J. J. Keller® Compliance Network Logo
Start Experiencing Compliance Network for Free!
Update to Professional Trial!

Be Part of the Ultimate Safety & Compliance Community

Trending news, knowledge-building content, and more – all personalized to you!

Already have an account?
FREE TRIAL UPGRADE!
Thank you for investing in EnvironmentalHazmat related content. Click 'UPGRADE' to continue.
CANCEL
YOU'RE ALL SET!
Enjoy your limited-time access to the Compliance Network Professional Trial!
A confirmation welcome email has been sent to your email address from ComplianceNetwork@t.jjkellercompliancenetwork.com. Please check your spam/junk folder if you can't find it in your inbox.
YOU'RE ALL SET!
Thank you for your interest in EnvironmentalHazmat related content.
WHOOPS!
You've reached your limit of free access, if you'd like more info, please contact us at 800-327-6868.

HR Monthly Round Up - January 2024

In this monthly roundup video, we’ll review the most impactful HR news.

Welcome, everyone! In the next few minutes, we’ll review the latest in HR news. Let’s get started.

On January 9, the U.S. Department of Labor released a final rule about independent contractors. The rule lists the criteria for employers to consider when classifying workers as either employees or independent contractors.

Although the final rule impacts businesses across the country, the transportation industry in particular will be affected by the changes since many carriers hire independent contractors to move freight.

The final rule is scheduled to take effect on March 11; however, challenges to the rule are underway. In the meantime, companies should review the new criteria to see how it impacts their workers.

Speaking of employment laws and trucking, a federal judge recently ordered a motor carrier to collect and submit driver job application data to the government for three years and pay more than $300,000 to a truck driver who is deaf. The driver had applied for a job at the carrier but wasn’t hired because of his hearing disability, despite being qualified.

The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission filed a suit on the driver’s behalf under the federal Americans with Disabilities Act. After a trial last year, the jury found the carrier guilty of violating the ADA and awarded the driver $36 million. The judge, however, reduced the damages.

Turning to poster news, this year penalties will top $42,000 for employers that fail to comply with federal labor law posting requirements. The higher fines, which were adjusted for inflation, apply to penalties assessed after January 15.

While posting fines are typically only levied if an employer willfully and repeatedly violates the law, the fact that the Department of Labor adjusts them each year shows that the agency takes posting compliance seriously.

And lastly, school budgets may be tight, but an Illinois district learned the hard way that limiting the pay of older, higher earning teachers to save money is not an acceptable way to control spending.

In an opinion issued this past November, a U.S. District Court judge found the Urbana school district violated the Age Discrimination in Employment Act by capping the salaries of teachers over age 45 to avoid pension contribution surcharges. The complaint was filed by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission on behalf of teachers affected by the district’s action.

That’s all the HR news we have time for today. For more information on these topics, click the content links in the transcript below. Thanks for watching. See you next month!

Transportation Monthly Round Up - January 2024

In this monthly video, we will review the most impactful regulatory proposals and changes that occurred in January.

Hello, the monthly round up video series will review the month’s most impactful regulatory proposals and changes, and we’ll discuss what you can do stay compliant. With that said, let’s get started!

Certified Medical Examiners (CMEs) receive new guidance as many may face removal from the National Registry. Interstate commercial motor vehicle (CMV) drivers must be medically qualified through an exam administered by Certified Medical Examiners — a group not usually in the news.

However, the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) published three significant notices in the past week regarding the following:

  • Medical Advisory Criteria revisions;
  • Medical Examiner Handbook (MEH) updates; and
  • A proposal to remove nearly 16,000 examiners due to inactive or non-existent National Registry of Certified Medical Examiner (NRCME) accounts.
Carriers and drivers should verify that a CME is active on the national registry before scheduling a medical exam. Per the FMCSA, carriers and drivers should not have issues obtaining medical exam appointments based on the 38,707 CMEs still actively providing exams.

Under a new proposal, fees for 2025 Unified Carrier Registration (UCR) would increase by an average of 25 percent above fees paid for the 2024 registration year. This amounts to between $9 and $9,000 per entity, depending on the applicable fee bracket. UCR fees are based on the number of vehicles a company owns or operates.

Despite the proposed 25 percent increase, the proposed fees are still less than the fees paid for registration years 2019-2022.

With the unseasonably warm weather in many Northern states in the last two weeks, watch for states to begin spring weight restrictions. Spring weight restrictions are most prevalent in the northern half of the United States and into Canada, but any state can impose restrictions.

One of the highest line items in any state budget is for roadway infrastructure. Highway funds are tight, the states simply cannot afford additional expense to repair or replace roadways due to being overloaded in the spring.

The spring weight limit could be less than the posted weight limit of the road. It truly is a “traveler beware” situation. It pays to be informed. Most states maintain websites with the spring restrictions.

The Province of B.C. amended regulations to increase fines and penalties for overpass crashes, and the changes will take effect in June of 2024.

Commercial vehicle infrastructure crashes cause damage, stop the movement of people and goods, and increase safety risks for everyone on the road. The ministry is implementing measures to further deter these incidents and to respond with stronger enforcement when they occur.

A more robust enforcement framework for companies that are repeatedly involved in infrastructure crashes could include outright cancellation of their carrier safety certificate, which would effectively prevent the company from operating in B.C.

That’s it for this month’s roundup. Stay safe, and thanks for watching.

EHS Monthly Round Up - January 2024

In this monthly video, we'll review the most impactful environmental, health, and safety news.

Hi everyone! Welcome to the monthly news roundup video, where we’ll go over the most impactful environmental, health, and safety news. Please view the content links in the transcript for more information about the topics I’ll be covering today. Let’s get started!

Effective January 15, OSHA penalties increased 3.2 percent for inflation. Most penalties increased to $16,131. Willful and serious violations, however, increased to $161,323.

Construction workers aged 45 and older suffer more severe injuries and higher associated costs than other age groups. Most injuries are due to slips, trips, and falls.

Washington State updated its process safety management rules to better protect workers in petroleum refineries from the hazards of volatile chemicals. The rules take effect December 27, 2024.

Bloodborne pathogens topped the list of OSHA violations for the healthcare industry in 2023. Hazard Communication was the second most cited standard, followed by respiratory protection.

OSHA Region 2 launched a regional emphasis program that targets tree trimming, tree removal, and land clearing operations. Region 2 includes New York, New Jersey, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands.

EPA continues to strengthen its regulation of per- and polyfluoroalkyl – or PFAS - substances. A new rule prevents facilities from using any of the 300+ inactive PFAS before EPA conducts a risk determination and, if necessary, regulates the activity.

Thanks for tuning in to the monthly news roundup. We’ll see you next month!

Specialized Industries

Go beyond the regulations! Visit the Institute for in-depth guidance on a wide range of compliance subjects in safety and health, transportation, environment, and human resources.

J. J. Keller® COMPLIANCE NETWORK is a premier online safety and compliance community, offering members exclusive access to timely regulatory content in workplace safety (OSHA), transportation (DOT), environment (EPA), and human resources (DOL).

Interact With Our Compliance Experts

Puzzled by a regulatory question or issue? Let our renowned experts provide the answers and get your business on track to full compliance!

Upcoming Events

Reference the Compliance Network Safety Calendar to keep track of upcoming safety and compliance events. Browse by industry or search by keyword to see relevant dates and observances, including national safety months, compliance deadlines, and more.

SAFETY & COMPLIANCE NEWS

Keep up to date on the latest developments affecting OSHA, DOT, EPA, and DOL regulatory compliance.

RegSense®Regulatory Reference

Explore a comprehensive database of word-for-word regulations and best practices on a wide range of topics.

THE J. J. KELLER INSTITUTE

The J. J. Keller INSTITUTE is your destination for in-depth content on hundreds of topics. Browse by subject to gain foundational knowledge and confirm best practices on the topics that matter to you. You'll find articles, videos, and interactive exercises that help you become an expert and apply key concepts in practical scenarios. There are almost 130 subjects covering 100s of topics.

Add Premium Hazmat & Environmental Resources

Unlock premium content offering expert insight into hazmat and environmental regulations with a COMPLIANCE NETWORK EDGE membership.

INTERACT WITH A COMPLIANCE EXPERT

In search of an answer? Try our FAQ Library or engage with an Expert for help!

Upcoming Events

Reference the Compliance Network Safety Calendar to keep track of upcoming safety and compliance events. Browse by industry or search by keyword to see relevant dates and observances, including national safety months, compliance deadlines, and more.

Most Recent Highlights In Environmental

EHS Monthly Round Up - January 2024

EHS Monthly Round Up - January 2024

In this monthly video, we'll review the most impactful environmental, health, and safety news.

Hi everyone! Welcome to the monthly news roundup video, where we’ll go over the most impactful environmental, health, and safety news. Please view the content links in the transcript for more information about the topics I’ll be covering today. Let’s get started!

Effective January 15, OSHA penalties increased 3.2 percent for inflation. Most penalties increased to $16,131. Willful and serious violations, however, increased to $161,323.

Construction workers aged 45 and older suffer more severe injuries and higher associated costs than other age groups. Most injuries are due to slips, trips, and falls.

Washington State updated its process safety management rules to better protect workers in petroleum refineries from the hazards of volatile chemicals. The rules take effect December 27, 2024.

Bloodborne pathogens topped the list of OSHA violations for the healthcare industry in 2023. Hazard Communication was the second most cited standard, followed by respiratory protection.

OSHA Region 2 launched a regional emphasis program that targets tree trimming, tree removal, and land clearing operations. Region 2 includes New York, New Jersey, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands.

EPA continues to strengthen its regulation of per- and polyfluoroalkyl — or PFAS — substances. A new rule prevents facilities from using any of the 300+ inactive PFAS before EPA conducts a risk determination and, if necessary, regulates the activity.

Thanks for tuning in to the monthly news roundup. We’ll see you next month!

EPA strengthens fine particulate matter air quality standards
2024-02-08T06:00:00Z

EPA strengthens fine particulate matter air quality standards

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) finalized its reconsideration of the National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Particulate Matter (NAAQS PM), strengthening the annual primary emissions limit of fine particulate matter (PM2.5), also known as soot.

What changed?

Under the Clean Air Act, EPA sets primary and secondary NAAQS. Primary standards focus on protecting human health, while secondary standards concentrate on protecting public welfare (e.g., preventing environmental damage).

In the finalized NAAQS, EPA strengthened the primary annual PM2.5 standard from 12 micrograms per cubic meter to 9 micrograms per cubic meter. The agency also:

  • Revised the Air Quality Index to improve public communications about health risks from PM2.5 exposures, and
  • Added a monitoring factor to better protect air quality in communities overburdened by air pollution.

What didn’t change?

The agency maintained:

  • The secondary annual PM2.5 standards,
  • The primary and secondary 24-hour PM2.5 standards, and
  • The primary and secondary coarse particulate matter (or PM10) standards.

Does this affect my facility?

Upon the effective date of the final rule, all applicants for permits to construct a new major source or make a major modification to an existing stationary source must conduct an air quality analysis that considers the revised PM2.5 NAAQS. Facilities with a Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) permit in progress must show the new or modified source won’t violate or cause a violation of the new annual primary PM2.5 NAAQS.

When EPA establishes a new NAAQS or revises an existing one, it begins a years-long process to implement the new standards in states:

  • EPA designates areas as either meeting (attainment) or not meeting (nonattainment) the new standards.
  • State and local air agencies develop and submit to EPA infrastructure State Implementation Plans (SIPs) to confirm air quality management programs are in place.
  • Once EPA designates areas, state and local air agencies with nonattainment areas develop and submit to the agency SIPs with the strategies and emissions control measures planned to meet the NAAQS.
  • EPA then reviews the SIPs. It either approves all or parts of a SIP or disapproves the plan. Any control measures EPA approves are immediately enforceable in federal court.

Now is the time to proactively consider ways your facility can further limit PM2.5 emissions. Your organization will be better prepared to comply with any future PM emissions control regulations.

Key to remember: EPA strengthened the annual primary standards for fine particulate matter, also known as soot.

2024-02-08T06:00:00Z

EPA Proposed Rule: Listing of Specific PFAS as Hazardous Constituents

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA or the Agency) is proposing to amend its regulation under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) by adding nine specific per-and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), their salts, and their structural isomers, to its list of hazardous constituents. These nine PFAS are perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA), perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS), perfluorobutanesulfonic acid (PFBS), hexafluoropropylene oxide-dimer acid (HFPO–DA or GenX), perfluorononanoic acid (PFNA), perfluorohexanesulfonic acid (PFHxS), perfluorodecanoic acid (PFDA), perfluorohexanoic acid (PFHxA), and perfluorobutanoic acid (PFBA). EPA's criteria for listing substances as hazardous constituents under RCRA require that they have been shown in scientific studies to have toxic, carcinogenic, mutagenic, or teratogenic effects on humans or other life forms. EPA reviewed and evaluated key toxicity and epidemiological studies and assessments for the nine PFAS to determine whether the available data for these PFAS meet the Agency's criteria for listing substances as hazardous constituents under RCRA. Based on EPA's evaluation, the above nine PFAS, their salts, and their structural isomers meet the criteria for being listed as RCRA hazardous constituents. As a result of this proposed rule, if finalized, when corrective action requirements are imposed at a facility, these PFAS would be among the hazardous constituents expressly identified for consideration in RCRA facility assessments and, where necessary, further investigation and cleanup through the RCRA corrective action process at RCRA treatment, storage, and disposal facilities.

DATES: This proposed rule is published in the Federal Register February 8, 2024, page 8606.

View proposed rule.

