Be Part of the Ultimate Safety & Compliance Community
Trending news, knowledge-building content, and more – all personalized to you!
Sexual harassment is a form of sex discrimination that violates Title VII of the Civil Rights Act. Like any other type of harassment, sexual harassment is a form of discrimination. Sexual harassment is harassment based on sex. Sexual harassment can include unwelcome sexual advances or requests for sexual favors. It can certainly be physical, but verbal remarks related to a person’s sex could also constitute sexual harassment.
Sexual harassment is a form of sex discrimination that violates Title VII of the Civil Rights Act.
Like any other type of harassment, sexual harassment is a form of discrimination. To be illegal, harassment must be based on an individual’s membership in a protected class; and obviously sexual harassment is harassment based on sex.
Sexual harassment can include unwelcome sexual advances or requests for sexual favors. It can certainly be physical, but verbal remarks related to a person’s sex could also constitute sexual harassment.
Sexual harassment is generally defined as unwelcome behavior of a sexual nature. Unwelcome sexual advances, requests for sexual favors, and other verbal or physical conduct of a sexual nature constitute sexual harassment when this conduct:
Sexual harassment is not limiting — it covers a wide variety of circumstances. The victim as well as the harasser may be any gender.
The harasser may be:
Unlawful sexual harassment may occur without economic injury to or discharge of the victim.
A hostile work environment is defined as behavior that creates an intimidating, hostile, or offensive working environment. A hostile environment is one that may contain discriminatory intimidation, ridicule, or insults — an environment created or condoned by the employer.
Among court cases, only those work environments that reasonable individuals find seriously hostile or abusive are considered “hostile environments.” The actions must be severe or pervasive enough to alter the workplace for the employee.
Of course, it can be very difficult to draw a line between offensive sexual conduct and unlawful sexual harassment. This is why employers must address harassing conduct immediately.
Sexual harassment is illegal when:
Quid pro quo involves submission to sexually harassing conduct as a condition of employment. It also may involve submission to or rejection of harassing conduct when it is used as the basis for an employment decision. This type of harassment often results in some form (or threat) of economic loss where, for example, an employee is passed up for promotion because the person rejected a supervisor’s advances.
This behavior does not have to be explicit — it is enough if it is implied through the words or conduct of the aggressor.
A sexual harassment claim may proceed even if the victim submitted to the advances, as long as the advances were unwanted, and the submission was not voluntary.
A quid pro quo (“this for that”) situation is created when:
The extent to which an employer is liable for acts of sexual harassment by supervisors was decided in two Supreme Court cases, Faragher v. City of Boca Raton, 524 U.S. 775 (1998) and Burlington Industries v. Ellerth, 524 U.S. 742 (1998). These cases decided that an employer is vicariously liable for the acts of its supervisors.
The Court held that where the harassment results in a “tangible employment action,” such as termination, demotion, or undesirable reassignment, the employer would be held liable for the actions of its supervisor, even if the employer was unaware of the conduct (because supervisors are representatives of the company).
If no tangible employment action occurs, an employer may raise an affirmative defense if it satisfies these two requirements:
When an employee comes to the employer with a claim that the individual was sexually harassed, the way a company responds may have a direct impact on the outcome of the situation. Do not ignore the claim — take all complaints seriously.
Designate someone to take complaints
The company should designate at least one official outside of an employee’s chain of command to take harassment complaints. For example, someone in the HR department could be authorized to handle complaints.
Allowing an employee to bypass the individual’s chain of command provides additional assurance that the complaint will be handled in an impartial manner. An employee who reports harassment by a supervisor may feel that officials within the chain of command will more readily believe the supervisor’s version of events.
Investigate all claims
One of the first steps in an investigation is a meeting between the person responsible for the investigation (the designated official outside of an employee’s chain of command) and the victim. In this meeting, which should take place where the conversation cannot be overheard, the victim should explain what happened.
