Compliance Just Got Easier: Stay ahead of regulatory changes with instant notifications on updates that matter.
['Registration and Permits - Motor Carrier']
['International Registration Plan (IRP)', 'Temporary trip permits']
2026-05-12T05:00:00Z
JOIN TODAY TO CONTINUE READING THIS ARTICLE & OTHER INDUSTRY NEWS!
You'll also get exclusive access to:
A database of easy-to-understand regulationsAsk unlimited questions to our expertsPre-led discussions forumsAnd more
TRY IT FREE TODAY
Already have an account? Log in now.
NewsIndustry NewsInternational Registration Plan (IRP)Temporary trip permitsFocus AreaIn-Depth ArticleFleet OperationsEnglishTransportationRegistration and Permits - Motor CarrierUSA
Your cab card is not one size fits all (states)
2026-05-12T05:00:00Z
If you’ve ever looked closely at your apportioned cab card, you may have noticed that not every state lists the same maximum weight. One jurisdiction might show 90,000 pounds, another 80,000, and others even lower. Is that a mistake? Usually not. But understanding what those numbers mean can help you avoid tickets, out-of-service orders, and audit headaches.
Why weights vary by state
Under the International Registration Plan (IRP), carriers register vehicles at declared weights for each participating jurisdiction. The weight shown for each state reflects what you paid to operate in that jurisdiction. It’s not a blanket authorization to run that weight everywhere.
Several factors drive the differences:
- State maximums: States allow defined maximum weights on their roads, and they’re not necessarily the same as what neighboring states allow.
- Axle and configuration limits: Some states may allow heavier weights with specific axle spacing or configurations.
- The registration weight you declared (and paid for): If you only declared 80,000 pounds for a particular state to reduce your registration fees, that’s the limit the cab card will show, even if the state allows more. Carriers often declare lower weights in some states to reduce IRP fees.
- Permits vs. registration: Higher weights often require overweight permits, which do not appear on the cab card.
What enforcement looks at
At roadside, enforcement is less concerned with why weights differ and more concerned with three things:
- Are you operating within your registered weight for that state? If your cab card says 80,000 for that jurisdiction, running heavier without a valid permit is a violation.
- Does your axle configuration comply with state law? Even if your total weight is within your registered weight, improper axle spacing can still put you over legal limits.
- Do you have required permits in-hand or electronically available? Operating under an overweight permit but failing to have the permit available during a roadside inspection can lead to citations or temporary out-of-service orders until proof is provided.
A common misconception is that enforcement defaults to 80,000 pounds. In reality, officers rely on what is printed on your cab card for each jurisdiction, combined with state axle laws and permit requirements.
Before crossing a state line, check:
- The cab card row for that state,
- Your current gross weight, and
- Whether a permit is required and available.
Avoid these mistakes
Common carrier mistakes include:
- Assuming the highest weight on the cab card applies everywhere,
- Running permit-only weights without a permit because the cab card shows a higher number in another state,
- Failing to update registered weights after changes in equipment or operations, and
- Letting drivers guess instead of helping them understand how to read the cab card correctly.
Key to remember: Your cab card is a state-by-state permission slip, not a universal weight pass. Understanding why the numbers differ and how enforcement uses them can prevent violations, delays, and costly compliance issues. When in doubt, verify the registered weight for a specific jurisdiction before rolling across the state line.

NewsIndustry NewsInternational Registration Plan (IRP)Temporary trip permitsFocus AreaIn-Depth ArticleFleet OperationsEnglishTransportationRegistration and Permits - Motor CarrierUSA
Your cab card is not one size fits all (states)
2026-05-12T05:00:00Z
Written by
Corrina Peterson
Corrina Peterson
University of Michigan
Compliance Expert at J. J. Keller & Associates, specializing in fleet taxes, registration, permitting, and hazardous materials.
If you’ve ever looked closely at your apportioned cab card, you may have noticed that not every state lists the same maximum weight. One jurisdiction might show 90,000 pounds, another 80,000, and others even lower. Is that a mistake? Usually not. But understanding what those numbers mean can help you avoid tickets, out-of-service orders, and audit headaches.
Why weights vary by state
Under the International Registration Plan (IRP), carriers register vehicles at declared weights for each participating jurisdiction. The weight shown for each state reflects what you paid to operate in that jurisdiction. It’s not a blanket authorization to run that weight everywhere.
Several factors drive the differences:
- State maximums: States allow defined maximum weights on their roads, and they’re not necessarily the same as what neighboring states allow.
- Axle and configuration limits: Some states may allow heavier weights with specific axle spacing or configurations.
- The registration weight you declared (and paid for): If you only declared 80,000 pounds for a particular state to reduce your registration fees, that’s the limit the cab card will show, even if the state allows more. Carriers often declare lower weights in some states to reduce IRP fees.
- Permits vs. registration: Higher weights often require overweight permits, which do not appear on the cab card.
What enforcement looks at
At roadside, enforcement is less concerned with why weights differ and more concerned with three things:
- Are you operating within your registered weight for that state? If your cab card says 80,000 for that jurisdiction, running heavier without a valid permit is a violation.
- Does your axle configuration comply with state law? Even if your total weight is within your registered weight, improper axle spacing can still put you over legal limits.
- Do you have required permits in-hand or electronically available? Operating under an overweight permit but failing to have the permit available during a roadside inspection can lead to citations or temporary out-of-service orders until proof is provided.
A common misconception is that enforcement defaults to 80,000 pounds. In reality, officers rely on what is printed on your cab card for each jurisdiction, combined with state axle laws and permit requirements.
Before crossing a state line, check:
- The cab card row for that state,
- Your current gross weight, and
- Whether a permit is required and available.
Avoid these mistakes
Common carrier mistakes include:
- Assuming the highest weight on the cab card applies everywhere,
- Running permit-only weights without a permit because the cab card shows a higher number in another state,
- Failing to update registered weights after changes in equipment or operations, and
- Letting drivers guess instead of helping them understand how to read the cab card correctly.
Key to remember: Your cab card is a state-by-state permission slip, not a universal weight pass. Understanding why the numbers differ and how enforcement uses them can prevent violations, delays, and costly compliance issues. When in doubt, verify the registered weight for a specific jurisdiction before rolling across the state line.
See More
RELATED NEWS
NewsIndustry NewsFleet SafetyInternational Registration Plan (IRP)TransportationVehicle Registration PermitsIn-Depth ArticleRegistrationCommercial motor vehicle definitionEnglishCommercial motor vehicle definitionFocus AreaRegistration and Permits - Motor CarrierUSA
09/08/2022
Your vehicle weight might not be what you thought
NewsIndustry NewsInternational Registration Plan (IRP)Vehicle Registration PermitsFocus AreaIn-Depth ArticleFleet OperationsCommercial motor vehicle definitionEnglishCommercial motor vehicle definitionTransportationRegistration and Permits - Motor CarrierUSA
12/13/2021
Your vehicle weight might not be what you thought

Specialized Industries
Go beyond the regulations! Visit the Institute for in-depth guidance on a wide range of compliance subjects in safety and health, transportation, environment, and human resources.
J. J. Keller® COMPLIANCE NETWORK is a premier online safety and compliance community, offering members exclusive access to timely regulatory content in workplace safety (OSHA), transportation (DOT), environment (EPA), and human resources (DOL).

Interact With Our Compliance Experts
Puzzled by a regulatory question or issue? Let our renowned experts provide the answers and get your business on track to full compliance!

Upcoming Events
Reference the Compliance Network Safety Calendar to keep track of upcoming safety and compliance events. Browse by industry or search by keyword to see relevant dates and observances, including national safety months, compliance deadlines, and more.
SAFETY & COMPLIANCE NEWS
Keep up with the latest regulatory developments from OSHA, DOT, EPA, DOL, and more.
REGSENSE® REGULATORY REFERENCE
Explore a comprehensive database of word-for-word regulations on a wide range of compliance topics, with simplified explanations and best practices advice from our experts.
THE J. J. KELLER INSTITUTE
The Institute is your destination for in-depth content on 120+ compliance subjects. Discover articles, videos, and interactive exercises that will strengthen your understanding of regulatory concepts relevant to your business.
ADD HAZMAT, ENVIRONMENTAL, & HR RESOURCES
Unlock exclusive content offering expert insights into hazmat, environmental, and human resources compliance with a COMPLIANCE NETWORK EDGE membership.
DIRECT ACCESS TO COMPLIANCE EXPERTS
Struggling with a compliance challenge? Get the solution from our in-house team of experts! You can submit a question to our experts by email, set up a phone or video call, or request a detailed research report.
EVENTS
Register to attend live online events hosted by our experts. These webcasts and virtual conferences feature engaging discussions on important compliance topics in a casual, knowledge-sharing environment.
Most Recent Highlights In Environmental
NewsGreenhouse GasesWaste/HazWasteToxic Substances Control Act - EPASafe Drinking WaterWater AnalysisWater ProgramsWater QualityMaximum Contaminant LevelsWalking Working SurfacesMonthly Roundup VideoCAA ComplianceSolid WasteCWA ComplianceLaddersEnglishUSAHeat StressIndustry NewsHeat and Cold ExposureSafety & HealthGeneral Industry SafetyWasteMaritime SafetyEnvironmentalFocus AreaWater MonitoringVolatile Organic CompoundsAir ProgramsStationary Emission SourcesVideo
EHS Monthly Round Up - April 2026
In this April 2026 roundup video, we’ll review the most impactful environmental health and safety news.
Hi everyone! Welcome to the monthly news roundup video, where we’ll review the most impactful environmental health and safety news. Let’s take a look at what happened over the past month.
OSHA revised its National Emphasis Program on heat-related hazards. Going forward, the agency will prioritize inspections in 55 high-risk industries in indoor and outdoor work settings. The program remains in effect for 5 years from its April 10 effective date.
An OSHA proposed rule seeks to eliminate the November 18, 2036, deadline in the Walking-Working Surfaces standard that would require all fixed ladders extending more than 24 feet above a lower level to be equipped with personal fall arrest systems or ladder safety systems. OSHA also seeks feedback on nine specific questions related to the proposal, with comments due on June 5.
On April 17, OSHA revoked its House Falls in Marine Terminals standard at 1917.41. The agency said that because most cargo has been containerized and is moved by cranes, the standard is no longer necessary to protect employees.
Turning to environmental news, an EPA final rule further delays the submission period for the one-time PFAS report required of manufacturers. It pushes the start of the submission period to either 60 days after the effective date of a future final rule updating the PFAS Reporting Rule or January 31, 2027, whichever comes first.
An EPA final rule makes technical changes to the emission standards established in March 2024 for crude oil and natural gas facilities. The changes take effect June 8.
EPA published the draft 6th Contaminant Candidate List for the next group of contaminants to be considered for regulation under the Safe Drinking Water Act. The proposed list designates microplastics and pharmaceuticals as priority contaminant groups for the first time.
And finally, EPA plans to make significant changes to coal combustion residuals requirements. A proposed rule published April 13 would revise the regulations governing the disposal of coal combustion residuals in landfills and surface impoundments, as well as the beneficial use of coal combustion residuals.
Thanks for tuning in to the monthly news roundup. We’ll see you next month!
NewsGreenhouse GasesEnforcement and Audits - OSHAMonthly Roundup VideoWalking Working SurfacesCAA ComplianceUSAInjury and Illness RecordkeepingLaddersEnglishIndustry NewsEnforcement and Audits - OSHAOSHA InspectionsSafety & HealthInjury and Illness Recording CriteriaGeneral Industry SafetyEnvironmentalFocus AreaAir ProgramsVideo
EHS Monthly Round Up - February 2026
In this Februrary 2026 roundup video, we'll discuss the most impactful environmental health and safety news.
Hi everyone! Welcome to the monthly news roundup video, where we’ll review the most impactful environmental health and safety news. Let’s take a look at what happened over the past month.
Fatal work injuries fell 4 percent in 2024, largely due to a decline in workplace drug- and alcohol-related overdoses. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, overdose fatalities fell from 512 in 2023 to 410 in 2024. Across all types of workplace incidents, there were 5,070 fatal work injuries in 2024, compared to 5,283 in 2023. Transportation incidents continue to be the most frequent type of fatal event, accounting for over 38 percent of all occupational fatalities in 2024.
OSHA is fast-tracking a proposal to remove the 2036 obligation to upgrade fall protection systems on fixed ladders that extend over 24 feet. This follows an industry petition from major chemical and petroleum industry groups, which argue the provision is unjustified, costly, and not supported by the rulemaking record. OSHA frames the upcoming proposed action as deregulatory, allowing employers to update fixed ladders at the end of their service lives. We’ll provide updates as more information becomes available.
As OSHA leans into “deregulatory” actions, lawmakers are moving to pressure the agency to issue “regulatory” rulemaking to protect American workers. The latest legislative wave of bills aims to fill regulatory gaps, tackle emerging hazards, expand OSHA authority, and raise penalties. Topics addressed by these bills include musculoskeletal disorders, heat stress, infectious diseases, wildfire smoke, and workplace violence.
In a recently issued letter of interpretation, OSHA states that a burn injury caused by a personal lithium-ion battery fire is work related if it occurs in the workplace during assigned working hours. The letter details an incident where an employee was burned when their rechargeable lithium-ion batteries for e-cigarettes sparked a fire after coming into contact with a key used for work.
A new report from the Department of Labor Office of Inspector General concludes that OSHA struggles to meet its mission, particularly in high-risk industries like healthcare, construction, and manufacturing. Several pages point to OSHA’s difficulties in effectively enforcing annual injury and illness reporting requirements, reaching the nation’s high-risk worksites for inspection, and addressing workplace violence by regulatory or other action.
Turning to environmental news, EPA extended the deadlines for Facility Evaluation Reports and related requirements for coal combustion residuals facilities. In most instances, the deadlines have been moved one or two years out.
And finally, EPA announced a final rule eliminating the 2009 Endangerment Finding and related greenhouse gas emission requirements for on-highway vehicles and vehicle engines. When the final rule takes effect, manufacturers and importers of new motor vehicles and motor vehicle engines will no longer have to measure, report, certify, or comply with federal greenhouse gas emission standards.
Thanks for tuning in to the monthly news roundup. We’ll see you next month!