2024-02-08T06:00:00Z

EPA Proposed Rule: Revision to Hazardous Waste Definition

This proposed rule would amend the definition of hazardous waste applicable to corrective action to address releases from solid waste management units at RCRA-permitted treatment, storage, and disposal facilities and make related conforming amendments, thereby providing clear regulatory authority to fully implement the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) statutory requirement that permitted facilities conduct corrective action to address releases not only of substances listed or identified as hazardous waste in the regulations but of any substance that meets the statutory definition of hazardous waste. The proposed rule would also provide notice of EPA's interpretation that the statutory definition of hazardous waste applies to corrective action for releases from solid waste management units at permitted and interim status facilities.

DATES: This proposed rule is published in the Federal Register February 8, 2024, page 8598.

View proposed rule.

2024-02-08T06:00:00Z

EPA Final Rule: Final Authorization of State Hazardous Waste Management Program for South Dakota

The State of South Dakota Department of Agriculture and Natural Resources has applied to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) for final authorization of the changes to its hazardous waste program under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). The EPA has determined that these changes satisfy all requirements needed to qualify for final authorization, and is authorizing the State's changes through this direct final action. The EPA uses the regulations entitled, “Approved State Hazardous Waste Management Programs” to provide notice of the authorization status of State programs and to incorporate by reference those provisions of State statutes and regulations that will be subject to the EPA's inspection and enforcement. This rule also codifies in the regulations the approval of South Dakota's hazardous waste management program and incorporates by reference authorized provisions of the State's regulations.

DATES: This direct final rule is effective on April 8, 2024 is published in the Federal Register February 8, 2024, page 8540.

§272.2101 South Dakota State-administered program: Final authorization.
Entire section RevisedView text
Appendix A to Part 272—State Requirements
Listing for “South Dakota” RevisedView text

New Text

§272.2101 South Dakota State-administered program: Final authorization.

(a) History of the State of South Dakota authorization. Pursuant to section 3006(b) of RCRA, 42 U.S.C. 6926(b), South Dakota has final authorization for the following elements as submitted to EPA in South Dakota's base program application for final authorization which was approved by EPA effective on November 2, 1984. Subsequent program revision applications were approved effective on June 17, 1991, November 8, 1993, March 11, 1994, September 23, 1996, June 8, 2000, May 24, 2004, March 8, 2006, August 8, 2012, August 23, 2016, and April 8, 2024.

(b) Enforcement authority. The State of South Dakota has primary responsibility for enforcing its hazardous waste management program. However, EPA retains the authority to exercise its inspection and enforcement authorities in accordance with sections 3007, 3008, 3013, and 7003 of RCRA, 42 U.S.C. 6927, 6928, 6934, and 6973, and any other applicable statutory and regulatory provisions, regardless of whether the State has taken its own actions, as well as in accordance with other statutory and regulatory provisions.

(c) State statutes and regulations —(1) Incorporation by reference. The South Dakota regulations cited in paragraph (c)(1)(i) of this section are incorporated by reference as part of the hazardous waste management program under Subtitle C of RCRA, 42 U.S.C. 6921 et seq. The Director of the Federal Register in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. This material is available for inspection at the EPA and at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). You may inspect a copy at EPA Region 8, 1595 Wynkoop Street, Denver, Colorado, phone number (303) 312–6667. For information on the availability of this material at NARA, email: fr.inspection@nara.gov, or go to: https://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html. You may obtain copies of the South Dakota regulations that are incorporated by reference in this paragraph from South Dakota Legislative Research Council, 3rd Floor, State Capitol, 500 East Capitol Avenue, Pierre, SD 57501, phone number 605–773–3251.

(i) EPA-Approved South Dakota Regulatory Requirements Applicable to the Hazardous Waste Management Program, dated June 2022.

(ii) [Reserved]

(2) Legal basis. The following provisions provide the legal basis for the State's implementation of the hazardous waste program, but they are not being incorporated by reference and do not replace Federal authorities:

(i) South Dakota Codified Laws (SDCL), as amended, 2021 Revision, Title 1, State Affairs and Government: Chapter 1–26, Administrative Procedures and Rules, sections 1–26–1(1), 1–26–1(4), 1–26–1(8) introductory paragraph, 1–26–1(8)(a), 1–26–2, 1–26–6.6, 1–26–16 through 1–26–19, 1–26–19.1, 1–26–19.2, 1–26–21, 1–26–27, 1–26–29, 1–26–30, 1–26–30.1, 1–26–30.2, 1–26–30.4, 1–26–31, 1–26–31.1, 1–26–31.2, 1–26–31.4, 1–26–35 and 1–26–36; Chapter 1–27, Public Records and Files, sections 1–27–1, 1–27–3, 1–27–9(2) and 1–27–28, 1–27–31; Chapter 1–32, Executive Reorganization, section 1–32–1(1); Chapter 1–41, Department of Agriculture and Natural Resources, sections 1–41–3.4, 1–41–18, 1–41–24 and 1–41–25.1.

(ii) SDCL, as amended, 2021 Revision, Title 15, Civil Procedure: Chapter 15–6, Rules of Procedure in Circuit Courts, section 15–6–24(a)–(c).

(iii) SDCL, as amended, 2021 Revision, Title 19, Evidence: Chapter 19–13, Privileges, sections 19–19–502(1), 19–19–502(5), 19–19–502(b), 19–19–507 and 19–19–509.

(iv) SDCL, as amended, 2021 Revision, Title 21, Judicial Remedies: Chapter 21–8, Injunction, section 21–8–1.

(v) SDCL, as amended, 2021 Revision, Title 22, Crimes: Chapter 22–6, Authorized Punishments, sections 22–6–1 introductory paragraph and 22–6–1(7).

(vi) SDCL, as amended, 2021 Revision, Title 23, Law Enforcement: Chapter 23–5, Criminal Identification, sections 23–5–1, 23–5–10(1), 23–5–10(3), 23–5–10(4) and 23–5–11 first sentence; Chapter 23–6, Criminal Statistics, section 23–6–4.

(vii) SDCL, as amended, 2021 Revision, Title 34, Public Health and Safety: Chapter 34–21, Radiation and Uranium Resources Exposure Control, section 34–21–2(7).

(viii) SDCL, as amended, 2021 Revision, Title 34A, Environmental Protection: Chapter 34A–6, Solid Waste Disposal, section 34A–6–1.3(17); Chapter 34A–10, Remedies for Protection of Environment, sections 34A–10–1, 34A–10–2, 34A–10–2.5, 34A–10–5, 34A–10–11, 34A–10–14 and 34A–10–16, Chapter 34A–11, Hazardous Waste Management, sections 34A–11–1, 34A–11–2 through 34A–11–4, 34A–11–5, 34A–11–8 through 34A–11–12, 34A–11–13 through 34A–11–16, 34A–11–17 through 34A–11–19, 34A–11–21 and 34A–11–22; Chapter 34A–12, Regulated Substance Discharges, sections 34A–12–1(8), 34A–12–4, 34A–12–6, 34A–12–8 through 34A–12–13, 34A–12–13.1 and 34A–12–14.

(ix) SDCL, as amended, 2021 Revision, Title 37, Trade Regulation, Chapter 37–29, Uniform Trade Secrets Act, section 37–29–1(4).

(x) Administrative Rules of South Dakota (ARSD), Article 74:08, Administrative Fees, effective April 19, 2021: Chapter 74:08:01, Fees for Records Reproduction, sections 74:08:01:01, 74:08:01:03, 74:08:01:04, 74:08:01:05.

(3) Related legal provisions. The following statutory provisions are broader in scope than the Federal program, are not part of the authorized program, are not incorporated by reference, and are not federally enforceable:

(i) SDCL, as amended, 2021 Revision, Title 34A, Environmental Protection, Chapter 34A–11, Hazardous Waste Management, sections 34A–11–12.1, 34A–11–16.1, 34A–11–25 and 34A–11–26.

(ii) [Reserved]

(4) Unauthorized State amendments. South Dakota has adopted but is not authorized for the following Federal final rules:

(i) Hazardous Waste Management System; User Fees for the Electronic Waste Manifest System and Amendments to Manifest Regulations (Non-HSWA), published in the Federal Register of 1/3/18.

(ii) Management Standards for Hazardous Waste Pharmaceuticals and Amendment to the P075 Listing for Nicotine (HSWA/Non-HSWA), published in the Federal Register of 2/22/19.

(iii) Those Federal rules written under RCRA provisions that predate HSWA (non-HSWA) which the State has adopted, but for which it is not authorized, are not federally enforceable. In contrast, EPA will continue to enforce the Federal HSWA standards for which South Dakota is not authorized until the State receives specific authorization from EPA.

(5) Memorandum of Agreement. The Memorandum of Agreement between EPA Region 8 and the State of South Dakota, signed by the Secretary of the South Dakota Department of Agriculture and Natural Resources Secretary on March 20, 2023, and by the EPA Region 8 Regional Administrator on March 10, 2023, although not incorporated by reference, is referenced as part of the authorized hazardous waste management program under subtitle C of RCRA, 42 U.S.C. 6921 et seq.

(6) Statement of legal authority. “Attorney General's Statement for Final Authorization”, signed by the Attorney General of South Dakota on May 24, 1984, and revisions, supplements and addenda to that Statement dated January 14, 1991, September 11, 1992, September 25, 1992, April 1, 1993, September 24, 1993, December 29, 1994, September 5, 1995, October 23, 1997, October 27, 1997, October 28, 1997, November 5, 1999, June 26, 2000, June 18, 2002, October 19, 2004, May 11, 2009, May 5, 2015, and November 29, 2021, although not incorporated by reference, are referenced as part of the authorized hazardous waste management program under subtitle C of RCRA, 42 U.S.C. 6921 et seq.

(7) Program Description. The Program Description and any other materials submitted as supplements thereto, although not incorporated by reference, are referenced as part of the authorized hazardous waste management program under subtitle C of RCRA, 42 U.S.C. 6921 et seq.

Appendix A to Part 272—State Requirements

* * * * *

South Dakota

The regulatory provisions include:

Administrative Rules of South Dakota (ARSD), Article 74:28, Hazardous Waste, as amended effective April 19, 2021, adopting by reference the Federal regulations as of July 1, 2018, and 83 FR 61552 (November 30, 2018).

Sections 74:28:21:01 (except the reference to “260.4 and 260.5” at 74:28:21:01(3)(b)(xii), and (14)(f)), 74:28:21:02, 74:28:21:03, 74:28:22:01 (except the phrase “; and 84 FR 36, 5938–5950 (February 22, 2019)”), 74:28:23:01, 74:28:24:01, 74:28:25:01 (except the phrase “; and 84 FR 36, 5938–5950 (February 22, 2019)”), 74:28:25:02 through 74:28:25:05, 74:28:26:01 (except the phrase “; and 84 FR 36, 5938–5950 (February 22, 2019)” in the introductory paragraph), 74:28:27:01 (except the phrase “; 84 FR 36, 5938–5950 (February 22, 2019)” in the introductory paragraph), 74:28:28:01 (except the phrase “; and 84 FR 36, 5938–5950 (February 22, 2019)”), 74:28:28:02 through 74:28:28:05, 74:28:29:01, 74:28:30:01 (except the phrase “; and 84 FR 36, 5938–5950 (February 22, 2019)”) and 74:28:33:01 (except the phrase “; and 84 FR 36, 5938–5950 (February 22, 2019)”); Article 74:36, Air Pollution Control Program, section 74:36:11:01.

Copies of the South Dakota regulations that are incorporated by reference are available from South Dakota Legislative Research Council, 3rd Floor, State Capitol, 500 East Capitol Avenue, Pierre, SD 57501, (Phone: 605–773–3251).

* * * * *

See More

Most Recent Highlights In Transportation

Avoid NESHAP Mishaps: Determine whether your facility must comply
2024-02-05T06:00:00Z

Avoid NESHAP Mishaps: Determine whether your facility must comply

The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) recently completed its review of the proposed rule to expand the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for lime manufacturing plants. If the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) finalizes the rule, it will regulate four additional hazardous air pollutants (HAPs). The OMB also has many other proposed NESHAP-strengthening rules queued for review.

This news likely brings up some questions. What exactly is a NESHAP? Is your facility subject to NESHAP regulations? Let’s take a closer look.

Defining NESHAP terms

EPA limits the amount of HAPs a facility can release into the air (or emit) through NESHAPs. The regulations apply to stationary sources, which are any buildings, structures, facilities, or installations that emit or may emit a HAP.

The agency puts stationary sources into industrial groups called source categories. Examples of the categories include asbestos, lead acid battery manufacturing, and petroleum refineries. EPA provides on its website a complete list of the source categories and where to find each category in the regulations.

Is my facility subject to NESHAPs?

The first potential mishap a facility faces is not knowing whether it’s covered by a NESHAP.

EPA controls HAP emissions in two ways. The rules under 40 CFR Part 61 regulate emissions by the type of HAPs released through specific activities, like removing asbestos when renovating a building. Part 63 regulates emissions based on the source categories, such as integrated iron and steel manufacturing.

To determine whether any NESHAPs apply to your facility, answer these questions.

1. Does your facility conduct any of the activities regulated under Part 61?

If your facility conducts any activities covered by Part 61, you must comply with the NESHAP for that specific activity and HAP. For example, a plant that produces vinyl chloride by any process is subject to the NESHAP for vinyl chloride (Part 61 Subpart F).

If your facility does not conduct any activities covered under Part 61, it’s not subject to the NESHAP regulations under Part 61.

2. Does a source category under Part 63 cover your facility?

If your facility does not fall under any source category identified in Part 63, it’s not subject to a NESHAP. However, if your facility is covered by a source category, you must then determine whether your facility is a major source or an area source.

Note that most source categories are regulated under Part 63, but a few are regulated under Part 61 in Subparts BB, C, D, E, F, FF, L, M, N, O, and P.

