Future and former employees protected by the FMLA
Most situations involving the federal Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) involve current employees. Just because an employee hasn’t yet walked in your doors (or out) does not, however, mean they can’t file FMLA claims. They have FMLA protections, too.
Case in point (an oldie, but a goodie)
Back in 1998, an appeals court case helped illustrate this when an employee volunteered to be laid off. Almost two years later, he reapplied for a job, but was turned down. The company refused to rehire him because, it claimed, during his previous tenure with the company, he had a “poor” attendance rating.
Unhappy about this, the employee filed a claim stating that the “poor” attendance rating given him was based on his 52-day FMLA leave. Therefore, he said the company’s refusal to rehire him interfered with his FMLA rights.
The lower court reasoned that because the employee had volunteered for a layoff, his claim arose as a prospective employee, not a current employee. That court believed — incorrectly — that the law’s enforcement applied only to current employees.
This interpretation, however, would exclude prospective employees who complain that they were not hired because they had used FMLA-protected leave in the past. It would also exclude former employees whose previous employer retaliated against them for using FMLA-protected leave by, for example, giving a negative reference to a future employer.
Appeals court rules in favor of employee
The appeals court, on the other hand, opined that, under the FMLA regulations, the term “employee,” includes prospective and former employees. It pointed to the statutory definition, which defers to the term as defined by the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), which includes former employees. The court also referred to a Supreme Court decision that indicated that the definition is exceedingly broad.
In the case, the company’s interpretation would foster an incentive to fire new employees or refuse to hire prospective employees who were seen as posing a risk of exercising their FMLA rights, such as women of child-bearing age.
According to the FMLA regulations, employers are prohibited from discriminating or retaliating against employees or prospective employees for having exercised or attempted to exercise FMLA rights. [29 CFR 825.220(c)]
If former employees were not protected, once terminated – even for taking FMLA leave – they would have little recourse. As many court cases have shown, former employees can file claims; therefore, they are protected.
In this case, the appeals court reversed the lower court’s decision and ruled in favor of the employee and returned it for further proceedings.
Duckworth v. Pratt & Whitney, First Circuit Court of Appeals, No. 97-2244, July 14, 1998.
Key to remember: Not only do current employees have FMLA protections, future and former employees do, too.