NewsWaste ManifestsEnforcement and Audits - OSHAWaste/HazWasteWater ProgramsMonthly Roundup VideoCAA ComplianceUSACWA ComplianceStormwaterEnglishAir ProgramsIndustry NewsEnforcement and Audits - OSHAMunicipal WastewaterSafety & HealthGeneral Industry SafetyWasteEnvironmentalFocus AreaAir ProgramsVideo
EHS Monthly Round Up - March 2026
In this March 2026 roundup video, we'll review the most impactful environmental health and safety news.
Hi everyone! Welcome to the monthly news roundup video, where we’ll review the most impactful environmental health and safety news. Let’s take a look at what happened over the past month.
OSHA released an updated Job Safety and Health poster. Employers can use either the revised version or the older one, but the poster must be displayed in a conspicuous place where workers can easily see it.
OSHA recently removed a link from its Data topic webpage that displayed a list of “high-penalty cases” at or over $40,000 since 2015. The agency says it discontinued and removed it in December. The data is frozen and archived elsewhere.
OSHA published two new resources as part of its newly launched Safety Champions Program. The fact sheet provides an overview of how the program works, eligibility criteria, and key benefits. The step-by-step guide helps businesses navigate the core elements of OSHA’s Recommended Practices for Safety and Health Programs.
Several forces are nudging OSHA to address a number of workplace hazards and high-hazard industries. This comes from other agencies, safety organizations, watchdogs, legislative proposals, and persistent injury/fatality data. Among the hazards are combustible dust; first aid; personal protective equipment; and workplace violence. How all this translates into new regulations, guidance, programmed inspections, or other initiatives remains to be seen.
Turning to environmental news, EPA issued a proposed rule to require waste handlers to use electronic manifests to track all RCRA hazardous waste shipments. Stakeholders have until May 4 to comment on the proposal.
On March 10, EPA finalized stronger emission limits for new and existing large municipal waste combustors and made other changes to related standards.
And finally, EPA temporarily extended coverage under the 2021 Multi-Sector General Permit for industrial stormwater discharges until the agency issues a new general permit. The permit expired February 28 and remains in effect for facilities previously covered. EPA won’t take enforcement action against new facilities for unpermitted stormwater discharges if the facilities meet specific conditions.
Thanks for tuning in to the monthly news roundup. We’ll see you next month!
NewsCERCLA, SARA, EPCRA CERCLA, SARA, EPCRASafety and Health Programs and TrainingElectronic Reporting of Injury and Illness RecordsWater ProgramsMonthly Roundup VideoSafety and Health Programs and TrainingUSAWater ProgramsHazard CommunicationInjury and Illness RecordkeepingEnglishTier II Inventory ReportingIndustry NewsSafety & HealthInjury and Illness RecordkeepingWater ReportingGeneral Industry SafetyEnvironmentalHazard CommunicationSARA ComplianceFocus AreaVideo
EHS Monthly Round Up - January 2026
In this January 2026 roundup video, we'll review the most impactful environmental health and safety news.
Hi everyone! Welcome to the monthly news roundup video, where we’ll review the most impactful environmental health and safety news. Let’s take a look at what happened over the past month.
Chemical manufacturers, importers, distributors, and employers will have an extra four months to comply with the provisions of OSHA’s revised Hazard Communication standard. When the rule was revised in 2024, it contained staggered compliance dates for those who classify or use chemical substances and mixtures. The first compliance date is now May 19 rather than January 19 of 2026.
On January 8, OSHA issued further technical corrections to its Hazard Communication final rule. An initial set of corrections was published in October 2024, and OSHA continued to review the standard for errors. The agency said these corrections should reduce confusion during the chemical classification process and prevent errors on labels and safety data sheets.
In 2024, private industry employers reported 2.5 million nonfatal workplace injuries and illnesses, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics. This is down 3.1 percent from 2023 and largely due to a decrease in respiratory illnesses. The greatest number of cases involving days away from work, job restriction, or transfer were caused by overexertion, repetitive motion, and bodily conditions, followed by contact incidents.
Registration is open for OSHA’s Safety Champions Program, which is designed to help employers develop and implement effective safety and health programs. Participants can work at their own pace through Introductory, Intermediate, and Advanced levels.
Turning to environmental news, on January 9, EPA withdrew its direct final rule on SDS/Tier II reporting tied to OSHA HazCom, before it had a chance to take effect. The direct final rule was published back on November 17, 2025, and was intended to relax the Tier II and safety data sheet reporting requirements and align with OSHA’s HazCom standard. EPA said it plans to write a new rule addressing all public comments.
And finally, EPA published a final rule that changes certain requirements for wastewater discharges from coal-fired steam electric power plants. It applies to the deadlines established by the preceding rule finalized in 2024.
Thanks for tuning in to the monthly news roundup. We’ll see you next month!
NewsIndustry NewsIndustry NewsToxic Substances Control Act - EPAToxic Subtances Control Act - EPATSCA ComplianceToxic Substances - EPAEnvironmental Protection Agency (EPA)EnvironmentalEnglishFocus AreaUSA
2026-05-07T05:00:00Z
EPA postpones compliance for TCE uses with TSCA Section 6(g) exemptions
On May 5, 2026, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) published a final rule postponing the effective date of compliance requirements for trichloroethylene (TCE) uses with Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) Section 6(g) exemptions until pending judicial review is concluded.
Who’s impacted?
The delay applies to the conditions imposed on each TSCA Section 6(g) exemption at 40 CFR 751.325, including the Workplace Chemical Protection Program requirements at 751.315.
Since the compliance requirements haven’t taken effect, facilities that use TCE with TSCA Section 6(g) exemptions don’t have to comply with the provisions yet.
Why the delay?
In December 2024, EPA released the final TCE rule (2024 TCE rule). The rule ultimately bans all uses of TCE, but it allows uses with TSCA Section 6(g) exemptions to continue for a limited time as long as facilities comply with strict workplace controls. Currently, the 2024 TCE rule is under judicial review. EPA has delayed the effective date of the requirements for TCE uses with TSCA Section 6(g) exemptions until the judicial challenges to the 2024 TCE rule are resolved.
If you have a sense of déjà vu, it’s for a good reason. This is the fifth time the agency has delayed the compliance requirements for TSCA Section 6(g) exemptions. However, EPA’s previous postponements established specific dates for the provisions to take effect, but this rule doesn’t.
Key to remember: EPA has delayed the compliance requirements for TCE uses with TSCA Section 6(g) exemptions until pending judicial review is concluded.
Most Recent Highlights In Transportation
NewsSafe Drinking WaterChange NoticesChange NoticeWater ProgramsEnvironmentalCWA ComplianceEnglishWisconsinFocus Area
2026-05-04T05:00:00Z
Wisconsin adds requirements to federal lead and copper drinking water rule
Effective date: May 1, 2026
This applies to: Public water systems
Description of change: The Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources (department) finalized amendments to align state regulations with the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA’s) updated lead and copper control requirements for drinking water. While most of the amendments conform to federal standards, the state has additional standards. The department also:
- Requires community water systems to make four contact attempts (two more than federal requirements) by two different means for elementary schools and childcare facilities to schedule lead monitoring,
- Requires public water systems on reduced annual monitoring to analyze and report the same number of sample results for copper and lead (instead of the federal requirements that only half of the copper samples are analyzed),
- Requires public water systems undergoing temporary treatment or source water changes (unregulated by EPA) for more than 30 days to notify the department 10 days before the planned change or as soon as possible for an unplanned emergency change,
- Requires groundwater system water suppliers that request to limit their entry point sampling to obtain prior approval from the department,
- Requires water suppliers that provide point-of-use treatment devices for the corrosion control treatment compliance flexibility option to submit a written plan to the department (not required by the federal rule),
- Grants the department the authority to require analysis of total and dissolved lead during distribution system and site assessments where the federal rule doesn’t provide this authority to the state,
- Requires water suppliers that request to invalidate a reported sample result to provide substantial evidence that the sample meets one of the invalidation criteria in the rule, and
- Combines the lead and copper monitoring waivers into one waiver and requires public water systems to complete at least two 6-month rounds of standard tap water monitoring (for which the federal rule only requires one 6-month round).
NewsDistrict of ColumbiaChange NoticesChange NoticeCAA ComplianceEnvironmentalAir PermittingFocus AreaEnglishAir Programs
2026-05-04T05:00:00Z
District of Columbia updates odor control permit rules
Effective date: April 10, 2026
This applies to: Entities required to obtain an operating air permit under Nuisance Odor Regulations
Description of change: The District of Columbia’s Department of Energy and Environment (DOEE) finalized a rulemaking that allows sources of nuisance odors to implement odor controls before obtaining an operating air permit under 20 DCMR Section 200.
To qualify, an entity must obtain from the DOEE written approval of the controls in the Odor Control Plan (OCP) decision letter. Additionally, the source must apply for an operating permit under 200.2 within 60 days of receiving an OCP decision letter.
Related state info: Clean air operating permits state comparison
NewsChange NoticesChange NoticeCaliforniaMobile Emission SourcesCAA ComplianceEnvironmentalFocus AreaEnglishAir Programs
2026-05-04T05:00:00Z
California permanently adopts emergency vehicle rules
Effective date: April 1, 2026
This applies to: New vehicle and engine manufacturers
Description of change: The California Air Resources Board (CARB) permanently adopted the Emergency Vehicle Emissions Regulations, which CARB adopted in 2025 as a temporary measure.
The rule reverts the emission standards and requirements for vehicle and engine manufacturers to the regulations in effect before the adoption of:
- Advanced Clean Cars II (ACC II), and
- Heavy-Duty Engine and Vehicle Omnibus Low NOx (Omnibus).
CARB allows manufacturers to comply with ACC II and Omnibus requirements voluntarily.
In 2025, the Environmental Protection Agency revoked CARB’s waivers to implement the ACC II, Omnibus, and Advanced Clean Trucks rules.
NewsHazardous WasteIndustry NewsWaste GeneratorsWaste ManifestsWaste/HazWasteWaste HandlersWasteEnvironmental Protection Agency (EPA)TSD FacilitiesEnvironmentalIn-Depth ArticleEnglishFocus AreaUSA
2026-04-28T05:00:00Z
Hazardous waste manifests: Hybrid vs. fully electronic
More industries are embracing the exclusive use of electronic platforms. For example, digital payments are replacing cash, news sites are going fully online, and cloud storage is eclipsing external computer storage. And, based on recent proposed rulemaking, hazardous waste manifests may join the list.
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) proposed the Paper Manifest Sunset Rule in March 2026, planning to shift to electronic-only manifests for tracking hazardous waste that’s regulated by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA).
If the proposed rule is finalized, regulated entities will have to track all hazardous waste shipments electronically. Specifically, generators, transporters, and receiving facilities could only use hybrid or fully electronic manifests on the Hazardous Waste Electronic Manifest System (e-Manifest).
So, what are the differences between hybrid and fully electronic manifests? Let’s compare the distinctions and explore some of the benefits that electronic manifests can offer.
What’s a hybrid manifest?
EPA initially established the hybrid manifest for generators that couldn’t fully participate in electronic manifests when the e-Manifest launched in 2018. The hybrid manifest combines paper and electronic manifests, allowing generators that aren’t registered in e-Manifest or don’t have an EPA identification (ID) number to sign printed copies of electronic manifests.
Here’s the general hybrid manifest process:
- The first transporter initiates an electronic manifest in e-Manifest. A hard copy of the electronic manifest is printed out, and the generator and initial transporter sign the paper copy.
- The generator keeps a signed paper copy on-site. The transporter keeps a signed paper copy with the shipment until it’s delivered to the receiving facility.
- From that point forward, the initial transporter and all subsequent waste handlers track the shipment in e-Manifest (using electronic signatures and electronic transmissions).
- The manifest is complete when the receiving facility or exporter electronically signs it on e-Manifest.
What’s a fully electronic manifest?
The fully electronic manifest is tracked completely online. All handlers — generators, transporters, and receiving facilities or exporters — must have an EPA ID number and be registered in e-Manifest to use the fully electronic manifest.
The entire process is conducted on e-Manifest:
- The manifest is created electronically in e-Manifest.
- All handlers electronically sign the manifest in e-Manifest.
- The manifest is complete when the receiving facility or exporter electronically signs it on e-Manifest.
What benefits do electronic manifests offer?
Regardless of whether EPA’s rule is finalized as is, electronic manifests offer hazardous waste handlers a range of benefits. Consider the following potential perks.
Compliance with existing regulations
Many handlers are already required to embrace electronic manifesting. In July 2024, EPA finalized the e-Manifest Third Rule, which requires:
- Large quantity generators and small quantity generators to register for e-Manifest,
- Exporters to submit manifests and continuation sheets to e-Manifest (and pay the associated fees), and
- Waste handlers to submit manifest-related reports and data corrections to e-Manifest.
Streamlined recordkeeping for generators
Hazardous waste handlers using e-Manifest automatically meet the recordkeeping requirements to maintain records of manifests (paper or electronic) since the manifests are retained electronically in the system.
This eliminates the need to keep hard copies. It also provides a centralized place where handlers can access these documents at any time.
However, the provision doesn’t apply to generators using hybrid manifests; they must keep the initial paper copies of the electronic manifest for 3 years.
Reduced costs
Embracing electronic manifesting removes the costs associated with printing paper manifests from EPA-approved sources.
Keep in mind, there’s an unavoidable cost for receiving facilities and exporters. These entities have to pay user fees for each manifest they submit to e-Manifest.
Proactive preparation
EPA’s proposed Paper Manifest Sunset Rule would prohibit the use of paper manifests 2 years after the publication of a final rule. Hazardous waste handlers who transition to using only electronic manifests now will be better prepared to comply with future regulations. It gives businesses time to coordinate resources and address any unexpected issues.
Key to remember: Do you know the differences between hybrid and fully electronic hazardous waste manifests? The distinctions could be the difference between compliance and noncompliance.
NewsIndustry NewsIndustry NewsToxic Substances Control Act - EPAToxic Subtances Control Act - EPATSCA ComplianceEnvironmental Protection Agency (EPA)EnvironmentalEnglishFocus AreaUSA
2026-04-27T05:00:00Z
EPA publishes first round of expiring TSCA CBI claims
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) published the first list of expiring Confidential Business Information (CBI) claims for information submitted under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA). The list covers CBI claims that expire from June 22, 2026, to July 31, 2026.
What are expiring CBI claims?
The Frank R. Lautenberg Chemical Safety for the 21st Century Act (which became law in June 2016) set an automatic 10-year expiration for most CBI claims made under TSCA. The first round of expiring claims starts in June 2026.
EPA allows businesses to request extensions of CBI protection for up to another 10 years.
