Compliance Just Got Easier: Stay ahead of regulatory changes with instant notifications on updates that matter.

Regulatory Compliance News & Updates
Keep up to date on the latest
developments affecting OSHA, DOT,
EPA, and DOL regulatory compliance.
Safety & Compliance News
FEATURED NEWS
2026-08-17T05:00:00Z
NewsEnforcement and Audits - OSHAMaterials Handling and StorageErgonomicsTransportationForklifts and Powered TrucksWalking Working SurfacesFire Protection and PreventionIn-Depth ArticleWalking Working SurfacesUSAEnglishHeat StressErgonomicsOSHA Emphasis ProgramsEmergency Planning - OSHAIndustry NewsHeat and Cold ExposureFleet SafetyOSHA InspectionsSafety & HealthForklifts and Powered TrucksGeneral Industry SafetyExit RoutesAgriculture SafetyMaritime SafetyOSHA RecordkeepingMaterials Handling and StorageFire Protection and PreventionFocus AreaInjury and Illness Recordkeeping
Warehousing NEP stacks up wall-to-wall OSHA inspections through 2031
Citing elevated injury and illness rates, OSHA relaunched a National Emphasis Program on Warehousing and Distribution Center Operations on July 31. With this NEP, it’s now all hands-on-deck for federal OSHA inspectors nationwide for the next five years, as they knock on doors to:
- Warehousing and distribution operations,
- Mail processing and distribution centers, and
- Parcel delivery and courier services.
The warehouse NEP (CPL 03-00-026) is one of only 12 for the agency. NEPs are enforcement programs that concentrate the agency’s inspection and outreach efforts, based on emerging trends and strategic goals.
OSHA looked at federal data on rates for injuries and illnesses involving days away, restriction, or transfer. It turns out these industries continue to have higher rates than private industry overall. What’s striking is that, in some cases, those figures are over two to four times the private industry rate.
Which sectors are targeted?
Unlike the previous NEP, this one is straightforward with only one track. OSHA will select establishments with the following North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) codes for a comprehensive (wall-to-wall) safety inspection:
- NAICS 491110 — Postal Service Processing & Distribution Centers
- NAICS 492110 — Couriers and Express Delivery Services
- NAICS 492210 — Local Messengers and Local Delivery
- NAICS 493110 — General Warehousing and Storage
- NAICS 493120 — Refrigerated Warehousing and Storage
- NAICS 493130 — Farm Product Warehousing and Storage
- NAICS 493190 — Other Warehousing and Storage
Retail operations (in NAICS 444110, 444130, 444190, 445110, and 452311) are no longer targeted by this NEP as they were previously.
OSHA will draw up a list of establishments within the specific NAICS codes for this NEP for each Area Office. Any establishment that had a comprehensive safety inspection involving the NEP-listed hazards within the prior three years generally will not be subject to another inspection under the NEP itself.
If the officer discovers that the establishment location has changed or is not correct, but the NAICS code, personnel, and operation are “substantially similar,” the official may proceed with an inspection.
Does the NEP apply to small employers?
The NEP does not offer a threshold for the number of employees. Therefore, small businesses may be targeted. However, an establishment that is exempted under the Appropriations Act cannot be inspected under the NEP. (See CPL 02-00-170, Enforcement Exemptions and Limitations under the Appropriations Act.)
What will OSHA officers look for?
Compliance officers will review OSHA 300 logs, 300A summaries, and 301 incident reports for the current and previous three calendar years to identify recorded injuries and illnesses associated with the hazards addressed by this NEP. Officers will be on the lookout for common safety and health hazards, including, but not limited to:
- Powered industrial vehicle operations,
- Materials handling and storage,
- Walking-working surfaces,
- Means of egress,
- Fire protection,
- Heat, and
- Ergonomics.
Unlike the prior NEP, the new one removes the requirement for officers to perform a dedicated heat and ergonomic hazard screening. This is not to say they won’t decide to assess those two hazards.
The latest NEP explains that an inspection “may be expanded” based on fatalities/catastrophes, complaints, referrals, recorded injuries/illnesses, employee statements, or “plain view” observations. Hazards found in this way may provide a basis for expanding the inspection. The NEP offers OSHA officers greater discretion in whether or not to expand an inspection.
What about state-plan states?
“State Plans” are OSHA-approved workplace safety and health programs operated by individual states or U.S. territories. OSHA strongly encourages, but does not require, state-plan states to participate in the revised NEP. If participating, a state’s emphasis program specifics and timelines may differ from the federal. States may also have more stringent regulations for the focus areas in the NEP.
What can employers do immediately?
