards associated with blood and OPIM, and the protective measures they should take to minimize the risk of occupational exposure. Whenever there are changes in procedures or tasks that affect occupational exposure, employees must be trained again.
While 1910.1030 does not apply to the construction industry, employees in construction aren’t free of bloodborne pathogen hazards. Therefore, employees responsible for providing first aid or medical assistance at a construction site are expected to receive basic instruction in bloodborne pathogen hazards.
Bloodborne pathogens training must be conducted by someone who is knowledgeable about bloodborne pathogen hazards, and the required training elements as they relate to the specific workplace.
Possible trainers include a variety of healthcare professionals such as infection control practitioners, nurse practitioners, registered nurses, occupational health professionals, physician’s assistants, and emergency medical technicians. However, a trainer does not need to be a healthcare professional. Non-healthcare professionals, such as but not limited to industrial hygienists, epidemiologists, and professional trainers, may conduct the training if they have the necessary knowledge of the subject matter covered by the training program as it relates to the workplace. One way, but not the only way, knowledge can be demonstrated is if the person received specialized training. If no one at a workplace is qualified to do the training, the employer may need to send employees outside to get trained or bring a trainer in.
In some workplaces, such as dental or physicians’ offices, the individual employer may conduct the training, given the necessary knowledge of bloodborne pathogen hazards and the subject matter specified by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) in paragraphs (g)(2)(vii)(A) through (N) of 1910.1030.
If an OSHA inspector finds training deficiencies in a workplace, the inspector will look at the specialized courses, degrees, or work experience of that workplace’s trainer to verify competence. G
In contract situations, both the contractor and client employer share responsibility for ensuring that contract employees are protected. Likewise, for temporary employees, the staffing agency and host employer are considered joint employers. In either scenario, it is in the interest of both employers to ensure that required training has been provided:
The provisions for employee bloodborne pathogens training are performance oriented, with flexibility allowed to tailor the program to the employee’s background and responsibilities. However, the training elements listed in subparagraph (g)(2)(vii) of the Bloodborne Pathogens Standard must be covered, and some elements call for site-specific information.
At a minimum, the training program must include the following elements:
Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and hepatitis B must be covered in bloodborne pathogen training, but other bloodborne pathogens and bloodborne diseases also exist, such as hepatitis C virus (HCV) and syphilis. Training should acknowledge other diseases while focusing on the ones that are most relevant to the workplace. Uncommon diseases such as Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease don’t need to be covered unless, for example, employees are working in a research facility with that particular virus.
HCV is the most common chronic bloodborne infection in the United States, so the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) says it is important that training include information on its transmission and symptoms. People who are chronically infected with HCV may not be aware of their infection because they may not be clinically ill. The infection may lead to chronic liver disease that develops slowly, often taking two or more decades before it is recognized.
For comprehensive information about basic symptoms and modes of transmission of bloodborne diseases, see the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention website at www.cdc.gov.
Subparagraph 1910.1030(g)(2)(ix) lists additional training elements for employees in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and hepatitis B virus (HBV) laboratories and production facilities. Research laboratories produce or use research-laboratory-scale amounts of HIV or HBV, while production facilities engage in industrial-scale, large-volume, or high-concentration production of HIV or HBV.
In addition to the general training requirements at 1910.1030(g)(2)(vii), employers in HIV or HBV research laboratories and HIV or HBV production facilities must do the following as part of initial training:
Once the jobs and tasks with occupational exposure are identified, employers can quickly find out which employees have occupational exposure. These employees must be trained in accordance with 1910.1030(g)(2). Information and training are required:
It’s the employer’s responsibility to institute a bloodborne pathogens training program and ensure employee participation.
Bloodborne pathogen information and training must be provided during paid working hours, at no cost to the employee. Other considerations in how to train involve trainee comprehension, training format, opportunities for questions, and hands-on training.
Comprehension
Training content and vocabulary must be appropriate for trainees’ education level, literacy, and language. In practical terms, instruction needs to be provided using both a language and vocabulary trainees can understand. If a trainee does not speak or comprehend English, instruction must be provided in a language the trainee can understand. Moreover, if the trainee’s vocabulary is limited, the training must account for that limitation. If a trainee is illiterate, then instruction should be available that requires no reading; telling the trainee to read training materials doesn’t satisfy the training obligation.
