
SAFETY & COMPLIANCE NEWS
Keep up to date on the latest developments affecting OSHA, DOT, EPA, and DOL regulatory compliance.

SAFETY & COMPLIANCE NEWS
Keep up to date on the latest developments affecting OSHA, DOT, EPA, and DOL regulatory compliance.
Let’s be honest, managing compliance is tough. But when it comes to Universal Waste (UW), items like fluorescent bulbs, used batteries, aerosol cans, and old thermostats can expose employers to fines without them even realizing it. Why? Because Universal Waste is the ultimate regulatory paradox. These items are still classified as hazardous waste, but the EPA created a streamlined rule set (40 CFR Part 273) to make recycling easier. The problem is that many employers assume "streamlined" means "ignorable." Fixing these problems is incredibly straightforward. By tackling the most common UW mistakes, you don’t just avoid penalties; you build a predictable, efficient, and cost-effective waste program.
Keys to remember: Universal waste compliance hinges on keeping containers closed, labeled, dated, and ensuring employees managing these materials are trained and documenting their actions. When your program is consistent, simple, and intentional, you eliminate preventable violations and turn UW management into a predictable, low-risk process.
Cold environments brings hazards ranging from slips and falls to cold stress injuries like hypothermia, frostbite, and trench foot. Working in cold conditions can be uncomfortable and potentially very dangerous. The most effective way to protect workers is by following the hierarchy of controls, starting with strategies that eliminate or reduce exposure before relying on personal protective equipment (PPE).
OSHA emphasizes that, even without a specific “cold stress” standard, employers are obligated under the General Duty Clause (Section 5(a)(1)) to provide a workplace free from recognized hazards and must comply with PPE requirements in 29 CFR 1910.132. Workers commonly exposed to cold stress include:
This list is not all inclusive; however, these jobs often involve long exposure to low temperatures, wind, wetness and physical exertion that test fine-motor tasks as dexterity drops in the cold.
When the temperature drops, quick action matters. The hierarchy of controls gives employers a step-by-step plan to reduce cold stress risks before they turn into emergencies. Below are practical steps and examples for each level of the hierarchy from most protective to least:
Elimination/substitution - Remove or replace the hazard entirely.
Engineering controls - Modify the work environment to reduce exposure.
Administrative controls - Change how work is performed to limit risk.
PPE - Provide gear when other controls can’t fully eliminate risk.
Wind chill is the temperature your body “feels” when wind speed and air temperature are combined. Wind strips away the thin layer of warm air next to the skin, accelerating convective heat loss. As wind speed rises, exposed skin cools faster, dramatically increasing frostbite and hypothermia risk.
OSHA and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Organization (NOAA) use Wind Chill Advisories and Warnings to signal when conditions are hazardous or life-threatening. As an example, at 20 °F with a 20-mph wind, the wind chill is ~4 °F, meaning cold stress sets in much faster than the air temperature alone would suggest.
Key to remember: By integrating wind chill awareness with the hierarchy of controls, supervisors can drastically reduce cold-related injuries by keeping crews safe and productive throughout the winter season.
In a recent webcast on intermittent leave under the federal Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA), attendees asked many questions, and amid those questions, some common themes appeared. The frequently asked questions (FAQs) revolved around employee FMLA eligibility, leave calculation, and intermittent leave. The questions included the following:
Q: How is FMLA eligibility determined (e.g., employee count, hours worked)?
A: Employees are eligible to take FMLA leave if they work in the U.S. for a covered employer and meet three criteria:
Q: How do employers calculate FMLA leave for employees with different work schedules, such as 37.5 hours/week instead of the usual 40 hours/week?
A: Eligible employees are entitled to 12 of their workweeks of FMLA leave. For intermittent or reduced schedule leave, employers multiply the employee’s regular workweek by 12 to determine how many hours of FMLA leave they get. If, for example, an employee regularly works 37.5 hours per week, that employee would be entitled to 450 hours of FMLA leave.
Q: When does FMLA leave start, on the approval date, the date of the first absence, or the date on the certification?
A: The FMLA leave begins when an employee first takes time off for a qualifying reason. The date on the certification should be the same as the first day the employee took off, but employers may rely on what the certification indicates if they differ. The approval date has little to do with when employers are to start tracking FMLA leave, particularly since employees have at least 15 days to give employers a certification.
Q: How does the rolling backward method work for FMLA leave calculation?
A: When using the rolling backward method to calculate the 12-month leave year period, each time an employee takes FMLA leave, employers look back 12 months and determine if and how much FMLA leave the employee took in those 12 months. They subtract that amount from the employee’s 12-week FMLA leave entitlement.
Q: Can employees take intermittent leave for baby bonding, or must they take it continuously?
