FREE TRIAL UPGRADE!
Thank you for investing in EnvironmentalHazmatHuman ResourcesHuman Resources, Hazmat & Environmental related content. Click 'UPGRADE' to continue.
CANCEL
YOU'RE ALL SET!
Enjoy your limited-time access to the Compliance Network!
A confirmation welcome email has been sent to your email address from ComplianceNetwork@t.jjkellercompliancenetwork.com. Please check your spam/junk folder if you can't find it in your inbox.
YOU'RE ALL SET!
Thank you for your interest in EnvironmentalHazmatHuman ResourcesHuman Resources, Hazmat & Environmental related content.
WHOOPS!
You've reached your limit of free access, if you'd like more info, please contact us at 800-327-6868.
You'll also get exclusive access to:
Already have an account? .

A federal court in Vermont ruled that the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) does not protect employees based on their use of marijuana, even if that use is legal under state law. Under the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA), however, substance abuse can be a serious health condition that might mandate employee job protections.

Employers benefit from knowing how these laws affect employees and employers.

The ADA

In the case, Ivo, an employee, used his medical marijuana prescription to help manage his chronic pain and depression. When he failed a drug test because of the marijuana, the employer fired him, and he sued.

In court, the employer argued that Ivo’s marijuana use, even if under the supervision of a doctor, precluded his ADA claim, because the drug is illegal under the federal Controlled Substances Act (CSA). The CSA indicates that, unlike some other illegal drugs (e.g., methadone) marijuana has no medical benefits or use.

The ADA does not protect employees who currently engage in the illegal use of drugs.

Therefore, because Ivo used an illegal drug, he was not considered a qualified individual under the ADA. Based on this, his ADA claim failed.

Vermont’s medical marijuana laws do not include job protections, although the state has other laws regarding drug testing and disability discrimination.

The FMLA

Under the FMLA, employees may take job-protected leave to obtain treatment for substance abuse (e.g., receive inpatient care, attend meetings, etc.). Time off because of the employee’s use of the substance, rather than for treatment, would not be protected by the FMLA.

In this case, Ivo did not ask for leave, as he was successfully performing his job. He failed a drug test, and the court sided with the employer in his ADA claim, and dismissed the case.

Skoric v. MVRTD, District Court of Vermont, No. 2:23-cv-00064, February 14, 2024.

Key to remember: Employers benefit from remembering that the ADA does not protect employees who test positive for cannabis. Other laws, however, might have some protections.

Specialized Industries

Go beyond the regulations! Visit the Institute for in-depth guidance on a wide range of compliance subjects in safety and health, transportation, environment, and human resources.

J. J. Keller® COMPLIANCE NETWORK is a premier online safety and compliance community, offering members exclusive access to timely regulatory content in workplace safety (OSHA), transportation (DOT), environment (EPA), and human resources (DOL).

Interact With Our Compliance Experts

Puzzled by a regulatory question or issue? Let our renowned experts provide the answers and get your business on track to full compliance!

Upcoming Events

Reference the Compliance Network Safety Calendar to keep track of upcoming safety and compliance events. Browse by industry or search by keyword to see relevant dates and observances, including national safety months, compliance deadlines, and more.

SAFETY & COMPLIANCE NEWS

Keep up with the latest regulatory developments from OSHA, DOT, EPA, DOL, and more.

REGSENSE® REGULATORY REFERENCE

Explore a comprehensive database of word-for-word regulations on a wide range of compliance topics, with simplified explanations and best practices advice from our experts.

THE J. J. KELLER INSTITUTE

The Institute is your destination for in-depth content on 120+ compliance subjects. Discover articles, videos, and interactive exercises that will strengthen your understanding of regulatory concepts relevant to your business.

ADD HAZMAT, ENVIRONMENTAL, & HR RESOURCES

Unlock exclusive content offering expert insights into hazmat, environmental, and human resources compliance with a COMPLIANCE NETWORK EDGE membership.

DIRECT ACCESS TO COMPLIANCE EXPERTS

Struggling with a compliance challenge? Get the solution from our in-house team of experts! You can submit a question to our experts by email, set up a phone or video call, or request a detailed research report.

EVENTS

Register to attend live online events hosted by our experts. These webcasts and virtual conferences feature engaging discussions on important compliance topics in a casual, knowledge-sharing environment.

Most Recent Highlights In Environmental

EPA’s 2026 regulatory shift: How environmental managers can stay ahead
2025-12-05T06:00:00Z

EPA’s 2026 regulatory shift: How environmental managers can stay ahead

The clock is ticking for environmental teams. By 2026, several new EPA regulations will reshape compliance obligations for U.S. companies. Organizations that act now will avoid costly penalties and operational disruptions.