The person designated to take complaints should interview any witnesses to the events, including other employees and supervisors. Those people may already be aware of problem situations. If employers observe harassing conduct, stop it immediately. Then take time to record the date, time, name of the harasser, the harassing conduct, and any possible victims.
Remedial or disciplinary action
If the investigation determines that sexual harassment occurred, remedial or disciplinary measures should be taken. A company should have a policy and procedure established for dealing with this type of situation. The measures do not have to be those that the employee requests or prefers, as long as the measures are effective. Remedial measures are designed to:
Remedial measures should not adversely affect the victim. If it is necessary to separate the employees involved, the harasser should be transferred or suspended. Do not transfer the victim, unless the person requests a transfer.
When a company determines a person is guilty of sexual harassment, remedial or disciplinary measures can include:
After the guilty party has been appropriately reprimanded, consider the victim’s needs. Try to find ways to restore the sense of a safe and secure workplace. Some measures employers should consider taking include:
Whatever corrective actions employers choose to make, the actions should reflect the severity of the conduct. Under U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) rules, management is required to correct the harassment situation, regardless of whether an employee files an internal complaint, as long as the conduct is clearly unwelcome.
A company may already have procedures in place for handling sexual harassment cases. If so, maintain a goal to uphold those procedures, help maintain the anonymity of the victim, and try to avert any future incidences.
Prevention is the most effective and cost-efficient method of dealing with sexual harassment. Every company needs to have a sound preventive program to let all employees know what constitutes sexual harassment, that it is illegal, and that this behavior will not be tolerated.
Help prevent sexual harassment
Companies should create and distribute a clear sexual harassment policy that promotes zero tolerance of sexually harassing conduct. A training program can also be developed and shared to help prevent sexual harassment from occurring in the workplace.
Create a respectful work environment
Other aspects of a training program can include:
Employers should develop a written sexual harassment policy and distribute it to all employees. Some states require that a sexual harassment notice be posted informing employees of their rights.
Employers may choose to request that employees sign a copy of the sexual harassment policy, stating that all have read and understood it. The sexual harassment policy is not something that employers should keep hidden. If all employees are aware that there is zero tolerance of sexually harassing conduct, such conduct is less likely to occur.
An effective sexual harassment policy may include the following items:
A good anti-sexual harassment training program can go a long way in preventing sexual harassment and proving that a company took adequate measures to prevent sexual harassment.
Whether a video is used, a pamphlet is distributed, or a classroom session is held, training is important. Effective training may mean the difference between sexual harassment occurring or not. If a case goes to court, the difference may be measured as a large amount of dollars. The effect of sexual harassment on victimized employees can be lifelong.
Courts sometimes require evidence of not only employee handbooks and written policies, but proof that employers have conducted face-to-face training on the employer’s rules to avoid punitive damage claims. Training should be done for all new employees and periodically for all employees.
Civility training is not focused specifically on harassment prevention, but rather on creating a more respectful environment overall, which should lead to less conflict and fewer incidents of harassment in the workplace. Research has shown that incivility is typically a precursor to harassment.
How can employers achieve and maintain civility in the workplace?
It’s not just about an organization protecting itself from civil rights lawsuits anymore—it’s about individuals treating everyone with respect. Being happy with a job isn’t just about the work individual’s do. Many employees cite coworkers as a primary source of workplace happiness, and the paycheck comes in second. With a variety of backgrounds and belief systems, employees of all stripes come together at work to earn a living and make a difference by working toward a shared goal.
In a diverse workplace, each person must take responsibility for individual actions to ensure the culture is fair and respectful for everyone. It’s natural to want to share opinions or even joke around, but if it causes an individual to pause and wonder if it may be out of line, the person probably shouldn’t do or say it.
