Compliance Just Got Easier: Stay ahead of regulatory changes with instant notifications on updates that matter.
Overwhelmed by all the regulatory compliance information out there? The J. J. Keller® COMPLIANCE NETWORK makes it simple by providing easy access to timely news, expert resources, and other personalized content!
For many transportation professionals, staying ahead of regulatory changes from the DOT and other agencies means consulting multiple resources and finding the details that are actually relevant to their fleet and drivers.
COMPLIANCE NETWORK is an online platform that delivers top-notch content from the leaders in transportation safety and compliance. When you create an account, you can build your profile with key information about your operation to see a feed of content custom-tailored to your compliance needs.
Compliance Network is the perfect way to ensure you never miss important updates, like these trending transportation articles:
Ah, the traffic roundabout — nature’s way of testing whether drivers truly understand the concept of yielding, or if they just enjoy circling endlessly like confused ducks in a kiddie pool. Some say roundabouts are the perfect solution to traffic congestion, reducing accidents and keeping things flowing like a well-oiled machine. Others argue they’re glorified spinning traps designed to confuse, frustrate, and occasionally launch unsuspecting minivans into orbit.
So, are roundabouts the heroes of modern traffic design or just circular chaos with landscaping in the middle? Buckle up as we take a few laps around this debate.
Believe it or not, roundabouts aren’t just there to make you question your sense of direction, make your GPS recalculate for the fifth time, or give your Uncle Bob another conspiracy theory to support. These circular marvels are actually traffic safety ninjas.
Studies by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) have shown that roundabouts typically result in:
| A 37% reduction in overall collisions. | A 75% reduction in injury collisions. |
| A 40% reduction in pedestrian collisions. | A 90% reduction in fatality collisions. |
| A 62-74% reduction in traffic delays. | As a planetary bonus, a 30% reduction in vehicle emissions. |
Don’t let these circular conundrums make drivers question everything you thought they knew about right-of-way, geometry, and your own patience. Here what to know so you can manage roundabouts without the road rage:
Think of navigating a roundabout like you are joining a polite game of bumper cars — everyone’s circling, and nobody’s crashing. You enter and exit only when you’ve proven you know how to yield without panicking (or making eye contact). Until then, you can always ask Siri how to avoid them altogether, but you may want to leave the house earlier!
For the critical thinkers who like to know where this concept of avoiding vertigo on the way to the office originated, here’s a historical detour to see that the idea isn’t new. Roundabouts have been a concept since an 18th century inventor called Pierre L’Enfant designed what became known as “traffic circles” in Washington DC.
The traffic trickery became part of the transportation system in 1905, when the Columbus Circle opened in New York City—one of the first traffic circles designed for cars. We have William Phelps Eno to thank (or criticize, depending upon your opinion of roundabouts) for that. The first European roundabout was built in 1907 in Letchworth Garden City, England — not for traffic, but as a pedestrian island. So yes, the early roundabouts weren’t even meant for cars, which might explain why some drivers still treat them like mysterious crop circles.
Improvements were made in the UK in the 1960’s to help prevent circular intersections from locking up, by not allowing vehicles to enter the intersection until there were enough gaps in circulating traffic. In addition, smaller circular intersections were proposed to not just fit the geography but that made vehicles turn more tightly, resulting in slower entry and circulating speeds.
The modern roundabout has greatly improved in terms of operations and safety, when compared with older roadway rotaries. The benefits of which include:
These obnoxious orbs are popping up everywhere across the U.S. and Canada, but now you are prepared to circle in style!
Key to remember: Roundabouts aren’t just a fancy way to make you feel like a NASCAR driver. Once you crack the circular code, you may just embrace these engineering superheroes for their ability to not only reduce traffic jams and fender benders but save lives!
Oregon is joining the International Fuel Tax Agreement (IFTA) as a full participant, and simplifying its weight-mile tax (WMT) along the way.
On November 7, 2025, Oregon House Bill (HB) 3991 was signed into law to provide emergency funding for Oregon’s roads, bridges, and transit operations at the state and local level.
Several of the fee and tax increases in the bill were repealed in May 2026. However, changes impacting motor carriers, including WMT Simplification and other rate changes, weren’t repealed and are moving forward on schedule.
