
Regulatory Compliance News & Updates
Keep up to date on the latest
developments affecting OSHA, DOT,
EPA, and DOL regulatory compliance.

Keep up to date on the latest
developments affecting OSHA, DOT,
EPA, and DOL regulatory compliance.
On April 9, 2026, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) published a final rule that makes technical changes to the emission standards established in March 2024 (2024 Final Rule) for crude oil and natural gas facilities. This rule (2026 Final Rule) amends the requirements for:
Who’s impacted?
The 2026 Final Rule affects new and existing oil and gas facilities. Specifically, it applies to the regulations for the Crude Oil and Natural Gas source category, including the:
These emission standards are commonly referred to as OOOOb/c.
What are the changes?
The 2026 Final Rule implements technical changes to the temporary flaring and vent gas NHV monitoring requirements set by the 2024 Final Rule.
Temporary flaring
The rule extends the baseline time limit for temporary flaring of associated gas at well sites in certain situations (like conducting repairs or maintenance) from 24 to 72 hours. Owners and operators must stop temporary flaring as soon as the situation is resolved or the temporary flaring limit is reached (whichever happens first).
It also grants allowances beyond the 72-hour limit if exigent circumstances occur (such as severe weather that prevents safe access to a well site to address an emergency or maintenance issue) and there’s a need to extend duration for repairs, maintenance, or safety issues. Owners and operators must keep records of exigent circumstances and include the information in their annual reports.
NHV monitoring
For new and existing sources, the 2026 Final Rule exempts all flare types (unassisted and assisted) and ECDs from monitoring due to high NHV content, except when inert gases are added to the process streams or for other scenarios that decrease the NHV content of the inlet stream gas. In these cases, EPA requires NHV monitoring via continuous monitoring or the alternative performance test (sampling demonstration) option for all flares and ECDs.
Other significant changes include:
The 2026 Final Rule takes effect on June 8, 2026.
Key to remember: EPA’s technical changes to the emission standards for oil and gas facilities apply to temporary flaring provisions and vent gas NHV monitoring requirements.
The Unified Carrier Registration (UCR) Board of Directors proposed a fee increase of 20 percent for the 2027 registration year and for the years following.
Under this proposal, increased fees would land between $9–$9,329 per entity depending on the tax bracket. UCR fees must be paid by motor carriers, motor private carriers of property, brokers, freight forwarders, and leasing companies.
The Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) notes in its proposal to adopt this fee increase that, despite the increased costs, the fees for registration year 2027 would still be less than they were from 2019–2022. Collections are expected to begin October 2026.
No fee increases were proposed for the 2026 registration year, but on September 18, 2025, the UCR Board of Directors recommended a fee increase for 2027 that averages out to about 20 percent across all brackets.
Supporting documents were submitted, in addition to an explanation of the basis for the recommendation and proposed procedures. There’s also an explanation of the methodology used to calculate the fee to allow the public to properly analyze the data and make comments.
The purpose of the fee increase is to cover a projected shortfall of nearly $22 million in required funding.
All comments for this proposal must be received by May 7, 2026, under Docket Number FMCSA-2025-0655. Comments may be submitted online, by mail, or by hand delivery.
Maneuvering a commercial truck and trailer into a tight spot or through a busy area in a yard is no easy feat. A common best practice is to use spotters to help drivers safely navigate through these obstacles.
Even with this additional set of eyes and ears, drivers must remain alert and effectively communicate with the spotter.
To help avoid hazards, a spotter directs the commercial driver using hand signals to make a desired vehicle movement. To be effective and safe, the spotter and driver must speak the same language.
Unlike some industries such as construction, the hand signals used throughout the trucking industry are not standardized. Drivers and yard employees should be trained on common, basic hand signals.
When at a shipper or receiver’s facility, the driver obviously has less control over the situation. The company’s standardized hand signals may not be recognized. The driver needs to discuss agreed upon hand signals with the yard or warehouse employee who is directing the driver.
The more commonly used hand signals that should be standardized include:
Above all, the stop signal needs to be clearly understood. It could make the difference between a safe docking and a crushed worker. Variations include both arms crossed with hands in fists, or hands straight up. In any event, the driver and spotter must agree on the stop signal, reinforced by yelling loudly to stop.
A driver should assess their surroundings before backing up and following a spotter’s directions:
The driver must stop the vehicle immediately when:
Spotters have their own safety concerns. They must be alert to:
To ensure their own personal safety, they should:
To make sure the driver knows where the spotter is at all times, they may need to change positions frequently so that they are visible in the driver’s passenger mirror.
Key to remember: A driver and spotter must effectively communicate to ensure the safety of the truck, spotter, and bystanders in busy yards and loading docks.
All these scenarios have one thing in common: They’re all situations in which employees put their employers on notice of the need for leave under the federal Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA).
The employees didn’t first fill out any leave request forms. They didn’t have to at this stage. The information they provided was enough to trigger employers’ FMLA obligations.
