
SAFETY & COMPLIANCE NEWS
Keep up to date on the latest developments affecting OSHA, DOT, EPA, and DOL regulatory compliance.

SAFETY & COMPLIANCE NEWS
Keep up to date on the latest developments affecting OSHA, DOT, EPA, and DOL regulatory compliance.
Employees have the right to pump breastmilk at work and/or nurse their children at work without fear of losing their jobs or being punished (directly or indirectly) for doing so. Those workplace rights are protected by employment laws, whether local, state, or federal.
Two federal laws that protect working moms are the:
These two laws have similarities, but also a few differences.
Under the PUMP Act, employers must give employees who are nursing reasonable break times during their workday and a private space to pump at work for up to 1 year after their child’s birth.
The space must be:
Employees may take reasonable break times each time they need to express milk. Employers may not deny a covered employee a needed break to pump. Employers, however, don’t have to pay employees for the breaks unless the employees are not completely relieved from their job duties.
If employers provide paid breaks, they must pay nonexempt employees who use such breaks to pump breast milk in the same way they pay other employees for breaks.
The PUMP Act doesn’t, however, require employers to allow employees to take time off to nurse their children.
Employers with fewer than 50 employees don’t have to comply with the PUMP Act if they can prove that complying would impose an undue hardship on them by causing significant difficulty or expense. To make this determination, employers must consider their company size, financial resources, nature of work, or structure of the business.
Under the PWFA, employers must give a “reasonable accommodation” to a worker’s known limitations related to pregnancy, childbirth, or related medical conditions, unless the accommodation would cause the employer an “undue hardship” on the business. “Workers” include those who are nursing their children up to a year after the birth.
Accommodations include giving employees breaks and space for pumping at work, similar to the PUMP Act. The PWFA, however, also includes accommodations when the regular location of the employee's workplace makes nursing during work hours a possibility because the child is nearby. Therefore, employers might have to allow breaks for employees to nurse.
While the PUMP Act limits its timeline for pumping breaks to up to 1 year after the child’s birth, the PWFA doesn’t have that limitation. Employers might, therefore, have to allow employees breaks for pumping or nursing for more than a year.
Key to remember: Employers must give employees breaks for pumping breast milk or nursing a child under two similar (but different) federal laws. Employers must also consider applicable state or local laws.
Not every employer has to submit injury and illness data electronically, but if you do, compliance depends on doing it correctly. Under OSHA’s electronic submission regulation at 29 CFR 1904.41, knowing who has to report, what must be submitted, and when it’s due helps avoid unwanted OSHA attention.
When it comes to figuring out who needs to submit OSHA injury and illness records, the first thing to understand is that these requirements apply to each establishment, not necessarily to the company as a whole. That raises the question, what exactly is considered an “establishment”?
OSHA defines an establishment as a single physical location where business is conducted or where services or industrial operations are performed. In plain language, if your company has multiple plants, offices, or warehouses, each one is usually considered its own establishment for reporting purposes.
But there’s a twist. Under 29 CFR 1904.46, the Agency makes an exception for situations where several buildings are close together and operate as one business unit. Think of a campus or a group of facilities under the same management and performing the same business activities, those are generally treated as a single establishment. On the other hand, if those buildings are spread out, run independently, or differ in the work they do, then each location counts as its own establishment.
Armed with a better understanding of what an establishment is, you can determine if you need to submit electronically and what must be submitted? The answer depends on establishment size, industry classification, and recordkeeping obligations under Part 1904 including the following categories:
Large establishments in any industry:
Medium-sized establishments in specific industries
Examples can include construction, manufacturing, and transportation.
Certain high-hazard industries
Examples can include hospitals, food manufacturing plants, and waste treatment facilities.
Keep in mind that unless your establishment falls into OSHA’s required categories, you usually don’t have to submit injury and illness data electronically through the Injury Tracking Application (ITA), unless OSHA specifically notifies you that electronic submission is required.
