
Be Part of the Ultimate Safety & Compliance Community
Trending news, knowledge-building content, and more – all personalized to you!
: |
The extent to which an employer is liable for acts of sexual harassment by supervisors was decided in two Supreme Court cases, Faragher v. City of Boca Raton, 524 U.S. 775 (1998) and Burlington Industries v. Ellerth, 524 U.S. 742 (1998). These cases decided that an employer is vicariously liable for the acts of its supervisors.
The Court held that where the harassment results in a “tangible employment action,” such as termination, demotion, or undesirable reassignment, the employer would be held liable for the actions of its supervisor, even if the employer was unaware of the conduct (because supervisors are representatives of the company).
If no tangible employment action occurs, an employer may raise an affirmative defense if it satisfies these two requirements:
The extent to which an employer is liable for acts of sexual harassment by supervisors was decided in two Supreme Court cases, Faragher v. City of Boca Raton, 524 U.S. 775 (1998) and Burlington Industries v. Ellerth, 524 U.S. 742 (1998). These cases decided that an employer is vicariously liable for the acts of its supervisors.
The Court held that where the harassment results in a “tangible employment action,” such as termination, demotion, or undesirable reassignment, the employer would be held liable for the actions of its supervisor, even if the employer was unaware of the conduct (because supervisors are representatives of the company).
If no tangible employment action occurs, an employer may raise an affirmative defense if it satisfies these two requirements: