Be Part of the Ultimate Safety & Compliance Community
Trending news, knowledge-building content, and more – all personalized to you!
:
|
Commercial drivers who transport perishable food should be reminded of their company- and/or shipper-mandated safety precautions. A little vigilance may prevent a rejected load at the receiver. Consider the following suggested practices.
At pick-up:
Enroute at each stop:
At delivery:
Staged equipment (if managed by motor carrier):
Handling a broken trailer seal
When a driver delivers a load in good condition except for the seal not being intact, this often leads to the entire shipment being rejected. The Sanitary Transportation of Human and Animal Food (STHAF) rule will likely be cited as the reason, and food safety will be called into question.
The STHAF rule states that “[a] broken cargo seal or any evidence of food cargo tampering would not necessarily create a per se presumption of adulteration” and noted that broken seals are a food security concern. If a customer uses the STHAF rule as the basis for rejecting a load due to a broken seal, this is not correct. The driver should refer to the contract with the customer for disposition of the product in case of a broken seal.
Commercial drivers who transport perishable food should be reminded of their company- and/or shipper-mandated safety precautions. A little vigilance may prevent a rejected load at the receiver. Consider the following suggested practices.
At pick-up:
Enroute at each stop:
At delivery:
Staged equipment (if managed by motor carrier):
Handling a broken trailer seal
When a driver delivers a load in good condition except for the seal not being intact, this often leads to the entire shipment being rejected. The Sanitary Transportation of Human and Animal Food (STHAF) rule will likely be cited as the reason, and food safety will be called into question.
The STHAF rule states that “[a] broken cargo seal or any evidence of food cargo tampering would not necessarily create a per se presumption of adulteration” and noted that broken seals are a food security concern. If a customer uses the STHAF rule as the basis for rejecting a load due to a broken seal, this is not correct. The driver should refer to the contract with the customer for disposition of the product in case of a broken seal.