FREE TRIAL UPGRADE!
Thank you for investing in EnvironmentalHazmatHuman ResourcesHuman Resources, Hazmat & Environmental related content. Click 'UPGRADE' to continue.
CANCEL
YOU'RE ALL SET!
Enjoy your limited-time access to the Compliance Network!
A confirmation welcome email has been sent to your email address from ComplianceNetwork@t.jjkellercompliancenetwork.com. Please check your spam/junk folder if you can't find it in your inbox.
YOU'RE ALL SET!
Thank you for your interest in EnvironmentalHazmatHuman ResourcesHuman Resources, Hazmat & Environmental related content.
WHOOPS!
You've reached your limit of free access, if you'd like more info, please contact us at 800-327-6868.
:
focus-area/human-resources/discrimination
559965345
['Discrimination']

One definition of the word “discriminate” is “to distinguish by discerning or exposing differences.” All employers discriminate, but for discrimination to be illegal, an employer’s actions must be based on an employee’s membership in one or more of many protected classes defined by state and federal employment laws. A common misconception is that any perceived unequal treatment is illegal discrimination, but discrimination is only illegal when it is based on race, color, religion, etc.

institute_stream_090163408058d437

Discrimination

One definition of the word “discriminate” is “to distinguish by discerning or exposing differences.” All employers discriminate, probably every day. They not only distinguish employees by discerning or exposing their differences, but use those differences to make employment decisions.

For example, employers discriminate by:

  • Giving seasoned employees more challenging assignments,
  • Granting the most reliable employees more flexibility in their daily schedules, and
  • Paying high performers more than lower performers.

These are all discriminatory acts, but because they are not based on an employee’s membership in a protected class, they do not create the foundation for a claim of illegal discrimination under employment laws. This distinction is important. A common misconception among some employers, and perhaps even more employees, is that any perceived unequal treatment is illegal discrimination.

This is simply untrue. For discrimination to be illegal, an employer’s actions must be based on an employee’s membership in one or more of many protected classes defined by state and federal employment laws.

What are the federal laws prohibiting job discrimination?

  • There are many federal laws regarding employment discrimination enforced by the EEOC.

The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) enforces most of the federal laws regarding discrimination in employment, such as:

  • Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII). This prohibits employment discrimination based on:
    • Race
    • Color
    • Religion
    • Sex
    • National origin
      • It applies to employers with 15 or more employees.
  • The Equal Pay Act of 1963 (EPA). This protects men and women who perform substantially equal work in the same establishment from sex-based wage discrimination.
    • Like the Fair Labor Standards Act, it applies to virtually all employers.
  • The Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (ADEA). This protects individuals who are 40 years of age or older.
    • It applies to employers with 20 or more employees.
  • Titles I and V of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA). These prohibit employment discrimination against qualified individuals with disabilities in:
    • The private sector, and
    • State and local governments.
      • These apply to employers with 15 or more employees.
  • Sections 501 and 505 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973. These prohibit discrimination against qualified individuals with disabilities who work in the federal government.
  • The Civil Rights Act of 1991. This provides, among other things, monetary damages in cases of intentional employment discrimination.
    • It covers the same employers as Title VII.
  • The Pregnancy Discrimination Act (PDA), is an amendment to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act. It prohibits employees from discriminating against employees on the basis of pregnancy.
  • The Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act (GINA). This prohibits employers from:
    • Obtaining or using genetic information about employees or applicants; or
    • Using that information to deny any term, condition, or privilege of employment.
      • It applies to employers with 15 or more employees.
  • The Pregnant Workers Fairness Act (PWFA). This law requires covered employers to provide reasonable accommodations to an employee’s known limitations related to pregnancy, childbirth, or related medical conditions, unless the accommodation will cause the employer an undue hardship.

What is employment discrimination?

  • It is illegal to discriminate based on protected categories in any aspect of employment.

It is illegal to discriminate based on protected categories in any aspect of employment, including:

  • Hiring and firing;
  • Compensation, assignment, or classification of employees;
  • Transfer, promotion, layoff, or recall;
  • Job advertisements;
  • Recruitment;
  • Testing;
  • Use of company facilities;
  • Training and apprenticeship programs;
  • Fringe benefits;
  • Pay, retirement plans, and disability leave; or
  • Other terms and conditions of employment.

Discriminatory practices include, but are not limited to:

  • Harassment based on:
    • Race,
    • Color,
    • Religion,
    • Sex,
    • National origin,
    • Pregnancy,
    • Disability, or
    • Age;
  • Retaliation against an individual for:
    • Filing a charge of discrimination,
    • Participating in an investigation, or
    • Opposing discriminatory practices;
  • Employment decisions based on stereotypes or assumptions about the abilities, traits, or performance of individuals of a certain:
    • Sex,
    • Race,
    • Age,
    • Religion,
    • Ethnic group, or
    • Disability; and
  • Denying employment opportunities because of marriage to, or association with, an individual of a particular:
    • Race,
    • Religion,
    • National origin; or
    • Disability.
      • Title VII also prohibits discrimination because of participation in schools or places of worship associated with a particular racial, ethnic, or religious group.

The federal discrimination laws not only protect employees, but also protect non-employees. For example, employers could be held liable for the:

  • Harassing acts of an independent contractor against their employees, if the company fails to address the conduct; and
  • Actions of their employees against customers.

What is harassment?

  • Employers are responsible for acts of harassment, even if they come from outside of the company.

Harassment based on race, color, sex, national origin, religion, age, or disability is a discriminatory practice. Although sexual harassment has received the most attention, many of the same principles apply to other types of harassment, and employers should be equally vigilant in preventing it.

Hostile work environment

Behaviors that create a hostile environment generally involve acts directed at people because of their race, color, national origin, religion, age, or disability. While sexual harassment involves sexual conduct, gender harassment can occur where no sexual conduct is involved.

Hostile environment harassment includes:

  • Unwelcome comments or conduct unreasonably interfering with an individual’s work performance; or
  • Creating an intimidating, hostile, or offensive work environment.

The harasser can be a supervisor, coworker, or non-employee. It is important to note that employers may not only be responsible for acts of harassment by employees and supervisors, but also for acts of non-employees, such as vendors and customers, where they knew about or should have known about the conduct being challenged.

Anti-harassment training for employees and supervisors

A good training program can go a long way in proving that your company took adequate measures to prevent sexual harassment.

Disparate treatment/disparate impact

There are two broad types of discrimination:

  • Disparate treatment: An intentional practice where members of a protected class are treated differently than other employees.
  • Disparate (or adverse) impact: A (usually) unintentional business practice that has the effect of discrimination on members of a protected class.

For example, more men than women are selected as firefighters because the physical requirements tend to screen out a higher percentage of women. This has an adverse impact on women as a group, although this is allowable due to business necessity. However, a hiring practice may be discriminatory if it tends to screen out a particular group and is unrelated to:

  • The requirements of the position, or
  • Business necessity.

What are protected classes?

  • Protected classes are protected from discrimination under federal law.

The term “protected class” is associated with discrimination. In short, discrimination is an adverse action taken, intentionally or unintentionally, where membership in a protected class was a motivating factor.

Employers cannot use a person’s membership in a protected class as a factor when making employment decisions (hiring, promotion, etc.). Classes protected under federal law include:

  • Age (over 40)
  • Disability
  • National origin
  • Pregnancy
  • Race
  • Religion
  • Sex (including sexual orientation and gender identity)
  • Genetic information (the provisions on genetic discrimination are typically similar to those for disabilities and prohibit medical tests that reveal genetic disorders.)

Note that in addition to these categories, federal contractors are specifically prohibited from discriminating based on an individual’s:

  • Protected veteran status

In addition, many states have created discrimination laws that include additional protected classes. Some of the more common classes that states have listed include:

  • Arrest or court records,
  • Military service,
  • Use of a lawful product (like tobacco), and
  • Engaging in lawful activity outside of work.

What is sex discrimination?

  • On June 15, 2020, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that sexual orientation and gender identity are covered under the category of sex, which has long been protected under Title VII.

Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, enforced by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), protects individuals against employment discrimination based on:

  • Sex
  • Race
  • Color
  • National origin
  • Religion

Title VII applies to:

  • Employers with 15 or more employees; and
  • Employment agencies, labor organizations, and the federal government.

Title VII prohibits:

  • Discrimination against any employees or applicants because of their sex regarding:
    • Hiring,
    • Termination,
    • Promotion,
    • Compensation,
    • Job training, or
    • Any other term, condition, or privilege of employment.
  • Employment decisions based on stereotypes and assumptions about abilities, traits, or the performance of individuals based on sex; and
  • Intentional discrimination and neutral job policies that:
    • Disproportionately exclude individuals based on sex, and
    • Are not job related.

When can sex be considered?

Sex can be considered where it is a bona fide requirement. For example, an employer looking to hire models for women’s clothing would not need to consider male applicants.

Some state laws used to prohibit or limit the employment of women in jobs requiring lifting or carrying weights exceeding certain limits, or other factors. Most have since been repealed. Such laws did not take the abilities of individual women into account and, therefore, were found to discriminate on the basis of sex. Where such laws still exist, they cannot be used as a defense to an unlawful employment practice.

It is also unlawful to retaliate against an individual for:

  • Opposing employment practices that discriminate based on sex; or
  • Filing a discrimination charge, testifying, or participating in any way in an investigation, proceeding, or litigation under Title VII.

Sexual orientation and gender identity

On June 15, 2020, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that sexual orientation and gender identity are covered under the characteristic of sex, which has long been protected under Title VII.

Family responsibility discrimination

Some employees have claimed “family responsibility” discrimination, which is effectively a form of sex discrimination. Typically, employees claim that assumptions about gender stereotypes formed the basis for discrimination. For example, if female employees are denied a promotion because of perceived child-care responsibilities, they might claim family responsibility discrimination based on those gender stereotypes.

What is race discrimination?

  • Race discrimination is another way employers can violate Title VII.

Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 protects individuals against employment discrimination based on:

  • Race
  • Color
  • National origin
  • Sex
  • Religion

Title VII applies to:

  • Employers with 15 or more employees, including state and local governments; and
  • Employment agencies, labor organizations, and the federal government.

Title VII prohibits:

  • Discrimination against any employees or applicants because of their race or color regarding:
    • Hiring;
    • Termination;
    • Promotion;
    • Compensation;
    • Job training; or
    • Any other term, condition, or privilege of employment.
  • Employment decisions based on stereotypes and assumptions about abilities, traits, or the performance of individuals of certain racial groups.
  • Intentional discrimination and neutral job policies that:
    • Disproportionately exclude minorities, and
    • Are not job related.

Equal employment opportunity cannot be denied because of:

  • Marriage to or association with an individual of a different race,
  • Membership in or association with ethnic-based organizations or groups, or
  • Attendance or participation in schools or places of worship generally associated with certain minority groups.

Title VII violations related to race include:

  • Race-related characteristics. Title VII prohibits:
    • Discrimination based on an immutable characteristic associated with race, even if all members of the race don’t share the same characteristic, such as:
      • Skin color,
      • Hair texture, or
      • Certain facial feature, and
    • Discrimination based on a condition that predominantly affects one race, such as:
      • A policy excluding individuals with sickle cell anemia, which predominantly occurs in Black people; and
      • A “no-beard” policy, which could discriminate against Black men predisposed to pseudofolliculitis barbae (severe shaving bumps).
        • The only exception is if the practice or policy is job related and consistent with business necessity.
  • Harassment. Harassment based on race and/or color violates Title VII, including:
    • Ethnic slurs,
    • Racial “joke,”
    • Offensive or derogatory comments, or
    • Other verbal or physical conduct that:
      • Creates an intimidating, hostile, or offensive working environment; or
      • Interferes with an individual’s work performance.
  • Segregation and classification of employees. Title VII is violated when:
    • Employees in a protected group are segregated by physically isolating them from other employees or from customer contact;
    • Employers assign employees according to race or color, such as:
      • Assigning primarily Black people to predominantly Black-owned establishments or geographic areas; and
      • Employers exclude members of one group from particular positions, or group or categorize employees or jobs so that certain jobs are generally held by members of a certain protected group.
        • Additionally, employers or employment agencies coding applications and/or resumes to designate an applicant’s race constitutes evidence of discrimination where people of a certain race or color are excluded from employment or from certain positions.
  • Pre-employment inquiries. Requesting pre-employment information that discloses or tends to disclose an applicant’s race strongly suggests that race will be used unlawfully as a basis for hiring.
    • Therefore, if members of minority groups are excluded from employment, the request would likely constitute evidence of discrimination.
  • Retaliation. It is unlawful to retaliate against an individual for:
    • Opposing employment practices that discriminate based on race or color; or
    • Filing a discrimination charge, testifying, or participating in any way in an investigation, proceeding, or litigation under Title VII.
      • Legal challenges usually involve motivation. Factors that may suggest race was a factor include:
        • Racial remarks by the decision maker,
        • A poor record of hiring minorities, and
        • Unimpressive qualifications of those selected or retained.
      • Factors that can be helpful in fighting a charge include:
        • A strong record of hiring minorities, and
        • Having treated minorities and non-minorities the same in similar circumstances.

What is age discrimination?

  • The ADEA protects employees who are 40 years old or older.

The Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (ADEA) makes it unlawful for an employer to discriminate against individuals in any aspect of employment because they are 40 years old or older (unless one of the statutory exceptions applies). Favoring an older individual over a younger individual because of age, however, is not unlawful discrimination, even if the younger individual is at least 40 years old.

The ADEA applies to:

  • Employers with 20 or more employees, including state and local governments; and
  • Employment agencies, labor organizations, and the federal government.

Motivating factors

The regulations recognize that differentiation based on reasonable factors other than age are not discriminatory. These may include:

  • Skill
  • Knowledge
  • Demonstrated performance

The issue in age cases is almost always one of motivation. Factors that tend to suggest age as a motivating factor include:

  • Remarks suggesting age bias by the decision maker,
  • A pattern of negative actions against older employees that cannot be explained, and
  • Replacement by a substantially younger employee without greater qualifications.

Factors that tend to suggest that age was not a motivating factor include:

  • Favorable treatment toward other senior employees,
  • Well-documented evidence of other reasons, and
  • Replacement by someone who is not substantially younger in a discharge case.

Juries seem inclined to conclude that the reason for discharge was due to age when:

  • The employee has many years of service,
  • No proper warning or opportunity to correct the problem was given, and
  • The employer denying age discrimination has allowed age-based remarks or jokes.

What is religious discrimination?

  • Unless it would cause undue hardship, employers are required to provide reasonable accommodation for religious beliefs and practices.

Title VII of the Civil Rights Act prohibits employers from discriminating against individuals because of their religion in any terms and conditions of employment. Title VII applies to employers with 15 or more employees.

