Compliance Just Got Easier: Stay ahead of regulatory changes with instant notifications on updates that matter.
['Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA)']
['Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA)']
2026-07-01T05:00:00Z
JOIN TODAY TO CONTINUE READING THIS ARTICLE & OTHER INDUSTRY NEWS!
You'll also get exclusive access to:
A database of easy-to-understand regulationsAsk unlimited questions to our expertsPre-led discussions forumsAnd more
TRY IT FREE TODAY
Already have an account? Log in now.
NewsWage and Hour Division (WHD), DOLIndustry NewsIndustry NewsHR GeneralistFamily and Medical Leave Act (FMLA)Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA)USAHR ManagementEnglishFocus AreaHuman Resources
The FMLA and treatment outside the U.S.
2026-07-01T05:00:00Z
While hiking on vacation in the Andes, Veronica fell and injured her ankle. She saw a local doctor who prescribed her pain medication, and she was laid up for 5 days. When she returned to work the following week, she told Glen, her supervisor, about the incident. Glen wondered if he had to do anything in relation to the incident, and whether the situation could involve leave under the federal Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA).
Glen then thought about other related situations, such as:
- When employees need to care for a family member who lives outside the U.S.
- When employees visit family members in other countries, and a family member develops a medical condition.
- When employees decide to get treatment for their medical condition from a health care provider in another country.
Glen was right to be curious, as employees may take FMLA leave for their own condition or that of a family member, even if they receive medical treatment outside the U.S.
What the FMLA regulations say
The regulations cover situations involving treatment outside the U.S. They say:
In circumstances in which the employee or a family member is visiting in another country, or a family member resides in another country, and a serious health condition develops, the employer shall accept a medical certification as well as second and third opinions from a health care provider who practices in that country. Where a certification by a foreign health care provider is in a language other than English, the employee must provide the employer with a written translation of the certification upon request.
Reference: 29 CFR 825.307(f)
While this focuses on getting an FMLA certification from health care providers outside the U.S, employers have to count leave supported by a foreign certification as FMLA leave.
Employers also might wonder if employees may take FMLA leave to voluntarily obtain treatment outside the U.S, since the regulation doesn’t specifically address this. According to a representative from the U.S. Department of Labor’s Wage and Hour Division (WHD), yes, they may.
FMLA health care providers can be beyond the U.S. borders, whether they provide treatment to employees or their family members with serious health conditions. Employers should count such time off as FMLA leave.
Travel time
The WHD recently indicated that eligible employees may use FMLA leave to travel to or from a medical appointment, even if a certification doesn’t indicate the need for, time required, or other particulars of such travel time.
Key to remember: Employees may take FMLA leave to care for a family member in another country, or when they receive treatment for their own condition in another country.

NewsWage and Hour Division (WHD), DOLIndustry NewsIndustry NewsHR GeneralistFamily and Medical Leave Act (FMLA)Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA)USAHR ManagementEnglishFocus AreaHuman Resources
The FMLA and treatment outside the U.S.
2026-07-01T05:00:00Z
While hiking on vacation in the Andes, Veronica fell and injured her ankle. She saw a local doctor who prescribed her pain medication, and she was laid up for 5 days. When she returned to work the following week, she told Glen, her supervisor, about the incident. Glen wondered if he had to do anything in relation to the incident, and whether the situation could involve leave under the federal Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA).
Glen then thought about other related situations, such as:
- When employees need to care for a family member who lives outside the U.S.
- When employees visit family members in other countries, and a family member develops a medical condition.
- When employees decide to get treatment for their medical condition from a health care provider in another country.
Glen was right to be curious, as employees may take FMLA leave for their own condition or that of a family member, even if they receive medical treatment outside the U.S.
What the FMLA regulations say
The regulations cover situations involving treatment outside the U.S. They say:
In circumstances in which the employee or a family member is visiting in another country, or a family member resides in another country, and a serious health condition develops, the employer shall accept a medical certification as well as second and third opinions from a health care provider who practices in that country. Where a certification by a foreign health care provider is in a language other than English, the employee must provide the employer with a written translation of the certification upon request.
Reference: 29 CFR 825.307(f)
While this focuses on getting an FMLA certification from health care providers outside the U.S, employers have to count leave supported by a foreign certification as FMLA leave.
Employers also might wonder if employees may take FMLA leave to voluntarily obtain treatment outside the U.S, since the regulation doesn’t specifically address this. According to a representative from the U.S. Department of Labor’s Wage and Hour Division (WHD), yes, they may.
FMLA health care providers can be beyond the U.S. borders, whether they provide treatment to employees or their family members with serious health conditions. Employers should count such time off as FMLA leave.
Travel time
The WHD recently indicated that eligible employees may use FMLA leave to travel to or from a medical appointment, even if a certification doesn’t indicate the need for, time required, or other particulars of such travel time.
Key to remember: Employees may take FMLA leave to care for a family member in another country, or when they receive treatment for their own condition in another country.
See More
RELATED NEWS

Specialized Industries
Go beyond the regulations! Visit the Institute for in-depth guidance on a wide range of compliance subjects in safety and health, transportation, environment, and human resources.
J. J. Keller® COMPLIANCE NETWORK is a premier online safety and compliance community, offering members exclusive access to timely regulatory content in workplace safety (OSHA), transportation (DOT), environment (EPA), and human resources (DOL).

Interact With Our Compliance Experts
Puzzled by a regulatory question or issue? Let our renowned experts provide the answers and get your business on track to full compliance!

Upcoming Events
Reference the Compliance Network Safety Calendar to keep track of upcoming safety and compliance events. Browse by industry or search by keyword to see relevant dates and observances, including national safety months, compliance deadlines, and more.
SAFETY & COMPLIANCE NEWS
Keep up with the latest regulatory developments from OSHA, DOT, EPA, DOL, and more.
REGSENSE® REGULATORY REFERENCE
Explore a comprehensive database of word-for-word regulations on a wide range of compliance topics, with simplified explanations and best practices advice from our experts.
THE J. J. KELLER INSTITUTE
The Institute is your destination for in-depth content on 120+ compliance subjects. Discover articles, videos, and interactive exercises that will strengthen your understanding of regulatory concepts relevant to your business.
ADD HAZMAT, ENVIRONMENTAL, & HR RESOURCES
Unlock exclusive content offering expert insights into hazmat, environmental, and human resources compliance with a COMPLIANCE NETWORK EDGE membership.
DIRECT ACCESS TO COMPLIANCE EXPERTS
Struggling with a compliance challenge? Get the solution from our in-house team of experts! You can submit a question to our experts by email, set up a phone or video call, or request a detailed research report.
EVENTS
Register to attend live online events hosted by our experts. These webcasts and virtual conferences feature engaging discussions on important compliance topics in a casual, knowledge-sharing environment.
Most Recent Highlights In Environmental
NewsIndustry NewsIndustry NewsPesticidesPesticide Registration and LabelingEnvironmental Protection Agency (EPA)EnvironmentalEnglishFocus AreaPesticidesUSA
2026-07-01T05:00:00Z
EPA sets MyPeST compliance reporting deadlines for bilingual pesticide labeling requirements
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) published instructions and deadlines for pesticide registrants to report compliance with bilingual labeling requirements in the MyPeST application. The first compliance reporting deadline is July 31, 2026, for pesticide products with the highest toxicity.
Who’s impacted?
Compliance reporting applies to registrants of pesticide products subject to the bilingual labeling requirements established by the Pesticide Registration Improvement Act of 2022 (PRIA 5) amendments to the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA).
PRIA 5 requires all end-use pesticide product labels to provide Spanish translations of the human health and safety sections by including the translated sections directly on the label or providing a link via scannable technology or other readily accessible electronic methods to the translated sections. EPA allows certain antimicrobial and non-agricultural pesticide products to comply by providing access to Spanish-language Safety Data Sheets instead of direct label translations.
Compliance timelines are based on the type of pesticide and its toxicity category.
What’s required?
Pesticide registrants must report compliance with the PRIA 5 bilingual labeling requirements using EPA’s MyPeST app. The agency recently published detailed reporting instructions in the MyPeST Application User Guide (accessible in the MyPeST app).
EPA also established the following deadlines for reporting compliance in MyPeST:
| Pesticide product type | Bilingual labeling deadline | Compliance reporting deadline |
|---|---|---|
| Restricted use pesticides (RUPs) | December 29, 2025 | July 31, 2026 |
| Non-RUP agricultural products | ||
| Acute Toxicity Category I | December 29, 2025 | July 31, 2026 |
| Acute Toxicity Category II | December 29, 2027 | January 28, 2028 |
| Antimicrobials and non-agricultural products | ||
| Acute Toxicity Category I | December 29, 2026 | January 28, 2027 |
| Acute Toxicity Category II | December 29, 2028 | January 28, 2029 |
| All other pesticide products | December 29, 2030 | January 28, 2031 |
NewsIndustry NewsEnvironmental Protection Agency (EPA)Oil Spill PreventionOil Spill PreventionEnvironmentalIn-Depth ArticleCWA ComplianceEnglishFocus AreaUSA
2026-06-30T05:00:00Z
Secondary containment alternative: Does your oil-filled operational equipment qualify?
Facilities that run like a well-oiled machine often rely on just that — operational equipment that stores and uses oil to function (like hydraulic systems). But wherever oil is stored, there’s always the possibility of a leak, and spilled oil can do serious harm, especially if it reaches water.
That’s where the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA’s) Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasure (SPCC) rule comes in. Usually, regulated facilities must equip oil-filled operational equipment with general secondary containment, which is designed to temporarily hold discharged oil until it can be properly cleaned up. However, some facilities may have another compliance option available.
EPA offers an alternative to secondary containment for qualified oil-filled operational equipment. Let’s take a look at the eligibility criteria and what the other method of compliance requires.
What’s oil-filled operational equipment?
EPA defines “oil-filled operational equipment” at 40 CFR 112.2. Generally, it refers to equipment that has one or more oil storage containers with oil that’s used solely to operate the equipment. Common examples are lubrication systems for pumps and compressors, machining coolant systems, circuit breakers, and electrical switches.
Does your facility have qualified equipment?
Only qualified oil-filled operational equipment is eligible for the alternative requirements to general secondary containment.
The SPCC rule considers oil-filled operational equipment to be qualified if it hasn’t had one discharge of oil exceeding 1,000 gallons or two discharges of oil exceeding 42 gallons each over the following time periods:
- If the facility has operated for at least 3 years, within any 12-month period in the 3 years before the SPCC Plan’s certification date; or
- If the facility has operated for less than 3 years, since becoming subject to the SPCC regulations.
Take note! When determining whether your facility’s oil-filled operational equipment is eligible under federal standards:
- Don’t count oil discharges caused by natural disasters, acts of war, or terrorism; and
- Don’t count the total amount of oil spilled, only the amount that reaches navigable waters or adjoining shorelines.
What about oil-filled manufacturing equipment?
The SPCC rule distinguishes between oil-filled manufacturing equipment and oil-filled operational equipment. Oil-filled manufacturing equipment stores oil only as a supporting element for conducting a mechanical or chemical operation to create or modify a product. It typically involves a flow-through process in which oil continuously moves through the equipment. Examples of this type of equipment include reaction vessels, mixing tanks, and distillation columns.
Because it’s defined independently under the SPCC rule, oil-filled manufacturing equipment isn’t eligible for the alternative compliance option available to qualified oil-filled operational equipment.
What are the alternative measures?
Instead of providing secondary containment for qualified oil-filled operational equipment, facilities may choose to comply with the alternative requirements at 112.7(k), which include:
- Establishing and documenting an inspection or a monitoring program to detect equipment failures and discharges; and
- Adding to the SPCC Plan:
- An oil spill contingency plan according to the requirements of Part 109; and
- A written commitment of the resources (manpower, equipment, and materials) needed to quickly control and remove any potentially harmful quantities of discharged oil;
Take note! If your business must submit a facility response plan (FRP) under 112.20, the oil spill contingency plan and written commitment requirements don’t apply since your FRP already contains these elements.
Why should my facility consider the alternative compliance option?
The alternative requirements to general secondary containment don’t require facilities to prepare an impracticability determination for qualified oil-filled operational equipment.
The impracticability determination provisions at 112.7(d) impose more requirements for facilities that use alternative measures to secondary containment for unqualified equipment.
In addition to meeting the same requirements for qualified oil-filled operational equipment, facilities must have the oil spill contingency plan certified by a Professional Engineer (unless self-certifying as a qualified facility). They also must:
- Describe in the SPCC Plan the reasons such measures aren’t practicable, and
- Conduct periodic integrity tests of bulk storage containers and periodic integrity and leak tests of valves and piping.
Key to remember: The SPCC rule offers an alternative to general secondary containment requirements for qualified oil-filled operational equipment.
NewsGreenhouse GasesAir QualityExcavationsToxic Substances Control Act - EPAToxic Subtances Control Act - EPAPersonal Protective EquipmentAir EmissionsTSCA ComplianceExcavationsMonthly Roundup VideoMiningCAA ComplianceUSAEnglishIndustry NewsSafety & HealthConstruction SafetyInfectious DiseasesCOVID-19General Industry SafetyGeneral Duty ClauseSpecialized IndustriesEnvironmentalFocus AreaRespiratory ProtectionMine SafetyGeneral Duty ClauseAir ProgramsVideo
EHS Monthly Round Up - August 2025
In this August 2025 roundup video, we'll review the most impactful environmental health and safety news.
Hi everyone! Welcome to the monthly news roundup video, where we’ll review the most impactful environmental health and safety news. Let’s take a look at what’s happened over the past month!
OSHA extended the comment period for multiple proposed rules it published on July 1. Stakeholders now have an extra 60 days, until November 1, to comment. Impacted rules include those for respiratory protection, construction illumination, COVID-19, and the General Duty Clause.
OSHA is expanding its Voluntary Protection Programs to help employers develop strong safety programs and lower injury rates. To participate, employers must submit an application to OSHA and undergo an onsite evaluation by a team of safety and health professionals.
Following a series of recent trench collapses, OSHA urges employers to take steps to protect workers. Trench collapses can be prevented by sloping or benching trench walls at an angle, shoring trench walls with supports, and shielding walls with trench boxes. More information can be found on OSHA’s website.