Employers can check the following:
- What the NAICS codes for their locations are to see if they fall under the NEP. If employers have more than one location, they should determine the industry code for each location and not assume that a corporate-wide industry classification is the one OSHA will use.
- Whether their locations are exempted from programmed safety inspections per CPL 02-00-170. Not all OSHA inspections are exempt under that CPL — the agency may conduct inspections for health hazards, complaints, referrals, fatalities, catastrophes, hospitalizations, imminent danger, and discrimination.
- Whether the state-plan state has implemented the NEP as written or with modifications.
- The dates and scope of any OSHA or state inspections at their locations in the last three years. Records of such inspections should be kept readily available in case of an OSHA visit.
How might employers prepare?
Affected employers should learn their inspection rights and have a protocol in place. OSHA’s publication, "Employer Rights and Responsibilities Following an OSHA Inspection" (OSHA 3000), may be helpful.
Employers may wish to also prioritize their compliance efforts on the core hazards and regulations mentioned in the NEP. This includes heat and ergonomics hazards in line with OSHA guidance, along with 29 CFR 1904 and five subparts of 29 CFR 1910:
| 29 CFR: | Description: | Covered industries had these frequent violations in fiscal year 2025: |
| 1904 | Recording and reporting occupational injuries and illnesses | 1904.4, .7, .29, .32, .33, .35, .39, .40, and .41 |
| 1910 Subpart D | Walking-working surfaces | 1910.22, .23, .25, .28, .29, and .30 |
| 1910 Subpart E | Exit routes and emergency planning | 1910.36, .37, and .38 |
| 1910 Subpart I | Personal protective equipment | 1910.132, .133, .134, .136, .138, .140, and .141 |
| 1910 Subpart L | Fire protection | 1910.157, .159, and .165 |
| 1910 Subpart N | Materials handling and storage | 1910.176, .178, .179, .180, and .184 |
Other frequently cited standards for the covered industries are worth mentioning because they may also draw officers’ attention. For fiscal year 2025, these included 29 CFR 1903.19 and 1910.101, .106, .110, .119, .120, .145, .146, .147, .151, .212, .213, .215, .219, .242, .253, .269, .272, .303, .304, .305, .333, .334, .335, .1000, .1001, .1025, .1026, .1030, and .1200. Find frequently cited standards for an industry NAICS code by visiting www.osha.gov/ords/imis/citedstandard.html.
After reviewing injury and illness records, an officer may be prompted to look into underlying compliance issues tied to those incidents. Employers should ensure these issues are corrected. This includes not just fixing the work environment but also conducting any required training and inspections and developing and implementing required written safety plans.
Key to remember
Establishments classified under one of seven NAICS codes are subject to possible inspection under OSHA’s revised warehousing NEP, which runs for five years. Eight compliance areas (including injury and illness recordkeeping) will be the emphasis. Inspections will be wall-to-wall.
Keep reading...Show less
2026-08-14T05:00:00Z
NewsIndustry NewsHazmat SafetyExpert InsightsFocus AreaShipping papers - HazmatShipping papers - HazmatEnglishTransportationUSA
Expert Insights: Hazmat communication matters
One thing I've learned over the years working with hazmat is that communication is everything. Whether you're a shipper, driver, inspector, warehouse employee, or emergency responder, everyone involved in the transportation process depends on accurate information to do their job safely and effectively.
When people think about communication, they usually think of conversations, emails, or training sessions. However, in the hazmat world, some of the most important communication happens without a single word being spoken. Markings, labels, placards, and shipping papers all serve as critical sources of information. They tell people what's inside a package, what hazards may be present, how the material should be handled, and what actions to take if an incident occurs.
Think about how quickly important information can be communicated through a placard. Before a trailer door is opened or shipping papers are reviewed, a placard can immediately alert someone that a load contains hazardous materials and may require special precautions. A hazard label can warn employees about corrosive or flammable contents. A UN number can help emergency responders identify a material and access the information they need during an emergency. These aren't just regulatory requirements. They're tools designed to protect people, property, and the environment.
Unfortunately, the opposite is also true. Missing, damaged, or incorrect hazard communication can create confusion at the wrong moment. A mislabeled package can slow down a response, increase risk, and lead to costly compliance violations. More importantly, it can put workers, responders, and the public in harm's way. I've seen many enforcement cases over the years where the underlying issue wasn't a lack of regulations. It was a breakdown in communication.
That's why it's important to view hazard communication as more than a box to check. Every marking, label, placard, and shipping description serves a purpose. Together, they create a consistent message that follows a shipment throughout its journey, providing the information people need to make safe decisions along the way.