To help ensure employees can identify when others have crossed the line, employers can train workers to ask:
Conscious inclusion
Focus on “conscious inclusion” for personal growth and organizational improvement. These are ways to practice conscious inclusion:
Positive examples
In contrast to typical anti-harassment training, civility training tends to give people positive examples of how to behave rather than highlighting the behaviors to avoid. The training typically includes a focus on interpersonal communication, conflict resolution, and effective supervisory techniques.
Bystander intervention training is a violence prevention strategy. As the name implies, bystander intervention training encourages people who witness potentially harassing situations to step in to diffuse them. Bystander intervention training is being used in organizations to prevent violence and sexual assault.
The concept involves at least four strategies:
Normalizing
Bystander training can put an end to “normalizing.” Normalizing occurs when a person dismisses or overlooks bad behavior for so long that it begins to feel acceptable or expected. Typically, this occurs because a person believes the behavior is unavoidable or easier to ignore than to address.
There is no environment where people should continue to dismiss acts of harassment because “this is just the way it is.” Sexual harassment is pervasive in some workplaces, but that doesn’t mean it’s acceptable or something to tolerate.
Some businesses have intimidating authority figures or a culture that promotes inappropriate behavior. If the culture of harassment is uncomfortable for individuals, those individuals should take steps to shift the culture to a healthier direction.
Employees should use whatever influence the person has with peers, or through the workers own position, to set the expectation that no one deserves to be harassed. Whether a new hire or 20-year veteran, an employee should make it clear that sexism, unwanted sexual advances, or sexually inappropriate behaviors will NOT be tolerated.
Retaliation against an employee who discloses or discusses sexual harassment or sexual assault is a risk even if an employee’s report of sexual harassment didn’t rise to the level of being illegal.
Retaliation is when an employer takes action against an employee in some way for making or supporting a claim of discrimination.
Even if employers handle a sexual harassment charge properly, and limit liability in that area, if a supervisor retaliates against an employee for reporting sexual harassment, company liability starts all over again.
Examples of workplace retaliation include:
Some states have specific training requirements regarding sexual harassment. Companies should consult state law for states where the company operates. Currently, only six states require private employers to conduct training on sexual harassment (though additional states require it for government employers). Still, training is strongly recommended by state and federal agencies.
If a company operates in the following states, employers should follow the specific guidelines.
States with regulations include:
Sexual harassment is generally defined as unwelcome behavior of a sexual nature. Unwelcome sexual advances, requests for sexual favors, and other verbal or physical conduct of a sexual nature constitute sexual harassment when this conduct:
Sexual harassment is not limiting — it covers a wide variety of circumstances. The victim as well as the harasser may be any gender.
The harasser may be:
Unlawful sexual harassment may occur without economic injury to or discharge of the victim.
A hostile work environment is defined as behavior that creates an intimidating, hostile, or offensive working environment. A hostile environment is one that may contain discriminatory intimidation, ridicule, or insults — an environment created or condoned by the employer.
Among court cases, only those work environments that reasonable individuals find seriously hostile or abusive are considered “hostile environments.” The actions must be severe or pervasive enough to alter the workplace for the employee.
Of course, it can be very difficult to draw a line between offensive sexual conduct and unlawful sexual harassment. This is why employers must address harassing conduct immediately.
Sexual harassment is illegal when:
Quid pro quo involves submission to sexually harassing conduct as a condition of employment. It also may involve submission to or rejection of harassing conduct when it is used as the basis for an employment decision. This type of harassment often results in some form (or threat) of economic loss where, for example, an employee is passed up for promotion because the person rejected a supervisor’s advances.
This behavior does not have to be explicit — it is enough if it is implied through the words or conduct of the aggressor.
A sexual harassment claim may proceed even if the victim submitted to the advances, as long as the advances were unwanted, and the submission was not voluntary.
A quid pro quo (“this for that”) situation is created when:
A hostile work environment is defined as behavior that creates an intimidating, hostile, or offensive working environment. A hostile environment is one that may contain discriminatory intimidation, ridicule, or insults — an environment created or condoned by the employer.
