
Welcome to J. J. Keller COMPLIANCE NETWORK
Make regulatory compliance easier than ever at your company with expert guidance and resources custom-tailored to your exact needs.

Welcome to J. J. Keller COMPLIANCE NETWORK
Make regulatory compliance easier than ever at your company with expert guidance and resources custom-tailored to your exact needs.
Workplace safety (OSHA).
Transportation (DOT).
Environment (EPA).
Human resources (DOL).
The clock is ticking for environmental teams. By 2026, several new EPA regulations will reshape compliance obligations for U.S. companies. Organizations that act now will avoid costly penalties and operational disruptions.
Although EPA has been deregulating or loosening some requirements, there are still some standards being tightened across multiple fronts in the coming year:
Failure to prepare could lead to fines, reputational damage, supply chain disruptions, and permit delays. Companies that weave compliance planning into their 2026 strategy will be positioned not just to meet legal deadlines but to sustain operations smoothly.
The EPA’s 2026 updates reflect a trend toward increased transparency and environmental accountability. Companies that treat compliance as strategic will not only avoid enforcement but also gain resilience and stakeholder trust.
Key to remember: Start planning now. Early action on EPA rule changes will save time, money, and headaches when enforcement begins.
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) issued a rule on December 3, 2025, that finalizes compliance deadline extensions for certain emissions standards applicable to crude oil and natural gas facilities. The final rule also further delays compliance timelines for two requirements.
EPA’s delays affect:
EPA’s December 2025 final rule is a direct response to the interim final rule (IFR) it issued in July 2025.
The July 2025 IFR extended the compliance deadline for net heating value (NHV) monitoring of flares and enclosed combustion devices (ECDs) to November 28, 2025. The IFR moved the rest of the compliance deadlines to January 22, 2027, for:
What’s the same?
EPA’s December 2025 final rule maintains the same compliance deadlines for all requirements delayed to January 22, 2027.
What’s different?
The agency’s December 2025 final rule sets a new compliance date of June 1, 2026, for the NHV monitoring requirements. This includes an alternative performance test (sampling demonstration) option for flares and ECDs.
Additionally, the rule moves the compliance date for annual reporting, establishing that no annual report is due before November 30, 2026. It gives owners and operators until November 30, 2026, to submit any reports that were originally due before this date. Note that the final rule specifies that annual reports due after November 30, 2026, must be submitted within 90 days of the end of each annual compliance period.
Key to remember: EPA’s final rule confirms deadline extensions for certain emissions standards that apply to crude oil and natural gas facilities. It also further delays a couple of the requirements.
Effective date: October 6, 2025
This applies to: Facilities with air permits in the counties of Anoka, Carver, Dakota, Hennepin, Ramsey, Scott, and Washington
Description of change: The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency adopted new rules mandating that facilities with air permits (except for Option B registration permits) in the Minnesota counties of Anoka, Carver, Dakota, Hennepin, Ramsey, Scott, and Washington submit annual air toxics emissions reports. The covered toxics include certain hazardous air pollutants (HAPs), per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), and other pollutants of concern. Annual emissions reports on HAPs, PFAS, and other covered pollutants are due by April 1.
View related state info: Clean air operating permits — Minnesota
Effective date: October 7, 2025
This applies to: All nonexempt new and unused products sold, offered for sale, or distributed for sale in Maine that contain intentionally added PFAS
Description of change: The Maine Department of Environmental Protection established designations for currently unavoidable uses of intentionally added per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in products subject to sales prohibitions that start on January 1, 2026.
Effective date: January 1, 2026
This applies to: Public water systems
Description of change: The Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation made multiple changes to the Water Supply Rule. Some of the major amendments include:
Effective date: November 5, 2025
This applies to: Emission units and source categories that qualify for an air permit by rule
Description of change: The Utah Department of Environmental Quality added new emission units and source categories that qualify for air permits by rule that are exempt from the requirement to obtain an Approval Order (per R307-401-8).
New emission units added include:
New source categories added include:
View related state info: Clean air operating permits — Utah
Effective date: December 1, 2025
This applies to: Owners and operators of composting facilities
Description of changes: The Ohio Environmental Protection Agency amended the regulations that apply to composting facilities. Major changes include:
Effective date: November 16, 2025
This applies to: Medium- and heavy-duty engine and vehicle manufacturers as well as heavy-duty internal combustion engine manufacturers
Description of change: The Washington State Department of Ecology amended the Clean Vehicles Program rules to incorporate changes made to the California Air Resources Board’s Advanced Clean Trucks and Heavy-Duty Vehicle and Engine Omnibus Low NOx regulations. The changes ease compliance requirements for the heaviest vehicles.
Effective date: October 1, 2025
This applies to: Entities participating in permanent underground carbon dioxide storage projects
Description of the change: The rule establishes carbon sequestration project applicability and establishes regulations for:
Effective date: November 20, 2025
This applies to: Title V permit holders
Description of change: The Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality requires all Title V operating permittees to use standard department-approved forms to submit the:
View related state info: Clean air operating permits — Louisiana
Effective date: October 2, 2025
This applies to: Entities subject to CARB’s vehicle emissions regulations
Description of change: Congressional resolutions disapproved the waivers for the California Air Resources Board’s (CARB’s) Advanced Clean Cars II and Heavy-Duty Vehicle and Engine Omnibus Low NOx (Omnibus) regulations.
Through an emergency rulemaking, CARB adopted the Emergency Vehicle Emissions Regulations, reinstating at a minimum earlier-adopted regulations displaced by Advanced Clean Cars II and Omnibus:
The regulation applies until litigation is resolved.
Regulated entities may follow either:
View related state info: Air programs — California Air Resources Board (CARB)
Effective date: November 13, 2025
This applies to: Owners and operators of wastewater treatment systems and businesses that install sanitary sewers
Description of changes: The Ohio Environmental Protection Agency amended the Permit to Install (PTI) program rules, which regulate the design and installation of wastewater conveyance and treatment systems. Most notably, the department extended the expiration date of PTIs from 18 months to start construction to 60 months to start construction. The amendments also exempt boat wash marinas and force mains serving one structure from PTIs.
View related state info: Industrial water permitting — Ohio
Effective date: November 6, 2025
This rule applies to: Out-of-state licensed treatment plant operators and distribution system operators
Description of change: The Florida Department of Environmental Protection adopted rules to:
Effective date: November 20, 2025
This applies to: Owners and operators of all facilities that generate, transport, treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste
Description of change: The Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality added hazardous waste aerosol cans to the universal waste program. The program streamlines hazardous waste management requirements and is identical to the federal universal waste requirements for aerosol cans.
View related state info: Universal waste — Louisiana
Effective date: March 28, 2026
This applies to: Mining operations with stormwater discharges
Description of change: The Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection reissued the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Permit for Stormwater Associated with Mining Activities (BMP GP-104). Mining operation sites must obtain an NPDES permit to discharge stormwater if the site has expected or potential stormwater runoff discharges.
The new permit made one substantial change to clarify that entities covered under this general permit must meet the 2-year, 24-hour event design standards at 25 Pa. Code Chapter 102. The BMP GP-104 takes effect on March 28, 2026, and expires on March 27, 2031.
View related state info: Industrial water permitting — Pennsylvania
What do the manufacturers of hairspray cans, foam wall insulation, and ice cream machines have in common? If their products contain hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), they have to report annually on the HFCs they use, and the first report due date is quickly approaching! Through the Technology Transitions Program, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regulates HFCs used for new products and equipment in three sectors: aerosols, foams, and refrigeration, air conditioning, and heat pumps (RACHP). Among other compliance requirements of the 2023 Technology Transitions Rule, manufacturers and importers of HFC-containing products and equipment must submit annual reports.
Note: EPA’s October 2025 proposed rule to amend the 2023 Technology Transitions Rule doesn’t impact annual reporting requirements.
Use this overview to help you determine whether your business needs to report and, if so, what’s required.
Annual reporting applies to manufacturers and importers of products and equipment that use HFCs. An organization has to submit an annual report if:
Reporting requirements apply to manufacturers and importers in all sectors and subsectors, and they start with data from calendar year 2025. The first annual report is due to EPA by March 31, 2026.
Note that the annual reporting requirements don’t apply to entities that only:
In each annual report, covered manufacturers and importers must provide:
Entities in all three sectors also have to report the total mass in metric tons of each HFC or HFC blend contained in all products and components manufactured, imported, and exported annually.
Further, sector-specific standards apply.
| Sector | Requires additional information for: | See 40 CFR: |
|---|---|---|
| Aerosol |
| 84.60(a)(5) |
| Foam |
| 84.60(a)(4) |
| RACHP |
| 84.60(a)(3) |
According to the latest information shared by EPA in the “Technology Transitions Program: What You Need to Know for January 1, 2025” webinar presentation, the agency is still designing the electronic platform for submitting annual reports. EPA plans to provide reporting instructions and forms before the upcoming deadline.