The Mine Safety and Health Administration launched a webpage for its new Compliance Assistance in Safety and Health, or CASH, program. The agency anticipates a surge in domestic mining productivity and seeks to proactively provide miners and mine operators with compliance assistance materials.
Turning to environmental news, EPA proposes challenges to California’s Clean Truck Check program. The program aims to reduce emissions of nitrogen oxides and particulate matter for heavy-duty vehicles. EPA supports the regulation as it applies to California-registered vehicles but disapproves the regulation as it applies to out of state and out of country vehicles. Stakeholders have until September 25 to comment on the proposal.
On August 14, EPA released the July 2025 nonconfidential TSCA Inventory of chemical substances manufactured, processed, or imported in the U.S. The Inventory contains over 86 thousand chemicals, nearly half of which are in active use. The next inventory update is planned for late 2026.
And finally, EPA proposes to rescind the 2009 Endangerment Finding and repeal greenhouse gas emissions for new motor vehicles and vehicle engines. The agency will accept comments on the proposal through September 15.
Thanks for tuning in to the monthly news roundup. We’ll see you next month!
NewsHazardous WasteGreenhouse GasesWaste ManifestsWater ProgramsFall ProtectionMonthly Roundup VideoFall Protection for ConstructionCAA ComplianceUSAWater ProgramsWaste/HazWasteEnglishIndustry NewsSafety & HealthConstruction SafetyGeneral Industry SafetyWasteEnvironmentalFocus AreaAir ProgramsVideo
EHS Monthly Round Up - September 2025
In this September 2025 roundup video, we'll review the most impactful environmental health and safety news.
Hi everyone! Welcome to the monthly news roundup video, where we’ll review the most impactful environmental health and safety news. Let’s take a look at what’s happened over the past month.
OSHA released its Spring 2025 regulatory agenda on September 4. Many rulemakings have been pushed into the fourth quarter of 2025 and the first half of 2026, while a few have been removed from the agenda altogether. These include Infectious Diseases, Blood Lead Level for Medical Removal, and the Musculoskeletal Disorders Column on the OSHA 300 log.
Three rules moved into the long-term actions category – Workplace Violence in Health Care and Social Assistance, Cranes and Derricks in Construction, and Process Safety Management and Prevention of Major Chemical Accidents. The proposed rule stage saw an influx of new entries, most of which were published in the July 1 Federal Register.
The Standards Improvement Project, slated for proposal in May 2026, intends to “remove, modernize, or narrow duplicative, unnecessary, or overly burdensome regulatory provisions.”
OSHA renewed its alliance with the National Waste and Recycling Association and the Solid Waste Association of North America. The partnership will focus on safety issues such as transportation hazards; slips, trips, and falls; needlestick and musculoskeletal injuries; and health issues associated with lithium battery hazards in waste/recycling collection and processing.
For the 15th year in a row, fall protection for construction topped OSHA’s list of top 10 violations. In fiscal year 2024, there were 5,914 recorded fall protection violations, down from 7,271 in fiscal year 2023. The standards that round out the top 10 remain unchanged, with a shift in some of the rankings.
Turning to environmental news, EPA proposes to eliminate the Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program requirements for all source categories except the petroleum and natural gas systems category. The agency also proposes to suspend compliance obligations for covered facilities until 2034. A public hearing was held October 1 and stakeholders have until November 3 to comment on the proposal.
Hazardous waste handlers may continue to use 5-paper copy manifest forms. EPA announced it will accept these forms from entities regulated by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, or RCRA, until further notice. The agency will give a 90-day notice before it plans to stop accepting the 5-copy forms.
And finally, EPA published its Spring 2025 regulatory agenda on September 4. The agenda outlines the agency’s upcoming regulatory actions and their status in the rulemaking process. Major updates on the docket include those for greenhouse gases, risk management rules, and the Renewable Fuel Standards for 2026 and 2027.
Thanks for tuning in to the monthly news roundup. We’ll see you next month!
NewsHazardous WasteEnforcement and Audits - OSHAToxic Substances Control Act - EPAToxic Subtances Control Act - EPAElectronic Reporting of Injury and Illness RecordsTSCA ComplianceMonthly Roundup VideoCAA ComplianceUSAInjury and Illness RecordkeepingWaste/HazWasteEnglishOSHA Violations and PenaltiesIndustry NewsCrystalline SilicaWaste HandlersSafety & HealthGeneral Industry SafetyWasteWaste TransportersEnvironmentalFocus AreaToxic and Hazardous Substances - OSHAVideo
EHS Monthly Round Up - January 2025
In this January 2025 monthly roundup video, we'll review the most impactful environmental health and safety news.
Hi everyone! Welcome to the monthly news roundup video, where we’ll review the most impactful environmental health and safety news. There’s a lot going on, so let’s get started!
As happens at the start of most incoming presidential administrations, a freeze has been placed on all regulatory activity at the federal level, giving the new administration time to review agencies’ plans. The Office of Management and Budget, which must approve most rulemaking activities, has sent numerous pending rules back to the agencies for review. In addition, OSHA withdrew its infectious diseases proposed rule and its COVID-19 in healthcare rule prior to the inauguration.
OSHA’s penalties increased on January 15. The maximum penalty amounts for serious and other-than-serious violations increased to $16,550. For willful or repeated violations, the maximum penalty increased to $165,514 per violation.
OSHA updated its directive on injury and illness recordkeeping policies and procedures. While it’s intended for OSHA compliance officers, employers can use the information to help with recordkeeping compliance.
Fewer workers died on the job in 2023, as fatal work injuries decreased 3.7 percent from 2022. Transportation incidents remained the most frequent type of fatal event, accounting for over 36 percent of all occupational fatalities.
California’s Occupational Safety and Health Standards Board voted to adopt a permanent silica standard. If approved, it would extend and strengthen the state’s emergency temporary standard, which was put in place in December 2023.
The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health updated its List of Hazardous Drugs in Healthcare Settings. This is a resource for employers and employees in identifying drugs that are hazardous to the health and safety of those who handle them.
Turning to environmental news, EPA released the biannual update of the nonconfidential TSCA inventory. The inventory helps facilities determine their regulatory requirements for the chemicals they use or plan to use.
And finally, EPA added new Management Method Codes to describe how hazardous waste will be managed after temporary storage and transfer. As of January 1st, hazardous waste handlers must use the codes on the Biennial Report Waste Generation and Management forms.
Thanks for tuning in to the monthly news roundup. We’ll see you next month!
Most Recent Highlights In Transportation
NewsProcess Safety ManagementEnforcement and Audits - OSHAToxic Substances Control Act - EPAWasteErgonomicsMonthly Roundup VideoUSAWaste/HazWasteEnglishErgonomicsIndustry NewsEnforcement and Audits - OSHASafety & HealthToxic Substances - EPAGeneral Industry SafetyWasteEnvironmentalHazardous Materials Safety - OSHAFocus AreaVideo
EHS Monthly Round-Up - August 2024
In this August 2024 roundup, we'll review the most impactful environmental, health, and safety news.
Hi everyone! Welcome to the monthly news roundup video, where we’ll review the most impactful environmental, health, and safety news. Please view the content links in the transcript for more information about the topics I’ll be covering today. Let’s get started!
Two State Plan agencies allegedly provided advance notice of workplace inspections to employers, a practice that’s prohibited under the Occupational Safety and Health Act. Now, lawmakers have requested that the Department of Labor’s acting secretary address the allegations and explain what challenges OSHA faces when monitoring and enforcing State Plan compliance.
A recent study shows jobs in agriculture, forestry, fishing, and hunting are among California’s most dangerous, accounting for the highest number of fatalities among full-time workers. Transportation and utilities jobs ranked second and construction was third.
Remote isolation of process equipment can quickly stop the release of hazardous materials, which can help prevent fatalities and injuries, limit facility damage, and better protect communities and the environment. A U.S. Chemical Safety Board study explores their use and makes recommendations for their utilization in chemical facilities.
A National Safety Council report explores the role of diversity, equity, and inclusion on work-related musculoskeletal disorders, or MSDs. MSDs are the most common workplace injury and often lead to worker disability, early retirement, and employment limitations.
And finally, turning to environmental news, EPA published a final rule that revises its hazardous waste export manifest regulations. All hazardous waste shipments and manifest-related reports will be managed electronically through the agency’s e-Manifest program.
Thanks for tuning in to the monthly news roundup. We’ll see you next month!
NewsIndustry NewsEnvironmental Management SystemsWaste/HazWasteCAA ComplianceSustainabilityIn-Depth ArticleCWA ComplianceEnvironmentalEnglishSustainabilityESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance)Focus AreaUSA
2026-06-26T05:00:00Z
Multi-media inspections are back: How to prepare for comprehensive EPA and state audits
Regulators have returned to routine, in-person inspections, and many are no longer limited to a single program. EPA and state agencies are again conducting multi-media inspections that review air, water, and hazardous waste compliance in one visit. For facilities, this shift raises the stakes. An issue in one program can quickly lead inspectors into others, especially when records or operations do not align.
Most inspectors now arrive with background data already reviewed. Electronic submissions, air reports, discharge monitoring reports, and hazardous waste filings are compared against what they see on site. When numbers, dates, or practices do not match, the scope of the inspection often expands.
What inspectors are really evaluating
While documents are important, inspectors focus on whether procedures match actual operations. They will often start with a walk-through of the facility, tracing how materials move through production and become emissions, discharges, or wastes.
For example:
- Air compliance may be checked by reviewing fuel use, hours of operation, or control device logs.
- Stormwater compliance often involves visual checks for exposed materials and condition of controls.
- Hazardous waste inspections typically focus on labeling, container condition, and accumulation practices.
The common thread is consistency. If a plan says one thing but operators do another, it is likely to result in a finding.
Common gaps seen during multi-media inspections
Across industries, several issues appear repeatedly:
- Records that do not match across programs (e.g., waste logs vs. manifests)
- Missing or incomplete inspection logs for air or stormwater systems
- Assumptions about exemptions without supporting documentation
- Satellite accumulation areas managed informally outside environmental oversight
- Housekeeping issues that create unintended stormwater exposure
Many of these are not complex violations. They are breakdowns in communication, training, or follow-through.
A practical way to prepare
Facilities can improve readiness by conducting an internal, cross-media review that mirrors an actual inspection. This is more effective than reviewing each program in isolation.
Start with a process-based walk-through:
- Identify where raw materials enter the facility
- Follow how they are used, stored, and handled
- Note where wastes, emissions, or discharges are generated
- Confirm how each is managed and documented
At each step, ask two questions:
- Is this activity reflected accurately in our records and plans?
- Would an operator explain it the same way it is written?
This approach often reveals gaps that are not obvious during a desk review.
A recent case: How one issue expands the scope
At a mid-sized manufacturing facility, inspectors began with a routine hazardous waste review. They noticed that waste logs showed periodic disposal of solvent residues, but there were no related air records for emissions tied to cleaning operations.
This led inspectors to review the facility’s air permit assumptions. They found that solvent use had increased over time, but the facility had not updated its potential-to-emit calculations. What started as a simple waste review expanded into an air applicability concern.
The facility ultimately faced findings in both programs, not because of a single major violation, but because information did not align across systems.
Strengthening compliance across programs
Preparation does not require building new systems. It requires making sure existing ones are aligned and consistently followed.
Focus on:
- Clear ownership of compliance tasks across departments
- Regular cross-checks between records (air, water, waste)
- Training staff on how their daily tasks affect compliance
- Maintaining documentation that supports assumptions, exemptions, and limits
Facilities that treat compliance as a connected system, not separate programs, are better positioned during inspections.
Key to remember: A multi-media inspection looks for consistency across air, water, and waste programs, not just isolated compliance. If your records and operations tell the same story, you are far less likely to face expanded scrutiny.
NewsHazardous WasteIndustry NewsWaste GeneratorsEnglishWasteEnvironmentalIn-Depth ArticleWaste/HazWasteFocus AreaUSA
2026-06-25T05:00:00Z
Hazardous waste episodic events: What to do when a bad month happens
Every generator has that month. A tank clean-out gets scheduled; a forklift punctures a tote, and suddenly you've generated way more hazardous waste than you normally would. If you're a Very Small Quantity Generator (VSQG) or Small Quantity Generator (SQG), that one bad month could technically bump you into Large Quantity Generator (LQG) status, potentially subjecting the facility to LQG requirements such as contingency planning, personnel training, and biennial reporting.
The good news is that EPA built in an escape hatch. The 2016 Generator Improvements Rule added 40 CFR Part 262, Subpart L (the "episodic event" provision), which lets you keep your normal generator category for that month, if you follow the rules in 40 CFR 262.232 exactly.
Scenario 1: The planned tank clean-out
Picture a metal finishing shop that's normally an SQG, generating about 400 kg/month of spent plating solution. They finally get around to cleaning out an old process tank that's been sitting idle for three years. That clean-out produces about 1,800 kg of sludge in one shot and enough to push them into LQG numbers for the month.
Since this is something the facility planned and scheduled for, it's a planned episodic event. Here's what the employer would need to do:
- Notify EPA (or the delegated state agency) at least 30 calendar days before the clean-out starts, using EPA Form 8700-12. Include the start/end dates, why the event is happening, estimated waste types and quantities, and a 24-hour emergency contact.
- Double-check the facility's EPA ID number to make sure it is current.
- Stage the waste properly with compliant containers or tanks and labeled with the episodic event start date.
- Get it manifested and shipped off-site within 60 calendar days of the start date.
- Hang onto every record including the notification, manifests for 3 years after the event ends.
Scenario 2: The unplanned spill
Next, picture a packaging plant. They are a VSQG generating around 80 kg/month. They have a forklift punch a hole in a 275-gallon tote of listed solvent and by the time cleanup is done, they're looking at about 900 kg of contaminated absorbent and solvent residue. Nobody planned this. It's not part of normal operations. That makes it an unplanned episodic event. Here is what they should do:
- They have 72 hours to notify EPA or the state by phone, email, or fax. There will be no time to fill out paperwork first.
- Follow that up by submitting EPA Form 8700-12 after the fact, documenting what happened since you couldn't give advance notice.
- Keep the spill cleanup waste separate from your routine waste streams and label it with the episodic start date.