Among court cases, only those work environments that reasonable individuals find seriously hostile or abusive are considered “hostile environments.” The actions must be severe or pervasive enough to alter the workplace for the employee.
Of course, it can be very difficult to draw a line between offensive sexual conduct and unlawful sexual harassment. This is why employers must address harassing conduct immediately.
Sexual harassment is illegal when:
Quid pro quo involves submission to sexually harassing conduct as a condition of employment. It also may involve submission to or rejection of harassing conduct when it is used as the basis for an employment decision. This type of harassment often results in some form (or threat) of economic loss where, for example, an employee is passed up for promotion because the person rejected a supervisor’s advances.
This behavior does not have to be explicit — it is enough if it is implied through the words or conduct of the aggressor.
A sexual harassment claim may proceed even if the victim submitted to the advances, as long as the advances were unwanted, and the submission was not voluntary.
A quid pro quo (“this for that”) situation is created when:
The extent to which an employer is liable for acts of sexual harassment by supervisors was decided in two Supreme Court cases, Faragher v. City of Boca Raton, 524 U.S. 775 (1998) and Burlington Industries v. Ellerth, 524 U.S. 742 (1998). These cases decided that an employer is vicariously liable for the acts of its supervisors.
The Court held that where the harassment results in a “tangible employment action,” such as termination, demotion, or undesirable reassignment, the employer would be held liable for the actions of its supervisor, even if the employer was unaware of the conduct (because supervisors are representatives of the company).
If no tangible employment action occurs, an employer may raise an affirmative defense if it satisfies these two requirements:
When an employee comes to the employer with a claim that the individual was sexually harassed, the way a company responds may have a direct impact on the outcome of the situation. Do not ignore the claim — take all complaints seriously.
Designate someone to take complaints
The company should designate at least one official outside of an employee’s chain of command to take harassment complaints. For example, someone in the HR department could be authorized to handle complaints.
Allowing an employee to bypass the individual’s chain of command provides additional assurance that the complaint will be handled in an impartial manner. An employee who reports harassment by a supervisor may feel that officials within the chain of command will more readily believe the supervisor’s version of events.
Investigate all claims
One of the first steps in an investigation is a meeting between the person responsible for the investigation (the designated official outside of an employee’s chain of command) and the victim. In this meeting, which should take place where the conversation cannot be overheard, the victim should explain what happened.
The person designated to take complaints should interview any witnesses to the events, including other employees and supervisors. Those people may already be aware of problem situations. If employers observe harassing conduct, stop it immediately. Then take time to record the date, time, name of the harasser, the harassing conduct, and any possible victims.
Remedial or disciplinary action
If the investigation determines that sexual harassment occurred, remedial or disciplinary measures should be taken. A company should have a policy and procedure established for dealing with this type of situation. The measures do not have to be those that the employee requests or prefers, as long as the measures are effective. Remedial measures are designed to:
Remedial measures should not adversely affect the victim. If it is necessary to separate the employees involved, the harasser should be transferred or suspended. Do not transfer the victim, unless the person requests a transfer.
When a company determines a person is guilty of sexual harassment, remedial or disciplinary measures can include:
After the guilty party has been appropriately reprimanded, consider the victim’s needs. Try to find ways to restore the sense of a safe and secure workplace. Some measures employers should consider taking include:
Whatever corrective actions employers choose to make, the actions should reflect the severity of the conduct. Under U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) rules, management is required to correct the harassment situation, regardless of whether an employee files an internal complaint, as long as the conduct is clearly unwelcome.
A company may already have procedures in place for handling sexual harassment cases. If so, maintain a goal to uphold those procedures, help maintain the anonymity of the victim, and try to avert any future incidences.