A: Employees aren’t automatically entitled to FMLA leave for bonding with a healthy child on an intermittent or reduced schedule basis. They may take such leave only if the employer agrees to allow it.
Q: When employees take unforeseeable intermittent FMLA leave, may employers ask for a doctor’s note for each instance of the leave?
A: Employers may not ask for a doctor’s note for each instance of unforeseeable intermittent FMLA leave. Asking for a doctor’s note is like asking for a recertification, so it would need to comply with the recertification rules.
Q: Can a salaried employee take leave in increments less than a full day?
A: Yes. The FMLA has a provision that allows employers to make deductions from an exempt employee's salary for any hours taken as intermittent or reduced FMLA leave within a workweek, without affecting the employee’s exempt status.
Key to remember: The FMLA has been challenging employers for decades, and these FAQs indicate that the challenges continue.
The Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) has announced the rollout of Motus, a new USDOT registration system designed to streamline compliance and modernize the way motor carriers, brokers, and supporting companies manage their regulatory obligations.
Motus represents a significant shift from the current patchwork of portals, consolidating USDOT numbers, biennial updates, hazmat registrations, and other filings into one secure, user-friendly platform. The initiative aims to:
Beginning in December 2025, Motus will open with limited access for supporting companies. These organizations will be able to create user and business profiles, ensuring their systems are prepared to meet industry needs once the platform expands. This early phase is critical for testing functionality and building readiness before carriers join.
Motor carriers don’t need to re-register immediately. Existing USDOT registrations remain valid until the system fully transitions in 2026.
At that time, all carriers will be required to:
FMCSA anticipates registration requirements will begin in mid to late 2026.
In response to industry feedback, FMCSA confirmed that Motus won’t initially introduce safety registration, eliminate docket numbers (MC/FF/MX), or alter BOC-3 filing processes. These proposals remain under consideration and will be subject to public comment.
FMCSA emphasized that stakeholder engagement will remain central throughout the Motus rollout. The agency plans to host informational webinars, industry roundtables, and training sessions to ensure registrants understand the new system and can provide feedback on its usability.
Motus is a step toward a safer, more efficient future for the transportation industry. By consolidating forms, improving verification, and reducing fraud, FMCSA is ensuring that carriers and support companies can navigate compliance with confidence.
National origin discrimination has been getting more attention in recent months as the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity (EEOC) has focused on protecting American workers.
Two recent EEOC lawsuits involving farm workers resulted in charges of national origin discrimination.
In the first case, a Mississippi farming operation began hiring immigrant agricultural workers from a foreign country to supplement its existing workforce which had consisted of farm workers of American national origin.
The EEOC alleged that the farm operation discriminated against American workers by giving foreign workers preferential job assignments which were less strenuous, and came with more work hours, higher pay, and higher bonuses.
In the second case, a Wisconsin dairy got in trouble with the EEOC. The dairy promised three Mexican nationals professional and/or management positions when they were hired and gave the same information to the U.S. Embassy for their visa applications.
When the three Mexican nationals arrived on the farm, however, the dairy denied the promised positions and instead gave them laborer positions and assigned them more difficult tasks and shifts. When a Mexican worker complained, a manager at the dairy justified the work assignment with a negative stereotype of American workers, saying “Americans are lazy,” according to the suit.
Even though the Mexican workers were not given the higher positions they were promised, this situation was viewed by the EEOC as discrimination against American workers because the employer was stereotyping Americans as “lazy.”
Both the Mississippi farming operation and the Wisconsin dairy’s alleged conduct violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which prohibits national origin discrimination.
The EEOC recently issued technical assistance on discrimination against American workers, including common business reasons for preferring foreign workers which may result in illegal national origin discrimination, violating Title VII.
The guidance specified that the following considerations don't excuse an employer’s decision to hire foreign workers over American workers:
The guidance also specified that Title VII bars discriminatory job advertisements and that evidence of such ads can include verbiage that the employer prefers or requires applicants from a particular country or with a particular visa status (for example, “H-1B preferred” or “H-1B only”).
Key to remember: The EEOC is cracking down on national origin discrimination against American workers. The agency recently issued guidance on the topic and has pursued lawsuits against two farming operations.
OSHA issued seven new letters of interpretation (LOIs) on a variety of workplace topics. These letters help ensure the consistent application of federal workplace safety and health standards, and provide regulatory clarification to employers, workers, and safety professionals.
This year's LOIs address the following topics:
To review these LOIs, previous guidance, or to submit new LOI requests, visit OSHA’s LOI interpretation page.


Got a Compliance Question?
We’ve Got You Covered!
Get clear, reliable answers from experts with 500+ years of combined experience.