Format
The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) doesn’t restrict the training format that employers use. Audiovisuals, classroom instruction, interactive video, and online and computer-based training are all good tools that can be used as part of an effective training program. Using a variety of audio, visual, and online tools may allow the training to fit with different learning styles and levels of experience among trainees.
However, acceptable training requires interaction and site-specific information. Training the employees solely by means of a film or video without the opportunity for a discussion would constitute a violation. Similarly, a generic online or computer program, even an interactive one, is not sufficient, unless the employer:
Opportunities for questions
During training, it is critical that trainees have the opportunity to ask questions and receive answers where material is unfamiliar to them. Frequently, a trainee may be unable to go further with the training or to understand related training content until a response is received. Therefore, under the standard, trainees must have direct access to a qualified trainer during training. However, the trainer does not need to be in the room with the trainee. OSHA’s requirement may be met if trainees have direct access to a trainer by way of a telephone hotline. Email is not considered direct access, unless the trainer is available to answer emailed questions as soon as they arise.
Hands-on training
Sufficient hands-on training is important because it allows trainees to interact with equipment and tools in the presence of a qualified trainer and to learn or refresh their skills through experience. It gives the trainer a chance to assess whether the trainees have mastered the proper techniques.
Must-read OSHA interpretations
While OSHA offers many letters of interpretation on 1910.1030, two letters are especially helpful for an employer looking to comply with the bloodborne pathogens training requirements:
Bloodborne pathogens training must be conducted by someone who is knowledgeable about bloodborne pathogen hazards, and the required training elements as they relate to the specific workplace.
Possible trainers include a variety of healthcare professionals such as infection control practitioners, nurse practitioners, registered nurses, occupational health professionals, physician’s assistants, and emergency medical technicians. However, a trainer does not need to be a healthcare professional. Non-healthcare professionals, such as but not limited to industrial hygienists, epidemiologists, and professional trainers, may conduct the training if they have the necessary knowledge of the subject matter covered by the training program as it relates to the workplace. One way, but not the only way, knowledge can be demonstrated is if the person received specialized training. If no one at a workplace is qualified to do the training, the employer may need to send employees outside to get trained or bring a trainer in.
In some workplaces, such as dental or physicians’ offices, the individual employer may conduct the training, given the necessary knowledge of bloodborne pathogen hazards and the subject matter specified by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) in paragraphs (g)(2)(vii)(A) through (N) of 1910.1030.
If an OSHA inspector finds training deficiencies in a workplace, the inspector will look at the specialized courses, degrees, or work experience of that workplace’s trainer to verify competence. G
In contract situations, both the contractor and client employer share responsibility for ensuring that contract employees are protected. Likewise, for temporary employees, the staffing agency and host employer are considered joint employers. In either scenario, it is in the interest of both employers to ensure that required training has been provided:
In contract situations, both the contractor and client employer share responsibility for ensuring that contract employees are protected. Likewise, for temporary employees, the staffing agency and host employer are considered joint employers. In either scenario, it is in the interest of both employers to ensure that required training has been provided:
The provisions for employee bloodborne pathogens training are performance oriented, with flexibility allowed to tailor the program to the employee’s background and responsibilities. However, the training elements listed in subparagraph (g)(2)(vii) of the Bloodborne Pathogens Standard must be covered, and some elements call for site-specific information.
At a minimum, the training program must include the following elements:
Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and hepatitis B must be covered in bloodborne pathogen training, but other bloodborne pathogens and bloodborne diseases also exist, such as hepatitis C virus (HCV) and syphilis. Training should acknowledge other diseases while focusing on the ones that are most relevant to the workplace. Uncommon diseases such as Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease don’t need to be covered unless, for example, employees are working in a research facility with that particular virus.
HCV is the most common chronic bloodborne infection in the United States, so the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) says it is important that training include information on its transmission and symptoms. People who are chronically infected with HCV may not be aware of their infection because they may not be clinically ill. The infection may lead to chronic liver disease that develops slowly, often taking two or more decades before it is recognized.
For comprehensive information about basic symptoms and modes of transmission of bloodborne diseases, see the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention website at www.cdc.gov.
Subparagraph 1910.1030(g)(2)(ix) lists additional training elements for employees in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and hepatitis B virus (HBV) laboratories and production facilities. Research laboratories produce or use research-laboratory-scale amounts of HIV or HBV, while production facilities engage in industrial-scale, large-volume, or high-concentration production of HIV or HBV.