3. Does your facility qualify as a major source or an area source under Part 63?

A major source is any facility or group of facilities located on the same property under common control that emits or has the potential to emit either:

  • 10 tons or more per year of any HAP, or
  • 25 tons or more per year of any combination of HAPs.

An area source is any facility or group of facilities that emit HAPs below the major source thresholds.

It’s important to distinguish between major and area sources because both types have applicable NESHAPs based on different standards. Maximum Achievable Control Technology (MACT) standards apply to major sources and reflect the maximum degree of HAP emission reduction possible. Some area sources are subject to Generally Available Control Technologies standards, which are typically less stringent than MACT standards and require minimum management practices to reduce HAP emissions.

If your facility falls under a source category and is either a major source or an area source with an applicable NESHAP, it’s subject to the NESHAP regulations under Part 63.

Tips to avoid NESHAP mishaps

Help keep your facility compliant with these tips:

  • Remember that NESHAPs are different from Title V operating permits, which require different compliance actions. Major sources and some area sources are required to obtain Title V operating permits.
  • Check EPA’s Federal Register page regularly for proposed and final rules about NESHAPs. Determine whether your facility could or will be affected. Note any new NESHAP compliance deadlines to ensure your facility stays on track to meet the requirements.
  • Evaluate the state requirements. EPA has delegated authority to many states to implement and enforce NESHAPs, and states may make minor changes to the rules.

Key to remember: The first step of compliance with the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants is to determine whether your facility is covered by the regulations.

2024-01-30T06:00:00Z

EPA Final Rule: Safe Drinking Water Act Test Procedures Amendments

This action announces the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA's) approval of alternative testing methods for use in measuring the levels of contaminants in drinking water to determine compliance with national primary drinking water regulations. The Safe Drinking Water Act authorizes EPA to approve the use of alternative testing methods through publication in the Federal Register . EPA is using this streamlined authority to make 93 additional methods available for analyzing drinking water samples. This expedited approach provides public water systems, laboratories, and primacy agencies with more timely access to new measurement techniques and greater flexibility in the selection of analytical methods, thereby reducing monitoring costs while maintaining public health protection.

DATES: This action is effective January 30, 2024, published in the Federal Register January 30, 2024, page 5773.

View final rule.

Appendix A to Subpart C of Part 141—Alternative Testing Methods Approved for Analyses Under the Safe Drinking Water Act
Table Alternative Testing Methods for Contaminants Listed at 40 CFR 141.23(k)(1)RevisedView text
Table Alternative Testing Methods for Contaminants Listed at 40 CFR 141.24(e)(1)RevisedView text
Table Alternative Testing Methods for Contaminants Listed at 40 CFR 141.25(a)RevisedView text
Table Alternative Testing Methods for Contaminants Listed at 40 CFR 141.74(a)(1)RevisedView text
Table Alternative Testing Methods for Disinfectant Residuals Listed at 40 CFR 141.74(a)(2)RevisedView text
Table Alternative Testing Methods for Contaminants Listed at 40 CFR 141.131(b)(1)RevisedView text
Table Alternative Testing Methods for Disinfectant Residuals Listed at 40 CFR 141.131(c)(1)RevisedView text
Table Alternative Testing Methods for Parameters Listed at 40 CFR 141.131(d)RevisedView text
Table Alternative Testing Methods for Contaminants Listed at 40 CFR 141.402(c)(2)RevisedView text
Table Alternative Testing Methods for Contaminants Listed at 40 CFR 141.852(a)(5)RevisedView text
Table Alternative Testing Methods for Contaminants Listed at 40 CFR 143.4(b) RevisedView text

Previous Text

Appendix A to Subpart C of Part 141—Alternative Testing Methods Approved for Analyses Under the Safe Drinking Water Act

* * * *

Alternative Testing Methods for Contaminants Listed at 40 CFR 141.23(k)(1)
ContaminantMethodologyEPA method SM 21st edition 1 SM 22nd edition 28 SM 23rd edition 49 SM Online 3 ASTM 4Other
AlkalinityTitrimetric2320 B2320 B2320 BD1067-06 B, 11 B, 16 B
AntimonyHydride—Atomic AbsorptionD 3697-07, -12, -17
Atomic Absorption; Furnace3113 B3113 B3113 B3113 B-04, B-10
Axially viewed inductively coupled plasma-atomic emission spectrometry (AVICP-AES) 200.5, Revision 4.2 2
ArsenicAtomic Absorption; Furnace3113 B3113 B3113 B3113 B-04, B-10D 2972-08 C, -15 C
Hydride Atomic Absorption3114 B3114 B3114 B3114 B-09D 2972-08 B, -15 B
Axially viewed inductively coupled plasma-atomic emission spectrometry (AVICP-AES) 200.5, Revision 4.2 2
BariumInductively Coupled Plasma3120 B3120 B3120 B
Atomic Absorption; Direct3111 D3111 D3111 D
Atomic Absorption; Furnace3113 B3113 B3113 B3113 B-04, B-10
Axially viewed inductively coupled plasma-atomic emission spectrometry (AVICP-AES) 200.5, Revision 4.2 2
BerylliumInductively Coupled Plasma3120 B3120 B3120 B
Atomic Absorption; Furnace3113 B3113 B3113 B3113 B-04, B-10D 3645-08 B, -15 B
Axially viewed inductively coupled plasma-atomic emission spectrometry (AVICP-AES) 200.5, Revision 4.2 2
CadmiumAtomic Absorption; Furnace3113 B3113 B3113 B3113 B-04, B-10
Axially viewed inductively coupled plasma-atomic emission spectrometry (AVICP-AES) 200.5, Revision 4.2 2
CalciumEDTA titrimetric3500-Ca B3500-Ca B3500-Ca BD 511-09, -14 A
Atomic Absorption; Direct Aspiration3111 B3111 B3111 BD 511-09, -14 B
Inductively Coupled Plasma3120 B3120 B3120 B
Axially viewed inductively coupled plasma-atomic emission spectrometry (AVICP-AES) 200.5, Revision 4.2 2
Ion ChromatographyD 6919-09, -17
ChromiumInductively Coupled Plasma3120 B3120 B3120 B
Atomic Absorption; Furnace3113 B3113 B3113 B3113 B-04, B-10
Axially viewed inductively coupled plasma-atomic emission spectrometry (AVICP-AES) 200.5, Revision 4.2 2
CopperAtomic Absorption; Furnace3113 B3113 B3113 B3113 B-04, B-10D 1688-07, -12 C, -17 C
Atomic Absorption; Direct Aspiration3111 B3111 B3111 BD 1688-07, -12 A, -17 A
Inductively Coupled Plasma3120 B3120 B3120 B
Axially viewed inductively coupled plasma-atomic emission spectrometry (AVICP-AES) 200.5, Revision 4.2 2
Colorimetry Hach Method 8026. 35 Hach Method 10272 36
ConductivityConductance2510 B2510 B2510 BD 1125-14 A
Cyanide Manual Distillation with MgCl 2 followed by: 4500-CN C4500-CN C4500-CN C4500-CN C-99D 2036-06 A
Spectrophotometric, Amenable4500-CN G4500-CN G4500-CN GD 2036-06 B
Spectrophotometric Manual4500-CN E4500-CN E4500-CN ED2036-06 A
Selective Electrode4500-CN F4500-CN F4500-CN F
Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry Headspace ME355.01. 7
FluorideIon Chromatography4110 B4110 B4110 BD 4327-11, -17
Manual Distillation; Colorimetric SPADNS4500-F B, D4500-F B, D4500-F B, D
Manual Electrode4500-F C4500-F C4500-F CD 1179-04, 10 B, 16 B
Automated Alizarin4500-F E4500-F E4500-F E
Arsenite-Free Colorimetric SPADNS Hach SPADNS. 2 Method 10225. 22
LeadAtomic Absorption; Furnace3113 B3113 B3113 B3113 B-04, B-10D 3559-08 D, -15 D
Axially viewed inductively coupled plasma-atomic emission spectrometry (AVICP-AES) 200.5, Revision 4.2 2
Differential Pulse Anodic Stripping Voltametry Method 1001, Rev. 1.1 57
MagnesiumAtomic Absorption3111 B3111 B3111 BD 511-09, -14 B
Inductively Coupled Plasma3120 B3120 B3120 B
Complexation Titrimetric Methods3500-Mg B3500-Mg B3500-Mg BD 511-09, -14 A
Axially viewed inductively coupled plasma-atomic emission spectrometry (AVICP-AES) 200.5, Revision 4.2 2
Ion ChromatographyD 6919-09, -17
MercuryManual, Cold Vapor3112 B3112 B3112 B3112 B-09D 3223-12, -17
NickelInductively Coupled Plasma3120 B3120 B3120 B
Atomic Absorption; Direct3111 B3111 B3111 B
Atomic Absorption; Furnace3113 B3113 B3113 B3113 B-04, B-10
Axially viewed inductively coupled plasma-atomic emission spectrometry (AVICP-AES) 200.5, Revision 4.2 2
NitrateIon Chromatography4110 B4110 B4110 BD 4327-11, -17
Automated Cadmium Reduction 4500-NO 3 F 4500-NO 3 F 4500-NO 3 F
Manual Cadmium Reduction 4500-NO 3 E 4500-NO 3 E 4500-NO 3 E
Ion Selective Electrode 4500-NO 3 D 4500-NO 3 D 4500-NO 3 D
Reduction/Colorimetric Systea Easy (1-Reagent). 8 NECi Nitrate-Reductase. 40
Colorimetric; Direct Hach TNTplus TM 835/836 Method 10206. 23
Capillary Ion ElectrophoresisD 6508-15
NitriteIon Chromatography4110 B4110 B4110 BD 4327-11, -17
Automated Cadmium Reduction 4500-NO 3 F 4500-NO 3 F 4500-NO 3 F
Manual Cadmium Reduction 4500-NO 3 E 4500-NO 3 E 4500-NO 3 E
Spectrophotometric 4500-NO 2 B 4500-NO 2 B 4500-NO 2 B
Reduction/Colorimetric Systea Easy (1-Reagent). 8 NECi Nitrate-Reductase. 40
Capillary Ion ElectrophoresisD 6508-15
Ortho-phosphateIon Chromatography4110 B4110 B4110 BD 4327-11, -17
Colorimetric, ascorbic acid, single reagent4500-P E4500-P E4500-P E4500-P E-99
Colorimetric, Automated, Ascorbic Acid4500-P F4500-P F4500-P F4500-P F-99 Thermo Fisher Discrete Analyzer. 41
Capillary Ion ElectrophoresisD 6508-15
pHElectrometric 150.3 484500-H + B4500-H + B4500-H + BD 1293-12, -18
SeleniumHydride-Atomic Absorption3114 B3114 B3114 B3114 B-09D 3859-08 A, -15 A
Atomic Absorption; Furnace3113 B3113 B3113 B3113 B-04, B-10D 3859-08 B, -15 B
Axially viewed inductively coupled plasma-atomic emission spectrometry (AVICP-AES) 200.5, Revision 4.2 2
SilicaColorimetricD859-05, 10, 16
Molybdosilicate 4500-SiO 2 C 4500-SiO 2 C 4500-SiO 2 C
Heteropoly blue 4500-SiO 2 D 4500-SiO 2 D 4500-SiO 2 D
Automated for Molybdate-reactive Silica 4500-SiO 2 E 4500-SiO 2 E 4500-SiO 2 E
Axially viewed inductively coupled plasma-atomic emission spectrometry (AVICP-AES) 200.5, Revision 4.2 2
Inductively Coupled Plasma3120 B3120 B3120 B
SodiumAtomic Absorption; Direct Aspiration3111 B3111 B3111 B
Axially viewed inductively coupled plasma-atomic emission spectrometry (AVICP-AES) 200.5, Revision 4.2 2
Ion ChromatographyD 6919-09, -17
TemperatureThermometric2550255025502550-10