What’s changing and why it matters

Although EPA has been deregulating or loosening some requirements, there are still some standards being tightened across multiple fronts in the coming year:

  • Renewable fuel standards (RFS): The EPA proposed higher volume requirements for 2026, including 24.02 billion renewable identification numbers (RINs), up nearly 8% from 2025. This increase pushes stricter expectations on fuel producers and organizations purchasing renewable fuels.
  • Stormwater multi-sector general permit (MSGP): A new MSGP set to take effect by February 2026 will require quarterly PFAS indicator monitoring, expanded benchmark sampling, and resiliency measures in stormwater control designs.
  • PFAS Reporting under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA): TSCA Section 8(a)(7) mandates PFAS manufacturing and import data collection beginning in April 2026, through October 2026, with extended deadlines for certain small manufacturers.

Failure to prepare could lead to fines, reputational damage, supply chain disruptions, and permit delays. Companies that weave compliance planning into their 2026 strategy will be positioned not just to meet legal deadlines but to sustain operations smoothly.

Key areas of impact

  • Renewable fuel standards (RFS) and air emissions The proposed increase in 2026 Renewable Identification Numbers (RIN) volumes, from 24.02 billion to 24.46 billion for 2027, signals tightening air and fuels policy that affects fuel use and emissions accounting.
  • Stormwater management The upcoming 2026 MSGP requires expanded quarterly PFAS monitoring, new benchmark triggers, corrective action plans, and integration of climate resilience in design standards.
  • PFAS disclosure (TSCA Section 8(a)(7)) Manufacturers and importers of PFAS must submit electronic reporting of usage, volumes, disposal, and exposure data between April and October 2026, with extensions available for smaller operations.

Steps to take now

  • Audit compliance programs: Cross-check operations against RIN inventory, stormwater permits, and TSCA reporting duties.
  • Upgrade monitoring and recordkeeping: Implement robust electronic systems to track PFAS, stormwater quality, fuel volumes, and emissions.
  • Staff training: Educate teams on PFAS obligations, new stormwater protocols, and RFS structures.
  • Engage regulators early: Comment on proposed rules, consult during permit drafting, and flag issues during the notice-and-comment period.

Looking ahead

The EPA’s 2026 updates reflect a trend toward increased transparency and environmental accountability. Companies that treat compliance as strategic will not only avoid enforcement but also gain resilience and stakeholder trust.

Key to remember: Start planning now. Early action on EPA rule changes will save time, money, and headaches when enforcement begins.

EPA confirms oil, gas emissions compliance extensions
2025-12-05T06:00:00Z

EPA confirms oil, gas emissions compliance extensions

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) issued a rule on December 3, 2025, that finalizes compliance deadline extensions for certain emissions standards applicable to crude oil and natural gas facilities. The final rule also further delays compliance timelines for two requirements.

EPA’s delays affect:

  • The New Source Performance Standards for crude oil and natural gas facilities (40 CFR 60 Subpart OOOOb), and
  • The emissions guidelines (EGs) for crude oil and natural gas facilities (60 Subpart OOOOc).

EPA’s December 2025 final rule is a direct response to the interim final rule (IFR) it issued in July 2025.

The July 2025 IFR extended the compliance deadline for net heating value (NHV) monitoring of flares and enclosed combustion devices (ECDs) to November 28, 2025. The IFR moved the rest of the compliance deadlines to January 22, 2027, for:

  • ECD performance tests;
  • Cover and closed vent system requirements for no identifiable emissions (NIEs), including:
    • Design and operation standards,
    • Test methods and procedures, and
    • Inspections.
  • Equipment leak repair requirements;
  • Phase two of zero-emission standards for process controllers;
  • Storage vessel requirements, including:
    • Using potential emissions limits that qualify as legally and practicably enforceable,
    • Triggering throughput-based modifications, and
    • Using a 30-day period of production to calculate potential emissions.
  • Flare and ECD pilot flame rules, including:
    • Ensuring the devices operate with a continuous pilot flame, and
    • Installing and operating a system to send an alarm to the nearest control room when a pilot flame is unlit.
  • Implementation of the Super Emitter Program, and
  • Submission of state plans for implementing the updated EGs.

What’s the same?

EPA’s December 2025 final rule maintains the same compliance deadlines for all requirements delayed to January 22, 2027.

What’s different?