In most cases, whether a practice or belief is “religious” is not at issue. Employers may not treat employees or applicants less — or more — favorably because of their religious beliefs or practices. For example, an employer may not:

  • Refuse to hire individuals of a certain religion,
  • Impose stricter promotion requirements for people of a certain religion, or
  • Impose more or different work requirements due to an employee’s religious beliefs or practices.

Employees cannot be forced to participate — or not participate — in a religious activity as a condition of employment.

What is religious accommodation?

In addition to avoiding discrimination, employers must reasonably accommodate employees’ sincerely held religious beliefs or practices unless doing so would impose an undue hardship. A reasonable accommodation is any adjustment to the work environment that will allow employees to practice their religion. Examples might include:

  • Flexible scheduling;
  • Voluntary job or shift substitutions or swaps;
  • Job reassignments and lateral transfers; or
  • Modifying workplace practices, policies, and/or procedures.

Generally, requests for religious accommodations can be handled with a change in shift or work hours. If an accommodation is denied, employers must show the accommodation would result in undue hardship or violate a bona fide seniority system. Otherwise, employers have a duty to accommodate the employee.

An accommodation posing undue hardship is one would result in substantial increased costs in relation to the conduct of their particular business. This is a higher threshold than that of a de minimis cost.

Employers must consider relevant factors in a situation, including the particular accommodations at issue and their practical impact in light of the nature, size, and operating cost of an employer.

When assessing an accommodation’s hardship, employers may include the impact on coworkers, but only if it affects the conduct of the business. Employers must look at other criteria.

Further, a hardship is not undue if it is attributable to:

  • Employee animosity to a particular religion,
  • To religion in general, or
  • To the very notion of accommodating religious practice.

Bias or hostility to a religious practice or accommodation is not a defense.

An attempt to accommodate an employee’s religious beliefs might not be successful, but failure to engage in the process, or the outright rejection of the request without any effort to accommodate, may result in a discrimination complaint. For example, declining a request for time off to attend a religious event because other employees would not be allowed off may not be appropriate unless it really would be an undue hardship. Treating everyone the same is not enough because of the positive duty to accommodate.

In some cases, the alleged discrimination isn’t obvious. For example, employees with performance problems may have also requested time off for their religious beliefs. If they are terminated, the courts may need to decide whether the employer had a “mixed motive” in firing the employee. If their religious beliefs were considered, the claim of performance issues may be a false reason or motive (or “pretext”) for discrimination. But if an effort was made to accommodate the need for time off, the employer should face fewer challenges in defending against the charge.

What is national origin discrimination?

  • National origin discrimination is prohibited under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act.

Regardless of ancestry, each employee or job applicant is entitled to the same employment opportunities. The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) enforces the federal prohibition against national origin discrimination in employment under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, which covers employers with 15 or more employees.

Discrimination includes treating someone less favorably because:

  • They come from a particular place,
  • Their ethnicity or accent,
  • They are believed to have a particular ethnic background, or
  • They are married to or associated with someone of a particular nationality.

Examples of violations covered under Title VII include:

  • Making employment decisions, such as hiring, firing, and promotion, based on national origin;
  • Offensive conduct, such as ethnic slurs, that creates a hostile work environment;
  • Basing a decision on an employee’s foreign accent unless it materially interferes with job performance;
  • Imposing English-fluency requirements where not required for the effective performance of the position; and
  • Setting English-only rules, other than when they are needed to promote the safe or efficient operation of the employer’s business.

National origin discrimination is also prohibited under the law that requires employers to complete an I-9 Form.

What is pregnancy discrimination?

The federal Pregnancy Discrimination Act is an amendment to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act and, therefore, applies to employers with 15 or more employees. Discrimination on the basis of pregnancy, childbirth, or related medical conditions is unlawful.

Pregnancy discrimination under Title VII can be based on:

  • Current pregnancy,
  • Past pregnancy,
  • Potential pregnancy,
  • Medical condition related to pregnancy or childbirth including breastfeeding/lactation,
  • Having or choosing not to have an abortion, and
  • Birth control (Contraception).

Women who are pregnant or affected by related conditions must be treated in the same manner as other applicants or employees with similar abilities or limitations. If an employee is temporarily unable to perform her job due to pregnancy or related conditions, the employer must treat her the same as any other temporarily disabled employee.

If, for example, the employer allows temporarily disabled employees to modify tasks, perform alternative assignments, or take leave, the employer must also allow an employee who is temporarily disabled due to pregnancy or related conditions to do the same.

Employers may not refuse to hire a pregnant woman because of pregnancy, a pregnancy-related condition, or because of the prejudices of co-workers, clients, or customers.

Pregnant employees must be permitted to work as long as they are able to perform their jobs. Employers may not force a woman to take leave because of a pregnancy. Employers must hold a job open for a pregnancy-related absence the same length of time jobs are held for employees with other temporary disabilities.

Pregnant Workers Fairness Act (PWFA)

The PWFA protects employees and applicants who have known limitations related to pregnancy, childbirth, or related medical conditions; it applies only to accommodations. Final rules implementing the PWFA became effective June 18, 2024. Employers with 15 or more employees are covered by the PWFA.

Existing laws that the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) enforces, such as the Pregnancy Discrimination Act, make it illegal to fire or otherwise discriminate against workers on the basis of pregnancy, childbirth, or related medical conditions, but don't require accommodations.

Under the PWFA, limitations may be minor and may be associated with an uncomplicated pregnancy and may require accommodations that are easy to make.

Related medical conditions must relate to pregnancy or childbirth of the specific individual. They can include lactation (including breastfeeding and pumping), miscarriage, stillbirth, having or choosing not to have an abortion, preeclampsia, gestational diabetes, and HELLP (hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes and low platelets) syndrome, sciatica, carpal tunnel syndrome, migraines, dehydration, anxiety, loss of balance, varicose veins, and menstruation, to name only some.

Note: Federal courts have enjoined the EEOC from enforcing the PWFA rules in relation to elective abortions.

Reasonable accommodations are changes to the work environment or the way things are usually done at work. Some examples of accommodating pregnancy, childbirth, or related medical conditions include:

  • Permission to sit or drink water;
  • Closer parking;
  • Flexible hours;
  • Appropriately sized uniforms and safety apparel;
  • Additional break time to use the bathroom, eat, and rest;
  • Leave or time off to recover from childbirth; and
  • Being excused from strenuous activities and/or activities that involve exposure to compounds not safe for pregnancy.

Qualified employees and applicants are entitled to receive accommodations. Employees or applicants can be “qualified” under the PWFA in two ways.

  • First, an employee or applicant who can perform the “essential functions” of the job with or without a reasonable accommodation is qualified.

“Essential functions” are the fundamental duties of the job. Many employees or applicants seeking accommodations will meet this part of the definition because they can perform the job or apply for the position with a reasonable accommodation—for example, the cashier who needs a stool, the production worker who needs bathroom breaks, or the retail worker who needs to carry around a bottle of water.

  • Second, if an employee cannot perform the essential functions of the job with or without a reasonable accommodation, an employee can be qualified even if they cannot do the essential functions of their job as long as:
    • The inability is “temporary;”
    • The employee could perform the functions “in the near future;” and
    • The inability to perform the essential functions can be reasonably accommodated.

The determination of whether an employee can perform the functions in the near future is made on a case-by-case basis. If the employee is pregnant, it is presumed that the employee could perform the essential function(s) in the near future because they could perform the essential function(s) within generally 40 weeks of its suspension. An accommodation can include the suspension of an essential function.

This means that an employee who is temporarily unable to perform one or more essential functions of their job, and who therefore needs light duty or a change in their work assignments, may be entitled to such a change as a reasonable accommodation. Leave can also be a reasonable accommodation.

Employees must communicate that they have a limitation — a physical or mental condition related to, arising out of, or affected by pregnancy, childbirth, or a related medical condition — and that they need an adjustment or change in their working conditions due to the limitation. Employees don't have to use any particular words or forms.

Once employers know of such a limitation and accommodation need, they should engage in the “interactive process” with the employee or applicant. They should talk to the employee about the known limitation and the adjustment or change needed at work.

Since employees often tell their managers or supervisors about such accommodation needs, managers and supervisors should be trained in how to recognize such requests and how to respond.

Employers must provide the following accommodations without delay or documentation:

  • Carrying or keeping water near and drinking, as needed;
  • Allowing additional restroom breaks, as needed;
  • Allowing sitting for those whose work requires standing and standing for those whose work requires sitting, as needed; and
  • Allowing breaks to eat and drink, as needed.

These are a small set of simple, inexpensive, commonly sought accommodations that are widely known to be needed during an uncomplicated pregnancy, and where documentation would not be easily obtained or necessary. These will not pose an undue hardship.

For other accommodation requests, employers may ask for supporting documentation only when reasonable and when the condition or accommodation need is not obvious.

Documentation is not reasonable if:

  • The limitation and need for an adjustment or change at work due to the limitation is obvious. For example, an obviously pregnant employee who seeks a bigger uniform because of their pregnancy cannot be required to provide additional information.
  • The employer already knows about the limitation and the adjustment or change at work due to the limitation. If, for example, the employee has already provided enough information that they have morning sickness due to pregnancy and need a later start time, the employer cannot demand a new doctor’s note every time the employee uses the accommodation of coming in later.
  • The employee is currently pregnant and needs breaks for the bathroom or to eat or drink, needs to carry water with them to drink, or needs to stand if their job requires sitting or to sit if their job requires standing.
  • The employee is lactating and needs modifications to pump at work or nurse during work hours.
  • The employer would not ask an employee for documentation in that situation normally. If an employer’s policy is that employees only need a note from a health care provider for absences if they are missing three or more days in a row, the employer can’t require someone who needs a reasonable accommodation of one day off because of pregnancy, childbirth, or a related medical condition to provide information from the health care provider.

When employers are allowed to get documentation from a health care provider, they are limited to documentation that:

  • Explains the health care provider’s qualifications and why they can provide the necessary information for this patient. A brief statement is sufficient. The provider does not need to be treating the condition at issue, as long are they are familiar enough with the patient’s circumstances to provide appropriate information.
    • Under the PWFA, health care professionals include, but are not limited to: doctors, nurses, nurse practitioners, physician assistants, midwives, physical therapists, and licensed mental health professionals. The health care provider may be a telehealth provider.
  • Confirms that the employee has a physical or mental condition. Because the PWFA covers a wide range of physical or mental conditions, the provider does not need to include a diagnosis; a simple statement of the employee's physical or mental condition is sufficient. The problem or impairment may be minor, modest, or episodic (like fatigue, vomiting, or swelling, need for rest,); a need to attend health care appointments; or maintaining the patient’s health or the health of their pregnancy (like avoiding extreme heat, lifting restriction, or limiting exposure to chemicals).
  • Confirms that the physical or mental condition is related to, affected by, or arising out of pregnancy, childbirth, or related medical conditions. Pregnancy, childbirth, or related medical conditions do not have to be the sole, the original, or a substantial cause of the physical or mental condition.
  • Describes the adjustment or change that is needed at work due to the limitation, including the expected duration of the accommodation. For example, no lifting more than 20 pounds for 3 months, the approximate number and frequency of health care appointments, the estimated time off for recovery, additional safety gear, work functions that should be suspended and for how long, or a later start time. If the change is the temporary suspension of a main job duty, it should make clear that the suspension will be temporary and that the employee could perform the job duty after the pregnancy or in the near future (and include an estimate of when that will be).

Employers should avoid using forms like FMLA certification forms or ADA forms to gather documentation, as they tend to ask for more information than needed. Whatever forms are used, employers should be prepared to have health care providers indicate that some entries or entries are not applicable.

Employers are required to provide reasonable accommodations unless they would cause an “undue hardship” on the employer’s operations. An “undue hardship” is significant difficulty or expense for the employer.

Employers may not:

  • Require an employee to accept an accommodation without a discussion with the employee about the accommodation (the interactive process),
  • Deny a job or other employment opportunities to a qualified employee or applicant based on the person’s need for a reasonable accommodation,
  • Require an employee to take leave if another reasonable accommodation can be provided that would let the employee keep working,
  • Retaliate against an individual for reporting or opposing unlawful discrimination under the PWFA or participating in a PWFA proceeding (such as an investigation), or
  • Interfere with any individual’s rights under the PWFA.

What is retaliation?

  • Retaliation is the most common discrimination charge.

Retaliation is consistently the most common of all discrimination charges, and many charges claiming another type of discrimination also include the assertion that retaliation occurred.

Title VII prohibits retaliation against individuals because they have either:

  • Opposed an unlawful employment practice; or
  • Made a charge, testified, or assisted with or participated in an investigation, proceeding, or hearing under the statute.
    • Retaliation is also unlawful under the Equal Pay Act, the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act (GINA), the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA).

Retaliation provisions provide exceptionally broad protection to individuals who file charges or otherwise aide the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC)’s enforcement function. The EEOC’s policy is to expedite the investigation of retaliation charges and seek injunctive relief, since it has a unique interest in:

  • Preserving the integrity of its investigative process, and
  • Preventing a chilling effect on the willingness of individuals to protest discriminatory conduct.

Employees are protected against retaliation for their opposition to discrimination if they have a reasonable and “good faith” belief that their employer’s conduct is illegal, even if it turns out that they were mistaken about the legality of the conduct.

However, the anti-retaliation provisions will not apply if the way an individual protests perceived discrimination is:

  • Unreasonable, or
  • If opposition is false and malicious.

In contrast, participation in the EEO process, such as filing a charge, receives absolute protection. Employee protections from retaliation also extend to applicants and employees even when they engaged in protected activity against a former employer.

For example, it would be unlawful for employers to refuse to hire applicants after a background check revealed that they sued a previous employer under EEO laws or participated in a discrimination proceeding in which a manager was charged with sexual harassment.

What is disability discrimination?

  • The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) prohibits employment discrimination against individuals with disabilities.

The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) prohibits, private employers, state and local governments, employment agencies, and labor unions from discriminating against qualified individuals with disabilities in job application procedures, hiring, firing, advancement, compensation, job training, and other terms, conditions, and privileges of employment.

If your company has at least 15 employees (or had at least 15 in the prior or present year), the ADA applies.

What are reasonable accommodations?

  • Reasonable accommodations are changes made to the workplace that allow employees to perform a job.
  • Reasonable accommodation is a key nondiscrimination requirement of the ADA.

Reasonable accommodations are changes made to the workplace, how work is done, company policies, and so on, that would allow an employee to perform the job or an applicant to proceed in the hiring process. Accommodation ideas are limited only by the imagination.