Alternative Testing Methods for Contaminants Listed at 40 CFR 141.24(e)(1)
ContaminantMethodologyEPA method SM 21st edition 1 SM 22nd edition, 28 SM 23rd edition 49 SM Online 3 ASTM 4Other
BenzenePurge &Trap/Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry9 524.3, 29 524.4.
Carbon tetrachloridePurge &Trap/Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry9 524.3, 29 524.4.
ChlorobenzenePurge &Trap/Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry9 524.3, 29 524.4.
1,2-DichlorobenzenePurge &Trap/Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry9 524.3, 29 524.4.
1,4-DichlorobenzenePurge &Trap/Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry9 524.3, 29 524.4.
1,2-DichloroethanePurge &Trap/Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry9 524.3, 29 524.4.
cis-DichloroethylenePurge &Trap/Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry9 524.3, 29 524.4.
trans-DichloroethylenePurge &Trap/Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry9 524.3, 29 524.4.
DichloromethanePurge &Trap/Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry9 524.3, 29 524.4.
1,2-DichloropropanePurge &Trap/Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry9 524.3, 29 524.4.
EthylbenzenePurge &Trap/Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry9 524.3, 29 524.4.
StyrenePurge &Trap/Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry9 524.3, 29 524.4.
TetrachloroethylenePurge &Trap/Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry9 524.3, 29 524.4.
1,1,1-TrichloroethanePurge &Trap/Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry9 524.3, 29 524.4.
TrichloroethylenePurge &Trap/Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry9 524.3, 29 524.4.
ToluenePurge &Trap/Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry9 524.3, 29 524.4.
1,2,4-TrichlorobenzenePurge &Trap/Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry9 524.3, 29 524.4.
1,1-DichloroethylenePurge &Trap/Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry9 524.3, 29 524.4.
1,1,2-TrichlorethanePurge &Trap/Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry9 524.3, 29 524.4.
Vinyl chloridePurge &Trap/Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry9 524.3, 29 524.4.
Xylenes (total)Purge &Trap/Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry9 524.3, 29 524.4.
2,4-DGas Chromatography/Electron Capture Detection (GC/ECD)6640 B6640 B6640 B-01, B-06D 5317-20.
2,4,5-TP (Silvex)Gas Chromatography/Electron Capture Detection (GC/ECD)6640 B6640 B6640 B-01, B-06D 5317-20.
AlachlorSolid Phase Extraction/Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry (GC/MS)24 525.3.
AtrazineLiquid Chromatography Electrospray Ionization Tandem Mass Spectrometry (LC/ESI-MS/MS)25 536.
Solid Phase Extraction/Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry (GC/MS)24 525.3, 26 523.
Benzo(a)pyreneSolid Phase Extraction/Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry (GC/MS)24 525.3.
CarbofuranHigh-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) with post-column derivatization and fluorescence detection6610 B6610 B6610 B-04.
Liquid Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry58 ME 531
ChlordaneSolid Phase Extraction/Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry (GC/MS)24 525.3
DalaponIon Chromatography Electrospray Ionization Tandem Mass Spectrometry (IC-ESI-MS/MS)14 557.
Gas Chromatography/Electron Capture Detection (GC/ECD)6640 B6640 B6640 B-01, B-06.
Di(2-ethylhexyl)adipateSolid Phase Extraction/Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry (GC/MS)24 525.3.
Di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalateSolid Phase Extraction/Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry (GC/MS)24 525.3.
Dibromochloropropane (DBCP)Purge &Trap/Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry9 524.3.
DinosebGas Chromatography/Electron Capture Detection (GC/ECD)6640 B6640 B6640 B-01, B-06.
EndrinSolid Phase Extraction/Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry (GC/MS)24 525.3.
Ethyl dibromide (EDB)Purge &Trap/Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry9 524.3.
GlyphosateHigh-Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) with Post-Column Derivatization and Fluorescence Detection6651 B6651 B6651 B-00, B-05.
HeptachlorSolid Phase Extraction/Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry (GC/MS)24 525.3.
Heptachlor EpoxideSolid Phase Extraction/Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry (GC/MS)24 525.3.
HexachlorobenzeneSolid Phase Extraction/Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry (GC/MS)24 525.3.
Hexachlorocyclo-pentadieneSolid Phase Extraction/Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry (GC/MS)24 525.3.
LindaneSolid Phase Extraction/Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry (GC/MS)24 525.3.
MethoxychlorSolid Phase Extraction/Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry (GC/MS)24 525.3.
OxamylHigh-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) with post-column derivatization and fluorescence detection6610 B6610 B6610 B-04.
Liquid Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry58 ME 531.
PCBs (as Aroclors)Solid Phase Extraction/Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry (GC/MS)24 525.3.
PentachlorophenolGas Chromatography/Electron Capture Detection (GC/ECD)6640 B6640 B6640 B-01, B-06D 5317-20.
Solid Phase Extraction/Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry (GC/MS)24 525.3.
PicloramGas Chromatography/Electron Capture Detection (GC/ECD)6640 B6640 B6640 B-01, B-06D 5317-20.
SimazineLiquid Chromatography Electrospray Ionization Tandem Mass Spectrometry (LC/ESI-MS/MS)25 536.
Solid Phase Extraction/Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry (GC/MS)24 525.3, 26 523.
ToxapheneSolid Phase Extraction/Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry (GC/MS)24 525.3.
Total TrihalomethanesPurge &Trap/Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry9 524.3, 29 524.4.

Alternative Testing Methods for Contaminants Listed at 40 CFR 141.25(a)
ContaminantMethodologyEPA method SM 21st edition 1 SM 22nd edition, 28 SM 23rd edition 49 ASTM 4 SM Online 3
Naturally Occurring:
Gross alpha and betaEvaporation 900.0, Rev. 1.0 507110 B7110 B
Liquid ScintillationD 7283-177110 D-17.
Gross alphaCoprecipitation7110 C7110 C
Radium 226Radon emanation 903.1, Rev. 1.0 537500-Ra C7500-Ra CD 3454-05, -18
Radiochemical 903.0, Rev. 1.0 547500-Ra B7500-Ra BD 2460-07
Gamma Spectrometry7500-Ra E7500-Ra E-07.
Radium 228 Radiochemical 904.0, Rev. 1.0  627500-Ra D7500-Ra D.
Gamma Spectrometry7500-Ra E7500-Ra E-07.
UraniumRadiochemical7500-U B7500-U B
ICP-MS3125D 5673-05, 10, 16
Alpha spectrometry7500-U C7500-U CD 3972-09
Laser PhosphorimetryD 5174-07
Alpha Liquid Scintillation SpectrometryD 6239-09
Man-Made:
Radioactive CesiumRadiochemical7500-Cs B7500-Cs B
Gamma Ray Spectrometry71207120D 3649-06
Radioactive Iodine Radiochemical7500-I B, 7500-I C, 7500-I D7500-I B, 7500-I C, 7500-I DD 3649-06.
Gamma Ray Spectrometry71207120D 4785-08, -20.
Radioactive Strontium 89, 90Radiochemical7500-Sr B7500-Sr B
Tritium Liquid Scintillation 7500- 3 H B 7500- 3 H B D 4107-08, -20
Gamma Emitters Gamma Ray Spectrometry7120, 7500-Cs B, 7500-I B7120, 7500-Cs B, 7500-I BD 3649-06, D 4785-08, -20

Alternative Testing Methods for Contaminants Listed at 40 CFR 141.74(a)(1)
OrganismMethodology SM 21st edition 1 SM 22nd edition 28 SM 23rd edition 49 SM Online 3Other
Total ColiformTotal Coliform Fermentation Technique9221 A, B, C9221 A, B, C9221 A, B, C9221 A,B,C-06
Total Coliform Membrane Filter Technique9222 A, B, C9222 A, B, C.
ONPG-MUG Test92239223 B9223 B9223 B-04.
Fecal ColiformsFecal Coliform Procedure9221 E9221 E9221 E9221 E-06.
Fecal Coliform Filter Procedure9222 D9222 D9222 D9222 D-06.
Heterotrophic bacteriaPour Plate Method9215 B9215 B9215 B9215 B-04.
Turbidity Nephelometric Method2130 B2130 B2130 B Hach Method 8195, Rev. 3.0. 52
Laser Nephelometry (on-line) Mitchell M5271, 10 Mitchell M5331, Rev. 1.2, 42 Lovibond PTV 6000. 46
LED Nephelometry (on-line) Mitchell M5331, 11 Mitchell M5331, Rev. 1.2  42 , Lovibond PTV 2000. 45
LED Nephelometry (on-line) AMI Turbiwell, 15 Lovibond PTV 1000. 44
LED Nephelometry (portable) Orion AQ4500, 12 Lovibond TB 3500, 64 Lovibond TB 5000. 65
Laser Nephelometry (portable) Lovibond TB 6000  63.
360° Nephelometry Hach Method 10258, Rev. 1.0, 39 Hach Method 10258, Rev. 2.0. 51

Alternative Testing Methods for Disinfectant Residuals Listed at 40 CFR 141.74(a)(2)
ResidualMethodologyEPA methods SM 21st edition 1 SM 22nd edition 28 , SM 23rd edition 49 ASTM 4Other
Free ChlorineAmperometric Titration4500-Cl D4500-Cl DD 1253-08, -14
DPD Ferrous Titrimetric4500-Cl F4500-Cl F
DPD Colorimetric4500-Cl G4500-Cl G Hach Method 10260. 31
Indophenol Colorimetric Hach Method 10241. 34
Syringaldazine (FACTS)4500-Cl H4500-Cl H
On-line Chlorine Analyzer 334.0 16
Amperometric Sensor ChloroSense 17 , ChloroSense Rev. 1.1. 59
Total ChlorineAmperometric Titration4500-Cl D4500-Cl DD 1253-08, -14
Amperometric Titration (Low level measurement)4500-Cl E4500-Cl E
DPD Ferrous Titrimetric4500-Cl F4500-Cl F
DPD Colorimetric4500-Cl G4500-Cl G Hach Method 10260. 31
Iodometric Electrode4500-Cl I4500-Cl I
On-line Chlorine Analyzer 334.0 16
Amperometric Sensor ChloroSense 17 , ChloroSense, Rev. 1.1. 59
Indophenol Colorimetric 127. 55
Chlorine DioxideAmperometric Titration 4500-ClO 2 C 4500-ClO 2 C
Amperometric Titration 4500-ClO 2 E 4500-ClO 2 E
Amperometric Sensor ChlordioX Plus 32 , ChlordioX Plus, Rev. 1.1. 60
OzoneIndigo Method 4500-O 3 B 4500-O 3 B

Alternative Testing Methods for Contaminants Listed at 40 CFR 141.131(b)(1)
ContaminantMethodologyEPA method ASTM 4 SM online 3 SM 21st edition 1 SM 22nd edition, 28 SM 23rd edition 49Other
TTHMP&T/GC/MS 524.3, 9 524.4. 29
HAA5LLE (diazomethane)/GC/ECD6251 B-076251 B6251 B.
Ion Chromatography Electrospray Ionization Tandem Mass Spectrometry (IC-ESI-MS/MS) 557. 14
Two-Dimensional Ion Chromatography (IC) with Suppressed Conductivity Detection Thermo Fisher 557.1. 47
BromateTwo-Dimensional Ion Chromatography (IC) 302.0. 18
Ion Chromatography Electrospray Ionization Tandem Mass Spectrometry (IC-ESI-MS/MS) 557. 14
Chemically Suppressed Ion ChromatographyD 6581-08 A.
Electrolytically Suppressed Ion ChromatographyD 6581-08 B.
ChloriteChemically Suppressed Ion ChromatographyD 6581-08 A.
Electrolytically Suppressed Ion ChromatographyD 6581-08 B.
Chlorite—daily monitoring as prescribed in 40 CFR 141.132(b)(2)(i)(A)Amperometric Titration Amperometric Sensor 4500-ClO 2 E 4500-ClO 2 E ChlordioX Plus 32 , ChlordioX Plus, Rev. 1.1. 60

Alternative Testing Methods for Disinfectant Residuals Listed at 40 CFR 141.131(c)(1)
ResidualMethodology SM 21st edition 1 SM 22nd edition, 28 SM 23rd edition 49 ASTM 4Other
Free ChlorineAmperometric Titration4500-Cl D4500-Cl DD 1253-08, -14
DPD Ferrous Titrimetric4500-Cl F4500-Cl F
DPD Colorimetric4500-Cl G4500-Cl G Hach Method 10260. 31
Indophenol Colorimetric Hach Method 10241. 34
Syringaldazine (FACTS)4500-Cl H4500-Cl H
Amperometric Sensor ChloroSense 17 , ChloroSense, Rev. 1.1. 59
On-line Chlorine Analyzer EPA 334.0. 16
Combined ChlorineAmperometric Titration4500-Cl D4500-Cl DD 1253-08, -14.
DPD Ferrous Titrimetric4500-Cl F4500-Cl F
DPD Colorimetric4500-Cl G4500-Cl G Hach Method 10260. 31
Total ChlorineAmperometric Titration4500-Cl D4500-Cl DD 1253-08, -14
Low level Amperometric Titration4500-Cl E4500-Cl E
DPD Ferrous Titrimetric4500-Cl F4500-Cl F
DPD Colorimetric4500-Cl G4500-Cl G Hach Method 10260. 31
Iodometric Electrode4500-Cl I4500-Cl I
Amperometric Sensor ChloroSense, 17 ChloroSense, Rev. 1.1. 59
On-line Chlorine Analyzer
On-line Chlorine Analyzer EPA 334.0. 16
Chlorine DioxideAmperometric Method II 4500-ClO 2 E 4500-ClO 2 E
Amperometric Sensor ChlordioX Plus, 32 ChlordioX Plus, Rev. 1.1. 60

Alternative Testing Methods for Parameters Listed at 40 CFR 141.131(d)
ParameterMethodology SM 21st edition 1 SM 22nd edition 28 SM 23rd edition 49 SM online 3EPAOther
Total Organic Carbon (TOC)High Temperature Combustion5310 B5310 B5310 B 415.3, Rev 1.2. 19
Persulfate-Ultraviolet or Heated Persulfate Oxidation5310 C5310 C5310 C 415.3, Rev 1.2. 19 Hach Method 10267. 38
Wet Oxidation5310 D5310 D 415.3, Rev 1.2. 19
Ozone Oxidation Hach Method 10261. 37
Specific Ultraviolet Absorbance (SUVA) Calculation using DOC and UV 254 data 415.3, Rev 1.2. 19
Dissolved Organic Carbon (DOC)High Temperature Combustion5310 B5310 B5310 B 415.3, Rev 1.2. 19
Persulfate-Ultraviolet or Heated Persulfate Oxidation5310 C5310 C5310 C 415.3, Rev 1.2. 19
Wet Oxidation5310 D5310 D 415.3, Rev 1.2. 19
Ultraviolet absorption at 254 nm (UV 254) Spectrophotometry5910 B5910 B5910 B5910 B-11 415.3, Rev 1.2. 19