The WMT structure is simplified starting July 1, 2027. Tax weight will be the same as registration weight. Several transportation fees including Flat Fees, WMT, and Road Use Assessment Fee (RUAF) rates will see rate changes.
Carriers will be asked to amend their enrolled vehicle weights in spring 2027.
The Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) will also implement a hybrid tax system in accordance with House Bill 3991. Heavy trucks will start paying fuels tax along with reduced WMT. Oregon will become a full participant in the IFTA program and begin collecting and distributing IFTA monies from all carriers, as opposed to only collecting IFTA taxes and fees for Oregon-based carriers.
Other important changes that will occur at the same time include:
On July 1, 2029, RUAF, WMT rates, and flat fee rates change in alignment with diesel tax implementation.
When motor carriers think about risk management, they often focus on insurance coverage, accident prevention, and driver training. While these are all important, one of the most effective tools for reducing regulatory risk and preventing costly enforcement actions is often overlooked: the mock audit.
A mock audit is a proactive review of a carrier's safety and compliance program. It’s conducted before an auditor, investigator, or enforcement official requests records. Simply put, it allows companies to identify and correct problems before they become violations.
Mock audits should be a routine part of a motor carrier’s compliance efforts considering that roadside inspections can expose issues that lead to warning letters, focused investigations, or comprehensive audits. A DOT investigation may reveal even more safety concerns that might have been addressed earlier had the motor carrier performed a mock audit.
The first step in any mock audit is determining what areas to review. While every operation is different, carriers should evaluate the same areas regulators are likely to scrutinize during an investigation. This typically includes driver qualification files, hours-of-service records, vehicle maintenance documentation, drug-and-alcohol testing records, accident registers, and supporting safety policies.
Companies should also understand which documents auditors frequently request. Recent enforcement trends have shown auditors requesting broader sets of records, including documentation related to drivers, maintenance activities, and multiple areas of compliance. Carriers that can quickly produce organized and accurate records often experience a smoother review process than those scrambling to locate documents after receiving an auditor's request.
One of the most valuable resources available during a mock audit is a carrier's own roadside inspection history. Roadside inspections generate information that regulators use to evaluate both driver and carrier safety performance. Violations identified during inspections often reveal trends that deserve closer attention.
For example, recurring logbook violations may indicate training gaps, while repeated vehicle maintenance violations could suggest weaknesses in preventive maintenance programs. Driver qualification issues may point to inconsistent hiring or recordkeeping practices. By analyzing inspection results, carriers can focus their compliance efforts on the greatest risks and address concerns before they attract additional regulatory attention.
A mock audit is only effective if deficiencies are corrected and tracked to completion. Identifying a problem without implementing a solution provides little value and leaves the organization vulnerable to repeat violations.
Successful carriers establish a corrective action process that:
These records not only help improve compliance but can also demonstrate a commitment to safety if regulators ever review the company's programs.
Key to remember: A structured mock audit program helps carriers identify risks early, strengthen compliance processes, and improve their overall safety posture.
Picture this: You receive an email that warns that your MCS-150 is out of date and you’re about to be shut down, but you can update it “here,” with a link to a website that asks for sensitive information and a credit card number. What do you do?
These messages aren’t new, but there has been an uptick in scams and predatory business practices around MCS-150 updates since the transition to Motus.
FMCSA has clearly warned that official communications will come from a .gov email address, not private domains, and that look‑alike or third‑party domains are a common tactic used in fraudulent outreach. Separately, FMCSA has issued multiple fraud alerts noting that scammers and third‑party marketers are sending emails that create urgency around authority issues (like revocations, missing filings, or compliance lapses) and then directing carriers to click links or pay for services.
Watch out for the following red flags when reading these messages:
Simply receiving these messages is not a cause for concern — so long as you do not interact. Instead, you should:
It is important to note that not every message along these lines comes from a scammer. There are also companies out there looking to help you stay compliant. These companies are called third-party service providers, and they may charge a fee to help motor carriers complete filings, monitor compliance deadlines, or manage updates such as the MCS-150.