When a company determines a person is guilty of sexual harassment, remedial or disciplinary measures can include:
After the guilty party has been appropriately reprimanded, consider the victim’s needs. Try to find ways to restore the sense of a safe and secure workplace. Some measures employers should consider taking include:
Whatever corrective actions employers choose to make, the actions should reflect the severity of the conduct. Under U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) rules, management is required to correct the harassment situation, regardless of whether an employee files an internal complaint, as long as the conduct is clearly unwelcome.
A company may already have procedures in place for handling sexual harassment cases. If so, maintain a goal to uphold those procedures, help maintain the anonymity of the victim, and try to avert any future incidences.
Prevention is the most effective and cost-efficient method of dealing with sexual harassment. Every company needs to have a sound preventive program to let all employees know what constitutes sexual harassment, that it is illegal, and that this behavior will not be tolerated.
Help prevent sexual harassment
Companies should create and distribute a clear sexual harassment policy that promotes zero tolerance of sexually harassing conduct. A training program can also be developed and shared to help prevent sexual harassment from occurring in the workplace.
Create a respectful work environment
Other aspects of a training program can include:
Employers should develop a written sexual harassment policy and distribute it to all employees. Some states require that a sexual harassment notice be posted informing employees of their rights.
Employers may choose to request that employees sign a copy of the sexual harassment policy, stating that all have read and understood it. The sexual harassment policy is not something that employers should keep hidden. If all employees are aware that there is zero tolerance of sexually harassing conduct, such conduct is less likely to occur.
An effective sexual harassment policy may include the following items:
A good anti-sexual harassment training program can go a long way in preventing sexual harassment and proving that a company took adequate measures to prevent sexual harassment.
Whether a video is used, a pamphlet is distributed, or a classroom session is held, training is important. Effective training may mean the difference between sexual harassment occurring or not. If a case goes to court, the difference may be measured as a large amount of dollars. The effect of sexual harassment on victimized employees can be lifelong.
Courts sometimes require evidence of not only employee handbooks and written policies, but proof that employers have conducted face-to-face training on the employer’s rules to avoid punitive damage claims. Training should be done for all new employees and periodically for all employees.
Civility training is not focused specifically on harassment prevention, but rather on creating a more respectful environment overall, which should lead to less conflict and fewer incidents of harassment in the workplace. Research has shown that incivility is typically a precursor to harassment.
How can employers achieve and maintain civility in the workplace?
It’s not just about an organization protecting itself from civil rights lawsuits anymore—it’s about individuals treating everyone with respect. Being happy with a job isn’t just about the work individual’s do. Many employees cite coworkers as a primary source of workplace happiness, and the paycheck comes in second. With a variety of backgrounds and belief systems, employees of all stripes come together at work to earn a living and make a difference by working toward a shared goal.
In a diverse workplace, each person must take responsibility for individual actions to ensure the culture is fair and respectful for everyone. It’s natural to want to share opinions or even joke around, but if it causes an individual to pause and wonder if it may be out of line, the person probably shouldn’t do or say it.
To help ensure employees can identify when others have crossed the line, employers can train workers to ask:
Conscious inclusion
Focus on “conscious inclusion” for personal growth and organizational improvement. These are ways to practice conscious inclusion:
Positive examples
In contrast to typical anti-harassment training, civility training tends to give people positive examples of how to behave rather than highlighting the behaviors to avoid. The training typically includes a focus on interpersonal communication, conflict resolution, and effective supervisory techniques.
Bystander intervention training is a violence prevention strategy. As the name implies, bystander intervention training encourages people who witness potentially harassing situations to step in to diffuse them. Bystander intervention training is being used in organizations to prevent violence and sexual assault.
The concept involves at least four strategies:
Normalizing
Bystander training can put an end to “normalizing.” Normalizing occurs when a person dismisses or overlooks bad behavior for so long that it begins to feel acceptable or expected. Typically, this occurs because a person believes the behavior is unavoidable or easier to ignore than to address.