Alternative Testing Methods for Contaminants Listed at 40 CFR 141.402(c)(2)
OrganismMethodology SM 20th edition 6 SM 21st edition 1 SM 22nd edition 28 SM 23rd edition 49 SM online 3Other
E. coliColilert9223 B9223 B9223 B9223 B-97, B-04
Colisure9223 B9223 B9223 B9223 B-97, B-04
Colilert-189223 B9223 B9223 B9223 B9223 B-97, B-04
Readycult® Readycult®. 20
Colitag Modified Colitag 13 , Modified Colitag, Version 2.0. 61
Chromocult® Chromocult®. 21
EC-MUG9221 F9221 F9221 F-06
NA-MUG9222 I
m-ColiBlue24 Test9222 J
EnterococciMultiple-Tube Technique9230 B-04.
Membrane Filter Techniques9230 C.
Fluorogenic Substrate Enterococcus Test (using Enterolert)9230 D.
ColiphageTwo-Step Enrichment Presence-Absence Procedure Fast Phage. 30

Alternative Testing Methods for Contaminants Listed at 40 CFR 141.852(a)(5)
OrganismMethodology categoryMethod SM 20th, 21st editions 1 6 SM 22nd edition 28 SM 23rd edition 49 SM online 3
Total ColiformsLactose Fermentation MethodsStandard Total Coliform Fermentation Technique9221 B.1, B.29221 B.1, B.2, B.3, B.49221 B.1, B.2-06.
Presence-Absence (P-A) Coliform Test9221 D.1, D.2, D.3
Membrane Filtration MethodsStandard Total Coliform Membrane Filter Procedure using Endo Media9222 B, C.
Simultaneous Detection of Total Coliforms and E. coli by Dual Chromogen Membrane Filter Procedure (using mColiBlue24 medium) 9222 J.
Simultaneous Detection of Total Coliform Bacteria and Escherichia coli Using RAPID' E.coli (REC2) in Drinking Water. 56
Enzyme Substrate MethodsColilert®9223 B9223 B9223 B-04
Colisure®9223 B9223 B9223 B-04.
Colilert-189223 B9223 B9223 B9223 B-04.
Tecta EC/TC. 33 43
Modified Colitag TM , Version 2.0. 61
Escherichia coliEscherichia coli Procedure (following Lactose Fermentation Methods) EC-MUG medium9221 F.19221 F.19221 F.1-06.
Escherichia coli Partitioning Methods (following Membrane Filtration Methods) EC broth with MUG (EC-MUG)9222 H.
NA-MUG medium9222 I.
Simultaneous Detection of Total Coliforms and E. coli by Dual Chromogen Membrane Filter Procedure mColiBlue24 medium9222 J.
Membrane Filtration Method Simultaneous Detection of Total Coliform Bacteria and Escherichia coli Using RAPID' E.coli (REC2) in Drinking Water. 56
Enzyme Substrate MethodsColilert®9223 B9223 B9223 B-04.
Colisure®9223 B9223 B9223 B-04.
Colilert-189223 B9223 B9223 B9223 B-04.
Tecta EC/TC. 33 43
Modified Colitag TM , Version 2.0. 61

Alternative Testing Methods for Contaminants Listed at 40 CFR 143.4(b)
ContaminantMethodologyEPA method ASTM 4 SM 21st edition 1 SM 22nd edition, 28 SM 23rd edition 49 SM online 3
AluminumAxially viewed inductively coupled plasma-atomic emission spectrometry (AVICP-AES) 200.5, Revision 4.2. 2
Atomic Absorption; Direct3111 D3111 D.
Atomic Absorption; Furnace3113 B3113 B3113 B-04, B-10.
Inductively Coupled Plasma3120 B3120 B.
ChlorideSilver Nitrate TitrationD 512-04 B, 12 B 4500-Cl - B 4500-Cl - B
Ion ChromatographyD 4327-11, -174110 B4110 B
Potentiometric Titration 4500-Cl - D 4500-Cl - D
ColorVisual Comparison2120 B2120 B.
Foaming AgentsMethylene Blue Active Substances (MBAS)5540 C5540 C.
IronAxially viewed inductively coupled plasma-atomic emission spectrometry (AVICP-AES) 200.5, Revision 4.2. 2
Atomic Absorption; Direct3111 B3111 B.
Atomic Absorption; Furnace3113 B3113 B3113 B-04, B-10.
Inductively Coupled Plasma3120 B3120 B.
ManganeseAxially viewed inductively coupled plasma-atomic emission spectrometry (AVICP-AES) 200.5, Revision 4.2. 2
Atomic Absorption; Direct3111 B3111 B.
Atomic Absorption; Furnace3113 B3113 B3113 B-04, B-10.
Inductively Coupled Plasma3120 B3120 B.
OdorThreshold Odor Test2150 B2150 B.
SilverAxially viewed inductively coupled plasma-atomic emission spectrometry (AVICP-AES) 200.5, Revision 4.2. 2
Atomic Absorption; Direct3111 B3111 B.
Atomic Absorption; Furnace3113 B3113 B3113 B-04, B-10.
Inductively Coupled Plasma3120 B3120 B.
SulfateIon ChromatographyD 4327-11, -174110 B4110 B
Gravimetric with ignition of residue 4500-SO 4- C 4500-SO 4- C 4500-SO 4- C-97.
Gravimetric with drying of residue 4500-SO 4- D 4500-SO 4- D 4500-SO 4- D-97.
Turbidimetric methodD 516-07, 11, 16 4500-SO 4- E 4500-SO 4- E 4500-SO 4- E-97.
Automated methylthymol blue method 4500-SO 4- F 4500-SO 4- F 4500-SO 4- F-97.
Total Dissolved SolidsTotal Dissolved Solids Dried at 180 deg C2540 C2540 C.
ZincAxially viewed inductively coupled plasma-atomic emission spectrometry (AVICP-AES) 200.5, Revision 4.2. 2
Atomic Absorption; Direct Aspiration3111 B3111 B.
Inductively Coupled Plasma3120 B3120 B.
From sunlight to sediment: EPA enforces the Clean Water Act
2024-01-29T06:00:00Z

From sunlight to sediment: EPA enforces the Clean Water Act

In a recent settlement case, the EPA alleges that a construction company violated the Clean Water Act (CWA) and related state laws during the construction of solar farms in Alabama, Idaho, and Illinois between 2016 and 2022. In total the company will pay just over two million dollars to resolve the allegations. The states of Alabama and Illinois joined the EPA in the settlement. The amount to be paid will include civil penalties, mitigation, and restoration projects.

Case Study

Specifically, the company failed to comply with National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permits, designed to regulate construction site runoff. Solar farm construction involves clearing and grading large sections of land, which can lead to significant erosion and major runoff of sediment into waterways if stormwater controls at the site are inadequate. A complaint filed with the settlement alleges that during its construction of solar farms near American Falls, Idaho, Lafayette, Alabama, and Perry and White Counties, Illinois, the construction company failed to use proper stormwater controls, did not conduct regular site inspections by qualified personnel and did not accurately report and address stormwater issues. These are all requirements of the NPDES Construction General Permit. These combined breaches put waterways at risk from sediment-laden runoff, potentially harming aquatic life and jeopardizing downstream drinking water quality.

Learn more about stormwater in our EzExplanation

What is an NPDES permit?

The CWA bans discharging any type of industrial, municipal, and agricultural waste through a point source into a water of the United States unless they have an NPDES permit. The permit contains limits on what you can discharge, monitoring and reporting requirements, and other provisions to ensure that the discharge does not impact water quality. The permit interprets general requirements of the CWA into specific provisions tailored to the operations related to discharging pollutants. NPDES permits make sure that a state's mandatory standards for clean water and the federal minimums are being met.

CGP requirements

When it rains, water washes over the soil and things stored outside on a construction site. This water can pick up dirt, trash, and chemicals from the soil and carry them to nearby sewers or bodies of water. The CGP ensures that site operators have measures in place to prevent this pollution and keep the water clean for the community and the environment. Typically, if your construction activities disturb one or more acres of land, or will disturb less than one acre of land but are part of a common plan of development you will need to file for coverage under the CGP. Before submitting your Notice of Intent (NOI), the form you file to obtain coverage under the CGP, you must develop a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) outlines how you plan to implement erosion and sediment controls and meet other requirements of the permit on your construction site.

Additional CGP requirements include:

  • Inspections to verify compliance with permit. Inspections must be conducted by a qualified person who has either completed the EPA construction inspection course or similar program and passed the exam. Inspection records must be kept for at least three years after permit coverage is terminated or expires.
  • Routine maintenance and corrective action to fix problems with controls or discharges.
  • Turbidity monitoring requirements for dewatering discharges to sensitive waters (if applicable).
  • There might also be state, tribal or territory specific requirements.

Key to remember

Solar farms are important for helping to reduce the impact of climate change. However, the companies that build these solar farms need to follow certain rules to protect the environment, just like any other construction project.

2024-01-26T06:00:00Z

EPA Proposed Rule: Waste Emissions Charge for Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing a regulation to implement the requirements of the Clean Air Act (CAA) as specified in the Methane Emissions Reduction Program of the Inflation Reduction Act. This program requires the EPA to impose and collect an annual charge on methane emissions that exceed specified waste emissions thresholds from an owner or operator of an applicable facility that reports more than 25,000 metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent of greenhouse gases emitted per year pursuant to the petroleum and natural gas systems source category requirements of the Greenhouse Gas Reporting Rule. The proposal would implement calculation procedures, flexibilities, and exemptions related to the waste emissions charge and proposes to establish confidentiality determinations for data elements included in waste emissions charge filings.

DATES: This proposed rule is published in the Federal Register January 26, 2024, page 5318.

View proposed rule.

2024-01-23T06:00:00Z

EPA Proposed Rule: Revision of Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Meat and Poultry Products

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA or the Agency) is proposing a regulation to revise the technology-based effluent limitations guidelines and standards (ELGs) for the meat and poultry products (MPP) point source category. The proposed rule would improve water quality and protect human health and the environment by reducing the discharge of nutrients and other pollutants to the nation's surface waters. EPA is proposing several regulatory options, including the preferred option discussed in this notice. The preferred option is estimated to cost $232 million annually and reduce pollutant discharges by approximately 100 million pounds per year.

DATES: This proposed rule is published in the Federal Register January 23, 2024, page 4474.

View proposed rule.

See More

Most Recent Highlights In Safety & Health

Inactive PFAS rule activated: EPA must review before use
2024-01-19T06:00:00Z

Inactive PFAS rule activated: EPA must review before use

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) continues to add regulations to per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS). The new rule finalized in January 2024 prevents facilities from using inactive PFAS before EPA reviews the planned use and makes a risk determination.

This significant new use rule (SNUR) applies to the 329 PFAS designated as inactive on the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) Chemical Substance Inventory and aren’t yet subject to an existing SNUR. An inactive PFAS hasn’t been manufactured (including imported) or processed in the U.S. since June 21, 2006.

What are PFAS?

Also called “forever chemicals,” PFAS are a group of thousands of manufactured chemicals that are used widely in industry and consumer products. Many take a long time to break down and build up over time. They’re found nearly everywhere in water, air, soil, and consumer products, such as nonstick cookware, food packaging, clothing, and shampoo.

Some studies suggest that exposure to PFAS may lead to health issues. However, research continues since much remains unknown about the chemical substances. EPA regulates PFAS to prevent them from entering air, land, and water at levels that may harm human health and the environment.

What are the new SNUR requirements?

Under TSCA, EPA can determine that a certain use of a chemical substance is a “significant new use” and require anyone who wants to use the chemical substance for that purpose to first notify the agency. EPA will then conduct a review and risk determination. The new SNUR requires EPA to conduct reviews and risk determinations of the inactive PFAS before they can be used again.

If your facility wants to manufacture (including import) or process an inactive PFAS, notify EPA at least 90 days through a significant new use notice before beginning use. Once EPA receives the notification, the agency will:

  • Conduct a review to determine whether the new use presents an unreasonable risk to human health or the environment, and
  • Make a risk determination.

If the new use doesn’t present an unreasonable risk and EPA makes an affirmative determination, your facility can use the PFAS. However, if the new use presents an unreasonable risk, the agency must first regulate the activity before you can use the PFAS.

What are other recent regulations of PFAS?

Over the past three years, EPA has implemented the 2021–2024 PFAS Strategic Roadmap, the agency's comprehensive strategy to address the risks of PFAS exposure and contamination through specific regulatory actions. The agency focuses on three directives: researching the forever chemicals, restricting the release of them into the environment, and cleaning up PFAS-contaminated sites.

This final rule joins EPA’s other actions taken via the PFAS Strategic Roadmap. These include:

  • Designating all PFAS as chemicals of special concern, eliminating the de minimis reporting exemption that allowed facilities to avoid reporting PFAS used in small quantities;
  • Removing the de minimis supplier notification exemption for all listed chemicals of special concern to require suppliers to notify users of any chemicals of special concern present in mixtures; and
  • Requiring all manufacturers (including importers) of PFAS and PFAS-containing articles in any year since 2011 to report information on uses, production volumes, disposals, exposures, and hazards.

How does this affect you?

If your facility manufactures (including imports) or processes PFAS, you’ll likely face more regulations and reporting requirements. So, how can you remain compliant? Stay informed of EPA’s latest regulatory actions regarding PFAS. Consider these best practices:

  • Check EPA’s final rules published in the Federal Register regularly for PFAS-related regulations.
  • Review EPA’s proposed rules (also published in the Federal Register) to prepare for potential upcoming regulations.
  • Identify any applicable state PFAS regulations.

Also, consider the proactive approach to search for safer alternative chemicals you can substitute for PFAS. It’s vital to choose chemicals already reviewed by EPA to ensure the alternative option doesn’t also present an unreasonable risk to human health and the environment.

Key to remember: EPA continues to strengthen its regulation of PFAS. A new rule now prevents facilities from using any of the 300+ inactive PFAS before EPA conducts a risk determination and, if necessary, regulates the activity.