How do I know if my CBI claims are expiring?
EPA will notify businesses of expiring CBI claims directly through the Central Data Exchange (CDX).
The agency will also release public lists of upcoming expiring CBI claims monthly on the “CBI Claim Expiration” webpage. The agency encourages businesses to review the lists to verify whether any of their claims are included.
How do I request an extension of expiring CBI claims?
Businesses seeking to extend a CBI claim beyond its expiration date must submit an extension request at least 30 days before the claim expires using the newly launched TSCA Section 14(e) CBI Claim Extension Request application in EPA’s CDX.
Here’s the general process:
- EPA notifies the business of an expiring CBI claim directly through CDX and via the public lists on the “CBI Claim Expiration” webpage.
- The business submits a request for extension through EPA’s CDX at least 30 days before the CBI claim expires. Requests must comply with the substantiation requirements at 40 CFR 703.5(a) and (b).
- EPA reviews the submission and either grants or denies the request.
What are the possible results?
If EPA approves the extension request, the information in the CBI claim will remain protected for up to another 10 years.
If EPA denies the extension request, the agency can publicize the information in the claim 30 days after notifying the submitter in CDX. Further, if a business doesn’t submit an extension request at least 30 days before the expiration date, EPA may publicize the information without notifying the submitter.
Key to remember: EPA published the first round of expiring CBI claims for information submitted under TSCA. Businesses must submit extension requests to keep the information protected.
Most Recent Highlights In Safety & Health
NewsChange NoticesAboveground Storage TanksChange NoticeEnvironmentalStorage TanksFocus AreaEnglishNorth DakotaTank Systems
2026-04-24T05:00:00Z
North Dakota establishes AST regulations
Effective date: April 1, 2026
This applies to: Owners and operators of aboveground storage tanks (ASTs) and liquid fuel storage tanks
Description of change: The Department of Environmental Quality adopted technical standards and corrective action requirements for ASTs. The department also approved amendments to the registration dates and fee categories of the Petroleum Tank Release Compensation Fund for liquid fuels storage tanks.
Related state info: Aboveground storage tanks (ASTs) state comparison — ASTs
NewsWater PermittingPublicly Owned Treatment WorksChange NoticesChange NoticeOhioWater ProgramsEnvironmentalWater ProgramsEnglishFocus AreaCWA Compliance
2026-04-24T05:00:00Z
Ohio finalizes sewage sludge amendments
Effective date: March 1, 2026
This applies to: Facilities regulated by the sewage sludge program
Description of change: The Ohio Environmental Protection Agency finalized changes to the sewage sludge program through its 5-year review of the regulations. The approved amendments:
- Add professional operator of record requirements for privately owned treatment works;
- Increase and add isolation distances for facilities;
- Prohibit beneficial use of biosolids within a vulnerable hydrogeological setting;
- Remove dioxin monitoring requirements; and
- Add requirements for beneficial user certification (including the application and examination process, recordkeeping requirements, and reasons for suspending or revoking a certification).
NewsNew MexicoNew Mexico Environment Department (NMED)Change NoticesChange NoticeMobile Emission SourcesCAA ComplianceEnvironmentalFocus AreaEnglishAir Programs
2026-04-24T05:00:00Z
New Mexico adopts Clean Transportation Fuel Program rules
Effective date: April 1, 2026
This applies to: Transportation fuel produced in, imported into, or dispensed for use in New Mexico
Description of change: The New Mexico Environment Department finalized regulations to implement the Clean Transportation Fuel Program (CTFP) to reduce the carbon intensity of transportation fuel (including gasoline and diesel). The program covers transportation fuel producers, importers, and dispensers.
The CTFP:
- Establishes annual statewide carbon intensity standards that apply to transportation fuel (e.g., gasoline and diesel) produced, imported, and dispensed for use in New Mexico;
- Allocates credits and calculates deficits for regulated entities based on the fuel’s carbon intensity; and
- Sets up a marketplace for selling and purchasing credits to comply with the carbon intensity standards.
The first compliance period runs from April 1, 2026, to December 31, 2027. The first compliance period report is due by April 30, 2028. Annual compliance reports will be due by April 30 for the previous calendar year.
NewsRecyclingChange NoticesChange NoticeMaineSustainabilityProduct StewardshipSustainabilityWaste MinimizationEnvironmentalEnglishSustainabilityFocus Area
2026-04-24T05:00:00Z
Maine lists materials covered for packaging stewardship program
Effective date: March 3, 2026
This applies to: Entities subject to the Stewardship Program for Packaging Regulations
Description of change: The Maine Department of Environmental Protection’s amendments to the Stewardship Program for Packaging Regulations (06-096 C.M.R. Chapter 428) include:
- Aligning the rules with changes made by An Act to Improve Recycling by Updating the Stewardship Program for Packaging (L.D. 1423), and
- Adding Appendix A — The Packaging Material Types List to the Stewardship Program for Packaging Regulations.
L.D. 1423:
- Excludes certain commercial, cosmetic, medical, environmental, dangerous, hazardous, and flammable product packaging from the program requirements;
- Excludes packaging of products related to public health and water quality testing from the program requirements;
- Requires the department to adopt a process for approving a producer payment system; and
- Updates definitions for clarity.
Appendix A defines packaging material and designates the material types readily recyclable as applicable. It may also designate materials as compostable or reusable.
NewsWaste/HazWasteChange NoticesChange NoticeWasteCaliforniaEnvironmentalSolid WasteEnglishFocus Area
2026-04-24T05:00:00Z
California adopts permanent illegal disposal rules
Effective date: March 4, 2026
This applies to: Entities that handle, transfer, compost, transform, or dispose of solid waste
Description of change: CalRecycle made permanent the current illegal disposal emergency regulations, allowing enforcement agencies to take action against any person who illegally disposes of solid waste.
The rule also:
- Adds the land application activities to the regulations, making the activities subject to the permitting tier structure and associated requirements (i.e., operator filing requirements, state minimum standards, recordkeeping, and enforcement agency inspection requirements); and
- Amends sampling and recordkeeping for solid waste facilities, operations, and activities.
Most Recent Highlights In Human Resources
NewsWest VirginiaChange NoticesChange NoticeWater ProgramsEnvironmentalCWA ComplianceEnglishUnderground Injection ControlFocus Area
2026-04-24T05:00:00Z
West Virginia establishes fee schedule for UIC Program
Effective date: March 4, 2026
This applies to: Underground Injection Control (UIC) Program permittees
Description of change: This rule establishes the schedules of fees for carbon dioxide capture and sequestration authorized by the West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection’s (WVDEP’s) Division of Water and Waste Management.
EPA granted primacy to the WVDEP to implement the UIC Program for Class VI wells in February 2025.
NewsGreenhouse GasesChange NoticesChange NoticeColoradoCAA ComplianceEnvironmentalFocus AreaEnglishAir Programs
2026-04-24T05:00:00Z
Colorado extends timeline to comply with GHG intensity targets
Effective date: April 14, 2026
This applies to: Small operators in the oil and gas sector
Description of change: The Colorado Air Quality Control Commission revised the intensity targets for reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions for small oil and gas operators (those with less than 45 thousand barrels of oil equivalent (kBOE) production in 2025). The commission extended the first deadline to 2030 for small operators to meet applicable intensity requirements.
However, small operators must still submit the intensity plan for the 2027 targets, which is due by June 30, 2026.
Related state info: Clean air operating permits state comparison — Clean air operating permits
NewsWater PermittingChange NoticesChange NoticeWater ProgramsColoradoEnvironmentalCWA ComplianceEnglishFocus Area
2026-04-24T05:00:00Z
Colorado finalizes state dredge and fill permit regulations
Effective date: March 30, 2026
This applies to: Projects that require preconstruction notification or compensatory mitigation
Description of change: The Colorado Water Quality Control Division finalized rules for implementing a state dredge and fill discharge authorization program established by HB24-1379. The program covers state waters that aren’t subject to federal dredge and fill permitting requirements under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act.
The division will continue issuing Temporary Authorizations until August 31, 2026. After that, applicants must apply for coverage under General Authorizations. The division already accepts applications for Individual Authorizations.
Related state info: Construction water permitting — Colorado
NewsNew YorkWater PermittingPublicly Owned Treatment WorksMunicipal WastewaterChange NoticesChange NoticeWater ProgramsWater ReportingIndustrial WastewaterEnvironmentalCWA ComplianceEnglishFocus Area
2026-04-24T05:00:00Z
New York adds wastewater cybersecurity rules
Effective date: March 26, 2026
This applies to: Wastewater treatment facilities
Description of change: The New York State Department of Environmental Conservation added cybersecurity regulations for wastewater treatment facilities. The rules:
- Require all State Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (SPDES) permittees to report cybersecurity incidents,
- Require publicly owned treatment works (POTWs) to establish, maintain, and implement an Emergency Response Plan and certify compliance with the provisions annually by March 28;
- Establish baseline cybersecurity control requirements;
- Add network monitoring and logging for certain POTWs with design flows of 10 million+ gallons per day; and
- Require wastewater treatment plant operators to complete a minimum number of training hours within their existing required hours on cybersecurity to renew certification every 5 years.
NewsHazardous WasteWaste/HazWasteChange NoticesChange NoticeWasteSpecial WasteCaliforniaEnvironmentalEnglishFocus Area
2026-04-24T05:00:00Z
California permanently adopts EPA’s conditional exemption for airbag waste
Effective date: March 6, 2026
This applies to: Airbag waste handlers and transporters
Description of change: The California Department of Toxic Substances Control permanently adopted the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA’s) interim final rule that allows airbag waste handlers and transporters to meet less stringent hazardous waste requirements (e.g., not manifesting the waste) if they meet certain conditions. Once the airbag waste is received at a collection facility or designated facility for proper disposal, it must be managed as hazardous waste.
The scope of the rule applies to all airbag waste, including recalled airbag inflators.
Related state info: Hazardous waste generators — California
New Network Poll
What are your biggest challenges with ensuring excavation and trenching compliance?
May 12, 2026
Although trench fatalities have declined since a record 39 deaths in 2022, excavation and trenching work continues to present significant compliance challenges and risks to workers across worksites. More than just digging a hole, this work can be dangerous for everyone involved, and cave ins are the most serious risk workers face. In fact, cave ins are more likely than many other excavation incidents to result in fatalities.
To put the danger into perspective, just one cubic yard of soil can weigh as much as a car. That amount of weight can have fatal consequences if a trench is not properly protected. Additionally, workers are exposed to potentially deadly hazardous atmospheres, falling loads, and risks from nearby mobile equipment. This is why employers need to manage the risks and workers should only enter trenches after the right protective systems are in place. To better understand which challenges are most common, we asked our Compliance Network subscribers to identify the factors that make excavation and trenching compliance hardest to maintain. Our pollsters highlighted the following as challenges affecting excavation and trenching compliance:
- 25 percent expressed being challenged by the identification of hazards within an excavation or trench, such as hazardous atmospheres, water, proper egress, etc., while
- 75 percent identified training and communication as their biggest excavation/trenching challenge.
The good news is that the survey responses suggested limited concern related to:
- Establishing a competent person;
- Using trench boxes, shielding, or other protective systems to prevent collapse; or
- Determining soil classifications.
Their insights helped us dig deeper into key opportunity areas where a more focused approach can make a meaningful impact. Keep reading to uncover practical ways to address each of the above challenges and make compliance more manageable.
Establishing a Competent Person (CP)
Designating the right person to serve as the Competent Person (CP) on an excavation site is one of the most important steps you can take to keep work safe and compliant. OSHA defines a CP as someone who can recognize hazards and has the authority to fix them right away. In practice, this means assigning someone who not only understands excavation and trenching risks (e.g., soil stability, protective systems, and potential atmospheric hazards) but also feels confident speaking up and stopping work if unsafe conditions or behaviors are observed.
When establishing the CP, it’s imperative to look at both experience and training. Questions that should be asked include:
- Has the person worked with trenching or excavation before?
- Do they understand how to classify soil and choose the right protective system, like sloping or trench boxes?
- Have they been clearly given the authority to act?
An effective CP is someone that knows how to conduct regular worksite inspections, especially after weather changes or other events that could affect site conditions. The CP should also know they have full support to correct issues immediately. With the right person in place and properly supported, you’re setting a strong foundation for safer, more compliant excavation work.
Identifying excavation and trenching hazards
With the CP designated, the next essential step in excavation and trenching safety is to identify the hazards. These hazards aren’t always obvious at first glance, which is why taking the time to fully assess the work area before and during the job is so critical. Common risks include:
- Cave-ins,
- Hazardous atmospheres,
- Falling loads,
- Water accumulation, and
- Limited access or egress.
Even nearby traffic, heavy equipment vibrations, or weather changes can quickly turn a seemingly stable excavation into a dangerous situation.
Safety and compliance rely on workers staying observant and being proactive. The CP should be routinely walking around the site, and workers should continuously be on guard for warning signs like cracks in the soil, bulging trench walls, standing water, or changes in soil consistency. Equally important is to consider what’s happening around the excavation. Things like utilities, adjacent structures, or equipment activity can all introduce additional hazards. Everyone on the site should feel comfortable pointing out concerns if something doesn’t look or feel right. When hazard identification becomes an ongoing, team effort rather than a one-time task, problems and compliance issues are addressed before they escalate.
Determining soil classifications
Classifying soil might sound technical, but on an excavation or trenching site, it’s really about understanding how stable the ground is before anyone enters the excavation or trench. OSHA groups soils into three main types:
- Type A (the most stable) holds together well. A good example would be clay soil that is hard, compact, and not previously disturbed.
- Type B (less stable) might hold its shape somewhat, but you’ll notice it doesn’t stick together as strongly as Type A. Previously disturbed clay, silty soil, or gravel mixed with soil can fall into this category.
- Type C (the least stable) is loose and prone to collapse or crumble. Typical examples include sand, gravel, or any soil with water seeping through it.
The CP is responsible for making the final soil type determination, and they do so by looking at both visual clues and performing simple field tests. For example, they might check whether the soil is cohesive, look for cracks, or see if water is present. A quick “thumb penetration” or “dry strength” test can also give a good sense of how the soil will hold up. When in doubt, it’s best to classify the soil as Type C and use the more protective approach. The extra caution can mean the difference between continuing work or rescuing a buried worker.