- The same 60-day shipping window and 3-year recordkeeping requirement apply here too.
The things you can't skip
Whether the event is planned or unplanned, there are a handful of conditions that apply across the board and missing any one of them could cost you the episodic event relief entirely.
- One event per year, period. Both VSQGs and SQGs get exactly one episodic event a year unless they petition the Regional Administrator under 40 CFR 262.233 for a second. That second one must be the opposite type, so if your first was planned, the next must be unplanned.
- The clock doesn't wait. Exactly 30 days out for planned and 72 hours for unplanned are required. Miss either window or you lose the relief entirely, meaning full LQG status kicks in for that period.
- The 60-day shipping clock starts on day one of the event, not when you send the notification, so make sure to track it immediately.
- Manifest the waste properly. Episodic waste can ship under the standard Subpart B manifest rules, even in the same load as your regular waste.
- Write everything down. Three years of solid records such as dates, causes of event, quantities, and where it went is what separates a clean inspection from an enforcement headache.
Keys to remember: The episodic event provision rewards generators who plan, classify the event correctly, notify on time, ship within 60 days, and document everything for three years.
NewsGreenhouse GasesAir QualityAir EmissionsChange NoticesChange NoticeVirginiaCAA ComplianceEnvironmentalFocus AreaEnglishAir ProgramsAir Programs
2026-06-24T05:00:00Z
Virginia reinstates power plant CO2 budget program
Effective date: April 24, 2026
This applies to: Power plant owners
Description of change: The Virginia Department of Environmental Quality reinstated the Virginia CO2 Budget Trading Program Regulation, which implements the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI). Participation in the RGGI was stopped in 2023, but the state will resume participation on July 1, 2026, the same date on which the compliance requirements take effect.
The regulation requires fossil fuel-fired units that serve an electricity generator with a capacity of 25 megawatts or more to obtain enough allowances to cover CO2 emissions, which they can purchase in the September and December RGGI auctions.
The department also adopted amendments to the regulations, including establishing a one-time 6-month control period from July 1, 2026, to December 31, 2026.
Related state info: Clean air operating permits state comparison
NewsMunicipal WastewaterChange NoticesChange NoticeWater ProgramsEnvironmentalCWA ComplianceEnglishFocus AreaNorth Carolina
2026-06-24T05:00:00Z
North Carolina approved revisions to wastewater discharge rules
Effective date: May 1, 2026
This applies to: Facilities with domestic wastewater discharges up to 2 million gallons per day
Description of change: The North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) adopted a rule that adds a permitting option to the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) program for facilities with domestic wastewater discharges of up to 2 million gallons per day.
DEQ removed the ban on new or expanded discharges of oxygen-consuming waste when the 7Q10 and 30Q2 flows are both 0 for these facilities. In other words, it allows systems to discharge domestic wastewater to zero-flow receiving streams, provided the system:
- Meets qualifying criteria,
- Complies with specific effluent limits, and
- Uses low-energy methods before discharging wastewater to the receiving stream.
It’ll likely benefit areas where the cost of piping to a higher-flowing stream farther away is prohibitive.
Most Recent Highlights In Safety & Health
NewsGroundwaterSafe Drinking WaterWater ProgramsWater QualityWater ProgramsCWA ComplianceEnglishMunicipal WastewaterWater PermittingChange NoticesChange NoticeWater ReportingIndustrial WastewaterEnvironmentalNew HampshireFocus Area
2026-06-24T05:00:00Z
New Hampshire updates sludge management rules
Effective date: May 15, 2026
This applies to: Owners and operators of drinking water and wastewater treatment plants that generate sludge; land application sites; and facilities that treat, manage, or dispose of sludge
Description of change: The New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services amended sludge management rules. Major changes include:
- Reinstating 5-year site and facility permit renewals (instead of 10 years),
- Adding annual reporting requirements for sludge haulers (which already apply to septage haulers), and
- Requiring all applications to be submitted electronically.
The rule also codifies per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) sampling (implemented in 2019 for the sludge quality certificate program).
NewsGroundwaterToxic/Hazardous Substance ReleasesCERCLA, SARA, EPCRASafe Drinking WaterChange NoticesChange NoticeWater ProgramsNew JerseyEnvironmentalCWA ComplianceEnglishFocus Area
2026-06-24T05:00:00Z
New Jersey adopts permanent remediation standards for PFAS
Effective date: June 15, 2026
This applies to: Contaminated sites subject to the remediation regulations for contaminated groundwater, soil, and soil leachate
Description of change: The New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (NJDEP) formally adopted its interim remediation standards for specific per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), including:
- Groundwater quality standards for hexafluoropropylene oxide dimer acid and its ammonium salt (GenX chemicals); and
- Soil and soil leachate remediation standards for:
- Perfluorononanoic acid (PFNA);
- Perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS);
- Perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA);
- GenX chemicals; and
- Methanol.
The interim standards have been in place since 2022 and 2023, requiring regulated entities to conduct remediation to ensure these PFAS are cleaned up.
Additionally, the NJDEP amended the technical requirements to mandate analyses of the following chemicals in all media when contaminants are unknown or not well documented at a contaminated site:
- PFNA,
- PFOS,
- PFOA,
- GenX chemicals, and
- 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin.
NewsHazardous WasteWaste HandlersChange NoticesChange NoticeWasteWaste/HazWasteWaste ManagementEnvironmentalNevadaEnglishFocus Area
2026-06-24T05:00:00Z
Nevada adds requirements for hazardous waste recyclers
Effective date: June 8, 2026
This applies to: Hazardous waste recyclers
Description of change: The State Environmental Commission adopted regulations to add requirements for entities that recycle certain hazardous waste, including compliance with:
- Certain federal requirements;
- Local zoning requirements, if applicable;
- Specific reporting and notification requirements; and
- Other particular regulations of the commission.
The rules also:
- Exempt owners and operators of certain facilities that recycle certain hazardous materials without storing those materials before they’re recycled from the above requirements, and
- Add fees for written determinations (required to construct or operate a facility or mobile unit for hazardous waste recycling) and for the facilities that recycle certain hazardous materials without storing those materials before they’re recycled.
NewsToxic Substances Control Act - EPAChange NoticesChange NoticeTSCA ComplianceToxic Substances - EPACaliforniaEnvironmentalEnglishFocus Area
2026-06-24T05:00:00Z
California adds TPhP nail products to Priority Products list
Effective date: October 1, 2026
This applies to: Nail products containing triphenyl phosphate (TPhP) at concentrations greater than 250 parts per million (ppm)
Description of change: The California Department of Toxic Substances Control added nail products with concentrations of 250 ppm or more of TPhP to the Priority Product list, making the substance subject to the Safer Consumer Products (SCP) Regulations.
By November 30, 2026, manufacturers must submit a Priority Product Notification. By March 30, 2027, manufacturers must submit:
- A Chemical Removal Intent/Confirmation Notification,
- A Product Removal Intent/Confirmation Notification,
- A Product-Chemical Replacement Intent/Confirmation Notification, or
- A Preliminary Alternatives Analysis Report or alternate reporting options.
NewsIndianaSafe Drinking WaterChange NoticesChange NoticeWater ProgramsEnvironmentalCWA ComplianceEnglishUnderground Injection ControlFocus Area
2026-06-24T05:00:00Z
Indiana adds permanent underground carbon dioxide storage rules
Effective date: June 10, 2026
This applies to: Entities that seek to participate in carbon sequestration projects
Description of change: The Natural Resources Commission adopted rules for permanent underground carbon dioxide storage, establishing:
- The rules for entities seeking to petition the Indiana Department of Natural Resources to issue involuntary integration orders for pore spaces, and
- The rules for storage operators seeking to apply for certificates of project completion.
These regulations add options for entities; the requirements apply only if the options are utilized.
The rules impact entities seeking to participate in carbon sequestration projects. The regulations also affect pore space owners and surface owners.
Most Recent Highlights In Human Resources
NewsTier II Inventory ReportingIndustry NewsIndustry NewsCERCLA, SARA, EPCRAEnvironmental Protection Agency (EPA)Safety Data Sheet ReportingEnvironmentalEnglishSARA ComplianceFocus AreaUSA
2026-06-24T05:00:00Z
EPA aligns EPCRA rules with OSHA’s HazCom amendments
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) published a final rule on June 22, 2026, conforming the hazardous chemical inventory reporting regulations under the Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act (EPCRA) to the Occupational Safety and Health Administration’s (OSHA’s) Hazardous Communication (HazCom) standard amendments of 2012 and 2024.
Who’s covered?
The final rule applies to facilities regulated under EPCRA Sections 311 and 312. These facilities are:
- Required by OSHA’s HazCom standard to maintain Safety Data Sheets (SDSs) for hazardous chemicals on-site at or above the reporting threshold, and
- Required by EPA’s EPCRA Section 312 rules (40 CFR Part 370) to submit annual hazardous chemical inventory reports (commonly known as Tier II reports) for the same chemicals by March 1.
Covered facilities submit SDSs and annual inventory reports to the State Emergency Response Commission (SERC), Local Emergency Planning Committee (LEPC), and local fire department.
How does this impact facilities?
EPA’s final rule replaces the previous EPCRA hazard categories with OSHA’s GHS-aligned hazard classes and hazard categories (totaling 118), which are already used in SDSs. Facilities must use OSHA’s hazard classes with their categories for SDS submissions and hazardous chemical inventory reports required under EPCRA Sections 311 and 312.
Note: SDSs for substances already contain the updated hazard classes and hazard categories. SDSs for mixtures must incorporate them by November 2027.
What’s the compliance timeline?
Covered facilities must use the new hazard categories by January 1, 2028. EPA expects facilities to incorporate them into the reporting year 2027 Tier II report (due March 1, 2028).
Key to remember: EPA has aligned regulations under EPCRA Sections 311 and 312 with OSHA’s HazCom amendments for hazardous chemical reporting requirements.
NewsProcess Safety ManagementRisk Management ProgramRisk Management ProgramCAA ComplianceIn-Depth ArticleEnglishSafety Data SheetsIndustry NewsSafety & HealthGeneral Industry SafetyGeneral Duty ClauseEnvironmentalFocus AreaHazardous Materials Safety - OSHAHazard CommunicationGeneral Duty ClauseAir ProgramsUSA
2026-06-23T05:00:00Z
CSB mounts pressure on OSHA, EPA over deadly process safety gap
Sugar may seem pretty harmless. However, a deadly explosion at a Kentucky caramel coloring facility reveals how this assumption can lead to disaster. The Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation Board (CSB) is again urging OSHA and EPA to address a gap in their chemical safety regulations.
The board is calling for them to tackle “reactive hazards.” These are the hazards CSB says triggered the tragedy. The familiar message has been repeated since 2002, but the alarm bells grow louder and more urgent now. These warnings are not just for OSHA and EPA. They are also for chemical plants and food ingredient manufacturers. Despite not being covered in the process safety and risk management standards, reactive hazards can and have led to catastrophe.
Runaway reaction
CSB determined that the explosion happened when a 2,500-gallon reactor experienced a runaway decomposition reaction. The reaction involved an “invert sugar” ingredient used to make caramel coloring. It rapidly increased the temperature and pressure. Then it overwhelmed the reactor’s emergency pressure relief system.
The reactor ruptured violently. Two workers died when the blast damaged a control room 40 feet from the reactor. Debris from the incident traveled as far as 400 feet beyond the facility fence line. It also caused approximately $40 million in damage.
CSB found that the reactor’s emergency pressure relief system would have needed to be about four times larger. This would have allowed it to safely relieve pressure generated during the runaway reaction.
Failure to recognize the hazard
CSB’s investigation found that the company did not understand the severe reactive hazards associated with the sugar ingredient. According to the board, this failure contributed to an undersized pressure relief system. It also created confusion on the day of the incident about the increasing pressure.
The report further states that the company’s lack of knowledge stemmed from:
- An incomplete investigation of the ingredients’ reaction potential,
- A lack of industry guidance on the safe manufacture of caramel coloring, and
- No warning on the safety data sheet (SDS) of reaction hazards.
SDS lacked critical information
The board found that the SDS provided by the sugar manufacturer did not warn of its reactivity hazards. CSB concluded that safety information communicated in sugar ingredient SDSs can vary significantly among suppliers. The board noted that improved hazard information in SDSs can help prevent future sugar decomposition incidents. CSB is urging industry groups and suppliers who manufacture invert sugar or corn syrup to update their SDSs for decomposition hazards.
Known regulatory gap
The report emphasizes a gap in:
- OSHA 29 CFR 1910.119, Process Safety Management of Highly Hazardous Chemicals (PSM); and
- EPA 40 CFR 68, Chemical Accident Prevention Provisions, also known as the Risk Management Program (RMP).
That gap is a lack of coverage of facilities processing chemicals with reactive hazards that could have catastrophic consequences.
The Kentucky caramel coloring plant was not subject to PSM and RMP. Had the facility been required to implement either regulation, the reactor designers would have had a better opportunity to be aware of the sugar ingredients’ decomposition hazards, says CSB. The board argues that this may have resulted in a safer design of the emergency pressure relief system.
Repeated recommendations
Since 2002, CSB has reiterated its recommendations for OSHA and EPA to fill the regulatory gap. Neither agency has implemented those recommendations.
Over that same period, the board investigated 15 additional incidents involving reactive chemicals not covered by PSM and RMP. Those incidents resulted in 31 fatalities and hundreds of injuries.
CSB is not deterred
CSB again recommends that OSHA and EPA broaden the coverage of PSM and RMP, respectively, to achieve more comprehensive control of reactive hazards.
Both OSHA and EPA currently use chemical lists to identify the processes subject to coverage. However, CSB claims the two agencies did not adequately consider reactive chemical hazards when developing those chemical lists. As a result, many reactive chemicals are currently not covered.
Word for employers and safety professionals
The latest report highlights the need for:
- Facilities to review not just the SDS for their chemicals but also additional sources of information about their reactive hazards.
- Chemical plants and food manufacturers to address reactive hazards regardless of coverage under 1910.119 and Part 68. At a minimum, these facilities may already be required to meet OSHA’s General Duty Clause and EPA’s Clean Air Act General Duty Clause.