In addition to the general training requirements at 1910.1030(g)(2)(vii), employers in HIV or HBV research laboratories and HIV or HBV production facilities must do the following as part of initial training:
Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and hepatitis B must be covered in bloodborne pathogen training, but other bloodborne pathogens and bloodborne diseases also exist, such as hepatitis C virus (HCV) and syphilis. Training should acknowledge other diseases while focusing on the ones that are most relevant to the workplace. Uncommon diseases such as Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease don’t need to be covered unless, for example, employees are working in a research facility with that particular virus.
HCV is the most common chronic bloodborne infection in the United States, so the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) says it is important that training include information on its transmission and symptoms. People who are chronically infected with HCV may not be aware of their infection because they may not be clinically ill. The infection may lead to chronic liver disease that develops slowly, often taking two or more decades before it is recognized.
For comprehensive information about basic symptoms and modes of transmission of bloodborne diseases, see the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention website at www.cdc.gov.
Subparagraph 1910.1030(g)(2)(ix) lists additional training elements for employees in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and hepatitis B virus (HBV) laboratories and production facilities. Research laboratories produce or use research-laboratory-scale amounts of HIV or HBV, while production facilities engage in industrial-scale, large-volume, or high-concentration production of HIV or HBV.
In addition to the general training requirements at 1910.1030(g)(2)(vii), employers in HIV or HBV research laboratories and HIV or HBV production facilities must do the following as part of initial training:
Once the jobs and tasks with occupational exposure are identified, employers can quickly find out which employees have occupational exposure. These employees must be trained in accordance with 1910.1030(g)(2). Information and training are required:
It’s the employer’s responsibility to institute a bloodborne pathogens training program and ensure employee participation.
Bloodborne pathogen information and training must be provided during paid working hours, at no cost to the employee. Other considerations in how to train involve trainee comprehension, training format, opportunities for questions, and hands-on training.
Comprehension
Training content and vocabulary must be appropriate for trainees’ education level, literacy, and language. In practical terms, instruction needs to be provided using both a language and vocabulary trainees can understand. If a trainee does not speak or comprehend English, instruction must be provided in a language the trainee can understand. Moreover, if the trainee’s vocabulary is limited, the training must account for that limitation. If a trainee is illiterate, then instruction should be available that requires no reading; telling the trainee to read training materials doesn’t satisfy the training obligation.
Format
The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) doesn’t restrict the training format that employers use. Audiovisuals, classroom instruction, interactive video, and online and computer-based training are all good tools that can be used as part of an effective training program. Using a variety of audio, visual, and online tools may allow the training to fit with different learning styles and levels of experience among trainees.
However, acceptable training requires interaction and site-specific information. Training the employees solely by means of a film or video without the opportunity for a discussion would constitute a violation. Similarly, a generic online or computer program, even an interactive one, is not sufficient, unless the employer:
Opportunities for questions
During training, it is critical that trainees have the opportunity to ask questions and receive answers where material is unfamiliar to them. Frequently, a trainee may be unable to go further with the training or to understand related training content until a response is received. Therefore, under the standard, trainees must have direct access to a qualified trainer during training. However, the trainer does not need to be in the room with the trainee. OSHA’s requirement may be met if trainees have direct access to a trainer by way of a telephone hotline. Email is not considered direct access, unless the trainer is available to answer emailed questions as soon as they arise.
Hands-on training
Sufficient hands-on training is important because it allows trainees to interact with equipment and tools in the presence of a qualified trainer and to learn or refresh their skills through experience. It gives the trainer a chance to assess whether the trainees have mastered the proper techniques.
Must-read OSHA interpretations
While OSHA offers many letters of interpretation on 1910.1030, two letters are especially helpful for an employer looking to comply with the bloodborne pathogens training requirements:
Preventive measures keep the spread of bloodborne-related diseases from happening. The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) offers two preventive measures under 1910.1030:
Vaccination can help to prevent the transmission of preventable diseases and keep employees on the job. Currently, OSHA only requires vaccination for hepatitis B to be made available to employees with occupational exposure, and it must be offered free of charge, at a convenient time and place, and by a licensed and qualified healthcare professional. The employee may decline the vaccine.
Using universal precautions is the practice of treating all human blood and other potentially infectious materials (OPIM) as if they are known to be infectious for bloodborne pathogens. This approach ensures that employees exercise a high level of caution. It also guards privacy by avoiding any reason for workers to guess at or gauge anyone’s infection or risk status.