There is no environment where people should continue to dismiss acts of harassment because “this is just the way it is.” Sexual harassment is pervasive in some workplaces, but that doesn’t mean it’s acceptable or something to tolerate.
Some businesses have intimidating authority figures or a culture that promotes inappropriate behavior. If the culture of harassment is uncomfortable for individuals, those individuals should take steps to shift the culture to a healthier direction.
Employees should use whatever influence the person has with peers, or through the workers own position, to set the expectation that no one deserves to be harassed. Whether a new hire or 20-year veteran, an employee should make it clear that sexism, unwanted sexual advances, or sexually inappropriate behaviors will NOT be tolerated.
Retaliation against an employee who discloses or discusses sexual harassment or sexual assault is a risk even if an employee’s report of sexual harassment didn’t rise to the level of being illegal.
Retaliation is when an employer takes action against an employee in some way for making or supporting a claim of discrimination.
Even if employers handle a sexual harassment charge properly, and limit liability in that area, if a supervisor retaliates against an employee for reporting sexual harassment, company liability starts all over again.
Examples of workplace retaliation include:
Employers should develop a written sexual harassment policy and distribute it to all employees. Some states require that a sexual harassment notice be posted informing employees of their rights.
Employers may choose to request that employees sign a copy of the sexual harassment policy, stating that all have read and understood it. The sexual harassment policy is not something that employers should keep hidden. If all employees are aware that there is zero tolerance of sexually harassing conduct, such conduct is less likely to occur.
An effective sexual harassment policy may include the following items:
A good anti-sexual harassment training program can go a long way in preventing sexual harassment and proving that a company took adequate measures to prevent sexual harassment.
Whether a video is used, a pamphlet is distributed, or a classroom session is held, training is important. Effective training may mean the difference between sexual harassment occurring or not. If a case goes to court, the difference may be measured as a large amount of dollars. The effect of sexual harassment on victimized employees can be lifelong.
Courts sometimes require evidence of not only employee handbooks and written policies, but proof that employers have conducted face-to-face training on the employer’s rules to avoid punitive damage claims. Training should be done for all new employees and periodically for all employees.
Civility training is not focused specifically on harassment prevention, but rather on creating a more respectful environment overall, which should lead to less conflict and fewer incidents of harassment in the workplace. Research has shown that incivility is typically a precursor to harassment.
How can employers achieve and maintain civility in the workplace?
It’s not just about an organization protecting itself from civil rights lawsuits anymore—it’s about individuals treating everyone with respect. Being happy with a job isn’t just about the work individual’s do. Many employees cite coworkers as a primary source of workplace happiness, and the paycheck comes in second. With a variety of backgrounds and belief systems, employees of all stripes come together at work to earn a living and make a difference by working toward a shared goal.
In a diverse workplace, each person must take responsibility for individual actions to ensure the culture is fair and respectful for everyone. It’s natural to want to share opinions or even joke around, but if it causes an individual to pause and wonder if it may be out of line, the person probably shouldn’t do or say it.
To help ensure employees can identify when others have crossed the line, employers can train workers to ask:
Conscious inclusion
Focus on “conscious inclusion” for personal growth and organizational improvement. These are ways to practice conscious inclusion:
Positive examples
In contrast to typical anti-harassment training, civility training tends to give people positive examples of how to behave rather than highlighting the behaviors to avoid. The training typically includes a focus on interpersonal communication, conflict resolution, and effective supervisory techniques.
Bystander intervention training is a violence prevention strategy. As the name implies, bystander intervention training encourages people who witness potentially harassing situations to step in to diffuse them. Bystander intervention training is being used in organizations to prevent violence and sexual assault.
The concept involves at least four strategies:
Normalizing
Bystander training can put an end to “normalizing.” Normalizing occurs when a person dismisses or overlooks bad behavior for so long that it begins to feel acceptable or expected. Typically, this occurs because a person believes the behavior is unavoidable or easier to ignore than to address.