Key to remember
The latest CSB report taps OSHA and EPA to address reactivity hazards. It is also a wake-up call for facilities to understand their reactive chemical hazards. What’s more, the report calls on chemical and food ingredient manufacturers to revisit their SDSs regarding reactive hazards.
NewsIndustry NewsWaste IdentificationEnglishWasteWaste ManagementEnvironmentalIn-Depth ArticleWaste/HazWasteFocus AreaUSA
2026-06-18T05:00:00Z
Hazardous waste determinations in practice: Lessons from aerosols, residues, and empty containers
Hazardous waste determinations remain one of the most common sources of noncompliance under RCRA. The requirement is simple on paper. Generators must determine whether a material is a hazardous waste at the point of generation. In practice, facilities often struggle with how the rules apply to everyday situations. Aerosol cans, process residues, and empty containers are frequent gray areas that lead to inconsistent decisions, inspection findings, and, in some cases, enforcement.
At the core, the regulatory expectation is clear: Generators must evaluate each waste to determine if it's listed or exhibits a characteristic of hazardous waste (40 CFR 262.11). That evaluation must be made when the waste is first generated and must be documented. The challenge isn't the rule itself but how it applies to materials that fall between operational categories — products, wastes, and residuals.
Aerosols: When a common waste becomes a compliance risk
Aerosol cans are widely used across industries for maintenance, coatings, and cleaning. Facilities often assume that once a can is “empty” or depressurized, it's no longer subject to hazardous waste rules. That assumption can be risky.
If an aerosol can contains a listed solvent or exhibits ignitability (D001), it's a hazardous waste unless managed under an exclusion or alternative standard. Since 2019, many aerosol cans can be managed as universal waste (40 CFR Part 273), which simplifies handling. However, this option introduces its own requirements, including labeling, accumulation time limits, and proper puncturing practices.
A common issue arises at puncturing stations. For example, a maintenance shop installs a puncturing device and begins draining leftover propellant and product into a drum. The cans themselves may now meet the empty container standard, but the collected liquid often remains hazardous waste. In several inspections, regulators have cited facilities not for the cans, but for failing to characterize the accumulated liquid or for allowing it to evaporate without proper controls.
The lesson is straightforward: Shifting management methods (e.g., puncturing or using universal waste standards) doesn't eliminate the obligation to evaluate all resulting waste streams.
Residues: Small quantities, big implications
Residues are another frequent source of confusion. These can include paint booth sludge, tank bottoms, and material left in process equipment. Facilities sometimes view these materials as insignificant or assume they take on the classification of the original product. In reality, residues must be evaluated as newly generated wastes.
For example, a facility cleaning a parts washer may generate a sludge that contains spent solvent. Even if the waste solvent was originally a listed waste (e.g., F003 or F005), the generator must determine whether the residue is itself a listed waste or exhibits a characteristic. Missteps often occur when facilities rely on outdated Safety Data Sheets (SDSs) or assume that dilution or drying changes the classification.
Another scenario involves “letting residues dry out” in containers before disposal. While intended to reduce volume, this practice can be interpreted as treatment if it's done to change the waste’s characteristics (40 CFR 260.10 definition of treatment). For generators without a permit, this creates additional compliance risk.
The key takeaway is that residues aren't an afterthought. They are distinct waste streams that require their own evaluation and, in some cases, can trigger more stringent requirements than expected.
Empty containers: A rule often misapplied
The empty container rule (40 CFR 261.7) is widely cited but frequently misunderstood. A container that held hazardous waste is considered empty if all wastes have been removed using common practices (e.g., pouring, pumping), and no more than 1 inch of residue remains (or 3 percent by weight for smaller containers).
In practice, facilities often overapply this rule. For example, a drum that held a listed solvent may be declared empty even though significant sludge remains at the bottom. Inspectors routinely check this by tipping containers or visually assessing residue. If the container doesn't meet the standard, it's still subject to full hazardous waste requirements.
Another common issue involves containers that held acute hazardous waste (P-listed). These have stricter emptying standards, including triple rinsing. Facilities that overlook this distinction can inadvertently manage regulated containers as non-hazardous scrap.
Importantly, even when a container meets the empty standard, any removed residue must still be evaluated as a waste. The container may be exempt, but the material removed from it isn't.
Bringing it together in practice
Across these examples, a consistent pattern emerges: compliance issues arise when facilities rely on assumptions rather than applying the regulatory framework to each specific situation. Aerosols, residues, and empty containers all sit at the boundary between product use and waste management. That boundary is where most determination errors occur.
Facilities can reduce risk by standardizing evaluation procedures, training staff on common gray areas, and documenting determinations clearly. In inspections, regulators often focus less on the conclusion and more on whether the generator followed a defensible process under 40 CFR 262.11.
Key to remember: Every waste stream, no matter how small or routine, requires a fresh, documented determination at the point of generation. Management shortcuts don't replace regulatory obligations.
NewsHazardous WasteWaste GeneratorsWaste ManifestsWaste/HazWasteWasteEnvironmental Protection Agency (EPA)In-Depth ArticleUSAEnglishIndustry NewsWasteTSD FacilitiesWaste ManagementEnvironmentalFocus AreaWaste Reporting
2026-06-15T05:00:00Z
Hazardous waste manifest S Codes: What storage and transfer facilities need to know
Have you cracked the “S Code” yet? Starting in 2027, facilities that receive regulated waste for temporary storage and disposal must use S Codes on hazardous waste manifests. If your facility hasn’t made the switch, now’s the time!
Under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) requires hazardous waste handlers to track shipments of regulated waste from the generating facility to final treatment, recycling, or disposal. Management Method Codes are key to hazardous waste manifests, and they also affect biennial reporting. The codes answer the vital question, “How’s the hazardous waste managed?"
Effective January 1, 2027, “S Codes” will officially replace Management MethodH141 for Storage and Transfer. EPA adopted these codes to improve the accuracy and transparency of waste tracking, specifically for wastes that travel through transfer facilities before final management. Use this overview to help your facility understand how to comply.
What are S Codes?
In January 2025, EPA added S Codes to the list of Management Method Codes, which identify the type of waste management system used to treat, recover, or dispose of a hazardous waste. Management Method Codes are used for:
- The Uniform Hazardous Waste Manifest (EPA Form 8700-22) and Continuation Sheet (EPA Form 8700-22A); and
- The National Biennial RCRA Hazardous Waste Report (EPA Form 8700-13 A/B), known as the Biennial Report.
S Codes apply to receiving facilities (primarily treatment, storage, and disposal facilities (TSDFs)) that temporarily store and then transfer regulated hazardous waste to another receiving facility without treating, recovering, or disposing of the waste. EPA established S Codes to provide more details than code H141 on waste handling activities, improving tracking and transparency. S Codes indicate two things:
- A hazardous waste was received to be stored or transferred; and
- The hazardous waste will be managed later by the final receiving facility using a certain method (i.e., the final management method).
EPA groups S Codes into three categories:
- Transfer off-site for reclamation and recovery,
- Transfer off-site for destruction or treatment prior to disposal, and
- Transfer off-site for disposal.
Each S Code corresponds to a specific final management method. Examples include metals recovery (S010), chemical treatment (S070), and landfilling (S132).
What’s required?
On January 1, 2027, EPA will remove Management Method Code H141 for Storage and Transfer from the e-Manifest and the Biennial Report forms. As a result, hazardous waste handlers must use S Codes instead of code H141 on manifests and the Biennial Report.
S Codes apply to RCRA hazardous waste that’s transferred off-site, impacting:
- Receiving facilities that store and transfer hazardous waste;
- Permitted TSDFs that receive hazardous waste solely for temporary storage and transfer (i.e., it’s the facility’s only management type); and
- Large quantity generators (LQGs) that report wastes shipped to transfer facilities on the Biennial Report.
Hazardous waste manifests
The first receiving TSDF is responsible for choosing and entering the S Codes on manifests. The storage and transfer facility must:
- Identify the S code that best describes how the hazardous waste will be managed by the final receiving facility, and
- Enter the S Code in Item 19 on the manifest and in Item 36 on the continuation sheet (if used).
Generators aren’t responsible for selecting or entering S Codes.
Biennial Reports
LQGs and TSDFs must use S Codes for the Biennial Report on the:
- Waste Generation and Management (GM) Form in Item 3, and
- Waste Received From Off-site (WR) Form in Item F.
LQGs use S Codes on the GM Form for shipments of hazardous waste off-site to a transfer facility for temporary storage and transfer.
TSDFs that receive hazardous waste for temporary storage and transfer off-site use S Codes on the WR Form. These TSDFs must also use Source Code G61 on the GM Form to report shipments of these transferred wastes.
How can facilities prepare?
Help your facility achieve a smooth shift to S Codes by January 1, 2027, with these tips:
- Identify where your facility currently uses code H141.
- Develop a process for transitioning to S Codes exclusively. Consider any changes your facility may need to make to its operations, such as updating software, adjusting procedures, and revising internal guidance documents.
- Train your employees accordingly.
- Set a deadline for making the switch to S Codes. Aim for a date well ahead of January 1, 2027, to give your facility enough time to address any issues that arise.
Key to remember: Starting in 2027, storage and transfer facilities must use S Codes in place of Management Method Code H141 on RCRA hazardous waste manifests and Biennial Reports.
NewsHazardous WasteWaste GeneratorsWaste ManifestsWaste/HazWasteWasteEnvironmental Protection Agency (EPA)In-Depth ArticleUSAEnglishIndustry NewsWasteTSD FacilitiesWaste ManagementEnvironmentalFocus AreaWaste Reporting
2026-06-15T05:00:00Z
Hazardous waste manifest S Codes: What storage and transfer facilities need to know
Have you cracked the “S Code” yet? Starting in 2027, facilities that receive regulated waste for temporary storage and disposal must use S Codes on hazardous waste manifests. If your facility hasn’t made the switch, now’s the time!
Under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) requires hazardous waste handlers to track shipments of regulated waste from the generating facility to final treatment, recycling, or disposal. Management Method Codes are key to hazardous waste manifests, and they also affect biennial reporting. The codes answer the vital question, “How’s the hazardous waste managed?"
Effective January 1, 2027, “S Codes” will officially replace code H141 for Storage and Transfer. EPA adopted these codes to improve the accuracy and transparency of waste tracking, specifically for wastes that travel through transfer facilities before final management. Use this overview to help your facility understand how to comply.
What are S Codes?
In January 2025, EPA added S Codes to the list of Management Method Codes, which identify the type of waste management system used to treat, recover, or dispose of a hazardous waste. Management Method Codes are used for:
- The Uniform Hazardous Waste Manifest (EPA Form 8700-22) and Continuation Sheet (EPA Form 8700-22A); and
- The National Biennial RCRA Hazardous Waste Report (EPA Form 8700-13 A/B), known as the Biennial Report.
S Codes apply to receiving facilities (primarily treatment, storage, and disposal facilities (TSDFs)) that temporarily store and then transfer regulated hazardous waste to another receiving facility without treating, recovering, or disposing of the waste. EPA established S Codes to provide more details than code H141 on waste handling activities, improving tracking and transparency. S Codes indicate two things:
- A hazardous waste was received to be stored or transferred; and
- The hazardous waste will be managed later by the final receiving facility using a certain method (i.e., the final management method).
EPA groups S Codes into three categories:
- Transfer off-site for reclamation and recovery,
- Transfer off-site for destruction or treatment prior to disposal, and
- Transfer off-site for disposal.
Each S Code corresponds to a specific final management method. Examples of these methods include metals recovery (S010), chemical treatment (S070), and landfilling (S132).
What’s required?
On January 1, 2027, EPA will remove Management Method Code H141 for Storage and Transfer from the e-Manifest and the Biennial Report forms. As a result, hazardous waste handlers must use S Codes instead of code H141 on manifests and the Biennial Report.
S Codes apply to RCRA hazardous waste that’s transferred off-site, impacting:
- Receiving facilities that store and transfer hazardous waste;
- Permitted TSDFs that receive hazardous waste solely for temporary storage and transfer (i.e., it’s the facility’s only management type); and
- Large quantity generators (LQGs) that report wastes shipped to transfer facilities on the Biennial Report.
Hazardous waste manifests
The first receiving TSDF is responsible for choosing and entering the S Codes on manifests. The storage and transfer facility must:
- Identify the S code that best describes how the hazardous waste will be managed by the final receiving facility, and
- Enter the S Code in Item 19 on the manifest and in Item 36 on the continuation sheet (if used).
Generators aren’t responsible for selecting or entering S Codes.
Biennial Reports
LQGs and TSDFs must use S Codes for the Biennial Report on the:
- Waste Generation and Management (GM) Form in Item 3, and
- Waste Received From Off-site (WR) Form in Item F.
LQGs use S Codes on the GM Form for shipments of hazardous waste off-site to a transfer facility for temporary storage and transfer.
TSDFs that receive hazardous waste for temporary storage and transfer off-site use S Codes on the WR Form. These TSDFs must also use Source Code G61 on the GM Form to report shipments of these transferred wastes.
How can facilities prepare?
Help your facility achieve a smooth shift to S Codes by January 1, 2027, with these tips:
- Identify where your facility currently uses code H141.
- Develop a process for transitioning to S Codes exclusively. Consider any changes your facility may need to make to its operations, such as updating software, adjusting procedures, and revising internal guidance documents.
- Train your employees accordingly.
- Set a deadline for making the switch to S Codes. Aim for a date well ahead of January 1, 2027, to give your facility enough time to address any issues that arise.
Key to remember: Starting in 2027, storage and transfer facilities must use S Codes in place of code H141 on RCRA hazardous waste manifests and Biennial Reports.
New Network Poll
Most Popular Highlights In Environmental
NewsIndianaSafe Drinking WaterChange NoticesChange NoticeWater ProgramsEnvironmentalCWA ComplianceEnglishUnderground Injection ControlFocus Area
2026-06-24T05:00:00Z
Indiana adds permanent underground carbon dioxide storage rules
Effective date: June 10, 2026
This applies to: Entities that seek to participate in carbon sequestration projects
Description of change: The Natural Resources Commission adopted rules for permanent underground carbon dioxide storage, establishing:
- The rules for entities seeking to petition the Indiana Department of Natural Resources to issue involuntary integration orders for pore spaces, and
- The rules for storage operators seeking to apply for certificates of project completion.