HFCs are greenhouse gases that were developed to replace ozone-depleting substances for use in various products and equipment (primarily refrigeration and air-conditioning systems). The American Innovation and Manufacturing Act of 2020 gives EPA the authority to address HFCs by:
The 2023 Technology Transition Rule established the Technology Transitions Program to restrict HFC uses in sectors and subsectors where lower global warming potential (GWP) technologies are or will soon be available. The regulations apply to manufacturers (including importers), exporters, sellers, distributors, and installers of systems or products in covered sectors that use HFCs.
What about the proposed changes to the 2023 Technology Transitions Rule?
On October 3, 2025, EPA proposed a rule to amend the existing 2023 Technology Transition Rule. However, the proposed changes don’t affect the annual reporting requirements for manufacturers and importers. All covered manufacturers and importers must submit the annual report by March 31, 2026.
The proposed rule impacts specific subsectors, including refrigerated transport, industrial process refrigeration, chillers, retail food (for supermarkets and remote condensing units), cold storage warehouses, and stationary residential and light commercial air conditioning and heat pumps. EPA proposes to:
Key to remember: The first annual reports required by the Technology Transitions Program for manufacturers and importers of HFC-containing products and equipment are due by March 31, 2026.
EPA issued a direct final rule to update its safety data sheet (SDS) reporting and Tier II inventory reporting requirements. The changes align EPA 40 CFR 370 with OSHA’s Hazard Communication (HazCom) standard at 29 CFR 1910.1200.
| News update: EPA extended the public comment period for this direct final rule that made technical amendments to 40 CFR 370 to conform to the 2024 OSHA HazCom standard. An EPA memo lodged in docket EPA-HQ-OLEM-2025-0299 at Regulations.gov, explains, “This document will be open for public comment until December 24, 2025.” Also, note that the docket offers 23 supporting and related materials, including a draft updated Tier II form, draft updated Tier II instructions, and a redline strikeout version of the rule changes. |
The biggest change is that facilities will be able to copy the hazard categories directly from section 2 of the SDSs to their Tier II report forms. This eliminates the guesswork. However, facilities may face added strain with their first Tier II submission under the rule. Instead of relying on the grouped hazard categories selected in the previous year’s forms, it looks like facilities will need to spend extra time retrieving specific categories from their SDSs.
EPA 40 CFR 370 applies to a facility owner or operator if:
If the applicability criteria are met, the facility owner/operator must submit to the state emergency response commission (SERC), local emergency planning committee (LEPC), and local fire departments:
A state may make its own laws and regulations in addition to or more stringent than federal Part 370.
Last year, OSHA amended its HazCom standard to conform to the seventh edition of the United Nations Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals (GHS). Changes to the chemical hazard classifications and categories were part of the amendments to 1910.1200. This is important because EPA Part 370 relies on the OSHA HazCom standard for the definition of “hazardous chemical” and the hazard categories that must be reported.
In the latest rule published November 17, 2025, EPA takes several actions to harmonize its regulations with OSHA’s. The preamble offers a complete list of amendments to Part 370. Here’s a summary:
| Change: | Details: | Sections affected: |
| Adopts all 112 OSHA hazard categories |
| 370.3, 370.30, 370.41, and 370.42 |
| Updates terminology |
| 370.3 and 370.66 |
| Removes the term MSDS |
| 370.3, 370.10, 370.12, 370.13, 370.14, 370.20, 370.30, 370.31, 370.32, 370.33, 370.60, 370.62, 370.63, and 370.64 |
| Makes minor plain language, clarifying, and consistency corrections |
| 370.1, 370.2, 370.3, 370.10, 370.14, 370.30, 370.32, 370.33, 370.40, 370.41, 370.42, 370.43, 370.44, 370.45, 370.60, 370.61, 370.62, 370.64, 370.65, and 370.66 |
The direct final rule is effective January 16, 2026, unless EPA receives an adverse comment during its 30-day comment period. [However, see the "news update," earlier in this article.] If that happens, the agency will publish a timely withdrawal. Then, it will move along with the proposed rule (also published in the November 17, 2025, Federal Register) and address public comments in a subsequent final rule.
Assuming no adverse comment is received on the original direct final rule, EPA gives covered facilities time to prepare. The rule offers a compliance date of December 1, 2026, for both SDS reporting and Tier II reporting. Note that for Tier II reporting, the updates kick in for the 2026 inventory reporting year, which impacts forms due by March 1, 2027, and thereafter. (Forms due on or before March 1, 2026, are unchanged.)
EPA took action to harmonize Part 370 with the changes OSHA made to 1910.1200 last year. The latest amendments to Part 370 have a compliance date of December 1, 2026. For Tier II reporting, the updates start with forms due on or before March 1, 2027.
If your facility generates hazardous waste, compliance with the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) is not optional. Yet many businesses overlook key requirements, leading to violations that can cost thousands in fines and damage their reputation. Understanding the most common mistakes and how to prevent them can keep your operations safe and compliant.
One of the most common errors is failing to determine whether a waste is hazardous. Businesses often assume leftover chemicals, contaminated rags, or spent filters are non-hazardous without testing or applying EPA criteria. Misclassification leads to improper storage and disposal, which can escalate into multiple violations.
Container management is another frequent problem. Inspectors often find containers without the required “Hazardous Waste” label or missing the accumulation start date. Some containers are left open or improperly sealed, allowing leaks or vapors to escape. These issues are easy to fix but often overlooked in busy facilities.
Weekly inspections are mandatory for central accumulation areas, yet many companies skip them or fail to document them correctly. Missing dates, signatures, or inspection logs can result in citations even if the area is otherwise compliant.
Employee training is another weak spot. Large Quantity Generators must train staff on handling hazardous waste and emergency procedures and keep records of that training. Training should be job specific including emergency response specific to the facility. When training is incomplete or undocumented, it counts as a violation even if employees know what to do.
Improper disposal is a serious and costly mistake. Pouring hazardous waste down drains, tossing it in regular trash, or shipping it without a manifest violates federal law. These actions can lead to severe penalties and, in some cases, criminal liability.
Other common issues include exceeding accumulation time limits, 90 days for large quantity generators and 180 days for small quantity generators, without obtaining a permit. Facilities also forget to maintain a valid EPA identification number or fail to update contingency plans and emergency contact information.
Start with a thorough waste determination. Identify all materials that could be hazardous and classify them correctly and keep a record of the waste determination. Review container labeling and make sure every container is closed, dated, and marked “Hazardous Waste.” Establish a routine for weekly inspections and keep detailed records.
Invest in employee training and refresh it regularly. Document every session and keep those records accessible. Monitor accumulation times and set reminders to move waste before deadlines. Always use the Uniform Hazardous Waste Manifest when shipping waste off-site, and verify that your transporter and disposal facility are authorized.
Finally, maintain your EPA site ID number and update your contingency plan. Make sure emergency equipment is available, and local responders have your contact information.
Key to Remember: RCRA compliance is detailed, but most violations stem from simple oversights such as open containers, missing labels, skipped inspections, or forgotten paperwork. By building strong procedures and training your team, you can avoid costly mistakes and keep your facility safe and compliant.
Environmental compliance and workplace safety are often treated as separate priorities, but they’re deeply connected. A strong environmental compliance program doesn’t just protect the environment; it also significantly improves safety outcomes, reduces risks, and safeguards employees.
Environmental compliance means following laws and regulations designed to prevent pollution and protect natural resources. These rules often overlap with occupational safety standards because environmental hazards such as chemical spills, air emissions, and improper waste handling can directly harm workers.
For example:
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) focuses on preventing environmental contamination, while the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) ensures safe working conditions. Ignoring environmental requirements can lead to unsafe conditions like toxic exposure, fire hazards, and respiratory risks.
A few years ago, I worked with a manufacturing facility that had recurring slip incidents near the chemical storage area. Initially, they were treated as isolated safety issues. The facility added cautionary signs, but the problem persisted.
After talking with the safety officer, I noticed a pattern. Since these near-miss spills occur inside a building, they typically aren’t reportable from an environmental compliance standpoint. These small drips during drum transfers or hose disconnections weren’t classified as “spills” by operators, so they weren’t cleaned up immediately.
The facility implemented a new process. Every chemical drip or near-miss spill had to be logged and addressed as part of both environmental and safety compliance. Absorbent mats were added near transfer stations, drip trays were installed under valves, and employees were trained to report even minor leaks and spills.
Within 3 months, slip incidents dropped significantly. By integrating spill tracking into the safety program, they not only reduced injuries but also improved their EPA audit scores. This new process of tracking near-miss spills also proved to be a good leading indicator. The facility discovered trends in equipment maintenance and had a more complete picture of the cost of releases.
Integrating environmental compliance into safety programs offers several advantages:
To maximize the impact of environmental compliance on safety programs, industrial facilities should consider the following:
Environmental compliance is a key driver of workplace safety. By integrating both programs, facilities can protect employees and the environment at the same time.