There is no environment where people should continue to dismiss acts of harassment because “this is just the way it is.” Sexual harassment is pervasive in some workplaces, but that doesn’t mean it’s acceptable or something to tolerate.
Some businesses have intimidating authority figures or a culture that promotes inappropriate behavior. If the culture of harassment is uncomfortable for individuals, those individuals should take steps to shift the culture to a healthier direction.
Employees should use whatever influence the person has with peers, or through the workers own position, to set the expectation that no one deserves to be harassed. Whether a new hire or 20-year veteran, an employee should make it clear that sexism, unwanted sexual advances, or sexually inappropriate behaviors will NOT be tolerated.
Civility training is not focused specifically on harassment prevention, but rather on creating a more respectful environment overall, which should lead to less conflict and fewer incidents of harassment in the workplace. Research has shown that incivility is typically a precursor to harassment.
How can employers achieve and maintain civility in the workplace?
It’s not just about an organization protecting itself from civil rights lawsuits anymore—it’s about individuals treating everyone with respect. Being happy with a job isn’t just about the work individual’s do. Many employees cite coworkers as a primary source of workplace happiness, and the paycheck comes in second. With a variety of backgrounds and belief systems, employees of all stripes come together at work to earn a living and make a difference by working toward a shared goal.
In a diverse workplace, each person must take responsibility for individual actions to ensure the culture is fair and respectful for everyone. It’s natural to want to share opinions or even joke around, but if it causes an individual to pause and wonder if it may be out of line, the person probably shouldn’t do or say it.
To help ensure employees can identify when others have crossed the line, employers can train workers to ask:
Conscious inclusion
Focus on “conscious inclusion” for personal growth and organizational improvement. These are ways to practice conscious inclusion:
Positive examples
In contrast to typical anti-harassment training, civility training tends to give people positive examples of how to behave rather than highlighting the behaviors to avoid. The training typically includes a focus on interpersonal communication, conflict resolution, and effective supervisory techniques.
Bystander intervention training is a violence prevention strategy. As the name implies, bystander intervention training encourages people who witness potentially harassing situations to step in to diffuse them. Bystander intervention training is being used in organizations to prevent violence and sexual assault.
The concept involves at least four strategies:
Normalizing
Bystander training can put an end to “normalizing.” Normalizing occurs when a person dismisses or overlooks bad behavior for so long that it begins to feel acceptable or expected. Typically, this occurs because a person believes the behavior is unavoidable or easier to ignore than to address.
There is no environment where people should continue to dismiss acts of harassment because “this is just the way it is.” Sexual harassment is pervasive in some workplaces, but that doesn’t mean it’s acceptable or something to tolerate.
Some businesses have intimidating authority figures or a culture that promotes inappropriate behavior. If the culture of harassment is uncomfortable for individuals, those individuals should take steps to shift the culture to a healthier direction.
Employees should use whatever influence the person has with peers, or through the workers own position, to set the expectation that no one deserves to be harassed. Whether a new hire or 20-year veteran, an employee should make it clear that sexism, unwanted sexual advances, or sexually inappropriate behaviors will NOT be tolerated.
Retaliation against an employee who discloses or discusses sexual harassment or sexual assault is a risk even if an employee’s report of sexual harassment didn’t rise to the level of being illegal.
Retaliation is when an employer takes action against an employee in some way for making or supporting a claim of discrimination.
Even if employers handle a sexual harassment charge properly, and limit liability in that area, if a supervisor retaliates against an employee for reporting sexual harassment, company liability starts all over again.
Examples of workplace retaliation include:
Some states have specific training requirements regarding sexual harassment. Companies should consult state law for states where the company operates. Currently, only six states require private employers to conduct training on sexual harassment (though additional states require it for government employers). Still, training is strongly recommended by state and federal agencies.
If a company operates in the following states, employers should follow the specific guidelines.
States with regulations include: