Compliance Just Got Easier: Stay ahead of regulatory changes with instant notifications on updates that matter.
['Recruiting and hiring', 'Discrimination', 'Human Resource Management', 'Wage and Hour', 'Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA)']
['Title VII (The Civil Rights Act of 1964)', 'Recruiting and hiring', 'Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA)', 'Applications/Applicants', 'Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA)']
09/30/2025
AI workplace protections — State comparison
RegSenseHuman Resource ManagementFamily and Medical Leave Act (FMLA)Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA)HR ManagementEnglishHuman ResourcesDiscriminationTitle VII (The Civil Rights Act of 1964)Recruiting and hiringCross Agency WizardWage and HourRecruiting and hiringBest ResultsFair Labor Standards Act (FLSA)Applications/ApplicantsFocus AreaUSA
While there is currently no federal law specifically regulating the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in employment decisions, employers who adopt AI or algorithmic tools must ensure these technologies do not inadvertently introduce bias. Improper use could lead to violations of existing anti-discrimination laws, such as Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which prohibits employment discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, or national origin.
As AI becomes increasingly common in workplace decision-making, state legislatures across the U.S. are deliberating how and whether to regulate its use. While only about a dozen states currently have enacted laws or issued guidance memos that affect employers’ use of AI in employment decisions, many more states have actively considered legislation related to AI and algorithmic decision-making tools in recent years.
Given the rapid pace of technological change and legislative activity, employers should stay informed about developments in their own states. Proactive compliance with emerging regulations, such as bias audits, transparency requirements, and consent protocols, will be essential to mitigate risk and ensure fair, responsible use of AI in employment practices.
Federal regulatory citation
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act — ezExplanation
State comparison
Some states have laws regarding the use of AI in hiring and employment decisions, and some have published guidance for employers using AI. Use the table below to determine whether your state has additional requirements.
Note: Many states have their own civil rights laws that may impose stricter requirements than federal regulations. For example, some states expand the list of protected classes beyond those covered by Title VII. Employers should be aware of these state-specific protections when assessing potential bias risks in hiring and other employment practices.
AI workplace protections — State comparison
State
State regulations or guidance apply (private employers)
Link to state regulation/guidance
California
Yes (regulation and guidance). View state
Illinois
Yes (regulation). View state
Massachusetts
Yes (state atty. general guidance). View state
New Jersey
Yes (state atty. general guidance). View state
Oregon
Yes (state atty. general guidance). View state
['Recruiting and hiring', 'Discrimination', 'Human Resource Management', 'Wage and Hour', 'Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA)']
['Title VII (The Civil Rights Act of 1964)', 'Recruiting and hiring', 'Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA)', 'Applications/Applicants', 'Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA)']
UPGRADE TO CONTINUE READING
J. J. Keller is the trusted source for DOT / Transportation, OSHA / Workplace Safety, Human Resources, Construction Safety and Hazmat / Hazardous Materials regulation compliance products and services. J. J. Keller helps you increase safety awareness, reduce risk, follow best practices, improve safety training, and stay current with changing regulations.
Copyright 2026 J. J. Keller & Associate, Inc. For re-use options please contact copyright@jjkeller.com or call 800-558-5011.