Accommodations can be grouped into some categories, such as:

  • Providing equipment or accessible materials,
  • Making changes to the workplace,
  • Restructuring the job,
  • Modifying work schedules,
  • Allowing remote work,
  • Providing leave,
  • Modifying policies,
  • Modifying supervisory methods, and
  • Reassignment (which is a last resort).

Reasonable accommodation is a key nondiscrimination requirement of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). Employers must provide reasonable accommodations to the known disability of an employee or applicant. Employers that fail to provide an accommodation risk a discrimination claim. This may be true even if no other negative employment action is taken.

The ADA defines an “individual with a disability” as someone who meets all prerequisites for performing the essential functions of a job except any that cannot be met because of a disability. Individuals who meet this definition are entitled to a reasonable accommodation that will enable them to perform the essential functions of a job, or be considered, or receive equal benefits, etc., unless it would impose an undue hardship on the operation of the business. Employers are not, however, required to provide an accommodation to someone who is only “regarded as” having an impairment.

In general, it is the responsibility of the applicant or employee with a disability to inform an employer that an accommodation is needed to participate in the application process, perform essential job functions, or receive equal benefits and privileges of employment. Employers are not required to provide an accommodation if they are unaware of the need.

Sometimes, however, a disability or the need for an accommodation will be obvious. Other times, employees will present with restrictions, such as a doctor’s note or a simple statement they make. Such a presentation would likely be considered a request for reasonable accommodation.

Overall accommodation process

  • Employers should understand and document the overall accommodation process.
  • It is vital that employers know how to recognize accommodation requests.
  • The interaction process is meant to be ongoing.

To help lay the groundwork for dealing with reasonable accommodation situations, employers should understand and document the overall process. This includes crafting written policies and procedures, training managers and supervisors, informing all employees, recognizing and responding to accommodation requests, creating a process for determining effective accommodation requests, and monitoring the accommodations.

Craft written policies and procedures

When crafting related policies and procedures, employers should consider factors such as:

  • Company culture;
  • Desired outcomes;
  • Who has input;
  • Who will be responsible for the policy, procedure, and process; and
  • The reasons behind them.

To help craft effective policies and procedures, employers should:

  • Talk to stakeholders for input on crafting the policies and procedures;
  • Listen to what they have to say and ask questions;
  • Keep the policies flexible and easy to understand;
  • Try to avoid jargon, acronyms, and legal-speak;
  • Work to ensure that they inform the reader effectively; and
  • Include definitions of terms used and resources available, including where to find additional information.

Train managers and supervisors

While training supervisors and managers regarding the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and reasonable accommodations is not mandated by law, doing so can help protect the company should it face a claim. Initial training is a good start, but because ADA-related situations do not arise frequently and the training is eventually lost, refresher training should be done regularly.

Two of the vital pieces of the ADA that managers and supervisors should be trained on are:

  • How to recognize a request for a reasonable accommodation, and
  • That applicant and employee medical information is to be kept confidential.

One of the purposes of the training should be to enable all employees to gain optimum job performance and productivity levels through the application of reasonable accommodations. The training also helps demonstrates that the company takes disability inclusion seriously.

Inform all employees

Employers should let all affected employees know about the ADA, even if at different levels of detail. While employees might not benefit from knowing the details of what the ADA requires, they would benefit from knowing how to request accommodations and what to expect.

Recognize and respond to accommodation requests

Employers and managers and supervisors should be able to recognize when an applicant or employee requests an accommodation. At the most basic level, an accommodation request is when an applicant or employee asks for a workplace change or adjustment because of a medical condition. The request does not need to include any particular terms, such as “ADA” or “accommodation.”

Create an interactive process for identifying effective accommodations

The interactive process is when a company representative and an applicant or employee work together focusing on identifying an effective reasonable accommodation. Shutting down this process, or not starting one, can be considered discrimination, and many court cases have included such actions.

Interactive process

  • The interactive process is when employers and employees work together to find a reasonable accommodation.
  • The ADA does not have a formula or prescribed method for an interactive discussion.
  • Employees and employers are required to engage in the interactive process.

When an employee requests an accommodation, an employer’s Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) obligations are triggered, including the interactive process. The interactive process is when employers and employees who request accommodations work together to identify an effective reasonable accommodation. Employers should engage in this process even if they believe the request is unreasonable or the employee is not qualified for the position.

Before engaging in the interactive process, it may be beneficial to review the employee’s position description to ensure that:

  • The description accurately reflects the essential functions of the position;
  • Quality and quantity requirements are stated, if appropriate;
  • Behavioral factors necessary for the job are considered in measurable terms; and
  • An ADA job evaluation has been performed, noting how the physical duties are functionally performed and the behavioral characteristics essential for job performance.

The ADA does not have a formula or prescribed method for an interactive discussion between the employer and the individual after a change due to a medical condition has been requested. The exact nature of the dialogue will vary.

While not mandated, the basic interactive process can include the following:

  1. Recognizing an accommodation request,
  2. Gathering information,
  3. Exploring accommodation options,
  4. Choosing an accommodation,
  5. Implementing the chosen accommodation, and
  6. Monitoring the accommodation to ensure it continues to be effective.

In many instances, both the disability and the type of accommodation required will be obvious, and there may be little or no need for discussion.

In other situations, the disability and/or the need for accommodation may not be obvious, and to identify an effective accommodation, employers may need to:

  • Ask questions concerning the nature of the disability and the individual’s functional limitations; or
  • Ask for reasonable documentation about the employee’s or the applicant’s disability and limitations, meaning only documentation that establishes:
    • A person has an ADA disability, and
    • The disability necessitates a reasonable accommodation.

Recognizing accommodation requests

When an individual makes it known that an adjustment or change is needed at work due to a medical condition and a work-related barrier, this is an accommodation request under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA).

Employees or applicants may ask for an accommodation in a variety of ways. They might, for example,

  • Allude to the need for accommodation during ordinary workplace conversations, or
  • Provide a doctor’s note that excuses absences for a medical reason or places restrictions on their ability to perform certain job tasks.

The request does not need to mention terms like “ADA” or “reasonable accommodation,” and it does not need to be in writing. An employer may, however, ask for something in writing to document the request.

Under the ADA, individuals may request an accommodation at any time during the application process or while they are employed. They can request an accommodation even if they did not ask for one when applying for a job or after receiving a job offer. Once employees or applicants request an accommodation, employers must:

  • Respond appropriately
  • Discuss the individual’s needs
  • Identify the appropriate reasonable accommodation

If employers are unsure whether an employee has requested an accommodation, they may ask for clarification on what is being requested and why.

Managers and supervisors may need to be able to recognize an accommodation request, as they are usually on the front line working with employees.

While employers are not required to ask whether a reasonable accommodation is needed when an employee has not asked for one, they may still ask if they reasonably believe that the employee may need an accommodation. Also, employers should initiate the reasonable accommodation interactive process without being asked if they:

  • Know the employee has a disability;
  • Know, or have reason to know, that the employee is experiencing workplace problems because of the disability; and
  • Know, or have reason to know, that the disability prevents the employee from requesting a reasonable accommodation.

If employees state that they do not need a reasonable accommodation, employers will have fulfilled their obligation.

As important as it is to recognize a request for accommodation, employers must also know what is not considered a request for accommodation under the ADA. It is not, for example, a request for accommodation when:

  • An applicant voluntarily self-identifies as an individual with a disability for affirmative action purposes under Section 503 of the Rehabilitation Act, or
  • An employee discloses a disability, but there is no connection to a work-related barrier or specific request.

Gathering information

Once an accommodation request is received, employers may gather information necessary to process the request. Employers may ask questions to help make an informed decision. This includes asking what type of reasonable accommodation is needed.

While individuals with disabilities do not need to be able to specify the precise accommodation, they do need to describe the problems posed by the workplace barrier. Additionally, suggestions from the individuals with disabilities may assist in determining the type of reasonable accommodation to provide.

If the disability and/or the need for accommodation is not obvious, employers may ask for reasonable documentation about the disability and functional limitations. Employers may require only the documentation that is needed to establish that a person has an ADA disability and that the disability necessitates a reasonable accommodation.

Questions to consider during the process include:

  • What limitations is the employee experiencing?
  • How do these limitations affect the employee and the employee’s job performance?
  • What specific job tasks are problematic because of these limitations?
  • What accommodations are available to reduce or eliminate these problems?
  • Are all possible resources being used to determine possible accommodations?
  • Has the employee been consulted regarding possible accommodations?
  • Once accommodations are in place, would it be useful to meet with the employee to evaluate the effectiveness of the accommodations and determine whether additional accommodations are needed?
  • Do supervisory personnel and employees need training?

Employees are required to engage in the interactive process as well as employers. Part of this process could include providing information for an employer to determine the extent of the employee’s disability and the breadth of potential accommodations that might be reasonably afforded. If employees fail to participate, their ADA protections could be at stake.

Exploring accommodations

Once employers have identified an employee’s workplace issue and the limitation causing it through the interactive process, they are ready to explore accommodation options. This is the time to brainstorm and consider what might work, and employers should be open to new ideas and ways of doing things.

The employee who requested the accommodation is a good place to start, so employers should always invite the employee to suggest accommodations. If more accommodation ideas are needed, they may ask the employee’s medical provider for ideas. In some cases, medical professionals can suggest effective accommodations. In other cases, they may not be able to suggest ideas, but may be able to say whether ideas under consideration will help overcome the employee’s limitations.

If employees know of an accommodation that will allow them to perform the essential functions of the job, they must share it. Reasonable accommodations must be determined on a case-by-case basis because workplaces and jobs, like people, vary. Not all people with disabilities, or even all people with the same disability, will require the same accommodation.

Accommodations may involve:

  • Changes to workplace policies, procedures, or practices;
  • Physical changes to the workplace; or
  • Extra equipment.

Types of accommodations can include:

  • Providing leave or breaks,
  • Making the work facility accessible,
  • Providing personal assistance,
  • Allowing service or emotional support animals,
  • Providing interpreters, and
  • Additional accommodations as technology advances.

Employers should look to many resources for input on identifying an effective accommodation, such as:

  • The employee or applicant
  • The individual’s health care provider
  • Condition-specific agencies
  • Other experts

A health care provider is not mandated to identify a reasonable accommodation, but might have some input on the employee’s limitations. Employers might not know if a particular accommodation will be effective, but should feel free to try one out on a temporary basis to see the results. If it works, great. If not, look for another that will be effective.

Choosing an accommodation

Although not required by the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), choose the employee’s preference whenever possible if there are multiple accommodation options. The employer, however, makes the decision and may choose, for example, the lowest-cost accommodation so long as the chosen accommodation is effective.

When an accommodation is identified, implement it by:

  • Installing equipment,
  • Providing training,
  • Informing managers or supervisors,
  • Involving outside services, or
  • Communicating with essential personnel about the accommodation.
    • ADA confidentiality rules dictate that only managers and supervisors should know about the accommodation, if necessary.

Employers are free to provide an accommodation on a trial basis and stop it if it does not work. One thing they might consider when testing accommodations is to make a written agreement, or at least a memo, with the employee that:

  • The accommodation is being tested,
  • How long the test will be, and
  • What will happen if the accommodation does not work.

That way, no one is surprised when the accommodation is revisited down the road.

Monitoring the accommodation

Because changes occur, employers may need to periodically check on the ongoing effectiveness of accommodations. If equipment is involved in the accommodation, someone may need to perform maintenance or upgrades as needed. Encouraging ongoing communication is the most important way to monitor accommodations, and employees who are receiving accommodations need to understand:

  • That they should let their employer know if there are changes or problems with the accommodation, and
  • Who, specifically, to contact.

A common misconception is that once an effective accommodation is implemented, the decision is final. The interactive process, however, is meant to be ongoing. Accommodations are not guaranteed to last forever, and there are times when some maintenance or adjustments may be needed. Employers should make sure to reassess whether the chosen accommodation remains effective and encourage the employee or applicant to let them know if the accommodation’s effectiveness begins to decrease. At this phase, employers should restrict questions about the condition and focus on the solution and its level of effectiveness.

Accommodations are individualized and may be continuous or temporary. Even a long-term reasonable accommodation may not be permanent. If an accommodation no longer meets the disability-related need or begins to pose a hardship, employers are obligated to explore alternative ideas. Of course, with all related actions, they should document what was done, when, why, where, how, etc.

Types of accommodations

  • Employers have many accommodation ideas from which to choose.

Accommodation ideas are limited only by the imagination. Some accommodation ideas include:

  • Providing/Modifying equipment
  • Providing accessible materials
  • Making changes to the physical workplace
  • Restructuring jobs
  • Modifying work schedules
  • Providing breaks
  • Allowing remote work
  • Modifying supervisory methods
  • Allowing service or emotional support animals
  • Reassigning the employee
  • Providing transportation
  • Modifying tests, exams, or training
  • Providing qualified readers
  • Providing interpreters
  • Providing leave Reassignment to a different position is a last resort accommodation.

An employee’s limitation will generally dictate the accommodation. For example, an employee with long COVID might have shortness of breath with exertion. Accommodations might, therefore, include the following:

  • Reduce physical exertion;
  • Allow rest breaks;
  • Reduce workplace triggers, if any;
  • Allow time for medical treatment such as use of a nebulizer or inhaler;
  • Restructure the job to remove marginal job functions; or
  • Develop an action plan to deal with sudden exacerbations.

An employee who suffers from fatigue might benefit from the following accommodations:

  • Allow rest breaks,
  • Provide an ergonomic workstation,
  • Allow a flexible schedule, or
  • Restructure the job to remove marginal job functions.

Employees who deal with brain fog (for example caused by long COVID), might need the following accommodations:

  • Provide a quiet work space;
  • Allow use of noise cancellation or white noise;
  • Provide uninterrupted work time;
  • Provide memory aids such as flowcharts and check lists;
  • Allow the use of apps for concentration, memory, and organization;
  • Allow rest breaks; or
  • Restructure the job to remove marginal functions to allow focus on essential job duties.

The following accommodations might be effective for employees with headaches:

  • Reduce workplace triggers, if any;
  • Provide alternative lighting;
  • Reduce glare; or
  • Allow flexible scheduling.

A particular conditions does not mean that a limited list of effective accommodations is available. Much will depend upon the employee’s particular limitations in relation to the job’s essential functions. Identify the barriers between them and find ways to break the barriers down or eliminate them.

Employees with mobility limitations might need to have the workplace be made more accessible. Someone with a hearing impairment might need a translator. Each situations must be dealt with on its own merits. That’s why the interactive process is so important; it deals with the specific facts involved.

Providing/Modifying equipment

Purchasing equipment or modifying existing equipment is a form of reasonable accommodation. All employees need the right tools and work environment to effectively perform their jobs. Similarly, individuals with disabilities may need workplace adjustments to maximize the value they can add to the organization.