Currently, the only vaccine required by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) is the hepatitis B vaccine series.
Hepatitis B is a liver infection caused by the hepatitis B virus (HBV). Hepatitis infection represents a significant occupational hazard to all workers who contact blood or certain body fluids from infected persons. Although many people with hepatitis B may feel or look ill, many people with a hepatitis B infection are unaware that they have contracted the virus.
The best way to prevent hepatitis B is by getting vaccinated. The vaccine stimulates the immune system to protect against the virus. After the vaccine is given, the body makes antibodies that protect against the virus. An antibody is a substance found in the blood that is produced in response to a virus invading the body. These antibodies will fight off the infection if the person is exposed to HBV in the future.
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) say the hepatitis B vaccine is safe and effective.
Vaccine availability
Employers must make the hepatitis B vaccine and vaccination series available at no cost to all employees who have occupational exposure. Booster doses are not currently recommended by the CDC, but if that recommendation changes, those boosters must also be offered.
Vaccinations must be made available at a time and place that’s convenient for employees.
Employers must offer the hepatitis B vaccine and vaccination series after initial training and within 10 working days of initial assignment to employees who have occupational exposure, unless:
The employee has the option to decline the vaccination and follow-up programs.
General requirements for vaccination
The vaccine must be performed by (or under) the supervision of a licensed physician or other licensed healthcare professional, whose legally permitted scope of practice includes independently performing the vaccination.
Vaccinations need to follow the current recommendations of the U.S. Public Health Service. This simply means the CDC guidelines.
Cost of vaccination
Vaccination must be at no cost to the employee. This means, among other things, no “out of pocket” expense. Employers can’t require employees to use healthcare insurance to pay for the vaccine unless the employer pays all of the cost of the health insurance and there are no deductibles, copayments, or other expenses. A reimbursement process would also violate the no-cost rule, as would requiring workers to pay back the cost of the vaccine if they leave their jobs before a specified time period.
First aid providers and Good Samaritans
First aid is often a collateral, not a primary, duty of an employee. If an employer fails to provide the vaccination to employees for whom first aid is not a major job task, OSHA can cite the employer but will not issue a fine if the following conditions are met:
If workers’ potential bloodborne pathogen exposure results from Good Samaritan acts that are not part of their job duties, employers aren’t required to offer them the vaccine. However, OSHA recommends that the employer offer Good Samaritans post-exposure evaluation and follow-up, which may include vaccination.
Construction industry
While 1910.1030 does not apply to the construction industry, employees in construction are not free from bloodborne pathogen hazards. Therefore, OSHA has indicated that employees responsible for providing first aid or medical assistance at a construction site are expected to receive vaccination and follow-up in the event of an exposure incident.
In a letter of interpretation dated January 26, 1993, OSHA was asked about the provision of the hepatitis B vaccine to employees in the construction industry who have occupational exposure to blood or other potentially infectious materials. The letter explains, “Section 5(a)(1) of the [Occupational Safety and Health Act], which requires employers to furnish a workplace which is free from recognized hazards which may cause or are likely to cause death or serious physical harm, may be applied where appropriate to the construction industry … It is under the General Duty Clause that OSHA may require, where appropriate, the provision of the hepatitis B vaccine to those employees who have occupational exposure [in construction]."
Worker consent and confidentiality in regard to hepatitis B vaccination are crucial. Employees cannot be required to be screened for HBV antibodies before or after vaccination, or to release test results to their employers. They can choose not to receive the hepatitis B vaccine.
Consent forms and waivers
Section 1910.1030 does not refer to consent forms for employees accepting the vaccine, so they’re not required. According to the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), medical informed consent forms are acceptable, unless they require employees to release test results to their employers or they exaggerate the hazards of the vaccine. Any waiver of liability for any harm caused by the vaccine also violates the regulation.
Pre- and post-vaccination testing
According to OSHA, an employer cannot require an employee to be pre-screened for hepatitis B virus antibodies. However, pre-screening can be made available at no cost to the employee. If the antibody testing reveals that the employee is immune, the employer doesn’t have to provide vaccination to that employee. If an employee declines the pre-screening, then the employer must make the vaccination available.
An employer also cannot require post-vaccination testing unless the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) call for it. CDC guidelines do call for a post-vaccination titer for certain employees who have ongoing contact with patients or blood and who are at ongoing risk of percutaneous (through the skin) injuries.