2024-01-18T06:00:00Z

EPA Final Rule: Mississippi: Final Approval of State Underground Storage Tank Program Revisions

The State of Mississippi (Mississippi or State) has applied to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) for final approval of revisions to its Underground Storage Tank Program (UST Program) under subtitle I of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Pursuant to RCRA, the EPA is taking direct final action, subject to public comment, to approve revisions to the UST Program. The EPA has reviewed Mississippi's revisions and has determined that these revisions satisfy all requirements needed for approval. In addition, this action also codifies the EPA's approval of Mississippi's revised UST Program and inCcorporates by reference those provisions of the State statutes and regulations that the EPA has determined meet the requirements for approval.

DATES:

This rule is effective March 18, 2024, published in the Federal Register January 18, 2024, page 3354.

View final rule.

§282.2 Incorporation by reference.
(b)(4)RevisedView text
§282.74 Mississippi State-Administered Program.
Entire sectionRevisedView text
Appendix A to Part 282 - State Requirements Incorporated by Reference in Part 282 of the Code of Federal Regulations
Entry for MississippiRevisedView text

New Text

§282.2 Incorporation by reference.

* * * *

(b)(4) Region 4 (Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee): 61 Forsyth Street, SW, Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960; Phone Number: (404) 562-9900.

§282.74 Mississippi State-Administered Program.

(a) History of the approval of Mississippi's program. The State of Mississippi (Mississippi or State) is approved to administer and enforce an underground storage tank (UST) program in lieu of the Federal program under subtitle I of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976 (RCRA), as amended, 42 U.S.C. 6991 et seq. The State's Underground Storage Tank Program (UST Program), as administered by the Mississippi Department of Environmental Quality (MDEQ), was approved by EPA pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 6991c and part 281 of this chapter. EPA approved the Mississippi UST Program on June 11, 1990, and it was effective on July 11, 1990. A subsequent program revision was approved by EPA and became effective March 18, 2024.

(b) Enforcement authority. Mississippi has primary responsibility for administering and enforcing its federally approved UST Program. However, EPA retains the authority to exercise its corrective action, inspection, and enforcement authorities under sections 9003(h), 9005, and 9006 of subtitle I of RCRA, 42 U.S.C. 6991b(h), 6991d, and 6991e, as well as under any other applicable statutory and regulatory provisions.

(c) Retention of program approval. To retain program approval, Mississippi must revise its approved UST Program to adopt new changes to the Federal subtitle I program which make it more stringent, in accordance with section 9004 of RCRA, 42 U.S.C. 6991c, and 40 CFR part 281, subpart E. If Mississippi obtains approval for revised requirements pursuant to section 9004 of RCRA, 42 U.S.C. 6991c, the newly approved statutory and regulatory provisions will be added to this subpart and notice of any change will be published in the Federal Register .

(d) Final approval. Mississippi has final approval for the following elements of its UST Program submitted to EPA and approved effective June 11, 1990, and the program revisions approved by EPA effective on March 18, 2024:

(1) State statutes and regulations— (i) Incorporation by reference. The Mississippi materials cited in this paragraph (d)(1)(i), and listed in appendix A to this part, are incorporated by reference as part of the UST Program under subtitle I of RCRA, 42 U.S.C. 6991 et seq. (See §282.2 for incorporation by reference approval and inspection information.) You may obtain copies of the Mississippi statutes and regulations that are incorporated by reference in this paragraph (d)(1)(i) from the Mississippi Department of Environmental Quality, P.O. Box 2261, Jackson, MS 29335; Phone number: (601) 961–5171; website: https://www.mdeq.ms.gov/water/groundwater-assessment-and-remediation/underground-storage-tanks/.

(A) “Mississippi Statutory Requirements Applicable to the Underground Storage Tank Program,” dated September 5, 2023.

(B) “Mississippi Regulatory Requirements Applicable to the Underground Storage Tank Program,” dated September 5, 2023.

(ii) Legal basis. EPA considered the following statutes and regulations which provide the legal basis for the State's implementation of the UST Program, but do not replace Federal authorities. Further, these provisions are not being incorporated by reference, unless the provisions place requirements on regulated entities.

(A) Mississippi Underground Storage Tank Act (the UST Act) of 1988, Miss. Code Ann. sections 49–17–401 to 49–17–435 (2022).

(1) Section 49–17–409, as to the first sentence, insofar as it provides for compliance monitoring and the promulgation of regulations for the reporting of releases.

(2) Section 49–17–413(1), insofar as it provides for compliance monitoring, and the promulgation of regulations for the implementation of the State UST Program.

(3) Section 49–17–415, insofar as it provides for compliance monitoring and establishes authority to conduct inspections, tests, and obtain information from owners.

(4) Section 49–17–419, insofar as it establishes authority over corrective action.

(5) Section 49–17–425, insofar as it provides for the sharing of information with EPA.

(6) Section 49–17–427, insofar as it provides for enforcement response, enforcement of orders, assessment of penalties under the UST Act, proceedings before the commission, and limitations on liability.

(7) Section 49–17–431, insofar as it provides for appeal of any decision by the commission or the director.

(B) Mississippi Air and Water Pollution Control Law, Miss. Code Ann. sections 49–17–27 and 49–17–31 to 49–17–41 (2020).

(1) Section 49–17–27, insofar as it provides for enforcement response and injunctive relief.

(2) Section 49–17–31, insofar as it provides for enforcement response, notice of violations, enforcement of regulations and orders, procedures for contested cases, and assessment of penalties.

(3) Section 49–17–33, insofar as it provides for hearing procedures, issuance of orders, and penalties.

(4) Section 49–17–35, insofar as it provides for enforcement response, public participation, and citizen intervention.

(5) Section 49–17–37, insofar as it provides for hearing procedures and transcripts.

(6) Section 49–17–39, insofar as it provides for the sharing of information with EPA.

(7) Section 49–17–41, insofar as it provides for appeal rights for aggrieved parties.

(C) Mississippi's Underground Storage Tank Regulations, 11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 5, Ch. 2 (2018).

(1) R. 2.3, 280.36, insofar as it provides for delivery prohibition and enforcement of the State UST Program.

(2) R. 2.6, 280.67, insofar as it provides for public participation in the corrective action process.

(D) Rule 24(a)(2) of the Mississippi Rules of Civil Procedure (1982), insofar as it provides for citizen intervention and public participation in the State enforcement process.

(iii) Other provisions not incorporated by reference. The following statutory and regulatory provisions applicable to the Mississippi UST Program are broader in scope than the Federal program, external to the State UST program approval requirements, or are being excluded for other reasons as noted below. Therefore, these provisions are not part of the approved UST Program and are not incorporated by reference in this section:

(A) Mississippi Underground Storage Tank Act (the UST Act) of 1988, Miss. Code Ann. sections 49–17–401 to 49–17–435 (2022).

(1) 49–17–403(b) is broader in scope as to the definition of “Bonded distributor,” insofar as it is associated with the regulation of entities other than owners and operators as these terms are defined in 40 CFR 280.12.

(2) Section 49–17–403(o) is broader in scope as to the definition of “Response action contractor,” insofar as it is associated with the regulation of entities other than owners and operators as these terms are defined in 40 CFR 280.12.

(3) Section 49–17–403(p) is broader in scope as to the definition of “Retailer,” insofar as it is associated with the regulation of entities other than owners and operators as these terms are defined in 40 CFR 280.12.

(4) Section 49–17–403(q) is broader in scope as to the definition of “Substantial compliance,” insofar as it relates to a State fund.

(5) Section 49–17–405 is broader in scope insofar as it provides for the creation of the Mississippi Groundwater Protection Trust Fund (State Fund), promulgation of regulations regarding the State Fund, criteria for qualified expenditure of funds, and liability of owners for fund expenditures.

(6) Section 49–17–407 is broader in scope insofar as it creates an environmental protection fee, provides limits on use of the State Fund, and addresses third party claims.

(7) Section 49–17–409 is broader in scope, all except for the first sentence, insofar as it provides for the eligibility requirements of the State Fund and reimbursement of costs from owners.

(8) Section 49–17–421 is broader in scope insofar as it establishes an annual tank regulatory fee.

(9) Section 49–17–422 is broader in scope insofar as it creates an Underground Storage Tank Advisory Council.

(10) Section 49–17–423 is broader in scope insofar as it pertains to the commission's administration of funds from the Leaking Underground Storage Tank Trust Fund.

(11) Section 49–17–429 is broader in scope insofar as it requires the certification of individuals to install, alter, or remove underground storage tanks and provides for the promulgation of regulations setting forth certification requirements.

(12) Section 49–17–433 is external insofar as it pertains to the severability of the State UST Act.

(13) Section 49–17–435 is external insofar as it contains reporting obligations on the State agency, not a regulated entity.

(B) Mississippi Air and Water Pollution Control Law, Miss. Code Ann. sections 49–17–27 and 49–17–31 to 49–17–41 (2020).

(1) Section 49–17–32 is external insofar as it does not pertain to the State UST Program.

(2) Section 49–17–34 is external insofar as it does not pertain to the State UST Program.

(3) Section 49–17–36 is external insofar as it does not pertain to the State UST Program.

(C) Mississippi's Groundwater Protection Trust Fund Regulations, 11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 5, Ch. 1 (2009) is broader in scope insofar as these provisions regulate Immediate Response Action Contractors, Environmental Response Action Contractors, and the State Fund.

(D) Mississippi's Underground Storage Tank Regulations, 11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 5, Ch. 2 (2018).

(1) R. 2.1, 280.12 is broader in scope as to the definition of “Ancillary equipment,” insofar as it pertains to dispensers.

(2) R. 2.1, 280.12 is broader in scope as to the definition of “Certificate of Operation,” insofar as it requires UST systems to be permitted by MDEQ and the payment of tank regulatory fees.

(3) R. 2.1, 280.12 is broader in scope as to the definition of “Motor fuel,” insofar as it includes 100% biodiesel or ethanol.

(4) R. 2.1, 280.12 is broader in scope as to the definition of “New tank system,” insofar as it includes dispensers as part of the new tank system.

(5) R. 2.1, 280.12 is broader in scope as to the definition of “Register,” insofar as it requires notification for installation, replacement, and change in operational status of a dispenser.

(6) R. 2.1, 280.12 is broader in scope as to the definition of “Replace,” insofar as it considers replacement of a dispenser to constitute a new UST system.

(7) R. 2.2, 280.20(j) is broader in scope insofar as it regulates shear valves.

(8) R. 2.2, 280.22(a) and (b) are broader in scope insofar as these provisions regulate dispensers.

(9) R. 2.3, 280.34(g) through (i) are broader in scope insofar as these provisions regulate dispensers.

(10) R. 2.3, 280.35(a)(4) is broader in scope insofar as it regulates dispensers.

(11) R. 2.3, 280.35(b)(1) is broader in scope insofar as it regulates shear valves.

(12) R. 2.3, 280.38(b)(1)(iii) is broader in scope insofar as it regulates shear valves.

(13) R. 2.8, 280.91(e) and (f), are excluded for other reasons. Paragraph (e) is excluded only insofar as it includes Indian tribes as a “local government entity,” and paragraph (f) is excluded insofar as EPA retains responsibility for implementing the Federal UST program in Indian country.

Note 1 to paragraph (d)(1)(iii)(D)(13).

MDEQ does not regulate any USTs on Indian lands and EPA retains responsibility for implementing the Federal UST program in Indian country. In a subsequent rulemaking, MDEQ will revise these provisions to remove references to the State's regulation of USTs in Indian country.

(14) R. 2.8, 280.92, is excluded for other reasons only insofar as the definition of “Local government” includes Indian tribes.

Note 2 to paragraph (d)(1)(iii)(D)(14).

MDEQ does not regulate any USTs on Indian lands and the EPA retains responsibility for implementing the Federal UST program in Indian country. In a subsequent rulemaking, MDEQ will revise the definition of “Local government” to exclude Indian tribes.

(15) R. 2.8, 280.100 is external insofar as it is not applicable in a State with an approved UST program.

(E) Mississippi's Underground Storage Tank Regulations for the Certification of Persons Who Install, Alter, and Remove Underground Storage Tanks, 11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 5, Ch. 3 (2018) is broader in scope insofar as these provisions provide for the certification and regulation of persons who install, alter, test, and permanently close underground storage tanks.

(2) Statement of legal authority. The Attorney General's Statement, signed by the Mississippi Attorney General on July 27, 2023, though not incorporated by reference, is referenced as part of the approved underground storage tank program under subtitle I of RCRA, 42 U.S.C. 6991 et seq.

(3) Demonstration of procedures for adequate enforcement. The “Demonstration of Adequate Enforcement Procedures” submitted in the application dated July 31, 2023, as amended on August 17, 2023, though not incorporated by reference, is referenced as part of the approved underground storage tank program under subtitle I of RCRA, 42 U.S.C. 6991 et seq.

(4) Program description. The program description submitted in the application dated July 31, 2023, as amended on August 17, 2023, though not incorporated by reference, is referenced as part of the approved underground storage tank program under subtitle I of RCRA, 42 U.S.C. 6991 et seq.

(5) Memorandum of Agreement. The Memorandum of Agreement between EPA Region 4 and the MDEQ, signed by the EPA Regional Administrator on October 12, 2018, though not incorporated by reference, is referenced as part of the approved underground storage tank program under subtitle I of RCRA, 42 U.S.C. 6991 et seq.

Appendix A to Part 282 - State Requirements Incorporated by Reference in Part 282 of the Code of Federal Regulations

* * * *

Mississippi

(a) The statutory provisions include:

Mississippi Underground Storage Tank Act (the UST Act) of 1988, Miss. Code Ann. sections 49–17–401 to 49–17–435 (2022):

49–17–401 Short Title.

49–17–403 Definitions, except (b), (o), (p), and (q).

49–17–411 Compliance with regulations.