The agency’s December 2025 final rule sets a new compliance date of June 1, 2026, for the NHV monitoring requirements. This includes an alternative performance test (sampling demonstration) option for flares and ECDs.

Additionally, the rule moves the compliance date for annual reporting, establishing that no annual report is due before November 30, 2026. It gives owners and operators until November 30, 2026, to submit any reports that were originally due before this date. Note that the final rule specifies that annual reports due after November 30, 2026, must be submitted within 90 days of the end of each annual compliance period.

Key to remember: EPA’s final rule confirms deadline extensions for certain emissions standards that apply to crude oil and natural gas facilities. It also further delays a couple of the requirements.

2025-12-02T06:00:00Z

Minnesota requires air toxics emissions reporting in 7 counties

Effective date: October 6, 2025

This applies to: Facilities with air permits in the counties of Anoka, Carver, Dakota, Hennepin, Ramsey, Scott, and Washington

Description of change: The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency adopted new rules mandating that facilities with air permits (except for Option B registration permits) in the Minnesota counties of Anoka, Carver, Dakota, Hennepin, Ramsey, Scott, and Washington submit annual air toxics emissions reports. The covered toxics include certain hazardous air pollutants (HAPs), per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), and other pollutants of concern. Annual emissions reports on HAPs, PFAS, and other covered pollutants are due by April 1.

View related state info: Clean air operating permits — Minnesota

2025-12-02T06:00:00Z

Maine designates currently unavoidable uses of PFAS

Effective date: October 7, 2025

This applies to: All nonexempt new and unused products sold, offered for sale, or distributed for sale in Maine that contain intentionally added PFAS

Description of change: The Maine Department of Environmental Protection established designations for currently unavoidable uses of intentionally added per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in products subject to sales prohibitions that start on January 1, 2026.

2025-12-02T06:00:00Z

Vermont updates drinking water rules

Effective date: January 1, 2026

This applies to: Public water systems

Description of change: The Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation made multiple changes to the Water Supply Rule. Some of the major amendments include:

  • Changes to the per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) regulations,
  • Additions to the contaminants covered by the rule, and
  • A new method to calculate the impact of PFAS mixtures.
See More

Most Recent Highlights In Transportation

2025-12-02T06:00:00Z

Utah adds emission units, source categories to air permit exemptions

Effective date: November 5, 2025

This applies to: Emission units and source categories that qualify for an air permit by rule

Description of change: The Utah Department of Environmental Quality added new emission units and source categories that qualify for air permits by rule that are exempt from the requirement to obtain an Approval Order (per R307-401-8).

New emission units added include:

  • Fuel storage tanks,
  • Abrasive blasting operations,
  • Degreasing operations,
  • Municipal solid waste landfills, and
  • Emergency engines.

New source categories added include:

  • Dry cleaners, and
  • Automotive refinishing sources.

View related state info: Clean air operating permits — Utah

2025-12-02T06:00:00Z

Ohio amends composting requirements

Effective date: December 1, 2025

This applies to: Owners and operators of composting facilities

Description of changes: The Ohio Environmental Protection Agency amended the regulations that apply to composting facilities. Major changes include:

  • Registering the facility annually with the annual report (no fees associated),
  • Submitting the most recent plan view drawing with the annual report, and
  • Maintaining an operator in compliance with the new certification program requirements at the facility.
2025-12-02T06:00:00Z

Washington amends Clean Vehicles Program

Effective date: November 16, 2025

This applies to: Medium- and heavy-duty engine and vehicle manufacturers as well as heavy-duty internal combustion engine manufacturers

Description of change: The Washington State Department of Ecology amended the Clean Vehicles Program rules to incorporate changes made to the California Air Resources Board’s Advanced Clean Trucks and Heavy-Duty Vehicle and Engine Omnibus Low NOx regulations. The changes ease compliance requirements for the heaviest vehicles.

2025-12-02T06:00:00Z

Indiana adopts permanent underground carbon sequestration regulations

Effective date: October 1, 2025

This applies to: Entities participating in permanent underground carbon dioxide storage projects

Description of the change: The rule establishes carbon sequestration project applicability and establishes regulations for:

  • Obtaining a carbon dioxide transmission pipeline certificate of authority,
  • Obtaining a carbon sequestration project permit,
  • Administrative and procedural processes for carbon sequestration projects and carbon dioxide transmission pipelines,
  • The ongoing responsibilities of storage operators, and
  • Records of a storage operator.
2025-12-02T06:00:00Z

Louisiana requires state forms for Title V permittees

Effective date: November 20, 2025

This applies to: Title V permit holders

Description of change: The Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality requires all Title V operating permittees to use standard department-approved forms to submit the:

  • Title V Semiannual Monitoring Report, and
  • Title V Annual Compliance Certification.