Companies operating across multiple states, or internationally, face a growing challenge: staying compliant with a patchwork of environmental regulations. As federal agencies scale back certain environmental rules, states are stepping in to fill the gaps. But these state-level regulations aren’t always aligned. One state may impose strict air quality standards, while another may prioritize water discharge limits. This fragmented landscape creates a complex web of requirements that businesses must navigate to avoid fines, delays, or reputational harm.
In the U.S., environmental laws are enforced at both federal and state levels. While EPA sets national standards, states often go further. For example:
Internationally, U.S. companies face additional hurdles. The European Union’s Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD) requires companies to identify and mitigate environmental risks across their global supply chains. This means a U.S. firm with operations or suppliers in Europe must meet stricter standards, even if those standards differ from U.S. law.
To manage this complexity, many companies adopt Environmental Management Systems such as ISO 14001. An EMS provides a structured framework to:
EMS tools help companies centralize oversight, reduce compliance gaps, and respond quickly to regulatory changes. For example, a company using EMS software can assign location-specific tasks, monitor progress, and generate reports tailored to each jurisdiction’s requirements.
Key to Remember: Multi-jurisdictional compliance isn’t just about knowing the rules—it’s about building systems that adapt to them. An Environmental Management System, paired with proactive planning and location-specific training, helps companies stay compliant, reduce risk, and operate confidently across borders.

ENTER THE INSTITUTE
Be your company’s leading compliance authority with a robust library of articles, videos, and practical exercises designed to grow your knowledge of 120+ regulatory subjects.
EPA issued a direct final rule to update its safety data sheet (SDS) reporting and Tier II inventory reporting requirements. The changes align EPA 40 CFR 370 with OSHA’s Hazard Communication (HazCom) standard at 29 CFR 1910.1200.
| News update: EPA extended the public comment period for this direct final rule that made technical amendments to 40 CFR 370 to conform to the 2024 OSHA HazCom standard. An EPA memo lodged in docket EPA-HQ-OLEM-2025-0299 at Regulations.gov, explains, “This document will be open for public comment until December 24, 2025.” Also, note that the docket offers 23 supporting and related materials, including a draft updated Tier II form, draft updated Tier II instructions, and a redline strikeout version of the rule changes. |
The biggest change is that facilities will be able to copy the hazard categories directly from section 2 of the SDSs to their Tier II report forms. This eliminates the guesswork. However, facilities may face added strain with their first Tier II submission under the rule. Instead of relying on the grouped hazard categories selected in the previous year’s forms, it looks like facilities will need to spend extra time retrieving specific categories from their SDSs.
EPA 40 CFR 370 applies to a facility owner or operator if:
If the applicability criteria are met, the facility owner/operator must submit to the state emergency response commission (SERC), local emergency planning committee (LEPC), and local fire departments:
A state may make its own laws and regulations in addition to or more stringent than federal Part 370.
Last year, OSHA amended its HazCom standard to conform to the seventh edition of the United Nations Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals (GHS). Changes to the chemical hazard classifications and categories were part of the amendments to 1910.1200. This is important because EPA Part 370 relies on the OSHA HazCom standard for the definition of “hazardous chemical” and the hazard categories that must be reported.
In the latest rule published November 17, 2025, EPA takes several actions to harmonize its regulations with OSHA’s. The preamble offers a complete list of amendments to Part 370. Here’s a summary:
| Change: | Details: | Sections affected: |
| Adopts all 112 OSHA hazard categories |
| 370.3, 370.30, 370.41, and 370.42 |
| Updates terminology |
| 370.3 and 370.66 |
| Removes the term MSDS |
| 370.3, 370.10, 370.12, 370.13, 370.14, 370.20, 370.30, 370.31, 370.32, 370.33, 370.60, 370.62, 370.63, and 370.64 |
| Makes minor plain language, clarifying, and consistency corrections |
| 370.1, 370.2, 370.3, 370.10, 370.14, 370.30, 370.32, 370.33, 370.40, 370.41, 370.42, 370.43, 370.44, 370.45, 370.60, 370.61, 370.62, 370.64, 370.65, and 370.66 |
The direct final rule is effective January 16, 2026, unless EPA receives an adverse comment during its 30-day comment period. [However, see the "news update," earlier in this article.] If that happens, the agency will publish a timely withdrawal. Then, it will move along with the proposed rule (also published in the November 17, 2025, Federal Register) and address public comments in a subsequent final rule.
Assuming no adverse comment is received on the original direct final rule, EPA gives covered facilities time to prepare. The rule offers a compliance date of December 1, 2026, for both SDS reporting and Tier II reporting. Note that for Tier II reporting, the updates kick in for the 2026 inventory reporting year, which impacts forms due by March 1, 2027, and thereafter. (Forms due on or before March 1, 2026, are unchanged.)
EPA took action to harmonize Part 370 with the changes OSHA made to 1910.1200 last year. The latest amendments to Part 370 have a compliance date of December 1, 2026. For Tier II reporting, the updates start with forms due on or before March 1, 2027.
Several questions we receive from our customers use the terms “hazardous waste” and “hazardous materials” interchangeably. At a recent event, a few attendees admitted that they didn’t think there was a difference between the two. This is a common point of confusion and we want to ensure that our readers know the difference. Let’s dive into it!
The term hazardous material is defined by the Department of Transportation and refers to any substance or material that poses an unreasonable risk to health, safety, and property during transportation. Hazardous materials include hazardous substances, hazardous wastes, marine pollutants, and elevated-temperature materials. Essentially, if it’s dangerous and transported, it’s considered a hazardous material.
On the other hand, hazardous waste is defined by the Environmental Protection Agency. It refers to contaminated chemicals or by-products that no longer serve their purpose and need to be disposed of. Hazardous wastes are either listed or exhibit characteristics like ignitability, corrosivity, toxicity, or reactivity. It’s essentially waste that poses a danger to health or the environment and requires special handling and disposal.
To put it simply, hazardous material is a broad term that includes various dangerous substances during transportation, while hazardous waste specifically refers to dangerous by-products that need disposal. Understanding these terms is crucial for compliance with environmental and safety regulations.
If you ever find yourself unsure, remember that hazardous materials are about transportation risks, and hazardous wastes are about disposal risks.
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) published the Spring 2025 Semiannual Agenda of Regulatory and Deregulatory Actions on September 4, 2025. The agenda outlines the agency’s upcoming regulatory actions and their status in the rulemaking process.
EPA has major updates on the docket, such as:
Additionally, the agency intends to address per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) across multiple media. For example, EPA plans to:
This article highlights some of the major rules we’re monitoring closely. You can review the entire agenda to learn about all the rulemakings on EPA’s docket. Please note that the agenda dates are tentative, indicating when the agency seeks to publish the rulemakings in the Federal Register.
| Final Rule Stage | |
| Projected publication date | Title |
| December 2025 | Phasedown of Hydrofluorocarbons: Reconsideration of Certain Regulatory Requirements Under the Technology Transitions Provisions of the American Innovation and Manufacturing Act of 2020 |
| January 2026 | Accidental Release Prevention Requirements: Risk Management Programs Under the Clean Air Act; Common Sense Approach to Chemical Accident Prevention |
| February 2026 | Addition of Certain Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) to the Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) |
| February 2026 | Initial Air Quality Designations for the 2024 Revised Primary Annual Fine Particle (PM2.5) National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) |
| April 2026 | Listing of Specific PFAS as Hazardous Constituents |
| Proposed Rule Stage | |
| Projected publication date of notice of proposed rulemaking | |
| October 2025 | Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Oil and Gas Extraction Category (40 CFR 435 Subpart E) |
| October 2025 | New Source Performance Standards for the Synthetic Organic Chemical Manufacturing Industry and National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for the Synthetic Organic Chemical Manufacturing Industry |
| November 2025 | Additional Reconsideration of Standards of Performance for New, Reconstructed, and Modified Sources and Emissions Guidelines for Existing Sources: Oil and Natural Gas Sector Climate Review |
| November 2025 | PFAS Requirements in NPDES Permit Applications |
| November 2025 | Steam Electric Effluent Limitations Guideline Reconsideration Rule |
| December 2025 | Updates to the RCRA Hazardous Waste Regulations and Related Technical Corrections — Permitting Updates Rule |
| January 2026 | Paper Manifest Sunset Rule; Modification of the Hazardous Waste Manifest System |
| January 2026 | Revision to “Begin Actual Construction” in the New Source Review Preconstruction Permitting Program |
| April 2026 | Reconsideration of National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants: Gasoline Distribution Technology Reviews and New Source Performance Standards Review for Bulk Gasoline Terminals |
| May 2026 | Formaldehyde; Regulation Under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) |
| Pre-Rule Stage | |
| Projected publication date or other action | Title |
| September 2025 (advanced notice of proposed rulemaking) | Visibility Protection: Regional Haze State Plan Requirements Rule Revision |
| December 2025 (end review) | National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Brick and Structural Clay Products Manufacturing; and Clay Ceramics Manufacturing |
On September 4, 2025, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) withdrew a direct final rule it issued on July 22, 2025, that offered active and inactive coal combustion residuals (CCR) facilities an alternative reporting option and delayed corresponding compliance obligations for CCR management units (CCRMUs). However, the parallel proposed rule that was published with the direct final rule remains in place, and EPA has extended the comment period through September 15, 2025.