So, whether you're preparing a shipment, conducting training, or reviewing your company's procedures, take a moment to consider the message you're sending. Are your hazard communications accurate, complete, and easy to understand? Because when it comes to hazmat, the right message at the right time can make all the difference.
Keep reading...Show less
2026-08-14T05:00:00Z
NewsIndustry NewsToxic Substances Control Act - EPAToxic Subtances Control Act - EPATSCA ComplianceToxic Substances - EPAEnvironmental Protection Agency (EPA)EnvironmentalIn-Depth ArticleEnglishFocus AreaUSA
TSCA Exposure Control Plan: 5 FAQs answered
Do you have a toxic work environment — literally? For facilities that handle chemicals, the answer is likely yes. And for specific chemicals, federal environmental regulations require facilities to protect workers by controlling their exposure to these substances.
The Workplace Chemical Protection Program (WCPP) is one way the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) protects potentially exposed workers from hazardous chemicals in the workplace. And at the core of the WCPP is the Exposure Control Plan (ECP); it’s the roadmap documenting how a facility will keep its employees safe. If your business manufactures (including imports), processes, distributes, uses, or disposes of a chemical substance subject to risk management regulations under Section 6 of the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA), an ECP may be required.
Consider these FAQs to help you implement an effective ECP that guards your workers against a “toxic work environment."
What’s an ECP?
An ECP is a strategic document explaining:
- What exposure controls the facility takes to reduce occupational exposure to a regulated chemical to or below EPA’s exposure limits; and
- How the facility will implement the other WCPP requirements (such as implementing exposure controls, establishing regulated areas, and providing training).
Any time a facility uses a TSCA Section 6 chemical that’s subject to the WCPP regulations (40 CFR Part 751), an ECP is required. This applies even if exposure monitoring determines that the concentration of a regulated chemical substance is below the existing chemical exposure limit or action level.
How do you develop an ECP?
Owners or operators must establish an ECP using the hierarchy of controls framework, following a sequence of actions to identify the control measures that will best reduce hazardous workplace exposures. The hierarchy of controls is ordered from the most to the least effective methods:
- Elimination stops the use of the chemical.
- Substitution replaces the chemical with a safer alternative.
- Engineering controls prevent people from coming into contact with the chemical (e.g., local exhaust ventilation and protective barriers).
- Administrative controls establish work practices that reduce the duration, frequency, or intensity of chemical exposure (like limiting access to exposure areas).
- Personal protective equipment (PPE), such as respirators, reduces or mitigates exposure.
EPA requires owners or operators to consider every level of the hierarchy. PPE should be a last resort and used only when other controls aren’t possible or when other methods don’t sufficiently reduce hazardous exposure to safe levels.
What’s in an ECP?
Generally, an ECP must include the following:
- The exposure control measures that were considered using the hierarchy of controls;
- The reason why each control measure was selected or not selected based on feasibility, effectiveness, or other relevant information;
- The actions required to implement the selected controls (e.g., installation, maintenance, training);
- The regulated areas (workplace locations where worker exposure may exceed exposure limits), how they’re identified, and the people authorized to enter them;
- The process for reviewing and updating the ECP to ensure that the exposure controls are effective, updated when needed, and properly implemented; and
- The procedures for responding to new sources of or increases in exposure to the regulated chemical, including taking corrective actions.
Owners or operators must review and update ECPs when making major changes to the WCPP. However, EPA’s chemical-specific rules limit the length of time between reviews. The review frequency in the chemical-specific rule is the minimum requirement.
For example, the perchloroethylene rule (751.607) requires facilities to review and update the ECP at least every 5 years, while the chrysotile asbestos rule (751.511) requires facilities to review and update the ECP at least annually.
Can an ECP be added to an existing safety program?
Yes! Owners or operators can either:
- Incorporate the ECP into an existing industrial hygiene or chemical management program (like a chemical hygiene plan) if the ECP contains all the required components, or
- Develop an individual document for the ECP.
Can one ECP be used for multiple regulated chemicals?
EPA allows owners or operators to develop one standalone ECP that covers multiple chemicals subject to TSCA Section 6 regulations if the plan complies with each chemical’s specific requirements.
Key to remember: The Exposure Control Plan explains how a facility will implement the Workplace Chemical Protection Program and the exposure controls needed to protect workers from hazardous chemical exposures.
Keep reading...Show less
2026-08-14T05:00:00Z
NewsGroundwaterChange NoticesChange NoticeWater ProgramsWater ReportingVirginiaEnvironmentalWater ProgramsEnglishFocus AreaCWA Compliance
Virginia amends water withdrawal reporting requirements
Effective date: September 9, 2026
This applies to: Water users providing water to another person off-site
Description of the change: The Virginia State Water Control Board amended water withdrawal reporting requirements for water users providing water to another person off-site. These users are now required to report monthly (or quarterly if applicable) the total volumes of potable water and reclaimed water that they provided:
- To a data center with an air permit from the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality; and
- For domestic, commercial, industrial, and all other non-categorized purposes.