That said, being exempt from electronic submission does not eliminate your other OSHA recordkeeping responsibilities under 29 CFR Part 1904. If you are required to keep injury and illness records, you must still:
If you have determined you must electronically submit your records, then the last piece of the puzzle is knowing the submission deadline. The electronic submission window for the previous calendar year’s data runs January 2 through March 2 annually. For example, 2025 data must be submitted by March 2, 2026. Late submissions can still be made until December 31, but missing the March deadline may trigger compliance issues.
Key to remember: Electronic submission requirements are based on establishment size and industry classification. Keep in mind, even if you’re not required to submit data electronically, you may still be required to keep injury and illness records, retain them for five years, and post the OSHA 300A every year.
A new wave of fraudulent emails impersonating the U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT) and the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) is circulating among motor carriers, prompting federal officials to issue an urgent warning to the industry. The scheme, described as unusually aggressive, uses convincing documents and realistic looking links to trick recipients into sharing sensitive information or making unauthorized payments.
According to FMCSA, the emails aren’t coming from any legitimate government source, despite appearing official. Many messages include branding, signatures, or formatting similar to authentic USDOT or FMCSA correspondence. However, the agency stresses that official communication almost always comes from email addresses ending in .gov. The only exception is when FMCSA sends customer satisfaction surveys following interactions with its Contact Center, and those messages never request personal or financial information.
Investigators note that fraudulent emails often contain links directing users to suspicious, non government domains. One example cited by FMCSA includes a URL resembling an FMCSA service site but ending in an unfamiliar extension. These links are designed to harvest data or pressure carriers into paying bogus fees.
FMCSA emphasized that it never solicits sensitive information such as Social Security numbers, bank details, Unified Carrier Registration (UCR) payments, or PIN numbers through unsolicited emails or phone calls. Any legitimate request for such information must be initiated by the carrier through official FMCSA channels.
Motor carriers are urged to remain vigilant. Officials recommend both hovering over links to verify the true destination before clicking and double checking that any website link ends in .gov. If there is any uncertainty, carriers should contact FMCSA directly through its official help portal or by calling the agency’s Call Center at 1-800-832-5660.
Those who receive suspicious emails are advised not to click links, open attachments, or reply to the sender. Instead, FMCSA encourages reporting the incident to the FMCSA Contact Center. Additional guidance on identifying phishing attempts is available through the Federal Trade Commission.
As cybercriminals continue to target the transportation sector, FMCSA urges carriers to stay alert and verify all unexpected communications to protect their businesses and industry partners.
It’s wintertime, and many construction sites across the U.S. face unique challenges that the season brings, especially keeping workers warm! However, one challenge that construction sites face year-round is how to keep stormwater runoff (whether it’s generated by snowmelt or rain) from transporting pollutants off-site into nearby waterways.
Under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) stormwater program (40 CFR Part 450), the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) requires construction site operators to obtain a permit to discharge stormwater runoff into waters of the United States from any construction activity that disturbs:
Construction sites must implement best management practices (BMPs), which are controls and activities used to prevent stormwater pollution. Erosion controls and sediment controls are the two leading types of BMPs that construction sites have to apply.
Understanding the differences between erosion controls and sediment controls (and how they function together) will help you choose the most effective BMPs to reduce stormwater pollution at your construction site.
Both types of controls are important, but their functions are distinct. Construction sites should use erosion controls as the primary method and sediment controls as the backup method to reduce stormwater pollution.
Erosion controls prevent the land from wearing away. These measures stop soil particles from being dislodged and transported by stormwater or wind. Erosion controls are the first line of defense against stormwater pollution.
Erosion control examples include:
Sediment controls capture soil particles that have been dislodged (i.e., eroded) before stormwater or wind moves them off the construction site. Sediment controls are the second line of defense, serving as backup BMPs.