Utilizing an external company to assist with compliance can be a game-changer for many carriers. But how do you know who to trust? Transparency is key. A legitimate provider will clearly explain:
Be cautious of any company that makes the message look like an official government notice; creates pressure with threats of immediate shutdown; or asks for payment, login credentials, or sensitive company information without clearly identifying who they are and what service they are providing.
Key to remember: Motor carriers should treat unsolicited MCS-150, DOT number, or operating authority messages with caution. Verify requests through official FMCSA channels before interacting with these messages in any way.
Each year, hundreds of workers are killed by objects, vehicles, and equipment they never expected would become deadly. Could the same struck-by risks exist in your workplace?
My home state of Michigan is seeing the effects of these unidentified hazards and the numbers are striking. As of the end of July 2026, Michigan had its 26th worker fatality, meaning 26 families had to say goodbye to a parent, spouse, or sibling they cherished. Of these 26 fatalities, almost 62% were due to struck-by incidents.
What’s even more striking is that each of these losses was preventable. The good news? What one organization learns through tragedy, another can learn through awareness!
| ACTIVITY | HAZARD | FATAL STRIKE | WORKER AGE |
| Manufacturing | Pneumatic (air) press | Lead production manager made initial adjustments to a press. During start-up of the production run, an air cylinder shaft broke and breached a guard, striking the employee on the head. | 53 |
| Construction | Factory beam | Co-owner was in a scissor lift disassembling beams when an unsecured beam twisted, tipping the scissor lift backward and causing the employee to strike their head on the ground. | 31 |
| Construction | Lifting mechanism | Owner was operating a pickup truck loaded with dirt. While raising a dump bed, the lifting mechanism failed, causing the bed to fall and struck the owner in the head. | 34 |
| Automotive | Dead tree | While attempting to recover a vehicle stuck in a wooded area, the strap used to secure the vehicle to a tree that caused the dead tree to fall, striking the technician. | 38 |
| Firefighting | Falling debris | Firefighter was struck by falling debris while fighting a residential fire. | 47 |
| Arboriculture | Falling tree branch | While sitting on a log, a branch from an adjacent tree fell and struck an arborist in the head. | 52 |
| Arboriculture | Falling tree branch | Tree branch fell when laborer was trimming trees, striking the employee in the head. | 50 |
| Transportation | Vehicle strike | Two maintenance workers were patching potholes along the right shoulder of the road when a passenger vehicle driver swerved and lost control, entering the work area and striking the employee. | 51 and 49 |
| Manufacturing | Die sets | While a die was being lowered by crane, the operator noticed the locating pin was in wrong position and began raising the die back up. Worker climbed off the bolster to locate the pin, the die caught another die, began swinging then pinned the victim between the two dies. | 34 |
| Transportation | Failed hydraulics | While performing hydraulic maintenance under the flatbed rollback, the hydraulics failed, crushing the tow truck driver. | 45 |
| Transportation | Vehicle strike | While assisting another driver, school bus driver was struck by a passing vehicle. | 45 |
| Automotive | Vehicle strike | Service technician was struck by a vehicle along the highway after one vehicle caused another vehicle to swerve. | 19 |
| Utilities | Falling tree branch | Supervisor was struck by a limb from a nearby tree while cutting tree limbs that had fallen onto a roadway due to high winds. | 43 |
| Construction | Excavator arm | When moving an excavator arm to help with reinstalling the pin, the While excavator cab and arm rotated pinning a laborer between the excavator arm and the loader bucket. | 53 |
Key to remember: Struck-by hazards often go unnoticed until a life is lost and the lessons become painfully clear. However, these tragedies offer valuable lessons that employers from across the country should view as a call to evaluate risks, reinforce safe practices, and prevent a preventable loss. The best time to identify a struck-by hazard is before it has the chance to strike!
COMPLIANCE NETWORK members also receive access to other best-in-class content and features tailored to your unique compliance needs:
Dive into articles, videos, and interactive exercises in the J. J. Keller Institute to expand your knowledge of the compliance subjects that matter to you.
Enjoy an unprecedented level of access to J. J. Keller Experts by submitting questions, scheduling consultations, and making research requests.