
SAFETY & COMPLIANCE NEWS
Keep up to date on the latest developments affecting OSHA, DOT, EPA, and DOL regulatory compliance.

SAFETY & COMPLIANCE NEWS
Keep up to date on the latest developments affecting OSHA, DOT, EPA, and DOL regulatory compliance.
Shipping papers, placards, and cargo securement dominated the list of reasons drivers received hazardous materials (hazmat or HM) violations during roadside inspections in 2025.
Out of 3.1 million roadside inspections last year, there were 35,700 hazmat violations, and 26 percent of those resulted in an out-of-service (OOS) order. Being familiar with the most common hazmat violations can help drivers and motor carriers take steps to avoid them.
The following table lists the top 20 hazmat violations cited during roadside inspections in 2025, including:
| Rank | Code | Description | Violations | OOS | CSA |
| 1 | 172.504, 177.823(a) | Placards or ID numbers missing or incorrect | 3,837 | 54% | 5 |
| 2 | 177.834(a) | Inadequate HM cargo securement | 3,561 | 99% | 10 |
| 3 | 172.201, 172.202 | HM shipping paper prepared improperly | 2,463 | 1% | 3 |
| 4 | 177.817(a) | No HM shipping paper | 2,439 | 68% | 3 |
| 5 | 172.516(c) | Placard damaged or improperly displayed | 2,348 | 0% | 5 |
| 6 | 177.817(e) | HM shipping papers inaccessible | 1,906 | 2% | 3 |
| 7 | 107.620(b) | No HM Registration Number in vehicle | 1,819 | 0% | 0 |
| 8 | 172.502(a) | Prohibited placarding | 1,352 | 12% | 5 |
| 9 | 177.801 | Failing to properly prepare an HM shipment, or transporting forbidden HM | 1,306 | 19% | 2-10 |
| 10 | 172.600(c) | No emergency response information immediately available | 1,153 | 0% | 3 |
| 11 | 172.328(d) | Manual remote shutoff device improperly marked | 923 | 0% | 5 |
| 12 | 172.602(c) | Improper maintenance/ accessibility of Emergency Response information | 916 | 0% | 3 |
| 13 | 173.24(b) | Leaking HM packaging | 786 | 91% | 10 |
| 14 | 172.602(a) | Incomplete or missing emergency response information | 748 | 0% | 3 |
| 15 | 172.200(a) | No/improper shipping paper from offeror | 713 | 18% | 3 |
| 16 | 180.415 | Improper cargo tank test information | 608 | 0% | 7 |
| 17 | 172.400(a) | Packaging not properly labeled | 443 | 0% | 5 |
| 18 | 172.332 | Failing to display ID numbers | 428 | 17% | 5 |
| 19 | 172.506(a) | Failure to affix placards | 345 | 10% | 5 |
| 20 | 107.608 | Failing to register with PHMSA | 302 | 0% | 0 |
Employees have the right to pump breastmilk at work and/or nurse their children at work without fear of losing their jobs or being punished (directly or indirectly) for doing so. Those workplace rights are protected by employment laws, whether local, state, or federal.
Two federal laws that protect working moms are the:
These two laws have similarities, but also a few differences.
Under the PUMP Act, employers must give employees who are nursing reasonable break times during their workday and a private space to pump at work for up to 1 year after their child’s birth.
The space must be:
Employees may take reasonable break times each time they need to express milk. Employers may not deny a covered employee a needed break to pump. Employers, however, don’t have to pay employees for the breaks unless the employees are not completely relieved from their job duties.
If employers provide paid breaks, they must pay nonexempt employees who use such breaks to pump breast milk in the same way they pay other employees for breaks.
The PUMP Act doesn’t, however, require employers to allow employees to take time off to nurse their children.
Employers with fewer than 50 employees don’t have to comply with the PUMP Act if they can prove that complying would impose an undue hardship on them by causing significant difficulty or expense. To make this determination, employers must consider their company size, financial resources, nature of work, or structure of the business.
Under the PWFA, employers must give a “reasonable accommodation” to a worker’s known limitations related to pregnancy, childbirth, or related medical conditions, unless the accommodation would cause the employer an “undue hardship” on the business. “Workers” include those who are nursing their children up to a year after the birth.
Accommodations include giving employees breaks and space for pumping at work, similar to the PUMP Act. The PWFA, however, also includes accommodations when the regular location of the employee's workplace makes nursing during work hours a possibility because the child is nearby. Therefore, employers might have to allow breaks for employees to nurse.
While the PUMP Act limits its timeline for pumping breaks to up to 1 year after the child’s birth, the PWFA doesn’t have that limitation. Employers might, therefore, have to allow employees breaks for pumping or nursing for more than a year.
Key to remember: Employers must give employees breaks for pumping breast milk or nursing a child under two similar (but different) federal laws. Employers must also consider applicable state or local laws.
As online sites and mobile apps make it easier than ever to place a bet on the Super Bowl and other events, there are benefits to making the workplace a wager-free zone.
An estimated 2.5 million adults in the U.S. have a severe gambling problem, and another 5 to 8 million have a mild or moderate problem, according to the National Council on Problem Gambling. Issues with gambling can result in:
Most adults gamble responsibly. For those fighting the compulsion to place a bet, however, even seemingly benign workplace activities like a baby pool, group lottery ticket purchases, or a fantasy sports league purse can be dangerous and should be avoided.
