
SAFETY & COMPLIANCE NEWS
Keep up to date on the latest developments affecting OSHA, DOT, EPA, and DOL regulatory compliance.

SAFETY & COMPLIANCE NEWS
Keep up to date on the latest developments affecting OSHA, DOT, EPA, and DOL regulatory compliance.
Winter weather creates unique challenges for workplace safety, particularly when it comes to emergency preparedness. Snow, ice, and freezing temperatures can obstruct exits, create slip hazards, and complicate evacuation plans. Taking proactive steps is essential to maintain compliance with OSHA and NFPA standards and keep your workers safe.
OSHA regulations (29 CFR 1910.37) require that all exit routes remain free and unobstructed at all times. NFPA 101 Life Safety Code reinforces this by emphasizing clear egress paths and proper door operation during emergencies. In winter, snow and ice can quickly compromise these requirements, making it critical to plan ahead.
OSHA’s minimum width requirement of 28 inches applies to the structural component of a permanent exit route. This means the physical design of the exit must meet that standard. However, OSHA also states that exit routes must be “free and unobstructed,” which is where snow and ice become a compliance issue. Even if the structure meets the 28-inch requirement, accumulated snow or ice that narrows the path or blocks access violates OSHA’s intent for safe egress.
NFPA often requires wider exit route dimensions than OSHA’s minimum, especially in facilities with higher occupancy or specific hazards. Because local building codes or municipal regulations may adopt NFPA standards or even stricter rules, it is recommended to verify with your Authority Having Jurisdiction (AHJ) to ensure compliance with any additional requirements.
Exit doors must open easily without special tools or excessive force, as required by OSHA and NFPA standards. Winter conditions can also compromise this requirement. Snow plowed against exterior doors, frozen gates or crash bars, narrowed sidewalks, and temporary storage of salt bags or heaters near exits can obstruct pathways and delay evacuation. Slippery outdoor stairways and walkways add further risk to safe workplace exiting.
Lighting is equally important. Emergency lights and exit signs must remain visible and functional, but snowbanks, ice buildup, or temporary coverings can block them, creating unsafe conditions and violating regulations. Recommended actions to minimize these hazards can include:
OSHA requires in 29 CFR 1910.38 that workplaces with 10 or more employees maintain a written Emergency Action Plan (EAP). The EAP should clearly outline procedures for reporting emergencies, evacuation routes, and employee responsibilities including cold weather emergencies for organizations exposed to winter weather climates.
To prepare for winter weather emergencies, start by reviewing your existing plan and adding contingencies for snow and ice. Identify primary and secondary evacuation routes and ensure they remain accessible even during severe storms. Include procedures for clearing snow from exits and walkways and assign specific personnel to each task. Backup lighting should be addressed in case of power outages, and emergency communication systems should be tested regularly to ensure functionality in cold conditions.
Consider adding steps for shelter-in-place situations caused by blizzards or extreme cold. Provide guidance on maintaining indoor heat safely and ventilation for preventing carbon monoxide exposure from temporary heating devices.
OSHA also emphasizes the importance of training and communication as part of an effective emergency preparedness program. Employees must understand evacuation procedures, know their roles during an emergency, and be familiar with winter-specific hazards. This includes recognizing slip hazards, practicing safe walking techniques, and proper use of personal protective equipment.
Supervisors should go beyond basic instruction by conducting seasonal safety meetings that cover winter-specific risks. Training should explain the importance of maintaining clear exits, snow and ice removal priorities, and what steps employees should take if they notice blocked exit routes. Communication tools such as signage, email alerts, and mobile notifications can reinforce these messages during severe weather events. Effective communication ensures employees remain aware of changing conditions and know how to respond quickly and safely.
Key to remember: Winter weather can delay evacuations, so planning ahead is essential. Proactive inspections, updated emergency plans, and training are your best defense against winter hazards like blocked exits and frozen doors.
An employee reported sexual harassment to HR. The accusation was investigated and found to have merit. The harasser was disciplined. The victim can move on.
Or can they?
Workplace sexual harassment isn’t just a violation of personal boundaries; it can have lasting psychological effects. Recent research, including a study by the Scandinavian Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, has found a connection between exposure to workplace sexual harassment and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD).
PTSD is a mental health condition that can develop after a traumatic event, such as being harassed, especially if the harassment was severe or ongoing. The Scandinavian study showed that frequent harassment increases the risk and severity of PTSD symptoms.
In addition, harassment from a colleague or leader was associated with slightly higher levels of PTSD symptoms than if the harassment was from a customer.
Symptoms of PTSD that a victim of harassment might experience include:
The impact of sexual harassment may lead to profound anxiety, depression, diminished sense of self-worth, self-blame, and negative self-esteem. Additionally, the trauma of sexual harassment can cause panic attacks and poor sleep, further exacerbating the toll on a victim’s mental well-being.
These mental health effects highlight the need for support and comprehensive care for individuals who have experienced workplace sexual harassment.
