Compliance Just Got Easier: Stay ahead of regulatory changes with instant notifications on updates that matter.
['Sexual Harassment']
['Sexual Harassment']
02/23/2026
:
|
InstituteSexual HarassmentSexual HarassmentUSAHR ManagementEnglishAnalysisFocus AreaCompliance and Exceptions (Level 2)Human Resources
Supervisory liability for sexual harassment
['Sexual Harassment']

- Since supervisors are representatives of the company, a company can be held liable for the actions of its supervisors.
The extent to which an employer is liable for acts of sexual harassment by supervisors was decided in two Supreme Court cases, Faragher v. City of Boca Raton, 524 U.S. 775 (1998) and Burlington Industries v. Ellerth, 524 U.S. 742 (1998). These cases decided that an employer is vicariously liable for the acts of its supervisors.
The Court held that where the harassment results in a “tangible employment action,” such as termination, demotion, or undesirable reassignment, the employer would be held liable for the actions of its supervisor, even if the employer was unaware of the conduct (because supervisors are representatives of the company).
If no tangible employment action occurs, an employer may raise an affirmative defense if it satisfies these two requirements:
- The company must show it exercised reasonable care to prevent and promptly correct any sexually harassing behavior once it became aware of it, and
- The company must show that the employee unreasonably failed to take advantage of any preventative or corrective opportunities provided by the employer (such as following a stated sexual harassment complaint reporting policy).
:
sexual-harassment
sexual-harassment
FOUNDATIONAL LEARNING
Supervisory liability for sexual harassment
InstituteSexual HarassmentSexual HarassmentUSAHR ManagementEnglishAnalysisFocus AreaCompliance and Exceptions (Level 2)Human Resources
['Sexual Harassment']

- Since supervisors are representatives of the company, a company can be held liable for the actions of its supervisors.
The extent to which an employer is liable for acts of sexual harassment by supervisors was decided in two Supreme Court cases, Faragher v. City of Boca Raton, 524 U.S. 775 (1998) and Burlington Industries v. Ellerth, 524 U.S. 742 (1998). These cases decided that an employer is vicariously liable for the acts of its supervisors.
The Court held that where the harassment results in a “tangible employment action,” such as termination, demotion, or undesirable reassignment, the employer would be held liable for the actions of its supervisor, even if the employer was unaware of the conduct (because supervisors are representatives of the company).
If no tangible employment action occurs, an employer may raise an affirmative defense if it satisfies these two requirements:
- The company must show it exercised reasonable care to prevent and promptly correct any sexually harassing behavior once it became aware of it, and
- The company must show that the employee unreasonably failed to take advantage of any preventative or corrective opportunities provided by the employer (such as following a stated sexual harassment complaint reporting policy).
2656869431
2656872733
UPGRADE TO CONTINUE READING
RELATED TOPICS
J. J. Keller is the trusted source for DOT / Transportation, OSHA / Workplace Safety, Human Resources, Construction Safety and Hazmat / Hazardous Materials regulation compliance products and services. J. J. Keller helps you increase safety awareness, reduce risk, follow best practices, improve safety training, and stay current with changing regulations.
Copyright 2026 J. J. Keller & Associate, Inc. For re-use options please contact copyright@jjkeller.com or call 800-558-5011.