Who does this affect?
The direct and proposed rules impact (a) active CCR facilities and (b) inactive CCR facilities with inactive surface impoundments (called legacy CCR surface impoundments) that are regulated by the 2024 Legacy Rule.
What does this mean?
Because the direct rule was withdrawn, the alternative reporting option for the Facility Evaluation Report (FER) Part 1 doesn’t apply, and the compliance deadlines for the related CCRMU requirements revert to the previous timelines.
The parallel proposed rule remains active and contains the same changes as the withdrawn direct final rule, including:
Further, the proposed rule seeks public input on potentially delaying both FER reporting deadlines and adjusting the CCRMU compliance timelines accordingly. The proposed additional extension would give CCR facilities the option to:
You can submit comments to Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OLEM-2020-0107.
Please see the original Industry News article ("EPA offers CCR facilities delayed reporting option and extends compliance deadlines") for more information about the withdrawn direct rule and the active proposed rule.
Key to remember: EPA has withdrawn a direct final rule that offered active and inactive coal combustion facilities an alternative reporting option, but the agency has kept the corresponding proposed rule in place.
Please note that the Environmental Protection Agency has withdrawn the direct final rule and maintained the proposed rule.
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) issued a direct final rule that adds a reporting option for regulated coal combustion residuals (CCR) facilities and extends compliance deadlines for CCR facilities with CCR management units (CCRMUs). These units include (a) inactive CCR landfills and (b) closed CCR surface impoundments and landfills.
Who’s impacted?
The direct rule applies to facilities subject to EPA’s final rule published in 2024 (2024 Legacy Rule), including:
The 2024 Legacy Rule established regulations for:
What are the changes?
The 2024 regulations (40 CFR Part 257 Subpart D) require active CCR facilities and legacy CCR surface impoundments to submit the Facility Evaluation Report (FER) Part 1 and FER Part 2 that identify any CCRMUs of 1 ton or more on-site.
Facilities with CCRMUs must also:
EPA’s 2025 direct final rule gives regulated facilities the option to:
The rule also delays the compliance timelines for related CCRMU requirements.
| Requirement | 2024 Legacy Rule deadline | 2025 direct final rule deadline |
| FER Part 1 | February 9, 2026 | February 9, 2026, or February 8, 2027 |
| FER Part 2 | February 8, 2027 | February 8, 2027 |
| CCR website | February 9, 2026 | February 9, 2026, or February 8, 2027 |
| Groundwater monitoring requirements | May 8, 2028 | August 8, 2029 |
| Initial annual report | January 31, 2029 | January 31, 2030 |
| Closure/post-closure care plan | November 8, 2028 | February 8, 2030 |
| Initiate closure | May 8, 2029 | August 8, 2030 |
About the proposed rule
In conjunction with the direct final rule, EPA published a proposed rule to obtain public feedback on further delaying the FERs. The rule offers two compliance timeline options for the evaluation reports:
Additionally, the proposed rule adjusts the deadlines for the other compliance requirements to 12 months from the 2024 Legacy Rule deadlines. The only exception is the CCR website requirement, which corresponds to the FER Part 1 submission date; it could be delayed for up to 24 months.
If EPA receives adverse comments on the direct final rule, the agency will publish a withdrawal of the specific requirements that won’t take effect. The remaining regulations in the direct final rule will take effect. If the agency determines (based on public feedback) to extend the FER Part 2 deadline by 12 months, the agency will withdraw the 2025 direct final rule and conduct the standard rulemaking procedures to apply the extension.
Key to remember: EPA offers active and inactive coal combustion facilities an alternative option to comply with the Facility Evaluation Report and adjusts the compliance timelines for regulations related to CCR management units.
Effective date: October 2, 2025
This applies to: Entities subject to CARB’s vehicle emissions regulations
Description of change: Congressional resolutions disapproved the waivers for the California Air Resources Board’s (CARB’s) Advanced Clean Cars II and Heavy-Duty Vehicle and Engine Omnibus Low NOx (Omnibus) regulations.
Through an emergency rulemaking, CARB adopted the Emergency Vehicle Emissions Regulations, reinstating at a minimum earlier-adopted regulations displaced by Advanced Clean Cars II and Omnibus:
The regulation applies until litigation is resolved.
Regulated entities may follow either:
View related state info: Air programs — California Air Resources Board (CARB)
For many small fleets, maintenance and repairs can be an ongoing battle. In-house shops are often not cost effective, and freight lanes sometimes require drivers to have trucks serviced at locations far from terminals. Inevitable breakdowns result in unscheduled downtime, resulting in late deliveries or missed loads. Proactive planning can help minimize downtime.
Every manufacturer has a scheduled maintenance recommendation. Carriers may have policies and procedures that require maintenance to be done at shorter intervals. To be proactive about breakdowns on the road, getting an overall inspection with each oil change will help identify potential problems before they happen. Scheduled downtime is always less costly than unexpected delays.
When trucks don't often visit terminals, identifying quality shops can be difficult. Start by identifying your most common routes and looking for shops along the way. Truck stops are often the most convenient place to have maintenance performed but often limit their services to only the oil change without any additional inspection. There is usually a cost for convenience, and this can sometimes be a more expensive way to go. Looking for a trusted chain, or having independent shops on your list, can help in coordinating maintenance between a delivery and the next pickup.
When your chain of vendors chosen to do your preventive maintenance identifies potential problems, they may not be equipped to do the repairs themselves. Choosing to have major repairs done far from home can be questionable at best. Deciding where to have your work done when it is discovered makes a huge difference in the time required, expense of the repairs, and quality of work. Waiting to get to a known vendor to have the repair made can result in a costly roadside breakdown. Dealers usually provide quality work but often take longer to do the repairs due to the volume of business they do. Local repair shops may have limited inventory, having parts overnighted at your expense will just add to the cost of repairs and may add additional delays. Most shops will provide a warranty for their work, but that is little help if the repair fails and your driver is now 1000 miles away.
Your network of maintenance providers may be able to help you find reputable repair shops near them. They value your business and would not intentionally send you to a shop that could not meet your needs. They could be your best partner for major repairs.
Breakdowns are inevitable. No matter how well you plan, or how proactive your maintenance, unforeseen failures will happen eventually. The time to look for a mobile mechanic is before you need one, not when you need one. The internet has made finding a quality roadside tech easier. Ratings and reviews can tell you a lot about past customer experiences. There are maintenance subscriptions for commercial vehicles that can help locate the nearest mechanic, and they take some of the guesswork out of the process.
Key to remember: A proactive approach to vehicle maintenance helps eliminate downtime, schedule service between loads, and keep your trucks moving.
Imagine you’re shipping or transporting hazmat and think you’ve got everything covered, such as labels, packaging, documentation. Then, an inspector shows up and points out a violation you didn’t even know existed. That’s the kind of surprise you want to avoid during an inspection. According to the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA) the new enforcement priorities focus on safety, clarity, and collaboration, which could minimize those types of surprises.
The Office of Hazardous Materials Safety (OHMS) has announced a fresh set of inspection and enforcement priorities. Acting Associate Administrator William Quade says the goal is to concentrate on resources where they make the biggest impact on reducing risk. For shippers and carriers, this means clearer expectations and fewer gray areas. If you know where PHMSA is looking, you can stay ahead of the curve.
Hazmat safety isn’t just focused on compliance, it also focuses on protecting lives, property, and the environment. These priorities are designed to reduce incidents, improve industry accountability, and ensure enforcement actions are fair and consistent. For the hazmat community, PHMSA says these priorities are intended to encourage better communication and emphasize partnership over penalties.
PHMSA wants to prevent problems before they happen. Here’s what they’re looking to do:
Expect PHMSA to focus on areas with a high-risk factor. This includes general hazmat shippers, cylinder and drum manufacturers, and recertification facilities. Lithium battery shipments, especially those being sold online, will be under the microscope. Not only that, but undeclared hazardous materials also sold online will be a major focus. Companies with major past violations should expect follow-up inspections.
When enforcement is necessary, PHMSA plans to keep it strategic. Cases will be processed promptly, with warning letters and tickets resolved within 180 days. Actions will target violations that pose the greatest safety risks, and penalty guidelines will reportedly be applied consistently nationwide. Data analytics will be used to drive decisions, helping PHMSA spot trends and prevent recurring issues.
If your operations involve cylinders, drums, lithium batteries, or online sales of hazmat, now is the time to review your compliance programs. Accurate classification, proper packaging, and clear documentation aren’t just regulatory boxes to check, they’re essential to avoiding enforcement actions and ensuring safe transportation.