View related state info: Clean air operating permits — Louisiana

See More

Most Recent Highlights In Safety & Health

2025-12-02T06:00:00Z

California adopts emergency vehicle emissions regulations

Effective date: October 2, 2025

This applies to: Entities subject to CARB’s vehicle emissions regulations

Description of change: Congressional resolutions disapproved the waivers for the California Air Resources Board’s (CARB’s) Advanced Clean Cars II and Heavy-Duty Vehicle and Engine Omnibus Low NOx (Omnibus) regulations.

Through an emergency rulemaking, CARB adopted the Emergency Vehicle Emissions Regulations, reinstating at a minimum earlier-adopted regulations displaced by Advanced Clean Cars II and Omnibus:

  • The Low-Emission Vehicle Regulation (LEV) III regulation and associated on-board diagnostic requirements, and
  • Medium- and heavy-duty regulations.

The regulation applies until litigation is resolved.

Regulated entities may follow either:

  • The LEV IV (part of Advanced Clean Cars II) or Omnibus standards, or
  • The LEV III and pre-Omnibus standards.

View related state info: Air programs — California Air Resources Board (CARB)

2025-12-02T06:00:00Z

Ohio extends expiration of Permit to Install

Effective date: November 13, 2025

This applies to: Owners and operators of wastewater treatment systems and businesses that install sanitary sewers

Description of changes: The Ohio Environmental Protection Agency amended the Permit to Install (PTI) program rules, which regulate the design and installation of wastewater conveyance and treatment systems. Most notably, the department extended the expiration date of PTIs from 18 months to start construction to 60 months to start construction. The amendments also exempt boat wash marinas and force mains serving one structure from PTIs.

View related state info: Industrial water permitting — Ohio

2025-12-02T06:00:00Z

Florida allows reciprocity for water system operator licensing

Effective date: November 6, 2025

This rule applies to: Out-of-state licensed treatment plant operators and distribution system operators

Description of change: The Florida Department of Environmental Protection adopted rules to:

  • Implement licensure reciprocity, allowing the department to issue licenses by reciprocity to water treatment, domestic water treatment, and water distribution system operators with out-of-state licenses; and
  • Allow the department to issue temporary operator licenses during a declared state of emergency to out-of-state licensed treatment plant and distribution system operators during a declared state of emergency.
2025-12-02T06:00:00Z

Louisiana adds aerosol cans to universal waste program

Effective date: November 20, 2025

This applies to: Owners and operators of all facilities that generate, transport, treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste

Description of change: The Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality added hazardous waste aerosol cans to the universal waste program. The program streamlines hazardous waste management requirements and is identical to the federal universal waste requirements for aerosol cans.

View related state info: Universal waste — Louisiana

2025-12-02T06:00:00Z

Pennsylvania reissues NPDES General Permit for mining

Effective date: March 28, 2026

This applies to: Mining operations with stormwater discharges

Description of change: The Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection reissued the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Permit for Stormwater Associated with Mining Activities (BMP GP-104). Mining operation sites must obtain an NPDES permit to discharge stormwater if the site has expected or potential stormwater runoff discharges.

The new permit made one substantial change to clarify that entities covered under this general permit must meet the 2-year, 24-hour event design standards at 25 Pa. Code Chapter 102. The BMP GP-104 takes effect on March 28, 2026, and expires on March 27, 2031.

View related state info: Industrial water permitting — Pennsylvania

See More

Most Recent Highlights In Human Resources

Annual HFC report: First submissions due March 2026
2025-11-25T06:00:00Z

Annual HFC report: First submissions due March 2026

What do the manufacturers of hairspray cans, foam wall insulation, and ice cream machines have in common? If their products contain hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), they have to report annually on the HFCs they use, and the first report due date is quickly approaching! Through the Technology Transitions Program, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regulates HFCs used for new products and equipment in three sectors: aerosols, foams, and refrigeration, air conditioning, and heat pumps (RACHP). Among other compliance requirements of the 2023 Technology Transitions Rule, manufacturers and importers of HFC-containing products and equipment must submit annual reports.

Note: EPA’s October 2025 proposed rule to amend the 2023 Technology Transitions Rule doesn’t impact annual reporting requirements.