The most important factor is remembering that soil conditions can change, sometimes quickly. What looked like stable soil in the morning can become much less reliable after rain or due to vibration from nearby equipment. As such, soil classification isn’t a one-and-done task but should be reassessed as conditions change. Choosing the right soil type is critical because it directly impacts which protective system you choose (e.g., benching, shoring, shielding). Taking the time to properly evaluate soil conditions helps ensure workers are protected from unexpected cave-ins.
Protecting workers from cave-ins
When it comes to protecting workers from cave-ins, the bottom line is using the right protective system for the conditions and making sure each is set up correctly every time. One of the most common approaches is sloping or benching, where the sides of the excavation are cut back at an angle to reduce the risk of collapse. This works well when you have enough space and understand the soil type, since softer soils require gentler slopes.
Shoring is another protective measure, which involves installing supports like hydraulic or timber systems to hold the trench walls in place. This is especially useful in tighter spaces where sloping isn’t practical.
Lastly is shielding, which is the use of safety structures, like trench boxes, to protect workers from cave-ins. Although shielding won’t prevent a cave-in, it does protect workers if one happens. Trench boxes are the most common go-to solution on many job sites because they’re reliable and relatively easy to use when installed properly.
Regardless of the method chosen, the key is matching the system to the soil conditions and site constraints, and making sure the CP is monitoring activities and conditions. Regular inspections, especially after weather changes or heavy equipment movement, are critical to ensure these protections remain effective throughout the project.
Making the most of training and communication
Training and communication on an excavation site is as important as assigning your CP and testing your soil. It really comes down to keeping things practical, consistent, and easy to understand. It’s not enough to simply give a tailgate talk and check the training box. Workers need to clearly understand the specific hazards they’ll face, especially cave-ins, hazardous atmospheres, and safe entry and exit. Tailoring training to the actual job site and in real-time, as well as walking through real-life scenarios helps the information stick with workers. Short, frequent refreshers such as toolbox talks before a shift can certainly go a long way in reinforcing expectations and keeping safety top of mind, but it shouldn’t be your sole training.
Maintaining effective communication is just as important once work is underway. Everyone on site should feel comfortable speaking up if they see a potential hazard or if conditions change, and there should be a clear process for reporting concerns and getting them addressed quickly. Daily briefings are a great way to cover changing conditions, like weather or soil stability, and make sure the whole crew is on the same page. When training and communication work together, they create a culture where workers are informed, engaged, and more likely to look out for one another. This not only helps prevent incidents before they happen, it keeps the worksite compliant as well.
Keys to remember: Excavation and trenching safety starts with assigning a competent person, correctly classifying soil, and choosing the right protective system. Regularly reassessing changing site conditions and ensuring workers are well-trained and comfortable speaking up about hazards are also key steps to significantly reduce risks and make compliance much more manageable.
Curious which excavation hazards are cited most by OSHA?
Check out our Compliance Network article, Top five excavation hazards cited by OSHA the most | J. J. Keller® Compliance Network.
Or interested in finding out specific excavation and trenching requirements for your state?
See our State comparison table at Find State requirements on specific regulations | J. J. Keller® Compliance Network.
Most Popular Highlights In Environmental
NewsGreenhouse GasesWaste/HazWasteToxic Substances Control Act - EPASafe Drinking WaterWater AnalysisWater ProgramsWater QualityMaximum Contaminant LevelsWalking Working SurfacesMonthly Roundup VideoCAA ComplianceSolid WasteCWA ComplianceLaddersEnglishUSAHeat StressIndustry NewsHeat and Cold ExposureSafety & HealthGeneral Industry SafetyWasteMaritime SafetyEnvironmentalFocus AreaWater MonitoringVolatile Organic CompoundsAir ProgramsStationary Emission SourcesVideo
EHS Monthly Round Up - April 2026
In this April 2026 roundup video, we’ll review the most impactful environmental health and safety news.
Hi everyone! Welcome to the monthly news roundup video, where we’ll review the most impactful environmental health and safety news. Let’s take a look at what happened over the past month.
OSHA revised its National Emphasis Program on heat-related hazards. Going forward, the agency will prioritize inspections in 55 high-risk industries in indoor and outdoor work settings. The program remains in effect for 5 years from its April 10 effective date.
An OSHA proposed rule seeks to eliminate the November 18, 2036, deadline in the Walking-Working Surfaces standard that would require all fixed ladders extending more than 24 feet above a lower level to be equipped with personal fall arrest systems or ladder safety systems. OSHA also seeks feedback on nine specific questions related to the proposal, with comments due on June 5.
On April 17, OSHA revoked its House Falls in Marine Terminals standard at 1917.41. The agency said that because most cargo has been containerized and is moved by cranes, the standard is no longer necessary to protect employees.
Turning to environmental news, an EPA final rule further delays the submission period for the one-time PFAS report required of manufacturers. It pushes the start of the submission period to either 60 days after the effective date of a future final rule updating the PFAS Reporting Rule or January 31, 2027, whichever comes first.
An EPA final rule makes technical changes to the emission standards established in March 2024 for crude oil and natural gas facilities. The changes take effect June 8.
EPA published the draft 6th Contaminant Candidate List for the next group of contaminants to be considered for regulation under the Safe Drinking Water Act. The proposed list designates microplastics and pharmaceuticals as priority contaminant groups for the first time.
And finally, EPA plans to make significant changes to coal combustion residuals requirements. A proposed rule published April 13 would revise the regulations governing the disposal of coal combustion residuals in landfills and surface impoundments, as well as the beneficial use of coal combustion residuals.
Thanks for tuning in to the monthly news roundup. We’ll see you next month!
NewsIndustry NewsTSCA ComplianceCAA ComplianceSustainabilityIn-Depth ArticleCWA ComplianceEnvironmentalEnglishSustainabilityESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance)Focus AreaUSA
2025-12-05T06:00:00Z
EPA’s 2026 regulatory shift: How environmental managers can stay ahead
The clock is ticking for environmental teams. By 2026, several new EPA regulations will reshape compliance obligations for U.S. companies. Organizations that act now will avoid costly penalties and operational disruptions.
What’s changing and why it matters
Although EPA has been deregulating or loosening some requirements, there are still some standards being tightened across multiple fronts in the coming year:
- Renewable fuel standards (RFS): The EPA proposed higher volume requirements for 2026, including 24.02 billion renewable identification numbers (RINs), up nearly 8% from 2025. This increase pushes stricter expectations on fuel producers and organizations purchasing renewable fuels.
- Stormwater multi-sector general permit (MSGP): A new MSGP set to take effect by February 2026 will require quarterly PFAS indicator monitoring, expanded benchmark sampling, and resiliency measures in stormwater control designs.
- PFAS Reporting under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA): TSCA Section 8(a)(7) mandates PFAS manufacturing and import data collection beginning in April 2026, through October 2026, with extended deadlines for certain small manufacturers.
Failure to prepare could lead to fines, reputational damage, supply chain disruptions, and permit delays. Companies that weave compliance planning into their 2026 strategy will be positioned not just to meet legal deadlines but to sustain operations smoothly.
Key areas of impact
- Renewable fuel standards (RFS) and air emissions The proposed increase in 2026 Renewable Identification Numbers (RIN) volumes, from 24.02 billion to 24.46 billion for 2027, signals tightening air and fuels policy that affects fuel use and emissions accounting.
- Stormwater management The upcoming 2026 MSGP requires expanded quarterly PFAS monitoring, new benchmark triggers, corrective action plans, and integration of climate resilience in design standards.
- PFAS disclosure (TSCA Section 8(a)(7)) Manufacturers and importers of PFAS must submit electronic reporting of usage, volumes, disposal, and exposure data between April and October 2026, with extensions available for smaller operations.
Steps to take now
- Audit compliance programs: Cross-check operations against RIN inventory, stormwater permits, and TSCA reporting duties.
- Upgrade monitoring and recordkeeping: Implement robust electronic systems to track PFAS, stormwater quality, fuel volumes, and emissions.
- Staff training: Educate teams on PFAS obligations, new stormwater protocols, and RFS structures.
- Engage regulators early: Comment on proposed rules, consult during permit drafting, and flag issues during the notice-and-comment period.
Looking ahead
The EPA’s 2026 updates reflect a trend toward increased transparency and environmental accountability. Companies that treat compliance as strategic will not only avoid enforcement but also gain resilience and stakeholder trust.
Key to remember: Start planning now. Early action on EPA rule changes will save time, money, and headaches when enforcement begins.
NewsGreenhouse GasesIndustry NewsIndustry NewsAir ProgramsEnvironmental Protection Agency (EPA)CAA ComplianceEnvironmentalFocus AreaEnglishVolatile Organic CompoundsAir ProgramsStationary Emission SourcesUSA
2026-04-10T05:00:00Z
EPA amends specific oil and gas emission standards
On April 9, 2026, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) published a final rule that makes technical changes to the emission standards established in March 2024 (2024 Final Rule) for crude oil and natural gas facilities. This rule (2026 Final Rule) amends the requirements for:
- Temporary flaring of associated gas, and
- Vent gas net heating value (NHV) monitoring provisions for flares and enclosed combustion devices (ECDs).
Who’s impacted?
The 2026 Final Rule affects new and existing oil and gas facilities. Specifically, it applies to the regulations for the Crude Oil and Natural Gas source category, including the:
- New Source Performance Standards at 40 CFR 60 Subpart OOOOb, and
- Emission guidelines at 60 Subpart OOOOc.
These emission standards are commonly referred to as OOOOb/c.
What are the changes?
The 2026 Final Rule implements technical changes to the temporary flaring and vent gas NHV monitoring requirements set by the 2024 Final Rule.
Temporary flaring
The rule extends the baseline time limit for temporary flaring of associated gas at well sites in certain situations (like conducting repairs or maintenance) from 24 to 72 hours. Owners and operators must stop temporary flaring as soon as the situation is resolved or the temporary flaring limit is reached (whichever happens first).
It also grants allowances beyond the 72-hour limit if exigent circumstances occur (such as severe weather that prevents safe access to a well site to address an emergency or maintenance issue) and there’s a need to extend duration for repairs, maintenance, or safety issues. Owners and operators must keep records of exigent circumstances and include the information in their annual reports.
NHV monitoring
For new and existing sources, the 2026 Final Rule exempts all flare types (unassisted and assisted) and ECDs from monitoring due to high NHV content, except when inert gases are added to the process streams or for other scenarios that decrease the NHV content of the inlet stream gas. In these cases, EPA requires NHV monitoring via continuous monitoring or the alternative performance test (sampling demonstration) option for all flares and ECDs.
Other significant changes include:
- Replacing the general exemption from NHV monitoring for associated gas for any control device used at well site affected facilities with NHV monitoring requirements,
- Granting operational pauses during weekends and holidays for the consecutive 14-day sampling demonstration requirements (limiting it to no more than 3 operating days from the previous sampling day), and
- Permitting less than 1-hour sampling times for twice daily samples where low or intermittent flow makes it infeasible (as long as owners and operators report the sampling time used and the reason for the reduced time).
The 2026 Final Rule takes effect on June 8, 2026.
Key to remember: EPA’s technical changes to the emission standards for oil and gas facilities apply to temporary flaring provisions and vent gas NHV monitoring requirements.
NewsIndustry NewsIndustry NewsToxic Substances Control Act - EPAToxic Subtances Control Act - EPATSCA ComplianceToxic Substances - EPAEnvironmental Protection Agency (EPA)EnvironmentalEnglishFocus AreaUSA
2026-04-13T05:00:00Z
EPA delays TSCA Section 8(a)(7) PFAS reporting timeline again
On April 13, 2026, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) published a final rule that further delays the submission period for the one-time report required of manufacturers on per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) by the PFAS Reporting and Recordkeeping Rule (PFAS Reporting Rule).
This final rule pushes the starting submission period to either 60 days after the effective date of a future final rule updating the PFAS Reporting Rule or January 31, 2027, whichever is earlier.
Who’s impacted?
Established under Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) Section 8(a)(7), the PFAS Reporting Rule (40 CFR Part 705) requires any business that manufactured (including imported) any PFAS or PFAS-containing article between 2011 and 2022 to report. Covered manufacturers and importers must submit information on:
- Chemical identity, uses, and volumes made and processed;
- Byproducts;
- Environmental and health effects;
- Worker exposure; and
- Disposal.
What’s the new timeline?
The opening submission period was moved from April 13, 2026, to either 60 days after the effective date of a future final PFAS Reporting Rule or January 31, 2027, whichever is earlier.
Most manufacturers have 6 months to submit the report. Small manufacturers reporting only as importers of PFAS-containing articles have 1 year.
| TSCA Section 8(a)(7) PFAS Reporting Rule submission period | ||
|---|---|---|
| Start date | End date | |
| Most manufacturers | 60 days from effective date of final PFAS Reporting Rule or January 31, 2027 (whichever is earlier) | 6 months from start date or July 31, 2027 (whichever is earlier) |
| Small manufacturers reporting solely as PFAS article importers | 60 days from effective date of final PFAS Reporting Rule or January 31, 2027 (whichever is earlier) | 1 year from start date or January 31, 2028 (whichever is earlier) |
Why the delay?
In November 2025, the agency proposed updates to the PFAS Reporting Rule. EPA has delayed the reporting period to give the agency time to issue a final rule (expected later this year).
Key to remember: EPA has delayed the starting submission deadline for the TSCA Section 8(a)(7) PFAS Reporting Rule from April 2026 to no later than January 2027.
NewsClosuresIndustry NewsIndustry NewsWaste/HazWasteWasteEnvironmental Protection Agency (EPA)Waste ManagementEnvironmentalSolid WasteEnglishFocus AreaUSA
2026-04-16T05:00:00Z
EPA proposes major changes to coal combustion residuals rules
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) published a proposed rule on April 13, 2026, to revise the existing regulations governing the disposal of coal combustion residuals (CCR) in landfills and surface impoundments as well as the beneficial use of CCR.
Who’s impacted?
The proposed rule affects coal-fired electric utilities and independent power producers subject to the CCR disposal and beneficial use regulations at 40 CFR Part 257.
What are the changes?