Many devices are available that make it possible for people to perform essential job functions. These devices range from very simple solutions, such as an elastic band that can enable a person with cerebral palsy to hold a pencil and write, to “high-tech” electronic equipment that can be operated with eye or head movements by people who cannot use their hands.

Employers are obligated to provide only equipment that is needed to perform a job; there is no obligation to provide equipment that the individual uses regularly in daily life, such as glasses, a hearing aid, or a wheelchair. However, employers may be obligated to provide items of this nature if special adaptations are required to perform a job.

Providing accessible materials

Employers may have to make written materials accessible to an individual with a disability who may not be able to read or understand them. Simple accommodations could include having someone read a list of employee conduct rules to an employee with a visual impairment or providing a simpler explanation of the rules for an employee with a cognitive disability.

Making changes to the workplace

Making changes to the facilities or work areas is a form of reasonable accommodation. This includes the physical barriers covered by the ADA accessibility standards. Employers need to make existing facilities used by employees readily accessible for employees with disabilities, such as making work areas accessible for approach, entry, and exit so people using wheelchairs can enter and back out of the area. This includes working areas as well as non-working areas such as break rooms, lunchrooms, training rooms, and restrooms.

Restructuring the job

Job restructuring includes shifting responsibility to other employees for minor tasks (or “marginal functions”) that an employee is unable to perform because of a disability and altering when and/or how a task is performed. It may involve reallocating or redistributing the marginal functions of a job. However, employers are not required to reallocate essential functions of a job as a reasonable accommodation under the ADA. Essential functions, by definition, are those that a qualified individual must perform, with or without an accommodation. If the workforce is small and all workers must be able to perform a number of different tasks, job restructuring may not be possible.

Even though the ADA does not require employers to reallocate essential functions as a reasonable accommodation, they may do so if they wish. An individual may be reassigned to a lower-graded position if there are no accommodations that would enable the employee to remain in the current position and there are no vacant equivalent positions for which the individual is qualified (with or without a reasonable accommodation).

Employers are not, however, required to maintain the reassigned individual with a disability at the salary of a higher-rated position if employers do not do so for reassigned employees who do not have a disability. It should further be noted that employers are not required to promote an individual with a disability as an accommodation.

Modifying work schedules

Modifying work schedules may involve adjusting arrival or departure time, providing periodic breaks, or altering when certain job tasks are performed. Employers should consider modification of a regular work schedule as a reasonable accommodation unless this would cause an undue hardship. Modified work schedules may include flexibility in work hours or the workweek, or part-time work, where this will not be an undue hardship.

A modified schedule may also involve allowing an employee to use accrued paid leave or providing additional unpaid leave. Employers must provide a modified or part-time schedule when required as a reasonable accommodation, absent undue hardship, even if they do not provide such schedules for other employees.

Providing breaks

Providing an employee with breaks can be seen as a reasonable accommodation involving a modified work schedule. Sometimes, however, breaks can be short and rather infrequent, not really reaching the level of a schedule change.

Working from home (Telework)

Many employers have discovered the benefits of allowing employees to work from home through telework (also known as telecommuting) programs, particularly since the COVID-19 pandemic.

Not all persons with disabilities need — or want — to work from home, and not all jobs can be performed at home. However, allowing an employee to work at home may be a reasonable accommodation where the person’s disability prevents successfully performing the job on-site and the job, or parts of the job, can be performed at home without causing significant difficulty or expense. To deny a request to work from home, employers must be able to show that attendance is an essential function for the particular job in question.

If an employee is working from home for a certain period, perhaps during a pandemic, you may ask employees if they will need reasonable accommodations in the future when they return to the workplace. Employers may ask employees with disabilities to request accommodations that they believe they may need when they return to the physical workplace, basically by beginning the interactive process.

Before allowing anyone to return to work (or even after they do return), employers may make information available to all employees about who to contact — if they wish — to request accommodation for a disability that they may need upon return to the workplace, even if no date has been announced for their return. If requests are received in advance, you may begin the interactive process.

Modifying supervisory methods

Simple modifications of supervisory methods may include communicating assignments in writing rather than orally for someone whose disability limits concentration or providing additional day-to-day guidance or feedback. Employers are not required, however, to change someone’s supervisor.

Making policy modifications

Modifying a workplace rule because of an employee’s disability may be a form of reasonable accommodation. Reasonable accommodation requires only that you modify the policy for an employee who requires such action because of a disability; however, you may continue to apply the policy to all other employees.

Granting time off or adjusting a work schedule may involve modifying leave or attendance procedures or policies. Similarly, you may need to modify a policy prohibiting animals in the workplace so that a visually impaired person can use a guide dog.

Allowing service animals or emotional support animals

Another type of accommodation is to allow employees to bring service animals or emotional support animals to work with them. Many individuals with disabilities use animals to help them perform some functions. Most people are familiar with seeing-eye dogs, for example.

A service animal and an emotional support animal are defined differently and apply in different situations. A service animal is specifically defined by the public accessibility provisions of the ADA, but not in the employment provisions.

An emotional support animal, on the other hand, is a companion animal that provides therapeutic benefit to an individual with a disability. Since the employment provisions of the ADA do not define a service animal or restrict accommodations to service animals as defined for public accessibility, employers may have to consider allowing an employee to bring an animal that does not meet the definition of a service animal into the workplace. This could include a therapy or emotional support animal. However, employers don’t have to allow an employee to bring any animal into the workplace if it is not needed because of a disability or if it disrupts the workplace or otherwise poses an undue hardship.

Even if employers have a no-pet policy, allowing a service or emotional can be a reasonable accommodation, because making exceptions to workplace policies can be an accommodation.

Service animals assist persons with a variety of disabilities in their day-to-day activities. Some examples include the following:

  • Alerting persons with hearing impairments to sounds.
  • Pulling wheelchairs or carrying and picking up things for persons with mobility impairments.
  • Assisting persons with mobility impairments with balance.

Service animals are not pets — they perform some of the functions that people with disabilities cannot do for themselves.

Some service animals, but not all, wear special collars, harnesses, or other identification signaling that it is a service animal and not a pet. Some, but not all, are licensed or certified and have identification papers.

No registry of service animals exists, so you can’t simply look up whether a particular service animal is registered.

Reassigning the employee

Reassignment is generally the reasonable accommodation of last resort. Reassignment may be necessary where an employee can no longer perform his or her job because of a disability. The employee must be qualified for the new position, however. This means that the employee

  • Satisfies the skill, experience, education, and other job-related requirements of the position, and
  • Can perform the primary job tasks of the new position, with or without reasonable accommodation.

The employee does not need to be the best qualified individual for the position.

Providing transportation

Other forms of accommodation may involve making transportation provided by the employer accessible. Employers must consider accommodations related to commuting problems. It does not matter if the employee is fully able to perform his job without the need for accommodations once he or she gets to work.

Generally, it is not always an employer’s responsibility to provide an employee with transportation to and from work. However, an employee’s disability may interfere with his or her ability to get to work.

Modifying tests, exams, or training

Employers may be required to modify, adjust, or make other reasonable accommodations in the ways that tests and training are administered in order to provide equal employment opportunities for qualified individuals with disabilities.

Accommodations may be needed to assure that tests or examinations measure the actual ability of an individual to perform job functions, rather than reflecting limitations caused by the disability. The ADA requires that tests be given to people who have sensory, speaking, or manual impairments in a format that does not require the use of the impaired skill, unless that is the job-related skill the test is designed to measure.

Employers have an obligation to inform job applicants in advance that a test will be given, so that an individual who needs an accommodation can make such a request.

Providing qualified readers

When an applicant or employee has a visual disability, employers and the individual should use the interactive process to identify specific limitations of the individual in relation to specific needs of the job and to assess possible accommodations. It may be a reasonable accommodation to provide a reader for an individual with a disability, if this would not impose an undue hardship.

In some job situations, a reader may be the most effective and efficient accommodation, but in other situations alternative accommodations may enable an individual with a visual disability to perform job tasks just as effectively.

Where reading is an essential job function, depending on the nature of a visual impairment and the nature of job tasks, print magnification equipment or a talking computer may be more effective and less costly than providing another employee as a reader. Where an individual has to read lengthy documents, a reader who transcribes documents onto tapes may be a more effective accommodation.

Providing interpreters

Providing an interpreter on an “as-needed” basis may be a reasonable accommodation for a person who is deaf in some employment situations, if this does not impose an undue hardship.

A person who with a hearing impairment should be able to communicate effectively with others as required by the duties of the job. Identifying the needs of the individual in relation to specific job tasks will determine if or when an interpreter may be needed. The resources available to employers would be considered in determining whether it would be an undue hardship to provide such an accommodation.

People with hearing impairments have different communication needs and use different modes of communication. Some use signing in American Sign Language (ASL), but others use sign language that has different manual codes. Some people rely on an oral interpreter who silently mouths words spoken by others to make them easier to lip-read. Many hearing-impaired people use their voices to communicate, and some combine talking and signing. The individual should be consulted to determine the most effective means of communication.

Leave as an accommodation

  • Allowing an employee to take leave can be a form of reasonable accommodation.
  • Leave provided under the ADA is job protected.
  • Leave can be provided as an accommodation when no other accommodations are effective.

Allowing an employee to use accrued paid leave and providing additional unpaid leave can be a form of reasonable accommodation. Such leave could be in large blocks of time or on an intermittent or reduced schedule basis.

Similar to the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA), leave provided under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) is job protected, but the ADA does not include an “equivalent” position provision; employers are expected to return employees to the jobs they had before leave began. The concept of leave as an accommodation might be confusing because it doesn’t align with the idea of providing an accommodation that keeps an employee on the job. The goal in allowing the use of leave, however, is to provide an employee the opportunity to manage the condition and ultimately remain in the workforce.

Leave could be provided as an accommodation when:

  • No other accommodation is effective,
  • The employee is not eligible for leave under the FMLA or has exhausted the FMLA leave, or
  • The employee has exhausted paid time off and required additional leave.

If employers have a leave policy, they should ensure it is flexible. If, for example, they provide employees with up to three months of company leave for a medical condition, but a particular employee needs three months and two weeks of leave, they would need to consider allowing the additional two weeks as a reasonable accommodation. Generally, if the leave does not pose an undue hardship, employers might have a hard time arguing why they did not provide it. An inflexible leave policy can risk a very expensive claim, as such policies would apply to all employees, constituting a systemic issue.

How much leave is reasonable remains a matter of debate. At least one court, the 7th Circuit, has ruled that extended leave is not reasonable. Perhaps a few weeks or intermittent leave would be in that jurisdiction.

Otherwise, the amount of leave is limited only by how much leave would prove to be an undue hardship.

Unlimited leave, however, is not considered reasonable. If an employee is unable to provide at least an estimated return-to-work date, employers need not provide the leave as an accommodation.

Undue hardship

  • Employers do not have to provide a particular accommodation if it would pose an undue hardship.
  • Employers should try to find another accommodation that would not pose an undue hardship.

Employers must provide a reasonable accommodation if a person with a disability needs one to apply for a job, perform a job, or enjoy benefits equal to those offered to other employees. Employers do not, however, have to provide any accommodation that would pose an undue hardship.

Undue hardship means that providing the accommodation would result in significant difficulty or expense, based on an employer’s resources and the operation of the business. While the “undue hardship” provision considers the financial realities of the particular employer, the concept of an undue hardship is not limited to financial difficulty and may refer to any accommodation that would be:

  • Excessively costly
  • Extensive
  • Substantial
  • Disruptive
  • Fundamentally altering the nature or operation of the business

Determinations of undue hardship must be based on an individualized assessment of current circumstances that show a specific reasonable accommodation would cause significant difficulty or expense. If providing a particular accommodation would result in undue hardship, employers should consider whether another accommodation exists would not.

Employers may not claim undue hardship based on employees’ or customers’ fears or prejudices toward the individual’s disability. Similarly, undue hardship cannot be claimed because providing the accommodation might have a negative impact on the morale of other employees. Employers may, however, be able to show undue hardship where providing an accommodation would be unduly disruptive to other employees’ ability to work.

What are the federal laws prohibiting job discrimination?

  • There are many federal laws regarding employment discrimination enforced by the EEOC.

The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) enforces most of the federal laws regarding discrimination in employment, such as:

  • Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII). This prohibits employment discrimination based on:
    • Race
    • Color
    • Religion
    • Sex
    • National origin
      • It applies to employers with 15 or more employees.
  • The Equal Pay Act of 1963 (EPA). This protects men and women who perform substantially equal work in the same establishment from sex-based wage discrimination.
    • Like the Fair Labor Standards Act, it applies to virtually all employers.
  • The Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (ADEA). This protects individuals who are 40 years of age or older.
    • It applies to employers with 20 or more employees.
  • Titles I and V of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA). These prohibit employment discrimination against qualified individuals with disabilities in:
    • The private sector, and
    • State and local governments.
      • These apply to employers with 15 or more employees.
  • Sections 501 and 505 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973. These prohibit discrimination against qualified individuals with disabilities who work in the federal government.
  • The Civil Rights Act of 1991. This provides, among other things, monetary damages in cases of intentional employment discrimination.
    • It covers the same employers as Title VII.
  • The Pregnancy Discrimination Act (PDA), is an amendment to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act. It prohibits employees from discriminating against employees on the basis of pregnancy.
  • The Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act (GINA). This prohibits employers from:
    • Obtaining or using genetic information about employees or applicants; or
    • Using that information to deny any term, condition, or privilege of employment.
      • It applies to employers with 15 or more employees.
  • The Pregnant Workers Fairness Act (PWFA). This law requires covered employers to provide reasonable accommodations to an employee’s known limitations related to pregnancy, childbirth, or related medical conditions, unless the accommodation will cause the employer an undue hardship.

What is employment discrimination?

  • It is illegal to discriminate based on protected categories in any aspect of employment.

It is illegal to discriminate based on protected categories in any aspect of employment, including:

  • Hiring and firing;
  • Compensation, assignment, or classification of employees;
  • Transfer, promotion, layoff, or recall;
  • Job advertisements;
  • Recruitment;
  • Testing;
  • Use of company facilities;
  • Training and apprenticeship programs;
  • Fringe benefits;
  • Pay, retirement plans, and disability leave; or
  • Other terms and conditions of employment.

Discriminatory practices include, but are not limited to:

  • Harassment based on:
    • Race,
    • Color,
    • Religion,
    • Sex,
    • National origin,
    • Pregnancy,
    • Disability, or
    • Age;
  • Retaliation against an individual for:
    • Filing a charge of discrimination,
    • Participating in an investigation, or
    • Opposing discriminatory practices;
  • Employment decisions based on stereotypes or assumptions about the abilities, traits, or performance of individuals of a certain:
    • Sex,
    • Race,
    • Age,
    • Religion,
    • Ethnic group, or
    • Disability; and
  • Denying employment opportunities because of marriage to, or association with, an individual of a particular:
    • Race,
    • Religion,
    • National origin; or
    • Disability.
      • Title VII also prohibits discrimination because of participation in schools or places of worship associated with a particular racial, ethnic, or religious group.