Key to remember: PHMSA’s updated approach focuses on high-risk areas like lithium battery shipments and cylinder facilities, emphasizes better communication with shippers, and promotes risk-based, consistent enforcement to strengthen compliance and reduce incidents.
In a move signaling tougher oversight of the entry-level driver training (ELDT) regulations, the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) has removed more than 3,000 ELDT providers from its Training Provider Registry (TPR), citing non-compliance with federal standards.
In addition, another 4,500 ELDT providers have received notices of proposed removal, meaning they could also be removed from the TPR.
These moves are the first steps in FMCSA’s review of the over 16,000 ELDT providers listed on the TPR. The agency’s goal is to remove providers that are:
In effect as of February 2022, the ELDT rule establishes minimum training standards for drivers who are:
Individuals must complete a course of theory and behind-the-wheel training offered by an entity listed on the TPR. To be listed on the TPR, an entity must meet specific requirements addressing curriculum, instructors, equipment, facilities, and recordkeeping.
This training must be successfully completed, and an individual must have proof of this prior to taking the skills test (except in the case of the hazmat endorsement, this proof must be presented prior to the knowledge test) for the new license or endorsement.
For carriers operating in New York, registration and decals expire December 31, 2024, for the Highway Use Tax (HUT) and Automotive Fuel Carrier (AFC) programs. Take steps now to make sure you receive your new decals before the current ones expire. You need a new certificate of registration and decal for each vehicle. And you must place the new decals on your vehicles before January 1, 2025.
The period to renew your 24th series HUT and AFC certificates of registration begins October 1, 2024. Act now to avoid delays and keep your highway use tax credentials active.
Get ready for renewal by taking the following steps now:
Once the renewal period opens, renew your credentials and pay your renewal fees online with One Stop Credentialing and Registration (OSCAR).
Submit your renewal application by November 30, 2024, to make sure you receive your decals in time to place them on your vehicles before January 1, 2025.
If you are already enrolled in OSCAR, use your current OSCAR password to renew online.
If you are not enrolled, visit OSCAR, and select Enroll Now. You must have a United States Department of Transportation (USDOT) number and an employer identification number (EIN).
To renew your registration:
If you are unable to renew electronically, you may file Form TMT-1.2, Renewal Application for Highway Use Tax (HUT) and Automotive Fuel Carrier (AFC) Certificates of Registrations and Decals – 25th Series.
Key to remember: Take steps now to renew your NY HUT and ensure you receive your new decals before the current ones expire.
Building a strong safety culture goes beyond fixing hazards. It requires engaging employees and modernizing training programs. Outdated safety videos and monotonous meetings do little to inspire action.
A fresh approach can make safety training more relevant and impactful. When you invest in safety training, you’re investing in your employees and their safety.
Consider the following actions to help capture your employees’ attention.
Start by updating training materials to reflect current best practices and real-world scenarios. Use interactive formats such as short videos, quizzes, and group discussions to keep employees engaged. Monthly safety meetings should focus on practical topics and encourage participation rather than simply reviewing rules.
When employees feel involved, they’re more likely to retain information and apply it on the job. Consider incorporating real-life examples from your own operations to make the training relatable.
Safety incentive programs also need attention. Traditional reward systems often fail to motivate employees. Instead, create meaningful incentives that recognize proactive behaviors, such as reporting hazards or suggesting improvements. Rewards can include gift cards, recognition events, or even additional time off.
These programs should celebrate safe behaviors, not just the absence of accidents. Public recognition during meetings or in newsletters can also boost morale and reinforce positive habits.
Employee involvement is critical to sustaining a safety culture. Form safety committees at each terminal and include drivers and warehouse staff. These committees provide a platform for employees to voice concerns and propose solutions. When workers feel heard, they take ownership of safety initiatives, creating a sense of shared responsibility.
Encourage committees to conduct walkthroughs, identify hazards, and then share their findings with management for quick resolution. Regular feedback loops help maintain momentum. Share progress on accident and injury reduction goals and celebrate milestones.
Transparency builds trust and reinforces the importance of safety. Employees should know that their efforts make a measurable difference. Posting monthly safety metrics in break rooms or on digital boards can keep everyone informed and motivated. Gamifying safety goals with leaderboards or team challenges can also make participation fun and competitive. These strategies turn safety into a shared mission rather than a management directive.
Modernizing training and engaging employees transforms safety from a compliance requirement into a core value. When everyone participates, the result is fewer accidents, fewer injuries, and a stronger, more resilient workforce. Safety becomes a part of the company’s identity, not just a checklist item.
Key to remember: The ultimate goal is to create an environment where employees feel empowered to speak up, take action, and work together to keep everyone safe.
Many shippers are unaware of their responsibility to provide placards to drivers, but the responsibility shifts as soon as the driver hits the road.
| Knowledge Check: What would you do in this placarding scenario? |
Check the regulations
According to Section 172.506 of the Hazardous Materials Regulations (HMR), a shipper offering a hazardous material for transportation by highway must provide the motor carrier with the required placards for the material being offered. The shipper must offer the placards to the carrier prior to, or at the same time as, the material is offered for transportation — unless the vehicle is already placarded for the hazmat.
Section 172.506 also states that no motor carrier may transport a hazardous material in a motor vehicle unless the required placards for the hazmat are affixed to the vehicle. Before transport, the driver is responsible for displaying the required placards for all the hazmat that is on the vehicle.
Avoid issues with shippers
Many trailers are equipped with flip placards that represent most classes of hazardous materials but without adequate training, shippers may not understand their responsibility to provide the driver with the required placards. If a driver arrives and the shipper fails to provide placards, the driver should contact dispatch for additional instructions or drive to a truck stop to secure the necessary placards. The driver becomes responsible for placards as soon as the trailer enters a public highway, so train your drivers to temporarily refuse the shipment until the proper placards can be obtained. If necessary, the driver must bobtail or leave empty before driving to pick up placards.
Another common placarding question with shippers involves combination loads. If a driver arrives at a shipper’s location and is already transporting a hazardous material below the placarding threshold, is the shipper required to provide placards for the combination load on the trailer? In this scenario, the driver already has 600 pounds of a Class 8 corrosive material on the trailer, and the shipper is offering an additional 500 pounds of the same commodity. The regulations state that the shipper is only required to provide placards for the commodity that is being offered, not for the aggregate weight of both shipments. In this scenario, the driver is responsible for providing placards since it involves a combination load.
The Hazardous Materials Regulations are complex, especially for newer employees. Drivers that can speak “hazmat” to shippers often secure additional business, so be sure to train your drivers and give them the confidence to have impactful conversations with shippers.
Key to remember: Carry extra placards in case a shipper is unable to supply the required placards or a combination of hazmat on the vehicle requires different placards.
Back in October 2018, Laffon had a medical emergency and needed some time off under the federal Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA).
Her leave lasted until November 15. Ten days after she returned to work, on November 26, her employer terminated her.
She sued, arguing that the employer retaliated against her because of her FMLA leave.
The catch? She didn't bring the suit until almost three years later.
No link between leave and termination
In court, the employer argued that there was no causal link between Laffon taking FMLA leave and her termination. Although the court documents aren't robust, they do reveal that the employer indicated that Laffon's allegations didn't show that her taking FMLA leave was a factor in the decision to terminate her. The documents showed only that the termination chronologically followed her leave.
The court agreed with the employer. It also agreed that Laffon failed to allege a willful violation of the FMLA, which would allow her to benefit from the FMLA's three-year statute of limitations.
Laffon appealed the case to the Ninth Circuit.
Statute of limitations
Under the FMLA, employees have two years from the date of the last event constituting the alleged violation for which they can bring a claim.
Those two years are extended to three years if the employer's actions were "willful." This means that an employee must show that the employer either knew or showed reckless disregard for whether its conduct violated the FMLA.
Ruling overturned
Fast forward to August 2023, when the Ninth Circuit reversed the lower court's decision. It indicated that, based on Laffon's amended complaint and liberally construing the law, her allegations establish that her leave was causally connected to her termination and that the employer's action (her termination) was willful.
Glymph v. CT Corporation Systems, No. 22-35735, Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, August 22, 2023.
Key to remember: Terminating an employee soon after returning from FMLA leave is risky, unless there is a clear, well-documented, non-leave-related reason. Case documents did not show such a clear reason, which can also increase the risk of a willful finding. Employees have time to file claims, even years.
There’s been quite a bit of chatter recently about employee rights regarding menopause. Rhode Island, for example, is the first state to pass a law mandating menopause workplace accommodations. Since menopause can result in varying symptoms, some employers might wonder if employees are entitled to take leave under the federal Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) for it.
The answer is: It’s possible.
The FMLA doesn’t have a list of serious health conditions for which employees may take leave. To figure out if a condition qualifies for leave, employers must refer to the FMLA’s definition of a serious health condition and compare it to the information in the employee’s medical certification.