These regulations add options for entities; the requirements apply only if the options are utilized.
The rules impact entities seeking to participate in carbon sequestration projects. The regulations also affect pore space owners and surface owners.
NewsToxic Substances Control Act - EPAChange NoticesChange NoticeTSCA ComplianceToxic Substances - EPACaliforniaEnvironmentalEnglishFocus Area
2026-06-24T05:00:00Z
California adds TPhP nail products to Priority Products list
Effective date: October 1, 2026
This applies to: Nail products containing triphenyl phosphate (TPhP) at concentrations greater than 250 parts per million (ppm)
Description of change: The California Department of Toxic Substances Control added nail products with concentrations of 250 ppm or more of TPhP to the Priority Product list, making the substance subject to the Safer Consumer Products (SCP) Regulations.
By November 30, 2026, manufacturers must submit a Priority Product Notification. By March 30, 2027, manufacturers must submit:
- A Chemical Removal Intent/Confirmation Notification,
- A Product Removal Intent/Confirmation Notification,
- A Product-Chemical Replacement Intent/Confirmation Notification, or
- A Preliminary Alternatives Analysis Report or alternate reporting options.
2026-01-02T06:00:00Z
Florida adds grease waste hauler requirements
Effective date: December 7, 2025
This applies to: Haulers of grease waste from food establishments
Description of change: The Florida Department of Environmental Protection established removal and disposal regulations for haulers of grease waste from originator food establishments. Haulers must dispose of grease waste at certified facilities and document removals and disposals using a service manifest.
NewsIndustry NewsEnvironmental Protection Agency (EPA)CAA ComplianceEnvironmentalIn-Depth ArticleFocus AreaEnglishAir PermittingAir ProgramsAir ProgramsUSA
2025-05-23T05:00:00Z
Title V operating permits: Comply, certify, repeat
A Title V operating permit is a legally enforceable document with the federal and state air emissions regulations that a facility must meet to operate. One requirement that applies to all Title V permit holders is the annual compliance certification. It answers whether a facility fulfills the permit’s terms and conditions (such as emissions limits, monitoring, recordkeeping, and reporting).
Whether the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) or a state or local regulatory agency issues the Title V permit, your facility must complete the annual compliance certification.
Discover what your facility needs to comply, certify, and repeat.
What’s required?
Facilities submit annual compliance certifications to the Title V permitting authority, which is usually a state or local regulatory agency (40 CFR 70.6). An EPA Regional Office serves as the permitting authority (71.6) for federally issued permits.
Title V tip: Check the state or local regulations for Title V compliance certification rules. They may require more frequent submissions and additional information.
At a minimum, the annual compliance certification covers two major areas for every permit term or condition:
- The compliance methods, and
- The compliance status.
Let’s take a closer look at each element.
Compliance methods
Your facility’s compliance methods are the ways it tracks whether it’s meeting the Title V permit requirements or not. When a term or condition isn’t met (like exceeding an emission limit), it’s known as a deviation.
Compliance methods consist of monitoring, recordkeeping, and reporting:
- Monitoring includes the procedures, test methods, and equipment used to track compliance data.
- Recordkeeping covers:
- The date, place, and time of monitoring;
- The date when monitoring results were analyzed, the entity that conducted the analysis, the analytical methods used, and the results; and
- The operating conditions during monitoring.
- Reporting consists of semiannual monitoring reports and deviation reports (which list the deviation, the applicable permit requirement, the probable cause, and any corrective or preventive actions).
Compliance status
Three questions determine the compliance status of each permit requirement during the covered period:
- Did the facility comply with the requirement?
- Was compliance continuous or intermittent?
- Were any deviations a “possible exception to compliance"?
Intermittent vs. continuous compliance
For each permit term or condition, your facility has intermittent compliance if it doesn’t meet the requirements at any time during the covered period. Your facility achieves continuous compliance only if it:
- Performs the necessary compliance methods,
- Has no unexcused deviations, and
- Records no contrary evidence.
Possible exception to compliance
EPA defines a possible exception to compliance as “any periods during which compliance is required and in which an excursion or exceedance … occurred” (70.6(c)(5)(iii)(C)).
Simply put, a possible exception to compliance is a deviation that occurs when compliance is mandated. If compliance isn’t required or another permit requirement excuses it, the deviation isn’t a possible exception.
How do I submit a compliance certification?
Your facility’s Title V permit provides instructions for how to submit the annual compliance certification, including the required forms and methods (via mail or electronic submission). You can also confirm requirements with your permitting authority. Generally, federally permitted facilities use the Annual Compliance Certification (EPA Form 5900-04).
Title V tip: Electronic submissions may be an option through the Compliance and Emissions Data Reporting Interface (CEDRI) on EPA’s Central Data Exchange. Check with your permitting authority to determine whether you may submit the annual compliance certification electronically via CEDRI.
Annual compliance certification is vital to maintaining your Title V permit. Keep in mind: comply, certify, and repeat.
Key to remember: Facilities with a Title V operating permit must certify compliance with the requirements at least annually.
NewsHazardous WasteEnforcement and Audits - OSHAToxic Substances Control Act - EPAToxic Subtances Control Act - EPAElectronic Reporting of Injury and Illness RecordsTSCA ComplianceMonthly Roundup VideoCAA ComplianceUSAInjury and Illness RecordkeepingWaste/HazWasteEnglishOSHA Violations and PenaltiesIndustry NewsCrystalline SilicaWaste HandlersSafety & HealthGeneral Industry SafetyWasteWaste TransportersEnvironmentalFocus AreaToxic and Hazardous Substances - OSHAVideo
EHS Monthly Round Up - January 2025
In this January 2025 monthly roundup video, we'll review the most impactful environmental health and safety news.
Hi everyone! Welcome to the monthly news roundup video, where we’ll review the most impactful environmental health and safety news. There’s a lot going on, so let’s get started!
As happens at the start of most incoming presidential administrations, a freeze has been placed on all regulatory activity at the federal level, giving the new administration time to review agencies’ plans. The Office of Management and Budget, which must approve most rulemaking activities, has sent numerous pending rules back to the agencies for review. In addition, OSHA withdrew its infectious diseases proposed rule and its COVID-19 in healthcare rule prior to the inauguration.
OSHA’s penalties increased on January 15. The maximum penalty amounts for serious and other-than-serious violations increased to $16,550. For willful or repeated violations, the maximum penalty increased to $165,514 per violation.
OSHA updated its directive on injury and illness recordkeeping policies and procedures. While it’s intended for OSHA compliance officers, employers can use the information to help with recordkeeping compliance.
Fewer workers died on the job in 2023, as fatal work injuries decreased 3.7 percent from 2022. Transportation incidents remained the most frequent type of fatal event, accounting for over 36 percent of all occupational fatalities.
California’s Occupational Safety and Health Standards Board voted to adopt a permanent silica standard. If approved, it would extend and strengthen the state’s emergency temporary standard, which was put in place in December 2023.
The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health updated its List of Hazardous Drugs in Healthcare Settings. This is a resource for employers and employees in identifying drugs that are hazardous to the health and safety of those who handle them.
Turning to environmental news, EPA released the biannual update of the nonconfidential TSCA inventory. The inventory helps facilities determine their regulatory requirements for the chemicals they use or plan to use.
And finally, EPA added new Management Method Codes to describe how hazardous waste will be managed after temporary storage and transfer. As of January 1st, hazardous waste handlers must use the codes on the Biennial Report Waste Generation and Management forms.
Thanks for tuning in to the monthly news roundup. We’ll see you next month!
NewsIndustry NewsEnvironmental Protection Agency (EPA)Mobile Emission SourcesCAA ComplianceEnvironmentalIn-Depth ArticleFocus AreaEnglishAir ProgramsUSA
2024-10-07T05:00:00Z
Vehicle emissions defeat devices: Steer clear!
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regulates emissions from motor vehicles, engines, and the fuels used to operate them. The agency requires vehicle manufacturers to install control devices that limit the amount of air pollutants a vehicle may emit. However, defeat devices attempt to detour around these controls and allow emissions beyond federal limits.
Excess vehicle emissions can threaten the health of others, impair state and local efforts to maintain national air quality standards, and — as one company and its owner learned — subject you and your business to steep monetary penalties.
Steer clear of defeat devices to ensure a smooth regulatory road.
Company learns multimillion-dollar lesson
EPA and the U.S. Department of Justice reached a settlement agreement with a North Carolina automotive parts company and its owner for violating the Clean Air Act (CAA) requirements for mobile sources by:
- Manufacturing, selling, and installing more than 250,000 defeat devices on diesel pickup trucks; and
- Installing aftermarket defeat devices on hundreds of diesel pickup trucks.
The company and its owner face civil and criminal consequences and will pay a total of $10 million in fees and penalties.
Civil enforcement
A July 2024 consent decree (pending court approval) requires both parties to pay a combined $7 million penalty. It also bans the company and owner from:
- Manufacturing, selling, offering to sell, and installing defeat devices;
- Transferring intellectual property to help others make or sell defeat devices; and
- Investing in or profiting from other businesses’ defeat devices.
Criminal enforcement
Both the company and owner pleaded guilty to conspiring to violate the CAA. The federal court ordered the company to pay a $2.4 million fine and complete three years of organizational probation. It also ordered the owner to pay a $600,000 fine and serve three years of probation.
What are defeat devices?
A defeat device is any component that “bypasses, impairs, defeats, or disables the control of emissions of any regulated pollutant” (40 CFR 1068.101(b)(2)). Put simply, it’s an illegal device that removes or disables a vehicle’s emissions controls.
There are generally two types of defeat devices: hardware (such as modified automotive parts) and software (like delete tuners). In fact, many of the devices consist of both types that work in tandem. Federal law (and EPA regulations at 1068.101(b)) bans defeat devices used to swerve around vehicle emissions controls. Section 203(a)(3) of the CAA prohibits anyone from:
- Tampering with an EPA-certified vehicle’s emissions control devices to remove them or make them inoperative before selling the vehicle,
- Knowingly tampering with an EPA-certified vehicle’s emissions control devices to remove them or make them inoperative after the vehicle is sold and delivered to the purchaser, and
- Knowingly manufacturing, selling, offering to sell, or installing defeat devices that bypass, defeat, or render inoperative any emission control device.
Common emission control devices include:
- Onboard diagnostic systems,
- Catalytic converters,
- Electronic control units,
- Fuel systems, and
- Diesel particulate filters.
Who do the regulations affect?
The prohibition on defeat devices applies to everyone, from the original equipment manufacturer that installs the vehicle emissions controls to the vehicle owner and operators.
The 1990 CAA Amendments expanded the tampering provision in Section 203(a)(3) to include “any person.” Further, EPA’s regulations at 1068.101(b) “apply to everyone,” such as:
- Vehicle manufacturers;
- Vehicle dealers;
- Automobile repair shops;
- Commercial mechanics;
- Fleet operators;
- Aftermarket automotive part manufacturers, sellers, and installers;
- Owners; and
- Operators.
Compliance tips
Consider these helpful suggestions for maintaining compliance:
- Check and comply with your state and local regulations, as they may be more stringent than federal requirements and impose additional rules. For example, states may require certified technicians to conduct automotive maintenance services on emission controls. States may also prohibit operating, selling, and/or registering tampered vehicles.
- Purchase aftermarket automotive parts only from reputable sources. Obtain proof that the aftermarket parts won’t increase emissions.
- Self-disclose any potential violations you find to EPA and/or the state environmental agency. EPA and many states will lower or waive civil penalties for self-reporting violations.
The case against this automotive parts company and owner serves as a multimillion-dollar reminder about making, selling, installing, or using defeat devices — steer clear!
Key to remember: Steer clear of defeat devices that try to detour around EPA’s vehicle emissions controls to ensure a smooth regulatory road.
Most Popular Highlights In Transportation
NewsIndustry NewsIndustry NewsFleet SafetyFederal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA), DOTFocus AreaVision - Motor CarrierUSAEnglishTransportationPhysical exam - Motor Carrier
2022-01-24T06:00:00Z
Alternate vision standard final rule
FMCSA published the alternative vision standard final rule with an effective date of March 22, 2022, for CMV drivers who do not meet the vision standard in the worse eye. If specified conditions and vision criteria are met, the driver can qualify for the vision portion of the DOT exam based on the vision in the better eye with or without corrective lenses.
To be qualified for the alternate vision standard (§391.44), the driver must:
- Have in the better eye a field of vision of at least 70 degrees in the horizontal meridian and vision of at least 20/40 with or without corrective lenses;
- Be able to recognize the colors of traffic signals with red, green, and amber;
- Have a stable vision deficiency; and
- Have had sufficient time for the vision deficiency to be stable.
To meet the alternate standard:
- An ophthalmologist or optometrist evaluates the driver;
- The ophthalmologist or optometrist completes the new Vision Evaluation Report Form MCSA-5871;
- The certified medical examiner performs a DOT exam not more than 45 days from the date on the MCSA-5871 and determines if the driver meets the alternative vision standard, as well as FMCSA’s other medical qualification standards;
- The driver receives a Medical Examiner’s Certificate (MEC), Form MCSA-5876, for a maximum of 12 months if determined to be medically qualified; and
- Drivers qualified under the alternative vision standard for the first time must satisfactorily complete an employer-administered road test before operating in interstate commerce, subject to limited exceptions.
This final rule eliminates the need for the current federal vision exemption program and the grandfather provision in §391.64. Individuals currently qualified under the grandfather provision and exemption holders have one year after the effective date of this rule to comply.
NewsIndustry NewsFleet OperationsEnglishFocus AreaIn-Depth ArticleHighway use - Mileage taxFleet TaxesInternational Fuel Tax Agreement (IFTA)Fleet taxesTransportationUSA
2024-09-19T05:00:00Z
Your HUT decals are expiring: Registration open Oct. 1
For carriers operating in New York, registration and decals expire December 31, 2024, for the Highway Use Tax (HUT) and Automotive Fuel Carrier (AFC) programs. Take steps now to make sure you receive your new decals before the current ones expire. You need a new certificate of registration and decal for each vehicle. And you must place the new decals on your vehicles before January 1, 2025.