Significant changes the EPA proposes include:
- Adding an option for facilities to certify the closure of legacy CCR surface impoundments by CCR removal that were closed before November 8, 2024, under regulatory oversight;
- Expanding the eligibility criteria for facilities to defer CCR closure requirements until site-specific determinations are made for legacy surface impoundments that were closed before November 8, 2024, under regulatory oversight;
- Exempting CCR dewatering structures (used to dewater CCR waste for the disposal of CCR elsewhere) from federal CCR regulations (Part 257);
- Rescinding all CCR management unit (CCRMU) requirements or revising the existing CCRMU regulations;
- Allowing permit authorities to make site-specific determinations regarding certain requirements during permitting for CCR units complying with federal CCR groundwater monitoring, corrective action, and closure requirements under a federal or an approved-state CCR permit; and
- Revising the beneficial use requirements by:
- Removing the environmental demonstration requirement for non-roadway use of more than 12,400 tons of unencapsulated CCR; and
- Excluding these beneficial uses from federal CCR regulations (Part 257):
- CCR used in cement manufacturing at cement kilns,
- Flue gas desulfurization (FGD) gypsum used in agriculture, and
- FGD gypsum used in wallboard.
Key to remember: EPA plans to make significant amendments to the coal combustion residuals requirements.
NewsHazardous WasteIndustry NewsEnglishWaste ManifestsSafety & HealthGeneral Industry SafetyWasteEnvironmentalIn-Depth ArticleEnvironmental Management SystemsFocus AreaUSA
2026-04-14T05:00:00Z
What to know about the EPA’s proposed manifest sunset rule
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is taking another major step toward modernizing hazardous waste tracking. The Agency’s proposed “manifest sunset rule” would officially phase out paper hazardous waste manifests and require the exclusive use of the e-Manifest system. For employers, especially those generating or managing hazardous waste, it’s a fundamental shift in how waste shipments are documented, tracked, and audited.
Since 2018, EPA’s e-Manifest system has been available as a digital alternative to paper manifests. Over the years, the agency has added requirements pushing the industry toward adoption, including mandatory registration and electronic data submission. But despite those efforts, many companies have continued to rely on paper manifests, either out of habit, convenience, or because parts of their waste chain weren’t ready to go digital. EPA even states in the proposed rule that less than one percent of all e-manifest users have completely switched to digital manifest. The proposed sunset rule is designed to close that gap. Once finalized, it would set a firm deadline (24 months) after which paper manifests would no longer be allowed.
Why EPA wants to eliminate paper manifests
EPA’s reasoning is pretty straightforward. Paper manifests are slower, easier to lose, and more prone to errors. They rely on manual handling and delayed processing, which can create gaps in tracking and compliance. A fully electronic system, on the other hand, allows for real-time visibility, standardized data entry, and faster correction of mistakes. It also gives regulators a clearer, more immediate picture of what’s happening across the entire waste life cycle.
Addressing one of the biggest digital barriers: signatures
One overlooked part of the proposed rule is how EPA is trying to solve one of the biggest barriers to going fully digital, which is signatures in the field. Anyone who has dealt with manifests knows that the weak point is often the hand-off between the generator and the transporter, especially when drivers don’t have system access or reliable connectivity. To address that, EPA is proposing new functionality that would allow users to sign manifests using quick response (QR) codes or even short message service (SMS). In practice, this could mean a driver scans a QR code or receives a text prompt, then completes the signature process directly from their phone. So, no login or full system access needed. EPA is also exploring the ability to use SMS and QR-based tools to make updates to manifest data without needing full system permissions. That’s a big deal operationally, because it removes one of the most common bottlenecks in needing a registered user at a specific site to make even minor corrections.
Operational challenges companies should expect
With that said, moving to a fully digital system still comes with potential issues. It requires coordination across your entire operation. Generators, transporters, and disposal facilities all have to be aligned and capable of using the system effectively. If one party in that chain struggles, it can create delays or compliance issues for everyone involved. There’s also an upfront investment to consider. Companies may need to upgrade internal systems, ensure reliable connectivity, and train employees in new work processes. For organizations with multiple sites or field operations, which can take some planning. But over time, many of those burdens are expected to decrease. Electronic signatures, reusable templates, and centralized record-keeping can significantly reduce administrative work.
One of the biggest shifts employers will notice is the level of visibility. With paper manifests, there’s often a lag between shipment and final documentation. In a digital system, that lag disappears. Information becomes available almost immediately, and regulators have access to the same data. That means errors or discrepancies are easier to find and harder to ignore.
The good news is that companies don’t have to wait for the final rule to start preparing. Taking a close look at your current manifest process is a good first step. If paper is still a major part of your workflow, that’s a clear signal that changes are coming. Making sure your e-Manifest account is fully set up and that employees understand how to use it, will go a long way in avoiding future disruptions.
Keys to remember: The EPA’s proposed Paper Manifest Sunset Rule would set a firm date to phase out paper hazardous waste manifests and require that all covered shipments be tracked through the agency’s electronic e‑Manifest system, in which the Agency says will improve hazardous‑waste tracking and transparency while reducing administrative burden and saving regulated entities roughly $28.5 million per year.
Most Popular Highlights In Transportation
NewsEnglishFleet SafetyChange NoticesChange NoticeDrug and Alcohol Testing - DOTDrug testing - Motor CarrierOffice of the Secretary of TransportationFocus AreaAlcohol testing - Motor CarrierTransportationUSA
2026-05-11T05:00:00Z
DOT Final Rule: Procedures for Transportation Workplace Drug and Alcohol Testing Programs
The U.S. Department of Transportation revises its drug and alcohol testing procedures to require a directly observed urine collection in situations where oral fluid tests are currently required but cannot be conducted because oral fluid testing is not yet available. The rule also updates terminology in these procedures consistent with Executive Order (E.O.) 14168, Defending Women from Gender Ideology Extremism and Restoring Biological Truth to the Federal Government.
DATES: This rule is effective on June 10, 2026. Published in the Federal Register May 11, 2026, page 25507.
View final rule.
| §40.65 What does the collector check for when the employee presents a urine specimen? | ||
| (d) | Added | View text |
| §40.67 When and how is a directly observed urine collection conducted? | ||
| (g) | Revised | View text |
| (h) | Revised | View text |
| §40.69 How is a monitored urine collection conducted? | ||
| (c) | Revised | View text |
| (d) | Revised | View text |
| §40.145 [Amended] | ||
| (h)(1)(ii) | Revised | View text |
Previous text
§40.67 When and how is a directly observed urine collection conducted?
* * * *
(g) As the collector, you must ensure that the observer is the same gender as the employee.
(1) You must never permit an opposite gender person to act as the observer.
(2) The observer can be a different person from the collector and need not be a qualified collector.
(3) If a same gender collector cannot be found or in circumstances of nonbinary or transgender employees:
(i) If the employer has a standing order to allow oral fluid testing in such situations, the collector will follow that order;
(ii) If there is no standing order from the employer, the collector must contact the DER and either conduct an oral fluid test if the collection site is able to do so, or send the employee to a collection site acceptable to the employer for the oral fluid test.
(h) As the collector, if someone else is to observe the collection (e.g., in order to ensure a same gender observer), you must verbally instruct that person to follow procedures at paragraphs (i) and (j) of this section. If you, the collector, are the observer, you too must follow these procedures.
§40.69 How is a monitored urine collection conducted?
* * * *
(c) As the collector, you must ensure that the monitor is the same gender as the employee, unless the monitor is a medical professional (e.g., nurse, doctor, physician’s assistant, technologist, or technician licensed or certified to practice in the jurisdiction in which the collection takes place). The monitor can be a different person from the collector and need not be a qualified collector.
(d) As the collector, if someone else is to monitor the collection (e.g., in order to ensure a same gender monitor), you must verbally instruct that person to follow the procedures of paragraphs (d) and (e) of this section. If you, the collector, are the monitor, you must follow these procedures.
§40.145 On what basis does the MRO verify test results involving adulteration or substitution?
* * * *
(h)(1)(ii) Assertion by the employee that his or her personal characteristics (e.g., with respect to race, gender, weight, diet, working conditions) are responsible for the substituted result does not, in itself, constitute a legitimate medical explanation. To make a case that there is a legitimate medical explanation, the employee must present evidence showing that the cited personal characteristics actually result in the physiological production of urine meeting the creatinine and specific gravity criteria of §40.88(b).
NewsIndustry NewsEnglishFleet SafetyFocus AreaIn-Depth ArticleEnforcement - DOTRoadside InspectionsTransportationUSA
2023-09-22T05:00:00Z
DataQs FAQs: How to knock out bad DOT data
No one likes an undeserved blemish on their record, and that’s especially true for commercial drivers and motor carriers. A crash or violation that doesn’t belong can result in lost business or even a lost job.
That’s where DataQs comes in. It’s an online system from the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) that lets drivers, motor carriers, or others challenge “bad” inspection and crash data.
With the FMCSA recently proposing some changes to DataQs, it’s a good time to review some common questions about how it works, along with tips for making the most of the service.
Q: Who can use DataQs?
A: Drivers, motor carriers, federal and state agencies, and others who have concerns about any federal or state data released to the public by the FMCSA. DataQs is most commonly used to challenge “bad” data appearing on roadside inspection reports.
| TIP: Be sure you have a valid reason for challenging the data. Data isn’t “bad” just because you don’t agree with it! A challenge is likely valid if, for example, a violation was assigned to the wrong motor carrier, or the alleged violation never actually existed. |
Q: How much does DataQs cost?
A: Nothing, it’s free.
Q: Where do I start?
A: You start by creating an account on the DataQs website at dataqs.fmcsa.dot.gov. If you already have an FMCSA Portal account, you can log in to the Portal (portal.fmcsa.dot.gov) and access DataQs from there. You’ll need your DOT number and PIN to get full functionality. If you lost your DOT-assigned PIN, the website has instructions for requesting it.
On the home page after logging in, you can click “Start a New Request” to submit a challenge or request.
Q: What is an “RDR”?
A: A “request for data review” (RDR) is the official name for what you submit when you challenge bad data in DataQs or otherwise submit a request through the site.
Q: What types of information or data can I challenge?
A: You can challenge the following types of data through DataQs:
Crashes
- A crash that is not yours, i.e., that did not involve your vehicle or driver.
- A crash that was not a DOT-reportable crash, i.e., one that was not an “accident” as defined in 49 CFR Sec. 390.5.
- A duplicate crash, i.e., a crash that is listed more than once.
- A DOT-reportable crash record is missing from your safety record.
- A crash report contains incorrect information (e.g., an incorrect fatality or injury count).
NOTE: If you think a crash could not be prevented, you may be able to challenge it through the “Crash Preventability Determination Program.” The crash won’t be removed from your record, but it may be shown as a non-preventable crash and help your CSA scores. Only certain types of crashes are eligible for review.
Roadside inspections
- A violation from a roadside inspection is incorrect or is listed multiple times.
- A violation or inspection is not yours, i.e., it was recorded under the wrong motor carrier or driver.
- An inspection record is missing.
- An inspection is listed multiple times.
- An inspection report contains incorrect information.
- You want to have an adjudicated citation removed.*
*NOTE: You can challenge a citation that a driver received during an inspection if a court or other adjudicator found the driver not guilty, the case was dismissed, or the driver was convicted of a different charge. On the DataQs site, select the “Citation associated with violation on an inspection” type of request.
| TIP: Enter the inspection report number accurately! You need to make sure your request is tied to the right inspection. If an inspection report number includes the state abbreviation as the first two characters and the number is 12 digits long, do NOT input the state abbreviation as part of the report number. |
Audits/Investigations
- There is an error with the results of a safety audit.
- There is an error with the results of a compliance review (but you cannot use DataQs to challenge errors in the way a safety rating was determined).
- There is an error with a CSA investigation.
- There is an error with a Notice of Claim (a fine) or a Notice of Violation. However, see Sec. 386.14 for rules for responding to notices of claim.
Other
- You updated your MCS-150 but the FMCSA is not displaying the updated information after its monthly update.
- You want review of a household goods complaint, e.g., it’s fraudulent or a duplicate.
- There’s an error in your Operating Authority information.
- There’s an error in your insurance information.
- You want to report a carrier that is registered improperly.
| TIP: Be sure to make the right choices when entering your challenge or request! |
Q: Can I challenge a third-party driver history report, such as a “DAC” report, using DataQs?
A: No. The FMCSA is not associated with such reports.
Q: I never received a copy of a roadside inspection report. Can I request one?
A: Yes, you can request copies of roadside inspection reports through DataQs. After searching for and selecting the right report, you can select the option to receive a copy.
| TIP: You can also view inspection reports online through the FMCSA’s Portal site or the CSA Safety Measurement System site. |
Q: Where can I look to find the most up-to-date FMCSA data?
A: The FMCSA’s Portal website (portal.fmcsa.dot.gov) is updated nightly and contains the most recent inspection data. The CSA Safety Measurement System (SMS) and the Pre-Employment Screening Program (PSP) sites are updated monthly.
Q: How long will it take to get a response to my challenge?
A: It depends on the state. The FMCSA wants states to respond to data challenges within 10 business days, but the agency has no direct control over the process. However, the FMCSA does get alerted when a state falls behind, so there is some oversight.
| TIP: Log in to the DataQs website periodically to check the status of your request on the home page. |
Q: Who handles my challenge?
A: Usually someone at the state enforcement agency for the state where the inspection or crash occurred, although the FMCSA may also respond if the challenge involves the FMCSA directly.
| TIP: Keep in mind that DataQs is run through a federal website but the program is essentially operated by the states. If you enter a challenge, it will be forwarded directly to the state agency that did the inspection or crash investigation, without review or input from the FMCSA. |
Q: How long do I have to challenge bad data?
A: For challenges to inspection-related data, you can file a challenge up to three years from the date of inspection. For crash-related data, you have up to five years from the date of the crash.
| TIP: Submit your challenge as quickly as possible! The longer you wait, the more likely it is that details will be forgotten by parties on both sides. This means you should be monitoring the FMCSA’s data as often as possible. |
Q: Can I challenge a violation before it’s visible on the CSA website?
A: Yes. The sooner you can challenge bad data, the better. You can submit a challenge as soon as you have the inspection report in hand (so you have the details necessary to file a challenge).
Q: Can I appeal a DataQs decision?
A: Yes, one appeal is allowed.
| TIP: Be sure to provide new information or additional documentation in your appeal, or it may be rejected. Don’t expect a different result if you submit the exact same information. |
Q: An inspection report shows that my driver was only issued a warning but the alleged violations are still affecting my CSA scores. Can I challenge the violations?
A: Yes, if the violations were inaccurate. However, the CSA system relies on all violations noted during roadside inspections, including those that the state considers to be warnings. Challenging the warning would require some proof that the violation didn’t exist, was recorded in error, was listed multiple times, etc. If you think there’s an error, you can challenge it on DataQs using the same process for challenging any violation.