All laboratory tests must be free of charge to the employee and conducted by an accredited lab. The healthcare professional must provide a written opinion to the employer as to whether hepatitis B vaccination is needed and if the employee has received it.
Vaccination declination statement
Any employee with occupational exposure who chooses not to receive the hepatitis B vaccine must sign OSHA’s statement of declination of hepatitis B vaccination. Before signing, the employee must be given appropriate training regarding the following:
The statement is not a waiver; employees can request and receive the hepatitis B vaccination at a later date, provided they still have occupational exposure.
Signing the statement of declination confirms that the employee is aware of the risk of hepatitis B and was given the chance to be vaccinated, but is declining it with the understanding that a free vaccination will be available at a later date if the employee still has occupational exposure.
Employers must use the declination form as provided by OSHA. Any additions to the form language should be made for the sole purpose of improving employee comprehension. Using a form that conveys the same information, but with different words, may be considered a de minimis (no penalty) violation. Employers must not add language that would discourage employee acceptance of the vaccine or add liability concerns. If an employer adds information that requires the employee to provide confidential medical information, either on the declination form or on a separate form, an OSHA citation may be issued.
Universal precautions is an approach to infection control under which all human blood and other potentially infectious materials (OPIM) are treated as if known to be infectious for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), hepatitis B virus (HBV), hepatitis C virus (HCV), and other bloodborne pathogens.
Universal precautions treat all people in the workplace the same way, removing any reason to speculate about anyone’s infection or risk status. If an employer has a policy of treating the blood or OPIM of some patients as potentially infectious and the blood or OPIM of others (e.g., the elderly or children) as not infectious, this is an Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) violation.
Universal precautions are to be observed in all situations where there is a potential for contact with blood or OPIM, whether or not this contact arises as part of a job duty. This is similar to an approach that is followed in hospitals and other healthcare facilities. If it’s difficult or impossible to differentiate between body fluid types, all body fluids are to be considered potentially infectious, and universal precautions must be observed.
Two alternative concepts in infection control, body substance isolation (BSI) and standard precautions, are discussed below. These concepts are acceptable alternatives to universal precautions, provided that facilities using them fulfill all other requirements of the Bloodborne Pathogens Standard.
Implementing universal precautions
Paragraph (d) of the Bloodborne Pathogens Standard sets forth the method by which employers must protect their employees from the hazards of bloodborne pathogens and comply with 1910.1030 through the use of universal precautions, engineering controls, work practice controls, personal protective equipment (PPE), proper housekeeping, and handling of regulated waste.
Body substance isolation
One alternative to universal precautions is called body substance isolation (BSI). This is an infection control method that defines all body fluids and substances as infectious, not just blood and OPIM as in the Bloodborne Pathogens Standard.
BSI is an acceptable alternative to universal precautions as long as facilities adhere to all other provisions of 1910.1030.
Standard precautions
Another alternative to universal precautions is known as standard precautions. This term refers to the minimum infection prevention measures that apply to all patient care, regardless of the suspected or confirmed infection status of a patient, in any setting where healthcare is delivered.
Standard precautions include:
For the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), standard precautions have replaced earlier guidance relating to universal precautions and BSI. Standard precautions are more stringent than universal precautions and are therefore acceptable to OSHA. However, OSHA currently only requires universal precautions.
Currently, the only vaccine required by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) is the hepatitis B vaccine series.
Hepatitis B is a liver infection caused by the hepatitis B virus (HBV). Hepatitis infection represents a significant occupational hazard to all workers who contact blood or certain body fluids from infected persons. Although many people with hepatitis B may feel or look ill, many people with a hepatitis B infection are unaware that they have contracted the virus.
The best way to prevent hepatitis B is by getting vaccinated. The vaccine stimulates the immune system to protect against the virus. After the vaccine is given, the body makes antibodies that protect against the virus. An antibody is a substance found in the blood that is produced in response to a virus invading the body. These antibodies will fight off the infection if the person is exposed to HBV in the future.
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) say the hepatitis B vaccine is safe and effective.
Vaccine availability
Employers must make the hepatitis B vaccine and vaccination series available at no cost to all employees who have occupational exposure. Booster doses are not currently recommended by the CDC, but if that recommendation changes, those boosters must also be offered.
Vaccinations must be made available at a time and place that’s convenient for employees.