Although gambling has financial consequences, problem gambling is more of an emotional issue than a financial one. Gambling brings a dopamine rush, which makes a person feel good.
This rush occurs whether a person wins or loses. That makes it tempting to keep gambling as losses pile up. While some people can stop gambling after a loss, others continue to gamble to win back what’s been lost. This is known as “chasing losses.”
According to the National Council on Problem Gambling, signs of gambling addiction include:
Because of the emotional impact of gambling, problematic habits can persist even if all debts are paid off. Getting rid of a gambling addiction often requires treatment and social support, as well as abstinence from gambling.
A few years ago, Matthew Missar of The Better Institute spoke on gambling and the workplace at the Society for Human Resource Management (SHRM) Annual Conference. He provided these tips to help curb problem gambling in the workplace:
Key to remember: Trying to guess which team will win the Super Bowl can make for interesting workplace conversation, but when it turns into a gambling opportunity, it’s best to say all bets are off.
As OSHA leans into “deregulatory” actions, lawmakers are moving to pressure the agency to issue “regulatory” rulemaking to protect American workers. The House and Senate have nine bills on the table so far. The latest legislative wave aims to fill regulatory gaps, tackle emerging hazards, expand OSHA authority, and raise penalties.
Topics addressed by these bills include musculoskeletal disorders, heat stress, infectious diseases, wildfire smoke, and workplace violence. Federal OSHA does not have comprehensive standards for any of those hazards. Some existing standards are related — sanitation, first aid, personal protective equipment, and injury/illness recordkeeping and reporting.
Without comprehensive standards, OSHA may turn to enforce these hazards under the General Duty Clause (GDC), Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act. Yet, the GDC poses a high bar for inspectors. OSHA can only cite under Section 5(a)(1) if the alleged hazard: exists, is recognized, is serious, and has a feasible means to reduce that hazard.
If any one of the four criteria is missing, a GDC citation will not hold. On the other hand, putting a standard in place both mandates protections and makes it much easier for OSHA to cite employers for the hazards.
Worth noting, some of the bills specifically cover domestic workers, firefighters, warehouse workers, public sector workers, and healthcare and social service workers.
Below are the nine Congressional bills (and companions) currently under consideration:
Several bills in Congress would modernize the OSH Act and mandate OSHA rulemaking to strengthen or increase worker protections.
Effective date: February 1, 2026
This applies to: Employers covered by Washington State’s workplace safety regulations
Description of change: On May 20, 2024, Federal OSHA updated its Hazard Communication Standard at 29 CFR 1910.1200. Washington State adopts these changes.
See full text of changes: https://roar-assets-auto.rbl.ms/documents/91954/26-02-011.pdf
See effective dates: WAC 296-901-14020
View related state info: Hazard communication (HazCom) - Washington
Not every employer has to submit injury and illness data electronically, but if you do, compliance depends on doing it correctly. Under OSHA’s electronic submission regulation at 29 CFR 1904.41, knowing who has to report, what must be submitted, and when it’s due helps avoid unwanted OSHA attention.
When it comes to figuring out who needs to submit OSHA injury and illness records, the first thing to understand is that these requirements apply to each establishment, not necessarily to the company as a whole. That raises the question, what exactly is considered an “establishment”?
OSHA defines an establishment as a single physical location where business is conducted or where services or industrial operations are performed. In plain language, if your company has multiple plants, offices, or warehouses, each one is usually considered its own establishment for reporting purposes.
But there’s a twist. Under 29 CFR 1904.46, the Agency makes an exception for situations where several buildings are close together and operate as one business unit. Think of a campus or a group of facilities under the same management and performing the same business activities, those are generally treated as a single establishment. On the other hand, if those buildings are spread out, run independently, or differ in the work they do, then each location counts as its own establishment.
Armed with a better understanding of what an establishment is, you can determine if you need to submit electronically and what must be submitted? The answer depends on establishment size, industry classification, and recordkeeping obligations under Part 1904 including the following categories:
Large establishments in any industry:
Medium-sized establishments in specific industries
Examples can include construction, manufacturing, and transportation.
Certain high-hazard industries
Examples can include hospitals, food manufacturing plants, and waste treatment facilities.
Keep in mind that unless your establishment falls into OSHA’s required categories, you usually don’t have to submit injury and illness data electronically through the Injury Tracking Application (ITA), unless OSHA specifically notifies you that electronic submission is required.
That said, being exempt from electronic submission does not eliminate your other OSHA recordkeeping responsibilities under 29 CFR Part 1904. If you are required to keep injury and illness records, you must still:
If you have determined you must electronically submit your records, then the last piece of the puzzle is knowing the submission deadline. The electronic submission window for the previous calendar year’s data runs January 2 through March 2 annually. For example, 2025 data must be submitted by March 2, 2026. Late submissions can still be made until December 31, but missing the March deadline may trigger compliance issues.
Key to remember: Electronic submission requirements are based on establishment size and industry classification. Keep in mind, even if you’re not required to submit data electronically, you may still be required to keep injury and illness records, retain them for five years, and post the OSHA 300A every year.


Got a Compliance Question?
We’ve Got You Covered!
Get clear, reliable answers from experts with 500+ years of combined experience.