Virtual conference offers OSHA injury recordkeeping scenarios
Employers often struggle to determine if a workplace injury must be recorded on the OSHA 300 Log. To help employers make these decisions, J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc. hosted a virtual conference titled, “Are these incidents recordable? You decide.” A recording of the event is available here.
The one-hour event began by outlining the criteria that determine whether an incident is work-related and recordable. The introduction also offered tips on filling out the 300 Log and completing the 300A Annual Summary.
The presenters then described several workplace incidents and asked attendees for feedback. Most scenarios involved whether the case would be work-related or recordable, but one involved how to record the case. After each scenario, the presenters offered variations to illustrate how minor changes in circumstances could affect the answer.
The five scenarios were as follows:
- An employee fell in the parking lot before work, went to a hospital for x-rays, but did not require treatment beyond first aid. Is this recordable?
- An employee walking across the parking lot after work is struck by another employee who is driving a personal vehicle, arriving for the next shift. The pedestrian gets admitted to the hospital and misses several days of work. Is this recordable?
- An employee briefly passes out at work and, upon waking, claims he’s on a special diet that causes low blood sugar and he sometimes passes out at home. Is this recordable?
- An employee was seriously injured in November and needed time off; he still hasn’t returned when the employer needs to prepare the 300A Annual Summary. What day count does the employer put on the 300A?
- An employee fractures an ankle while stepping on a broken pallet at work, then fails a post-incident drug test. Is this recordable?
Answers and variables
Along with the answers to the scenarios presented, the event described some variables that could change the outcome. In the same order above, the event covered the following:
- The injury to the employee who fell in the parking lot would be work-related but not recordable because there was no medical treatment. However, if the employee needed restrictions or missed a day of work, it would be recordable even if medical treatment was not needed.
- The injury to the pedestrian struck by a vehicle would not be work-related or recordable because it meets an exception at 1904.5(b)(2)(vii). However, if the pedestrian had been working (like cleaning up the parking lot) rather than starting a commute home, the incident would be work-related and recordable.
- The employee who passed out due to a special diet would not have a recordable loss of consciousness. This was a non-work condition that happened to occur at work under 1904.5(b)(2)(ii). Oddly, if the employee had passed out due to a phobia, like seeing a large spider at work, that would be work-related and recordable.
- For the employee injured in November and still away from work in January, the employer should estimate the number of days away, use that estimate to complete the 300A, and later update the 300 Log when the exact day count is known.
- The employee who fractured an ankle and failed a drug test did have a work-related and recordable injury, even if the employer believes the drug use contributed to the situation.
The event was presented by Edwin Zalewski and Joe Proulx. They also responded to many audience questions during the event.
Key to remember: Any event that occurs at work is presumed to be work-related for the OSHA 300 Log, unless an exception applies. Those exceptions are narrow and depend on the circumstances.



















