Q: If I intend to challenge a roadside inspection result, should I still sign and submit the inspection report within 15 days?
A: Yes, the 15-day deadline still applies even if you intend to challenge the report.
Q: Do I need to submit supporting documentation?
A: It depends. If you submit a challenge and are later asked for supporting documentation, you must submit whatever was requested. If you are submitting an initial challenge, then you do not necessarily need to add supporting documentation but you’ll probably have more success if you do. In fact, challenges that include documentation are almost twice as likely to be successful as those without. Only submit documents that are accurate and relevant to your case.
| TIP: Don’t submit a long dissertation with your challenge! Stick to the facts at hand and include relevant documentation. Keep your request professional and detailed. |
Supporting documents might include:
- Copies of roadside inspection or crash reports
- Statements from maintenance personnel or roadside assistance services
- Shipping papers
- Lease, contract, or rental paperwork
- Applicable regulations
- FMCSA interpretations or guidance documents
- Documentation from the driver’s file showing that he/she was properly licensed and/or qualified at the time of the inspection.
- Drivers’ logs
- Any special exemptions or waivers that apply to your drivers or company
- Vehicle registration
- IRP cab card
- Photos with a time/date stamp
- The “notes” section of the inspection report obtained from the state enforcement agency, if it can be obtained
| TIP: If the reviewing agency asks you to submit more information but it’s going to take you longer than 14 days to submit it, ask for an extension. The state has the authority to grant you more time. |
NewsIndustry NewsHazmat SafetyHazmat: HighwayFocus AreaIn-Depth ArticleHazmat EnforcementEnglishTransportationUSA
2022-12-27T06:00:00Z
Placarding responsibility – Whose is it?
Many shippers are unaware of their responsibility to provide placards to drivers, but the responsibility shifts as soon as the driver hits the road.
Check the regulations
According to Section 172.506 of the Hazardous Materials Regulations (HMR), a shipper offering a hazardous material for transportation by highway must provide the motor carrier with the required placards for the material being offered. The shipper must offer the placards to the carrier prior to, or at the same time as, the material is offered for transportation — unless the vehicle is already placarded for the hazmat.
Section 172.506 also states that no motor carrier may transport a hazardous material in a motor vehicle unless the required placards for the hazmat are affixed to the vehicle. Before transport, the driver is responsible for displaying the required placards for all the hazmat that is on the vehicle.
Avoid issues with shippers
Many trailers are equipped with flip placards that represent most classes of hazardous materials but without adequate training, shippers may not understand their responsibility to provide the driver with the required placards. If a driver arrives and the shipper fails to provide placards, the driver should contact dispatch for additional instructions or drive to a truck stop to secure the necessary placards. The driver becomes responsible for placards as soon as the trailer enters a public highway, so train your drivers to temporarily refuse the shipment until the proper placards can be obtained. If necessary, the driver must bobtail or leave empty before driving to pick up placards.
Another common placarding question with shippers involves combination loads. If a driver arrives at a shipper’s location and is already transporting a hazardous material below the placarding threshold, is the shipper required to provide placards for the combination load on the trailer? In this scenario, the driver already has 600 pounds of a Class 8 corrosive material on the trailer, and the shipper is offering an additional 500 pounds of the same commodity. The regulations state that the shipper is only required to provide placards for the commodity that is being offered, not for the aggregate weight of both shipments. In this scenario, the driver is responsible for providing placards since it involves a combination load.
The Hazardous Materials Regulations are complex, especially for newer employees. Drivers that can speak “hazmat” to shippers often secure additional business, so be sure to train your drivers and give them the confidence to have impactful conversations with shippers.
Key to remember: Carry extra placards in case a shipper is unable to supply the required placards or a combination of hazmat on the vehicle requires different placards.
NewsIndustry NewsEnglishFleet SafetyFocus AreaIn-Depth ArticleEnforcement - DOTRoadside InspectionsTransportationUSA
2022-07-08T05:00:00Z
What does the alphabet soup following 392.2 on a roadside inspection report mean?
One question that comes up when reviewing roadside inspection reports is, “What is the meaning of the letters that follow a violation of 392.2 on a roadside inspection report?”
‘State and local laws’
A violation of 392.2 is a violation of a local or state law, regulation, or ordinance. These must be obeyed due to 392.2, which reads, “Every commercial motor vehicle must be operated in accordance with the laws, ordinances, and regulations of the jurisdiction in which it is being operated.”
The confusion is that there are no paragraphs in 392.2, so there technically should be no letters following that section. However, to inform the driver, carrier, and the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) what particular state or local law or regulation was involved, FMCSA has developed a system of suffix codes. The letters following “392.2” – the “suffix” — show which state or local law or regulation was involved.
When one of these codes is used, the officer should include a description of the specific violation in the “violation details” area on the actual inspection report. FYI: Summary roadside inspection reports (such as the ones visible in CSA’s SMS) do not show these details.
| For more information, see our ezExplanation on Roadside Inspections. |
Not all 392.2 violations are used in CSA
Not all of these state and local law or regulation violations are used by the FMCSA for scoring purposes. The Compliance, Safety, Accountability (CSA) Safety Measurement System (SMS) does not use the 392.2 violations that cannot be tied to crash causation. Here are a couple of examples: 392.2UCR Failure to pay UCR fee and 392.2W Size and weight are not used.
Most common 392.2 violations
Below are the top 10 392.2 violations written during 2021. All of these violations are safety-related, and therefore used in the CSA SMS for scoring. The BASIC within the SMS the violation is scored in is shown following the violation description.
- 392.2SLLS2 Speeding 6-10 miles per hour over the speed limit (Unsafe Driving)
- 392.2C Failure to obey traffic control device (Unsafe Driving)
- 392.2LV Lane Restriction violation (Unsafe Driving)
- 392.2SLLS3 Speeding 11-14 miles per hour over the speed limit (Unsafe Driving)
- 392.2WC Wheel (Mud) flaps missing or defective (Vehicle Maintenance)
- 392.2SLLS4 Speeding 15 or more miles per hour over the speed limit (Unsafe Driving)
- 392.2ML Failure to maintain lane (Unsafe Driving)
- 392.2SLLSWZ Speeding work/construction zone (Unsafe Driving)
- 392.2PK Unlawfully parking and/or leaving vehicle in the roadway (Unsafe Driving)
- 392.2FC Following too close (Unsafe Driving)
Key to remember
In general, FMCSA does not write traffic codes. They rely on local and state agencies to do that. When state or local traffic codes are violated, it appears on a roadside inspection report as a violation of 392.2, with a suffix indicating which traffic code was involved.
NewsIndustry NewsHazmat SafetyFocus AreaIn-Depth ArticleShipping papers - HazmatEnglishEmergency response informationTransportationUSA
2022-06-30T05:00:00Z
The Emergency Response Guidebook
What is that little orange book for?
Many shippers and transporters of hazardous materials are familiar with the small orange Emergency Response Guidebook (ERG). Most associate the ERG with compliance with the Hazardous Materials Regulations (49 CFR), using it to provide emergency response information for a hazardous materials shipment. This may be surprising, but that is not why the ERG was created.
Original use for the ERG
The Emergency Response Guidebook was originally developed by the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT), Transport Canada, and the Secretariat of Transport and Communications of Mexico for use by police, firefighters, and other emergency personnel who are the first to arrive at the scene of a transportation incident involving hazardous materials/dangerous goods. The ERG helps first responders quickly identify the hazard(s) of the materials and protect themselves and the general public during the initial response phase of an incident.
The “initial response phase” is that period following the first responders’ arrival at the scene of an incident, during which the presence and/or identification of hazardous materials is confirmed, protective actions and area securement are initiated, and assistance of qualified personnel is requested.
The DOT prints and distributes copies of the ERG to emergency responders throughout the United States. The goal is to have an ERG available to every emergency responder in the United States. Responders are familiar with the ERG because the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regulations require that they be trained on the use of the ERG.
Another use for the ERG
To increase the likelihood that emergency response information will be available to first responders at the scene of a hazardous materials incident, the Hazardous Materials Regulations require that emergency response information accompany most shipments of hazardous materials. Emergency response information is not required for hazardous materials that do not require shipping papers or are classified as an Limited Quantity.
The emergency response information can be provided in a variety of ways:
- It can be entered on the hazmat shipping papers; or
- It can be provided in another document, other than the shipping paper, that includes the basic description (and technical name if appropriate) of the hazardous material. A Safety Data Sheet is an example of this type of document; or
- It can be provided in a separate document, other than the shipping paper, that cross-references the description of the hazardous material on the shipping paper with the emergency response information contained in the document. The ERG is an example of this type of document.
Carriers that transport hazardous materials must maintain the emergency response information the same as they do shipping papers. The emergency response information must be readily available to, and recognizable by, authorities in the event of an incident or inspection.
Although not the original intended use for the ERG, keeping an ERG with the hazmat shipping papers is an easy way to comply with the emergency response information requirements in the Hazardous Materials Regulations. Many carriers play it safe and carry an ERG in their vehicles to cover any hazmat load/situation that they may encounter.
Key to remember
The ERG was originally created to help first responders protect themselves and the public during a hazardous materials incident. The ERG can also be used to provide emergency response information that is required for most hazardous materials shipments.
NewsIndustry NewsFleet OperationsEnglishFocus AreaIn-Depth ArticleHighway use - Mileage taxFleet TaxesInternational Fuel Tax Agreement (IFTA)Fleet taxesTransportationUSA
2024-09-19T05:00:00Z
Your HUT decals are expiring: Registration open Oct. 1
For carriers operating in New York, registration and decals expire December 31, 2024, for the Highway Use Tax (HUT) and Automotive Fuel Carrier (AFC) programs. Take steps now to make sure you receive your new decals before the current ones expire. You need a new certificate of registration and decal for each vehicle. And you must place the new decals on your vehicles before January 1, 2025.
The period to renew your 24th series HUT and AFC certificates of registration begins October 1, 2024. Act now to avoid delays and keep your highway use tax credentials active.
To-do before October 1
Get ready for renewal by taking the following steps now:
- File all your highway use tax returns that are due.
- Pay your taxes. The state will not issue a new certificate of registration if you owe back taxes. Before you apply to renew, make sure that you’ve paid all taxes due under any of the programs administered by the New York State Tax Department, including:
- HUT,
- personal income tax,
- International Fuel Tax Agreement (IFTA),
- sales tax, and
- withholding tax.
- Create an online account if you do not already have one and you want to renew your credentials and pay online (https://www.oscar.ny.gov/).
- Make sure your vehicle registration information is correct and accurate. Review and update your information as soon as possible. Incorrect information will delay the processing of your certificates and decals.
Beginning October 1
Once the renewal period opens, renew your credentials and pay your renewal fees online with One Stop Credentialing and Registration (OSCAR).
Submit your renewal application by November 30, 2024, to make sure you receive your decals in time to place them on your vehicles before January 1, 2025.
If you are already enrolled in OSCAR, use your current OSCAR password to renew online.
If you are not enrolled, visit OSCAR, and select Enroll Now. You must have a United States Department of Transportation (USDOT) number and an employer identification number (EIN).
To renew your registration:
- Visit the OSCAR website and select HUT Renewal from the Business Type drop-down.
- Enter your information in the USDOT#, NYS Tax ID#, and Password fields, then select Log in.
- If you have 300 or fewer vehicles, choose either:
- Renew all HUT/AFC Certificates of Registration to renew all your active current series permits, or
- Select HUT/AFC Certificates of Registration to renew specific permits.
- If you have more than 300 vehicles, choose either:
- Renew all to renew all your active current series permits, or
- File renewal to renew select permits.
If you are unable to renew electronically, you may file Form TMT-1.2, Renewal Application for Highway Use Tax (HUT) and Automotive Fuel Carrier (AFC) Certificates of Registrations and Decals – 25th Series.
Key to remember: Take steps now to renew your NY HUT and ensure you receive your new decals before the current ones expire.
Most Popular Highlights In Human Resources
NewsEmployee RelationsFamily and Medical Leave Act (FMLA)Disabilities and ADAUSAIn-Depth ArticleFamily and Medical Leave Act (FMLA)EnglishHR ManagementReasonable AccommodationsIndustry NewsEmployee RelationsHR GeneralistAssociate RelationsCommunication ToolsFocus AreaDisabilities and ADAHuman Resources
2026-05-06T05:00:00Z
Help! My employee’s coming back from weeks of FMLA leave!
When an employee is returning to work after taking multiple weeks off under the federal Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA), an employer has much to consider. The focus might be simply on putting the employee back in the same position, as required. But there are other considerations to reacclimate an employee to the workplace following extended leave.
Communication
Before the employee returns, the employer should talk to the employee and solidify the employee’s return date and time. It’s also a good idea to make sure the employee knows what to expect and what is expected of them upon return.
If the employee has any continuing restrictions, the employer might have to make changes to the work, workplace, or company policies. This might indicate the need to engage in an interactive process with the employee to identify any effective, reasonable accommodations under the federal Americans with Disabilities Act.
The employer should also talk to the employee’s supervisor to help coordinate the process of bringing the employee back, whether the employee works onsite or remotely. Upon return, the supervisor should discuss any updates with the employee that occurred during the leave.
The supervisor might also want to inform other team members of the employee’s return and what is expected, including workload distribution.
Fitness for duty
Also, if the employee took leave for their own condition, before the employee returns, the employer might have indicated in the FMLA designation notice that the employee would need to provide an FMLA fitness-for-duty (FFD) certification before returning to work. If so, the employer should indicate when the employee should provide the certification, to whom, and in what particular format or form.
An FFD certification is sufficient if it indicates that the employee is able to resume work. If the employer indicated in the designation notice that the FFD certification must address the employee’s ability to perform the job’s essential functions, and the employer gave a list of those duties, the employer may hold the employee to providing information regarding their ability to perform the functions.
Prepare the workplace
Before the employee returns, the employer should ensure that the employee has access to the facility, as well as any computers and other systems. The latter might call for help from the IT department.
If the employee needs any workplace changes, those should be in place before the employee returns.
The employee's perspective
From an employee’s perspective, returning to work can be a big transition. The smoother the transition, the less risk of production or employee relations issues. If an employee were to return to an unprepared workplace and be greeted with unforeseen expectations, the employee would be more apt to complain, even to coworkers. Such negative news travels fast.
Key to remember: Employers should carefully plan and prepare for an employee’s return from extended FMLA leave.