Use this overview to help you determine whether your business needs to report and, if so, what’s required.

Who reports?

Annual reporting applies to manufacturers and importers of products and equipment that use HFCs. An organization has to submit an annual report if:

  • It manufactures or imports a product or component within a regulated sector or subsector (see 40 CFR 84.54), and
  • The product or component uses or will use a regulated HFC or HFC blend.

Reporting requirements apply to manufacturers and importers in all sectors and subsectors, and they start with data from calendar year 2025. The first annual report is due to EPA by March 31, 2026.

Note that the annual reporting requirements don’t apply to entities that only:

  • Sell or distribute equipment, or
  • Install or operate new RACHP systems.

What’s reported?

In each annual report, covered manufacturers and importers must provide:

  • The entity’s name and address;
  • The entity’s contact person, the contact's email address, and the contact's phone number;
  • The calendar year covered by the report and the submission date;
  • All applicable North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) codes; and
  • A statement certifying that the data is accurate and that the products use HFCs or HFC blends in compliance with the use restrictions and labeling requirements.

Entities in all three sectors also have to report the total mass in metric tons of each HFC or HFC blend contained in all products and components manufactured, imported, and exported annually.

Further, sector-specific standards apply.

SectorRequires additional information for:See 40 CFR:
Aerosol
  • Sets of products with the same HFC combination and quantity
84.60(a)(5)
Foam
  • Sets of products (excluding foam-blowing containers) with the same HFC density and identity
  • Containers or foam-blowing products with foam-blowing agents
84.60(a)(4)
RACHP
  • Sets of products or components with the same charge size and HFC combination
  • Products or components with HFC-containing closed-cell foam
84.60(a)(3)

How’s the report submitted?

According to the latest information shared by EPA in the “Technology Transitions Program: What You Need to Know for January 1, 2025” webinar presentation, the agency is still designing the electronic platform for submitting annual reports. EPA plans to provide reporting instructions and forms before the upcoming deadline.

About the 2023 Technology Transitions Rule

HFCs are greenhouse gases that were developed to replace ozone-depleting substances for use in various products and equipment (primarily refrigeration and air-conditioning systems). The American Innovation and Manufacturing Act of 2020 gives EPA the authority to address HFCs by:

  • Phasing down production and consumption through the HFC Allowance Allocation Program,
  • Implementing restrictions on HFC use in specific sectors, and
  • Developing regulations to maximize the reclamation and minimize the release of HFCs from equipment.

The 2023 Technology Transition Rule established the Technology Transitions Program to restrict HFC uses in sectors and subsectors where lower global warming potential (GWP) technologies are or will soon be available. The regulations apply to manufacturers (including importers), exporters, sellers, distributors, and installers of systems or products in covered sectors that use HFCs.

What about the proposed changes to the 2023 Technology Transitions Rule?

On October 3, 2025, EPA proposed a rule to amend the existing 2023 Technology Transition Rule. However, the proposed changes don’t affect the annual reporting requirements for manufacturers and importers. All covered manufacturers and importers must submit the annual report by March 31, 2026.

The proposed rule impacts specific subsectors, including refrigerated transport, industrial process refrigeration, chillers, retail food (for supermarkets and remote condensing units), cold storage warehouses, and stationary residential and light commercial air conditioning and heat pumps. EPA proposes to:

  • Exempt certain intermodal containers transporting cargo at very cold temperatures;
  • Extend compliance dates for industrial process refrigeration used in semiconductor manufacturing;
  • Raise global warming potential thresholds for remote condensing units, supermarket systems, and cold storage warehouses;
  • Extend compliance dates for refrigerated centrifuges and laboratory shakers; and
  • Allow existing residential and light commercial air-conditioning and heat pump equipment (i.e., manufactured or imported before January 1, 2025) to continue to be installed.

Key to remember: The first annual reports required by the Technology Transitions Program for manufacturers and importers of HFC-containing products and equipment are due by March 31, 2026.

EPA’s SDS/Tier II reporting now in lockstep with OSHA HazCom
2025-11-25T06:00:00Z

EPA’s SDS/Tier II reporting now in lockstep with OSHA HazCom

EPA issued a direct final rule to update its safety data sheet (SDS) reporting and Tier II inventory reporting requirements. The changes align EPA 40 CFR 370 with OSHA’s Hazard Communication (HazCom) standard at 29 CFR 1910.1200.