49–17–413 Rules and regulations, except for (1).

49–17–417 Repealed.

Note to paragraph (a) of Appendix A to Part 282.

Miss. Code Ann. section 49–17–413(2) is approved as part of the State UST Program to the extent that Mississippi will not grant a variance that makes its UST Program less stringent than the Federal regulations. In practice, Mississippi does not grant variances for the UST Program. Mississippi has agreed to execute a revised Memorandum of Agreement with EPA stating that Mississippi will limit the scope of its variance authority to only those situations where the Federal regulations allow the implementing agency to approve flexibilities.

(b) The regulatory provisions include:

Mississippi's Underground Storage Tank Regulations, 11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 5, Ch. 2 (2018):

Rule 2.1 Program Scope and Interim Prohibition

280.10 Applicability.

280.11 Installation requirements for partially excluded UST systems.

280.12 Definitions, except for “dispensers” in the definition of “Ancillary equipment;” the definition of “Certificate of Operation;” “including 100% biodiesel or ethanol” from the definition of “Motor fuel;” “dispensers” and (c) from the definition of “New tank system;” “dispensers” from the definition of “Register;” “dispensers” and (c) from the definition of “Replace.”

280.13 Industry codes and recommended practices.

Rule 2.2 UST Systems: Design, Construction, Installation and Notification

280.20 Performance Standards for new UST systems, except for (j).

280.21 Upgrading of existing UST systems.

280.22 Notification requirements, except as applied to “dispensers” in (a) and (b).

Rule 2.3 General Operating Requirements

280.30 Operation and maintenance of spill and overfill prevention.

280.31 Operation and maintenance of secondary containment.

280.32 Operation and maintenance of corrosion protection.

280.33 Compatibility.

280.34 Repairs and replacements, except as applied to “dispenser(s)” in (g), (h), and (i).

280.35 Reporting recordkeeping, except as applied to “dispensers” in (a)(4); and except as applied to “shear valves” in (b)(1).

280.37 Operator training.

280.38 Operation and maintenance walkthrough inspections, except for (b)(1)(iii).

Rule 2.4 Leak Detection

280.40 General requirements for all UST systems.

280.41 Requirements for petroleum UST systems.

280.42 Requirements for hazardous substance UST systems.

280.43 Methods of leak detection for tanks.

280.44 Methods of leak detection for piping.

280.45 Leak detection recordkeeping.

Rule 2.5 Leak Reporting, Release Reporting, Investigation, and Confirmation

280.50 Reporting of leaks and suspected releases.

280.51 Investigation due to off-site impacts.

280.52 Release investigation and confirmation steps.

280.53 Reporting and cleanup of spills and overfills.

Rule 2.6 Release Response and Corrective Action for UST Systems Containing Petroleum or Hazardous Substances

280.60 General.

280.61 Initial response.

280.62 Initial abatement measures and site check.

280.63 Initial site characterization.

280.64 Free product removal.

280.65 Investigations for soil and ground-water cleanup.

280.66 Corrective action plan.

Rule 2.7 Out-of-Service UST Systems and Closure

280.70 Temporary closure.

280.71 Permanent closure and changes-in-service.

280.72 Assessing the site at closure or change-in-service.

280.73 Applicability to previously closed UST systems.

280.74 Closure records.

Rule 2.8 Financial Responsibility

280.90 Applicability.

280.91 Compliance dates, except for “including Indian tribes” in (e), and (f).

280.92 Definition of terms, except for “and includes Indian tribes” from the definition of “Local government.”

280.93 Amount and scope of required financial responsibility.

280.94 Allowable mechanisms and combinations of mechanisms.

280.95 Financial test of self-insurance.

280.96 Guarantee.

280.97 Insurance and risk retention group coverage.

280.98 Surety bond.

280.99 Letter of credit.

280.101 State fund or other State assurance.

280.102 Trust fund.

280.103 Standby trust fund.

280.104 Local government bond rating test.

280.105 Local government financial test.

280.106 Local government guarantee.

280.107 Local government fund.

280.108 Substitution of financial assurance mechanisms by owner or operator.

280.109 Cancellation or nonrenewal by a provider of financial assurance.

280.110 Reporting by owner or operator.

280.111 Recordkeeping.

280.112 Drawing on financial assurance mechanisms.

280.113 Release from the requirements.

280.114 Bankruptcy or other incapacity of owner or operator or provider of financial assurance.

280.115 Replenishment of guarantees, letters of credit, or surety bonds.

280.116 Suspension of enforcement. [Reserved]

Rule 2.9 Lender Liability

280.120 Definitions.

280.121 Participation in management.

280.122 Ownership of an underground storage tank or underground storage tank system or facility or property on which an underground storage tank or underground storage tank system is located.

280.123 Operating an underground storage tank or underground storage tank system.

Rule 2.10 UST Systems with Field-Constructed Tanks and Airport Hydrant Fuel Distribution Systems.

280.130 Definitions.

280.131 General requirements.

280.132 Additions, exceptions, and alternatives for UST systems with field-constructed tanks and airport hydrant systems.

Note to paragraph (b) of Appendix A to Part 282.

11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 5, Ch. 2, 280.42(b)(5) is approved as part of the UST Program only to the extent that Mississippi will not allow alternate release detection methods for hazardous substance UST systems installed on or after October 13, 2015. Sections 40 CFR 281.33(e) and 280.42(e) of the Federal regulations only allow alternate release detection methods for hazardous substance UST systems installed prior to October 13, 2015. Mississippi's section 280.42(b)(5) does not contain an analogous limitation on the use of alternative release detection methods. In practice, MDEQ does not allow alternative release detection methods for hazardous substance tanks installed after October 1, 2008. In a subsequent rulemaking, MDEQ will revise 11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 5, Ch. 2, R. 2.4, section 280.42(b)(5) to clarify this point.

(C) Copies of the Mississippi statutes and regulations that are incorporated by reference are available from the Mississippi Department of Environmental Quality, P.O. Box 2261, Jackson, MS 29335; Phone number: (601) 961–5171; website: https://www.mdeq.ms.gov/water/groundwater-assessment-and-remediation/underground-storage-tanks/.

Smoke signals: Battling the hazy maze of wildfire smoke
2024-01-17T06:00:00Z

Smoke signals: Battling the hazy maze of wildfire smoke

The increase in unhealthy air pollution produced by wildfires has intensified the challenges associated with protecting workers from exposure to this health hazard. However, this exposure can be reduced with knowledge, safe work practices, and appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE). It’s important for employers to have a plan in place to protect workers by preventing or minimizing exposure to hazardous air quality.

Wildfire smoke is composed of harmful chemicals and tiny particles of partially burned material less than 2.5 micrometers in diameter, which present a significant health hazard for workers exposed to it. These particles can enter the lungs and even the bloodstream, and are linked to serious or even fatal health effects, such as:

  • Reduced lung function,
  • Bronchitis,
  • Worsening asthma, and
  • Heart failure.

Taking action to reduce exposure

There are currently three states with regulations that specifically address the air quality index (AQI) as it relates to wildfire smoke:

  • California (Title 8, CCR 5141.1),
  • Oregon (OAR 437-002-1081 and OAR 437-004-9791), and
  • Washington (Chapter 296-820 WAC).

Absent any standard, all employers across the country have an obligation under the General Duty Clause to protect their workers from exposure to unhealthy levels of air pollutants due to wildfire smoke emissions.

Employers should take protective measures to reduce smoke exposure for outdoor workers including:

  • Monitoring air quality: Make it a point to frequently check the AQI in the area(s) where their workplace is located. This can be done by visiting the EPA’s AirNow site or using air quality monitoring devices.
  • Developing a wildfire smoke policy: Implement a policy that identifies how the workplace will respond to wildfire smoke events. This should include preparation and monitoring, when and how to act, and communication with employees.
  • Training employees: At a minimum, train employees on the health effects of wildfire smoke, adverse symptoms associated with exposure, and ways to protect themselves. They should also clearly understand any state-specific requirements.
  • Reducing, relocating or rescheduling work tasks: During times of elevated concern due to the AQI, reduce levels of physical activity, relocate employees or adjust work schedules to minimize exposure.
  • Improving indoor air quality: Keep all building windows, doors, bays, and other structure openings closed whenever possible. Ensure air is filtered by a mechanical ventilation system. Company vehicles should be equipped with cabin air filters.
  • Providing or allowing PPE: Allow NIOSH-approved respirators for voluntary use, unless otherwise required.
  • Keeping employees informed: Establish a system of communication that informs employees of the current AQI, any reduced or rescheduled work tasks or locations, and what protective measures are available to reduce wildfire smoke exposure.

Understanding air quality index

Air quality is a complex and evolving challenge. The EPA has established an AQI for five major air pollutants regulated by the Clean Air Act. Each of these pollutants has a national air quality standard set by EPA to protect public health:

  • Carbon monoxide,
  • Ground-level ozone,
  • Nitrogen dioxide,
  • Particle pollution (i.e., PM2.5 and PM10), and
  • Sulfur dioxide.

Employers must create protective measures to reduce employee exposure to these major air pollutants. When AQI values are above 100, as listed on the EPA’s AirNow.gov website, air quality is unhealthy: first for certain sensitive groups of people, then for everyone as AQI values increase.

Key to remember

Employers should have a plan to prevent employee exposure to dangerous air quality levels.

2024-01-11T06:00:00Z

EPA Final Rule: Significant New Use Rule

Under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA), EPA is finalizing a significant new use rule (SNUR) for 329 per- and poly-fluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) that are designated as inactive on the TSCA Chemical Substance Inventory. PFAS are a group of chemicals that have been used in industry and consumer products since the 1940s because of their useful properties, such as water and stain resistance. Many PFAS break down very slowly and can build up in people, animals, and the environment over time. Exposure at certain levels to specific PFAS can adversely impact human health and other living things. Persons subject to the final SNUR are required to notify EPA at least 90 days before commencing any manufacture (including import) or processing of the chemical substance for a significant new use. Once EPA receives a notification, EPA must review and make an affirmative determination on the notification, and take such action as is required by any such determination before the manufacture (including import) or processing for the significant new use can commence. Such a review will assess whether the new use may present unreasonable risk to health or the environment and ensure that EPA takes appropriate action as required to protect health or the environment.

DATES: This final rule is effective March 11, 2024, published in the Federal Register January 11, 2024, page 1822.

View final rule.

§9.1 OMB approvals under the Paperwork Reduction Act.
Entry for §721.11777AddedView text
§721.11777 Per- and poly-fluoroalkyl chemical substances designated as inactive on the TSCA Inventory.
Entire section AddedView text
2024-01-09T06:00:00Z

EPA Proposed Rule: Clarifications scope of requirements of operating permit programs

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) proposes to update its title V operating permit program regulations to more clearly reflect the EPA's existing interpretations and policies concerning when and whether “applicable requirements” established in other Clean Air Act (CAA or the Act) programs should be reviewed, modified, and/or implemented through the title V operating permits program. Specifically, this action clarifies the limited situations in which requirements under the New Source Review (NSR) preconstruction permitting program would be reviewed using the EPA's unique title V oversight authorities. Additionally, this action clarifies that requirements related to an owner or operator's general duty to prevent accidental releases of hazardous substances are not “applicable requirements” for title V purposes and are not implemented through title V.

DATES: This proposed rule is published in the Federal Register January 9, 2024, page 1150.

View proposed rule.

See More

Most Recent Highlights In Human Resources

Leap into Biennial Report compliance: Here’s what’s required
2024-01-05T06:00:00Z

Leap into Biennial Report compliance: Here’s what’s required

It’s a leap year in 2024, so facilities have an extra day to prepare the National Biennial Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) Hazardous Waste Report, commonly known as the Biennial Report.

Due by March 1st of every even-numbered year, the Biennial Report covers the hazardous waste activities regulated under RCRA Subtitle C that occurred during the preceding odd-numbered year (or reporting year). It describes each generated hazardous waste, how it was generated, how much was generated, and how it was managed. The report itself contains four forms:

  • RCRA Subtitle C Site Identification Form (Site ID Form),
  • Waste Generation and Management Form (GM Form),
  • Waste Received From Off-Site Form (WR Form), and
  • Off-Site Identification Form (OI Form).

It can sometimes feel like taking a leap in the dark when trying to complete the report, especially if you’re unfamiliar with any of the forms. This article takes a closer look at each form to shed light on what you need to accurately complete the Biennial Report.

First things first: Is your facility affected?

Facilities required to file a Biennial Report include those which, during any calendar month of a reporting year:

If your facility meets the definition of an LQG in any calendar month of a reporting year, you must complete a Biennial Report for the entire reporting year, not just the month(s) your facility was an LQG.

Check your facility’s state requirements! While very small quantity generators (VSQGs) and small quantity generators (SQGs) aren’t required to file the federal Biennial Report, states may have different reporting requirements and different generator categories. For example: California requires TSDFs to report annually, and Maine requires annual reporting and has different generator categories (SQG, SQG Plus, and LQG).

What do the forms in the Biennial Report require?

Once you confirm that your facility must complete a report, begin gathering the information to fill out the forms. Here’s a closer look at each form in the Biennial Report.

Site ID Form

The Site ID Form (EPA Form 8700-12) is the same form used to obtain an EPA Identification Number (specific to each facility) and notify EPA of any changes to the information on the form, including generator status.

When using the Site ID Form for the Biennial Report:

  • Select “Submitting as a component of the Hazardous Waste Report” as the Reason for Submittal,
  • Enter the reporting year, and
  • Indicate if your site was an LQG, TSDF, and/or reverse distributor in one or more months of the reporting year.