Employers must offer the hepatitis B vaccine and vaccination series after initial training and within 10 working days of initial assignment to employees who have occupational exposure, unless:
The employee has the option to decline the vaccination and follow-up programs.
General requirements for vaccination
The vaccine must be performed by (or under) the supervision of a licensed physician or other licensed healthcare professional, whose legally permitted scope of practice includes independently performing the vaccination.
Vaccinations need to follow the current recommendations of the U.S. Public Health Service. This simply means the CDC guidelines.
Cost of vaccination
Vaccination must be at no cost to the employee. This means, among other things, no “out of pocket” expense. Employers can’t require employees to use healthcare insurance to pay for the vaccine unless the employer pays all of the cost of the health insurance and there are no deductibles, copayments, or other expenses. A reimbursement process would also violate the no-cost rule, as would requiring workers to pay back the cost of the vaccine if they leave their jobs before a specified time period.
First aid providers and Good Samaritans
First aid is often a collateral, not a primary, duty of an employee. If an employer fails to provide the vaccination to employees for whom first aid is not a major job task, OSHA can cite the employer but will not issue a fine if the following conditions are met:
If workers’ potential bloodborne pathogen exposure results from Good Samaritan acts that are not part of their job duties, employers aren’t required to offer them the vaccine. However, OSHA recommends that the employer offer Good Samaritans post-exposure evaluation and follow-up, which may include vaccination.
Construction industry
While 1910.1030 does not apply to the construction industry, employees in construction are not free from bloodborne pathogen hazards. Therefore, OSHA has indicated that employees responsible for providing first aid or medical assistance at a construction site are expected to receive vaccination and follow-up in the event of an exposure incident.
In a letter of interpretation dated January 26, 1993, OSHA was asked about the provision of the hepatitis B vaccine to employees in the construction industry who have occupational exposure to blood or other potentially infectious materials. The letter explains, “Section 5(a)(1) of the [Occupational Safety and Health Act], which requires employers to furnish a workplace which is free from recognized hazards which may cause or are likely to cause death or serious physical harm, may be applied where appropriate to the construction industry … It is under the General Duty Clause that OSHA may require, where appropriate, the provision of the hepatitis B vaccine to those employees who have occupational exposure [in construction]."
Worker consent and confidentiality in regard to hepatitis B vaccination are crucial. Employees cannot be required to be screened for HBV antibodies before or after vaccination, or to release test results to their employers. They can choose not to receive the hepatitis B vaccine.
Consent forms and waivers
Section 1910.1030 does not refer to consent forms for employees accepting the vaccine, so they’re not required. According to the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), medical informed consent forms are acceptable, unless they require employees to release test results to their employers or they exaggerate the hazards of the vaccine. Any waiver of liability for any harm caused by the vaccine also violates the regulation.
Pre- and post-vaccination testing
According to OSHA, an employer cannot require an employee to be pre-screened for hepatitis B virus antibodies. However, pre-screening can be made available at no cost to the employee. If the antibody testing reveals that the employee is immune, the employer doesn’t have to provide vaccination to that employee. If an employee declines the pre-screening, then the employer must make the vaccination available.
An employer also cannot require post-vaccination testing unless the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) call for it. CDC guidelines do call for a post-vaccination titer for certain employees who have ongoing contact with patients or blood and who are at ongoing risk of percutaneous (through the skin) injuries.
All laboratory tests must be free of charge to the employee and conducted by an accredited lab. The healthcare professional must provide a written opinion to the employer as to whether hepatitis B vaccination is needed and if the employee has received it.
Vaccination declination statement
Any employee with occupational exposure who chooses not to receive the hepatitis B vaccine must sign OSHA’s statement of declination of hepatitis B vaccination. Before signing, the employee must be given appropriate training regarding the following:
The statement is not a waiver; employees can request and receive the hepatitis B vaccination at a later date, provided they still have occupational exposure.
Signing the statement of declination confirms that the employee is aware of the risk of hepatitis B and was given the chance to be vaccinated, but is declining it with the understanding that a free vaccination will be available at a later date if the employee still has occupational exposure.
Employers must use the declination form as provided by OSHA. Any additions to the form language should be made for the sole purpose of improving employee comprehension. Using a form that conveys the same information, but with different words, may be considered a de minimis (no penalty) violation. Employers must not add language that would discourage employee acceptance of the vaccine or add liability concerns. If an employer adds information that requires the employee to provide confidential medical information, either on the declination form or on a separate form, an OSHA citation may be issued.