News update: EPA extended the public comment period for this direct final rule that made technical amendments to 40 CFR 370 to conform to the 2024 OSHA HazCom standard. An EPA memo lodged in docket EPA-HQ-OLEM-2025-0299 at Regulations.gov, explains, “This document will be open for public comment until December 24, 2025.” Also, note that the docket offers 23 supporting and related materials, including a draft updated Tier II form, draft updated Tier II instructions, and a redline strikeout version of the rule changes.

The biggest change is that facilities will be able to copy the hazard categories directly from section 2 of the SDSs to their Tier II report forms. This eliminates the guesswork. However, facilities may face added strain with their first Tier II submission under the rule. Instead of relying on the grouped hazard categories selected in the previous year’s forms, it looks like facilities will need to spend extra time retrieving specific categories from their SDSs.

Who’s impacted by the rule?

EPA 40 CFR 370 applies to a facility owner or operator if:

  • The OSHA HazCom standard requires the facility to prepare or have available an SDS or material safety data sheet (MSDS) for a hazardous chemical;
  • The hazardous chemical is not exempted at 370.13 or 1910.1200(b)(6); and
  • The hazardous chemical is present at or above certain threshold levels.

If the applicability criteria are met, the facility owner/operator must submit to the state emergency response commission (SERC), local emergency planning committee (LEPC), and local fire departments:

  • An SDS or MSDS for each covered hazardous chemical or a list of all covered hazardous chemicals; and
  • A Tier II hazardous chemical inventory form by March 1 annually for all covered hazardous chemicals.

A state may make its own laws and regulations in addition to or more stringent than federal Part 370.

What’s changing in Part 370?

Last year, OSHA amended its HazCom standard to conform to the seventh edition of the United Nations Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals (GHS). Changes to the chemical hazard classifications and categories were part of the amendments to 1910.1200. This is important because EPA Part 370 relies on the OSHA HazCom standard for the definition of “hazardous chemical” and the hazard categories that must be reported.

In the latest rule published November 17, 2025, EPA takes several actions to harmonize its regulations with OSHA’s. The preamble offers a complete list of amendments to Part 370. Here’s a summary:

Change:Details:Sections affected:
Adopts all 112 OSHA hazard categories
  • The hazard categories are amended to include the full list of OSHA hazard classes with their categories for health and physical hazards. (Previously, EPA used an abbreviated list of hazard classes. The change impacts both SDS reporting and Tier II reporting.)
370.3, 370.30, 370.41, and 370.42
Updates terminology
  • The definitions are moved from 370.66 to 370.3.
  • The definition for the term “hazard category” now means the classification of a chemical’s hazard(s) into classes with their categories as are reported in section 2 of SDSs in accordance with 1910.1200.
  • The terms “health hazards” and “physical hazards” are updated to align with OSHA. However, “simple asphyxiants” will remain a health hazard, “combustible dust” will remain a physical hazard, and “hazard not otherwise classified” will remain both a physical hazard and a health hazard.
  • The definition of “material safety data sheet (MSDS)” is removed.
  • Minor changes to other terms are made for plain language, clarity, and consistency purposes.
370.3 and 370.66
Removes the term MSDS
  • The terms MSDS and material safety data sheet are removed to conform to the OSHA HazCom standard.
370.3, 370.10, 370.12, 370.13, 370.14, 370.20, 370.30, 370.31, 370.32, 370.33, 370.60, 370.62, 370.63, and 370.64
Makes minor plain language, clarifying, and consistency corrections
  • Historic dates and clarifications for electronic reporting are removed.
  • Each initial letter of the term “Extremely Hazardous Substance” is capitalized.
  • Other minor corrections are made.
370.1, 370.2, 370.3, 370.10, 370.14, 370.30, 370.32, 370.33, 370.40, 370.41, 370.42, 370.43, 370.44, 370.45, 370.60, 370.61, 370.62, 370.64, 370.65, and 370.66

When will the changes take effect?

The direct final rule is effective January 16, 2026, unless EPA receives an adverse comment during its 30-day comment period. [However, see the "news update," earlier in this article.] If that happens, the agency will publish a timely withdrawal. Then, it will move along with the proposed rule (also published in the November 17, 2025, Federal Register) and address public comments in a subsequent final rule.

Assuming no adverse comment is received on the original direct final rule, EPA gives covered facilities time to prepare. The rule offers a compliance date of December 1, 2026, for both SDS reporting and Tier II reporting. Note that for Tier II reporting, the updates kick in for the 2026 inventory reporting year, which impacts forms due by March 1, 2027, and thereafter. (Forms due on or before March 1, 2026, are unchanged.)