If an employee’s or a family member’s menopause-related symptoms meet the definition, the employee may take FMLA leave for them.
If, for example, an employee experiences panic attacks or bouts of depression because of menopause, the employee could be entitled to take FMLA leave. As such, the FMLA leave could be intermittent when symptoms flare up.
Under the federal Pregnant Workers Fairness Act (PWFA), employers have to provide reasonable accommodations to an employee’s or applicant’s known limitations related to, affected by, or arising out of pregnancy, childbirth, or related medical conditions, unless the accommodation will cause the employer an undue hardship.
Similar to the FMLA, the PWFA also doesn’t include condition details, like a complete list of related limitations or specifically mention menopause.
In the vote for the final PWFA regulations, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) Commissioner Andrea Lucas said, “Thus, the final rule opens the door to requiring accommodations potentially extending to a myriad of conditions ranging from infertility to menstruation to hormone issues to menopause.” The current EEOC might revise the PWFA regulations, in which the agency could provide more details.
Therefore, until the EEOC provides more guidance, the courts might need to chime in on whether employers have to accommodate an employee’s menopause symptoms. If employers don’t want to be legal guinea pigs, the safest route would be to allow time off for menopause.
The federal Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) requires employers to provide reasonable accommodations to the known disability of an employee or applicant. A disability is an impairment that substantially limits one or more major life activities.
Like the FMLA and PWFA, the ADA also doesn’t have a complete list of conditions that are disabilities. Employers have to assess each situation on the facts involved to determine if menopause rises to the level of a disability,
Key to remember: Employers must give employees FMLA leave for menopause if the symptoms meet the definition of a serious health condition.
‘Tis the season for time off. Complying with wage and hour laws can be tricky, but especially at this time of year, when many employees are coming and going, whether due to vacations, holidays, or illnesses.
Tracking nonexempt employees’ hours is pretty straightforward. However, employers should know that they may require exempt employees to use paid time off (PTO) for absences of less than a full day, but doing so depends on several factors.
Under the federal Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), employers must pay exempt employees their full salary for each week they perform any work. If they don’t, employers risk an FLSA violation, and those employees could lose their exemption.
Employers may deduct from exempt employees’ accrued paid time off (PTO) leave bank for partial-day absences. This, essentially, requires exempt employees to use their PTO for absences of less than a day. Employers must, however, be careful.
Where employers have a benefits plan (e.g., vacation time, sick leave), they may reduce the accrued leave for the time an employee is absent from work, whether the absence is a partial day or a full day, without affecting the employee’s exemption, as long as the employee receives their guaranteed weekly salary.
This is true even if the employee has no accrued benefits in the leave plan and the account has a negative balance.
If employees are absent for 1 or more full days for personal reasons (e.g., car repair), other than sickness or disability, employers may deduct from their salary, as opposed to their PTO bank.
If, for example, an exempt employee is absent for 2 full days to move to a new house, the employer may deduct from the employee’s weekly salary for the 2 days. If, however, the employee is absent for 1.5 days, the employer may deduct from the employee’s salary only for the 1 full-day absence. The employer may deduct from the employee’s PTO bank for the partial-day absence.
While employers don’t have to have a bona fide sick leave plan, they may make such deductions due to absences related to sickness or disability only if they have one. Employers must communicate the plan to eligible employees and follow the plan.
To be bona fide, employers must administer the plan impartially, and its design shouldn’t reflect an effort to evade the salary-basis requirement.
Whether a particular plan is bona fide would be based upon the actual design of and practices applicable under the plan. A PTO plan might qualify as bona fide even though it’s not exclusively for use during sickness or disability.
Assuming that a bona fide plan exists, employers may make deductions from an employee’s salary for absences of 1 or more full days because of sickness or disability before the employee has qualified under the plan and after the employee has exhausted their PTO/sick leave.
Key to remember: Employers may deduct from exempt employees’ PTO bank for partial-day absences.
The U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agency has detained several individuals, many of whom are employees. If an employee is detained and subsequently suffers a serious health condition, an employer might wonder if the employee would be entitled to take job-protected leave under the federal Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA).
Eligible employees who work for covered employers are entitled to take FMLA leave for qualifying reasons, regardless of their immigration status.
Assuming that if a serious health condition made them unable to perform one or more job functions, then they can take leave. The FMLA doesn’t restrict why the condition began or where the employee is at the time. Those details aren’t addressed in the FMLA regulations.
When employees put their employers on notice of the need for leave for a reason that might qualify for FMLA protections, the employer’s FMLA obligations are triggered. They must give the employee an eligibility/rights & responsibilities notice within 5 business days. If an employee is detained, however, the employer might not know how to get this notice to the employee.
In most cases, employers may require employees to give them a certification supporting the need for FMLA leave. For medical conditions, this must come from a health care provider. A detained employee might not have the opportunity to obtain treatment from a health care provider, thus making it difficult to get the required certification.
Employers aren’t, however, required to ask for a certification. They may make exceptions to such a requirement if they wish.
Otherwise, the employee is responsible for getting the certification.
Currently, no state has a law specifically protecting employees who are detained. California Gov. Gavin Newsom recently vetoed a bill that would have required California employers that are aware of an employee who’s detained or incarcerated due to a pending deportation or immigration proceeding to place the employee on unpaid leave for up to 12 months. During the 12 months, the employee would have had the same reinstatement rights as employees terminated for lacking work authorization.
The measure would also have allowed workers to take up to 5 days of unpaid leave to attend to immigration-related matters. Consideration of the governor's veto is pending.
Key to remember: Whether a detained employee is entitled to FMLA leave protections depends on all the facts, including whether they provide the requested certification.
The U.S. Bureau of Labor statistics reported in July 2024 that there are 8.2 million job openings in the U.S., but only 7.2 million unemployed workers.
With that in mind, employers might choose to hang onto employees even if they’re under performing. But what about when complaints are rolling in from different angles? Take, for example, a lackluster supervisor who’s annoying employees and disappointing customers.
An employer could be hesitant to let the supervisor go, especially if there’s no documentation backing up claims of misconduct. The employer must weigh their options to decide if putting the supervisor on a performance improvement plan (PIP) or moving right to termination is the ideal choice.
At-will employment
For starters, in most states employers may terminate an employee at-will, meaning they can fire employees for pretty much any reason as long as it doesn’t discriminate against someone in a protected class based on sex, age, race, religion, etc. Employers also cannot terminate in retaliation for an employee making a claim of harassment, discrimination, or safety concerns.
Aside from these limits, employers can terminate employees for good cause, bad cause, or no cause at all.
PIP or terminate
Deciding whether to put an employee on a PIP or terminate must be decided on a case-by-case basis.
A PIP is usually for job performance issues (hence, performance improvement plan). This could mean anything from not making enough sales to being inept at the job’s essential functions. If job performance doesn’t improve under the PIP, termination may be the end result depending on company policies and practices.
Even if an employee has job performance issues, the employer can terminate without going through the PIP process first, unless the usual process is to implement a PIP with employees who have had similar problems. In that case, not doing a PIP could be seen as discrimination against an employee, especially if the person falls into a protected class.
Workplace misconduct, however, is another situation altogether. This could be anything from a one-off poor joke to pervasive harassment. Snapping at customers or coworkers (or worse), for example, is a conduct issue. An employer could issue a warning or move right to termination if the behavior is clearly illegal or a serious threat to workplace safety.
| Read more: ezExplanation on discharging employees |
Termination tips
If an employer decides to terminate, they should treat the employee as respectfully as possible during the termination process. Also, an employer should carefully and clearly communicate the job-related reasons for the termination to avoid any hint of discrimination. Lastly, an employer should document the reasons and reiterate the steps taken leading up to the termination and keep those records handy in case the employee files a wrongful termination lawsuit.
Key to remember: Employers sometimes struggle when making termination decisions. Having a process in place and documenting steps along the way can help if a case lands in court.
Now is the time to think ahead to 2026 and consider where changes need to be made to your workplace wellness program.
Whether you’re looking to inject some excitement into the program or want to make sure it’s still meeting your needs, employee input can put you on the right track.
Gathering ideas and opinions from employees lets you know what they value and can also help generate support for your program. Workers are more likely to take part in something they have had a hand in creating.
To encourage employees to give their input:
Announce the why. Let employees know that you are asking for their input and explain why it’s important to you. Intranet articles, posters, and flyers placed in bathroom stalls can let employees know that you’re refreshing your wellness program and will be looking for their thoughts. Your communication can also explain why you are taking this step and why their feedback is valued.
Come up with questions. Find out what employees like about your current program and what changes they would like to see. Use a mixture of open-ended questions and rating scales to gather data and ideas. When creating questions, use “we.” For example: “When it comes to wellness, what do we do well?” or “What are some ways we could improve our wellness program?”