The federal discrimination laws not only protect employees, but also protect non-employees. For example, employers could be held liable for the:

  • Harassing acts of an independent contractor against their employees, if the company fails to address the conduct; and
  • Actions of their employees against customers.

What is harassment?

  • Employers are responsible for acts of harassment, even if they come from outside of the company.

Harassment based on race, color, sex, national origin, religion, age, or disability is a discriminatory practice. Although sexual harassment has received the most attention, many of the same principles apply to other types of harassment, and employers should be equally vigilant in preventing it.

Hostile work environment

Behaviors that create a hostile environment generally involve acts directed at people because of their race, color, national origin, religion, age, or disability. While sexual harassment involves sexual conduct, gender harassment can occur where no sexual conduct is involved.

Hostile environment harassment includes:

  • Unwelcome comments or conduct unreasonably interfering with an individual’s work performance; or
  • Creating an intimidating, hostile, or offensive work environment.

The harasser can be a supervisor, coworker, or non-employee. It is important to note that employers may not only be responsible for acts of harassment by employees and supervisors, but also for acts of non-employees, such as vendors and customers, where they knew about or should have known about the conduct being challenged.

Anti-harassment training for employees and supervisors

A good training program can go a long way in proving that your company took adequate measures to prevent sexual harassment.

Disparate treatment/disparate impact

There are two broad types of discrimination:

  • Disparate treatment: An intentional practice where members of a protected class are treated differently than other employees.
  • Disparate (or adverse) impact: A (usually) unintentional business practice that has the effect of discrimination on members of a protected class.

For example, more men than women are selected as firefighters because the physical requirements tend to screen out a higher percentage of women. This has an adverse impact on women as a group, although this is allowable due to business necessity. However, a hiring practice may be discriminatory if it tends to screen out a particular group and is unrelated to:

  • The requirements of the position, or
  • Business necessity.

What are protected classes?

  • Protected classes are protected from discrimination under federal law.

The term “protected class” is associated with discrimination. In short, discrimination is an adverse action taken, intentionally or unintentionally, where membership in a protected class was a motivating factor.

Employers cannot use a person’s membership in a protected class as a factor when making employment decisions (hiring, promotion, etc.). Classes protected under federal law include:

  • Age (over 40)
  • Disability
  • National origin
  • Pregnancy
  • Race
  • Religion
  • Sex (including sexual orientation and gender identity)
  • Genetic information (the provisions on genetic discrimination are typically similar to those for disabilities and prohibit medical tests that reveal genetic disorders.)

Note that in addition to these categories, federal contractors are specifically prohibited from discriminating based on an individual’s:

  • Protected veteran status

In addition, many states have created discrimination laws that include additional protected classes. Some of the more common classes that states have listed include:

  • Arrest or court records,
  • Military service,
  • Use of a lawful product (like tobacco), and
  • Engaging in lawful activity outside of work.

What is sex discrimination?

  • On June 15, 2020, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that sexual orientation and gender identity are covered under the category of sex, which has long been protected under Title VII.

Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, enforced by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), protects individuals against employment discrimination based on:

  • Sex
  • Race
  • Color
  • National origin
  • Religion

Title VII applies to:

  • Employers with 15 or more employees; and
  • Employment agencies, labor organizations, and the federal government.

Title VII prohibits:

  • Discrimination against any employees or applicants because of their sex regarding:
    • Hiring,
    • Termination,
    • Promotion,
    • Compensation,
    • Job training, or
    • Any other term, condition, or privilege of employment.
  • Employment decisions based on stereotypes and assumptions about abilities, traits, or the performance of individuals based on sex; and
  • Intentional discrimination and neutral job policies that:
    • Disproportionately exclude individuals based on sex, and
    • Are not job related.

When can sex be considered?

Sex can be considered where it is a bona fide requirement. For example, an employer looking to hire models for women’s clothing would not need to consider male applicants.

Some state laws used to prohibit or limit the employment of women in jobs requiring lifting or carrying weights exceeding certain limits, or other factors. Most have since been repealed. Such laws did not take the abilities of individual women into account and, therefore, were found to discriminate on the basis of sex. Where such laws still exist, they cannot be used as a defense to an unlawful employment practice.

It is also unlawful to retaliate against an individual for:

  • Opposing employment practices that discriminate based on sex; or
  • Filing a discrimination charge, testifying, or participating in any way in an investigation, proceeding, or litigation under Title VII.

Sexual orientation and gender identity

On June 15, 2020, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that sexual orientation and gender identity are covered under the characteristic of sex, which has long been protected under Title VII.

Family responsibility discrimination

Some employees have claimed “family responsibility” discrimination, which is effectively a form of sex discrimination. Typically, employees claim that assumptions about gender stereotypes formed the basis for discrimination. For example, if female employees are denied a promotion because of perceived child-care responsibilities, they might claim family responsibility discrimination based on those gender stereotypes.

What is race discrimination?

Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 protects individuals against employment discrimination based on:

  • Race
  • Color
  • National origin
  • Sex
  • Religion

Title VII applies to:

  • Employers with 15 or more employees, including state and local governments; and
  • Employment agencies, labor organizations, and the federal government.

Title VII prohibits:

  • Discrimination against any employees or applicants because of their race or color regarding:
    • Hiring;
    • Termination;
    • Promotion;
    • Compensation;
    • Job training; or
    • Any other term, condition, or privilege of employment.
  • Employment decisions based on stereotypes and assumptions about abilities, traits, or the performance of individuals of certain racial groups.
  • Intentional discrimination and neutral job policies that:
    • Disproportionately exclude minorities, and
    • Are not job related.

Equal employment opportunity cannot be denied because of:

  • Marriage to or association with an individual of a different race,
  • Membership in or association with ethnic-based organizations or groups, or
  • Attendance or participation in schools or places of worship generally associated with certain minority groups.

Title VII violations related to race include:

  • Race-related characteristics. Title VII prohibits:
    • Discrimination based on an immutable characteristic associated with race, even if all members of the race don’t share the same characteristic, such as:
      • Skin color,
      • Hair texture, or
      • Certain facial feature, and
    • Discrimination based on a condition that predominantly affects one race, such as:
      • A policy excluding individuals with sickle cell anemia, which predominantly occurs in Black people; and
      • A “no-beard” policy, which could discriminate against Black men predisposed to pseudofolliculitis barbae (severe shaving bumps).
        • The only exception is if the practice or policy is job related and consistent with business necessity.
  • Harassment. Harassment based on race and/or color violates Title VII, including:
    • Ethnic slurs,
    • Racial “joke,”
    • Offensive or derogatory comments, or
    • Other verbal or physical conduct that:
      • Creates an intimidating, hostile, or offensive working environment; or
      • Interferes with an individual’s work performance.
  • Segregation and classification of employees. Title VII is violated when:
    • Employees in a protected group are segregated by physically isolating them from other employees or from customer contact;
    • Employers assign employees according to race or color, such as:
      • Assigning primarily Black people to predominantly Black-owned establishments or geographic areas; and
      • Employers exclude members of one group from particular positions, or group or categorize employees or jobs so that certain jobs are generally held by members of a certain protected group.
        • Additionally, employers or employment agencies coding applications and/or resumes to designate an applicant’s race constitutes evidence of discrimination where people of a certain race or color are excluded from employment or from certain positions.
  • Pre-employment inquiries. Requesting pre-employment information that discloses or tends to disclose an applicant’s race strongly suggests that race will be used unlawfully as a basis for hiring.
    • Therefore, if members of minority groups are excluded from employment, the request would likely constitute evidence of discrimination.
  • Retaliation. It is unlawful to retaliate against an individual for:
    • Opposing employment practices that discriminate based on race or color; or
    • Filing a discrimination charge, testifying, or participating in any way in an investigation, proceeding, or litigation under Title VII.
      • Legal challenges usually involve motivation. Factors that may suggest race was a factor include:
        • Racial remarks by the decision maker,
        • A poor record of hiring minorities, and
        • Unimpressive qualifications of those selected or retained.
      • Factors that can be helpful in fighting a charge include:
        • A strong record of hiring minorities, and
        • Having treated minorities and non-minorities the same in similar circumstances.

What is age discrimination?

  • The ADEA protects employees who are 40 years old or older.

The Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (ADEA) makes it unlawful for an employer to discriminate against individuals in any aspect of employment because they are 40 years old or older (unless one of the statutory exceptions applies). Favoring an older individual over a younger individual because of age, however, is not unlawful discrimination, even if the younger individual is at least 40 years old.

The ADEA applies to:

  • Employers with 20 or more employees, including state and local governments; and
  • Employment agencies, labor organizations, and the federal government.

Motivating factors

The regulations recognize that differentiation based on reasonable factors other than age are not discriminatory. These may include:

  • Skill
  • Knowledge
  • Demonstrated performance

The issue in age cases is almost always one of motivation. Factors that tend to suggest age as a motivating factor include:

  • Remarks suggesting age bias by the decision maker,
  • A pattern of negative actions against older employees that cannot be explained, and
  • Replacement by a substantially younger employee without greater qualifications.

Factors that tend to suggest that age was not a motivating factor include:

  • Favorable treatment toward other senior employees,
  • Well-documented evidence of other reasons, and
  • Replacement by someone who is not substantially younger in a discharge case.

Juries seem inclined to conclude that the reason for discharge was due to age when:

  • The employee has many years of service,
  • No proper warning or opportunity to correct the problem was given, and
  • The employer denying age discrimination has allowed age-based remarks or jokes.

What is religious discrimination?

  • Unless it would cause undue hardship, employers are required to provide reasonable accommodation for religious beliefs and practices.

Title VII of the Civil Rights Act prohibits employers from discriminating against individuals because of their religion in any terms and conditions of employment. Title VII applies to employers with 15 or more employees.

In most cases, whether a practice or belief is “religious” is not at issue. Employers may not treat employees or applicants less — or more — favorably because of their religious beliefs or practices. For example, an employer may not:

  • Refuse to hire individuals of a certain religion,
  • Impose stricter promotion requirements for people of a certain religion, or
  • Impose more or different work requirements due to an employee’s religious beliefs or practices.

Employees cannot be forced to participate — or not participate — in a religious activity as a condition of employment.

What is religious accommodation?

In addition to avoiding discrimination, employers must reasonably accommodate employees’ sincerely held religious beliefs or practices unless doing so would impose an undue hardship. A reasonable accommodation is any adjustment to the work environment that will allow employees to practice their religion. Examples might include:

  • Flexible scheduling;
  • Voluntary job or shift substitutions or swaps;
  • Job reassignments and lateral transfers; or
  • Modifying workplace practices, policies, and/or procedures.

Generally, requests for religious accommodations can be handled with a change in shift or work hours. If an accommodation is denied, employers must show the accommodation would result in undue hardship or violate a bona fide seniority system. Otherwise, employers have a duty to accommodate the employee.

An accommodation posing undue hardship is one would result in substantial increased costs in relation to the conduct of their particular business. This is a higher threshold than that of a de minimis cost.

Employers must consider relevant factors in a situation, including the particular accommodations at issue and their practical impact in light of the nature, size, and operating cost of an employer.

When assessing an accommodation’s hardship, employers may include the impact on coworkers, but only if it affects the conduct of the business. Employers must look at other criteria.

Further, a hardship is not undue if it is attributable to:

  • Employee animosity to a particular religion,
  • To religion in general, or
  • To the very notion of accommodating religious practice.

Bias or hostility to a religious practice or accommodation is not a defense.

An attempt to accommodate an employee’s religious beliefs might not be successful, but failure to engage in the process, or the outright rejection of the request without any effort to accommodate, may result in a discrimination complaint. For example, declining a request for time off to attend a religious event because other employees would not be allowed off may not be appropriate unless it really would be an undue hardship. Treating everyone the same is not enough because of the positive duty to accommodate.

In some cases, the alleged discrimination isn’t obvious. For example, employees with performance problems may have also requested time off for their religious beliefs. If they are terminated, the courts may need to decide whether the employer had a “mixed motive” in firing the employee. If their religious beliefs were considered, the claim of performance issues may be a false reason or motive (or “pretext”) for discrimination. But if an effort was made to accommodate the need for time off, the employer should face fewer challenges in defending against the charge.

What is national origin discrimination?

Regardless of ancestry, each employee or job applicant is entitled to the same employment opportunities. The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) enforces the federal prohibition against national origin discrimination in employment under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, which covers employers with 15 or more employees.

Discrimination includes treating someone less favorably because:

  • They come from a particular place,
  • Their ethnicity or accent,
  • They are believed to have a particular ethnic background, or
  • They are married to or associated with someone of a particular nationality.

Examples of violations covered under Title VII include:

  • Making employment decisions, such as hiring, firing, and promotion, based on national origin;
  • Offensive conduct, such as ethnic slurs, that creates a hostile work environment;
  • Basing a decision on an employee’s foreign accent unless it materially interferes with job performance;
  • Imposing English-fluency requirements where not required for the effective performance of the position; and
  • Setting English-only rules, other than when they are needed to promote the safe or efficient operation of the employer’s business.

National origin discrimination is also prohibited under the law that requires employers to complete an I-9 Form.

What is pregnancy discrimination?

The federal Pregnancy Discrimination Act is an amendment to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act and, therefore, applies to employers with 15 or more employees. Discrimination on the basis of pregnancy, childbirth, or related medical conditions is unlawful.

Pregnancy discrimination under Title VII can be based on:

  • Current pregnancy,
  • Past pregnancy,
  • Potential pregnancy,
  • Medical condition related to pregnancy or childbirth including breastfeeding/lactation,
  • Having or choosing not to have an abortion, and
  • Birth control (Contraception).

Women who are pregnant or affected by related conditions must be treated in the same manner as other applicants or employees with similar abilities or limitations. If an employee is temporarily unable to perform her job due to pregnancy or related conditions, the employer must treat her the same as any other temporarily disabled employee.

If, for example, the employer allows temporarily disabled employees to modify tasks, perform alternative assignments, or take leave, the employer must also allow an employee who is temporarily disabled due to pregnancy or related conditions to do the same.

Employers may not refuse to hire a pregnant woman because of pregnancy, a pregnancy-related condition, or because of the prejudices of co-workers, clients, or customers.

Pregnant employees must be permitted to work as long as they are able to perform their jobs. Employers may not force a woman to take leave because of a pregnancy. Employers must hold a job open for a pregnancy-related absence the same length of time jobs are held for employees with other temporary disabilities.