Key to remember

EPA took action to harmonize Part 370 with the changes OSHA made to 1910.1200 last year. The latest amendments to Part 370 have a compliance date of December 1, 2026. For Tier II reporting, the updates start with forms due on or before March 1, 2027.

Avoiding costly mistakes: The most common RCRA hazardous waste violations
2025-11-24T06:00:00Z

Avoiding costly mistakes: The most common RCRA hazardous waste violations

If your facility generates hazardous waste, compliance with the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) is not optional. Yet many businesses overlook key requirements, leading to violations that can cost thousands in fines and damage their reputation. Understanding the most common mistakes and how to prevent them can keep your operations safe and compliant.

The most frequent violations according to EPA

One of the most common errors is failing to determine whether a waste is hazardous. Businesses often assume leftover chemicals, contaminated rags, or spent filters are non-hazardous without testing or applying EPA criteria. Misclassification leads to improper storage and disposal, which can escalate into multiple violations.

Container management is another frequent problem. Inspectors often find containers without the required “Hazardous Waste” label or missing the accumulation start date. Some containers are left open or improperly sealed, allowing leaks or vapors to escape. These issues are easy to fix but often overlooked in busy facilities.

Weekly inspections are mandatory for central accumulation areas, yet many companies skip them or fail to document them correctly. Missing dates, signatures, or inspection logs can result in citations even if the area is otherwise compliant.

Employee training is another weak spot. Large Quantity Generators must train staff on handling hazardous waste and emergency procedures and keep records of that training. Training should be job specific including emergency response specific to the facility. When training is incomplete or undocumented, it counts as a violation even if employees know what to do.

Improper disposal is a serious and costly mistake. Pouring hazardous waste down drains, tossing it in regular trash, or shipping it without a manifest violates federal law. These actions can lead to severe penalties and, in some cases, criminal liability.

Other common issues include exceeding accumulation time limits, 90 days for large quantity generators and 180 days for small quantity generators, without obtaining a permit. Facilities also forget to maintain a valid EPA identification number or fail to update contingency plans and emergency contact information.

How to stay compliant

Start with a thorough waste determination. Identify all materials that could be hazardous and classify them correctly and keep a record of the waste determination. Review container labeling and make sure every container is closed, dated, and marked “Hazardous Waste.” Establish a routine for weekly inspections and keep detailed records.

Invest in employee training and refresh it regularly. Document every session and keep those records accessible. Monitor accumulation times and set reminders to move waste before deadlines. Always use the Uniform Hazardous Waste Manifest when shipping waste off-site, and verify that your transporter and disposal facility are authorized.

Finally, maintain your EPA site ID number and update your contingency plan. Make sure emergency equipment is available, and local responders have your contact information.

Key to Remember: RCRA compliance is detailed, but most violations stem from simple oversights such as open containers, missing labels, skipped inspections, or forgotten paperwork. By building strong procedures and training your team, you can avoid costly mistakes and keep your facility safe and compliant.

Expert Insights: Connecting environmental compliance and employee safety
2025-11-21T06:00:00Z

Expert Insights: Connecting environmental compliance and employee safety

Environmental compliance and workplace safety are often treated as separate priorities, but they’re deeply connected. A strong environmental compliance program doesn’t just protect the environment; it also significantly improves safety outcomes, reduces risks, and safeguards employees.

Why environmental compliance matters for safety

Environmental compliance means following laws and regulations designed to prevent pollution and protect natural resources. These rules often overlap with occupational safety standards because environmental hazards such as chemical spills, air emissions, and improper waste handling can directly harm workers.

For example:

  • Chemical spills can create slippery surfaces, leading to falls and injuries.
  • Air emissions from volatile chemicals can cause respiratory illnesses or even explosions if vapors accumulate.
  • Improper waste storage can result in fires or toxic exposure.

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) focuses on preventing environmental contamination, while the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) ensures safe working conditions. Ignoring environmental requirements can lead to unsafe conditions like toxic exposure, fire hazards, and respiratory risks.

How tracking spills reduced slips

A few years ago, I worked with a manufacturing facility that had recurring slip incidents near the chemical storage area. Initially, they were treated as isolated safety issues. The facility added cautionary signs, but the problem persisted.

After talking with the safety officer, I noticed a pattern. Since these near-miss spills occur inside a building, they typically aren’t reportable from an environmental compliance standpoint. These small drips during drum transfers or hose disconnections weren’t classified as “spills” by operators, so they weren’t cleaned up immediately.