The FMLA or its regulations say nothing about employees having to apply for or specifically request initial FMLA leave. Employers may require employees to complete an application or request form, but that requirement must be flexible depending on each situation, and should not be the initial step.
Employers must, however, get any additional required information through informal means. This means that employees must respond to related questions designed to determine whether an absence is potentially FMLA-qualifying.
Employers, therefore, shouldn’t wait until employees mention the FMLA or apply for it before starting the FMLA process. If employers, including supervisors or managers, have an inkling that employees might need FMLA leave, they should start down the FMLA path.
Once their FMLA leave is approved, however, that’s a different story.
When employees ask for FMLA leave that employers have already approved, employees must specifically reference either the qualifying reason for leave or the need for FMLA leave. Calling in “sick” without providing more information isn’t enough to trigger employers’ FMLA obligations at this point. Employees have to be more specific. They must either mention the qualifying reason or “FMLA” leave.
When leave is foreseeable, employees must give at least 30 days’ notice or as much notice as is practicable.
Courts have ruled against employers for overlooking situations where employees gave notice. In one case, an employee’s sleeping on the job was seen as notice (Byrne v. Avon Products, Inc., 7th Circuit Court of Appeals, No. 02-2629, 4/14/2003). In another case, an employee’s crying on the job was enough notice (Valdivia v. Township High School District 214, Northern District of Illinois, No. 16-cv-10333, 5/15/17).
Employers (and anyone acting on their behalf) are responsible for recognizing when employees give notice and responding appropriately.
Key to remember: Employers must be able to recognize when employees put them on notice of the need for leave and not expect employees to say any particular words or phrases, at least initially.
Hi everyone! Welcome to the monthly news roundup video, where we’ll review the most impactful environmental health and safety news. Let’s take a look at what happened over the past month.
OSHA released an updated Job Safety and Health poster. Employers can use either the revised version or the older one, but the poster must be displayed in a conspicuous place where workers can easily see it.
OSHA recently removed a link from its Data topic webpage that displayed a list of “high-penalty cases” at or over $40,000 since 2015. The agency says it discontinued and removed it in December. The data is frozen and archived elsewhere.
OSHA published two new resources as part of its newly launched Safety Champions Program. The fact sheet provides an overview of how the program works, eligibility criteria, and key benefits. The step-by-step guide helps businesses navigate the core elements of OSHA’s Recommended Practices for Safety and Health Programs.
Several forces are nudging OSHA to address a number of workplace hazards and high-hazard industries. This comes from other agencies, safety organizations, watchdogs, legislative proposals, and persistent injury/fatality data. Among the hazards are combustible dust; first aid; personal protective equipment; and workplace violence. How all this translates into new regulations, guidance, programmed inspections, or other initiatives remains to be seen.
Turning to environmental news, EPA issued a proposed rule to require waste handlers to use electronic manifests to track all RCRA hazardous waste shipments. Stakeholders have until May 4 to comment on the proposal.
On March 10, EPA finalized stronger emission limits for new and existing large municipal waste combustors and made other changes to related standards.
And finally, EPA temporarily extended coverage under the 2021 Multi-Sector General Permit for industrial stormwater discharges until the agency issues a new general permit. The permit expired February 28 and remains in effect for facilities previously covered. EPA won’t take enforcement action against new facilities for unpermitted stormwater discharges if the facilities meet specific conditions.
Thanks for tuning in to the monthly news roundup. We’ll see you next month!
Welcome, everyone! In the next few minutes, we’ll review the latest HR news. Let’s get started.
On February 27th, the U.S. Department of Labor’s Wage and Hour Division published a proposed rule that would rescind the 2024 independent contractor rule and replace it with a rule that’s similar to the one that was finalized in 2021, but never took effect. The public may submit comments until April 28th.
In the meantime, employers should follow guidance from the 2024 rule and ensure they’re complying with all federal, state, and local employment laws, especially when it comes to properly classifying workers.
One other tidbit about this independent contractor proposed rule, it also stretches its application beyond the federal Fair Labor Standards Act to the federal Family and Medical Leave Act.
While employers wouldn’t see a major FMLA change, if the proposed rule is finalized, they would benefit from the simplicity and certainty of having both laws use the same definitions.
And, finally, could a federal paid leave law be in the works? While employers shouldn’t hold their breath, paid leave is once again on the minds of Congress members. On February 24th, the U.S. House Employee Protections subcommittee held a hearing titled “Balancing Careers and Care: Examining Innovative Approaches to Paid Leave.” The hearing was held to examine the challenges of the U.S. paid leave landscape.
With the patchwork of state paid leave laws, House members at the hearing recognized the challenge private-sector employers have in navigating them. While nothing may come of this, it shows Congress is still very interested in the topic of paid leave.
That’s all the HR news we have time for today. Thanks for watching. See you next month!


Got a Compliance Question?
We’ve Got You Covered!
Get clear, reliable answers from experts with 500+ years of combined experience.