Chronic stress and anxiety resulting from the experience can lead to physical ailments, including high blood pressure and cardiovascular problems. These conditions may cause attendance problems and scheduling issues.
In addition, fear of retaliation and emotional turmoil often leads to decreased job satisfaction and reduced productivity.
Employers are responsible for creating safe, supportive environments and providing adequate mental health resources for their employees.
Someone who is suffering from PTSD should seek professional counseling as soon as it’s evident that the trauma is interfering with day-to-day life.
An Employee assistance program (EAP) can offer counseling, support groups, and resources for both employees and their families.
Share information about your workplace EAP with sexual harassment victims and explain how counselors can help. If you don’t have a workplace EAP, share information about support groups and other resources in the community.
It's also important to know that PTSD will easily be concluded to be a disability under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) thus qualifying the employee for an accommodation. An accommodation might be as simple as a scheduling change that would allow the employee to attend counseling sessions.
By understanding an employee’s need for support, employers can help them cope during a painful time.
Key to remember: Studies have shown a link between sexual harassment and PTSD. Employers should be aware of this and provide support to victims.
Guidance issued this week urges states to begin enforcement January 1 for the Unified Carrier Registration (UCR) 2026 registration year.
Enforcement officials verify compliance with UCR during roadside inspections. A violation appears on the Driver/Vehicle Examination Report as “392.2 UCR - Failure to pay UCR fees.” Officials verify compliance via CVIEW, SAFER, or www.ucr.gov/enforcement. No UCR credential must be carried in the commercial motor vehicle.
During roadside inspections, enforcement officials may look for evidence of interstate or international operations during the past registration year. Proof may include:
The program applies to all motor carriers that operate in interstate and international commerce. This includes:
Carriers based in Canada or Mexico that operate in the U.S. must also register under the program.
Carriers not subject to UCR include:
Key to remember: Carriers subject to UCR must register and pay by January 1. There is no grace period for compliance.
On October 6, 2025, the U.S. Supreme Court (SCOTUS) decided not to take up a case involving an employer that didn’t pay an employee for time spent driving between job sites. The circuit court ruling, therefore, stands and serves as a good reminder that the federal Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) requires employers to pay employees for travel time between job sites, even if those job sites are personal residences.
In this case, a home health care service provider didn’t pay its employees for time spent traveling between clients’ homes.
The SCOTUS points to the FLSA’s requirement that employers must pay for work-related travel time during the workday. Pay is required when:
• The employee is on duty and when entering or exiting a period of off-duty rest.
• The travel is necessary and constitutes “part of” the employee’s “principal activity.”
In other words, although employers don’t have to pay for off-duty time, the travel time necessary to go between job sites is integral to a principal work activity and must be paid.
The FLSA doesn’t define “work.” The SCOTUS has explained that an employee “works” within the meaning of the FLSA when the employee is engaged in some kind of activity that is “controlled or required by the employer and pursued necessarily and primarily for the benefit of the employer and his business.”
In the case, the employer argued that the Portal-to-Portal Act (PPA) says that employers don’t have to pay employees for time spent “walking, riding, or traveling to and from the actual place of performance of the [employee’s] principal activity or activities” and doing “activities which are preliminary to or postliminary to said principal activity or activities.”
But the PPA covers only travel to the job site that occurs either before the time the work begins or after the principal work activities end. The PPA doesn’t apply to the time between the workday’s start and end
Once the workday has begun, employees are entitled to be paid even if they’re not working at every moment of the day.
For example, a messenger who works on a crossword puzzle while awaiting assignments and a factory worker who talks to his fellow employees while waiting for machinery to be repaired are working during their periods of inactivity.
Employers must pay employees for travel time when employees lack the time to go off duty. Employers can’t claim that the travel period between job sites is part of an employee’s break. They must pay employees for time spent traveling before or after an off-duty period/break.
Employees go off duty when they’re completely relieved from duty long enough to enable them to use the time effectively for their own purposes.
This employer said the situation was a challenge because off-duty employees could go wherever they wanted and begin their travel to a client’s home from wherever they wanted, so it was harder to say when they would return to on-duty status.
The employer argued that this theory of compensation was “unworkable” and “would require estimation of the compensable portion of travel” in a manner that would violate the FLSA.
The court said that the employer simply had to make a record so that it and employees had “the most probative facts concerning the nature and amount of work performed.”
The employer also tried to argue that travel wasn’t closely related to the productive work, such as feeding, bathing, providing medication, and dressing their clients. The court disagreed.
An activity doesn’t need to be predominant in some way over all other activities to qualify as principal. The employees were hired to travel and provide care to clients where they reside, rather than meeting them in hospitals or clinics. So, travel was part of their principal activities.
U.S. Department of Labor v. Nursing Home Care Management Inc., Third Circuit Court of Appeals, No. 23-2284, March 5, 2025.
Key to remember: As the SCOTUS makes clear, employers must pay employees for time spent travelling during the workday.