The period to renew your 24th series HUT and AFC certificates of registration begins October 1, 2024. Act now to avoid delays and keep your highway use tax credentials active.
To-do before October 1
Get ready for renewal by taking the following steps now:
- File all your highway use tax returns that are due.
- Pay your taxes. The state will not issue a new certificate of registration if you owe back taxes. Before you apply to renew, make sure that you’ve paid all taxes due under any of the programs administered by the New York State Tax Department, including:
- HUT,
- personal income tax,
- International Fuel Tax Agreement (IFTA),
- sales tax, and
- withholding tax.
- Create an online account if you do not already have one and you want to renew your credentials and pay online (https://www.oscar.ny.gov/).
- Make sure your vehicle registration information is correct and accurate. Review and update your information as soon as possible. Incorrect information will delay the processing of your certificates and decals.
Beginning October 1
Once the renewal period opens, renew your credentials and pay your renewal fees online with One Stop Credentialing and Registration (OSCAR).
Submit your renewal application by November 30, 2024, to make sure you receive your decals in time to place them on your vehicles before January 1, 2025.
If you are already enrolled in OSCAR, use your current OSCAR password to renew online.
If you are not enrolled, visit OSCAR, and select Enroll Now. You must have a United States Department of Transportation (USDOT) number and an employer identification number (EIN).
To renew your registration:
- Visit the OSCAR website and select HUT Renewal from the Business Type drop-down.
- Enter your information in the USDOT#, NYS Tax ID#, and Password fields, then select Log in.
- If you have 300 or fewer vehicles, choose either:
- Renew all HUT/AFC Certificates of Registration to renew all your active current series permits, or
- Select HUT/AFC Certificates of Registration to renew specific permits.
- If you have more than 300 vehicles, choose either:
- Renew all to renew all your active current series permits, or
- File renewal to renew select permits.
If you are unable to renew electronically, you may file Form TMT-1.2, Renewal Application for Highway Use Tax (HUT) and Automotive Fuel Carrier (AFC) Certificates of Registrations and Decals – 25th Series.
Key to remember: Take steps now to renew your NY HUT and ensure you receive your new decals before the current ones expire.
NewsGeneral Duty Clause Enforcement AreasIn-Depth ArticleEnglishWork ZonesIndustry NewsFleet SafetyTransportation SecuritySafety & HealthConstruction SafetyGeneral Industry SafetyAgriculture SafetyMaritime SafetyGeneral Duty ClauseWork ZonesFocus AreaFleet OperationsMine SafetyGeneral Duty ClauseTransportationUSA
2023-09-07T05:00:00Z
Putting the brakes on workplace parking lot collisions
The National Safety Council estimates at least 60,000 people are injured, with another 500 being killed, in parking lot crashes each year. Employers can proactively circumvent parking lot collisions at their worksites by implementing a few simple policies.
With one in five accidents happening in parking lots and the potential for recordable events, putting the brakes on parking lot collisions is critical for employers. Reducing speed limits is one way to prevent collisions. However, even going 5 miles per hour can do a lot of damage to a pedestrian who wasn’t seen by a distracted driver. Employers can reduce parking lot collisions by:
- Managing speed and traffic flow in parking lots. As mentioned, reducing speeds in parking lots is an effective way to prevent collisions. However, the additional management of traffic flow can also assist. Establishing separate entrances and exits as well as providing designated truck or heavy equipment access can help keep a smooth, collision-free traffic flow.
- Ensuring parking lots are well-lit with adequate distance and clearance for parking spaces. Confined spaces and vision obstructions make safely navigating parking lots difficult. Ensure there’s adequate space for parking to avoid unnecessary congestion. Illumination, whether natural or artificial, should provide good distribution of light and prevent glare, objectional shadows, and extreme contrasts that can make objects difficult to see.
- Prohibiting distracted driving while on company property. A recent study by the National Safety Council revealed that drivers are more distracted when in parking lots than on the road. Drivers admitted in the study that they make calls, set the GPS, answer emails, and even watch videos while in parking lots as they feel it’s safer than doing so while on faster roadways. These behaviors should be strictly prohibited while vehicles are in motion.
- Executing a “pull-through first” requirement for parking vehicles. Since backing a vehicle is more hazardous than driving forward, pull-through parking spaces are the safest method for parking. The second option would be backing into a parking spot. Because drivers are already in the mindset of watching for road hazards, they’re most alert to back into a parking space when entering a parking lot. Contrarily, drivers tend to be more tired or distracted when first getting into a parked vehicle. Therefore, they may not be as alert to hazards while backing out of the parking space.
- Implementing a 360 walk-around procedure. The concept of a 360 walk-around is quite simple. Before a driver is permitted to move a vehicle from the parking lot, they’re expected to walk around the entire vehicle and look in, over, under, and through it. This reveals to the driver any obstructions, oil or fuel leaks, flat tires, or other issues that may result in an incident or collision if the vehicle is moved or operated.
These safety measures also offer a great opportunity to boost an off-the-job safety initiative. Once procedures and practices are implemented at work, they often become habits at home as well!
Are injuries from workplace parking lots recordable?
Parking lots are company property and, therefore, susceptible to workplace injury reporting. Work-related exposures include most of the employees’ activities on the employers’ premises as well as situations off premises where employees are engaged in job tasks or are there as a condition of employment. For recordkeeping purposes, company parking lots are part of the employer’s premises and, thus, part of the establishment.
Under 29 CFR 1904.5(b)(2)(v), an injury or illness is not work-related if it’s solely the result of an employee doing personal tasks (unrelated to their employment) at the establishment outside of the employee’s assigned working hours. For this exception to apply, an incident must meet both stated conditions: the incident must (1) be solely the result of the employee doing personal tasks (unrelated to their employment) and (2) occur outside of the employee’s assigned working hours.
| Want to test your skills on determine recordability? See our FAQs and our In-Depth article titled, “Recordable or not recordable? You decide!” |
Keys to remember
Even a collision at 5 miles per hour can be deadly, so employers must do what they can to prevent parking lot collisions at their workplace. Parking lot safety procedures not only help prevent OSHA recordables, but they can also easily be used off the job as well.
NewsIndustry NewsInternational Registration Plan (IRP)Credentials for unlicensed vehicles/trailersTemporary trip permitsFocus AreaIn-Depth ArticleFleet OperationsEnglishTransportationRegistration and Permits - Motor CarrierUSA
2022-07-28T05:00:00Z
Bought a truck? There’s no grace period for credentials
Compliance questions tend to come in waves. The trend of late involves questions from carriers who purchase a commercial motor vehicle (CMV) in another state and wonder if they can drive it back to their home state without plates or other operating credentials. The short answer to this question is no. The truck might be new to the new owner, but it’s still being operated “in commerce” and is being driven for a business purpose.
When you purchase a CMV, whether used or new, the truck will need everything that any other CMV would need to be legal on the road. It needs to be marked with the purchasing company’s name and USDOT number, the driver must be qualified to be on the road and have the proper license to operate the vehicle, hours of service compliance, etc. The driver will have to stop at weigh stations along the way and comply with any other rules that apply to operating the vehicle on public roadways.
Registration and fuel taxes
You'll need trip and fuel permits if the truck is a qualifying vehicle under those programs (depending on the type of vehicle, but usually both are required). Sometimes, along with a registration trip permit, the state in which the vehicle was purchased will issue a temporary registration or temporary registration permit so the vehicle has a “plate” of sorts. Then, state-by-state trip and fuel permits can be purchased for the trip home.
Operating authority
Trip permits for interstate for-hire operating authority are not available from states. Carriers must have federal operating authority before conducting any for-hire transportation. Jurisdictions requiring authority registration for interstate exempt and/or private carriers typically do not have temporary permits available for carriers that are not permanently registered.
Unified Carrier Registration
All interstate and international carriers (private, exempt, for-hire) must be registered under the Unified Carrier Registration (UCR) Agreement. UCR trip permits are not available.
Mileage taxes
A few U.S. jurisdictions (including Kentucky, New York, New Mexico, and Oregon) assess mileage or highway use taxes in addition to fuel taxes. Trip permits are available for carriers not permanently registered.
Heavy vehicle use tax
The Heavy Vehicle Use Tax (HVUT) applies to highway motor vehicles with a taxable gross weight of 55,000 pounds or more and includes trucks, tractors, and buses. For these vehicles, you must file Form 2290 and Schedule 1 if a taxable highway motor vehicle is registered, or required to be registered, in your name under any state or District of Columbia, Canadian, or Mexican law at the time of its first use.
Key to remember
Enforcement personnel might congratulate you on the purchase of your new truck, but they’ll also want to see that the truck and driver meet all compliance obligations.
NewsIndustry NewsFleet SafetyRisk Management TransportationRisk Management - Motor CarrierFocus AreaIn-Depth ArticleEnglishTransportationUSA
2026-06-25T05:00:00Z
Can a freight broker defend contracting with your carrier?
Freight brokers may be less likely to use your trucking services if you have a questionable safety record.
A U.S. Supreme Court decision now permits liability claims against brokers for the actions of the trucking companies they use. Consequently, motor carriers, even those with exemplary records, may experience more scrutiny when seeking brokered loads. Brokers will want assurance that you are a safe business using qualified personnel and well-maintained vehicles.
A quick glance at your Safer profile
Brokers and shippers often start the vetting process by checking out the carrier’s Safer website profile.
A cursory glance of the site will show the following about a carrier:
- Active or inactive USDOT number,
- Start date of authority, and
- Nature of the carrier, including:
- Property/passenger carrier
- For-hire/private carrier,
- Broker authority,
- Household good authority,
- Hazmat operation,
- Interstate and/or intrastate designation,
- Number of power units and drivers, and
- Vehicle miles traveled (VMT).
Brokers will use the carrier’s start date to help identify a chameleon carrier. A chameleon carrier is one that creates a new DOT number under the same ownership to hide a poor safety record. This is not permitted under the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) regulations.
Motor carrier insurance is also a priority for the broker. Often, they ask the carrier for proof of insurance through a copy of the MCS-90A.
In addition, the Safer site will show information on the number of CMV crashes and roadside inspections, along with the out-of-service rate. The carrier’s safety rating will also appear on Safer
What does your safety rating say about you?
A motor carrier’s safety reputation hinges on its safety rating. A rating is the result of a compliance review (audit) that looks at the carrier’s whole motor carrier safety program in comparison to FMCSA regulations. The auditor exams the carrier’s compliance records within five regulatory categories. Violations within each are scored to arrive at one of three ratings (conclusions about your company):
- Satisfactory: The motor carrier is considered low risk by having effective safety management controls in place to meet FMCSA’s safety fitness standard.
- Conditional: The motor carrier is considered a higher-risk carrier, even though the carrier has some safety management controls. The safety management controls, however, aren’t adequate to ensure compliance with safety standards. A conditional rating may result in increased scrutiny and higher insurance premiums.
- Unsatisfactory: A motor carrier's safety management controls are severely lacking. Significant safety violations found during the audit may require the carrier to cease operations until they are corrected.
Some carriers may not have a safety rating if they have only experienced a new entrant audit, which doesn’t result in a rating. Most carriers are unrated.
To enhance your brand image, if you have a conditional rating, you always have the option of making the necessary corrective actions and ask FMCSA to consider changing the rating to Satisfactory. Many large brokers don’t use conditional carriers.
CSA: A deeper dive into your safety record
A safety rating doesn’t always tell the whole story. A carrier can appear safe on paper, but actions on the road may show otherwise.
A carrier’s Compliance, Safety, Accountability (CSA) data originates from roadside inspection and commercial motor vehicle (CMV) crash reports. The CSA site’s public view of the Safety Measurement System (SMS) provides a starting point to see the frequency of specific roadside inspection violations and details of crashes. The information far exceeds the Safer carrier overview. Only motor carriers, when logged into the SMS, can see details such as the carrier’s CSA BASIC scores (percentile ranking against peers) and the identity of a driver associated with a specific report.
Even though CSA BASIC scores for property-carrying motor carrier are not publicly available, there is nothing keeping a broker or other customer from asking to see the scores as a term of doing business.
Since SMS damaging information can be a deal-breaker, a motor carrier should review its data routinely to ensure that it’s accurate. Motor carriers should work to get any misinformation corrected. This requires submitting a request to correct the data using the federal DataQs portal. If successful in the challenge, it will aid in lowering your CSA scores for brokers and others to see.
Key to remember: Brokers are now responsible for the actions of the motor carriers they utilize, so they may implement more stringent vetting procedures for those they provide loads.
NewsIndustry NewsCarrier profiles, safety ratings and facility auditsSafety fitness certificatesWeights and dimensionsFleet SafetyLoad documentationFocus AreaIn-Depth ArticleEnglishSize and Weight LimitsOversize and Overweight MovementsTransportationUSA
2023-08-30T05:00:00Z
The Big and the Heavy: What you need to know about overweight trucks in Canada
Do you have questions on how to avoid or deal with driving an overweight truck in Canada? It can have serious consequences if your commercial vehicle is deemed overweight by the regulations of the jurisdiction where you plan to operate. When a vehicle is overweight, permits are issued for trucks and loads that exceed the weights set by the ruling transportation body of each province and permits are valid typically for highways only. If you want to drive on municipal roads, you may be required to get additional permits or permission directly from that municipality.
What you need to be aware of will depend on the province in which you are planning to operate. The maximum weight allowed for commercial vehicles in Canada depends on the registered gross vehicle weight (RGVW), the axle configuration and spacing, and the type of tires.
For example, in British Columbia, The maximum weight allowed for commercial vehicles in BC depends on the licensed gross vehicle weight (GVW), the gross combination vehicle weight (GCVW), the axle configuration and spacing, and the type of permit. The maximum GCVW for term permits in BC is 64,000 kg.
Checking your weight and dimensions
There are a few ways to estimate your vehicle’s weight. You can look up your vehicle by registration number or VIN or you can look in your vehicle’s manual or even call the manufacturer. The best way to get your vehicle’s weight is to weigh your vehicle using portable scales under each axle or by driving onto a scale. The rules, laws, and regulations for oversize in Canada are extensive and informative and are designed to ensure the safety of drivers, other road users, and the infrastructure.