NewsIndustry NewsIndustry NewsHR GeneralistFamily and Medical Leave Act (FMLA)Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA)USAHR ManagementEnglishFocus AreaHuman Resources
2023-09-06T05:00:00Z
Appellate court sided with employee's (almost) 3-year-delayed FMLA claim
Back in October 2018, Laffon had a medical emergency and needed some time off under the federal Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA).
Her leave lasted until November 15. Ten days after she returned to work, on November 26, her employer terminated her.
She sued, arguing that the employer retaliated against her because of her FMLA leave.
The catch? She didn't bring the suit until almost three years later.
No link between leave and termination
In court, the employer argued that there was no causal link between Laffon taking FMLA leave and her termination. Although the court documents aren't robust, they do reveal that the employer indicated that Laffon's allegations didn't show that her taking FMLA leave was a factor in the decision to terminate her. The documents showed only that the termination chronologically followed her leave.
The court agreed with the employer. It also agreed that Laffon failed to allege a willful violation of the FMLA, which would allow her to benefit from the FMLA's three-year statute of limitations.
Laffon appealed the case to the Ninth Circuit.
Statute of limitations
Under the FMLA, employees have two years from the date of the last event constituting the alleged violation for which they can bring a claim.
Those two years are extended to three years if the employer's actions were "willful." This means that an employee must show that the employer either knew or showed reckless disregard for whether its conduct violated the FMLA.
Ruling overturned
Fast forward to August 2023, when the Ninth Circuit reversed the lower court's decision. It indicated that, based on Laffon's amended complaint and liberally construing the law, her allegations establish that her leave was causally connected to her termination and that the employer's action (her termination) was willful.
Glymph v. CT Corporation Systems, No. 22-35735, Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, August 22, 2023.
Key to remember: Terminating an employee soon after returning from FMLA leave is risky, unless there is a clear, well-documented, non-leave-related reason. Case documents did not show such a clear reason, which can also increase the risk of a willful finding. Employees have time to file claims, even years.
NewsIndustry NewsAssociate Benefits & CompensationHR GeneralistFamily and Medical Leave Act (FMLA)In-Depth ArticleFamily and Medical Leave Act (FMLA)Associate RelationsEnglishHR ManagementFocus AreaHuman ResourcesUSA
2025-03-27T05:00:00Z
Who can fill out FMLA forms? The answer might surprise you
One of the most common questions involving the federal Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) that we see is: “Can ________ fill out the medical certification?”
This question stumps a lot of HR people and can be a little confusing.
It might be easier to start with who CAN’T fill out an FMLA certification. That includes your coworker, best friend, neighbor, or pet.
Jokes aside, often (but not always) a doctor fills out the FMLA certification, and since March 30 is “Doctors’ Day,” this is a great time to discuss this topic.
FMLA certification basics
Employers aren’t required to use certifications, but if they do, the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) has five different certification forms to use for various FMLA leave situations.
The forms are as follows:
- Certification of Health Care Provider for Employee's Serious Health Condition,
- Certification of Health Care Provider for Family Member's Serious Health Condition,
- Certification of Qualifying Exigency for Military Family Leave,
- Certification for Serious Injury or Illness of a Current Servicemember for Military Family Leave, and
- Certification for Serious Injury or Illness of a Veteran for Military Family Leave.
Let’s focus on the first two, as these are the most common ones HR administrators use.
Who can fill out an FMLA certification?
The FMLA regulations describe the person who has the authority to fill out a certification as a “health care provider.” The good news is, the regulations include a lengthy list of medical professionals who fit this role.
Under the FMLA, a health care provider includes:
- A doctor of medicine or osteopathy,
- A podiatrist,
- A dentist,
- A clinical psychologist,
- An optometrist,
- A chiropractor (limited to manual manipulation of the spine as demonstrated by X-ray),
- A nurse practitioner,
- A nurse midwife,
- A clinical social worker,
- A physician assistant,
- A Christian Science practitioner, and
- Any health care provider from whom the employer or the employer's group health plan's benefits manager will accept a medical certification to substantiate a claim for benefits.
To be qualified to fill out FMLA forms, medical professionals must be authorized to practice in the state and perform within the scope of their practice. This means that the provider must be authorized to diagnose and treat physical or mental health conditions.
What about doctors in a foreign country?
If an employee or an employee's family member is visiting another country, or a family member resides in another country, and a serious health condition develops, the employer must accept a medical certification from a health care provider who practices in that country. This includes second and third opinions.
If a medical certification from a foreign health care provider is not in English, the employee may be required to provide a written translation of the certification.
Key to remember: The FMLA regulations spell out which medical professionals can fill out certification forms.
NewsMonthly Roundup VideoFamily and Medical Leave Act (FMLA)LeaveFamily and Medical Leave Act (FMLA)USAHuman ResourcesLeaveHR ManagementEnglishAssociate Benefits & CompensationDiscriminationIndustry NewsGovernment contractsGovernment ContractsHR GeneralistFocus AreaAssociate RelationsExecutive Order 11246Video
HR Monthly Round Up - April 2026
In this April 2026 roundup video, we’ll review the most impactful HR news.
Welcome, everyone! In the next few minutes, we’ll review the latest HR news. Let’s get started.
Sometimes employees go on leave at really inconvenient times. But the federal Family and Medical Leave Act doesn’t care about that. If an employee’s eligible for FMLA leave and the reason qualifies, employer convenience doesn’t matter. This is true even if the employee is considered an essential worker during hurricane season, as a recent Florida court case showed.
In Burrows v. Prummell, the judge denied the employer’s request to dismiss the case in which a sheriff’s office employee took FMLA leave in the midst of emergency weather. As a result, this case will proceed to a jury trial, unless it’s settled.
Speaking of the FMLA, Nevada recently became the first state to limit what doctors can charge for filling out FMLA certifications for their patients. Effective January 1st, 2026, health care providers in Nevada may not charge more than $30 for this task.
The FMLA doesn’t govern whether or how much health care providers charge for a certification. And not all providers charge a fee, but many do, with some charging more than $100.
Remember, though, no employer — in Nevada or any other state — is required to use FMLA certifications. But many employers DO use them to help verify the leave. Stay tuned to see if other states follow in Nevada’s footsteps.
Two other quick updates. On March 31st, members of Congress introduced first-of-its-kind legislation regarding paid leave. If passed into law, it would require covered employers to provide eligible employees paid leave for reproductive health care reasons. The Reproductive Healthcare Leave Act would allow employees to take up to 12 days of paid leave each calendar year.
And, finally, an Executive Order titled “Addressing DEI Discrimination by Federal Contractors” was issued by President Trump on March 26th. It’s the latest in a series of actions taken by the administration targeting what it views as unlawful Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion practices. Although legal challenges are anticipated, federal contractors and sub-contractors that don’t comply could have contracts cancelled.
That’s all the HR news we have time for today. Thanks for watching. See you next month!
NewsIndustry NewsAssociate Benefits & CompensationFamily and Medical Leave Act (FMLA)In-Depth ArticleFamily and Medical Leave Act (FMLA)Human ResourcesEnglishFocus AreaUSA
2022-09-06T05:00:00Z
How to collect premiums during unpaid FMLA leave
Payment options during unpaid FLMA leave
When an employee is on leave under the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA), the employer must maintain benefits under the company’s group health plan.
Thus, employees generally must continue paying their share of the health insurance premiums.
But how do employees pay their share of the premiums when FMLA leave is unpaid? Employers may offer three payment options:
- Pre-pay
- Pay-as-you-go
- Catch-up
Employers may allow a combination of these options, such as pre-pay for part of the leave and catch-up for the remainder. Below is a breakdown of the three available payment options.
Option #1: Pre-pay
When unpaid FMLA leave is foreseeable, employers may allow employees to pre-pay their premiums. For example, if an employee is adopting a child and requests several weeks for bonding time but does not have enough vacation to cover the entire absence, an employer could allow the employee to pre-pay his or her premiums for the portion of the leave that would be unpaid.
Employers may not require an employee to pre-pay, so this cannot be the only option offered.
If an employee chooses this option, however, employers may collect premiums on a pre-tax basis – with one exception. If the absence will extend into the next tax year (such as leave from December through January), only the premiums for the current tax year may be pre-paid with pre-tax income. The IRS does not allow employees to defer untaxed income from one year to the next.
In this example, the premiums for January could either be pre-paid with after-tax income, or the employee could elect one of the other options (pay-as-you-go or catch-up).
Option #2: Pay-as-you-go
Under the pay-as-you-go option, employees pay their share of the premiums based upon the agreed terms made between the employer and employee. These payments are usually made on an after-tax basis.
For example, the employee might mail in a personal check every two weeks. If the employee fails to send in the checks, or otherwise fails to make payments using the agreed-upon system, the FMLA does allow employers to drop coverage after giving specified notices of non-payment.
Dropping coverage would likely cause some administrative headaches, and some insurers may refuse to do this because the employee would have to be reinstated to the health plan upon return from FMLA leave.
Therefore, employers may prefer to continue coverage by paying the employee’s share of the premiums, then use the catch-up option once the employee returns to work. Some insurance carriers recommend this as an alternative to dropping coverage.
Option #3: Catch-up
Under the catch-up option, the employer and employee agree that the employee will not pay premiums until he or she returns from leave.
This option might be used when the need for FMLA leave was not foreseeable, such as having to care for a parent who was unexpectedly hospitalized.
To use this option, the employer and employee must agree in advance that:
- The employee elects to continue health coverage while on leave;
- The employer will pay the employee’s share of premiums during the leave; and
- The employee will repay those amounts when he or she returns.
When the employee returns, the employer collects the current premiums plus any catch-up payments, perhaps taking double premiums, until caught up. Contributions under the catch-up option may be taken on a pre-tax basis.
The IRS regulations indicate that, if the employee chooses the pay-as-you-go option, but fails to make the required payments, you may change to the catch-up option even without the employee’s prior agreement.
Key to remember
Employees on unpaid FMLA leave must still pay their share of health insurance premiums by either pre-paying, paying as they go, or making catch-up contributions upon returning to work.
NewsIndustry NewsHR GeneralistFamily and Medical Leave Act (FMLA)In-Depth ArticleFamily and Medical Leave Act (FMLA)HR ManagementEnglishUSAFocus AreaHuman Resources
2024-05-07T05:00:00Z
May employees take FMLA leave to care for family members outside the U.S.?
Yes, employees may take leave under the federal Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) to care for family members who are outside U.S. borders.
If the employee meets the eligibility criteria of the FMLA, the family member has an FMLA serious health condition, and the employee is needed to care for the family member, the employee’s time off would be protected. It doesn’t really matter where the family member is.
To figure out whether the family member’s condition meets the criteria under the FMLA, employers may require that the employee provide a certification supporting the leave.
Certifications in other languages
If an employee or a family member is visiting in another country, or a family member lives in another country, and a serious health condition develops, employers must accept a medical certification from a health care provider who practices in that country. This rule applies to an original certification, a recertification, and when requesting a second or third opinion from a provider.
If a certification by a health care provider from another country is in a language other than English, employers may require that the employee provide a written translation of the certification.
Traveling to care for family member
If family members are outside the U.S., employees will need to spend some time traveling. The employee’s travel time would likely be seen as part of the FMLA leave if:
- The travel is so intertwined with the care, or
- If it is needed to obtain the care.
Handling intermittent leave
Employees may also take intermittent FMLA leave to care for far-away family members. Employers would manage such leave the same way they do for intermittent leave inside the U.S. Employers should:
- Give the employee an eligibility/rights & responsibilities notice within five days of being put on notice,
- Ask for a certification if desired (including a translation),
- Give the employee a designation notice within five days of getting enough information, and
- Track the employee’s leave time.
Whenever employees are away from the physical worksite, tracking how much intermittent FMLA leave they are taking has its own challenges. Employers may use a simple honor system of self-reporting or technology to keep track of when the employee is taking FMLA leave and when the employee is working.
Key to remember: Eligible employees may take FMLA leave to care for family members who are outside the U.S.
Most Popular Highlights In Safety & Health
NewsIndustry NewsSafety & HealthConstruction SafetyGeneral Industry SafetyAgriculture SafetyMaritime SafetyIn-Depth ArticleHazard CommunicationHazCom Written ProgramEnglishFocus AreaUSA
2026-05-06T05:00:00Z
Got chemicals? You may need a written HazCom program
What triggers the need for a written Hazard Communication (HazCom) program? The answer to this popular Expert Help question depends on certain requirements, definitions, and exceptions within the standard at 29 CFR 1910.1200. Simply put, if all four of the following statements apply, you must develop, implement, and maintain a written HazCom program at each workplace:
- Your organization is an employer. OSHA defines “employer” at 1910.1200(c) as “a person engaged in a business where chemicals are either used, distributed, or are produced for use or distribution, including a contractor or subcontractor.”
- The HazCom standard applies. If you’re an employer, the standard applies if you have any hazardous chemical that’s known to be present in the workplace in such a manner that employees may be exposed under normal conditions of use or in a foreseeable emergency. “Hazardous chemical” means any chemical which is classified as a physical or health hazard, simple asphyxiant, combustible dust, or hazard not otherwise classified (HNOC).
- At least one area/operation of the workplace where hazardous chemicals are present is covered by 1910.1200 and not simply exempted under paragraph (b)(3) or (b)(4). According to these paragraphs, OSHA does not require a written HazCom program to be developed for:
- Laboratories [Note: See our Lab applicability FAQ for details on when a laboratory is covered by 1910.1450 or 1910.1200.], or
- Work operations where employees only handle chemicals in sealed containers that are not opened under normal conditions of use, such as those found in marine cargo handling, warehousing, or retail sales.
It should be noted, however, that these operations do have other obligations under the HazCom standard, outlined at 1910.1200(b)(3) and (b)(4).
- At least one hazardous chemical in the workplace is covered by the standard and is not exempted under 1910.1200(b)(6). (Paragraph (b)(6) exempts certain substances from coverage by the HazCom standard.)
What information must the written program include?
Paragraph (e) of 1910.1200 outlines written program requirements. Although the program doesn’t need to be lengthy or complicated, it must include enough detail to explain how your organization is complying with the HazCom standard. There are specific elements OSHA will look for to ensure compliance:
- A list of the hazardous chemicals known to be present in the workplace that matches the identifier on the container label and the safety data sheet (SDS).
- The designation of person(s) responsible for ensuring labeling of in-house containers and the person(s) responsible for ensuring labeling of shipped containers (if any).
- A description of any in-house labeling system(s) and any labeling alternatives used in the facility (if applicable).
- A description of HazCom training provided to employees.