Pregnant Workers Fairness Act (PWFA)

The PWFA protects employees and applicants who have known limitations related to pregnancy, childbirth, or related medical conditions; it applies only to accommodations. Final rules implementing the PWFA became effective June 18, 2024. Employers with 15 or more employees are covered by the PWFA.

Existing laws that the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) enforces, such as the Pregnancy Discrimination Act, make it illegal to fire or otherwise discriminate against workers on the basis of pregnancy, childbirth, or related medical conditions, but don't require accommodations.

Under the PWFA, limitations may be minor and may be associated with an uncomplicated pregnancy and may require accommodations that are easy to make.

Related medical conditions must relate to pregnancy or childbirth of the specific individual. They can include lactation (including breastfeeding and pumping), miscarriage, stillbirth, having or choosing not to have an abortion, preeclampsia, gestational diabetes, and HELLP (hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes and low platelets) syndrome, sciatica, carpal tunnel syndrome, migraines, dehydration, anxiety, loss of balance, varicose veins, and menstruation, to name only some.

Note: Federal courts have enjoined the EEOC from enforcing the PWFA rules in relation to elective abortions.

Reasonable accommodations are changes to the work environment or the way things are usually done at work. Some examples of accommodating pregnancy, childbirth, or related medical conditions include:

  • Permission to sit or drink water;
  • Closer parking;
  • Flexible hours;
  • Appropriately sized uniforms and safety apparel;
  • Additional break time to use the bathroom, eat, and rest;
  • Leave or time off to recover from childbirth; and
  • Being excused from strenuous activities and/or activities that involve exposure to compounds not safe for pregnancy.

Qualified employees and applicants are entitled to receive accommodations. Employees or applicants can be “qualified” under the PWFA in two ways.

  • First, an employee or applicant who can perform the “essential functions” of the job with or without a reasonable accommodation is qualified.

“Essential functions” are the fundamental duties of the job. Many employees or applicants seeking accommodations will meet this part of the definition because they can perform the job or apply for the position with a reasonable accommodation—for example, the cashier who needs a stool, the production worker who needs bathroom breaks, or the retail worker who needs to carry around a bottle of water.

  • Second, if an employee cannot perform the essential functions of the job with or without a reasonable accommodation, an employee can be qualified even if they cannot do the essential functions of their job as long as:
    • The inability is “temporary;”
    • The employee could perform the functions “in the near future;” and
    • The inability to perform the essential functions can be reasonably accommodated.

The determination of whether an employee can perform the functions in the near future is made on a case-by-case basis. If the employee is pregnant, it is presumed that the employee could perform the essential function(s) in the near future because they could perform the essential function(s) within generally 40 weeks of its suspension. An accommodation can include the suspension of an essential function.

This means that an employee who is temporarily unable to perform one or more essential functions of their job, and who therefore needs light duty or a change in their work assignments, may be entitled to such a change as a reasonable accommodation. Leave can also be a reasonable accommodation.

Employees must communicate that they have a limitation — a physical or mental condition related to, arising out of, or affected by pregnancy, childbirth, or a related medical condition — and that they need an adjustment or change in their working conditions due to the limitation. Employees don't have to use any particular words or forms.

Once employers know of such a limitation and accommodation need, they should engage in the “interactive process” with the employee or applicant. They should talk to the employee about the known limitation and the adjustment or change needed at work.

Since employees often tell their managers or supervisors about such accommodation needs, managers and supervisors should be trained in how to recognize such requests and how to respond.

Employers must provide the following accommodations without delay or documentation:

  • Carrying or keeping water near and drinking, as needed;
  • Allowing additional restroom breaks, as needed;
  • Allowing sitting for those whose work requires standing and standing for those whose work requires sitting, as needed; and
  • Allowing breaks to eat and drink, as needed.

These are a small set of simple, inexpensive, commonly sought accommodations that are widely known to be needed during an uncomplicated pregnancy, and where documentation would not be easily obtained or necessary. These will not pose an undue hardship.

For other accommodation requests, employers may ask for supporting documentation only when reasonable and when the condition or accommodation need is not obvious.

Documentation is not reasonable if:

  • The limitation and need for an adjustment or change at work due to the limitation is obvious. For example, an obviously pregnant employee who seeks a bigger uniform because of their pregnancy cannot be required to provide additional information.
  • The employer already knows about the limitation and the adjustment or change at work due to the limitation. If, for example, the employee has already provided enough information that they have morning sickness due to pregnancy and need a later start time, the employer cannot demand a new doctor’s note every time the employee uses the accommodation of coming in later.
  • The employee is currently pregnant and needs breaks for the bathroom or to eat or drink, needs to carry water with them to drink, or needs to stand if their job requires sitting or to sit if their job requires standing.
  • The employee is lactating and needs modifications to pump at work or nurse during work hours.
  • The employer would not ask an employee for documentation in that situation normally. If an employer’s policy is that employees only need a note from a health care provider for absences if they are missing three or more days in a row, the employer can’t require someone who needs a reasonable accommodation of one day off because of pregnancy, childbirth, or a related medical condition to provide information from the health care provider.

When employers are allowed to get documentation from a health care provider, they are limited to documentation that:

  • Explains the health care provider’s qualifications and why they can provide the necessary information for this patient. A brief statement is sufficient. The provider does not need to be treating the condition at issue, as long are they are familiar enough with the patient’s circumstances to provide appropriate information.
    • Under the PWFA, health care professionals include, but are not limited to: doctors, nurses, nurse practitioners, physician assistants, midwives, physical therapists, and licensed mental health professionals. The health care provider may be a telehealth provider.
  • Confirms that the employee has a physical or mental condition. Because the PWFA covers a wide range of physical or mental conditions, the provider does not need to include a diagnosis; a simple statement of the employee's physical or mental condition is sufficient. The problem or impairment may be minor, modest, or episodic (like fatigue, vomiting, or swelling, need for rest,); a need to attend health care appointments; or maintaining the patient’s health or the health of their pregnancy (like avoiding extreme heat, lifting restriction, or limiting exposure to chemicals).
  • Confirms that the physical or mental condition is related to, affected by, or arising out of pregnancy, childbirth, or related medical conditions. Pregnancy, childbirth, or related medical conditions do not have to be the sole, the original, or a substantial cause of the physical or mental condition.
  • Describes the adjustment or change that is needed at work due to the limitation, including the expected duration of the accommodation. For example, no lifting more than 20 pounds for 3 months, the approximate number and frequency of health care appointments, the estimated time off for recovery, additional safety gear, work functions that should be suspended and for how long, or a later start time. If the change is the temporary suspension of a main job duty, it should make clear that the suspension will be temporary and that the employee could perform the job duty after the pregnancy or in the near future (and include an estimate of when that will be).

Employers should avoid using forms like FMLA certification forms or ADA forms to gather documentation, as they tend to ask for more information than needed. Whatever forms are used, employers should be prepared to have health care providers indicate that some entries or entries are not applicable.

Employers are required to provide reasonable accommodations unless they would cause an “undue hardship” on the employer’s operations. An “undue hardship” is significant difficulty or expense for the employer.

Employers may not:

  • Require an employee to accept an accommodation without a discussion with the employee about the accommodation (the interactive process),
  • Deny a job or other employment opportunities to a qualified employee or applicant based on the person’s need for a reasonable accommodation,
  • Require an employee to take leave if another reasonable accommodation can be provided that would let the employee keep working,
  • Retaliate against an individual for reporting or opposing unlawful discrimination under the PWFA or participating in a PWFA proceeding (such as an investigation), or
  • Interfere with any individual’s rights under the PWFA.

Pregnant Workers Fairness Act (PWFA)

The PWFA protects employees and applicants who have known limitations related to pregnancy, childbirth, or related medical conditions; it applies only to accommodations. Final rules implementing the PWFA became effective June 18, 2024. Employers with 15 or more employees are covered by the PWFA.

Existing laws that the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) enforces, such as the Pregnancy Discrimination Act, make it illegal to fire or otherwise discriminate against workers on the basis of pregnancy, childbirth, or related medical conditions, but don't require accommodations.

Under the PWFA, limitations may be minor and may be associated with an uncomplicated pregnancy and may require accommodations that are easy to make.

Related medical conditions must relate to pregnancy or childbirth of the specific individual. They can include lactation (including breastfeeding and pumping), miscarriage, stillbirth, having or choosing not to have an abortion, preeclampsia, gestational diabetes, and HELLP (hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes and low platelets) syndrome, sciatica, carpal tunnel syndrome, migraines, dehydration, anxiety, loss of balance, varicose veins, and menstruation, to name only some.

Note: Federal courts have enjoined the EEOC from enforcing the PWFA rules in relation to elective abortions.

Reasonable accommodations are changes to the work environment or the way things are usually done at work. Some examples of accommodating pregnancy, childbirth, or related medical conditions include:

  • Permission to sit or drink water;
  • Closer parking;
  • Flexible hours;
  • Appropriately sized uniforms and safety apparel;
  • Additional break time to use the bathroom, eat, and rest;
  • Leave or time off to recover from childbirth; and
  • Being excused from strenuous activities and/or activities that involve exposure to compounds not safe for pregnancy.

Qualified employees and applicants are entitled to receive accommodations. Employees or applicants can be “qualified” under the PWFA in two ways.

  • First, an employee or applicant who can perform the “essential functions” of the job with or without a reasonable accommodation is qualified.

“Essential functions” are the fundamental duties of the job. Many employees or applicants seeking accommodations will meet this part of the definition because they can perform the job or apply for the position with a reasonable accommodation—for example, the cashier who needs a stool, the production worker who needs bathroom breaks, or the retail worker who needs to carry around a bottle of water.

  • Second, if an employee cannot perform the essential functions of the job with or without a reasonable accommodation, an employee can be qualified even if they cannot do the essential functions of their job as long as:
    • The inability is “temporary;”
    • The employee could perform the functions “in the near future;” and
    • The inability to perform the essential functions can be reasonably accommodated.

The determination of whether an employee can perform the functions in the near future is made on a case-by-case basis. If the employee is pregnant, it is presumed that the employee could perform the essential function(s) in the near future because they could perform the essential function(s) within generally 40 weeks of its suspension. An accommodation can include the suspension of an essential function.

This means that an employee who is temporarily unable to perform one or more essential functions of their job, and who therefore needs light duty or a change in their work assignments, may be entitled to such a change as a reasonable accommodation. Leave can also be a reasonable accommodation.

Employees must communicate that they have a limitation — a physical or mental condition related to, arising out of, or affected by pregnancy, childbirth, or a related medical condition — and that they need an adjustment or change in their working conditions due to the limitation. Employees don't have to use any particular words or forms.

Once employers know of such a limitation and accommodation need, they should engage in the “interactive process” with the employee or applicant. They should talk to the employee about the known limitation and the adjustment or change needed at work.

Since employees often tell their managers or supervisors about such accommodation needs, managers and supervisors should be trained in how to recognize such requests and how to respond.

Employers must provide the following accommodations without delay or documentation:

  • Carrying or keeping water near and drinking, as needed;
  • Allowing additional restroom breaks, as needed;
  • Allowing sitting for those whose work requires standing and standing for those whose work requires sitting, as needed; and
  • Allowing breaks to eat and drink, as needed.

These are a small set of simple, inexpensive, commonly sought accommodations that are widely known to be needed during an uncomplicated pregnancy, and where documentation would not be easily obtained or necessary. These will not pose an undue hardship.

For other accommodation requests, employers may ask for supporting documentation only when reasonable and when the condition or accommodation need is not obvious.

Documentation is not reasonable if:

  • The limitation and need for an adjustment or change at work due to the limitation is obvious. For example, an obviously pregnant employee who seeks a bigger uniform because of their pregnancy cannot be required to provide additional information.
  • The employer already knows about the limitation and the adjustment or change at work due to the limitation. If, for example, the employee has already provided enough information that they have morning sickness due to pregnancy and need a later start time, the employer cannot demand a new doctor’s note every time the employee uses the accommodation of coming in later.
  • The employee is currently pregnant and needs breaks for the bathroom or to eat or drink, needs to carry water with them to drink, or needs to stand if their job requires sitting or to sit if their job requires standing.
  • The employee is lactating and needs modifications to pump at work or nurse during work hours.
  • The employer would not ask an employee for documentation in that situation normally. If an employer’s policy is that employees only need a note from a health care provider for absences if they are missing three or more days in a row, the employer can’t require someone who needs a reasonable accommodation of one day off because of pregnancy, childbirth, or a related medical condition to provide information from the health care provider.

When employers are allowed to get documentation from a health care provider, they are limited to documentation that:

  • Explains the health care provider’s qualifications and why they can provide the necessary information for this patient. A brief statement is sufficient. The provider does not need to be treating the condition at issue, as long are they are familiar enough with the patient’s circumstances to provide appropriate information.
    • Under the PWFA, health care professionals include, but are not limited to: doctors, nurses, nurse practitioners, physician assistants, midwives, physical therapists, and licensed mental health professionals. The health care provider may be a telehealth provider.
  • Confirms that the employee has a physical or mental condition. Because the PWFA covers a wide range of physical or mental conditions, the provider does not need to include a diagnosis; a simple statement of the employee's physical or mental condition is sufficient. The problem or impairment may be minor, modest, or episodic (like fatigue, vomiting, or swelling, need for rest,); a need to attend health care appointments; or maintaining the patient’s health or the health of their pregnancy (like avoiding extreme heat, lifting restriction, or limiting exposure to chemicals).
  • Confirms that the physical or mental condition is related to, affected by, or arising out of pregnancy, childbirth, or related medical conditions. Pregnancy, childbirth, or related medical conditions do not have to be the sole, the original, or a substantial cause of the physical or mental condition.
  • Describes the adjustment or change that is needed at work due to the limitation, including the expected duration of the accommodation. For example, no lifting more than 20 pounds for 3 months, the approximate number and frequency of health care appointments, the estimated time off for recovery, additional safety gear, work functions that should be suspended and for how long, or a later start time. If the change is the temporary suspension of a main job duty, it should make clear that the suspension will be temporary and that the employee could perform the job duty after the pregnancy or in the near future (and include an estimate of when that will be).

Employers should avoid using forms like FMLA certification forms or ADA forms to gather documentation, as they tend to ask for more information than needed. Whatever forms are used, employers should be prepared to have health care providers indicate that some entries or entries are not applicable.

Employers are required to provide reasonable accommodations unless they would cause an “undue hardship” on the employer’s operations. An “undue hardship” is significant difficulty or expense for the employer.

