
Experience Everything Compliance Network Has to Offer
Not many issues are more sensitive or potentially embarrassing as personal hygiene in the workplace; as a result, mangers and supervisors often hand over personal hygiene problems to personnel in the company’s Human Resources department. While you may also be tempted to let a personal hygiene problem slide, it should be dealt with as you would any other employee relations issue. Handle the matter before it affects the morale, and perhaps even job performance, of other employees.
Managers and supervisors often hand over employee personal hygiene problems to personnel in the company’s Human Resources department.
Handling a body odor problem. If you’ve been made aware of an employee who exudes an unpleasant body odor, severe bad breath, or other hygiene concern, follow these steps:
Here’s where the personal hygiene issue gets particularly tricky: If the employee’s body odor is caused by a medical condition, you may be obligated under the American’s with Disability Act (ADA) to provide an accommodation. Examples of an accommodation may include:
If your employee tells you that the unpleasant odor has a medical, or even religious or cultural cause, then it is suggested that you check with your company’s legal council before taking any action. You don’t want to open yourself up to an ADA or discrimination lawsuit.
What about poor grooming, improper dress, tattoos and piercings? The way your employees present themselves can affect your company’s image, especially if they deal with the public.
Of course, nothing in life is that simple. Employees can, and have, claimed religious exemptions to company dress codes. So, while you don’t have to accept tattoos or piercings if they’re only part of an employee’s preferred wardrobe, you may have to put up with them if they’re part of that employee’s religion. One court case involved an employer that ended up settling a religious discrimination suit for $150,000. An employee claimed that his wrist tattoos were a significant element in his ancient Egyptian religious practices. The company fired him for refusing to cover them up, and the employee appealed to the EEOC, which ended up suing the company under the Civil Rights Act citing religious discrimination.
When it comes to piercings, remember that you have an obligation, under the Occupational Safety and Health Act, to provide work and a workplace free from identified hazards. If an employee is wearing piercings that may get caught in equipment, or pose other hazards, you need to address it as a safety concern.
Try to work with employees who want exemptions to your dress code. Engage them in constructive dialogues to see if you can come up with a solution. Perhaps the employee could remove facial piercings during work hours or would agree to cover up tattoos.
Remember, you don’t have to provide accommodations that would create an undue hardship on the employer. For instance, courts have sided with companies against employees who want to display facial piercings when those employees need to work with customers, arguing that companies have the right to control the image they present to the public.
What about fragrances and Multiple Chemical Sensitivity? A growing concern for employers is “fragrance sensitivity.” Each year a larger number of people report reactions to the fragrances in perfumes, colognes, hand lotions, body sprays, and more. This condition presents a tricky problem for employers; there’s a fine line between accommodating an employee’s fragrance sensitivity and being the “fragrance police.”
Another name for fragrance sensitivity is Multiple Chemical Sensitivity (MCS). People who suffer from MCS become sickened by chemicals, including fragrances, in the environment. People with MCS report headaches, asthma-like symptoms, difficulty breathing, light-headedness, even unconsciousness, in response to chemicals in the environment. They may react to substances and fragrances in concentrations small enough that others don’t even notice them. As the condition becomes more common, many employers are instituting “fragrance-free” policies. Most hospitals and clinics already have such policies in place.
Again, as with many medical conditions, you may have to provide a reasonable accommodation under the ADA, barring undue hardship. You may need to give the affected employee a private office or allow him or her to wear a face mask to work. There have been cases where employees react to everything — including other employee’s choice of deodorant, the carpeting materials, or even lunch smells. Make sure you’re on good legal footing before making decisions regarding an employee with MCS.
Stay current. Issues surrounding personal hygiene will continue to test HR professionals as employment laws evolve and public perceptions regarding grooming change. In the future, tattoos and body piercings may become more common and accepted in the workplace, while chemical sensitivities may offer mounting challenges for workplace accommodations. Keep your company’s policies up-to-date and stay current on the latest trends and cases in the employment law arena.