The maximum legal limits allowed for height, width, and length are:
- Maximum width – 2.6 metres (vehicle and load)
- Maximum height – 4.15 metres (vehicle and load)
- Maximum length – 12.5 metres (single vehicle including load)
- Maximum length - 14.65 metres (semi-trailer including load)
- Maximum length (combination) - 23metres (combination vehicle and loads)
If your combination exceeds these dimensions, an oversize permit would be required.
Are you eligible for an overweight permit?
In Canada, whether or not you need an overweight permit for your trucks depends on the province you will be crossing and on many other different variables like axle spreads, specific axle weights, tire size, etc. This is why it is important to include as many details as possible when you fill out the application.
You are eligible to apply for a permit if your vehicle or load cannot be reduced because it:
- Could not be used for its intended purpose or function; and/or
- Would require more than eight work hours to dismantle.
You will not be eligible for a permit if your load is :
- Vehicle, load, or combination will be overweight, and your load is made up of more than one item;
- Vehicle or load is over height, over width, or overlength because of the way you have loaded it. For example, items are stacked in a way that creates unnecessary additional height, width, or length.
- Vehicle or load is overlength, your load is made up of more than one item, and the overhang of your load to the rear exceeds 4.65 metres from the centre of the rear-most axle
How do I get an oversize/overweight permit?
The process of getting a permit for an overweight truck may vary depending on the jurisdiction and the type of permit you need. You need to apply to the transportation authority of the province or territory where you plan to travel. The requirements, fees and conditions may vary depending on the type and size of your load and vehicle. You can find more information and online application forms on the websites of each province or territory.
The federal government does not issue permits for oversized or overweight vehicles.
How long is your permit valid?
Permits are good for a single trip meaning that if you cross from one province into the other and come back to your home province that permit is not valid anymore. For example, if you are based in Ontario, you deliver goods in Quebec and come back to Ontario, the permit you were issued is no longer valid. On the other hand, permits do have a validity period to complete your single trip and it can range from 48 hours to 10 days depending on which province the permit was issued in. Always read your permit to ensure you’re complying with its conditions.
Key to remember: To avoid overweight issues, plan your route to avoid roads or bridges that have weight restrictions, make sure your load is evenly distributed, obtain the proper permits, and most importantly follow the safety standards and regulations in your jurisdiction.
Most Popular Highlights In Human Resources
NewsIndustry NewsIndustry NewsHR GeneralistFamily and Medical Leave Act (FMLA)Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA)USAHR ManagementEnglishFocus AreaHuman Resources
2023-09-06T05:00:00Z
Appellate court sided with employee's (almost) 3-year-delayed FMLA claim
Back in October 2018, Laffon had a medical emergency and needed some time off under the federal Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA).
Her leave lasted until November 15. Ten days after she returned to work, on November 26, her employer terminated her.
She sued, arguing that the employer retaliated against her because of her FMLA leave.
The catch? She didn't bring the suit until almost three years later.
No link between leave and termination
In court, the employer argued that there was no causal link between Laffon taking FMLA leave and her termination. Although the court documents aren't robust, they do reveal that the employer indicated that Laffon's allegations didn't show that her taking FMLA leave was a factor in the decision to terminate her. The documents showed only that the termination chronologically followed her leave.
The court agreed with the employer. It also agreed that Laffon failed to allege a willful violation of the FMLA, which would allow her to benefit from the FMLA's three-year statute of limitations.
Laffon appealed the case to the Ninth Circuit.
Statute of limitations
Under the FMLA, employees have two years from the date of the last event constituting the alleged violation for which they can bring a claim.
Those two years are extended to three years if the employer's actions were "willful." This means that an employee must show that the employer either knew or showed reckless disregard for whether its conduct violated the FMLA.
Ruling overturned
Fast forward to August 2023, when the Ninth Circuit reversed the lower court's decision. It indicated that, based on Laffon's amended complaint and liberally construing the law, her allegations establish that her leave was causally connected to her termination and that the employer's action (her termination) was willful.
Glymph v. CT Corporation Systems, No. 22-35735, Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, August 22, 2023.
Key to remember: Terminating an employee soon after returning from FMLA leave is risky, unless there is a clear, well-documented, non-leave-related reason. Case documents did not show such a clear reason, which can also increase the risk of a willful finding. Employees have time to file claims, even years.
NewsIndustry NewsHR GeneralistFamily and Medical Leave Act (FMLA)In-Depth ArticleFamily and Medical Leave Act (FMLA)HR ManagementEnglishFocus AreaHuman ResourcesUSA
2026-06-23T05:00:00Z
Elective procedures and the FMLA
With employees being more open to obtaining elective medical procedures again, employers might see an increase in employees asking for time off for them. Employees might be entitled to job-protected leave under the federal Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) for such procedures. Just because a procedure is deemed “elective” doesn’t always matter.
What the FMLA regulations say
Employers might think that the FMLA regulations say that employees don’t get FMLA leave for elective procedures. The regulations, however, make it clear that, in some situations, employees may, and that just because a procedure is elective doesn’t automatically mean it’s not FMLA-qualifying.
“Conditions for which cosmetic treatments are administered (such as most treatments for acne or plastic surgery) aren’t serious health conditions unless inpatient hospital care is required or unless complications develop.” [29 CFR 825.113(d)]
The word “unless” means that there are exceptions.
Therefore, if an employee has an overnight stay in a health care facility, whether the procedure is elective or not, it won’t matter; it’s an FMLA-qualifying serious health condition. If, for example, a perfectly healthy employee decides to donate a kidney to a sibling, the time off for the procedure and recovery from it will fall under the FMLA, as the employee will be kept overnight in the hospital — it will be an inpatient situation.
Another example would include a situation in which an employee’s procedure results in a period of incapacity for more than 3 consecutive calendar days, and any subsequent treatment that also involves:
- Treatment two or more times, within 30 days of the first day of incapacity, unless extenuating circumstances exist, or
- Treatment by a health care provider on at least one occasion, which results in a regimen of continuing treatment under the supervision of the health care provider.
Some of the more common elective procedures employers might have employees ask for time off include:
- Hysterectomy
- Liposuction
- Breast reduction/augmentation
- Joint replacement
- Facelift
- Rhinoplasty
- Cataract removal
- Tonsillectomy
Some elective procedures are designed to improve the quality of life as opposed to saving lives in emergencies.
Employers shouldn’t focus on the name of the condition or procedure, but on whether the condition meets the FMLA’s definition of a serious health condition, which is on the last page of the certification.
When employees ask for time off for what might be an FMLA-qualifying reason, employers should treat the situation as they would any FMLA leave request, including asking for a certification supporting the need for leave. It should give employers enough information to determine if the condition meets the FMLA’s definition of a serious health condition.
Key to remember: Employees could be entitled to FMLA leave for elective medical procedures, depending on all the facts involved.
NewsI-9sI-9sHuman Resource ManagementEmployee RelationsIn-Depth ArticleUSAHR ManagementEnglishTalent Management & RecruitingIndustry NewsRecruiting and hiringAudits - HRApplications/ApplicantsEmployee RelationsHR GeneralistAssociate RelationsFocus AreaHuman Resources
2022-12-22T06:00:00Z
Name change tops list of employer questions about Form I-9
Does the Form I-9 need to be updated when an employee’s name changes?
That was the most frequently asked listener question during a recent J. J. Keller & Associates webcast about the Form I-9.
Name change not (technically) required on Form I-9
When an employee has a legal name change because of marriage, divorce, or another reason, the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) does not require employers to update the Form I-9.
However, the agency does recommend that the employer note the name change in Section 3 of the form. The agency suggests that employers maintain correct information on the form.
Employers need to be sure of an employee’s identity
Employers shouldn’t simply take an employee’s word for it when it comes to a name change. The agency recommends that employers ask for proof.
Once again, the agency doesn’t require this, but it is certainly a good idea. The agency recommends that employers take steps to be reasonably assured of an employee’s identity, and this may involve asking the employee to provide documentation of the legal name change.
Keeping documentation of name change a best practice
Information about a name change is kept with the employee’s I-9.
That way if an employer’s I-9 forms are audited by a government agency, and the employee’s form is inspected, having this documentation shows the actions that were taken to verify identity.
Accepting documents with different names
An employer may also encounter name issues when an employee presents the documents needed to initially complete the Form I-9.
If an employee presents two documents with different last names, and one name matches the name the employee entered in Section 1, the employer may accept the documents.
The USCIS suggests that an employer attach a brief memo to the form that explains the reason for the different names. Any supporting documentation provided by the employee should also be attached.
The employee is not required to provide the documents explaining the name change. However, the employer is allowed to ask for other acceptable documents if there is something suspicious about the document with a different name that makes the employer question whether it is genuine.
Key to remember: An employer is not required to update an employee’s Form I-9 when the employee’s name change, but it is recommended.
NewsIndustry NewsEnglishHR GeneralistFamily and Medical Leave Act (FMLA)LeaveIn-Depth ArticleFamily and Medical Leave Act (FMLA)HR ManagementLeaveUSAFocus AreaHuman Resources
2025-01-21T06:00:00Z
DOL: Employers are to treat state paid leave like workers’ comp or STD
Time off under the federal Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) is unpaid. Employees, however, have the right to use their accrued paid time off (PTO) to supplement their income while they’re on unpaid FMLA leave. Employers may also require employees to use their PTO in these types of situations, and many do.
When employees receive pay from other sources, like short-term disability (STD) or workers' compensation, they may not “double dip” and use their PTO for the FMLA leave (and employers may not require it). They might, however, use PTO to “round out” their pay since these other benefits usually only provide a percentage of income.
What about situations where employees take paid leave under state laws?
The DOL chimes in
In an interpretive opinion letter released on January 14, 2025, the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) said that employers should treat state paid leave the same.
Employers need to keep some information in mind:
- Designating leave: When employees take leave under a state paid family or medical leave law if the leave is also covered by the FMLA, employers must designate it as FMLA leave and give the employee a designation notice, which should include the amount of leave to be counted against the employee’s FMLA leave entitlement.
- Receiving state pay: During FMLA leave, when employees receive pay from a state family or medical leave law, the FMLA “substitution” provision does not apply to the part of leave that is paid. As a result, employees may not use PTO, and employers may not require it when leave is paid by state law.
- Supplementing pay: If employees are receiving pay through state paid family or medical leave that doesn’t fully pay for their FMLA-covered leave, and employees have available PTO, employers, and employees may agree, where state law permits, that employees may use their PTO to supplement their pay under a state leave law.
- Qualifying conditions: If employees use state paid family and medical leave for reasons that don’t qualify as FMLA leave, employers may not count the leave against the employee's FMLA leave entitlement. If, for example, a state paid family leave law allows for paid leave to care for a family member with a medical condition that is not an FMLA-qualifying serious health condition or serious injury or illness, employers may not count the leave taken under such circumstances against the employee’s FMLA leave entitlement.
- Exhausting leave: If employees’ leave under a state paid family or medical leave program ends before the employees have exhausted the 12 weeks of FMLA leave, employees are still entitled to the FMLA protections. If, therefore, employees use up all the state paid leave, after that, the FMLA substitution provision would apply and employees would be able to elect, or the employer would be able to require the employee, to substitute employer-provided accrued paid leave.
Key to remember: Employers may not require employees to use their accrued paid time off when employees are receiving pay under a state paid leave law. Employees are also not allowed to do so. Employees, however, might be able to use PTO to round out their income and bring it to full pay.
NewsIndustry NewsAssociate Benefits & CompensationHR GeneralistFamily and Medical Leave Act (FMLA)In-Depth ArticleFamily and Medical Leave Act (FMLA)Associate RelationsEnglishHR ManagementFocus AreaHuman ResourcesUSA
2025-03-27T05:00:00Z
Who can fill out FMLA forms? The answer might surprise you
One of the most common questions involving the federal Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) that we see is: “Can ________ fill out the medical certification?”
This question stumps a lot of HR people and can be a little confusing.
It might be easier to start with who CAN’T fill out an FMLA certification. That includes your coworker, best friend, neighbor, or pet.
Jokes aside, often (but not always) a doctor fills out the FMLA certification, and since March 30 is “Doctors’ Day,” this is a great time to discuss this topic.
FMLA certification basics
Employers aren’t required to use certifications, but if they do, the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) has five different certification forms to use for various FMLA leave situations.
The forms are as follows:
- Certification of Health Care Provider for Employee's Serious Health Condition,
- Certification of Health Care Provider for Family Member's Serious Health Condition,
- Certification of Qualifying Exigency for Military Family Leave,
- Certification for Serious Injury or Illness of a Current Servicemember for Military Family Leave, and
- Certification for Serious Injury or Illness of a Veteran for Military Family Leave.
Let’s focus on the first two, as these are the most common ones HR administrators use.
Who can fill out an FMLA certification?
The FMLA regulations describe the person who has the authority to fill out a certification as a “health care provider.” The good news is, the regulations include a lengthy list of medical professionals who fit this role.
Under the FMLA, a health care provider includes:
- A doctor of medicine or osteopathy,
- A podiatrist,
- A dentist,
- A clinical psychologist,
- An optometrist,
- A chiropractor (limited to manual manipulation of the spine as demonstrated by X-ray),
- A nurse practitioner,
- A nurse midwife,
- A clinical social worker,
- A physician assistant,
- A Christian Science practitioner, and
- Any health care provider from whom the employer or the employer's group health plan's benefits manager will accept a medical certification to substantiate a claim for benefits.
To be qualified to fill out FMLA forms, medical professionals must be authorized to practice in the state and perform within the scope of their practice. This means that the provider must be authorized to diagnose and treat physical or mental health conditions.
What about doctors in a foreign country?
If an employee or an employee's family member is visiting another country, or a family member resides in another country, and a serious health condition develops, the employer must accept a medical certification from a health care provider who practices in that country. This includes second and third opinions.
If a medical certification from a foreign health care provider is not in English, the employee may be required to provide a written translation of the certification.
Key to remember: The FMLA regulations spell out which medical professionals can fill out certification forms.
NewsIndustry NewsHR GeneralistFamily and Medical Leave Act (FMLA)In-Depth ArticleFamily and Medical Leave Act (FMLA)HR ManagementEnglishUSAFocus AreaHuman Resources
2023-11-07T06:00:00Z
Shhhh — FMLA and confidentiality
When processing a leave request under the federal Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA), employees share personal information with their employers. Often, this includes medical facts. Without these details, employers are usually unable to determine whether the situation qualifies for FMLA protections.