Employers may not:

  • Require an employee to accept an accommodation without a discussion with the employee about the accommodation (the interactive process),
  • Deny a job or other employment opportunities to a qualified employee or applicant based on the person’s need for a reasonable accommodation,
  • Require an employee to take leave if another reasonable accommodation can be provided that would let the employee keep working,
  • Retaliate against an individual for reporting or opposing unlawful discrimination under the PWFA or participating in a PWFA proceeding (such as an investigation), or
  • Interfere with any individual’s rights under the PWFA.

What is retaliation?

Retaliation is consistently the most common of all discrimination charges, and many charges claiming another type of discrimination also include the assertion that retaliation occurred.

Title VII prohibits retaliation against individuals because they have either:

  • Opposed an unlawful employment practice; or
  • Made a charge, testified, or assisted with or participated in an investigation, proceeding, or hearing under the statute.
    • Retaliation is also unlawful under the Equal Pay Act, the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act (GINA), the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA).

Retaliation provisions provide exceptionally broad protection to individuals who file charges or otherwise aide the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC)’s enforcement function. The EEOC’s policy is to expedite the investigation of retaliation charges and seek injunctive relief, since it has a unique interest in:

  • Preserving the integrity of its investigative process, and
  • Preventing a chilling effect on the willingness of individuals to protest discriminatory conduct.

Employees are protected against retaliation for their opposition to discrimination if they have a reasonable and “good faith” belief that their employer’s conduct is illegal, even if it turns out that they were mistaken about the legality of the conduct.

However, the anti-retaliation provisions will not apply if the way an individual protests perceived discrimination is:

  • Unreasonable, or
  • If opposition is false and malicious.

In contrast, participation in the EEO process, such as filing a charge, receives absolute protection. Employee protections from retaliation also extend to applicants and employees even when they engaged in protected activity against a former employer.

For example, it would be unlawful for employers to refuse to hire applicants after a background check revealed that they sued a previous employer under EEO laws or participated in a discrimination proceeding in which a manager was charged with sexual harassment.

What is disability discrimination?

  • The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) prohibits employment discrimination against individuals with disabilities.

The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) prohibits, private employers, state and local governments, employment agencies, and labor unions from discriminating against qualified individuals with disabilities in job application procedures, hiring, firing, advancement, compensation, job training, and other terms, conditions, and privileges of employment.

If your company has at least 15 employees (or had at least 15 in the prior or present year), the ADA applies.

What are reasonable accommodations?

  • Reasonable accommodations are changes made to the workplace that allow employees to perform a job.
  • Reasonable accommodation is a key nondiscrimination requirement of the ADA.

Reasonable accommodations are changes made to the workplace, how work is done, company policies, and so on, that would allow an employee to perform the job or an applicant to proceed in the hiring process. Accommodation ideas are limited only by the imagination.

Accommodations can be grouped into some categories, such as:

  • Providing equipment or accessible materials,
  • Making changes to the workplace,
  • Restructuring the job,
  • Modifying work schedules,
  • Allowing remote work,
  • Providing leave,
  • Modifying policies,
  • Modifying supervisory methods, and
  • Reassignment (which is a last resort).

Reasonable accommodation is a key nondiscrimination requirement of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). Employers must provide reasonable accommodations to the known disability of an employee or applicant. Employers that fail to provide an accommodation risk a discrimination claim. This may be true even if no other negative employment action is taken.

The ADA defines an “individual with a disability” as someone who meets all prerequisites for performing the essential functions of a job except any that cannot be met because of a disability. Individuals who meet this definition are entitled to a reasonable accommodation that will enable them to perform the essential functions of a job, or be considered, or receive equal benefits, etc., unless it would impose an undue hardship on the operation of the business. Employers are not, however, required to provide an accommodation to someone who is only “regarded as” having an impairment.

In general, it is the responsibility of the applicant or employee with a disability to inform an employer that an accommodation is needed to participate in the application process, perform essential job functions, or receive equal benefits and privileges of employment. Employers are not required to provide an accommodation if they are unaware of the need.

Sometimes, however, a disability or the need for an accommodation will be obvious. Other times, employees will present with restrictions, such as a doctor’s note or a simple statement they make. Such a presentation would likely be considered a request for reasonable accommodation.

Overall accommodation process

  • Employers should understand and document the overall accommodation process.
  • It is vital that employers know how to recognize accommodation requests.
  • The interaction process is meant to be ongoing.

To help lay the groundwork for dealing with reasonable accommodation situations, employers should understand and document the overall process. This includes crafting written policies and procedures, training managers and supervisors, informing all employees, recognizing and responding to accommodation requests, creating a process for determining effective accommodation requests, and monitoring the accommodations.

Craft written policies and procedures

When crafting related policies and procedures, employers should consider factors such as:

  • Company culture;
  • Desired outcomes;
  • Who has input;
  • Who will be responsible for the policy, procedure, and process; and
  • The reasons behind them.

To help craft effective policies and procedures, employers should:

  • Talk to stakeholders for input on crafting the policies and procedures;
  • Listen to what they have to say and ask questions;
  • Keep the policies flexible and easy to understand;
  • Try to avoid jargon, acronyms, and legal-speak;
  • Work to ensure that they inform the reader effectively; and
  • Include definitions of terms used and resources available, including where to find additional information.

Train managers and supervisors

While training supervisors and managers regarding the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and reasonable accommodations is not mandated by law, doing so can help protect the company should it face a claim. Initial training is a good start, but because ADA-related situations do not arise frequently and the training is eventually lost, refresher training should be done regularly.

Two of the vital pieces of the ADA that managers and supervisors should be trained on are:

  • How to recognize a request for a reasonable accommodation, and
  • That applicant and employee medical information is to be kept confidential.

One of the purposes of the training should be to enable all employees to gain optimum job performance and productivity levels through the application of reasonable accommodations. The training also helps demonstrates that the company takes disability inclusion seriously.

Inform all employees

Employers should let all affected employees know about the ADA, even if at different levels of detail. While employees might not benefit from knowing the details of what the ADA requires, they would benefit from knowing how to request accommodations and what to expect.

Recognize and respond to accommodation requests

Employers and managers and supervisors should be able to recognize when an applicant or employee requests an accommodation. At the most basic level, an accommodation request is when an applicant or employee asks for a workplace change or adjustment because of a medical condition. The request does not need to include any particular terms, such as “ADA” or “accommodation.”

Create an interactive process for identifying effective accommodations

The interactive process is when a company representative and an applicant or employee work together focusing on identifying an effective reasonable accommodation. Shutting down this process, or not starting one, can be considered discrimination, and many court cases have included such actions.

Interactive process

  • The interactive process is when employers and employees work together to find a reasonable accommodation.
  • The ADA does not have a formula or prescribed method for an interactive discussion.
  • Employees and employers are required to engage in the interactive process.

When an employee requests an accommodation, an employer’s Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) obligations are triggered, including the interactive process. The interactive process is when employers and employees who request accommodations work together to identify an effective reasonable accommodation. Employers should engage in this process even if they believe the request is unreasonable or the employee is not qualified for the position.

Before engaging in the interactive process, it may be beneficial to review the employee’s position description to ensure that:

  • The description accurately reflects the essential functions of the position;
  • Quality and quantity requirements are stated, if appropriate;
  • Behavioral factors necessary for the job are considered in measurable terms; and
  • An ADA job evaluation has been performed, noting how the physical duties are functionally performed and the behavioral characteristics essential for job performance.

The ADA does not have a formula or prescribed method for an interactive discussion between the employer and the individual after a change due to a medical condition has been requested. The exact nature of the dialogue will vary.

While not mandated, the basic interactive process can include the following:

  1. Recognizing an accommodation request,
  2. Gathering information,
  3. Exploring accommodation options,
  4. Choosing an accommodation,
  5. Implementing the chosen accommodation, and
  6. Monitoring the accommodation to ensure it continues to be effective.

In many instances, both the disability and the type of accommodation required will be obvious, and there may be little or no need for discussion.

In other situations, the disability and/or the need for accommodation may not be obvious, and to identify an effective accommodation, employers may need to:

  • Ask questions concerning the nature of the disability and the individual’s functional limitations; or
  • Ask for reasonable documentation about the employee’s or the applicant’s disability and limitations, meaning only documentation that establishes:
    • A person has an ADA disability, and
    • The disability necessitates a reasonable accommodation.

Recognizing accommodation requests

When an individual makes it known that an adjustment or change is needed at work due to a medical condition and a work-related barrier, this is an accommodation request under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA).

Employees or applicants may ask for an accommodation in a variety of ways. They might, for example,

  • Allude to the need for accommodation during ordinary workplace conversations, or
  • Provide a doctor’s note that excuses absences for a medical reason or places restrictions on their ability to perform certain job tasks.

The request does not need to mention terms like “ADA” or “reasonable accommodation,” and it does not need to be in writing. An employer may, however, ask for something in writing to document the request.

Under the ADA, individuals may request an accommodation at any time during the application process or while they are employed. They can request an accommodation even if they did not ask for one when applying for a job or after receiving a job offer. Once employees or applicants request an accommodation, employers must:

  • Respond appropriately
  • Discuss the individual’s needs
  • Identify the appropriate reasonable accommodation

If employers are unsure whether an employee has requested an accommodation, they may ask for clarification on what is being requested and why.

Managers and supervisors may need to be able to recognize an accommodation request, as they are usually on the front line working with employees.

While employers are not required to ask whether a reasonable accommodation is needed when an employee has not asked for one, they may still ask if they reasonably believe that the employee may need an accommodation. Also, employers should initiate the reasonable accommodation interactive process without being asked if they:

  • Know the employee has a disability;
  • Know, or have reason to know, that the employee is experiencing workplace problems because of the disability; and
  • Know, or have reason to know, that the disability prevents the employee from requesting a reasonable accommodation.

If employees state that they do not need a reasonable accommodation, employers will have fulfilled their obligation.

As important as it is to recognize a request for accommodation, employers must also know what is not considered a request for accommodation under the ADA. It is not, for example, a request for accommodation when:

  • An applicant voluntarily self-identifies as an individual with a disability for affirmative action purposes under Section 503 of the Rehabilitation Act, or
  • An employee discloses a disability, but there is no connection to a work-related barrier or specific request.

Gathering information

Once an accommodation request is received, employers may gather information necessary to process the request. Employers may ask questions to help make an informed decision. This includes asking what type of reasonable accommodation is needed.

While individuals with disabilities do not need to be able to specify the precise accommodation, they do need to describe the problems posed by the workplace barrier. Additionally, suggestions from the individuals with disabilities may assist in determining the type of reasonable accommodation to provide.

If the disability and/or the need for accommodation is not obvious, employers may ask for reasonable documentation about the disability and functional limitations. Employers may require only the documentation that is needed to establish that a person has an ADA disability and that the disability necessitates a reasonable accommodation.

Questions to consider during the process include:

  • What limitations is the employee experiencing?
  • How do these limitations affect the employee and the employee’s job performance?
  • What specific job tasks are problematic because of these limitations?
  • What accommodations are available to reduce or eliminate these problems?
  • Are all possible resources being used to determine possible accommodations?
  • Has the employee been consulted regarding possible accommodations?
  • Once accommodations are in place, would it be useful to meet with the employee to evaluate the effectiveness of the accommodations and determine whether additional accommodations are needed?
  • Do supervisory personnel and employees need training?

Employees are required to engage in the interactive process as well as employers. Part of this process could include providing information for an employer to determine the extent of the employee’s disability and the breadth of potential accommodations that might be reasonably afforded. If employees fail to participate, their ADA protections could be at stake.

Exploring accommodations

Once employers have identified an employee’s workplace issue and the limitation causing it through the interactive process, they are ready to explore accommodation options. This is the time to brainstorm and consider what might work, and employers should be open to new ideas and ways of doing things.

The employee who requested the accommodation is a good place to start, so employers should always invite the employee to suggest accommodations. If more accommodation ideas are needed, they may ask the employee’s medical provider for ideas. In some cases, medical professionals can suggest effective accommodations. In other cases, they may not be able to suggest ideas, but may be able to say whether ideas under consideration will help overcome the employee’s limitations.

If employees know of an accommodation that will allow them to perform the essential functions of the job, they must share it. Reasonable accommodations must be determined on a case-by-case basis because workplaces and jobs, like people, vary. Not all people with disabilities, or even all people with the same disability, will require the same accommodation.

Accommodations may involve:

  • Changes to workplace policies, procedures, or practices;
  • Physical changes to the workplace; or
  • Extra equipment.

Types of accommodations can include:

  • Providing leave or breaks,
  • Making the work facility accessible,
  • Providing personal assistance,
  • Allowing service or emotional support animals,
  • Providing interpreters, and
  • Additional accommodations as technology advances.

Employers should look to many resources for input on identifying an effective accommodation, such as:

  • The employee or applicant
  • The individual’s health care provider
  • Condition-specific agencies
  • Other experts

A health care provider is not mandated to identify a reasonable accommodation, but might have some input on the employee’s limitations. Employers might not know if a particular accommodation will be effective, but should feel free to try one out on a temporary basis to see the results. If it works, great. If not, look for another that will be effective.

Choosing an accommodation

Although not required by the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), choose the employee’s preference whenever possible if there are multiple accommodation options. The employer, however, makes the decision and may choose, for example, the lowest-cost accommodation so long as the chosen accommodation is effective.

When an accommodation is identified, implement it by:

  • Installing equipment,
  • Providing training,
  • Informing managers or supervisors,
  • Involving outside services, or
  • Communicating with essential personnel about the accommodation.
    • ADA confidentiality rules dictate that only managers and supervisors should know about the accommodation, if necessary.

Employers are free to provide an accommodation on a trial basis and stop it if it does not work. One thing they might consider when testing accommodations is to make a written agreement, or at least a memo, with the employee that:

  • The accommodation is being tested,
  • How long the test will be, and
  • What will happen if the accommodation does not work.

That way, no one is surprised when the accommodation is revisited down the road.

Monitoring the accommodation

Because changes occur, employers may need to periodically check on the ongoing effectiveness of accommodations. If equipment is involved in the accommodation, someone may need to perform maintenance or upgrades as needed. Encouraging ongoing communication is the most important way to monitor accommodations, and employees who are receiving accommodations need to understand:

  • That they should let their employer know if there are changes or problems with the accommodation, and
  • Who, specifically, to contact.

A common misconception is that once an effective accommodation is implemented, the decision is final. The interactive process, however, is meant to be ongoing. Accommodations are not guaranteed to last forever, and there are times when some maintenance or adjustments may be needed. Employers should make sure to reassess whether the chosen accommodation remains effective and encourage the employee or applicant to let them know if the accommodation’s effectiveness begins to decrease. At this phase, employers should restrict questions about the condition and focus on the solution and its level of effectiveness.

