Court delays November 1 DO mandatory deadline
The US Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit has put the new direct-observation drug testing requirements that were to take effect on November 1, 2008, on hold. The court announced on Friday, October 31, 2008, that it was temporarily delaying a June 25, 2008, rule from the Department of Transportation (DOT) that would have required collection sites to directly observe urine collections from any employees undergoing return-to-duty or follow-up drug tests.
The DOT had enacted the rule in an effort to clamp down on commercial drivers, railway workers, and others who might try to cheat on their drug tests. Under new procedures that were part of the June 25 rule, drivers undergoing directly observed collections would be asked to lower their slacks and raise their shirts so an observer could check for adulterants or prosthetics that could be used to beat the test. Such observation has always been optional – at the employer’s discretion – for return-to-duty and follow-up tests, and privacy concerns were raised when the DOT announced that such observation would be mandatory for those tests.
Petitioners, including a large railway, asked the court for an emergency delay while the court reviews the matter. Because the court granted the request, direct observation of return-to-duty and follow-up tests “will continue to be an employer option, rather than mandatory,” according to Jim L. Swart, director of the DOT Office of Drug and Alcohol Policy and Compliance.
The delay only affects the implementation of changes to 49 CFR §40.67(b). The June 25, 2008, rule said those changes would take effect August 25, but DOT later issued a notice that delayed the effective date until November 1. Other changes that appeared in the June 25 rule took effect as planned on August 25.
The court has not indicated when it might issue a decision on the case.
















































