Compliance Just Got Easier: Stay ahead of regulatory changes with instant notifications on updates that matter.
['Machine Guarding']
['Machine Guarding Hazards', 'Machine Guarding', 'Power Presses']
08/12/2025
:
|
InstituteSafety & HealthPower PressesGeneral Industry SafetyMachine GuardingIn Depth (Level 3)Focus AreaEnglishMachine GuardingAnalysisMachine Guarding HazardsUSA
What are some secondary safeguarding methods for mechanical power presses?
['Machine Guarding']

- Secondary safeguarding methods give extra protection by supplementing primary safeguards.
- Employers may never use secondary safeguarding methods alone unless primary safeguarding is impossible.
Safeguarding methods that offer some protection but do not prevent employees from reaching into the die area are considered secondary safeguarding methods. Examples of secondary safeguarding include:
- Presence-sensing devices,
- Awareness devices, and
- Safe work procedures.
Employers may use secondary safeguarding methods to supplement primary safeguarding methods for protecting employees against the hazards of mechanical power presses. However, employers are prohibited from using secondary safeguarding methods alone unless they can show that it is impossible to use any of the primary safeguarding methods.
The following are some work practices, complementary equipment, and energy control procedures that should supplement primary safeguarding methods.
“No-hands-in-die” policy and hand-feeding tools
Employers need to enforce a “no-hands-in-die” policy that prohibits power press operators from placing hands in the die area during normal operations, unless a press is designed for “hands-in-die” work. Employers must also enforce the use of hand tools to feed and remove material from the die area to minimize the time operators’ hands spend near it, even when hand feeding is allowed according to 29 CFR 1910.217(d)(1)(ii).
However, hand-tool feeding alone does not ensure that the operator’s hands cannot reach the danger area. For this reason, employers must still use primary safeguarding methods to protect operators, such as secure barrier guards and a properly applied two-hand control or two-hand trip safeguarding device.
Integrating point-of-operation safeguarding with lockout/tagout
When guards are removed from the die area for press servicing and maintenance work such as die setting and repair, exposure to hazardous slide motion creates serious point-of-operation hazards. Employees performing this kind of servicing and maintenance must use energy control procedures that integrate point-of-operation safeguarding methods with lockout/tagout procedures.
One essential point-of-operation safeguarding method is the safe use of an inch or jog safety device. By operating a part-revolution press in the inch mode, using two-hand controls or a single control mounted at a safe distance from the die area, die setters and service personnel can control hazardous slide motion by gradually “inching” the press through small portions of a stroke.
However, an inch or jog safety device cannot prevent the slide from falling if there is a component or control system malfunction or if the press is activated by others. For this reason, additional energy control precautions (e.g., safety blocks; lockout/tagout of the press disconnect switch if re-energization presents a hazard) are necessary if employees must place hands or arms between a press’s bolster plate and slide for servicing and maintenance such as adjusting, cleaning, or repairing dies.
:
machine-guarding
machine-guarding
FOUNDATIONAL LEARNING
What are some secondary safeguarding methods for mechanical power presses?
InstituteSafety & HealthPower PressesGeneral Industry SafetyMachine GuardingIn Depth (Level 3)Focus AreaEnglishMachine GuardingAnalysisMachine Guarding HazardsUSA
['Machine Guarding']

- Secondary safeguarding methods give extra protection by supplementing primary safeguards.
- Employers may never use secondary safeguarding methods alone unless primary safeguarding is impossible.
Safeguarding methods that offer some protection but do not prevent employees from reaching into the die area are considered secondary safeguarding methods. Examples of secondary safeguarding include:
- Presence-sensing devices,
- Awareness devices, and
- Safe work procedures.
Employers may use secondary safeguarding methods to supplement primary safeguarding methods for protecting employees against the hazards of mechanical power presses. However, employers are prohibited from using secondary safeguarding methods alone unless they can show that it is impossible to use any of the primary safeguarding methods.
The following are some work practices, complementary equipment, and energy control procedures that should supplement primary safeguarding methods.
“No-hands-in-die” policy and hand-feeding tools
Employers need to enforce a “no-hands-in-die” policy that prohibits power press operators from placing hands in the die area during normal operations, unless a press is designed for “hands-in-die” work. Employers must also enforce the use of hand tools to feed and remove material from the die area to minimize the time operators’ hands spend near it, even when hand feeding is allowed according to 29 CFR 1910.217(d)(1)(ii).
However, hand-tool feeding alone does not ensure that the operator’s hands cannot reach the danger area. For this reason, employers must still use primary safeguarding methods to protect operators, such as secure barrier guards and a properly applied two-hand control or two-hand trip safeguarding device.
Integrating point-of-operation safeguarding with lockout/tagout
When guards are removed from the die area for press servicing and maintenance work such as die setting and repair, exposure to hazardous slide motion creates serious point-of-operation hazards. Employees performing this kind of servicing and maintenance must use energy control procedures that integrate point-of-operation safeguarding methods with lockout/tagout procedures.
One essential point-of-operation safeguarding method is the safe use of an inch or jog safety device. By operating a part-revolution press in the inch mode, using two-hand controls or a single control mounted at a safe distance from the die area, die setters and service personnel can control hazardous slide motion by gradually “inching” the press through small portions of a stroke.
However, an inch or jog safety device cannot prevent the slide from falling if there is a component or control system malfunction or if the press is activated by others. For this reason, additional energy control precautions (e.g., safety blocks; lockout/tagout of the press disconnect switch if re-energization presents a hazard) are necessary if employees must place hands or arms between a press’s bolster plate and slide for servicing and maintenance such as adjusting, cleaning, or repairing dies.
2656872526
2656870363
UPGRADE TO CONTINUE READING
RELATED TOPICS
J. J. Keller is the trusted source for DOT / Transportation, OSHA / Workplace Safety, Human Resources, Construction Safety and Hazmat / Hazardous Materials regulation compliance products and services. J. J. Keller helps you increase safety awareness, reduce risk, follow best practices, improve safety training, and stay current with changing regulations.
Copyright 2026 J. J. Keller & Associate, Inc. For re-use options please contact copyright@jjkeller.com or call 800-558-5011.