Accommodations are individualized and may be continuous or temporary. Even a long-term reasonable accommodation may not be permanent. If an accommodation no longer meets the disability-related need or begins to pose a hardship, employers are obligated to explore alternative ideas. Of course, with all related actions, they should document what was done, when, why, where, how, etc.

Types of accommodations

  • Employers have many accommodation ideas from which to choose.

Accommodation ideas are limited only by the imagination. Some accommodation ideas include:

  • Providing/Modifying equipment
  • Providing accessible materials
  • Making changes to the physical workplace
  • Restructuring jobs
  • Modifying work schedules
  • Providing breaks
  • Allowing remote work
  • Modifying supervisory methods
  • Allowing service or emotional support animals
  • Reassigning the employee
  • Providing transportation
  • Modifying tests, exams, or training
  • Providing qualified readers
  • Providing interpreters
  • Providing leave Reassignment to a different position is a last resort accommodation.

An employee’s limitation will generally dictate the accommodation. For example, an employee with long COVID might have shortness of breath with exertion. Accommodations might, therefore, include the following:

  • Reduce physical exertion;
  • Allow rest breaks;
  • Reduce workplace triggers, if any;
  • Allow time for medical treatment such as use of a nebulizer or inhaler;
  • Restructure the job to remove marginal job functions; or
  • Develop an action plan to deal with sudden exacerbations.

An employee who suffers from fatigue might benefit from the following accommodations:

  • Allow rest breaks,
  • Provide an ergonomic workstation,
  • Allow a flexible schedule, or
  • Restructure the job to remove marginal job functions.

Employees who deal with brain fog (for example caused by long COVID), might need the following accommodations:

  • Provide a quiet work space;
  • Allow use of noise cancellation or white noise;
  • Provide uninterrupted work time;
  • Provide memory aids such as flowcharts and check lists;
  • Allow the use of apps for concentration, memory, and organization;
  • Allow rest breaks; or
  • Restructure the job to remove marginal functions to allow focus on essential job duties.

The following accommodations might be effective for employees with headaches:

  • Reduce workplace triggers, if any;
  • Provide alternative lighting;
  • Reduce glare; or
  • Allow flexible scheduling.

A particular conditions does not mean that a limited list of effective accommodations is available. Much will depend upon the employee’s particular limitations in relation to the job’s essential functions. Identify the barriers between them and find ways to break the barriers down or eliminate them.

Employees with mobility limitations might need to have the workplace be made more accessible. Someone with a hearing impairment might need a translator. Each situations must be dealt with on its own merits. That’s why the interactive process is so important; it deals with the specific facts involved.

Providing/Modifying equipment

Purchasing equipment or modifying existing equipment is a form of reasonable accommodation. All employees need the right tools and work environment to effectively perform their jobs. Similarly, individuals with disabilities may need workplace adjustments to maximize the value they can add to the organization.

Many devices are available that make it possible for people to perform essential job functions. These devices range from very simple solutions, such as an elastic band that can enable a person with cerebral palsy to hold a pencil and write, to “high-tech” electronic equipment that can be operated with eye or head movements by people who cannot use their hands.

Employers are obligated to provide only equipment that is needed to perform a job; there is no obligation to provide equipment that the individual uses regularly in daily life, such as glasses, a hearing aid, or a wheelchair. However, employers may be obligated to provide items of this nature if special adaptations are required to perform a job.

Providing accessible materials

Employers may have to make written materials accessible to an individual with a disability who may not be able to read or understand them. Simple accommodations could include having someone read a list of employee conduct rules to an employee with a visual impairment or providing a simpler explanation of the rules for an employee with a cognitive disability.

Making changes to the workplace

Making changes to the facilities or work areas is a form of reasonable accommodation. This includes the physical barriers covered by the ADA accessibility standards. Employers need to make existing facilities used by employees readily accessible for employees with disabilities, such as making work areas accessible for approach, entry, and exit so people using wheelchairs can enter and back out of the area. This includes working areas as well as non-working areas such as break rooms, lunchrooms, training rooms, and restrooms.

Restructuring the job

Job restructuring includes shifting responsibility to other employees for minor tasks (or “marginal functions”) that an employee is unable to perform because of a disability and altering when and/or how a task is performed. It may involve reallocating or redistributing the marginal functions of a job. However, employers are not required to reallocate essential functions of a job as a reasonable accommodation under the ADA. Essential functions, by definition, are those that a qualified individual must perform, with or without an accommodation. If the workforce is small and all workers must be able to perform a number of different tasks, job restructuring may not be possible.

Even though the ADA does not require employers to reallocate essential functions as a reasonable accommodation, they may do so if they wish. An individual may be reassigned to a lower-graded position if there are no accommodations that would enable the employee to remain in the current position and there are no vacant equivalent positions for which the individual is qualified (with or without a reasonable accommodation).

Employers are not, however, required to maintain the reassigned individual with a disability at the salary of a higher-rated position if employers do not do so for reassigned employees who do not have a disability. It should further be noted that employers are not required to promote an individual with a disability as an accommodation.

Modifying work schedules

Modifying work schedules may involve adjusting arrival or departure time, providing periodic breaks, or altering when certain job tasks are performed. Employers should consider modification of a regular work schedule as a reasonable accommodation unless this would cause an undue hardship. Modified work schedules may include flexibility in work hours or the workweek, or part-time work, where this will not be an undue hardship.

A modified schedule may also involve allowing an employee to use accrued paid leave or providing additional unpaid leave. Employers must provide a modified or part-time schedule when required as a reasonable accommodation, absent undue hardship, even if they do not provide such schedules for other employees.

Providing breaks

Providing an employee with breaks can be seen as a reasonable accommodation involving a modified work schedule. Sometimes, however, breaks can be short and rather infrequent, not really reaching the level of a schedule change.

Working from home (Telework)

Many employers have discovered the benefits of allowing employees to work from home through telework (also known as telecommuting) programs, particularly since the COVID-19 pandemic.

Not all persons with disabilities need — or want — to work from home, and not all jobs can be performed at home. However, allowing an employee to work at home may be a reasonable accommodation where the person’s disability prevents successfully performing the job on-site and the job, or parts of the job, can be performed at home without causing significant difficulty or expense. To deny a request to work from home, employers must be able to show that attendance is an essential function for the particular job in question.

If an employee is working from home for a certain period, perhaps during a pandemic, you may ask employees if they will need reasonable accommodations in the future when they return to the workplace. Employers may ask employees with disabilities to request accommodations that they believe they may need when they return to the physical workplace, basically by beginning the interactive process.

Before allowing anyone to return to work (or even after they do return), employers may make information available to all employees about who to contact — if they wish — to request accommodation for a disability that they may need upon return to the workplace, even if no date has been announced for their return. If requests are received in advance, you may begin the interactive process.

Modifying supervisory methods

Simple modifications of supervisory methods may include communicating assignments in writing rather than orally for someone whose disability limits concentration or providing additional day-to-day guidance or feedback. Employers are not required, however, to change someone’s supervisor.

Making policy modifications

Modifying a workplace rule because of an employee’s disability may be a form of reasonable accommodation. Reasonable accommodation requires only that you modify the policy for an employee who requires such action because of a disability; however, you may continue to apply the policy to all other employees.

Granting time off or adjusting a work schedule may involve modifying leave or attendance procedures or policies. Similarly, you may need to modify a policy prohibiting animals in the workplace so that a visually impaired person can use a guide dog.

Allowing service animals or emotional support animals

Another type of accommodation is to allow employees to bring service animals or emotional support animals to work with them. Many individuals with disabilities use animals to help them perform some functions. Most people are familiar with seeing-eye dogs, for example.

A service animal and an emotional support animal are defined differently and apply in different situations. A service animal is specifically defined by the public accessibility provisions of the ADA, but not in the employment provisions.

An emotional support animal, on the other hand, is a companion animal that provides therapeutic benefit to an individual with a disability. Since the employment provisions of the ADA do not define a service animal or restrict accommodations to service animals as defined for public accessibility, employers may have to consider allowing an employee to bring an animal that does not meet the definition of a service animal into the workplace. This could include a therapy or emotional support animal. However, employers don’t have to allow an employee to bring any animal into the workplace if it is not needed because of a disability or if it disrupts the workplace or otherwise poses an undue hardship.

Even if employers have a no-pet policy, allowing a service or emotional can be a reasonable accommodation, because making exceptions to workplace policies can be an accommodation.

Service animals assist persons with a variety of disabilities in their day-to-day activities. Some examples include the following:

  • Alerting persons with hearing impairments to sounds.
  • Pulling wheelchairs or carrying and picking up things for persons with mobility impairments.
  • Assisting persons with mobility impairments with balance.

Service animals are not pets — they perform some of the functions that people with disabilities cannot do for themselves.

Some service animals, but not all, wear special collars, harnesses, or other identification signaling that it is a service animal and not a pet. Some, but not all, are licensed or certified and have identification papers.

No registry of service animals exists, so you can’t simply look up whether a particular service animal is registered.

Reassigning the employee

Reassignment is generally the reasonable accommodation of last resort. Reassignment may be necessary where an employee can no longer perform his or her job because of a disability. The employee must be qualified for the new position, however. This means that the employee

  • Satisfies the skill, experience, education, and other job-related requirements of the position, and
  • Can perform the primary job tasks of the new position, with or without reasonable accommodation.

The employee does not need to be the best qualified individual for the position.

Providing transportation

Other forms of accommodation may involve making transportation provided by the employer accessible. Employers must consider accommodations related to commuting problems. It does not matter if the employee is fully able to perform his job without the need for accommodations once he or she gets to work.

Generally, it is not always an employer’s responsibility to provide an employee with transportation to and from work. However, an employee’s disability may interfere with his or her ability to get to work.

Modifying tests, exams, or training

Employers may be required to modify, adjust, or make other reasonable accommodations in the ways that tests and training are administered in order to provide equal employment opportunities for qualified individuals with disabilities.

Accommodations may be needed to assure that tests or examinations measure the actual ability of an individual to perform job functions, rather than reflecting limitations caused by the disability. The ADA requires that tests be given to people who have sensory, speaking, or manual impairments in a format that does not require the use of the impaired skill, unless that is the job-related skill the test is designed to measure.

Employers have an obligation to inform job applicants in advance that a test will be given, so that an individual who needs an accommodation can make such a request.

Providing qualified readers

When an applicant or employee has a visual disability, employers and the individual should use the interactive process to identify specific limitations of the individual in relation to specific needs of the job and to assess possible accommodations. It may be a reasonable accommodation to provide a reader for an individual with a disability, if this would not impose an undue hardship.

In some job situations, a reader may be the most effective and efficient accommodation, but in other situations alternative accommodations may enable an individual with a visual disability to perform job tasks just as effectively.

Where reading is an essential job function, depending on the nature of a visual impairment and the nature of job tasks, print magnification equipment or a talking computer may be more effective and less costly than providing another employee as a reader. Where an individual has to read lengthy documents, a reader who transcribes documents onto tapes may be a more effective accommodation.

Providing interpreters

Providing an interpreter on an “as-needed” basis may be a reasonable accommodation for a person who is deaf in some employment situations, if this does not impose an undue hardship.

A person who with a hearing impairment should be able to communicate effectively with others as required by the duties of the job. Identifying the needs of the individual in relation to specific job tasks will determine if or when an interpreter may be needed. The resources available to employers would be considered in determining whether it would be an undue hardship to provide such an accommodation.

People with hearing impairments have different communication needs and use different modes of communication. Some use signing in American Sign Language (ASL), but others use sign language that has different manual codes. Some people rely on an oral interpreter who silently mouths words spoken by others to make them easier to lip-read. Many hearing-impaired people use their voices to communicate, and some combine talking and signing. The individual should be consulted to determine the most effective means of communication.

Leave as an accommodation

  • Allowing an employee to take leave can be a form of reasonable accommodation.
  • Leave provided under the ADA is job protected.
  • Leave can be provided as an accommodation when no other accommodations are effective.

Allowing an employee to use accrued paid leave and providing additional unpaid leave can be a form of reasonable accommodation. Such leave could be in large blocks of time or on an intermittent or reduced schedule basis.

Similar to the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA), leave provided under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) is job protected, but the ADA does not include an “equivalent” position provision; employers are expected to return employees to the jobs they had before leave began. The concept of leave as an accommodation might be confusing because it doesn’t align with the idea of providing an accommodation that keeps an employee on the job. The goal in allowing the use of leave, however, is to provide an employee the opportunity to manage the condition and ultimately remain in the workforce.

Leave could be provided as an accommodation when:

  • No other accommodation is effective,
  • The employee is not eligible for leave under the FMLA or has exhausted the FMLA leave, or
  • The employee has exhausted paid time off and required additional leave.

If employers have a leave policy, they should ensure it is flexible. If, for example, they provide employees with up to three months of company leave for a medical condition, but a particular employee needs three months and two weeks of leave, they would need to consider allowing the additional two weeks as a reasonable accommodation. Generally, if the leave does not pose an undue hardship, employers might have a hard time arguing why they did not provide it. An inflexible leave policy can risk a very expensive claim, as such policies would apply to all employees, constituting a systemic issue.

How much leave is reasonable remains a matter of debate. At least one court, the 7th Circuit, has ruled that extended leave is not reasonable. Perhaps a few weeks or intermittent leave would be in that jurisdiction.

Otherwise, the amount of leave is limited only by how much leave would prove to be an undue hardship.

Unlimited leave, however, is not considered reasonable. If an employee is unable to provide at least an estimated return-to-work date, employers need not provide the leave as an accommodation.

Undue hardship

  • Employers do not have to provide a particular accommodation if it would pose an undue hardship.
  • Employers should try to find another accommodation that would not pose an undue hardship.

Employers must provide a reasonable accommodation if a person with a disability needs one to apply for a job, perform a job, or enjoy benefits equal to those offered to other employees. Employers do not, however, have to provide any accommodation that would pose an undue hardship.

Undue hardship means that providing the accommodation would result in significant difficulty or expense, based on an employer’s resources and the operation of the business. While the “undue hardship” provision considers the financial realities of the particular employer, the concept of an undue hardship is not limited to financial difficulty and may refer to any accommodation that would be:

  • Excessively costly
  • Extensive
  • Substantial
  • Disruptive
  • Fundamentally altering the nature or operation of the business

Determinations of undue hardship must be based on an individualized assessment of current circumstances that show a specific reasonable accommodation would cause significant difficulty or expense. If providing a particular accommodation would result in undue hardship, employers should consider whether another accommodation exists would not.

Employers may not claim undue hardship based on employees’ or customers’ fears or prejudices toward the individual’s disability. Similarly, undue hardship cannot be claimed because providing the accommodation might have a negative impact on the morale of other employees. Employers may, however, be able to show undue hardship where providing an accommodation would be unduly disruptive to other employees’ ability to work.

Load More