GM Form

A GM Form must be submitted for each hazardous waste used to determine your facility’s generator status. This includes hazardous waste:

  • Generated and accumulated on-site and subsequently managed on-site or shipped off-site in the reporting year,
  • Generated and accumulated on-site in the reporting year but not managed on-site or shipped off-site until after the reporting year,
  • Generated and accumulated on-site before the reporting year but either managed on-site or shipped off-site in the reporting year,
  • Received from VSQGs by LQGs under the control of the same person (as defined in 260.10) and managed according to the applicable regulations in 262.17(f), and
  • Imported from a foreign country.

Note that at the federal level, hazardous waste exported to a foreign country doesn’t require a GM Form; it requires the Annual Report (262.83(g)). However, your state may require you to submit the Annual Report with the Biennial Report.

WR Form

If your facility received RCRA hazardous waste from off-site and managed the waste on-site (even with a subsequent transfer off-site) during the reporting year, you must submit a WR Form. It includes hazardous waste:

  • Imported from a foreign country,
  • Received and recycled without first being stored,
  • Received and stored before being recycled (i.e., your facility has a RCRA storage permit), and
  • Received from hazardous waste generators to be partially reclaimed into commodity-like materials that are excluded from RCRA regulations.

OI Form

You must submit an OI form only if the state in which your facility operates requires it. The form includes the names and addresses of the sites identified in the Biennial Report (including generators, transporters, and receiving facilities).

Noncompliance is too costly

EPA and states use the data from Biennial Reports to manage the nation’s RCRA-regulated hazardous waste. Unfiled, incomplete, and late reports result in inaccurate data that can ultimately affect federal and state regulations designed to protect human health and the environment.

Further, if you fail to submit a complete, accurate Biennial Report by the deadline, you can face enforcement actions such as compliance orders and civil and criminal lawsuits that may result in steep fines and even jail time.

By remaining compliant with the Biennial Reports, your facility:

  • Avoids time-consuming corrective actions and hefty fines,
  • Guards the reputation and the financial of the organization, and
  • Protects the health of the surrounding community and environment.

Key to remember: RCRA’s Biennial Report, due by March 1st of this year, can contain up to four forms to complete based on a covered facility’s hazardous waste management activities and state requirements.

2023-12-26T06:00:00Z

EPA Final Rule: Technology Transitions Program for Phasedown of Hydrofluorocarbons

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency is amending a provision of the recently finalized Technology Transitions Program under the American Innovation and Manufacturing Act (AIM Act). This action allows one additional year, until January 1, 2026, solely for the installation of new residential and light commercial air conditioning and heat pump systems using components manufactured or imported prior to January 1, 2025. The existing January 1, 2025, compliance date for the installation of certain residential and light commercial air conditioning and heat pump systems may result in significant stranded inventory that was intended for new residential construction. EPA is promulgating this action to mitigate the potential for significant stranded inventory in this subsector. In addition, EPA is clarifying that residential ice makers are not included in the household refrigerator and freezer subsector under the Technology Transitions Rule and are not subject to the restrictions for that subsector. EPA is requesting comments on all aspects of this rule.

DATES: This interim final rule is effective on December 26, 2023, published in the Federal Register December 26, 2023, page 88825.

View final rule.

§84.54 Restrictions on the use of hydrofluorocarbons.
(c)(1)RevisedView text

Previous Text

§84.54 Restrictions on the use of hydrofluorocarbons.

* * * * *

(c) * * *

(1) Effective January 1, 2025, residential or light commercial air-conditioning or heat pump systems using a regulated substance, or a blend containing a regulated substance, with a global warming potential of 700 or greater, except for variable refrigerant flow air-conditioning and heat pump systems;

* * * * *

EPA to take fresh look at animal waste emissions reporting; sniffing out comments
2023-12-22T06:00:00Z

EPA to take fresh look at animal waste emissions reporting; sniffing out comments

Despite a complex history of regulations, legal challenges, and congressional legislation, EPA stands firm when it says that animal waste can generate potentially harmful air emissions of ammonia and hydrogen sulfide. Recently, however, EPA backpedaled a bit with its rulemaking to return reporting requirements to farms for their air emissions from animal waste.

Rather than issue a final rule in 2024, as planned, the agency withdrew the rule and is now soliciting comments through February 15.

What is animal waste?

Animal waste means feces, urine, or other excrement, digestive emission, urea, or similar substances. These are emitted by animals including any form of livestock, poultry, or fish. The term also covers animal waste that is mixed or commingled with bedding, compost, feed, soil, or any other material typically found with that waste.

The problem, EPA says, is ammonia and hydrogen sulfide can be emitted from animal waste. Those two chemicals are listed as:

  • Hazardous substances under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA); and
  • Extremely hazardous substances (EHSs) under the Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act (EPCRA).

Historical background

On August 1, 2018, EPA published a final rule to incorporate changes to CERCLA reporting regulations at 40 CFR 302. Those changes were mandated law. Specifically, the Fair Agricultural Reporting Method (FARM) Act of 2018 exempted the reporting of air emissions from animal waste at farms under CERCLA.

Subsequently, on June 13, 2019, EPA issued a final rule to amend the emergency release notification regulations at 40 CFR 355 to implement similar exemptions for animal waste at farms. In addition, the agency added regulatory definitions of “animal waste” and “farm” for this new EPCRA reporting exemption.

However, in January 2021, EPA, under a new administration, reviewed the 2019 final rule and urged a district court to remand the rule. The court granted the remand on February 14, 2022, “without vacatur.” That meant the EPCRA exemption for farms remains in place while EPA reconsiders the rule.

The agency said in the Spring 2022 agenda, that it was working on a rulemaking to roll back the June 2019 rule. EPA tentatively set publication of a proposed rule for June 2023, but that proposal never happened. A final rule was also slated for May 2024.

Latest twist

However, on October 27, 2023, EPA reversed course. The agency withdrew its rulemaking to reconsider the 2019 rule. So, the current 40 CFR 355, which exempts reporting of farm animal waste air emissions, is still on the books. End of story, right? No.

A couple weeks later, on November 17, 2023, EPA published a pre-proposal entitled, “Potential Future Regulation for Emergency Release Notification Requirements for Animal Waste Air Emissions Under EPCRA.” Note that the pre-proposal only impacts 40 CFR 355, not 40 CFR 302.

The agency is looking for information by February 15, 2024, on five topics:

  • Health impacts,
  • Implementation challenges,
  • Costs and benefits,
  • The small farm definition and reporting exemption, and
  • A national report on animal waste air emissions.

EPA explains that it seeks comments to help it decide:

  • Whether to pursue a proposed rule, and
  • How best to implement the reinstating of EPCRA reporting from farms, if finalized.

What’s more, the agency is requesting information on any other topics relevant to conducting a future rulemaking on EPCRA reporting of air emissions from animal waste on farms.

Docket EPA-HQ-OLEM-2023-0142 offers a 149-page, technical background document with information about:

  • The universe of potentially regulated facilities;
  • A cost analysis of a rule;
  • The benefits of a rule;
  • Small entities potentially affected by the action; and
  • The effects on communities with environmental justice concerns.

References to other data, literature, an emissions calculator, and emissions modeling are also provided in the background document.

EPA intends to carefully review all comments received. Then it will determine whether to pursue a proposed rule to reinstate air emission reporting from animal waste at farms under EPCRA.

Key to remember

EPA withdrew the rule to reinstate air emissions reporting of hazardous substances and EHSs in animal waste on farms. Instead, the agency is soliciting comments through February 15 under a new pre-proposal.

2023-12-18T06:00:00Z

EPA Final Rule: Significant New Use Rules on Certain Chemical Substances

EPA is issuing significant new use rules (SNURs) under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) for certain chemical substances that were the subject of premanufacture notices (PMNs) and are also subject to an Order issued by EPA pursuant to TSCA. The SNURs require persons who intend to manufacture (defined by statute to include import) or process any of these chemical substances for an activity that is designated as a significant new use by this rule to notify EPA at least 90 days before commencing that activity. The required notification initiates EPA's evaluation of the use, under the conditions of use for that chemical substance, within the applicable review period. Persons may not commence manufacture or processing for the significant new use until they have submitted a Significant New Use Notice (SNUN), and EPA has conducted a review of the notice, made an appropriate determination on the notice, and has taken such actions as are required by that determination.

DATES: This rule is effective on February 16, 2024, published in the Federal Register December 18, 2023, page 87346.

View final rule.

§9.1 OMB approvals under the Paperwork Reduction Act.
Table 1 Entries added View text
Part 721 Subpart E—Significant New Uses for Specific Chemical Substances
§721.11752 Quaternary ammonium salt of polyisobutene succinic acid (generic).
Entire section Added View Text
§721.11753 2-Propenoic acid, 2-alkyl-, 2- (dialkylamino)alkyl ester, polymer with .alpha.-(2-alkyl-1-oxo-2-alken-1-yl)- .omega.-methoxypoly(oxy-1,2- alkanediyl) (generic).
Entire section Added View Text
§721.11754 Alkanedioic acid, polymer with cycloalkyl dimethanol, alkyl and cycloalkyl diisocyanates, dimethylalkanediol, dihydroxyalkanoic acid methylenebis[isocyanatocyclohexane], hydroxyethyl acrylate- and polyalkyl glycol monoalkyl ether blocked (generic).
Entire section Added View Text
§721.11755 Poly(oxy-1,4-butanediyl), .alpha.-hydro-.omega.-hydroxy-, polymer with 1,1′-methylenebis[4- isocyanatobenzene], caprolactamblocked.
Entire section Added View Text
§721.11756 Tall-oil pitch, fraction, sterollow (generic).
Entire section Added View Text
§721.11757 Carboxylic acid, reaction products with metal hydroxide, inorganic dioxide and metal (generic). Carboxylic acid, reaction products with metal hydroxide, inorganic dioxide and metal (generic).
Entire section Added View Text
§721.11758 Multi-walled carbon nanotubes; closed; 4.4–12.8 nm diameter; bundle length 10.6–211.1 mm; Grade: Jenotube 6.
Entire section Added View Text
§721.11759 Multi-walled carbon nanotubes; closed; 5.1–11.6 nm diameter; bundle length 1.9–552.0 mm; Grade: Jenotube 8
Entire section Added View Text
§721.11760 Multi-walled carbon nanotubes; closed; 7.9–14.2 nm diameter; bundle length 9.4–106.4 mm; Grade: Jenotube 10.
Entire section Added View Text
§721.11761 Multi-walled carbon nanotubes; closed; 17.0–34.7 nm diameter; globular shape; Grade: Jenotube 20.
Entire section Added View Text
§721.11762 Nonanamide, N,N-dimethyl-.
Entire section Added View Text
§721.11763 2-Propenoic acid, 2-methyl, 2- (dimethylamino)ethyl ester, polymers with 2-(C16–18-acylamino)ethyl acrylate and hydroxyalkyl acrylate, acetates (generic).
Entire section Added View Text
§721.11765 2H-Pyran, tetrahydro-4-methyl.
Entire section Added View Text
§721.11766 Organic acid ester, polymer with aliphatic diols and 1,1′-methylenebis[4- isocyanatobenzene] (generic).
Entire section Added View Text
§721.11767 4,4-Methylenebis (2,6-dimethyl phenol) polymer with 2- (chloromethyl)oxirane, 1,4-benzenediol, 2-methyl-2-propenoic acid, mixed alkyl substituted 2-methyl 2-propenoate, and ethyl 2-propenoate, reaction products with 2-(dimethylamino) ethanol (generic).
Entire section Added View Text
§721.11768 Phenol, methylethylidene, polymer chloromethyl epoxide and methylethylidene bis-oxy, bis-amine (generic).
Entire section Added View Text
§721.11769 Amine, methylethylidenebis(oxy) (generic).
Entire section Added View Text
§721.11770 Carbamic acid, N-[3- (trialkoxysilyl)propyl]-, C,C′-[2,2,4(or 2,4,4)-trimethyl-1,6-hexanediyl] ester (generic).
Entire section Added View Text
§721.11771 Arylfurandione, [bis(trihaloalkyl)alkylidene]bis-, polymer with alkanediamine (generic).
Entire section Added View Text
§721.11772 Phosphonic acid, dimethyl ester, reaction products with alkyl-alkylalkanediol and alkanediol (generic).
Entire section Added View Text
§721.11773 Silane, halogenated (generic).
Entire section Added View Text
§721.11774 Heteromonocycle, polymer, substituted aliphatic carbamate, [2-[(1- oxo-2-propen-1-yl)oxy]alkyl]ester (generic).
Entire section Added View Text
§721.11775 Alkanes, C4-8-branched and linear.
Entire section Added View Text
§721.11776 5H-1,2-Oxathiole, 2,2-dioxide.
Entire section Added View Text
2 weeks and counting: Don’t ring in the new year without meeting the CARB deadline
2023-12-15T06:00:00Z

2 weeks and counting: Don’t ring in the new year without meeting the CARB deadline

Don’t let holiday cheer turn to January blues. Make sure you meet the California Air Resources Board (CARB) program deadlines.

Several CARB programs have a January 1, 2024, deadline. They affect carriers that operate in California, regardless of where they are based.

The programs are:

  • The Clean Truck Check (also known as the HD I/M program)
  • Advanced Clean Fleet
  • Transportation Refrigeration Unit (TRU)

For more information CARB and related topics, check out these Compliance Network resources:

Other related content:

If you have additional questions on CARB or any other topic, please contact our subject matter experts using Expert Help.

See More
New Network Poll
How do you determine work-relatedness for illnesses or injuries?

How do you determine work-relatedness for illnesses or injuries?


No active poll
Please come back soon!
See More
See More
See More
See More
Saved to my EVENT CALENDAR!
View your saved links by clicking the arrow next to your profile picture located in the header. Then, click “My Activity” to view the Event Calendar on your Activity page.