The reporting requirement takes effect on January 1, 2027.
Keep reading...Show less
2026-08-14T05:00:00Z
NewsNon-Point SourcesPublicly Owned Treatment WorksMunicipal WastewaterChange NoticesChange NoticeWater ProgramsIndustrial WastewaterVirginiaEnvironmentalWater MonitoringCWA ComplianceEnglishFocus Area
Virginia requires PFAS monitoring for wastewater
Effective date: September 9, 2026
This applies to: Publicly owned treatment works (POTW)
Description of change: The Virginia State Water Control Board adopted amendments to the Virginia Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (VPDES) Permit regulation. The updated regulations:
- Require POTWs to mandate quarterly discharge monitoring for per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) for certain industrial user categories,
- Establish a 30-day reporting deadline for monitoring results, and
- Specify acceptable test methods.
Covered industrial categories include:
- PFAS manufacturing facilities;
- Electroplating and metal finishing facilities using PFAS;
- Semiconductor and circuit board facilities using PFAS;
- Paper and packaging manufacturing facilities using PFAS;
- Textile mills and tanneries using PFAS and leather, fabric, and carpet treaters using PFAS;
- Centralized waste treatment industrial facilities;
- Industrial launderers; and
- Any other facility or site that’s a source of PFAS (such as landfills).
The POTWs must report results quarterly to the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality. Additionally, industrial users must report monitoring results within 30 days of receiving the laboratory results.
Related state info: Industrial water permitting — Virginia
Keep reading...Show less
2026-08-13T05:00:00Z
NewsIndustry NewsFleet SafetyEntry-Level driver trainingEntry-level driver trainingHazmat SafetyFocus AreaIn-Depth ArticleFleet OperationsEnglishTransportationUSA
Hauling hazmat starts with ELDT
Hauling hazardous materials is serious business. For the driver, it comes with higher expectations and requirements, including adding a hazmat endorsement to their CDL.
To add this endorsement, a CDL holder must complete a course of entry-level driver training (ELDT) designed to prepare them for the unique challenges of transporting hazardous materials safely and compliantly.
Instructional requirements
The ELDT regulations require theory instruction from a training provider listed on the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration's (FMCSA) Training Provider Registry (TPR). The curriculum is outlined in Appendix E to Part 380 and covers 13 hazardous materials topics:
- Basic introductory hazardous materials requirements,
- Operational hazardous materials requirements,
- Reporting hazardous materials crashes and releases,
- Tunnels and railroad-highway grade crossing requirements,
- Loading and unloading hazardous materials,
- Hazardous materials on passenger vehicles,
- Bulk packages,
- Operating emergency equipment,
- Emergency response procedures,
- Engine (Fueling),
- Tire check,
- Routes and route planning, and
- Hazardous materials safety permits.
There is no minimum number of hours required for the theory instruction. However, drivers must complete a written assessment and achieve an overall score of at least 80 percent.
Instructor Requirements
A hazardous materials theory instructor must hold a CDL that includes a hazmat endorsement. The instructor must have either:
- A minimum of two years of experience driving a commercial motor vehicle requiring a CDL, including the hazmat endorsement; or
- A minimum of two years of experience as a behind-the-wheel commercial motor vehicle instructor.
Knowledge test
When a driver successfully completes this course of instruction, the training provider electronically submits the completion information to the TPR.
Once the driver’s state driver licensing agency receives this information and the driver successfully completes the required Transportation Security Administration (TSA) background check, they may take the hazmat endorsement knowledge test.
Key to remember: Hauling hazardous materials starts with ELDT. Before obtaining a hazmat endorsement, CDL holders must complete required theory training from an approved provider, pass a background check, and successfully complete the hazmat knowledge test.
Keep reading...Show less


Got a Compliance Question?
We’ve Got You Covered!
Get clear, reliable answers from experts with 500+ years of combined experience.
J. J. Keller is the trusted source for DOT / Transportation, OSHA / Workplace Safety, Human Resources, Construction Safety and Hazmat / Hazardous Materials regulation compliance products and services. J. J. Keller helps you increase safety awareness, reduce risk, follow best practices, improve safety training, and stay current with changing regulations.
Copyright 2026 J. J. Keller & Associate, Inc. For re-use options please contact copyright@jjkeller.com or call 800-558-5011.