The FMLA, however, restricts what employers may do with the information.
Keep it confidential
Employers must keep FMLA records and documents relating to certifications, recertifications, or medical histories of employees or their family members as confidential medical records. They must keep this information in separate files/records apart from the usual personnel files.
The FMLA does not dictate how employers should keep the information confidential. Storing it under lock and key and restricting access to only those who handle FMLA leave would be appropriate. That could be in a secure cabinet or office.
Employers often confuse the privacy provisions of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) with the confidentiality provisions of the federal Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). The ADA, however, was the inspiration for the FMLA’s confidentiality rules.
Exceptions
Employers may share some information in certain situations:
- Leave administrators may inform supervisors and managers about necessary restrictions of an employee’s work or duties and necessary accommodations.
While leave administrators are free to inform managers that an employee is on FMLA leave, and when the employee is expected to be out, they should not disclose the employee’s medical information.
Leave administrators may request a certification supporting the need for FMLA leave, but they must keep the details on that certification confidential.
In that same vein, managers should not ask employees for more medical information. Managers may tell other employees that someone is out, but should not share more details without the employee’s voluntary permission.
If managers find out information about an employee (or family member) medical situation, perhaps because an employee volunteered it, the manager should keep the details private and secure.
- First aid and safety personnel may be informed (when appropriate) if the employee’s physical or medical condition might require emergency treatment.
Like managers, leave administrators must keep employee FMLA information confidential. If, however, an employee has a workplace medical emergency, leave administrators may inform first aid and safety personnel about the condition if helpful.
- Government officials investigating compliance with FMLA (or other pertinent law) must be provided relevant information upon request.
If a representative of the U.S. Department of Labor were to ask to see FMLA certifications or other related documents, employers are required to provide them.
Key to remember: Employers have a responsibility to keep certain employee FMLA information private and secure, with limited exceptions. Failure to do so could risk a claim.
Most Popular Highlights In Safety & Health
NewsIndustry NewsSafety & HealthGeneral Industry SafetyForklifts and Powered TrucksFocus AreaIn-Depth ArticleEnglishPIT InspectionsUSA
2022-07-05T05:00:00Z
Safely maintaining forklift batteries
If employees work with forklifts and their batteries, they must understand the hazards of the liquid in those batteries.
According to OSHA’s forklift standard at 1910.178(g)(7), “When charging batteries, acid shall be poured into water; water shall not be poured into acid.” This can be confusing because workers commonly add distilled water to battery cells.
What OSHA is referring to is the initial mixing of sulfuric acid with water to create an electrolyte solution. Electrolyte solution is added to battery cells when the acid level is so low that a charge cannot be maintained.
What is an electrolyte?
Pure water will not carry an electric current, but adding sulfuric acid creates an electrolyte solution that allows the electric current to pass. Employees may need to mix concentrated sulfuric acid with distilled (pure) water to make the electrolyte solution.
The chemical reaction of mixing sulfuric acid with water can generate heat, resulting in a violent reaction. Because of this reaction, when mixing an electrolyte solution for forklift batteries, always add acid to the water to avoid the hazard of smoking and splattering.
When transferring acid from a large container, it’s a good idea to use a siphon. It’s much easier to control, reducing the chance for spilling or splashing. Splashed acid will eat holes in cloth and skin, so wearing protective equipment during this task is essential, including gloves, long sleeves, and goggles.
Maintaining battery cells
Normal forklift operations cause water in the battery cells to evaporate. If the fluid level in the cells is low, add distilled water before charging. Never add water immediately after a charge.
When the electrolyte level is low, clean off the top of the battery. Remove the battery’s filter caps and add distilled water to the cells. Be sure that the filter caps are tightened securely after the cells are filled.
If workers are not fully trained and authorized to perform this function, they must not attempt to add fluids of any kind to batteries.
NewsIndustry NewsSafety & HealthIn-Depth ArticleGeneral Industry SafetyHazardous Materials Safety - OSHAEnglishFocus AreaHazardous Materials Safety - OSHAUSA
2021-10-05T05:00:00Z
Safely handling battery acid spills
If employees charge forklift or other industrial batteries, they need to understand the hazards of acid and know how to handle small, incidental spills.
Battery acid is dilute sulfuric acid. Sulfuric acid is a clear, colorless liquid with an acrid smell. It’s corrosive and can cause severe burns.
In the event of a sulfuric acid/battery acid spill, employees should:
- Report the incident immediately.
- Neutralize the spill with soda ash or baking soda. Use one pound of baking soda to one gallon of water. Appropriate supplies should be near the charging area.
- The acid reaction is complete when it stops fizzing. Verify that the acid is neutralized by checking the pH with litmus paper or a pH meter. A neutral pH reading is between six and eight.
- Absorb neutralized material using material such as clay or kitty litter, if necessary. If the spill is very large, contain it with earth or clay dikes.
- Brush under battery connectors and remove all grime. Rinse the residue from the battery with clean water.
- Determine proper disposal by contacting local environmental authorities.
With proper training and supplies, employees can clean up battery acid spills safely.
NewsIndustry NewsSafety & HealthGeneral Industry SafetyWalking Working SurfacesIn-Depth ArticleWalking Working SurfacesEnglishFocus AreaUSA
2021-12-16T06:00:00Z
Walking-working Surface Handout
Don’t get tripped up by OSHA’s walking-working surfaces standard
There are many slips, trips, and fall hazards on construction sites. Employers must be proactive to find and fix these workplace hazards BEFORE they become an issue. Exposure to these types of hazards can pose a significant risk of death or serious harm to workers.
Employers can use a fall protection method or system that works best for the work operation. Regular inspections and training will help employers prevent and eliminate walking-working surface hazards.
What is a walking-working surface?
OSHA’s 1926.500(b)(2) says a walking-working surface is a horizontal or vertical surface. For example, it would include floors, roofs, ramps, bridges, runways, formwork, and concrete reinforcing steel but not include ladders, vehicles, or trailers where employees can stand. You must identify and eliminate walking-working surface hazards with proactive measures such as fall protection. Fall protection includes using: covers, designated areas, guardrails, handrails, personal fall protection systems, ladder safety systems, and safety nets.
Employers should perform regular inspections to identify and mitigate slips, trips, and fall hazards.
Things to keep in mind while performing these inspections include:
- Passageways, storerooms, service rooms, and walking-working surfaces must be kept clean, orderly, and sanitary.
- Walking-working surfaces must have a proper load rating to safely support loads applied to it.
- If a corrective action or repair cannot be made immediately, the hazard must be guarded to prevent employees from using the walking-working surface.
- False floors, platforms, and mats must be provided when wet processes are used;
- Hazardous conditions on walking-working surfaces must be corrected or repaired before an employee can use it again.
- Employers must provide safe access and egress to and from walking-working surfaces.
- Protruding objects, loose boards, corrosion, leaks, spills, snow, and ice, are not allowed on walking-working surfaces.
- Only a qualified person can repair structural integrity issues on a walking-working surface.
NewsIndustry NewsSafety & HealthElectrical SafetyGeneral Industry SafetyElectrical SafetyIn-Depth ArticleEnglishClearance DistancesFocus AreaUSA
2025-11-14T06:00:00Z
Beware of these common electrical safety violations
Electrical safety violations are among the most-cited General Industry standards. The combined total citations under 1910.303 and 1910.305 exceeded the machine guarding violations last year. Neither standard requires training, but training could help avoid citations and injuries.
The industries most often cited under those two standards include manufacturing, retail, wholesale, lodging and food service, and transportation and warehousing. OSHA commonly issues citations for things like:
- Using portable fans that were not approved for industrial locations,
- Leaving electrical boxes open,
- Failing to maintain sufficient space around electrical boxes, and
- Improperly using flexible cords or extension cords.
Use equipment properly
Paragraph 1910.303(b) covers examination, installation, and use of equipment. It includes a kind of a “general duty clause” that states, “Electric equipment shall be free from recognized hazards that are likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees.”
Since electricity could cause serious harm, OSHA can cite that paragraph for a number of hazards. Citations include things like damaged insulation on wiring or exposed electrical parts of equipment motors. However, that isn’t the most frequently cited paragraph.
Sub-paragraph 1910.303(b)(2) gets cited most often. It states, “Listed or labeled equipment shall be installed and used in accordance with any instructions included in the listing or labeling.” Essentially, this tells employers to follow manufacturer instructions when using electrical equipment. OSHA uses this for violations like improperly using power strips or allowing employees to use outlets that were not correctly installed.
For related information, see our article, Five things to know before letting employees work with electricity.
Another frequently cited issue is failing to maintain access and working space around electrical equipment. Paragraph 1910.303(g)(1) requires sufficient access and space to allow safe operation and maintenance, describes specific distances, prohibits using the working space for storage, and requires guarding when live parts are exposed for inspection or service.
Wiring issues
The other commonly-cited electrical standard is 1910.305, covering wiring methods and more. These violations include issues such as outlets or switches without covers, or improperly using flexible cords (such as extension cords) where permanent wiring should be used.
One of the most-cited paragraphs is 1910.305(b)(1)(ii) which says, “Unused openings in cabinets, boxes, and fittings shall be effectively closed.” For example, if a circuit breaker panel has an unused breaker space, it must be filled with a blank. It cannot be left open, and placing tape over the empty slot is not sufficient.
Another frequently-cited paragraph is (g)(2)(iii), which says: “Flexible cords and cables shall be connected to devices and fittings so that strain relief is provided that will prevent pull from being directly transmitted to joints or terminal screws.” OSHA uses this when saws or other equipment gets power through flexible cables coming from an electrical panel.
The Bureau of Labor Statistics lists more than 2,000 injuries from exposure to electricity each year and around 150 deaths per year. Neither of the above standards specifically requires training workers on electrical safety, but employers should provide training on properly using (and not improperly using) electrical equipment and tools. For related information, see our article, What is the difference between qualified and unqualified electrical workers?
Key to remember: Electrical hazards from exposed electrical lines and improperly using equipment could be mitigated by training employees.
NewsIndustry NewsIndustry NewsEnforcement and Audits - OSHAOSHA InspectionsEnforcement and Audits - OSHASafety & HealthGeneral Industry SafetyOccupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), DOLEnglishFocus AreaUSA
2025-05-29T05:00:00Z
OSHA updates Site-Specific Targeting program
On May 20, OSHA updated its Site-Specific Targeting (SST) program to reflect the use of Form 300A data for calendar years (CY) 2021-2023. The SST program is OSHA’s primary planned inspection program for general industry establishments with 20 or more employees with the highest injury and illness rates.
Using Form 300A data from CY 2021-2023, OSHA may target establishments for inspection based on:
- High injury and illness rates from 2023 data.
- Upward trending injury and illness rates based on 2021-2023 data at or above twice the 2022 private sector average.
- Injury and illness rates markedly below industry averages.
- Failure to submit an OSHA Form 300A in 2023.
This update replaces the previous SST directive, issued in February 2023, which used CY 2019-2021 data.
NewsEmergency Planning - OSHAIndustry NewsSafety & HealthEmergency Planning (OSHA)General Industry SafetyExit RoutesEmergency ExitsIn-Depth ArticleEnglishFocus AreaUSA
2022-03-30T05:00:00Z
When an exit is not an exit
Depending on the size of your facility, you may have tens or hundreds, if not thousands, of doors. Knowing which doors to identify as an exit (or not an exit for that matter) can assist your employees in evacuation procedures. OSHA can sometimes use broad language, which can create an impression that nearly every door must be marked either “Not an exit” or marked for its actual use. It’s important to read further into the regulation and understand what OSHA actually requires.
Breaking down the regulation
Let’s start with the first part of the “Maintenance, safeguards, and operations features for exit route” regulation.
- 1910.37(b)(5): “each doorway or passage along an exit access that could be mistaken for an exit must be marked “Not an exit” or similar designation or be identified by a sign indicating its actual use (e.g., closet).”
- Per the definition in 1910.34, “Exit access means that portion of an exit route that leads to an exit. An example of an exit access is a corridor on the fifth floor of an office building that leads to a two-hour fire resistance-rated enclosed stairway (the Exit).”
We understand that wherever people are working, they probably follow a corridor or hallway, and those passages might potentially be part of an “exit access.” However, you might start your focus on the designated exit routes (as shown on evacuation maps) since those should be the primary doors of concern.
There’s more to read into this regulation.
- 1910.37(b)(5): “each doorway or passage along an exit access that could be mistaken for an exit must be marked “Not an exit” or similar designation or be identified by a sign indicating its actual use (e.g., closet).”
You’ll want to evaluate whether certain doors “could be mistaken” for an exit. Things like office doors are unlikely to be mistaken for an exit. Similarly, restrooms are usually marked as such, so they are “identified by a sign indicating actual use.” Potentially, areas like conference rooms are also marked (and potentially unlikely to be mistaken for an exit). Likewise, if you have increased your building footprint, and doors which used to lead outside now open into a new indoor area, you would want to mark those doors as “Not an exit” if they are as such.
Before you go out and spend your entire safety budget on “Exit” and “Not an exit” signage, remember that this regulation leaves open some subjectivity for interpretation.
Key to remember: Review your facility emergency action plan, look at your designated evacuation routes, and take a walk to see what signs currently exist. Not every door or passage will be along an exit access, and not every door or passage will have the potential to be mistaken for an exit.
Saved to my EVENT CALENDAR!
View your saved links by clicking the arrow next to your profile picture located in the header. Then, click “My Activity” to view the Event Calendar on your Activity page.
OK
J. J. Keller is the trusted source for DOT / Transportation, OSHA / Workplace Safety, Human Resources, Construction Safety and Hazmat / Hazardous Materials regulation compliance products and services. J. J. Keller helps you increase safety awareness, reduce risk, follow best practices, improve safety training, and stay current with changing regulations.
Copyright 2026 J. J. Keller & Associate, Inc. For re-use options please contact copyright@jjkeller.com or call 800-558-5011.












