Provide opportunities. Offer a number of structured ways for employees to share their thoughts. You can set up small group meetings or one-on-one conversations with a cross section of employees or meet with a group of wellness champions who have shown an interest in workplace wellness. Employees may be more likely to speak out in a relaxed setting than in a large group meeting. You could also do an employee survey or use a suggestion box that offers a confidential way to contribute ideas.
Pay attention. When meeting with employees, avoid distractions. To show employees that you respect their ideas, repeat back what you have heard. Be open to new ideas and thank employees for their input. To determine which ideas have most support, list them on a board and have employees put a checkmark next to the one(s) that they like the most.
Manage expectations. If budget or time constraints mean an idea isn’t feasible at this time, let employees know. Ask if they have other ways to address the concern. It can also be helpful to have a group provide two benefits for an idea and two challenges. This can help identify the amount of effort it would take to implement the idea.
Take action. After gathering and analyzing input, prioritize solutions and changes. Share survey results and ideas for moving forward. If there are one or two ideas that can be quickly started and implemented, work on them as soon as possible. Let employees know what will change and why. To generate support, find ways for employees to be an active part of the changes, perhaps by planning events or becoming a wellness champion.
Key to remember: It’s important to regularly revisit your wellness program to make sure it’s providing value to your workforce. Use employee input to generate support and keep it on the right track.
Before you prepare the 300A Annual Summary, OSHA requires you to review the 300 Log and verify that the entries are complete and accurate. This does not require examining every entry, but you should spot check a sampling of cases. Below are some common errors on the 300 Log.
Column (E) requires listing a location. Just writing “warehouse” or “office” may not provide enough detail. Ideally, someone else should be able to locate the area where the incident occurred. OSHA gives examples like “loading dock north end.” The location doesn’t appear on the Annual Summary, but it’s good to review in case OSHA inspects your records.
Column (F) requires describing the injury, body part, and cause of the injury. A common error is listing a body part (like “lacerated forehead”) but missing the description of how it happened. Also, for body parts such as arms or legs, the entry should specify left or right. OSHA gives an example, “Second degree burns on right forearm from acetylene torch” to describe an injury, body part, and cause.
If an injured employee is still on work restrictions (or days away) into the next calendar year, do not add the case to next year’s Log. That would indicate a new injury. It may seem odd if, for example, an employee injured on December 13th had 73 days away listed under that date. However, the day count simply indicates the severity of the incident. For that purpose, it doesn’t matter if the days occurred in the next calendar year.
Also, if an injured worker is still away from work (or on restrictions) when you prepare the Annual Summary, you must estimate the day count and use that to complete the summary, per 1904.7(b)(3)(ix). You might use a doctor’s estimate or make a guess based on experience with similar cases. You’ll then post the summary using the estimated days.
Once you know the exact day count, you must update the 300 Log. However, you do not have to update the Annual Summary after it is posted. Consider this: An injury in December could involve a return-to-work date after April 30, at which point the 300A no longer needs to be posted.
Finally, a company executive must review and sign the completed 300A. In a letter of interpretation from January of 2009, OSHA clarified that employers keeping electronic records can use electronic signatures for this.
You must post a physical copy of the 300A from February 1 through April 30. In a large facility, this may require more than one posting. Some employers post the summary on the company intranet, which is fine, but that’s not a substitute for physical posting. You must also ensure that the summary is not altered, defaced, or covered by other material.
OSHA does not require sending the 300A to people working from home, but check state requirements. For example, California does require providing the summary to remote workers who do not report to the office at least weekly during the posting period.
Key to remember: Review the 300 Log for accuracy and, if needed, estimate day counts before preparing and posting the 300A Annual Summary.
If you’re a smaller-size, non-construction employer, you know you have OSHA requirements. Yet, you may not have a team of safety professionals to ensure you stay on track. The good news is you have one trick up your sleeve! You can see where the peers in your size bracket went wrong. Reviewing the top 10 OSHA violations for your size may help you to tackle some of your bigger OSHA obligations. It will also give you an edge in an OSHA inspection if you can get “up to code” with these major standards.
Each year, OSHA identifies frequently cited standards for the previous fiscal year. While these violations can lead to costly penalties, they also reveal gaps in safety and health training, inspections, written safety plans, signs/labels, and other duties. Our table shows the top 10 non-construction violations in fiscal year 2025 for employers with fewer than 100 employees, as well as the three industries that violated them the most. (Data reflect October 2024 through September 2025.)
| Rank | OSHA requirement | Top 3 violators |
| 1 | 1910.1200 - Hazard communication (HazCom) |
|
| 2 | 1910.134 – Respiratory protection |
|
| 3 | 1910.178 – Powered industrial trucks |
|
| 4 | 1910.147 – The control of hazardous energy (lockout/tagout) |
|
| 5 | 1910.212 – Machine guarding |
|
| 6 | 1903.19 – Abatement verification |
|
| 7 | 1910.303 – Electrical – General |
|
| 8 | 1910.132 – Personal protective equipment (PPE) – General requirements |
|
| 9 | 1910.305 – Electrical – Wiring methods, components, and equipment for general use |
|
| 10 | Section 5(a) of OSH Act – General Duty Clause |
|
The HazCom standard rose to first place on our list of violations for non-construction employers with less than 100 employees. HazCom is about the employees’ right to understand the hazardous chemicals they are exposed to at work. That standard was followed by the Respiratory Protection and Powered Industrial Trucks standards. Three industries dominated the violations for all three — fabricated metal product manufacturing, repair and maintenance, and non-metallic mineral product manufacturing.
Citations in our top 10 were heavily concentrated in manufacturing industries, perhaps not surprising as these work environments can present a wide range of hazards such as chemicals, moving machinery and equipment, and temperature extremes. However, don’t let that fool you! Any general industry employer could be slapped with the violations in our list, if applicable. Don’t forget that OSHA can use the General Duty Clause (our number 10 violation on the list) to cite serious, recognized hazards for which no regulatory standard exists, such as heat, ergonomics, workplace violence, and unanchored metal racks.
Interestingly, food manufacturers were roped in the top three violators for lockout/tagout and electrical citations. Because employees in this industry may perform equipment maintenance or otherwise be exposed to hazards during this maintenance, lockout/tagout covers these activities. OSHA’s electrical standards are designed to protect employees exposed to dangers such as electric shock and electrocution. Section 1910.303 applies to the examination, installation, and use of electrical equipment, particularly the safety of equipment like appropriate markings, space around equipment, and guarding of live parts. Red flags for OSHA compliance officers are blocked electrical panels, missing markings on electrical panels, and improper use of PPE. Section 1910.305 applies to grounding; temporary wiring; cable trays, boxes, and fittings; switches and panelboards; enclosures for damp or wet location; insulation; and flexible cords and cables. OSHA will look for things like burned electrical outlets, damaged extension cords, and lack of training for employees doing electrical work.
Number six on the list, abatement verification, was a surprise. Under 1903.19, “abatement” means action by an employer to comply with a cited standard or regulation or to eliminate a recognized hazard identified by OSHA during an inspection. OSHA sets a date for hazards to be corrected, and employers must:
Failure to abate a cited hazard can cost you $16,550 per day beyond the abatement date, up to 30 days. That amounts to almost $500,000 per citation in addition to the original penalty amount!
Key to remember: Although the top violators in our list were concentrated in manufacturing in fiscal year 2025, all small, non-construction employers who fall under OSHA jurisdiction can use the top 10 table to strengthen their safety programs, protect their workforce, and reduce their chances of a citation.
Safety professionals know that building a strong safety culture is more than just repeating slogans like “stay safe out there.” Sustainable safety happens when it’s woven into the daily routines and attitudes of every worker.
Supervisors play a critical role in this process and bridge the gap between high-level safety goals and what actually happens on the job site. To make safety stick, supervisors must turn broad initiatives into clear, practical actions that workers can see, understand, and follow every day.
One of the most effective ways to build a safety culture is to involve front-line workers from the beginning. When workers participate in hazard assessments or help pilot new safety initiatives, they’re more likely to take ownership. This sense of ownership makes safety feel like something they control, not just something imposed from above.
For example, a manufacturing supervisor might invite experienced machine operators to help evaluate a new lockout/tagout procedure. Their insights can improve the process and ensure it’s realistic for daily use.
Actionable step:
Vague goals like “improve safety culture” don’t necessarily resonate with workers. Instead, break initiatives into specific, observable actions. If the goal is to reduce slips and falls, define behaviors such as “wipe up spills immediately” or “wear slip-resistant footwear in wet zones.” These clear expectations help workers know exactly what’s required.
Actionable step:
Safety messages should be easy to understand and remember. Use plain language and visuals such as posters, infographics, and short videos to reinforce key points.
For instance, a warehouse might display a visual checklist near the loading dock showing proper lifting techniques and PPE requirements. This keeps safety top-of-mind without overwhelming workers with too much reading required.
Actionable step:
Repetition builds habits. Supervisors should weave safety into daily routines through shift huddles, toolbox talks, and pre-task checklists.