- Procedures to review and update label information when necessary.
- Methods used to inform employees of the hazards of non-routine tasks, such as cleaning reactor vessels, and the hazards of unlabeled pipes in their work areas.
- An explanation of how the employer will comply on multi-employer worksites. Employers on multi-employer worksites who do not use hazardous chemicals, but whose employees are exposed to the chemicals used by other employers on the worksite, are required to have a program and train their employees on the hazards of the chemicals in the work areas.
Key to remember: If you’re covered by the HazCom standard, you may need a written program. It must include specific elements listed in 1910.1200(e).
NewsIndustry NewsSafety & HealthConstruction SafetyGeneral Industry SafetyWalking Working SurfacesIn-Depth ArticleLaddersEnglishFocus AreaUSA
2026-04-22T05:00:00Z
Ladders, familiar work, serious risks
Ladder-related standards consistently rank among OSHA’s top 10 most cited violations. Every year, serious injuries continue to occur, not because ladders are unsafe, but because they’re used in ways people don’t recognize them as risky.
Preventing ladder incidents starts with recognizing when everyday tasks introduce risk and making deliberate choices to use, position, and reassess ladders before unsafe habits take hold.
Ladders feel safe, until they’re not
Ladders don’t usually trigger a sense of risk because they’re seen as a part of everyday work. When tasks feel quick and familiar, people don’t always stop reassessing the setup. That’s how unsafe ladder habits with big consequences can develop, including:
- standing on the top step “just for a second;”
- reaching too far instead of climbing down;
- using whatever ladder is closest, not the right one; and
- skipping ladder inspections because “it worked last time.”
Ladder safety isn’t going away, and that’s not a bad thing
If ladder safety feels like a repeat conversation, that’s because the same risks keep showing up. New employees are hired; facilities and equipment changes, and old habits stick around longer than they should. Even experienced workers fall into this trap. Familiar tasks start to invite rushing. Rushing leads to shortcuts, and shortcuts are where ladder injuries happen.
Emphasis must be placed on recognizing the risk before the climb starts. This means knowing when a ladder is the wrong choice, repositioning is safer than reaching, and when a quick task deserves the same setup as a longer one.
Most incidents don’t start with bad intentions. They start with “just this once” decisions, one more rung, one quick reach, one skipped check. Effective ladder safety training is about breaking routines and refocusing attention on the decisions that make ladder work safer.
Routine work, repeat injuries
Ladder injuries follow a familiar pattern. They don’t usually come from unusual jobs or unexpected hazards, and they happen during everyday tasks that feel common. Injury reports often look the same, such as short tasks, quick setups, and decisions made under time pressure. The ladder didn’t fail. The setup and the decisions around it did.
Injury data from OSHA and the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) consistently point to the same causes. That’s why the same types of ladder injuries keep occurring repeatedly, not because the hazards are unknown, but because routine work makes those hazards easier to overlook. These reasons include:
- people underestimate the risk because ladders feel familiar;
- jobs feel “too small” to stop and reset the ladder;
- time pressure encourages leaning, rushing, and overreaching; and
- experience leads to comfort, and comfort leads to shortcuts.
The rules are written in injuries
OSHA ladder requirements are built around real injury trends and are based on decades of injury data. Falls from ladders remain one of the leading causes of workplace injuries, which is why OSHA keeps ladders near the top of its enforcement priorities year after year:
OSHA 29 CFR 1910.23 defines how ladders are intended to be used, specifically prohibiting practices such as standing on the top step of a stepladder, using ladders for purposes they were not designed for, and climbing ladders that have not been inspected. These requirements exist because improper use, poor setup, and skipped inspections consistently show up in ladder fall investigations.
OSHA 29 CFR 1910.30 reinforces that preventing ladder injuries depends on training employees to recognize hazards before they climb, understand proper ladder selection and positioning, and know when a ladder is not the right tool for the task. Together, these standards emphasize that ladder injuries are not random events, they are predictable outcomes of routine decisions made during everyday work.
Small choices make a big difference
Ladder safety isn’t only about compliance. Incidents develop from a series of small, moment to moment decisions made during routine work. These choices made daily either reduce risk or quietly add to it. Ladder injuries can be avoided by taking the time to make simple improvements including:
- inspecting and securing the ladder,
- climbing down and repositioning,
- selecting the proper ladder for the task, and
- stopping when the ladder no longer feels stable or safe.
Key to remember: Take the time to choose safer setups, stay alert, and prevent routine decisions from turning into preventable injuries. When employees choose the correct ladder, reposition instead of reaching, and inspect before use, the risk of ladder injuries falls, not your employees.
NewsPersonal Protective EquipmentIn-Depth ArticleWellnessEnglishWellnessIndustry NewsHead ProtectionSafety & HealthConstruction SafetyGeneral Industry SafetyAgriculture SafetyEmployee Mental HealthFocus AreaUSA
2026-04-02T05:00:00Z
From hard hats to headspace: Why mental health is critical for every worker
Protecting workers’ heads takes more than a hard hat. A 2017 National Institute of Health (NIH) study looked at employees across four Kansas worksites and found a clear link between stress and productivity. The study revealed that higher stress scores were significantly associated with lower productivity and greater job dissatisfaction. The result of this study suggests that employers who actively work to reduce stress are not just improving mental health and morale, but they’re boosting productivity as well.
Hidden in plain sight
When Sebastian walked into the office each morning, no one could see the weight he carried. Deadlines were met, meetings attended, yet his smile never faltered. Inside, stress and anxiety were taking a toll, and his story isn’t unique.
One study showed a very interesting contrast: most employees (about 77%) stated they were comfortable supporting a coworker’s mental health. However, when it comes to their own stress or burnout, 42% worry that opening up about it or seeking help could hurt their career or make them a target. Even more striking, one in four have thought about quitting because of mental health challenges. And it’s not just long-term stress. A recent Gallup poll found that 41% of workers felt highly stressed just “yesterday.”
These statistics underscore a troubling theme that employees value and wish to nurture mental wellness; however, stigma, insufficient support, and overwhelming stress persist. Employers need to begin recognizing and proactively addressing workplace mental health in order to cultivate resilient, productive teams.
What one state is doing
The state of Michigan is piloting a new initiative aimed at improving workplace mental health which is increasingly being recognized as an occupational safety and health issue. This expands the state’s historically stringent approach to reducing on-the-job risks.
Michigan’s LEADS program—short for Learn, Educate, Act, Deploy, Study—is a four-month initiative designed to give employers practical tools to tackle stress, burnout, and communication breakdowns that often lead to safety incidents. The idea is simple: when communication falters and stress goes unchecked, mistakes happen. Those mistakes can mean more human errors, higher injury rates, quiet quitting, and turnover.
One of the program’s key features is an evidence-based organizational assessment. Think of it like a safety audit that’s focused on mental health risks rather than physical hazards. Employers get a clear picture of issues such as heavy workloads, unclear roles, workplace conflict or bullying, and weak support systems that can quickly erode a strong safety culture.
The end goal of the LEADS program is not to replace existing safety programs but rather strengthen them. Consider joining Michigan in their effort to enhance communication, better define workers’ roles, support unfettered reporting, and more effectively engage employees.
Key to remember: Stress doesn’t just weigh people down; it can have significant safety and productivity consequences. Programs like Michigan’s LEADS pilot initiative are giving employers the ability to tackle stress and burnout before they lead to mistakes, injuries, or turnover.
NewsIndustry NewsIndustry NewsSafety & HealthMaritime SafetySpecialized IndustriesMarine Terminal OperationsEnglishFocus AreaUSA
2026-04-21T05:00:00Z
OSHA revokes House Falls in Marine Terminals standard
On April 17, OSHA revoked its House Falls in Marine Terminals standard at 1917.41 after determining that the standard is no longer necessary to protect marine terminal employees from occupational safety and health (S&H) hazards. Since most cargo has been containerized and is moved by cranes, OSHA determined that removing 1917.41 would help reduce the compliance burden without compromising worker safety.
The standard, initially adopted in 1983, addressed serious S&H hazards within marine terminal operations and required:
- Span beams be secured to prevent accidental dislodgement;
- A safe means of access for employees working with house fall blocks; and
- Daily inspection of chains, links, shackles, swivels, blocks and other loose gear to prevent the use of defective equipment.
NewsIndustry NewsWaste/HazWasteSafety & HealthConstruction SafetyGeneral Industry SafetyWasteEnvironmentalIn-Depth ArticleCWA ComplianceUsed OilEnglishFocus AreaUSA
2025-03-03T06:00:00Z
Used oil disposal: How to stay compliant with EPA, OSHA, and your state
Used oil disposal is a critical issue for safety managers and shop supervisors in industrial settings. Whether your facility generates used oil from machinery, vehicles, or hydraulic systems, you must understand the regulatory requirements to ensure compliance and avoid hefty fines.
Used oil is not always considered hazardous waste, but improper handling, storage, or disposal can lead to regulatory violations and environmental hazards. Understanding how used oil is classified, when it is considered hazardous, and how to manage it in compliance with 40 CFR Part 279 is essential.
Let’s uncover the regulatory framework for used oil disposal, including storage requirements, transportation rules, and best practices to ensure compliance at both the federal and state levels.
What is used oil?
The EPA defines used oil as any petroleum-based or synthetic oil that has been used and is contaminated by physical or chemical impurities. Common sources of used oil in industrial operations include:
- Motor oil and lubricants from vehicle maintenance
- Hydraulic fluids used in heavy machinery
- Metalworking fluids and coolants
- Compressor oils used in air compression systems
According to EPA regulations (40 CFR Part 279), used oil is presumed to be managed under the less stringent used oil management standards unless it meets hazardous waste criteria.
Used oil becomes hazardous waste if:
- It is mixed with hazardous waste (e.g., solvents or heavy metals)
- It contains more than 1,000 parts per million (ppm) of total halogens, unless proven otherwise, or
- It is disposed of improperly, leading to environmental contamination.
If used oil is classified as hazardous waste, it must be managed in accordance with the applicable solid and hazardous waste requirements.
EPA requirements for used oil disposal
The EPA requirements for used oil consist of three different aspects, as outlined below.
1. Storage Requirements
Use leak-proof tanks and containers made of durable, non-earthen materials (e.g., steel, plastic, or concrete). Label all used oil containers with the words "Used Oil" to prevent misidentification. Prevent leaks and spills by using secondary containment systems and regularly inspecting tanks. Never mix used oil with hazardous waste unless authorized.
2. Transportation and Disposal
Used oil generators may transport up to 55 gallons of used oil to a registered collection center without an EPA ID number. If contracting a used oil transporter, ensure they have an EPA Identification Number.
Used oil must be:
- Recycled or re-refined into new oil.
- Burned for energy recovery in approved furnaces or boilers.
- Disposed of at an authorized hazardous waste facility if deemed hazardous.
3. Spill Prevention and Cleanup
Facilities storing large amounts of used oil must have a Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasure (SPCC) Plan. SPCC plans establish procedures, methods, and equipment requirements to prevent oil from reaching waterways, and to contain discharges of oil.
Any spills must be cleaned up immediately, and absorbent materials must be disposed of properly. Rags and shop towels contaminated with hazardous materials may be classified as hazardous waste.
OSHA regulations for handling used oil
While the EPA focuses on environmental compliance, OSHA (29 CFR Part 1910) regulates worker safety when handling used oil. Key OSHA requirements include:
1. Personal Protective Equipment (PPE)
Workers handling used oil must wear gloves and protective clothing to prevent skin exposure. Safety goggles or face shields are also important to avoid eye contact.
2. Hazard communication (HazCom) program
Employers must label all used oil containers with appropriate hazard information and train employees on safe handling procedures and emergency response.
3. Fire and Explosion Safety
Always store used oil away from ignition sources to prevent fire hazards. Ensure storage areas are ventilated to avoid vapor buildup.
State-Specific used oil disposal regulations
Many states have stricter used oil regulations than federal laws. For example:
- California classifies used oil as hazardous waste unless it meets specific recycling criteria.
- Texas requires additional storage permits for large generators.
- New York mandates annual reporting on used oil disposal activities.
To ensure compliance, check with your state’s environmental agency for state-specific used oil disposal rules and whether used oil is considered hazardous. Additional permits for transporting or processing used oil may be necessary.
Staying compliant with used oil disposal requirements
Ensuring compliance with EPA, OSHA, and state laws is essential for safety managers and shop supervisors handling used oil. By following proper storage, transportation, and disposal practices, businesses can reduce environmental risks, improve workplace safety, and avoid costly fines.
Key to remember: By staying informed and proactive, your facility can maintain safe, sustainable, and compliant used oil management practices.
NewsIndustry NewsIndustry NewsHeat and Cold ExposureEnforcement and Audits - OSHAEnforcement and Audits - OSHASafety & HealthConstruction SafetyGeneral Industry SafetyAgriculture SafetyMaritime SafetyEnglishHeat StressFocus AreaUSA
2026-04-14T05:00:00Z
OSHA revises heat emphasis program
OSHA revised its National Emphasis Program (NEP) on outdoor and indoor heat-related hazards on April 10. Using OSHA and Bureau of Labor Statistics data from 2022-2025, the agency will prioritize inspections in 55 “high-risk industries” in indoor and outdoor work settings.
The revised NEP introduces two reorganized appendices: one that includes information on how OSHA investigators will evaluate heat illnesses and prevention programs and another that provides citation guidance. The updated NEP also includes better guidance designed to strengthen tracking procedures and more effectively implement the program’s enforcement and outreach efforts.
Compliance officers will provide outreach and compliance assistance and broaden inspections if heat hazards are found on heat priority days. Additionally, random inspections will occur on days when the National Weather Service issues a heat advisory or warning.
The revised NEP remains in place for 5 years after the effective date.
Saved to my EVENT CALENDAR!
View your saved links by clicking the arrow next to your profile picture located in the header. Then, click “My Activity” to view the Event Calendar on your Activity page.
OK
J. J. Keller is the trusted source for DOT / Transportation, OSHA / Workplace Safety, Human Resources, Construction Safety and Hazmat / Hazardous Materials regulation compliance products and services. J. J. Keller helps you increase safety awareness, reduce risk, follow best practices, improve safety training, and stay current with changing regulations.
Copyright 2026 J. J. Keller & Associate, Inc. For re-use options please contact copyright@jjkeller.com or call 800-558-5011.
















