The facility implemented a new process. Every chemical drip or near-miss spill had to be logged and addressed as part of both environmental and safety compliance. Absorbent mats were added near transfer stations, drip trays were installed under valves, and employees were trained to report even minor leaks and spills.

Within 3 months, slip incidents dropped significantly. By integrating spill tracking into the safety program, they not only reduced injuries but also improved their EPA audit scores. This new process of tracking near-miss spills also proved to be a good leading indicator. The facility discovered trends in equipment maintenance and had a more complete picture of the cost of releases.

The business case for integration

Integrating environmental compliance into safety programs offers several advantages:

  • Reduced risk of incidents: Compliance minimizes hazards that could harm employees and the environment.
  • Regulatory collaboration: Many safety and environmental requirements overlap, allowing for streamlined processes.
  • Enhanced reputation: Demonstrating commitment to both safety and sustainability builds trust with regulators, customers, and the community.
  • Cost savings: Preventing spills, fires, and injuries avoids costly fines, cleanup expenses, and workers’ compensation claims.

To maximize the impact of environmental compliance on safety programs, industrial facilities should consider the following:

  • Joint audits: Evaluate environmental and safety risks together to identify overlapping controls.
  • Holistic employee training: Include environmental compliance topics in safety training sessions and toolbox talks (and vice versa).
  • Integrated procedures: Develop standard operating procedures that address both environmental and safety requirements.
  • Technology: Implement monitoring systems for air quality, spill detection, and waste tracking.

Environmental compliance is a key driver of workplace safety. By integrating both programs, facilities can protect employees and the environment at the same time.

Navigating the complexities of multi-jurisdictional environmental compliance
2025-11-18T06:00:00Z

Navigating the complexities of multi-jurisdictional environmental compliance

Companies operating across multiple states, or internationally, face a growing challenge: staying compliant with a patchwork of environmental regulations. As federal agencies scale back certain environmental rules, states are stepping in to fill the gaps. But these state-level regulations aren’t always aligned. One state may impose strict air quality standards, while another may prioritize water discharge limits. This fragmented landscape creates a complex web of requirements that businesses must navigate to avoid fines, delays, or reputational harm.

The compliance puzzle: Federal, state, and global layers

In the U.S., environmental laws are enforced at both federal and state levels. While EPA sets national standards, states often go further. For example:

  • California requires Scope 3 greenhouse gas emissions reporting for large companies starting in 2027.
  • New York and Vermont have enacted climate superfund laws that hold fossil fuel companies financially liable for climate-related damages.
  • Louisiana successfully challenged the EPA’s use of environmental justice criteria in permitting decisions, resulting in a federal court ruling that blocks Title VI enforcement in the state.

Internationally, U.S. companies face additional hurdles. The European Union’s Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD) requires companies to identify and mitigate environmental risks across their global supply chains. This means a U.S. firm with operations or suppliers in Europe must meet stricter standards, even if those standards differ from U.S. law.

Environmental Management Systems (EMS): A strategic solution

To manage this complexity, many companies adopt Environmental Management Systems such as ISO 14001. An EMS provides a structured framework to:

  • Identify applicable regulations across jurisdictions,
  • Set environmental goals and track performance,
  • Conduct internal audits and drive continual improvement, and
  • Ensure consistent documentation and training.

EMS tools help companies centralize oversight, reduce compliance gaps, and respond quickly to regulatory changes. For example, a company using EMS software can assign location-specific tasks, monitor progress, and generate reports tailored to each jurisdiction’s requirements.

Practical strategies for multi-jurisdictional success

  • Centralize compliance oversight: Use a unified system to track permits, deadlines, and reporting across all sites.
  • Leverage EMS tools: Automate alerts, audits, and documentation to stay ahead of changes.
  • Train staff by location: Tailor training to reflect the specific rules and risks of each jurisdiction.
  • Conduct routine audits: Internal reviews help catch issues before regulators do.

Key to Remember: Multi-jurisdictional compliance isn’t just about knowing the rules—it’s about building systems that adapt to them. An Environmental Management System, paired with proactive planning and location-specific training, helps companies stay compliant, reduce risk, and operate confidently across borders.

See More
New Network Poll
After the recent updates to English language proficiency enforcement, what's your biggest challenge as a motor carrier?

After the recent updates to English language proficiency enforcement, what's your biggest challenge as a motor carrier?

No active poll
Please come back soon!
See More
See More
See More
See More
Saved to my EVENT CALENDAR!
View your saved links by clicking the arrow next to your profile picture located in the header. Then, click “My Activity” to view the Event Calendar on your Activity page.