Court holds California must list more chemicals on Prop 65 list
The Alameda Superior Court has ruled that California’s landmark “right-to-know” and safe drinking water protection law, Proposition 65, must be extended to toxic chemicals known to cause cancer and reproductive harm identified under worker protection standards. The ruling finds in favor of labor and environmental groups, including the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC), United Steelworkers, and Sierra Club that fought the case against the California Chamber of Commerce.
Under Proposition 65, California annually publishes a list of chemicals that warms consumers of harmful substances and prohibits the discharges of listed chemicals into drinking water sources. According to NRDC, California has failed, for many years, to include a number of carcinogens and reproductive toxins on the list that were already the subject of workplace warning requirements.
However, the court held that California has an annual legal duty to update the Proposition 65 list with carcinogens and reproductive toxins identified under worker protection standards. The groups sued the state in 2007 over what they called its failure to keep the Proposition 65 list current in light of new science and revised workplace protections. The court’s ruling rejected an argument made by the California Chamber of Commerce in a consolidated lawsuit.
Precisely which chemicals California must now add to the Proposition 65 list is still in dispute, but more than 90 additional chemicals identified in workplace safety standards are at issue. NRDC says examples of chemicals that are likely to be listed as a result of this ruling include: styrene, a principal ingredient in various plastic and foam products, gasoline additives such as tert-amyl methyl ether (TAME), and carbaryl, a common lawn and garden pesticide.
For information on Proposition 65, visit http://www.oehha.ca.gov/prop65.html.

















