As an example, a construction supervisor might start each morning with a five-minute safety briefing, highlighting potential hazards for the day and encouraging questions. These micro-interactions reinforce safety as a shared responsibility.
Actionable step:
Positive reinforcement is a powerful motivator. Recognize workers who consistently follow safety rules or report hazards. This could be as simple as a shout-out during a team meeting or a small reward like a gift card or company swag. When workers see that safety is valued, they’re more likely to prioritize it.
Actionable step:
People learn best by doing. Offer hands-on training that simulates real scenarios. For example, a manufacturing plant might run spill response drills where workers practice containment and cleanup procedures. This experience builds confidence and ensures workers are prepared when it counts.
Actionable step:
Workers won’t report hazards if the process is complicated or if they fear retaliation. Provide simple, anonymous reporting tools such as mobile apps, paper forms, or even an anonymous drop box. Most importantly, act on reports and communicate what’s been done or not done. Closing the loop shows workers that their voices matter.
Actionable step:
Key to remember: Make safety stick by turning it into something simple and actionable. Empower your team by listening, teaching, and rewarding safe choices. When people feel involved and valued, safety becomes a natural part of the job and a shared responsibility.
Ever since OSHA published its Trade Release on December 11, 2023, people have been scratching their heads about the “new” PPE requirement.
But here’s the thing. There isn’t a new requirement for “helmets” instead of hard hats.
So where’s the confusion? And what is actually required?
OSHA released a Safety and Health Bulletin (SHIB 11-22-2023) on November 22, 2023, detailing the key differences and benefits of using modern safety helmets over traditional hard hats.
And just a few weeks later, in the December 11, 2023 Trade Release, the Agency announced it would now require its inspectors to wear Type II head protection, which is also commonly referred to as safety helmets.
The November 22, 2023 SHIB discussed two main benefits of choosing modern safety helmets over traditional hard hats -- the construction of materials and the use of chinstraps.
| Construction of Materials: | The SHIB first explained that one of the benefits of safety helmets lies in their construction materials. While hard hats are made from hard plastics, safety helmets incorporate a combination of materials, including lightweight composites, fiberglass, and advanced thermoplastics. Such materials can help enhance the impact resistance of the helmets but also include the added benefit of reducing the overall weight of the helmet. This reduces neck strain and improves comfort during extended use. |
| Use of Chinstraps: | The SHIB also discussed the potential benefits of chinstraps used in conjunction with Type II safety helmets. The general idea here is that chinstraps can be helpful in maintaining the position of the safety helmet and protecting the worker’s head in the event of a slip, trip, or fall. According to data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, head injuries accounted for nearly 6% of non-fatal occupational injuries involving days away from work. About 20% of those were caused by slips, trips, and falls. |
And while OSHA has recognized the benefits of Type II safety helmets, and is actively taking steps to protect its own employees, it’s important to understand that there is not a new requirement for employers to make the switch to safety helmets.
That being said, a growing number of employers have recognized the benefits of added head protection and are choosing to use Type II helmets for their workers. In addition, some clients are starting to contractually require their construction contractors to make the switch as well.
Hard hats will have a Type I or Type II rating on the manufacturer’s sticker. These markings are based on ANSI Z89.1’s impact ratings.
Type I hard hats protect from objects or impacts from the top center area of the hard hat and are often used in work areas with no lateral head impact hazards.
Type II hard hats, on the other hand, offers protection from both top and lateral impacts and objects and is often found on construction job sites or complex general industry settings where workers face multiple head contact exposures.
Hard hats are classified based on their level of voltage protection. See the chart below.
| Class G – (General) low voltage protection. Class E – (Electrical) high voltage protection. Class C – (Conductive) no voltage protection. |
Employers should conduct a job hazard analysis and/or a PPE assessment to determine which style hard hat is best for their workers. In general, OSHA recommends the use of Type II safety helmets at the following locations:
1. Construction Sites: For construction sites, especially those with high risks of falling objects and debris, impacts from equipment, or slips, trips, and falls, safety helmets have enhanced impact resistance and additional features that offer superior protection compared to the components and construction of traditional hard hats.
2. Oil and Gas Industry: In these sectors where workers face multiple hazards, including potential exposure to chemicals and severe impacts, safety helmets with additional features can provide comprehensive protection.
3. Working from Heights: For tasks or jobs that involve working from heights, safety helmets offer protection of the entire head and include features that prevent the safety helmet from falling off.
4. Electrical Work: For tasks involving electrical work or proximity to electrical hazards, safety helmets with non-conductive materials (Class G and Class E) provide protection to prevent electrical shocks. However, some traditional hard hats also offer electrical protection.
5. High-Temperature Environments: In high temperatures or where there is exposure to molten materials, safety helmets with advanced heat-resistant properties can provide additional protection to workers.
Key to remember: While there isn’t a new requirement for safety helmets, employers should review their workplace hazards to determine which style of hard hat will best protect their employees.
October is fire prevention month, a time dedicated to raising awareness about fire safety in homes, workplaces, and communities. Each year, the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) designates one week in October as Fire Prevention Week™, focusing on a specific theme to promote fire prevention efforts.
This year’s theme is “Charge into Fire Safety™,” which highlights the safe use, charging, and disposal of lithium-ion batteries. These devices are increasingly linked to fire incidents.
Provide fire safety training: Organize sessions on general fire prevention and lithium-ion battery safety. Cover topics like safe charging, storage, inspection, disposal, and emergency response.
Share resources: Distribute materials and safety posters throughout the workplace. Highlight key fire risks, including electrical hazards, clutter, and battery safety.
Review policies: Update fire safety policies and ensure all battery-powered equipment is used and maintained according to manufacturer guidelines.
Promote safe disposal: Set up battery recycling stations and educate employees on proper disposal methods for batteries and other fire hazards.
Conduct fire drills: Practice evacuation plans and ensure all employees know escape routes and assembly points.
How can workers stay safe with lithium-ion batteries at work and home? Workplaces often rely on rechargeable batteries and electrical equipment, which if mishandled, can pose serious fire hazards. To help prevent incidents, employees should:
Battery-related fires can happen at home just as easily as they can at work, especially with the growing number of personal devices such as smartphones, laptops, e-bikes, power tools, and electric vehicles. Here are some strategies to include:
Lithium-ion battery fires are an escalating concern across the United States. These batteries pose serious fire risks when damaged, improperly charged, or disposed of incorrectly. Fires involving lithium-ion batteries burn hotter and spread faster than traditional fires, making them especially dangerous.
Since 2017, incidents have increased by approximately 20% annually. According to the NFPA, urban areas face the highest risk. In New York City alone, 268 lithium-ion battery fires were recorded in 2023, resulting in 18 deaths. As the use of rechargeable devices and electric vehicles continues to grow, these fire incidents are expected to rise nationwide.
Key to remember: Lithium-ion batteries are becoming more popular and essential, but they must be handled responsibly. October’s annual focus on fire prevention is a great time to reinforce safety practices, educate workers, and take steps to prevent fires at work and at home.
Did you know that would-be rescuers account for more than 60% of all confined space deaths?
These deaths represent the number of workers who ran into a space during an emergency in an attempt to rescue a co-worker or friend.
But confined space hazards can quickly overwhelm the people inside. And the would-be rescuers often become victims themselves before they can even reach the original entrants.
That’s why it’s so important to have a rescue plan in place.
In a recent J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc. survey with 224 participants, 22% of employers felt that rescue preparedness was their biggest challenge regarding confined spaces.
So let’s review what federal OSHA requires for confined space rescue.
First, according to OSHA standard 1910.146(d)(9), employers must develop and implement procedures for the following:
This is where employers need to put on their critical thinking caps. Ask yourself: Do we have procedures for summoning rescue and emergency services? How do we rescue entrants from our permit spaces?
These conversations need to be had between the key players in your confined space operations. Supervisors, entrants, attendants, and safety personnel should develop and implement these procedures together.
Next, OSHA standard 1910.146(f) requires the entry permits to identify the following:
To facilitate non-entry rescue, retrieval systems or methods shall be used whenever an authorized entrant enters a permit space unless the retrieval equipment would increase the overall risk of entry or would not contribute to the rescue of the entrant.
Next, OSHA standard 1910.146(i) lists the attendants' duties. And in terms of rescue, those duties include:
And finally, OSHA standard 1910.146(k) offers guidance on designating rescue and emergency services.
Essentially, employers must evaluate a prospective rescuer's ability to respond to a rescue summons in a timely manner. They must take the specific hazards involved into consideration when determining what a “timely” rescue means.
Employers have two options for designating rescue and emergency services:
If the employer chooses to use an in-house team of employees, the employer must:
Check out “Part 2” of this series, Confined Space Rescue (Part 2): Partnering with outside resources.
Key to remember: Employers must develop and implement rescue procedures for all permit-required confined space entry operations. Are you prepared?