As the January frost settles in, the primary mission for any workplace becomes a simple one: stay warm. Whether it’s a drafty warehouse or a corner office with a chill, employees instinctively reach for tools to turn up the heat. However, in the pursuit of comfort, two silent and often overlooked hazards creep into the workplace, Carbon Monoxide (CO) poisoning and space heater fire hazards.
While these hazards appear different, they do share a dangerous commonality; they are often the result of small, well-intentioned adjustments to our environment that go unnoticed until it is too late. To protect your team this Winter Safety Month, it is essential to understand how these risks intersect and how to manage the "invisible" side of winter safety.
The danger begins with the air we breathe. Carbon monoxide is frequently called the “silent killer” because it is colorless, odorless, and tasteless. In the winter, the risk spikes as buildings are sealed tight to keep the cold out, inadvertently trapping any gases produced by fuel-burning equipment.
In industrial settings, this might be a propane-powered forklift running in a closed loading dock. In an office setting, it could be a malfunctioning furnace or the improper use of a kerosene heater. Because CO mimics the symptoms of common winter ailments, it is easy to ignore. Employees might complain of a "dull headache," "winter fatigue," or "nausea," assuming they are just coming down with a cold. However, a key red flag for employers is this "cluster effect." If multiple people in the same area begin feeling lethargic or dizzy simultaneously, it is probably not a virus—more than likely it is an environmental emergency. Protecting your team starts with the installation of CO detectors, but it continues with a culture where employees feel empowered to speak up the moment the air feels off.
Where fuel-burning equipment creates a chemical hazard, electric heating creates a structural one. When the central HVAC system can’t keep up with a January cold snap, the "personal space heater" becomes the most popular tool in the building. While these devices provide immediate relief, they are responsible for a staggering percentage of workplace fires because they are often treated as "plug-and-play" appliances rather than high-powered industrial tools.
The transition from a cozy workstation to a fire hazard often happens through simple proximity. This is where the "Three-Foot Rule" becomes non-negotiable. Whether it is a stack of paper, a plastic trash can, or a winter coat draped over a chair, combustible materials must be kept at a distance. A heater doesn't need to touch an object to ignite it; the constant radiant heat can raise the temperature of nearby materials to their ignition point over several hours.
Beyond the physical placement of the heater lies the electrical strain. A common mistake in office environments is "daisy-chaining” or plugging a space heater into a power strip or an extension cord. Most power strips are designed for low-draw electronics like monitors and phone chargers. A space heater draws a large amount of electricity, which can cause the internal wiring of a power strip to melt or ignite long before a circuit breaker ever trips. To bridge this gap, employers should enforce a "Direct-to-Wall" policy. If a heater cannot reach a wall outlet, it should not be used. This ensures the building’s heavy-duty wiring handles the load, rather than a thin plastic extension cord hidden under a rug.
Protecting employees during the winter months requires a much broader view of indoor safety. It isn’t just about checking the furnace or just banning heaters; it’s about managing how we modify our environment. A few winter safety strategies should include:
Keys to remember: By addressing the air we breathe and the equipment we plug in as two parts of the same winter safety goal, employers can ensure that the workplace remains a sanctuary from the cold, rather than a source of danger.
There’s nothing worse than driving at night through a work zone and having some glaring aqua headlights coming right at you, right? At times, we are left wondering if the lights are meant for work zone safety, emergency vehicles, or if they are even legal. So, let’s explore which vehicle lights are required according to regulators and why they matter.
Understanding which vehicle lights are required and why they are necessary is more than a regulatory checkbox; it's a cornerstone of safety. These lights aren't just for visibility but are intended to communicate intent, type of vehicle, guide traffic, and protect both workers and drivers. When properly used, they reduce confusion, prevent collisions, and reinforce the presence of a temporary but high-risk zone. The ultimate goal is to reduce traffic incidents and deaths by providing appropriate, noticeable vehicle lighting on public roads.
OSHA regulations for vehicle light colors are primarily governed by the Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards (FMVSS) standard number 108. The standard establishes requirements for motor vehicle lighting equipment, including light colors and brightness.
The color in all lamps and reflective devices must follow Table I in FMVSS No. 108, which includes:
FMVSS isn’t the only regulator having a say in work vehicle lighting. Additional regulations designed to keep work zones safe include:
While OSHA doesn’t regulate vehicle lights directly, it mandates safe working conditions, and proper visibility in work zones. That being said, there are some OSHA standards for work vehicle lighting. Construction motor vehicles that operate within an off-highway jobsite (not open to public traffic) are covered by 29 CFR 1926.601 and must:
Compliance with all of these regulations is vital to incident prevention and roadway safety.
Each state sets its own color patterns for emergency and service vehicles to ensure visibility and safety. Here are just a few examples:
Regardless of the state, the bottom line is that flashing lights in work zones mean slow down and stay alert—lives depend on it.
Key to remember: Vehicle lighting is essential for reducing the risk of accidents in high-risk or low-visibility environments. Specific lights communicate intent and are designed to protect both workers and the public in and around work zones.


Got a Compliance Question?
We’ve Got You Covered!
Get clear, reliable answers from experts with 500+ years of combined experience.