Examples of sediment controls are:
Common BMP examples
EPA’s “National Menu of Best Management Practices (BMPs) for Stormwater-Construction” webpage details erosion controls and sediment controls frequently used at construction sites, including (but not limited to) the following:
| Erosion control BMPs | Sediment control BMPs |
|---|---|
|
|
The most effective way to control stormwater pollution at construction sites is by applying a selection of erosion controls and sediment controls that are coordinated to work together. Consider these examples:
Most states issue NPDES construction stormwater permits. Additionally, some local governments may impose requirements on construction sites. However, unless the local program is designated as a qualifying local program, compliance with local regulations may not mean that your construction site is compliant with EPA’s rules (and vice versa).
Check the permit to confirm erosion control and sediment control requirements, as they may be more stringent at the state or local level.
Key to remember: Construction sites must implement erosion controls and sediment controls to prevent stormwater pollution.
OSHA recently revamped two of its guidance publications related to enforcement and nail salon safety. The agency also revised and returned the redline-strikeout version of the Hazard Communication (HazCom) rule to its website. All three documents are intended to be informational and don’t create new regulations or obligations.
OSHA inspections can be an overwhelming experience. Understanding the regulatory terms and what’s required of you afterwards can be confusing. OSHA says its Employer Rights and Responsibilities Following a Federal OSHA Inspection booklet can and should be used as a discussion guide during your closing conference with the compliance officer.
The booklet explains that:
Also explained in OSHA’s guidance are types of violations, employer options, how to comply, how to contest citations, and more. The booklet is available as a pdf or ebook in English and Spanish.
Nail technicians are exposed to hazardous chemicals found in glues, polishes, removers, and other salon products. The trouble is these exposures can lead to asthma and other respiratory illnesses, skin disorders, liver disease, reproductive loss, and cancer. Additionally, awkward positions and repetitive motions may lead to muscle strains, and workers face potential infections from contact with client skin, nails, or blood.
Stay Healthy and Safe While Giving Manicures and Pedicures: A Guide for Nail Salon Workers highlights common issues in nail salons — such as chemical and biological exposures, ventilation problems, inadequate personal protective equipment (PPE), and ergonomic risks. Importantly, the guide provides practical steps for correcting those issues. It also explains worker rights and offers a list of applicable OSHA standards and resources. The publication is available in five languages.
Finally, OSHA returned the redline-strikeout version of its 2024 HazCom rule to its Hazard Communication topic page. The latest document includes the corrections issued in the Federal Register (on May 20, 2024, October 9, 2024, January 8, 2026, and January 15, 2026). The redline-strikeout version is the full text of 29 CFR 1910.1200 with all revisions from 2024 and 2026 marked in red so you can spot what was added, revised, or removed.
We anticipate more HazCom guidance and enforcement information will be coming to OSHA’s HazCom topic page, either behind the HCS final rule link or the other links on the page.
Key to remember: OSHA continues to update its guidance publications. The latest ones cover OSHA inspections, nail salon safety, and hazard communication.
International Roadcheck 2026 is right around the corner, taking place in early May this year. This annual 3-day vehicle inspection event is designed to educate and spread awareness about motor vehicle safety.
Inspections will take place at weigh/inspection stations, mobile patrols, and temporary sites during the 72-hour inspection. The Commercial Vehicle Safety Alliance (CVSA) says that it’s conducted over 1.8 million inspections since this event began in 1988.
Roadcheck is scheduled for May 12-14, 2026, so make sure your team and operations are ready. Remember, every roadside inspection has an impact on Compliance, Safety, Accountability (CSA) scores.
During the inspection blitz, CVSA-certified law enforcement personnel across Mexico, the U.S., and Canada will examine motor vehicles to verify state, federal, provincial, and territorial regulatory compliance.
Inspectors will perform as many Level I inspections as possible. This is a complete inspection of the driver and vehicle. Unsuccessful inspections could result in a vehicle or driver being placed out of service until the violation is resolved.
The CVSA has eight levels of roadside inspections. Each level has a varying degree of emphasis and detail. Although Roadcheck 2026 will involve mostly Level I comprehensive driver/vehicle inspections, drivers (and their vehicles) should be prepared for all inspection types every day of the year.


Got a Compliance Question?
We’ve Got You Covered!
Get clear, reliable answers from experts with 500+ years of combined experience.